Introduction
As the world continues to advance technologically, more and more jobs become susceptible to automation, with machines completing tasks formerly undertaken by people on an increasing scale. Automation is widely hailed as a cost-effective, efficiency-oriented solution for businesses, which can use technology to greatly reduce instances of human error in their work, speed up production, and cut long-term costs. As automation has grown, a debate about its implications for the future of work has emerged too.
The debate on automation
The automation debate generally centers around the extent to which automation will affect workers in the future. Among economists, there is a general consensus that automation is a key contributing factor to societal inequality, with associated job loss outweighing any negative externalities to workers from trade or immigration. These economists argue automation will lead to mass job losses in the coming decades and, while new jobs will certainly be created, the rate at which they are created will not be sufficient to offset the losses caused by automation.
The more repetitive the tasks associated with a particular job, the easier those tasks are to map and replicate with technology.
This statement rings true for a wide range of jobs, whether traditionally blue collar or white collar, including factory, assistant or secretarial, and even legal and financial work. The jobs safest from automation are managerial or executive positions. Hence, economists claim, the jobs most susceptible to automation are those predominantly held by members of the lower and middle classes, whereas the wealthiest members of society hold the safest jobs. Research from the Economic Policy Institute supports these claims; though worker productivity is on the rise due to automation, wages have stagnated.
Echoing economists assertions, those working in the technology or tech-adjacent industries are well aware of the power automation wields. A recent report by the research firm Forrester estimates that over 1 million knowledge-work jobs jobs that require working with information rather than performing manual labor will be lost in 2020. However, the report also estimates that 331,500 net human-touch jobs requiring intuition, empathy and physical and mental agility will be added to the US workforce this year. Thus, industry experts claim jobs requiring creative thinking, adaptability and human emotion will be more highly valued. While there will always be a sufficient volume of jobs available to the public, the jobs of the future will look different from those available today. As such, a significant portion of workers will require training in new skills.
Within academia, scholars appear split on the implications of automation for workers. Existing scholarly literature on the topic generally falls into one of three camps: optimistic, pessimistic, and somewhere in between. Optimists envision a future in which existing work will either be abolished at no cost to workers due to (universal) basic income programs or supported by new technologies which will allow humans to work even more productively.
Pessimists, on the other hand argue that, while society is headed toward a post-work future, with large swaths of existing human jobs becoming obsolete, there is no indication that workers will be protected. They point to a rise in offshoring and the existence of large, exploitative organizations that provide poor wages, working conditions, and benefits to many of their workers.
Scholars between the optimists and pessimists argue that their peers analyses are gross oversimplifications of the issue at hand. They acknowledge automation is an important issue for society, researchers should continue to study its projected impact, and policy leaders should take action to ensure future job security for workers. However, they reject that automation will have a completely transformative effect on the economy.
Finally, politicians appear divided on the issue of automation and its impacts, and not just along party lines. Due to Andrew Yangs 2020 presidential campaign, the issue has garnered some additional attention this election cycle. Yang has made the issue a cornerstone of his campaign, arguing that the United States must stop denying the effects of automation and implement 21st-century solutions such as universal basic income to address these effects.
In contrast, Senator Elizabeth Warren, argues the idea of automation causing job insecurity is a good story, except its not really true. Warren, instead, points to harmful trade policy as the main culprit behind American job insecurity. Other 2020 Democratic candidates fall on a spectrum between Yang and Warren with regard to their stances on automation and the future of work, with Pete Buttigieg emphasizing the importance of education programs in the face of increased automation and Senator Bernie Sanders proposing guaranteeing federal jobs for workers displaced at the hands of automation.
Takeaways from the debate on automation
The sheer variety of voices in the loud and lively debate regarding the impact of automation on the future of work makes identifying the problem, developing a robust understanding of the problem and formulating an appropriate response difficult. Furthermore, there is a lack of forward-looking data, meaning predictive models are built using past trends. Since researchers cannot predict the future, they must rely on existing political theories, models, and anecdotal evidence to formulate their arguments. Many studies thus end up either overly broad or narrow in focus, often lacking evidence-based approaches. For instance, much of the existing literary works on automation and the future of work display inherent political bias on the part of their authors, as evidenced by their overt optimistic, pessimistic or neutral undertones.
On the other hand, economists assertions, while evidence-based, rely on general productivity and growth models, failing to zero in on the effects of technology in the workplace specifically. Proving causation between technological advancement and job security using these models is difficult due to the number of potential confounding variables, such as trade, that could exist. Industry specialists have the opposite problem: while it is easier to demonstrate the impact of technology through industry practices by working directly with organizations to conduct studies, the conclusions drawn from these studies often lack external validity due to their relatively narrow approach, which is heavily reliant on the particular clients with which they work, and therefore cannot be easily generalized.
Finally, most politicians lack of academic or industry experience relating to automation precludes them from convincingly articulating what it means for the future of work. Nevertheless, politicians have campaigns to run and in the absence of a general consensus on the impact of automation on job security can point to various studies and assertions to spin existing information in their favor. Until a new, evidence-based method for evaluating the relationship between automation and the future of work is introduced to the automation-job security debate, existing stakeholders will continue to talk in circles. The problem is in the event that automation does progress enough to the point where tangible, associated job loss occurs, it may be too late to take key preventative policy actions in the future, due to the exponential nature of technological development.
Where do we go from here?
The effect of automation on the future of work is notoriously difficult to study, due to the various angles taken by those examining this relationship and the lack of data regarding the ever-evolving prevalence of technology in the workplace. The best way to remedy the extant information gap, which, if filled, would allow for more robust analysis of the relationship between automation and workforce development, is to examine the relationship by designing real-time experiments. One researcher, Benjamin Shestakofsky, designed such an experiment: a 19-month long study at a software firm to test how relations between workers and technology evolved over three phases of the companys development. The results of the study showed that despite increasingly automating its own processes, the firm opted not to perfect its software algorithms to continuously push people out of the production process and instead continually reorganized to allow humans to work with the software. The study suggests that automation is not necessarily detrimental to workers.In order to better understand the aggregate effects of automation on the workforce, studies like Shestakofskys need to be replicated on a larger scale and a longer-term basis, controlling for factors such as regional differences, company culture, and so forth. Doing so will allow researchers to reach causal inferences/conclusions and translate them into meaningful conclusions about what automation means for the future of work.
Cover picture source: Mixabest | Wikimedia Commons
More:
- The Automation Conference - December 9th, 2016 [December 9th, 2016]
- The Best Home Automation Systems of 2016 | Top Ten Reviews - December 24th, 2016 [December 24th, 2016]
- Compact Automation - Actuators, Hydraulic Cylinders, Linear ... - December 24th, 2016 [December 24th, 2016]
- What is Home Automation? | Home Automation Systems - December 24th, 2016 [December 24th, 2016]
- Job Seekers - Automation Personnel Services - December 24th, 2016 [December 24th, 2016]
- iAutomation - December 25th, 2016 [December 25th, 2016]
- Beyond Automation - hbr.org - December 25th, 2016 [December 25th, 2016]
- Automation The Car Company Tycoon Game on Steam - December 25th, 2016 [December 25th, 2016]
- Automation - Wikipedia - December 25th, 2016 [December 25th, 2016]
- Build automation - Wikipedia - December 26th, 2016 [December 26th, 2016]
- Home - Enerwave Home Automation - December 27th, 2016 [December 27th, 2016]
- Automation | Technologies | Systems | Integrator ... - December 27th, 2016 [December 27th, 2016]
- Automation - DESHAZO - December 27th, 2016 [December 27th, 2016]
- Custom Automation & Machine Design | Automation GT - December 27th, 2016 [December 27th, 2016]
- IT Automation - BMC - December 27th, 2016 [December 27th, 2016]
- Werner Electric | Automation - January 28th, 2017 [January 28th, 2017]
- Automationtechies | Automation Engineering Recruiting - January 28th, 2017 [January 28th, 2017]
- Automation - Mazak Corporation - January 28th, 2017 [January 28th, 2017]
- Automation | Food Engineering - January 28th, 2017 [January 28th, 2017]
- Test Automation Services for Development of Regression ... - January 28th, 2017 [January 28th, 2017]
- UI Automation Overview - msdn.microsoft.com - February 5th, 2017 [February 5th, 2017]
- The Evolution of Automation and What It Means for the Integration Industry - Commercial Integrator - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Automation, robots could replace 250000 public sector workers in the next 15 years - Computer Business Review - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- New telecom transformation goals require service automation - TechTarget - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Automation expected to displace insurance underwriters, real estate brokers - CIO Dive - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- The Perks Of Automation And The Risks: Why To Think Twice About Getting Into That Driverless Uber - Forbes - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Voices Reinventing enterprise finance by overhauling AP automation - Accounting Today - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- DFLabs Launches the First Security Automation and Orchestration Platform based Upon Supervised Active Intelligence - Business Wire (press release) - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- VIDEO: Going Big on Automation in a Small Footprint Facility - ENGINEERING.com - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Building a better model of human-automation interaction - Phys.org - Phys.Org - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Cruise Automation Is Testing an App For Hailing Self-Driving Cars - Fortune - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- AlixPartners examines automation in manufacturing and logistics management - Logistics Management - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- Women need to look out for each other in automated workplaces - The Guardian - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- Automation vs. the H-1B visa program: Which matters to employees? - TechTarget - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- Automation is the unavoidable future of the economy - The Daily Cougar - February 8th, 2017 [February 8th, 2017]
- Speeders beware: Legislation would allow automation crackdown ... - SFGate - February 9th, 2017 [February 9th, 2017]
- Robots versus bureaucrats: Why public sector work is ripe for automation - Financial Post - February 9th, 2017 [February 9th, 2017]
- Rockwell Automation Surged 10% in January as Growth Picked Up Steam - Motley Fool - February 9th, 2017 [February 9th, 2017]
- Global Medical Automation Market to Reach Approximately $75.6 Billion by 2025 - By End User, Application ... - PR Newswire (press release) - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- Automation 'key' to advancing Thai production - The Nation - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- WorkWave Releases New Lead Management And Marketing ... - PR Newswire (press release) - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- 'We employ insane levels of automation' Kris Canekeratne - Times of India - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- Most people are optimistic about workplace automation, social data suggests - ZDNet - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- Yes, there's a job creation argument for automation and technology ... - The Hill (blog) - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- Technobabble: Automation and the modern worker - CIO Dive - February 10th, 2017 [February 10th, 2017]
- Improving Behavior Through Automation of Vehicle Systems - School Transportation News (blog) - February 11th, 2017 [February 11th, 2017]
- Automation Nightmare: Philosopher Warns We Are Creating a World Without Consciousness - Big Think - February 11th, 2017 [February 11th, 2017]
- Why Don't We See More Automation in Federal Networks? - Nextgov - February 11th, 2017 [February 11th, 2017]
- Automation can revitalize the US workforce - Fox News - February 11th, 2017 [February 11th, 2017]
- Readers Write (Feb. 12): The moose population; jobs, start-ups and automation; diversity in the funny pages - Minneapolis Star Tribune - February 12th, 2017 [February 12th, 2017]
- Automation can replace bureaucrats and save taxpayers money - Hot Air - February 12th, 2017 [February 12th, 2017]
- TigerStop hopes to ride automation to new heights - The Columbian - February 12th, 2017 [February 12th, 2017]
- Your Most Valuable Resource is Time Get More of it through Automation - CMS Critic (press release) (blog) - February 13th, 2017 [February 13th, 2017]
- What Does Device Automation Mean for Users? - Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry (blog) - February 13th, 2017 [February 13th, 2017]
- How To Beat Automation And Not Lose Your Job - Forbes - February 13th, 2017 [February 13th, 2017]
- Logistics firm gets automation boost - The Straits Times - February 14th, 2017 [February 14th, 2017]
- PP Control & Automation launch new video to kick-start exciting plans for 2017 - Manufacturer.com - February 14th, 2017 [February 14th, 2017]
- Automation's Impace on Data Center Monitoring Alerts - The Data Center Journal - February 14th, 2017 [February 14th, 2017]
- Hollysys Automation Technologies Reports Unaudited Financial Results for the First Half Year and the Second Quarter ... - PR Newswire (press release) - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- 4 Automation Hacks to Save You Money and Manpower - Yahoo Finance - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- Istuary Innovation Group and Bluewrist Partner to Bring Robotics and Automation into China's Manufacturing Sector - Yahoo Finance - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- Redwood Software Named a Strong Performer in Independent Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report - Yahoo Finance - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- Boeing ramps up automation, innovation as it readies 737MAX | The ... - The Seattle Times - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- Robots and AI are coming for our jobs, but can augmentation save us from automation? - Digital Trends - February 15th, 2017 [February 15th, 2017]
- The Impact of Bad Data in Automation: Why Quality Management is Critical - R & D Magazine - February 16th, 2017 [February 16th, 2017]
- Automation: Are We Empowering Human Interaction Or Displacing It? - Business 2 Community - February 16th, 2017 [February 16th, 2017]
- Life in the Fast LaneAutomation with Software-Defined Intelligence - InfoWorld - February 16th, 2017 [February 16th, 2017]
- Luddite Lefty Journalists Apparently Think Workplace Automation is Conservatives' Fault [VIDEO] - Daily Caller - February 16th, 2017 [February 16th, 2017]
- Will automation define the future of network technology? - TechTarget - February 16th, 2017 [February 16th, 2017]
- Editorial: Improving automation - The Motorship - February 17th, 2017 [February 17th, 2017]
- TigerText Unveils Role-based Scheduling Automation, Amazon Alexa integration - HIT Consultant - February 17th, 2017 [February 17th, 2017]
- 89% people want automation at workplace: Adobe - Economic Times - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Delta veers to EV parts, automation - Bangkok Post - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Robotic process automation makes nearshore outsourcing more ... - CIO - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- The working-class job that Trump could save from automation - Washington Post - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- China must be ready for automation - Basic Income News - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Bill Gates Says Robots Should Be Taxed Like Workers - Fortune - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Trump and automation challenge India's IT industry - VentureBeat - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Both Trump and Automation Are Challenging India's IT Industry - Fortune - February 20th, 2017 [February 20th, 2017]
- 89% people want automation at workplace: Adobe - ETCIO.com - February 20th, 2017 [February 20th, 2017]