What to Expect at Hedonism | Hedonism II

Departure City

Albany, Ny [ALB]Albuquerque, Nm [ABQ]Allentown, Pa [ABE]Amarillo, Tx [AMA]Anchorage, Ak [ANC]Appleton, Mn [AQP]Arcata, Ca [ACV]Asheville, Nc [AVL]Aspen, Co [ASE]Atlanta, Ga [ATL]Atlantic City, Nj [ACY]Austin, Tx [AUS]Baltimore, Md [BWI]Bangor, Me [BGR]Beaumont, Tx [BPT]Bethel, Ak [BET]Billings, Mt [BIL] Binghamton, Ny [BGM]Birmingham, Al [BHM]Bismarck, Nd [BIS]Bloomington, Il [BMI]Boise, Id [BOI]Boston, Ma [BOS]Brownsville, Tx [BRO]Brunswick, Ga [BQK]Buffalo, Ny [BUF]Burbank, Ca [BUR]Burlington, Vt [BTV]Calgary [YYC]Cedar Rapids, Ia [CID]Charleston, Sc [CHS]Charleston, Wv [CRW]Charlotte, Nc [CLT]Charlottesville, Va [CHO]Chicago (Midway), Il [MDW]Chicago (O'Hare), Il [ORD]Cincinnati, Oh [CVG]Cleveland, Oh [CLE]College Station, Tx [CLL]Colorado Springs, Co [COS]Columbia, Mo [COU]Columbia, Sc [CAE]Columbus, Oh [CMH]Cordova, Ak [CDV]Corpus Christi, Tx [CRP]Dallas Love Field, Tx [DAL]Dallas/Fort Worth, Tx [DFW]Dayton, Oh [DAY]Denver, Co [DEN]Des Moines, Ia [DSM]Detroit, Mi [DTW]Duluth, Mn [DLH]Durango, Co [DRO]Edmonton Intntl [YEG]Eastern Iowa, Ia [CID]El Paso, Tx [ELP]Erie, Pa [ERI]Eugene, Or [EUG]Eureka, Ca [EKA]Fairbanks, Ak [FAI]Fargo, Nd [FAR]Flint, Mi [FNT]Fresno, Ca [FAT]Ft. Lauderdale, Fl [FLL]Ft. Myers, Fl [RSW]Ft. Walton/Okaloosa [VPS]Ft. Wayne, In [FWA]Gainesville, Fl [GNV]Grand Forks, Nd [GFK]Grand Rapids, Mi [GRR]Great Falls, Mt [GTF]Green Bay, Wi [GRB]Greensboro, Nc [GSO]Greenville, Sc [GSP]Gulfport, Ms [GPT]Halifax Intntl [YHZ]Harlingen [HRL]Harrisburg, Pa [MDT]Hartford, Ct [BDL]Helena, Mt [HLN]Hilo, Hi [ITO]Hilton Head, Sc [HHH]Honolulu, Hi [HNL]Houston Hobby, Tx [HOU]Houston Busch, Tx [IAH]Huntington, Wv [HTS]Huntsville Intl, Al [HSV]Idaho Falls, Id [IDA]Indianapolis, In [IND]Islip, Ny [ISP]Ithaca, Ny [ITH]Jackson Hole, Wy [JAC]Jackson Int'L, Ms [JAN]Jacksonville, Fl [JAX]Juneau, Ak [JNU]Kahului, Hi [OGG]Kansas City, Mo [MCI]Kapalua, Hi [JHM]Kauai, Hi [LIH]Key West, Fl [EYW]Knoxville, Tn [TYS]Kona, Hi [KOA]Lanai, Hi [LNY]Lansing, Mi [LAN]Las Vegas, Nv [LAS]Lexington, Ky [LEX]Lincoln, Ne [LNK]Little Rock, Ar [LIT]Long Beach, Ca [LGB]Los Angeles, Ca [LAX]Louisville, Ky [SDF]Lubbock, Tx [LBB]Lynchburg, Va [LYH]Montreal Mirabel [YMX]Montreal Trudeau [YUL]Madison, Wi [MSN]Manchester, Nh [MHT]Maui, Hi [OGG]Mcallen, Tx [MFE]Medford, Or [MFR]Melbourne, Fl [MLB]Memphis, Tn [MEM]Miami, Fl [MIA]Midland/Odessa, Tx [MAF]Milwaukee, Wi [MKE]Minneapolis/St. Paul [MSP]Missoula, Mt [MSO]Mobile Regional, Al [MOB]Molokai, Hi [MKK]Monterey, Ca [MRY]Montgomery, Al [MGM]Myrtle Beach, Sc [MYR]Naples, Fl [APF]Nashville, Tn [BNA] New Braunfels, Tx [BAZ]New Orleans, La [MSY]New York Kennedy, Ny [JFK]New York Laguardia [LGA]Newark, Nj [EWR]Norfolk, Va [ORF]Ottawa Mcdonald [YOW]Oakland, Ca [OAK]Oklahoma City, Ok [OKC]Omaha, Ne [OMA]Ontario, Ca [ONT]Orange County, Ca [SNA]Orlando, Fl [MCO]Palm Springs, Ca [PSP]Panama City, Fl [PFN]Pensacola, Fl [PNS]Peoria, Il [PIA]Philadelphia, Pa [PHL]Phoenix, Az [PHX]Pittsburgh, Pa [PIT]Port Angeles, Wa [CLM]Portland Intl, Or [PDX]Portland, Me [PWM]Providence, Ri [PVD]Quebec Intntl [YQB]Raleigh/Durham, Nc [RDU]Rapid City, Sd [RAP]Redmond, Or [RDM]Reno, Nv [RNO]Richmond, Va [RIC]Roanoke, Va [ROA]Rochester, Ny [ROC]Rockford, Il [RFD]Sacramento, Ca [SMF]Saginaw, Mi [MBS]Salem, Or [SLE]Salt Lake City, Ut [SLC]San Antonio, Tx [SAT]San Diego, Ca [SAN]San Francisco, Ca [SFO]San Jose, Ca [SJC]Santa Barbara, Ca [SBA]Santa Rosa, Ca [STS]Sarasota/Bradenton [SRQ]Savannah, Ga [SAV]Seattle/Tacoma, Wa [SEA]Shreveport, La [SHV]Sioux City, Ia [SUX]Sioux Falls, Sd [FSD]Spokane, Wa [GEG]Springfield, Il [SPI]Springfield, Mo [SGF]St. Louis, Mo [STL]St. Petersburg, Fl [PIE]Syracuse, Ny [SYR]Toronto Pearson [YYZ]Tallahassee, Fl [TLH]Tampa, Fl [TPA]Traverse City, Mi [TVC]Tucson, Az [TUS]Tulsa, Ok [TUL]Vancouver Intntl [YVR]Victoria Intntl [YYJ]Winnipeg Intntl [YWG]Washington Natl, Dc [DCA]Washington/Dulles, Dc [IAD]Wenatchee, Wa [EAT]West Palm Beach, Fl [PBI]White Plains, Ny [HPN]Wichita, Ks [ICT]Wilkes-Barre/Scranton [AVP]

See the article here:

What to Expect at Hedonism | Hedonism II

Hedonism – Ethics Unwrapped

Hedonism is the belief that pleasure, or the absence of pain, is the most important principle in determining the morality of a potential course of action. Pleasure can be things like sex, drugs, and rock n roll, but it can also include any intrinsically valuable experience like reading a good book.

Hedonism is a type of consequentialism, and it has several forms. For example, normative hedonism is the idea that pleasure should be peoples primary motivation. On the other hand, motivational hedonism says that only pleasure and pain cause people to do what they do.

Egotistical hedonism requires a person to consider only his or her own pleasure in making choices. Conversely, altruistic hedonism says that the creation of pleasure for all people is the best way to measure if an action is ethical.

Regardless of the type of hedonism, critics fault it as a guide for morality because hedonism ignores all other values, such as freedom or fairness, when evaluating right and wrong.

Read the rest here:

Hedonism - Ethics Unwrapped

Human Rights and Dutertes War on Drugs

Since becoming president of the Philippines in June 2016, Rodrigo Duterte has launched a war on drugs that has resulted in the extrajudicial deaths of thousands of alleged drug dealers and users across the country. The Philippine president sees drug dealing and addiction as major obstacles to the Philippines economic and social progress, says John Gershman, an expert on Philippine politics. The drug war is a cornerstone of Dutertes domestic policy and represents the extension of policies hed implemented earlier in his political career as the mayor of the city of Davao. In December 2016, the United States withheld poverty aid to the Philippines after declaring concern over Dutertes war on drugs.

How did the Philippines war on drugs start?

More From Our Experts

When Rodrigo Duterte campaigned for president, he claimed that drug dealing and drug addiction were major obstacles to the Philippines economic and social progress. He promised a large-scale crackdown on dealers and addicts, similar to the crackdown that he engaged in when he was mayor of Davao, one of the Philippines largest cities on the southern island of Mindanao. When Duterte became president in June, he encouraged the public to go ahead and kill drug addicts. His rhetoric has been widely understood as an endorsement of extrajudicial killings, as it has created conditions for people to feel that its appropriate to kill drug users and dealers. What have followed seem to be vigilante attacks against alleged or suspected drug dealers and drug addicts. The police are engaged in large-scale sweeps. The Philippine National Police also revealed a list of high-level political officials and other influential people who were allegedly involved in the drug trade.

When Rodrigo Duterte campaigned for president, he claimed that drug dealing and drug addiction were major obstacles to the Philippines economic and social progress.

More on:

Philippines

Rodrigo Duterte

Drug Policy

Human Rights

The dominant drug in the Philippines is a variant of methamphetamine called shabu. According to a 2012 United Nations report, among all the countries in East Asia, the Philippines had the highest rate of methamphetamine abuse. Estimates showed that about 2.2 percent of Filipinos between the ages of sixteen and sixty-four were using methamphetamines, and that methamphetamines and marijuana were the primary drugs of choice. In 2015, the national drug enforcement agency reported that one fifth of the barangays, the smallest administrative division in the Philippines, had evidence of drug use, drug trafficking, or drug manufacturing; in Manila, the capital, 92 percent of the barangays had yielded such evidence.

How would you describe Dutertes leadership as the mayor of Davao?

After the collapse of the Ferdinand Marcos dictatorship, there were high levels of crime in Davao and Duterte cracked down on crime associated with drugs and criminality more generally. There was early criticism of his time as mayor by Philippine and international human rights groups because of his de facto endorsement of extrajudicial killings, under the auspices of the Davao Death Squad.

Duterte was also successful at negotiating with the Philippine Communist Party. He was seen broadly as sympathetic to their concerns about poverty, inequality, and housing, and pursued a reasonably robust anti-poverty agenda while he was mayor. He was also interested in public health issues, launching the first legislation against public smoking in the Philippines, which he has claimed he will launch nationally.

More From Our Experts

What have been the outcomes of the drug war?

By early December, nearly 6,000 people had been killed: about 2,100 have died in police operations and the remainder in what are called deaths under investigation, which is shorthand for vigilante killings. There are also claims that half a million to seven hundred thousand people have surrendered themselves to the police. More than 40,000 people have been arrested.

Daily News Brief

A summary of global news developments with CFR analysis delivered to your inbox each morning.Most weekdays.

A summary of global news developments with CFR analysis delivered to your inbox each morning.Most weekdays.

A curation of original analyses, data visualizations, and commentaries, examining the debates and efforts to improve health worldwide.Weekly.

Although human rights organizations and political leaders have spoken out against the crackdown, Duterte has been relatively successful at not having the legislature engaged in any serious oversight of or investigation into this war. PhilippineSenator Leila de Lima, former chairperson of the Philippine Commission on Human Rights and a former secretary of justice under the previous administration, had condemned the war on drugs and held hearings on human rights violations associated with these extrajudicial killings. However, in August, Duterte alleged that he had evidence of de Lima having an affair with her driver, who had been using drugs and collecting drug protection money when de Lima was the justice secretary. De Lima was later removed from her position chairing the investigative committee in a 16-4 vote by elected members of the Senate committee.

More on:

Philippines

Rodrigo Duterte

Drug Policy

Human Rights

What is the public reaction to the drug war?

The war on drugs has received a high level of popular support from across the class spectrum in the Philippines. The most recent nationwide survey on presidential performance and trust ratings conducted from September 25 to October 1 by Pulse Asia Research showed that Dutertes approval rating was around 86 percent. Even through some people are concerned about these deaths, they support him as a president for his position on other issues. For example, he has a relatively progressive economic agenda, with a focus on economic inequality.

Duterte is also supporting a range of anti-poverty programs and policies. The most recent World Bank quarterly report speaks positively about Dutertes economic plans. The fact that he wants to work on issues of social inequality and economic inequality makes people not perceive the drug war as a war on the poor.

How is Duterte succeeding in carrying out this war on drugs?

The Philippine judicial system is very slow and perceived as corrupt, enabling Duterte to act proactively and address the issue of drugs in a non-constructive way with widespread violations of human rights. Moreover, in the face of a corrupt, elite-dominated political system and a slow, ineffective, and equally corrupt judicial system, people are willing to tolerate this politician who promised something and is now delivering.

Drug dealers and drug addicts are a stigmatized group, and stigmatized groups always have difficulty gaining political support for the defense of their rights.

There are no trials, so there is no evidence that the people being killed are in fact drug dealers or drug addicts. [This situation] shows the weakness of human rights institutions and discourse in the face of a popular and skilled populist leader. It is different from college students being arrested under the Marcos regime or activists being targeted under the first Aquino administration, when popular outcry was aroused. Drug dealers and drug addicts are a stigmatized group, and stigmatized groups always have difficulty gaining political support for the defense of their rights.

How has the United States reacted to the drug war and why is Duterte challenging U.S.-Philippines relations?

Its never been a genuine partnership. Its always been a relationship dominated by U.S. interests. Growing up in the 1960s, Duterte lived through a period when the United States firmly supported a regime that was even more brutal than this particular regime and was willing to not criticize that particular government. He noticed that the United States was willing to overlook human rights violations when these violations served their geopolitical interests. He was unhappy about the double standards. [Editors Note: The Obama administration has expressed concern over reports of extrajudicial killings and encouraged Manila to abide by its international human rights obligations.] For the first time, the United States is facing someone who is willing to challenge this historically imbalanced relationship. It is unclear what might happen to the relationship under the administration of Donald J. Trump, but initial indications are that it may not focus on human rights in the Philippines. President-Elect Trump has reportedly endorsed the Philippine presidents effort, allegedly saying that the country is going about the drug war "the right way," according to Duterte.

The interview has been edited and condensed.

See original here:

Human Rights and Dutertes War on Drugs

The War on Drugs (band) – Wikipedia

American rock band

The War on Drugs is an American rock band from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, formed in 2005. The band consists of Adam Granduciel (vocals, guitar), David Hartley (bass guitar), Robbie Bennett (keyboards), Charlie Hall (drums), Jon Natchez (saxophone, keyboards), Anthony LaMarca (guitar) and Eliza Hardy Jones (keyboards).

Founded by close collaborators Adam Granduciel and Kurt Vile, The War on Drugs released their debut studio album, Wagonwheel Blues, in 2008. Vile departed shortly after its release to focus on his solo career. The band's second studio album Slave Ambient was released in 2011 to favorable reviews and a lengthy tour.

The band's third album, Lost in the Dream, was released in 2014 following extensive touring and a period of loneliness and clinical depression for primary songwriter Granduciel. The album was released to widespread critical acclaim and increased exposure. Previous collaborator Hall joined the band as its full-time drummer during the recording process, with saxophonist Natchez and additional guitarist LaMarca accompanying the band for its world tour. Signing to Atlantic Records, the six-piece band released their fourth album, A Deeper Understanding, in 2017, which won the Grammy Award for Best Rock Album at the 60th Annual Grammy Awards. The band released their fifth album, I Don't Live Here Anymore, in 2021.

In 2003, frontman Adam Granduciel moved from Oakland, California, to Philadelphia, where he met Kurt Vile, who had also recently moved back to Philadelphia after living in Boston for two years.[2] The duo subsequently began writing, recording and performing music together.[3] Vile stated, "Adam was the first dude I met when I moved back to Philadelphia in 2003. We saw eye-to-eye on a lot of things. I was obsessed with Bob Dylan at the time, and we totally geeked-out on that. We started playing together in the early days and he would be in my band, The Violators. Then, eventually I played in The War On Drugs."[4]

Granduciel and Vile began playing together as The War on Drugs in 2005. Regarding the band's name, Granduciel noted, "My friend Julian and I came up with it a few years ago over a couple bottles of red wine and a few typewriters when we were living in Oakland. We were writing a lot back then, working on a dictionary, and it just came out and we were like "hey, good band name" so eventually when I moved to Philadelphia and got a band together I used it. It was either that or The Rigatoni Danzas. I think we made the right choice. I always felt though that it was the kind of name I could record all sorts of different music under without any sort of predictability inherent in the name."[5]

While Vile and Granduciel formed the backbone of the band, they had a number of accompanists early in the group's career, before finally settling on a lineup that added Charlie Hall as drummer/organist, Kyle Lloyd as drummer and Dave Hartley on bass.[6] Granduciel had previously toured and recorded with The Capitol Years, and Vile has several solo albums.[7] The group gave away its Barrel of Batteries EP for free early in 2008.[8] Their debut LP for Secretly Canadian, Wagonwheel Blues, was released in 2008.[9]

Following the album's release, and subsequent European tour, Vile departed from the band to focus on his solo career, stating, "I only went on the first European tour when their album came out, and then I basically left the band. I knew if I stuck with that, it would be all my time and my goal was to have my own musical career."[4] Fellow Kurt Vile & the Violators bandmate Mike Zanghi joined the band at this time, with Vile noting, "Mike was my drummer first and then when The War On Drugs' first record came out I thought I was lending Mike to Adam for the European tour but then he just played with them all the time so I kind of had to like, while they were touring a lot, figure out my own thing."[10]

The lineup underwent several changes, and by the end of 2008, Kurt Vile, Charlie Hall, and Kyle Lloyd had all exited the group. At that time Granduciel and Hartley were joined by drummer Mike Zanghi, whom Granduciel also played with in Kurt Vile's backing band, the Violators.

After recording much of the band's forthcoming studio album, Slave Ambient, Zanghi departed from the band in 2010. Drummer Steven Urgo subsequently joined the band, with keyboardist Robbie Bennett also joining at around this time. Regarding Zanghi's exit, Granduciel noted: "I loved Mike, and I loved the sound of The Violators, but then he wasn't really the sound of my band. But you have things like friendship, and he's down to tour and he's a great guy, but it wasn't the sound of what this band was."[11]

In 2012, Patrick Berkery replaced Urgo as the band's drummer.[12]

On December 4, 2013 the band announced the upcoming release of its third studio album, Lost in the Dream (March 18, 2014). The band streamed the album in its entirety on NPR's First Listen site for a week before its release.[13] Award winning alt-country rocker Ryan Adams tweeted that Lost in the Dream was a perfect album.[14]

Lost in the Dream was featured as the Vinyl Me, Please record of the month in August 2014. The pressing was a limited edition pressing on mint green colored vinyl.

In June 2015, The War on Drugs signed with Atlantic Records for a two-album deal.[15]

On Record Store Day, April 22, 2017, The War on Drugs released their new single "Thinking of a Place".[16] The single was produced by frontman Granduciel and Shawn Everett.[17] April 28, 2017, The War on Drugs announced a fall 2017 tour in North America and Europe and that a new album was imminent.[18] On June 1, 2017, a new song, "Holding On", was released, and it was announced that the album would be titled A Deeper Understanding and was released on August 25, 2017.[19] "Holding On" was also used on the official soundtrack of EA Sports' FIFA 18.

The 2017 tour began in September, opening in the band's hometown, Philadelphia, and it concluded in November in Sweden.[20]

A Deeper Understanding was nominated for the International Album of the Year award at the 2018 UK Americana Awards.[21]

At the 60th Annual Grammy Awards, on January 28, 2018, A Deeper Understanding won the Grammy for Best Rock Album.[22]

On October 6, 2020, The War on Drugs announced a live album titled Live Drugs, which was released on November 20, 2020.[23]

The War on Drugs released their fifth studio album, I Don't Live Here Anymore, on October 29, 2021. Along with the album announcement, the band also released a single and accompanying music video for the album's lead track, "Living Proof", along with a 2022 tour announcement.[24] The album was released to widespread critical acclaim, placing highly on several end-of-year lists. For the album's accompanying tour, keyboardist Eliza Hardy Jones - who has previously played with bass guitarist Dave Hartley in his solo project, Nightlands - joined the band.

The band has been described as indie rock,[6][25][26][27][28] heartland rock[27][29] and neo-psychedelia,[28][30] as well as Americana.[31] Their Dylan and Springsteen-influenced lyrical approach meets Tom Petty and Sonic Youth musically for a roots-soaked-synth-and-guitar approach to American rock and roll. Not only do they draw inspiration from artists like Bruce Springsteen, Talk Talk, and Granduciel's "favorite modern day band", Wilco, but they have inspired their own wave of guitar-forward, synth-layered indie rockers.[32]

Granduciel and Zanghi are both former members of founding guitarist Vile's backing band The Violators, with Granduciel noting, "There was never, despite what lazy journalists have assumed, any sort of falling out, or resentment"[33] following Vile's departure from The War on Drugs. In 2011, Vile stated, "When my record came out, I assumed Adam would want to focus on The War On Drugs but he came with us in The Violators when we toured the States. The Violators became a unit, and although the cast does rotate, we've developed an even tighter unity and sound. Adam is an incredible guitar player these days and there is a certain feeling [between us] that nobody else can tap into. We don't really have to tell each other what to play, it just happens."

Both Hartley and Granduciel contributed to singer-songwriter Sharon Van Etten's fourth studio album, Are We There (2014). Hartley performs bass guitar on the entire album, with Granduciel contributing guitar on two tracks.[citation needed]

Granduciel is currently[when?] producing the new Sore Eros album. They have been recording it in Philadelphia and Los Angeles on and off for the past several years.[4]

In 2016, The War on Drugs contributed a cover of "Touch of Grey" for a Grateful Dead tribute album called Day of the Dead. The album was curated by The National's Aaron and Bryce Dessner.[20] Granduciel had been curious about the Grateful Dead and other jam bands since he attended Phish concerts when he was younger.[34]

Current members

Current touring musicians

Former members

Delivered since 2010, the GAFFA Awards (Swedish: GAFFA Priset) are a Swedish award that rewards popular music awarded by the magazine of the same name.

Read this article:

The War on Drugs (band) - Wikipedia

Philippines War on Drugs – Human Rights Watch

Since taking office on June 30, 2016, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has carried out a war on drugs that has led to the deaths of over 12,000 Filipinos to date, mostly urban poor. At least 2,555 of the killings have been attributed to the Philippine National Police. Duterte and other senior officials have instigated and incited the killings in a campaign that could amount to crimes against humanity.

Human Rights Watch research has found that police are falsifying evidence to justify the unlawful killings. Despite growing calls for an investigation, Duterte has vowed to continue the campaign.

Large-scale extrajudicial violence as a crime solution was a marker of Dutertes 22-year tenure as mayor of Davao City and the cornerstone of his presidential campaign. On the eve of his May 9, 2016 election victory, Duterte told a crowd of more than 300,000: If I make it to the presidential palace I will do just what I did as mayor. You drug pushers, holdup men, and do-nothings, you better get out because I'll kill you.

Read this article:

Philippines War on Drugs - Human Rights Watch

50-year war on drugs imprisoned millions of Black Americans

By AARON MORRISON

https://apnews.com/article/war-on-drugs-75e61c224de3a394235df80de7d70b70

Landscaping was hardly his lifelong dream.

As a teenager, Alton Lucas believed basketball or music would pluck him out of North Carolina and take him around the world. In the late 1980s, he was the right-hand man to his musical best friend, Youtha Anthony Fowler, who many hip hop and R&B heads know as DJ Nabs.

But rather than jet-setting with Fowler, Lucas discovered drugs and the drug trade at the height of the so-called war on drugs. Addicted to crack cocaine and involved in trafficking the drug, he faced decades-long imprisonment at a time when the drug abuse and violence plaguing major cities and working class Black communities were not seen as the public health issue that opioids are today.

By chance, Lucas received a rare bit of mercy. He got the kind of help that many Black and Latino Americans struggling through the crack epidemic did not: treatment, early release and what many would consider a fresh start.

I started the landscaping company, to be honest with you, because nobody would hire me because I have a felony, said Lucas. His Sunflower Landscaping got a boost in 2019 with the help of Inmates to Entrepreneurs, a national nonprofit assisting people with criminal backgrounds by providing practical entrepreneurship education.

Lucas was caught up in a system that imposes lifetime limits on most people who have served time for drug crimes, with little thought given to their ability to rehabilitate. In addition to being denied employment, those with criminal records can be limited in their access to business and educational loans, housing, child custody rights, voting rights and gun rights.

Its a system that was born when Lucas was barely out of diapers.

Fifty years ago this summer, President Richard Nixon declared a war on drugs. Today, with the U.S. mired in a deadly opioid epidemic that did not abate during the coronavirus pandemics worst days, it is questionable whether anyone won the war.

Yet the loser is clear: Black and Latino Americans, their families and their communities. A key weapon was the imposition of mandatory minimums in prison sentencing. Decades later those harsh federal and state penalties led to an increase in the prison industrial complex that saw millions of people, primarily of color, locked up and shut out of the American dream.

An Associated Press review of federal and state incarceration data shows that, between 1975 and 2019, the U.S. prison population jumped from 240,593 to 1.43 million Americans. Among them, about 1 in 5 people were incarcerated with a drug offense listed as their most serious crime.

The racial disparities reveal the wars uneven toll. Following the passage of stiffer penalties for crack cocaine and other drugs, the Black incarceration rate in America exploded from about 600 per 100,000 people in 1970 to 1,808 in 2000. In the same timespan, the rate for the Latino population grew from 208 per 100,000 people to 615, while the white incarceration rate grew from 103 per 100,000 people to 242.

Gilberto Gonzalez, a retired special agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration who worked for more than 20 years taking down drug dealers and traffickers in the U.S., Mexico and in South America, said hell never forget being cheered on by residents in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood near Los Angeles as he led away drug traffickers in handcuffs.

That gave me a sense of the reality of the people that live in these neighborhoods, that are powerless because theyre afraid that the drug dealers that control the street, that control the neighborhood are going to do them and their children harm, said Gonzalez, 64, who detailed his field experiences in the recently released memoir Narco Legenda.

We realized then that, along with dismantling (drug trafficking) organizations, there was also a real need to clean up communities, to go to where the crime was and help people that are helpless, he said.

Still, the law enforcement approach has led to many long-lasting consequences for people who have since reformed. Lucas still wonders what would happen for him and his family if he no longer carried the weight of a drug-related conviction on his record.

Even with his sunny disposition and close to 30 years of sober living, Lucas, at age 54, cannot pass most criminal background checks. His wife, whom hed met two decades ago at a fatherhood counseling conference, said his past had barred him from doing things as innocuous as chaperoning their children on school field trips.

Its almost like a life sentence, he said.

___

Although Nixon declared the war on drugs on June 17, 1971, the U.S. already had lots of practice imposing drug prohibitions that had racially skewed impacts. The arrival of Chinese migrants in the 1800s saw the rise of criminalizing opium that migrants brought with them. Cannabis went from being called reefer to marijuana, as a way to associate the plant with Mexican migrants arriving in the U.S. in the 1930s.

By the time Nixon sought reelection amid the anti-Vietnam War and Black power movements, criminalizing heroin was a way to target activists and hippies. One of Nixons domestic policy aides, John Ehrlichman, admitted as much about the war on drugs in a 22-year-old interview published by Harpers Magazine in 2016.

Experts say Nixons successors, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, leveraged drug war policies in the following decades to their own political advantage, cementing the drug wars legacy. The explosion of the U.S. incarceration rate, the expansion of public and private prison systems and the militarization of local police forces are all outgrowths of the drug war.

Federal policies, such as mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses, were mirrored in state legislatures. Lawmakers also adopted felony disenfranchisement, while also imposing employment and other social barriers for people caught in drug sweeps.

The domestic anti-drug policies were widely accepted, mostly because the use of illicit drugs, including crack cocaine in the late 1980s, was accompanied by an alarming spike in homicides and other violent crimes nationwide. Those policies had the backing of Black clergy and the Congressional Black Caucus, the group of African-American lawmakers whose constituents demanded solutions and resources to stem the violent heroin and crack scourges.

I think people often flatten this conversation, said Kassandra Frederique, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit organization pushing decriminalization and safe drug use policies.

If youre a Black leader 30 years ago, youre grabbing for the first (solution) in front of you, said Frederique, who is Black. A lot of folks in our community said, OK, get these drug dealers out of our communities, get this crack out of our neighborhood. But also, give us treatment so we can help folks.

The heavy hand of law enforcement came without addiction prevention resources, she said.

Use of crack rose sharply in 1985, and peaked in 1989, before quickly declining in the early 1990s, according to a Harvard study.

Drug sales and use were concentrated in cities, particularly those with large Black and Latino populations, although there were spikes in use among white populations, too. Between 1984 and 1989, crack was associated with a doubling of homicides of Black males aged 14 to 17. By the year 2000, the correlation between crack cocaine and violence faded amid waning profits from street sales.

Roland Fryer, an author of the Harvard study and a professor of economics, said the effects of the crack epidemic on a generation of Black families and Black children still havent been thoroughly documented. A lack of accountability for the war on drugs bred mistrust of government and law enforcement in the community, he said.

People ask why Black people dont trust (public) institutions, said Fryer, who is Black. Its because we have watched how weve treated opioids its a public health concern. But crack (cocaine) was, lock them up and throw away the key, what we need is tougher sentencing.

Another major player in creating hysteria around drug use during the crack era: the media. On June 17, 1986, 15 years to the day after Nixon declared the drug war, NBA draftee Len Bias died of a cocaine-induced heart attack on the University of Maryland campus.

Coverage was frenzied and coupled with racist depictions of crack addiction in mostly Black and Latino communities. Within weeks of Biass death, the U.S. House of Representatives drafted the Anti-Abuse Act of 1986.

The law, passed and signed by Reagan that October, imposed mandatory federal sentences of 20 years to life in prison for violating drug laws. The law also made possession and sale of crack rocks harsher than that of powder cocaine.

The basketball players death could have been one of the off-ramps in Lucass spiral into crack addiction and dealing. By then, he could make $10,000 in four to five hours selling the drug.

One of the things that I thought would help me, that I thought would be my rehab, was when Len Bias died, Lucas said. I thought, if they showed me evidence (he) died from an overdose of smoking crack cocaine, as much as I loved Len Bias, that I would give it up.

I did not quit, he said.

He was first introduced to crack cocaine in 1986, but kept his drug use largely hidden from his friends and family.

What I didnt know at the time was that this was a different type of chemical entering my brain and it was going to change me forever, Lucas said. Here I am on the verge of being the right-hand man to DJ Nabs, to literally travel the world. Thats how bad the drug did me.

By 1988, Fowlers music career had outgrown Durham. He and Lucas moved to Atlanta and, a few years later, Fowler signed a deal to become the official touring DJ for the hip hop group Kris Kross under famed music producer Jermaine Dupris So So Def record label. Fowler and the group went on to open for pop music icon Michael Jackson on the European leg of the Dangerous tour.

Lucas, who began trafficking crack cocaine between Georgia and North Carolina, never joined his best friend on the road. Instead, he slipped further into his addiction and returned to Durham, where he took a short-lived job as a preschool instructor.

When he lacked the money to procure drugs to sell or to use, Lucas resorted to robbing businesses for quick cash. He claims that he was never armed when he robbed soft targets, like fast food restaurants and convenience stores.

Lucas spent four and a half years in state prison for larceny after robbing several businesses to feed his addiction. Because his crimes were considered nonviolent, Lucas learned in prison that he was eligible for an addiction treatment program that would let him out early. But if he violated the terms of his release or failed to complete the treatment, Lucas would serve more than a decade in prison on separate drug trafficking charges under a deal with the court.

He accepted the deal.

After his release from prison and his graduation from the treatment program, Fowler paid out of his pocket to have his friends fines and fees cleared. Thats how Lucas regained his voting rights.

On a recent Saturday, the two best friends met up to talk in depth about the secret that Lucas intentionally kept from Fowler. The DJ learned of his friends addiction after seeing a Durham newspaper clipping that detailed the string of robberies.

Sitting in Fowlers home, Lucas told his friend that he doesnt regret not being on the road or missing out on the fringe benefits from touring.

All I needed was to be around you, Lucas said.

Right, Fowler replied, choking up and wiping tears from his eyes.

Lucas continued: You know, when I was around you, when there was a party or whatnot, my job, just out of instinct, was to watch your back.

In a separate interview, Fowler, who is a few years younger than Lucas, said, I just wanted my brother on the road with me. To help protect me. To help me be strong. And I had to do it by my damn self. And I didnt like that. Thats what it was.

___

Not everyone was as lucky as Lucas. Often, a drug offense conviction in combination with a violent gun offense carried much steeper penalties. At the heights of the war on drugs, federal law allowed violent drug offenders to be prosecuted in gang conspiracy cases, which often pinned homicides on groups of defendants, sometimes irrespective of who pulled the trigger.

These cases resulted in sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, a punishment disproportionately doled out to Black and Latino gang defendants.

Thats the case for Bill Underwood, who was a successful R&B and hip hop music promoter in New York City in the late 70s through the 80s, before his 33-year incarceration. A judge granted him compassionate release from federal custody in January, noting his lauded reputation as a mentor to young men in prison and his high-risk exposure to COVID-19 at age 67.

As the AP reported in 1990, Underwood was found guilty and sentenced to life without parole for racketeering, racketeering conspiracy and narcotics conspiracy, as part of a prosecution that accused his gang of committing six murders and of controlling street-level drug distribution.

I actually short-changed myself, and my family and my people, by doing what I did, said Underwood, who acknowledges playing a large part in the multimillion-dollar heroin trade, as a leader of a violent Harlem gang from the 1970s through the 1980s.

Underwood is now a senior fellow with The Sentencing Project, a nonprofit pushing for an end to life imprisonment. He testified to Congress in June that his punishment was excessive.

As human beings, we are capable of painful yet transformative self reflection, maturity, and growth, and to deny a person this opportunity is to deny them their humanity, he said in the testimony.

Though he feels the system is broken, Brett Roman Williams, a Philadelphia-based independent filmmaker and anti-gun violence advocate, said a lack of counseling and support for people re-entering society after incarceration has serious consequences.

Williams grew up watching his older brother, Derrick, serve time in prison for a serious drug offense. But in 2016, his brother who discouraged young people from making choices similar to his own was killed by gunfire in Philadelphia less than three weeks after he left prison, where he had been held on a parole violation.

We do need reform, we do need opportunities and equity within our system of economics. But we all have choices, Williams said, adding that those were the principles that my brother stood on.

Rep. Cori Bush of St. Louis, following similar action by several members of Congress before her, last month introduced legislation to decriminalize all drugs and invest in substance abuse treatment.

Growing up in St. Louis, the War on Drugs disappeared Black people, not drug use, Bush, who is Black, wrote in a statement sent to the AP. Over the course of two years, I lost 40 to 50 friends to incarceration or death because of the War on Drugs. We became so accustomed to loss and trauma that it was our normal.

___

The deleterious impacts of the drug war have, for years, drawn calls for reform and abolition from mostly left-leaning elected officials and social justice advocates. Many of them say that in order to begin to unwind or undo the war on drugs, all narcotics must be decriminalized or legalized, with science-based regulation.

Drug abuse prevention advocates, however, claim that broad drug legalization poses more risks to Americans than it would any benefits.

Provisional data released in December from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show overdose deaths from illicit drug use continued to rise amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. And according to the latest Drug Enforcement Administration narcotics threat assessment released in March, the availability of drugs such as fentanyl, heroin and cocaine remained high or plateaued last year. Domestic and transnational drug trade organizations generate tens of billions of dollars in illicit proceeds from sales annually in the U.S., the DEA said.

Many people think drug prevention is just say no, like Nancy Reagan did in the 80s, and we know that did not work, said Becky Vance, CEO of the Texas-based agency Drug Prevention Resources, which has advocated for evidenced-based anti-drug and alcohol abuse education for more than 85 years.

As a person in long-term recovery, I know firsthand the harms of addiction, said Vance, who opposes blanket recreational legalization of illicit drugs. I believe there has to be another way, without legalizing drugs, to reform the criminal justice system and get rid of the inequities.

Frederique, of the Drug Policy Alliance, said reckoning with the war on drugs must start with reparations for the generations senselessly swept up and destabilized by racially biased policing.

This was an intentional policy choice, Frederique said. We dont want to end the war on drugs, and then in 50 years be working on something else that does the same thing. That is the cycle that were in.

It has always been about control, Frederique added.

As much as the legacy of the war on drugs is a tragedy, it is also a story about the resilience of people disproportionately targeted by drug policies, said Donovan Ramsey, a journalist and author of the forthcoming book, When Crack Was King.

Even with all of that, its still important to recognize and to celebrate that we (Black people) survived the crack epidemic and we survived it with very little help from the federal government and local governments, Ramsey told the AP.

Fowler thinks the war on drugs didnt ruin Lucas life. I think he went through it at the right time, truth be told, because he was young enough. Lukes got more good behind him than bad, the DJ said.

Lucas sees beauty in making things better, including in his business. But he still dreams of the day when his past isnt held against him.

It was the beautification of doing the landscaping that kind of attracted me, because it was like the affirmation that my soul needed, he said.

I liked to do something and look back at it and say, Wow, that looks good. Its not just going to wash away in a couple of days. It takes nourishment and upkeep.

___

Morrison reported from New York. AP writers Allen G. Breed in Durham, North Carolina, and Angeliki Kastanis in Los Angeles contributed.

___

Morrison writes about race and justice for the APs Race and Ethnicity team. Follow him on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/aaronlmorrison.

___

This story was first published on July 21, 2021. It was updated on July 23, 2021 to correct that the brother of Brett Roman Williams, a Philadelphia-based independent filmmaker and anti-gun violence advocate, was killed less than three weeks after he was freed from prison.

Read more here:

50-year war on drugs imprisoned millions of Black Americans

The Shocking Story Behind Richard Nixons War on Drugs … – AEI

This Sunday, June 17 will mark the 47th anniversary of a shameful day in US history its when President Richard Nixons declared what has been the US governments longest and costliest war the epic failure known as the War on Drugs. At a press conference on that day in 1971, Nixon identified drug abuse as public enemy number one in the United States and launched a failed, costly and inhumane federal war on Americans that continues to today. Early the following year, Nixon created the Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement (ODALE) in January 1972 to wage a government war on otherwise peaceful and innocent Americans who voluntarily chose to ingest plants, weeds, and intoxicants proscribed by the government. In July 1973, ODALE was consolidated, along with several other federal drug agencies, into the newly established Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a new super agency to handle all aspects of the War on Drugs Otherwise Peaceful Americans.

But as John Ehrlichman, Nixons counsel and Assistant for Domestic Affairs, revealed in 1994, the real public enemy in 1971 wasnt really drugs or drug abuse. Rather the real enemies of the Nixon administration were the anti-war left and blacks, and the War on Drugs was designed as an evil, deceptive and sinister policy to wage a war on those two groups. In an article in the April 2016 issue of The Atlantic (Legalize It All: How to win the war on drugs) author and reporter Dan Baum explains how John Ehrlichman, the Watergate co-conspirator, unlocked for me one of the great mysteries of modern American history: How did the United States entangle itself in a policy of drug prohibition that has yielded so much misery and so few good results? As Baum discovered, heres the dirty and disgusting secret to that great mystery of what must be the most expensive, shameful, and reprehensible failed government policy in US history.

Americans have been criminalizing psychoactive substances since San Franciscos anti-opium law of 1875, but it was Ehrlichmans boss, Richard Nixon, who declared the first War on Drugs in 1971 and set the country on the wildly punitive and counterproductive path it still pursues. Id tracked Ehrlichman, who had been Nixons domestic-policy adviser, to an engineering firm in Atlanta, where he was working on minority recruitment. At the time, I was writing a book about the politics of drug prohibition. I started to ask Ehrlichman a series of earnest, wonky questions that he impatiently waved away.

You want to know what this was really all about? he asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what Im saying? We knew we couldnt make it illegal to be either against the war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

Nixons invention of the War on Drugs as a political tool was cynical, but every president since Democrat and Republican alike has found it equally useful for one reason or another. Meanwhile, the growing cost of the Drug War is now impossible to ignore: billions of dollars wasted, bloodshed in Latin America and on the streets of our own cities, and millions of lives destroyed by draconian punishment that doesnt end at the prison gate; one of every eight black men has been disenfranchised because of a felony conviction.

MP: As much as Prohibition (The War on Alcohol) was also an expensive, epic and misguided failure of government policy, it didnt have its origins in any type of equivalent sinister and evil plot like the War on Drugs to destroy enemies of the Woodrow Wilson administration in 1919. In fact, President Wilson vetoed the Volstead Act, the popular name for the National Prohibition Act, but the House and Senate both voted quickly to override the veto and America started the War on Alchohol Otherwise Peaceful Americans Who Voluntarily Chose to Ingest Beer, Wine, and Spirits in 1920.

If the real goal of the War on Drugs was to target, convict and incarcerate subversive anti-war hippies and black Americans, as Ehrlichman describes it, it sure worked as the chart above of the male incarceration rate in the US shows. During the nearly 50-year period between 1925 and the early 1970s, the male incarceration rate was remarkably stable at about 200 men per 100,000 population, or 1 US male per 500, according to data from Bureau of Justice Statistics. By 1986, about a decade after the War on Drugs started locking up drug users and dealers in cages, the male incarceration rate doubled to 400 per 100,000 population. Then within another decade, the male incarceration rate doubled again to more than 800 by 1996 before reaching a historic peak of 956 in 2008 (about one in 100) that was almost five times higher than the stable rate before the War on Drugs. The arrest and incarceration data show that the War on Drugs had a significantly much greater negative effect on blacks and Hispanics than whites, making the Drug War even more shameful for its devastating and disproportionate adverse effects on Americas most vulnerable and disadvantaged populations.

Since the 2008 peak, the male incarceration rate has been gradually declining in each of the last seven years of available data through 2016, possibly because of three trends: a) decriminalization of weeds at the city and state level, b) the legalization of medical weeds at the state level, and c) now legalization of recreational weeds at the city and state levels.

While there could have been other factors that contributed to the nearly five-fold increase in the male incarceration rate between the early 1970s and the peak in 2008, research clearly shows that the War on Drugs, along with mandatory minimum sentencing in the 1980s and the disparate treatment of powdered cocaine and crack cocaine (powdered cocaine processed with baking soda into smokable rocks) were all significant contributing factors to the unprecedented rate of incarcerating Americans. Here are some conclusions from the 2014 book The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences (my emphasis):

Bottom Line: Even without the nefarious, vile, and veiled origins revealed by Ehrlichman in 1994, the War on Drugs Otherwise Peaceful Americans Who Voluntarily Choose To Ingest or Sell Intoxicants Currently Proscribed by the Government, Which Will Lock Up Users or Sellers in Cages if Caught would represent one of the most shameful chapters in Americas history. But with its intention to destroy the black community and anti-war peace activists, which has certainly been successfully achieved for the black community, the shamefulness of the War on Drugs is elevated to a much higher level of despicable, evil immorality.

More:

The Shocking Story Behind Richard Nixons War on Drugs ... - AEI

Editorial: War on drugs – Telangana Today

In the past one year, over 3,600 kg of drugs have been seized from freight containers across several ports in the country

Published Date - 12:30 AM, Mon - 26 December 22

The drug menace not only destroys individual lives and their families but also poses a serious threat to national security. The profits from narcotic trafficking are being used to finance terrorism, thereby weakening the economy. Indias location in the middle of the two largest sources of illicit drugs in South Asia Golden Crescent (Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran) on the northwest and the infamous Golden Triangle (Myanmar, Thailand, and Laos) on the northeast makes it more vulnerable to the trafficking of narcotics and drugs. The NDA governments much-touted zero tolerance policy on drug menace must be made visible on the ground. union Home Minister Amit Shah, who recently told Parliament that the big criminals involved in narcotic trafficking would be put behind bars in the next two years, must walk the talk and deliver on his promise. Despite the Border Security Force (BSF) stepping up vigil near the India-Pakistan border in Punjab, the frequent seizures dont seem to be deterring drug traffickers. There are reports that the illicit drug trade continues to flourish in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime, which had promised a crackdown on narcotics after it grabbed power in August last year. India has proactively used multilateral platforms this year to push for a joint fight against terror funding. International cooperation is needed to punish the countries that aid and abet narco terror. State-of-the-art counter-drone technology must be deployed to block the aerial route of drug supply.

While waging an all-out war on drug trade, the government agencies need to differentiate between users, who must be treated as victims, and peddlers, who should not be spared. Similar sensitivity needs to be adopted by law enforcement authorities while applying the harsh provisions of Indias anti-narcotics law, where the burden of proof is often effectively shifted on to the accused and bail is sparingly given. Studies show that people arrested for personal consumption constitute the bulk of those behind bars and many of them are from marginalised backgrounds. Drug trafficking is a major transnational organised crime with the potential to undermine national security. The growing nexus between drug smugglers and terrorist groups is a matter of concern for countries like India. Such complex security concerns can be dealt with a comprehensive review of the surveillance mechanisms along with effective coordination between the Centre and the States. The emerging trend of international criminal syndicates using the containerised trade networks for trafficking drugs has posed a major challenge to the enforcement agencies in India and other countries in the region. In the past one year, over 3,600 kg of drugs have been seized from freight containers across several ports in the country. Apart from a more efficient coordination among various government agencies, real-time data on shipments is essential to develop an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for zeroing in on suspect consignments.

Go here to read the rest:

Editorial: War on drugs - Telangana Today

21 Deep Questions to Ask to Get to Know Someones … – Learning Mind

How do you get to know someones true personality? It would seem weird to ask a relative stranger about their values and beliefs.

Luckily, the following questions are good conversation starters that reveal more than you might think. Read on to find some great deep questions to ask someone to get to know them better.

When thinking of deep questions to ask people to get a conversation started, it can be wise to pick ones that cant be answered with a yes or no. Those types of questions lead to stilted conversations and awkward pauses.

Instead, pick an interesting subject that will help the other person open up a bit about themselves and their views.

Asking the right questions can stimulate more meaningful and interesting conversations. They can lead to the discovery of common interests and mutual understanding.

It is as well to be cautious about how you ask someone questions. You dont want them to feel they are being grilled or that you are asking questions that are too revealing. Bear these points in mind and choose questions that gradually help you to get to know the other person.

The most important factor in getting to know someone is actually as much to do with how you listen than what questions you ask them. Give your attention fully to what they say so that you can respond appropriately and begin to develop a deeper bond.

Dont forget to share something about yourself too. If you force the other person into doing all the talking, they can begin to feel pressured. This can make them feel vulnerable and as if the relationship is one-sided. Sharing something personal, but not too personal, about yourself can help to build trust.

These questions are light-hearted and will not seem too weird to a potential new acquaintance. However, they can actually reveal a lot about what the other person enjoys, cares for and dreams of.

Once you know someone a bit better, you might like to ask some deeper questions. These questions reveal more about a persons background and fundamental beliefs and values as well as their accomplishments and what drives them in life.

The last questions are some of the deepest and should be saved for when you know someone reasonably well. Some of them ask the other person to reveal very personal details and become quite vulnerable.

So make sure they are comfortable with the questions and dont push too hard if they dont want to answer. If they seem uneasy, switch back to some more light-hearted questions for now.

These questions are all great conversation starters, but they often reveal more than you think about a persons values in life. They seem quite casual but can tell us a lot about another persons personality, desires and values.

Of course, you must consider the situation and the other persons reaction. Some people do not like to give away too much information about themselves too quickly.

Allow the person to feel comfortable in what they reveal about themselves and dial it back if you suspect they are uneasy.

At the end of the day, there is no point in rushing into a relationship with someone. Asking these questions can help you get started, but remember that the best friendships and relationships take time and commitment to develop.

Contributing writer at Learning Mind

Kirstie Pursey holds a diploma in creative writing from the Open University and works as a writer, blogger, and storyteller. She lives in London with her family of people, dogs, and cats. She is a lover of reading, writing, being in nature, fairy lights, candles, fireside, and afternoon tea.

More here:

21 Deep Questions to Ask to Get to Know Someones ... - Learning Mind

Caffe | Deep Learning Framework

Caffe is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind.It is developed by Berkeley AI Research (BAIR) and by community contributors.Yangqing Jia created the project during his PhD at UC Berkeley.Caffe is released under the BSD 2-Clause license.

Check out our web image classification demo!

Expressive architecture encourages application and innovation.Models and optimization are defined by configuration without hard-coding.Switch between CPU and GPU by setting a single flag to train on a GPU machine then deploy to commodity clusters or mobile devices.

Extensible code fosters active development.In Caffes first year, it has been forked by over 1,000 developers and had many significant changes contributed back.Thanks to these contributors the framework tracks the state-of-the-art in both code and models.

Speed makes Caffe perfect for research experiments and industry deployment.Caffe can process over 60M images per day with a single NVIDIA K40 GPU*.Thats 1 ms/image for inference and 4 ms/image for learning and more recent library versions and hardware are faster still.We believe that Caffe is among the fastest convnet implementations available.

Community: Caffe already powers academic research projects, startup prototypes, and even large-scale industrial applications in vision, speech, and multimedia.Join our community of brewers on the caffe-users group and Github.

Please cite Caffe in your publications if it helps your research:

If you do publish a paper where Caffe helped your research, we encourage you to cite the framework for tracking by Google Scholar.

Join the caffe-users group to ask questions and discuss methods and models. This is where we talk about usage, installation, and applications.

Framework development discussions and thorough bug reports are collected on Issues.

The BAIR Caffe developers would like to thank NVIDIA for GPU donation, A9 and Amazon Web Services for a research grant in support of Caffe development and reproducible research in deep learning, and BAIR PI Trevor Darrell for guidance.

The BAIR members who have contributed to Caffe are (alphabetical by first name):Carl Doersch, Eric Tzeng, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, Jon Long, Philipp Krhenbhl, Ronghang Hu, Ross Girshick, Sergey Karayev, Sergio Guadarrama, Takuya Narihira, and Yangqing Jia.

The open-source community plays an important and growing role in Caffes development.Check out the Github project pulse for recent activity and the contributors for the full list.

We sincerely appreciate your interest and contributions!If youd like to contribute, please read the developing & contributing guide.

Yangqing would like to give a personal thanks to the NVIDIA Academic program for providing GPUs, Oriol Vinyals for discussions along the journey, and BAIR PI Trevor Darrell for advice.

See original here:

Caffe | Deep Learning Framework

Deep Breathing Benefits and How-To | Right as Rain

You probably dont think about your breath that often. Its always there, in the background, when you need it.

But paying more attention to how youre breathing canmakea big impact on your stress levels.

When youre stressed or anxious, your breathing tends to be irregular and shallow, saysKristoffer Rhoads, a clinical neuropsychologist who treats patients at theUW MedicineMemory & Brain Wellness Centerat Harborview Medical Center. Your chest cavity can only expand and contract so much, which makes it hard to get more air in.

Deep breathing (sometimes called diaphragmatic breathing) is a practice that enables more air to flow into your body and can help calm your nerves, reducing stress and anxiety. It can also help youimprove your attention spanandlower pain levels.

Ready to give it a try?

Your breath isnt just part ofyour bodys stress response, its key to it. In fact, you caninduce a state of anxiety or panicin someone just by having them take shallow, short breaths from their chest, Rhoads says.(Youve probably heard of this as hyperventilation.)

That means that purposeful deep breathing can physically calm your body down if youre feeling stressed or anxious.It can be helpful for dealing with day-to-day anxiety as well as more pervasive problems such asgeneralized anxiety disorder.

But why does deep breathing work? It has to do with how your nervous system functions.

Heres a quick and painless biology lesson: Your autonomic nervous system, which controls involuntary actions like heart rate and digestion, is split into two parts. One part, the sympathetic nervous system, controls your fight-or-flight response. The other part, the parasympathetic nervous system, controls your rest-and-relaxresponse.

While both parts of your nervous system arealways active, deep breathing can help quiet your sympathetic nervous system and therefore reduce feelings of stress or anxiety.

It is not possible to turn the sympatheticnervoussystem off completely, but I think of shifting ones breathing to a modulated, slow, relaxed pattern of not overly deep inhales and exhales as a way to turn the volume down on it, Rhoads explains.

Deep breathing instead involves taking slower, longer breaths from your stomach to counter the short, rapid breaths that you default to when stressed or anxious.

Rhoads likes to teach deep breathing by first having someone activate their sympathetic nervous system. You can do this by sitting comfortably, closing youreyesand imagining an extremely stressful situation. Notice how your body responds: Your chest might tighten, your breathing might growshallowerand your heart might beat faster.

Next, turn your attention to your breath. Focus on breathing from your stomach, pushing your stomach out each time you inhale. Take longer breaths, counting to at least three for each inhalation and exhalation. Keep doing this even though it may feel uncomfortable at first. After a while, you will start to notice your body feeling more relaxed.

Noticing the differences for yourself in how your body feels is more powerful than anyone describing it to you, Rhoads says.

Deep breathing may be simple, but it isnt necessarily easy. It can quiet your nervous system in a short amount of time, though it probably wont provide instant relief from all anxiety. The more you practice, the better youll get at it and the more youll be able to use it in times of stress to help calm yourself down.

Here are some ways to up your deep breathing game.

There aremany waysto breathe deeply, so play around to find one that feels natural to you.

Try breathing in for four counts, then out for six. Or try square breathing: in for four, hold for four, out for four, hold for four.

As long asyourestill keepingyour breathing slow and deep, theres no pattern thats better than the others.

Be kind to yourself as you practice deep breathing. Recognize that you might not notice results immediately, and thats OK.

Give yourself credit for trying, and keep practicing,even just for aminute or twoat a time, until you reach a point where you notice its starting to help you manage your stress.

Then keep at it. Deep breathing isnt like riding a bike; youmustdo it regularly for it to be helpful.

Being mindful can enhance your deep breathing practice.Mindfulnessis about recognizing your emotions and whats going on in your body without judging any of it as bad or good.

To be mindful during deep breathing, focus on your breath and let any thoughts fade away. Dont judge yourself for having them, but dont pursue them; try to let them go.

Notice if your body is tense or if your mind keeps trying to go back to a particular unpleasant topic, but dont get down on yourselfjust recognize whats going on as a way of gathering information about yourself and your stress response.

If trying to guide your own deep breathing isnt working well, try aphone appor website or audiobook that will guide you throughthe practice.

You might find it helpful to record yourself talking through a breathing exercise and then playing it back when you want to practice. Or, if you need peer support, ask a friend to join you or research local meditation groups.

Original post:

Deep Breathing Benefits and How-To | Right as Rain

Moore’s law – Wikipedia

Observation on the growth of integrated circuit capacity

Moore's law is the observation that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit (IC) doubles about every two years. Moore's law is an observation and projection of a historical trend. Rather than a law of physics, it is an empirical relationship linked to gains from experience in production.

The observation is named after Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel (and former CEO of the latter), who in 1965 posited a doubling every year in the number of components per integrated circuit,[a] and projected this rate of growth would continue for at least another decade. In 1975, looking forward to the next decade, he revised the forecast to doubling every two years, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 41%. While Moore did not use empirical evidence in forecasting that the historical trend would continue, his prediction held since 1975 and has since become known as a "law".

Moore's prediction has been used in the semiconductor industry to guide long-term planning and to set targets for research and development, thus functioning to some extent as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Advancements in digital electronics, such as the reduction in quality-adjusted microprocessor prices, the increase in memory capacity (RAM and flash), the improvement of sensors, and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras, are strongly linked to Moore's law. These ongoing changes in digital electronics have been a driving force of technological and social change, productivity, and economic growth.

Industry experts have not reached a consensus on exactly when Moore's law will cease to apply. Microprocessor architects report that semiconductor advancement has slowed industry-wide since around 2010, slightly below the pace predicted by Moore's law.

In 1959, Douglas Engelbart studied the projected downscaling of integrated circuit (IC) size, publishing his results in the article "Microelectronics, and the Art of Similitude".[2][3][4] Engelbart presented his findings at the 1960 International Solid-State Circuits Conference, where Moore was present in the audience.[5]

In 1965, Gordon Moore, who at the time was working as the director of research and development at Fairchild Semiconductor, was asked to contribute to the thirty-fifth anniversary issue of Electronics magazine with a prediction on the future of the semiconductor components industry over the next ten years. His response was a brief article entitled "Cramming more components onto integrated circuits".[1][6][b] Within his editorial, he speculated that by 1975 it would be possible to contain as many as 65,000 components on a single quarter-square-inch (~1.6 square-centimeter) semiconductor.

The complexity for minimum component costs has increased at a rate of roughly a factor of two per year. Certainly over the short term this rate can be expected to continue, if not to increase. Over the longer term, the rate of increase is a bit more uncertain, although there is no reason to believe it will not remain nearly constant for at least 10 years.[1]

Moore posited a log-linear relationship between device complexity (higher circuit density at reduced cost) and time.[9][10] In a 2015 interview, Moore noted of the 1965 article: "...I just did a wild extrapolation saying its going to continue to double every year for the next 10 years."[11] One historian of the law cites Stigler's law of eponymy, to introduce the fact that the regular doubling of components was known to many working in the field.[10]

In 1974, Robert H. Dennard at IBM recognized the rapid MOSFET scaling technology and formulated what became known as Dennard scaling, which describes that as MOS transistors get smaller, their power density stays constant such that the power use remains in proportion with area.[12][13] Evidence from the semiconductor industry shows that this inverse relationship between power density and areal density broke down in the mid-2000s.[14]

At the 1975 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Moore revised his forecast rate,[15][16] predicting semiconductor complexity would continue to double annually until about 1980, after which it would decrease to a rate of doubling approximately every two years.[16][17][18] He outlined several contributing factors for this exponential behavior:[9][10]

Shortly after 1975, Caltech professor Carver Mead popularized the term "Moore's law".[19][20] Moore's law eventually came to be widely accepted as a goal for the semiconductor industry, and it was cited by competitive semiconductor manufacturers as they strove to increase processing power. Moore viewed his eponymous law as surprising and optimistic: "Moore's law is a violation of Murphy's law. Everything gets better and better."[21] The observation was even seen as a self-fulfilling prophecy.[22][23]

The doubling period is often misquoted as 18 months because of a prediction by Moore's colleague, Intel executive David House. In 1975, House noted that Moore's revised law of doubling transistor count every 2 years in turn implied that computer chip performance would roughly double every 18 months[24] (with no increase in power consumption).[25] Mathematically, Moore's Law predicted that transistor count would double every 2 years due to shrinking transistor dimensions and other improvements. As a consequence of shrinking dimensions, Dennard scaling predicted that power consumption per unit area would remain constant. Combining these effects, David House deduced that computer chip performance would roughly double every 18 months. Also due to Dennard scaling, this increased performance would not be accompanied by increased power, i.e., the energy-efficiency of silicon-based computer chips roughly doubles every 18 months. Dennard scaling ended in the 2000s.[14] Koomey later showed that a similar rate of efficiency improvement predated silicon chips and Moore's Law, for technologies such as vacuum tubes.

Microprocessor architects report that since around 2010, semiconductor advancement has slowed industry-wide below the pace predicted by Moore's law.[14] Brian Krzanich, the former CEO of Intel, cited Moore's 1975 revision as a precedent for the current deceleration, which results from technical challenges and is "a natural part of the history of Moore's law".[26][27][28] The rate of improvement in physical dimensions known as Dennard scaling also ended in the mid-2000s. As a result, much of the semiconductor industry has shifted its focus to the needs of major computing applications rather than semiconductor scaling.[22][29][14] Nevertheless, leading semiconductor manufacturers TSMC and Samsung Electronics have claimed to keep pace with Moore's law[30][31][32][33][34][35] with 10nm and 7nm nodes in mass production[30][31] and 5nm nodes in risk production as of 2019[update].[36][37]

As the cost of computer power to the consumer falls, the cost for producers to fulfill Moore's law follows an opposite trend: R&D, manufacturing, and test costs have increased steadily with each new generation of chips. Rising manufacturing costs are an important consideration for the sustaining of Moore's law.[38] This led to the formulation of Moore's second law, also called Rock's law, which is that the capital cost of a semiconductor fabrication plant also increases exponentially over time.[39][40]

Numerous innovations by scientists and engineers have sustained Moore's law since the beginning of the IC era. Some of the key innovations are listed below, as examples of breakthroughs that have advanced integrated circuit and semiconductor device fabrication technology, allowing transistor counts to grow by more than seven orders of magnitude in less than five decades.

Computer industry technology road maps predicted in 2001 that Moore's law would continue for several generations of semiconductor chips.[64]

One of the key challenges of engineering future nanoscale transistors is the design of gates. As device dimension shrinks, controlling the current flow in the thin channel becomes more difficult. Modern nanoscale transistors typically take the form of multi-gate MOSFETs, with the FinFET being the most common nanoscale transistor. The FinFET has gate dielectric on three sides of the channel. In comparison, the gate-all-around MOSFET (GAAFET) structure has even better gate control.

Microprocessor architects report that semiconductor advancement has slowed industry-wide since around 2010, below the pace predicted by Moore's law.[14] Brian Krzanich, the former CEO of Intel, announced, "Our cadence today is closer to two and a half years than two."[96] Intel stated in 2015 that improvements in MOSFET devices have slowed, starting at the 22nm feature width around 2012, and continuing at 14nm.[97]

The physical limits to transistor scaling have been reached due to source-to-drain leakage, limited gate metals and limited options for channel material. Other approaches are being investigated, which do not rely on physical scaling. These include the spin state of electron spintronics, tunnel junctions, and advanced confinement of channel materials via nano-wire geometry.[98] Spin-based logic and memory options are being developed actively in labs.[99][100]

The vast majority of current transistors on ICs are composed principally of doped silicon and its alloys. As silicon is fabricated into single nanometer transistors, short-channel effects adversely change desired material properties of silicon as a functional transistor. Below are several non-silicon substitutes in the fabrication of small nanometer transistors.

One proposed material is indium gallium arsenide, or InGaAs. Compared to their silicon and germanium counterparts, InGaAs transistors are more promising for future high-speed, low-power logic applications. Because of intrinsic characteristics of III-V compound semiconductors, quantum well and tunnel effect transistors based on InGaAs have been proposed as alternatives to more traditional MOSFET designs.

Biological computing research shows that biological material has superior information density and energy efficiency compared to silicon-based computing.[108]

Various forms of graphene are being studied for graphene electronics, e.g. graphene nanoribbon transistors have shown great promise since its appearance in publications in 2008. (Bulk graphene has a band gap of zero and thus cannot be used in transistors because of its constant conductivity, an inability to turn off. The zigzag edges of the nanoribbons introduce localized energy states in the conduction and valence bands and thus a bandgap that enables switching when fabricated as a transistor. As an example, a typical GNR of width of 10nm has a desirable bandgap energy of 0.4eV.[109][110]) More research will need to be performed, however, on sub-50nm graphene layers, as its resistivity value increases and thus electron mobility decreases.[109]

In April 2005, Gordon Moore stated in an interview that the projection cannot be sustained indefinitely: "It can't continue forever. The nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens." He also noted that transistors eventually would reach the limits of miniaturization at atomic levels:

In terms of size [of transistors] you can see that we're approaching the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier, but it'll be two or three generations before we get that farbut that's as far out as we've ever been able to see. We have another 10 to 20 years before we reach a fundamental limit. By then they'll be able to make bigger chips and have transistor budgets in the billions.[111]

In 2016 the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, after using Moore's Law to drive the industry since 1998, produced its final roadmap. It no longer centered its research and development plan on Moore's law. Instead, it outlined what might be called the More than Moore strategy in which the needs of applications drive chip development, rather than a focus on semiconductor scaling. Application drivers range from smartphones to AI to data centers.[112]

IEEE began a road-mapping initiative in 2016, "Rebooting Computing", named the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS).[113]

Most forecasters, including Gordon Moore,[114] expect Moore's law will end by around 2025.[115][112][116] Although Moore's Law will reach a physical limitation, some forecasters are optimistic about the continuation of technological progress in a variety of other areas, including new chip architectures, quantum computing, and AI and machine learning.[117][118] Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang declared Moore's law dead in 2022;[119] several days later Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger declared that Moore's law is not dead.[120]

Digital electronics have contributed to world economic growth in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.[121] The primary driving force of economic growth is the growth of productivity,[122] and Moore's law factors into productivity. Moore (1995) expected that "the rate of technological progress is going to be controlled from financial realities".[123] The reverse could and did occur around the late-1990s, however, with economists reporting that "Productivity growth is the key economic indicator of innovation."[124] Moore's law describes a driving force of technological and social change, productivity, and economic growth.[125][126][122]

An acceleration in the rate of semiconductor progress contributed to a surge in U.S. productivity growth,[127][128][129] which reached 3.4% per year in 19972004, outpacing the 1.6% per year during both 19721996 and 20052013.[130] As economist Richard G. Anderson notes, "Numerous studies have traced the cause of the productivity acceleration to technological innovations in the production of semiconductors that sharply reduced the prices of such components and of the products that contain them (as well as expanding the capabilities of such products)."[131]

The primary negative implication of Moore's law is that obsolescence pushes society up against the Limits to Growth. As technologies continue to rapidly "improve", they render predecessor technologies obsolete. In situations in which security and survivability of hardware or data are paramount, or in which resources are limited, rapid obsolescence often poses obstacles to smooth or continued operations.[132]

Because of the intensive resource footprint and toxic materials used in the production of computers, obsolescence leads to serious harmful environmental impacts. Americans throw out 400,000 cell phones every day,[133] but this high level of obsolescence appears to companies as an opportunity to generate regular sales of expensive new equipment, instead of retaining one device for a longer period of time, leading to industry using planned obsolescence as a profit centre.[134]

An alternative source of improved performance is in microarchitecture techniques exploiting the growth of available transistor count. Out-of-order execution and on-chip caching and prefetching reduce the memory latency bottleneck at the expense of using more transistors and increasing the processor complexity. These increases are described empirically by Pollack's Rule, which states that performance increases due to microarchitecture techniques approximate the square root of the complexity (number of transistors or the area) of a processor.[135]

For years, processor makers delivered increases in clock rates and instruction-level parallelism, so that single-threaded code executed faster on newer processors with no modification.[136] Now, to manage CPU power dissipation, processor makers favor multi-core chip designs, and software has to be written in a multi-threaded manner to take full advantage of the hardware. Many multi-threaded development paradigms introduce overhead, and will not see a linear increase in speed vs number of processors. This is particularly true while accessing shared or dependent resources, due to lock contention. This effect becomes more noticeable as the number of processors increases. There are cases where a roughly 45% increase in processor transistors has translated to roughly 1020% increase in processing power.[137]

On the other hand, manufacturers are adding specialized processing units to deal with features such as graphics, video, and cryptography. For one example, Intel's Parallel JavaScript extension not only adds support for multiple cores, but also for the other non-general processing features of their chips, as part of the migration in client side scripting toward HTML5.[138]

Moore's law has affected the performance of other technologies significantly: Michael S. Malone wrote of a Moore's War following the apparent success of shock and awe in the early days of the Iraq War. Progress in the development of guided weapons depends on electronic technology.[139] Improvements in circuit density and low-power operation associated with Moore's law also have contributed to the development of technologies including mobile telephones[140] and 3-D printing.[141]

Several measures of digital technology are improving at exponential rates related to Moore's law, including the size, cost, density, and speed of components. Moore wrote only about the density of components, "a component being a transistor, resistor, diode or capacitor",[123] at minimum cost.

Transistors per integrated circuit The most popular formulation is of the doubling of the number of transistors on ICs every two years. At the end of the 1970s, Moore's law became known as the limit for the number of transistors on the most complex chips. The graph at the top shows this trend holds true today. As of 2017, the commercially available processor possessing the highest number of transistors is the 48 core Centriq with over 18billion transistors.[142]

This is the formulation given in Moore's 1965 paper.[1] It is not just about the density of transistors that can be achieved, but about the density of transistors at which the cost per transistor is the lowest.[143]As more transistors are put on a chip, the cost to make each transistor decreases, but the chance that the chip will not work due to a defect increases. In 1965, Moore examined the density of transistors at which cost is minimized, and observed that, as transistors were made smaller through advances in photolithography, this number would increase at "a rate of roughly a factor of two per year".[1]

Dennard scaling This posits that power usage would decrease in proportion to area (both voltage and current being proportional to length) of transistors. Combined with Moore's law, performance per watt would grow at roughly the same rate as transistor density, doubling every 12 years. According to Dennard scaling transistor dimensions would be scaled by 30% (0.7x) every technology generation, thus reducing their area by 50%. This would reduce the delay by 30% (0.7x) and therefore increase operating frequency by about 40% (1.4x). Finally, to keep electric field constant, voltage would be reduced by 30%, reducing energy by 65% and power (at 1.4x frequency) by 50%.[c] Therefore, in every technology generation transistor density would double, circuit becomes 40% faster, while power consumption (with twice the number of transistors) stays the same.[144] Dennard scaling came to end in 20052010, due to leakage currents.[14]

The exponential processor transistor growth predicted by Moore does not always translate into exponentially greater practical CPU performance. Since around 20052007, Dennard scaling has ended, so even though Moore's law continued for several years after that, it has not yielded dividends in improved performance.[12][145] The primary reason cited for the breakdown is that at small sizes, current leakage poses greater challenges, and also causes the chip to heat up, which creates a threat of thermal runaway and therefore, further increases energy costs.[12][145][14]

The breakdown of Dennard scaling prompted a greater focus on multicore processors, but the gains offered by switching to more cores are lower than the gains that would be achieved had Dennard scaling continued.[146][147] In another departure from Dennard scaling, Intel microprocessors adopted a non-planar tri-gate FinFET at 22nm in 2012 that is faster and consumes less power than a conventional planar transistor.[148] The rate of performance improvement for single-core microprocessors has slowed significantly.[149] Single-core performance was improving by 52% per year in 19862003 and 23% per year in 20032011, but slowed to just seven percent per year in 20112018.[149]

Quality adjusted price of IT equipment The price of information technology (IT), computers and peripheral equipment, adjusted for quality and inflation, declined 16% per year on average over the five decades from 1959 to 2009.[150][151] The pace accelerated, however, to 23% per year in 19951999 triggered by faster IT innovation,[124] and later, slowed to 2% per year in 20102013.[150][152]

While quality-adjusted microprocessor price improvement continues,[153] the rate of improvement likewise varies, and is not linear on a log scale. Microprocessor price improvement accelerated during the late 1990s, reaching 60% per year (halving every nine months) versus the typical 30% improvement rate (halving every two years) during the years earlier and later.[154][155] Laptop microprocessors in particular improved 2535% per year in 20042010, and slowed to 1525% per year in 20102013.[156]

The number of transistors per chip cannot explain quality-adjusted microprocessor prices fully.[154][157][158] Moore's 1995 paper does not limit Moore's law to strict linearity or to transistor count, "The definition of 'Moore's Law' has come to refer to almost anything related to the semiconductor industry that on a semi-log plot approximates a straight line. I hesitate to review its origins and by doing so restrict its definition."[123]

Hard disk drive areal density A similar prediction (sometimes called Kryder's law) was made in 2005 for hard disk drive areal density.[159] The prediction was later viewed as over-optimistic. Several decades of rapid progress in areal density slowed around 2010, from 30100% per year to 1015% per year, because of noise related to smaller grain size of the disk media, thermal stability, and writability using available magnetic fields.[160][161]

Fiber-optic capacity The number of bits per second that can be sent down an optical fiber increases exponentially, faster than Moore's law. Keck's law, in honor of Donald Keck.[162]

Network capacity According to Gerald Butters,[163][164] the former head of Lucent's Optical Networking Group at Bell Labs, there is another version, called Butters' Law of Photonics,[165] a formulation that deliberately parallels Moore's law. Butters' law says that the amount of data coming out of an optical fiber is doubling every nine months.[166] Thus, the cost of transmitting a bit over an optical network decreases by half every nine months. The availability of wavelength-division multiplexing (sometimes called WDM) increased the capacity that could be placed on a single fiber by as much as a factor of 100. Optical networking and dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) is rapidly bringing down the cost of networking, and further progress seems assured. As a result, the wholesale price of data traffic collapsed in the dot-com bubble. Nielsen's Law says that the bandwidth available to users increases by 50% annually.[167]

Pixels per dollar Similarly, Barry Hendy of Kodak Australia has plotted pixels per dollar as a basic measure of value for a digital camera, demonstrating the historical linearity (on a log scale) of this market and the opportunity to predict the future trend of digital camera price, LCD and LED screens, and resolution.[168][169][170][171]

The great Moore's law compensator (TGMLC), also known as Wirth's law generally is referred to as software bloat and is the principle that successive generations of computer software increase in size and complexity, thereby offsetting the performance gains predicted by Moore's law. In a 2008 article in InfoWorld, Randall C. Kennedy,[172] formerly of Intel, introduces this term using successive versions of Microsoft Office between the year 2000 and 2007 as his premise. Despite the gains in computational performance during this time period according to Moore's law, Office 2007 performed the same task at half the speed on a prototypical year 2007 computer as compared to Office 2000 on a year 2000 computer.

Library expansion was calculated in 1945 by Fremont Rider to double in capacity every 16 years, if sufficient space were made available.[173] He advocated replacing bulky, decaying printed works with miniaturized microform analog photographs, which could be duplicated on-demand for library patrons or other institutions. He did not foresee the digital technology that would follow decades later to replace analog microform with digital imaging, storage, and transmission media. Automated, potentially lossless digital technologies allowed vast increases in the rapidity of information growth in an era that now sometimes is called the Information Age.

Carlson curve is a term coined by The Economist[174] to describe the biotechnological equivalent of Moore's law, and is named after author Rob Carlson.[175] Carlson accurately predicted that the doubling time of DNA sequencing technologies (measured by cost and performance) would be at least as fast as Moore's law.[176] Carlson Curves illustrate the rapid (in some cases hyperexponential) decreases in cost, and increases in performance, of a variety of technologies, including DNA sequencing, DNA synthesis, and a range of physical and computational tools used in protein expression and in determining protein structures.

Eroom's law is a pharmaceutical drug development observation which was deliberately written as Moore's Law spelled backwards in order to contrast it with the exponential advancements of other forms of technology (such as transistors) over time. It states that the cost of developing a new drug roughly doubles every nine years.

Experience curve effects says that each doubling of the cumulative production of virtually any product or service is accompanied by an approximate constant percentage reduction in the unit cost. The acknowledged first documented qualitative description of this dates from 1885.[177][178] A power curve was used to describe this phenomenon in a 1936 discussion of the cost of airplanes.[179]

Edholm's law Phil Edholm observed that the bandwidth of telecommunication networks (including the Internet) is doubling every 18 months.[180] The bandwidths of online communication networks has risen from bits per second to terabits per second. The rapid rise in online bandwidth is largely due to the same MOSFET scaling that enables Moore's law, as telecommunications networks are built from MOSFETs.[181]

Haitz's law predicts that the brightness of LEDs increases as their manufacturing cost goes down.

Swanson's law is the observation that the price of solar photovoltaic modules tends to drop 20 percent for every doubling of cumulative shipped volume. At present rates, costs go down 75% about every 10 years.

More:

Moore's law - Wikipedia

Liverpool John Moores University : Rankings, Fees & Courses Details …

Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) can trace its roots back to 1823 and the foundation of Liverpool Mechanics and Apprentices Library. Weve come a long way since then, becoming a university in 1992 and we are now ranked 60th in The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2018.

Throughout our history we have championed education for all; from our earliest students in the nineteenth century through to todays skilled graduates, who are driving forward twenty-first century innovations and economic success, both in the UK and overseas.

We take our name from one of the UKs most successful businessmen, Sir John Moores, who turned his love of football into a business empire that was worth millions. Born into a working class family, he proved that, with vision and hard work, anyone can achieve success.

So if you have talent and are willing to work hard and grasp every opportunity that comes your way, we are the University that can help you achieve your ambitions.

See the article here:

Liverpool John Moores University : Rankings, Fees & Courses Details ...

Moores law | computer science | Britannica

Moores law, prediction made by American engineer Gordon Moore in 1965 that the number of transistors per silicon chip doubles every year.

For a special issue of the journal Electronics, Moore was asked to predict developments over the next decade. Observing that the total number of components in these circuits had roughly doubled each year, he blithely extrapolated this annual doubling to the next decade, estimating that microcircuits of 1975 would contain an astounding 65,000 components per chip. In 1975, as the rate of growth began to slow, Moore revised his time frame to two years. His revised law was a bit pessimistic; over roughly 50 years from 1961, the number of transistors doubled approximately every 18 months. Subsequently, magazines regularly referred to Moores law as though it were inexorablea technological law with the assurance of Newtons laws of motion.

What made this dramatic explosion in circuit complexity possible was the steadily shrinking size of transistors over the decades. Measured in millimetres in the late 1940s, the dimensions of a typical transistor in the early 2010s were more commonly expressed in tens of nanometres (a nanometre being one-billionth of a metre)a reduction factor of over 100,000. Transistor features measuring less than a micron (a micrometre, or one-millionth of a metre) were attained during the 1980s, when dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips began offering megabyte storage capacities. At the dawn of the 21st century, these features approached 0.1 micron across, which allowed the manufacture of gigabyte memory chips and microprocessors that operate at gigahertz frequencies. Moores law continued into the second decade of the 21st century with the introduction of three-dimensional transistors that were tens of nanometres in size.

More:

Moores law | computer science | Britannica

What is Moore’s Law? | Is Moores Law Dead? | Synopsys

The slowing of Moores law has prompted many to ask, Is Moores law dead? This, in fact, is not occurring. While Moores law is still delivering exponential improvements, the results are being delivered at a slower pace. The pace of technology innovation is NOT slowing down, however. Rather, the explosion of hyperconnectivity, big data, and artificial intelligence applications has increased the pace of innovation and the need for Moores law-style improvements in delivered technology.

For many years, scale complexity drove Moores law and the semiconductor industrys exponential technology growth. As the ability to scale a single chip slows, the industry is finding other methods of innovation to maintain exponential growth.

This new design trend is driven by systemic complexity. Some aspects of this new approach to design have been dubbed more than Moore. This term refers primarily to 2.5D and 3D integration techniques.

The complete landscape is far bigger and presents the opportunity for higher impact, however. At the 2021 SNUG World conference of worldwide Synopsys Users Group members, the chairman and co-CEO of Synopsys, Aart de Geus, presented a keynote address. In his presentation, de Geus observed that Moores law is now blending with new innovations that leverage systemic complexity. He coined the term SysMoore as a shorthand way to describe this new design paradigm.

These trends and resultant terminology are summarized below. The SysMoore era will fuel semiconductor innovation for the foreseeable future. With it comes a wide range of design challenges that must be addressed.

Link:

What is Moore's Law? | Is Moores Law Dead? | Synopsys

Liverpool John Moores University – Wikipedia

University in Liverpool, England

Liverpool John Moores University (abbreviated LJMU) is a public research university in the city of Liverpool, England. The university can trace its origins to the Liverpool Mechanics' School of Arts, established in 1823.[3] This later merged to become Liverpool Polytechnic. In 1992, following an Act of Parliament, the Liverpool Polytechnic became what is now Liverpool John Moores University.[4] It is named after Sir John Moores, a local businessman and philanthropist, who donated to the university's precursor institutions.

The university had 25,050 students in 2019/20, of which 20,105 are undergraduate students and 4,945 are postgraduate,[2] making it the 30th largest university in the UK by total student population.

It is a member of the University Alliance, the Northern Consortium and the European University Association.

Founded as a small mechanics institution (Liverpool Mechanics' School of Arts) in 1823, the institution grew over the centuries by converging and amalgamating with different colleges, including the F.L.Calder School of Domestic Science,[5] the City of Liverpool C.F. Mott Training College, before eventually becoming Liverpool Polytechnic in 1970.[6] The university also has a long history of providing training, education and research to the maritime industry, dating back to the formation of the Liverpool Nautical College in 1892.

The institution then became a university under the terms of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992 under the new title of "Liverpool John Moores University". This new title was approved by the Privy Council on 15 September 1992. The university took its name from Sir John Moores, the founder of the Littlewoods empire. Moores was a great believer in the creation of opportunity for all, which embodies the ethos of LJMU in providing educational routes for people of all ages and from all backgrounds. This belief led Sir John Moores to invest in the institution and facilities, such as the John Foster Building (housing the Liverpool Business School), designed by and named after leading architect John Foster.[6] With the institution's backgrounds dating back as far as 1823, many of the university buildings date back also, with aesthetically pleasing Georgian and Victorian buildings found on a few of the campuses.[1]

LJMU now has more than 27,000 students[7] from over 100 countries world-wide, 2,400 staff and 250 degree courses.[8] LJMU was awarded the Queen's Anniversary Prize in 2005.[9]

Currently, Liverpool John Moores University is receiving more applications than previously seen[citation needed]; according to data in 2009, the total number of applications submitted to LJMU was 27,784.[10]

On 28 March 2022, former student and founder of Mowgli, Nisha Katona was installed as Chancellor of the university.[11] Previously, in 2008, astrophysicist and Queen lead guitarist Brian May was appointed the fourth Chancellor of Liverpool John Moores University. He replaced outgoing Chancellor Cherie Blair, wife of former Prime Minister Tony Blair. Honorary fellows in attendance at the ceremony included astronomer Sir Patrick Moore and actor Pete Postlethwaite.[12] May was succeeded as Chancellor by judge Sir Brian Leveson in 2013.

LJMU is a founding member of the Northern Consortium, an educational charity owned by 11 universities in northern England.

The university is separated into two campuses in Liverpool:

Between the two campuses is the Copperas Hill Site, opened in summer 2021, containing many faculties moved from the former IM Marsh Campus, and home to the Student Life and LJMU Sports Buildings. Its location between the two sites has been described by the university to help connect both of its campuses together, and is not regarded to be part of either. It is however closer to the Mount Pleasant Campus and separated from the City Campus by the A5047, and Liverpool Lime Street railway station.[13]

There are currently two libraries operated by LJMU, one for either campus:[14]

There is an LRC present in the Learning Commons of the Student Life Building on the Copperas Hill site between the two campuses.

Students of the university can use any library in term-time and some non-term time periods within the library's opening hours. The Student Life Building is open 24/7 in term time. Students need their student identification card for entry to all buildings.

There are more than 68,500 books in the Libraries' collections, with 1,630 work spaces available for students 24 hours a day. In addition to this there are over 16,000 e-books and 5,000 e-journals available.[15] It is a member of the Libraries Together: Liverpool Learning Partnership (evolved from Liverpool Libraries Group) which formed in 1990. Under which, a registered reader at any of the member libraries can have access rights to the other libraries within the partnership.[16]

The Tom Reilly Building houses the School of Sports and Exercise Sciences and the School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, which are both part of the Faculty of Science.[17] Some 8,000 students use the building which is located at LJMU's City Campus on Byrom Street. The five storey, 6,493m2 (69,890sqft) building was completed in November 2009[17] and opened in March 2010 by Liverpool F.C. captain Steven Gerrard.[18] The building provides sports and science facilities including; appetite laboratories, psychology testing labs, neuroscience labs, an indoor 70-metre running track, force plates, caren disc, physiology suites, a DEXA scanner, a driving simulator and a chronobiology lab.[17]

The university is organised into five faculties (which are each split into schools or centres), most of the faculties are based at a particular campus site however, with many joint honours degrees and some conventional degrees, the faculties overlap meaning students' degrees are from both faculties. The five faculties are:

LJMU is highly ranked for teaching and research in Sports and Exercise Sciences.[19][20] The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) awarded LJMU 4.5million over five years for the establishment of a Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL)[citation needed]. The CETL award recognises LJMU's record for Physical Education, Dance, Sport and Exercises Sciences. LJMU is the only United Kingdom university to be awarded an Ofsted Grade A in Physical Education and it is also the premier institution for both teaching and research in Sport and Exercise Sciences.[20]

Liverpool Business School (LBS) is located in the Redmonds Building on the Mount Pleasant Campus and has over 2,500 students and 100 academics.[21][self-published source?]

LBS offers undergraduate, postgraduate (including an Executive MBA) and research based programmes.[21][self-published source?] Research areas include International Banking, Economics and Finance, Sustainable Enterprise, Public Service Management, Development of Modern Economic Thought, Performance Management, Marketing, Project Management, and Market Research.[22][self-published source?]

In the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), LJMU reported notable research strengths in general engineering and sports-related sciences. By the 2008 RAE, LJMU was the top-performing post-92 university for Anthropology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, General Engineering, Physics (Astrophysics) and Sports-Related Studies. According to the UK Research Assessment Exercise 2014 (RAE 2014), LJMU every unit of assessment submitted was rated as at least 45% internationally excellent or better.[23] In 2012, the university's scientist published notable research suggesting that the dinosaur's extinction may have been caused by increased methane production from the dinosaurs, with some informally saying that dinosaurs "farted" their way to extinction.[24]

Liverpool John Moores University was included in the new 2013 Times Higher Education 100 under 50, ranking 72 out of 100. The list aims to show the rising stars in the global academy under the age of 50 years.[31]

First Destination Survey results show that 89% of LJMU graduates are in employment or undertaking postgraduate study within six months of graduating.[1]

Students at the university are represented by the John Moores Students' Union.

Representation for all students is central and is conducted by executive officers elected annually. In most cases, these students will be on a sabbatical from their studies. The election process is normally contested in mid April, successful candidates assuming office the following academic year.

Liverpool John Moores University has BUCS-registered teams in badminton, basketball, cricket, football, cycling, hockey, netball, rugby league, rugby union, tennis, volleyball, swimming, and American football. Many of the sports teams compete in BUCS competitions. Liverpool Students' Union has 15 BUCS sports, from which 36 teams run, catering for over 800 athletes. In recent years, LJMU students have competed for BUCS representative squads, in national finals and at World University Championships.[32] In addition, the Students' Union also runs intramural sports leagues.

The university also enjoys success at national and world level. Gymnast Beth Tweddle studied at LJMU and has achieved national, Commonwealth, European, and World medals whilst also competing at the Olympic Games.

Every year the university sports compete for 'The Varsity Cup' in the inter-university derby, Liverpool John Moores University Vs. University of Liverpool. The competing sports include: badminton, basketball, hockey, football, netball, volleyball, swimming, tennis, and the snowriders racing team.

Excerpt from:

Liverpool John Moores University - Wikipedia

Moore’s Law in 2022: Whats the status quo? – Power & Beyond

SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY Moore's Law in 2022: Whats the status quo?

28.02.2022Updated on 27.07.2022 From Luke James

Related Vendors

Moores law is dead! This is a line of thought championed by many prominent individuals in the fields of electrical and power engineering. But its quite a controversial one; just as many people believe Moores Law is still true today in 2022 as those who believe that its dead and no longer valid.

(Source: Revoltan - stock.adobe.com)

The debate of whether Moores Law is dying (or already dead) has been going on for years. It has been discussed by pretty much everyone. But before we can give an aswer to that, let's first clarify the meaning of Moore's Law.

Moore's Law stems from the observation of Gordon Moore, co-founder and chairman emeritus of Intel, made in 1965. At the time, he said that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit had doubled roughly every year and would continue to do so for the next 10 years. In 1975, he revised his observation to say that this would occur every two years indefinitely.

Moore's Law is the principle that the speed and capability of computers can be expected to double every two years, as a result of increases in the number of transistors a microchip can contain.

Moores observation became the driving force behind the semiconductor technology revolution that led to the proliferation of computers and other electronic devices.

Moores Law is based on empirical observations made by Gordon Moore. The yearly doubling of the number of transistors on a microchip was extrapolated from observed data in 1965.Over time, the details of Moores Law were amended to reflect the true growth of transistor density. First, the doubling interval was increased to two years and then decreased to around 18 months. The exponential nature of Moores Law continued and created decades of opportunity for the semiconductor industry and the electronics that use them.

The issue for Moores Law is the inherent complexity of semiconductor process technology, and these complexities have been growing. Transistors are now three-dimensional, and the small feature size of todays advanced process technologies has required multiple exposures to reproduce these features on silicon wafers. This has added extreme complexity to the design process and has slowed down Moores Law.

Watch this video to see the origin story of Moore's Law with statement by Gordon Moore:

This slowing down has led many to ask, Is Moores Law dead?The simple answer to this is no, Moores Law is not dead. While its true that chip densities are no longer doubling every two years (thus, Moores Law isnt happening anymore by its strictest definition), Moores Law is still delivering exponential improvements, albeit at a slower pace. The trend is very much still here.

Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger believes that Moore's Law is far from obsolete. As a goal for the next 10 years, he announced in 2021 not only to uphold Moore's Law, but to outpace it. There are many industry veterans who agree with this. Mario Morales, a program vice president at IDC, said he believes Moores Law is still relevant in theory in an interview with TechRepublic.If you look at what Moores Law has enabled, were seeing an explosion of more computing across the entire landscape,' he said. It used to be computing was centered around mainframes and then it became clients and now edge and endpoints, but theyre getting more intelligent, and now theyre doing AI inferencing, and you need computing to do that. So, Moores Law has been able to continue to really push computing to the outer edge.

While the consensus is that Moores Law is slowing down and that it might soon be augmented, it is still driving improvements in processing technology and the amount of progress that follows these improvements.

If it were dead, it simply couldnt do this.

Have you enjoyed reading this article? Then follow us on LinkedIn and stay up-to-date with daily posts about the latest developments on the industry, products and applications, tools and software as well as research and development.

(ID:48035602)

It goes without saying that we treat your personal data responsibly. Where we collect personal data from you, we process the data in compliance with the relevant data protection regulations. More detailed information is available in our privacy policy.

I consent to the use of my email address to send editorial newsletters by Mesago Messe Frankfurt GmbH, Rotebhlstr. 83-85, 70178 Stuttgart, Germany including all of its affiliates within the meaning of Section15 et seq. AktG (Mesago). I have viewed lists of each group of affiliates here for the Mesago.The content of the newsletter covers the products and services of all of the companies listed above including, for example, trade magazines and specialist books, events and exhibitions and event-related products and services, printed and digital media products and services such as additional (editorial) newsletters, competitions, lead campaigns, online and offline market research, technical web portals and e-learning courses. If my personal telephone number has also been collected, it may be used to send offers for the aforementioned products and services from the above companies, as well as for market research purposes.If I wish to access protected content online on portals of Mesago including its affiliates within the meaning of Section15 et seq. AktG, I must register with additional data in order to access that content. In return for this free access to editorial content, my data may be used in line with this declaration of consent for the purposes described herein.

I am aware that I can withdraw this consent at any time with future effect. My withdrawal of consent does not affect the lawfulness of processing performed based on my consent before its withdrawal. If I wish to withdraw my consent, I can send an email to Mesago at privacy@mesago.com. If I no longer wish to receive individual newsletters to which I have subscribed, I can also click on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of a newsletter. I can find more information on my right to withdraw, how to exercise this right and the consequences of my withdrawal in the Privacy policy Editorial newsletters section.

Read more here:

Moore's Law in 2022: Whats the status quo? - Power & Beyond

Why tech giants in Asia are propelling the rise of superapps

If there is one thing Asian can lay claim to as pioneers, it would be the superapp a single portal on our mobile phones giving us access to a wide range of virtual products and services.

Chinas WeChat inevitably comes to mind when we talk about superapps, and its said to inspired Elon Musks desire to build something similar, starting with Twitter.

Elsewhere in Asia, SingaporesGrab, IndonesiasGojekand South Koreas Kakao are also hard at work, trying to style themselves into a superapp equivalent for their respective markets.

Without a doubt, superapps clearly represent the next frontier in app development. So, what exactly is their appeal? And should we be wary about using them?

WeChat is long considered the titan of superapp that helps facilitate life online for millions of Chinese residents, bundling together social media, e-commerce, and digital payments.

However, the reasons behind its runaway success have more to do with the lack of alternatives in China.

In a society where WhatsApp, Twitter and Google are blocked, WeChat was in a unique position to monopolise the market simply by being one of the few communication options available.

While WeChats growth into a superapp is partly accidental, its success has paved the way for a demand for superapps elsewhere as consumers and businesses start seeing its value.

For users, superapps represent unparalleled convenience. Instead of jumping from app to app, the ability to make a restaurant reservation, pay for dinner and hail a ride home with one app inexplicably draws people into using it.

As for businesses hoping to stand out in a crowded landscape of apps, morphing into a superapp is the perfect solution to scale the business and dominate the market.

Grab clearly saw the superapp as a strategy for growth. Within a decade, it has spread its tentacles and evolved from a ride-hailing app into a conglomerate that offers deliveries, logistics and financial services.

By offering a myriad of services through its app, Grab managed to maintain a grip on our attention and make itself an indispensable part of daily living to over 180 million users.

Meanwhile, Gojek, another superapp that started as a call centre to connect users to ride-share services, has expanded to become one of the most valuable companies in Indonesia.

By leveraging its army of ride-share drivers as mobile bank tellers, Gojek was able to expand its customer base bybringing financial servicesto areas lacking access to banking infrastructure.

For businesses, the ultimate goal of creating a superapp is simple to keep customers happy and disincentivise them from interacting with other apps.

And hopefully, unyielding loyalty can be forged once the process of using a particular app becomes a habit.

Superapps are now a mainstay in our lives. In fact, it would be unheard of to find a phone in Singapore that does not have the Grab app.

However, should we be concerned about giving big tech so much insight and control into our habits?

According toDavid Shrier, a professor of AI and innovation at Imperial College Business School in London, superapps will know a lot about us, especially our payment habits. And herein lies the problem.

The disadvantage (with superapps) is we create a market power concentration. Suddenly, these companies are able to decide which goods and services you get to see because it controls the window you look through. And oligopolies tend to raise prices.

Besides trapping users within a content fortress, revolving ones life around an app can be problematic. Namely, what happens when the app breaks down?

When South Korean superapp Kakao had a nationwide outage, chaos ensued as daily life screeched to a halt for millions of users. As a result, Kakaos CEO was forced to resign, and a class-action lawsuit was brought against the company.

Lastly, the fact that one single app can access an unprecedented amount of customer data is troubling.

Not only do we have no way of knowing what is being done with our data, but there is also the risk of hackers stealing our information for nefarious activities.

Singtel,Carousellandmany othershave all been hit by data breaches. Even with sophisticated cyber defences, it is only a matter of time before we get hit by another cyberattack.

Sadly, there is none. Now that superapps are so integrated with our lives, quitting them will result in a cold turkey of convenience.

As we callously surrender our data and allow big tech firms to exert so much influence on our lives, ignorance is bliss when it comes to using superapps.

After all, it is only a matter of time before another superapp gets hit by a glitch, resulting in massive upheaval and social suicide.

Featured Image Credit: CNBC

More:

Why tech giants in Asia are propelling the rise of superapps

Russian Tech Giant Wants Out of the Country As Ukraine War Rages on

Thanks for signing up!

Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go. download the app

Russia stands to lose its biggest tech company, which would throw a wrench in President Putin's plans to foster Russian-grown alternatives for Western technology.

Yandex, often referred to as Russia's Google, is the country's largest internet business best known for its search browser and ride-hailing apps. But its Dutch-based parent company, Yandex N.V., wants out of Russia because of the potential negative impact the Ukrainian invasion could have on its business, according to a report by The New York Times.

The exit of Russia's biggest tech company would deliver a blow to Putin, who has made a concerted effort to produce Russian technology and goods as sanctions cut access to Western suppliers.

Yandex N.V. said Friday that its board had "commenced a strategic process to review options to restructure the group's ownership and governance in light of the current geopolitical environment."

These options, Yandex said, included developing some of its international divisions "independently from Russia" and divesting "ownership and control of all other businesses in the Yandex Group." The company added: "This process is at a preliminary stage."

The Bell, a Russian media group, had earlier reported that Yandex N.V. would move its new businesses and most promising technologies including self-driving cars, machine learning, and cloud-computing services outside of Russia, the Times reported, citing two anonymous sources familiar with the matter. Those businesses would need access to Western markets, experts, and technology, all of which is unviable while the Russian invasion of Ukraine rages on and Western sanctions remain in place.

However, the decision to move Yandex's fledgling technology businesses might not be up to its parent company. The firm will have to get the Kremlin's approval to transfer Russian-registered tech licenses outside of the country, The Times reported. Plus, Yandex's shareholders would have to approve the broader restructuring plan.

Yandex's business, once hailed as a rare Russian business success story, has struggled since the invasion of Ukraine. The tech giant's story is not unlike those found in the Silicon Valley. Yandex employed more than 18,000 people, it was worth more than $31 billion, and is often referred to as the "Google of Russia." It even had offices in downtown Palo Alto, California, at one point.

But since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, thousands of Yandex employees have left Russia, and the price of the company's New York-listed shares lost more than $20 billion in value almost immediately after the war, before Nasdaq suspended trading in its shares. Meanwhile, Yandex's Moscow-listed shares dropped 62% in the past year.

Yandex's misfortune mirrors other Russian tech companies, which have struggled in the face of Western sanctions and the exodus of tens of thousands of Russian IT workers, according to an Al Jazeera report. It's something even Putin can't deny, admitting that the Russian IT sector will experience "colossal" difficulties as the US and 37 other countries restrict Russia's access to technologies, like semiconductors and telecommunications equipment, via export controls.

Untangling Russia's reliance on the global economy has been an uphill battle for the country, even before the Ukranian invasion and its sanctions.

In 2015, the Kremlin tried to stop all government bodies from using foreign software, but by 2019 only 10% of state-used software was Russian made. Russia's not just dependent on foreign tech, either. More than half, or 65% of Russian businesses relied on imports for their manufacturing, according to a 2021 note from Russia's central bank. From cars to office paper, most companies involve foreign providers some place in the supply chain.

Original post:

Russian Tech Giant Wants Out of the Country As Ukraine War Rages on