Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2020 – Cole of Duty

Insights on the Global Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics Market

PMR is one of the leading market research companies in India. Our team of research analysts have a deep understanding and knowledge related to the latest market research techniques and use their analytical skills to curate insightful and high-quality market reports. The presented data is collected from credible primary sources including marketing heads, sales managers, product managers, industry experts, and more.

As per the report, the global Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market reached a value of ~US$ XX in 2018 and is likely to surpass a market value of ~US$XX by the end of 2029. Further, the report reveals that the Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market is set to grow at a CAGR of ~XX% during the forecast period (2019-2029)

Request Sample Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/samples/3086

Critical doubts related to the Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market addressed in the report:

Request Report Methodology @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/methodology/3086

Segmentation of the Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market

The report bifurcates the Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market into different segments to provide a clear understanding of the various aspects of the market.

Regional Outlook

The regional outlook section of the report includes vital data such as the current trends, regulatory framework, The Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market study offers critical data including, the sales volume, sales growth, and pricing analysis of the different products in the Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics market.

Some of the major companies operating in the global systemic psoriasis therapeutics market are AbbVie Inc., Stiefel Laboratories, Inc., Biogen Idec, Novartis AG, CELGENE CORPORATION, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Pfizer Inc., Amgen Inc., Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company.

Key points covered in the report

For any queries get in touch with Industry Expert @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/ask-an-expert/3086

Important insights present in the report:

Read the original post:

Systemic Psoriasis Therapeutics Market Forecasted To Surpass The Value Of US$ XX Mn/Bn By 2020 - Cole of Duty

Fresh Scrutiny For Fox’s Tucker Carlson As Top Writer Quits Over Bigoted Posts – NPR

A top writer for Fox News' Tucker Carlson resigned after CNN revealed his racist and sexist posts, reviving criticism of Carlson's commentaries. Carlson is set to address the controversy on Monday. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images hide caption

A top writer for Fox News' Tucker Carlson resigned after CNN revealed his racist and sexist posts, reviving criticism of Carlson's commentaries. Carlson is set to address the controversy on Monday.

Updated at 9:35 p.m. ET Monday

The revelation that Fox News prime-time star Tucker Carlson's top writer had posted racist, sexist and homophobic sentiments online for years under a pseudonym has led to renewed scrutiny of Carlson's own commentaries, which have inspired a series of advertising boycotts.

The writer, Blake Neff, resigned on Friday after questions raised by CNN's Oliver Darcy led to the posts becoming public.

Carlson addressed the controversy on the air Monday night, saying Neff's comments were wrong and "have no connection to the show." After noting Neff had paid the price for his actions, Carlson also spoke about what he called the costs of self-righteousness.

"When we pretend we are holy, we are lying," he said. "When we pose as blameless in order to hurt other people, we are committing the gravest sin of all, and we will be punished for it, no question."

In an internal memo, Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott and President and Executive Editor Jay Wallace called the postings "horrific racist, misogynistic and homophobic behavior." Neff had, among other things, assailed the intelligence of Black Americans, African immigrants and Asian Americans, according to CNN. He also repeatedly demeaned a woman, posting details about her dating life and mocking her in personal terms.

Carlson has publicly cited the importance of the value of Neff's work on his show and for an earlier book. The host has courted criticism repeatedly for severe rhetoric, especially toward people of color, immigrants and women.

"I think his show is very close to what his writer, Blake Neff, was doing, apparently anonymously for five years," former CNN and NBC host Soledad O'Brien, who is Black and Latina, told NPR. On his program, she said, Carlson is "anti-immigrant, he's frequently racist. He says despicable things about women, he says despicable things about Asians. He says despicable things about Latinos. He talks about the kind of people who 'hate' America."

President Trump is known to be a frequent viewer and often cites Carlson's arguments publicly. In recent days, some Republican strategists have even looked to Carlson as a Republican presidential candidate in 2024 should Trump lose this November.

The irony is that even as Carlson has just set a record for viewers for any cable news show in the history of the industry in this country, sponsors are peeling away.

An estimated 4.3 million Americans tuned in to watch his program each night for the second quarter of this year more than anyone ever in cable news. And yet Disney, Papa John's and T-Mobile are among the most recent major advertisers who have pulled commercials from the show, in their cases, citing his remarks about Black Lives Matter protests.

"This may be a lot of things, this moment we are living through, but it is definitely not about Black lives," Carlson said in early June. "Remember that when they come for you. And at this rate, they will." (A Fox News spokesperson told reporters that "they" referred to Democrats, not Black protesters.)

Fox did not comment beyond the memo from Scott and Wallace, which was shared with reporters and offered neither support nor criticism for Carlson. Carlson declined several requests for comment from NPR.

These concerns are not new, along with pressures on and from advertisers.

In 2018, for example, Carlson told his viewers: "Our leaders demand we shut up and accept this. We have a moral obligation to admit the world's poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer and dirtier and more divided."

Fox News is part of Rupert Murdoch's larger media empire. Last year, Joseph Azam, a former lawyer and senior vice president for Murdoch's publishing arm, told NPR that Carlson's comments on immigration and rhetoric from other Fox News hosts led him to leave the company. Azam is Muslim and an emigrant from Afghanistan.

Just last week, Carlson questioned the patriotism of two Democratic members of Congress who are both women of color: Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, who emigrated from Somalia, and Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, whose mother is Thai of Chinese descent.

Duckworth is a retired lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army. She lost both her legs and partial use of an arm when a helicopter she was piloting was shot down by Iraqi insurgents in 2004. After Duckworth tweeted in response that Carlson should "walk a mile in my legs and then tell me whether or not I love America," Carlson escalated his attacks the next night, calling her a "coward" and a "fraud."

On his show, Carlson has hosted Pete D'Abrosca, who has expressed sympathy for alt-right leaders; the British commentator Katie Hopkins, banned from Twitter for violating its hateful conduct policy and who told his viewers that white Christian women were "endangered"; and disgraced U.S. Rep. Steve King of Iowa, whom Carlson defended for tweeting that America could not "restore our civilization with somebody else's babies."

Similarly, the Daily Caller, a publication that Carlson co-founded and in which he owned a major stake until last month, has repeatedly faced public outcry over various contributors and staffers who were revealed to have written white supremacist rhetoric on other platforms and outlets.

White nationalists, including David Duke and Richard Spencer, have hailed Carlson's show as echoing their own talking points. For his part, Carlson has called the idea of white supremacy in the U.S. a hoax.

"Tucker's show itself skates that line very closely," says O'Brien, now an independent television host, reporter and producer. "He's a guy who's beloved by white supremacists. I mean, clearly, they say so. That is an indication that he says the kinds of things that they like to hear. He frames arguments that are basically white supremacist arguments. He's not going to use the N-word on TV, certainly. But I think he goes right up to that line."

Last year, when the liberal watchdog Media Matters published a series of offensive past remarks Carlson had made about women on radio shows, the Fox News host issued his own challenge in return:

"Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I'm on television every weeknight live for an hour. If you want to know what I think, you can watch."

Carlson said at the end of Monday's show that he would take the next four days off to go fishing on a long-planned vacation.

Read the rest here:

Fresh Scrutiny For Fox's Tucker Carlson As Top Writer Quits Over Bigoted Posts - NPR

‘Ferocious Rally’: Weiss Ratings Bullish on Bitcoin, Price to Hit $70K Next Year | Markets and Prices – Bitcoin News

Weiss Ratings has outlined key reasons why investors should be bullish about bitcoin, seeing a ferocious rally with the price of the cryptocurrency expected to hit $70,000 next year. In addition, the Federal Reserves massive money-printing and institutional investments into cryptocurrencies add to the bullishness.

Weiss Ratings analysts Bruce Ng and Juan Villaverde explained last week why investors should be bullish about bitcoin despite some sideways consolidations. Weiss Ratings currently ranks bitcoin first among all cryptocurrencies overall.

One of the three key reasons why the analysts are bullish about bitcoin stems from a price prediction based on the stock-to-flow analysis (S2F). The popular forecasting model now points to a ferocious rally over the next 12 months or so, they wrote.

Ng and Villaverde described that S2F is based on the common-sense notion that the scarcer a commodity is, the more valuable it becomes, adding that scarcity is measured by circulating supply. For example, Gold has an S2F of 62, which is the number of years of current production required to match global above-ground holdings, they clarified.

After the May Bitcoin halving, 6.25 new bitcoins are being created every 10 minutes, meaning it would take an estimated 56 years for new mintage to match Bitcoins circulating supply, they continued. Notice how close that is to the S2F number for gold, which makes sense because bitcoin is fast becoming a major rival to gold as a safe-haven investment.

The analysts added that previous S2F predictions line up quite well with bitcoins actual price performance, as seen in the chart above, elaborating:

Now, based on the history of the halving, current S2F analysis says bitcoin should reach $70,000 by sometime around mid-2021 Even if it turns out to be only half right, you could still triple your money.

The other two reasons Weiss Ratings analysts highlighted were QE infinity and institutional money flowing into cryptocurrencies. The covid-19 pandemic environment has pushed the Federal Reserve to print $2.9 trillion in new paper money in just 13 weeks, or about $22 million a minute, the analysts detailed. By any measure, this is corruption of money on an industrial scale, they exclaimed, predicting that investors will pour money into bitcoin and gold as a safe haven when they lose confidence in paper money.

Billionaire investor Mike Novogratz has also been saying that central banks printing record amount of money is the best environment for bitcoin.

The last major factor Ng and Villaverde focused on was the increasing interest in cryptocurrency among institutional investors, such as by Paul Tudor Jones who invested about $210 million of his own money into bitcoin. Grayscale Investments has been adding bitcoin to its Grayscale Bitcoin Trust faster than the rate of new coins being mined and recently, venture capitalist Andreessen Horowitz raised half a billion dollars to invest in crypto startups. The analysts opined:

The sheer weight of institutional-sized money flows into a small market like bitcoin can have truly explosive effects.

Are you bullish on bitcoin? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Weiss Ratings

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

The rest is here:

'Ferocious Rally': Weiss Ratings Bullish on Bitcoin, Price to Hit $70K Next Year | Markets and Prices - Bitcoin News

Crypto Winter Could Really Be Over as New Bitcoin Starts to Bloom – Cointelegraph

There is no doubt that cryptocurrency specifically Bitcoin (BTC), which is frequently used as a barometer for the health of the entire sector has made a comeback. As of the writing of this article, Bitcoin stands at a little over $9,000, very close to the $10,000 rebound that investors hoped for sometime this year and we are barely in the third quarter.

Although there are signs that crypto winter is over, many experts are still understandably cautious.

Related: What's Next for the Industry as 'Crypto Winter' Thaws?

Cryptocurrency has been a notoriously unstable investment, first selling at less than a penny and then varying from $400 to $1,242 between all of 2013 and 2016. In 2017, crypto investors were gleeful (and some, probably, quite smug) to see the currency reach the insane height of $4,400 and then end the year breaking an astonishing $20,000 all this after plummeting to $2,000 that same September.

Of course, what followed that bright season in the cryptocurrency industry was what we refer to as crypto winter the drastic drop in value following several high-profile Ponzi schemes, successful hacks, crypto-jacking attempts and overall negative media coverage.

In this article, we will discuss the question of whether crypto winter is over, whether those who have already invested have a reason to be hopeful, and whether those who havent should jump on the bandwagon soon before prices skyrocket. We will also place a focus on blockchain technology as it exists both inside and outside the cryptocurrency industry, and why widespread adoption of this new technology is an indicator of cryptocurrencys future success.

For many of the experts, the answer seems to be yes. From crypto enthusiasts to Forbes, the current viewpoint of many is that Bitcoin is poised to make huge gains for the next 10 years. Although the vagaries of the cryptocurrency industry are as mysterious as Satoshi Nakamoto himself, it seems that we have headed into a period of stability during which the fundamentals of cryptocurrency are better understood and trusted.

Only 4% of Americans polled cite cryptocurrency as their preferred long-term investment, but this is very likely going to change in the near future, as Bitcoin has nothing but room to grow.

Many compare the future of Bitcoin to that of the internet, and claim that the commodity is going through the same growing pains of scalability, availability and ease of use that the internet first went through from 1995.

Similarly, market experts note that although only 11% of Americans own Bitcoin, those numbers are on par with other huge technological developments in their early stages, such as smartphones.

Many point out that the disruption caused by the coronavirus outbreak to traditional banking and investing institutions may be a motivator to invest in the digital currency to protect against inflation and the questionable resilience of fiat currencies.

Many experts also suggest that cryptocurrency transactions arent completely secure and anonymous without the use of a virtual private network, or VPN. They are also irreversible. Once a coin is gone from your account, it can easily vanish without a trace. Hackers have taken advantage of this by breaking into exchanges and stealing small amounts from each user.

So, it will likely take time until Bitcoin gains trust from the wider public, but for those willing to take a risk, it might be the most profitable investment of 2020, specifically for those who are willing to wait 10 years to witness the true extent of its growth.

Although much is left to be seen about the future of cryptocurrency, no one can deny that the idea of creating a digital-only currency is as old as science fiction. From transportation to food to medicine to video games, a wide variety of industries continue to look to blockchain technology for logistical and transactional solutions. In seven years, it is estimated that $300 billion worth of food products will be tracked using blockchain technology, saving over $100 billion annually.

In 2018, JPMorgan surprised the traditional financial world by publicly stating that blockchain technology is the way of the future for cross-border payments. A year after that, IBM, Citibank and Barclays announced the development of their own blockchain-based platforms, and Dubai made a statement that it has a new goal to become blockchain-powered by 2020.

Although this is still a relatively new technology, there is little doubt that blockchain and the cryptographic technology it uses will rapidly dominate the landscape in coming years. Countless top-tier engineers, product developers and designers are building real solutions on top of blockchain, working to perfect this technology for widespread use across various industries.

It is possible that we may have to wait until blockchain technology is fully understood, utilized and appreciated by the masses in order to provide cryptocurrency a much-needed publicity boost.

After all, although currencies and monetary investments like cryptocurrencies can go through wild ups and downs, there is nothing more stable than an already proven and reliable technological solution like blockchain.

Many unanswered questions and problems that still exist are unsettling to cautious investors, but these obstacles bear resemblance to other successful, ground-breaking technologies such the internet and Apple smartphones. Furthermore, much of the negative press about the problems associated with Bitcoin is due to scams that could have been easily avoided with adequate financial knowledge and cybersecurity.

Also, lets not forget that traditional banking institutions have a vested interest in making cryptocurrency seem like a questionable investment. Of course, big banks and traditional investing platforms have significant power to fund research and news stories that influence opinions on a daily basis. This might be more of a reflection of their fear of competition rather than a legitimate portrayal of the value of the cryptocurrency industry.

Certainly, if you prefer safe and reliable investments with moderate-to-low gains in the short term, Bitcoin is probably not the right investment for you.

However, if you are looking to potentially gain big by investing in a growing new industry, and are not afraid of the spring cleaning that is currently needed to make improvements to the future security and useability of cryptocurrency, it might be just the right time to buy Bitcoin.

After all, where there is no risk, there is no reward and it may be wise not to wait until everyone is singing the praises of Bitcoin in the coming years to make the decision to invest.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Sam Bocetta is a freelance journalist specializing in United States diplomacy and national security with an emphasis on technology trends in cyber warfare, cyber defense and cryptography. Previously, Sam was a contractor for the U.S. Department of Defense, working in partnership with architects and developers to mitigate controls for vulnerabilities identified across applications.

Read more from the original source:

Crypto Winter Could Really Be Over as New Bitcoin Starts to Bloom - Cointelegraph

$424 Million and Numismatic Value: There’s Only 20000 Casascius Physical Bitcoins Left Unspent | Featured Bitcoin News – Bitcoin News

For many years now physical bitcoins have been a very popular trend, but one specific type called the Casascius physical bitcoin collection has intrigued people for years. Last December, someone redeemed a 100 BTC Casascius bar and since then 560 Casascius coins worth $5.1 million have been redeemed. As of today, there are only 20,901 Casascius coins or bars left in the world, with roughly $424 million worth of bitcoins loaded on them.

Bitcoins believe it or not can have nostalgic value, especially when they are tethered to a physical bitcoin. During the last decade, numerous manufacturers have created physical bitcoins that have been loaded with the digital currency.

Most all of these types of coins are collectors items, as the physical attributes can give the cryptocurrency numismatic value. One of the most popular physical bitcoin creators was Mike Caldwell who issued the Casascius physical bitcoin collection from 2011 to 2013.

Unfortunately, the U.S. government shut down Caldwells operation by telling him he could no longer load the physical coins with real digital bitcoin. However, during Caldwells tenure of making the Casascius physical bitcoin collection, he minted close to 90,000 BTC in various denominations.

On July 12, 2020, theres only 45,760 active BTC held on Casascius physical coins or bars in existence, as there were roughly 46,320 active BTC coins in December 2019. That means at todays BTC/USD exchange rates out of the 560 coins redeemed, $5.1 million in BTC was spent.

Last December when news.Bitcoin.com reported on the 100 BTC gold bar that was redeemed on the 23rd, it was the last 100 BTC peeled since then. So far the highest increment peeled between December and now, was a few 25 BTC coins. At the time of writing, there are still 48- 100 BTC bars that have not been spent, leaving $44.4 million left (100 BTC bars) unspent to-date.

Caldwell also minted a number of 1,000 BTC bars and so far, most of those have been redeemed. The series one 1,000 BTC bar data shows that 87% have been redeemed. The series two Casascius bars only stored 500 BTC and every single one of those bars have been peeled.

Although some individuals are lucky enough to own the series one 1,000 BTC Casascius coins minted in 2011. Only six were manufactured and there are four coins left, and that means only 33.33% of the BTC has been spent so far. It could be possible that due to the size of these coins being much smaller (28.6mm) than the bars (80mm x 40mm x 6mm), a few may have been lost.

In the Casascius collection, there are a lot more physical coins with smaller increments between 0.5 BTC to 25 BTC. As mentioned above, Casascius coins have given bitcoiners a lot of nostalgia, and lots of these coins have gathered numismatic value that far exceeds the BTC value stored on the coin.

For instance, on Ebay theres two Casascius coins selling for far more than the original BTC value. One example shows a rare 2011- 1 BTC physical Casascius coin selling for $101,000. Another seller on the eBay auction website wants $25k for his 2013- fully funded 1 BTC Casascius coin.

There are not that many Casascius coins on eBay, but theres a whole lot more coins from manufacturers like Denarium and BTCC Mint. Caldwell did make a number of unloaded Casascius bitcoins that contain no real digital currency value, and those trinkets sell for $25 a pop.

People can follow the redemption cycle of Casascius bitcoins on Twitter by following the bot called Casascius Coin Tracker (@Casasciusbot). When news.Bitcoin.com reported on the 100 BTC bar peel, it was the largest month between now and then for redemptions with 172 coins peeled. In mid-March 54 coins were redeemed and so far only 14 Casascius coins have been peeled in July.

Of course, the biggest month in a long while was December 2017, when the public witnessed 1,172 redeemed Casascius coins. As 560 Casascius coins worth $5.1 million have been redeemed since December 2019, it shows that these physical bitcoins are becoming rarer by the day. Its likely that as scarcity continues to take hold of these loaded physical bitcoins, they will always be worth more than the original digital load value.

What do you think about the number of Casascius coins left in existence? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, casasciustracker.com

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Visit link:

$424 Million and Numismatic Value: There's Only 20000 Casascius Physical Bitcoins Left Unspent | Featured Bitcoin News - Bitcoin News

Stocks, Greed and Exuberance: 5 Things to Watch in Bitcoin This Week – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) begins Monday by avoiding another test of $9,000, but what could happen to change the mood or even set off a bull run?

Cointelegraph takes a look at five major facts that could influence the BTC price during the coming week.

The macro outlook seemed more or less stable on Monday. Prior to trading, futures for the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and more were modestly up, despite concerns mounting over coronavirus.

Specifically, one source quoted by Bloomberg warned on Sunday, the sentiment is one of worry both about the spread of cases and the United States response to protect the economy.

If the Federal Reserve intervenes in equities yet again and adds to its balance sheet, it would increase the sense of an artificial presence on the markets in terms of competition.

There is an emerging possibility that the Fed hasnt gone far enough, quantitative strategists at Sanford C. Bernstein wrote in a note.

If that came to pass, then maybe valuation of the market simply doesnt matter.

Fed balance sheet as of July 7. Source: Federal Reserve

As Cointelegraph reported, Bitcoin has shown no signs of lessening its dependence on stocks in recent weeks. Moves up or down appeared to shape BTC/USD performance, with last weeks trip from $9,000 to near $9,500 and back down again being no exception.

Analysts particularly eye the S&P 500, an index with which Bitcoin currently shows a 95% correlation.

Coronavirus is also weighing on U.S. consumer confidence, fresh data meanwhile shows, with five indicators all flashing bearish in July after recovering during the two previous months.

On the topic of macro, trader sentiment in cryptocurrency still contrasts with that of traditional markets.

That was the conclusion from two incarnations of the Fear & Greed Index, a basket of factors designed to show whether traders are overly risk-off or unduly confident.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index remains in the fear category with little movement for several weeks. By contrast, the traditional market equivalent is flashing greed, while slowly trending downwards towards neutral.

On a scale of 1 to 100, Monday scored 59, down 7 points from the same time one month ago. The cryptocurrency equivalent measured 43 for Monday and 38 last month.

Fuelling traditional greed was extreme greed in stock price breadth, while derivatives put and call options, along with safe-haven demand, also sat firmly in the greed range.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index 1-month chart. Source: Alternative.me

The greed narrative fits with other signs that stocks, in particular, are overly buoyant.

As noted by market commentator Holger Zschaepitz on Monday, the correlation between the Nasdaq and S&P 500 is on the up, in what he describes as a sign of exuberance.

At the same time, banks are gearing up for a dismal quarterly performance, something that is on track to be the worst since the 2008 financial crisis.

As Cointelegraph noted, misgivings about stocks recovery since March have long persisted in Bitcoin circles. The Feds interventions, in particular, have fuelled accusations that the entire atmosphere is now artificial, and true value is of limited relevance.

Numbers this week show that investors themselves have in fact gone for cash and gold not equities in 2020. Inflows into the two assets beat others since the start of the year, similar to 2008-9.

Inflows as a % of assets under management chart. Source: Jeroen Blokland/ Twitter

Monday sees a new Bitcoin difficulty adjustment, the latest in a series of bullish moves that underline miner confidence.

With the event just hours away at press time, estimates suggest a difficulty uptick of around 9.5%.

This is much stronger than the previous move two weeks ago, which was stagnant, and on the way to matching last months 15% surge, which was the largest since early 2018.

Difficulty represents how much effort is required to solve equations when mining new Bitcoin blocks. Upward adjustments suggest more competition, with Mondays estimate slowly increasing over the past week.

At the same time, the network hash rate, having reached an all-time average high last week, has tailed off slightly. Data from Blockchain estimates a seven-day average of 124.42 EH/s for Monday, having previously hit 126 EH/s.

Hash rate is a sensitive and inexact metric, but nonetheless provides an idea of how much computing power is being dedicated to Bitcoin mining. Major swings are not uncommon, and a popular theory suggests that bullish progress for hash rate is followed some time later by a copycat Bitcoin price move.

Bitcoin 7-day average hash rate 1-month chart. Source: Blockchain

Bitcoin futures markets generated few opportunities for price movements over the weekend. Low volatility means that markets will begin Monday in a similar position to that at which they ended on Friday.

If Monday and Friday do not match, a gap opens up in futures markets which the BTC/USD spot tends to fill in subsequent days or even hours.

CME Bitcoin futures chart showing lack of weekend gap. Source: TradingView

Nonetheless, futures remain a source of suspicion for some. As Cointelegraph reported, in-house analyst filbfilb warned last week that weak performance could be a sign of worse to come.

Specifically, one indicator showed uncanny similarities to the days before Bitcoins March crash. Should history repeat itself, he added, the drop, however, should not be as intense as at that time.

Read more from the original source:

Stocks, Greed and Exuberance: 5 Things to Watch in Bitcoin This Week - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin and forex are unlikely to make you wealthy. But a Stocks and Shares ISA could do so – Yahoo Finance UK

When it comes to making money from the worlds financial markets, you have no shortage of options these days. Forex, cryptocurrencies, stocks, funds, ETFs, commodities These are just some of the ways you can potentially generate profits.

Some financial strategies are more likely to make you wealthy than others, however. If youre serious about generating wealth, I say forget about cryptocurrencies and forex trading, and instead, put your money into a Stocks and Shares ISA.

Its easy to see why cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin have caught the attention of many investors. Had you bought a decent amount of Bitcoin a decade ago, youd probably be a millionaire by now.Yet looking ahead, I think its unlikely Bitcoin will generate the same returns for investors. The chances of Bitcoin being adopted as a proper currency look slim. Meanwhile, regulators are cracking down on cryptocurrencies in a big way. This means there is now more downside risk. If your goal is to build real wealth, Id steer clear of Bitcoin.

Id also steer clear of forex trading. Why? Simply because the majority of forex traders lose money. Just look at the stats. According to forex.com, 72% of retail investor accounts on its platform lose money. Meanwhile, on fxcm.com, it says 75% of retail investor accounts lose money. Of course, there are plenty of forex traders that do make good returns trading the worlds currency markets. However, becoming a top forex trader is not easy.

If youre looking for a straightforward way to build wealth, I think youre better off putting your money into a Stocks and Shares ISA. With this type of ISA, you can invest your money in a wide range of wealth-building assets. And any gains you make will be completely tax-free.

With a Stocks and Shares ISA, you have plenty of investment options.

One option is to invest in a global equity fund such as Fundsmith Equity. This is a top-performing investment fund that owns stocks such as Microsoft,PayPal, and Unilever. It has returned about 20% per year over the last five years.

Another option is to invest in an investment trust such as Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust. This is a tech-focused investment trust that owns stocks such as Amazon, Tesla and Netflix. This trusts share price has risen about 230% over the last five years.

You also have the option to invest in individual companies yourself. For example, you could buy shares in companies that you know such as Apple, Alphabet (Google), or JD Sports Fashion. All of these companies have delivered strong returns for investors in recent years.

Alternatively, you could invest in fast-growing smaller companies. Smaller companies are generally riskier than large companies, however, they tend to produce higher returns. For example, video game company Keywords Studios has turned a 2k investment into about 22k in just five years.

Invest 500 a month into a Stocks and Shares ISA and earn 10% per year on your money, and youre looking at a one million pound investment portfolio in around 30 years. With a simple investment strategy, its very easy to build real wealth within a Stocks and Shares ISA.

The post Bitcoin and forex are unlikely to make you wealthy. But a Stocks and Shares ISA could do so appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.

More reading

Edward Sheldon owns shares in Microsoft, PayPal, Unilever, Keywords Studios, Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, Alphabet, Apple, and JD Sports Fashion and has a position in Fundsmith. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fools board of directors. Teresa Kersten, an employee of LinkedIn, a Microsoft subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fools board of directors. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended Alphabet (C shares), Apple, Microsoft, Netflix, PayPal Holdings, and Tesla. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Keywords Studios and Unilever and recommends the following options: long January 2021 $85 calls on Microsoft, short January 2021 $115 calls on Microsoft, and long January 2022 $75 calls on PayPal Holdings. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Motley Fool UK 2020

See the article here:

Bitcoin and forex are unlikely to make you wealthy. But a Stocks and Shares ISA could do so - Yahoo Finance UK

A Panel of Experts See Bitcoin Averaging $12948 by Year End – Bitcoin News

A panel of experts is predicting the price of bitcoin will rise to $10,337 by September before adding a further $2,611 to end the year at $12,948.

The findings are drawn from a Finder Cryptocurrency Predictions Report for July 2020 and the latest figure is roughly $2,500 less than the price predicted in the April report.

In the report, 28 panellists drawn from academia, crypto research firms, and hedge funds are also asked to give their sentiments about bitcoin.

Some 50% of those surveyed believe now is the best time to buy bitcoin.

According to the findings, half of the panellists (50%) thinks now is the time to buy, with a little under a third (32%) suggesting holding. Only 18% say now is the best time to sell.

Meanwhile, two of the panellists who share this buy sentiment argue their case in the same report. Kinetic Trading CEO David Wills, one of the two panellists, believes events sparked by the coronavirus pandemic have created the best scenario to buy. He said:

I am a big follower of Plan B stock to flow analysis. This combined with the debasement of fiat currency in the wake of covid-19 is the perfect set-up for a bull run in the second half of the year.

Echoing Willis sentiments is Coinmama CEO, Sagi Baksi, who notes a few different factors at play.

Baksi points to the stock to flow model, the financial instability, as well as the printing of money by the US Federal Reserve. From these pointers, he concluded that now is the time to buy bitcoin.

Gavin Smith, general partner at Panxora, is one of the few dissenting panellists. He thinks now is the best time to sell.

While agreeing with the long-term inflation outlook, Smith does point out that the global economy has been hit by a negative demand shock caused by covid-19.

This hit is a strong enough basis for a short-term significant decline in the value of bitcoin as the deflationary demand shock filters through.

Smiths prediction for the end of year value for bitcoin of $7,000 sharply contrasts with the panels average prediction.

In the meantime, bitcoins value appears to have stabilized above $9,000 since the halving. It has only breached the $10,000 mark a few times despite some bullish predictions.

Do you think bitcoin is currently trading at a discount? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

The rest is here:

A Panel of Experts See Bitcoin Averaging $12948 by Year End - Bitcoin News

Institutional OG: The Fact That You Can Go 100x Leverage on Bitcoin Is Pretty Wild – Cointelegraph

Crypto-focused institutional trading desks are lately springing up. While Wall Street investment banks and hedge funds are still in the early stages of involvement, a class of crypto-native funds founded by institutional pros is by now well established.

Cointelegraph interviewed the co-founder of one of these funds, CMS Holdings Dan Matuszewski, to learn more about his views on the crypto market.

Before involving himself in crypto in 2012, Matuszewski worked for some years at Bay Hill, an institutional hedge fund. Most of his career was nevertheless tied to crypto, with a brief stint at Kraken and a longer tenure as the head of the OTC desk at Circle.

In 2019, Matuszewski left Circle to co-found CMS Holdings, a fund that operates like a hedge fund despite only working with principal capital the co-founders own money.

He shared his views on the growing derivatives market in crypto, highlighting some of the differences with traditional markets.

While derivatives have been growing, their volume is still below that of spot, or direct crypto trading. The majority of derivatives volume comes from futures, a derivatives contract that seeks to closely follow the price of the underlying asset. Commenting on this, Matuszewski said:

The derivatives market is always going to dwarf the spot market, just because theres bigger access to leverage and it's just a lot easier to trade.

But Matuszewski finds it odd that leverage in crypto is so high. The fact that you can go 100x on Bitcoin, it's kind of wild to me, he added. In his view, these crypto derivatives are really treated more like a casino rather than a hedging tool, as they see much higher retail trader participation who have much more of a gambling mentality. Though he disclaimed that traditional derivatives products are also highly speculated upon.

The differences in risk approaches are amply shown by CME Bitcoin futures. While the exchange allows double or triple digits of leverage for gold futures, on Bitcoin the maximum leverage is only about 3x, though it varies each day as maintenance margins change.

I hope a lot of people aren't doing that [using 100x leverage]. But Arthur [Hayes, CEO of BitMEX,] put out a post about BitMEX average margin usage [...] and its high. People are pretty wound up on that thing.

Matuszewski noted that futures by themselves are not particularly new for crypto, as some platforms offered them even when he first got into crypto in 2012. BitMEX popularized them in 2018, which led to a host of competitors springing up. But Matuszewski believes they do not have much to compete on:

There's only a couple of permutations right now. You give people more things to trade, or you give them more access to trade what they have already. So its either leverage or new assets.

On leverage, he noted that theres not that much further you can go. Until volatility falls to consistently low levels, there will be an upper bound on it. You can't give somebody 500x leverage in Bitcoin because the bid offer [spread] will just liquidate them, he added.

Nevertheless, he believes that the derivatives market will keep growing:

I think that's the trend, I think people will be getting more in the derivatives space than spot going forward. Options markets will grow, Deribits had very good growth on that thing, CME just got into it.

See the original post here:

Institutional OG: The Fact That You Can Go 100x Leverage on Bitcoin Is Pretty Wild - Cointelegraph

US Dept of Homeland Security Buys Analytics Software From Coinbase | News – Bitcoin News

Coinbase is selling its blockchain analytics software to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Secret Service. Following criticisms from the crypto community, CEO Brian Armstrong defended Coinbases position.

Public records on the U.S. governments websites reveal that the San Francisco-based crypto exchange Coinbase has signed a contract with the U.S. government for its blockchain analytics software. The records were first spotted by The Block.

The contract, awarded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was signed on May 9. It went into effect the next day with a tentative end date of May 11, 2024. The obligated amount is currently $49,000 and the potential award amount is $183,750. The contracting agency is the U.S. Secret Service, a federal agency that investigates monetary crimes such as fraud and counterfeiting; it was transferred from the Department of the Treasury to the Department of Homeland Security on March 1, 2003.

Following the news of Coinbase selling its analytics software to the U.S. Secret Service, many people took to Twitter to criticize the companys action, with some urging others to delete Coinbase, saying that the company is bad for bitcoin and crypto.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong quickly defended his companys decision. Blockchain analytics software is nothing new has been around a long time it uses publicly available data to try and track crypto transactions usually to catch bad actors, he tweeted.

Armstrong proceeded to explain that his company started off by using some of the existing blockchain analytics services out there. This worked out ok, but the issue with it was that we dont like sharing data with third parties when we can avoid it, and they didnt support all the features/chains we needed. So we realized at some point we would need to bring this capability in house, the CEO described, elaborating:

Its expensive to build this capability, and we want to recoup costs. There is an existing market for blockchain analytics software, so we sell it to a handful of folks as well. It also helps us build relationships with law enforcement which is important to growing crypto.

Last month, it was reported that Coinbase wanted to sell its analytics software to two other U.S. government agencies: the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Meanwhile, the company is reportedly planning an initial public offering (IPO) in the U.S.

What do you think about Coinbase selling its analytics software to the government? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, U.S. government

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More here:

US Dept of Homeland Security Buys Analytics Software From Coinbase | News - Bitcoin News

Listen: What a Bitcoin Researcher Says About Lightning – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Chaincode Labs researcher Clara Shikhelman has been studying mathematics in university since she was 14 years old. Now, as the bitcoin companys newest post-doctoral fellow, she is exploring ways to optimize the Lightning Network.

Formore episodesand free early access before our regular 3 p.m. Eastern time releases, subscribe withApple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocketcasts, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Stitcher, RadioPublica, iHeartRadioorRSS.

This episode is sponsored byBitstampandCrypto.com.

In this audio interview, CoinDesks Leigh Cuen and Chaincode Labs researcherClara Shikhelmantalk aboutbitcoinand what attracted them to it.

As a co-founder of the IsraeliWomen in Mathematics Association, Shikhelman has been researching complex math problems for nearly a decade. But she said bitcoin offers especially interesting puzzles to solve because this technology may have the potential to change the world. Shes one of many young researchers who identify with the cypherpunk movement.

There are a lot of people like me, their main thing is academic, Shikhelman said. They are not the classic cypherpunk people, but [t]hey believe in privacy, in political change.

Until recently, most people associated with thecypherpunk movementwere technologists in the 1980s and 1990s who circulated mailing lists about encryption and other privacy tech topics. The term was created byfeminist hackitvist Judith Milhon, although it is widely associated with software engineers such as bitcoin veteran Adam Back. Many of the original cypherpunks are still active in thecryptocurrency spacetoday. However, theyve also inspired a new generation of self-identified cypherpunks with different skills now also exploring the subcultures proverb that cypherpunks build things.

In Shikhelmans case, shes focused on mathematical research to make bitcoinsLightning Networkreliable. Like her predecessors, she shares a love of cypherpunk literature, such as novels by science fiction writer Neal Stephenson. These fantasy worlds help her think outside the box and apply math to ideas with cypherpunk potential, meaning the potential to use privacy tech to promote social change. Such solutions-oriented research is a fundamental part of building technology, just as valuable as adding open source code to a Github repo.

Lets talk big. Lets think huge. Lets talk about thousands of years in the future, changing humanity, Shikhelman said.

In order to build privacy into the bitcoin ecosystem, technologists first must understand the mathematical aspects of the system. Just as safety equipment works best when it fits the person (an oversized helmet can be more dangerous than none at all), software works best when designed with both the details and holistic value flow in mind.

Lightning will need more than justonion routingfor good privacy guarantees going forward, said cypherpunk journalistJanine Rmer, who writes anewsletterabout bitcoin privacy tech. Lightning is one of many adaptations that will expand Bitcoins ability to carry larger and larger portions of the global economy.

Similar to Shikhelman, Rmer is a researcher who views herself as part of the broader cypherpunk movement.

A lowercase c cypherpunk, she joked, acknowledging she was never involved with the movements founding fathers.

This social movement is not preoccupied with overthrowing or altering governments, in stark contrast with Bitcoin Twitters anarchist undertones. Instead, Rmer said, rather than seizing power the movement is focused on working to make things un-take-over-able. In short, unseizable assets, self-sovereign data and other types of independence in a digital world.

I prefer the term informational self-determination, which is used in the German constitution, Rmer said.

As for bitcoin, Shikhelman described Bitcoin Core as pretty much stable and running, meaning her focus has now turned to privacy-centric usability for the Lightning Network. With regards to bitcoins reliability so far, Rmer agreed.

I hope bitcoin will become/keep being something that survives under adversity, and gives the people who use it at least enough privacy that they can escape from whatever preys on them. Whether thats the state, banks, corporations, abusive family or partners, Rmer concluded.

Formore episodesand free early access before our regular 3 p.m. Eastern time releases, subscribe withApple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocketcasts, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Stitcher, RadioPublica, iHeartRadioorRSS.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Continued here:

Listen: What a Bitcoin Researcher Says About Lightning - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Two Teens Arrested After Paying Bitcoin to See Livestream Murder on Dark Web – Cointelegraph

Two Italian 17-year-olds were arrested for paying Bitcoin (BTC) to see children being sexually abused, tortured and murdered in live streaming.

Local media Il Messaggero reported on July 15 that the deep web website viewed by the two also allowed users to pay extra to decide what torture the children would be subjected to next. Italian law enforcement explained:

Users that were able to reach those kinds of obscure environments are allowed to take part in acts of sexual violence and torture on minors, performed live by adults.

The services offered by the website have different costs. Viewing a pre-recorded video costs much less than watching live, but in both cases the viewing concludes with the death of the child. The article also provides another example, according to which viewers can for instance request them to amputate a childrens arm or to pour hot oil over the victim. Law enforcement said:

The live requests really cost a lot of money and ensure particularly high profits to the foreign organizations that carry out those inhuman acts.

The two were searched as part of an ongoing investigation that has so far involved 25 people 19 minors and six over 18 residing in 13 Italian provinces. The operation is nicknamed Delirio delirium in Italian by local law enforcement. It started in October and resulted in tens of searches.

The two arrested are a man and a woman who exchanged details pertaining to what they referred to as a red room. The man often shared with the women grim details of the livestreams.

Media found include pedopornographic videos self-made by minors, videos of children as young as three-year-olds being molested by adults, and videos depicting violence often accompanied by Nazi symbology.

It is unclear whether the website offering the services was shut down, but presumably only some of its viewers were caught. Local law enforcement has not answered Cointelegraphs inquiry.

Cryptocurrencies pseudonymity and the lack of governmental control over them make them suitable for criminals. Among such criminals, we can find political dissidents, whistleblowers and journalists, but also pedophiles, drug dealers and black-hat hackers.

There have been many worldwide reports on the use of Bitcoin and other crypto assets specifically in child porn dealings. For instance, at the end of June Spanish law enforcement took down a dark-web child porn ring that used cryptocurrency transactions to pay for content.

View post:

Two Teens Arrested After Paying Bitcoin to See Livestream Murder on Dark Web - Cointelegraph

Ethereum Is Ready to Go Bullish According to These Indicators – Crypto Briefing

Key Takeaways

Despite lackluster price action last week, Ether is flashing multiple buy signals as Ethereum network growth continues to surge.

Ethereum was contained within a descending parallel channel through June. During the previous month, ETH rose to the upper boundary of this technical formation, but its price was rejected by the barrier and fell back towards the lower boundary. From that point, the smart contract giant bounced back up to resistance, consistent with the characteristics of a channel.

A spike in the buying pressure behind Ether allowed it to break out of the descending parallel channel last week. However, buy-pressure was weak and prices sputtered.

Now, ETH is trading just above the upper boundary of the channel. With sufficient consolidation, this may create a new overhead resistance level unless theres an uptick in demand.

One strategy for analysis is to draw a parallel line equal to the height of the channel to use as a target when an asset breaks out of that channel. Based on this technical rule, Ethereum could advance as far as $265 if demand picks up.

Even though Ethereum seems to be on the cusp of a bullish breakout, traders have shifted their focus towards lower-cap altcoins. Data reveals that the number of ETH-related mentions across different social media networks dropped significantly over the past few days.

The negative social sentiment is likely due to the lackluster price action, but the outcome may benefit the bulls, according to Brian Quinlivan, marketing and social media director at Santiment.

With enough people ignoring ETH while keeping their eyes on smaller caps, there will be an opportunity to catch the crowd off guard to make whale investors maximize their gains when they finally make their moves, said Quinlivan.

The rate at which the Ethereum network is growing adds credence to the bullish outlook. This fundamental metric is one of the most important gauges for understanding the health and well being of any crypto project.

Historical data suggests that this is a precise price predictor. Indeed, network growth has led to an increase in Ethereums price over the last four months, while declining network growth has been followed by price slumps.

Over the past three days, Ethereums network growth jumped by nearly 21%. The sudden upswing might be followed by a price increase if history repeats itself.

While the odds seem to favor the bulls, investors must pay close attention to the $236 support level. A daily candlestick close below this price hurdle may jeopardize the optimistic outlook. Under such circumstances, the next significant levels of support to watch out for sits between $231 and $224.

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

More Delays? Ethereum 2.0 Developers Expect 2021 Launch, Vitalik Buter...

SEC Approves Arcas Ethereum-Based Digital Securities Fund

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Open Markets With a Bang, More to Come

Original post:

Ethereum Is Ready to Go Bullish According to These Indicators - Crypto Briefing

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 18th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS fell by 0.19% on Friday. Following on from a 1.18% decline on Thursday, EOS ended the day at $.24991.

It was another mixed start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning high $2.5155 before hitting reverse.

Coming up short of the major resistance levels, EOS fell to a mid-morning intraday low $2.4767.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $2.4382, EOS struck a mid-day intraday high $2.5233 before easing back.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $2.5641, EOS fell back to sub-$2.50 levels and into the red.

Finding support late in the day, EOS briefly moved back through to $2.50 levels before easing back.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.18% to $2.5036. A bullish start to the day saw EOS rise from an early morning low $2.5036 to a high $2.5063.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to move through the $2.5000 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $2.5227.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break back through to $2.52 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $2.5233 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $2.5000 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.4761 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, EOS should steer clear of sub-$2.40 levels. The third major support level at $2.4065 should limit the downside.

First Major Support Level: $2.4761

Pivot Level: $2.5000

First Major Resistance Level: $2.5227

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 0.33% on Friday. Following on from a 2.07% slide on Thursday, Ethereum ended the day at $232.7.

It was also another mixed start to the day. Ethereum rose to an early morning high $234.33 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $238.46, Ethereum slid to a mid-morning intraday low $230.87.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $229.07, Ethereum moved back through to $233 levels before easing back.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 0.16% to $233.07. A mixed start to the day saw Ethereum fall to an early morning low $232.49 before rising to a high $233.26.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $232.71 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $234.54.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break back through to $234 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $234.55 should cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $232.71 pivot would bring the first major support level at $230.86 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, Ethereum should continue to steer clear of sub-$225 levels. The second major support level at $229.03 would come into play in the event of a pullback, however.

First Major Support Level: $230.86

Pivot Level: $232.71

First Major Resistance Level: $234.54

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP fell by 0.03% on Friday. Following on from a 1.58% slide on Thursday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.19464.

A bearish start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall to a mid-morning intraday low $0.19153 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.1894, Ripples XRP struck a mid-day intraday high $0.19842.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $0.19785, Ripples XRP fell back to sub-$0.1930 levels before finding support.

A late move back through to $0.1940 levels reversed the heavier losses from the day.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.13% to $0.19490. A mixed start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall to an early morning low $0.19434 before rising to a high $0.19490.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall back through the $0.1949 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.1982.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break back through to $0.1980 levels.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $0.19842 should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP should test resistance at $0.20 before any pullback. The second major resistance level sits at $0.2018.

Failure to avoid a fall back through the $0.1949 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.1913 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.1850 levels. The second major support level at $0.1880 should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $0.1913

Pivot Level: $0.1949

First Major Resistance Level: $0.1982

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Go here to see the original:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 18th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

EOS, Ethereum and Ripple’s XRP – Daily and Hourly Tech Analysis July 12th, 2020 – FX Empire

Looking at the Technical Indicators

Major Support Level: $237.21

Pivot Level: $239.39

Major Resistance Level: $241.36

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rose by 0.86% on Saturday. Partially reversing a 1.69% fall from Friday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.20124.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP break through R1 @ $0.2041 to strike an intraday high $0.20504.

Bearish through the afternoon, Ripples XRP fell to a late intraday low $0.19811.

While falling into the red, Ripples XRP avoided S1 @ $0.1936. Finding late support, Ripples XRP moved back through to $0.20 levels and into the green.

Looking at the MACD, weve seen a narrowing of the bullish histograms early on, supportive of a pullback in the day ahead.

The spreads between the 50-day EMA and 100 and 200 EMAs have also narrowed marginally also supporting a reversal.

Avoiding a fall through the days pivot level at $0.2015 will be key to support the upward momentum.

Barring an extended crypto rally, R1 @ 0.2048 and Saturdays high $0.20504 would likely cap any upside.

A fall through the days pivot level at $0.2015 would bring the S1 @ $0.1979 into play before any recovery.

Barring an extended sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.19 levels. S2 @ 0.1945 should limit any downside.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.11% to $0.20147. A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise from an early morning low $0.20122 to a high $0.20340. Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Read more:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripple's XRP - Daily and Hourly Tech Analysis July 12th, 2020 - FX Empire

Ethereum Showing Early Signs of Strong Decline, But $230 Is The Key – newsBTC

Ethereum is retreating lower from the $245 resistance against the US Dollar. ETH is now showing bearish signs below $235, but the $230 support holds the key in the near term.

In the past few sessions, Ethereum followed a bearish path from the $245 resistance against the US Dollar. ETH price broke the main $235 support level and the 100 hourly simple moving average to move into a bearish zone.

The decline was such that the price tested the $230 support level. Ether is currently correcting higher and trading above the $232 level. It surpassed the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the recent decline from the $239 swing high to $230 low.

On the upside, the price is facing a strong resistance near the $235 level. There is also a crucial bearish trend line forming with resistance near $235 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD.

The trend line is close to the 50% % Fib retracement level of the recent decline from the $239 swing high to $230 low. The next key resistance is near the $236 level and the 100 hourly SMA (the recent breakdown zone).

If ether climbs above the $235 and $236 resistance levels, it could start a decent recovery wave. The next hurdle could be $240, but the main barrier for the bulls is still near the $245 level.

On the downside, the $230 support holds the key in the coming sessions. If there is a successful break and close below the $230 support, it might confirm a bearish break.

In the stated case, the bears are likely to take control and they might aim a test of the $220 pivot level.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD The MACD for ETH/USD is slowly moving in the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI The RSI for ETH/USD is currently rising towards the 50 level.

Major Support Level $230

Major Resistance Level $236

Take advantage of the trading opportunities with Plus500

Risk disclaimer: 76.4% of retail CFD accounts lose money.

Originally posted here:

Ethereum Showing Early Signs of Strong Decline, But $230 Is The Key - newsBTC

The Fascist Messaging of the Trump Campaign Eagle – Hyperallergic

2nd German Empire (Reichsadler), 1871-1918, (image via Wikimedia Commons)

Whats in an eagle? This is a question many have been asking since the Donald Trump campaign began selling an America First T-shirt emblazoned with an eagle icon that very closely resembles the one used by Nazi Germany. While intent for the choice of this image may be unclear, in the context of recent rhetoric by the administration and its supporters, there is reason for concern. The circumstantial evidence piling up strongly suggests that individuals within the administration and the Trump 2020 campaign are amplifying white supremacist and fascist messaging. Consider that:

This brings us back to the campaigns use of this particular eagle. The eagle rousant (eagle rising) is, of course, not unique to the Nazis or to the United States for that matter. The Romans used the eagles (Aguila) as the figurehead for their military standards. Almost every empire and country has used one in its heraldry at some time or another. In heraldic custom, the eagle faces to its own right (viewers left). What makes this use by the Trump campaign problematic is the specific choice of depicting an eagle facing to the viewers right.

The origin of the eagle symbol lies in the Holy Roman Empire, during the 10th century, whose rule was represented by the Reichsadler (Imperial Eagle). It evolved into a double-headed eagle, and then a single-headed form became the symbol of the German empire (Second Reich) in 1871. After Germanys defeat in World War I, the fledgling Weimar Republic democracy sought a new symbol that compromised with both the conservative past and the hopeful liberal present, in an attempt to unify a deeply divided country.

On November 11, 1919, exactly one year after the end of the war, the first President of the Republic, Friedrich Ebert, issued a proclamation declaring the Reichsadler to be the official symbol, combined with the new Weimar colors. This marked the beginning of a very real flag dispute. Marketing consultant Hans Domizlaff claimed the right design was critical to moving past the disastrous spiritual disunity of the German people. Ebert placed responsibility for design of the emblem itself with the governments official artistic office, the Reichskunstwart, under Edwin Redslob. Redslob sought designs, including a promising one by Expressionist artist Karl Schmidt-Rottluff. Though this design was unanimously approved, Redslob opted for a more traditional version. The new emblem received instant criticism from conservative corners who disliked its modernist appearance. In 1920, right-wing magazine Rote Hand mocked the new symbol in a cartoon. An upstart politician named Adolf Hitler called the new eagle a Jewish bankruptcy vulture and symbolic of the what an abomination the new nation was.

Thus, it comes as no surprise that Hitler ensured the eagle would be changed at the birth of the Third Reich. The new symbol of Nazi Germany was a brutalist, stylized emblem clutching a wreath with a swastika in it. Importantly, when used as the official emblem of the Nazi Party, known as the Parteiadler (Party Eagle), the eagles head was turned to its left, ostensibly facing to the East, the geographic target of the movement. The same emblem with the head facing right was used throughout the Reich. The German army adopted the Parteiadler shortly after, and both versions figured prominently on all manner of Nazi flags, awards, and other paraphernalia. This symbol, which during Weimar was intended to unify, watched over the Holocaust and crimes against humanity across Europe.

None other than President Harry S. Truman found the details of this eagle critically important and ordered a change to the seal of the president of the United States. He followed the advice of Army chief of Heraldry Arthur E. Dubois to depict the eagle facing to its right (our left). This was more than return to heraldic orthodoxy. President Truman told reporters in 1945 that This new flag faces the eagle toward the staff, which is looking to the front all the time when you are on the march, and also has him looking at the olive branch for peace, instead of the arrows for war. This long discussion of the iconography of the eagle provides an important context to the deeper (and explicit) meanings behind the images which brings us back to the Trump campaign eagle.

The Trump campaign had plenty of images to choose from a search on Shutterstock for American Eagle yields almost 70,000 results, whereas US eagle yields 7,200 and Patriotic Eagle 26,500. However, the campaign chose the only emblem facing to its left, like the Nazi version. This form of the eagle is used by neo-Nazis and a modified version is used by the Nazi Lowriders, a gang associated with the neo-Nazi Aryan Brotherhood.

Walter Benjamin wrote amidst the turmoil of the Third Reich, that the logical result of Fascism is the introduction of aesthetics into political life. Trump and his surrogates have repeatedly and blatantly integrated fascist aesthetics and messaging into the administration and the campaign. This T-shirt design is only the latest example. Any of the instances mentioned here by themselves could have been written off as a gaffe or a coincidence. However, given the accumulation of coincidences, alternative explanations become far more plausible: Trump and his backers are either aping a fascist aesthetic out of admiration or as a not-so-subtle nod to the most extreme elements of the right (or both).

Steven Heller is a scholar of graphic design; he is also the author of The Swastika and Symbols of Hate: Extremist Iconography Today and Iron Fists: Branding the 20th-Century Totalitarian State. When I asked him what he made of the choice of the eagle for Trumps T-shirt design, he told me, I find it hard to believe that the direction of the eagles head (mandated by Harry Truman) was flaunted by Trumps designers without knowing the symbolism But his gang know what theyre doing. They understand the force of well-staged performance, props and all. So, my belief is that this eagle is indeed a nod (a secret handshake, so to speak) between Trump and racist America. As others have observed, Trump keeps showing us who he is. When will we start taking him at his word?

Correction:A previous version of this article attributed a Walter Benjamin quote to the incorrect date of 1955. We apologize for the error which has been amended.

Read more here:

The Fascist Messaging of the Trump Campaign Eagle - Hyperallergic

Lincoln the Emancipator: The Civil War & the Continuous Battle against Northern Negrophobia (Part 1 of a two-part series) – Milwaukee Courier…

By LaKeshia Myers

A few weeks ago, the Black Student Union at the University of Wisconsin demanded the removal of the Abraham Lincoln statue. The students outlined many hard truths about Lincoln such as his policies pertaining to Native American tribes as well as his candor regarding emancipation of the formerly enslaved. However, manyincluding UW-Madison Chancellor, Rebecca Blankwere unwilling to part with the statue, an iconic bastion of the UW campus landscape. Chancellor Blank, in her remarks regarding the statue, offered a measured response to her the campus community stating, the former presidents history should not be erased, but, examined. Thank you, Madam Chancellor, as a former history teacher, I will help begin the examination process.

If you were to take a straw poll and ask any American high school student what the cause of the Civil War was, they all would probably say, North versus South or the north was antislavery and the south wanted slaveryor some variation thereof. This is true of most Americans; we automatically assume that every northerner was antislavery and that every southerner was proslavery. However, when you delve deep into the historical context of the Civil War and Reconstruction eras, it is quite interesting the narrative that one uncovers. The idea that northerners could be vehemently pro-union, but anti-emancipation was mind-boggling.

According to James McPherson, the military, diplomatic, and political maneuvers during the first two years of the war took place in the sometimes-unacknowledged context of the slavery issue (McPherson, 1981). While slavery was the fundamental cause of the sectional conflict that led to war, the North suffered more disunity over the wars aims. The South fought for independence. So long as the North fought for restoration of the union, Northern unity was impressivebut the more difficult question was, what type of union were we to become? Was it to be a union without the institution of slavery as abolitionists had hoped or was the union to return to the status quo?

In reading the article Emancipation, Negrophobia and Civil War Politics in Ohio, author W. Sherman Jackson, assuages that while northern Republicans were vehemently intent on keeping the union together, they were divided as to whether or not emancipation of slaves was part of the new union (Jackson, 1980). In giving readers a brief profile of Abraham Lincoln, Harry Blackiston, author of Lincolns Emancipation Plan, we learn that slavery existed in the Northwest Territory during the time a young Abe Lincoln moved there with his family.

Blackiston writes, after separating from the Indiana Territory, Illinois legalized slavery by indenture, provided for the hiring of slaves from Southern states to supply labor in its various industries, and at the same time passed a stringent law to prohibit the immigration of free Negroes into that state (Blackiston, 1922). Blackiston also notes, Such slavery as existed in Illinois, however, differed widely from that in the south where it had become economic rather than patriarchal as it then existed in certain parts of the North (Blackiston, 1922).

When the Civil War was underway, northern Border States like Ohio (which bordered the slave states of Kentucky and Virginia) were concerned that the war was being fought to end slavery; this produced mass hysteria among some residents. According to Jackson, Because they feared an exodus of former slaves into the state, white Ohioans visualized an Africanization of their race (Jackson, 1980). This widespread Negrophobiathe fear of Africans and their descendantsgave rise to a sharply divided north. Politically, the Negrophobes aligned themselves with the growing Copperhead movement. The Copperhead Democrats were a growing faction within the Democratic Party that were made up of Northern democrats who were opposed to the Civil War. They wanted an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats Copperheads, likening them to the venomous snake.

The Copperhead movement continued to grow in the North as the war continued. Skillful politicians used the issues of Negrophobia and miscegenation (interracial marriage) to enhance the political fortunes of Copperhead candidates and supporters. This, coupled with President Lincolns preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in 1862 had a dramatic impact on Ohio politics. Copperheads campaigned hard against Lincolns military edict which proposed to free all slaves whose masters were still rebelling against the Union on January 1, 1863 (Jackson, 1980). The Copperheads used as their campaign slogan, The Constitution as it is, the Union as it was, and the Negroes where they are (Voegeli, 1968).I would be remised if I did not take a moment to acknowledge that this divisive rhetoric was astounding to me. It is reminiscent of the tone used by many in the alt-right movement today. While the Copperheads were effectively supportive of slavery, the alt-right is supportive of closing the borders and building a wall to keep Mexican immigrants out of the country. Near identical messages used 150 years later; one can only wonder, what weve learned in the interim.

While many historians have speculated as to whether or not emancipation was always apart of Lincolns agenda [his July 4, 1861, speech to Congress where he stated he would not, directly or indirectly interfere with slavery, in the states where it exists] what is undisputable is that Lincoln exercised extreme caution and was methodical in his approach to the subject. Lincolns use of executive orders was also fascinating during this period. McPherson assuages that, Lincolns actions during the first 80 days of the war established the tone for his use of executive power (McPherson, 1981). For example, Lincolns proclamation of blockade, was in effect a declaration of war. He also removed money from the treasury, expanded both the army and navy, and issued a call for military volunteersall of these measures traditionally required approval of Congress.

This level of activism was necessary; had it not been for these earlier instances of executive action, the confiscation law would not have been implemented. The belligerent right of confiscation was incorporated into a law signed by Lincoln in August of 1861. The law authorized the seizure of all property, including slaves, used in military aid of the rebellion.

The confiscation act applied only to a few slaves, but, as McPherson states, it was the thin edge of the wedge of emancipation (McPherson, 1981). With the enactment of the confiscation act, Northern Democrats went into frenzy; fueled by salacious headlines from the media, many of them feared that tens of thousands of confiscated blacks would move into their towns and threaten the local economy. The Cincinnati Enquirer even reported, and will either be competitors with our white mechanics and laborers, degrading them by the competition, or they will have to be supported as paupers and criminals at the public expense (McPherson, 1981). With the threat of emancipation looming, Republicans had to acknowledge that racism infected even the northern states. Our people hate the Negro with a perfect if not supreme hatred said Congressman George Julian of Indiana. These thoughts would also translate to the union soldiers who would now be tasked with fighting not only to preserve the union, but to free slaves.

Negrophobia during this period laid the groundwork for northern segregation and Jim Crow that was to follow. It was the precursor to redlining, restrictive housing covenants, hyper-segregation of schools, race-based policing policies etc. All things that were prevalent in northern cities such as Milwaukee and Chicago; and all of which are at the crux of the Black Lives Matter movement today.

Excerpt from:

Lincoln the Emancipator: The Civil War & the Continuous Battle against Northern Negrophobia (Part 1 of a two-part series) - Milwaukee Courier...

Best of Philly: Heres to the People Who Protested – Philadelphia magazine

City

Theyve marched in Center City and South Philly, on 52nd Street and in Fishtown. And theyre changing the world.

Philadelphia protesters on May 30th. Photograph by NurPhoto

Published as part of our annual Best of Philly tribute. See all the winners here.

It was 1:40 a.m. on June 3rd, 2020, but it felt like Christmas.

My phone rang in the middle of the night; a media colleague said four words I wasnt expecting to hear so soon.

They took him down, he told me ecstatically.

Who? I asked, now alarmed.

Rizzo! Theyre taking the Frank Rizzo statue down right now!

Id eventually see a few pictures of this once-in-a-lifetime moment tall cranes lifting away the bronze monstrosity that had sparked controversy and racial tension in Philadelphia for more than 20 years. Erected in honor of the infamous mayor with a history of racist and homophobic police brutality, the Rizzo statue was almost as contentious as the man it represented.

Only a few days prior to the statues abrupt removal, diverse activists from all over the region had tried to set it on fire, defaced it, and attempted to bring it down with a rope tied around its neck. The message was loud and clear: Philadelphians couldnt wait another moment. It was finally time for this oppressive monument to go.

We owe its removal to the protesters who stood their ground that day and activist groups such as Philly for R.E.A.L. Justice, which led the first major calls for the Rizzo statue to come down, in 2016.

As the world wrestles with a devastating pandemic and signs of a racial uprising following the extrajudicial police killing of George Floyd, its important to remember that protesters have kept the pulse of the moment in more ways than one. Whether standing up against police brutality or reminding the world that #BlackTransLivesMatter, protesters have made sacrifices to remind us of the importance of speaking out even when social distancing.

In the midst of this pandemic, I would really enjoy spending all my time hanging with friends and family, watching movies or playing video games, says Anthony Smith, a social studies teacher in Philadelphia. But in a country that destroys Black life so indiscriminately and viciously, I am called to action. Smith, 28, a steering member of Philly for R.E.A.L. Justice, has been an activist for the last half-dozen years all in the name of wanting to get out of this endless cycle of useless reform and Black suffering.

In recent years, it almost felt like we had protest fatigue. Though there was a huge wave of demonstrations following the election of President Donald Trump, such protests seemed to lose their momentum as the electoral dust settled. Bye-bye to the ambitious Handmaids Tale-inspired costumes people wore as they marched down Broad Street calling for the end of a fascist White House regime. Sure, we still had the Womens March and an occasional spat with alt-right out-of-towners, but things seemed to wind down a bit before this summer arrived and oh, was Philly ready.

It was hard to ignore the thousands of people who took over the streets of Philadelphia from all over, demanding justice not just in Center City, but in Fishtown, on 52nd Street, in South Philly and beyond. Not every gathering was the same some protesters were met with tear gas or violent vigilantes but their solidarity remained intact.

I chose to protest because it was the right thing to do, says Shakira King, an activist from West Philadelphia. Philadelphia is a Black mecca. Its Black art and history are being erased; its people are suffering and being pushed out. This city needed to know that we are here and deserve to be cared for and invested in.

When you consider the progressive policies being proposed at City Council and in Harrisburg, its hard not to recognize the impact that protesters like King have made. Ending stop-and-frisk, defunding the police, and increasing law enforcement accountability are demands that local activists have been making for years. Organizations like Black Lives Matter Philly, the Black and Brown Workers Cooperative, Philly for R.E.A.L. Justice, Juntos, and ACT UP Philadelphia, as well as members of the MOVE family and many others, were calling for radical social justice long before it was the latest trend to catch the attention of safe, liberal nonprofits and companies.

It is the protesters we should be honoring for awakening people and motivating change once more. Lets hold them in the highest regard, instead of the Rizzo statue that finally fell like the Berlin Wall.

Published as The People Who Protested in our Best of Philly tribute in the August 2020 issue of Philadelphia magazine.

View post:

Best of Philly: Heres to the People Who Protested - Philadelphia magazine

The Man in the Antifa Mask: Who he is and why he regrets showing up at a Coeur d’Alene protest with a crowbar – Pacific Northwest Inlander

The word was out: Antifa was coming for the Winco in Coeur dAlene.

At least, thats what Brett Surplus hunting TV show host, Idaho state Senate write-in candidateand a former police officer and sheriff's deputy was ready for on the evening of June 1.

And so Surplus stands in the Winco parking lot, dressed in a tactical vest and armed with his AR-15. It wasn't vigilantism, he believed. It was patriotism.

He pans his camera to show a crapton of Idaho boys he estimates about 150 armed with an arsenal of high powered weapons. And he says he's already had success.

Facebook video screenshot

Brett Surplus

"Just so you know, if you're planning on coming over here and trying to be a piece of trash over in my city, feel free. Because we will unleash the beast," Surplus boasts. "Freakin' slugs for thugs, all the day long. And Ill take your damn crowbar. Bring it. This aint Spokane."

Today, his Facebook live video thats racked up more than 28,000 views. There ain't nothin' that's going to happen," he continues. "Try to come over here. Ill take the A out of your tifa in a heartbeat.

And then he says he hears that five more vans are coming down the freeway.

"Sounds like we're going to have company," he says. "I'm going to see if we can ruin some people's days real quick... I think it may get hinky."

Sam Rowland, a progressive Army veteran who showed up supporting Black Lives Matter in the Coeur dAlene Winco, says that antifa had become an obsession in North Idaho.

And so that made it all the more interesting when someone shows up who looks a lot like witch: A protester with a crowbar on his belt loop, walked up to Surplus and Rowland, wearing wearing flannel, an Ice Cube T-shirt, and a skull mask. And on the mask, hes drawn three diagonally facing arrows, the "iron front" symbol often used by antifa activists.

"The minute I saw it, I knew in my gut this stupid shit was going to happen," Rowland says.

Antifa far-left mostly anonymous activists who take a militant approach to opposing who they see as racist or fascist groups have brawled repeatedly with far-right groups like the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer in liberal havens like Portland and Berkeley.

And yet for years after Trump's election, the right-wing rumor mill churned out claims that antifa activists or even super soldiers were also plotting to hold riots in tiny towns, like North Idaho's Bonner's Ferry.

Year after year, the antifa riots never arrived. But this year, when some protests over the murder of George Floyd turned violent and destructive, it fell neatly into that ready-made narrative.

Surplus says he saw the rumors that antifa was driving Mercedes Benz vans with foreign plates. He claims that antifa communicates using PlayStation 4 gaming systems, because they know they're being watched. He claims antifa "scouts" showed up to check out the June 1 protest Winco event, though he doesn't show any evidence. He claims he has his sources inside law enforcement, but won't say who.

As the Intercept recently revealed, the FBI was internally sharing the claim that "antifa" protesters were supposedly traveling from Spokane to Coeur d'Alene to protest, and then supposedly planned to road trip to Minneapolis. So far, nothing has been released to substantiate this report.

In fact, Detective Mario Rios with the Coeur dAlene Police Department says his department never had any actionable intelligence that antifa or other radicals were traveling to Coeur dAlene

The ISP has NOT intercepted a semi loaded with people and weapons, the Idaho State police wrote in a tweet. This is a lie being spread on social media.

And yet, the day before the June 1 rally at the Winco Coeur d'Alene, Spokane's rally had been marred by violence, looting and vandalism and the Spokane County Sheriff blamed antifa with absolute certainty. Couer d'Alene noticed.

What had taken place over in Spokane, everybody was thinking the same thing was coming, Surplus tells the Inlander.

Except this time, as Surplus and dozens of other right-wingers stand outside Winco near a handful of Black Lives Matter protesters, it looks like antifa had shown up.

Link:

The Man in the Antifa Mask: Who he is and why he regrets showing up at a Coeur d'Alene protest with a crowbar - Pacific Northwest Inlander