Polyarc closes USD $9 million in Series B funding to add Augmented Reality to its business offering – Auganix

In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality News

July 29, 2020 Polyarc, the studio behind the popular single player virtual reality (VR) puzzle game Moss, has today announced the close of USD $9 million in Series B funding, led by Hiro Capital, followed by Vulcan Capital, an existing investor, and Galaxy Interactive via its Galaxy EOS VC Fund, a partnership with EOSIO blockchain software publisher Block.one.

Leveraging its teams experience of creating immersive VR games such as Moss, Polyarc has stated that it will now add augmented reality (AR) to its core business competencies. Furthermore, Ian Livingstone, a founding partner of Hiro Capital, will join the Polyarc Board of Directors.

The thing we want people to remember about Polyarc in 40 years is our characters. Our means to make our characters the most memorable is to build a company oriented around introducing them directly to our players in person. VR, AR, and the spectrum in between, offer an opportunity to connect our players with our characters through physical interaction and emotional feedback in a way that no other medium can match, said Tam Armstrong, CEO and co-founder, Polyarc. This round of funding was essential for us to expand our development focus to further embrace VR and AR games.

This is the second round of funding that the company has received, as Polyarc raised USD $3.5 million in 2016 to fund the development of Moss, which now ranks as one of the top-rated VR games of all time and has received several industry awards and nominations from organizations such as BAFTA, The Game Awards, E3 Game Critics, D.I.C.E., GDC, Golden Joystick, and the Annie Awards, according to the company.

Ian Livingstone, founding Partner at Hiro Capital, said: Polyarc is a proven leader in developing innovative VR interactive entertainment, and Moss is their amazing game which showcases the beauty and possibilities of what the VR platform can deliver. Hiro Capital is delighted to invest in Polyarc to help accelerate the studios future development of mixed reality experiences.

Hiro Capital launched a EUR 100 million Fund in 2019 to back deep technology entrepreneurs and creative studios in games, esports, and digital sports, as well as sector-specific applications of Cloud, Mobile, Streaming, Big Data, AI, Wearables, and AR and VR technologies. Hiro Capitals investment in Polyarc adds to its growing portfolio.

We are excited to be partnering with Polyarc to push Mixed Reality to the next level. They are a super-smart, passionate team who combine creative brilliance with business vision. Hiro invests in strong character-led IP on next-generation cross-platform tech: we believe that Polyarc will be a leader in the next generation of Immersive entertainment. said Luke Alvarez, Managing Partner of Hiro.

For information on Polyarc, please visit the companys website. The company is also currently hiring for several positions.

Image credit: Polyarc / Hiro Capital

About the author

Sam Sprigg

Sam is the Founder and Managing Editor of Auganix. With a background in research and report writing, he covers news articles on both the AR and VR industries. He also has an interest in human augmentation technology as a whole, and does not just limit his learning specifically to the visual experience side of things.

See original here:

Polyarc closes USD $9 million in Series B funding to add Augmented Reality to its business offering - Auganix

Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) Market Forecasts to 2027: Global Industry Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Segmentation…

New Jersey, United States,- The research report on Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) market comprises of insights in terms of pivotal parameters such as production as well as the consumption patterns alongside revenue estimations for the projected timeframe. Speaking of production aspects, the study offers an in-depth analysis regarding the manufacturing processes along with the gross revenue amassed by the leading producers operating in this business arena. The unit cost deployed by these producers in various regions during the estimated timeframe is also mentioned in the report.

Significant information pertaining to the product volume and consumption value is enlisted in the document. Additionally, the report contains details regarding the consumption graphs, Individual sale prices, and import & export activities. Additional information concerning the production and consumption patterns are presented in the report.

In a word, the Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) Market report provides major statistics on the state of the Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) industry with a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market. In the end, Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) Market report delivers a conclusion which includes Research Findings, Market Size Evaluation, Global Market Share, Consumer Needs along with Customer Preference Change, Data Source. These factors will raise the growth of the business overall.

Regions Covered in the Global Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) Market:

The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt)

North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada)

South America (Brazil etc.)

Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)

Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Highlights of the Report:

Accurate market size and CAGR forecasts for the period 2020-2026

Identification and in-depth assessment of growth opportunities in key segments and regions

Detailed company profiling of top players of the global Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) market

Exhaustive research on innovation and other trends of the global Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) market

Reliable industry value chain and supply chain analysis

Comprehensive analysis of important growth drivers, restraints, challenges, and growth prospects

The scope of the Report:

The report offers a complete company profiling of leading players competing in the global Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) marketwith a high focus on the share, gross margin, net profit, sales, product portfolio, new applications, recent developments, and several other factors. It also throws light on the vendor landscape to help players become aware of future competitive changes in the global Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) market.

Reasons to Buy the Report:

About Us:

Market Research Intellect provides syndicated and customized research reports to clients from various industries and organizations with the aim of delivering functional expertise. We provide reports for all industries including Energy, Technology, Manufacturing and Construction, Chemicals and Materials, Food and Beverage, and more. These reports deliver an in-depth study of the market with industry analysis, the market value for regions and countries, and trends that are pertinent to the industry.

Contact Us:

Mr. Steven Fernandes

Market Research Intellect

New Jersey ( USA )

Tel: +1-650-781-4080

The rest is here:

Automotive Augmented Reality (AR) And Virtual Reality (VR) Market Forecasts to 2027: Global Industry Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Segmentation...

If our reality is a video game, does that solve the problem of evil? – The Conversation UK

Pandemics and natural disasters cause pain and suffering to millions worldwide and can challenge the very foundations of human belief systems. They can be particularly challenging for those who believe in an all-knowing and righteous God. The Lisbon earthquake of 1755, for example, shook the previously unquestioned faith of many and led Voltaire to question whether this really could be the best of all possible worlds.

When the Spanish flu struck in 1918, some chose to see it as divine punishment for the sins of mankind and looked to prayer, rather than science, for salvation. Notoriously, the Bishop of Zamora resisted calls from the Spanish authorities to close his churches and instead insisted on holding additional masses and processions.

From a theological standpoint, natural disasters and pandemics inevitably raise the profile of the long-standing and much-debated problem of evil. Here is philosopher Galen Strawsons take on the problem:

We can, for example, know with certainty that the Christian God does not exist as standardly defined: a being who is omniscient, omnipotent and wholly benevolent. The proof lies in the world, which is full of extraordinary sufferingbelief in such a God, however rare, is profoundly immoral. It shows contempt for the reality of human suffering, or indeed any intense suffering.

But suppose the person who was directly responsible for creating the world wasnt God but some far lesser, far more fallible being. Someone more akin to an ordinary human engineer or scientist or even a movie director or video-game designer. Let us further suppose that the diseases and disasters that can be found in the world are all the result of design choices, freely made by this non-divine designer of worlds.

This may seem fantastically far fetched. But in the realm of physics just these kinds of scenarios are being played out as scientists work on the complex mathematics behind lab-created pocket universes and tech leaders, such as Elon Musk, explore the potential of brain-machine interfaces.

Its also important to appreciate that if this were the case then for many theists God could no longer be blamed for much of the suffering that exists in our world and the problem of evil would be very largely solved.

This article is part of Conversation InsightsThe Insights team generates long-form journalism derived from interdisciplinary research. The team is working with academics from different backgrounds who have been engaged in projects aimed at tackling societal and scientific challenges.

Why? Because for theists human beings are creatures of a very special sort: thanks to our God-given free will we have the ability to choose whether we act well or badly. And, generally speaking, God does not interfere with these choices or their consequences. If a free agent acts appallingly (committing murder, rape or genocide) the resulting moral evil is to be greatly regretted, but God should not be blamed. The fault lies entirely with the person who freely chose to act in this way.

Morality and free will are deeply intertwined. If someone does something very wrong, they arent morally at fault if they only acted in that way because they were hypnotised or brainwashed. Similarly, if someone performs a good act (giving food to a starving child, say) but only did so because a gun was pointed at their heads, they are not morally praiseworthy.

Most religious believers hold that humans have the capacity to make free choices. They also believe that anyone who chooses to do the right things can expect to be rewarded by God, whereas those who act wrongly can expect to be punished. For this to be possible God has to not only provide us with free will, he also has to allow us to carry out those actions we freely choose to perform the bad ones included.

This free will solution to the problem of evil has been a mainstay of theology since it was elaborated by St Augustine more than 1,500 years ago. From the theological perspective, the so-called natural evils pose a far more intractable problem. These include all the vast amounts of suffering caused by diseases, earthquakes and floods along with the agonies suffered by animals. As normally construed, these sources of suffering are not moral evils, since they are not the result of freely chosen human actions.

Hence the problem posed by such evils for anyone who believes that God created our world. Couldnt a creator that is truly all-powerful, all-knowing and good have made a much better job of it? In fact, wouldnt it have been quite easy for God to ensure that the world contains far fewer natural evils? A few tweaks to human DNA would provide immunity to cancer. A slightly different tweak would provide immunity to viruses. When designing the animals an all-powerful God would not need to rely on the incredibly slow and imperfect method of evolution by natural selection a process which inevitably results in vast amounts of pain and suffering.

On the other hand, if the maker of our world was not all-powerful, or all-knowing, or as good as its possible to be, then its not surprising to find ourselves living in the sort of world we do.

As for why we should take seriously the idea that there can be makers of worlds who are less than divine, there is no shortage of relevant scenarios to be found in science, science fiction and philosophy.

Among the obstacles that Cern had to overcome when constructing the Large Hadron Collider (the very large and powerful machine which discovered the Higgs boson in 2012) was persuading a worried public that running the collider would not create a mini-black hole that would escape the confines of the lab and go on to consume the entire planet. Although there was no real danger of this happening, such worries were by no means entirely groundless.

As long ago as the 1980s and 1990s, Alan Guth and Andrei Linde (respected physicists and pioneers of the now widely accepted inflationary cosmology) raised the possibility that scientists might soon be able to create bubble or pocket universes in a laboratory. Initially sub-microscopic, the newly created bubble universe rapidly expands and soon constitutes a full-scale cosmos in its own right. These new universes create their own space and time as they grow, so they take up no room at all in our world and pose no threat to us.

The energy driving the expansion of the envisaged pocket universes derives from the same inflationary field that cosmologists believe was responsible for an explosive expansion in our own universe that took place shortly after the big bang. During this brief period the scale of the universes expansion was enormous, it got trillions of times bigger in little more than an instant. But since the negative energy perfectly cancels the positive energy of the matter being created, no energy conservation laws are infringed. As Guth is fond of remarking, the universe is the ultimate free lunch.

Read more: Explainer: how does an experiment at the Large Hadron Collider work?

Various methods for creating universes in labs have since been proposed, including compressing a few grams of ordinary matter into a very small volume to create small black holes and deploying stable magnetic monopoles to create exotic spacetime structures. Precisely controlling the physical laws that govern the worlds created by these methods will not be easy. But physicists have not ruled out the possibility of fine tuning their basic physical constants to render them more capable of sustaining the complex structures needed for life.

Even if creating such universes requires knowledge and technology that we do not currently possess, a scientifically more advanced civilisation could easily possess what is required. Hence Lindes playful quip: Does this mean that our universe was created, not by a divine design, but by a physicist hacker?

This is one potential route to creating an entire world. But there are other possibilities, too. Perhaps in reality humans are all characters living inside something akin to a vast multi-player online video game, running on a super-powerful computer.

By the 1980s and 90s science fiction writers such as Iain M Banks Greg Bear and Greg Egan had started to explore the fictional possibilities of wholly computer-generated virtual realities in impressive depth and detail. The inhabitants of these worlds might seem to have ordinary physical bodies and brains, but like everything else in these worlds, their bodies and brains were virtual rather than physical, existing only as data flowing through a computers innards.

The 1982 Disney production TRON was an early movie depiction of this sort of wholly computer-generated virtual world. The human protagonists are converted into data (or digitised) by a specially adapted laser beam, which allows them to embark on adventures in a digital virtual reality. The movies ground-breaking computer-generated imagery may be unremarkable by contemporary standards, but they are vastly more sophisticated than those found in the early video game PONG, one of the main inspirations for the movie.

In 2003 the philosopher Nick Bostrom published his much-discussed simulation argument, the upshot of which is that not only are TRON-style virtual worlds perfectly possible, there is a significant probability that we are living in one. Bostroms initially surprising conclusion is based on some by no means implausible assumptions regarding the computational capacity that future computers are likely to possess (astonishingly vast, it turns out).

If we do exist inside a computer simulation, then since we are all conscious (at least while were awake) it must be possible for a computer to generate the kinds of experiences we are enjoying right now. If consciousness required a biological brain, Bostroms simulation scenario wouldnt get off the ground. But science fiction writers were not the only people to be impressed by the arrival of computers.

In the 1970s and 80s increasing numbers of philosophers came round to the view that conscious mentality is not essentially biological in character. Slogans such as, mind is related to brain as software is related to hardware seemed very plausible, not only to philosophers but to psychologists and neuroscientists too. If mentality is essentially a matter of information flow (as the computer analogy suggested) then anything could possess a mind provided it processes information in the right sorts of ways. And computers seemed at least as well suited to this task as a biological brain.

Less radical forms of virtual worlds are also possible and the Matrix movies provide a well-known example. In this scenario most humans find themselves living somewhere that seems similar to contemporary Earth. In reality, their entire environment is, in effect, a communal mass hallucination a wholly virtual world produced by a powerful computer hooked into peoples brains via a neural interface. But it doesnt seem like that: the virtual world seems just as real as our world.

Smaller scale variants of this scenario are also possible. Instead of an entire planetary population being simultaneously plugged into the same virtual world, just a few people are. Perhaps you are a 22nd-century schoolchild, enjoying a virtual lesson supplied via a tiny but highly sophisticated neural interface, spending a bit of time learning what it was like to be an early 21st-century person leading a perfectly ordinary life. In an hour or so your lesson will finish and your version of the 21st century will come to an end.

A Matrix-style brain-computer interface is capable of controlling every aspect of a subjects sensory consciousness down to the smallest detail. If it werent, it wouldnt be able to supply a completely lifelike total virtual reality experience, involving vision, hearing, smell, taste and touch. Society does not possess anything close to this kind of technology at present. But there is every reason to believe it is possible, in principle, and rapid advances are already being made.

The Pentagons Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) made headlines in 2017 when one of its neural interfaces allowed a paralysed woman to control a jet plane in a flight simulator. More recently, Elon Musks Neuralink start-up announced that it had designed a neurosurgical robot capable of inserting 192 electrodes a minute into a rats brain without triggering bleeding and experiments involving humans are expected to begin soon.

Read more: Elon Musk says we're probably living in a computer simulation here's the science

The science and technology needed to undertake this kind of world-making will be more advanced than anything we possess at present, but not by enormous or inconceivable margins. These are technologies we might reasonably expect to develop within a century or so perhaps sooner.

In any event, the capabilities of these world-makers evidently fall far short of the capabilities of the omniscient, omnipotent and wholly benevolent God of traditional theism. Given the worlds many and varied imperfections, if there is a creator at all, doesnt it seem more reasonable to suppose that it is of the non-divine variety? Someone more akin to the physicist hacker envisaged by Linde, or the virtual-reality programmers envisaged by Bostrom?

Adopting this hypothesis does not mean the theistic God is entirely redundant far from it. Theists can still be confident that God is the ultimate creative force in the cosmos. Maybe it was God who brought the primordial cosmos into existence and furnished it with natural laws that allowed its less-than-divine inhabitants to develop the capability of acting as world-makers in their own right, with all the moral responsibilities this brings. Although there is (at present) no way for us to find out what this divinely created world was like, we can be certain of one thing: being far better designed, it contains far fewer natural evils than can be found in this world, and so far less death and suffering.

But would a benevolent God allow less-than-divine people to create their own worlds? There is at least one compelling reason to think they would. As recent history has shown (think of the suffering resulting from the actions of Hitler, Stalin or Mao) God grants people a great deal of leeway when it comes to making choices that have horrendous consequences for untold millions of innocent men, women and children.

The problem of evil has bedevilled monotheistic religions ever since their inception, and the idea of extending the free-will solution to encompass natural evil has always been available. But until very recently, the idea that anything other than a being possessing supernatural powers could create a world such as ours was almost impossible to take seriously. This is no longer the case.

For you: more from our Insights series:

To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversations evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Excerpt from:

If our reality is a video game, does that solve the problem of evil? - The Conversation UK

Virtual Reality Content Creation Market By Supply And Consumption Demand Analysis To 2020Virtual Reality Content Creation Market By Supply And…

: , , , , 20202027

:

:

: /

?

. . , , . , , , , , , , , .

The major players in the Virtual Reality Content Creation Market are 360 Labs, Blippar, Koncept VR, Matterport, Panedia Pty Ltd., SubVRsive, Vizor, Voxelus, WeMakeVR, and WevrWe also need a market analysis section solely dedicated to major players such as where analysts give us an insight into the financial statements of all the major players, along with product benchmarking and SWOT analysis. Global Virtual Reality Content Creation market with great emphasis on its market share, recent developments, business overview, market served, and growth strategies.

You Keep Your Social Distance And We Provide You A SocialDISCOUNTUseSTAYHOMECode In Precise Requirement And GetFLAT $ 1,000 OFFOn AllCMI Reports

Get Sample Copy Of This Report @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/1142

Virtual Reality Content Creation Market: Research Methodology

Coherent Market Insights follows a comprehensive research methodology focused on providing the most precise market analysis. The company leverages a data triangulation model which helps company to gauge the market dynamics and provide accurate estimates. Key components of the research methodologies followed for all our market reports include:

As part of Primary research, our analysts interviewed a number of primary sources from the demand and supply sides of the global Virtual Reality Content Creation Market. This helped them to obtain both quantitative and qualitative data and information. On the demand side of the global Virtual Reality Content Creation Market are end-users, whereas on the supply side are distributors, vendors, and manufacturers.

Every Day There Is A Treasure,

You Need To Find The Discount!!!

During our Secondary research, we collect information from different sources such as databases, regulatory bodies, gold and silver-standard websites, articles by recognized authors, certified publications, white papers, investor presentations and press releases of companies, and annual reports.

COVID-19 Impact on Virtual Reality Content Creation Market

This research study also includes the analyses related to the impact of Covid-19 on the Virtual Reality Content Creation Market. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may significantly affect the growth of the Virtual Reality Content Creation Market in near future. As per the experts viewpoints, it affects the global economy in 3 major ways:

Virtual Reality Content Creation Market: Regional Analysis

This part of the report includes detailed information on the market in various regions. Each region offers different scope for markets because every region has different government policies and other factors. The regions included in this report areNorth America, Europe, The Asia Pacific, and the Middle East and Africa. Information about the different areas helps the reader to understand better the global market.

Complete SWOT Analysis of the Global Virtual Reality Content Creation Market

SWOT analysisis one technique that is quite that helps to gain an insight into the past and find a solution for the benefit of current or future blemish, useful for existing companies as well as the new plan. SWOT-analysis helps reduce weaknesses while maximizing the strong side of the company. Its can also be used when it comes to achieving certain goals in non-profit organizations or private companies. This tool can be used to make a reconsideration during the study.

Importance of SWOT Analysis in Business :

The mostimportantpart of aSWOT analysisis to improve the viability of your company.Importantthreats coupled with a company weakness typically put at risk your companys future, and theSWOT analysisidentifies these risks. You can eliminate internal weaknesses by assigning company resources to fix the problems.

Factors of SWOT-analysis will help businesses to understand their strengths to the threat that what is the strength of the company and what could be a threat or a risk in the future. With the help of SWOT analysis, companies can increase the chances of success and reduce the possibility of failure.

When the company conducted a SWOT analysis they need to know what are the weak points of the company. Then, managers can provide training to employees who help the company to improve employee performance.

DISCOUNT THAT YOU CANT RESIST

When managers know each and every aspect of the company from strength to threats. Time strategy formulation becomes easy. It helps companies to formulate a strategy.

It helps the company to motivate employees because when companies must know their weaknesses are trying to remove and send employees. When employees know their weaknesses are also working hard to eliminate the weaknesses

It helps companies to identify potential opportunities. SWOT analysis company because when they come to know about any potential opportunities that can help a business to grow.

Competitor analysis is critical to any marketing plan and SWOT analysis provides a perfect way to do this. Typically, PEST analysis is done before a SWOT analysis to provide details on opportunities and threats sections. Once you have a complete SWOT diagram you and your competitors, you can make better decisions about your marketing plan.

PESTEL Analysis :

APESTEL analysisor more recently named PESTELE is a framework or tool used by marketers to analyse and monitor the macro-environmental (external marketing environment) factors that have an impact on an organisation. The result of which is used to identify threats and weaknesses which are used in a SWOTanalysis.

Opportunities come in various forms, then the value of doing a PESTEL analysis. PESTEL stands for:

DISCOUNTBecauseBuying Without A Discount Is Sin!!!

Use STAYHOME Code And GetFLAT $ 1,000 OFF

Ask Discount Before Purchasing @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-discount/1142

How SWOT Analysis Is Important for Virtual Reality Content Creation Market ?

There are three steps to follow in this analysis.

In this stage, and we collect all the information regarding the first two internal factors, strengths and weaknesses. However, this information collection can be done in a number of different ways. One-to-one interview or a group discussion can be carried to gather information. There will be a number of different views, questions, and issues related to these elements.

Here, we can make a list of all the opportunities that it may encounter in the future. It can make another list of all the future possible threats within the organization.

In this stage, the plan of action will have carried out to meet these opportunities and to secure the company from the threats. In this stage, the organization makes sure that they can maintain the strengths, change or stop the weaknesses, prioritize opportunism and minimize threats.

If you are not doing a SWOT analysis for your business or new start-ups you will face some of these Problems or Issues:

Appendix

Virtual Reality Content Creation Market report gives you details about the market research finding and conclusion which helps you to develop profitable market strategies to gain a competitive advantage. Supported by comprehensive primary as well as secondary research, the Virtual Reality Content Creation Market the report is then verified using expert advice, quality check and final review. The market data was analyzed and foretasted using market dynamics and consistent models.

AlsoCheckout our latest Blog at:

Go here to see the original:

Virtual Reality Content Creation Market By Supply And Consumption Demand Analysis To 2020Virtual Reality Content Creation Market By Supply And...

How Amika leveraged a chatbot to boost its DTC site – Glossy

After 13 years in business, hair-care brand Amika, which is primarily found in professional salons and Sephora, was ready to invest in its website.

The brand already had a live chat function on its website, but it mainly served as a way for customers to ask about an order. It lacked a sense of personalization and the capability to offer product recommendations, so Amika added a chatbot feature to the customer shopping experience to gather more data about customers and also boost e-commerce sales. While retail stores either remain closed or have had to re-close (as is the case for stores in Los Angeles), replicating the in-store discovery experience has become key to making the brands direct-to-consumer channel a success.

Live chat was more customer service-based [post-sale] than it was a sales or promotional opportunity, said Robbi Webb, Amika senior director of e-commerce. [For example] when were talking to a customer directly, or even when theyre on our website, we often dont know what their motivation is for shopping with us. Were still a small company and still up-and-coming; [we] dont have hundreds of millions of dollars worth of tech investment.

Amika began working with chatbot marketing company Automat in January, which afforded the brand the ability to offer 24/7 personalized shopping opportunities to customers. The bot, called Ace,is accessible in several places on the e-commerce site, including in the lower right corner of the homepage and in a banner photo at the top of all pages. Ace asks customers approximately 15 questions about their hair type, the products theyre looking for and their hair goals, while also offering the opportunity to sign up for Amikas newsletter to receive a 15% off coupon. After customers complete the questionnaire, Ace recommends between two and five products.

This conversational technology has almost always been used for [replacing human] customer service, which most people dont like, said Andy Mauro, Automat CEO and co-founder. But for somebody in their shopping journey, a chatbot is giving them something that they were not expecting.

Within the beauty industry, the onset of coronavirus in March quickly exposed brands who had not invested in their own e-commerce. Brands like Dior quickly added virtual reality to its e-commerce in April, while MAC Cosmetics added augmented reality in May. In many ways, the prioritization of the in-store experiences over the last five years meant any digital e-commerce investments were to supplement stores rather than rival them. But beauty brands with richer digital experiences that can match the in-store experience (or those that are DTC-only, in the case of brands like Glossier and Il Makiage) have faired better. In the long term, industry insiders predict a shift in omnichannel, with e-commerce becoming a more important priority.

Webb said the quiz has a 57% completion rate, and because Amika does not have any other survey tools on its website, it is gaining valuable insight into what current and new customers are looking for and what needs they have. Amika is using this information for ad targeting and email capture, and then personalized email marketing. Over 22,000 people have completed the quiz, accounting for about 15% of Amikas web traffic. The average percentage of web traffic that engages with a brands chatbot was about 3% pre-coronavirus and is 6% amid coronavirus, said Mauro. Webb declined to say what percentage of Amikas revenue is DTC versus retail and salons. Mauro explained that Automat prices its technology based on sales uplift, and that the price is locked-in after a three-month trial period.

Through the chatbot, Amika has seen sales conversion rates increase, on average, by 300%, but the conversion rate spiked to 800% when Amika ran a flash sale in May. Additionally, quiz takers spend at least four times longer on the e-commerce site, and the average basket size of those customers is at least 70% larger than non-quiz takers, though Webb declined to specify further. The chatbot has not had an impact on cart abandonment, she said.

Moving forward, Webb said that Amika is looking to create a custom landing page by the end of August that focuses on the chat specifically for customers who are coming to Amika through search, paid ads and unpaid social posts. This will allow Amika to gather customer information from the get-go rather than wait for them to seek out the Ace chatbot, said Webb.

The rest is here:

How Amika leveraged a chatbot to boost its DTC site - Glossy

The importance of virtual reality in business – Research Snipers

VR technology has come a long way in quite a short space of time, and unlike the 3D glasses gimmick that seems to have largely run its course, it seems like this technology is here to stay, increasingly being adopted into different mainstream industries and even in the business sphere.

Interested to learn more about the importance of virtual reality in business, and how it might be able to benefit your business/line of work in the future? Heres a little bit more general information about the technology itself, as well as some examples of interesting professional uses that you may not have considered.

Breaking down VR

Examples of current usages

Again, the benefits and usages of virtual reality technology are quite varied, and a lot of different companies are already utilizing the technology in order to help them get the job done more efficiently. For inspiration on how you might be able to use VR to assist in your line of work, here are a few examples: Forward-thinking investment As part of their wide array of digitally-available investment materials, allowing international investors enquiring remotely and those stuck at home due to the current pandemic situation to get involved, RWinvest offers virtual reality viewings on many of their developments throughout Liverpool and Manchester. Providing a 3D visualization of what the property looks like from a first-person perspective, it gives buyers a unique look that they perhaps might not have been able to get from simple floor plans or blueprints.

Go here to see the original:

The importance of virtual reality in business - Research Snipers

Nock and Mencken on Democracy and Equality – The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette

(Adapted from The Libertarian Legacy of the Old Right: Democracy and Representative Government, Journal of Libertarian Studies23 (2019): 521.)

Albert Jay Nock (18701945) and Henry L. Mencken (18801956) were the two leading libertarian intellectuals of the Old Right,during the thirties of the twentieth century. Both defended laissez-faire but opposed the New Deal, any connections between big government and big business, the First World Warand the American policy of imperialism. They were also very polemical against various movements for cultural and moral elevation of the people, such as Prohibition and the battle for public education.

With Myth of a Guilty Nation, published in 1922, Nock influenced an entire generation of classical liberals, opposing Wilsonian internationalism and arguing for anti-militarism.From 1920 to 1924 he was editor of the weekly journal The Freeman. His writings are mostly elitist, based as they are on the fundamental role of the individual capable of elevating himself over the mass of the people. His thought is anchored in a strong individualism, explicitly critical of any forms of statism. Nock has a disenchanted approach to democracy, mainly based on the idea that the lowering of the level of culture and education is related to the democratic ideology. Enlarging the suffrage would not do any better and its only result would be the destruction of the highest ranks of culture. The policy, decided on by the government, of universal education is based on the theory that everyone is equally educable and that education has to be extended to the largest possible group. But, for Nock, this does not make sense, since we are not all equals in attitudes and capacities. The only true kind of equality is the equality of liberty and before the law. But the education system is based on a perversion of the idea of equality and on democracy. First of all, Nock clarifies, the Founding Fathers chose the republican system as the best way to secure the free expression of the individual in politics. A republic where everybody votes is considered ipso facto a democracy, but considering republican and democratic as synonymous is simply a confusion of terms. Actually, strictly speaking, democracy is simply a matter of counting the ballots, but it became an ideology. RepublicanismNock writesdoes notof itself even imply democracy.Democracy is not a matter of an extension of the suffrage.It is a matter of the diffusion of ownership; a true doctrine of democracy is a doctrine of public property. And this because we are aware that it is not, never was and never will be, those who vote that rule, but those who own. So democracy, being an economic status, is animated by a strong resentment toward the lite, the socially, economically and intellectually superior persons. The democratic ideology rejects the simple reality that some achievements and experiences are open only to some people and not to all. Democracy postulates that everybody has to enjoy the same things.

The whole institutional life organized under the popular idea of democracy, then, must reflect this resentment. It must aim at no ideals above those of the average man, that is to say, it must regulate itself by the lowest common denominator of intelligence, taste and character in the society which it represents.

In a democratic system, therefore, education would be common property and so what is not manageable by everybody must be disregarded. This leads to a low and poor level of education and to the destruction of the higher ranks of culture, art, taste and life itself. Moreover, Nocks theory of the state, as an enemy institution, founded on exploitation and robbery, sheds further light on his ideas about democracy. The doctrine of popular sovereignty was a structural alteration to the state, necessary to make people believe that the state was literally the expression of the popular will. Democratic representation has been an expedient in order to submit the subjects to a state they believed was legitimate. The most important expedient

was that of bringing in the so called representative or parliamentary system, which Puritanism introduced into the modern world, and which has received a great deal of praise as an advance towards democracy. This praise, however, is exaggerated. The change was one of form only, and its bearing on democracy has been inconsiderable.

Henry Louis Mencken was a leading protagonist of the American Old Right. In the weekly journal American Mercury, he and his colleagues bitterly criticized moral crusaders and the entire Wilsonian politics that considered the United States as the guardian of the world. Although he was a literary figure and did not elaborate a systematic system of political thought, he can rightly be considered a libertarian. Both Murray N. Rothbard and (Justin) Raimondo are convinced that there are many good reasons to place Mencken in the libertarian tradition. Rothbard defined him as the joyous libertarian for his witty and satirical prose.Mencken was, in Rothbards words, a serene and confident individualist, dedicated to competence and excellence and deeply devoted to liberty, but convinced that the bulk of his fellows were beyond repair. Mencken had a great influence on the Old Right during the twenties, rejecting the idea of a world war for peace and democracy,and defending laissez-faire in economics and in private life. His liberating force and his writings were not for the masses, but for the intelligent few who could understand and appreciate his message. Mencken believed that

government, in its essence, is a conspiracy against the superior man; its one permanent object is to oppress him and cripple him.One of its primary functions is to regiment men by force, to make them as much alike as possible, to search out and combat originality among them. The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regards to the prevailing superstitions and taboos.

The government is a separate, independent and often hostile power. Mencken perceived the deep sense of antagonism between the government and the people it governs. It isa separate and autonomous corporation mainly devoted to exploiting the population for the benefits of their own members, oppressing the taxpayers to their own gain. The best kind of government, he writes, is one which lets the individual alone, one which barely escapes being no government at all.

Menckens individualist perspective gives great consistency to his views on many topics, among the most important of which is democracy. Notes on Democracy, published in 1926, contains one of the most scathing critiques of the idea that the great masses of the people have an inalienable right to govern themselves and that they are competent to do it. A government is considered a good one if it can satisfy quickly the desires and ideas of the masses, that is to say of the inferior men. A good and democratic government is based on the idea of the omnipotence and omniscience of the masses. But, Mencken states, that there is actually no more evidence for the wisdom of the inferior man, nor for his virtue, than there is for the notion that Friday is an unlucky day.Mencken begins his analysis of democracy examining the psychology of the democratic man and clarifying that in an aristocratic society government is a function of those who have got relatively far up the poles.In a democratic society it is the function of all, and hence mainly of those who have got only a few spans from the ground.The democratic man contemplates with bitterness and admiration those who are above him. Bitterness and admiration form a complex of prejudices that, in a democracy, is called public opinion, which, under democracy, is regarded as something sacred. But, asks Mencken:

What does the mob think? It thinks, obviously, what its individual members think. And what is that? It is, in brief, what somewhat sharp-nosed and unpleasant children think. The mob, being composed, in the overwhelming main, of men and women who have not got beyond the ideas and emotions of childhood, hovers, in mental age, around the time of puberty, and chiefly below it. If we would get at its thoughts and feelings we must look for light to the thoughts and feelings of adolescents.

The main sentiment of humanity is fear and the main sentiment of the democratic man is envy. The democratic man hates the fellow who is having a better time in this world (Mencken 1926, 45), this is why, according to Mencken, envy is the origin of democracy. Politicians are well aware of the psychology of the masses, and those who know how to use the fears of the mob are the most successful. Politics under democracy consists almost wholly of the discovery, chase and scotching of bugaboos. The statesman becomes, in the last analysis, a mere witch-hunter; in fact the plain people, under democracy, never vote for anything, but always against something. Actually politics are not determined by the will of the people, but by small groups with special interests able to use the fears and to excite the envy of the masses. Public policies are determined and laws are made by small minorities playing upon the fears and imbecilities of the mob. Those who succeed in the realm of politics are not the best and most intelligent men, but are the ablest and cunning demagogues. Anticipating Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Mencken states that except for a miracle it would be very difficult for a man of value to be elected to office in a democratic state. The problem is that people believe that the cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy or something closer to direct democracy. The great masses of men, though free in theory, submit to oppression and exploitation. In fact, according to Mencken, the popular will remains purely theoretical in every form of democracy. Moreover, there is no reason for believing that its realization would change the main outlines of the democratic process, considering the low level of intelligence and knowledge of the mob.

Mencken examines the relationship between democracy and liberty and notes that the democratic man does not fight to gain more liberty but for more security and protection. The fact, he writes, is that liberty, in any true sense, is a concept that lies quite beyond the reach of the inferior mans mind.Liberty means self-reliance, it means resolution, it means enterprise, it means the capacity for doing without. But these are not the characteristics of the democratic masses. Actually, the masses longing for material goods can only be satisfied at the expense of liberty and property rights. It cannot be denied that freedom is an indispensable condition for the development of the personality of the individual, but if we look at the propensities of the masses we discover that frequently they prefer to sacrifice freedom in order to enjoy material or psychological advantages. The average man wants to feel protected even from himself. Writes Mencken:

The truth is that the commons man love of libertyis almost wholly imaginary.He is not actually happy when free; he is uncomfortable, a bit alarmed.He longs for the warm, reassuring smell of the herd, and is willing to take the herdsman with it. Liberty is not a thing for such as he.The average man doesnt want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.What the common man longs foris the simplest and most ignominious sort of peacethe peace of a trusty in a well-managed penitentiary. He is willing to sacrifice everything else to it. He puts it above his dignity and he puts it above his pride. Above all, he puts it above his liberty.

The average man tends to consider liberty as a weapon used against him in the hands of superior men but, recalling Edmund Burke, Mencken writes that

the heritage of freedom belongs to a small minority of men.It is my contention that such a heritage is necessary in order that the concept of libertymay be so much as graspedthat such ideas cannot be implanted in the mind of man at will, but must be bred in as all other ideas are bred in.It takes quite as long to breed a libertarian as it takes to breed a racehorse.

If one of the main purposes of civilized governments is to preserve and augment liberty of the individual, then surely democracy accomplishes it less efficiently than any other form of government, since the aim of democracy is to break all free spirits. Mencken describes the tyrannical consequences of the cultural levelling tendencies of democracy. Like Alexis de Tocqueville he realizes that the pressure of a mass society of men all alike and equal leads to ostracism of those superior individuals merely thinking unpopular thoughts. Once a man is accused of such heresy, the subsequent proceedings take on the character of a lynching. The democratic, egalitarian society is pledged to common cultural values resulting in a rigorous homogeneity of way of thinking and of life. So a man who stands in contempt of the prevailing ideology has no rights under the law. By the mid-thirties the influence of Nock and Mencken had begun to decline. The Old Right, after playing an important role opposing the New Deal and in the crucible of the First World War, almost disappeared. During the years of World War II, government banned any opposition to war, Roosevelt and the New Deal. The Old Right went underground for the duration of the war and when America emerged from the war a new generation of old style libertarians appeared. They believed in laissez-faire and nonintervention in foreign policy.

Continue reading here:

Nock and Mencken on Democracy and Equality - The Shepherd of the Hills Gazette

Read the transcript for episode eight of Stress Test – The Globe and Mail

You had your best-laid plans and then COVID-19 came along and hammered the entire economy. But youve got this if you have the right information. Join Rob Carrick and Roma Luciw on Stress Test, a podcast guiding you through one of the biggest challenges your finances will ever face.

ROB:You spent your childhood and teenage years under their roof. Should you move back in with your parents if it makes sense financially? Thats our big question today.

Welcome to Stress Test, a Globe and Mail podcast where we look at how the rules of personal finance have changed in the pandemic for Gen Z and millennials. I'm Rob Carrick, personal finance columnist at the Globe and Mail.

ROMA: And I'm Roma Luciw, personal finance editor at the Globe. Well, Rob, this is the last episode of Stress Test that we'll be recording this summer. And I'm feeling a bit nostalgic.

Story continues below advertisement

ROB: Me too. You know, I think when we started this, it was like, there was snow on the ground and now it's like blazing hot summer like, so much has happened. The pandemic is still out there. But in Ottawa, where I live, people are out on patios and I have to confess I had a beer and a hot dog at a really nice patio by the Rideau Falls and things are looking up.

ROMA: Well, we had wine with friends on Friday night outside on their back patio, distanced but together, and I felt like old times. We were all so happy to just spend some time together outside without the children for five minutes. It was a wonderful, wonderful experience.

In terms of the podcast, I think also for me, it's been a journey because I'm more accustomed to being the person that does the assigning and editing. I'm not accustomed to being in front of the microphone and talking about these ideas where people can hear me and I have to say, that over the course of the recordings, I've gotten more comfortable, and I really enjoyed it.

ROB: Talking about all this in a podcast is a bit like rehearsing future columns and also greatest hits from the past. It's just me sort of thinking out loud about what I've learned and making mental notes about things I want to look into further in the next few months.

ROMA: So we knew we wanted moving back home to be our last episode. Why are we talking about this today?

ROB: I think we're talking about moving back home with your parents because it ties together a lot of the themes that we've been discussing in the podcast like the gig economy, student debt, expensive housing. A lot of these trends work against people achieving quick and easy financial independence after they graduate. And it's going to send some of them back home where they can live cheaply and build up their resources to move out later on.

ROMA: So once again, we see the pandemic, emphasizing or exacerbating some of the trends that were already taking place, we'll see another pop in this. And so it makes sense to use this as a launching point for looking ahead in terms of what we'll see in the months and years ahead.

Story continues below advertisement

ROB: Just as occurred after the last recession, I think the pandemic-driven economic downturn, however bad it turns out to be, is going to send a lot of people moving home and that's a good thing. I hope we can draw out in this episode that that's a smart way to handle a problem.

ROMA: Absolutely. If there's one thing I think we should do today, it's make sure that that's not a shameful thing. And we can talk that through as we proceed.

ROB: Today, we're talking about whether or not you should move back home with your parents to save money. I think now is the right time to talk about it.

ROMA: In every episode of Stress Test, we talk to real people and experts to see how the basic rules of personal finance have been stress-tested by COVID-19. Should you move back home? That's up next.

COMMERCIAL: This podcast is brought to you by CPP Investments. Take comfort knowing the Canada Pension Plan Fund will be there for you. We invest to help ensure the CPP Fund remains resilient over the long term, sustainable and secure for millions of Canadians. Learn more at CPPinvestments.com.

ROMA: To find out what it's like when COVID causes you to move back home, we're taking you to Brockville, Ontario, which is halfway between Toronto and Montreal.

Story continues below advertisement

RILEY: Hi, my name is Riley Morrison.

ROMA: Riley is 23 years old. Normally I live in Toronto but currently I am living in Brockville. So I was living in Toronto with my sister. Because I work in the film industry, everything is closed down so I can't work while COVID is happening. So we thought it would be best if both Paige and I came back to live with our parents until this is a little more settled or things open up a little more. So we came back.

ROMA: We spoke to Riley in April, just a month into COVID. In Canada, there was so much uncertainty. How was the new everyday routine going for Riley and her family?

RILEY: Surprisingly well. I mean, I haven't lived with my parents for more than two weeks at a time since I was 17.

ROMA: That's when Riley went away for school. And then she built the start of a pretty good career in Toronto.

RILEY: I'm an Assistant Director for film and television. I'm the fourth assistant director which means I'm one of the first people in in the morning and it's my job to make sure that cast go through hair, makeup and wardrobe. before we're ready to shoot at the beginning of a day. I coordinate with the wardrobe department. People who don't really know my industry when I describe myself job to them, they basically say that I sound like a babysitter. And it's kind of true.

Story continues below advertisement

ROMA: The TV show she works on was shut down just like everything else, Back in the spring, Riley came home to Brockville where life really slowed down. At first, it was nice to have some family time.

RILEY: My dad declared Sunday movie night. So on Sundays, we make popcorn and we choose a movie and we all sit down and watch it together.

ROMA: Riley's family built fun routines for the new COVID life together. But the early days were still pretty stressful.

RILEY: My grandmother, she drove by and like stood outside her car and we stood at the door, and we were having a talk and she was asking me about things and it was what I was like really stressed like right at the beginning, and I ended up like, totally broke down in the yard. Because I was stressed about my rent and my worry come August like I don't want to lose my apartment.

ROMA: Riley still pays for her apartment in Toronto, which is her single biggest expense, while she lives at home, rent-free.

RILEY: So that night, my mom and I, we went over my finances, and we talked about it. And I have a bit of a plan now. So I'm okay

Story continues below advertisement

ROMA: With all the stress of COVID. Being able to move home was a real relief.

RILEY: Financially speaking, it's really nice because the only money I'm spending right now is to pay my rent in Toronto. But I've been worried about my rent as I feel like a lot of people in cities like Toronto are because it's expensive.

ROMA: Because Riley and her sisters still pay for their rent in Toronto, their parents don't ask them to contribute financially to the household in Brockville.

RILEY: Which, you know, we're very lucky enough to have that kind of privilege. So it's nice to be home because I don't have any other expenses except for rent, which I only have to worry about once a month. The thing I've taken away from this is like, I haven't worked in retail in like four years, but maybe starting this year, like during the winter when I don't have a show I should get a retail job. So I have a backup. So I'm not dependent on EI. So I can work a little bit longer. Like it's just unfortunate that this thing I enjoy, my work that I love, I can't do. And I -- no one can give a like straight answer for when things are going to pick up or go back and that's the thing that frustrates me the most

ROMA: Overall, how does Riley feel about living at home during COVID?

RILEY: I don't feel bad about living with my parents right now because it's not like I've made some massive mistake in my career or a relationship and I need like, I mean, obviously, I needed to come home and it's financially better. But like, I feel reassured that it's not my fault. Like, this horrible pandemic happened and I came home, but like, it's not because I failed at anything. So I'm happy to be with my family, knowing I have not failed in anything.

Story continues below advertisement

ROB: Im glad Riley mentioned the word failure because its a word I do not want to hear associated with the idea of moving back home. Its a rational, smart, shrewd thing to do. If you cant afford your rent if you cant afford to be living where you are, use the help available from your family. Its a smart thing to do. And you know, I find quite often parents are quite happy to offer that level of assistance to their adult kids.

ROMA: Certainly seemed like for Riley and her sister, her parents were willing and able and happy to help. I'd like to point out that in the meantime, Riley has moved back to Toronto and is in her apartment. She hasn't been forced to take on debt. And she's in a better financial situation that she would have been had she been living in Toronto, buying her own groceries, paying for all her bills. In the meantime, she got to go home, take a breather, and she's in a better situation overall, why wouldn't you do that?

ROB: We're grateful to Riley for telling us what it's like to move home during a pandemic. But COVID is just the latest reason why you might have to move back home.

ROMA: At this point. It's worth asking ourselves, why is it a big deal that people are moving home after graduation instead of going out on their own? How did we get here?

ROB: The idea of students moving home as a social trend got some traction after the last recession in 08 09 the economy tanked hard. And a lot of millennials started moving back home. And I remember it well, because there was a certain sourness about this as if all these millennials were losers moving back home. Remember failure to launch, the boomerang generation. Its like they went out on the world and just couldnt hack it and had to move home. The ignorance level was just stunning to me, like oblivious to the disappearance of jobs to the fact that millennials were only getting part-time jobs or temporary jobs. They werent able to use all the skills they built up getting their education. And gradually we got used to it because people started to realize especially the parents of millennials, the economy is extremely challenging. The opportunities are not the same as they were for previous generations. And just as we were getting used to it, I think were going to face a big pop and this again, theres going to be more millennials and members of Gen Z, who are not going to be on a traditional career trajectory, which means graduating from school, getting a great job, getting a first apartment and living that great phase of life, when youve just got off your first job and your income is substantial and the worlds in front of you.

ROMA: Let's remember that there are cultures and where it's normal and preferable for young adults to live at home until they marry until they can afford a house. In some cultures, kids and parents live together, grandparents then help adult children raise their kids, but for many other people, there's an expectation of this progression from university or college to a career to financial independence that includes getting your own place and not popping back in and out of mom and dad's house. That wasn't the case for me. I certainly remember moving back in with my parents after university. There were chunks of time in my life where I wasn't working where my life was in flux. It just didn't make sense for me to be renting a place and it was feasible to my parents to help me. I don't know where this shame idea came from, but I think if your parents can help you, it only makes sense to do that.

One of the things I'm seeing in the circles around me is parents of kids who are in school Elementary School in high school are preparing themselves for that kind of future. So we have some friends on our street that are doing a renovation, they're setting up their basement as almost a self-contained apartment with the expectation that one of their sons is at some point going to have to move back home, and they're going to be in a position to help him. I know of other people who were in their late 20s or early 30s and wanted to save a chunk of money for a down payment. What did they do? They move back home. Rob, you know this from personal experience, and we're going to hear from Rob's family. That's next.

COMMERCIAL: This podcast is brought to you by CPP Investments. At CPP Investments we never lose sight of the long term. We invest the Canada Pension Plan Fund to help provide financial security for generations of Canadians. We diversify the CPP Fund across two geographies and asset classes to access the best investment opportunities and generate sustainable long-term returns. The fund is now more than $400 billion. To learn more about our investment performance for Canadians visit CPPinvestments.com.

ROMA: So, Rob, this is where we hear from your family. And I looked down a timeline to see what my life is gonna be like in 10 years [laughs].

Rob actually wrote the book on this topic. It's called How Not To Move Back In With Your Parents, The Young Person's Complete Guide to Financial Empowerment. We're going to hear from your family now. You want to tell us who we're hearing from?

ROB: We're gonna hear from my wife, Theresa, and our oldest son Will, he's 26. He spent four years in Toronto, going to university there, then he moved back here. While he was finding his first job. Will works in the gig economy he's currently employed, working in graphic design and art. Our family lives in Ottawa. We recorded our family conversation in early June and started by getting Will to tell us what Theresa is like to live with.

WILL:I know that my mom really loves to keep a clean house. I like my space to feel a little lived in. I've noticed that my mom, you know, she, she really likes to make a good impression on guests, you know, the place has got to be clean for that kind of thing with me, it's like, you know, whatever, I'll do some dishes. And that's good enough.

THERESA: His room was a little bit messier than ours. And I would try to stay out of it. And every once in a while, I just couldn't help myself I would just go in there and with a garbage bags and clean things out, but you cooked amazing dinners.

WILL: That made up for it [laughs]. But honestly, like, I think is there's definitely more of like a give and take. I feel less like I'm just owed anything and more like I need to contribute to the household.

ROB: I think that's a really good observation. And you know, now that you've mentioned it Will, I thought that was exactly what was happening. You know what, you did make a lot of the dinners like it was I felt like we had a chef living in the house and it was I thought that was a huge contribution like, on nights where wasn't making dinner, Theresa and I just sort of looked around and thought we better go out [laughs].

THERESA: Thats right! Will gained life skills, we lost life skills -- the ability to cook dinners.

ROB: You know, kids moving back home after university is something as a subject that I think you really are only aware of if you're a parent with kids in their 20s. And so tell them about your book club. And all the comings and goings of the kids of the members.

THERESA: Right. Every single member of my book club has had their kids come and go and many still have their children living at home now, even well into adulthood. It's just, not only is it financially difficult to have your own place and expensive. The job market is so precarious even our own kids, they're employed right now. And yet it's so hard to find permanent employment, and then layer on that, just the complexities of life and the fact that kids may struggle with physical health issues, mental health issues, changes in relationships that are going to bring kids back home again, sometimes. I've seen all that among my friends, and a little bit of that with ourselves with our own kids.

ROB: The whole point of letting your adult children move back home is to help them get a handle on their finances. When Will did that he got his own place. The key was to land a stable job.

WILL: I knew I wanted to live alone. So that kind of helped me sort of budget what kind of apartment I was looking for, something like a bachelor, you know. And then once I had the first and last month's rent, and then I think money for two or three more months after that, I think it came out, I don't know, like five $6,000 then I was able to kind of comfortably say to myself, okay, I can I can move out and I know that I'm not going to end up on the street and you know, yeah, although I know my parents wouldn't allow that.

ROB: I have taught that boy well [laughs].

Are there any downsides to moving back in with your parents?

WILL: I think there's definitely a loss of freedom. Nonetheless, when you are living with your parents, I guess you feel some sort of obligation to you know, let them know where you're going or you know, all that kind of stuff. And then I guess there's also the element of living with somebody who isn't a college student, which is, you know, two very different standards in terms of, I'd say cleanliness and I guess, home maintenance.

ROB: Also, some recreational activities may have to be moderated or adjusted for communal living [laughs]

WILL:Touch, yeah.

THERESA: Will moved out when he was just 18 and moved back after he graduated. He was really just a high schooler when he left and he was an adult when he came back. So mentally, I found for me, it was a big adjustment. Was I going to be his mom? Or was I his roommate? And if they were to move back in again, at some point, you know, we would have a whole different Will and Jamie that we had to get to know and develop a relationship with.

WILL: I think it was very interesting getting into my own place and realizing I can just go wherever I want and do whatever I want and spend my money on whatever I want. Right? And I think there's definitely a period where I had to kind of, you know, learn the hard lessons about that sort of thing and learn how to, you know, moderate financially, and otherwise. You know, I'm constantly trying to, you know, turn myself into an adult, I'd like to behave more as such.

THERESA: This is where it's great when your dad is a personal finance columnist because I've found that Rob and the boys had this ongoing conversation about how they manage their finances. And Rob sort of had this really nice way of very gently kind of easing back on getting involved with their finances. And I'm really impressed with how financially responsible both of them are.

ROB: My one rule is no credit card debt. And if you ever have it, you come and talk to me and we will kill it off right away, because we're not, there's no way, that's just an endless trap. And far from that being a concern, actually, it's impressed me that both boys really know how to save. They know they're precarious workers because they work on contracts and they have both socked away a good amount of money and that really impresses me. Will, of all the things that you've learned about money at home what sticks with you?

WILL: I think it's a really a package deal of how to moderate your spending. One of the most important things that I learned, especially with the way that you're helping me sort of organize my finances early on, is that I need to make my money last. And I need to kind of be paying a little bit more attention on how I spend that exactly and where.

ROB: You know, I think all parents want to see their kids become financially successful and independent and be able to live the lives that they want to lead. And I think moving back home can be a way to strategically make that happen.

THERESA: For sure. And I guess what I would add is that, at the same time, there are things that our kids only learned once they move out, financial lessons they can only learn by living on their own and maybe feeling a little bit of nervousness and fear about how will I pay the rent and how much money am I spending week to week so it's always a balance between offering that space and enjoying spending time with them, but at the same time letting them grow.

ROB: Yeah, no, you know, I thought having the boys back in as adults was a kick really, you know what, like we had the best discussions ever. And, you know, were there tensions, of course there were but I thought it was a bit relaxing to be the parent of 20-somethings living at home. Like I've trusted them to go and come back when they needed to. And I had no concerns where they were going and what they were doing. I trusted them. And you know, there were moments when I thought it'd be nice to have a place back to ourselves again, but then we used to think we're going to be empty nesters again. So you know what, on the whole, a positive experience.

THERESA: It's nice to get to spend time with your kids that -- it's a little bit of a gift in, you know, in the middle of their adulthood that you get to spend time with them.

ROB: Any advice for someone who's going to make the leap and move back home, Will?

WILL: I suppose I would say adjust your expectations. It's easy to go back home and think that things are going to be just the way they were except now you're an older person and you can do whatever you want. But I think it's important to know that your parents aren't going to be you know, serving your every backing call all the time, you have to be a little bit more self-sufficient. And you know, make sure that the house that you're living in is, you know, everyone's doing their part.

ROB: And the other advice? Well give the last word to Will.

WILL:

Really kind of manage your expenses in a way where you know that you're constantly building towards that, like first and last month's rent that'll let you you know, get out of there as soon as possible.

ROMA: Rob, it was so nice to hear from your family. Will totally sounds like a kid that's got it all together. Sounds like he must have learned some of those money skills from you, either through osmosis or maybe some of those conversations eventually sank in.

ROB: It's osmosis, I think. You know, you never really know what your kids are listening to what they're picking up on. So anyway, however it was I was super-happy to hear that he had picked up a lot of the basic fundamentals and everything that I see it shows me that he's on a really good track for handling money.

ROMA: Rob, you wrote the book on this topic, How Not to Move Back in With Your Parents, The Young Person's Complete Guide to Financial Empowerment. But it was published over 10 years ago in the aftermath of the global economic crisis, when we saw the first wave of adult kids moving back home, what would you say has changed today?

ROB: One of the big differences to me is that back in 08 09, 2010, the gig economy was a novelty. People thought, Oh, interesting. Companies are only hiring millennials for short periods of time. Maybe well get back to normal and we havent got back to normal. That trend is a lot more pronounced now. And I expect it to get even worse. So I think helping millennials flourish in the gig economy would be a theme that I would hammer harder this time around. And I think Id probably want to spend more time helping young people pick a course of study that will develop into a decent-paying career. And I think I would also want to talk to them more about jobs or skills about developing a career how to get your foot in the door so that you get higher-quality contracts and you have a better chance of getting a full-time job.

ROMA: How much has the housing market impacted all this?

ROB: I recall back in 08 09, millennials were very keen to get into housing and I know theyre at least as keen today. I think its a little bit more economically out of reach because the past decade has been all about giant increases in house prices. So I think we might have to work a little harder to make millennials and Gen Z comfortable with the idea of renting for longer, Ive looking at alternatives to homeownership of not rushing into this financial straitjacket, waiting to get yourself more solid in the workforce before buying a house.

ROMA: One thing that stands out to me listening to your story, and with my own, is that it seems like the shame or stigma of living at home in your 20s and into maybe your 30s is sort of dissipating. Is that something you see?

ROB: I think it is you know, I moved back home after I graduated from journalism school back in the 80s. And I felt a little bit of shame but I had a job that was promised to me, it fell through for various reasons, and I ended up going to work for that employer later but I moved back in April. It took until December for me to start working again and then I moved out again in February but I did feel a bit, I didn't feel, I wasn't really proud of having to do that. Although it worked out super well. It was like up to me it was the prototype of an effective smart, moving back home, gathering your resources and then moving right back out again. Today I hear parents talk about it so normally they I hear parents talk about the quote, revolving door on their front door with our kids are moving in, they're moving out, moving in and out multiple times. We've seen that at our house. I think it is quite normal now. And I think it's seeping into the broader population. There's much less judgement about that. And I think that is such a healthy development.

ROMA: To me, one thing that stands out that we haven't really discussed is parents helping kids who can't afford it. I'm a little less worried about that when it comes to this idea of moving back into a house they already have. But when does that become dangerous?

ROB: I think that parental support for adult children becomes financially risky when the parents are digging into their own savings to help the young people. I think that digging into an RRSP to help young people buy a house is not an intelligent use of money. Often it's helping people get into a housing market they can't really afford. And so what value is really occurred from the sacrifice the parents have made? Parents need to keep themselves on a good trajectory for retirement. And I encourage them to help their kids as much as they want, and feel able to, without self-sacrifice. Now, there may be some, you know, day to day, month to month, year to year helping with various expenses, but I'm talking about taking a big chunk of money out of their savings and giving it to an adult child to pay for a house or for something else, that should only be done where it is clearly affordable.

ROMA: And what we're talking about for the purposes of this episode is mostly adult kids moving into their childhood home, and parents helping them out by giving them free rent. There are of course, other ways that kids could contribute that we've discussed. You could help out with some bills or you can help out by helping around the house, making meals doing things like that.

ROB:Absolutely. You know, there's a lot of value to be done in that. When our boys were home, they cut the grass, they shoveled the driveway, they made dinners. They helped with other tasks, they picked up stuff for me, they took the cars to the garage. I mean, the amount of time and money they saved was phenomenal. It was like so useful. So I thought there was huge economic value in that.

ROMA: One thing we're also seeing is parents helping their adult kids by paying for things like cell phone bills, car insurance, car loan payments, what are the ins and outs around that?

ROB: I have no problem with that. You know, I say that from the point of view of knowing that a lot of millennials and Gen Z, people are making minimal salaries, they've got high rents. They don't have a lot of money to do anything other than cover all the basics. So if you can take a little of the pressure off, and it's no problem for your parental finances. Basically, you're keeping the same family cellphone plan going after your kids are graduating, you're used to making the payments. If it's no sweat, why not keep on? As soon as they're able, as their income increases, you can fix that. Same with car insurance. It's just a little extra parental help that if it's affordable, I don't see a problem doing that. As long as it's understood that as soon as their salary moves up to a decent level, you offload that cost to them, pronto.

ROMA: So what we're talking about here is progression. What you want to see is someone who starts off in a more tenuous job position, perhaps in their early 20s. How they move through that, what kinds of steps they're taking, as they move into their mid and late 20s and into their 30s.

ROB: For sure, and if parents, if you see your kids forgetting to take on the cell phone bill after that, so don't hesitate to say, you know what, I see you're making more money now, why don't you pay for your cell phone?

ROMA: Rob, how do you prevent your kids from feeling entitled, like you should be paying their cell phone bill for them? Like it's sort of an easy thing? And why not let mom and dad take care of that? How do you help to make sure that they're progressing into a fully functioning, financially successful adult?

ROB: One thing is to make them realize the cost pressures of everyday life from a young age. So if your kids are going to university and you've saved up money for them through an RESP, you're going to have them contribute to this you're going to have understand this is how much tuition cost you want to go away? Okay, here's how much a dorm room is going to cost for accommodation. What can you kick in? They need to understand the economic value of living as an adult. And you can help them do that, as they take their very first step as an adult, which is going to university giving up high school, going to university taking on this big cost of education, they should have some skin in that game.

ROMA: It's interesting you mentioned that. My son just got his first cell phone, and we are having him pay for the cost of that phone each month. He wanted a cell phone. We didn't think that he needed one yet. We came to an agreement. You want a cell phone, you pay the monthly bill. What we're talking about here, and I think what you and I are both seeing, is that we need to have a higher degree of financial literacy. And that just means talking to your kids about money and how to manage it and how to handle it.

ROB: Right.

Go here to read the rest:

Read the transcript for episode eight of Stress Test - The Globe and Mail

The 3 Secrets Of The Happiest Retirees (And How You Can Plan For Them) – Forbes

No matter where they live, what they did with their lives, or how much money they have, there are ... [+] three things I have observed over my career that happy retirees have in common.

No matter where they live, what they did with their lives, or how much money they have, there are three things I have observed over my career that happy retirees have in common.

The good news is, these are things you can plan for.

Theyre debt free.

Reaching financial independence wont be easy until youre free of debt especially adverse debt. Not all debt is adverse debt, but consumer debt for car loans, student loans, credit cards and other personal spending is categorically bad. The best way to free yourself of debt is to avoid it completely, but of course, thats not always an option.

Starting as early as possible, make a clear plan for getting out of debt and stick to it, even if it means delaying or reducing some of your savings or investments for retirement.

They have their health.

Being happy in retirement is undoubtably tied to being healthy in retirement. But a healthy lifestyle is something that must begin years before you retire.

Taking care of your health throughout your lifetimethrough nutrition, exercise, preventative medicine and mental health careis key to preserving your wellness into retirement. Find an active hobby, like tennis or hiking, that you can continue as you age to keep yourself physically fit.

If you already have health issues, take whatever steps you can to improve or preserve your health now and make sure you have a plan for how you will pay for health care throughout your retirement and have a good understanding of long-term care options.

They have a purpose.

As our life expectancy increases, the length of our retirement does as well. Day time television and shuffleboard will only keep you amused for so long.

Have a missiona reason to get out of bed in the morningthat will keep you active and thriving for all the years ahead of you. This can vary for each person, and Ive seen it include grandchildren, consulting, part-time work, volunteering and traveling. You can do anything, just dont do nothing.

Of course, you can take breaks and take time for yourself. But you cant spend 30 years sitting around and still feel fulfilled.

The lesson:

Being happy in retirement is not a coincidence, and its not something you can expect to achieve with no effort. Your plan for fulfillment and happiness is just as important as your plan for sustainable income.

Before you hand in your letter of resignation, make sure you know what you want to be when you grow up.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those held by Kestra Investment Services, LLC or Kestra Advisory Services, LLC. This is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any individual. It is suggested that you consult your financial professional, attorney, or tax advisor with regards to your individual situation. Comments concerning the past performance are not intended to be forward looking and should not be viewed as an indication of future results.

Securities offered through Kestra Investment Services, LLC (Kestra IS), member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Kestra Advisory Services, LLC (Kestra AS), an affiliate of Kestra IS. Brotman Financial Group, Inc. and BFG Financial Advisors are not affiliated with Kestra IS or Kestra AS.

Read this article:

The 3 Secrets Of The Happiest Retirees (And How You Can Plan For Them) - Forbes

Fitch assigns ‘A-‘ Insurer Financial Strength rating with stable outlook to the operating insurance subsidiaries of Ohio National Financial Services -…

Fitch views Ohio Nationals risk-adjusted capitalization as strong

Stable outlook reflects Fitchs view the company is well positioned in a challenging external environment

CINCINNATI, July 29, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Ohio National Financial Services announced today that Fitch Ratings has assigned ratings for the financial strength of The Ohio National Life Insurance Company and Ohio National Life Assurance Corporation at A- with stable outlook.

The A- rating is Fitchs seventh-highest rating on a 21-part scale. According to Fitch, insurers rated with a category have high credit quality and are subject to low credit default risk.

The rating reflects, in part, the companys insurance operating subsidiaries strong risk-adjusted capitalization and leverage, stable financial performance and conservative investment portfolio. The stable outlook reflects Fitch's view the company is well positioned in an external environment that will present earnings-related pressures over the next 12-18 months.

Highlights from Fitchs release also include:

We are pleased that Fitch highlights our strong capitalization and stable growth in operating earnings, noted Gary T. Doc Huffman, CLU, ChFC, Ohio National chairman and chief executive officer. This rating highlights we are well positioned in the current economic environment as the coronavirus-related economic downturn is creating a severe and extensive credit shock and earnings pressures across many sectors, regions and markets, including the life insurance industry.

Huffman continued, We are successfully executing our strategy, all while maintaining our long-standing financial strength, and we continue to focus on serving our policyholders first.

About Ohio National Financial ServicesSince 1909, Ohio National has been committed to helping individuals, families and businesses protect what matters most. Through our network of financial professionals across 49 states (all except New York), the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico and through affiliated operations in South America, we provide the insurance products that help our policyholders achieve financial security and independence. As of December 31, 2019, its affiliated companies have $40.5 billion total assets under management. Products are issued by The Ohio National Life Insurance Company and Ohio National Life Assurance Corporation. Please explore ohionational.comfor more information and for the latest company updates, connect with Ohio National onLinkedIn,FacebookandYouTube.

Lisa Doxsee, APR513.794.6418 office 513.218.5519 mobilelisa_doxsee@ohionational.com

Andy Haskin513.794.6693 office513.608.3763 mobileandy_haskin@ohionational.com

See original here:

Fitch assigns 'A-' Insurer Financial Strength rating with stable outlook to the operating insurance subsidiaries of Ohio National Financial Services -...

Government of Canada invests $19 million to reduce human trafficking and support those most impacted – Canada NewsWire

OTTAWA, ON, July 29, 2020 /CNW/ -Today, the Honourable Maryam Monsef, Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Rural Economic Development, along with the Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness announced funds to support victims and survivors of human trafficking. The $19 million will be administered by two federal departments responsible for the implementation of the Government's five-year National Strategy to Combat Human Trafficking, a whole-of-government approach to eradicating human trafficking and supporting those impacted.

Human trafficking is a vile, harmful crime that disproportionately impacts women and girls. The Government of Canada is working with domestic and international partners to combat human trafficking in all its forms. The pandemic has made it more difficult to keep vulnerable populations safe, and help victims escape situations of human trafficking and access the supports they need. Starting today, the Government is accepting applications for projects that work to prevent and address human trafficking and support survivors.

$14 million will be distributed by Women and Gender Equality Canada (WAGE) and $5 million through Public Safety Canada. WAGE's call for proposals will support organizations that work to prevent and address human trafficking to develop and implement promising practices to enhance empowerment supports for at-risk populations and survivors of human trafficking. The call will remain open until September 4, 2020.

The funding available through Public Safety Canada will support two initiatives. The first is for projects that seek to empower victims and survivors of human trafficking through the provision of supports and services that are trauma-informed and culturally relevant. The second is for pilot projects to establish and test best practices to raise awareness of human trafficking among at-risk youth. The call will remain open until September 4, 2020.

Eligible organizations for the funds include not-for-profits, Indigenous governments (including band councils, tribal councils and self-government entities) and their agencies, Indigenous not-for-profit organizations (that represent First Nations, Inuit and/or Mtis interests, and that are controlled by members of the population they serve) and municipalities and their agencies.

Quote

"Human trafficking is largely hidden. New trends continue to emerge and the pandemic has increased the harms to the most vulnerable. If you are a survivor of sexual exploitation, forced labour; if you believe someone else might be; or if you are currently being exploited and ready to talk to someone about your next steps, please call the Canadian Human Trafficking Hotline at 1-833-900-1010. Caring professionals are ready to assist you 24/7. If you and your team provide holistic, trauma-informed services to help survivors regain their independence, reintegrate into their communities, and begin their healing and recovery process, we thank you. Eligible organizations for the funds announced today include those supporting victims and survivors and community-led empowerment programs addressing the root causes of human trafficking."

The Honourable Bill Blair, P.C., M.P.

Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness

and

The Honourable Maryam Monsef, P.C., M.P.

Minister for Women and Gender Equality

Minister for Rural Economic Development

Quick Facts

Related Product

Backgrounder

Government of Canada's Efforts to Combat Human Trafficking

Human trafficking is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable. Globally, people, especially women, girls, and Indigenous peoples are trafficked for many reasons: sexual exploitation, forced labour, forced begging, forced marriage, for selling children and as child soldiers, as well as for the removal of organs.

This crime and violation of human rights disproportionately impacts women and girls. According to the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, between 2009 and 2016, 95% of human trafficking victims in Canada were female, 72% were women under the age of 25, and 25% were under 18. Most victims are trafficked within their countries' borders; those trafficked abroad are moved to the richest countries. Children are at heightened risk of exploitation due to school closures during the pandemic, since many of them are increasingly online for learning and socializing. This may make them more vulnerable to online sexual predators

Action must be taken to end human trafficking in all its forms. In September 2019, the Government of Canada launched the new comprehensive National Strategy to Combat Human Trafficking (National Strategy), a whole-of-government approach to eradicating human trafficking and supporting those most impacted by this crime.

Under the National Strategy, the Government of Canada is launching calls for proposals for projects that aim to prevent and address human trafficking, empower victims and survivors, and raise awareness among at-risk youth.

Women and Gender Equality Canada Call for Proposals

Women and Gender Equality's Human Trafficking Initiative will provide multi-year funding to eligible organizations to develop, deliver, and test promising practices in prevention and intervention. The work made possible through this funding will advance knowledge and enhance empowerment supports for at-risk populations and survivors of human trafficking.The aim is to empower women, girls and LGBTQ2 individuals at an increased risk of being trafficked to protect themselves from being trafficked and empower survivors of human trafficking to regain independence and control over their lives. It also works to implement the Calls for Justice from the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls.

Up to $14 million is being made available over four years under this call for proposals. Organizations can find more information and submit an application to the Call for Proposals by visitingthe Funding opportunities page. The call opens on July 29, 2020 and the deadline to submit is September 4, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time.

Public Safety Canada Call for Proposals

Public Safety Canada's Contribution Program to Combat Serious and Organized Crime (CPCSOC) for the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness supports initiatives, research, partnership building, specialized police services, projects and programs to increase knowledge, raise awareness and/or help advance efforts to combat serious and organized crime.

Through the CPCSOC, Public Safety Canada is launching a Call for Proposals for two initiatives: Community-Based Trauma-Informed Empowerment Projects and Pilot Projects for At-Risk Youth. Through this open call, up to $5 million in funding will be available over four years to eligible organizations.

Public Safety Canada will be accepting applications from eligible organizations starting on July 29, 2020 until September 4, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time.

1. Community-Based Trauma-Informed Empowerment Projects

The objective of this call for proposals is to fund projects by eligible organizations that provide trauma-informed, culturally-relevant, wrap-around services and supports to victims and survivors of human trafficking.

Projects funded through this initiative should aim to empower victims and survivors of human trafficking to regain their independence and prevent their re-victimization.

Projects could provide transition, second stage housing, mental health, and employment services and supports, as well as training and tools to gain financial independence.

A total of $3 million will be made available over four years to fund eligible empowerment projects, with $750,000 being made available per year for all funded projects.

2. Pilot Projects for At-Risk Youth

The objective of this call for proposals is to provide funding to eligible organizations to develop pilot projects with a focus on raising awareness of human trafficking among at-risk youth, particularly homeless youth and those living in care.

Projects funded through this initiative should aim to create innovative awareness tools for at-risk youth and empower youth to be active participants in the prevention of their own potential victimization.

Projects should incorporate how to recognize signs of human trafficking, how to recognize grooming and luring mechanisms commonly used by perpetrators, rights under the United Nations Rights of the Child Convention, and how to report suspected cases of human trafficking or exploitation. Initiatives should also include the creation, promotion and/or dissemination of educational and/or awareness materials/resources.

A total of $2 million will be made available over four years to fund eligible pilot projects for at-risk youth, with $500,000 being made available per year for all funded projects.

Associated Links

Follow Women and Gender Equality Canada:

SOURCE Women and Gender Equality Canada

For further information: Marie-Pier Baril, Press Secretary, Office of the Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Rural Economic Development, 613-295-8123; Mary-Liz Power, Press Secretary, Office of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, [emailprotected]; Media Relations, Women and Gender Equality Canada, 1-855-969-9922; Media Relations, Public Safety Canada, 613-991-0657, [emailprotected]

http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/

Link:

Government of Canada invests $19 million to reduce human trafficking and support those most impacted - Canada NewsWire

The collective wisdom that emerges from The Baby-Sitters Club – The Christian Century

BETTERTOGETHER: In the new Netflix reboot of the classic young adult novels, the girls of the Baby-Sitters Club share the power of friendship and collaborative leadership. (Photo Kailey Schwerman / Netflix)

The new Netflix adaptation of The Baby-Sitters Club provides comfort nostalgia for adult viewers who grew up on the original series of young adult novels. It also offers something exhilaratingly fresh and wonderful: a vision of collaborative leadership and friendship centered around young women.

If you grew up in the 1980s and 90s, especially if you identified as a girl, you probably know the premise of the series: a group of 12-year-old girls bands together to start a babysitting service in their small Connecticut town. Each books story is told from the point of view of one of the girls as they tackle a new problem in babysitting and the challenges of growing up.

The original series had a relatively diverse cast of characters for the 1980s, and it dealt with complicated families. The new television series expands that diversity as it gracefully moves the series into the 21st century. This means both that the characters represent a wider range of racial, ethnic, class, and sexual identities and, perhaps more importantly, that growing up successfully means learning to talk about these identities with honesty and bravery.

In the books Claudia is a junk foodobsessed Japanese-American artist with a reputation for funky clothes. In the show she discovers her artistic voice when she grapples with her grandmothers stories about her experience as a child in American internment camps. Mary Anne is being raised by an overprotective single father, just as in the booksbut she discovers her own moral compass and bravery when she has to speak out on behalf of one of her babysitting charges, a trans girl who is consistently being misgendered as a boy. This in turn leads her to embrace her own curly black-girl hair as part of a more grown-up and authentic sense of style.

These are the struggles of 12-year-old girls, but it turns out 12-year-old girls have a lot to teach us. So much fiction jumps immediately from childhood make-believe kingdoms and talking animals to the perils of early adulthood. The BSC sets up shop in the in-between years, when young teens are seeking autonomy and the freedom to take risks but still fundamentally need and want the haven of a family or community to hold them. Perhaps the greatest lesson the girls are learning is how to be that community for each other as they press beyond their families of origin.

As a 12-year-old reader, I was enamored of the club part of BSC: this semiautonomous space where the girls assigned each other roles (president, treasurer) and made collective decisions. Sure, they relied on parents and older brothers to drive them there, but sitting up in Claudias bedroom eating hidden candy and waiting for the phone to ring, they practiced a form of collective leadership that felt like a vision of adult life.

In the reboot, the girls buy a retro phone on Etsy to re-create this experience in an iPhone age. They assign jobs based on a rotating calendar, vote on club decisions, and problem-solve complicated clients: a newly divorced mom who has farmed out all adult responsibilities to her sitter, a little girl who is going through a morbid phase and holds funerals for her dolls. Those of us who grew up on the BSC quickly realized that adulthood offers few models of community or collective leadership as compelling.

Now I identify more with the girls parents, who are navigating second marriages, single parenthood, the illness of their own parents. Most of these parents were shaped by 1980s and 90s feminism and are doing their best to pass on those lessons to their kids. Kristys mom desperately tries to impart the importance of financial independence as she worries about marrying a much wealthier man. Dawns mother takes her to a feminist spiritual share-mony to purge bad energy as they start a new life in Connecticut after a move from California.

In the bright-eyed moment on the cusp of adolescence, the girls see adulthood clearly as a series of compromises and compensation strategies. They feel those compromises and live with sadness and grief, tooa dead mother, an absent father, financial precarity, their own illnesses. But they take what they are learning back to the club, where they discuss and debate it, work it out collectively, and arrive at their own sense of wisdom. We are used to thinking of adolescence as a time to find oneself as an individual. The BSC suggests this is a fools errand if you dont have a collective community to help you discern.

Most of us feel the collapse of leadership all around us. The future needs something more than a new set of leaders repeating the same mistakes. This reboot suggests that if the 12-year-old girls are alright, we might get a chance at a better future.

A version of this article appears in the print edition under the title The collective wisdom of 12-year-old girls.

Read more here:

The collective wisdom that emerges from The Baby-Sitters Club - The Christian Century

10 Growth Stocks to Buy for Long-Term FIRE Investors – Investorplace.com

For young FIRE investors, retirement isnt an age. Its a number. And its a number which they believe they can get to rather quickly. Much more quickly than their parents did.

FIRE which stands for Financial Independence, Retire Early is a modern, Millennial-driven movement creating a blueprint for young workers to follow so that they can retire well before 65, and even as early as 35 or 40.

What does that blueprint look like? Its not too complex.

Save. Invest. Retire.

Specifically, live with minimal expenses so that you can afford to regardless of your income save anywhere between 50% and 75% of your annual salary. Take those savings and smartly invest them across various assets, like stocks.

Watch your investment portfolio benefit from the wonders of compounding. Retire within 15 to 20 years as a millionaire. Heres the math.

Its 2020. Lets say you have a job which pays $60,000 per year (the median household salary in the U.S. today). Lets also say you live by FIRE principles, and invest half of that salary every year. If you net out 10% returns per year on those investments, then by 2040, your investment account will have more than $2 million in it.

And thats what the FIRE movement is all about. Creating millionaires through frugal living and smart investing.

Of course, critical to unlocking this huge growth is picking the right stocks to buy so that you can net out those 10% returns per year. Here are 10 growth stocks to buy for long-term FIRE investors:

With a disciplined budget and these stocks in your portfolio, financial independence is closer than you think.

Source: Mike Mareen / Shutterstock.com

FIRE investors want exposure to Amazon. This company has its fingers in every important, hyper-growth industry out there.

Amazon.com is the global leader in e-commerce, a space which is projected to grow by leaps and bounds over the next several years as consumers continue to migrate into online channels.

Amazon Web Services is also the global leader in cloud computing, a space which is similarly projected to grow dramatically as businesses increasingly digitize office workloads.

Meanwhile, the companys smart home business headlined by Alexa is a leader in the emerging voice assistant and AI-powered consumer products market. Amazons digital ad business is in the first innings of becoming a formidable player in that secular growth industry. Amazon also owns Twitch, the leading video game streaming platform, which will see huge uptake over the next few years as eSports gain traction.

Theres also the autonomous vehicle business, which was boosted recently by the acquisition of Zoox. At scale, Amazon could build out a fairly robust self-driving logistics business.

Net net, Amazon has a ton of long-term growth potential through its various hyper-growth businesses. All of that potential will keep AMZN stock on a healthy upward trajectory for the next 10+ years.

Source: justplay1412 / Shutterstock.com

Maybe the best growth stock to buy for FIRE investors is Shopify.

Thats because this company is rapidly turning into the backbone of modern commerce, a journey which will ultimately power huge gains in revenues, profits and the stock price over the next 10+ years.

Shopify broadly provides e-commerce solutions to merchants and retailers of all shapes and sizes. Such tools include website building tools, expert consulting advice, digital marketing insights, social channel selling capabilities and much more.

These tools are the building blocks of modern commerce. That is, a retailer cannot stay alive for long today without a robust online selling operation, and that robust online selling operation is powered by the tools which Shopify provides.

To that end, Shopify is becoming the backbone of modern commerce. Yet gross merchandise value through the platform measured less than 2% of total e-retail sales last year. And the companys profit margins are essentially flat today, despite near 60% gross margins.

Thus, over the next 10+ years, Shopify will leverage e-commerce tailwinds to dramatically grow its share of the global retail market, power huge revenue growth, drive significant margin expansion and produce enormous profit growth.

That enormous profit growth will help SHOP stock sustain huge gains in the long run.

Source: Wachiwit / Shutterstock.com

Facebook has tremendous long-term growth potential, making it a must-buy for FIRE investors.

The company owns four of the most used social media apps in the world. Each of them Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger have over a billion users. Yet, only two of them Facebook and Instagram are populated with ads. Thus, Facebook has a huge opportunity in the long run to roll out ads on WhatsApp and Messenger, dramatically increase ad inventory in its ecosystem and power huge revenue growth.

Thats on top what is already rapid ad revenue growth on Facebook and Instagram, which is powered by an exceptionally sticky user base and a shift of ad dollars from offline to online channels.

Even further, Facebook has a huge opportunity in e-commerce. We are already spending all of our time on social channels. And we are already discovering tons of products and services on social feeds. So why not just buy products and services though social channels, too?

Facebook is trying to build out this last step in the shopping process, with new initiatives like Shops. If these initiatives gain traction over the next decade, Facebook could inject a ton of e-commerce related revenue into its growth narrative.

Big picture: Facebook has a ton of growth potential over the next decade, and all that growth potential will drive consistently large gains in FB stock.

Source: shutterstock.com

The shift from guess-and-check, human-driven processes towards data-driven, computer-powered processes is already one of the biggest trends in the world, and that is only set to acccelerate.

One way to play this trend is to buy programmatic advertising leader The Trade Desk.

The Trade Desk operates a demand-side advertising platform which leverages data-driven algorithms to dynamically and automatically run ad campaigns in way that decreases costs and optimizes every ad dollar spent.

This form of data-driven advertising is the future of advertising.

Yet today, only about 1% of total digital ad spending goes through The Trade Desks platform.

Thus, this innovative company has a huge opportunity to grow market share, ad spend and revenues over the next decade. The Trade Desk will do just that. At the same time, the companys highly scalable application software business model will benefit from positive operating leverage and profit margin expansion.

At the end of the day then, The Trade Desk is in the first few innings of a huge, multi-year growth narrative wherein the companys profits and stock price will soar higher.

Source: calimedia / Shutterstock.com

The future of meats consumption is plant-based, and this simple reality makes Beyond Meat one of the best stocks to buy for FIRE investors.

In a nutshell, one of the defining megatrends of the 2020s which started to emerge in the late 2010s will be a mass consumer shift towards socially and environmentally positive products and services.

Why? Thanks to the internet and social media, consumers are plugged into everything, all the time. This always on behavior from consumers has increased their social and environmental awareness, to a point where they increasingly want to do their part to save the planet.

The adoption of plant-based meat fits in perfectly with this trend.

Relative to animal meat, plant-based meat is environmentally positive (it eliminates the need for cows and meat production plants, which are huge contributors to global warming) and socially positive (it preserves animal welfare). So over the next decade, as more and more consumers pivot towards socially and environmentally positive products and services, many of these consumers will gradually adopt plant-based meat.

Beyond Meat is the Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) of this space. They have the branding power. They have all the distribution partnerships. And they have robust technological advantages in efficiently mass-producing plant-based meat of all varieties.

So, what Tesla did in the 2010s is what Beyond Meat could do in the 2020s.

And that makes BYND stock one of the best stocks to buy for young FIRE investors.

Source: r.classen / Shutterstock.com

Adobe as a leader in all things visual media is set to win big over the next 10+ years as the world increasingly communicates through visual media.

Long story short, everything is visual these days. Consumers are spending all their time communicating with each other through visual-heavy social apps, like Instagram, Snap (NYSE:SNAP), and TikTok. Because of this, brands are spending all their time communicating with customers through these visual-heavy social apps, too.

What this creates is persistently rising demand for tools which help consumers and enterprises create compelling visual content.

Adobe is the head-and-shoulders-above-the-rest sector leader when it comes to providing those tools.

Consequently, demand for the companys consumer-facing and enterprise-facing visual media content tools will surge over the next 10+ years as the world more significantly pivots into visual communication.

At the same time, Adobe has a digital workflow business which helps businesses digitize their contract management processes. This business, too, has secular growth prospects, thanks to the rise of remote work.

Overall then, Adobe has a bright future. That bright future will continue to guide ADBE stock to big gains for long-term investors.

Source: Lori Butcher / Shutterstock.com

Okta has developed a unique cloud security platform that represents the future of how companies will secure their workflows and data.

In a nutshell, Okta has created a security platform which turns identity into the defense perimeter. What that means is that, as opposed to protecting a companys workflows and data with a wall of security, Okta simply protects the identities of each employee in the ecosystem. In so doing, the company has created a cloud security platform which optimizes for employee mobility and workflow flexibility without compromising security integrity.

In the future, organizations will employ a hybrid business model which incorporates remote and in-office work. Oktas novel Identity Cloud platform is the ideal security solution in that world.

As such, Oktas Identity Cloud platform will go from relatively niche today, to nearly ubiquitous over the next decade. As that happens, the companys customer base, revenues and profits will all soar.

So will OKTA stock.

And that makes OKTA one of the best stocks to buy for long-term FIRE investors.

Source: JHVEPhoto / Shutterstock.com

The long-term bull thesis on Roku is very simple.

Streaming TV is the new cable TV. But, when you sit back and think about it, streaming TV isnt too different from cable TV. It just has multiple on-demand streaming services, as opposed to multiple pre-programmed channels.

Still, in both spaces the existence of multiple content options mandates the existence a centralized software platform that aggregates and curates all the content, and provides consumers with seamless access to whatever they want to watch.

In the old cable TV world, the cable box did this job. In the new streaming TV world, Roku does this job.

The company has created a centralized software platform which both operates through standalone plug-and-play Roku devices, and is built-in into smart TVs that aggregates, curates and provides seamless access to all the streaming services in the world, from Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) to Disney+ to Amazon Prime Video.

In so doing, Roku is turning into the cable box of streaming TV.

Thats a valuable position to be in. Over the next 5 to 10 years, the $70+ billion of ad spend sitting in the linear TV channel, will migrate into the streaming TV channel. As it does, a lot of those ad dollars will make their way into the Roku ecosystem, since its the biggest central access point in the entire industry.

This huge influx of TV ad dollars will propel equally huge revenue growth at Roku. Big profit growth will follow suit. So will big gains in ROKU stock.

Source: Michael Vi / Shutterstock.com

Young FIRE investors should invest in the big data revolution.

Thats because over the next decade, the widespread proliferation of data-tracking software will dramatically increase the volume of data globally. At the same time, technological advancements in AI-powered data analytics algorithm will dramatically increase the value of insights companies can glean from data.

In essence then, the global big data market is on the cusp of huge growth. By the end of the decade, data will be everywhere. So will data analytics tools and platforms.

Splunk is at the heart of this big data megatrend.

The company provides market-leading data analysis tools through its Data-to-Everything platform which allow companies to take the mountains of data they are collecting, and quickly turn into them into accurate and actionable insights.

These tools will increasingly become mission-critical and ubiquitous over the next decade.

As they do, Splunks growth narrative and SPLK stock will power higher over the next 10+ years.

Source: IgorGolovniov / Shutterstock.com

Last but not least, on this list of growth stocks to buy for FIRE investors is Square.

Square is a pure-play on the cashless commerce revolution.

The era of cash is coming to an end. The era of card and digital payments is here. Square has built a robust portfolio of tools and services to help facilitate this transition from cash to cashless payments.

This includes seller-side tools, such as cashless payment readers, digital payroll management services and e-banking services. It also includes buyer-side tools, such as the digital peer-to-peer payments ecosystem, Cash App and an accompanying debit card.

Both of these sets of tools will see robust adoption over the next few years as cash increasingly becomes antiquated.

Squares reach across the global payments network will increase. The companys revenues and profits will soar. So will the SQ stock price.

Luke Lango is a Markets Analyst for InvestorPlace. He has been professionally analyzing stocks for several years, previously working at various hedge funds and currently running his own investment fund in San Diego. A Caltech graduate, Luke has consistently been rated one of the worlds top stock pickers by various other analysts and platforms, and has developed a reputation for leveraging his technology background to identify growth stocks that deliver outstanding returns. Luke is also the founder of Fantastic, a social discovery company backed by an LA-based internet venture firm. As of this writing, he was long AMZN, SHOP, FB, TTD, BYND, ADBE, OKTA, ROKU, SPLK, SQ, and NFLX.

Read more from the original source:

10 Growth Stocks to Buy for Long-Term FIRE Investors - Investorplace.com

Swine building maintenance the topic of online webinar series | The Standard Newspaper – Waukon Standard

The overall profitability of a livestock production operation greatly depends on the age of the buildings.

Maintenance of the buildings is critical for their continued use. Techniques that can help improve the usable life of roofs, concrete, slats and trusses need to be considered and implemented, notes Kapil Arora, agricultural engineering specialist with ISU Extension and Outreach.

ISU Extension and Outreach is joining industry partners to offer a five-part webinar series on the maintenance issues faced by facility managers and maintenance crews. The sessions are geared toward livestock producers, livestock building owners and contractors, facility managers, maintenance crew members, engineers, designers and others interested in swine building maintenance.

- Aug. 19: It Is Your Concrete Pit as Well.- Aug. 21: Maintenance of Concrete Pits and What to Look For.- Aug. 24: Gable End Attic Air Intakes for Roof and Moisture Management.- Aug. 26: General Maintenance Tips for Swine Buildings.- Aug. 28: Building Truss Management.

Each session is offered from 1-2 p.m. CDT by Zoom videoconference.

Sessions will discuss concrete pit maintenance and construction, truss management, roof and moisture management and other repair and maintenance issues that can help protect the building and extend its life.

Participants also will learn about unique ways to allow clean air into the attic space and minimize pit-ventilated gases from entering the attic during periods of minimum ventilation during winter months, helping to reduce roof corrosion. Ways to maintain concrete slats including their repair, to help enhance their usable life, will also be discussed.

The series is offered in collaboration with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and sponsored by Ag Property Solutions, AgVICE, Hills Bank, Hog Slat, Iowa Pork Producers Association, Marcus Lumber and Pinnacle.

Advance registration is required to participate and must be completed for all five sessions by midnight, Aug. 17. Payment is online with credit card only.

Online registration and additional information is available at http://www.aep.iastate.edu/building. For questions, contact ANR Program Services at anr@iastate.edu, or contact your regional Iowa State University Extension and Outreach agricultural engineering field specialist.

Excerpt from:

Swine building maintenance the topic of online webinar series | The Standard Newspaper - Waukon Standard

Instead of crying wolf on Section 230 reform, platforms should focus on the predators within | TheHill – The Hill

Internet platforms and their defenders want you to believe that every attempt to reform Section 230 would repeal the provision and, with it, free speech on the internet. That isnt the case. The proposals under serious consideration do not strike Section 230, but instead make narrow changes to fix its flaws. And, as always, the First Amendment has the final word on free expression in the United Stateseven on the internet.

Congress decision to create Section 230 was precipitated by the 1995 case of Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy. Applying a traditional libel analysis, the New York Supreme Court had ruled that Prodigys efforts to moderate inappropriate language on its electronic bulletin boards meant Prodigy had exercised editorial discretion, making it a publisher. Consequently, Prodigy was potentially liable for defamatory statements on the bulletin boards, even if it wasnt aware of the statements. Platforms that chose not to moderate content, by contrast, could not be held culpable unless they knew or should have known about such statements.

Concerned that platforms would stop moderating content to avoid liability, Congress overturned Stratton legislatively. In particular, Section 230(c)(2) states that [n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.

By creating a safe harbor for content moderation, Section 230(c)(2) gives platforms confidence to serve as outlets for user-generated content and free expression. Thats a good thing. Section 230(c)(1), however, states that [n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Courts have held that this language shields platforms from liability even if they inadequately moderate illicit activity or refuse to moderate at all, including in cases involving sexual disparagement, revenge porn, harassment, and terrorism.

That interpretation eliminates for internet platforms the legal duty of care that businesses ordinarily have: to take reasonable steps to curb illicit use of their services and facilities. Platforms say they take such steps, anyway, and that may be true in some cases. But their decisions are beyond judicial scrutiny, which means they cannot be held accountable even when they dont take such steps.

Internet platforms oppose Section 230 reform because they wish to continue avoiding liability when they negligently, recklessly, or willfully disregard illicit activity. But thats not a winning argument. So they claim that reforming Section 230 would imperil free speech and the internet.

This simply isnt true, at least under proposals by a number of commentatorsmyself includedto require that platforms take reasonable steps to curb illicit conduct as a condition of receiving protection under Section 230.

The reasonableness standard is inherently flexible. It would account for the resources available to a platform and the benefits and risks posed by use of its services. The effort needed to meet the reasonableness standard will be proportional to platform size, ensuring smaller platforms are not unreasonably burdened as they try to grow and that firms are asked only to expend resources that make sense in light of the severity of a potential harm and the costs to combat it.

Because this approach does not require regulation, it avoids censorship concerns. Significantly, it would also leave in place the Section 230(c)(2) safe harbor for content moderation. So long as platforms meet the modest responsibility of taking reasonable steps to curb illicit activityas other companies mustthe platforms could continue to serve as outlets for free expression without fear of liability.

Moreover, even if an internet platform failed to take such steps, it would not automatically be subject to liability. It simply could no longer hide behind Section 230. Any lawsuit would still need to prove some cause of action. And a court would still be bound to consider the free speech implications before assessing liability, because loss of Section 230s special protections does not eliminate the First Amendments protections.

Internet platforms desire to stop changes to a provision that gives them liability protection not enjoyed by non-internet servicesmany of which they compete withis not surprising. But that does not represent good public policy when it vastly increases harmful behavior online that victimizes real people. If the platforms would take reasonable steps to prevent predatory behavior on their services, rather than cry wolf, they should have nothing to fear from this reform of Section 230, as both they, and the internet, could continue to thrive.

Neil Fried, former Chief Counsel for Communications and Technology to the Energy and Commerce Committee, testified at the Committees June 24 hearing on Section 230. In January, he left the Motion Picture Association and started DigitalFrontiers Advocacy.

View original post here:

Instead of crying wolf on Section 230 reform, platforms should focus on the predators within | TheHill - The Hill

The statue defenders are the real enemies of free speech – Open Democracy

In the decades which followed the end of the Second World War, Britain emerged as a democratic state shorn of its empire, committed to a new global order based on the self-governing sovereignty of nations and the equality of their citizens. This was a radical break with what had gone before. Protecting empire had been a central theme in the politics of the 1930s. War was fought by the empire, in part to defend empire. But after 1945 empires collapsed quickly, and as they did so, in most parts of the world, the imperial statues came down quickly.

Statues celebrating Germanys empire were the first to fall, replaced by heroes of nations like Poland and Czechoslovakia, newly independent from Nazi occupation. In India, statues were first moved by Britons anxious to protect the monuments of imperial heroes from newly enfranchised Indian crowds. For example, a figure in Kanpur commemorating the death of Britons during the rebellion of 1857 was quietly moved in 1947 to protect it from Indians let into the previously white-only park where it had been housed. By the 1960s, Indian state governments were pulling down imperial statues in the hundreds. They did so to express a more confident sense of cultural nationalism, and caused diplomatic protests from Harold Wilsons government in London. More recently, the fall of the Soviet empire has seen the mass removal of statues to Russias Communist empire-builders in eastern Europe.

In Britain, statues to imperial heroes were until recently ignored not pulled down, more likely to be the repository of bird-shit than political rage.

Britain moved on from empire, without taking statues down. In part that happened as mid-century politicians and intellectuals rewrote empires story to claim independence in India and elsewhere was its culmination, not collapse. But by 1960, empire had been abandoned so fundamentally that Harold Macmillan could stand before parliaments in Ghana and South Africa in his Winds of Change speeches and celebrate Black African nationalism.

A review of the imperial statues in our towns and cities is long overdue.

Most were put up in a short period between the 1860s to 1920s, and they commemorated a politics based on racial inequality and violent conquest. The statue-builders imagined the world was divided between a small number of large competing imperial states whose power was based on force. Many of the figures celebrated, Robert Baden-Powell and Cecil Rhodes for example, thought war allowed better societies to thrive, and the weaker ones to die out.

These kinds of ideas have always been contested. The figure of Robert Clive standing amidst cannon-fire which Lord Curzon erected in King Charles Street was fervently opposed by liberals, who wanted Garibaldi put up instead. But there were enough like Curzon with the power to get statues put up to celebrate the men who embodied imperial violence.

Britains empire ended a long time ago. The fall of statues to slavers and imperial officers is an opportunity for the iconography of our public spaces to finally be brought into line with the democratic approach that has governed public life for almost a century. Protests in response to the Black Lives Movement create the exciting prospect of Britain properly reckoning with the empire it lost generations ago. In its place, they allow us to collectively create a shared national story to reflect and celebrate what, in practice, the country has been since the 1950s: a democratic, self-governing, multi-racial post-imperial society.

But that national conversation is currently being blocked by the irate response of politicians and commentators who vigorously condemn the removal of statues. Some of these largely conservative critics use hysterical rhetoric about totalitarianism and revolution. The more apoplectic among them (Peter Hitchens and Toby Young, for example) imagine that anti-imperial iconoclasm is undermining Britains liberal, easy-going, tolerant society.

The irony is worth noting peaceful protests against statues which commemorate the anti-liberal supporters of authoritarian regimes are condemned as attacking free speech. Its worth reminding ourselves how different the world which produced these statues is from the values that Hitchens, Young and comrades defend. The early twentieth-century Conservative party was imperialist and protectionist. It championed tariffs to protect national and imperial trade. Its arguments for imperial federation, an imperial single market and customs union were linked to ideas about racial hierarchy, and to the idea of uniting what Rhodes called the Anglo-Saxon race. But supporters of empire also used arguments about the need for big states in a competitive world familiar to present-day supporters of the European Union. By contrast, the modern Conservative party is avowedly anti-racist, economic liberal and strongly wedded to the idea of free trade. Most importantly it believes in the sovereignty of the nation-state, imagining the world to consist of independent, self-governing societies that have a right to resist the encroachment of external forces on national life. Rhetorically it is more likely to appropriate the language of anti-imperialism opposing the great empire of Europe, for example - than to justify imperial rule.

None of this is surprising. Since the mid-1950s the most articulate Conservative intellectuals had either become committed anti-imperialists (for example Enoch Powell) or simply remained silent on the subject. There is no unambiguously celebratory history of the British empire written by a Conservative-voting writer until 2003. Niall Fergusons Empire published in that year celebrates empire as something it was emphatically not: a vehicle for diffusing free trade. Until Iraq, even for Tories, empire was consigned to the irrelevant past. The useful, celebrated past for Britains right consisted instead of the moderate, decent, down-to-earth lessons learnt from the supposedly continuous history of an insular, island nation state over many generations.

My point is to highlight the strange predicament of those protesting against the downfall of statues. They defend statues which celebrate figures symbolising values exactly the opposite of those they support. They talk of a cultural revolution, but dont defend the order the supposed revolutionaries are trying to replace. Their worry is not that anything specific which the statues stood for might be dethroned; it is with the act of dethroning itself, and what conscious change in our public realm might entail.

This only makes sense if, a century after universal suffrage, conservatives are anxious about democratic conversation. If there is, in other words, a deep-rooted authoritarianism in conservative thinking which distrusts popular debate. From the comments of the statue-defenders, this certainly seems the case. Critics argue that those encouraging discussion of statues are accused of playing an irresponsible and dangerous game; dissent pushes us down a slippery slope. For one prominent blogger, protests about statues in Britain threaten the degeneration of our ordered polity into feudal tribalism unless the state adopts a vigorous, violent response. Given the largely peaceful character of protests and the success of the police in maintaining order, these are remarkable statements. They imply the paranoid view that open debate about the destiny of the nation and its heroes will quickly lead to disorder. In fact of course, theres no sign that thats the case.

The statue-defenders claim to defend the nation, but they have a hollow and undemocratic idea of what it is. They do not think we, its citizens, can debate and agree on our moral values, so instead they need to be imposed by an elite. They believe there is no space for reasoned disagreement within the national public. They do not trust people to speak other than through the narrow questions asked in plebiscites. Ultimately, the dictates of order force these fearful conservatives to defend silence in public space.

There are better ways of engaging with our national history than this, and they are being developed in towns and cities throughout Britain, by leaders from all political sides. In less than two months weve seen the debate about who to represent on the empty plinth in Bristol where Thomas Colston once stood; Sadiq Khans review of London statues and the discussion convened by a Conservative councillor in Croydon about imperial street names in Croydon. These, and conversations which will begin over the next months and years show that citizens want a mature and sustained debate about what and who we value in our history, about what we share in common, about which elements of the past we can celebrate and which move beyond or challenge.

Contrary to the fears of frightened Conservatives, we are capable of reaching a consensus about whose image should stay and who should go. The question is not whether each individual was morally pure, but whether they connect with what we want to celebrate now. My guess is wed keep Churchill and Gladstone, but remove Clive and Baden-Powell. But lets have the debate. If the defenders of silence and opponents of debate dont get their way, the empty plinths which emerge are an opportunity for a national conversation about the relationship between the past and present which is long overdue.

Excerpt from:

The statue defenders are the real enemies of free speech - Open Democracy

Good Faith And The Golden Rule At Mediation – JD Supra

Authors preface: Mediation is indisputably the most cost-effective and efficient way to resolve disputes. Moreover, there is positive energy and cautious optimism in the mediation process, which every participant enjoys. Especially, now in the time of Covid, we enjoy seeing people face-to-face, even if it is on the computer or mobile device. The enhanced communication of the mediation process increases the ability to view the issues from the perspective of the other parties and the mediator.

Be transparent

At mediation, It is better to be transparent from the start, lay your cards on the table and show good faith with the neutral and opposing counsel. Unwanted surprises can sometimes derail a settlement.

The number onesurprise commonlyencountered is when a party appears at mediation with a settlement position that is so high or so low as to be unreasonable. An outrageous starting point isn't so bad if the party taking that position becomes more flexible during the mediation and brings the position within the realm of reason. But last minute details may very well derailany chance of a quicksettlement.Instead, therevelation becomes the main subject of discussion as the mediation continues.

The mediator's function is to helpthe parties sort through the facts of thecase.His or hersuccessas a mediator depends upon treating everyone in the room with equanimity. It's difficult enough to prepare for a mediation, but finding out that the playing field has been changed at the last minute makes thingsthatmuch more difficult.

Good Faith

The Golden Rule states you should treat others as you wouldlike tobe treated

and is especially applicable to all mediations. Good faithinsettlement negotiations includes how we handle theentireprocess, not just being willing to pay a reasonable settlement number.All parties have an ethical obligation to bargain in good faith. This, of course, does not always happen,which raises question about suchunconventional negotiationtactics.

The principle of good faith must be adhered to when negotiating at mediation. There is little to be gained by disclosing new information that may significantly change the value of the case. in fact, it might force a case to court that could and should be reasonably settled early on.The party springing the surprise during negotiations may actually end up being the one most surprised at the end of a long and expensive trial.

Be reasonable and respectful

People who frequently mediate find it useful to maintain a reputation for predictability and consistency. This makes it easier to negotiatewith all partiesand reach a result acceptable to the client.Taking realistic positions and not wasting time usually makes the people on the other side of the table more forthcoming. When somebody likes dealing with you, it makes it easier for them to offer you what you need. Some of the most effective people take a reasonable position and stick with it. If it turns out that the position has a weakness, they will listen to reason. If their position is strong, they will stick with their position. Rationality, not emotion, drives effective strategy.

Mutual respect is essential. When people spend several hours at mediation only to find that there was never any settlement possibility from the get-go, they are universally unhappy. Delay and obfuscation make the other side unwilling to make any deal. Consider being up-front with your position well prior to the mediation day, so the other side has time to consider it and to consult with necessary authorities. The need to speak with supervisors is particularly true when dealing with insurance carriers. Any settlement authority given by those supervisors is based only on known information. If you appear at mediation and for the first time disclose a substantial lien, a new injury or recent surgeries, many times the insurance representative at mediation cannot get the additional settlement authority needed, the case can't settle, and preventable delay ensues.

Don't fall in love with your case

Don't let emotion color your position. Any jury may disagree with your idea of justice and any trial judge may refuse to admit evidence essential to your position. Maybe you need to step back, talk with colleagues, and see if your expectations should be adjusted.

Many dealing in the law recognize the Golden Rule as akin to Karma; What goes around comes around. This may not always be true, but regulars at mediation know that being up-front yields benefits in the long run. Be prepared, professional, considerate, and let the other side know that there is nothing personal in the position you are taking. A mutual attitude of cautious optimism makes mediation both enjoyable and effective. Building positive relationships with the opposition makes it much easier to settle cases in the future.

One last aphorism to ponder when you are on your way to the next mediation: You can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar.

[View source.]

View post:

Good Faith And The Golden Rule At Mediation - JD Supra

Should owner-occupied duplexes in Berkeley be subject to rent control? – Berkeleyside

The Rent Board voted to ask the City Council to place a measure on the November ballot eliminating the golden duplex exemption, among other actions. The council will take up the matter tonight. Photo: Pete Rosos

For the last two years, the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board has worked to eliminate a carve-out to the citys rent control laws the so-called golden duplex rule.

When Berkeley voters adopted rent control in 1980, they decided that people who owned a duplex, lived there by Dec. 31, 1979, and rented out the other apartment should not be subject to rent control. The thinking was that was an intimate relationship that shouldnt be regulated by a government institution.

But in ensuing years, that philosophy has come under attack. Tenant activists say that all tenants should be protected by rent and eviction controls and that the intimate relationship between a golden duplex owner and their tenants is ripe for exploitation. The owner can raise their tenants rent as high as they want and as often as they want. The owner can kick someone out of their unit whenever they want and for whatever reason they want. For that reason, many Rent Board commissioners, and groups like the Berkeley Tenants Union, want to eliminate the rent and eviction control exemptions for golden duplexes.

On May 29, in a 7-2 vote, the Rent Board voted to ask the City Council to place a measure on the November ballot eliminating the golden duplex exemption, among other actions. The council will take up the matter tonight.

No one is certain how many golden duplexes there are in Berkeley, but estimates range from 400 to 1,000. Since they are exempt from rent regulations, owners do not have to register them with the Rent Board. There are about 27,550 rental units in Berkeley, according to the Rent Board. About 19,667, or 71% of them, are covered by rent and eviction controls

The golden duplex vote has prompted lobbying and action from organizations representing both renters and property owners.

The Berkeley Tenants Union, an organization dedicated to defending and advancing the rights of Berkeley renters, encouraged its members this week to write to the City Council and urge them to place the golden duplex law on the November ballot. Two leaders of the BTU also serve as Rent Board commissioners and voted to ask the council to put the item on the ballot Paola Laverde, the Rent Board president, and John Selawsky. The BTU is providing talking points for members to say at tonights council meeting or in an email.

Dont be fooled by landlords, who are falsely claiming that they need their businesses to be exempt from reasonable regulations, the BTU wrote on Facebook. Just a cursory investigation shows that they are lying about supposed reasons to continue exempting golden duplexes and ADUs.

Being a landlord is a FOR-PROFIT BUSINESS, and a very lucrative one, the BTU post continued. Like every other for-profit industry, it must be regulated at EVERY SCALE in order to protect consumers in this case tenants from exploitative practices.

The Berkeley Property Owners Association, which represents landlords in Berkeley, many of them small property owners, is also advocating for its members to get involved with the vote. In addition, the BPOA filed a complaint with the Fair Political Practices Commission against Leah Simon-Weisberg, a Rent Board commissioner. The complaint states that Simon-Weisberg should have recused herself from voting to ask the City Council to place the golden duplex measure on the ballot because she lives in a golden duplex, according to the complaint. Therefore, she stands to benefit financially if that unit becomes rent-controlled, the complaint contends.

Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board Commissioner Leah Simon Weisberg violated [the law] section 87100 when she made a governmental decision which had a reasonably foreseeable material effect on one of her personal financial interests, reads part of the FPPC complaint.

Matt Brown, the acting executive director of the Rent Board, told Berkeleyside that Simon-Weisberg did not have a conflict.

Commissioners are free to participate in discussions and vote upon proposals that may have direct consequences for their personal housing situation or the financial performance of their rental property, so long as the proposal does not treat the Commissioners any differently from anyone else who owns or lives in the same type of property, he said in an email.

(The BPAO also sent a letter to the Berkeley city attorney which incorrectly argued that Simon-Weisberg cast the deciding fifth vote to send the matter to the council. Since she should not have voted, that matter would not have advanced, the letter argued. The BPOA later acknowledged it had counted the votes incorrectly).

The Berkeley Property Owners Association also wants Mayor Jesse Arregun to recuse himself from voting tonight because it believes he lives in a golden duplex in North Berkeley, said Krista Gulbransen, the organizations executive director. She sent what the BPOA considers evidence of this situation to the Berkeley City attorney late Monday night. She said she believes City Council member Ben Bartlett also lives in a golden duplex and should not vote.

In light of this evidence, and due to the fact that the Council will be considering whether to remove the rent control exemption from these properties, we assert the that Mayor stands to gain a financial benefit and should recuse himself from Item #41 ahead of tomorrow nights meeting, just as Councilmember Bartlett has been advised to do, Gulbransen wrote.

Mayor Arregun and Councilmember Bartlett will recuse themselves from voting

Arregun said he has contacted the Fair Political Practices Commission to determine whether it would be a conflict for him to vote on the golden duplex issue since he lives in a golden duplex. He said he was not aware there might be an issue until last night when the BPOA sent a letter to the city.

Out of an abundance of caution, he will not participate in the discussion of the issue, he said.

I resent suggestions I have acted improperly, he said. This last-minute attempt of the Berkeley Property Owners Association to silence me and the people I represent is undemocratic.

Arregun said he will join in on the discussion on the other items the rent board wants put on the ballot.

Bartlett told Berkeleyside that he lives in a golden duplex and is negotiating to buy a property with an ADU so he will not vote on those issues coming up tonight. Bartlett said he consulted with the city attorney about this a few weeks ago and had alerted his constituents to the matter.

Arregun has introduced a compromise measure around golden duplexes. The proposed ballot language suggested by the Rent Board would immediately eliminate the exemptions. Arreguns measure, in contrast, would only eliminate the measure after current owners sell their property. (Arregun said he will no longer introduce this measure).

As long as you owned and lived in your golden duplex as of March 1, 2020 and continuously reside there, you keep the exemption, Arregun said in an email. If you sell it, then you lose the exemption. It is intended to be a compromise to keep existing golden duplex owners rights, recognizing they bought the property with a certain understanding of their legal rights and the landlord-tenant relationship, but once it is sold, it is no longer exempt. This would have the effect of gradually phasing in these properties into full rent control.

The Rent Board also asked the City Council to add other items to the November ballot, including one that would put newly constructed accessory dwelling units, ADUs, under rent control. They are:

Update: 3:45 p.m. This article has been updated twice to add Arregun and Bartletts viewpoints.

Read more:

Should owner-occupied duplexes in Berkeley be subject to rent control? - Berkeleyside

Letters to the editor for July 30, 2020 – Opinion – Echo Pilot

Gordon Lampitt, a true American hero

As we continue to fight a deadly pandemic, racial injustice and an economic crisis, we are consistently reminded of the fragility of life. But there are also moments that remind us of the heroes among us.

Gordon Lampitt, a Browns Mills resident since 1958 who recently passed at age 96, was one of those unsung heroes. He dedicated his entire life to his beloved family and his country. U.S. Army Command Sgt. Maj. Lampitt was one of few Americans to have served three tours in World War II, three tours in the Korean War and two tours in the Vietnam War.

A decorated veteran, Gordon continued to serve his country even after retiring from the Army, working at Fort Dix for 15 years. His unwavering commitment and dedication to his country, exemplified by his service in three wars was the ultimate testament of his patriotism and courage. He is a true American hero.

My thoughts, prayers and deepest condolences are with Gordons family and loved ones. I thank Gordon for making this country a better place and South Jersey is eternally grateful for his service and countless contributions to our community.

Congressman Donald Norcross, 1st District, New Jersey

First and foremost, we are all Americans

We are all Americans. We all live in this great melting pot called the United States of America. We come from different ethnic, racial and societal backgrounds. But first and foremost we are Americans.

We all have under the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution the rights of life, liberty and freedom and the pursuit of happiness. We seem to have lost sight of these facts.

People in China, Russia, North Korea and Syria live under the thumb of the likes of Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un and Bashar Hafez al-Assad. So be thankful that you live here.

Wear your camouflage, dreadlocks, hijab, Ivy League button downs I don't care. Just treat each other with respect, dignity and the knowledge that we all have the right to exist and to pursue our dreams and goals.

If you are the best qualified to do the job you need to get it albeit with a crew cut, piles of dreads or hijab. Teach the Golden Rule to your babies. They are our future and we owe it to them to fix all the mistakes we and our forebears made so they can live in peace with their fellow Americans.

Richard Egloff, Mount Laurel

Read this article:

Letters to the editor for July 30, 2020 - Opinion - Echo Pilot

Connecticut’s great job managing the ‘plague’ – News from southeastern Connecticut – theday.com

Connecticut, and especially New London County, has weathered the first wave of COVID-19 magnificently. In March, April and May Imarveled at the courage of our ICU team; men and women who bravely donned hazmat suits to care for very sick patients in air thick with COVID-19. Now there arefew cases. Why? Thanks to you, our fellow citizens, who get it, who socially distance, wear masks in public and look out for each other.

This will be a temporary victory if we drop our guard. Only about 10% of us have gotten COVID-19. Getting it does not mean we are immune. It is likely that a vaccine will reduce but will not eliminate acute illness from COVID-19. In other words, get used to this new reality and do not stop what you are doing. The greatest civic virtue derivative of the Golden Rule is looking out for our neighbors. With COVID-19, we must continue to protect each other, especially the most vulnerable among us. Do not despair. For the gullible, political puffery will eventually give way to self-interest, severe illness, or death (see Florida, Texas and Arizona).

We Nutmeggers have mastered this plague but itmay never go away entirely. Keep your focus to distance, mask, and insist (politely, but firmly) on the same from all.

Constantine Manthous

East Lyme

See the article here:

Connecticut's great job managing the 'plague' - News from southeastern Connecticut - theday.com