Building ecosystems is hard. Auditing them is worse. – Stacey on IoT

I write a lot about the importance of building connected products with an eye toward also building out an ecosystem, because a connected device is really only as valuable as the other things it can work with. Were very early in this phase, but these ecosystems are currently emerging in the enterprise world in the form of platforms provided by incumbents such as Honeywell, Emerson, Siemens, and more.

So, in my Everything is Connected event held this past Tuesday, I wanted to understand how companies were building out such ecosystems and what challenges they face. I asked executives from Honeywell, Intel, Zededa, and DevicePilot to offer their advice on building out ecosystems that work, including how to bring startups into the fold.

The first thing to do in establishing an ecosystem is to figure out a compelling business case, then to try and find one or more partners.

Each participant had different experiences when it came to choosing a business case. Ginger Smith, director of strategic partnerships at Honeywell Connected Enterprise, talked about how Honeywell and SAPs recent partnership around smart buildings was based on a meeting between the two companies respective CEOs at Davos.

Irene Petrick, senior director of Industrial Innovation in the Internet of Things Group at Intel, suggested that companies find their business case with the business line managers who have a specific need. Petrick also recommended picking partners who have graduated beyond slideware and have specific use cases already deployed and to be prepared to customize, since theres never a solution thats ready right off the shelf.

Regardless of how the partnerships get started, to work they need people who are committed to solving a problem across all levels of an organization. Petrick said people who can move freely between the tech and business teams to help define problems and communicate the technical limitations available are crucial. She called these individuals bridgers.

And according to Pilgrim Beart, CEO of DevicePilot, many companies that have built connected products or are in the process of building one might be surprised to discover that they are already part of an ecosystem. An IoT product is not simply a product. Its an ecosystem in its own right, he said. A lot of people have to collaborate to bring any one IoT solution into the market.

The good news is that companies may be further along than they think in terms of understanding how to build these ecosystems. So what about creating relationships between traditional companies and startups?

Smith said that her group at Honeywell is working with two startups at the moment, and in general is looking for companies that are building a product that either isnt competitive and can slot into the Honeywell roadmap and help it get to market faster, or one that customers are asking for that Honeywell doesnt have. She admitted that many startups will likely find working with a larger company trying. Petrick was more blunt, noting that Intel is probably not as an effective a partner for startups because it is so big and has so many competing interests.

Differently sized companies are not the only challenge to building an ecosystem partnerships face. The point of establishing an ecosystem is to create a web of companies to offer services and products that provide more value together than apart. But figuring out how to charge customers for that value and then apportion that value among the partners is tough.

Delivering value and harvesting that value is not yet appreciated in the IoT space, said Beart, who thinks it will simply take time. People are constantly trying to work out how to pass value down the chain, what to keep to themselves, and how to structure a business model.

Petrick believes IoT also needs more infrastructure. She mentioned auditing ecosystem partnerships as an example of a challenge that doesnt yet have a solution. So I have a rev share agreement in a partnership, but I have to know whos selling what, and to whom, and some of the auditing mechanisms arent really well-established or clear yet. She noted that we tend to audit things that are easy to count, but in the IoT, those may not be the right metrics, especially when it comes to sharing data.

For more on the challenges and other advice around data sharing and even the contracts necessary for building out an enterprise ecosystem, please check out thevideos of the sessions.

Related

Originally posted here:

Building ecosystems is hard. Auditing them is worse. - Stacey on IoT

Opinion | How to make online payments bustle with competition – Livemint

Last week, several newspapers reported that the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) was reviving a proposal that it had first mooted a year agoto impose transaction limits on the Unified Payments Interface, or UPI, ecosystem. Once fully implemented, no single UPI payment entity will be allowed to process more than a third of the total transactions on the payment network.

At present, though there are dozens of apps you can use to make UPI payments, the ecosystem is dominated by just three players. Of these, two account for as much as 77% of the entire market. Given that there were nearly 1.5 billion UPI transactions in July alone, the NPCI is justifiably concerned about the systemic risk of letting two playersor worse, just onecontrol the entire UPI ecosystem.

This fear, I believe, is well founded. Everyone knows that digital platforms are susceptible to winner-takes-all effects. In sector after sector, companies with the first-mover advantage have consolidated their early lead into absolute market dominance. In search, social media and e-commerce, the companies that dominate the market today started out small but went on to build moats around their platforms till it became virtually impossible for anyone to mount a challenge to their dominance. And while all these sectors are important, none of them is as systemically significant as payments. The NPCI would be wise to take precautions in order to prevent Indias UPI ecosystem from being dominated by a few.

That said, I believe that instead of imposing restrictions as crude as an absolute limit on the total the number of transactions that an individual player can carry out, there are other more elegant measures that the NPCI should consider in order to make the market more naturally competitive.

In the first place, the NPCI should even out the playing field to make it easy for players without significant financial resources to also participate. The UPI market is, at present, rife with discounts and cashbacks, as UPI players look to buy customer loyalty through whatever means they have at their disposal. While this is great for the consumer, it requires deep pockets to be able to sustain these financial subsidies over an extended period of time. If UPI players are allowed to take this to the next level and enter exclusive arrangements with merchants who end up locking themselves into one platform or another, certain products and services might in the future only be available through a single UPI app. Unless such practices are regulated, the market will end up being dominated by companies that have the financial resources to be able to stick it out till the bitter end.

Of similar concern is the data advantage that UPI players will inevitably be able to build. As transaction volumes rise month on month, the UPI applications through which this flood of financial data is funnelled will become more and more valuable. UPI platforms will start to leverage their unique position to derive unprecedented market insights from the data that passes through their systems.

In its report, the Non-Personal Data Committee highlighted the value inherent in aggregate data like this. It would be wise to ensure that no one player gains exclusive control over this data. One possible way of achieving this, which has been alluded to in the committees report, would be to create a marketplace for data where UPI players can offer the datasets that they alone are in a unique position to generate.

But, by far the most effective mechanism to ensure greater competition is to let more participants enter the ecosystem. The UPI ecosystem is, by design, radically substitutable. Any UPI app can be used to transfer money from any bank account to any other.

Unlike every other payment system in existence on the planet, there is absolutely no friction in switching from one UPI service provider to another. That being the case, I cant understand why the NPCI has been dragging its feet in allowing other big players to enter the ecosystem.

The immediate effect of letting other powerful players operate in this ecosystem will be that these new players will serve as an effective antidote to the evident risk that the two companies that currently dominate the market would run away with their early advantage.

Apart from acting as a brake on the ambition of such entrenched players, this move would also encourage greater diversity in the ecosystem, allowing for the establishment of niche payment platforms designed to cater to the unique needs of specific market segments. For instance, I can see how players with special expertise in the legal and healthcare sectors could develop UPI applications designed especially for cases as specific as the payment of court fees or recurring medical bills. There could be many other niche applications as well.

Finally, it is critically important to ensure that UPI spreads into the rural hinterland. As impressive as the current numbers are, UPI transactions are almost entirely taking place in urban parts of the country. If it is to reach its full potential, NPCI will have to go out of its way to encourage UPI platforms that show a commitment to expanding in the rural market.

It is only when all these measures to boost competition fail and expand the systems reach that the NPCI should impose curbs on the total volume of transactions.

Rahul Matthan is a partner at Trilegal and also has a podcast by the name Ex Machina. His Twitter handle is @matthan

Subscribe to newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

See the rest here:

Opinion | How to make online payments bustle with competition - Livemint

AB 3030 fails to recognize marine protections that exists in California – CALmatters

In summary

Unless AB 3030 is changed to protect existing fishing access and to recognize sustainable management of West Coast fisheries, sport and commercial fishers must oppose it.

Marc Gorelnik chairs the Pacific Fishery Management Council, marc@gorelniklaw.com.

Mike Conroy is executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associations, mike@ifrfish.org.

We Californians are rightfully protective of our environment. Unfortunately, our ecological ethic is not widely applied around the globe.

In much of the worlds oceans, meaningful protections are absent. There are a variety of reasons: corrupt governments, lack of management and enforcement resources, and the simple lack of appreciation of the mutual benefits of a healthy, abundant ecosystem.

Keep tabs on the latest California policy and politics news

Against this background, the international environmental community has joined forces to ensure our planets biodiversity by proposing to protect 30% of the worlds oceans, land and inland waters by the year 2030. Assembly Bill 3030, a bill introduced by Assemblymember Ash Kalra, a San Jose Democrat, would similarly declare Californias goal to protect at least 30% of Californias waters and lands by 2030.

The goal is laudable, but the bills language is not. Unless the bill is fixed to protect existing fishing access absent a need to protect biodiversity from specific harm and to recognize the sustainable management of West Coast fisheries, sport and commercial fishers must regretfully oppose AB 3030.

Why have sport and commercial fishers up and down Californias coast opposed AB 3030? The bill strays from the international initiative from which it was spawned. The bill fails to recognize that the meaningful marine biodiversity protections sought elsewhere in the world already exist here in California.

Whether an area is protected depends solely on the nature and extent of the restrictions applied there, not a label that may or may not be correctly applied. In California, existing fishing management measures already protect marine biodiversity and its role in the larger marine ecosystem.

Virtually all of the ocean waters off California are already protected by overlapping federal and state laws and regulations designed to protect the health of living marine resources. Significant threats remain to our oceans, such as offshore energy and mineral extraction, climate change, ocean acidification, plastics, inland pollution reaching the ocean, and water policies in our rivers that diminish stocks of salmon and steelhead. However, no evidence supports the notion that sustainable fishing in the ocean waters of California creates a risk to Californias marine biodiversity. If a threat from fishing were to arise, tools are already in place to address it.

AB 3030 ignores the presence of these existing, comprehensive biodiversity protections. Supporters claim that only 16% of ocean waters are protected because they focus solely on areas designated by the California Fish and Game Commission. These no take areas are the most extreme form of protection, but not the only form of biodiversity protection recognized by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

Twenty years ago, there were a host of overfished marine species in California and little attention was paid to protecting habitat. That is no longer the case. Vast areas of the ocean have been and remain closed to fishing in order to minimize impacts and allow stocks to recover. As stocks rebuilt to healthy levels, fishing access was carefully and slowly restored.

Much of the ocean bottom is protected as Essential Fish Habitat. All fishing activities must comply with the Endangered Species Act to protect listed species. Numerous National Marine Sanctuaries have been established along our coast. The tight management of fishing activities in the Golden State are now a model of biodiversity protection for the world.

Californias fishers rely on a healthy and abundant ecosystem. That is why fishers have consistently supported strong laws to protect living natural resources and preserve their abundance for generations to come. Gratuitously decreasing fishing access in Californias waters will do nothing to cure environmental malpractice happening elsewhere around the globe. Therefore, AB 3030 in its current form must be fixed or defeated.

As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on the generosity of Californians like you to cover the issues that matter. If you value our reporting, support our journalism with a donation.

More here:

AB 3030 fails to recognize marine protections that exists in California - CALmatters

COVID-19 Impacts: Global Automotive Intelligent Door System Market will Accelerate at a CAGR of almost 12% through 2020-2024|Growing Demand for…

LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Technavio has been monitoring the global automotive intelligent door system market size and it is poised to grow by 1,869.20 thousand units during 2020-2024, progressing at a CAGR of almost 12% during the forecast period. The report offers an up-to-date analysis regarding the current market scenario, latest trends and drivers, and the overall market environment.

Technavio suggests three forecast scenarios (optimistic, probable, and pessimistic) considering the impact of COVID-19. Please Request Latest Free Sample Report on COVID-19 Impact

The market is fragmented, and the degree of fragmentation will accelerate during the forecast period. Aisin Seiki Co. Ltd., Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. KG, Continental AG, Huf Hlsbeck & Frst GmbH & Co. KG, Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd., Kiekert AG, Magna International Inc., Mitsui Kinzoku ACT Corp., Schaltbau Holding AG, and WITTE Automotive GmbH are some of the major market participants. To make the most of the opportunities, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.

The growing demand for differentiated in-car experiences has been instrumental in driving the growth of the market. However, the imposition of higher tax on luxury vehicles might hamper market growth.

Automotive Intelligent Door System Market 2020-2024 : Segmentation

Automotive intelligent door system market is segmented as below:

To learn more about the global trends impacting the future of market research, download a free sample: https://www.technavio.com/talk-to-us?report=IRTNTR44507

Automotive Intelligent Door System Market 2020-2024 : Scope

Technavio presents a detailed picture of the market by the way of study, synthesis, and summation of data from multiple sources. Our automotive intelligent door system market report covers the following areas:

This study identifies as the development of smart doors one of the prime reasons driving the automotive intelligent door system market growth during the next few years.

Automotive Intelligent Door System Market 2020-2024 : Vendor Analysis

We provide a detailed analysis of around 25 vendors operating in the automotive intelligent door system market , including some of the vendors such as Aisin Seiki Co. Ltd., Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. KG, Continental AG, Huf Hlsbeck & Frst GmbH & Co. KG, Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd., Kiekert AG, Magna International Inc., Mitsui Kinzoku ACT Corp., Schaltbau Holding AG, and WITTE Automotive GmbH. Backed with competitive intelligence and benchmarking, our research reports on the automotive intelligent door system market are designed to provide entry support, customer profile and M&As as well as go-to-market strategy support.

Register for a free trial today and gain instant access to 17,000+ market research reports.

Technavio's SUBSCRIPTION platform

Automotive Intelligent Door System Market 2020-2024 : Key Highlights

Table Of Contents :

Executive Summary

Market Landscape

Market Sizing

Five Forces Analysis

Market Segmentation by Technology

Customer Landscape

Geographic Landscape

Market Drivers

Market Challenges

Market Trends

Vendor Landscape

Vendor Analysis

Appendix

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focuses on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavios report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavios comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Visit link:

COVID-19 Impacts: Global Automotive Intelligent Door System Market will Accelerate at a CAGR of almost 12% through 2020-2024|Growing Demand for...

VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry Market Professional Survey 2020 by Manufacturers, Share, Growth, Trends, Types and Applications, Forecast to…

Latest published market study on Global VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry Market with + data Tables, Pie Chart, high level qualitative chapters & Graphs is available now to provide complete assessment of the VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry Market highlighting evolving trends, Measures taken up by players, current-to-future scenario analysis and growth factors validated with Viewpoints extracted via Industry experts and Consultants. The study breaksVoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry market by revenue and volume (wherever applicable) and price history to estimates size and trend analysis and identifying gaps and opportunities.

The report on VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry market covers the key trends of the industry which impact its growth with reference to the competitive arena and key regions. The study highlights the challenges this industry vertical will face along with the growth opportunities which would support the business development in existing & untapped markets. Besides this, the report also includes few case studies including those which take into account the corona virus pandemic, with an intention to offer a clear picture of this business sphere to all stakeholders.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/29422

Important pointers of COVID-19 effect analysis:

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/29422

Assessment of regional terrain:

Top rated pointers from the VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry market report:

Important facts about this Report

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-for-customization/29422

Read the rest here:

VoLTE (Voice over LTE) Ecosystem Industry Market Professional Survey 2020 by Manufacturers, Share, Growth, Trends, Types and Applications, Forecast to...

Podcast: CLUECON SPECIAL FEATURE OrecX not only delivers top shelf stereo recording, but delivers a huge ecosystem of add on technology that may…

Bruce Kaskey COO at OrecX delves into the world of voice and screen recording with Don Witt of The Channel Daily News, a TR publication. Bruce discusses why one should select OrecX for Voice and Screen Recording.

OrecX is a strong supporter of the channel as well as their analytics partners.

Bruce and OrecX have also been attending the ClueCON Conference from the beginning.

The founders of OrecX areopen sourcerecording pioneers, launching the Oreka GPL in 2005 (used today by millions in over 190 countries).

OrecXs mission is simple: Organize the worlds spoken word with a modern and open audio capture platform that meets the widest variety of use cases and promotes interaction with third partysolutionssuch as speech analytics and customer experience management solutions.

OrecXscustomersand partners benefit from the Strategic, Technical, Economic and Collaborative benefits of the OrecX audio capture platform. Users can perform long term strategic planning with confidence, extend the platforms value without any arbitrary restrictions on system data, and build a rich complimentary ecosystem of speech analytics, AI, customer experience platform and transcription partners.

For more information, go to: https://www.orecx.com/

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 10:18 9.4MB)

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android |

Read the original post:

Podcast: CLUECON SPECIAL FEATURE OrecX not only delivers top shelf stereo recording, but delivers a huge ecosystem of add on technology that may...

Singapore Launches SGGA To Create A Sustainable And Inclusive Ecosystem for Gaming and Esports. – IGN Southeast Asia

Earlier today the Singapore Games Association (SGGA) was launched with support from Enterprise Singapore (ESG), Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), and the Singapore Tourism Board (STB). The association aims to develop and sustain a gaming and esports system locally.

With hopes of putting Singapore on the world map when it comes to gaming and esports, the SGGAs foundation is to build a local gaming and esports industry. It is estimated that the video games segment in Singapore will reach US$130m in 2020 and US$138m by 2024, according to research by Statista.

Initial efforts of the SGGA were previously headed by the former Singapore Games Guild (SGG), which focused more on supporting Singapore based game devs. Now, with more support and collaborations with different entities, we can see the SGGA support not only gaming but also esports as well.

Among the initiatives that have been proposed by the SGGA include Singapore Esports. It aims to provide a holistic development for the esports scene besides positioning Singapore as the number one sport for international esports tournaments and events.

An upcoming event under SGGA that is coming this month is Gamescom Asia. Despite the pandemic, we can expect the event to still kick-off online. SGGA is gearing up to collaborate with the organizers of the event to showcase made-in-Singapore games.

For those who are interested in joining the SGGA to boost Singapores gaming and esports industry, SGGA will be launching its paid membership program in Q3 2020. Among benefits for those who participate include special rates and access to SGGA initiatives, including local and

overseas event participation, focus groups, networking opportunities, resources, training courses, and benefits through SGGAs partner network. This program is open to all companies registered in Singapore as well as Singapore-based individuals and freelancers.

Currently, the SGGA is also looking for people who are interested in contributing to the gaming and esports industry of Singapore as well as volunteers of different merits. You can find out more about the SGGA on their official website.

Read the original post:

Singapore Launches SGGA To Create A Sustainable And Inclusive Ecosystem for Gaming and Esports. - IGN Southeast Asia

‘Mono’ virus turns on cancer-related genes. Here’s how. – Live Science

A type of herpes virus, one that causes mono, can in rare cases raise the risk of developing certain types of cancer. And now researchers know how: The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can directly latch onto bundles of genetic material in infected cells, and switch "on" nearby genes that turn healthy cells cancerous, according to a new study in human cells.

Not all people who become infected with EBV go on to develop cancer; but in rare instances, the virus can raise people's risk of developing nasopharyngeal cancer, Burkitt's lymphoma and certain stomach cancers, according to the American Cancer Society. While more than 90% of people catch the virus worldwide, only about 1.5% of cancer cases are linked to the infection, according to a 2019 report in the journal Annual Review of Pathology. Other viruses that drive cancer growth, such as hepatitis B and human papillomavirus (HPV), do so by worming their way into the genomes of their infected host but EBV takes a different approach, researchers just found.

Rather than intertwining with host DNA, EBV DNA binds to the surface of the host DNA in a way that makes the molecule change shape, and that turns on cancer-related genes nearby, study author Patrick Tan, executive director of the Genome Institute of Singapore and a professor at the Duke-NUS Medical School, told Live Science in an email. The research, published July 27 in the journal Nature Genetics, pinpoints where on the host genome the viral DNA grabs hold.

Related: 7 odd things that raise your risk of cancer (and 1 that doesn't)

Understanding this process could allow scientists to develop drugs and gene therapies to undo the virus's harmful modifications, Rona Scott, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email.

In addition, "identifying footprints [or telltale marks] of EBV infection in cancer may help us determine if EBV, which infects over 95% of adults worldwide, contributes to other cancers not yet associated with this virus," she said.

While some of the details remain fuzzy, "the link between EBV and certain types of cancer has been known for many years," Tan said. For example, the virus has been linked to about 8% to 10% of stomach cancers, which collectively stand as the third leading cause of cancer death globally, according to a statement from Duke-NUS Medical School.

Past research explained one way EBV fuels cancer: The virus triggers chemical reactions that stick molecular tags known as methyl groups onto genes, switching them "on" or "off," according to a 2007 report in the journal Cancer Science. One theory was that these so-called epigenetic modifications, meaning modifications "on top of" the genome, disabled genes that would normally suppress tumor growth.

But Tan wondered whether EBV was also changing the 3D structure of the host genome in ways that up the risk of cancer.

Cells package DNA in organized bundles called "chromatin," with some genes tucked inside the bundle, unreachable by cellular machinery that translates those genes into protein. Chromatin's structure therefore determines which genes can be turned on or off, and at what time. While this is a helpful control mechanism in healthy cells, certain changes to the chromatin's structure can spur cancer development, according to a 2016 report in the journal Science Tan and his colleagues thought EBV might warp host chromatin in this way.

To find out, the team examined healthy stomach cells and cancerous stomach cells grown in culture, as well as cells sampled from patients with EBV-related stomach cancers, to compare the structure of their genetic material.

Related: The 12 deadliest viruses on Earth

They found that EBV DNA, also packaged into chromatin bundles, bound directly to specific spots within the chromatin of infected stomach cells. Namely, the viral DNA latched onto regions of the host genome known as genetic enhancers, which help to activate specific genes. Although switched off in the healthy cells sampled, these enhancers turned on in response to EBV infection and boosted the activation of cancer-related genes, specifically ones that stimulate cell growth and proliferation, the authors found. When dysregulated, these genes can spur tumor growth.

"We were definitely very surprised by the results," as we did not expect the viral genome to directly participate in rewiring the host cell, and controlling which proteins it builds, Tan said.

Even when the authors removed EBV from infected cells, the structural changes the virus made to host DNA stayed put. The finding supports prior evidence that EBV may contribute to cancer in a "hit-and-run" manner, meaning that even if you eliminate the virus itself, the cell's DNA remains altered and continues to drive tumor growth, Scott said.

But that theory must be confirmed in future studies, Tan added. The team also aims to study if genes that are modified by this process can serve as new drug targets to treat EBV-related cancers, he said.

Perhaps other factors, such as the innate defenses the cells use against viruses, determine which genes EBV can manipulate and in which people, though that must also be confirmed, Scott added.

In many EBV infections, the virus carries out its life cycle tucked away in immune cells called B cells and epithelial cells, which line surfaces of the body, "without much consequence" to the infected person's health, Scott noted. However, in the instances when the virus does contribute to cancer, undermining its ability to reshape the host DNA may be a critical route of treatment, she said.

Originally published on Live Science.

Go here to see the original:

'Mono' virus turns on cancer-related genes. Here's how. - Live Science

Human Challenge Trial Neither Essential Nor Ethically Justified at This Time, Says US Expert Anthony Fauci – Yahoo India News

Human challenge trials (HCT) to test Covid-19 vaccines are not necessary at this time as randomised controlled trials are quite feasible owing to the high incidence of the infectious disease, said Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in the US.

HCTs involve intentionally injecting a human trial participant with an infectious disease organism. Faucis comments come in the backdrop of the Oxford Universitys plans to consider using HCT to speed up the vaccine trials.

The recently published results of their Phase I trial showed that the vaccine did not lead to major adverse reactions and also produced neutralising antibodies in some measure.

Fauci said that an expert consultation was carried out on this issue in the US and it was concluded that such studies were not necessary at this time. The full impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet fully understood and we dont have highly effective therapies that are available to cure individuals who are infected in the challenge studies. These factors have led us to conclude that human challenge trials are not essential nor are they ethically justified at the present time, Fauci said.

The veteran infectious disease expert who is leading the fight against Covid-19 pandemic in the United States spoke on the issue at a special online symposium organised by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) on Science and Ethics of vaccine.

Fauci said that the continuing high incidence of the infectious disease, though concerning from a public health standpoint, has made randomised control trials feasible.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has said that this organism may be close wild-type and pathogenic, adapted and/or attenuated from wild-type with less or no pathogenicity, or genetically modified on some manner.

Phase-III clinical trials of the Oxford vaccine candidate had begun late May, and besides testing it on 10,000 people in the United Kingdom, the Universitys team has also tied up with organisations in Brazil and South Africa for Phase-IIII trials.

Dr Adrial Hill, director of the Jenner Institute and professor of human genetics at the University of Oxford made a case for using HCTs in a complementary role and raised a question on the reluctance to use it at ICMRs symposium.

They (HCTs) are not sufficient unto themselves; they need the safety data before you can license it. Given that there are 19 infectious diseases where people in modern era in recent years have been infecting others safely, and the track of all those diseases we see, there have been no issues. Then why are we so reluctant to do this in Covid-19? Hill said.

The most controversial is if we can treat these people, is there a pre-emptive therapy. Now you have Remdemsivir; you have Interferon-Beta, convalescent plasma. I would recommend people consider both approaches in parallel. The second one is massively quicker and less expensive than the first and will add information to your vaccine, Hill added.

Historically, HCTs have been used for small pox, cholera, influenza and typhoid. However, critics have argued that unlike Covid-19, many of these diseases had an alternative therapy available to save people from dying.

Earlier in his brief talk, Fauci said that NIAID, National Institute of Health, ICMR and Department of Biotechnology have partnered for more than 30 years on the Indo-US vaccine action plan (VAP).

Three weeks ago the VAP convened an expert advisory committee to review Covid-19 vaccine research and development in India. Eleven vaccines were reviewed by a panel of experts who provided recommendations for how these candidates might be further developed and assessed. We look forward to continue this involvement and supporting these vaccines R&D efforts, Fauci said.

Hill, too, highlighted that India is among nine countries where the Oxford University has engaged with vaccine manufacturers. The University has tied up with Pune-based Serum Institute of India to produce millions of doses of its prospective vaccine. However, the Indian government clarified on Thursday that it has not entered into agreements with any vaccine manufacturers yet.

More here:

Human Challenge Trial Neither Essential Nor Ethically Justified at This Time, Says US Expert Anthony Fauci - Yahoo India News

WAI Architecture Think Tank launches critical education platform modeled on Caribbean loudreading – The Architect’s Newspaper

As architects and educators, we have seen how the pandemic put many things on hold. Graduating students who planned to jumpstart their careers saw their employment opportunities vanish. Younger students were similarly deprived of summer internships. All were left processing a strange spring semester, the second half of which was necessarily conducted online. The experience forced many questions to the surface: What is the value of an architecture education? Is the classroom or studio the most conducive space for learning? If not, what is?

We do not pretend to know all these answers. What we do know, however, is that we live in a world perpetually in crisis. The pandemic is not unique in this sense, even if its proscriptions are. The public health mandate to socially distance ourselves from others mirrors the alienation endemic to capitalist society, which separates workers from the products of their labor and draws up a barrier between thinking intellect and toiling bodies. In the case of architecture, the field has become detached from the wider world, giving practitioners a false sense of autonomy.

But few, if any, can completely insulate themselves from the effects of crises. We must, then, respond by equipping ourselves with the knowledge and tools to build alternatives to the present order of things. (We might unmake architecture in the process.) To this end, we recently launched the Loudreaders Trade School as a new, free, and accessible platform for education. The name alludes to the practice of 19th- and 20th-century Cuban (and eventually Puerto Rican) tobacco workers who, bored with rolling cigars all day, hired the literate among their ranks to read to them on the job. As the practice of loud-reading grew, the lectores (loudreaders) became traveling performers with larger and larger audiences. They succeeded in creating networks of solidarity all around the Caribbean, as well as a massive shared and open-access oral library to workers who were denied any other form of formal education.

A growing, accessible library is central to our Loudreaders program. The texts it holds were compiled from contributing international authors, designers, artists, and thinkers who gather online to loud-read critical discourses to audiences. The books, essays, and articles shared by the loudreaders range from histories of race and the exploitation of oppressed groups to strategies of solidarity and other models of anti-capitalist resistance in architecture, urbanism, and culture. Together, they form a critical infrastructure for understanding the world today.

Here, we highlight 12 of these texts that we believe can help readers foster an emancipatory imagination. Well need it for the turbulent times ahead.

Critique of Black Reason (2013)by Achille Mbembe

By delving into the work of Frantz Fanon and other critical thinkers, Mbembe renders the intersection where capitalism, exploitation, and race meet. Not much escapes Mbembes grasp, as he traces the creation of the concept of Blackness and the transatlantic slave trade to our current neoliberal moment, one characterized by the climatological crisis, the postimperial military complex, contemporary technologies of mass communication, and the commodification of death.

Necropolitics(2011)by Achille Mbembe and Gore Capitalism (2018)by Sayak Valencia

Capitalisms architecture is anchored in the foundations of death. Achille Mbembe and Sayak Valencia expose the relations between hyperviolence and law, militarization and the commodification of death, geopolitical borders, and the postcolonies, norm and exception, the state of war and states of security and freedom.

Caliban and The Witch (1998) by Silvia Federici and Learning From the Virus(2020) by Paul B. Preciado

For Silvia Federici and Paul B. Preciado, the body is the center around which capitalism, class, exploitation, and politics turn. Federici rethinks the origins and development of capitalism and a long history of models of resistance from a feminist viewpoint, while Preciado proposes to look at links between community and immunity, health and class, and subjecthood and sovereignty.

Potential History: Unlearning Imperialism (2019) by Ariella Azoulay and The Tertiary (2018)by Raquel Salas Rivera

By creating a potential history, Azoulay questions the imperialist construction of time, space, and politics through objects and experiences of struggles around the world, from the original peoples in the Americas, to the Congo under King Leopold II. Salas Rivera reexamines theories of value in Marxist economics and suggests that just as labor is usually the third thing that gives value, there are also other tertiaries between colonialism and Puerto Rico, queer and transness, the binary of colony and empire.

El Lector: A History of the Cigar Factory Reader (2010) by Araceli Tinajero and Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution (1902) by Pytor Kropotkin

In El Lector, Araceli Tinajero describes the evolution of the loudreaders and role of iconic figures like the Puerto Rican feminist and anarcho-syndicalist Luisa Capetillo in the Tobacco Factories across the Caribbean and U.S. as they were able to establish networks of subversive solidarity that promoted emancipatory practices. Among the texts read by Capetillo and others in the tobacco factories, Kropotkins Mutual Aid served as a model for solidarity, collective organization, and emancipatory empowerment.

In Praise of Laziness (1993) by Mladen Stilinovi and Laziness as the Real Truth of Mankind (1921) by Kazimir Malevich

Against the commodification of human life, Mladen Stilinovi and Kazimir Malevich plead for idleness as the ultimate goal of worldly existence. As Stilinovi recalls, Malevich criticized capitalism, because it enabled only a small number of capitalists to be lazy, but also state socialism, which lionized work and disparaged laziness. The lockdown of the past few months rendered architectural labor as non-essential, while making laziness all the more appealing, even necessary, something Stilinovi repeatedly notes in his work: There is no art without laziness. Work is a Disease. Work is a shame.

In Defense of the Poor Image (2009) by Hito Steyerl

In one of the most compelling manifestos about the post-internet era (the art and cultural phenomenon of the mid 2000s), Hito Steyerl reveals the value, intelligence, and subversive power of low-res images. Challenging the capitalist framework that focuses on authorship and high resolution, In Defense of the Poor Image is an ode to low-quality, mass-recycled, authorless pictures. In the kingdom of the internet, the poor image reigns supreme.

Cruz Garcia & Nathalie Frankowski are the founders of WAI Architecture Think Tank. The pair launched the Loudreaders Trade School in June 2020.

See more here:

WAI Architecture Think Tank launches critical education platform modeled on Caribbean loudreading - The Architect's Newspaper

Litecoin, Stellar’s Lumen, and Tron’s TRX – Daily Analysis August 4th, 2020 – FX Empire

For the day ahead

Stellars Lumen would need to avoid a fall through the $0.10545 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.10891.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Stellars Lumen to break back through to $0.1080 levels.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely limit any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.10545 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.10176 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, however, Stellars Lumen should steer of sub-$0.10 levels and the second major support level at $0.09830.

First Major Support Level: $0.10176

First Major Resistance Level: $0.10891

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.09960

38% FIB Retracement Level: $0.14336518

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.2050

Trons TRX rallied by 4.72% on Monday. Partially reversing a 7.24% slide from Sunday, Trons TRX ended the day at $0.019895.

Tracking the broader market, Trons TRX dipped to an early morning intraday low $0.018847 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.01746, Trons TRX rallied to a late afternoon intraday high $0.020083.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $0.02090, Trons TRX fell back to sub-$0.020 levels before finding support.

Late in the day, Trons TRX recovered to $0.01989 levels to deliver the upside on the day.

At the time of writing, Trons TRX was up by 1.53% to $0.02020. A bullish start to the day saw Trons TRX rise from an early morning low $0.019914 to a high $0.02020.

Trons TRX left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

More:

Litecoin, Stellar's Lumen, and Tron's TRX - Daily Analysis August 4th, 2020 - FX Empire

Litecoin (LTC) Down $0.53 in Last 4 Hours, Started Today Up 3.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days – CFDTrading

Litecoin 4 Hour Price Update

Updated August 04, 2020 07:18 PM GMT (03:18 PM EST)

57.3 (USD) was the opening price of the four-hour candle for Litecoin, resulting in the last 4 hour candle being one in which price moved down 0.92% ($0.53) from the last 4 hour candle. Out of the 5 instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Litecoin ended up ranking 3rd for the four-hour candle in terms of price change relative to the last 4 hour candle.

Litecoin entered today at $58.53, up 3.14% ($1.78) from the day prior. This move happened on lower volume, as yesterdays volume was down 50.43% from the day before and down 55.31% from the same day the week before. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Litecoin ranked 4th since the day prior in terms of percentage price change. Here is a daily price chart of Litecoin.

The clearest trend exists on the 14 day timeframe, which shows price moving up over that time. For additional context, note that price has gone up 9 out of the past 14 days.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Litecoin for the past day were:

Just under $2.6 bln of #Litecoin was sent from #LTC addresses in the past week (27 Jul 2 Aug).Thats the equivalent of buying 619,991,295 fart cushions at $4.17 each on Amazon.

Litecoin has a market cap of $3.8bn.What does Litecoin do again? RUNE has a market cap of $83m. Its about to battle-test bleeding edge blockchain tech which could draw huge rivers of liquidity and correlated value accrual.Arbitrary examples are my forte, thanks for asking.

@panini_pamela @LTCtruth People Who Do Things Right On The Switch Over Will Not Need A Job Ever Again!Biggest Transfer Of Wealth On The Way! The Biggest Thing About Corona Is To Get People To Wake Up And Realize No Ceiling Level For What You Can Earn In The New World Coming! I Smell Opportunities!

Continued here:

Litecoin (LTC) Down $0.53 in Last 4 Hours, Started Today Up 3.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days - CFDTrading

Litecoin (LTC) Down $0.21 Over Past 4 Hours, Started Today Up 3.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days – CFDTrading

Litecoin 4 Hour Price Update

Updated August 04, 2020 07:20 AM GMT (03:20 AM EST)

Litecoin closed the last 4 hour candle down 0.36% ($0.21); this denotes the 3rd candle in a row a decline has happened. Relative to other instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Litecoin ranked 4th since the last 4 hour candle in terms of percentage price change.

58.53 (USD) was the opening price of the day for Litecoin, resulting in the previous day being one in which price moved up 3.14% ($1.78) from the previous day. This move happened on lower volume, as yesterdays volume was down 50.43% from the day before and down 55.31% from the same day the week before. Out of the 5 instruments in the Top Cryptos asset class, Litecoin ended up ranking 4th for the day in terms of price change relative to the previous day. The daily price chart of Litecoin below illustrates.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 14 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. For additional context, note that price has gone up 9 out of the past 14 days.

Over on Twitter, here were the top tweets about Litecoin:

Just under $2.6 bln of #Litecoin was sent from #LTC addresses in the past week (27 Jul 2 Aug).Thats the equivalent of buying 619,991,295 fart cushions at $4.17 each on Amazon.

@panini_pamela @LTCtruth People Who Do Things Right On The Switch Over Will Not Need A Job Ever Again!Biggest Transfer Of Wealth On The Way! The Biggest Thing About Corona Is To Get People To Wake Up And Realize No Ceiling Level For What You Can Earn In The New World Coming! I Smell Opportunities!

Litecoin has a market cap of $3.8bn.What does Litecoin do again? RUNE has a market cap of $83m. Its about to battle-test bleeding edge blockchain tech which could draw huge rivers of liquidity and correlated value accrual.Arbitrary examples are my forte, thanks for asking.

Follow this link:

Litecoin (LTC) Down $0.21 Over Past 4 Hours, Started Today Up 3.14%; in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days - CFDTrading

Litecoin, Stellar’s Lumen, and Tron’s TRX – Daily Analysis July 30th, 2020 – FX Empire

XLM/USD 30/07/20 Daily ChartFor the day ahead

Stellars Lumen would need to move through the $0.09655 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.09824.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Stellars Lumen to break back through to $0.098 levels.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely limit any upside.

Failure to move through the $0.09655 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.09351 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, however, Stellars Lumen should steer well clear of the second major support level at $0.09182.

First Major Support Level: $0.09351

First Major Resistance Level: $0.09824

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.09960

38% FIB Retracement Level: $0.14336518

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.2050

Trons TRX slipped by 0.12% on Wednesday. Following a 2.26% gain on Tuesday, Trons TRX ended the day at $0.019224.

A bearish start saw Trons TRX fall to an early morning intraday low $0.018989 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.01844, Trons TRX rallied to an early morning intraday high $0.019990.

Trons TRX broke through the first major resistance level at $0.01971 before falling back to $0.01910 levels.

Finding late support, however, Trons TRX revisited $0.0195 levels before sliding to $0.0192 levels and into the red.

At the time of writing, Trons TRX was down by 0.50% to $0.019128. A bearish start to the day saw Trons TRX fall to an early morning low $0.018829 before rising to a high $0.019169.

Trons TRX left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

The rest is here:

Litecoin, Stellar's Lumen, and Tron's TRX - Daily Analysis July 30th, 2020 - FX Empire

You Can Now Trade Litecoin on the Ethereum Blockchain With Kyber By Cointelegraph – Up News Info

You Can Now Trade Litecoin on the Ethereum Blockchain With Kyber

The Kyber Network, a decentralized, on-chain cryptocurrency exchange, has just listed the Ethereum-compatible pLTC token a new cross-chain token developed by pTokens project.

Announcing the news to Cointelegraph on Aug. 3, Kyber Network said that pLTC tokens will be accessible through KyberSwap and other decentralized apps, or DApps. They will also be available on platforms powered by Kybers on-chain liquidity protocol.

Continue Reading on Coin Telegraph

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Excerpt from:

You Can Now Trade Litecoin on the Ethereum Blockchain With Kyber By Cointelegraph - Up News Info

Insights into the Litecoin Exchange Industry to 2026 Impact of COVID-19 on the Market – Owned

The comprehensive report published, offers an in-depth intelligence related to the various factors that are likely to impact the demand, revenue generation, and sales of the Litecoin Exchange Market. In addition, the report singles out the different parameters that are expected to influence the overall dynamics of the Litecoin Exchange Market during the forecast period (2020-2026). A detail of COVID19 Impact analysis which is included in the report.

As per the findings of the presented study, the Litecoin Exchange Market is poised to surpass the value of ~US$ XX by the end of 2026 growing at a CAGR of ~XX% over the assessment period. The report includes a thorough analysis of the upstream raw materials, supply-demand ratio of the Litecoin Exchange in different regions, import-export trends and more to provide readers a fair understanding of the global market scenario.

Get Free PDF for More Professional and Technical Insights Including COVID19 Impact [emailprotected] https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2736835

This report covers leading companies associated in Litecoin Exchange market:

Scope of Litecoin Exchange Market:The global Litecoin Exchange market is valued at million US$ in 2017 and will reach million US$ by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of during 2018-2025.

Make An Enquiry for Discount Before Buying The Report: https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=D&repid2736835

Litecoin Exchange Market: Regional analysis includes:

This Market Report includesdrivers and restraints of the global Litecoin Exchange market and their impact on each region during the forecast period. The report also comprises the study of current issues with consumers and opportunities. It also includes value chain analysis.

On the basis on the end users/applications,this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, Litecoin Exchange market share and growth rate of Litecoin Exchange foreach application, including-

On the basis of product,this report displays the sales volume, revenue (Million USD), product price, Litecoin Exchange market share and growth rate ofeach type, primarily split into-

Litecoin Exchange Market: Regional analysis includes:

Contact For Any Query or to Get Customized Report: https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2736835

Litecoin Exchange Market Report Structure at a Glance:

For More Information Kindly Contact: ResearchMozMr. Rohit Bhisey,90 State Street,Albany NY,United States 12207Tel: +1-518-621-2074USA-Canada Toll Free: 866-997-4948Email: [emailprotected]Follow us on LinkedIn @ http://bit.ly/1TBmnVGMedia Release: https://www.researchmoz.us/pressreleaseFollow me on : http://marketresearchlatestreports.blogspot.com/

See the original post here:

Insights into the Litecoin Exchange Industry to 2026 Impact of COVID-19 on the Market - Owned

Online Banking Industry Global Forecast by Products, Applications, Distribution Channels, Form, Regions, Company Analysis – Market Research Posts

The global Online Banking Market, which is extensively assessed in the report contemplates the best need development angles and how they could affect the market over the figure residency under thought. The experts have taken careful endeavors to thoroughly evaluating every development factor of the market, other than indicating how certain market restrictions could represent a danger to players in the coming years. In addition, the report additionally gives data on top patterns and openings and how players could take advantage of them to take up the difficulties in the Online Banking Market. This could be a helpful rule for players to concrete their situation in the business or make a rebound in the market.

The Leading Market Players Covered in this Report are : ACI,Microsoft,Fiserv,Tata Consultancy Services,Cor Financial Solutions,Oracle,Temenos,Rockall Technologies,EdgeVerve Systems,Capital Banking,CGI .

Get Free Sample PDF Of Online Banking Market @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=S&repid2734757

Impact of Covid-19 in Online Banking Market:The utility-owned segment is mainly being driven by increasing financial incentives and regulatory supports from the governments globally. The current utility-owned Online Banking are affected primarily by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the projects in China, the US, Germany, and South Korea are delayed, and the companies are facing short-term operational issues due to supply chain constraints and lack of site access due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Asia-Pacific is anticipated to get highly affected by the spread of the COVID-19 due to the effect of the pandemic in China, Japan, and India. China is the epic center of this lethal disease. China is a major country in terms of the chemical industry.

Key Businesses Segmentation of Online Banking MarketOn the basis on the end users/applications,this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, Online Banking market share and growth rate of Online Banking foreach application, including-

On the basis of product,this report displays the sales volume, revenue (Million USD), product price, Online Banking market share and growth rate ofeach type, primarily split into-

Online Banking Market Regional Analysis Includes: Asia-Pacific(Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia) Europe(Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) North America(the United States, Mexico, and Canada.) South America(Brazil etc.) The Middle East and Africa(GCC Countries and Egypt.)

Key Highlights of the Table of Contents:Online Banking Market Study Coverage:It includes key market segments, key manufacturers covered, the scope of products offered in the years considered, global Online Banking market and study objectives. Additionally, it touches the segmentation study provided in the report on the basis of the type of product and applications.Online Banking Market Executive summary:This section emphasizes the key studies, market growth rate, competitive landscape, market drivers, trends, and issues in addition to the macroscopic indicators.Online Banking Market Production by Region:The report delivers data related to import and export, revenue, production, and key players of all regional markets studied are covered in this section.Online Banking Market Profile of Manufacturers:Analysis of each market player profiled is detailed in this section. This segment also provides SWOT analysis, products, production, value, capacity, and other vital factors of the individual player.

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected]https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=E&repid2734757

Key Questions Answered: To gain insightful analyses of the Online Banking market and have a comprehensive understanding of the global market and its commercial landscape. Assess the production processes, major issues, and solutions to mitigate the development risk. To understand the most affecting driving and restraining forces in the market and its impact on the global Online Banking market. Learn about the Online Banking market strategies that are being adopted by leading respective organizations. To understand the future outlook and prospects for the market. Besides the standard structure reports, we also provide custom research according to specific requirements.

For More Information Kindly Contact: ResearchMozMr. Rohit Bhisey,90 State Street,Albany NY,United States 12207Tel: +1-518-621-2074USA-Canada Toll Free: 866-997-4948Email: [emailprotected]Media Release @ https://www.researchmoz.us/pressreleaseFollow me on Blogger: https://trendingrelease.blogspot.com/

Read the rest here:

Online Banking Industry Global Forecast by Products, Applications, Distribution Channels, Form, Regions, Company Analysis - Market Research Posts

Internet Banking Market 2020 New Techniques, Research Analysis, Treatment Types, Latest Trends, Regional Demand and Forecast Outlook 2025 – Market…

The Global Internet Banking Market offers a primary overview of the Internet Banking industry covering different product definitions, classifications, and participants in the industry chain structure. Global Internet Banking Market Report analyzes the production of goods, supply, sales and the current state of the market in detail. In addition, the report examines the market share of production and sales of products, as well as capacity, production capacity, sales trends, cost analysis and revenue generation. The Global Internet Banking market report is provided for the international markets as well as development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status.

Get sample copy of Internet Banking Market report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/27

This report covers present status and future prospects for Internet Banking Market forecast till 2025. The research report cover market Overview, Development and Segment by Type, Application and Region. Global Internet Banking Market by company, Type, Application and Geography. The report begins from overview of industrial chain structure and describes the upstream. Besides, the report analyses Internet Banking market trends, size and forecast in different geographies, type and end-use segment, in addition, the report introduces market competition overview among the major companies and companies profiles, besides, market price and channel features are covered in the report.

Top Leading Key Players are:

Microsoft Corporation (US), Fiserv, Inc. (US), ACI Worldwide (US), Tata Consultancy Services (India), Cor Financial Solutions Ltd. (UK), Capital Banking Solutions (US), Edge Verve Systems Limited (India), Rockall Technologies (Ireland, Temenos Group AG (Switzerland) and Oracle Corporation (US)

Browse the complete report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/internet-banking-market

In addition, report on global Internet Banking market presents strategic analysis and ideas for new entrants using historic data study. Thus report provides estimation about the market size, revenue, sales analysis and opportunities based on the past data for current and future market status. Report covers analysis of different enterprises as part of global Internet Banking market. There are some important tools for any market movement. Also report forecasts the market size of global Internet Banking market in Compound Annual Growth Rate in terms of revenue during the forecast period.

Global Internet Banking market is segmented based by type, application and region.

Based on Type, the market has been segmented into:

retail banking & investment banking

In addition, study report covers all the important geographical regions which have good market growth of global Internet Banking market. Government organizations and policy makers are taking initiatives to promote the global Internet Banking market thus it is boosting the growth of global Internet Banking market. Furthermore, report presents the end users on the basis of enterprise size for the global Internet Banking market. Report is beneficial for any user of any department as report provides strategic analysis for the expansion of the business cross the globe.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the size of the Internet Banking market are as follows:Historical Year: 2015-2019Base year: 2019Estimated year: 2020Forecast year 2020 to 2026

For information on data by region, company, type and 2019, is considered the base year. Whenever data were not available for the base year, the previous year was taken into account.

Key Developments in the Internet Banking Market. To describe Internet Banking Introduction, product type and application, market overview, market analysis by countries, market opportunities, market risk, market driving force;. To analyze the manufacturers of Animation Software, with profile, main business, news, sales, price, revenue and market share in 2016 and 2018;. To display the competitive situation among the top manufacturers in Global, with sales, revenue and market share in 2016 and 2018;. To show the market by type and application, with sales, price, revenue, market share and growth rate by type and application, from 2013 to 2019;. To analyze the key countries by manufacturers, Type and Application, covering North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle-East and South America, with sales, revenue and market share by manufacturers, types and applications;. Internet Banking market forecast, by countries, type and application, with sales, price, revenue and growth rate forecast, from 2018 to 2025;. To analyze the manufacturing cost, key raw materials and manufacturing process etc.. To analyze the industrial chain, sourcing strategy and downstream end users (buyers);. To describe Internet Banking sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers etc.. To describe Internet Banking Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source

For Any Query on the Internet Banking Market: https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/27

About Us :

Adroit Market Research is an India-based business analytics and consulting company. Our target audience is a wide range of corporations, manufacturing companies, product/technology development institutions and industry associations that require understanding of a markets size, key trends, participants and future outlook of an industry. We intend to become our clients knowledge partner and provide them with valuable market insights to help create opportunities that increase their revenues. We follow a code Explore, Learn and Transform. At our core, we are curious people who love to identify and understand industry patterns, create an insightful study around our findings and churn out money-making roadmaps.

Contact Us :

Ryan JohnsonAccount Manager Global3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas,TX 75204, U.S.APhone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199 / +91 9665341414

Read the original:

Internet Banking Market 2020 New Techniques, Research Analysis, Treatment Types, Latest Trends, Regional Demand and Forecast Outlook 2025 - Market...

Ron Rivera will stand for anthem, but fully supports First Amendment rights – NBC Sports – NFL

Getty Images

When the regular season begins (and hopefully it will), the head coach of The Washington Football Team will be standing for The National Anthem. But Ron Rivera will not question the decision of players to use the anthem as a platform for protest.

Well, the truth of the matter is again, lets go back to our Constitution, to our Bill of Rights, the amendment, Rivera recently told TheAthletic.com. Lets go back to the oath of office to serve and protect. Part of the Constitution is the First Amendment. Theres a lot of people out there that support the Second Amendment vehemently. Well, if you support the Second Amendment vehemently, why wouldnt you support the first one, which is freedom of expression, freedom of speech? And thats all that is. Thats an extension of one of our unalienable rights, one of our God-given rights, one of the things written into the Constitution. So, again, lets at least applaud that. Lets celebrate that as well.

Rivera said hell stand because his father served in the military, his brother was a first responder, and his wifes family has a history of military service.

My dad had brothers that served in World War II, Rivera added. So to me, standing at attention is what Im going to do. Thats how Im going to honor them. I might kneel during the coin toss because I do support Black Lives Matter. I do support the movement to help correct the policing. But at the same time, I think everybody has to celebrate what the Constitution of the United States entitles us to do as Americans. Thats the thing that everybodys got to understand. We got to get past all this other stuff and quit making this a political fight. Theres nothing political about the Constitution. Its clear cut the Supreme Court rules on it, follow it, and then were supposed to defend it.

As the pandemic continues to consume so much of footballs focus, issues regarding the anthem will become front and center if/when games are played. Given the uncertainty created by COVID-19, criticism and controversy over players not standing for the anthem should be regarded as the proverbial good problem to have, because it will mean that games are being played.

Read the rest here:

Ron Rivera will stand for anthem, but fully supports First Amendment rights - NBC Sports - NFL

Letters to the editor for Aug. 4, 2020 | Opinion | thefacts.com – Brazosport Facts

Journalists want to have it both ways

In your reprint of the Seattle Times editorial, it seems the journalist wants to be on both sides of the First Amendment. If they print the truth, the mob will turn on them, so they want to withhold anything that exposes the mob. It is reported more than 500 assaults on media journalist were reported while they were covering a peaceful demonstration of First Amendment rights. The police want unpublished material to identify illegal acts and perpetrators. The journalist think this is a violation of their First Amendment rights.

kAmx 5:D28C66 :7 E96J 2C6 ?@E C6A@CE:?8 @3D6CG65 @44FCC6?46D[ H9J 2C6 E96J E96C6n xE D66>D E@ >6 C6A@CE:?8 E96 ECFE9 D9@F=5 36 E96 8@2=] %96? =6E E96 A6@A=6 564:56 H92E E96J E9:?<]k^Am

kAm%96 >65:2 😀 3:2D65 2?5 C6A@CED H92E E96 =2E6DE A@=:E:42= 4@CC64E?6DD 5:4E2E6D] x 9@A6 E9:D 😀 E96 DE2CE @7 2 324<=2D9 282:?DE E96 >65:2] %96C6 😀 ?@ A=246 7@C 3:2D65 C6A@CE:?8 >2DBF6C25:?8 2D E96 ECFE9]k^Am

kAms@? (2CC6?[ p?8=6E@?k^Am

kAmr=2DD:4 >@G:6 42CC:6D 649@6D @7 4FCC6?E 6G6?EDk^Am

kAm(9:=6 H2E49:?8 E96 @=5 4=2DD:4 >@G:6 y6K636= DE2CC:?8 q6EEJ s2G:D D6E 😕 2?E636==F> }6H ~C=62?D 5FC:?8 E96 >:5`g__D[ H9:49 x 42?E 96=A E9:?<:?8 E@52JD A6@A=6 @7 E96 $@FE9 36=:6G6 H2D 2 E:>6 H96? p>6C:42 H2D 8C62E[ C6>:?565 >6 @7 E96 D:EF2E:@? H6 2C6 6IA6C:6?4:?8 ?@H]k^Am

kAmx? E96 >@G:6[ 2 5625=J @FE3C62< @7 J6==@H ;24< W76G6CX 92D DH6AE E96 4:EJ 2?5 :E :D 36:?8 7@F89E H:E9 42??@? 2?5 D>@<6 :?DE625 @7 D6?D:3=6 >62DFC6D =:<6 D4:6?E:7:4 AC@@7 @7 5C2:?:?8 DH2>AD 😀 5:D>:DD65] %96J C6D@CE E@ 5C2DE:4 >62DFC6D =:<6 E96 D:4< 2C6 E@ 36 BF2C2?E:?65 E@ 2 =6A6C 4@=@?J[ 2?5 A6@A=6 H9@ ECJ E@ 6D42A6 E96 4:EJ F?56C BF2C2?E:?6 2C6 D9@E] $66:?8 E96 H28@?=@25D @7 E96 5625 2?5 D:4< 36:?8 42CC:65 @77 E@ {2K2CFD xD=2?5 H2D E@F49:?8 2?5 >256 >6 E92?<7F= H6 5@?E 92G6 E@ 8@ E9C@F89 2 E:>6 =:<6 E92E]k^Am

kAm%:>6D 2C6 567:?:E6=J 5:776C6?E[ 3FE :E 92D 2 46CE2:? C9JE9> @7 9@H 9:DE@CJ 😕 2 DEC2?86 H2J C6A62ED :ED6=7] tG6? E96 E2=< :? E96 7:=> 3J E96 D@FE96C? 86?E=6>6? 23@FE 9@H E96 ?@CE96C? 23@=:E:@?:DED 282:?DE D=2G6CJ H6C6 ECJ:?8 E@ 492?86 E96:C H2J @7 =:76 H2D <66?=J D:>:=2C] xC@?:4[ E9@F89[ H2D D66:?8 E96 ?68C@ D=2G6D H9@ H6C6 42CCJ:?8 @77 E96 3@5:6D H62C:?8 7246 >2DA:2? :E D66>65]k^Am

kAm%92?<7F==J[ E96 DE@CJ 925 D@>6H92E @7 2 92AAJ 2?5 >@C2= 6?5:?8 @7 9F>2? 42C:?8 2?5 D24C:7:46 E92E 6?565 H:E9 7:C6] |2J36 E96C6D AC@A964J :?G@=G65[ 2?5 >2J36 H96? E9:D 4C:D:D H6 2C6 😕 😀 @G6C[ E96C6 H:== 36 D2=G2E:@? 2?5 2 ?6H 52J 7@C E96 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

kAms2G:5 z2H[ {2<6 y24

kAm~?6 7=28 😀 6?@F89k^Am

kAmx? C6DA@?D6 E@ |D] (C:89ED 42== 7@C s@H E@ 7=J 2 7=28 7@C E96 =:76DEJ=6D @7 E96 A6@A=6[ x C6DA64E7F==J DF3>:E E96J 2=C625J 5@ 2?5 :ED ~=5 v=@CJ] (:E9 ;FDE E9@D6 E9C66 4@=@CD[ `b DEC:A6D 2?5 d_ DE2CD[ :E C6AC6D6?ED 6G6CJE9:?8 2?5 6G6CJ@?6 8@@5 2?5 325 😕 E9:D 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

kAmuC2?<=J[ H6 5@?E ?665 2?@E96C 7=28 E@ C6AC6D6?E E9:D 4@F?ECJ @C E9:D A6@A=6]k^Am

kAmy@9? |:=?6C[ q2J r:EJk^Am

See original here:

Letters to the editor for Aug. 4, 2020 | Opinion | thefacts.com - Brazosport Facts