In 2003, Reason named Clarence Thomas one of the magazine's "35 Heroes of Freedom" because the Supreme Court justice had proven himself "a reliable defender of freedom of speech in such diverse contexts as advertising, broadcasting, and campaign contributions." Alas, Thomas' recent statements in support of greater government control over "digital platforms" such as Twitter and Facebook have somewhat tarnished his First Amendment bona fides.
In April, Thomas joined his fellow justices in ridding the Supreme Court of a lingering legal dispute over the propriety of thenPresident Donald Trump's decision to block various critics on Twitter. With Trump out of the Oval Office, the Court said inBiden v. Knight First Amendment Institute(formerlyTrump v. Knight First Amendment Institute), the case was now moot.
Thomas agreed but did not let the matter rest there. In a solo concurrence, he lamented what he called the "unprecedentedconcentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties." Yes, Trump prevented "several people from interacting with his messages," Thomas wrote. But Twitter "removed him from the entire platform, thus barringallTwitter users from interacting with his messages." For Thomas, the takeaway was as troubling as it was obvious. "As Twitter made clear," he wrote, "the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms."
The justice then delivered what amounted to a regulatory call to arms against those platforms. "Part of the solution" to the "problem" of "private, concentrated control over online content and platforms available to the public," Thomas wrote, may be found in "two legal doctrines" that "limit the right of a private company to exclude."
The first doctrine, he explained, involved "common carriers," such as railroads and telegraphs, which have historically been required "to serve all comers." The second involved "places of public accommodation" or amusement, such as inns, restaurants, and theaters, which have generally been forbidden from denying service to certain categories of people. "The similarities between some digital platforms and common carriers or places of accommodation," Thomas wrote, "may give legislators strong arguments for similarly regulating digital platforms."
But these arguments may not be quite as strong as Thomas thinks. For one thing, today's social media enterprises neither look nor act much like traditional common carriers. Unlike a telegraph company, for instance, Twitter and Facebook not only move information from place to place but curate it and moderate it, resulting in all sorts of varied and even personalized user experiences. What is more, the platforms let users curate and moderate their own unique experiences, leading to a vast array of online associations and communities. All of which qualifies as expressive activity, which is shielded by the First Amendment.
Thomas' public accommodation theory also has its faults. To be sure, state and federal law do prohibit most businesses from refusing service based on a customer's race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or certain other legally protected categories. But it is not illegal (yet) to deny service based on a customer's comments about politics, which is what Thomas is ultimately objecting to here.
Like a number of other modern conservatives, Thomas seems to think that Twitter and other tech companies are effectively censoring right-of-center views. But Twitter is a private entity with First Amendment protections of its own and is thus under no obligation to share its soapbox. Thomas' approach, by contrast, would trespass the Constitution by forcing the company to play host to speech that it does not want to be associated with.
Thomas' arguments came about in a mooted case in which he wrote only for himself. Still, it would be a mistake to dismiss them as a fringe legal stance. The justice has a record of staking out lonely positions that later become entrenched in law. His critics underestimate him at their peril.
Take campaign finance. InMcConnell v. Federal Election Commission(2003), Thomas wrote alone to fault his colleagues in the majority for largely approving the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, which, among other things, banned corporate- and union-funded "electioneering communications" that mentioned a candidate by the name in the run-up to an election. Seven years later, inCitizens United v. Federal ElectionCommission(2010), the Court cited Thomas'McConnellopinion while striking down the same "electioneering communications" ban. He knows a thing or two about playing the legal long game.
Thomas also wields considerable influence in the broader conservative world, where interested parties are no doubt paying close attention to the present case. In other words, get ready for a host of new laws and lawsuits that cite Thomas' words in support of greater regulatory crackdowns on tech companies.
And do not be surprised when federal judges start citing him too. As Jeff Kosseff, author ofThe Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet(Cornell University Press), remarked on Twitter, "I do think that Thomas's statement increases the chances that at least two judges on a randomly chosen circuit court panel will rule in favor of must-carry rules for social media platforms." The legal conflict over government control of social media is just starting to heat up.
Thomas is surely correct about one thing. "We will soon have no choice," he wrote, "but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms." One way or another, Big Tech will eventually collide with government regulators at the Supreme Court.
Read the rest here:
Clarence Thomas Declares War on Big Tech - Reason
- Stocks Close Higher With Amazon and Netflix Making Big Gains - Barron's - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- Samsung needs a splashy product for its splashy product launch - The Verge - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- Big Tech's Washington hearing will be a spectacle for the ages - Financial Post - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- Dow gains more than 400 points after big tech rally, Amazon and Netflix hit records - CNBC - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- Here Come the 4 Horsemen of the Techopolypse - The New York Times - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- New records show 5,000+ contracts between big tech and the Pentagon - Business Insider - Business Insider - July 8th, 2020 [July 8th, 2020]
- Stock market rising on the indispensable companies - Minneapolis Star Tribune - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Tech Stocks Have Been the Markets Stars. Are They Overbought? - Barron's - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Tech Stocks Are Getting Scary. Why Theres No Way to Escape Them. - Barron's - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Big Tech companies have got universities in their sights - Telegraph.co.uk - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- The National Research Cloud: Big Tech And Academic Research - Seeking Alpha - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Nasdaq At Record as Investors Bet on Big Tech to Weather Virus Storm; Dow Falls - Yahoo Finance - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Big Tech saved the day. We still dont trust them. - BetaBoston - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Big tech, even bigger heart, provides shields to Hatzalah - The Riverdale Press - July 12th, 2020 [July 12th, 2020]
- Cramer's earnings watch: 'If the banks get hammered, things could get ugly' - CNBC - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- Big Tech joins fight against Trump's restrictions on international students - The Logic - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- Pittsburgh Big tech companies are flocking to Pittsburgh. The foundation was laid over decades - Technical.ly Pittsburgh - Technical.ly - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- Ask the Rational Investor: Is big tech too large? - Massillon Independent - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- Big Tech went from growth stocks to Wall Street's Treasury bond substitute during the coronavirus - CNBC - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- Thousands of contracts highlight quiet ties between Big Tech and U.S. military - NBC News - July 13th, 2020 [July 13th, 2020]
- The Information's Takeover Target List - The Information - July 18th, 2020 [July 18th, 2020]
- The Tension Between Competition and Tech Are Gaining Global Attention - JD Supra - July 18th, 2020 [July 18th, 2020]
- Cloudflare DNS goes down, taking a large piece of the internet with it - TechCrunch - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- As the Revolving Door Swings - The American Prospect - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Big Tech is Poised to Pounce on Banking - Global Banking And Finance Review - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- The Biggest Problem With Investing in Teladoc - The Motley Fool - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- How Palantir and Peter Thiel might lead the biggest tech IPO of the year - Vox.com - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Here's what happened to the stock market on Monday - CNBC - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- 'Big Tech' Pullback Explains Why Bitcoin Rally Has Paused in Q3 | NewsBTC - newsBTC - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Advertiser alliance, media companies, and Big Tech to collude and create a definition of hate speech - Reclaim The Net - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Congress has the legal power to investigate Silicon Valley. Let's make it count - The Guardian - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- The Problem with Big Ideas (and Some Ramblings on Virtual Desktops & Tech's Blurred Lines) - www.waterstechnology.com - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Here are all the battlefronts TikTok is currently fighting on - KTVZ - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Exxon has topped North Texas' biggest-companies list for 3 decades. Now there's a challenger to the throne - The Dallas Morning News - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- G20 Finance Officials Eye Solution to Digital Tax Row This Year - The New York Times - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Earnings and fiscal debate could be catalysts for stocks in the week ahead - CNBC - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Big Tech firms back suing Trump administration over rule that could drive out foreign students - Axios - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Big Techs latest reckoning is coming as it continues to rack up record valuations - MarketWatch - July 19th, 2020 [July 19th, 2020]
- Here's a new reason to invest in Europe - WICZ - July 21st, 2020 [July 21st, 2020]
- Recovery from Covid-19 will be threatened if we don't learn to control big tech - The Guardian - July 21st, 2020 [July 21st, 2020]
- Tech watchdog calls on Facebook Oversight Board members to demand real power or resign - TechCrunch - July 21st, 2020 [July 21st, 2020]
- Roku Is A Strong Gatekeeper In Streaming, But Could Be Crushed By Big Tech Analyst - Deadline - July 22nd, 2020 [July 22nd, 2020]
- The Conservative Inc. to Big Tech Pipeline - The American Conservative - July 22nd, 2020 [July 22nd, 2020]
- Are Facebook and Alexa really listening? 6 common tech myths debunked - USA TODAY - July 23rd, 2020 [July 23rd, 2020]
- New Emails Reveal Warm Relationship Between Kamala Harris And Big Tech - HuffPost - July 23rd, 2020 [July 23rd, 2020]
- Amazon-led rally boosts Jeff Bezos and Big tech"s billionaire boys - Proactive Investors USA & Canada - July 23rd, 2020 [July 23rd, 2020]
- Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Invited To Testify In Congressional Big Tech Hearing - The Federalist - July 23rd, 2020 [July 23rd, 2020]
- EU-wide digital tax on big tech touted as best resource - EURACTIV - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- Cramer says this tech stock rally is not like 1999 but here is what could stop it - CNBC - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- Report Doorcast: Big Tech antitrust hearing preview and the Xbox Games Showcase breakdown - Report Door - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- The one big thing each tech CEO will tell Congress - Axios - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- Big Tech Unmasked as Anti-conservative by Project Veritas - Newsmax - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- Antitrust Hearing Involving Apple Chief Tim Cook and Other Big Tech CEOs Reportedly Postponed - MacRumors - July 24th, 2020 [July 24th, 2020]
- Amazon To Invest In Reliance Retail: Is Big Tech Joining Hands To Conquer India? - Inc42 Media - July 26th, 2020 [July 26th, 2020]
- Zuckerberg, Bezos, other tech CEOs to testify at anti-trust hearing - Toronto Star - July 26th, 2020 [July 26th, 2020]
- Lily Allen says she feels sad and calls out big tech amid Wiley antisemitism row - The Independent - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Big Tech feels the heat from Washington and small agency leaders dish: Tuesday Wake-Up Call - AdAge.com - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Overzealous government officials should stay out of big tech's way - Washington Times - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Mint Lite | India covid tally, protests across globe, big tech CEOs & other news - Livemint - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Big tech antitrust probe report from US Congress likely by early fall - Times Now - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Antitrust Hearing Involving Apple Chief Tim Cook and Other Big Tech CEOs Reportedly Postponed [Update:... - MacRumors - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Congressional antitrust probe of Big Tech expected by early fall - The Globe and Mail - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Big Tech chiefs get brief reprieve from govt hearing into their growing power - ARNnet - July 27th, 2020 [July 27th, 2020]
- Lawmakers keen to break up 'big tech' like Amazon and Google need to realize the world has changed a lot since Microsoft and Standard Oil - Fairfield... - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Stock futures are flat ahead of Fed decision and Big Tech testimony - CNBC - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Ahead of hearing with big tech CEOs, Cicilline says a Biden presidency would lead to regulation next year - Yahoo News - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Democrats hurt small business when they attack Big Tech | TheHill - The Hill - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Tech leads stocks higher as CEOs testify and Fed keeps rates near zero - Fox Business - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- WATCH LIVE: Heads Of Amazon, Apple, Facebook And Google Testify On Big Tech's Power - NPR - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Big Tech to Testify: What Jim Cramer Is Watching - TheStreet - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Apple, Google, Amazon, other Big Tech companies have a climate problem; now being forced to clean up - Firstpost - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Commentary: Big Tech is engaged in a hostile takeover of our country - TheBlaze.com - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Slog AM: Big Tech's Anti-Trust Hearing, COVID-19 Goes to College, Boeing Is Boned - TheStranger.com - July 29th, 2020 [July 29th, 2020]
- Big tech antitrust probe report from Congress likely by early fall - Reuters - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Vergecast: Big Tech antitrust hearing preview and the Xbox Games Showcase breakdown - The Verge - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Biased Big Tech algorithms limit our lives and choices. Stop the online discrimination. - USA TODAY - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Big 5 Tech Stocks Have Trounced the Market. So Have Their Fundamentals. - Barron's - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Top antitrust Democrat opens hearing by comparing big tech firms to past monopolies | TheHill - The Hill - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Big Tech antitrust hearing could be colossal or mere theater - Roll Call - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]
- Stop with the egg metaphor in discussing Big Tech break-ups | TheHill - The Hill - July 30th, 2020 [July 30th, 2020]