Fidget Toys Aren't Just Hype – Scientific American

The following essay is reprinted with permission fromThe Conversation, an online publication covering the latest research.

The fidget spinner craze has been sweeping elementary and middle schools. As of May 17 every one of the top 10 best-selling toys on Amazon was a form of the hand-held toy people can spin and do tricks with. Kids and parents are even making them for themselves using 3D printers and other more homespun crafting techniques.

But some teachers are banning them from classrooms. And experts challenge the idea that spinners are good for conditions like ADHD and anxiety. Meanwhile, the Kickstarter online fundraising campaign for the Fidget Cube another popular fidget toy in 2017 raised an astounding US$6.4 million, and can be seen on the desks of hipsters and techies across the globe.

My research group has taken a deep look at how people use fidget items over the last several years. What we found tells us that these items are not a fad that will soon disappear. Despite sometimes being an annoying distraction for others, fidget items can have some practical uses for adults; our inquiry into their usefulness for children is underway.

Fidgeting didnt start with the spinner craze. If youve ever clicked a ballpoint pen again and again, youve used a fidget item. As part of our work, weve asked people what items they like to fidget with and how and when they use them. (Were compiling their answers online and welcome additional contributions.)

One thing people often report is that fidgeting with an object in the hand helps them to stay focused when doing a long task or sitting still and attentive in a long meeting. Many examples people have told us about are ready-to-hand objects like paper clips, USB thumb drives, headphone earbuds and sticky tape. But people also buy specialized items like a fidget spinner or a Fidget Cube for this purpose.

Another common thread involves people using some fidget objects like a favorite smooth stone to calm themselves down, helping them achieve a more relaxed, contemplative, even mindful state.

Psychology research about sensation seeking tells us that people often seek to adjust their experiences and their environments so that they provide just the right level of stimulation. Different people function well under different circumstances. Some people like total quiet to help them focus, while others are happiest working in a busy, noisy environment.

The optimal level of stimulation (or lack thereof) not only varies among people but even can change for one person throughout the day depending upon what he or she is trying to do. So people fine-tune their environments to get things just right: for example, putting on headphones in a noisy office environment to substitute less distracting noise.

A person who cant get up and walk around to wake up a bit, or go have a nice cup of tea to calm down, may find it helpful to use a fidget item to get in the right frame of mind to stay focused and calm while staying put.

Our results align with anecdotal accounts about fidget toys helping children with attention or anxiety issues to stay focused and calm in the classroom. In fact, fidget toys have been available for kids for quite some time.

There hasnt yet been a definitive study of the impact of these toys in the research world. In one preliminary study looking at stress ball use, sixth graders who used these fidget toys during instruction independently reported that their attitude, attention, writing abilities, and peer interaction improved.

The closest significant research is UC Davis behavioral science professor Julie Schweitzers study of letting children with ADHD fidget wriggling, bouncing or otherwise moving gently in place while they worked on a lab-based concentration task called the flanker paradigm. She found that more overall movement (measured using an accelerometer on the ankle) in children with ADHD did help them perform this cognitively demanding task.

Of course, its a big step from that finding to a claim that fidgeting with small objects in the hand can work, too. However, therapists tend to focus more on results than theoretical findings. They use what gets results and throw out what doesnt, so practical experience suggests these toys may help kids.

And yet, schools are banning the spinners and teachers are taking them away. The reason is that not all fidget items are created equal.

The items that therapists recommend are primarily tactile a user holds it in a hand and can manipulate it without looking. But fidget spinners require hand-eye coordination.

To use a fidget spinner, a person holds the center of the spinner with thumb and finger, and then uses the other hand (or other fingers on the same hand) to get the spinner rotating. Once its spinning, there are tricks to be explored, like balancing the rotating spinner on a thumb.

Balancing a moving object really requires keeping an eye on it, and doing tricks is a lot of what makes the spinners fun. Its also what draws the eyes of the user away from the teacher, and likely also the eyes of nearby students. This is the bane of a teacher trying to keep a classroom focused.

By contrast, putty, stress balls and other therapeutic fidget items dont have this visual attention problem. They can serve the same purpose as the spinners, but are more classroom-ready and less distracting. In the same way, the Kickstarted Fidget Cube, too, is probably also more classroom-friendly.

Fidget items do seem to serve a valuable purpose. Theres still science to be done, but theyre not just a fad. They embody an enduring phenomenon that nearly everyone uses at some point just watch your own behavior when doing desk work or sitting in meetings. My research team continues to study fidgeting behavior and design, working to create next-generation smart fidget objects that support managing attention and keeping calm.

This article was originally published onThe Conversation. Read the original article.

See the article here:
Fidget Toys Aren't Just Hype - Scientific American

Zipongo Hires Vice President of Data Science to Advance Eating Well Made Simple Platform – PR Newswire (press release)

Nguyen spent more than eight years at Gap, Inc., during which time he grew the analytics team from four to 30 FTEs and 50 contractors. His primary expertise is in scaling analytics operations to meet growing customer needs. At Gap, Inc., he was responsible for both inventory management and customer data science. Prior to his tenure at Gap, Inc., he spent six years developing data-centric applications at Oracle.

"Food poses an exciting challenge for data science we must both keep consumers engaged, and also gradually help them advance on a path to better health," Nguyen said. "Zipongo is the only healthy eating technology application I have seen that really 'gets it.' The focus is on meeting users where they are and working with them to change unhealthy behaviors in a personalized approach that really works."

Nguyen's connection to Zipongo dates back eight years, when he first worked with Zipongo CEO and Founder Jason Langheier, MD, MPH to create a nutritional database that would eventually become the backbone of the current technology platform.

"We are thrilled to welcome Viet, an early contributor to our Food Terminology Index," said Dr. Langheier. "Given his experience with both enterprise analytics at Oracle and leading a large consumer-oriented data science organization at Gap, Inc., Viet will skillfully continue to build out our full-stack data science team at an important inflection point for Zipongo."

Dr. Langheier continued, "Data Science is integral to the R&D process at Zipongo, driving product science that optimizes the user experience, analytics and actuarial sciences for health plan and employer customers, as well as ontology development behind our Food Terminology Index, and predictive modeling that drives our personalized nutrition recommendations that sync with national guidelines."

Zipongo offers recipe, food shopping and restaurant recommendations that are personalized to each user's food preferences, health status, health goals and genetic makeup. Zipongo's expanding food benefits offerings include recipe recommendations, customized grocery lists, grocery delivery, restaurant ordering support and digital nutrition coaching.

Zipongo envisions a future where employers deploy food as medicine to improve the overall health of the workforce and help rein in health costs. Zipongo's current and future products are backed by the latest data science to track and report success metrics to customers.

About ZipongoZipongo is Eating Well Made Simple. Zipongo's platform enables digital nutrition coaching for large employers, health plans and health systems, and provides food utility tools to families that make it easier to consistently select and buy healthy food people love. Zipongo provides trusted food selection and buying environments for cooking and eating prepared meals that meet the needs of diverse groups of people, with tools ranging from meal planning, recipes, grocery rewards and online grocery ordering, to menu coaching and mobile meal ordering. Zipongo's HIPAA secure software-as-a-service platform is built to meet people where they areat home, at work, or on the go, and deliver robust, anonymized population analytics back to enterprises. Learn more atwww.zipongo.comand follow us onTwitterandLinkedIn.

Media ContactTodd Stein Amendola Communications for Zipongo 916.346.4213 tstein@acmarketingpr.com

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/zipongo-hires-vice-president-of-data-science-to-advance-eating-well-made-simple-platform-300459595.html

SOURCE Zipongo

https://www.zipongo.com

Visit link:
Zipongo Hires Vice President of Data Science to Advance Eating Well Made Simple Platform - PR Newswire (press release)

More Evidence That Charlie Sheen's 2015 HIV Announcement Saved Lives – New York Magazine

Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE public health May 18, 2017 05/18/2017 8:00 am By Jesse Singal Share

To a certain approximation, awareness is overrated: That is, as a general rule, educating people about problems in the world is unlikely to nudge their behavior or their views all that significantly. But there are exceptions to that rule, and one of the more interesting classes of exceptions occurs when theres a big, high-profile event that focuses a lot of media attention on a particular problem.

John Ayers, a San Diego State University computational epidemiologist with a behavioral-science bent, has done a lot of work with his colleagues studying the effects of these events on Google search terms. One such example came in November 2015, when Charlie Sheen announced on the Today show that he was HIV-positive, and that the treatment he had received for the virus had rendered it undetectable in his blood. It was one of those media events that focused a huge amount of attention on one public figure and one very important public-health issue.

And it left a behavioral mark at least on Google. A few months later, in a JAMA Internal Medicine study that Science of Us covered, Ayers and his colleagues found that Sheens announcement appeared to have caused a massive uptick in Google searches pertaining to HIV testing and condoms. As I noted at the time, such a search spike suggested, but didnt prove on its own, that Sheens high-profile interview may have saved some lives by leading some people to change their behavior: The big question, of course, is what percentage of these searches will lead to action to the querier getting tested or having safer sex.

Thats what Ayers and his colleagues sought to find out for a new study just published in Prevention Science. Rather than just examine search-term volume, the researchers looked at sales data for OraQuick, which is apparently the only rapid-result HIV testing kit available in the United States.

Sure enough:

Thats a big jump. And it lends a lot of credence to the idea that some high-profile events really can cause massive, albeit probably temporary, changes in behavior sometimes, as in this case, life-saving ones. So maybe its time for a parenthetical addendum: Awareness is overrated (usually).

Whole Foods Would Look a Lot Different If It Were Science-Based

How to Predict If a Borrower Will Pay You Back

Why Some Women Arent Excited About Leadership Positions

Turns Out Nazis Have Some Pretty Wrong Views About Genetics

This Is What Happens to Your Brain When You Read Poetry

An MIT Scientist Claims That This Pill Is the Fountain of Youth

How Neuroscientists Explain the Mind-Clearing Magic of Running

So Apparently There Are 4 Kinds of Introversion

How Exercise Shapes You, Far Beyond the Gym

5 Leading Theories of What Dreams Actually Are

Most Popular Video On Science of Us

A new study found that when you pair two disagreeable people together, they both get what they want and have more fun in the process.

A new study looks at the sales of an at-home HIV-testing kit and finds some very encouraging results.

The psychology of how we choose who to leave out.

Research suggests that sexism in hiring cant explain the entire gender gap in leadership positions theres other stuff going on, too.

Just about everyone, everywhere, is a complicated mutt, and stories about pure bloodlines are almost always false.

Labels like organic and natural are impossibly vague and often misleading.

Most adults can do a decent job of understanding other peoples internal mental states. Not the leader of the free world.

Or its about to be, at least. Thats just the life cycle of any fad.

It might seem counterintuitive to advertise a place for injection-drug users to shoot up, but theres smart public-health reasoning behind the idea.

Not exactly, but theres some merit to the myth.

Time to find another hangover remedy.

A realization about monogamy that should make anyone getting married feel a little more hopeful.

Its a mixed bag.

The science behind a common-sense piece of advice.

Giving your mind time to wander is a key part of creativity.

Theres a bit of dissent within the American Psychological Association about the role of video games in contributing to violence.

A new TEDx video sums up the research of Bella DePaulo, a social psychologist who has been chipping away at the many myths surrounding marriage.

No matter how long they live in a loud urban environment.

The WHO and the CDC offer different recommendations for proper handwashing technique. Which is right?

Drinking with the author of Cork Dork, a new book about the obsessive world of wine.

Continued here:
More Evidence That Charlie Sheen's 2015 HIV Announcement Saved Lives - New York Magazine

How Can We Tell Whether Comey's Firing Was Justified? – Patheos (blog)

Caption: Image of James Comey and Donald Trump (Courtesy of BBC/Reuters)

________________________________________________________________

We all want our top investigative bodies to be headed by competent officials. We also all want to ensure that these officials can freely investigate other branches of the government including the presidential administration without fear of retribution. How can we tell whether Donald Trumps firing of FBI Director James Comey was meant to ensure competent leadership of the FBI, as Trump claims, or to prevent Comey from digging deeper into Trumps potential connections with Russia, as many Democrats claim?

Our personal political perspectives will strongly influence us to favor one explanation or the other, regardless of the truth. According to behavioral science research, our minds tend to interpret new information in accordance with our past beliefs a thinking error known as the confirmation bias. Fortunately, we can fight the confirmation bias in such situations by evaluating the opinions of people who both have the most information and have political motivations to support one side, but fail to do so or even support the other side.

Caption: Meme saying Look for the actual truth, not just for what supports your beliefs (Created for Intentional Insights by Lexie Holliday)

In this case, we can observe a number of prominent Republicans expressing concerns over Comeys firing. Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican who heads the Senates Russia investigation, stated that he was troubled by the timing and reasoning of Comeys firing, which confuses an already difficult investigation for the Committee. So did a number of other influential Republican Senators, such as Bob Corker, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and stated in response to Trump firing Comey that It is essential that ongoing investigations are fulsome and free of political interference until their completion. Representative Justin Amash, who belongs to the conservative House Freedom Caucus, even stated that he intends to introduce legislation calling for creating an independent commission to investigate Russias interference in the election. Pat Tiberi, a conservative member of the House, expressed potential support for a special prosecutor of the Trump and Russia connection and stated that the White House needs to come clean.

Altogether, about 40 Republican members of Congress have expressed concerns over Comeys firing, while virtually every Democrat is calling for an independent commission or special prosecutor to evaluate Comeys firing. While some of these Republicans are known for breaking ranks at times, such as Senator John McCain, many others such as Corker and Burr are mainstream Republicans who generally toe the party line. This data on many of those in the know federal lawmakers who have clear political motivation to align with Trump firing Comey instead broke ranks provides strong evidence that the decision to fire Comey is less about incompetence and more about the Russia investigation than anything else.

Another thinking error playing a role in clouding our judgment is illusory correlation, namely an incorrect illusory perception of a connection between two events. Trumps administration claimed, in a memo by deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that Trump referenced in his firing of Comey, that Comey lost support due to his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clintons email server. Democrats claimed that Trump fired Comey because of Comeys investigation into the Trump-Russia connection as part of Russias meddling in the US presidential elections.

One of these is an illusory connection, but which is it? Due to confirmation bias, Republicans will be likely to see the Trump-Russia connection as illusory. Democrats will tend to see the Clinton investigation connection as illusory.

Caption: Meme saying It would be very convenient if the things that are most comfortable to believe are also the ones that happen to be the most true (Image created for Intentional Insights by Isabelle Phung)

Fortunately, we can use another technique from behavioral science to correct for this thinking error consider the alternative. Consider a situation where Trumps true concerns lay with Comeys Clinton email server investigation. When would Trump fire Comey if this was the case? Trump would fire Comey when Trump entered office, as Trump did with a number of federal attorneys. Instead, Trump specifically made a decision to keep Comey in office when he took the presidency, despite knowing about Comeys handling of the email server. Trump specifically indicated, in a message loud and clear for the government investigative bodies, that he would not pursue any further investigation into Clintons email server shortly after he was elected. As late as April 12, long after Trump had access to any secret information about Comeys handling of Clintons email server and any other information relevant to Comeys pre-election activities, Trump said in an interview with Fox Business Network I have confidence in . Given this evidence, it seems quite unlikely that the real reason for Comeys firing is the Clinton email scandal.

What about the Trump-Russia investigation? According to Fox News, a conservative source, the day before he was fired, Comey met with the Republican and Democrat Senators on the Senate intelligence committee, Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner. At the meeting, he discussed the inquiry into Russian hacking in the presidential election and potential involvement of Trump and members of his administration in this hacking. Burr and Warner both wanted Comey to speed up the investigation, and Comey responded that he needed more resources to conduct the investigation. Earlier, Comey allegedly made a request for more resources for this investigation from Rosenstein, whose later memo was used by Trump as a reason to fire Comey. Given the evidence of the closeness of the timing of Comeys requests for more resources and Trump firing Comey, the connection between the investigation into Russian hacking and the firing of Comey appears to be true rather than illusory.

Now, this behavioral science-based conclusion does not favor the conservative perspective, and instead favors the liberal one. Will it mean that conservatives dismiss it out of hand? To determine if this is the case, I went on the conservative radio network 700WLW to speak on this topic with the well-known radio show host Scott Sloan two days after Comeys dismissal. Sloan is known as a strong proponent of Christian and conservative values but not someone who practices post-truth politics by dismissing the truth in favor of his personal beliefs. We had a civil discussion, during which Sloan acknowledged the validity of this behavioral science-informed perspective and accepted that the evidence pointed against Trumps narrative. It is highly likely that our conversation on his radio show swayed some of his conservative audience to change their perspective as well.

Caption: Meme saying Tempting Lies or Wholesome Truth: The Choice is Yours (created for Intentional Insights by Jane A. Gordon)

This interview shows the benefits of using such behavioral science-based approaches to bridge the political divide and have reasonable conversations that result in people going against their current values and changing their minds to match reality. What it takes is knowing why our minds are likely to lead us astray and addressing these internal biases using science-informed strategies to
do so. In this case, the evidence once corrected for political bias points conclusively, in a way that both reasonable conservative and liberals can agree on, to Trump firing Comey due to concerns over the FBIs investigation into Russian interference in the election.

P.S. Want to reverse the tide of lies in politics? Take the Pro-Truth Pledge! ____________________________________________________________________

Continue reading here:
How Can We Tell Whether Comey's Firing Was Justified? - Patheos (blog)

Can Rewards for Not Texting and Driving Break the Habit? – Government Technology

Last September, a University of Georgia (UGA) student was struck and killed as she cycled down an Athens road with two friends. The driver was later found to be under the influence of a cocktail of drugs at the time of the accident. She was reaching for her ringing cellphone when her car veered out of the lane and plowed into the trio of cyclists.

That incident kept coming up between a group of students sitting down to discuss ideas for theNational Public Policy Challenge, which is hosted by the University of Pennsylvanias Fels Institute of Government and Governing. Their focus, however, wasn't on the fact that the driver was impaired but on the fact that a reach for a phone -- something most drivers are guilty of doing at some point -- ended someones life.

From those conversations came TurnKey, a program that uses and updates an existing app to encourage teens to avoid using their phones while driving. The idea eventually won first place at the national competition in March, and the team received $10,000 to roll it out this fall.

[Unlike drunk driving], texting and driving isnt something that has really been addressed as a public safety issue. We wanted to get on the forefront of that, says Laura Pontari, one of the UGA graduate students behind the proposal.

TurnKey will work like this: Students at high schools in Athens-Clarke County will be given access to a specialized version of an app called JoyRyde, which awards drivers points for every mile theyre on the road without touching their cellphone. To take JoyRyde further, the UGA students got local businesses on board to give students prizes -- such as free ice cream or coffee -- for accruing a certain number of points. Students will also receive notifications on their phones to nudge them into using the app. One Friday, for example, they might get a notification that says 80 percent of your classmates are driving safely this weekend! Students will also be assembled into teams by grade and, when the program expands, by high school, to foster friendly competition and further encourage use of the app.

Our intervention is about using the existing technology of the app in conjunction with behavioral science in order to encourage teens to drive safely, says Pontari.

Its well-known by behavioral scientists that rewards work better to change behavior than punishments. Because of that, giving students an incentive to drive safely should be a more effective social intervention than simply reminding them of the risks associated with distracted driving or giving them a ticket when theyre caught, says Pontari.

After TurnKey's debut this fall, the team will begin to assess the effectiveness of the program via user data provided to them by the app company and accident reports from the Athens-Clarke County Police Department. Theyre hoping to eventually see at least a 10 percent reduction in accidents due to distracted driving -- and perhaps a reduction in fatalities, too.

That kind of result could be a boon to new projects like this around the country, considering the abject failure of laws against texting and driving, which have cropped up in 46 states. Despite that widespread implementation, traffic fatalities increased nationwide for the first time in three decades in 2015, and experts pointed to distracted driving as the culprit. If TurnKey has even a modest effect on rates of distracted driving among students in Athens-Clarke, the implications could be significant.

We want to serve as a model for other places, says Pontari. We would hope to see something like this rolled out all over the country.

This article was originally published on Governing.

See original here:
Can Rewards for Not Texting and Driving Break the Habit? - Government Technology

Jonathan Belanich (Photo by Russ Houston) – Mississippi State Newsroom

Contact: Karyn Brown

STARKVILLE, Miss.A Mississippi State biological sciences doctoral student is receiving a fellowship from the American-Scandinavian Foundation to study abroad at the University of Copenhagen.

Jonathan Belanich will continue his dissertation research in microbiology and bio-computing through the fellowship, conducting studies in the Centre for GeoGenetics, a part of the National History Museum of Denmark at the University of Copenhagen. He will travel to Denmark in September and stay for one year.

I am excited to have been awarded this fellowship, as it will allow me to incorporate samples from northern Europe into my analysis, permitting comparisons between ancient remains from vastly different cultures, Belanich said.

Belanich, who earned a masters degree in applied anthropology from MSU in 2016, will continue his investigation of the composition of ancient oral microbiomes, with a particular focus on the presence of pathogenic bacteria. Originally from Long Island, New York, he completed undergraduate degrees at the University of Alabama in biology and anthropology with minors in computerbased research and Italian.

I look forward to this chance to contribute to the budding field of ancient oral microbiome research, with the hope of improving our understanding of the complex mechanisms by which the bacteria inhabiting our mouths influence, or are influenced by, our state of health, Belanich said.

The University of Copenhagen is a world leader in applying the latest genome sequencing tools to ancient DNA.

Jonathan Belanich is an exceptional graduate student, and the magnitude of his research into the evolution of human pathogens will be greatly amplified by this fellowship, the Scandinavian equivalent of a Rhodes or Gates Cambridge Scholarship, said Mark Welch, associate professor and graduate coordinator for MSUs Department of Biological Sciences. I feel that this accomplishment is an endorsement of both our graduate program and the collaborative spirit of our college which fostered Jonathans interest in anthropology and encouraged an interdisciplinary shift toward microbial ecology and evolution.

The College of Arts and Sciences includes more than 5,000 students, 300 full-time faculty members, nine doctoral programs and 24 academic majors offered in 14 departments. It also is home to the most diverse units for research and scholarly activities, including natural and physical sciences, social and behavioral sciences, and the humanities.

Natural and physical science research projects have been supported over the decades by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation.

Research expenditures in the humanities also are an important part of Mississippi States overall research portfolio. Additionally, the NSF has ranked MSU among the top 25 for research expenditures in the social sciences.

For complete information about the College of Arts and Sciences, visit http://www.cas.msstate.edu and the biological sciences department at http://www.biology.msstate.edu.

MSU is Mississippis leading university, available online at http://www.msstate.edu.

Read this article:
Jonathan Belanich (Photo by Russ Houston) - Mississippi State Newsroom

Religion and mental illness form a complex relationship – Wichita Eagle


Wichita Eagle
Religion and mental illness form a complex relationship
Wichita Eagle
I would describe it as being complex and patient specific, said Lisa Harding, a resident in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science at the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita. There's no 'one shoe fits all' as to how religion ...

Read more from the original source:
Religion and mental illness form a complex relationship - Wichita Eagle

Daily News Roundup: Trump's Refugee Crackdown Hits Resettlement Charities' Budgets – Chronicle of Philanthropy (subscription)

Refugee Nonprofits Slash Staffs as Administration Slows Arrivals: The nine organizations designated by the government to oversee U.S. refugee resettlement have frozen hiring or laid off workers in some cases, by the hundreds as the State Department cuts spending on such programs amid efforts to sharply curb new arrivals, reports The Wall Street Journal (subscription). Charities Find Trump's Fla. Estate a Bigger Draw Since Election: Several nonprofits that hold fundraising events at Mar-a-Lago told The Washington Post they saw increased revenue this gala season as the possibility of the president dropping in juiced ticket sales. Controversy over Trump administration policies prompted a handful of other groups to relocate future galas.

Obama Presidential Center to Eschew Federal Money: The Chicago institution is opting out of the National Archives and Records Administration's presidential-library network, forgoing millions of dollars a year in government funding but freeing the Obama Foundation from costly endowment, design, and other requirements that would come with the government support, the Chicago Tribune writes.

Then-Harvard Endowment Chief Was Paid $14.9 Million in 2015: Stephen Blyth's compensation for running the university's investment arm was more than seven times that of Harvard's president, Bloomberg reports, citing tax filings. Mr. Blyth left the Harvard Management Company last May after about 18 months at the helm, during which time the fund's returns lagged behind those of peer institutions.

Appeals to Individuality Boost Giving by Wealthy, Study Suggests: A trio of psychology and behavioral-science scholars summarize in The New York Times their research on framing charity appeals for donors of different socioeconomic backgrounds, which found that people of means respond better to calls for individual action than to pitches that emphasize the common good.

$48 Million in Grants Back Veterans' Care at U. of Colorado: Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus's foundation committed $38 million to create an institute at the university's Anschutz Medical Campus to help ex-service members suffering from brain injuries and post-traumatic stress, and hedge-fund mogul Steven Cohen's Cohen Veterans Network pledged $9.8 million to establish a mental-health clinic for Denver-area veterans, reports the Associated Press. Read a Chronicle article about Mr. Cohen's giving for veterans' causes.

Ex-Minn. Charity Leader Gets 4 Years for Misappropriating $800,000: Prosecutors said Bill Davis, the longtime leader of Community Action of Minneapolis who pleaded guilty to fraud charges last June, used the now-defunct social-service nonprofit as a "personal piggy bank," drawing on its assets to buy himself a car and fund vacations to destinations like Las Vegas and the Bahamas.

Read more from the original source:
Daily News Roundup: Trump's Refugee Crackdown Hits Resettlement Charities' Budgets - Chronicle of Philanthropy (subscription)

Where you live may impact how much you drink – Science Daily

Where you live may impact how much you drink
Science Daily
... neighborhood factors that are relevant, then this might point to population-level strategies to modify or improve the environments where people live," said Isaac Rhew, a research assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral ...

and more »

Original post:
Where you live may impact how much you drink - Science Daily

City study: Scarier the better when it comes to collection notices – Philly.com

Attention, Philadelphians: Your city government is conducting experiments to better understand how to get you to react.

As part of an effort to use human behavior to inform how City Hall reaches residents, a group led by Mayor Kenneys policy team conducted three studies, the results of which were made available last week.

The team: Director of Policy Anjali Chainani, Assistant Director of Policy Yuan Huang, and Policy Analyst Nandi OConnor. They run GovLabPHL, which connects volunteer researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Swarthmore College with various city departments. In its first round of testing, GovLabPHL worked with the citys Revenue Department, Indego bike share, and a summer jobs program.

Some of the experiments may seem simple, but they are shaping how departments go about mail and email campaigns to maximize responses and participation.

Were doing this because we have a commitment from the policy office to lead with research and evidence, Chainani said. All these departments really believe in being able to use scientific methods to see if their outcomes work, primarily because we do the best we can with the resources we have, but we cant always know exactly what is working until we test it.

The Revenue Department focused on first-time delinquent taxpayers. The office sent different messages to see which drew the most responses. The first letter appealed to the persons civic duty, citing specific parks and recreation centers in the neighborhood supported by property taxes. A second letter sought to shame recipients by pointing out that nine out of 10 Philadelphians pay taxes and that they were in the tax-dodging minority. The final and most effective message listed all the properties in the neighborhood that had been sold at sheriff's sale because of unpaid taxes.

The scary letter -- warning of impending consequences -- was by far the most effective, First Deputy Revenue Commissioner Marisa Waxman said. Weve really learned through this work that everything is a choice. Not thinking about how youre structuring or delivering your message is a choice.

The department spent $17,000 on the mailers but collected $615,752 more in delinquent taxes than it did from a control group that received in the mail the standard, less personalized notice of delinquency. If each recipient had received the scary letter, Waxman said, the city could have reaped $1 million, based on the data.

The Revenue Department also wanted to increase participation in a water bill discount program for senior citizens. In this instance it was the packaging, not the message, that made a difference.

The city found that large envelopes with handwritten addresses received more responses than regular-size envelopes, phone calls or post-cards. Mint- or sage-colored regular-size envelopes also seemed to get peoples attention, Waxman said.

In an attempt to find out what motivates children to sign up for summer jobs, Philadelphia Youth Network sent out two types of e-mail reminders -- one that stressed what a job could mean for the young persons career prospects, and another touting the pay.

The city found reminders of any kind helped boost applications, but that teens who received e-mails mentioning money were slightly more likely to submit applications.

The summer jobs program, which Mayor Kenney wants to increase to 16,000 young people by 2020, had 10,600 participants last year.

Indego bike share wanted to increase the rate of renewal among people who sign up for the program. The program e-mailed coupons for 15 percent off to one cohort, coupons for 50 percent off to another, and no coupons to a third. Renewals increased twice as much among coupon recipients as among non-coupon recipients, and the higher discount drew more renewals.

Chainani said the department would work with the Department of Licenses and Inspections on how to get more people to renew licenses online and the school district to increase teacher participation in an annual survey. The city has also applied for a Knight Foundation grant to place two full-time researchers at City Hall.

Published: May 14, 2017 8:14 PM EDT

We recently asked you to support our journalism. The response, in a word, is heartening. You have encouraged us in our mission to provide quality news and watchdog journalism. Some of you have even followed through with subscriptions, which is especially gratifying. Our role as an independent, fact-based news organization has never been clearer. And our promise to you is that we will always strive to provide indispensable journalism to our community. Subscriptions are available for home delivery of the print edition and for a digital replica viewable on your mobile device or computer. Subscriptions start as low as 25 per day. We're thankful for your support in every way.

See the original post here:
City study: Scarier the better when it comes to collection notices - Philly.com

How Can We Tell Whether Comeys Firing Was Justified – Utne Reader Online

Photo by AdobeStock/assetseller

We all want our top investigative bodies to be headed by competent officials. We also all want to ensure that these officials can freely investigate other branches of the government including the presidential administration without fear of retribution. How can we tell whether Donald Trumps firing of FBI Director James Comey was meant to ensure competent leadership of the FBI, as Trump claims, or to prevent Comey from digging deeper into Trumps potential connections with Russia, as many Democrats claim.

Our personal political perspectives will strongly influence us to favor one explanation or the other, regardless of the truth. According to behavioral science research, our minds tend to interpret new information in accordance with our past beliefs a thinking error known as theconfirmation bias. Fortunately, we can fight the confirmation bias in such situations by evaluating the opinions of people who both have the most information and have political motivations to support one side, but fail to do so or even support the other side.

In this case, we can observe a number of prominent Republicansexpressing concernsover Comeys firing. Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican who heads the Senates Russia investigation, stated that he was troubled by the timing and reasoning of Comeys firing, which confuses an already difficult investigation for the Committee. So did a number of other influential Republican Senators, such as Bob Corker, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and stated in response to Trump firing Comey that "It is essential that ongoing investigations are fulsome and free of political interference until their completion. Representative Justin Amash, who belongs to the conservative House Freedom Caucus, even stated that he intends to introduce legislation calling for creating an independent commission to investigate Russia's interference in the election. Pat Tiberi, a conservative member of the House, expressedpotential support for a special prosecutor of the Trump and Russia connection and stated that the White House needs to come clean.

Altogether, about 40 Republican members of Congress have expressed concerns over Comeys firing, while virtually every Democrat is calling for an independent commission or special prosecutor to evaluate Comeys firing. While some of these Republicans are known for breaking ranks at times, such as Senator John McCain, many others such as Corker and Burr are mainstream Republicans who generally toe the party line. This data on many of those in the know federal lawmakers who have clear political motivation to align with Trump firing Comey instead broke ranks provides strong evidence that the decision to fire Comey is less about incompetence and more about the Russia investigation than anything else.

Another thinking error playing a role in clouding our judgment isillusory correlation, namely an incorrect illusory perception of a connection between two events. Trumps administration claimed, in a memo by deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein thatTrump referencedin his firing of Comey, that Comey lost support due to his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clintons email server. Democrats claimed that Trump fired Comey because of Comeys investigation into the Trump-Russia connection as part of Russias meddling in the US presidential elections.

One of these is an illusory connection, but which is it? Due to confirmation bias, Republicans will be likely to see the Trump-Russia connection as illusory. Democrats will tend to see the Clinton investigation connection as illusory.

Fortunately, we can use another technique from behavioral science to correct for this thinking error consider the alternative. Consider a situation where Trumps true concerns lay with Comeys Clinton email server investigation. When would Trump fire Comey if this was the case? Trump would fire Comey when Trump entered office, asTrump didwith a number of federal attorneys. Instead, Trump specificallymade a decisionto keep Comey in office when he took the presidency, despite knowing about Comeys handling of the email server. Trump specifically indicated, in a message loud and clear for the government investigative bodies, that he would not pursue any further investigation into Clintons email servershortly afterhe was elected. As late as April 12, long after Trump had access to any secret information about Comeys handling of Clintons email server and any other information relevant to Comeys pre-election activities, Trump saidin an interviewwith Fox Business Network I have confidence in [Comey]." Given this evidence, it seems quite unlikely that the real reason for Comeys firing is the Clinton email scandal.

What about the Trump-Russia investigation?According to Fox News, a conservative source, the day before he was fired, Comey met with the Republican and Democrat Senators on the Senate intelligence committee, Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner. At the meeting, he discussed the inquiry into Russian hacking in the presidential election and potential involvement of Trump and members of his administration in this hacking. Burr and Warner both wanted Comey to speed up the investigation, and Comey responded that he needed more resources to conduct the investigation. Earlier, Comey allegedlymade a requestfor more resources for this investigation from Rosenstein, whose later memo was used by Trump as a reason to fire Comey. Given the evidence of the closeness of the timing of Comeys requests for more resources and Trump firing Comey, the connection between the investigation into Russian hacking and the firing of Comey appears to be true rather than illusory.

Now, this behavioral science-based conclusion does not favor the conservative perspective, and instead favors the liberal one. Will it mean that conservatives dismiss it out of hand? To determine if this is the case, I went on the conservative radio network 700WLW to speak on this topic with the well-known radio show hostScott Sloan two days after Comeys dismissal. Sloan is known as a strong proponent ofChristian and conservativevalues but not someone who practicespost-truth politicsby dismissing the truth in favor of his personal beliefs. We had acivil discussion, during which Sloan acknowledged the validity of this behavioral science-informed perspective and accepted that the evidence pointed against Trumps narrative. It is highly likely that our conversation swayed some of his conservative audience to change their perspective as well.

This interview shows the benefits of using such behavioral science-based approaches to bridge the political divide and have reasonable conversations that result in people going against their current values and changing their minds. What it takes is knowing why our minds are likely to lead us astray and addressing these internal biases using science-informed strategies to do so. In this case, the evidence once corrected for political bias points conclusively, in a way that both reasonable conservative and liberals can agree on, to Trump firing Comey due to concerns over the FBIs investigation into Russian interference in the election.

See the original post:
How Can We Tell Whether Comeys Firing Was Justified - Utne Reader Online

Genes in children linked to stress, bipolar disorder — ScienceDaily – Science Daily

Genetic alterations that can be modulated by stress have been identified in children at high risk for bipolar disorder, according to a recently published study by researchers at McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). Results appeared in Translational Psychiatry, a Nature Publishing Group journal.

"We've known that children of patients with bipolar disorder have a higher risk of developing the illness but the biological mechanisms are largely unknown," said Gabriel R. Fries, Ph.D., first author and a post-doctoral research fellow in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at McGovern Medical School at UTHealth. "By analyzing the blood of children of controls and comparing it to children of bipolar patients, we identified several genes or markers that can explain the increased risk."

Researchers analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a total of 18 children and adolescents in three matched groups: bipolar patients, unaffected offspring of bipolar parents and children of parents with no history of psychiatric disorders.

The analysis revealed that, compared to children in the control group, bipolar patients and unaffected offspring of bipolar parents had genetic alterations that can influence the response to stress.

"All combine to modulate the response to stress in these children," Fries said. "We know from clinical studies of behavior and the environment that when children are chronically exposed to stressors, they are at a higher risk of developing bipolar disorder. Bipolar parents may struggle because of their disease, leading to higher environmental stress. Their children, because of the genetic markers they have, could be more vulnerable to stress."

The genetic alterations that researchers discovered were validated in blood samples of unrelated adult bipolar patients, Fries said.

New avenues of research could include the effects of reducing environmental stress, as well as whether pharmacological agents might be able to reverse the genetic alternations in vulnerable children before the disorder develops.

Blood samples for the research came from the innovative Pediatric Bipolar Registry at the UTHealth Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders. The research was supported in part by grants from the Pat Rutherford, Jr. Endowed Chair in Psychiatry and the John S. Dunn Foundation.

Senior author is Jair C. Soares, M.D., Ph.D., professor, chairman and the Pat R. Rutherford, Jr. Endowed Chair in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at McGovern Medical School.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

See the original post here:
Genes in children linked to stress, bipolar disorder -- ScienceDaily - Science Daily

NCCU awards first doctorates in a half century – Durham Herald Sun

NCCU awards first doctorates in a half century
Durham Herald Sun
The program's focus is the study of health disparities, incorporating knowledge from various fields such as biology, biomedical and behavioral sciences, chemistry, physics, bioinformatics, computer science/information science, environmental sciences ...

and more »

See more here:
NCCU awards first doctorates in a half century - Durham Herald Sun

New Behavioral Evidence Hub puts powerful solutions in the hands of the world's problem-solvers – Marketwired (press release)

NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwired - May 11, 2017) - A group of leading organizations from the behavioral science community today launched the Behavioral Evidence Hub, a comprehensive resource that brings together some of the world's most promising innovative solutions into a single tool, putting them within easy reach of all those working to solve a wide range of intractable problems affecting the wellbeing and livelihood of people around the world.

The website, BHub.org, includes evidence-based initiatives that offer deep insight into tough problems negatively impacting people in the U.S. and globally -- from staying in college and increasing savings rates to improving medication adherence and vaccination uptake. The site also features solutions and implementation guidelines for practitioners interested in using the insights and innovations in their own work.

Backed by leading experts, the solutions featured on the B-Hub are focused on applying behavioral science for social good. The goal of the new site is to bridge the gap between promising academic research and large-scale deployment of behaviorally-informed solutions in products, systems and programs.

With the launch of the B-Hub, practitioners can now easily access potential new solutions across a wide range of problem domains including health, education, criminal justice, environmental conservation, and financial inclusion.

The B-Hub's easy-to-use format enables users to discover insights by problem domain, geography or solution format. Users can browse through the curated database of content, focus on specific insights that might be applicable to their own work, or run their existing programs through a checklist to determine how behaviorally optimized it is.

The site is open-source and supported by contributions from the researchers and organizations producing the innovations and solutions. It was built by a community of experts including ideas42, Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA), and the Center for Health Incentives & Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania (CHIBE). Ongoing content development is supported by a growing network of contributors including the Behavioral Insights Group at the Harvard Kennedy School, the OECD, and the U.K.'s Financial Conduct Authority. The site is made possible in part by support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and others.

In a joint statement, the founding organizations ideas42, IPA, and CHIBE said, "The path to expansive social impact through applied behavioral science is now clearer than ever. The B-Hub is an invaluable tool for researchers, government experts and other practitioners engaged in finding solutions to tough problems. This platform provides insights that can help drive change more effectively -- and often at low cost. The B-Hub was created with the core mission of centralizing knowledge, increasing social impact, and tracking the growth of applied behavioral interventions around the world. It's easy to use, contains effective solutions, and we hope it becomes a go-to resource for problem-solvers everywhere."

Visit BHub.org for more information.

See the original post:
New Behavioral Evidence Hub puts powerful solutions in the hands of the world's problem-solvers - Marketwired (press release)

The Shoddy Science Behind Fidget Spinners – TIME

The latest toy craze comes with bold health claimsbut experts say fidget spinners dont deliverSigne Pierce for TIME

Sean Gregory is a TIME senior writer

Jenn Jarmula, an elementary- and middle-school teacher in Chicago, recently hung a sign outside her classroom. This Is A Fidget Spinner Free Zone, it read. Fidget spinners which dominate Amazon's top-selling toys and games list are nothing more than gadgets with three weighted prongs that spin, spin, spin on the fingers of sixth-graders like tiny ceiling fans. They've existed in some form since 1993, but lately they've grown so popular that retailers can barely keep them in stock. In order to keep up with demand, Toys "R" Us has chartered jets to ship spinners to its stores.

Jarmula says they've become disruptive in the classroom. She recently confiscated four spinners from a single student in one class period, stuffing them into the pockets of her pants, which she now favors wearing over skirts for their ample fidget-spinner storage space. She's just one of many teachers who are opting to ban spinners from classrooms, even as some manufacturers are touting their therapeutic benefits for students with autism, anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The alleged mental benefits of the toys have helped fuel their sales, but even a cursory look at the nonexistent science and the history of the spinners makes it clear that these claims are specious at best. Fidget spinners weren't created by behavioral scientists with a deep knowledge of intellectual disability nor were they created by experts in a lab; they were first patented by an inventor from Florida named Catherine Hettinger who wanted to promote world peace. She began imagining the spinner while visiting her sister in Israel. What if the young boys throwing rocks at police officers played with something calming instead? she thought. Hettinger's spinner never took off: Hasbro passed on it, her patent expired in 2005, and the spinner toiled in obscurity until earlier this year, when a series of YouTube videos featuring teenagers doing tricks with them went viral.

Soon, anecdotal reports emerged of special-needs kids benefiting from them. Cat Bowen, a lifestyle writer at Romper.com, a website for millennial mothers, says that since her 9-year-old son, who's on the autism spectrum, started using a spinner, he's been more focused. Math homework that used to take him an hour to get through now takes just 40 minutes, she says.

But anecdotal evidence from an individual child isn't the same as the scientific evidence required to support marketing claims like "Perfect for ADD, ADHD, Anxiety and Autism," as one fidget-spinner ad does. At least 10 other companies listed on Amazon market the product as a medical intervention.

Some scientific studies have found that fidgeting can, indeed, benefit young students with ADHD. Researchers suspect that movement helps kids maintain alertness during cognitive tasks. In her work, Julie Schweitzer, director of the attention, impulsivity and regulation laboratory at the University of California, Davis, has found that children with ADHD scored higher on an attention test while squirming in their seats and moving their legs, compared with when they sat still. Another study, published in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, found that the more kids with ADHD fidgeted, the better their working memory. Such movement probably stimulates underactive regions of the brain, like the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which plays a role in attention, planning and impulse control.

Many children with autism also have elevated symptoms of ADHD, so it stands to reason that fidgeting could aid them too in theory, anyway. But experts say that playing with a fidget spinner, which does not require much physical activity, might not garner the same results as actual fidgeting. With fidget spinners, kids essentially outsource the action. "The spinner does the movement for them," says Mark Rapport, head of the Children's Learning Clinic at the University of Central Florida. "I imagine it would distract the heck out of kids."

Experts say that promising relief for a child through a $5 spinning ball bearing can have pernicious effects. "Many parents are desperate," says Rapport. "They're looking for magic. These claims raise their hopes, only for them to get dashed."

Link:
The Shoddy Science Behind Fidget Spinners - TIME

University graduations – Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Here is a list of some commencement ceremonies at colleges and universities in Arkansas.

Today

Arkansas Tech University

7 p.m., Graduate College, John E. Tucker Coliseum.

Henderson State University

9 a.m., College of Business and Teachers College, Wells Center Gymnasium.

12 p.m., College of Arts and Sciences, Wells Center Gymnasium.

University of Arkansas

3 p.m., J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences, Bud Walton Arena.

University of Arkansas at Monticello

10 a.m. and 2 p.m., Steelman Fieldhouse.

Saturday

Arkansas State University

10 a.m., College of Education and Behavioral Science, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Convocation Center.

2:30 p.m., College of Agriculture, Engineering and Technology; College of Business; College of Liberal Arts and Communication; College of Sciences and Mathematics; and undergraduate studies, Convocation Center.

Arkansas Tech University

10 a.m., College of Arts and Humanities, College of Education, Tucker Coliseum.

2 p.m., College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, College of eTech, Tucker Coliseum.

6 p.m., College of Business, College of Natural and Health Sciences, all associate degrees, Tucker Coliseum.

Hendrix College

9 a.m., Wellness and Athletics Center in the Event Gymnasium.

Ouachita Baptist University

9:30 a.m., Cone-Bottoms Hall.

University of Arkansas

8:30 a.m., All University Commencement, Bud Walton Arena. Speaker: the Rev. Becca Stevens, founder and president of Thistle Farms, Nashville, Tenn.

12 p.m., College of Engineering, Barnhill Arena. Speaker: Adam Monroe, '88, president Novozymes Americas.

1 p.m., Sam M. Walton College of Business, Bud Walton Arena. Speaker: Ed Wilson, Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, '80, CEO and founder of Dreamcatcher Media LLC.

1 p.m. Fay Jones School of Architecture and Design, Faulkner Performing Arts Center. Speaker: Cheryl Durst, CEO and executive vice president of International Interior Design Association of Chicago.

3:30 p.m., Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences, Barnhill Arena. Speakers: Outstanding Alumnus John Paul Pendergrass, co-owner of Pendergrass Cattle Co. in Charleston; Outstanding Young Alumna Courtney Meyers, associate professor of agricultural communications, Texas Tech University.

5:30 p.m., College of Education and Health Professions, Bud Walton Arena. Speaker: Sandra Keiser Edwards, deputy director of Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art and former associate vice chancellor for development at UA-Fayetteville.

University of Arkansas-Fort Smith

10 a.m. and 2 p.m., Stubblefield Center.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock

9:30 a.m., College of Education and Health Professions, Donaghey College of Engineering and Information Technology, Jack Stephens Center. Speaker: Candice Hunter Corby, '94, CEO and president of Cobra Legal Solutions in Austin.

3 p.m., College of Arts, Letters and Sciences, College of Business, College of Social Sciences and Communication, Jack Stephens Center. Speaker: Corby.

7 p.m., William H. Bowen School of Law, Jack Stephens Center.

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff

3 p.m., Pine Bluff Convention Center arena. Speaker: Phylicia Rashad, actress and director.

University of the Ozarks

10:30 a.m., campus mall.

Williams Baptist College

10 a.m., Southerland-Mabee Center. Speaker: U.S. Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark.

May 20

University of Arkansas

2 p.m., School of Law, Fayetteville Town Center. Speaker: U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker, '96.

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

3 p.m., Verizon Arena. Speaker: UAMS Chancellor Dan Rahn, in his last commencement as UAMS chancellor. He is scheduled to retire in the summer.

NW News on 05/12/2017

View original post here:
University graduations - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

University initiative focuses on behavioral science to tackle campus challenges – Princeton University

A new University initiative is bringing together researchers and administrators to apply insights from behavioral science to tackle campus challenges and advance research in that field.

Representatives from 24 administrative units and seven academic departments, programs and centers gathered in March to launch the Campus Behavioral Science Initiative (CBSI), a joint effort of the Office of the Executive Vice President and the Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science & Public Policy.

"CBSI aspires to foster collaboration between administrative units and academic researchers to use the campus as a research site, tapping behavioral science to develop innovative solutions to campus challenges," said Treby Williams, the University's executive vice president.

Eldar Shafir, the Class of 1987 Professor in Behavioral Science and Public Policy, professor of psychology and public affairs, and inaugural director of the Kahneman-Treisman Center, said the initiative offers researchers the opportunity to gather valuable data, further their scholarly work and contribute to the University in a new way.

"This campus has a group of very talented and hard-working researchers who try to use behavioral insights to produce better outcomes," Shafir said. "We love and care about this campus, and it is so close and available. Why shouldn't we turn our eye partly to what we can do here?"

Behavioral science focuses on scientific experimentation, controlled observation of real-life behavior, and systematic analysis of data to understand the motivations, limitations and biases inherent in human behavior. The Kahneman-Treisman Center brings together faculty members from departments including psychology, sociology, politics, philosophy and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs who pursue research in behavioral science.

Williams said the University can benefit from the application of behavioral-science insights as it tackles challenges from developing programs to reduce the number of cars driven to campus each day or reducing campus energy use to guiding employees toward appropriate health-care programs or helping students make better decisions related to healthy eating, sleep and alcohol consumption.

"Innovative solutions to these kinds of challenges require accurate insights into human behavior and decision-making. Without that knowledge, we won't succeed," Williams said.

Learnings from behavioral science have already been used successfully on campus, such as shifting default participation to "opt-in." For example, in the past, eligible faculty members had to take action to opt in to a benefit that gave them a reduced teaching load following the birth of a child. Shifting the benefit to one that faculty members automatically accrue unless they take action to opt out has increased participation on campus. A similar approach for a retirement savings program has increased the amount employees are saving for retirement.

The CBSI kick-off event included a brainstorming session where administrators and researchers offered ideas and suggested areas for potential collaboration. Khristina Gonzalez, associate dean in the Office of the Dean of the College, and Margaret Frye, assistant professor of sociology, expressed an interest in research about the experience of low-income and first-generation students at Princeton. Gonzalez and Frye have already met with colleagues from the departments of politics and psychology to chart their next steps and will be bringing other administrators and researchers into the project in the fall.

Gonzalez oversees the Freshman Scholars Institute and the Scholars Institute Fellows Program, which are designed to empower undergraduates to thrive at Princeton, particularly those from first-generation and low-income backgrounds. She said CBSI presents an opportunity to learn from research about what helps such students succeed and to contribute to additional research on the topic.

"I think it can be a valuable partnership because there is a lot of great, innovativeresearch in this field and working together will help us think about how to use that research to improve interventions to support our students," Gonzalez said.

Back To Top

See the article here:
University initiative focuses on behavioral science to tackle campus challenges - Princeton University

Recommendation by operational working group to impact structure of combined Armstrong-Georgia Southern University – The George-Anne

The consolidation implementation committee (CIC) for the new Georgia Southern institution will vote on proposed a recommendation by an operational working group that will result in the division of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences into two different colleges, the College of Arts and Humanities and the College of Behavioral Sciences.

The committee is expected to vote on the recommendation at their meeting on Wednesday, however, some faculty members at both campuses are opposing the recommendation, according to Savannah Morning News.

According to Savannah Morning News, over 100 faculty members of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences have signed a petition to oppose the recommendation of splitting the college into two.

If approved, the consolidated institution will have nine total colleges: Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Computing, College of Arts and Humanities (new), College of Behavioral Sciences (new), College of Business, College of Education, Don and Cindy Waters College of Health Professions, Jiann-Pin Hsu College of Public Health, College of Science and Mathematics and the J.N Averitt College of Graduate Studies.

According to the official agenda for the consolidation committee, the proposal would move several departments around, but cites that dividing the liberal arts and social sciences into two new colleges would be more manageable across the three campuses.

The recommendation was reviewed and supported by Jean Bartels, provost and vice president of academic affairs for Georgia Southern, and Robert Smith, provost and vice president of academic affairs for Armstrong State.

Other items

In the committee meeting on Wednesday, faculty welfare, faculty processes/resources, first-year programs, research, communication and marketing issues, along with other topics are expected to be discussed, according to the agenda.

The committee will discuss over 30 recommendations about the different topics and how to proceed. As of Tuesday, only eight recommendations by the CIC have been approved.

This meeting comes days after seven appointments were made to the senior organizational structure on Friday.

Following the meeting on Wednesday, the committee will meet again on May 24, 2017 at Armstrong State University. For a full schedule of the meetings, click here.

For the full agenda for the May 10 meeting, click here.

The meeting will take place at the Military Science building from 2 to 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

Correction:The recommendation was made by an operational working group as part of the consolidation process, not by the CIC.

More:
Recommendation by operational working group to impact structure of combined Armstrong-Georgia Southern University - The George-Anne

Stopping the revolving prison door – The MIT Tech

More than three out of every four individuals released from U.S. prisons are re-arrested within five years. Given the sharp negative effects that incarceration has on individuals and their communities, as well as the often staggering expense of jails and prisons to governments and taxpayers, addressing this revolving door has become a top priority for many policymakers.

Reentry interventions programs designed to help people readjust to society following their release from jail and prison are one promising strategy. Former inmates often face complex challenges after release and experience an increased risk of homelessness, unemployment, addiction, and trauma. Sixty to 75 percent of recently incarcerated individuals were unemployed one year after release, and when they do find employment, former inmates can expect to earn 40 percent less, on average, than they did before going to jail. Seventy to 90 percent of the 10 million people released from jail or prison each year are uninsured, yet this group experiences mental illness, substance use disorders, infectious disease, and chronic health conditions at a rate that is seven times higher than the general population. Difficulty accessing housing, jobs, and treatment services puts this population at a high risk of reoffending, creating a self-perpetuating cycle.

The research community has done an extensive amount of work documenting and exploring the challenges faced by formerly incarcerated individuals and the resulting effects on prison populations when those individuals reoffend. However, as policymakers face tough choices about which reentry programs to support with limited funding available, we dont know enough about which approaches work, which work best, and why.

The Milwaukee Safe Streets Prisoner Release Initiative

J-PAL North America, based within MIT's Department of Economics, is supporting randomized evaluations to rigorously test prisoner reintegration policies and programs so policymakers can direct their efforts in the most effective way possible. Looking at some past examples of research is helping to guide our thinking on what still needs to be tested. In one study, researchers Anthony Braga (Harvard University), Philip Cook (Duke University), Songman Kang (Hanyang University), Jens Ludwig (University of Chicago), and Mallory OBrien (Medical College of Wisconsin) evaluated the impact of the Milwaukee Safe Streets Prisoner Release Initiative (PRI) on improving employment prospects and reducing recidivism. The PRI provides intensive, comprehensive services such as vocational and soft-skills training, remedial education, restorative justice circles, substance use treatment, and assistance finding housing, transportation, and employment to inmates in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, both before and after release with the aim of improving their chance of finding a job and staying out of jail.

Within the first year of release, the PRI program increased the likelihood of former inmates finding employment from 55 to 80 percent. However, while the treatment group was more likely to earn an income, their wages were still very low leaving many in poverty. The PRI program also decreased the likelihood that former inmates would be rearrested (63 versus 72 percent), though there was no discernible difference in recidivism rates.

A different approach to recidivism: Behavioral interventions

A cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program used in the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (JTDC) in Chicago, Illinois, offers a potentially more scalable model for policymakers to adopt. The therapy sessions, studied by Sara Heller (University of Pennsylvania), Anuj K. Shah (University of Chicago), Jonathan Guryan (Northwestern University), Jens Ludwig (University of Chicago), Sendhil Mullainathan (Harvard University), and Harold A. Pollack (University of Chicago), generated small but significant and sustained reductions in recidivism at a much lower cost than the PRI.

As part of the experiment, trained detention staff led group CBT sessions twice a day for members of the treatment group. The sessions were targeted at reducing impulsive and harmful behaviors that can lead to criminality, and the curriculum was created by surveying other CBT programs and adapting them to the JTDC context based on behavioral science research. This allowed for an extensive understanding of the key elements necessary for successful implementation of CBT in a juvenile detention center.

This CBT program helped high-risk youth avoid being readmitted to JTDC after their release. Juveniles who complied with the treatment were 13 percentage points less likely to be readmitted to JTDC than their control counterparts within two months after release, and 16 percentage points less likely after 18 months (an overall 21 percent reduction in readmission to JTDC).

While both the CBT program and the PRI intervention proved successful by some measures, the PRI intervention cost about $5,000 per participant, whereas the CBT program cost approximately $60 each. Intensive programs like the PRI may need to have a greater and more sustained impact on recidivism to justify the high cost. On the other hand, investing in cognitive behavioral therapy programs like the one used at JTDC can produce returns ranging from 5-to-1 to 30-to-1 in averted recidivism costs.

Moving forward

Governments, service providers, and researchers are continuing to develop innovative projects aimed at finding scalable, effective solutions to close our criminal justice systems revolving door. With support from J-PAL North America made possible by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Jennifer Doleac (University of Virginia) and Benjamin Castleman (University of Virginia) are testing a tablet-based reentry module in two county jails that aims to strengthen inmates transition back into society. Through this module, inmates create a personalized transition plan prior to release, and after leaving jail receive support and reminders to encourage them to adhere to their plan. If effective, this highly-scalable, technology-based and behavioral-science informed strategy may be a promising tool for successful reentry reforms.

With a renewed wave of political attention and practitioner innovation in this space, there is much more to learn about how best to support formerly incarcerated individuals to make communities safer and reduce the burden of the criminal justice system. J-PAL North America invites prospective partners interested in expanding the evidence base on reentry policy to reach out to J-PAL North Americas crime sector manager, Ben Struhl, with ideas for evaluations.

Link:
Stopping the revolving prison door - The MIT Tech