What is gain of function research in genetics? – Cosmos Magazine

Its the rumour that wont go away that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally leaked from a high biosecurity lab in Wuhan, China. The allegation is that the laboratory was conducting gain of function (GOF) research, and that this produced a potent version of coronavirus that led to the pandemic.

This has led to some scepticism and distrust of the field of research and whether it is necessary to conduct experiments using GOF techniques.

Essentially, GOF research is used to learn how viruses gain new functions through mutation and evolution.

A function is simply a property of an organism, such as plants that are more tolerant to drought or disease, or enzymes that evolved to make our bodies work.

The language about GOF has become loaded with negative connotations that associate this work with dangerous or risky research. But like rhetoric about genetic modification, these connections dont represent the diversity of the field or the security precautions that regulate the research. At its core, though, the research does exactly what the name suggests.

GOF research observes these mutations and sees how certain stimuli might affect evolutionary changes and properties of a virus or organism.

However, in our current climate its often spoken about in a much narrower context, as though its specifically about how a virus changes to move more easily between humans, or how viruses become more lethal. This just doesnt represent the full picture of GOF research.

Viruses evolve rapidly thats why there are so many new SARS-CoV-2 variants. GOF seeks to understand why and how these changes occur, and what environmental factors might influence the process.

In a sense, this is a know-your-enemy approach.

Beyond the benefit to fundamental biology research about the nature of viruses and evolution, GOF contributes to three clear areas: pandemic preparedness, vaccine development, and identification of new or potential pathogens.

GOF research can help us understand the rate at which mutations occur, and how many generations may be needed for a virus to change in a way that will require extra precautions in the community, which is information that is fed into epidemiological modelling.

This GOF information helps predict things such as how likely a virus is to become a nasty variant in a certain population size or density, during a certain season, or within a particular period or time. This informs how we react to a pandemic. Beyond this, it also informs how quickly a virus might mutate to overcome vaccines, and provides genetic information that may be useful in vaccine development. Specifically, GOF research can accumulate potential vaccine candidates in a database that can be accessed if an outbreak occurs because of natural evolution.

In turn, this means vaccine development can be sped up exponentially because candidates are already available.

For instance, a report from a 2015 GOF risk-assessment workshop for expert organisations revealed the genomics information from GOF research. This showed that bat-borne, SARS-like coronaviruses had many strains and mutations that had pandemic potential against which countermeasures need to be developed.

This information led to current pandemic responses and vaccine development the pandemic was already predicted because of a thorough understanding of the evolution of coronaviruses.

In another example, GOF experiments about influenza showed that the virus had the potential to be transmitted between different mammals with only a few changes to the genetic code, and has contributed to seasonal flu vaccines.

GOF research is based on observed evolution and changes to DNA or RNA.

The genome is the sum of all the genetic information in an organism. Some of this DNA or RNA is made up of genes, which often hold information on how to make a protein. These proteins perform functions in our body to make everything work.

These genes can naturally change a bit every generation. This happens because, to reproduce, the DNA of the parent must be replicated. The mechanisms that do this arent perfect, so little mistakes can be made when the DNA is copied.

Most of the time, the changes are tiny just a single unit of DNA (called a nucleotide) could be changed, and it may have no effect on the proteins made. At other times, the tiny change of a single nucleotide can make a gene gain a whole new function, which could be beneficial to an organism.

Natural mutations that occur during reproduction are one example of evolution in action.

These changes happen every generation, so organisms that can breed quickly, such as flies, can also evolve quickly as a species.

This process happens in essentially the same way with viruses, except that viruses have RNA instead of DNA and reproduce asexually. They still make proteins, and they still accumulate mutations, but the major difference is that they can reproduce very, very fast they can start reproducing within hours of being born and evolve at an exceptionally rapid rate.

This is why we have identified so many new variants of SARS-CoV-2 since the beginning of 2020. Every time the virus enters a new host, it reproduces rapidly, and mutations occur. Over time these mutations change the properties of the virus itself.

For example, new mutations may end up making the virus more virulent or cause worse symptoms because the proteins have changed their properties.

In these cases, we would say that the mutant strain has gained a function, and this is what GOF research aims to understand.

The viruses in a lab dont have a human host in which to grow, so researchers grow them in Petri dishes or animals instead.

There are two ways of using GOF in a lab: you can observe the virus mutate on its own (without intervention), or you can control small changes through genetic modification.

The first type of use involves putting the virus in different situations to see how it will evolve without intervention or aid.

This video is an example of GOF research with bacteria (not a virus, but the method is similar). The researchers put bacteria onto a giant petri dish with different concentrations of antibiotics. They leave the bacteria and watch how it naturally evolves to overcome the antibiotic.

The new strains of bacteria were able to be genetically sequenced to see what genetic changes had caused them to become antibiotic-resistant. This experiment can show how quickly the bacteria evolve, which can inform when or how often antibiotics are given, and whether there is a high-enough concentration of antibiotic that can halt the speed at which the antibiotic is overcome by resistance.

Similar experiments can be conducted with viruses to see how they might change to overcome human antibodies and other immune system protections.

Read more: What happens in a virology lab?

The second type of use is through small changes using genetic modification. This type of experiment occurs after a lot of other genetic information has already been gathered to identify which nucleotides in virus RNA might particularly contribute to a new function.

After these have been identified, a single or small nucleotide change will be made to the virus to confirm the predictions gained from genomic research. The modified virus will then be placed on a petri dish or inserted into an animal, such as a rabbit or a mouse, to see how the change affects the properties of the virus.

This type of research is done in specialised laboratories that are tightly controlled and heavily regulated under biosecurity laws that involve containment and decontamination processes.

Read more: How are dangerous viruses contained in Australia?

While the benefits of virus GOF research centre around pandemic preparedness, concerns have been raised about whether the research is ethical or safe.

In 2005, researchers used this technique for viruses when they reconstructed influenza (H1N1) from samples taken in 1918. The aim was to le
arn more about the properties of influenza and future pandemics, as influenza still circulates, but the controversial study sparked heavy debate about whether it should be acceptable.

The two major concerns are about whether this poses any threat to public health if a virus escapes the lab, or whether the techniques could be used for nefarious purposes.

In the past year, 16 years after the H1N1 study, there has been debate about whether SARS-CoV-2 had spontaneous zoonotic origins, or whether it was created in a lab in GOF experiments, and then escaped.

So now, 16 years after the first controversial H1N1 study, this speculation has pushed GOF research back into the public eye and led to many criticisms of the research field, and regulation of laboratories that use this technique.

In 2017, the US government lifted bans on GOF pathogen research after the National Institute of Health concluded that the risks of research into influenza and MERS were outweighed by the benefits, and that few posed significant threats to public health.

Following concerns about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, however, the rules surrounding GOF research, risk assessments and disclosure of experiments are now under review again, in order to clarify policy.

Read more: The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and dont know

Beyond this, the speculation has sparked further inquiries into the origin of SARS-CoV-2, although the World Health Organization concluded that viral escape from a laboratory was very unlikely.

Regardless, its never a bad thing to review biosafety, biosecurity and transparency policy as new evidence becomes available, and they have been frequently reviewed throughout history.

As for the concern that a government or private entity might abuse scientific techniques for malevolent purposes, scientists can, and do, support bans on research they deem ethically irresponsible, such as the controversial CRISPR babies.

Ultimately, the parameters around how scientific techniques like GOF are used and by whom is not a scientific question, but one that must be answered by ethicists.

Visit link:
What is gain of function research in genetics? - Cosmos Magazine

Could editing the genomes of bats prevent future pandemics? – STAT – STAT

Amid the devastating Covid-19 pandemic, two researchers are proposing a drastic way to stop future pandemics: using a technology called a gene drive to rewrite the DNA of bats to prevent them from becoming infected with coronaviruses.

The scientists aim to block spillover events, in which viruses jump from infected bats to humans one suspected source of the coronavirus that causes Covid. Spillover events are thought to have sparked other coronavirus outbreaks as well, including SARS-1 in the early 2000s and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).

This appears to be the first time that scientists have proposed using the still-nascent gene drive technology to stop outbreaks by rendering bats immune to coronaviruses, though other teams are investigating its use to stop mosquitoes and mice from spreading malaria and Lyme disease.

advertisement

The scientists behind the proposal realize they face enormous technical, societal, and political obstacles, but want to spark a fresh conversation about additional ways to control diseases that are emerging with growing frequency.

With a very high probability, we are going to see this over and over again, argues entrepreneur and computational geneticist Yaniv Erlich of the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel, who is one of two authors of the proposal, titled Preventing COVID-59.

advertisement

Maybe our kids will not benefit, maybe our grandchildren will benefit, but if this approach works, we could deploy the same strategy against many types of viruses, Erlich told STAT.

As the Covid-19 pandemic has killed more than 3.9 million people and triggered $16 trillion in economic losses, scientists, public health officials, ecologists, and many others have called for deeper investments in longstanding pandemic prevention measures.

Such measures include boosting global health funding, reducing poverty and health inequity, strengthening disease surveillance networks and community education, preventing deforestation, controlling the wildlife trade, and beefing up investments in infectious disease diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines.

Erlich and his co-author, immunologist Daniel Douek at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, now propose an additional measure: creating a gene drive to render wild horseshoe bats immune to the types of coronavirus infections that are thought to have triggered the SARS, MERS, and Covid-19 pandemics. They shared the proposal Wednesday on the Github publishing and code-sharing platform.

Though there is heated debate about whether the Covid-19 virus originated in a lab, most scientists say the virus is most likely to have originated in wild animals. There is strong evidence, for instance, that horseshoe bats carry the coronavirus that caused the SARS outbreak.

A gene drive is a technique for turbocharging evolution and spreading new traits throughout a species faster than they would spread through natural selection. It involves using a gene editing technology such as CRISPR to modify an organisms genome so that it passes a new trait to its offspring and throughout the species.

The idea of making a gene drive in bats faces such enormous scientific, technical, social, and economic obstacles that scientists interviewed by STAT called it folly, far-fetched, and concerning. Among other objections, they worried about unintended consequences with so radically tampering with nature.

We have other ways of preventing future Covid-19 outbreaks, argued Natalie Kofler, a trained molecular biologist and bioethicist and founder of Editing Nature, a group focused on inclusive decision-making about genetic technologies.

We need to be thinking about changing the unhealthy relationship of humans and nature, not to gene drive a wild animal so that we can continue our irresponsible and unsustainable behavior that is going to come back to bite us in the ass in the future.

Coming from anyone else, the idea might be laughed off.

But Erlich has a reputation as a visionary. In 2014, for instance, he and another scientist predicted that genetic genealogy databases might one day be used to reveal peoples identities. Four years later, that happened, when law enforcement officials used the method to identify a former California police officer as the notorious Golden State Killer. Erlich has since become chief scientific officer of the genetic genealogy company MyHeritage and he is also founder of a biotech startup, Eleven Therapeutics.

Now, Erlich says, its worth thinking about how a gene drive could work in bats.

Erlich proposes to modify bat genomes so that they would block coronavirus infections. He would create a genetic element, called a shRNA, that targets and destroys coronaviruses. He would then use CRISPR to insert this element into the bat genome. The insertion would also contain a component that pushes bats to preferentially pass the shRNA to their offspring, so that entire bat populations would soon resist coronavirus infection.

Its almost like creating a self-propagating vaccine in these bats, Erlich said.

The idea is intriguing, said geneticist and molecular engineer George Church of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University.

Most of the proposals Ive heard involving gene drives have seemed quite attractive, and this is probably the most attractive, he said.

Creating a gene drive in bats would be enormously difficult, and perhaps impossible, other scientists say. Researchers have created gene drives in mosquitoes and mice in the lab, but none has been released in the wild. The most advanced gene drive projects intended for field use involve modifying mosquitoes to prevent the spread of malaria and attempting to engineer mice to stop them from causing ecological damage.

But its been difficult to engineer effective gene drives in mammals. Developmental geneticist Kim Cooper and her team at the University of California, San Diego, engineered a gene drive that spread a genetic variant through 72% of mouse offspring in her lab. That isnt efficient enough to quickly spread the desired trait in the wild.

Whats more, creating a gene drive in bats would be much harder than it is in mice, because bat researchers lack the genetic tools available in mice, said Paul Thomas, a developmental geneticist at the University of Adelaide in Australia, who is trying to engineer mouse gene drives.

And unlike mice, which can breed at 6 to 8 weeks of age, bats take two years to reach sexual maturity, so it would take much longer for a trait to spread throughout wild bat populations than in lab mouse populations.

They say the proposal is not an easy feat from a technical standpoint, and I think that underplays how hard it might be, Cooper said.

Biologists also say that Erlichs proposal is unlikely to work in the wild even if researchers get bat gene drives to work in a lab because bats are incredibly diverse.

There are 1,432 bat species, including multiple horseshoe bat species that carry coronaviruses and pass them among each other.

Wild viruses similar to the human Covid-19 virus have been found in bats across Asia, and in pangolins. And in June, Weifeng Shi of the Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences in Taian, China, found 24 coronavirus genomes in bat samples taken from in and around a botanical garden in Yunnan province, in southern China.

Engineering one gene drive in just one bat species would not solve the problem, biologists say.

Youd have to develop systems for entire bat communities, said evolutionary biologist Liliana Dvalos of Stony Brook University. Its the job of visionaries to come up with creative ideas, but this is a giant blind spot in their thinking.

Biologists are also concerned about focusing on bats themselves, because they may not be the most important source of human epidemics. No one has found the exact bat analog to the human Covid-19 virus, or definitively pro
ven that spillover from bats did start the pandemic. Coronaviruses have also been found in other species, including palm civets, pangolins, and camels.

Further, nobody knows how eliminating coronaviruses might affect bats.

We dont know the implications of wiping out coronaviruses in bat populations, because we dont know how bats have evolved to coexist with these viruses, said virologist Arinjay Banerjee of the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada.

Some scientists, though, welcomed Erlichs proposal, hoping that it will focus attention on what it would take to create successful mammalian gene drive systems.

Royden Saah, for instance, coordinates the Genetic Biocontrol of Invasive Rodents (GBIRd) program, which is trying to engineer gene drives in mice to prevent island bird extinctions. He wants to see more funding to help scientists solve the technical obstacles to such projects, and involve more communities in discussions about these ideas.

I would be concerned if this proposal detracted from the need to fund public health infrastructure, said Saah. But with that caveat, he added, I think this proposal could make people think, OK, if we were to use this technology in this animal in this system, what would we need to do? There would need to be a foundation of ethical development, of clear understanding, of social systems and trust, and technology built in a stepwise manner.

Virologist Jason Kindrachuk of the University of Manitoba said that there are numerous technical and political challenges to a bat gene drive project, and that preventing future outbreaks should mainly involve tackling the challenges that drive spillover events, such as underfunded public health systems, poverty, food insecurity and climate-change-driven ecological disruption. But, he said, given the enormous economic and human toll of Covid-19 and other recent outbreaks, scientists and public health officials might also need to consider new approaches.

In the past, maybe we were blinded a little bit by our belief that we would just be able to increase surveillance and identify these pathogens prior to them spilling over, Kindrachuk said. We now realize that this is going to take a lot of different efforts, so theres an aspect from a research standpoint where we continue to look at things like this, and say, what are the top 5 to 10 things we should invest in.

Erlich acknowledges the obstacles to his proposal, but thinks they arent insurmountable. He thinks the project would require an international investment involving a multidisciplinary consortium.

While we totally agree about the technical complexities, technology advances at exponential rates, Erlich said. Things that are nearly impossible now can be totally reachable within a decade or so.

He also thinks a gene drive could be a better alternative than culling bats, which has been tried (unsuccessfully) in communities around the world, and that scientists could monitor for negative impacts on bat populations.

Lets discuss the idea and think about what we can do to identify a very rigorous and cautious way to test this approach, Erlich said. We dont like to mess with nature, but the current situation is not sustainable.

Excerpt from:
Could editing the genomes of bats prevent future pandemics? - STAT - STAT

Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan – MIT Technology Review

For Baric, that research started in the late 1990s. Coronaviruses were then considered low risk, but Barics studies on the genetics that allowed viruses to enter human cells convinced him that some might be just a few mutations away from jumping the species barrier.

That hunch was confirmed in 200203, when SARS broke out in southern China, infecting 8,000 people. As bad as that was, Baric says, we dodged a bullet with SARS. The disease didnt spread from one person to another until about a day after severe symptoms began to appear, making it easier to corral through quarantines and contact tracing. Only 774 people died in that outbreak, but if it had been transmitted as easily as SARS-CoV-2, we would have had a pandemic with a 10% mortality rate, Baric says. Thats how close humanity came.

As tempting as it was to write off SARS as a one-time event, in 2012 MERS emerged and began infecting people in the Middle East. For me personally, that was a wake-up call that the animal reservoirs must have many, many more strains that are poised for cross-species movement, says Baric.

By then, examples of such dangers were already being discovered by Shis team, which had spent years sampling bats in southern China to locate the origin of SARS. The project was part of a global viral surveillance effort spearheaded by the US nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance. The nonprofitwhich has an annual income of over $16 million, more than 90% from government grantshas its office in New York but partners with local research groups in other countries to do field and lab work. The WIV was its crown jewel, and Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, has been a coauthor with Shi on most of her key papers.

By taking thousands of samples from guano, fecal swabs, and bat tissue, and searching those samples for genetic sequences similar to SARS, Shis team began to discover many closely related viruses. In a cave in Yunnan Province in 2011 or 2012, they discovered the two closest, which they named WIV1 and SHC014.

Shi managed to culture WIV1 in her lab from a fecal sample and show that it could directly infect human cells, proving that SARS-like viruses ready to leap straight from bats to humans already lurked in the natural world. This showed, Daszak and Shi argued, that bat coronaviruses were a substantial global threat. Scientists, they said, needed to find them, and study them, before they found us.

Many of the other viruses couldnt be grown, but Barics system provided a way to rapidly test their spikes by engineering them into similar viruses. When the chimera he made using SHC014 proved able to infect human cells in a dish, Daszak told the press that these revelations should move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger.

To others, it was the perfect example of the unnecessary dangers of gain-of-function science. The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk, the Rutgers microbiologist Richard Ebright, a longtime critic of such research, told Nature.

To Baric, the situation was more nuanced. Although his creation might be more dangerous than the original mouse-adapted virus hed used as a backbone, it was still wimpy compared with SARScertainly not the supervirus Senator Paul would later suggest.

In the end, the NIH clampdown never had teeth. It included a clause granting exceptions if head of funding agency determines research is urgently necessary to protect public health or national security. Not only were Barics studies allowed to move forward, but so were all studies that applied for exemptions. The funding restrictions were lifted in 2017 and replaced with a more lenient system.

If the NIH was looking for a scientist to make regulators comfortable with gain-of-function research, Baric was the obvious choice. For years hed insisted on extra safety steps, and he took pains to point these out in his 2015 paper, as if modeling the way forward.

The CDC recognizes four levels of biosafety and recommends which pathogens should be studied at which level. Biosafety level 1 is for nonhazardous organisms and requires virtually no precautions: wear a lab coat and gloves as needed. BSL-2 is for moderately hazardous pathogens that are already endemic in the area, and relatively mild interventions are indicated: close the door, wear eye protection, dispose of waste materials in an autoclave. BSL-3 is where things get serious. Its for pathogens that can cause serious disease through respiratory transmission, such as influenza and SARS, and the associated protocols include multiple barriers to escape. Labs are walled off by two sets of self-closing, locking doors; air is filtered; personnel use full PPE and N95 masks and are under medical surveillance. BSL-4 is for the baddest of the baddies, such as Ebola and Marburg: full moon suits and dedicated air systems are added to the arsenal.

There are no enforceable standards of what you should and shouldnt do. Its up to the individual countries, institutions, and scientists.

In Barics lab, the chimeras were studied at BSL-3, enhanced with additional steps like Tyvek suits, double gloves, and powered-air respirators for all workers. Local first-responder teams participated in regular drills to increase their familiarity with the lab. All workers were monitored for infections, and local hospitals had procedures in place to handle incoming scientists. It was probably one of the safest BSL-3 facilities in the world. That still wasnt enough to prevent a handful of errors over the years: some scientists were even bitten by virus-carrying mice. But no infections resulted.

In 2014, the NIH awarded a five-year, $3.75 million grant to EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk that more bat-borne coronaviruses would emerge in China, using the same kind of techniques Baric had pioneered. Some of that work was to be subcontracted to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Read the original:
Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan - MIT Technology Review

Science, industry team up in Italy to zap COVID with laser – New York Post

ROME, July 2 A United Nations-backed scientific research centre hasteamedupwith an Italian tech firm to explore whetherlaserlight can be used to kill coronavirusparticles suspended in the air and help keep indoor spaces safe.

The joint effort between the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) of Trieste, a city in the north ofItaly, and the nearby Eltech K-Lasercompany, was launched last year as COVID-19 was battering the country.

They created a device that forces air through a sterilization chamber which contains alaserbeam filter that pulverizesviruses and bacteria.

I thoughtlasers were more for a shaman rather than a doctor but I have had to change my mind. The device proved able to kill theviruses in less than 50 milliseconds, said Serena Zacchigna, groupleader for Cardiovascular Biology at the ICGEB.

Healthy indoor environments with a substantially reduced pathogen count are deemed essential for public health in the post COVID-19 crisis, a respiratory infection which has caused more than four million deaths worldwide in barely 18 months.

Zacchigna hookedupwith Italian engineer Francesco Zanata, the founder of Eltech K-Laser, a firm specialised in medicallasers whose products are used by sports stars to treat muscle inflammation and fractures.

Some experts have warned against the possible pitfalls of using light-based technologies to attack thevirusthat causes COVID-19.

A study published by the Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology in November 2020 highlighted concerns ranging from potential cancer risks to the cost of expensive light sources.

But Zacchigna and Zanata dismissed any health issues, saying thelasernever comes into contact with human skin.

Our device uses nature against nature. It is 100% safe for people and almost fully recyclable, Zanata told Reuters.

The technology, however, does not eliminateviruses and bacteria when they drop from the air onto surfaces or the floor. Nor can it prevent direct contagion when someone who is infected sneezes or talks loudly in the proximity of someone else.

Eltech K-Laserhas received a patent from Italian authorities and is seeking to extend this globally.

The portable version of the invention is some 1.8 metres (5.9 ft) high and weighs about 55 lb. The company said the technology can also be placed within air-conditioning units.

In the meantime, the first potential customers are liningup, including Germanys EcoCare, a service provider of testing and vaccination solutions.

The company aims to license the technology for German and UAE markets, an EcoCare spokesperson said in an email to Reuters.

See the rest here:
Science, industry team up in Italy to zap COVID with laser - New York Post

Khalifa University researchers complete reference genome study for the UAE – WAM EN

ABU DHABI, 5th July, 2021 (WAM) -- A team of scientists from Khalifa University of Science and Technology has completed a significant local genome study that will contribute to nationwide efforts to build a high-quality, comprehensive reference genome for the UAE population.

The first phase of the study - the description of the first whole genome sequences of UAE nationals - was completed in 2019. Subsequently, in 2020, the researchers completed the second phase which described the nature of the genetic diversity found among UAE nationals. This year, the researchers completed the third phase of the UAE reference genome, which supports a broader understanding of the genome composition of the nation.

Following advancements in DNA sequencing and analysis techniques since renowned scientist Craig Venter and his colleagues published the first whole human genome sequence at the turn of this century, the genome study has become part of a major area of research at Khalifa University.

The Khalifa University scientists recently published a report titled A population-specific Major Allele Reference Genome from the United Arab Emirates population in the international journal, Frontiers in Genetics. The study was authored by Dr. Habiba Alsafar, Associate Professor, Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Dr. Andreas Henschel, Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, with Dr. Gihan Daw Elbait and Dr. Guan Tay, from the Center for Biotechnology.

Dr. Arif Sultan Al Hammadi, Executive Vice-President, Khalifa University, said: "Our researchers have published the first whole genome of a UAE national and have followed it up with this reference genome. This will advance our understanding of the genomes of the UAE population, improving the ability of researchers and clinicians to identify genetic causes of diseases that are common in the UAE and the region. This is a stellar achievement in the field of medicine and healthcare, as this will become a fundamental tool that will advance genome and public health research in the UAE, and contribute to nationwide efforts, being led by the recently formed UAE Genomics Council to incorporate genomics into the healthcare ecosystem of the UAE."

The ethnic composition of the population of a nation contributes to its genetic uniqueness. Consequently, it is important to define national reference genomes of its people to avoid any confounding effects which are linked to the use of reference genomes from other national genome sequencing efforts. A total of 1,028 UAE nationals were recruited for this study, as part of the 1,000 UAE genome project that was conceived by the research team when the Center of Biotechnology was founded in 2015. Of these, 129 samples were selected as individuals that are most representative of the genetic diversity of the UAE for construction of the UAERG.

"Despite achieving this major milestone in a relatively short period of time, our work to improve our understanding of how genes contribute to health continues," said Dr. Alsafar and added, "Our next challenge is to decode the genome data to identify genetic markers that better predict the likelihood of disease."

Precision medicine has the potential to profoundly improve the practice of medicine. The goal is to enable clinicians to quickly, efficiently and accurately predict the most appropriate course of action for a patient; a pre-emptive strike to prevent or delay the onset of disease. However, the practice of precision medicine and personalized healthcare is a complex science as it is influenced by a range of factors such as the environment and the inherent characteristics within an individual. Genetics is an important contributor to this complexity and genome science will play a key role in the rollout of future national health programs.

Since the establishment of the Center for Biotechnology, its primary mission sought to address a gap in knowledge relating to the specific genomic features of the UAE population. In 2018, the BTC team outlined a vision for a National Arab Genome project for the UAE in the Journal of Human Genetics. The aim was to address the deficiency in genome data on the UAE population to improve our understanding of genome variants that are unique to the population of the nation. The team led by eminent geneticist Dr. Alsafar, proceeded with the bold ambition to sequence Emirati nationals to provide a reference upon which clinical decisions can be made.

In 2019, Dr. Alsafar led the team that described the first Whole Genomes Sequences (WGS) of two UAE nationals in Nature Publishing Groups Scientific Report. "It was important to achieve this milestone, as the whole genome sequences provided a starting point for construction of a UAE reference panel which will lead to improvements in the delivery of precision medicine, which we hope will eventually lead to improvements in the quality of life of UAE nationals" said Dr Alsafar.

Despite reporting on the first genome of a UAE national, the Khalifa University team continued to sequence samples provided by UAE nationals for research. In mid-2020, the team followed up the report of the first UAE Whole Genome Sequence with two papers in Frontiers in Genetics. These studies showed that the contemporary population of the UAE arose from gradual admixture through complex and long term interactions between local communities of the area that is now the UAE and the people of neighbouring regions.

Continue reading here:
Khalifa University researchers complete reference genome study for the UAE - WAM EN

Synthetic auxotrophy remains stable after continuous evolution and in coculture with mammalian cells – Science Advances

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary stability and possible context dependence of biological containment techniques is critical as engineered microbes are increasingly under consideration for applications beyond biomanufacturing. While synthetic auxotrophy previously prevented Escherichia coli from exhibiting detectable escape from batch cultures, its long-term effectiveness is unknown. Here, we report automated continuous evolution of a synthetic auxotroph while supplying a decreasing concentration of essential biphenylalanine (BipA). After 100 days of evolution, triplicate populations exhibit no observable escape and exhibit normal growth rates at 10-fold lower BipA concentration than the ancestral synthetic auxotroph. Allelic reconstruction reveals the contribution of three genes to increased fitness at low BipA concentrations. Based on its evolutionary stability, we introduce the progenitor strain directly to mammalian cell culture and observe containment of bacteria without detrimental effects on HEK293T cells. Overall, our findings reveal that synthetic auxotrophy is effective on time scales and in contexts that enable diverse applications.

New safeguards are needed for the deliberate release of engineered microbes into the environment, which has promise for applications in agriculture, environmental remediation, and medicine (1). Genetically encoded biocontainment strategies enable attenuation of engineered live bacteria for diverse biomedical applications (24), including as potential vaccines (510), diagnostics (11), and therapeutics (1215). Auxotrophy, which is the inability of an organism to synthesize a compound needed for its growth, is an existing strategy for containment. However, foundational studies of auxotrophic pathogens demonstrated proliferation in relevant biological fluids (16) and reversion to prototrophy upon serial passaging (17, 18). Modern genome engineering strategies can prevent auxotrophic reversion, and auxotrophy has been a key component of microbial therapies that have reached advanced clinical trials. However, the ability for auxotrophs to access required metabolites within many host microenvironments, and after leaving the host, remains unaddressed. Auxotrophy may not be effective in scenarios where engineered living bacteria encounter metabolites from dead host cells (19) or invade host cells (20). Growth of double auxotrophs is supported in vivo by neoplastic tissue (13). Auxotrophy may also be insufficient for tight control of cell proliferation in environments rich with microbial sources of cross-feeding (21), such as gut, oral, skin, and vaginal microbiomes. Given that most naturally occurring microorganisms are auxotrophs (22), it is also unlikely that auxotrophy will limit the spread of an engineered microbe once it leaves the body and enters the environment.

Synthetic auxotrophy may overcome these hurdles by requiring provision of a synthetic molecule for survival of the engineered bacteria. This strategy was first implemented successfully in Escherichia coli by engineering essential proteins to depend on incorporation of a nonstandard amino acid (nsAA) (23, 24). We previously engineered E. coli strains for dependence on the nsAA biphenylalanine (BipA) by computer-aided redesign of essential enzymes in conjunction with expression of orthogonal translation machinery for BipA incorporation (23). Among several synthetic auxotrophs originally constructed, one strain harbored three redesigned, nsAA-dependent genesadenylate kinase (adk.d6), tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (tyrS.d8), and BipA-dependent aminoacyl-tRNA synthetasefor aminoacylation of BipA (BipARS.d6). This BipA-dependent strain, dubbed DEP, exhibited undetectable escape throughout 14 days of monitoring at an assay detection limit of 2.2 1012 escapees per colony-forming unit (CFU) (23). Although this strain demonstrates effective biocontainment in 1-liter batch experiments, its precise escape frequency and long-term stability remained unexplored.

Here, we perform the first study of evolutionary stability of a synthetic auxotroph with the aid of automated continuous evolution. Continuous evolution better emulates scenarios where biocontainment may be needed by fostering greater genetic variability within a population. We posited that decreasing BipA concentrations would add selective pressure for adaptation or for escape, either of which would be enlightening. Adaptive laboratory evolution of DEP may improve its fitness in relevant growth contexts, as previously demonstrated for its nonauxotrophic but recoded ancestor, C321.A (25). We report that DEP maintains its inability to grow in the absence of synthetic nutrient, even after three parallel 100-day chemostat trials. In addition, we find evidence of adaptation, with evolved DEP isolates requiring 10-fold lower BipA concentration to achieve optimal growth than ancestral DEP (0.5 M rather than 5 M). We resequence evolved populations and perform allelic reconstruction in ancestral DEP using multiplex automatable genome engineering (MAGE), identifying alleles that partially restore the adaptive phenotype. Last, we advance this technology toward host-microbe coculture applications, demonstrating direct mixed culture of DEP and mammalian cells without the need for physical barriers or complex fluidics.

To perform continuous evolution of E. coli, we constructed custom chemostats for parallelized and automated culturing (Fig. 1A). Our design and construction were based on the eVOLVER system (26), an open-source, do-it-yourself automated culturing platform (figs. S1 to S4). By decreasing BipA concentration over time in our chemostats, we provide an initial mild selection for escape and steadily increase its stringency. This design is analogous to a morbidostat, where a lethal drug is introduced dynamically at sublethal concentrations to study microbial drug resistance (27), but with synthetic auxotrophy providing selective pressure. Our working algorithm for automated adjustment of BipA concentration as a function of turbidity is shown in Fig. 1B, and a representative image of our hardware is shown in Fig. 1C (see also fig. S5).

(A) Illustration of a smart sleeve connected to separate nonpermissive media and biphenylalanine (BipA; structure shown in blue) feed lines for automated adjustment of BipA concentration based on growth rate. Pumps and optics are integrated with Arduino controller hardware and Python software based on the eVOLVER do-it-yourself automated culturing framework. (B) Working algorithm for maintenance of cultures in continuous evolution mode. Criteria for lowering the BipA concentration are based on the difference in time elapsing between OD peaks (tpeak OD). Smaller time elapsed between OD peaks is indicative of higher growth rates, triggering decrease in BipA concentration when below a threshold value. (C) Representative configuration of hardware for parallelized evolution in triplicate, with three empty sleeves shown. Photo credit: Michael Napolitano, Harvard Medical School.

Our long-term culturing experiments featured two phases. The first phase included one chemostat (N = 1) that was inoculated with DEP for an 11-day incubation, with an initial concentration of BipA of 100 M and automated adjustment based on growth rate (Fig. 2A). Because we observed no colony formation when the outgrowth from this population was plated on nonpermissive media, we then began a second phase in replicate. We used our population grown for 11 days to inoculate three chemostats in parallel (N = 3) where BipA supply decreased automatically over the following 90 days from 100 M to nearly 100 nM. One controller provided identical BipA concentrations to all three vials at any given time. To determine whether the decrease in BipA supply was due to escape from dependence on BipA, we periodically performed escape assays. We continued to observe no escape, including when we seeded liter-scale cultures and plated the associated outgrowth on nonpermissive media. Evolved isolates were obtained after this procedure (fig. S6), and th
eir growth was characterized across BipA concentrations (Fig. 2B and fig. S7). At 0.5 to 1 M BipA, we observed growth of all evolved isolates and no growth of the ancestral DEP strain.

(A) Timeline for continuous evolution, with detection limits for escape frequency assays shown in parentheses. (B) Doubling times of progenitor and evolved synthetic auxotrophs as a function of BipA concentration, normalized to the doubling time of DEP at 100 M BipA. Error bars represent the SD across technical triplicates within the same experiment.

To identify the causal alleles contributing to decreased BipA requirement of all three evolved isolates, we performed whole-genome sequencing and mutational analysis. We expected that mutations in auxotrophic markers or orthogonal translation machinery associated with aminoacylation of BipA would be observed. However, no variants were detected in the plasmid-expressed orthogonal translation machinery (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA) reference sequence. Instead, in all three evolved isolates, variants were observed in three nonessential genes, all of which are implicated in molecular transport: acrB, emrD, and trkH (Fig. 3A). AcrB and EmrD are biochemically and structurally well-characterized multidrug efflux proteins (28), and TrkH is a potassium ion transporter (29). These exact mutations have no precedent in the literature to our knowledge. Because they are missense mutations or in-frame deletions, it is unclear whether they cause loss of function or altered function (table S1). Because permissive media contain four artificial targets of efflux (BipA, l-arabinose, chloramphenicol, and SDS), mutations that confer a selective advantage during continuous evolution could disable BipA/l-arabinose efflux, improve chloramphenicol/SDS efflux, or affect transport of these or other species more indirectly. Given the strong selective pressure enforced by decreasing BipA concentration, we hypothesize that mutations observed are more likely to affect BipA transport. We also observed mutations in all evolved populations to the 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene rrlA (table S2). 23S rRNA mutations have been found to enhance tolerance for D-amino acids (30) and -amino acids (31). However, 23S rRNA mutations could also be related to increased tolerance of chloramphenicol (32).

(A) List of alleles identified through next-generation sequencing. Sequencing results originally obtained during the project identified this EmrD allele as a 33-bp deletion, which was then reconstructed in the experiment shown in (B). However, resequencing performed at the end of the project identified the allele as a 39-bp deletion and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. A repetitive GGCGCG nucleotide sequence corresponding to G323-A324 and G336-A337 creates ambiguity about the precise positional numbering of the deletion. However, the three possible 13amino acid deletions (323335, 324336, and 325337) result in the same final protein sequence. (B) Effect of reconstructed allele in DEP progenitor on doubling time as a function of BipA concentration, normalized to the doubling time of DEP at 100 M BipA. Error bars represent the SD across technical triplicates within the same experiment.

To learn how identified transporter alleles may contribute to increased growth rates at low BipA concentration, we performed allelic reconstruction in the progenitor DEP strain using MAGE (33). Among four mutants that we generated in DEP, we observed growth of all mutants at 2 M BipA, a condition in which progenitor DEP could not grow (Fig. 3B and fig. S8). Furthermore, only emrD mutants exhibited near-normal growth at 1 M BipA. To investigate possible differential sensitivity of strains that contain reconstructed alleles to other media components of interest (SDS, l-arabinose, tris buffer, and chloramphenicol), we varied the concentration of these components and measured doubling times (fig. S9). We observed no significant deviation in doubling time from DEP in any of these cases. These results collectively suggest that observed transporter alleles are linked to BipA utilization.

The unobservable escape of DEP even after 100 days of evolution encouraged us to explore the possibility of an improved in vitro model for host-microbe interactions. In vitro models allow direct visualization and measurement of cells and effectors during processes such as pathogenesis (34). They are more relevant than animal studies for several human cell-specific interactions due to biological differences across animal types (35, 36). A nonpathogenic E. coli strain engineered to express heterologous proteins could be particularly useful for studying or identifying virulence factors and disease progression. However, an obstacle associated with coculture of microbial and mammalian cells is microbial takeover of the population. Approaches used to address this are bacteriostatic antibiotics (37), semipermeable Transwell membranes (3840), microcarrier beads (41), microfluidic cell trapping (42), peristaltic microfluidic flow (43, 44), and microfluidic perfusion (45). However, the use of a well-characterized synthetic auxotroph capable of limited persistence could offer a superior alternative for spatiotemporal control of microbial growth, especially for studying longer duration phenomena such as chronic infection or wound healing. Our study demonstrates how temporal control can be achieved by removal of BipA; we anticipate that spatial control could be achieved by patterning BipA onto a variety of solid surfaces with limited diffusion, such as a skin patch.

We investigated mammalian cell culture health, growth, and morphology after simple transient exposure to a hypermutator variant of DEP that we engineered by inactivating mutS during allelic reconstruction (DEP*). The use of DEP* rather than DEP is yet another form of a stress test to increase opportunity for escape under coculture conditions. We directly cocultured adherent human cell line human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T with either no bacteria, nonauxotrophic E. coli DH5, or DEP* overnight (24 hours). HEK293T cells were cultured in selection media that allow only growth of desired but not contaminant strains while selecting for bacterial plasmid maintenance. After coculture, we washed cells and replenished cells with media varying in inclusion of BipA and/or an antibiotic cocktail (penicillin/streptomycin/amphotericin B). We continued incubation and imaged cells at days 2, 4, and 7 after initial coincubation. HEK293T cells contain a copy of mCherry integrated into the AAVS1 locus, and they appear red. DH5 and DEP* were transformed with Clover green fluorescent protein before coculture and appear green.

Compared to the control culture where bacteria were not added (Fig. 4A), HEK293T cells cocultured with DH5 display visible bacterial lawns with no attached human cells in the absence of the antibiotic cocktail at all days of observation (Fig. 4B). In the presence of antibiotic, cocultures containing DH5 sharply transition from bacterial overgrowth to apparent bacterial elimination (Fig. 4C). In contrast, cells cocultured with DEP* in the absence of BipA exhibited similar morphology to the control at all days of observation and no detectable bacteria by fluorescence microscopy on day 7, without the need for antibiotics to achieve bacterial clearance (Fig. 4D). Thus, DEP* addition was not detrimental to HEK293T cells in the absence of BipA, and DEP* remains biocontained and cannot survive because of cross-feeding. Clearance of bacterial cells from human cells appears to occur faster for DEP* when not provided BipA (Fig. 4D) than for DH5 when provided with the antibiotic cocktail (Fig. 4C).

Bacteria were added to HEK293T cell cultures and coincubated for 24 hours before washing and replenishing media. HEK293T cells express mCherry, whereas bacterial cells express Clover green protein marker. Images were taken at days 2, 4, and 7 after coincubation. (A) Untreated HEK293T cells. (B) HEK293T with commercial E. coli DH5 in the absence of antibiotic cocktail. (C) HEK293T with DH5 in presence of antibioti
c cocktail. (D) HEK293T and DEP* (mismatch repair inactivated to create hypermutator phenotype) in the absence of BipA. (E) HEK293T cells and DEP* in the presence of BipA. (F) HEK293T and DEP* in the absence of BipA until day 2 [identical at this point to condition in (D)], and then 100 M BipA was added to this condition daily until day 7.

To learn how the synthetic auxotroph behaves when supplied its essential nutrient in these coculture settings, we tested DEP* cocultures with continual resupply of 100 M BipA. Here, DEP* proliferates and in turn decreases proliferation and viability of HEK293T cells (Fig. 4E). A bacterial lawn begins to form on day 2, and at later times, human cell debris is overtaken by DEP*. This demonstrates that DEP* is fully capable of taking over the coculture if supplied with BipA. Replicates for these experiments can be found in figs. S10 to S12.

Given that DEP* grows in cocultures when BipA is provided, we sought to understand whether it could be rescued by readdition of BipA after multiple days of withholding. The possible time scale of reemergence influences applications where the duration of bacterial activity would need to be prolonged and/or repeated via limited BipA introduction while remaining contained. We find that coculturing DEP* with HEK293T cells for 2 days in the absence of BipA followed by the addition of BipA at day 2 does not rescue the DEP* growth (Fig. 4F and fig. S13). Human cells still grow and look morphologically similar to untreated cells, and bacteria are not visible. To look at analogous questions for nonauxotrophic E. coli, we removed antibiotics after 2 days of coculturing and do not observe bacterial rescue (fig. S13). We also investigated whether bacterial clearance could be delayed by the addition of antibiotic after some growth of DH5. DH5 cells grown in the absence of the antibiotic cocktail for 2 days before addition of the cocktail and maintenance to day 7 result in bacterial lawns (fig. S13, A and D). This demonstrates that antibiotic cocktails ordinarily used in mammalian cell culture maintenance can become ineffective beyond a certain amount of nonauxotrophic bacterial growth, whereas synthetic auxotrophy is subject to fewer and different constraints.

To further investigate the persistence of progenitor DEP and its evolved descendants, we performed BipA readdition studies in Lennox lysogeny broth (LB-Lennox) monoculture. Within 7 hours of BipA removal, DEP cell populations that are harvested from midexponential or stationary phases can be reactivated upon delayed BipA addition with unperturbed growth kinetics after a highly tunable lag phase (fig. S14). Further studies are ongoing to investigate the amount of time after which BipA reintroduction can recover growth of synthetic auxotrophs under different contexts.

We have shown that synthetic auxotrophy can exhibit long-term stability and function in unique contexts, enabling reliable control of microbial proliferation. Recent work has also shown that the escape rate and fitness of multiple synthetic auxotrophs can be improved by increasing the specificity of nsAA incorporation machinery (46). Collectively, these engineering and characterization efforts advance synthetic auxotrophy as a powerful safeguard for basic and applied research when using engineered microbes.

Cultures for general culturing, growth rate assays, biocontainment escape assays, MAGE, and fluorescent protein assays were prepared in LB-Lennox medium [bacto tryptone (10 g/liter), sodium chloride (5 g/liter), and yeast extract (5 g/liter)] supplemented with chloramphenicol (15 g/ml), 0.2% (w/v) l-arabinose, 20 mM tris-HCl buffer, 0.005% SDS, and variable concentration of L-4,4-biphenylalanine (BipA). Unless otherwise indicated, all cultures were grown in 96-well deep plates in 300 l of culture volumes at 34C and 400 rpm. The above media are permissive for growth of the synthetic auxotroph. Nonpermissive media are identically formulated as permissive media except for BipA, which is not included.

Construction of appropriate fluidics and chambers followed the eVOLVER framework (26) (figs. S1 and S2). The following components were included: (i) fluidics and chambers (reactor vial, inlet and outlet lines, filters, pumps, stirrers, and inlet and outlet reservoirs); (ii) light source and detector (LED and photodiode); (iii) controller hardware (circuit and microprocessors); and (iv) controller software (Arduino for controlling tasks, Raspberry Pi for computing tasks, and Python code for programming tasks) (full build of materials included in table S3). Briefly, our apparatus consisted of a custom smart sleeve (fig. S3), with the following modifications: Each vial was constructed without temperature control and was supplied by two media pumps (one for permissive media and another for nonpermissive media) and connected to one waste pump. All pumps were RP-Q1 from Takasago Fluidics, each driven off a standard N power MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor) with an Arduino controlling the gate. Like the eVOLVER system, we installed a stirring fan underneath each sleeve that consisted of magnets attached to a computer fan. By including a small stir bar within each reactor vial, we enabled efficient mixing of 1-ml working volumes. To enable automated measurement of turbidity [optical density (OD)], we used a 605-nm LED (LO Q976-PS-25) and an OPT101P-J photodiode detector. We mounted the LED and detector on custom printed circuit boards mounted to the vial sleeve to enable easier construction and better control of ambient light leakage into the light path (fig. S4). To monitor turbidity within each vial and to control pump arrays in response, we constructed printed circuit board designs in Gerber format as is standard for circuit fabrication. We attached an Arduino Mega microcontroller with an analog-digital converter and directed it using a PyMata script (47).

Chemostats were operated by automated maintenance of culture OD within a specified parameter range within exponential growth phase (20 to 80% of dynamic range) depending on linearity of photodiode measurements. Constant fixed dilutions of permissive media were used to decrease OD until desired equilibrium of cell growth and dilution rates. This resulted in a sawtooth curve (27), where time between peaks is recorded as a proxy for growth rate. Our program gradually decreased the ratio of permissive to nonpermissive media as step functions, with a specified number of dilution cycles allowed to elapse before the next decrease to provide time for acclimation. Time between OD peaks lengthened as strain fitness decreased. Once a threshold difference between ancestral peak-to-peak time and current peak-to-peak time was passed, the ratio of permissive to nonpermissive media remained fixed. This allowed cells to evolve until peak-to-peak time returns to ancestral values, which initiated the next phase of decrease in BipA concentration. To assess the quality of our continuous evolution process, we paused chemostat trials on a weekly basis for strain storage, strain evaluation, chemostat cleaning, and investigation of contamination.

Growth assays were performed by plate reader with blanking as previously described (25). Overnight cultures were supplemented with different BipA concentrations depending on the strain. The DEP progenitor strain was grown in permissive media containing 100 M BipA, and evolved DEP strains DEP.e3, DEP.e4, and DEP.e5 were grown in permissive media containing 1 M BipA. Saturated overnight cultures were washed twice in LB and resuspended in LB. Resuspended cultures were diluted 100-fold into three 150-l volumes of permissive media. BipA concentrations used in this assay were 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, and 100 M. Cultures were incubated in a flat-bottom 96-well plate (34C, 300 rpm). Kinetic growth (OD600) was monitored in a Biotek Eon H1 microplate spectrophotometer reader at 5-min intervals for 48 hours. The doubling times across technical replicates were calculated as previously indicated. We refer to these as technical replica
tes because although triplicate overnight cultures were used to seed triplicate experiment cultures, the overnight cultures were most often seeded from one glycerol stock.

Escape assays were performed as previously described with minor adjustments to decrease the lower detection limit for final evolved populations (23, 46). Strains were grown in permissive media and harvested in late exponential phase. Cells were washed twice with LB and resuspended in LB. Viable CFU were calculated from the mean and SEM of three technical replicates of 10-fold serial dilutions on permissive media. Twelve technical replicates were plated on noble agar combined with nonpermissive media in 500-cm2 BioAssay Dishes (Thermo Fisher Scientific 240835) and monitored daily for 4 days. If synthetic auxotrophs exhibited escape frequencies above the detection limit (lawns) on nonpermissive media, escape frequencies were calculated from additional platings at lower density. The SEM across technical replicates of the cumulative escape frequency was calculated as previously indicated.

Genomic DNA was obtained from evolved populations and ancestral clone using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). Sequencing libraries were prepared as described in Baym et al. (48). Sequencing was performed using a NextSeq instrument, producing 75base pair (bp), paired-end reads. Resulting data were aligned to the E. coli C321.delA nonauxotrophic but recoded reference sequence (GenBank no. CP006698.1) and the sequence of the plasmid encoding nsAA incorporation machinery. The Millstone software suite was used to identify variants, provide measures of sequencing confidence, and predict their likelihood of altering gene function (49). Genomic variants of low confidence, low sequence coverage, or presence in the ancestral strain were discarded, prioritizing variants observed in three nonessential genes that encode membrane proteins: acrB, emrD, and trkH.

Subsequent genomic sequencing was performed on genomic DNA extracted from the evolved populations and ancestral clone using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Genomic DNA was then sent to the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS) in Pittsburgh, PA. Variants were identified through the variant calling service from MiGS.

MAGE (33) was used to inactivate the endogenous mutS gene in the DEP strain. Overnight cultures were diluted 100-fold into 3 ml of LB containing chloramphenicol, BipA, l-arabinose, and tris-HCl buffer and grown at 34C until midlog. The genome-integrated lambda Red cassette in this C321.A-derived strain was induced in a shaking water bath (42C, 300 rpm, 15 min), followed by cooling the culture tube on ice for at least 2 min. The cells were made electrocompetent at 4C by pelleting 1 ml of culture (8000 rcf, 30 s) and washing thrice with 1 ml of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Electrocompetent pellets were resuspended in 50 l of dH2O containing the desired DNA; for MAGE oligonucleotides, 5 M of each oligonucleotide was used. Allele-specific colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify desired colonies resulting from MAGE as previously described (50). Oligonucleotides used for MAGE and for allele-specific colony PCR are included in table S4.

This assay was performed using a similar protocol as described in the Measurement of doubling times section. The cultures for DEP and its single mutants were grown overnight in 100 M BipA. Then, cultures were diluted 100 in the media specified. Those conditions include standard media conditions and single component changes: 0% SDS, 0.01% SDS, 0.02% (w/v) arabinose, 0 mM tris-HCl, and chloramphenicol (30 g/ml). The cultures were grown in triplicate for each condition and in a SpectraMax i3 plate reader, shaking at 34C for 24 hours. The OD600 was measured about every 5 min. The doubling times were then calculated as previously described.

HEK293T cells containing one copy of mCherry marker (red) integrated into the AAVS1 locus were grown at 40 to 50% confluency in DMEM (Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium) high-glucose medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 11965175) with 10% inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 10082147), 100 MEM NEAA (nonessential amino acids; Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 11140050), and 100 diluted anti-anti cocktail [antibiotic-antimycotic: penicillin (10,000 U/ml), streptomycin (10,000 g/ml), and Gibco amphotericin B (25 g/ml); Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 15240112). Commercially acquired E. coli DH5 bacteria were used as control to the E. coli DEP mutS or DEP* strain. A plasmid containing Clover (green marker) containing a UAA stop codon compatible with the biocontained strain DEP, and under the selection marker ampicillin was transformed into both DH5 and DEP* strains to visualize them with the mammalian cells (red). BipA-dependent auxotroph DEP* bacteria were grown to an OD of 0.6 in LB medium supplemented with 1% l-arabinose, 100 M BipA, carbenicillin (100 g/ml), and chloramphenicol (25 g/ml) and then washed three times with 1 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). DEP* culture conditions with l-arabinose, carbenicillin, and chloramphenicol supplements did slightly affect HEK293T early cell growth compared to untreated cells, although insufficient to affect conclusions drawn from these experiments. DH5 strain was grown to an OD of 0.6 with carbenicillin (100 g/ml). The pellet of 10-ml bacterial cell culture was resuspended in mammalian cell medium as described above without any antibiotics and anti-anti, and split equally among all conditions and their replicates. Auxotroph bacteria are added to HEK293T cells plated in pretreated 12-well plates in 2 ml of mammalian cell medium. The coculture is incubated overnight before the medium that contains the bacterial cells is removed. HEK293T cells were washed three times with 1x PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. 10010023) and replenished with fresh media as conditions indicate. Media were replaced and added fresh to all conditions daily for 7 days. Imaging of cells was done with the inverted microscope Nikon Eclipse TS100 at days 2, 4, and 7 after initial coculture at 200 magnification.

Conditions:

Control: HEK293T grown in regular 10% FBS media with anti-anti and NEAA as described above.

DH5: HEK293T cells cocultured with this strain in mammalian cell media supplemented with carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain plasmid during growth and absence of anti-anti.

DH5; anti-anti (antibiotic cocktail): HEK293T cells cocultured with this strain in mammalian cell media supplemented with carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain plasmid during growth and presence of anti-anti cocktail.

DH5; anti-anti after day 2: HEK293T cells cocultured with this strain in mammalian cell media supplemented with carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain plasmid during growth and absence of anti-anti cocktail. At 48 hours, anti-anti added and maintained to day 7.

DH5; anti-anti; no anti-anti after day 2: HEK293T cells cocultured with this strain in mammalian cell media supplemented with carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain plasmid during growth and presence of anti-anti until day 2. After day 2, no anti-anti added and maintained to day 7.

DEP*: HEK293T cells cocultured with the biocontained strain in media supplemented with l-arabinose, chloramphenicol (25 g/ml), and carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain bacteria and green marker. No bipA or anti-anti was added.

DEP*; bipA: HEK293T cells cocultured with the biocontained strain in media supplemented with l-arabinose, chloramphenicol (25 g/ml), and carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain bacteria and green marker. One hundred micromolar bipA and no anti-anti added.

DEP*; bipA after day 2: HEK293T cells cocultured with the biocontained strain in media supplemented with l-arabinose, chloramphenicol (25 g/ml), and carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain bacteria and green marker. No bipA or anti-anti added. At 48 hours, bipA at 100 M concentration added and maintained to day 7.

DEP*; anti-anti: HEK293T cells cocultured with the biocontaine
d strain in media supplemented with anti-anti, l-arabinose, chloramphenicol (25 g/ml), and carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain bacteria and green marker. No bipA added.

DEP*; bipA; anti-anti: HEK293T cells cocultured with the biocontained strain in media supplemented with anti-anti, l-arabinose, chloramphenicol (25 g/ml), and carbenicillin (100 g/ml) to maintain bacteria and green marker. One hundred micromolar bipA added.

Persistence was evaluated by two kinds of assays: plate reader and colony count. For the plate reader case, DEP, DEP.e3, DEP.e4, and DEP.e5 cultures were grown overnight in permissible media conditions with 100 M BipA. For cells harvested at midexponential phase, the cultures were diluted 100 and grown to that state. Both stationary-phase and midexponential-phase cultures were then washed twice with LB media and resuspended in the original volume of nonpermissible media containing all specified media components except BipA. The resuspended cultures were then diluted 100 into nonpermissible media in triplicate for each time point to be tested. The specified concentration of BipA was then added back to those cultures at the specified time points. Typically, the BipA readdition occurred at 10 or 5 M concentrations and at hourly or daily intervals. The cultures were then incubated with shaking in SpectraMax i3 plate readers in a flat, clear-bottom 96-well plate with breathable and optically transparent seal for an upward of 84 hours at 34C. Approximately every 5 min, the OD600 was measured to determine cell growth kinetics.

More:
Synthetic auxotrophy remains stable after continuous evolution and in coculture with mammalian cells - Science Advances

COVID-19 origin: It looks like this virus was designed to infect humans – The New Daily

In recent weeks, there has been a radical shift in sober thinking about where the SARS-CoV-2 virus, better known as COVID 19, originated.

Early talk about an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology where bat coronaviruses are modified to become more infectious to humans was largely written off as a conspiracy theory.

As The New Daily reported a month ago, the lab-leak theory is being investigated with vigour under the direction of United States President Joe Biden notwithstanding the limited access investigators have had to the Wuhan lab.

One of the compelling pieces of evidence being examined by members of the US Congress was done by Australian researchers who were shocked by their own findings.

Their paper, published last week, found that the coronavirus is most ideally adapted to infect human cells and not bat or pangolin cells, thought to be the likely origin culprits.

The study findings, from Flinders University and La Trobe University, also ruled out monkeys, snakes, cows, tigers, hamsters, cats, civets, horses, ferrets, mice, and dogs.

On the face of it, this stands as an intriguing challenge to the prevailing theory that SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in a bat and was then passed on to people via another, unidentified animals.

The problem is, the Australia data found that bats were a very poor fit for infection by the coronavirus, while humans were way off the top of the list.

One of the co-authors of the study is Professor Nikolai Petrovsky. He isdirector of endocrinology at Flinders Medical Centre and a professor of Medicine at Flinders University. Hes also vice-president and secretary-general of the International Immunomics Society.

Professor Petrovsky said the research, which began last year when the pandemic was taking hold, was based on the assumption that this was another natural transmission rather than an engineered one.

We were trying to find the particular species of animal in which this virus might have originated, he told The New Daily.

The world is now full of armchair virologists who understand that the spike protein (S) of the coronavirus gains entry to a human cell by binding to the cells ACE2 receptor like a key being inserted into a lock is the common metaphor.

Essentially, ACE2 acts as a cellular doorway or receptor for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Professor Petrovsky with La Trobe Professor David Winkler and others used genomic data from the 12 animal species to painstakingly build computer models of the key ACE2 protein receptors for each species.

These models were then used to calculate the strength of binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to each species ACE2 receptor.

Surprisingly, the results showed that SARS-CoV-2 bound to ACE2 on human cells more tightly than any of the tested animal species, including bats and pangolins.

If one of the animal species tested was the origin, it would normally be expected to show the highest binding to the virus.

Said Professor Petrovsky, What shocked us, and not what we were expecting, was that humans came out at the very top.

The teams modelling shows the SARS-CoV-2 virus also bound relatively strongly to ACE2 from pangolins, a rare exotic ant-eater found in some parts of South-East Asia with occasional instances of use as food or traditional medicines.

The pangolins had the highest spike binding energy of all the animals the study looked at significantly higher than bats, monkeys and snakes.

Pangolins were an early suspect, because of a coronavirus it was carrying. But the pangolin coronavirus had less than 90 per cent genetic similarity to SARS-CoV-2.

And hence could not be its ancestor, Professor Petrovsky said.

However, the specific part of the pangolin coronavirus spike protein that binds ACE2 is almost identical to that of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

How to explain this incongruence? Maybe the pangolin and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins were of evolutionary cousins.

They may have evolved similarities through a process of convergent evolution, genetic recombination between viruses, or through genetic engineering, with no current way to distinguish between these possibilities.

In other words, its a possibility that the hand of man interfered with these viruses that were adapted pangolins and humans.

Or it could be the natural world doing its creative thing.

Getting into a cell is one thing but making an effective take-over of the cell is another issue. It usually happens via a series of infections, during which the virus adapts.

Ordinarily, then, the first human infection by a virus wouldnt be a potent event.

What the researchers found in their modelling: it appears that human cells, from the beginning, were ripe for a takeover. They launched into the world, fully adapted to infect people.

This is hot stuff but, as Professor Petrovsky makes plain: Its just one piece of evidence that has to be assessed with all the other evidence.

You never say never, said Professor Petrovsky.

But what we know is this: If you look at SARS, that only became human-adapted through a complex series of events that have been mapped starting with bats and then mutating, moving on to civets, and from civets to humans.

Over three to four months of human infection, the virus adapted and became more efficient as one would expect.

The virus is usually weak when it infects a new species until it has time to adapt and become more efficient, said Professor Petrovsky.

But this virus was extremely good at infecting humans and there wasnt a clear explanation for that. So it means theres a coincidence or it could mean there had been some intervention that helped the virus become adapted to humans.

Which is why scientists are looking at the Wuhan Institute of Virology: it houses more bat coronaviruses than anywhere else in the world, and some of the work done there involves re-engineering coronaviruses so they adapt to infecting humans more easily.

Which is another remarkable coincidence or its telling you something, said Professor Petrovsky.

Looking just at the data youd say that it looked like this virus was designed to infect humans, he said,

But of course, scientifically, you have to go back and ask how could this have happened without infecting a human before?

It is a big question and its currently an unanswered question.

The rest is here:
COVID-19 origin: It looks like this virus was designed to infect humans - The New Daily

Science, industry team up in Italy to zap virus with laser – Reuters

A rendering of an air purifier prototype developed by Italian tech company Eltech K-laser is seen in this image obtained by Reuters on June 30, 2021. Eltech K-Laser/Handout via REUTERS

ROME, July 2 (Reuters) - A United Nations-backed scientific research centre has teamed up with an Italian tech firm to explore whether laser light can be used to kill coronavirus particles suspended in the air and help keep indoor spaces safe.

The joint effort between the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) of Trieste, a city in the north of Italy, and the nearby Eltech K-Laser company, was launched last year as COVID-19 was battering the country.

They created a device that forces air through a sterilization chamber which contains a laser beam filter that pulverizes viruses and bacteria.

"I thought lasers were more for a shaman rather than a doctor but I have had to change my mind. The device proved able to kill the viruses in less than 50 milliseconds," said Serena Zacchigna, group leader for Cardiovascular Biology at the ICGEB.

Healthy indoor environments with a substantially reduced pathogen count are deemed essential for public health in the post COVID-19 crisis, a respiratory infection which has caused more than four million deaths worldwide in barely 18 months.

Zacchigna hooked up with Italian engineer Francesco Zanata, the founder of Eltech K-Laser, a firm specialised in medical lasers whose products are used by sports stars to treat muscle inflammation and fractures.

Some experts have warned against the possible pitfalls of using light-based technologies to attack the virus that causes COVID-19.

A study published by the Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology in November 2020 highlighted concerns ranging from potential cancer risks to the cost of expensive light sources.

But Zacchigna and Zanata dismissed any health issues, saying the laser never comes into contact with human skin.

"Our device uses nature against nature. It is 100% safe for people and almost fully recyclable," Zanata told Reuters.

The technology, however, does not eliminate viruses and bacteria when they drop from the air onto surfaces or the floor. Nor can it prevent direct contagion when someone who is infected sneezes or talks loudly in the proximity of someone else.

Eltech K-Laser has received a patent from Italian authorities and is seeking to extend this globally.

The portable version of the invention is some 1.8 metres (5.9 ft) high and weighs about 25 kg (55 lb). The company said the technology can also be placed within air-conditioning units.

In the meantime, the first potential customers are lining up, including Germany's EcoCare, a service provider of testing and vaccination solutions.

"The company aims to license the technology for German and UAE markets," an EcoCare spokesperson said in an email to Reuters.

Reporting by Giselda Vagnoni; Editing by Crispian Balmer, William Maclean

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

See the article here:
Science, industry team up in Italy to zap virus with laser - Reuters

‘Soft’ Graphene-Containing Electrodes That Adapt to Living Tissue – Printed Electronics World

Researchers from The University of Manchester and Harvard University have collaborated on a pioneering project in bioengineering, producing metal-free, hydrogel electrodes that flex to fit the complex shapes inside the human body.

Replacing rigid metals

Tringides and Mooney, in collaboration with the Nanomedicine Lab in Manchester, identified a mixture of graphene flakes and carbon nanotubes as the best conductive filler, replacing the use of traditional rigid metals.

Cinzia Casiraghi, Professor of Nanoscience from the NGI and Department of Chemistry at Manchester, said: "This work demonstrates that high-quality graphene dispersions - made in water by a simple process based on a molecule that one can buy from any chemical supply - have strong potential in bioelectronics. We are very interested in exploiting our graphene (and other 2D materials) inks in this field."

Collaborative effort

Kostas Kostarelos, Professor of Nanomedicine and leader of the Nanomedicine Lab, added: "This truly collaborative effort between three institutions is a step forward in the development of softer, more adaptable and electroactive devices, where traditional technologies based on bulk and rigid materials cannot be applied to soft tissues such as the brain."

Source: University of Manchester

Top image source: Wyss Institute at Harvard University

More:
'Soft' Graphene-Containing Electrodes That Adapt to Living Tissue - Printed Electronics World

Corrigendum for the article Anti-Cancer Activity Based on the High Doc | IJN – Dove Medical Press

Xu M, Yao C, Zhang W, Gao S, Zou H, Gao J. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:27352749.

The authors have advised the Acknowledgment statement on page 2748 is incorrect. The acknowledgment section should read as follows:

The authors acknowledge the formulation for the docetaxel in Poly(2-oxazoline) micelles previously developed and published by the Kabanov lab with reference to Seo Y, Schulz A, Han Y, et al. Poly (2-oxazoline) block copolymer based formulations of taxanes: effect of copolymer and drug structure, concentration, and environmental factors. Polym Adv Technol. 2015;26(7):837850 (https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3556).24 The current article reports the authors original research evaluating this polymeric micelle formulation of docetaxel in their own animal models. Dr Jing Gao wishes to acknowledge her time spent as a visiting scholar to the Kabanov lab at UNC-Chapel Hill from 2013-2014. This study was supported by Military Medical Innovation Project (16CXZ032), National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development (No. 2018ZX09J18107-003, 2018ZX0 9721003-005-009) and NSFC projects (No. 81773278, 81702491).

Read the original article

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Read more:
Corrigendum for the article Anti-Cancer Activity Based on the High Doc | IJN - Dove Medical Press

Mibelle debuts new moss based ingredient to harmonize the skin’s moisture flow – Premium beauty

A few years after the launch of MossCellTec No.1, the Swiss-based supplier of cosmetic ingredient is launching MossCellTec Aloe[1], an unequaled aloe-moss extract sustainably obtained.

Derived from aloe-moss (Aloina aloides), a tiny dark green to reddish-brown moss measuring 2 to 5 mm in height and known as common aloe-moss, MossCellTec Aloe improves cell-to-cell communication via connexin channels, optimally evens the moisture distribution in the skin and reduces the volume and depth of wrinkles.

Due to the similarity in the appearance of the leaves, aloe-moss was named after the Aloe vera plant. This rare and tiny moss species has a high water retention capacity. Compared to seed plants, mosses do not have roots and water transport systems. Instead, they absorb water directly into their leaves. Mosses can trap excess water and nutrients from the soil and air.

In vivo tests have shown that MossCellTec Aloe can reduce signs of skin aging (skin elasticity, wrinkle volume and depth), improve skin hydration and improve moisture homogeneity.

MossCellTec Aloe is based on Mibelle Biochemistrys MossCellTec technology which allows for the sustainable large-scale production of the moss extract.

Visit link:
Mibelle debuts new moss based ingredient to harmonize the skin's moisture flow - Premium beauty

Letter for the article A Review on the Mechanism Between Different Fac | PRBM – Dove Medical Press

Correspondence: Abdul Moiz Sahito; Govinda KhatriDow Medical College, Mission Road, New Labour Colony Nanakwara, Karachi, Sindh, PakistanEmail [emailprotected]; govindakha[emailprotected]

We read a review article entitled A Review on the Mechanism Between Different Factor and the Occurrence of Autism and ADHD Xi et al published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management.1 We appreciate the authors for this informative review article and would like to make some contributions.

In this review, the authors have specifically elaborated genetic aspects and pathogenic hypotheses of these two kinds of neurodevelopmental diseases in children, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) while analyzing the relationship between different environmental toxins and these two disorders.1

Although, each disorders individual genetic profile was described the review lacked a mention of the shared genetic overlap between the two disorders and the biochemical factors affecting it. We want to highlight those aspects by mentioning that in a recent study conducted by Ma et al SHANK2 has been shown to be a potential pleiotropic gene underlying the genetic overlap between ADHD and Autism.2 It has been suggested that SHANK genes may play a crucial role in memory and executive dysfunctions found in a wide range of neuropsychiatric disorders, including ADHD and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).3 There are also some biochemical factors that seem to affect the genes that ADHD and autism share. Recent studies have shown that Zn2+ ions are able to modulate the Postsynaptic Density (PSD) scaffold of synapses via the autism-associated proteins SHANK2 and SHANK3.4 Zinc deficiency has also been associated with ADHD. In a study conducted by El-Bakry et al Zinc was found to be significantly deficient in patients with ADHD compared with healthy controls, so it was concluded that zinc deficiency might play a role in the etiopathogenesis of ADHD.5

The shared genetic overlap between ADHD and Autism and the biochemical factors that affect that overlap makes it imperative that a thorough study is conducted in this direction to reduce the ambiguity underlying these disorders and to figure out efficient ways to prevent them.

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

1. Xi T, Wu J. A review on the mechanism between different factors and the occurrence of autism and ADHD. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:393. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S304450

2. Ma SL, Chen LH, Lee CC, et al. Genetic overlap between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in SHANK2 gene. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:481. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.649588

3. Guilmatre A, Huguet G, Delorme R, Bourgeron T. The emerging role of SHANK genes in neuropsychiatric disorders. Dev Neurobiol. 2014;74(2):113122. doi:10.1002/dneu.22128

4. Jan HH, Chen IT, Tsai YY, Chang YC. Structural role of zinc ions bound to postsynaptic densities. J Neurochem. 2002;83(3):525534. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01093.x

5. El-Bakry A, El Safty AM, Abdou AA, Amin OR, Ayoub DR, Afifi DY. Zinc deficiency in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Egypt J Psychiatr. 2019;40(2):95. doi:10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_11_19

Follow this link:
Letter for the article A Review on the Mechanism Between Different Fac | PRBM - Dove Medical Press

4-H Foundation awards record number of scholarships for 2021 – The Star Beacon

JEFFERSON The Ashtabula County 4-H Foundation has awarded college scholarships to 14 local youths.

Thats a record number for the foundation,said 4-H president Jim Butler.

Since 1997, the Ashtabula County 4-H Foundation has been raising funds through multiple fund-raising events with the purpose of supporting advanced education of 4-H members.High school seniors and returning college students whohave participated in 4-H for a minimum offive years are eligible to apply, regardless of college or career choice.

The cost of college doesnt go down after the first year and it makes a big difference to get any help you can, Butler said. Some of our recipients applied last year and didnt receive one, but got one this year. You just never know. Different year, different judges. Just keep trying.

The 2021 recipients will need to successfully complete the fall semester to receive their scholarship in January. The recipients are as follows:

Kate Brand, a 2019 graduate of Jefferson Area High School. Sheattends Miami University-Oxford. She is double majoring in biology and psychology, and co-majoring in neuroscience.

Tory Durkovic, a 2021 graduate of Jefferson Area High School. She plans to attend Youngstown State this fall to major in Integrated Mathematics Education.

Katie Eldred, a 2019 graduate of Edgewood High School, who is pursuing a degree in sports psychology at the Ohio State University.

Emily Falcone, a 2020 graduate of Conneaut High School. She is returning to the University of Findlay studying animal science and pre-veterinary medicine.

Megan Jacobs, a 2020 Jefferson Area High School graduate. She attends Thiel College studying biochemistry.

Cheyenne Kase, a 2019 graduate of Jefferson Area High School. She attends the Ohio State University pursuing a degree in animal bioscience.

Emily Millard, a 2021 graduate of Pymatuning Valley High School. She will be attending Kent State-Trumbull campus studying for a bachelor of science in nursing.

Lydia Randolph, a 2021 graduate of Edgewood High School. She will be attending Trine University majoring in chemical engineering and biochemistry.

Caroline Sabo, a 2021 graduate of Madison High School. She will be attending the University of Akron studying civil engineering.

Shelby Schwotzer, a 2019 graduate of Edgewood High School. She will be returning to Grove City College studying biology and secondary education.

Garhett Smith, a 2020 Jefferson Area High School graduate. He attends Malone University studying zoo and wildlife biology.

Allison Stokes, a 2021 graduate of Pymatuning Valley High School. She plans to attend Kent State University-Main Campus studying general studies.

Emily Taft, a 2020 Jefferson Area High School graduate. She attends the Ohio State University studying history and education.

Faith Blankenship, a 2021 graduate of Jefferson Area High School. She is the 2021 recipient of the J.J. Stitt Memorial Scholarship. This scholarship is funded by the annual Ride for J.J. event and awarded through the 4-H Foundation and the Stitt Family. Faith plans to attend Youngstown State University and majoring in special education.

The 4-H Foundation extends a huge congratulations to all of the 2021 scholarship recipients and wishes only success to all of our local youth, Butler said.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Read the original post:
4-H Foundation awards record number of scholarships for 2021 - The Star Beacon

North Carolina State University: Biochemical Sensor Researcher Makes MIT Technology Review’s List Of Top Young Innovators – Patch.com

Amay J. Bandodkar, an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at North Carolina State University, has been named one of MIT Technology Review's "Innovators Under 35" for his work on developing wearable biochemical sensors.

"I am very excited that Tech Review is recognizing our work to move health technology into the future," says Bandodkar. "I owe it to my amazing team members and mentors."

The annual list, which Tech Review has issued since 1999, was created to highlight exceptionally talented young innovators from around the world in a variety of fields. Previous winners include Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Sergey Brin and Vivian Chu.

Bandodkar works at the interface of electronics, materials science, and biology to create next-generation wearable sensors with biomedical applications such as disease monitoring.

"My ultimate goal would be to develop technology that allows us to assess a person's health status by merely scanning a reader just like the tricorder from Star Trek," Bandodkar says.

Bandodkar joined NC State in January 2021, and is part of the university's National Science Foundation-funded ASSIST Center. The ASSIST Center's mission is to create self-powered, wearable health monitoring technologies.

Learn more about this year's honorees on the MIT Technology Review website here and in the July/August issue, which went live online June 30.

Founded in 1899, MIT Technology Review is an independent media company whose insight, analysis, and interviews explain the newest technologies and their commercial, social, and political impacts. MIT Technology Review's mission is to bring about better-informed and more conscious decisions about technology through authoritative, influential, and trustworthy journalism.

-shipman-

This press release was produced by North Carolina State University. The views expressed here are the author's own.

See original here:
North Carolina State University: Biochemical Sensor Researcher Makes MIT Technology Review's List Of Top Young Innovators - Patch.com

Student fury as universities plan to continue online teaching into 2022 – LBC

5 July 2021, 14:15 | Updated: 5 July 2021, 15:30

Students have told LBC they are "infuriated" at plans from some universities to continue teaching parts of their course online, even as Boris Johnson is set to announce plans for all social distancing rules to be removed.

Multiple universities including Kent, Sheffield and University College London have already made public that students should expect "blended learning" - with some lectures given online.

Hundreds of students have signed a petition at Kent University after they said group lectures would continue online next year with the aim of reverting to in-person "in early 2022".

Manchester University has gone further, announcing a permanent move to including online teaching in their courses, including for "explanatory material" that would previously have been given in lecture theatres.

But despite promises of more in-person teaching, after over a year of watching lectures from their bedrooms students have told LBC they are thoroughly opposed to the plans and have little trust in university management.

Biochemistry first-year student Caitlin Wright told LBC she has only had four hours of in-person teaching in her first year at Manchester University.

"Labs have been taught by YouTube tutorials and when people went in to do one they had no idea what to do and how to use the equipment," she recounted.

Caitlin described the decision by Manchester to move to permanently include online teaching as part of the courses as "absolutely shocking and not in the best interests of students".

"I understand why it was necessary for this year but past the pandemic I am not sure why it is necessary.

"Everyone learns so much better in person, where they can bounce ideas off each other and put their hands up to ask questions. Online it takes three to five business days to get an answer to your question."

Read more: Manchester students claim police are carrying out 'random' Covid-19 checks in halls

Similarly, first-year Politics student Chris Adair told LBC he is worried the "quality of teaching will be severely affected if the university use the pandemic as an excuse to move to online teaching".

While the university says using a hybrid approach will allow students more flexibility, Chris told LBC he did not understand this as "many lectures were already recorded" pre-pandemic.

Chris said he and other students are "very, very worried" that the university could again move back to fully-online teaching.

"Last year they promised there would be blended learning and they reneged on that in the fist few weeks. There is uncertainty and real distrust between students and management."

Read more: Manchester Uni students pull down lockdown fencing put up around halls

Nick Hillman, Director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, told LBC universities have been scarred by the chaos of last autumn and are adapting their plans accordingly.

"Students regard learning as a social endeavour and see part of the university experience as spending time in the presence of people from other countries, other parts of the UK and other backgrounds," he explained.

"But universities got it wrong last year, when they promised face-to-face learning would come back earlier than it was allowed to for most students, and they are desperate not to overpromise this year."

Unlike Manchester, the University of Sheffield have not said they will be moving to blended learning permanently, but will adapt their learning to include online teaching "should this be necessary".

Sheffield say their "expectation and current plan is to deliver as much face-to-face teaching as possible in 2021-22", but students are concerned that they have heard nothing concrete from the university so far.

"I have only had 45 minutes of actually being at university, one in-person seminar the entire year," Politics student Dan Walsh told LBC.

"I would be hoping for an approach that is blended but also returns teaching to what it is meant to be," they continued.

"My course is meant to have 10 weeks of teaching but the university is saying because it is online only five weeks is needed.

"We're getting half the teaching for 9,000. That's not fair, that's not just."

Ahead of Boris Johnson's announcement that all sectors of the economy will now be able to open up, Dan added: "What difference is it going to make if we don't have in-person teaching if everyone is going to the pubs and clubs. It's pretty futile."

Explained: What time is Boris Johnson's announcement and what will he say?

Responding to the student's concerns, a University of Manchester spokesperson told LBC: This is not online teaching, but aboutaugmenting in-person lectures, seminars, labs, Q&As and discussions, and workshops with high quality online materials for self-study.

"We have been speaking to students for some time about ways to increase flexibility and choice and we will continue to do so to help shape this activity to their needs and the needs of each discipline.

"Our commitment to blended and flexible learning is part of the university strategy.

A University of Sheffield spokesperson said they "are working hard to provide the best on-campus experience in a Covid-secure way, in line with government guidelines.

Our top priority is always the wellbeing of our university community. Our expectation and current plan is to deliver the great majority of teaching face-to-face in September, with some larger lectures being delivered online.

"However, we have proven expertise in providing blended learning over the past year and will be able to adapt our learning and teaching delivery in response to new Covid-19 safety measures should this be needed.

"Digital delivery has opened up many possibilities for enhanced innovative learning and virtual social activities over the past year.

View post:
Student fury as universities plan to continue online teaching into 2022 - LBC

The living pose greater covid19 risks than the dead – TT Newsday

CommentaryNewsday24 Hrs Ago

DR VISHNU BISRAM

CONVERSATIONS with Trinis suggest that last rites of covid19 deceased are not treated with respect and dignity. Families dont get to properly bid farewell because of rules. Public safety should never be compromised.

But common sensical applications should also not be ignored when treating the deceased who died of covid19. The deceased does not pose as much threat to public safety as the living. The probability of covid19 infection from the dead is minimal millions of times lower than getting covid19 from the living.

Families and communities can have proper and dignified burial or cremation rites for the covid19 deceased. The risks of attending a funeral for a covid19 victim is not any higher than that of attending a rite for someone who died from other causes or attending a religious institution for regular worshipping.

TT has countless biologists and biochemists who would have studied virology or virus contamination. I have not seen anyone address this issue of covid19 infection from a deceased.

I may be known as a pollster and social commentator, but I am also a degree holder in biochemistry and taught said subject as well as worked in biology labs for several years before making the transition to social science almost four decades ago.

My recollection from biology studies is a virus dies with its host, and thus the chance of the covid19 virus moving from the dead to the living, while possible, is very remote.

Tens of millions of people are hosts to covid19. The virus cannot reproduce without a living host. In theory, once the host dies, so does the virus. The covid19 virus survives for only a few hours (at most) without a host.

Of the millions of funerals of victims of covid19, only one person is known to have contracted the virus from the dead. Contrast this figure with the hundreds of millions who got infected by coming in contact with the living.

As long as proper safety measures are in place (safe distancing and wearing of PPE), normal funeral rites are safe (safer than going to a market or riding a maxi). In fact, in the US and other developed countries, almost normal funeral rites are being allowed.

When the virus broke out in January 2020 in the West, it was not clear how the virus spread. It was a mystery; scientists took a long time to understand its behaviour. In fact, it is still a mystery how it is mutating and combating the several vaccines.

Thus, the deceased was disposed of in closed bags, closed caskets (families could not see the face of loved ones), and closed rites from a far distance. But as scientists got an understanding of the viruss behaviour, coffins have been open over the last year.

Also, the dead is now ritually washed in America and properly dressed and displayed in full view. I attended funerals of several victims in New York; many Trinis and Guyanese who I knew died of covid19 in the US. I presided over the Hindu funeral rites of my mother who was a covid19 victim, including repeatedly touching her body as required by Hindu scriptures. Knowing the science, I had no reservations about touching her body.

I know of others who performed similar rituals for family members who died of covid19. None of them (or myself) contracted the virus from the deceased (and I did not even wear PPE when touching my moms body). Several individuals contracted covid19 from living family members who were covid19 positive (a few of who later died from the virus).

It is natural for people to be fearful of contracting the virus from the deceased covid19 victim. I too was very fearful and avoided funerals of covid19 deceased in the first several months of the pandemic. But it is now reassuring that the virus will not jump from dead to living.

No funeral worker (at a funeral home, crematorium, or graveyard) has been infected with the virus from handling the deceased. A lone case was that of an exposed pathologist (who did not wear PPP) who performed an autopsy of a covid19 victim some 15 months ago.

Once you wear PPE and maintain physical distancing, you will be safe. People should be more concerned about contracting covid19 from the living rather than the dead.

Thus, the Government should consider allowing normal funerals open coffins and cremations and attendance in public places. Families should be allowed to perform burials and cremations according to prescribed cultural and religious practices as the dead do not pose covid19 risk.

Attendees should take the necessary precautions to limit covid19 exposure from the living.

Visit link:
The living pose greater covid19 risks than the dead - TT Newsday

Vaccines found to be less effective against Epsilon strain of COVID-19 | Times of Oman – Times of Oman

The Epsilon variant is the name given to the B.1.427/B.1.429 lineages of the virus | Representative image

Seattle: Scientists have found that a variant of the coronavirus, dubbed the Epsilon strain, has more resistance to vaccines, thereby somewhat neutralising their effectiveness.

The mutations give this coronavirus variant of concern a means to totally evade specific monoclonal antibodies used in clinics and reduces the effectiveness of antibodies from the plasma of vaccinated people, said the University of Washingtons School of Medicine, one of the institutions involved in research into the Epsilon strain.

The project was led by David Veesler of UWs Department of Biochemistry, and Luca Piccoli and Davide Corti of Vir Biotechnology.

The Epsilon variant is the name given to the B.1.427/B.1.429 lineages of the virus, which was first discovered in the US in the summer of 2020.

Studies found that the ability of plasma to fight the virus from patients who had previously been infected with COVID-19 was reduced by about two to three and a half times when exposed to the Epsilon variant.

Epsilon mutations were responsible for rearrangements in critical areas of the spike glycoprotein, added the release from UW. Electron cryo-microscopy studies showed structural changes in these areas. Visualising these mutations help explain why antibodies had difficulty binding to the spike glycoprotein.

One of the three mutations in the Epsilon variant affected the receptor binding domain on the spike glycoprotein, added the university. This mutation reduced the neutralising activity of 14 out of 34 neutralising antibodies specific to that domain, including clinical stage antibodies.

The findings of the scientists have been published in the journal Science, where their research is explained in-depth.

The fast rise in the number of cases associated with the B.1.427/B.1.429 lineages led to their classification as a variant of concern by the US Centre for Disease Control, they added in their research paper.

Excerpt from:
Vaccines found to be less effective against Epsilon strain of COVID-19 | Times of Oman - Times of Oman

Climate change means Kansas farmers are dealing with hotter nights and change in rainfall and freezing patterns – The Topeka Capital-Journal

By Brian Grimmett| Kansas News Service

MANHATTAN Climate change conjures notions of rising water levels along the coasts, severe drought in the Intermountain West and the record temperatures baking the Pacific Northwest this week.

Add to that toasty Kansas evenings.

New research from Kansas State University shows that rising overnight temperatures hurt wheat harvests. Rice, corn and barley all face similar problems.

While researchers also look into finding more resilient varieties of those crops to account for the change, the immediate climate trends could have a dramatic impact.

In trials of some of the most popular varieties of wheat grown in Kansas, K-State and North Carolina State University researchers found that an increase of only 1.8 degrees Fahrenheitin overnight temperatures caused a 5% reduction in wheat yield.

Most people think plants arent dynamic, but they are, said Colleen Doherty, an associate professor of biochemistry at North Carolina State University. Plants are constantly regulating their biological processes gearing up for photosynthesis just before dawn, winding that down in the late afternoon, determining precisely how and where to burn their energy resources.

She said their experiments showed that hotter overnight temperatures confuse the plants internal clock. With a screwed-up clock, the plant has a harder time turning the sugars produced during photosynthesis in the day into plant growth.

The amount of wheat that youll get will go down, but also the quality of wheat will go down, said K-State crop physiologist Krishna Jagadish. So your bread probably may start to taste a little bit different in the future.

Average summer nighttime temperatures have been increasing across the state. Since 1970, the average low in the Wichita area has increased 2.7 degrees. In Topeka, it increased 3.5 degrees.

At the same time, the average summer high temperature only increased 1.4 degrees in Wichita and 2.8 degrees in Topeka.

Jagadish said its harder for people to notice these changes when the average temperature is increasing more during the night than it is in the day. But researchers, like him, are beginning to look more into the issue and to provide information that reveals the true extent of the dangers.

Rising overnight temperatures arent the only negative impacts from climate change that Kansans can expect to experience. Assistant state climatologist Mary Knapp says were already seeing changes in precipitation patterns.

Were getting more rain, but it may not be distributed as evenly as needed, she said.

That means some places are going from very dry to getting the expected monthly rain total in a single day. That wont show up in long-term averages, but has real consequences.

Youve got more of it running off, she said. Youve got more erosion issues and youve got more flooding issues.

Knapp also said Kansas winters are getting milder. She said the state will still experience its typical spring freezes in March and April, but milder Decembers and Januarys will confuse trees and plants, making them less resilient to those freezes.

Its not all doom and gloom from the wheat research. Theres already evidence that some varieties of wheat are more resilient to temperature increases in both the day and the night. Jagadish said once those traits have been genetically identified, scientists can begin breeding new varieties that combine that trait with other proven varieties.

It is going to take time, he said. But I think thats the way to do it and we are making progress.

The researchers suspect the sensitivity to rising nighttime temperatures can be found in all starchy grains. Theyve now turned their attention to corn, to prove their hypothesis.

(Our study) is not just an interesting scientific question, Doherty said. Its a global food security issue.

Brian Grimmett reports on the environment, energy and natural resources for KMUW in Wichita and the Kansas News Service.

Here is the original post:
Climate change means Kansas farmers are dealing with hotter nights and change in rainfall and freezing patterns - The Topeka Capital-Journal

Washington University collaborates with Agilent, Merck to expand metabolomics research – Washington University in St. Louis Newsroom

A collaborative effort between Washington University in St. Louis, Agilent Technologies and the biopharmaceutical company Merck aims to expand research in the field of metabolomics, the comprehensive study of small molecules within a biological system.

Using top-of-the-line research instrumentation from Agilent, scientists in the Department of Chemistry in Arts & Sciences will develop new metabolomics workflows of interest to many members of the drug-development community. The partnership also includes salary support for postdoctoral research fellows for the next two years.

Metabolomics provides a direct readout of biochemical activity. It is ideally suited to study the effect that drugs have on cells and tissues, said Gary Patti, the Michael and Tana Powell Professor of Chemistry in Arts & Sciences and professor of medicine at the School of Medicine, who leads the universitys portion of the collaboration.

With these instruments from Agilent, we are delighted to establish a dedicated training laboratory outfitted with cutting-edge mass spectrometry equipment for metabolomics, said Feng Sheng Hu, the Lucille P. Markey Distinguished Professor and dean of the faculty of Arts & Sciences.

Trainees will be exposed to computational approaches in metabolomics, mass spectrometry, cell work and animal work, as well as many other biochemical techniques making them exceptional candidates to pursue careers within the biopharmaceutical industry, Hu said. We are grateful to Agilent and Merck for their support in helping Washington University to develop the pipeline of research experts skilled in scientific discovery within the fields of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug metabolism and metabolomics.

We are excited to participate in this collaborative effort. The combination of metabolomics with drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) offers significant potential to accelerate drug development, said Sudharshana Seshadri, vice president of Agilents Mass Spectrometry Division. We are confident that the Agilent LC/TQ and LC/Q-TOF workflow solutions will deliver deep insights with great accuracy and enable rapid progress for our collaborators.

This collaboration will fast-track the training of next-generation bioanalytical scientists at Washington University, incorporating new workflows combining metabolomics with DMPK analysis to define mode of action, off-target effects and stratification of results with metabolic biomarkers, said Darlene Solomon, senior vice president and chief technology officer at Agilent.

We are excited to embark on this timely collaboration, said Dan Rock, associate vice president of pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism at Merck Research Laboratories. Mass spectrometry and computational advancements have opened the scope of metabolomics to more global exposure-response modeling techniques, which present a truly unique path to accelerating drug discovery.

Researchers in the Patti laboratory use metabolomics to elucidate novel biochemical mechanisms of disease. Patti himself has made major contributions in the development and application of new metabolomics technologies. He is a previous recipient of an Agilent Early Career Professor Award.

Metabolomics is transforming the ways in which drugs are discovered and developed. For example, researchers can now use metabolomics to create a full tally of drug metabolites the individual byproducts created when the body breaks down a drug into different substances as well as the precursors and products of the reactions that these substances affect. Such work enhances the understanding of how drugs circulate around the body and the chemical mechanisms behind their actions. This knowledge is critical to identifying which drugs can be used to treat which diseases and at what doses to administer them.

The new partnership builds upon Pattis previous work to establish an experimental strategy to find off-target effects by metabolomics.

Off-target effects occur when you develop a drug to do one thing, but then it also does something else unexpectedly, Patti said. Off-target effects can lead to toxicity and are one of the biggest reasons that drugs fail during development. The earlier that off-target effects can be identified, the better. Metabolomics has a lot of potential to help here.

The three-way collaboration offers an opportunity to integrate the unique expertise and perspectives of academic researchers, instrument manufacturers and scientists from the pharmaceutical industry.

This will position us to tackle the toughest challenges in drug development by applying the newest metabolomics technologies to a wide range of biological systems that span from cells and animals to human patients, Patti said.

More:
Washington University collaborates with Agilent, Merck to expand metabolomics research - Washington University in St. Louis Newsroom

New Plant Growth Regulator Thins Stone Fruit and Apples – Growing Produce

Valent BioSciences LLC announces EPA registration of a new plant growth regulator (PGR), which will be marketed under the brand name Accede, utilizing the active ingredient 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC).

Accede is the first PGR based on a naturally occurring compound developed specifically for thinning of stone fruit, including peaches and nectarines. It also gives apple growers an effective tool to thin apples in the late thinning window when fruit are 15 mm to 20 mm in diameter. According to Valent BioSciences, until now, no fruit thinner has provided reliable thinning at this stage of development. Use of Accede will reduce the need for costly hand thinning to adjust the crop load and generate higher fruit quality and grower returns.

ACC occurs naturally in plants. Once applied to the crop, the active ingredient in Accede is quickly converted to ethylene using the plants natural biochemical pathways. The ethylene generated after application of Accede stimulates and accelerates flower and fruit drop in apples and stone fruit.

Accede does not leave ACC residues at harvest, as it is rapidly broken down in plants. The product was classified as a biochemical by the EPA in 2015. The technology in Accede is covered by numerous patents.

This game-changing plant growth regulator will revolutionize the way tree fruit growers manage their crop loads, Dr. Warren Shafer, Vice President of Global Research and Development and Regulatory Affairs at Valent BioSciences, says. Its registration in the U.S. is the culmination of more than a decade of research and development collaboration between Valent BioSciences, Valent U.S.A. LLC, and our parent company, Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. We are proud to bring this unique, effective biorational product to market and help growers realize its tremendous benefits.

The rest is here:
New Plant Growth Regulator Thins Stone Fruit and Apples - Growing Produce