Cisco bugs leave network automation vulnerable to attack – The Register

A slip in certificate handling is one of three bugs in Cisco's Autonomic Networking software.

As its name implies, Autonomic Networking is about reducing the load on network administrators by offering self-management for suitable switches and routers under suitable versions of the IOS operating system.

And then, as they say, the murders began: Autonomous Networking uses infrastructure certificates to verify nodes in the system, and that's where the problem has emerged.

It starts with this advisory: a mistake in infrastructure certificate revocation.

In Cisco IOS XE, the bug could let an unauthenticated, remote autonomic node back into a network after its certificate has been revoked.

That's because the software doesn't transfer certificate revocation lists across Autonomic Control Plane Channels (ACP). An attacker with access to the remote node, even if its certificate has been revoked, can re-insert the revoked node into the autonomic domain.

The bug affects Release 16.x of Cisco IOS XE Software and are configured to use Autonomic Networking.

The only option for affected admins is to manually check that the bad node's certificate has been deleted properly, and then update the Autonomic Networking whitelist file.

The other Autonomic Networking bugs in the collection are an information disclosure vulnerability, and a denial-of-service vulnerability.

In the first, the information disclosure is only available to an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to view control plane packets in clear text. So far, there's no fix available.

In the second, attackers can crash adjacent IOS and IOS XE Autonomic Networking nodes. Cisco doesn't yet know what causes the bug, but if an attacker captured packets (exploiting the information disclosure bug, for example), they can replay them to reset the ACP channel of the system. Again, users will have to keep an eye out for when a fix lands.

Sponsored: The Joy and Pain of Buying IT - Have Your Say

View original post here:

Cisco bugs leave network automation vulnerable to attack - The Register

GE’s Jim Fowler embraces the ‘chief automation officer’ role – TechTarget

Jim Fowler, CIO at GE, believes in a couple of certainties: Machines will change how people work and how processes run. To be a competitive force in the machine age, Fowler is pushing his colleagues to see him as something more than the guy who keeps the lights on and the help desk tickets flowing. Instead, he's asked the business leaders to consider him the chief automation officer.

In this SearchCIO video interview filmed at the recent MIT Sloan CIO Symposium in Cambridge, Mass., Fowler described what he sees as the primary responsibilities of a chief automation officer. He also talked about how artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and the company's Predix platform, which collects and analyzes data from the industrial internet of things, help him fulfill the role.

Read excerpts of the interview below, or click on the player to listen to this interview in its entirety.

Who owns the AI budget at GE?

Jim Fowler: Inside GE -- for the GE component of AI -- that's in my budget. There's also a GE for customer component where we've made an acquisition this year in the AI space. And that actually sits in the commercial team's budget. I'm their biggest customer. I own the spending that we have there, as well as with other AI vendors.

What are you spending that budget on?

Fowler: We're looking at how we can automate. That's the other big change happening inside [IT's] role: I've told my business leaders to stop thinking about the CIO as the person running the network, the PCs, etc. Those are table stakes. Instead, think about this person as the chief automation officer who should be helping point out how work is going to change over the next 10 years, how machines are going to tell people what to do more than people telling machines what to do, and how they are going to help you see where productivity will come from as we go through that automation market. AI and machine learning are at the heart of all of that.

How are you measuring the ROI on those investments?

Fowler: For me, it's broader than artificial intelligence -- it's technology in general. And when I look at the application of technology inside the company, the measures are pretty simple. There are three metrics that my variable compensation is based on: The first is operating profit driven by productivity; I have a $700 million target for productivity this year that I have to meet. There's also a free cash flow metric that I have to meet, and there's a revenue generation and orders metric that I have to meet.

It's those business metrics that determine the success of a program. If I can't tie a program back to one of those three things, we, frankly, shouldn't be working on it.

What steps are you taking to hit that $700 million productivity target?

Fowler: I'll give you an example: Our services business is probably one of the biggest elements of productivity for us. If you picture GE, we sell big equipment -- aircraft engines, locomotives, turbines, MRI units. We have a large field staff -- 40,000 field workers that are out doing field maintenance and support for our customers. We've implemented a set of technologies over this last year that starts to automate and simplify their world.

In our power business, field service engineers use 86 different applications to do their job. Think about the process complexity behind all that. We've used our Predix platform to build one application that's persona-based that's focused on how they do their job; that gives them every transaction, every piece of data, every drawing that they need to do their job. We've started to overlay augmented reality on top of visualizations to show them how to do their job. And we've used collaboration tools to let them collaborate and see how the assets that they're working on are running in real time. That alone [resulted in] $200 million of productivity last year.

We look at each job as a persona, and we look at how can to make that persona -- that person's job -- easier to do.

Go here to see the original:

GE's Jim Fowler embraces the 'chief automation officer' role - TechTarget

Marketing Automation Isn’t Just for B2Bs Anymore – eMarketer

Because of complex sales cycles that often require multiple exchanges with prospects through email and other channels, business-to-business (B2B) marketers rely on automation technology to take repetitive tasks off marketers plates. Its not surprising, then, that business and industry companies accounted for 41% of all companies using marketing automation worldwide in 2016, according to data from agency Bold Digital and marketing tech firm SimilarTech.

Business-to-consumer (B2C) sales cycles are typically much shorter, so the need for marketing automation technology isnt as dire. But that doesnt mean B2C marketers arent using automation. Companies in the internet and telecom space, for example, accounted for almost 10% of those using automation.

Other industries are implementing marketing automation as well. Retail (shopping) brands 5% accounted for 5% of users, and travel companies made up 2%, according to the study.

The adoption of automation technology could be even greater if it werent for tight budgets and other obstacles. According to a February 2017 survey from email marketing provider GetResponse, 36.1% of B2B and B2C email marketers said securing funds for marketing automation technology was a challenge.

Bad data could be a culprit as well35% of marketers in the survey named the quality of customer data as a top challenge.

As the marketing technology landscape continues to grow, the increasing number of available automation tools can be overwhelming for marketers. More than one-third (35%) of marketers said having the knowledge to set up different types of automation was an issue, according to GetResponse.

Maria Minsker

Read this article:

Marketing Automation Isn't Just for B2Bs Anymore - eMarketer

Defeating Cyber Attacks on Your Business Will Require Humans and Automation – Small Business Trends

To defeat cyber crime, humans and robots are going to have to learn to work together. A new McAfee report released today sees a best case scenario where human threat hunters team with automation and machine learning technology to fight back against digital thieves.

The report Disrupting the Disruptors, Art or Science? makes it clear humans acting without help cant deal with the volume of data needed to thwart cyber attacks. It also stresses that one hand washes the other when it comes to the partnership between humans and technology in the fight against cyber attacks.

The new report classifies companies as mature and immature. The immature ones give their human cyber criminal hunters sophisticated tools and data and turn them loose in an ad hoc manner. But as these businesses mature, they come to rely on automation, analytics and other tools and refine their hunting techniques. The survey shows that once these processes are fully intertwined, the companies that are the most mature are more than twice as likely to automate large parts of their cyber crime investigations.

The results are 70 percent of these investigations are closed in a week or less. This compares with a rate of less than 50 percent for companies that havent optimized this balance between humans and machines.

Mo Cashman, Enterprise Architect and Principal Engineer for McAfee makes an important point about not putting the cart before the horse in the companys Threat Hunting Report Executive Summary.

This research highlights an important point: mature organizations think in terms of building capabilities to achieve an outcome and then think of the right technologies and processes to get there. Less mature operations think about acquiring technologies and then the outcome, Cashman writes.

The tools these firms use also vary with their maturity levels. For example, the organizations classified as the most mature are more than three times more likely to consider using various automation tools. These include user behavior analysis, endpoint detection and response as well as sandboxing. As the name suggests, sandboxing is about isolating suspicious programs or code so they can be tested separately without endangering your systems.

Customizing and optimizing also play key roles for the more successful organizations. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) coupled with custom scripts are just two of the techniques used to automate processes. The human cybercrime fighters working in more mature firms spend 70 percent more time customizing techniques and tools.

The report also underlines the correct use of threat intelligence as another secret sauce to getting the best results.

The processes comes down to combining human judgement and intuition with pattern recognition and speed of automation. The report also stresses that human decision making can make a big difference. It notes successful teams fighting cyber security breaches use a tried and tested process. The Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act template was first documented byU.S. Air Force Colonel John Boyd .

The McAfee report surveyed 700 IT and security experts from firms with 1,000 to more than 5,000 employees worldwide.

Realistically, if you start your business from a laptop on your kitchen table or in the den, you may not have an IT team. But its probably a mistake to believe youll be too small to avoid the notice of cyber criminals.

And after your business has lost important client data, its too late to be thinking what you might have done. One thing the MacAfee survey highlights is the partnership between human judgement and automation.

Even in the early days, look for software and apps that can help you automate some of your security. Youll need to pay attention and update your systems regularly when patches and security improvements become available. Combine human judgement and automation to keep your data safe even when you cant afford an IT team.

Image: McAfee

See the article here:

Defeating Cyber Attacks on Your Business Will Require Humans and Automation - Small Business Trends

Managed IT Services: How MSPS Can Survive the Automation Revolution – MSPmentor

The world is becoming increasingly automated.

ForMSPs, this means the key to success is identifying processes that can't be automated and building service offerings around them.

In today's software economy, automation is king.

Automation is the only way you can build large systems at scale.

It's also essential for optimizing maintenance costs and resource consumption.

Tools that provide automation are everywhere you look.

They include solutions like Continuous Integration servers (like Jenkins and Bamboo), orchestrators for cloud infrastructure and containers (such asKubernetes) and Infrastructure-as-Code engines (like Chef andAnsible), to name just a few examples.

You Can't Automate Everything

If you're in the managed IT services business, the proliferation of automation tools may seem threatening.

MSPsmake money by providing services that their clients don't want to provide themselves.

If clients can automate those services using software tools, the burden of providing them becomes smaller, and the clients may no longer seek the help ofMSPs.

However, not all IT tasks and processes can be automated.

MSPswho want to survive the automation revolution need to identify services that are difficult to automate, such as:

Network architecture planning. Software tools can help monitor and manage computer networks. They may also be able to automate some aspects of policy configuration. But planning a network architecture is a complicated task that can't be consigned to a tool.

Security. There is no shortage of tools to help secure networks and data. However, tools alone can't prevent security breaches. (If they could, we would not have so many breaches.) Organizations need security experts to help them protect their assets against attackers.

Data recovery. Data backups are easy to automate, but restoring data following a major failure requires expertise and manual control. This is a serviceMSPscan provide.

Hardware maintenance. No matter how sophisticated software tools become, they can't fix broken disks or dispose of decommissioned hardware.MSPscan do these things and more as part of managed hardware services.

Software support. Tools can automate software maintenance to a large extent. Sooner or later, however, every organization runs into a support problem with an application or infrastructure that can't be solved by a script. This is when manual intervention from an expert becomes a necessity.

Forward-thinkingMSPsshould build managed services offerings around needs like those listed above.

These are the areas where organizations will continue to need help even after they have automated the rest of their software delivery processes.

Read this article:

Managed IT Services: How MSPS Can Survive the Automation Revolution - MSPmentor

Are Trump Voters More At Risk Of Automation? – HuffPost

Oxford University's Carl Benedikt Frey is no stranger to controversy. He burst onto the public stage back in 2013 with apaperhighlighting the risks various professions faced of automation in the coming years. He then followed that up with a study exploring the impact of Uber on the taxi industry earlier this year.

It is to automation however that Frey returns, with his colleagues Thor Berger and Chinchih Chen analyzing the voting record of Americans in last year's Presidential election, and cross referencing that with the risk of automation of the professions held by voters.

The authors wanted to explore whether those whose jobs were at risk would be more likely to vote for radical political parties. The analysis revealed that electoral districts where automation was more prevalent were significantly more likely to vote for Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton.

A 5% increase in jobs lost to automation in the past was associated with a 10% increase in voter share for Donald Trump. The authors believe it's the first analysis linking automation with political outcomes.

Our study suggests that automation has been the real cause of voters concern, Frey says. The prime victims of theComputer Revolution (the period starting with the arrival of the personal computer in the 1980s, through to the development of the internet in the 1990s)want anything but the status quo. The populist rebellion in America, Europe, and elsewhere, has many causes, but workers losing out to technology is seemingly the main reason.

Suffice to say, given Frey's earlier work, he believes that this is only the beginning of such phenomenon and that as automation kicks up a gear, people will be increasingly attracted to radical politicians for answers to their situation. Frey likens the 2016 election with the political upheaval caused by the industrial revolution in Britain, where the Luddite rebellion raged against the machines that they believed were destroying their livelihoods.

He predicts that there are many countries where the risk of automation is higher, and therefore the risk of political upheaval is similarly high. Political leaders are therefore forewarned that their own jobs may be about to be disrupted.

The Morning Email

Wake up to the day's most important news.

Original post:

Are Trump Voters More At Risk Of Automation? - HuffPost

Barclays: The Biggest Reason To Like Blue Apron Is Automation – Benzinga

Amid a slew of sell-side coverage initiations on Blue Apron Holdings Inc (NYSE: APRN) Monday morning, Barclays Ross Sandler was one of only three analysts to rate the company at Equal Weight.

Sandler placed a $7 price target on the stock, which had climbed over 18 percent to $7.74 by 12 p.m. ET on Monday.

Sandler noted the $1 trillion total addressable market Blue Apron stands to gain from, compared to its $1 billion annual run rate, but said his optimism is somewhat tempered by the revenue deceleration and erosion in unit economics over the past couple quarters.

There is also the looming threat of Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN)s meal kit service, which soft launched last week.

There is one major reason to like Blue Apron, according to Sandler. The company has been working to drastically improve its logistics and weekly menu selection.

Blue Aprons business has been largely conducted manually for the past five years, but investments in logistics automation are expected to allow the company to rapidly perform its processes.

New systems will also allow subscribers to order in more flexible amounts and overall improve the companys retention rate.

Altogether, Sandler expects the company to soon see growth accelerate and margins increase.

Sandler keyed in on three risks facing the Blue Apron, with no mention of term length or near-term solutions.

Contribution profits from each order has shrunk by 66 percent, from $12 to $4, over the last four quarters. Sandler doubts this trend will turn around until the fourth quarter.

Slowing growth and increased competition from grocery companies and direct online competitors are leading to low retention rates, which are only about 10 percent after six months for the entire industry.

Amazons meal kit service has a wider selection, lower prices and same-day delivery through AmazonFresh, and Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ: WFM) hasnt even been integrated yet.

Keep up with analyst coverage and the latest business news in real-time with Benzinga Pro.

Related Links:

McDonald's Preferred Over Chipotle, But Argus Still Likes The Latter Long Term

Bullish Amazon Analyst Tempers Optimism For AWS Following Channel Checks

View More Analyst Ratings for APRN View the Latest Analyst Ratings

Posted-In: Analyst Color News Price Target Commodities Initiation Top Stories Markets Analyst Ratings Best of Benzinga

2017 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Visit link:

Barclays: The Biggest Reason To Like Blue Apron Is Automation - Benzinga

Future-proofing automation: Making the new economy work for people, not robots – City A.M.

Across developed countries, the number of people reaching retirement age is increasing.

By 2047, the number of elderly people will exceed the number of children for the first time.

In Japan, we already have the highest percentage of people aged over 60 and one of the highest life expectancies. The UK like other successful economies now faces similar demographic challenges as the dependency ratio (the ratio of dependents to active workers) increases.

Read more: Training the future workforce for an automated tomorrow

A key solution for managing these trends is to boost productivity. Automation offers a chance to do this, but we believe that it must work for people not just for robots.

As a major industrial manufacturer, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) was an early adopter of automation. Since we first began automating production lines, we have always ensured that the workers affected are retained and switched to other roles within the company. There, they can put their skills to better use, driving further business growth and productivity.

As well as ensuring that the benefits of automation are shared across the business, moving people to other areas of our organisation helps us to retain vital skills and expertise that might otherwise be lost in the process of automation. Businesses like ours will need to tread carefully to ensure that valuable institutional knowledge doesnt simply disappear.

Automated technologies should be viewed as tools, not as catch-all solutions. It would be shortsighted if companies like ours which spends years training and investing in our workforce cast workers aside at the first opportunity.

We should be looking to our employees to spur further innovation and product development. Leading tech companies are already doing this and others can too.

But we are looking to go further. As more people retire, companies will face a growing skills shortage with skilled jobs potentially left unfilled. It is therefore essential to utilise the vast expertise that already exists among senior workers and retirees.

For this reason we recently established MHI Executive Experts, a new company specifically for staff of retirement age and above. The company recruits veteran MHI employees, including engineers, and dispatches them to provide expertise on current projects while also training the next generation of workers.

The initial programme results are very positive, and appear to offer a pragmatic solution to Japans skills gap. We plan to expand MHI Executive Experts activities to include fields such as sales, legal, and ICT, and are also considering how to trial this successful model at our businesses in Europe.

As demographic and technological shifts continue to mould the new economy, it will be incumbent upon business to be at the forefront of the changes. We must help set standards to ensure that skills are passed down and that automation is implemented responsibly, and to the benefit of broader society.

Companies like ours are already having to think outside the box to tackle these challenges. This will mean better leveraging older workers, addressing skills gaps, improving intelligence sharing and making sure the benefits of automation are felt by the whole workforce.

Read more: Mitsubishi's gearing up for an electric car revolution

Go here to read the rest:

Future-proofing automation: Making the new economy work for people, not robots - City A.M.

Manufacturing’s Confusing Approach to Cybersecurity – Automation World

Cisco has been publishing cybersecurity reports for nearly a decade and its 2017 Midyear Cybersecurity Report has been released amid a flurry of global malware activity across industry. This midyear report notes that the dramatic increase in cyberattack frequency, complexity and size over the past year suggests that the economics of hacking have turned a corner due to the quick and easy access to a range of useful and low-cost resources.

With this reality in mind, Cisco points out that the intent of these reports is to keep security teams and the businesses they support alert to the increasing sophistication of threats and the techniques that adversaries use to compromise users, steal information and create disruption.

Despite the difference in cybersecurity issues across industries, Ciscos report notes that there are numerous common concerns and, thus, lessons to be learned among industries.

An example of thisand one which Automation World readers will find familiaris the reports call to better integrate information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT). The recent WannaCry ransomware attack caused shutdowns at the Renault-Nissan auto plants in Europe and is an example of how connected systems can be affected by an attack, the report states. If connectivity is not done securely and in a coordinated fashion, then even untargeted ransomware can affect OT systems. As connected systems come to the OT world, IT and OT can no longer be walled off from each other. They can benefit by sharing data for analysis to help improve safety and product quality. They can also work together to manage cybersecurity threats. But to do so, they must develop their defense-in-depth capabilities, since disconnected and siloed systems wont provide a comprehensive view of IT and OT.

As concerning as cybersecurity breaches are, news about their increasing occurrence appears to be leading manufacturers to improve security. According to the report, 95 percent of the manufacturing security professionals surveyed said cybersecurity breaches have driven improvements at their companies to at least a modest extent. The report also notes that 28 percent of the manufacturers surveyed for the report cited a loss of revenue due to cybersecurity attacks in the past year.

Two key findings in this most recent report of particular interest to manufacturing organizations involve the Internet of Things (IoT) and the supply chain.

Ciscos report states that one of the biggest vulnerabilities of the IoT is a lack of visibility. The report says that defenders are simply not aware of what IoT devices are connected to their network. They need to move quickly to address thisbecause threat actors are already exploiting security weaknesses in IoT devices; [these] devices [then] serve as strongholds for adversaries, and allow them to move laterally across networks quietly and with relative ease.

Supply chain attacks offer adversaries a way to spread malware to many organizations through a single compromised site, according to the report. In one attack a software vendors download webpage was compromised, allowing the infection to spread to any organization that downloaded the software from this vendor.

To get to the point where manufacturing systems are updated and integrated, manufacturers must resolve the security solution complexity problem, according to the Cisco report. Forty-six percent of the manufacturing security professionals said they use six or more security vendors; 20 percent said they use more than 10 vendors. And when asked specifically about products they use from these vendors, 63 percent of security professionals said they use six or more products, while 30 percent said they use more than 10 products. Essentially, they are using one or more products per vendor they are associated with.

This high number of cybersecurity products and vendors in the typical manufacturing facility creates a confusing picture for security experts, states the report. This complexity speaks to the need for both IT and OT teams to narrow their focus on security threatsfor example, using only those products than can address the most immediate concerns. Manufacturers could look toward implementing a defense-in-depth policy that includes simple protections for physical assets, such as blocking access to ports in unmanaged switches or using managed switches in their plant network infrastructure.

Despite the clear increase in cybersecurity breaches that have targeted manufacturers, Cisco says the good news is that there are simple steps manufacturers can take to improve security. The report points out that improving cybersecurity should be seen by manufacturers as being a gradual process rather than a task to be completed all at once. Though something as simple as a written security policy can provide a framework for improvements, the Cisco study shows that 40 percent of the manufacturing security professionals said they do not have a formal security strategy, nor do they follow standardized information security policy practices such as ISO 27001 or NIST 800-53.

Theres clear room for direct and immediate improvement by simply addressing such best practices.

Download the complete report from Cisco.

Read the original here:

Manufacturing's Confusing Approach to Cybersecurity - Automation World

Automation: This Byte’s For You – National Review

Writing for City Journal, Mark Mills warns that the robots (to use the shorthand) will be gnawing their way far higher up the food chain than we have seen before.

Heres the dirty little secret about automation: its easier to build a robot to replace a junior attorney than to replace a journeyman electrician. And that fact helps explain why economists and politicians are feeling misgivings about creative destruction, which, up to now, they have usually embraced as a net good for society.

In the age of the algorithm, though, theyre not so sure any more, and no wonder: instead of creative destruction coming to factories and farms, its sweeping through city centers and taking white-collar jobs. The chattering classes have talked and written for years about the end of work. Doubtless many fear that the end of their work is in the offing, this time around.

Creative destruction doesnt sound so benign when its coming your way.

Mills:

Consider a bellwether of more white-collar disruption yet to come: of the nearly 200 so-called Unicornsprivate, venture-backed companies such as Uber that are valued over $1 billion90 percent are in nonmanufacturing businesses. Theres a good reason for such a skewed focus. Supercomputer-class software in the cloud can perform, at minimal cost, once-daunting information-centric tasks, from reading X-rays to managing a passive investment fund. But the engineering challenges are far greater and many times more complex in cyber-physical systems, where software meets steel in real time

[W]ere in the midst of an upheaval in what we might call the means of management. The overall effect, I believe, will be the same as in the pasta boost to the economy and more jobsbut the makeover this time will affect the professional and managerial classes. We should expect them to be at least as vocal about it as many factory workers were a generation ago.

While I doubt that this revolution will create more jobs (at least any time soon and then theres its depressing effect on the wages of those who still have work to consider) Id agree with Mr. Mills that those being displaced will be at least as vocal about it. In fact, my guess is that they will be very much more vocal about it.

I touched on this topic last year on a piece on automation for NRODT.

Heres an excerpt:

When Americans do finally grasp what automation is doing to their prospects, rage against the machines (or, more specifically, their consequences) will blend with existing discontent to form a highly inflammable mix. This broader economic unease is already spreading beyond left-behinds and Millennials, but when we reach the point where even those who are still doing well see robots sending proletarianization their way, theres a decent chance that something akin to middle-class panic (a phenomenon identified by sociologist Theodor Geiger in, ominously, 1930s Germany) will ensue. Many of the best and brightest will face a stark loss of economic and social status, a blow that will sting far more than the humdrum hopelessness that many at the bottom of the pile have, sadly, long learned to accept. They will resist while they still have the clout to do so, and the media, filled with intelligent people who have already found themselves on the wrong side of technology, will have their back

Every revolution, whether at the polling station or on the street, needs foot soldiers drawn from the poor and the left behind. Still, its the leadership that counts. Add the impact of automation to the effects of existing elite overproduction and the result will be that the upheaval to come will be steered by a very large officer class angry, effective, efficient, a counter-elitelooking to transform the social order of which, under happier circumstances, it would have been a mainstay.

The consequences are unlikely to be pretty.

Here is the original post:

Automation: This Byte's For You - National Review

Softening vehicle sales, rising automation halt growth in Ohio’s auto jobs – The Columbus Dispatch

Dan Gearino The Columbus Dispatch @DanGearinoMark Williams The Columbus Dispatch @BizMarkWilliams

It was nice while it lasted.

A surge in auto-manufacturing jobs since the start of the decade provided a desperately needed lift for Ohioas it climbed out of the worst recession since the Great Depression.

But that growth has stalled, based on recent figures,and analysts expect the job totals to remain flat or even shrink.

Much of the blame goes to a peak in auto sales after years of growth; automation is also a factor because it allows companies to produce more with fewer workers.

The question for Ohio is how will this shift reverberate through the economy. In short, the state will need to look more to other sectors to attract jobs, or find ways to counter the trend in auto manufacturing.

"It's not a catastrophe, but some of the bloom is off the post-recession growth," said Mike Hicks, a Ball State University economist. "For Ohio, that may be more painful, and for the Midwest in general. It is another factor that keeps growth less robust than we might have wished or expected it to be."

Ohio's auto-sector employment both vehicle manufacturing and the making of parts rose by 1,500 jobs, or 1.6 percent, lastyear; that was the slowest growth rate since the recession, according to federal employment data.Those two sectors employ about 97,000 in Ohio.

Looking ahead, modest increases probably will shift toward modest declines, according to a forecast by Moody's Analytics. The research firm expects that Ohio's transportation-sector employment will grow less than 1 percent this year, followed by decreases of less than 1 percent in each of the following six years.

"We'll be expecting this to be a slowdown, but we don't think it's going to be anything that will be severe enough to send Midwestern states into recession," said Brent Campbell, a Moody's Analytics' economist who covers Ohio.

Bound to happen

The stalled growth is a normal part of the economic cycle after the boom of the last few years. Auto-related employment in Ohio has increased about 35 percent since 2010, when automakers began adding jobs after the recession. Auto plants have been running at close to full capacity as sales of new cars and trucks doubledfrom 2009 to 2016.

There is no doubt that the tide has turned, however. Here is some of the evidence:

Ohio'semployment in manufacturing had flat-lined as of June compared with a year ago, with a drop of 200 jobs among manufacturers of "durable goods," which areitems meant to last at least three years, according to preliminary government data issued Friday.

Auto inventories were at 4.2 million vehicles as of July 1, the highest in 13 years, according to Automotive News.

New-vehicle sales are down 2.1 percent from 2016's record pace.

Production in the first five months of 2017 at auto assembly plants in the district covered by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland all of Ohio, western Pennsylvania, eastern Kentucky and northern West Virginia was down about 9 percent from the same period of 2016, according to the bank.

At the same time, the industry is contending with an unsettled political climate.

President Donald Trump has threatenedto enact stiff tariffs or quotas on steel imports. Although such a move would benefit U.S. steel producers, it probably would lead to higher prices for trucks and cars and potentially further depress sales because automakers would have to use more-expensive domestic steel.

At the same time, banks and other lenders have tightened some lending for auto buyers,particularly for those with low credit scores.

If these factors weren't enough, manufacturers continue to figure out how to produce more with fewer workers.

"They are developing remarkable technologies. It is much more sophisticated, but needs fewer people to operate," said Eric Burkland, executive director of the Ohio Manufacturers' Association. Workers "are higher-skilled, more highly compensated."

Openings available

Despite the slowdown in hiring, manufacturers have openings, and Burkland said they routinely talk about how tough it is to find applicants.

That trouble finding workers is another reason that job growth is being held in check, said Ned Hill, an Ohio State University economist.

"If the cost of semi-skilled labor gets too high, including the cost of health-care benefits, work will be automated," he said. "This is looming in the logistics side of the business."

But Hill does see a silver lining: Predictions of a decrease in manufacturing jobs do not account for normal attrition, such as retirements. So, even if the state's total is falling, there will be openings.

Also, other sectors will be growing. Moody's Analytics and others expect service and health-care jobs to become a larger share of Ohio's economy. Economic-development leaders can use this information to help attract more jobs in the fields most primed for growth.

Unexpected events could change the landscape, however. Hill said the only way he sees more-significant auto-related employment in the future is the addition of an assembly plant, something he doubts will happen.

In addition, the state will need to hold on to the assembly plants it has: two Jeep plants in Toledo, a General Motors plant in Lordstown, and Honda plants in Marysville and East Liberty.

In addition, many plants make engines, transmissions, vehicle bodies and other auto parts.

The president of the United Auto Workers union raised concern last week that GM's lagging sales could lead to job losses. Reuters reported that GM is considering a phaseout of U.S. production of several passenger-car models. Absent from the list, which Reuters said came from unidentified sources familiar with the plans, is the Chevrolet Cruze, the model assembled in Lordstown.

Honda appears to be a stable presence in central Ohio, where it makes the Accord in Marysville and the CR-V in East Liberty, among other models.The automaker also has a research-and-development office and has attracted a network of other companies that manufacture parts, making the region a hub for auto production.

Asked about Honda's plans, spokesmanChrisAbbruzzese said:

"We're confident that our products and our flexible manufacturing operations will continue to provide Honda and our suppliers with the ability to maintain a significant presence in central Ohio."

mawilliams@dispatch.com

@BizMarkWilliams

dgearino@dispatch.com

@DanGearino

Here is the original post:

Softening vehicle sales, rising automation halt growth in Ohio's auto jobs - The Columbus Dispatch

Don Lindich’s Sound Advice: Home automation without breaking the budget – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Don Lindich's Sound Advice: Home automation without breaking the budget
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
We recently received an Amazon Dot as a gift, and a few people have suggested we use it to integrate home automation into the room, but we find this a bit intimidating. The electrician will be wiring things soon and we need to make a decision. Any ...

Read more from the original source:

Don Lindich's Sound Advice: Home automation without breaking the budget - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

‘I’m concerned about automation replacing jobs’ – The Hindu


The Hindu
'I'm concerned about automation replacing jobs'
The Hindu
It highlights the challenges that are coming ahead and one of those big challenges is that if you look at many economic assessments, they are all saying the radical displacement of jobs due to automation. A big component of that automation is robotics, ...

See more here:

'I'm concerned about automation replacing jobs' - The Hindu

Automation Nation: Amazon’s Brampton facility putting robotics to the ultimate test – Toronto Sun


Toronto Sun
Automation Nation: Amazon's Brampton facility putting robotics to the ultimate test
Toronto Sun
The scene resembles something out of Wall-E, with these nine-foot automated Amazon Robotics Drive Units scanning QR codes to detect their path and moving in different directions within a grid. Using built-in sensor technology, the robots don't crash ...
Robots Are Moving in on E-commerce PackingFortune

all 4 news articles »

More here:

Automation Nation: Amazon's Brampton facility putting robotics to the ultimate test - Toronto Sun

Let the robots take our jobs and pay for a universal basic income – Quartz

As developments in artificial intelligence and robotics advance, there is going to be a severe and swift disruption of many working classes. Large swaths of laborers are going to lose their jobs, leading to unprecedented levels of unemployment.

To account for this problem, having access to basic needs should become a right, not a privilege for the non-automated classes. It should be the responsibility of the corporations that have taken away working-class jobs to grant families this rightand the best solution would be in the form of a universal basic income.

UBI, an economic proposition in which a sum of money is regularly paid to a population, could be a vital bulwark against the unintended consequences of automation in the workforce. Companies will profit significantly from workforce automation, so the private sector will be able to afford shouldering this burden, while at the same time still making greater profits.

AI and robotics technologies have been accelerating at an impressive clip and show no sign of slowing down. A number of economic and technical barriers to wider adoption are beginning to fall, says the Boston Consulting Groups latest report. As a result, a dramatic takeoff in advanced robotics is imminent. These advances allow businesses to perform more complex functions at greater efficiency and ease, and such automated workforces have huge benefits for companies. After all, a full-time human has needs: 30 minutes for lunch each day, vacation and sick time, toilet breaks, and health benefits, to name a few. Meanwhile, an automated worker would only require an initial installation and the occasional repair or upgrade. This will have complicating effects on the health of Americas employment statistics.

The prices for robotics hardware and software have decreased by around 40% over the last decade as the cost of systems engineering has gone down. The BCG report stated that a human welder today is paid around $25 an hour (including benefits) versus the equivalent operating cost of around $8 for a robot. In 15 years, that gap will widen even more dramatically, the report states. The operating cost per hour for a robot doing similar welding tasks could plunge to as little as $2 when performance improvements are factored in.

This trend will only continue to accelerate. McDonalds, an early pioneer of automation, is already replacing human workers with automated kiosks. They expect a 5% to 9% return on investment in just the first year; in 2019 they expect this return to balloon to double digits. And this is only one sector: PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates that 38% of US jobs will be in danger of being replaced by automation by 2030.

Companies that automate their workforces should be taxed on these new massive profits, and some of the resulting capital given back to workers by the government in the form of UBI.

While the idea of a UBI is popularMark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates have all championed ithow exactly would a universal basic income be engineered? A small, yet successful, experiment has conducted in the UK, and Ontario, Canada is also about to experiment with it this year. But how would a private-sector-funded version work?

As the robots take over, people will begin to lose their jobs, but companies will be fine. More likely than thattheyll thrive.The profits generated from automation could be used to pay a basic wage to those displaced by robots. To use the welder example from before, a company could slash the cost of their production by at least a third in a short period of time, and would continue to see greater profits as efficiencies increase and the price for parts drops. If that company eventually arrives at the $2 an hour mark that BCG predicts, the companys bottom line would have been improved by 1250%.

Given all of the savings and massive profits companies are going to reap from these new technologies, they should be responsible for using part of this monetary kick-back to help the workers theyve displaced. Legislators might consider a sliding-scale automation tax, where a company qualifying itself as using an automated workforce would be taxed depending on how many human workers they have performing tasks compared to how many tasks are performed by automated workers that a human could rightly do. This money could then be put into a UBI fund that is then distributed by the government to citizens affected by automationor to the entire population.

At the exponential rate of robotization, there isnt a lot of time for legislators to figure out the intricacies of a solutionbut they dont seem to be in too much of a rush. Steven Mnuchin, the USs treasury secretary, is already completely ignoring this issue, for example. To understand how crucial it is that legislators get cracking, consider the timeline for the current mess that is healthcare in America: If it takes this long to debate solutions on something as dire as health insurance, what hope do we have for the solution to an automated economy? Governments need to act now to stymie potentially disastrous socio-economic effects in the coming decades.

The answer lies in two of the most popular contemporary hot-spot topics in the modern media landscape: UBI and automation. They could play into each other in a mutually beneficial fashion. Portions of the profits reaped by robots should be diverted to support this new system as humans inevitably phase out of the workforce.

Learn how to write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.

Follow this link:

Let the robots take our jobs and pay for a universal basic income - Quartz

50% of low-skilled jobs will be replaced by AI and automation, report claims – TechRepublic

While artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are poised to shake up the workforce by becoming skilled at performing human tasks, it has not been clear exactly how manyand whichhuman workers will be affected by the changes. And although AI is expected to master a variety of human tasks351 scientists just offered a timeline for when human tasks will be completed by machinesthe vast majority of US workers still do not fear that their entire job will be replaced by robots, according to the 2017 Randstad Employer Brand Research.

A new report, however, sheds light on which human workers will be most impacted by advances in automation and AI, by geographic region. Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana, recently released a report from its Center for Business and Economic Research making a bold prediction: Half of low-skilled US jobs are at risk of being replaced by automation.

The report examined how AI and automation will impact the workforce in America by mapping out two variables: Risk of automation, and offshore job losses. It found a "very strong regional concentration of potential automation and trade job losses facing American communities."

According to the report, job losses will not be spread evenly across income lower-wage, low-skilled workers are most at risk of losing work due to automation. In both caseslosses due to offshoring as well as losses due to AI and automationrural communities are more at risk, with the report stating that "urban places tend to offer more resilience due to existing forces of agglomeration."

It's clear that AI and automation will force both employers and employees to change the way we think about work. TechRepublic's Alison DeNisco has also reported on the effects of automation, from a geographical standpoint, looking at how US cities will be most impacted. "Low-wage cities such as Las Vegas, Orlando, and El Paso will be hit the hardest by job automation, according to a recent report from the Institute for Spatial Economic Analysis (ISEA)," DeNisco wrote. She went on to add that job losses are likely to be more drastic than previously predicted, and that the jobs that may take the greatest hitsdue to advances in machine learningare in truck driving, healthcare diagnostics, and education.

Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Follow this link:

50% of low-skilled jobs will be replaced by AI and automation, report claims - TechRepublic

A new report examines the state of automated journalism in Europe and what’s holding it back – Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard

Fear not, journalists: Roboreporters are not coming for your jobs, at least not yet.

Thats the takeaway from a new report from Alexander Fanta at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, who took a look at how 15 news agencies in Europe have implemented automation in their organizations. While the news agencies have been drawn to the the efficiencies of the technology, organizations still have a lot of work to do with realizing that promise. Fantasconclusion: So far, automation is limited in its scope and complexity, as he writes in the report.

Here are a few of his standout findings:

Automations role is growing, but still limited. Big news agencies like AP, Reuters, and AFP are producing thousands of algorithm-aided stories month, particularly in finance and sports. But adoption is still uneven. Organizations such as Spains Efe and Ansa in Italy are still reluctant to make the necessary investments in the tech, citing the uncertain payoff in investment in the tech.

Data availability is still a challenge. When it comes to automation, news agencies have been drawn to sports and finance because there is readily available, structured data in those fields. Thats less the case in many other sectors, which limits news agencies ability to produced automated stories and many areas. Many agencies are also reluctant to build their own data repositories, which introduces new costs and complexity and requires expertise that they lack.

News agencies say they arent turning to automation to cut jobs. This, of course, is one of the big concerns among reporters about the industrys interest in automation. But none of the news agencies Fanta spoke to said that automation is helping to cut costs. On the contrary, automation has introduced new costs to news agencies, such as expenses related to developing the automation technology (or licensing it from outside companies) and maintaining the data sets that the automation tools rely on.

People think automation is cheap, but automation is in fact not that cheap. If you automate, it costs you money. You have to maintain it, you have to track it, you have to manage it. Its actually not [there] to save a lot of money, said Reuters innovation manager Reg Chua.

Go here to read the rest:

A new report examines the state of automated journalism in Europe and what's holding it back - Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard

Is your organization ready for automation deployment? – TechTarget

Remember the voice-data convergence? I hope you're prepared, because a similar transition is ready to take roo...

Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.

By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.

You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

t.

This time, it is the transition to automation, and then to forms of automation deployment and advanced control and management.

When we transitioned from wired PBX systems to voice over IP, the team that handled the voice system had to make a big change. In the old system, circuits and wires were the basic components. Sure, there was some multiplexing -- T1s and the like -- but nothing like IP packets. Training voice technicians was an interesting process. Some made the transition, while others retired, along with the equipment they supported.

A similar situation is unfolding today. I've had more than one network engineer tell me they hope the latest transition takes long enough to allow them to retire before they have to learn new things. I was shocked.

Change is coming, and it is necessary. Compute and storage are dynamic, having made their transition over the last 10 years. The network is the final obstacle to dynamic IT systems that can more easily adapt to changing business requirements. Change is needed to increase networking efficiency, just as it has for server automation. The only thing we need to determine is the path this journey will take.

This transformation of IT and networking is gathering speed. The growth in the DevNet section of Cisco Live is one indication. When I search the web, I find a lot more activity around the use of APIs for automation deployment. I even took a class on using Ansible for network configuration control.

It's pretty incredible how simple a configuration can be when it is constructed in a YAML definition. Configuration elements that are repeated in a normal configuration get entered once in YAML, such as loopback interface addresses or Border Gateway Protocol addresses. A BGP peering relationship can be reduced to just a few lines of configuration and ported between hardware vendors with simple changes. A complete data center pod can be configured with a similar reduction in complexity.

The tie-in to culture is due to the change in how network configuration is handled. Processes and procedures that have been developed -- over the past 10 to 20 years -- need to change when automation is used. These past procedures will often have the network staff propose a set of changes, a test plan and a back-out plan to be executed if a change fails.

A change control board reviews the change and frequently approves it. Because changes sometimes create brief network outages -- for example, a spanning tree root bridge change -- they are typically implemented during a preapproved change window. Part of the reason for this step-by-step process is to force the network engineers to think more carefully about changes before rolling them out to the network.

Many organizations use network change and configuration management (NCCM) tools to push changes to devices. That's a step toward automation, but they still rely on command-line interface (CLI) configuration commands. Manual methods are then frequently used for the validation test, limiting the extent of things that can be checked. This is where automation can be applied. Construct good test plans and a set of automated checks to be performed on the network -- not just the device being changed. Likewise, the back-out plan should be automated through the NCCM platform so it is easy and fast to back out.

Automation is just the next step in the journey. It isn't the final step.

Automation is just the next step in the journey. It isn't the final step. The problem I have with basic automation tools is they don't create new abstractions. The Ansible libraries for Cisco NX-OS use the same parameters in the API as are used in the CLI. There's nothing new there, just a new communications mechanism that's uninteresting. There are no new abstractions that allow us to hide the details of a complex configuration.

Some companies, like Amazon, are already in this next phase. Create an Amazon Web Services (AWS) compute instance with X CPU power, Y storage capacity and a public IP address. How long does it take for AWS to create the instance, modify the network to support it and have a public IP address assigned? It's just a few minutes. You specified what you wanted, and the system delivered it. You didn't have to specify "how to do it" details like VLAN ID, firewall rules or any Layer 4 VPN to keep your traffic separate from everyone else's. AWS created an abstract compute and storage entity.

We need new abstractions in networking that allow us to hide as much complexity as possible. It remains to be seen whether new abstractions will come from the intent-based networking systems that companies like Apstra have pioneered and Cisco has now embraced. These systems are worth investigating, but probably only after you've undertaken the effort to learn about basic automation. Think of it as a "walk before you run" approach.

Clearly, some people are concerned that automation and whatever follows will replace their jobs. As with the convergence of voice and data, some people make the transition and others don't. That transition, just like this one, was more about changing jobs than eliminating them. There will always be a need for people who understand how complex technology works, how to use it in good designs and how to diagnose problems when it doesn't work the way you intended.

This is a journey. You don't get to skip steps. The entire organization has to learn new technology, how to best apply that technology, and to develop processes to implement and maintain it. Several things must happen to make a successful journey, among them:

You get to decide if you're going to participate in this journey to automation deployment as a leader and control your destiny, or if you're going to participate after someone else has blazed the trail. Just note that first movers frequently have a competitive advantage over their slower-moving peers.

What will the future hold for enterprise networking?

SDN now includes virtualization and automation

DevOps and automation in software-defined networks

Read more:

Is your organization ready for automation deployment? - TechTarget

Dockworkers squeezed by automation, abandoned by politicians – SFGate

Photo: Ben Margot, Associated Press

A crane transporting vehicles from a container ship operates at the Port of Oakland. Automation is reducing the number of longshore workers jobs.

A crane transporting vehicles from a container ship operates at the Port of Oakland. Automation is reducing the number of longshore workers jobs.

Dockworkers squeezed by automation, abandoned by politicians

The ink wasnt even dry on the West Coast longshore contract when the head of the employers group, the Pacific Maritime Association, proposed to the International Longshore and Warehouse Union a three-year extension, making it an eight-year contract. While the number of registered longshore jobs, 14,000, is the about same as in 1952, the volume of cargo passing through the 29 ports has increased 14 times to a record-breaking 350 million revenue tons a year.

Under the current contract, employers have eliminated hundreds of longshore jobs through automation on marine terminals such as the fully automated Long Beach Container Terminal and the semi-automated TraPac freight-forwarding facility in the Port of Los Angeles.

By the end of an extended contract in 2022, several thousand longshore jobs will be eliminated on an annual basis due to automation, warned Ed Ferris, president of ILWU Local 10 in San Francisco. With driverless trucks and crane operators in control towers running three cranes simultaneously, the chance of serious and deadly accidents are enormous.

Now maritime employers are pulling out all stops to push through this job-killing contract extension, using both Democratic and Republican politicians, high-powered PR firms and even some union officials.

On July 18, The Chronicle published an Open Forum by Democrats Mickey Kantor, former U.S. secretary of commerce who led the U.S. negotiations to create the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement, which cost millions of jobs, and Norman Mineta, also a former secretary of commerce.

The authors of this pro-employer piece talk of preserving labor peace and refer to West Coast port shutdowns over the last 15 years. Yes, there is a class war on the waterfront, but its being waged by the employers: Those port closures were caused by employer lockouts in 2002, 2013 and 2014 during longshore contract negotiations.

The 2002 lockout was ended after Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called on President George W. Bush to invoke the antilabor Taft-Hartley Act not against the maritime employers lockout but against the longshore union. The only time the ILWU shut down Pacific Coast ports between 2002 and today was May Day, 2008, in protest of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan the first-ever labor strike in the United States to protest a war.

In their Chronicle commentary, the two Democrats cite figures for wages and pensions that reflect only the highest skill level after a lifetime of work in one of the most dangerous industries. And then they threaten that if the contract proposal is rejected, it could lead Republicans and Democrats alike to impose antistrike legislation on the waterfront.

The ILWU backed Bernie Sanders in the presidential primary and then Hillary Clinton in the election. Yet no matter who leads it, the Democratic Party represents Wall Street on the waterfront. Clearly whats needed is a workers party to fight for workers interests. And that includes fighting for nationalization without compensation of the transport industry while establishing workers control.

The so-called friends of labor Democrats have been enlisted by the Pacific Maritime Association because earlier this year at the Longshore Caucus, a union meeting representing West Coast dockworkers, the San Francisco delegates voted unanimously to oppose a contract extension. Saturday, they held a conference at their union hall on automation and the proposed contract extension. One proposal was to make automation benefit dockworkers by reducing the workweek to 30 hours while maintaining 40 hours pay, creating another work shift.

There are tens of millions of unemployed people in this country. The labor movement should launch a new campaign for a shorter workweek at no loss in pay as part of a struggle for full employment to benefit all, not President Trump and his Wall Street cronies. In resisting this contract extension, ILWU waterfront workers can stand up for all workers.

Jack Heyman, a retired Oakland longshoreman, chairs the Transport Workers Solidarity Committee. https://www.transportworkers.org/

See the article here:

Dockworkers squeezed by automation, abandoned by politicians - SFGate

Apple Acquires BellSouth Patent Regarding Home Device Automation and Smart Interaction – Patently Apple

Today the US Patent & Trademark Office published a patent application from Apple titled "Learning Device Interaction Rules." The invention was acquired. As you can see below, the inventors of today's Apple patent are the same as those listed on the 2006 granted patent with BellSouth IP being the assignee, not Apple.

The patent covers a smart home environment being controlled by a single handheld device that learns new functions over time to control various in-home devices from a TV to an oven, microwave and so forth. There's no use delving into this patent because it's unknown if Apple acquired the patent for a particular technology to use with HomeKit or a future smart TV or to simply stave off a potential patent infringement lawsuit.

However, with that said the original patent only covered 6 patent claims focused on TV and VCR functionality and interaction whereas Apple's version greatly expands the patent claims to 21 in total and modernizes the invention to cover all devices in a home and eliminating any references to VCRs that are no longer relevant.

For those wanting to dive into the details of this invention, check out Apple's patent here.

Apple's patent application 20170207982 was published today by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Considering that this is a patent application, the timing of such a product to market is unknown at this time.

Patently Apple presents a detailed summary of patent applications with associated graphics for journalistic news purposes as each such patent application is revealed by the U.S. Patent & Trade Office. Readers are cautioned that the full text of any patent application should be read in its entirety for full and accurate details. About Making Comments on our Site: Patently Apple reserves the right to post, dismiss or edit any comments. Those using abusive language or negative behavior will result in being blacklisted on Disqus.

Read the original post:

Apple Acquires BellSouth Patent Regarding Home Device Automation and Smart Interaction - Patently Apple