Cybin Applauds TheraPsil’s Advocacy to Bring Psilocybin Therapy to Palliative Care of Canadian Patients | INN – Investing News Network

Cybin Corp. applauds the efforts of TheraPsil, a non-profit coalition that advocates for legal, Special Access Programme (SAP) access to psilocybin therapy for palliative care of Canadians.

Cybin Corp. (Cybin or the Company), Canadas leading-edge mushroom life sciences company, is proud to applaud the efforts of TheraPsil, a non-profit coalition that advocates for legal, Special Access Programme (SAP) access to psilocybin therapy for palliative care of Canadians.

Recently, four Canadians battling incurable cancer were approved by the federal Minister of Health, Patty Hajdu, to use psilocybin therapy in the treatment of their end-of-life distress. According to TheraPsil, these four patients mark the first publicly-known individuals to receive a legal exemption from the Canadian Drugs and Substances Act, under Section 56, to access psychedelic therapy. They are also the first known patients to legally use psilocybin since the compound became illegal in Canada in 1974.

This is a watershed moment for the patients involved who deserve the right to manage their health challenges with dignity, said Paul Glavine, Co-founder of Cybin. Everyone at Cybin applauds the efforts of TheraPsil and these brave individuals, and we thank the Minister of Health for her foresight.

Former Ontario Health Minister and Cybin advisor, Dr. Eric Hoskins, praised Minister Hajdus approval. I am pleased to see this important step towards considering psilocybin as a natural compound with a growing body of experience of therapeutic uses for patients in need, rather than strictly a prohibited substance, Hoskins said. I joined Cybin because of their dedication to patients who need and benefit from psilocybin-assisted therapy.

Dr. Jukka Karjalainen, Cybins Chief Medical Officer concurs: This landmark recognition of the benefits of psilocybin is tremendous validation for our sector. Cybin is proud to applaud TheraPsils efforts, while continuing to focus on the development of a psilocybin oral film delivery system which will potentially alleviate the burden of pill consumption for seniors and patients in palliative care, who often have difficulty swallowing.

About Cybin

Cybin is a life sciences company advancing mushroom-based psychedelic and nutraceutical products for various psychiatric and neurologic conditions. Cybin is developing technology that seeks to improve bioavailability to achieve the desired effects of psychedelics at lower dosages. Cybin is developing products with new delivery systems and intends to support clinical trials to evaluate efficacy to potentially combat major depressive disorder and addiction and improve cognitive flexibility.

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements in this press release constitute forward-looking information. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this press release, including, without limitation, those regarding the ability to receive all necessary approvals, the bioavailability and potential use of the oral film delivery system, the potential safety and efficacy of psilocybin administered in an orally-dissolving film, research and clinical trial programs, statements regarding Cybins future, strategy, plans, objectives, goals and targets, and any statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words believe, expect, aim, intend, plan, continue, will, may, would, anticipate, estimate, forecast, predict, project, seek, should or similar expressions or the negative thereof, are forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent only Cybins expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. These statements are not guaranteeing future performance and involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information and forward-looking statements included in this press release are made as of the date of this press release. The Company does not undertake an obligation to update such forward-looking information or forward-looking information to reflect new information, subsequent events or otherwise unless required by applicable securities law.

Source

Read the original post:

Cybin Applauds TheraPsil's Advocacy to Bring Psilocybin Therapy to Palliative Care of Canadian Patients | INN - Investing News Network

Level 3 Travel Advisory for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean – US Embassy in Barbados

On August 6, the U.S. Department of State removed the Global Level 4 Travel Advisory Do Not Travel and adjusted the individual travel advisories of Barbados and the countries of the Eastern Caribbean to Level 3 Reconsider Travel. After nearly five months of a global do not travel advisory, the upgrade to Level 3 takes into account both the current assessment of conditions on the ground and the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose unprecedented risks for travelers. We routinely review safety and securityconditionsacross the region and will update destination-specific information asappropriate. Travel advisories are not issued against countries. They have a singular purpose to keep U.S. citizens informed and help ensure their health and safety. We will continue to work with Barbados and the countries of the Eastern Caribbean through bilateral communication, economic cooperation, and humanitarian aid to end the spread of COVID-19.

By U.S. Embassy Bridgetown | 8 August, 2020 | Topics: Press Releases

Originally posted here:

Level 3 Travel Advisory for Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean - US Embassy in Barbados

Nigel Spence: The Recipe for the Perfect Pig Caribbean Journal – Caribbean Journal

This year, with the pandemic and shutdowns in place, I finally got around to reading a lot more of the trade magazines I have piled up in my desk and revisiting so many recipes and notes I have jotted down hastily for future use, that sometimes never gets past that point-as life sometimes gets in the way more often than not for me. Such is the life story of a chef/owner/marketer/human resources person/ shopper/equipment mechanic and administrator. I may start the day at the market, move on to prepping, interview a prospective employee, fight with my fish guy, then end the day fixing a pump tube on the dish machine then having a drink with the bartender next door just to get away from it all for a moment. Yet I wake up every day and love doing it all over again and wouldnt have it any other way. For some, chaos is par for the course and fuel for the soul. I am one of those somebodies.

This pandemic has introduced me to someone I knew very little aboutmeit forced me to reflect on life and where I fit in and I gotta tell u folks it wasnt pretty!

What was pretty though was some of the amazing dishes I produced while looking at all the notes I wrote on napkins, on receipts, on the back of business cards, etc.

Which is where I came upon a business card from the owner of a farm. A few years back he invited me and about 10 other chefs to a pig feast; at which we were to share our thoughts and give feedback on the prepared dishes expertly paired with some great wines.

It was a smart idea as the pork he peddled was quite a departure from anything we are used to here in America and would certainly need a positive nod from us chefs to get it on menus in the area, and patrons indoctrinated into this new style of protein.

It certainly worked because I remember everyone oohing and awwing with each course, and the most memorable part of the evening for me was when I bit into a cut called the collar steak. I even wrote on the back of business card Experiment further with collar steak as soon as possible-a true gamechanger.

And then of course life got in the way and it never made it to my menu but at least some of the other chefs who had their s#$%t together better than I do, did get it on theirs.

Until NOWthe name of the pig in question is a heritage breed coming all the way from Hungary, now being raised in the United States called a Mangalitsa pig. Unlike the regular pigs we know, this one has hair. Yes I know all pigs have hair, but this one has real honest to goodness mane of hair like sheep and about as much fat to match the hair. Most American pigs are bred to be lean, as in the other white meat-but this one certainly is not!

As a matter of fact, the collar cut as it is called looks more like a cut of beef, with deep red hues and marbling rivaling a high grade rib-eye steak. The cut I used is taken from the neck and was about of an inch thick. Because of all the marbling, I decided it would be high on the flavor scale, so I didnt want to adulterate that flavor by adding too many seasonings to it (though this is totally a personal preference). I simply sprinkled some kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper on the steak. I then grabbed a small sprig of rosemary, added clarified butter to a roasting pan over low heat, added the rosemary sprig and dropped the steak on top of it. I slowly pan roasted while basting it with the now mildly flavored butter from the pan. I roasted the first side for approximately 5 minutes while it developed a golden crust, I then flipped it over and continued to pan roast and baste for an additional 4 minutes. I then transferred it to a 300-degree oven and let it slowly finish up for another 3 minutes to get to a medium temperature.

I then removed it and allowed it to rest for 15 minutes tented with foil, while I deglazed the pan with a bit of allspice liqueur (slightly sweet complex liqueur from the allspice berry), mounted some butter on the sauce and served it next to the steak.

Oh, my gravy what a treat! The steak was quite juicy, tender, definitely a departure from the texture of a standard American pork chop that just gets really chewy and dry anywhere north of medium rare. Not even the Iberico pork could stand next to this little freak, except that I have never had the collar steak from the Iberico steak, only the standard chop, so I guess I am not quite comparing apples to apples.

Nonetheless, this thing was the BEST cut of pork I have ever had and reminds me well of the first time I had it at the dinner party. Though I might be biased toward my own technique, I would venture to say the first time I had it was not as good as this second time probably because it may have been cooked past my ideal temperature of medium for a pork chop, which is what the collar steak was meant to mimic.

This recipe is obviously less about the seasonings or aromatics and more about the protein itself and the cooking technique, which is of utmost importance to get the best taste and texture on your plate. Enjoy!

Nigel Spence, a Culinary Institute of America alumnus, was born in Kingston, Jamaica. Nigel freelanced at the Television Food Network for 3 years where he worked with culinary luminaries such as Bobby Flay and Emeril Lagasse. Chef Spence has appeared twice on Throwdown with Bobby Flay where he emerged the victor in cook offs against the Food Network star and was featured on CBS when he appeared on Tonys Table as well as ABCs Neighborhood Eats, NBCs The Today Show , Sirius Everyday Living with Martha Stewart and TVFNs Chopped. The acclaimed and New York Times-reviewedRipe Kitchen and Baris Mr Spences first entrepreneurial endeavor.

The rest is here:

Nigel Spence: The Recipe for the Perfect Pig Caribbean Journal - Caribbean Journal

Facebook is wrong to censor Donald Trump – The Spectator USA

Donald Trump has hardly covered himself in glory in his latest public responses to the pandemic. His calamitous Axios interview with Australian journalist Jonathan Swan will probably enter the presidential history books for all the wrong reasons.

Nevertheless, the news that Facebook has removed a video of the Presidents latest appearance on Fox News on the grounds that it spreads misinformation about COVID-19 should raise alarm bells in the ears of anyone who cares about free speech. Twitter has similarly frozen a Trump campaign account until the video is removed.

Facebook has taken issue with Trumps comment that children are almost immune from coronavirus. They have labeled this remark as harmful misinformation and therefore taken it upon themselves to ensure that nobody can view the video on their platform.

This heavy handed response is a step up from the platforms previous policy,announced in May, which involved labeling potentially misleading content with a warning. Only when content is in danger of causing imminent physical harm, the policy claimed, should it be removed.

Whether Trumps remarks will cause children to come to imminent physical harm is up for debate. Not only did he qualify his statement with the word almost an admittedly rare moment of restraint the jury is still very much out on the science when it comes to COVID-19 and children. There has not been a single case of a child under 10 passing on coronavirus in contact tracing carried out by the World Health Organization and a study by Britains Royal College of Paediatricians and Child Health found the evidence consistently demonstrates reduced infection and infectivity of children in the transmission chain.

Donald Trump was offering an outspoken opinion on an inconclusive topic many will disagree with him but do his remarks really deserve censorship? As with so much of the science behind the pandemic, theres no way yet of knowing for certain whether he was peddling so-called misinformation.

Facebook has plowed more than $1 million into assembling a global army of fact checkers to monitor its content, but, as this decision painfully shows, any assessment of the facts always requires a degree of subjective judgment. Its simply not possible to police content in an entirely objective, apolitical way.

***Get a digital subscription toThe Spectator.Try a month free, then just $3.99 a month***

Misinformation a word that is almost Orwellian in tone is defined so vaguely that it can be applied increasingly liberally to all manner of online content. Heaven forbid that individual users might deploy their own reasoning skills to assess whether the information they are consuming is useful or valuable. Once again consumers are being treated as easily led fools who can only be trusted with news sources that have been vetted on their behalf.

Mark Zuckerberg is still reeling from the drop in share price and advertising revenue that occurred after the Stop Hate for Profit campaign when he refused to censor Trump earlier in the pandemic. Was Facebook waiting for an opportunity to show its contrition? The decision to remove the Fox video smacks more of big corporate PR than it does a genuine defense of the public interest.

By appointing itself as a cultural and political arbiter, Facebook finds itself on a slippery slope. It must wield its power carefully if it doesnt want to hemorrhage users who are tired of being patronized.

This article was originally published on The Spectators UK website.

Read the original:

Facebook is wrong to censor Donald Trump - The Spectator USA

Fear of Authoritarian Regimes Is Pushing the Film Industry to Self-Censor – Foreign Affairs Magazine

What sets the United States apart from the rest of the world is and has always been its soft power. The Soviets may have equaled the Americans in nuclear capability, but they could never rival the appeal of the American way of life. And even as China tries to spread its culture across the globe, its rise tends to inspire more trepidation than admiration.

Many ingredients combine to give U.S. soft power its strength and reach, but entertainment and culture have always been central to the mix. Film and television have shaped how the world sees the United Statesand how it perceives the countrys adversaries. Yet that unique advantage seems to be slipping away. When it comes to some of the great questions of global power politics today, Hollywood has become remarkably timid. On some issues, it has gone silent altogether.

The most glaring example is the growing wariness of U.S. studios to do anything that might imperil their standing with the Chinese government. Chinas box office is as large as the American one, and entertainment is above all a business. So Hollywood sanitizes or censors topics that Beijing doesnt like. But the phenomenon is not limited to China, nor is it all about revenue. Studios, writers, and producers increasingly fear they will be hacked or harmed if they portray any foreign autocrats in a negative light, be it Russian President Vladimir Putin or North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.

It wasnt always this way. In the 1930s, Charlie Chaplins The Great Dictator took on Adolf Hitler. Later, Martin Scorseses Kundun shone a light on the fate of Tibet, and The Unbearable Lightness of Being and The Hunt for Red October made the Cold War come alive. Today, the market power of Chinaand the cyberpower of some rogue statesis making studios and creatives think twice about producing such daring, overtly political films. And as the retreat from the kind of films that once bolstered American soft power accelerates, Hollywood is running out of real-life antagonists.

Nazi troops were marching into Poland when Chaplin began filming The Great Dictator. The films titular character, a buffoonish, mustachioed dictator named Adenoid Hynkel, was clearly meant to deflate Hitlers magnetic appeal. The British government, seeking to appease Germany, initially suggested it might ban the film from British theaters. (It changed its mind once the war commenced.) Even among Chaplins collaborators in Hollywood, some feared a backlash. (Hollywood also had a financial interest in reaching the large German film market, although historians debate how much this led American studios to bend to Nazi preferences in the 1930s.) U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt is said to have personally encouraged Chaplin to continue production. When the film was released in 1940, it proved an artistic and political triumph and was among the highest-grossing films of the year. Soon, overt condemnations of fascism were the norm: between 1942 and 1945, over half of all Hollywood films touched on the war in some way or another, hundreds of them with an anti-Nazi message.

With the Cold War came a new adversary against which to deploy the promise and glamor of American consumerism. Hollywood was on the frontlines of this effort. American films from the early years of the Cold War often brimmed with anti-Soviet jingoism. (I Was a Communist for the FBI, released in 1951, is a classic of the genre.) Indeed, nearly half of all war-themed movies coming out of Hollywood in the 1950s were made with the Pentagons assistance and vetting to ensure they were sufficiently patriotic. (To this day, the Pentagon and the CIA have active entertainment liaisons.) Even foreign productions were enlisted in the culture war against the Soviets: in 1954, when British animators adapted Animal Farm, George Orwells famous allegorical indictment of Stalinism, they enjoyed secret CIA funding.

When it comes to some of the great questions of global power politics today, Hollywood has become remarkably timid. On some issues, it has gone silent altogether.

By the 1960s, Hollywood productions began to cast the United States and its role in the world in a far more critical light. But even if it was not their intended effect, these films projected American values and bolstered U.S. soft power in their own way: by demonstrating Americans openness and tolerance for dissent. Dr. Strangelove called out the absurdity of apocalyptic nuclear confrontation. Apocalypse Now, Platoon, and even the popular TV series M*A*S*H presented nuanced and sometimes harrowing perspectives on U.S. power abroad.

Today, audiences can take their pick: there is no shortage of jingoistic U.S. films or televisionseries, nor of material that challenges pro-American foreign policy orthodoxies. When it comes to how other great powers are portrayed, however, some hot-button topics are now off limits. American films dealing with the history and people of Tibet, a popular theme in the 1990s, have become a rare sight. There has never been a Hollywood feature film about the dramaticand horrificmassacre in Tiananmen Square in 1989. The 2012 remake of Red Dawn initially centered on a Chinese invasion in the United States but was later rewritten to make North Korea the aggressor instead of China. And Variety called the 2014 blockbuster Transformers: Age of Extinction a splendidly patriotic film, if you happen to be Chinese.

Across the board, film studios appear to take great care not to offend Chinese sensibilities. One scene in last years Abominable, coproduced by DreamWorks and the Shanghai-based Pearl Studio last year, featured a map showing the so-called nine-dash line, which represents Chinas expansiveand highly contestedclaims in the South China Sea. That same year, CBS censored its drama series The Good Fight, cutting a short scene that mentioned several topics that Beijing considers to be taboo, including the religious movement Falun Gong, Tiananmen, and Winnie the Pooha frequent and sly stand-in for Chinese President Xi Jinping on Chinese social media.

The most obvious reason for Hollywoods timidity is the enormous size of Chinas market. Unlike the Soviet Union during the Cold War, China is not only a geopolitical adversary but also a major economic partner. Its box office numbers will soon be the worlds largest. Hollywood never cared much about distributing its movies in the Soviet Union. The same isnt true of China today.

The promise of Chinese funding is another potential reason for studios to toe the party line on sensitive political questions. The Shenzhen-based tech giant Tencent, for instance, is an investor in the highly anticipated remake of Top Gun. An early trailer for the movie shows Tom Cruise wearing his iconic flight jacketbut without the Taiwanese and Japanese flag patches that were sewn into the back in the original 1986 film. The worlds largest cinema chain, which includes the American subsidiary AMC Theatres, is now owned by the Wanda Group, a Chinese conglomerate. Foreign funders can be useful partners, but their presence, unsurprisingly, can also make producers wary of content that might displease their benefactors.

Box office and funding are not the only reasons Hollywood is shying away from certain topics. It is likely that studios and theater chains also worry that some content might lead them to come under attack from foreign hackers. Hollywood itself was already hit in 2014, when Sony Pictures fell victim to a major cyberattack ahead of the premiere of The Interview, a satire of North Koreas leader Kim Jong Un. The North Korean government had previously warned Sony, branding the films depiction of Kim an act of war and promising a resolute and merciless response. Debate remains in the industry over whether the hack was in fact the work of North Korean hackers or rather that of disgruntled insidersor perhaps even Russia. Regardless of the culprit, the attack was an inflection point. Since the days of The Great Dictator, studios have worried that controversial material might hurt their bottom line. But the Sony hack added fear that personal or professional harm might come to those who provoke certain foreign leaders or regimes.

Russia elicits particular fear. When the idea of adapting the book Red Notice, which details the corruption of Putins cronies, was discussed at a major studio a few years ago, executives balked, fearful of the potential repercussions of angering Putin, according to a person familiar with the discussions (The upcoming comedy with the same title, featuring Dwayne Johnson, is unrelated.) Red Sparrow, the 2017 film based on a novel by a former CIA operative, kept the books Russian setting but left out Putin, who had played a central role in the novel. As the Hollywood Reporter notedat the time, by avoiding Putin, Fox also is steering clear of any Russian hackers who might protest.

Fears of a cyberattack are not fiction. HBO, Netflix, and UTA, one of Hollywoods largest talent agencies, have all suffered hacks in recent years; in the case of HBO, federal prosecutors eventually indicted a former Iranian military hacker. Devastating cyberattacks against other U.S. entities, such as the 2015 data breach at the federal Office of Personal Management, which U.S. officials linked to the Chinese government, have shown that no institution is immune from the threat. Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election further fueled the perception in liberal Hollywood that foreign hackers are skilled, ruthless, and essentially undeterrable.

Hollywoods self-censorship is no passing fad. The specter of retaliatory attacksonline or offlineis unlikely to fade, and barring a major economic meltdown, the appeal of Chinas massive moviegoer market will remain. Chinese acquisitions of theater chains, investments in film studies, and cofinancing of movies make Beijing a critical player that can shape the content of American entertainmentand thereby blunt a key aspect of American soft power.

Indeed, the U.S. government increasingly views the entertainment industry as a potential national security liability. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the government body tasked with vetting foreign investments in critical industries, has traditionally not concerned itself with the entertainment sector. But the tide seems to be turning. In 2016, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic senator from New York, wrote a letter to then Treasury Secretary Jack Lew noting the Wanda Groups acquisition of AMC Theatres, as well as its investments in American studios, urging the committee to pay closer attention to such deals.

As the line between technology and media continues to blur, CFIUS will probably heed Schumers call before long. (Indeed, CFIUS is currently engaged in a review of ByteDance, the Chinese parent firm of the massively popular video-based app TikTok.) But greater government scrutiny is unlikely to make studio executives more willing to run with content that might draw the ire of Beijing and threaten their profits. The result is an uneven competitive landscape that rewards those who play it safe. Tibet, Taiwan, and Tiananmen will remain taboo subjects in Hollywood. The same deference shown to Beijing may be extended to countries that lack major box offices but whose regimes have shown themselves willing to attack their perceived opponents abroad, such as North Korea and Russia.

Chaplin attacked Hitler and made money (and art) in the process. But it is hard to imagine a modern-day Chaplin tackling Vladimir Putin, let alone Xi Jinping. Villains in comic-book capes still existindeed they are proliferating. Yet the kind of ripped-from-the-headlines film that once bolstered American soft power vis--vis its rivals is increasingly rare.

Not long ago, an Oscar-winning screenwriter was asked to rewrite one of the biggest video game franchises. The company began by saying that the war-based game had a problem: who was the enemy? It could notbe China, of course. Nor Russia, North Korea, or Iran. As the company executives said, We dont know who we can make the villain anymore.

Loading...Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.

View post:

Fear of Authoritarian Regimes Is Pushing the Film Industry to Self-Censor - Foreign Affairs Magazine

Elon Musk | Biography & Facts | Britannica

Elon Musk, (born June 28, 1971, Pretoria, South Africa), South African-born American entrepreneur who cofounded the electronic-payment firm PayPal and formed SpaceX, maker of launch vehicles and spacecraft. He was also one of the first significant investors in, as well as chief executive officer of, the electric car manufacturer Tesla.

Top Questions

Elon Musk was born on June 28, 1971.

Elon Musk cofounded the electronic payment firm PayPal and founded the spacecraft company SpaceX. He became chief executive officer of the electric-car maker Tesla.

Elon Musk founded SpaceX, a company that makes rockets and spacecraft. He became the chief executive officer and a major funder of Tesla, which makes electric cars.

Musk was born to a South African father and a Canadian mother. He displayed an early talent for computers and entrepreneurship. At age 12 he created a video game and sold it to a computer magazine. In 1988, after obtaining a Canadian passport, Musk left South Africa because he was unwilling to support apartheid through compulsory military service and because he sought the greater economic opportunities available in the United States.

Musk attended Queens University in Kingston, Ontario, and in 1992 he transferred to the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, where he received bachelors degrees in physics and economics in 1995. He enrolled in graduate school in physics at Stanford University in California, but he left after only two days because he felt that the Internet had much more potential to change society than work in physics. That year he founded Zip2, a company that provided maps and business directories to online newspapers. In 1999 Zip2 was bought by the computer manufacturer Compaq for $307 million, and Musk then founded an online financial services company, X.com, which later became PayPal, which specialized in transferring money online. The online auction eBay bought PayPal in 2002 for $1.5 billion.

Musk was long convinced that for life to survive, humanity has to become a multiplanet species. However, he was dissatisfied with the great expense of rocket launchers. In 2002 he founded Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) to make more affordable rockets. Its first two rockets were the Falcon 1 (first launched in 2006) and the larger Falcon 9 (first launched in 2010), which were designed to cost much less than competing rockets. A third rocket, the Falcon Heavy (first launched in 2018), was designed to carry 117,000 pounds (53,000 kg) to orbit, nearly twice as much as its largest competitor, the Boeing Companys Delta IV Heavy, for one-third the cost. SpaceX has announced the successor to the Falcon 9 and the Falcon Heavy: the Super HeavyStarship system. The Super Heavy first stage would be capable of lifting 100,000 kg (220,000 pounds) to low Earth orbit. The payload would be the Starship, a spacecraft designed for providing fast transportation between cities on Earth and building bases on the Moon and Mars. SpaceX also developed the Dragon spacecraft, which carries supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). Dragon can carry as many as seven astronauts, and it had a crewed flight carrying astronauts Doug Hurley and Robert Behnken to the ISS in 2020. Musk sought to reduce the expense of spaceflight by developing a fully reusable rocket that could lift off and return to the pad it launched from. Beginning in 2012, SpaceXs Grasshopper rocket made several short flights to test such technology. In addition to being CEO of SpaceX, Musk was also chief designer in building the Falcon rockets, Dragon, and Grasshopper.

Musk had long been interested in the possibilities of electric cars, and in 2004 he became one of the major funders of Tesla Motors (later renamed Tesla), an electric car company founded by entrepreneurs Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. In 2006 Tesla introduced its first car, the Roadster, which could travel 245 miles (394 km) on a single charge. Unlike most previous electric vehicles, which Musk thought were stodgy and uninteresting, it was a sports car that could go from 0 to 60 miles (97 km) per hour in less than four seconds. In 2010 the companys initial public offering raised about $226 million. Two years later Tesla introduced the Model S sedan, which was acclaimed by automotive critics for its performance and design. The company won further praise for its Model X luxury SUV, which went on the market in 2015. The Model 3, a less-expensive vehicle, went into production in 2017.

Musk expressed reservations about Tesla being publicly traded, and in August 2018 he made a series of tweets about taking the company private, noting that he had secured funding. The following month the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Musk for securities fraud, alleging that the tweets were false and misleading. Shortly thereafter Teslas board rejected the SECs proposed settlement, reportedly because Musk had threatened to resign. However, the news sent Tesla stock plummeting, and a harsher deal was ultimately accepted. Its terms included Musk stepping down as chairman for three years, though he was allowed to continue as CEO.

Dissatisfied with the projected cost ($68 billion) of a high-speed rail system in California, Musk in 2013 proposed an alternate faster system, the Hyperloop, a pneumatic tube in which a pod carrying 28 passengers would travel the 350 miles (560 km) between Los Angeles and San Francisco in 35 minutes at a top speed of 760 miles (1,220 km) per hour, nearly the speed of sound. Musk claimed that the Hyperloop would cost only $6 billion and that, with the pods departing every two minutes on average, the system could accommodate the six million people who travel that route every year. However, he stated that, between running SpaceX and Tesla, he could not devote time to the Hyperloops development.

Follow this link:

Elon Musk | Biography & Facts | Britannica

Blog: Elon Musk and the future of the D&O market – Insurance Age

Elon Musk recently made headlines in the insurance industry press for stating that he has replaced Teslas D&O policy with a personal indemnity for the companys board members in response to disproportionately high renewal quotations.

The story is one high-profile example of a possible trend of companies scaling back on D&O cover as the market continues to harden. So what is moving the market, how are businesses responding and what might the consequences be if companies increasingly rely on

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [emailprotected].

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [emailprotected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [emailprotected] to find out more.

Read the rest here:

Blog: Elon Musk and the future of the D&O market - Insurance Age

Elon Musk says coronavirus pandemic is ‘practice run’ for …

Elon Musk

Mike Blake | Reuters

Elon Musk said how the United States reacts to the Covid-19 pandemic can be viewed as a sort of trial run before an even more deadly virus spreads across the globe.

"At some point there probably will be a pandemic with a high mortality rate, something that's killing a lot of 20 year olds, let's say. This is kind of like a practice run for something that might in the future might have a really high mortality rate," the Tesla CEO said in an interview with comedian Joe Rogan that aired Thursday.

"We kind of got to go through this without it being something that kills vast numbers of young, healthy people," he added.Musk stressed that he believes the mortality rate of Covid-19 is much lower than estimated. The World Health Organization said in March that the Covid-19 mortality rate is 3.4% globally.

The WHO warned last month that more young peopleare becoming critically ill and dying from the coronavirus.Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO's emergencies program, has said that it's a mistake to assume the virus only seriously harms older people and those with underlying health conditions.

Musk has been a vocal critic of how government and health officials are reacting to the coronavirus pandemic that's killed at least 73,431 people in the United States. While talking to analysts in the company's Q1 2020 earnings call, Musk said stay-at-home orders are "forcibly imprisoning people in their homes against all their constitutional rights."

Public health officials have routinely cautioned that reopening too quickly could result in cases of Covid-19 re-accelerating and developing new hot spots that could overwhelm health systems.

Musk that people will come out of the pandemic with healthier habits, such as increased hand washing and mask usage, which he views as a silver lining. More vaccines and cures could be generated too as the understanding of these viruses improve, he added.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

More:

Elon Musk says coronavirus pandemic is 'practice run' for ...

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk’s plans to colonize space are even crazier than we thought – New York Post

As a child, Elon Musk would read comic books and sci-fi novels and dream of fantastical worlds. Now the tech entrepreneur is on the verge of visiting one.

Musks focus narrowed some 20 years ago while poking around NASAs website. He noticed that there was no timetable for a manned mission to Mars. He later called the lack of vision shocking.

Musk, then already a millionaire from the sale of a software company, ditched Silicon Valley for Los Angeles, in order to be closer to the aerospace industry, and set his sights on the stars.

Now the future of space is largely in his and the hands of other free-spending, big-dreaming billionaires like him, including Amazons Jeff Bezos.

But what will this future look like?

Some answers can be found in the new book Star Settlers: The Billionaires, Geniuses, and Crazed Visionaries Out to Conquer the Universe (Pegasus Books) by Fred Nadis, out now.

I see [guys like Musk] almost like medieval cathedral builders, with this multi-century project that theyre willing to take their time and their livelihood, Nadis told The Post.

That said, the author thinks these billionaires may be dreaming a bit too big.

Musk, the founder of Tesla, has said that all of his earthly business ventures are just a way to fund his true passion: colonizing Mars.

His company, SpaceX, is planning to send humans to the red planet in 2024. Within a century, Musk envisions reusable rockets blasting off every two years and ferrying some 200 passengers at a time, ultimately establishing an outpost of a million people.

Its still unclear how theyll survive.

At its closest, Mars is some 35million miles from Earth, and a trip would take around nine months. Once they get there, the problem explorers will face is that Mars atmosphere is much thinner than Earths and the planet generates no electromagnetic field, meaning it gets pounded by cosmic rays and other energy harmful to humans.

Its really challenging, Nadis says. Not quite as simple as SpaceX might make it out to be.

Musk has offered sketchy details of what life off-world might look like. Any Mars colony would have to be self-sustaining and not rely on supplies from Earth. Musk has suggested food be grown on hydroponic farms, either underground or in an enclosed structure to protect the crops from radiation, but because Mars surface gets about half the sunlight Earth does, whatever plants that can be grown will likely have to be supplemented with artificial lights and powering those lights will be no small challenge.

Musk has said farms will be powered by solar panels, though hes offered few details.

Really pretty straightforward, he told Popular Mechanics last year.

In the same interview, the billionaire suggested Mars inhabitants might live under a glass dome with an outdoorsy, fun atmosphere until the planet is terraformed artificially transforming the planet to make it more Earth-like, with a livable atmosphere.

But that plan also presents a problem: A 2018 NASA-sponsored study concluded that terraforming Mars is impossible, because there is not enough carbon dioxide locked in the soil to release into the air.

Musk, however, isnt daunted. He has suggested exploding 10,000 nuclear missiles over Mars surface in order to melt the planets ice reserves, thereby releasing the carbon dioxide locked within. His company has even produced Nuke Mars T-shirts.

Scientists are divided on whether the idea would work. Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann, for example, told US News and World Report in 2015, There are so many things that could go wrong here, it is difficult to know where to start.

Meanwhile, Bezos and his company, Blue Origin, are also focused on moving off-world but onto space colonies. Bezos is worried that the Earths resources will be gone in a few hundred years, spurring the need to leave.

Bezos draws much of his inspiration from the work of Gerard ONeill, a Princeton physicist who in the 1970s laid out a grand design for space colonies.

There are so many things that could go wrong here

ONeill envisioned two giant counter-rotating cylinders rotating in order to create artificial gravity joined at each end by a rod. The massive structures could be 4 miles in diameter and at least 16 miles long.

The interior of each cylinder would offer controlled climates and temperate weather, with an Earth-like landscape consisting of forests, artificial rivers and mountains. To protect from cosmic radiation, the cylinders would be lined with moon rock. Plants, pigs and chickens might be raised for food. Low-gravity sports might serve as entertainment.

Colonists might reside in apartments overlooking farmland and living conditions in the colonies should be much more pleasant than in most places on Earth, ONeill wrote in 1974.

With certain technological advances, ONeill envisioned the cylinders being able to grow to encompass some 30,000 square miles, allowing room for up to 700million people.

The colony would likely be parked in a stable orbit between the Earth and the moon, first calculated by a mathematician in 1772. ONeill has said there is room for several thousand colonies there.

Bezos is a fan of ONeills designs, and has said that he one day envisions a trillion of us living on space colonies, though Nadis predicts thats hundreds of years away.

The Amazon founder said its his generations job to begin laying the groundwork for the colonies so that future generations can actually construct them.

The kids here, and your children, and their grandchildren, youre going to build the ONeill colonies, Bezos told attendees at a Washington, DC, press conference last year.

A colony on the moon might be a more realistic bet in some of our lifetimes. Making it to the moon has long been a dream for many, including Bezos and the Japanese tech billionaire Yusaku Maezawa, who tweeted earlier this year that he was looking for a girlfriend to join him on a trip to the orbiting body.

Nadis said the most likely habitats at first will be simple modular units, built on Earth, then flown via rocket to the moon. But one tantalizing prospect is the moons lava tubes seemingly massive underground tunnels made by lava flows. Living inside them would offer protection from radiation and a more stable temperature (about -4 degrees Fahrenheit) than the surface.

Scientists arent yet sure how big or deep these tubes are and what they might look like inside. In his influential magazine, Moon Miners Manifesto, sci-fi fan Peter Kokh once described a civilization of thousands of people living on the rocky terrain, almost like setting up camp in an Earth cave. Sunlight would be piped down below via shafts or optical cable bundles. Elevators would be built to carry inhabitants to the surface. Ultimately, it might be possible to seal a tube and pressurize it, just like with an airplane, creating a breathable habitat.

But one major problem none of these dreamers have been able to solve is human procreation: It may be extremely difficult in space. Never mind the challenges of having sex in diminished gravity. The radiation in space could render males temporarily and females permanently sterile, Nadis writes.

In one Russian experiment, rats were unable to produce babies in space, and when those space rats returned to Earth and mated with regular rats, the offspring tended to have significant abnormalities.

Other bodily functions might suffer in space as well. Take sleep, for example. Our bodies are cued by light exposure and the 24-hour day. On the moon, though, a day lasts more than 27 Earth days, severely screwing with human circadian rhythms. (Mars day is very similar to Earths.)

One solution is to equip habitats with lights that simulate the sun. The compartments then get darkened for night.

And what about peeing and pooping in diminished gravity? Early astronauts had to do their business in a bag (bits sometimes missed and floated around their space capsule). But, in the future, waste might be recycled. A 2017 paper in the journal Life Sciences in Space Research detailed a compact bioreactor that could recycle Numbers 1 and 2 into an edible goo.

Even with so many potential complications, Nadis appreciates the vision of the billionaire space explorers.

What once was fringe thought escaping to the stars has been inching toward the center, the author writes. A potentially profound cultural change appears underway, as we shift from thinking of ourselves as an earthbound species to one of (potential) spacefarers.

But, he concludes, whether we are worthy candidates for dispersal through the solar system or galaxy remains an open question.

Read more here:

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk's plans to colonize space are even crazier than we thought - New York Post

To understand how rich billionaires really are, use this calculator – The Guardian

We all know Jeff Bezos is very rich but wouldnt you love to know how long it would take him to, for example, earn your entire years salary, tackle your entire student debt or pay off your mortgage?

A new website will you give you these exact numbers, as they apply to Bezos and 14 other tech moguls. The company a text messaging company says it uses data on salary, bonuses, earnings from equity and other forms of compensation from 2019 SEC filings to let you calculate just how quickly people like Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Susan Wojcicki of YouTube and Reed Hastings of Netflix could pay off all of your expenses.

The data tells us the 15 best-paid CEOs in tech have a combined annual income of over $83bn which is greater than the entire gross domestic product of hundreds of countries.

Tech moguls are now so rich that its not unusual to see shocking comparisons that demonstrate exactly how egregious their salaries are. When Bezos was touted to soon become the worlds first trillionaire (he isnt yet but his net worth of $144bn puts him on track to become one by 2026), we learned he was richer than entire countries and later also found out he was richer than combined countries (to take an example: Jamaica, Iceland, Tunisia and Estonia).

Remember when Elizabeth Warren helped billionaires calculate how much they would pay under her ultra-millionaire tax proposals, and it was pointed out that under her plan, even after tax, Bill Gates would still be a billionaire 60 years from now? Oh, and that time we learned that Zuckerberg takes about two minutes to earn the average US yearly wage?

Now that I know Bezos earns my entire salary in under a minute, it does make the additional $2 an hour that Amazon employees briefly received for working during the pandemic seem even more paltry. (Bezos has now ended that entitlement, despite the virus still raging across the US.)

As for Elon Musk, he could pay my monthly rent after less than 30 minutes of work which makes you wonder why he violated Californias stay-at-home order to keep Teslas factory open, and why he sued local authorities after he was forced to shut it. We can all understand how eager he must be to continue his work (particularly his pressing mission to, er, colonize Mars) but a global pandemic feels like a good moment for pause.

Then again, when you have so much money, it may just not matter: Musks net-worth is almost 20 times the entire budget of the county he sued.

Continued here:

To understand how rich billionaires really are, use this calculator - The Guardian

Elon Musk’s SpaceX: We now want to bring Starlink internet from space to 5 million in US – ZDNet

Elon Musk's SpaceX has applied for a license to roll out five million 'UFO on a stick' end-user terminals, after 700,000 US residents signed up to be updated about the service's availability.

"SpaceX seeks to increase the number of fixed earth stations authorized under this blanket license from 1,000,000 to 5,000,000," the company said in an application to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The FCC in March approved SpaceX's request to operate one million end-user terminals in the US. Then in June the company invited potential customers to register their interest in Starlink broadband by providing their email address and zip code.

SEE:Hiring Kit: Autonomous Systems Engineer (TechRepublic Premium)

SpaceX told the FCC it is applying for five million end-user terminals "due to the extraordinary demand for access to the Starlink non-geostationary orbit satellite system".

The invite was opened as part of SpaceX's plan to launch the Starlink public beta in North America in the coming month, by which time it will have put into orbit just 600 of the 12,000 satellites the FCC has approved for launch.

"Despite the fact that SpaceX has yet to formally advertise this system's services, nearly 700,000 individuals represented in all 50 states signed up over a matter of just days to register their interest in said services at http://www.starlink.com," SpaceX said in its new application.

"To ensure that SpaceX is able to accommodate the apparent demand for its broadband internet access service, SpaceX Services requests a substantial increase in the number of authorized units."

SpaceX filed for the new authorization on July 31, one day after the FCC approved Amazon's Project Kuiper application to launch 3,236 broadband beaming satellites. Amazon plans to open its service once 578 Kuiper satellites have been launched.

While none of the nearly 700,000 people is yet a Starlink subscriber, the volume of early interest in Starlink satellite broadband reflects both Musk's marketing nous and the number of people in the US population who aren't satisfied with existing broadband options.

House Democrats in June announced a proposal to overhaul the current FCC definition of broadband by reclassifying 25Mbps download speeds as 'unserved' as part of a $100bn fiber broadband rollout.

SEE: From Earth to orbit with Linux and SpaceX

Elon Musk has said SpaceX needs about 400 Starlink satellites to provide "minor" coverage and 800 for "moderate" coverage in North America. He's also said that Starlink will cater to just 3% to 4% of the population in unserved and underserved areas, but that it would not be suitable for dense urban environments due to bandwidth limitations.

For the section of the population it does serve, SpaceX claims it will offer high-speed broadband with an estimated latency of less than 50 milliseconds.

Also in June it asked the FCC for approval to launch a further 30,000 second generation satellites.

Originally posted here:

Elon Musk's SpaceX: We now want to bring Starlink internet from space to 5 million in US - ZDNet

Russian Indigenous groups call on Elon Musk not to buy battery metals from Nornickel – The Independent Barents Observer

The company that recently made international headlines for causing environmental disasters on the Taimyr Peninsula by spilling 20,000 tons of diesel fuel into a river in the fragile Arctic ecosystems is under increased pressure.

In a letter to Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, the Aborigen Forum urgehim not to buy nickel, copper and other products from Nornickel until the company conducts a full and independent assessment of the environmental damage caused by its production.

This week, The Barents Observer could tell the story about dying tree leaves caused by massive air-pollutionover a several square kilometers large area near Nornickels smelters in Monchegorsk on the Kola Peninsula.

In the letter, the Aboriginal-Forum describes environmental pollution as routine occurrencepointing to the river oil spill on the Taimyr Peninsula as an on-going environmental disaster, but not an isolated incident.

The lands of indigenous people appropriated by the company for industrial production now resemble a lunar landscape, and traditional use of these lands isno longer possible, the letter to Musk reads.

Indigenous peoples in the Murmansk region is the Smi, while the Nentsy, Nganasan, Entsy, Dolgan and Evenki live on the Taimyr Peninsula in Siberia.

With mines and metallurgical factories one the Taimyr Peninsula and in the Murmansk region, Nornickel is the worlds largest nickel producer and ranks among the top ten copper producers. It also produces cobalt. All three minerals are important components in the current booming battery production for electric vehicles.

Teslas Elon Musk recently called on miners to produce more nickel. Tesla will give you a giant contract for a long period of time if you mine nickel efficiently and in an environmentally sensitive way,he said in a plea tomining companies quoted by Bloomberg.

It is about 75 kilograms of nickel in an average Tesla Model S battery pack. The metal makes batteries energy dense so vehicles can drive further on a single charge. Tesla sold 367,500 cars last year and production is ramping up with new factories in China, Germany and Texas.

Other carmakers, like VW, BMW, Hyundai and others, are all rushing to secure raw materials for battery cars believed to count for millions of new vehicles annually within the next few years.

Dmitry Berezhkov is one of the experts working with the Aborigen-Forum network in Russia. He says to The Barents Observer it is difficult for the indigenous peoples to have their voices heard.

It is not only difficult, It became impossible during the recent years,he says.

Russia is building a new Arctic industrial reality rapidly and indigenous people are not considered in these activities at all.

Berezhkov names Russian authorities international statements about respect for indigenous peoples as propaganda, and especially so in the Arctic Council where Kremlin, according to him, has full control of the voices from the official Russian indigenous peoples representatives.

Moscow takes over the Chair of the Arctic Council in 2021 for a two-year period.

In reality, they dont pay any attention to indigenous peoples rights on the ground, Dmitry tells.

He hopes the letter to Elon Musk could help.

Nobody knows where Tesla gets the battery metals from as the company doesnt disclose its suppliers. But we consider Musks request to nickel producers as an occasion to pay attention to the environmental degradation of indigenous peoples traditional lands, Dmitry Berezhkov says.

The Aborigen Forum asks battery car makers not to buy metals from Nornickel until the company prepares and implements a plan for re-cultivating contaminated lands on the Taimyr Peninsula and in the Murmansk region.

Also, Nornickel should revise its policies for engaging with indigenous peoples, making new guidelines based in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the network writes.

As previously reported by The Barents Observer,Nornickel is cooperating with German chemicals producer BASF on a factory in Finland for battery components to carmakers in Europe. Nornickel will supply nickel and cobalt.

Visit link:

Russian Indigenous groups call on Elon Musk not to buy battery metals from Nornickel - The Independent Barents Observer

The NY Times and Elon Musk Deal With Bolivia – Fair Observer

Maria Silvia Trigo and Anatoly Kurmanaev have penned an article for The New York Times that describes the dramatic protests in Bolivia against the interim government. As so often in NYT articles, the content reveals more about the newspaper itself than about the topic it analyzes.

Treating the current instability in Bolivia with the perspective acquired 10 months after the ouster of Evo Morales, the former president, should have provided a perfect opportunity to review the complex drama surrounding that coup. Instead, the authors chose to describe the dramatic events unfolding today as a simple contest between two opposing groups. The article reports on the roadblocks organized by anti-government protesters that have paralyzed several cities in Bolivia. It cites two motives behind the protests: to challenge the delay of general elections and rebuke the governments poor response to the coronavirus pandemic.

READ MORE

The authors have reduced an existential geopolitical drama to little more than a vigorous election campaign between two sides with contrary views of the best way of governing. They do take the trouble to mention, in a single sentence, the crucial spark that set off the crisis: Mr. Morales, Bolivias first Indigenous president, was ousted from power in November after a fraught bid for a fourth term.

Here is todays 3D definition:

Fraught:

A convenient adjective to describe a situation characterized by factors that cause anxiety and stress leading to suffering while creating the impression that the reasons for the anxiety are inexplicable, there being no identifiable party responsible for either the stress or the suffering, which also may simply be imaginary

The New York Times has an excellent reason for avoiding to delve into the complex facts behind Morales fraught bid for a fourth term. The Times itself not only misreported those facts at the time of Morales ouster, but the journal actively contributed to justifying a right-wing, anti-indigenous coup led by a fanatically evangelical Christian faction that the US government and its media supported under manifestly false pretenses.

The authors are skilled in The Times art of crafting reporting to get a political message across while hiding their own allegiances from view. In the sentence cited above Mr. Morales. was ousted from power the authors deftly use the passive construction to exclude any reference to how the ousting took place, by whom and with what objective. It was just something that happened, possibly on its own. The ouster was successful and now belongs to history. The passive mood removes any consideration of accountability.

In an earlier article published in June revealing the uncomfortable truth that the pretext for removing Morales was flawed, the authors also demonstrated their talent at carefully designing their wording to remove the question of agency: Mr. Moraless downfall paved the way to a staunchly right-wing caretaker government, led by Jeanine Aez, which has not yet fulfilled its mandate to oversee swift new elections.

Calling it Mr. Moraless downfall implies that, like Humpty Dumpty, the president teetered and fell off the wall. Nobody pushed him. The metaphor paved the way implies that the Anez government simply wandered innocently into a situation of Morales making and profited from it. Continuing to call it a caretaker government denies what most observers had noticed at least since January: that the right-wing former senator entered the presidential palace claiming a much bigger mandate, as Angus McNelly put it.

Finally, adding yet to the observation that the Anez government has not fulfilled its mandate fails to recognize the increasingly evident fact that it has no intention to keep its promise. The very idea of a mandate also obscures the more egregious fact that nobody actually issued a mandate. Back in the thick of events in November 2019, Kurmanaev, quoting Javier Corrales of Amherst College, described the position of the Anez faction: Without a popular mandate, they are pushing forward some of the most objectionable aspects of their agenda.

Then theres the question of possible US involvement, which The New York Times famously dislikes mentioning whenever left-wing governments fall. In the June article, the authors offered a single hint at the US State Departments likely involvement in the coup. The United States State Department quickly reacted to the O.A.S. [Organization of American States] statement, accusing electoral officials of trying to subvert Bolivias democracy, they wrote.

This leaves the impression that the US was nothing more than a neutral observer of the events that played out and that its only interest in the affair is safeguarding democracy. The same article highlighted the flawed accusations of electoral fraud that led to Morales ouster accusations put forward by the OAS, which is largely obedient to the US. Clearly, with hindsight, the US was quite content to see Bolivian democracy not only subverted but canceled.

The article concludes with the now traditional false balance or bothsidesism characteristic of NYT journalism. Referring to the strategic implications around the current protests and their possible political consequences, the authors quote Filipe Carvalho, a Washington-based analyst. Both sides are playing the pandemic for electoral gain, adding a new level of tensions, he said. This leads the journalists to the melancholy conclusion: Whoever wins will take control of a highly divided country in deep recession and few options to restart economic growth.

Anatoly Kurmanaevs article on December 5, 2019,began with this sentence: An independent international audit of Bolivias disputed election concluded that former President Evo Moraless officials resorted to lies, manipulation and forgery to ensure his victory.

On June 7 of this year, Kurmanaev and Maria Silvia Trigo provided an update with this explanation: A close look at Bolivian election data suggests an initial analysis by the O.A.S. that raised questions of vote-rigging and helped force out a president was flawed. Instead of pointing to politically interested deceit, they attributed everything to the fault of undue haste. Quoting Calla Hummel, a Bolivia observer at the University of Miami, they write, The issue with the O.A.S. report is that they did it very quickly.

As The Times reporters consistently skirted around the facts concerning Morales ouster, two other reporters, Vijay Prashad and Alejandro Bejarano, writing for Salon, have provided a more complete historical background. They have updated the history with a revealing story about how American interests have been involved in the Bolivian economy well before the dramatic events of 2019.

The authors call Morales ouster the lithium coup. In July, Elon Musk stepped up to the public witness box with a tweet that inadvertently provided evidence of the economic and political intrigue underlying Bolivias drama. The billionaire entrepreneur began by advising the American people against the evils of too much generosity. Another government stimulus package is not in the best interests of the people imo, Musk opined on Twitter. This provoked the following response from a user called Armani: You know what wasnt in the best interest of people? the U.S. government organizing a coup against Evo Morales in Bolivia so you could obtain the lithium there.

Instead of denying any connection with the coup, Musk defiantly tweeted: We will coup whoever we want. Deal with it. Apparently realizing that this might be interpreted as a confession of collusion, he later deleted the tweet.

This battle of tweets could be dismissed as just another example of Musks Trump-like irresponsible addiction to Twitter. It doesnt prove Teslas CEO had any hand in or knowledge of the events that led to the coup in Bolivia, though the lithium factor and Musks initiatives in South America would seem to point in that direction.

But Musks formulation of his message is revealing. He claims we have the right to foment coups. He begins by claiming to speak in the name of the interests of the [American] people. But the we he identifies with is not the people. Its US imperial power, a force that for more than a century has intervened against whoever we want as it has both successfully and unsuccessfully sought to overthrow any government guilty of showing a preference for the interest of its people to the detriment of American businesses.

On the day following Musks original tweet advising against a stimulus package following the economic downturn in the US, The New York Times Maureen Dowd published an interview with him in which she affirmed that he also really does want to save the world and make products that bring joy. In the end, thats how The Times has treated all the coups of the past. The rest of the world simply has to learn to deal with it.

*[In the age of Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain, another American wit, the journalist Ambrose Bierce, produced a series of satirical definitions of commonly used terms, throwing light on their hidden meanings in real discourse. Bierce eventually collected and published them as a book, The Devils Dictionary, in 1911. We have shamelessly appropriated his title in the interest of continuing his wholesome pedagogical effort to enlighten generations of readers of the news. Read more of The Daily Devils Dictionary on Fair Observer.]

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observers editorial policy.

The rest is here:

The NY Times and Elon Musk Deal With Bolivia - Fair Observer

Elon Musk’s Neuralink Chip Could Lead to a ‘Black Mirror’ Episode in Real Life: Experts Warn It Could be Hacked – Tech Times

The hype around Elon Musk's mysterious Neuralink brain-computer interface (BCI) is getting bigger as the billionaire tech CEO is slowly detailing how the chip would work, but experts have a warning: the chip, along with other neural interfaces, could be hacked.

(Photo : Gerd Altmann from Pixabay)Experts warn that brain-computer interface like the Neuralink chip could be hacked.

According to a Daily Mailreport, experts have issued a warning that hackers could target these BCIs, including Musk's Neuralink chip, to create a worse breach than anything else.

Based on the report, hackers could exploit the tech, read and steal thoughts and memories, and delete your skills, which could be easily mistaken for a Black Mirrorepisode--only that it could happen in real life.

Elon Musk has been working on Neuralink since 2016 when he first founded it.

Not much has been said about the company, nor the brain chip they have been working on except a few details that Musk has announced over his Twitter account.

Read Also: [BEWARE] China's All-Seeing Massive Surveillance Could Monitor Every 'Millimeter' of an Entire Population

But one thing is for sure: Musk said he has been developing the neural interface so that humans could compete with artificial intelligence and avoid a looming Singularity apocalypse, which is the theory that AI and robots will soon overtake people.

In a previous interview with the New York Times, Musk predicted that in the next five years, humankind could already be overtaken by AI, and although humanity won't become extinct, it could be "uncomfortable."

A few of the details that the tech CEO has shared via social media is the chip's ability to cure depression, change the wearer's mood, hear thingsthey weren't able to hear before, and even cure mobility problems, which could be helpful for people who have paralysis due to injured spines.

But while BCIs, specifically the Neuralink's chip, appears to be a great answer to many problems with our bodies, security experts are worried.

ZDNetreports that experts believe that cybercriminals would try and hack into these types of technologies, especially as they could use it to bring down large corporations to even nations as they could read the minds of political leaders, business executives, and such.

Furthermore, experts could soon use these neural chips as an authentication mechanism as our brain activities' patterns are incredibly unique.

They believe it could be used to permit access to sensitive data, which is why cybercriminals think it would be worthwhile to hack into these systems, despite the challenge they would face in replicating brain waves.

But in the event a hack takes place, what are the repercussions?

"What type of damage will [an attack] do to the brain, will it erase your skills or disrupt your skills? What are the consequences - would they come in the form of just new information put into the brain, or would it even go down to the level of damaging neurons that then leads to a rewiring process within the brain that then disrupts your thinking," said director of research Dr. Sasitharan Balasubramaniam from the Waterford Institute of Technology's Telecommunication Software and Systems Group (TSSG).

To avoid these worst-case scenarios, manufacturers such as Musk's Neuralink would have to ensure the security of these interfaces by using all sorts of familiar measures to "ensure that no unauthorized person can modify their functionality."

Read Also: [VIDEO] Human Tongues Could Control Games, Phones, or Computer Through This Device!

This article is owned by TechTimes.

Written by: Nhx Tingson

2018 TECHTIMES.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

The rest is here:

Elon Musk's Neuralink Chip Could Lead to a 'Black Mirror' Episode in Real Life: Experts Warn It Could be Hacked - Tech Times

How did the American Jewish Congress hire a budding white nationalist? – Forward

A political activist with ties to white nationalists, who in June led a rally defending a statue of Teddy Roosevelt, worked recently as the marketing director of the American Jewish Congress, a century-old organization that was once the voice of working-class Jews on anti-Nazism and civil rights.

Gavin Wax, 26, is a graduate of Baruch College who became marketing director of the Congress in November, according to his LinkedIn page.

Wax declined to comment after being reached by phone.

Image by Twitter

Gavin Wax

He no longer works at the American Jewish Congress, although the organization did not fire him because of his political views, wrote Akri Cipa, a policy analyst at the Congress, in an email. Those views include strong anti-immigrant sentiment and support for white nationalist and right-wing extremist groups.

Cipa said the organization only learned about Waxs far-right views after being contacted Tuesday by the Forward. Cipa did not respond to a question about when Wax had been terminated.

But Waxs far-right views and affiliations were already a matter of public record when he was hired. Since October, 2018, he has been listed as a partner in the Yorkville Group, a political consultancy firm whose founder bragged about advising the anti-Muslim, Nazi-sympathizing German political party Alternative fur Deutschland. (The firms offices are located near the historically German Manhattan neighborhood of Yorkville, which was the stronghold of the pro-Nazi German American Bund organization in the 1930s.)

Also in October, 2018, Wax also called the Proud Boys described by the ADL as a violent, nationalistic, Islamophobic, transphobic and misogynistic extremist group as a patriotic fraternal group who like America and beer, in an American Thinker article.

More recently, Wax earned media coverage for planning and leading a rally defending the statue of Teddy Roosevelt on the steps of the American Museum of Natural History. The museum has asked permission from the city to remove the monument because it explicitly depicts Black and Indigenous people as subjugated and racially inferior.

This is about much more than a statue, Wax said at the June 28 rally. You cant judge premodern people by postmodern standards of morality, because at that rate you wont have a history.

Image by Getty

The rally Wax planned on June 28 in defense of a statue of Teddy Roosevelt.

Cipa said Wax identifies as Jewish, and on Twitter Wax has called himself an Italian Jew.

In an emailed statement, the Congress wrote of Wax: We certainly never had any impression that he held any far-right, white supremacist sympathies nor would we have tolerated such views as this organization not only abhors extremism but actively works against its perpetrators. It strikes us as being unusual that someone with extremist views would want to work for a civil rights organization like the American Jewish Congress.

Waxs ties to far-right figures have grown stronger in recent months, according to a lengthy report on him in the blog Angry White Men.

In July, he appeared on a podcast run by VDARE, a white-nationalist and anti-immigrant website. He was interviewed by John Derbyshire, who was fired as a columnist at National Review in 2012 after including a racist statement about Black people in an article and who has written sympathetically about white supremacy.

On Twitter, Wax has praised Sen. Joseph McCarthy and Enoch Powell, the British politician who delivered the violently anti-immigrant Rivers of Blood speech in 1968, and has parroted conspiracy theories about George Soros, the Hungarian Jewish businessman and philanthropist.

Other Jews move in far-right activist circles. Laura Loomer emerged in 2016 as a far-right provocateur. (Loomer is currently running to unseat the Jewish Democrat Lois Frankel in Floridas 21st Congressional District.) Stephen Miller, a top White House aide, has pushed white nationalist ideas to the Conservative website Breitbart.

Waxs bio also lists that he is the publisher of The Schpiel, a right-wing news site.

The American Jewish Congress was once a major Jewish advocacy group that supported civil rights, and it remains in the Conference of Presidents, a consortium of the largest and most influential American Jewish organizations.

Jack Rosen, an investor and businessman, took control of the Congress in 2010 the wake of the Bernie Madoff scandal, which crippled the organizations finances. Rosen retains a small staff for the Congress and has focused the organization primarily on support of Israel.

Rosen did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

Ari Feldman is a staff writer at the Forward. Contact him at feldman@forward.com or follow him on Twitter @aefeldman

Excerpt from:

How did the American Jewish Congress hire a budding white nationalist? - Forward

Recruiting for Utopia: Print and the Imagination Opens Next Month at Fruitlands Museum – ArtfixDaily

After design by Charles Fitch & Apollos Hale, Detail, A Chronological Chart of the Visions of Daniel & John, 1842, hand-tinted lithograph on cloth, 55 x 39 inches, J.V. Himes, Boston.Fruitlands Museum collection.

Boston & Harvard, MA Shana Dumont Garr and Fruitlands Museum have announced their newest exhibition, Recruiting for Utopia: Print and the Imagination, opening to the public September 5,2020 and running through March 2021. Recruiting for Utopia considers the influence of printed matter on Utopian thought in 1840s New England and encompasses both historical and contemporary sections.

Recruiting for Utopia is about how and why people share ideas that feel urgent and of the utmost importance in their time, notes organizing curator, Shana Dumont Garr. Today, in a relatively secular society, we might consider climate change to be comparable to the Biblical apocalypse that loomed in the fears of many nineteenth-century New Englanders. The exhibition focuses on the power of design to share a particular ethos and influence others.

Radical and alternative ideas were among the first to be distributed via the growing industry of print facilitated by new technology in the early 19th century. Inspired by the Millerite banners in the Fruitlands Museum collection, the focus of the historical portion of the exhibition illuminates the use of and message it shared, specifically the imminent, apocalyptic end of the world. Banners hung on tents and pamphlets shared at meetings were an important part of the Millerite message, with the group effectively sharing their message through print in the United States.

In addition to Millerite ephemera, subject matter from the Shakers and Transcendentalists are included in the exhibition. New England has always served as an incubator for alternative ways of society and Recruiting for Utopia incorporates wider themes, including early female spiritual and lay leaders in the United States whose influence we can trace with early testimonies, biographies, and even an anonymously published narrative. At a time when females having influence outside of the domestic sphere was rare, figures including Mother Ann Lee (1736-1784) and Jemima Wilkinson (1752-1819) provide inspiring examples of early leading female leaders.

Accompanying the historical materials show, the contemporary section showcases the priorities of activism and community building still prevalent in New England today. Contemporary publications include the print of an Auction Block Memorial by Steve Locke, a Repatriation Comic by Sonya Atalay, Jen Shannon, and John G. Swagger, and a poster by Demian Dineyazhi. These materials will appear throughout the museum, including historical spaces. This part of the exhibition is co-curated by art historian Paige Johnston.

In addition, site-specific artwork by artist-in-residence Jane Marsching complements the significance of print both historically and now whilereferring directly to history reflected in Fruitlands Museums permanent collection. Marschingcreates large-scale banners with ink she made from plant materials foraged from the Fruitlands forest and printed on Tyvek, a collaborative process executed on the museum grounds. The banners feature quotes from authors in the Museums Transcendentalist archives as well as utopian thinkers from the mid-nineteenth century and today. These banners hang in trees through the landscape and connect the cultural landmarks of the Museum with its trail system.

Artist-in-Residence Maria Molteni creates a performance video within the museums 1790s Shaker Office. Developed in coordination with artists Allison Halter and Gabe C. Elder, the film incorporates the imagery of Shaker gift drawings or sacred sheets, spiritualism, and nature.

In conjunction with Recruiting for Utopia, concurrent and related exhibitions are also on display at the deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum, also a Trustees reservation located in Lincoln, and the Fitchburg Art Museum.

Visionary New EnglanddeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park | Lincoln, MA | October 8, 2020 March 14, 2021

Visionary, mystical, and utopian practices are crucial to New Englands culture, history, and character. From the experimental agrarian communities founded in the 1840s, such as Brook Farm andFruitlands, to the intersections of spiritualism and experimental psychology at the turn of the 20th century, New England has long developed alternative ways of nurturing community, personal growth, and societal reform. Related artists and writers frequently united their intimate connection to nature with a search for access to alternate dimensions or higher powers.

After Spiritualism: Loss and Transcendence in Contemporary ArtFitchburg Art Museum | Fitchburg, MA | Through September 6, 2020

The group exhibition offers an occasion to reflect on personal and shared losses through varied contemporary art practices. The works on view focus on trauma and mourning and is inspired by Spiritualisms aims to connect the living with the dead for comfort, guidance, and enlightenment.

About Fruitlands Museum

Fruitlands Museum, a property of the Trustees since 2016, is a historic, natural, and cultural destination in Harvard, MA. Founded in 1914 by author and preservationist Clara Endicott Sears, the Museum takes its name from an experimental utopian community that existed on this site in 1843 and was led by Transcendentalists Bronson Alcott and Charles Lane. Fruitlands is dedicated to New England history, art, and nature, and its collections include: The Fruitlands Farmhouse, The Shaker Gallery, The Native American Gallery, and The Art Gallery. It is located on 210 acres of land with panoramic views of the Nashua River Valley, including 2.5 miles of meadows and woodland recreational trails. http://www.thetrustees.org/fruitlands.

About The TrusteesFounded in the city of Boston by landscape architect and open space visionary Charles Eliot in 1891, the Trustees is the nations first and the Commonwealths largest preservation and conservation non-profit. For more than 125 years, we have worked to preserve and protect dynamic natural and cultural sites from beaches and community gardens to farms, historic homesteads, designed landscapes, and hiking trails for public use and enjoyment. Today we are working to engage a larger constituency of Massachusetts residents, members, visitors, and public and private partners in our work to help protect our beloved and fragile natural, ecological, cultural, and coastal sites for current and future generations.

Excerpt from:

Recruiting for Utopia: Print and the Imagination Opens Next Month at Fruitlands Museum - ArtfixDaily

Utopia: Amazon Preview Shows Some Conspiracy Theories Are Real – Bleeding Cool News

WhileGone Girl author-screenwriter Gillian Flynn's upcoming Amazon Studios adaptation Utopia may still be listed as "Fall 2020" as its premiere window, that doesn't mean it's too early for a new set of preview images that we would like to say clear up everything and give us an easier understanding of what the series is all about. But they don't, and we don't think they were intended to. What they did do was confuse us in all the right ways, and curious to see how it all connects- so we're guessing "mission accomplished" (and just in case you don't believe us, there's something waiting for you mid-article that makes our case for us).

Utopia follows a group of young adults who meet online that are mercilessly hunted by a shadowy deep state organization after they come into possession of a near-mythical cult underground graphic novel. Within the comic's pages, they discover the conspiracy theories may actually be real and are forced into the dangerous, unique, and ironic position of saving the world. John Cusack(High Fidelity), Ashleigh LaThrop(Fifty Shades Freed), Rainn Wilson(The Office),Sasha Lane (American Honey), Javon "Wanna" Walton (Euphoria), Jessica Rothe(Happy Death Day 2U), Ashleigh LaThrop (Fifty Shades Freed), Dan Byrd (Cougar Town), Desmin Borges (You're The Worst), Farrah Mackenzie (Ascension), Christopher Denham (Billions), Felisha Terrell (Shooter), andDustin Ingram (Watchmen) star.

But that's not all. We're taking a brief break from the preview images to offer up the next two cryptic teasers, with their ominous captions: "First we reap, then we sow" and "A vial a day keeps the doctor at play."

Cusack's Dr. Kevin Christie is a charismatic, media-savvy, and brilliant biotech mind who wants to change the world through science. Wilson's Michael Stearns was once a promising virologist, now a forgotten scientist who's lost his edgeunder-appreciated and underfunded in his laboratory work. When a nationwide outbreak of a deadly flu arises, Michael offers his expertise, and soon finds he has landed smack in the middle of something much bigger. Lane's Jessica Hyde: tough and feral after a life on the run from a mysterious and dangerous group, Jessica believes all the answers about her perplexing life story may be hidden in the graphic novel Utopia. Walton's Grant is streetwise beyond his years, independent, fearless, crafty, and charming. Raised in the Kansas City projects by an alcoholic single mother, he's now roaming the streets alone.

Grant embarks on a dangerous mission to uncover the secrets from Utopia. Rothe's Samantha is extremely idealistic, sharp-witted, and a natural-born leader. She earnestly believes in changing the world through action and scoffs at cheap rhetoric about progress. She could school any comic book nerd about the graphic novel Utopia and is embarking on a mission to uncover its secrets. Terrell's Hailey Alvez is a sharp, rising star in journalism with a friendly air and affable manner. She interviews pharmaceutical giant Kevin Christie about his groundbreaking new product and asks some serious, pointed questions. Ingram's Tallman is extremely wealthy and eerily eccentric. A collector of priceless comic books, Tallman will go to great lengths to get his hands on the mysterious graphic novel, Utopia.

LaThrop's Becky is bright and big-hearted, using her kindness and empathy as a way to get closer to the graphic novel she desperately needs to save her life. Borges' Wilson Wilson is a brilliant, paranoid, and eccentric conspiracy theorist who is obsessed with Utopia and convinced that it hides more dark secrets about the very future of our world. Mackenzie's Alice is an adopted foster child who is bright and curious, with a steely resolve when challenged and thrown into the dangerous world of our Nerds. Denham's Arby is a shark-like menace who's emotionally stunted and socially disconnected but whose cold facade starts crumbling as he learns some dangerous truths about his childhood.

Created byDennis Kelly and produced by Endemol Shine Group's UK production studio Kudos, the original Utopia premiered on Channel 4 and aired for two seasons. Leadcharacter Jessica Hyde was portrayed byFiona O'Shaughnessy(Striking Out, My Mother and Other Strangers) Utopia is a co-production between Endemol Shine North America/Kudos and Amazon Studios. Flynn, Kelly, Jessica Rhoades, Kudos'Karen Wilson, and Diederick Santer, andSharon Hallwill executive produce. President of Unscripted & Scripted Television for Endemol Shine North AmericaSharon Levywill oversee production.

Serving as Television Editor since 2018, Ray began five years earlier as a contributing writer/photographer before being brought on board as staff in 2017.

twitter instagram envelope

Read the original here:

Utopia: Amazon Preview Shows Some Conspiracy Theories Are Real - Bleeding Cool News

Hey Look, There Are Some Cars In That New Animated Star Trek Show – Jalopnik

Screenshot: CBS / Jason Torchinsky

As you may be aware, the Start Trek franchise is finally taking a real stab at a show that doesnt take itself so damn seriously. I mean, yeah, I get that its wonderful to have a show about the future thats utopian and not the now-far-more-common dystopian hellscape, but even a utopia needs to get the piss taken from it every so often. The show Lower Decks intends to do that, and Ill let our pals at iO9 handle full reviews because I just want to talk about the fact that an actual car shows up in the pilot episode.

Of course, by actual car I mean something thats very much not an actual car, because not only is it fictitious, and wont exist until several centuries from now even if it wasnt fictional, its animated, so its just a bunch of drawings of a fake car thats from the future.

Still, it has actual (again, not actual actualwhy am I explaining fiction here? Get a grip, Jason) wheels, which, for a vehicle on a Star Trek show, is pretty rare.

Heres what it looks like:

G/O Media may get a commission

Huh. Thats kind of small. Hold on. Computer! Zoom and enhance!

Thats a little better. Lets try again. Computer! Uh, focus in on the coordinates with, um, the car, and zoom and enhance! Maximum resolution! Engage!

Oh good, much better.

Okay, so, lets see what were looking at here: its very much a utility vehicle type of design, with an open cab that I think seats four roughly human-shaped beings and with a short open truck bed at the rear.

Its got large wheels with lots of suspension travel and looks to be made to handle off-road use, which I suppose is smart since it may be used on planets without developed road networks.

If it looks kind of familiar, that may be because weve seen a vehicle like this at least once before in Star Trek, in the 2002 movie Star Trek: Nemesis that, if I recall, kind of sucked? I dont really remember, to be honest.

The Nemesis vehicle, the Argo, was very similar in overall design, but a bit different in details. Still, I think the Lower Decks truck thing is pretty similar.

Having an open cab is kind of a strange choice for a multi-use, multi-planet ground vehicle when you think about it. If this thing could end up on all kinds of planets with all kinds of environments and climates, wouldnt you want to have an enclosed cab that could be heated or cooled as needed?

I mean, hell, at least a windshield would be a good idea, so you dont get any weird alien bugs slamming into your face, which could cause all kinds of problems. Hell, the plot of the first episode here revolves around problems from an alien insect!

The front end design is quite different from the Argo, too, with a larger, more prominent intake area for, presumably, cooling air and some lights, which of course would be useful. Theres no evidence of signal lights or anything like that, which I suppose makes sense given that these are not really designed for established road networks.

Maybe the lights are advanced enough to interface with local planetary databases and configure themselves to blink in whatever crazy alien color aliens like to use to indicate turns or other maneuvers.

Man, Id love to be an exoturnsignologist.

The instruments and controls seem to consist of a Starfleet-standard LCARS display in the center (perhaps with provision for Apple ShuttlePlay or Android Starship) and a yoke-like steering assembly that may also control throttle and brake.

If I had to guess what powered these things, Id go with some kind of microfusion reactor to produce electricity instead of batteries they seem to use those things for everything from little computers to vibrators, probably. Id imagine that these would provide power for these things for years and years of hard use.

The power from those reactors would power some suitably futuristic version of electric motors, likely one powering each wheel. Honestly, this type of machine would be absolutely trivial for Federation industry to crank out hell, we could basically build this thing today, albeit with batteries.

Aside from the open cab, I think these are smart vehicles to have available on a starship, and it always baffles me why wheeled vehicles werent more common on every other Star Trek show. How many times have we seen a team of Starfleet crewpeople in dress shoes and hot polyester pants beam down into the empty outskirts of some settlement or colony or whatever, and then have one of them look down at their little tricorder thing and announce oh, no biggie, we just have to walk five kilometers to the south or some shit?

Why dont any of them start bitching about how would it have killed them to beam them down some bikes, at least? Why dont they always beam down with a little vehicle to get around? Hell, they even had one on Firefly, and that was in a universe with much less advanced tech:

So, good for Lower Decks for including several good old wheeled vehicles on the show. We always sort of knew humble machines like these had to still have some role in this utopian future, and I suppose its fitting that it took a show about the unsung parts of the Star Trek universe to give old-school cars a place.

Maybe well get to see more alien cars! Its happened at least once before, after all.

See original here:

Hey Look, There Are Some Cars In That New Animated Star Trek Show - Jalopnik

Comforters Market with Competitive Analysis, New Business Developments and Top Companies: Utopia Bedding, AmazonBasics, Elegant Comfort, Comfort…

Latest Research Report: Comforters industry

Comforters Market report is to provide accurate and strategic analysis of the Profile Projectors industry. The report closely examines each segment and its sub-segment futures before looking at the 360-degree view of the market mentioned above. Market forecasts will provide deep insight into industry parameters by accessing growth, consumption, upcoming market trends and various price fluctuations.

This has brought along several changes in This report also covers the impact of COVID-19 on the global market.

Comforters Market competition by top manufacturers as follow: , Beckham Luxury Linens, Utopia Bedding, AmazonBasics, Elegant Comfort, Comfort Spaces, Linenspa, Cozy Beddings, Equinox International, Unique Home, ienjoy Home, Comfort

Get a Sample PDF copy of the report @ https://reportsinsights.com/sample/61029

Global Comforters Market research reports growth rates and market value based on market dynamics, growth factors. Complete knowledge is based on the latest innovations in the industry, opportunities and trends. In addition to SWOT analysis by key suppliers, the report contains a comprehensive market analysis and major players landscape.The Type Coverage in the Market are: SingleQueenKing

Market Segment by Applications, covers:HouseholdCommercial

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaRest of Asia PacificCentral & South AmericaMiddle East & Africa

To get this report at a profitable rate.: https://reportsinsights.com/discount/61029

Important Features of the report:

Reasons for buying this report:

Access full Report Description, TOC, Table of Figure, Chart, [emailprotected] https://reportsinsights.com/industry-forecast/Comforters-Market-61029About US:

Reports Insights is the leading research industry that offers contextual and data-centric research services to its customers across the globe. The firm assists its clients to strategize business policies and accomplish sustainable growth in their respective market domain. The industry provides consulting services, syndicated research reports, and customized research reports.

Contact US:

:(US) +1-214-272-0234

:(APAC) +91-7972263819

Email:[emailprotected]

Sales:[emailprotected]

Read the original post:

Comforters Market with Competitive Analysis, New Business Developments and Top Companies: Utopia Bedding, AmazonBasics, Elegant Comfort, Comfort...

David Ross Has "Addressed Some Things That Have Been Lingering for Years" and Other Cubs Bullets – bleachernation.com

We lost our power early this morning, and after an hour or so, it came back on. No big deal. Mustve been something minor. But two minutes after the power came back on, there was a big, ugly sound somewhere outside and the power went right back out. Hasnt come back since. That seems not great.

The Cubs are up to 9-2 on the season, the best record in the National League, and four games clear of the Reds and Cardinals in the NL Central. The Cubs pace wont last, but its also absurd that they have a four-game lead just 11 games into the season. Their playoff odds at FanGraphs are already up to 94.2% thanks to the crazy start and the expanded postseason. It already wouldve been wildly disappointing if the Cubs didnt make the playoffs when 8 teams out of 15 make it, but now it would be even more of a stunner than anything that happened the last two years.

Theo Epstein spoke with the media last night, and Jordan Bastian laid out the full Q&A here for you to peruse and digest. Its nice to appreciate a leader who is so thoughtful and kind at a time like this. Epstein just always seems to hit the right notes, and on the team-pandemic-related stuff, this stood out to me, simultaneously acknowledging certain realities of this process while also underscoring that we shouldnt jump to blame: No set of protocols are perfect. Theyre designed to minimize the risk as best as you possibly can. Theyre designed to put you into a position to reduce your chances of getting the infection. And then, if someone in your organization gets it, theyre designed to try to minimize the spread. Now, obviously, in these first two examples, its proven really difficult to contain the virus once its infiltrated an organization. I think thats the focus of what we need to learn from this and try to make some adjustments. But, its impossible for any set of protocols to eliminate the chance of infection. Thats just not going to happen. So, there should be no inferences out there that everyone whos positive has violated protocols. Thats just not how this is working.

We are each of us constantly at risk for contracting the virus in ways we didnt anticipate, so even as the Cubs have had a great deal of success so far (so much that MLB reportedly reached out to get tips), that doesnt mean itll continue perfectly for another two months.

As for his rookie manager, Epstein was effusive in his praise of David Ross, and hinted that hes already seen improvement in certain areas that seemed deficient by the end of Joe Maddons tenure (and led to those many philosophical differences about organizational complacency): [The whole being less than the sum of the parts is] an area where we collectively have fallen short, I think, the last couple years. I think weve had more talent than the results would indicate the last couple years. You know, thats why there have been different attempts to change the environment. You guys that have followed the club have known that . [Ross] has stepped in and helped address some things that have been lingering for years, you know? And to do that his first month on the job essentially, his first two weeks as a regular season manager, is just really impressive. It just shows hes fearless. Hes alert, observant and has great emotional intelligence, kind of knowing when to step in to challenge a player and call him out, and knowing when to step in and offer a kind word and support and make it really clear that hes got a players back. I think thats a big part of being a leader and being a manager in the Major Leagues these days, and hes just got really good feel for it. And he has not eased his way in. Hes on it in a very, very impressive way.

As we discussed for a long time, Joe Maddon was perfect for the 2015-17 Cubs, and then he was not. It isnt a shot at Maddon or his hands-off style in fact, its more of a shot at the organization as a whole for not more quickly addressing things that fell behind the curve after winning the World Series. Ross was the right guy at this moment to come in the door and organically change player preparation, focus, etc.

Not that you would be surprised at this point, but Ross also has commanded the total respect of his players:

Similarly, from Jon Lester, who underscores that idea that guys just want to do well for Ross (NBCSC): I think the biggest thing with Rossy is just his energy. The presence that he brings when hes in a dugout or in a clubhouse, he demands respect. He demands attention to detail. And guys know that when we show up every day. So, when were out doing our work you kind of feel like hes always watching you. Not in a bad way, but you want to do the right things to keep the line moving offensively or keep the line moving as far as our rotation.

Thats two outings in a row that Kyle Ryan got lit up on the ole hard contact meter, and were it not for his velocity being way down to open this season, it might not concern you right away. But for a guy who was delayed in his start to camp, and who didnt have a lot of velocity to begin with, losing three-ish MPH on his fastball and his cutter is a serious issue. Moreover, the fact that his spin rate is alarmingly down on the cutter is also a serious issue (hes getting far less horizontal movement on the pitch than last year). I think we are already seeing the fruits of that issue in the form of rockets by expected wOBA, Ryans cutter was his best pitch last year, and this year its his worst. I know the Cubs are hard up for lefties at the moment, but until and unless Ryan gets himself right, it already seems like hes another guy that has to have a very short leash, and ideally isnt used in high-leverage moments.

The latest from the podcast, if youve not checked it out (subscribe on iTunes its free!):

Good boys:

Air fryers, writing utensils, and much more are your Deals of the Day at Amazon. #ad

Read this article:

David Ross Has "Addressed Some Things That Have Been Lingering for Years" and Other Cubs Bullets - bleachernation.com