Mystery of DNA decay unravelled

A new study is finally laying to rest the debate over whether DNA from the age of the dinosaurs could survive to the present day.

Scientists at Murdoch University led a study which shows the rate of DNA degradation and calculates that all bonds in a DNA strand preserved at the ideal temperature of minus five degrees centigrade would be completely destroyed in bone after approximately 6.8 million years.

This figure is incompatible with the idea of finding intact DNA in an 80 million year old dinosaur remnant, as was famously alluded to in the Steven Spielberg film Jurassic Park, but is much older than the currently accepted record of 450,000 to 800,000-year-old DNA from Greenlandic ice cores.

Dr Mike Bunce and Dr Morten Allentoft from Murdoch Universitys Ancient DNA lab came to their conclusions after studying 158 fossilised leg bones belonging to three species of the moa, an extinct group of birds that once roamed New Zealand.

It has been agonisingly difficult to estimate the rate of DNA decay before now because finding a large set of DNA-containing fossils with which to make meaningful comparisons are exceedingly rare, said Dr Bunce.

Environmental conditions like temperature, degree of microbial attack and oxygenation, can affect the DNA decay process and make it hard to detect a basic rate of degradation.

The moa bones however have allowed us to study the comparative DNA degradation because they come from different ages from a region where they have all experienced the same environmental conditions.

The fossil bone specimens were carbon dated as being between 600 and 8000 years old and looking at the varying degrees of DNA degradation in each specimen, the team were able to calculate a DNA half-life of 521 years. The half-life is the amount of time taken for an amount of DNA to reach 50 per cent of the starting amount.

The scientists found that the estimated decay rate in the specimens was almost 400 times slower than predicted from simulation experiments carried out in the lab.

Based on these calculations and other investigations, the team were able to make their predictions of DNA survival deeper into time.

Read more:
Mystery of DNA decay unravelled

Posted in DNA

DNA testing keeps convicted killer's hopes alive

ST. LOUIS Rodney Lincoln has spent half his life in prison and knows he will spend the rest there, too, unless a sealed Federal Express container en route to Lorton, Va., can unlock his cell.

Inside: A swab of red stain from the front edge of a kitchen sink. A piece of aluminum door frame with a bloody fingerprint. A steak knife and butcher knife, both with blood. A broom. And a piece of tissue paper left near a doorway where the killer fled.

Those are among the physical evidence stored for decades from the gruesome murder of JoAnn Tate and attack on her two young daughters at their St. Louis apartment on April 27, 1982.

Now, with the state's blessing, the evidence will be tested by Bode Technology, in the suburbs of Washington. It specializes in DNA comparisons, science not available at the time of the crime.

The Midwest Innocence Project is paying for the testing, believing the results will not only free Lincoln whose case they've been fighting for years but also point to a particular man it suspects of being the real killer.

Tate's family, however, hopes the tests will put a final stamp on Lincoln's conviction and provide closure.

A GRUESOME CRIME

Police who responded on that spring morning to Tate's apartment on Farrar Street encountered a gory scene.

Tate, 35, was facedown in a pool of blood, fatally stabbed in the chest and sexually assaulted with a broom. The killer delivered 10 stab wounds to Tate's daughter, Melissa, 7, and sliced the throat of Renee, 4.

Melissa feebly told relatives who found them, "Bill did it."

Read the original:
DNA testing keeps convicted killer's hopes alive

Posted in DNA

DNA has a 521-year half-life

Palaeogeneticist Morten Allentoft used the bones of extinct moa birds to calculate the half-life of DNA.

M. Mhl

Few researchers have given credence to claims that samples of dinosaur DNA have survived to the present day, but no one knew just how long it would take for genetic material to fall apart. Now, a study of fossils found in New Zealand is laying the matter to rest and putting paid to hopes of cloning a Tyrannosaurus rex.

After cell death, enzymes start to break down the bonds between the nucleotides that form the backbone of DNA, and micro-organisms speed the decay. In the long run, however, reactions with water are thought to be responsible for most bond degradation. Groundwater is almost ubiquitous, so DNA in buried bone samples should, in theory, degrade at a set rate.

Determining that rate has been difficult because it is rare to find large sets of DNA-containing fossils with which to make meaningful comparisons. To make matters worse, variable environmental conditions such as temperature, degree of microbial attack and oxygenation alter the speed of the decay process.

But palaeogeneticists led by Morten Allentoft at the University of Copenhagen and Michael Bunce at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, examined 158 DNA-containing leg bones belonging to three species of extinct giant birds called moa. The bones, which were between 600 and 8,000 years old, had been recovered from three sites within 5 kilometres of each other, with nearly identical preservation conditions including a temperature of 13.1 C. The findings are published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B1.

By comparing the specimens' ages and degrees of DNA degradation, the researchers calculated that DNA has a half-life of 521 years. That means that after 521 years, half of the bonds between nucleotides in the backbone of a sample would have broken; after another 521 years half of the remaining bonds would have gone; and so on.

The team predicts that even in a bone at an ideal preservation temperature of 5 C, effectively every bond would be destroyed after a maximum of 6.8 million years. The DNA would cease to be readable much earlier perhaps after roughly 1.5 million years, when the remaining strands would be too short to give meaningful information.

This confirms the widely held suspicion that claims of DNA from dinosaurs and ancient insects trapped in amber are incorrect, says Simon Ho, a computational evolutionary biologist at the University of Sydney in Australia. However, although 6.8 million years is nowhere near the age of a dinosaur bone which would be at least 65 million years old We might be able to break the record for the oldest authentic DNA sequence, which currently stands at about half a million years, says Ho.

The calculations in the latest study were quite straightforward, but many questions remain.

Continue reading here:
DNA has a 521-year half-life

Posted in DNA

DNA's half-life identified using fossil bones

We are used to radioactive substances having a half-life, but DNA? Now a study of bones from extinct birds suggests the double helix too has a measurable half-life and that we have underestimated its ability to survive in the fossil record.

"DNA degrades at a certain rate, and it therefore makes sense to talk about a half-life," says Morten Allentoft at Copenhagen University, Denmark, who together with Mike Bunce at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, and colleagues, extracted DNA from the leg bones of 158 extinct flightless birds called moas.

Part of the reason a DNA half-life has been so elusive is that it is hard to find a large enough cache of samples that have been exposed to similar conditions. The moa bones were all between 600 and 8000 years old, and came from a 5-kilometre-wide area of New Zealand's South Island, key factors for helping identify a regular pattern of decay.

With an estimated burial temperature of 13 C, the DNA's half-life was 521 years almost 400 times longer than expected from lab experiments at similar temperatures, says Allentoft.

The oldest DNA to date belongs to insects and plants and was found in 450,000 to 800,000-year-old ice. Under subzero conditions, Allentoft and Bunce estimate that DNA's half-life can be up to 158,000 years, meaning the last remnants would disappear around the 6.8-million-year mark. Allentoft does say that is an optimistic assessment, and doesn't imply that samples of DNA large enough to measure could be extracted from such old bones.

Eva-Maria Geigl at the Jacques Monod institute in Paris, France, is still to be convinced by the half-life claims, which she says rest on statistically weak evidence. She points out, for example, that the correlation relies heavily on the moa bones older than 6000 years when fewer than 10 of the 158 bones are this ancient.

"Old fossils are rare and hence there will be less data in this part of the analysis," says Bunce. "There is nothing we can do about it other than present what we have at hand and clearly, the signal is present. The correlation is highly significant."

If DNA decays in a predictable way, can we calculate the chances of finding it at key sites? Ever since the Indonesian island of Flores yielded remains of the "hobbit", Homo floresiensis in 2004, speculation has been rife that some specimens might contain DNA that would help pin down its position in the human family tree. This notion has been spurred by evidence that the hobbits may have survived until as recently as 18,000 years ago.

Unfortunately, Bunce thinks the new calculations will be difficult to apply to specific sites. "A host of other factors come into play," he says, including the season the organism died. In fact, although the moa bones in the analysis had been buried in a similar environment, the age of the specimens could account for only about 40 per cent of the variation in DNA preservation in other words, the half-life signal is noisy.

Alan Cooper, director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of Adelaide, South Australia, agrees. "The rotting process after death is very seasonal and context dependent, and has a major impact on DNA survival."

Read more:
DNA's half-life identified using fossil bones

Posted in DNA

DNA links Fresno robbery suspects to fatal crash

DNA from two home-invasion robbery suspects who allegedly stole a truck and then got into a fatal hit-and-run crash will be pivotal evidence in their trial, which started Tuesday, the prosecutor said.

Curtis Travis, 35, and Stephen Stowers, 24, both of Fresno, are on trial for murder, robbery and hit-and-run in the death of Heliodoro Anthony Ruvalcaba, 50, of Fresno, who was killed in January 2011.

Ruvalcaba was on his way home from his janitorial job when he was struck by a truck that Travis and Stowers allegedly stole minutes earlier.

The pair had been at a friend's apartment at 4111 N. Blythe Ave. about 1 a.m. on Jan. 5, 2011.

A short time later, they forced their way into another apartment at the complex, taking a laptop computer, two cellphones, $10 and keys to the resident's pickup, police reports state.

David Ruiz testified Tuesday that he was asleep in the apartment with his wife and two children when Travis and Stowers entered by breaking a window.

After hearing the noise, he went into his living room to investigate and was ordered by the two men to hand over his keys, cash, laptop computer and cellphones. Ruiz said he did so because he feared for the lives of his wife and daughters.

Ruiz described the men as light-skinned and dark-skinned, and he identified Travis as the man who made most of the demands. He could not positively identify Stowers. Travis is white and Stowers is black.

The pair left in Ruiz's 1994 Chevrolet Silverado, running two red lights before speeding about 60 mph eastbound on Ashlan Avenue near Highway 99, police said.

Travis, reportedly the driver, ran red lights at Ashlan and the Highway 99 offramp and hit Ruvalcaba's northbound 1998 Ford Taurus, killing him, police said.

Link:
DNA links Fresno robbery suspects to fatal crash

Posted in DNA

DNA dating study kills off Jurassic Park

Reconstructing dinosaurs from ancient DNA has been dealt a blow with a new study finding genetic material can only last 1 million years.

An international team of researchers reached the finding after analysing DNA extracted from bones of the extinct New Zealand moa.

They found that while short fragments of DNA could possibly survive up to 1 million years, sequences of 30 base pairs or more would only have a half-life of around 158,000 years under certain conditions.

Lead author Dr Morten Allentoft from Murdoch University's Ancient DNA lab in Perth says their results contradict earlier studies which claimed to have extracted DNA fragments several hundred base pairs long from dinosaur bones and preserved insects, claims which underpinned the storyline of the 1993 movieJurassic Park.

"What we show here with the decay rate of DNA is that this is never going to be possible," Dr Allentoft said.

"It may be that you can have extremely short fragments of DNA, only a few base pairs that persist for maybe a million years, maybe even longer."

Dr Allentoft says the earlier findings may have been due to contamination with human DNA.

Rate of decay

The latest study, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, also establishes a DNA decay rate which could help identify specimens likely to yield useful genetic material.

It might also one day enable DNA to be used to date bones and teeth or even be used for forensic investigation of human remains.

Visit link:
DNA dating study kills off Jurassic Park

Posted in DNA

Applied DNA Sciences and 3SI Use DNA to Protect Teller Stations

STONY BROOK, NY--(Marketwire - Oct 9, 2012) - Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. ( OTCBB : APDN ), (Twitter: @APDN), a provider of DNA-based anti-counterfeiting technology and product authentication solutions, announced today that 3SI Security Systems is expanding its use of APDN's SigNature DNA evidence marking product into 3SI smoke and dye cash protection systems used across Europe. First orders, to the banking sector, are already being processed.

3SI Security Systems is a world leader in cash protection systems designed to recover stolen cash and high-value assets, apprehend criminals and deter crime.

The smoke and dye system, called Thinpac, is already in use in over 130,000 locations worldwide, with great success at deterring crime. 3SI called the addition of SigNature DNA marking to the Thinpac "a unique and leading edge security feature which we are happy to be able to offer to our customers." The company points out that "SigNature-DNA-tagged items can be identified unequivocally with a marker unique to a specific Thinpac, and hence unique to a particular crime. Any item, cash or person that comes in contact with the smoke will be marked by the SigNature DNA."

Police forces across Europe are becoming more familiar with the use of unique SigNature DNA markers in cash-protection systems, placing them in a much better position to catch and convict criminals. SigNature DNA provides police with a welcome additional investigative tool, which often reduces the amount of time it takes the police to undertake such investigations.

James Hayward, Chairman and CEO of Applied DNA Sciences, said, "Our SigNature DNA product is now used in many countries across Europe and is increasingly popular with police. One of our best examples of how the police make excellent use of our DNA to catch criminals is in the United Kingdom where 48 criminals have already been convicted and jailed for over 242 years, providing a great deterrent that has helped to significantly reduce the number of Cash in Transit robberies."

SigNature DNA is used to protect approximately 26% of cash movements in the United Kingdom.

Protection of bank tellers adds to APDN's portfolio of cash protection products. 3SI already uses APDN SigNature DNA marks to protect nearly 5,000 ATMs, using a DNA liquid which is placed in ink tanks that are fitted inside individual ATM cassettes. The cassette activates when triggered, marking all the cash inside the ATM and the criminals.

David Stanks, CEO of 3SI Corporation noted, "We have proven that we can significantly extend the value of our solutions by including the SigNature DNA products. This is a logical continuation of our strategy to deter crime and protect people."

About Applied DNA Sciences

APDN is a provider of botanical-DNA based security and authentication solutions that can help protect products, brands and intellectual property of companies, governments and consumers from theft, counterfeiting, fraud and diversion. SigNature DNA and smartDNA, our principal anti-counterfeiting and product authentication solutions that essentially cannot be copied, provide a forensic chain of evidence and can be used to prosecute perpetrators.

Read this article:
Applied DNA Sciences and 3SI Use DNA to Protect Teller Stations

Posted in DNA

Gazette.Net: Goodall talk to be streamed live online Saturday from College Park

Photo by Michael Neugebauer Jane Goodall sits with Freud, a chimpanzee who lives in the Gombe National Park on the eastern shores of Lake Tanganyika in Tanzania. British born Goodall, who became world famous for her work with chimps, has also been a United Nations Messenger for Peace for 10 years. In 1977 she founded the Jane Goodall Institute, which has an office in Vienna, Va., and works to protect all living things.

Biology major Spencer Brodsky from Potomac will be among the more than 1,000 students and academic staff expected to hear Jane Goodall speak Saturday at the University of Maryland in College Park.

A junior, Brodsky hopes to personally ask Goodall what research scientists can do through their work to help the world solve its problems, considering recent cuts to research budgets.

First of all, dont lose hope, says Goodall, who will speak at 1:30 p.m. at the Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center on campus.

Afterwards, Goodall will be available to sign some of the many books she has written that will be available for sale.

The talk, called Making a Difference, is already fully reserved, but a standby line will begin forming at 1 p.m. to fill any empty seats that become available.

Goodalls talk will also be streamed live online with links posted on the University of Maryland website (www.umd.edu or http://www.bsos.umd.edu) just prior to the talk.

Additionally, Discovery Communications, headquartered in Silver Spring, will premiere a two-hour documentary about Goodall called Janes Journey on Animal Planet at 9 p.m. tonight.

Goodall, 78, who lives in England but travels about 300 days a year, is currently visiting universities and other venues around the United States to update people about her work with chimpanzees in Tanzania in the 1960s, 1970s and early 1980s as part of work on human evolution.

Through persistent observation, she documented their complex social relationships and use of sticks to extract termites for food, challenging previous beliefs that humans were the worlds only toolmakers.

See original here:
Gazette.Net: Goodall talk to be streamed live online Saturday from College Park

The Prize in Biology in Memory of Alfred Nobel

The days leading up to the announcements of the Nobel Prizes as well as the aftermath are gossip heaven for us scientists. We love to speculate who will win and after the announcements, we exchange wild conspiracy theories, talk about the painful snubs and pontificate on whether or not the recipients deserve the honors. Our dark side also tends to chime in and we exhibit some Schadenfreude when the more pompous leaders in a field are snubbed and some of us also salaciously look forward to another Nobel scandal. The announcement that John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka are the recipients of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was a special treat for me. Usually, when I hear about the Physiology or Medicine Nobel Prizes, the discoveries for which the recipients are honored either occurred decades ago or were in areas of biomedical research that are not directly my area of interest. This year's Nobel Prize was awarded to Gurdon and Yamanaka for their ground-breaking work, which showed that adult, mature cells can be reprogrammed to an immature, stem cell state. This discovery is the basis of much of the work in my own laboratory and as I write this, I know that stem cells are being cultured in my laboratory using the methods that Yamanaka developed only six years ago. When I read the paper by Takahashi and Yamanaka published in the journal Cell in 2006, I knew that I was witnessing a land-mark discovery by brilliant scientists, and many of us in the stem cell field have been expecting that Yamanaka would receive the Nobel Prize for his work, we just seemed to disagree about the year in which he would receive it. John Gurdon's work dates back to the 1950s and 1960s, when he showed that nuclei from adult cells of the Xenopus frog could be transplanted into an enucleated egg and give rise to healthy frogs - the first example of animal cloning. Gurdon challenged the older paradigm that once a cell becomes mature, it cannot go back. His work was a conceptual revolution and many of his colleagues were initially resistant to embracing this paradigm shift. Gurdon's seminal findings gradually convinced many other scientists to embrace his ideas and he inspired numerous other scientists to attempt cloning of other animals. The mechanisms of how the reprogramming occurred remained a mystery. How could a nucleus of an adult cell suddenly activate the transcriptional program of its embryonic past simply by being transplanted into an egg cell without a nucleus? This type of nuclear reprogramming was also rather cumbersome, especially in adult mammals. Extracting the nucleus of an adult cell and then injecting it into a single egg cell required a lot of expertise and was not ready for a widespread use in stem cell laboratories. When Yamanaka published a method nearly 50 years later in which the reprogramming to the embryonic-like state could be initiated by merely implanting four genetic regulators into an adult mouse cell, the idea of reprogramming adult cells suddenly caught on. Within a matter of months, other laboratories confirmed the findings and his paper became one of the most highly cited papers in recent history. In a period of just six years, Yamanaka's paper has been cited more than 4,000 times! Yamanaka then published a second paper in 2007, showing that adult human skin cells could be reprogrammed to the embryonic-like induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) state and this has lead to the generation of stem cell lines from numerous patients. I think most stem cell biologist will agree that both Gurdon and Yamanaka deserve the Nobel Prize for their discoveries. Some may ask why the first author Kazutoshi Takahashi on the landmark 2006 paper was not a co-recipient. Others may wonder about whether the scientists who developed techniques to culture human embryonic stem cells should also have been honored, because without their hard work, Takahashi and Yamanaka may not have been able to culture the human iPSCs. Such questions common after all Nobel Prize announcements, and are in part due to the stringent requirement that the Nobel Prize can be shared by no more than three researchers, a requirement that should perhaps be reconsidered in our age of collaborative and networked discovery. The question that bothers me, however, is why John Gurdon had to wait so long for his Nobel Prize. He had published many of the papers that convincingly documented successful reprogramming of adult Xenopus cells nearly 50 years ago. This was a pioneering discovery that challenged the paradigm of irreversible differentiation during development and had a major impact on the thinking of not just developmental biologists, but biologists from numerous disciplines. The Lasker Foundation also recognized the importance of John Gurdon's work, when it awarded the prestigious Lasker Basic Medical Research Award to both, Gurdon and Yamanaka in 2009. I think the obvious reason for Gurdon's recognition in recent years is that Yamanaka's method of reprogramming allowed for a much broader application of Gurdon's idea to mammalian and human cells, in a manner that can will likely be used for regenerative therapies, disease modeling and screening of patient specific pharmaceutical agents. If Yamanaka had not published his work on reprogramming mouse and human cells, would Gurdon have still received the Nobel Prize? This is a speculative question, but I think the answer is "No", because the awarded Nobel Prize is in "Medicine or Physiology". The title of the prize implies that the discovery has to have a link to medicine or normal physiology, but this makes it difficult to justify awarding the prize for ground-breaking discoveries in biology without a direct relevance for medicine or physiology. When the Nobel prizes were established more than a century ago, biology as an independent science was still in its infancy. The past century has brought us remarkable discoveries in biology, such as those in the areas of evolution or photosynthesis, which do not have a direct medical application. Just like the Nobel Prize in Physics honors great intellectual feats in the field of physics without documenting that these discoveries will lead to new technologies, biological discoveries should be similarly recognized without having to await imminent medical relevance. Even though Nobel did not establish a Nobel Prize in Economics, the Sveriges Riksbank responded to the recognition for the need of such a Nobel Prize by donating the required money to the Nobel Foundation to establish "The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel". It has this convoluted name, because it is technically not a "Nobel Prize" and was not part of Nobel's will, but it is still administered by the Nobel Foundation like all the other Nobel prizes and this is why in common parlance, we all refer to it as the Nobel Prize in Economics. I think that we have to realize there is a similar need for a Nobel Prize in Biology, to honor outstanding biological discoveries that stand on their own, without having to prove their medical relevance. Establishing the "The Prize in Biology in Memory of Alfred Nobel", would be one way to recognize discoveries in biology and also foster even greater interest in this field, that will likely become one of the most important sciences of the 21st century.

Follow Scientific American on Twitter @SciAm and @SciamBlogs. Visit ScientificAmerican.com for the latest in science, health and technology news. 2012 ScientificAmerican.com. All rights reserved.

See the original post here:
The Prize in Biology in Memory of Alfred Nobel

Fellowship list

Election to the Fellowship recognises a career that has significantly advanced the world's store of scientific knowledge. The Academy also elects a small fraction of its Fellows by Special Election, recognising conspicuous service to the cause of science.

Fellows elected to the Academy in 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | Y | Z

Adams, Jerry Mckee, PhD, FAA, FRS, NAS Joint Head, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, and Director, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Specialized Center of Research, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. Professor of Molecular Genetics, University of Melbourne. Speciality: The genetics of haemopoietic differentiation and malignancy. Year of election: 1986

Allen, David Grant, PhD, FAA Professor of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney. Website: http://www.physiol.usyd.edu.au/~davida Speciality: Cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology. Year of election: 2006

Alpers, Michael, AO FAA FRS Centre for International Health, Curtin University Year of election: 2012

Anderson, Brian David Outram, AO, PhD, DHC (Louvain), Hon Dr ScTech (Swiss Fed Inst Tech), Hon DEng (Syd, Melb, Newcastle), Hon DSc (UNSW), FAA, FRS, FTSE Professor, Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University. Website: http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~briandoa/contact.html Speciality: Control systems; signal processing; telecommunications. Year of election: 1974

Anderson, Jan Mary, PhD, FDhc (Ume), FAA, FRS Adjunct Professor, Division of Plant Science Research School of Biology, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University. Website: http://biology.anu.edu.au/Staff/Profiles/PS/Anderson/index.php Speciality: Thylakoid membranes; photosynthesis; acclimation; photoinactivation; molecular organisation. Year of election: 1987

Anderson, Marilyn FAA, FAICD, FTSE Professor, Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe University. Speciality: Plant defence related proteins. Year of election: 2011

Andrews, Thomas John, PhD, FAA Speciality: Biochemistry and molecular biology of photosynthetic carbon metabolism. Year of election: 1998

Continue reading here:
Fellowship list

Symposium highlights postdoctoral research

Carolyn Lim | DP

Dr. Christine Guthrie, a biochemistry professor at the University of California, San Francisco, delivered the keynote address at Penns biomedical postdoctoral research symposium, which took place on Oct. 9.

Yesterday, the Biomedical Postdoctoral Council and the Office of Biomedical Postdoctoral Programs hosted a symposium to showcase current postdoctoral research.

The symposium, featured about 50 poster exhibits, nine lectures and a keynote address given by Dr. Christine Guthrie, a professor of biochemistry at the University of California, San Francisco.

The event began at noon, ended at 5 p.m. and was followed by a short reception. About 200 people attended the event.

The symposium gave postdocs the opportunity to present their research and to strengthen Penns postdoctoral community, said postdoctoral fellow Melissa Mendez, chair of the BPC Symposium Committee. It gives people who want to present the opportunity to practice and to get communication going, she said. The people who come want to get to know their colleagues.

But the symposium was more than just a postdoctoral mixer. It was an opportunity for the fellows and researchers to practice communicating their ideas to those who do not understand the intricacies of their fields.

It all comes down to communication, said Rohinton Tarapore, BPC co-chair and a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Periodontics. Can postdocs communicate their science in laymans terms? The way we measure the success [of this event] is if you understood a majority of the posters. That means that the postdocs are doing a good job of communicating their ideas.

Postdocs are technically not faculty or staff of the university but are trainees who receive a stipend while conducting research. Their appointments are annual and can be renewed for a maximum of five years. Most postdocs do not see their position as a permanent job, but rather as a stepping-stone toward a larger goal.

Your end goal can be a faculty position, and you can become a professor, or it can be joining and doing industry research in a start-up biotech company like GSK or Pfizer, Tarapore said. You can become a consultant or you can be in policy-making. You can start your own biotech company or [you could go into] writing science articles.

Link:
Symposium highlights postdoctoral research

U of A honours biochemistry professor with University Cup

The highest honour an academic staff member can receive from the University of Alberta was recently awarded to researcher and professor Marek Michalak.

Vice-Dean of Research at the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and a professor in the Department of Biochemistry, Michalak was honoured with the University Cup for his successes in teaching, research and community service at the Celebrate! Teaching. Learning. Research ceremony Sept. 27.

Originally from Poland and a faculty member with the U of A since 1987, Michalak has mentored nearly 100 students and post-doctoral fellows in his time at the university. However, he believes working with a vibrant team is far more important that his individual contributions.

If (the team) will bring passion and motivation to their work, what difference does it make if we are the bosses? As long as (we) provide the environment, the mentorship and the supervision, then everything falls into place, he said.

If you really think about it thats what I said to the crowd (at the ceremony) Im just doing my job, so whats the big deal?

The research conducted by Michalak and his team includes the analysis and reduction of protein-folding diseases, such as Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis and cystic fibrosis.

As a leader in the field of molecular cell biochemistry, Michalaks accolades include the awarding of $24 million in research funding for his lab and the publication of more than 200 academic papers.

Michalak explained most of his research discoveries started from asking curiosity-driven questions.

In the past 20 years, weve been asking ourselves very simple, almost trivial questions that led us to huge findings, such as (issues like) complete heart blocking in children. That received quite a lot of attention, he said.

Anything is possible; you just never know what the next discovery brings. Thats the fascinating part of science.

Here is the original post:
U of A honours biochemistry professor with University Cup

NSF funds Clemson research of mobile technology for perioperative services

Public release date: 9-Oct-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Kevin Taaffe taaffe@clemson.edu 864-656-0291 Clemson University

CLEMSON, S.C. Three Clemson University professors have received $797,066 from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to investigate how the use of mobile technology can improve coordination in perioperative services.

The care provided by perioperative services is given before, during and after surgery, and takes place in three main areas pre-op, the operating room and post-anesthesia care.

The Clemson faculty are principal investigator Kevin Taaffe and co-investigators Joel Greenstein, both professors in the industrial engineering department, and Larry Fredendall, a professor of management in the College of Business and Behavioral Science.

The team will share research findings with Health Sciences South Carolina and the S.C. Hospital Association. Their work also will be used in health care-training simulations to improve coordination among staff.

The Clemson researchers are part of a statewide team that includes two faculty at the University of South Carolina. The total NSF award for the two universities is $1.4 million.

The researchers will use artificial intelligence and data analytics to improve coordination in perioperative services at three hospitals: Greenville Memorial Hospital, Palmetto Health Richland in the Columbia area and the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston.

Taaffe will coordinate research across the two universities, the three hospital systems and other state-level institutions.

The collaboration will provide expertise in operations research, data mining, computer science, simulation, human-computer interaction and quality and process management.

Read the rest here:
NSF funds Clemson research of mobile technology for perioperative services

Nobel Prize season opens with medicine award

(CNN) -

The 2012 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded Monday to Sir John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka for work that revolutionized the understanding of how cells and organisms develop.

The Nobel Assembly's announcement at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, is the first for what will be a series of prizes announced this week. The Norwegian Nobel committee will announce the most anticipated of the annual honors -- the Nobel Peace Prize -- on Friday in Oslo, Norway.

Gurdon, 79, of Dippenhall, England, and Yamanaka, 50, of Osaka, Japan, share the prize jointly for their discovery that "mature, specialised cells can be reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of developing into all tissues of the body," according to the Nobel Assembly, which consists of 50 professors at the Karolinska Institute.

Gurdon discovered in 1962 that the cells are reversible in an experiment with an egg cell of a frog. Yamanaka discovered more than 40 years later how mature cells in mice could be reprogrammed to become immature stem cells "that are able to develop into all types of cells in the body," the assembly said in a statement.

"These groundbreaking discoveries have completely changed our view of the development and cellular specialisation. We now understand that the mature cell does not have to be confined forever to its specialised state," the Nobel Assembly said.

"Textbooks have been rewritten and new research fields have been established. By reprogramming human cells, scientists have created new opportunities to study diseases and develop methods for diagnosis and therapy.

Separated by more than 40 years, the work of Gurdon and Yamanaka led to a practical medical use for stem cell research that sidesteps the main argument by anti-abortion opponents.

Now embryonic-like stem cells can be created in the laboratory from adult cells of the same organism, rather than using aborted fetuses or embryos, explained Visar Belegu, a stem cell researcher at the Hugo W. Moser Research Institute, part of the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore.

Gurdon pioneered cloning through cell reproduction in a tadpole in 1962. In 2006, Yamanaka figured out how to reprogram mature cells so that they revert to their primitive state as "induced pluripotent stem cells," or iPS cells, capable of developing into any part of the body, Belegu said.

Excerpt from:
Nobel Prize season opens with medicine award

Nobel Prize season begins

(CNN) -

The 2012 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded Monday to Sir John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka for work that revolutionized the understanding of how cells and organisms develop.

The Nobel Assembly's announcement at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, is the first for what will be a series of prizes announced this week. The Norwegian Nobel committee will announce the most anticipated of the annual honors -- the Nobel Peace Prize -- on Friday in Oslo, Norway.

Gurdon, 79, of Dippenhall, England, and Yamanaka, 50, of Osaka, Japan, share the prize jointly for their discovery that "mature, specialised cells can be reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of developing into all tissues of the body," according to the Nobel Assembly, which consists of 50 professors at the Karolinska Institute.

Gurdon discovered in 1962 that the cells are reversible in an experiment with an egg cell of a frog. Yamanaka discovered more than 40 years later how mature cells in mice could be reprogrammed to become immature stem cells "that are able to develop into all types of cells in the body," the assembly said in a statement.

"These groundbreaking discoveries have completely changed our view of the development and cellular specialisation. We now understand that the mature cell does not have to be confined forever to its specialised state," the Nobel Assembly said.

"Textbooks have been rewritten and new research fields have been established. By reprogramming human cells, scientists have created new opportunities to study diseases and develop methods for diagnosis and therapy.

Separated by more than 40 years, the work of Gurdon and Yamanaka led to a practical medical use for stem cell research that sidesteps the main argument by anti-abortion opponents.

Now embryonic-like stem cells can be created in the laboratory from adult cells of the same organism, rather than using aborted fetuses or embryos, explained Visar Belegu, a stem cell researcher at the Hugo W. Moser Research Institute, part of the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore.

Gurdon pioneered cloning through cell reproduction in a tadpole in 1962. In 2006, Yamanaka figured out how to reprogram mature cells so that they revert to their primitive state as "induced pluripotent stem cells," or iPS cells, capable of developing into any part of the body, Belegu said.

More:
Nobel Prize season begins

Capitol Alert: Nutrition group says Prop. 37 foes are mischaracterizing its position

A national group of nutritionists says its position on the safety of genetically-engineered foods has been misrepresented by opponents of Proposition 37 in the California voter guide.

"We are concerned that California's voters are being misled to believe the nation's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals is against Proposition 37, when in fact, the Academy does not have a position on the issue," said a statement from Ethan A. Bergman, president of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

The organization is mentioned in the "Arguments Against Proposition 37" section of the voter guide published by the Secretary of State, which says, "Respected scientific and medical organizations have concluded that biotech foods are safe, including... (the) Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics."

Opponents of Proposition 37 said they based the statement on a 2006 report by the organization, which was previously known as the American Dietetic Association, and didn't double check to see if it was still valid.

"ADA's official position was in strong support of GE technology and safety and, unfortunately, the version we saw was not clear that position expired in 2010, though that's obviously the case," Kathy Fairbanks, spokeswoman for the No on Proposition 37 campaign, said in a statement. "We apologize for the error."

Supporters of the measure had weeks to verify claims being made by the other side before the voter handbook was printed, but apparently didn't make an effort to do so.

"We were nave to think they would tell the truth about an endorsement they had so we didn't think to check it out," said Stacy Malkan, a spokeswoman for the Yes on Proposition 37 campaign.

Proposition 37 requires new labels on foods containing genetically-engineered ingredients, also known as genetically-modified organisms or GMOs. It is being supported by organic food producers and alternative health web site Mercola.com. Opponents include companies that make genetically-modified seeds and major snack and soda manufacturers that use such crops in their recipes. About 90 percent of corn and soy grown in the US is genetically engineered. It makes its way into many packaged foods in the form of corn syrup, corn meal, soy sauce and soy lecithin.

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics does not have a position on labeling genetically-engineered foods, and plans to release a new position paper on the safety of such food next year.

Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more here:
Capitol Alert: Nutrition group says Prop. 37 foes are mischaracterizing its position

Eating Out: Conference offers nutrition experts a full plate of new ideas

Nobodys perfect, and thats especially true when it comes to eating a healthy, well-balanced diet.

All these years and we still know that balance, variety and moderation are the keys to good nutrition, and that includes enjoying occasional splurges, said dietitian Jill Melton, editor of Relish Magazine.

Melton and more than 8,000 other nutrition experts gathered at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2012 Food & Nutrition Conference in Philadelphia to learn the latest research and sample the best new healthy food products.

Heres a taste of what they learned:

Whats on your plate?

The U.S. Department of Agricultures nutrition icon, MyPlate, which has replaced the food pyramid, is receiving rave reviews from dietitians.

Its an easy visual. People easily see that half their plate should be fruits and vegetables whether theyre eating at home or at a restaurant, said dietitian Roberta Duyff, the author of The Complete Food and Nutrition Guide.

Dr. Robert Post, deputy director of the USDAs Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, said MyPlates meal planning tool called SuperTracker will soon allow users to include their favorite foods to calculations.

If you have your own version of a turkey avocado sandwich, Post said, you can create it with SuperTracker and save it in your profile.

Write it if you bite it.

See more here:
Eating Out: Conference offers nutrition experts a full plate of new ideas

Rayney investigators seek 'third person' DNA

Update: A forensic expert in the Corryn Rayney murder investigation was asked to check whether a specific third person had left behind hair in Mrs Rayney's car or at the alleged crime scene, statements have revealed.

Statements from forensic scientist Rosalyn Treliving were among those released to the media today.

In her statements, the scientist says she had been given hairs found in Mrs Rayney's car and outside her Como home - the alleged crime scene - to see whether they matched her husband Lloyd Rayney or a third person whose name is blacked out of the statements for legal reasons.

Mr Rayney has pleaded not guilty to wilful murder and denies any involvement in the death of his wife who was last seen alive at a dance class that evening.

In her statements, Ms Treliving said that not all the hairs contained roots and of those that did no DNA was recoverable apart from partial profiles corresponded with Mrs Rayney's profile and therefore could have come from her.

She concluded the findings could not assist in determining whether Mr Rayney or the third person were involved in Mrs Rayney's death.

She also examined a handkerchief found in Mrs Rayney's grave, locating possible saliva but not blood. The handkerchief did not yield DNA.

Ms Treliving stated that tests were also conducted on DNA extracts from hair on Mrs Rayney's clothes, DNA from a tree branch at her gravesite and DNA from a hair in her body bag.

She said DNA samples from the gravesite branch and from on hair on her clothes could not be reliably said to have come from Mrs Rayney, her husband or the other suspect. but they did contain components that could not have come from the trio.

A single DNA component from hair on Mrs Rayney's clothes that corresponded with both Mrs Rayney and her husband's profiles bore little significance while a single DNA component from the body bag hair and which matched the un-named suspect was also of little significance becasue it was in one of every five people.

See the original post here:
Rayney investigators seek 'third person' DNA

Posted in DNA

DNA testing leads to charges in elderly woman's rape in 2003

HOUSTON (KTRK) -- DNA testing has led to a man being charged in the 2003 rape of an elderly woman.

According to court documents, the victim, who was 77 at the time of the alleged incident, told police she was raped on August 8, 2003 in the dining room of her apartment on N. Braeswood. The woman says a man grabbed her from behind and dragged her to her bedroom as she screamed for help. Then she says the man punched her and threw her to the floor.

Court documents state the suspect stole her coin jar and piggy bank, then tied her hands together and sexually assaulted her. The woman says he took her purse too.

The woman said she did not see the suspect's face because the room was dark and she suffers from degenerative eye disease. She got a rape kit on the same day.

Then on September 21 of this year, DPS crime lab identified a DNA profile match with Wesley Bernard Gordon.

Gordon, 40, is charged with aggravated sexual assault of elderly person. He is not in custody.

Court records show Gordon has prior convictions for theft in 1990 and burglary of a motor vehicle in 1991.

(Copyright 2012 KTRK-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)

Get more Local

Tags:

Original post:
DNA testing leads to charges in elderly woman's rape in 2003

Posted in DNA

Ancient DNA and Sumerians | Gene Expression

A few months ago someone asked me (via email) which populations I would love to get typed (genetically that is). There is one population which did not come to mind at the time: the Sumerians. Why? Because these are arguably the first historic nation. The first self-conscious ethnic group which operated by the rules which we define as the fundamentals of literate civilization. Strangely, they are an ethno-linguistic isolate. My own assumption until lately has been that this is not too surprising, in that prior to the rise of expansive civilizations (Sargon of Akkad) there was much more linguistic and ethnic diversity than we currently see around us. Or, was evident even in the early Iron Age. In other words, the ancient Fertile Crescent may have resembled the highlands of Papua, with Hurrians, Akkadians, Gutians, Elamites, Sumerians, etc., all speaking mutually unintelligible dialects which diverged very far back in the mists of antiquity.

I am no longer quite so sure about this model. That is largely due to the possibility that there was a great deal of demographic change between the Mesolithic and the Bronze Age, with successive waves of layering and replacement. My rough model is that a few groups of farmers may have expanded to swallow up thousands of hunter-gatherer groups. These homogeneous farmer societies eventually would diversify, because they were not united by the institutional forces which cemented later imperial regimes, in particular, literate elites which had a sense of consciousness which extended deep into the past because of written records.Therefore, the diversification would presumably have been similar to what we see with Romance languages, or Indo-Aryan, branching out from an common root language which replaced many competitors rapidly. Without writing and large scale polities the divergence would be more rapid, and there would be many more tips on the phylogenetic tree.

The Sumerians, and their neighbors the Elamites, as well as groups like the Hatti and Hurrians & Urartian, pose problems for this thesis. None of these groups seem to be Indo-European or Semitic, the two dominant language families of Near East by ~1,000 B.C. You have in the ancient Near East then a situation where the light of history reveals before us not the diversification of Indo-European and Semitic speaking farmers, but rather a host of unique and disparate peoples, all simultaneously lurching toward literate civilization, one after another.

Something just does not add up in my models. Genetics will not solve the puzzle, but it may help in elucidating relationships. The origins of the Sumerians are murky, but many scholars have suggested that they may have arrived from the south (the oldest city, Eridu, is in the south). Others have suggested that the Sumerians descended from the mountains of the northeast. Though I presume that the people Arabia have changed a great deal since antiquity, it would be interesting if it was found that the Sumerians resembled the Qatari (at least the Eurasian component) more than they did the modern Assyrians.

See original here:
Ancient DNA and Sumerians | Gene Expression

Posted in DNA