Nanotechnology-based antiviral therapeutics – DocWire News

This article was originally published here

Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2020 Aug 3. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00818-0. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The host immune system is highly compromised in case of viral infections and relapses are very common. The capacity of the virus to destroy the host cell by liberating its own DNA or RNA and replicating inside the host cell poses challenges in the development of antiviral therapeutics. In recent years, many new technologies have been explored for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of viral infections. Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies on account of its ability to deal with viral diseases in an effective manner, addressing the limitations of traditional antiviral medicines. It has not only helped us to overcome problems related to solubility and toxicity of drugs, but also imparted unique properties to drugs, which in turn has increased their potency and selectivity toward viral cells against the host cells. The initial part of the paper focuses on some important proteins of influenza, Ebola, HIV, herpes, Zika, dengue, and corona virus and those of the host cells important for their entry and replication into the host cells. This is followed by different types of nanomaterials which have served as delivery vehicles for the antiviral drugs. It includes various lipid-based, polymer-based, lipid-polymer hybrid-based, carbon-based, inorganic metal-based, surface-modified, and stimuli-sensitive nanomaterials and their application in antiviral therapeutics. The authors also highlight newer promising treatment approaches like nanotraps, nanorobots, nanobubbles, nanofibers, nanodiamonds, nanovaccines, and mathematical modeling for the future. The paper has been updated with the recent developments in nanotechnology-based approaches in view of the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19.Graphical abstract.

PMID:32748035 | DOI:10.1007/s13346-020-00818-0

See the rest here:

Nanotechnology-based antiviral therapeutics - DocWire News

The Iron Man Defeat Too EMBARRASSING For The Movies | Screen Rant – Screen Rant

Iron Mans armor is indestructible unless you have a special arsenal that can take it apart in the most embarrassing way possible.

When Tony Stark invented his Iron Man armor, he made sure to use only the most durable components. Despite his superhero name, Iron Mans suit isnt actually made of iron, but a much stronger form of titanium with some suits incorporating nanotechnology into the mix for a virtually indestructible suit. Nevertheless, there are certain things that can penetrate or even tear apart the Iron Man armor from powerful lasers, to Wolverines adamantium claws, to Magnetos mutant ability to manipulate metal.

Yet all of these weapons pale against one innovative device that an almost forgotten villain once used against the Armored Avenger to embarrassing effect.

Related: Marvels Weirdest Iron Man Was Technically A Squirrel?

In Marvel Adventures: The Avengers, the Avengers (this time with a lineup that included Spider-Man, Iron Man, Giant Girl, Storm, Captain America, and Wolverine) found themselves up against a New Masters of Evil team that broke into Stark Tower to steal some battle suits. Although Spider-Man and Iron Man manage to take on the teams muscle, the Man-Bull, they run into some problems when they find the Masters of Evil also includes a nearly forgotten villain the Melter.

An old Iron Man villain from the 1960s, the Melter had a particularly interesting ability. Although he had no innate superhuman powers, his gun could loosen the bonding forces between the molecules of any substance he fired upon, causing them to liquify or melt into useless slag. Since the Melters gun didnt use heat, the melting process wouldnt actually burn or injure anyone who touched the melted objects, but his gun was very useful for breaking into secure buildings, damaging vital equipment or melt Iron Mans gauntlets and disable his repulsor rays.

As the Melter warned he could adjust his guns settings to melt human flesh as well, he was stopped by the archer Hawkeye, who had broken into Stark Tower to see if he could join the Avengers. Leaving their teammate behind, the remaining Masters of Evil took off with the stolen battle suits. Unwilling to surrender, the Melter fired his gun one final time and ended up melting Iron Mans pants right off of his body, leaving Tony Stark standing in his boxers. Spider-Man broke into a laughing fit and Tony, annoyed at the embarrassing wardrobe malfunction, stalked off to the armor lab.

The Masters of Evil would go on to save the Melter from imprisonment and commit more crimes thanks to a bug they implanted on Captain Americas suit that gave them a way to track the Avengers movements. Once the Avengers discovered what they were doing, however, they disabled the bug and tracked the villains to their headquarters where Spider-Man quickly webbed up the Melter before he could liquify Iron Mans armor. Informing the team that Your only mistake was melting Iron Mans pants, Spider-Man and the rest of the Avengers made short work of the Masters of Evil.

Despite being used as a comedic villain, the Melter had a very effective power that could be quite devastating against armored heroes (as well as people in general if he was willing to use his gun for flesh-melting purposes). True, Tony Stark could probably design a suit of armor that immunized him against the Melters attack (likely with a nanotech design that constantly rearranged itself to compensate against the Melters gun) but any villain capable of taking out Iron Man so easily deserves to be given some notice. Especially after he melts Iron Mans pants.

Next: Iron Man Fan Art Showcases Armored Adult Morgan Stark

Star Wars: How Many Days Revenge Of The Sith Takes Place Over

Michael Jung is a mild-mannered freelance writer-for-hire, actor, and professional storyteller with a keen interest in pop culture, education, nonprofit organizations, and unusual side hustles. His work has been featured in Screen Rant, ASU Now, Sell Books Fast, Study.com, and Free Arts among others. A graduate of Arizona State University with a PhD in 20th Century American Literature, Michael has written novels, short stories, stage plays, screenplays, and how-to manuals.

Michaels background in storytelling draws him to find the most fascinating aspects of any topic and transform them into a narrative that informs and entertains the reader. Thanks to a life spent immersed in comic books and movies, Michael is always ready to infuse his articles with offbeat bits of trivia for an extra layer of fun. In his spare time, you can find him entertaining kids as Spider-Man or Darth Vader at birthday parties or scaring the heck out of them at haunted houses.

Visit Michael Jungs website for information on how to hire him, follow him on Twitter Michael50834213, or contact him directly: michael(at)michaeljungwriter(dot)com.

See the original post:

The Iron Man Defeat Too EMBARRASSING For The Movies | Screen Rant - Screen Rant

How Trump erased the election-year line between politics and policy – NBC News

WASHINGTON In the past few months, President Donald Trump has invited supporters wearing "Make America Great Again" campaign gear onstage with him during official presidential speeches. He has criticized Democratic rival Joe Biden in Rose Garden addresses. He has played campaign-style videos in the White House briefing room, and he has used his campaign playlist, typically reserved for rallies, at official presidential events.

Presidents running for re-election have traditionally worked to balance official government business with campaign activity. But government watchdogs and officials from past administrations warn that Trump has smashed that norm, showing an unusual willingness to use his presidential platform for political purposes.

Trump's penchant for blurring the lines between his campaign and his official duties came to a head last week when he confirmed that he was considering giving his acceptance speech for the Republican presidential nomination one of the most anticipated moments of the election season from the White House South Lawn.

"I'll probably do mine live from the White House," Trump said on Fox News. "The easiest, least expensive and, I think, very beautiful [location] would be live from the White House."

Presidential ethics veterans said the savings weren't his to take. "What Trump is doing is a form of stealing," said Norm Eisen, who was President Barack Obama's special counsel and special assistant for ethics and government reform.

"The taxpayer entrusts funds to the government to do the official business of the government. If they want to support a political candidate, they make a political contribution," he said. "For Trump to effectively be reaching into all of our pockets to subsidize his proposed activity on the South Lawn ... no, the taxpayer should not have to pay for that."

Trump's boundary stretching goes beyond the location of his acceptance speech, Eisen and others said.

The president has increasingly turned official White House events, both in Washington and on the road, into political events as the coronavirus pandemic has kept him off the usual campaign trail and unable to hold large in-person rallies.

Since March, Trump has taken official presidential trips to Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina and Ohio. He has also made multiple visits to Arizona, Texas and Florida. All of those states are critical to Trump's re-election.

"It's always been a fine line that presidents ride with making sure that the official activity in an election year does not go too far into campaign activity," said Kedric Payne, general counsel and senior director of ethics at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit advocacy group. Trump, Payne said, is "barely disguising it as official activity."

On an official government trip to Texas in July, for example, a senior administration official told NBC News that the visit was intended to highlight Trump's energy policy and contrast it with that of Biden's. On another official White House trip in June, to Arizona, the president headlined an event hosted by Students for Trump at a Phoenix church.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

On his most recent presidential trip last week, to Ohio, the White House said Trump was met on Air Force One by a campaign senior adviser in the state, Bob Paduchik. The president held a small campaign-style rally on the tarmac and then visited a Whirlpool factory, where he made fun of Biden ("Did you ever watch Biden, where he's always saying the wrong state?"). He rounded out the journey with a supporters roundtable and a campaign fundraiser.

The trips can become expensive when the airfare and the cost of federally mandated Secret Service protection are taken into consideration.

When a presidential trip involves both official and political events, the White House is supposed to use a formula to determine the amount of money that the campaign or the party should reimburse to the Treasury Department to protect taxpayers from paying for any political activities. The formula generally is not made public.

A spokesperson for the Federal Election Commission said that to distinguish political travel from official travel, the White House should consider the purposes and the natures of the events at each stop.

According to FEC data, the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee have reimbursed more than $600,000 to the Treasury since May for airfare. Neither the Trump campaign nor the RNC provided NBC News with a breakdown of which trips taxpayers were reimbursed for.

Trump has also officially hosted a number of constituent-based events at the White House since the pandemic hit, involving truck drivers, farmers, veterans and seniors a key voting bloc whose support for the president has slipped amid the pandemic. Five of the nearly two dozen events have been with faith leaders, a demographic that propelled Trump to victory in 2016 but whose support this time around has softened.

The campaign has pushed back against criticism that the president is misusing White House events.

"Democrats and the media are desperate to muzzle President Trump. They don't want him tweeting, they don't want him holding rallies, they don't want him speaking at Mount Rushmore, and now they don't want him holding press conferences," said Tim Murtaugh, the campaign's communications director. "Every week, Joe Biden reads speeches off the teleprompter attacking the president and the media gleefully reports every word, and President Trump is entitled to fight back."

While there are some clear rules governing what sort of political activity the president can engage in on official trips and on the White House grounds (he cannot make fundraising calls from the Oval Office, for example), many of the president's political actions are guided by tradition and norms.

The Hatch Act, a law limiting the political activities that federal employees can engage in to ensure that federal policies are carried out in a nonpartisan fashion and to protect federal workers from political coercion, does not apply to the president.

Officials from previous administrations say decoupling the political from the policy can be difficult, and many relied on White House lawyers, advisers and watchdogs to avoid Hatch Act and ethics violations.

"They were afraid of losing Congress, so they pushed the envelope on a bunch of things," said Richard Painter, a Trump critic who was the chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, recalling the 2006 midterm elections, when he frequently had to push back on some actions by administration officials.

Still, said Greg Jenkins, who was Bush's deputy assistant and director of White House advance, "we had a policy that drew a bright line between official and political events."

"All White Houses do events at the White House that advocate or oppose particular policies or proposals. While those are done for political purposes to persuade people to your side they weren't electioneering," Jenkins said.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Johanna Maska, Obama's White House director of press advance from 2009 to 2015, said she and other officials would get regular Hatch Act and ethics training from the White House counsel.

Maska said she recalled discussions during the 2012 campaign about whether using Obama's official armored podium with the presidential seal at political events was an example of undue influence and a burden on taxpayers. Ultimately, the campaign decided to buy its own armored podium for Obama to use at events, which, Maska recalled, was expensive.

"Our typical default was we wanted to pay for everything to make sure we were following the law and weren't making any in-kind contributions," Maska said.

Eisen, the special counsel to Obama, said establishing a strict set of rules on the use of Air Force One and reimbursements, among other ethics issues, was a "huge priority" for the administration. "I personally trained everyone in the White House on these rules so they wouldn't break them," he said.

Eisen recalled telling Pete Rouse, a senior adviser to Obama who is an avid Grateful Dead fan, that he had to take down an Obama poster hanging in his office signed by the band because "there can be no taint of politics in this workplace, which is for policy."

Government watchdogs say Trump has strayed far from the ethics norms of past administrations. They say he sets a dangerous precedent that could erode public trust.

"There are all sorts of debates, and the thing I was proud about is that our counsel would challenge us to make sure we were making the best decision for the taxpayers," Maska said. "My question is: What is this counsel doing?"

Original post:

How Trump erased the election-year line between politics and policy - NBC News

Donald Trumps face on Mount Rushmore? Reports say White House inquired about the possibility – PennLive

When President Donald Trump gave an Independence Day speech at Mount Rushmore in early July, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem gifted him with a four-foot statue of the famous landmark with one notable addition.

Trumps face was added to it.

According to CNN, though, the President wants more.

It reported that a White House aide reached out to Noem last year to inquire about possibly adding Trumps face to the landmark.

Its not possible, according to Business Insider, because theres no stable surface left for carving a fifth face.

But, according to the reports, its a dream of Trumps and its something he has brought up more than once. In fact, Noem told South Dakotas Argus Leader, he mentioned it during their first meeting in the Oval Office.

He said, Kristi, come on over here. Shake my hand, she said. I shook his hand, and I said, Mr. President, you should come to South Dakota sometime. We have Mount Rushmore. And he goes, Do you know its my dream to have my face on Mount Rushmore?

Noem said she started laughing.

He wasnt laughing, she said. So, he was totally serious.

Original post:

Donald Trumps face on Mount Rushmore? Reports say White House inquired about the possibility - PennLive

Scott Morrison presses Trump for continued detention of ex-Afghan soldier who killed three Australians – The Guardian

Scott Morrison says he has pressed Donald Trump for help to prevent the release of an Afghan man who was convicted of murdering three Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

The prime minister said the Australian government would continue to push as hard as we can for the continued detention of the former Afghan soldier known as Hekmatullah, after reports he could be released as a result of peace negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban.

Hekmatullah was convicted of murdering three Australian soldiers Corporal Stjepan Milosevic, Private Robert Poate and Sapper James Martin as they played cards at a patrol base north of Tarin Kowt in August 2012.

Australian defence officials contacted the families of the three Australians late last week to inform them Hekmatullah was likely to be one the 5,000 prisoners set to be released after prisoner swap negotiations, the ABC reported.

Morrison told reporters in Canberra on Monday that he had raised the issue directly with the US president. He said the defence minister, Linda Reynolds, and the foreign affairs minister, Marise Payne, had also raised the issue with their American counterparts at the Ausmin talks in Washington late last month.

This has been a matter of very regular and persistent petitioning on our behalf, the prime minister said.

It is a matter that Ive written to the president about. It is a matter of keen interest to Australia and weve reminded them of that.

Morrison said Hekmatullah was responsible for murdering three Australians and our position is that he should never be released. Morrison argued such a release would not contribute to regional peace.

That is the position that we will continue to maintain and well maintain it strongly, he said.

I cant promise you the outcome we all want here, but it is certainly the outcome we will continue to press for as hard as we can.

The families issued a joint statement to say the news came as a crushing blow and that they believed Hekmatullah should have been executed in line with the sentence issued by the court in Afghanistan, the Australian newspaper reported.

Poates father, Hugh, told the newspaper the news of the likely release was like deflating a balloon.

Hekmatullahs potential release stems from a peace agreement between the US and the Taliban that was reached in February this year.

The US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, said last week that the release of prisoners was unpopular but it would lead to a reduction of violence and direct talks resulting in a peace agreement and an end to the war in Afghanistan.

Under the February agreement, the US committed to work with all relevant sides on a plan to expeditiously release combat and political prisoners as a confidence-building measure with the coordination and approval of all relevant sides.

It flagged the release of up to 5,000 Taliban fighters in return for the release of up to 1,000 government security forces. According to the text of the agreement, the Taliban committed that its released prisoners will be committed to the responsibilities mentioned in this agreement so that they will not pose a threat to the security of the United States and its allies.

The deal also included a commitment to withdraw from Afghanistan all military forces of the US, its allies, and coalition partners. There have been some difficulties and delays in implementing the prisoner release aspect of the deal.

Hekmatullah went on the run after the fatal attack on the Australian soldiers but was captured in Pakistan in February 2013 about six months later and then brought to trial in Afghanistan.

In 2013, an Australian Defence Force inquiry found there was a failure to provide appropriate force protection at the Wahab base where the soldiers were killed despite sufficient resources being available.

A Queensland coroner who also investigated the deaths found that an order from headquarters to increase security at patrol bases had not been passed down to troops on the ground.

The opposition leader, Anthony Albanese, said news of the potential release would be a source of great distress for the families of the victims.

This is a critical issue for the families but also for justice, Albanese said.

This man should not be released, and Australia needs to make the strongest possible representations to both the Afghan government and to the United States to ensure that this doesnt happen.

Follow this link:

Scott Morrison presses Trump for continued detention of ex-Afghan soldier who killed three Australians - The Guardian

Trump Takes Executive Action on Economic Relief Package – Voice of America

BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY - President Donald Trump acted Saturday to extend an expired jobless benefit to tens of millions of Americans who have lost their jobs during the coronavirus pandemic and defer payroll taxes after negotiations with Congress on a new package of economic aid collapsed.

As the United States neared 5 million cases of the coronavirus and 162,000 deaths Saturday, Trump called for up to $400 extra in weekly unemployment payments, one-third less than the $600 people had been receiving. Congress allowed those payments to end August 1, and talks to extend them fell apart Friday, with the White House and Democrats far apart on relief aid.

"This is the money they need, this is the money they want, this gives them an incentive to go back to work," Trump said of the smaller jobless benefits during a news conference at his private country club in Bedminster, New Jersey.

He said 25 percent of it would be paid by states, whose budgets have been hard hit by the crisis. The president wants to set aside $44 billion in previously approved aid to help states pay the larger jobless benefits, but it would be up to states to decide how much, if any, to use, so the benefits could be smaller still. The previous unemployment benefit was fully funded by Washington.

"Donald Trump is trying to distract from his failure to extend the $600 federal boost for 30 million unemployed workers by issuing illegal executive orders," Oregons Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said. "This scheme is a classic Donald Trump con: playacting at leadership while robbing people of the support they desperately need."

Payroll taxes

The president is also suspending payroll taxes for workers who make less than $100,000 through the end of the year. Unemployed workers, who do not pay the tax because they arent collecting a paycheck, wont benefit. The taxes, 7 percent for employees, pay for Medicare and Social Security and will need to be paid eventually unless Congress acts, but there is bipartisan opposition to this on Capitol Hill.

"This fake tax cut would also be a big shock to workers who thought they were getting a tax cut when it was only a delay," Wyden said. "These workers would be hit with much bigger payments down the road."

Finally, the president said he was extending protections for tenants threatened with eviction and further delaying student loans payments and zero percent interest on federally financed loans.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden called the orders a "series of half-baked measures" and accused Trump of putting Social Security "at grave risk" by delaying the collection of payroll taxes that pay for the program.

However, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement Saturday, Struggling Americans need action now. Since Democrats have sabotaged backroom talks with absurd demands that would not help working people, I support President Trump exploring his options to get unemployment benefits and other relief to the people who need them the most.

At an impasse

Negotiations between top congressional Democrats and the White House reached an impasse after nearly two weeks with the two sides about $2 trillion apart.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had offered to cut their $3.4 trillion aid package by almost one-third if the Republicans would double their $1 trillion counteroffer. That $1 trillion package faces opposition by about 20 of the Senates 54 Republicans.

Todays meager announcements by the President show President Trump still does not comprehend the seriousness or the urgency of the health and economic crises facing working families, Pelosi and Schumer said in a statement Saturday.

These policy announcements provide little real help to families. Furthermore, these announcements do nothing to increase testing, nothing to reopen schools, nothing to put food on the table for hungry families, nothing to prevent heroes being laid off across state and local government, nothing to protect the Postal Service or the integrity of our elections, nothing on many critical needs of the American people.

The breakdown in the negotiations between the White House and congressional Democrats is particularly distressing for schools, which have been counting on billions of dollars from Washington to help with the costs of reopening. But other priorities, not addressed in Trumps actions Saturday, are also languishing, including a fresh round of $1,200 direct payments to most people, a cash infusion for the struggling Postal Service and money to help states hold elections in November.

Four coronavirus rescue bills amounting to nearly $3 trillion all won bipartisan approval, but conservatives have recoiled at the prospect of another agreement with a whopping deficit-financed cost.

Originally posted here:

Trump Takes Executive Action on Economic Relief Package - Voice of America

Trump to Long Branch fundraiser crowd: ‘Deal with Iran within four weeks’ if-relected – Asbury Park Press

Supporters and protesters lined the streets to greet President Trump during his visit to Long Branch for a fundrasier on Aug. 9, 2020. Asbury Park Press

LONG BRANCH President Donald Trump arrived here shortly before 5 p.m. for a private fundraising event on Ocean Avenue.

Marine One, the helicopter that transports the president, touched down at Elberon Park at 4:47 p.m. A motorcade then escorted Trump to a private home on Ocean Avenue in the city's Elberon section. The home belonged to the lateStanley Chera, a friend of Trump's who died in April due to complications of COVID-19.

Admission to the fundraiser cost supporters between $5,600 and $250,000, with perks including photo opportunities and a seat at a roundtable discussion with the president.Trump departed the event shortly after 7 p.m.

In a video tweeted out by Jewish Insider, Trump promises the sitting crowd of supporters some of whom rise to their feet that the White House will reach some sort of agreement with Iran within a month of Election Day if he wins re-election.

"If we win, we will have a deal with Iran within four weeks," he says in the video.

Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have gradually increased since Trump withdrew the United States from a 2015 nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions that restricted Iranian oil exports and brought the Iranian economy to a halt. In January, a U.S. drone strike killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.

Iran responded by firing ballistic missiles at U.S. forces in Iraq.

On Friday, National Counterintelligence and Security Center director William Evanina said Iran "seeks to undermine U.S. democratic institutions, President Trump, and to divide the country in advance of the 2020 elections.

Other videos from the fundraiser show Trump and the crowd being blessed by a group of rabbis, as well as his introduction by Haim Chera son of Stanley Chera.

In one video tweeted by Jewish news website Belaaz, Haim Chera refers to Trump as "the greatest president in our country's history" and thanks him for his friendship after his father's death.

In the video, Haim Chera also propulgates a popular conspiracy theory that the COVID-19 may have been "maliciously released" by the Chinese government.

None of the fundraiser guests, who appear to be packed in under an outdoor tent, appear to be wearing face coverings in the video.

"You are fighting a war against an invisible enemy, recklessly or maliciously released onto our shores from China, and you still made time to offer your assistance to us," Haim Chera said in the video.

Opponents and supporters of Trump gathered on Ocean Avenue, about one block south of the Chera compound, where a pair of heavy-duty green and gray public works trucks served as a barricade.

At 2 p.m., hours before Trump's anticipated arrival, protesters for and against his administration squared offoneither side of South Lincoln Avenue, trading chants "Dump Trump!" and "Four more years!"

Supporters and protesters gathered in Elberon on Sunday, Aug. 9, and begun marching to Ocean Avenue where, sometime before 5 p.m., President Donald Trump is expected to arrivefor a fundraiser with New Jersey supporters.(Photo: Mike Davis/Asbury Park Press)

"They have their own fundraiserdown the road. What do they need us for," said Summitresident Jill LaZare, aDeal native and former Assembly candidate who organized the anti-Trump protest.

WHAT WE KNOW: President Trump schedules fundraiser in Elberon

"A lot of these people have been yelling 'we don't want you here,' and I want to make sure it's clear that there are a lot of people in this area who do not support Trump, and are outraged by his presidency on so many different levels," LaZare said.

LaZare and about 50 other protesters were gathered on a small field on one side of the street, flanked by the infamous "Baby Trump" balloon, a caricature of the president that has made appearances at various protests and events over the last few years.

Jack Gavin drove to the protest from his home in West Caldwell to help set up the Baby Trump balloon and pass out pocked-sized copies of the Constitution, a practice he said was inspired by Gold Star father Khizr Khan, who offered to lend Trump a copy at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

Its an important thing to educate everyone I can about what the Constitution says and does not say and the importance of it especially when it comes to checks and balances, Gavin said. Donald Trump is walking all over checks and balances and the Republican Senate is doing nothing to stop it.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

At 4 p.m., police told protest organizers to take the balloon down at the order of the U.S. Secret Service, LaZare said.

On the other side of the street were about 25 counter-protesters, stacked two or three deep and waving an American flag, a "blue line" flag and a Trump 2020 campaign flag.

Rafi King, a police chaplain, spent the first half-hour chanting "Trump 2020" and "blue lives matter" into a megaphone before police instructed him to put it away. LaZare said her group wasn't allowed to use one, and asked police to enforce that rule on the counter-protesters.

Supporters and protesters gathered in Elberon on Sunday, Aug. 9, and begun marching to Ocean Avenue where, sometime before 5 p.m., President Donald Trump is expected to arrive for a fundraiser with New Jersey supporters.(Photo: Mike Davis/Asbury Park Press)

There were hints of outrage, but never violence. Anti-Trump protesters swarmed a luxury car, with New York plates, exchanging obscene hand gestures after unknown words were exchanged.

Vic Hara, 61, of Oakhurst said he voted for Trump in the last election and would do so again. Hara, who is Jewish, also supports the presidents pro-Israel actions.

He shows respect for the country, he said. We were losing ourrespect as a country.

My man Donald Trump, I supported him in the last election. Im supporting him in this election," said another Trump supporter, Ray Antoky, 73, of Long Branchs West End section. "He made America great again, and hes going to do it again.

Trump supporters Vic Hara, of the Oakhurst section of Ocean Township (left) with Ray Antoky , of Long Branchs West End, on Ocean Avenue in Long Branch ahead of the president's visit on Aug. 9, 2020.(Photo: Amanda Oglesby)

Antoky said he likes Trumps fight against the Deep State and fake press. The president cares about employment and people, he said. Antoky, who is Jewish, said he likes Trump for being pro-Israel.

And one anti-Trump protester made the mistake of arriving at the protest on the wrong side of the street. The crowd of pro-Trump protesters swarmed her, at one point ripping one of her homemade posters in half.

They ripped it up, said the woman, a local resident who declined to give her name. That was uncalled for. There was no reason for him to do that.

The anti-Trump protesters displayed hand-written signs while the pro-Trump group waved the American flag, along with a blue lives matter and Trump 2020 campaign flag.

Chera, 77, had relocated to his Elberon home in late March but was admitted to New York Presbyterian Hospital with the novel coronavirus a short while later. He died on April 11.

When you send a friend to the hospital, and you call up to find out how is he doing it happened to me, where he goes to the hospital, he says goodbye, Trump said during a March press briefing, referring to Chera. "And you call up the next day: 'How's he doing? And hes in a coma? This is not the flu.

In Elberon, barely any of the pro-Trump protesters was wearing a face mask, despite both doctors encouragingand state law requiring people to doo so in order to curb the spread of COVID-19.

Their unencumbered chants ofget a job and four more years" occasionally drowned out the "dump Trump" and "show me what democracy looks like" chants of the masked anti-Trump protesters, who instead displayed their hand-made posters.

"162,000+ dead," one sign read. "Are we winning?"

Mike Davis has spent the last decade covering New Jersey local news, marijuana legalization, transportation and basically whatever else is going on at any given moment. Contact him atmdavis@gannettnj.comor@byMikeDavison Twitter.

Read or Share this story: https://www.app.com/story/news/2020/08/09/president-donald-trump-fundraiser-nj-protesters-deal/3326672001/

Continued here:

Trump to Long Branch fundraiser crowd: 'Deal with Iran within four weeks' if-relected - Asbury Park Press

Here are 160000 reasons why nobody likes Donald Trump – Lewiston Morning Tribune

Nobody likes me.

Truth or Consequences is the name of a town in New Mexico, and of a game show dating from the 1940s. But its also one of the primal laws of existence. Where an important truth is denied, consequences follow.

So none of us can be surprised at the state of the union after seven months of Donald Trumps lies, alibis and magical thinking in the face of one of the worst public health crises in history. Almost 160,000 of us are dead, the U.S. economy just endured its worst quarter on record and there is no sign the disaster is going to abate any time soon. To the contrary, the federal government is adding to the list of red zone states i.e., states where the COVID-19 infection rate continues to climb. Twenty-one states nearly half the country now make the list, including Florida, Tennessee, Texas and Mississippi.

And it should be lost on none of us that the red zone states are also mostly red states. Nineteen of the 21 California and Nevada are the outliers went for Trump in 2016. Red states, not to put too fine a point on it, are those wed expect to be most susceptible to his lies, alibis and magical thinking and most resistant to masks and social distancing.

Again, this is no surprise. As has been noted repeatedly in this space, truth doesnt care about your feelings. Unfortunately, Trump doesnt care about truth, so on behalf of 330 million of us, he chose consequences instead. And this country will be years in recovering, if it ever does.

All of which lends to a sense of astonishment at the morose monologue quoted above. It came during a news conference, called ostensibly to provide an update on the nations fight against the coronavirus pandemic. But the briefing also offered a squirm-inducing glimpse into Trumps fragile psyche as he ruminated over the fact that Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the face of his coronavirus task force, is more popular than he is.

It sort of is curious, Trump said. A man works for us and yet theyre highly thought of and nobody likes me. It can only be my personality. And Lord, what to say about that?

It was pathetic, the miserableness of an unloved boy poking through the braggadocio of a 74-year-old man.

It was amazing, this most reality-resistant of men publicly conceding this most humiliating of facts.

It was sickening, almost 160,000 people dead, the nation in chaos, and yet, he cant see beyond his own envy.

And it was revealing, testament to a failure of self-awareness more epic than Greek tragedy.

Consider that shortly before the briefing, Trump retweeted the crackpot theories of some woman who claims, despite expert consensus to the contrary, that hydroxychloroquine can cure COVID-19. Mind you, she also believes doctors use alien DNA to treat patients, and researchers are creating a vaccine to stop people from being religious.

Called on his decision to amplify this woman, Trump insisted she is very respected. And also that I know nothing about her. Yet he muses that nobody likes him and it must be his personality?

Well, yeah. That, his imbecility and his utter inability to feel or even fake compassion for other human beings.

Nobody likes me. Boo hoo.

He denied the truth, and thats one of the consequences. Here are some of the others: People are sick, people are dying, people are losing their homes, people are losing their businesses, the country is unraveling. So Trumps operatic self-pity is a bridge way too far.

If anyone has compassion to spend, there are 330 million people who deserve it more.

Excerpt from:

Here are 160000 reasons why nobody likes Donald Trump - Lewiston Morning Tribune

Trump may finally realize he’s suppressing his own vote – CNN

This is the kind of stuff that confuses people.

What won't help is the major delay in results for some primary races in New York, people not receiving ballots for Tuesday's primary in Michigan and other snarls and hiccups we've seen through the primary season.

Colorado, Washington and Oregon have conducted vote-by-mail elections in the past. Hawaii and Utah had planned to hold a vote-by-mail election before the pandemic struck.

I talked to Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at Brookings and the founder of their Center on Effective Public Management.

Our conversation, conducted by phone and slightly edited for flow, is below.

Suppressing his own vote!

WHAT MATTERS: What's the first thing people need to know about the current debate over mail-in voting?

KAMARCK: People including the President until recently conflate what are called universal mail-in ballot states with absentee ballot systems.

There are only seven states in the United States that are going to use universal mail-in ballots for the November election.

They are Washington, Oregon, Utah, Colorado, California, Hawaii and the District of Columbia. All the ones we give As to.

First of all, the President has gotten into his head that somehow these states are corrupt and this system is corrupt. Not one of these states has had an allegation of corruption. Not one. Oregon has used this for 20 years and hasn't had a contested election, so I don't know where the hell he's getting that from.

The rest of the states in the union have absentee ballot provisions. Every state has absolutely valid provisions And as you saw from our map some are easier to access than others. That's why we graded them from A to F.

What he's doing is he's suppressing his own goddamn vote! It's just the stupidest thing I have ever seen in my life.

Be ready for election night to last a month

WHAT MATTERS: What's one thing everyone needs to be ready for as a result of all the mail-in voting?

KAMARCK: It sets us up for a very long election night or election week.

Because what's going to happen is the vote on election night may or may not -- probably will not -- be reflective of the total vote ...

Twenty states are now accepting absentee ballots that arrive as late as 10 days after Election Day.

So in other words, they have to be postmarked on Election Day. But if they arrive five days, six days, seven days later, they're going to be counted.

And this, this is a new wrinkle. Usually you have 1 to 5% of ballots are absentee ballots. Usually it doesn't make a difference in the outcome of the race. ... My guess is we're going to have 50% absentee ballots. That's my estimate from what happened in the primaries, is we're going to 50/50.

Can the states handle this?

WHAT MATTERS: Is the US able to handle a massive uptick in vote by mail?

KAMARCK: Yes it is. And the reason it is is that every state has had a practice run in the primary.

So they are working hard on this. Now, handling it now it may take longer to count these things, but they are able to handle it.

KAMARCK: We looked at a series of variables that all related to ease of voting absentee. And, for instance, there were some states that require you to have a notary notarize your absentee ballot. Well if there's no need to do that -- and obviously as you can imagine tracking down the notary is a big pain in the neck whenever you have to do it and that's very bad -- that definitely cuts down on absolutely valid use. Many states are moving away from that. There's only a handful of states that do that. But we took points off.

We had a point system, we took points off if you had to have a notary. And we gave points if all you needed was the signature of a registered voter.

Is the system safe?

WHAT MATTERS: How is the system secure if it simply requires a signature?

KAMARCK: States match signatures. They've got a signature on your voter registration, which they keep on file. Some states actually have technology that matches signatures ...

And this is another place where Trump is out of his mind. The ballots are usually printed county by county. They're on specific kinds of paper. They're in a specific format. Sometimes they've got barcodes on them. In other words, the notion that somebody could go out and massively create a bunch of fake ballots and send them to fake voters who weren't real people who didn't have signatures that matched their voter registration. That's really hard ...

So this whole notion that this is vulnerable to fraud just doesn't hold water.

Prior to the pandemic the biggest worry about our election apparatus was that Russians or other foreigners would hack into the election systems and alter the vote.

Ironically, before the election, 22 states had moved to adopt paper ballots so that there could be a verifiable paper trail in the case of a recount.

As we move now to all absentee ballots, essentially we have a really, really good paper trail because it's an absentee ballot with a signature, etcetera etcetera.

It's hard to hack into that. Absentee ballots are counted in large rooms, which are secured by guards in the state capital or the state election board headquarters. So Boris may find it easy to hack into the transmission of results. He's not going to find it very easy to get in the damn room where they're counting the ballots.

Who is allowed in that room? Election officials and a representative of each political party.

It's not like, you know, they're going to let the Republican in the room and keep the Democrat out, right?

Those representatives of political parties are usually lawyers and they are armed to the gills to run right to court. And they're gonna run right to court the minute anything funny shows up.

This will not be flawless

WHAT MATTERS: In Michigan, in New York, in Connecticut and elsewhere, vote by mail has not been flawless in the primary process. Should people be worried about those problems that we've seen with ballots not arriving on time, or should they just accept that as a part of the new system?

KAMARCK: Well I think the answer is yes and no. The bad news is that every state is going to be going through a volume of ballots that they've never had before. So for many, many states this is going to be all brand new and stuff is gonna happen, right? There will be ballots that are arriving late, etcetera ...

The good news is that the the primaries were a dry run. And states learned things in the primaries. One of the most important things they learned is that ... you have to have some sort of backup system.

Provisional ballots. In some states, the people realize you need to have more in-person voting places than they thought they needed. So say you apply for your absentee ballot and you don't get it by Election Day.

You need to be able to go to a polling place and vote, and one of the things that happened in so many states in the primaries was that they didn't have enough polling places because they saw the volume of absentee ballot requests and then they thought, 'Oh we don't need a lot of voting places.'

Well it turns out they maybe didn't need as many as they usually do. But they needed a heck of a lot more than they had because people ... who didn't get their ballots wanted to go vote in person.

Let's say Covid had just hit in August. Then we really wouldn't be very prepared for this. At least we're a little bit better prepared.

Can the US Postal Service handle this?

WHAT MATTERS: What's your assessment of whether the Postal Service can deal with this deluge of ballots?

KAMARCK: I think it will be slow. I think there will be -- it'll take time to get ballots in.

I think a lot of people who know who they're going to vote for are going to vote early to make sure that their ballot gets in.

The second thing we see states doing -- and we're up 20 states now -- they are accepting valid ballots after Election Day. And that is specifically to account for this problem. ... And we gave them good grades obviously for doing that.

So that's one adjustment. My expectation is that more states are gonna adopt that so that if the mail is slow, they'll still get their ballots counted.

Election Day starts in one month

KAMARCK: Well it's too late for North Carolina. But no, it's not too late for states to make changes. And one of the reasons we're updating our score card every Friday is because states are in fact making changes, you know, as we speak. I'd say there's probably another month or so for states to make changes and then it's pretty locked in.

The other thing that's going on by the way is there are a lot of court cases. So the Republican National Committee has been fighting this, trying to follow in Trump's footsteps, although they've not been very successful. ... I think the courts need to act expeditiously and make decisions here so that come around Labor Day everybody knows how to vote in their given state.

The media's special responsibility

WHAT MATTERS: Is there anything else you think people need to know?

KAMARCK: I'll tell you this one last thing.

I think it is very important that the media not set expectations that we're gonna have everything decided on election night.

Because frankly, if they try to call this too fast and then the absentee ballots change and the outcome changes in some state or the election is close, then it plays right into the hands of the conspiracy theorists, including the President, who is trying to argue that the election is going to be wrecked and incorrect.

And so the media plays a big role here ... the worst thing the media can do is jump to conclusions. If it's really clear, if it's a landslide, then they probably can call it on election night. But short of that, they've got to be really careful about calling the election.

Originally posted here:

Trump may finally realize he's suppressing his own vote - CNN

Badshah on being questioned by police in fake followers case: Ive categorically denied all the al… – Hindustan Times

Music producer and rapper Badshah has issued a statement after he was questioned by the police in the fake followers scam. Badshah said he did his part by aiding the investigation and was never part of the scam.

Following the summons, I have spoken to the Mumbai Police. I have aided the officials in their investigation by cooperating and carrying out the due diligence on my part. Ive categorically denied all the allegations levelled against me and made it clear that I was never involved in such practices, nor do I condone them, he said.

The investigation procedure is being executed in accordance with the law and I have complete faith in the authorities, who are handling this matter. Id like to thank all those who have conveyed their concern to me. It means a lot to me, he added.

Badshah reached the office of the Crime Intelligence Unit (CIU) around 12.30 pm on Friday. He stepped out of the CIU office around 9.45 at night, an official told PTI.

Also read:Rana Daggubati shares pic with father, uncle Venkatesh before wedding to Miheeka Bajaj, says hes ready

The CIU started probing the racket after Bollywood singer Bhumi Trivedi found that somebody had created her fake profile on social media and complained to the police. During the probe, the police unearthed the racket which creates fake social media profiles and sells fake followers and likes to celebrities and `influencers.

The police have recorded statements of nearly 20 people in the case. Senior police officials had said earlier that this was a serious issue as fake profiles are also used to spread fake news or misinformation.

Follow @htshowbiz for more

Read the rest here:

Badshah on being questioned by police in fake followers case: Ive categorically denied all the al... - Hindustan Times

Recruitment notice in our name to fill 5285 vacancies is fake: Ministry of Railways – Hindustan Times

The Ministry of Railways has tweeted from its official twitter handle that a recruitment notification circulated online claiming to offer over 5,000 vacancies in Indian Railways is a fake. The Ministry of Railways has urged the public to beware of this fake recruitment notice circulated in its name by an organization named Avestran Infotech.

The Ministry on Sunday issued a clarification regarding the fake recruitment notice, where it has said, railways have not authorized any private agency as yet to do the recruitment of staff on its behalf as alleged by the above-named agency.

Candidates should always go to the official website of Indian Railways to verify the genuineness of any notification issued by them.

The recruitment of various categories of Group C and Group D posts on Indian Railways is presently catered to by 21 Railway Recruitment Boards (RRBs) and 16 Railway Recruitment Cell (RRC) only and not by any other agency. Vacancies on Indian Railways are filled up by giving wide publicity through Centralized Employment Notifications (CENs).

On-line applications are called for from eligible candidates all over the country. CEN is published through Employment News/Rozgar Samachar and an indicative notice is given in National Daily and Local Newspapers. The CEN is also displayed on the official websites of RRBs/RRCs. The website address of all RRBs/RRCs is mentioned in the CEN, reads the PIB notice.

Go here to read the rest:

Recruitment notice in our name to fill 5285 vacancies is fake: Ministry of Railways - Hindustan Times

Fall Guys and Cyberpunk 2077? Joke exchange on Twitter, but The Witcher intrudes! – Asap Land

Share it:

Facebook Twitter Pinterest

Recently available on PlayStation 4 and PC, Fall Guys has had an incredible launch, with over a million and a half players active in conjunction with Day One.

Also due to the presence of the colorful title in the line up of free PS4 games with PS Plus in August, the production Mediatonic can currently count on a warm welcome from the public. And while the players challenge each other in crazy mini-games in an attempt to be crowned the only winners, the development team seems willing to walk the road of the collaborations.

In this sense, a fun and ironic (?) Exchange of jokes involved the official Twitter accounts of Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout is Cyberpunk 2077. As you can indeed verify at the bottom of this news, MediaTonic has kindly tried to persuade CD Projekt RED the opportunity for collaboration. To quell everything, however, the official Twitter account of The Witcher, with the famous IP of the Polish team ready to submit an offer "more exciting"than that of the world of Night City. To make the whole thing even more surreal, contributed the intervention of the Nordic division of Bandai Namco, rather amused by the whole thing!

The tones seem decidedly playful, but never say: in the comments, the Twitter community has already indulged in asking for special Cyberpunk 2077 themed skins.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest

Continue reading here:

Fall Guys and Cyberpunk 2077? Joke exchange on Twitter, but The Witcher intrudes! - Asap Land

Gamedec Revels in Player Choice, but It’ll Be Hard to Pull Off What It Promises – The Escapist

Theres generally an expectation when it comes to RPGs that no matter how expansive its story, well-written its characters, or original its premise, youre eventually going to battle it out with rooms full of enemies and loot their corpses. So, when you first hear about an isometric cyberpunk RPG like Gamedec, you expect something along the lines of the Shadowrun games developed by Harebrained Schemes: explore a technological dystopia, uncover some conspiracies, and spend a lot of time turning living things into dead things.

Gamedec manages to completely avoid that formula. It doesnt even have a combat system to speak of. Gameplay consists of inspecting, hacking, interrogating, smooth-talking, making deals, and staring out a window contemplating the tech-saturated landscape. Most of this plays out through a series of dialogue boxes. It does still have a skill tree and character progression, but its focused on areas of expertise like technology, crime, charisma, and medicine, all of which give you different advantages and disadvantages along the way.

The focus of Gamedec is on choice, which was made clear in the Kickstarter trailer that ends with the statement: There are no wrong answers, only false assumptions. You are the sum of your choices.

My first choice in the game ended up accidentally putting a woman in a coma, which certainly feels like a wrong answer, but it served as a good introduction to a game centered around the idea that your choices have consequences.

You play as a Gamedec, which is short for Game Detective, and your job is to find clients and solve crimes in the cyberpunk world of 22nd century New Warsaw. These crimes take place inside virtual worlds, which some of the inhabitants seem to consider just as real as reality or realium, as the game has a tendency of calling it.

There was only one case available in the build I played: A rich CEOs kid is stuck in one of these worlds, theres an unknown girl stuck alongside him, and a friend of his that managed to get out is tight-lipped about whats going on. Your job: figure out where the son went, get him out of there, and try to make enough money in the meantime to stay afloat.

Gamedec makes use of a deduction system, which you use to reach conclusions based on the information youve uncovered in order to advance the story. It prevents you from exploring multiple possibilities at once, which is a bit odd, though it seems like the intent is to force players to make choices that have lasting consequences. But if thats the reason for the system, it doesnt really work, since every path I took eventually led me in the right direction to uncovering the culprit.

But despite all that, there are plenty of ways to completely, utterly screw up the investigation. The first time around, I was more cautious than I should have been and complied with a criminals demands, leading to a less-than-happy ending for everyone involved. Theres also a choice to force the CEO to deal with the issue himself in hopes of improving his fractured relationship with his son a choice that sounds nice in theory, but it doesnt end well.

There are additionally a good number of choices in Gamedec that can have consequences further down the line befriending a brash, rage-filled esports star, for instance, led to his rescuing me from a sticky situation by crashing a vehicle through a wall. On one run-through, I also made the less-than-cautious decision to let a sentient AI loose upon the world, which actually ended up helping me out later down the line.

Theres a choice that lets you go completely in the wrong direction and start searching the wrong virtual world for the boy, though unfortunately that other virtual world hasnt actually been programmed in yet.

The one virtual world I was able to visit was a bit disappointing in its aesthetic. The world is a seedy, wrong-side-of-town-type environment. While it does fit the cyberpunk theme, the only detail to even suggest that youre visiting a virtual world is the player who glitched the game so as to play as a unicorn.

The difference between the virtual and the real does play a big role in the plot, however. As you dig deeper into the case at hand, you discover a pretty clever reason as to what caused the boy to get stuck in the first place, and you have to rack your brain to come up with a way to free him.

In the end, it felt satisfying to return the kid to his dad in one piece and only a little brain-damaged. Yes, that damage was completely my fault. I didnt admit that to my client when debriefing him though.

My main concern for Gamedec is this: Can the writers actually keep this up? Actions having major consequences over the course of one mission is one thing, but itll be hard to write a longer narrative that keeps track of everything thats happened over the course of the game. I suspect thats part of the reason the second virtual world wasnt programmed in the more choices a player has, the more possibilities a writer has to consider.

But if Anshar Studios manages to make player choice matter to this degree throughout the entire game, it will have accomplished something astonishing.

View post:

Gamedec Revels in Player Choice, but It'll Be Hard to Pull Off What It Promises - The Escapist

Cyberpunk 2077 and cosplay: 400 hours of work for this replica of V’s jacket – Asap Land

Share it:

Facebook Twitter Pinterest

The passion for cosplay prompted the Valentine Costumes artist to dedicate over 400 hours of work to the reinterpretation of the "Samurai jacket" worn by the protagonist of Cyberpunk 2077, the netrunner V.

From the pages of his official Instagram profile, the costume designer shows the fruits of his exceptional work done in recent months after being chosen for the finals of the contest. Cyberpunk 2077 cosplay organized by CD Projekt.

V's jacket made by Valentine Costumes recreates every single detail of the garment worn by lone executioner of Night City, including the detail of thebright inside of the collar through the use of multicolored LED strips which, according to its author, should not generate too much heat and annoy the wearer of this jacket. At the bottom of the news you will find all the shots and videos shared by the CP2077 fan.

While waiting to find out what you think about it, we remind you that CD Projekt RED has unveiled the second Night City Wire of Cyberpunk 2077, setting the date for August 10 and confirming the presence of numerous gameplay scenes dedicated to the RPG branching of missions and the variety of weapons available to the hero of the blockbuster in the open world.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest

Original post:

Cyberpunk 2077 and cosplay: 400 hours of work for this replica of V's jacket - Asap Land

Explained: What is SpaceXs SN5 Starship prototype that completed its first test flight? – The Indian Express

By: Explained Desk | New Delhi | Updated: August 7, 2020 8:08:15 am Starship is launched on Tuesday in south Texas. (SpaceX via AP)

On Tuesday (August 4), just two days after SpaceXs Crew Dragon capsule landed in the Gulf of Mexico, a prototype of the companys uncrewed Mars ship, a stainless steel test vehicle called SN5, and which is a part of the Starship spacecraft, successfully flew to an altitude of over 500 feet for a little less than 60 seconds. The test flight was carried out at Boca Chica in Southern Texas, SpaceXs commercial launch site designed for orbital missions.

What is Starship?

Designed by SpaceX, Starship is a spacecraft and super-heavy booster rocket meant to act as a reusable transportation system for crew and cargo to the Earths orbit, Moon and Mars. SpaceX has described Starship as the worlds most powerful launch vehicle with an ability to carry over 100 metric tonnes to the Earths orbit.

What is the idea behind developing this spacecraft?

Starship has been under development since 2012 and is a part of Space Xs central mission to make interplanetary travel accessible and affordable and to become the first private company to do so. Therefore, the company is working on building a fleet of reusable launch vehicles, capable of carrying humans to Mars and other destinations in the solar system.

Reusability is at the heart of making interplanetary travel accessible, SpaceX believes, since a majority of the launch cost is attributed to the expense of building a rocket which is ultimately designed to burn up during re-entry. Following the commercial model, a rapidly reusable space launch vehicle could reduce the cost of traveling to space by a hundredfold, SpaceX mentions on its website.

Once functional, the Starship spacecraft will enter Mars atmosphere at a speed of 7.5 km per second and will be designed to withstand multiple entries. While no human being has set foot on Mars yet, the planet continues to intrigue scientists and researchers because of the possibility that life existed there once. SpaceX is planning its first cargo mission to the red planet by 2022 and by 2024, the company wants to fly four ships including two cargo and two crewed ones to Mars.

Express Explainedis now onTelegram. Clickhere to join our channel (@ieexplained)and stay updated with the latest

Late last month, a series of unmanned missions to Mars were launched by the US, China and the first one for the middle-eastern world called Hope.

So what all can Starship do?

Starship can deliver satellites further and at lower marginal costs than SpaceXs Falcon vehicles and it can ferry both cargo and crew to the International Space Station (ISS). Once developed, Starship is also expected to help carry large amounts of cargo to the Moon, for human spaceflight development and research. Beyond the Moon, the spacecraft is being designed for carrying crew and cargo for interplanetary missions as well.

Dont miss from Explained | Why people are using #ZimbabweanRightsMatter tag in online campaign

The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Visit link:

Explained: What is SpaceXs SN5 Starship prototype that completed its first test flight? - The Indian Express

Brexit LIVE: David Frost urged to WITHHOLD UK repayments ‘Sovereignty above all else!’ – Daily Express

Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader, said it was vital Mr Frost continues to champion UK sovereignty in the talks, as the issue was fundamental to many Brexit voters.

The Brexiteer highlights this in a recent Express.co.uk comment piece, where he points out most people who voted to leave the EU did so to return sovereignty to the UK.

The Tory MP said a poll conducted by Lord Ashcroft on the day of the 2016 EU referendum found nearly half of leave voters said the biggest single reason for wanting to leave the EU was the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK.

The survey found only a third said the main reason was to regain control over immigration and its own borders.

When discussing the current trade talks, Sir Iain wrote: Importantly, David Frost, Boriss chief negotiator made it clear he agreed when he wrote that in the negotiations, the UK places sovereignty above all else.

It is in that context that the issue of how these outstanding payments to the EU impinge on the UKs sovereignty which matter now.

The Brexiteer urges Mr Frost to walk away from the talks if the UKs sovereignty risks being impinged.

He said: The WA was always work in progress as at the end of this year, the UK has a right to a comprehensive agreement, one which treats the UK as a sovereign partner.

A failure to observe this must lead to a rejection of the WA.

FOLLOW EXPRESS.CO.UK FOR LIVE UPDATES:

9.33am update:Brexit Britain could form NEW superpower alliance with Australia, Canada and New Zealand

Brexit Britain could form a federation with Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to create a superpower" after fully cutting ties with the EU, a historian has claimed.

Historian Andrew Roberts described the federation of nations whose majority of people speak English could be a free trade zone with the free movement of people.

The idea is based on the concept of the "CANZUK Union", this being the acronym for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

The union could have a mutual defence organisation and combined military capabilities, the historian claimed.

According to Mr Roberts, the "CANZUK" union would be the fourth-largest economy in the world.

9am update:FTSE-100 shares rose on hopes of Brexit deal

London-listed shares rose on Monday, due in part to renewed hopes of a Brexit trade deal with the EU.

The FTSE-100 was up 0.8 percent, with the mid-cap FTSE-250 also up 0.7 percent - a seven-week high.

Traders are hopeful of a Brexit trade deal after Britain's top minister overseeing negotiations said on Friday he was confident of an agreement with the EU.

Stocks also rose in response to optimism around a post-pandemic economic rebound in China.

8.07am update:Ireland must take a long hard look at Brussels membership

Ireland has been tipped to follow the UK's lead and quit the European Union by a former Irish diplomat who called for "a long hard look" at whether the country's membership of the bloc was worth it.

Ray Bassett pulls no punches in his new book, 'Ireland and the EU Post Brexit', suggesting the benefits bestowed on Dublin by Brussels are drying up, with "difficult choices" on the horizon.

In his book, he writes: "We need a long hard look at our EU membership and pose the question, is it worth the price?"

"The billionaire businessman, George Soros, an ardent europhile, has accepted the inevitable and predicted that unless the EU reforms it will perish.

"The pipe dreams of Emmanuel Macron and his proposals for even a more centralised EU are vanishing against the cold reality of the desire for the citizenry of EU Member States for national sovereignty.

"The disastrous showing of the establishment centre-right and centre-left parties in the 2019 European Parliament elections demonstrated this in a very direct way."

Read the original here:

Brexit LIVE: David Frost urged to WITHHOLD UK repayments 'Sovereignty above all else!' - Daily Express

Brexit: Boris Johnsons promise of lucrative trade deals in trouble, study warns – The Independent

Boris Johnsons promise of lucrative post-Brexit trade deals as the UK takes back control of its rules is on course to fail, a study warns today.

Three years have been wasted failing to agree what Britain wants from its negotiations, the Institute for Government finds handing the advantage to countries on the other side of table.

It means the controversy over the US demand to sell its chlorinated chicken which has stalled a deal with Washington will be repeated, its report concludes.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

The think tank criticises the unforced error of launching into complex trade talks before ministers have decided what they want their post-Brexit regulations to be.

Three years ago, we warned that the government had not set up the necessary structures for effective decision making on key trade policy issues, said Maddy Thimont Jack, a senior researcher.

The government did not heed that warning then, but it now needs to move urgently to put them in place. Otherwise it will find itself losing control of trade and regulatory policy to better-prepared partners.

The criticism comes as trade talks with the EU remain deadlocked because the government cannot agree its future state aid rules and needs to satisfy Brussels fears of undercutting.

Hopes of a deal with the US this year have been abandoned and even a revamped deal with Japan has run into trouble, in a row over access for UK agricultural products.

Notoriously, Brexit-backing Conservatives claimed it would be easy to strike numerous lucrative deals with other countries, once the UK was free to negotiate alone.

A referendum is held on Britain's membership of the European Union. Fifty-two per cent of the country votes in favour of leaving

AFP via Getty

David Cameron resigns on the morning of the result after leading the campaign for Britain to remain in the EU

Getty

Theresa May becomes leader of the Conservative party and prime minister, winning the leadership contest unopposed after Andrea Leadsom drops out

Getty

The High Court rules that parliament must vote on triggering Article 50, which would begin the Brexit process

The prime minister triggers Article 50 after parliament endorses the result of the referendum

Getty

Seeking a mandate for her Brexit plan, May goes to the country

Getty

After a disastrous campaign, Theresa May loses her majority in the commons and turns to the DUP for support. Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party makes gains after being predicted to lose heavily

AFP/Getty

David Davis and Michel Barnier, chief negotiators for the UK and EU respectively, hold a press conference on the first day of Brexit negotiations. Soon after the beginning of negotiations, it becomes clear that the issue of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic will prove a major sticking point

AFP/Getty

The government suffers a defeat in parliament over the EU withdrawal agreement, guaranteeing that MPs are given a 'meaningful vote' on the deal

Following a summit at Chequers where the prime minister claimed to have gained cabinet support for her deal, Boris Johnson resigns as foreign secretary along with David Davis, the Brexit secretary

Reuters

The draft withdrawal agreement settles Britain's divorce bill, secures the rights of EU citizens living in the UK and vice versa and includes a political declaration commiting both parties to frictionless trade in goods and cooperation on security matters. The deal also includes the backstop, which is anathema to many brexiteers and Dominic Raab and Esther McVey resign from the cabinet in protest

Getty

After several failed attempts to pass her withdrawal agreement through the commons, Theresa May resigns

Reuters

Boris Johnson is elected leader of the Conservative party in a landslide victory. He later heads to Buckingham Palace where the Queen invites him to form a government

Getty

Boris Johnson prorogues parliament for five weeks in the lead up to the UK's agreed departure date of 31 October.

Stephen Morgan MP

The High Court rules that Johnson's prorogation of parliament is 'unlawful' after a legal challenge brought by businesswoman Gina Miller

Getty

Following a summit in Merseyside, Johnson agrees a compromise to the backstop with Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar - making the withdrawal agreement more palatable to Brexiteers

Getty

As parliament passes the Letwin amendment requiring the prime minister to request a further delay to Brexit, protesters take to the streets in the final show of force for a Final Say referendum

Getty

The Conservatives win the December election in a landslide, granting Boris Johnson a large majority to pass through his brexit deal and pursue his domestic agenda

Getty

The withdrawal agreement passes through the commons with a majority of 124

Getty

Members of the European parliament overwhelmingly back the ratification of Britain's departure, clearing the way for Brexit two days later on 31 January. Following the vote, members join hands and sing Auld Lang Syne

AFP/Getty

A referendum is held on Britain's membership of the European Union. Fifty-two per cent of the country votes in favour of leaving

AFP via Getty

David Cameron resigns on the morning of the result after leading the campaign for Britain to remain in the EU

Getty

Theresa May becomes leader of the Conservative party and prime minister, winning the leadership contest unopposed after Andrea Leadsom drops out

Getty

The High Court rules that parliament must vote on triggering Article 50, which would begin the Brexit process

The prime minister triggers Article 50 after parliament endorses the result of the referendum

Getty

Seeking a mandate for her Brexit plan, May goes to the country

Getty

After a disastrous campaign, Theresa May loses her majority in the commons and turns to the DUP for support. Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party makes gains after being predicted to lose heavily

AFP/Getty

David Davis and Michel Barnier, chief negotiators for the UK and EU respectively, hold a press conference on the first day of Brexit negotiations. Soon after the beginning of negotiations, it becomes clear that the issue of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic will prove a major sticking point

AFP/Getty

The government suffers a defeat in parliament over the EU withdrawal agreement, guaranteeing that MPs are given a 'meaningful vote' on the deal

Following a summit at Chequers where the prime minister claimed to have gained cabinet support for her deal, Boris Johnson resigns as foreign secretary along with David Davis, the Brexit secretary

Reuters

The draft withdrawal agreement settles Britain's divorce bill, secures the rights of EU citizens living in the UK and vice versa and includes a political declaration commiting both parties to frictionless trade in goods and cooperation on security matters. The deal also includes the backstop, which is anathema to many brexiteers and Dominic Raab and Esther McVey resign from the cabinet in protest

Getty

After several failed attempts to pass her withdrawal agreement through the commons, Theresa May resigns

Reuters

Boris Johnson is elected leader of the Conservative party in a landslide victory. He later heads to Buckingham Palace where the Queen invites him to form a government

Getty

Boris Johnson prorogues parliament for five weeks in the lead up to the UK's agreed departure date of 31 October.

Stephen Morgan MP

The High Court rules that Johnson's prorogation of parliament is 'unlawful' after a legal challenge brought by businesswoman Gina Miller

Getty

Following a summit in Merseyside, Johnson agrees a compromise to the backstop with Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar - making the withdrawal agreement more palatable to Brexiteers

Getty

As parliament passes the Letwin amendment requiring the prime minister to request a further delay to Brexit, protesters take to the streets in the final show of force for a Final Say referendum

Getty

The Conservatives win the December election in a landslide, granting Boris Johnson a large majority to pass through his brexit deal and pursue his domestic agenda

Getty

The withdrawal agreement passes through the commons with a majority of 124

Getty

Members of the European parliament overwhelmingly back the ratification of Britain's departure, clearing the way for Brexit two days later on 31 January. Following the vote, members join hands and sing Auld Lang Syne

AFP/Getty

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, Mr Johnson said before the 2016 referendum. I think there is a huge opportunity. Do free trade deals, believe in ourselves.

The latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox

In fact, a deal with the US, even if it can be struck, would add only 0.2 per cent to GDP in the long run, the Treasury has estimated and a continued deal with Tokyo only 0.07 per cent.

The IfG study, Trade and Regulation after Brexit, says it will be impossible to marry the desire for a clutch of new agreements and for regulatory autonomy because a weakened UK will be told to change its standards in return.

It warns ministers that the UK:

* Could easily fall victim to other nations threatening to collapse the talks if they do not get what they want.

* Will be vulnerable to challenge at the World Trade Organisation, if its currently dysfunctional dispute system becomes operational again.

* Has failed to agree its stance on key regulatory issues, which risks it being pushed into making concessions it shouldnt.

* Risks damaging the union, unless it can reach agreement with the other UK nations, which are responsible for implementing trade deals and could choose not to

More here:

Brexit: Boris Johnsons promise of lucrative trade deals in trouble, study warns - The Independent

Michel Barnier’s ‘major’ concession on state aid a big win for UK – EU backing down – Daily Express

Mr Barnier indicated this week the EU may drop its demands over state aid which, professor Alex De Ruyter from Birmingham Universitys Centre for Brexit Studies, stated is a major boost for the UK. The EU has called for the UK to agree to a level playing field on state aid but this week Mr Barnier indicated the demand could be dropped for an independent dispute settling mechanism. Speaking toExpress.co.uk, Mr De Ruyter stated an independent dispute settling mechanism would be the obvious way to settle state aid rules.

He said: This is what the UK has been pushing for all along and it would represent a major move.

To be honest, an independent dispute resolution mechanism is the obvious way to resolve disputes relating to any trade agreement.

This is widely done internationally.

The issue of state aid has remained one of the areas of divergence between the two sides during Brexit talks.

State aid determines the level of support from public authorities for organisations.

The EU wants the UK to agree to a certain set of regulations and rules in order stop Britain undercutting Brussels and becoming a more attractive destination for companies.

This week, Mr Barnier told EU diplomats an independent mechanism could be created in order to settle the issue.

Such is the importance of the issue, some diplomats stated if the UK agreed to the proposition, a deal could soon be agreed.

JUST IN:Brexit LIVE: Gove to unveil groundbreaking 355million trade system

The diplomat said: There must be a solid framework with independent oversight.

If they agree to settle on broad rules for granting state aid and to have this independent institution, then we have a deal.

The rules surrounding fisheries and the role of the European Court of Justice in British judicial matters also remain undecided.

Similar to the issue of state aid, UK officials have declared any ECJ role in UK judicial matters would keep Britain tied into regulations and rules set by Brussels post-Brexit.

DON'T MISSEU 'to collapse in 10 years' as three countries tipped to leave[Update]Chinas fearsome threat picked apart by Cummings[Latest]SNP ultimatum: MP demands MORE funding from Sunak over furlough scheme[Insight]

In terms of fisheries, the UK is adamant Britain must no longer be under the Common Fisheries Policy.

Under the policy, all coastal areas are placed within the EUs exclusive economic zone.

However, due to the UKs large and rich coastal waters, some have stated the policy allows Europe fishermen to exploit Britains waters.

UK officials want to move away from the policy and set up an agreement similar to Norways fisheries deal with the EU.

Under the agreement, the EU and Norway hold annual negotiations on fishing quotas and access.

Despite the concession from the EU on state aid, Mr Barnier has called for preparations to be made for a no deal Brexit.

Prof De Ruyter concluded: There is scope for both sides to come to a reasonable agreement, but that doesnt mean they will!

At the moment, it is still very unclear what the eventual outcome will be, although I would stress that a no deal scenario would be more costly for the UK than the EU."

Follow this link:

Michel Barnier's 'major' concession on state aid a big win for UK - EU backing down - Daily Express

U.S. Department of Education reaffirms commitment to protecting the religious liberty of students, religious organizations – The Highland County Press

U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos announced Friday guidance to protect the religious liberty of individuals and institutions participating in Department of Education programs. This action is part of ongoing efforts by the Department to advance religious liberty protections and delivers on President Donald J. Trumps Executive Order 13798, Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty.

This administration will continue to protect the religious liberty and First Amendment rights of every student, teacher and educational institution across the country, Secretary DeVos said. Too many misinterpret the separation of church and state as an invitation for government to separate people from their faith.

In reality, the First Amendment doesnt exist to protect us from religion. It exists to protect religion from government. Todays guidance reaffirms our commitment to protecting our first liberty and ensuring that discriminatory restrictions on access to federal grant funding are no longer tolerated.

This guidance follows recent Supreme Court victories for religious liberty, asEspinozav. Montana Department of Revenueand Trinity Lutheran v. Comercurtailed religious discrimination and thus strengthened protections for religious organizations.

The guidance was drafted pursuant to a directive from the Office of Management and Budget requiring each agency to publish policies detailing how they will administer federal grants in compliance with Executive Order 13798, as well as the Attorney Generals Oct. 6, 2017, Memorandum on Religious Liberty, and the Office of Management and Budgets Jan. 16, 2020, Memorandum.

Notably, the guidance announces a new process by which individuals and organizations can inform the Department of a burden or potential burden on their religious exercise under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to adequately protect their religious liberties while participating in Department programs.

The new guidance also, consistent with First Amendment principles and Department regulations, does the following:

Affirms that religious organizations are equally eligible to participate in ED-administered programs as their secular counterparts.

Affirms that financial award decisions are made based on merit, not based on an organizations religion, religious belief or the lack thereof.

States that religious organizations receiving federal financial assistance under a Department program must comply with program-specific legislation and regulations, but clarifies that these organizations may continue to carry out their missions and maintain their religious character. However, direct federal financial assistance may not be used for religious worship, religious instruction or proselytization.

Reminds states that they may not use discriminatory Blaine Amendments to deny faith-based organizations contracts or grants, as this violates Department regulations against discrimination on the basis of an organizations religious character or affiliation.

Affirms that students and/or borrowers seeking to participate in Department loan programs and beneficiaries seeking to participate in Department social service programs will not be penalized or singled out for disadvantages on the basis of religion.

Clarifies the role of the Departments Center for Faith and Opportunity Initiatives (CFOI) as a Department office that collaborates with faith and community leaders to maximize participation of religious organizations in Department programs while eliminating barriers in the grantmaking or regulatory process to safeguard religious liberty.

Read more:

U.S. Department of Education reaffirms commitment to protecting the religious liberty of students, religious organizations - The Highland County Press

Constitutional Connections: Five takeaways from the Supreme Court’s 2019-2020 term – Concord Monitor

Last month, the Supreme Court wrapped up its 2019-20 term with a flurry of significant rulings.

The court confirmed that Congress and state attorneys general may subpoena third parties for evidence when legitimately investigating a sitting president; held that the executive branch must engage in reasoned decision-making when rescinding administrative protections for a vulnerable population (i.e., beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program); and defined the scope of the presidents power to remove officials from high office.

The court also clarified that federal anti-discrimination employment protections extend to LGBTQ workers; held that states may punish members of the electoral college who do not vote for the candidate they pledged to support; determined that much of eastern Oklahoma falls within a Creek Nation Indian reservation; emphasized that the First Amendment right to freely exercise ones religious beliefs contains broad anti-discrimination guarantees; and reaffirmed that states may not undermine abortion rights by enacting laws that purport to protect womens health but in fact are designed to close clinics where abortions are performed.

Each of these rulings deserves its own column. But lets start with five clear lessons that may be drawn from the courts historic term.

1) This is Chief Judge John Robertss court. When Sandra Day OConnor retired, Anthony Kennedy replaced her as the swing justice i.e., the justice most likely to swing back and forth between the courts conservative and liberal wings. Now that Kennedy has retired, Roberts has replaced him as the courts swing justice. Roberts authored or joined the majority opinion an astounding 97% (59 out of 61) of the time this term.

The only written decisions in which Roberts was not a member of the majority were Ramos v. Louisiana, which held that states must require unanimous jury verdicts as a matter of federal due process, and McGirt v. Oklahoma, which held that, for purposes of the federal Major Crimes Act, much of eastern Oklahoma is an Indian reservation where only federal authorities (and not state authorities) may prosecute tribe members for certain major crimes.

2) Roberts, although deeply conservative, is an institutionalist. When Roberts reaches the merits of a dispute, he is likely to side with the courts conservatives. But Roberts is far more likely than the other conservative justices to use procedural and prudential doctrines to enforce rule-of-law values and avoid having the court take center stage in litigation with strong partisan overtones.

Consider, for example, Robertss opinions in the 2020 case involving the Trump administrations cancellation of DACA (Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California) and the 2019 case involving the Trump administrations efforts to add a citizenship question to the census (Department of Commerce v. New York). In both, Roberts joined the courts four liberal justices to hold that the administration had violated fundamental administrative law principles by failing to provide reasoned explanations for their actions. Neither opinion held that the administration was pursuing an unlawful end; both held that the means used to adopt the policy change were unlawful.

Or, consider Robertss opinion in June Medical Services v. Russo. Roberts wrote that, while he disagrees with the analytical approach used in a 2016 court decision rendering unconstitutional a Louisiana statute limiting access to abortion, the court ordinarily should follow its prior rulings. Therefore, Roberts invoked the doctrine of stare decisis, Latin for to stand by whats been decided, and joined the courts four liberal justices to strike down the law.

Or, finally, consider Robertss opinions for the court in Trump v. Vance and Trump v. Mazars. These cases considered, respectively, the power of state attorneys general and Congress to subpoena third parties for the financial records of a sitting president. In both cases, Roberts rejected President Donald Trumps sweeping claims of presidential immunity. Yet, Roberts remanded these cases back to the lower courts for reconsideration in light of the special concerns that arise when an attorney general or Congress investigates the president. The likely result is that the records will be made public, if ever, only after the November election.

3) Religious rights are expanding. Churches, religious organizations, and religious individuals have invoked the First Amendments free exercise clause to bring two types of cases in recent years. In the first, they have argued that it is a violation of their right to freely exercise their religious beliefs if they are excluded on grounds of separation of church and state when government makes benefits available to a similar class of organizations or persons. In the second, they have argued for exemptions from required compliance with certain anti-discrimination laws on the ground that these laws intrude on their free-exercise rights. And they have succeeded in both types of cases.

Consider this terms decisions in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue and Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey-Berru. In Espinoza, the court held that a provision of Montana law barring aid to religious schools could not constitutionally bar tuition assistance to parents who send their children to religious schools when such assistance is made available to other parents. In Our Lady of Guadalupe, the court held that, because churches must have the unlimited ability to fire those who serve as their ministers, Catholic school teachers whose teaching assignments included religion could not challenge their dismissals under either the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Consequently, churches and the religious stand on largely equal footing with all others when it comes to receiving public benefits. But they are exempt from certain generally applicable laws when applying those laws could interfere with the free exercise of their religion.

4) Lower courts should not lightly intervene in election disputes to protect the right to vote. In April, a federal judge in Wisconsin issued an injunction extending the deadline for the casting and counting of absentee ballots to one week beyond election day. The judge premised the injunction on the fact that Wisconsin election officials were overwhelmed by requests for absentee ballots from voters who did not wish to risk exposure to the coronavirus in personally casting their ballots. But the Supreme Court, in Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee, dissolved the injunction in a 5-4 ruling. The court majority applied a prudential principle that courts should not change election rules as election day approaches.

The court also acted similarly in election disputes that reached it from Alabama, Texas, and Florida. The message to lower courts seems clear: Do not lightly involve yourselves in election disputes on the ground that state officials are failing to sufficiently protect voting rights.

5) If Justice Ginsburg is replaced by another Trump appointee, the court will have a dependable, deeply conservative majority. The court recently announced that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is 87, has been treated for a recurrence of cancer. If Justice Ginsburg leaves the court and President Trump succeeds in appointing a replacement, the court will almost certainly lack a swing justice to periodically join with the liberal justices to forge a majority.

President Trump has delivered on his promise to appoint deeply conservative justices. Although Justice Neil Gorsuch joined with the liberal justices in two high-profile cases this term (Bostock v. Clayton County, which extended federal anti-discrimination protections to LGBTQ workers, and the aforementioned McGirt, which held that much of eastern Oklahoma is a Creek Nation reservation), he and Justice Brett Kavanaugh (Trumps other appointee) have thus far reliably voted with arch-conservatives Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Yet another Trump appointee like Gorsuch or Kavanaugh would leave the court with a fifth deeply conservative vote even if Chief Justice Roberts were to continue to sometimes vote with the Courts three remaining liberal justices.

More on these developments in future columns.

(John Greabe teaches constitutional law and directs the Warren B. Rudman Center for Justice, Leadership & Public Service at the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law. The opinions he expresses in his Constitutional Connections columns are entirely his own.)

Read more:

Constitutional Connections: Five takeaways from the Supreme Court's 2019-2020 term - Concord Monitor