A sweet and sour history of Jews and pickles – The Jewish Star

By Dr. Yvette Alt Miller

Pickling, the process of preserving food by preserving it in salt or brine, has a long history. For thousands of years, pickling fruits and vegetables even meat, fish and eggs has allowed people to store food long-term. In the years before refrigeration, this was a crucial way of making sure people had enough food to eat year-round.

There are two methods of pickling food. Marinating foods in vinegars or other acidic liquids kills most bacteria, ensuring that pickled foods can last for years even without refrigeration. Pickles can also be marinated in brine, a salty liquid. This causes fermentation and the growth of edible bacteria, and prevents the development of harmful bacteria that can cause spoilage.

Pickling also imparts a delicious flavor. Here are seven little known facts about the Jewish love of pickles, along with some recipes for quintessentially Jewish pickled dishes. Enjoy!

Ancient pickles?

Cucumbers, one of the most popular pickled foods, are native to India. In ancient times they were sold and eaten throughout the Middle East, including ancient Egypt. The Torah even records that after the Jews left Egypt, they missed the cucumbers and other flavorful produce theyd eaten in Egypt:

We remember the fish which we were wont to eat in Egypt for nought; the cucumbers, and the melons, and the leeks, and the onions, and the garlic. (Numbers 11:5)

Its likely that the cucumbers mentioned by our Jewish forebears were pickled in some way. Ancient cucumbers tasted extremely bitter and the ancient Egyptians cooked their cucumbers by lightly fermenting them. The resulting pickled vegetables were slightly alcoholic, and were seemingly eaten for their mind-altering properties.

Talmudic pickle description

The Talmud says, Salting is like hearing and marinating is like cooking (Chullin, 97b). This is one of the earliest descriptions of preserving food by pickling in ancient times.

According to the Jewish law, pickling food is akin to cooking it. Just as the laws of keeping kosher prohibit cooking meat and dairy items together, so too is it prohibited to pickle meat and dairy foods in the same jar.

Pickling foods by marinating in vinegar or salt seems to have been so common in Talmudic times that the Talmud even records a disagreement between two sages, Rabbah bar Rav Huna and Rava, over whether sprinkling salt on foods while sitting at the Shabbat table can be considered pickling.

The Talmud concludes that since its unlikely a diner would sprinkle sufficient quantities of salt on their foods that their meals could become pickled, salting foods poses no problem on Shabbat (Shabbat 75b). The discussion paints a fascinating portrait of a world in which so much food had to be salted and pickled to preserve it that the act of pickling was seemingly on everybodys minds at meals and when preparing foods.

Preserving food in the shtetl

For generations, pickled foods made up a large portion of poor peoples diets. For the impoverished Jews of Eastern Europe, pickles were a crucial means of preserving food and ensuring that people had enough to eat during the long winter months.

Vegetable pickles, especially cabbage, beet, and cucumber, were staples in the diet of Jews in Poland, Lithuania, the Ukraine, and Russia, notes Claudia Roden in The Book of Jewish Food (1996).

In addition to preserving vital foods and vitamins, pickles piquant taste provided a counterpoint to the often bland Eastern European diet. Jews became known for making tasty pickles.

Housewives would prepare stocks of winter provisions, Roden records, leaving them to ferment in cellars and outhouses. To the country markets, where peasants brought their farm produce, Jewish housewives brought their pickles in barrels for sale.

Pickled herring

One of the most iconic Jewish pickles is also one of the most unlikely sounding pickled herring.

For centuries herring has been a popular fish in the Baltic nations of northern Europe; locals preserved herrings by various means, including salting, smoking and pickling. In the Renaissance, Dutch fishing fleets trawled the Baltic Sea for herring, and cornered the market: the Netherlands had a substantial Jewish population, and Jews became key agents in the Netherlands herring trade.

Jewish traders pickled herring and exported it all over Europe without spoiling. A popular method was to pickle the fish in a marinade of vinegar, sugar and onions. Once herring was pickled, Jewish chefs sometimes packaged it in a wine sauce or a cream sauce.

Jewish chefs became connoisseurs of various forms of pickled herring: shmaltz herrings are larger, fatty fish. Matjes herring are younger and smaller.

Pickled herring became a mainstay in Jewish homes throughout Europe, and was particularly popular as a Shabbat delicacy and a Hanukkah holiday meal. When Jews moved to the United States in the 1800s, they brought their love of pickled herrings with them, selling the delicacy from pushcarts. In 1925, a Jewish girl who immigrated to America and lived on the Lower East Side of New York, Anzia Yezierska, published a semi-autobiographical novel The Bread Givers about what life was like for those penniless, pious Jewish immigrants.

Facing semi-starvation, the daughter of the family takes a job selling pickled herring on the streets: I was burning up inside me with my herring to sell like a houseful of hungry mouths my heart cried, Herring herring! Two cents apiece!

A Yiddish saying summed up the special place that the humble pickled herring had in the hearts of Ashkenazi Jews: Bmakom sheeyn ish, iz hering oykh a fish (Where there is no worthy man, even a herring is a fish).

Today, Jews continue to enjoy pickled herring. In fact, Israel, despite its small size, is one of the worlds top importers of herring, after the Netherlands, Germany, Ukraine and LIthuania.

Depraved pickles

Jews living in the tenements in New York and other cities would place barrels containing cucumbers, cabbage, beets and other vegetables in brine each summer when produce was plentiful, then let them pickle in cool cellars and basements during the long cold winter. This way, poor families could have access to vegetables, albeit in pickle form.

Even when Jews didnt make their own pickles, they could easily be found in many Jewish neighborhoods. In the 1920s, the Lower East Side in New York had no fewer than 80 kosher pickle factories.

Available year round, cheap, and ready to eat, pickles fed tenement dwellers and reminded many Eastern Europeans of the lands they had left behind, the New York Tenement Museum notes.

For many non-Jewish Americans, the Jewish fondness for pickles was evidence of Jews supposed degeneracy. The famous American doctor and author Susanna Way Dodds, who published copiously about a healthy lifestyle at the turn of the 20th century, opined that pickled cucumbers could morally corrupt children: The spices in (pickles) are bad, the vinegar is a seething mass of rottenness and the poor little innocent cucumber if it had very little character in the beginning, must now fall into the ranks of the totally depraved.

The NYC Board of Education even launched its school lunch program as a way of weaning immigrant children off their habit of eating pickles.

Kosher dills

In Europe, many non-Jewish cooks used vinegar to pickle their foods. Derived from wine, vinegar was just too expensive for many Jewish cooks to use. Instead, Jewish housewives turned to brine, with salt and water as the primary ingredients. It became popular to add garlic and dill to the brine, and in time kosher dills pickled cucumbers were a quintessentially Jewish delicacy.

Other Jewish pickles include sours, half sours and sweets. These names refer to the length of time theyre fermented. Sours are fully fermented in brine for weeks. Half sours are partially fermented in salt brine for two to four weeks. Sweet pickles are pickled in salt brine and also in sugar, which also acts as a fermenting agent.

Recipe

Heres a recipe for Kosher Dill Pickles to try at home:

1/3 cup kosher salt

2 lbs. Kirby cucumbers, washed and halved or quartered lengthwise

5 cloves garlic, crushed

1 large bunch of fresh dill, washed thoroughly

Combine the salt and 1 cup boiling water in a large bowl. Stir to dissolve the salt. Add a handful of ice cubes to cool the mixture, then all the remaining ingredients.

Add cold water to cover. Use a plate slightly smaller than the diameter of the bowl and a small weight to keep the cucumbers immersed. Set aside at room temperature.

Begin sampling the cucumbers after 4 hours if your quartered them. It will probably take 12 to 24 hours or even 48 hours for them to taste pickled enough to suit your taste.

When they are ready, refrigerate them, still in the brine. The pickles will continue to ferment as they sit, more quickly at room temperature and more slowly in the refrigerator. They will keep well for up to a week.

Sephardi pickled delicacies

Sephardi Jewish cuisines contain delicious pickled vegetable dishes. Pickled lemons, pink pickled turnips and pickled eggplants are all delectable Sephardi dishes that have become staples in many Israeli kitchens, no matter where their ancestors came from.

Pickles and marinated vegetables had an important place in the old Sephardi world, notes Claudia Roden, who grew up in Egypt. They were brought out as appetizers with drinks and again as side dishes during the meal. Originally a way of preserving seasonal vegetables, they became delicacies to be eaten as soon as they were ready.

Here is a wonderful and easy recipe for Torshi Left, a turnip pickle that was brought to Israel by Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese Jews and is a quintessentially Israeli condiment today.

2 lbs turnips

1 beet, raw or cooked, peeled and cut in slices

3 or 4 garlic cloves, cut into slices

3-3/4 cups water

3 to 4 Tbsp. red or white wine vinegar

2-1/2 Tbsp. salt

Peel the turnips, cut in half or quarters, and put them in a jar interspersed with the slices of beet and garlic. In a pan bring the water, vinegar, and salt to the boil, stirring to dissolve the salt. Then pour over the turnips. Let cool before closing the jar.

(Variation: You may also add a chili pepper.)

Pickle in refrigerator as long as possible; the longer turnips stay in the marinade, the stronger your pickles will be. Roden notes that in her family the kids could never wait until the pickles were ready and would snack on them while they were still crisp. Taste every few days to get a sense of how strong youd like this pickle to be.

Recipes from The Book of Jewish Food by Claudia Roden, Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.

Read more by Dr. Yvette Alt Miller at Aish.com.

See the rest here:

A sweet and sour history of Jews and pickles - The Jewish Star

Holy Witnesses – Torah Insights – Parshah – Chabad.org

Witnesses are an important part of every judicialsystem. Yet, as is often the case, Judaism presents a deeper dimension andperspective on the function and purpose of witnesses.

According to the Talmud, there are two categories ofwitnesses, clarifying witnesses and establishing witnesses. Clarifyingwitnesses are witnesses in the conventional sense. They observe an event andlater testify that the event indeed occurred; for example, witnesses cantestify that a man borrowed one hundred dollars from his friend. The witnesses,however, have no part in the transaction; the borrower is morally obligated torepay the loan whether or not the witnesses testify. It is the loan that obligateshim, not the witnesses.

The second category, establishing witnesses, isentirely different. According to Jewish law, there are events that have nolegal significance unless there are witnesses present. For example, thewitnesses at a wedding ceremony not only attest that the wedding took place,but actually establish the marriage itself. Without proper witnesses, themarriage would have no legal significance.

In other words, the clarifying witnesses reveal thelegal reality, and the establishing witnesses actively participate increating a legal reality. But these two categories of witnesses are not justlegal definitions; theyre relevant to the inner, spiritual dimension of theTorah.

The prophet Isaiah tells us: You are My witnesses, says the Lrd.We are the witnesses charged with the responsibility to testify and revealthe truth of Gd throughout the earth.Our spiritual task as witnesses contains both dimensions, clarifying andestablishing, We serve as clarifying witnesses when we recognize the presenceof Gd in the magnificent universe He created. When we remind ourselves andothers of the good inherent in the world and within people.

Yet merely observing, appreciating and sharing doesnot capture the full potential and greatness of the Jew, for the Jew is awitness to a marriage, the marriage between Creator and creation, between theGd and the Jewish people, between heaven and earth. As previously explained,the witnesses of a marriage are establishing witnesses, part of the creationand establishment of the marriage.

To be a witness to the marriage of heaven and earth,the Jew must do more than appreciate and focus on the inherent Gdliness foundon earth. The Jew must partner with Gd in creation. The Jew actively improvesand elevates the world around him. He transforms the mundane by imbuing it withmeaning and holiness. The Jew doesn't just tell a story, the Jew seeks toactively create it.

More:

Holy Witnesses - Torah Insights - Parshah - Chabad.org

Running a Jewish day school just got a lot more expensive and parents shouldn’t be the only ones paying the price. – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic…

BALTIMORE (JTA) The coronavirus pandemic has made it even more difficult to expect parents alone to bear the huge costs of educating their children.

During the past few months, online instruction has become our new normal. This critical innovation has salvaged our childrens education, but its inferior to in-person instruction and requires a higher level of parental involvement. It creates significant stress and challenges for working parents, single parents and parents of multiple school-aged children.

For private schools, including Jewish day schools like those associated with the Orthodox Union, these issues are entwined with challenging economic realities. Some parents, heavily burdened by high tuition in the best of times, are suffering the economic consequences of the pandemic and are concerned about the inevitable weaknesses of the virtual school experience. They may balk at paying the same yeshiva tuition rates for a year of remote learning.

But we need to remember that the schools themselves are in a bind, too. They must invest in the things that will make physical reopening possible: new air filtration systems, increased cleaning costs, personal protective equipment, Plexiglas partitions and other infrastructure changes, as well as more staff to teach smaller classes. They also must be prepared for the real possibility of switching to remote schooling at a moments notice a challenge in other ways.

To weather these challenges, and for the longer term, we must produce more than educational tweaks and expanded scholarship pools. All of us who care about our schools and our families need to create a paradigm shift in education funding.

When youre paying day school tuition or supporting an individual institution, youre not just paying for the costs of teacher salaries and the building itself youre investing in the future of our communities. So we need to think communally instead of transactionally.

We used to do this more. As Yossi Prager wrote for Jewish Action in 2005, American Orthodoxys vast day school system was built and nurtured by countless individuals who understood in the Talmudic tradition of Joshua ben Gamla that thriving Jewish day schools are a communal imperative. The funding model for these institutions was dependent more on communal support and far less on tuition dollars.

The sacrifices and commitment of these builders and funders are reminiscent of the magnificent Talmudic story of the man who planted a carob tree that would not bear fruit for 70 years, by which time he would be long gone. Nevertheless, he happily invested in planting for future generations, who because of his efforts would find their world filled with beautiful fruit trees.

While funding our schools and yeshivas remains a core communal responsibility in practice, many of these institutions have come to depend increasingly on tuition payments. So instead of being community-supported institutions, many schools rely on the current parent body for funding.

The current system of financing Jewish education is relatively recent, and subsidizing tuition for those who struggle to afford it was viewed as a communal obligation into the 20th century. In his Hatakanot BeYisrael, Rabbi Yisrael Schepansky notes the varied ways in which communities levied taxes to support tuition for those unable to pay: Some communities assessed based on means, others imposed a head tax and at least one community levied a kind of sales tax on shechita, or kosher slaughter.

Rabbi Yechiel Michel Epstein, in his Aruch Hashulchan (Yoreh Deah 245:9-10), wrote that fathers who are able to hire teachers for their children and grandchildren are obliged to do so, and if a parent of means nonetheless wishes to enroll his child in the community yeshiva, he is obliged to contribute much money in order to benefit the poorer children of the community.

The conclusion is inescapable: In the Jewish worldview, Jewish education is not a consumer good but a communal obligation.

We must explore the causes of the shift away from this philosophyand what can be done to reverse it for the longer term. But today, with virtual schooling a likely piece of this years plan, we must also mobilize to minimize any immediate and lasting damage to our children, families and institutions.

All of us in the community-at-large, whether or not we have school-aged children, must come together to support both schools and parents by shouldering more of the financial burdens of keeping our schools open. We must organize as communities and galvanize support that assists the schools while bringing real and immediate relief to parents.

At the same time, parents should also recognize the challenges all schools face and realize that even if they may not be benefiting as much from the school this year, they must do their part to ensure the school will be around and be equipped to educate their child and others in the future.

And schools should acknowledge the stresses and challenges faced by their parent body, recognizing that in a framework of virtual school where students are getting less parents may be less ready to pay the usual fare.

This year, we all need to think beyond what we will be getting for our dollars. We need to keep planting and caring for the carob trees so that they will be there for us, for our children and grandchildren, and for our broader communal future.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JTA or its parent company, 70 Faces Media.

Read more here:

Running a Jewish day school just got a lot more expensive and parents shouldn't be the only ones paying the price. - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic...

Heichal HaTorah Bais Medrash Enters Its Second Year with 40 Talmidim – Join us this Zman! – Yeshiva World News

This past year, Heichal HaTorah of Teaneck, NJ began the Heichal HaTorah Bais Medrash. Designed for young men returning from yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel, HBM boasts world-class rebbeim, new facilities, serious and friendly chaveirim and an opportunity to earn a convenient and affordable college degree. The HBM will be open this Elul in-person.

Current talmidim of HBM, hailing from yeshivas such as Kerem BYavneh, the Mir, and Netiv Aryeh, form a small student body. In the warm and friendly atmosphere, the talmidim enjoy spending Shabbosim together, learning together, and playing basketball together. Ive never seen a yeshiva so successful in creating a permeating feeling of you are wanted here, we care about you, in the way Heichal HaTorah does, says Yehuda Assouline, a talmid of HBM.

Rav Aryeh Stechler, the Rosh Yeshiva, described HBM as a makom Torah where, talmidim can come and reach their full potential in learning and Avodas Hashem. And indeed, the rebbeim of HBM are committed to ensuring that each talmid feels comfortable and welcome, a key component to their success in Talmud Torah.

Of course, the core mission of HBM is excellence in Talmud Torah, and the rebbeim of HBM excel at clear and passionate teaching. Several of the rebbeim have published seforim, such as the HBM Mashgiach, Rav Moshe Don Kestenbaum, who wrote Olam Hamiddos, a world-famous mussar sefer. The Bais Medrash schedule balances iyun, bekius, and mussar, and, in addition, the rebbeim offer various chaburos for those talmidim interested in other topics such as Mussar and Chassidus. Because each of the rebbeim is deeply dedicated to their talmidim, each of the talmidim has a deep connection with his rebbeim. I really cherish my close relationship with the Mashgiach, Rav Kestenbaum, says Tzviki Liff, who has come to HBM after learning at Merkaz HaTorah and the Mir. The Bais Medrash has two other shiurim, offered by world renowned talmid chacham Rav Yitzchak Reichman, one of the leading lamdanim to come out of Shaar HaTorah in Queens, and son-in-law of Shaar HaTorah Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Sholom Spitz. Another morning shiur is offered by Rav Moshe Genack, author of Birchas Moshe, and son of OU CEO, Rav Menachem Genack. In addition, Rav Genack coordinates the Iyun Kal Afternoon Seder Program.

The HBM talmidim enjoy learning in the brand new Rozehzadeh Bais Medrash, recently dedicated by Dr. Joe and Mrs. Lori Rozehzadeh in memory of Dr. Rozehzadehs father. My father would have delighted in the chance to see young men learning Torah in an open environment where they are free to pursue their Judaism and spiritual growth, says Dr. Rozehzadeh.

The Bais Medrash believes that talmidim should be equipped with the skills to succeed in their chosen career path, says Rav Aryeh Stechler. HBM partners with several colleges to afford talmidim the opportunity to earn a B.A. Currently, HBM has four different paths for talmidim to earn their degrees, including partnerships with Fairleigh Dickinson University and Landers College. The diversity of options allows for the flexibility that many talmidim need. Rav Stechler encourages all talmidim of HBM to pursue their degrees at the right time and pace for each individual. All college classes take place in our yeshiva building or online and are taught by Bnei Torah.

Talmidim at HBM also find plenty of opportunities to enjoy time with each other. With a basketball court, an Olympic-sized swimming pool, and a close-by dormitory, the chevra of HBM form life-long friendships. Because all of the talmidim are invested in growth in middos and learning, the camaraderie and relationships are unparalleled. I could not have asked for a better chevra, says Yoni Sokol, who is learning in the Bais Medrash while pursuing a degree at FDU.

Rav Stechler opened Heichal Mesivta just seven years ago with nothing but a dream. Now, with 160 talmidim registered for the Mesivta and 40 talmidim registered for the Bais Medrash, Heichal is a central makom Torah in the NY/NJ area.

To learn more about the Bais Medrash or register for Elul, visitwww.heichalhatorah.org/baismedrash.

Read more from the original source:

Heichal HaTorah Bais Medrash Enters Its Second Year with 40 Talmidim - Join us this Zman! - Yeshiva World News

Citizens for Free Speech

Americans Are Waking Up To The Destruction Of First Amendment Rights

Many Americans realize that the radical political mandates to wear face masks and practice social distancing areegregious violations of the First Amendment. A large chunk of Americans simply cannot wear face masks because of pre-existing health conditions. Others believe that face masks pose a serious risk to their health, and do not believe the government has any authority to force such harm upon them.

More importantly, face masks and social distancing grossly impede our right to Free Speech and Peaceable Assembly.

Now is the time to draw the line in the sand and say NO MORE!

The Department of Justice recently issued a Statement of Interest brief to support a church's lawsuit against a city for Constitution overreach. The brief stated,

There is no pandemic exception, however, to the fundamental liberties the Constitution safeguards. Indeed, individual rights secured by the Constitution do not disappear during a public health crisis.These individual rights, including the protections in the Bill of Rights made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, are always in force and restrain government action.(Download here)

Apparently, government officials missed the part about "restrain government action." (But now, that is where YOU come in...)

If you are fed up with government overreach, draconian mandates to muzzle your voice and First Amendment rights and putting your own health at risk, then please stand with us by joining below. There is no charge to join, but you can certainly support us by donating.

After you join below, you will be directed to a donate page to consider receiving a card and lanyard as pictured below. This is OPTIONAL, but if you feel strongly that you must make a statement in your community, this is the card to display around your neck!

CFFS Members have reported very good results from wearing this card. Steve from Idaho City wrote,

"Can I get another badge/lanyard that you sent to us? They are coming down on us heavy with the mandatory mask thing in our area. My wife has used the badge/lanyard you sent us multiple times, and it works to ward off the tyrannists"

Many merchants and organizations will "honor" your wishes and not require you to wear a mask. For all who would dispute your rights, the First Amendment is conveniently printed on the reverse side, giving you an opportunity to educate them on THEIR Constitutional rights as well.

Please tell a friend. Bring them here. Work with them in your local community. Don't give in and don't give up!

The first step in getting started is to put yourself on record. Not everyone volunteers, but some will. Not everyone donates, but some can. Not everyone can reach thousands, but everyone can reach someone. We need each other because only together can we do great things. There is no time to wait, so please join us today! Note: CFFS is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational organization.

If you are already a CFFS member and you want more cards now, please click on the DONATE button in the right column!

See original here:

Citizens for Free Speech

Hannah Gadsby on comedy, free speech, and living with autism – Vox.com

Australian comedian Hannah Gadsby became a global star with her Netflix special Nanette. Its a remarkable piece of work, and it does what great art is supposed to do: give you a sense, however fleeting, of what it is like to live inside another humans experience. Gadsbys new special, Douglas, takes that a step further: It explores her autism diagnosis and gives you a sense of what it is like to experience the world through another persons mind.

The first half of my episode with Gadsby is about her experience moving through the world as a neurodiverse person. Gadsby didnt receive her autism diagnosis until she was almost 40 years old, after decades of struggling to navigate systems, institutions, and norms that werent built for people like her. Her story of how she got to comedy and how close she was to simply falling off the map is searing, and it helped me see some of the capabilities and social conventions I take for granted in a new light. As in her shows, Gadsby, here, renders an experience few of us have had emotionally legible. Its a powerful conversation.

Then we turn to the topics of free speech, safety, and cancel culture. For years, comedy has been undergoing many of the very same debates that have recently become front and center in the journalism world, and Gadsby has done some of the most powerful thinking Ive heard on these issues. We discuss what it means for people in power to take responsibility for their speech, how to navigate the complex relationship between creator and audience members, why Twitter is a bullying pulpit, the role of recording technology, and the new skills those of us privileged with a platform are going to need to develop.

This is one of those conversations Ive been thinking about since I had it. Dont miss it.

You can listen to our discussion by streaming it here, or by subscribing to The Ezra Klein Show wherever you get your podcasts.

Will you become our 20,000th supporter? When the economy took a downturn in the spring and we started asking readers for financial contributions, we werent sure how it would go. Today, were humbled to say that nearly 20,000 people have chipped in. The reason is both lovely and surprising: Readers told us that they contribute both because they value explanation and because they value that other people can access it, too. We have always believed that explanatory journalism is vital for a functioning democracy. Thats never been more important than today, during a public health crisis, racial justice protests, a recession, and a presidential election. But our distinctive explanatory journalism is expensive, and advertising alone wont let us keep creating it at the quality and volume this moment requires. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will help keep Vox free for all. Contribute today from as little as $3.

More here:

Hannah Gadsby on comedy, free speech, and living with autism - Vox.com

Can The Feds Protect Campus Free Speech? – Forbes

UNITED STATES - JULY 23: Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., arrives in the Capitol for a vote on Thursday, ... [+] July 23, 2020. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

It is a sad irony that freedom of speech is under threat on college campuses. From Galileo onward, history is replete with examples of what happens when the inquiry that leads to discovery is derailed. For 25 years, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, which I serve, has advocated before legislatures and boards of trustees for the protection of campus free speech. Most recently, I was a signatory to the Philadelphia Statement on Civil Discourse. It is an ongoing battle.

Last week, Senator Tom Cotton, along with fellow Senators Mitch McConnell, Kelly Loeffler, and Kevin Cramer, introduced the Campus Free Speech Restoration Act (CAFSRA) as a long-needed remedy. The bill addresses the failure of so many American institutions of higher learning to ensure a campus that protects rather than obstructs what Yales C. Vann Woodward Report of 1975 called the right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. If passed, CAFSRA will apply the Big Stick of federal intervention to public institutions that fail to honor the First Amendment. Private schools that violate their own stated free speech policies would also be subject to severe sanctions.

The initiative is timely, and its goals are impeccably virtuous. But it is a long way from a bills introduction to the final form of its passage, and this might be a good time to consider the context, collateral effects, and contingencies of its application.

The incentive for institutions to comply with the CAFSRA is enormous. The Big Stick that the bill proposes is rendering a noncompliant institution ineligible for federal funding. For many colleges and universities, this would mean insolvency and demise.

For such high stakes, there must be bright lines to guide behavior, and therein the bill encounters some significant challenges. Some provisions, such as the withholding of federal funds from public institutions that maintain policies in violation of the First Amendment, are unquestionably overdue: The persistence of unconstitutional speech codes is a disgrace that has long corrupted campus culture. Other provisions are less clear.

Inevitably, high-spirited college students will test the boundaries of the expressive activities protected by the law in the generally accessible outdoor area on which the bill places significant focus. The provisions of the proposed legislation as written may inadvertently provide shelter and legal protection for some programs that few would deem appropriate for public spaces. It is not unreasonable to ask whether the proposed legislation would extend federal protection, for example, to an outdoor drama or performance art utilizing sex toys, as expressive activity. Anyone who has worked on a college campus will know that this scenario is not at all beyond likelihood. Given that an adverse finding would jeopardize its access to federal funding, would the college administration dare to demand that such events not take place in a generally accessible outdoor area that members of the public with young children might frequent? Would this bill make such matters an occasion for litigation, rather than simply finding reasonable accommodations for the avant-garde that are not in the faces of the general public?

The proposed legislation states that the Secretary of Education will enforce the new law, and that, of course, means possibly promulgating negotiated rules to define further the reach of the legislation. There will soon be a presidential election, and it may be that the new Secretary of Education might determine, for example, that there is a compelling government interest in discouraging speech deemed hostile to protected minorities. In other words, the new legislation could be heavy on penalties but less effective than hoped in protecting viewpoint diversity. While it is purely logical that the federal government exercise its interest in ensuring that the colleges and universities that accept public money abide by the First Amendment (or, in the case of private institutions, their own stated policies on free speech), doing that fairly and effectively is no small challenge.

Ultimately, top down efforts at cultural change are likely to be infeasible and, even at their best, cannot be fully effective. What is crucial for the college students who will join the workforce is that they internalize the values of debate, discussion, and respectful disagreement. Seventy-four colleges and universities to date have adopted the Chicago Principles on Freedom of Expression, the gold standard for an institutional commitment to academic freedom, or a similar pledge to the free exchange of ideas. It is a disgrace that so few institutions have stepped forward. Every faculty assembly and every board of trustees at every one of Americas degree-granting colleges and universities, all 4,360+ of them, should by now have done so. It ranks up there with clean air and water on campus. Arguably, some kind of legislative kick is appropriate to get American higher education seriously to foster and protect free speech. The challenge is how to aim it.

South Dakotas lightly prescriptive intellectual diversity bill, H.B. 1087, is a model worth considering. (Disclosure, my employer, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, gave testimony supporting this bill.) Passed in 2019, the bill requires all of the states public universities to make intellectual diversity an institutional priority and to report on their progress, whether it be in the form of hiring faculty with varying viewpoints or bringing unconventional speakers to campus. The magic of the bill is that it respects institutional autonomy in educational decisions. So far, it has met with a remarkably high level of acceptance from the state Board of Regents.

In its austere majesty, the First Amendment reads, Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. The Constitution does not welcome Congress into such matters, and when congressional intervention is necessary, it must happen with an abundance of circumspection and caution.

Bravo to Senator Cotton and his cosponsors for taking on the challenge. There is significant work ahead to find just the right formula for success. What might be most fruitful is legislation that provides surgically targeted disincentives for institutions to discourage free speech and financial incentives for positive programming to create a culture in which the free exchange of ideas flourishes and becomes a lifelong habit for young American citizens.

Follow this link:

Can The Feds Protect Campus Free Speech? - Forbes

Free speech gone wild: The Meriwether case | TheHill – The Hill

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is being invited to invalidate the entire field of hostile environment harassment law. One cannot confidently predict that the invitation will be declined. If the plaintiff in Meriwether v. The Trustees of Shawnee State University prevails, teachers at public colleges will have a constitutional right to subject their students to bigoted slurs. Much of anti-discrimination law would be deemed unconstitutional.

Nicholas Meriwether teaches philosophy at Shawnee State University, a public university in Ohio. He refused to address a transgender student by the students preferred pronouns. Instead, while addressing all other students as Mr. or Ms., he referred to the student by last name only. When disciplined for discrimination, he sued the school, claiming that his free speech rights were violated.

His complaint is full of allegations about compelled speech. The nondiscrimination policies compel Dr. Meriwether to communicate messages about gender identity that he does not hold, that he does not wish to communicate, and that conflict with (and for him to violate) his religious beliefs. He is being punished for refusing to communicate a University-mandated ideological message regarding gender identity.

Meriwethers Sixth Circuit brief declares that the school gave him no way to speak without endorsing philosophies that he believes are false and violating his religious beliefs. . . . To call a man a woman, he must endorse metaphysical positions he believes are false. University officials are compelling him to communicate their ideas about sex and gender as his own.

All this is pretty silly stuff. Government employees do not get to say whatever they want. The clerk at the Department of Motor Vehicles may not make political speeches to those who apply for licenses. The Supreme Courts Pickering test holds that the speech of public employees always must be balanced against the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs. The rights of public employees to speak while on the job were even further narrowed in Garcetti v. Ceballos, which held that free speech does not apply to speech that is part of ones official duties. So, this is an easy case. Rules against discrimination obviously promote the delivery of educational services.

Even though the school was entitled to ignore Meriwethers claim, it tried to be nice. It suggested that he could refer to all students by first or last names only, without using gendered pronouns for any of them.That would have treated all students equally, and it would not have required him to say anything he did not believe. Why would he not do that?

Its sometimes tricky, but hardly impossible, for conservative Christians and LGBT people to live together in peace and mutual respect. Often, when they come into conflict, it is possible to put together a solution that makes room for everyone. Thats what the school tried to do. But this wont work if someone is spoiling for a fight and wont take yes for an answer.

His district court complaint declares: Dr. Meriwether refers to students in this fashion to foster an atmosphere of seriousness and mutual respect that is befitting the college classroom. Dr. Meriwether believes that this formal manner of addressing students helps them view the academic enterprise as a serious, weighty endeavor. Of course, the seriousness and weightiness of honorifics were not available to the transgender student. Meriwether is insisting on his right to single out the transgender student and treat her worse than all other students.

Meriwether is essentially alleging that his academic freedom, or perhaps his freedom from compelled speech (he offers lots of different free speech formulations), means that he has a First Amendment right to say anything he wants in his classroom. He also offers a Free Exercise argument, that he gets to say whatever is consistent with his religious beliefs. If these claims are accepted, then teachers have an unlimited right to verbally mistreat students.

His arguments are so extravagant that they shouldnt be worthy of notice. But lately we have seen a hypertrophy of First Amendment claims. In the 2018 case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado, Justice Thomas came close to saying that any action with communicative significance is protected by free speech, and Justice Gorsuch suggested that any law that penalizes religiously motivated conduct can be characterized as religious discrimination. Both that case and this one were litigated by Kristen Waggoner, of the Alliance Defending Freedom (which posts some of the cases documents here), and those justices adopted her claims. The claims themselves would make nonsense of the law.

But Waggoner is a capable lawyer who knows her court. I am confident that this extraordinarily broad understanding is not now the law, and that the Sixth Circuit thus must reject it. I cant be confident that she wont persuade the Supreme Court, if the case gets that far.

Andrew Koppelman is a professor of law at Northwestern University and author of the recently published "Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty? The Unnecessary Conflict." Follow him on Twitter@AndrewKoppelman.

More:

Free speech gone wild: The Meriwether case | TheHill - The Hill

Our First Amendment shows world meaning of free speech – The Connection

Forty-five words.

Throughout our history, United States citizens have debated 45 words that have become the bedrock on which our culture stands: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Since the death of George Floyd, I have spent an enormous amount of time reflecting on what has occurred and continues to occur in our country. What originated in Minneapolis has brought forth a level of dialogue around not only racism, but also our First Amendment right to free speech and peaceful assembly.

I did what any lifelong learner would do I researched it and refreshed my knowledge on those 45 words that are imprinted on Americans.

Did you know that the First Amendment was actually supposed to be the Third Amendment? The original first and second amendments were defeated at the time. The original first amendment dealt with how members of the House of Representatives would be assigned to the states a measure that would have resulted in more than 6,000 members of the House of Representatives. The original second amendment? It addressed Congressional pay (it was later approved as the 27th Amendment 203 years later).

And then the third became the first. How fortuitous it was to have the first two amendments fail so that the third would become the first. The amendment for which the United States is known around the world and arguably has influenced other nations became first through fate.

While our courts have decided that some speech is protected and some not (fighting words, child pornography, true threats, etc.), it is important to remember that we should not necessarily differentiate who is entitled to free speech and assembly and who is not.

The 45 words of the First Amendment encapsulate the liberty we cherish. You cannot be supporters of freedom of speech and assembly of only ideas with which you agree and only people with whom you agree.

The bottom line is this: Our First Amendment rights are fundamental to the fabric of our nation. Whether or not we agree with the speech or demonstration, we have been afforded this right by our founding fathers.

Our ability to contribute to the marketplace of ideas whether or not we like or agree with those ideas and those who share them is what makes our country an incomparable place to live, work and play.

Randy Boyd is the president of the University of Tennessee at Knoxville.

Follow this link:

Our First Amendment shows world meaning of free speech - The Connection

Facebook is in the dock; we need to resist Left-Congress assault on free speech – The Indian Express

Written by Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore | Updated: August 17, 2020 9:14:55 amIt is no secret globally that Facebook has been hauled up by various government bodies for controlling the flow of facts. (Reuters)

In George Orwells 1984, it was a thoughtcrime to actually disagree with the viewpoints established by Big Brother. The latest manifestation of this Orwellian concept is the Left-Congress cabals outrage over a Western media houses hit-job on Facebook, an already Left-Congress-leaning platform. Truth, as in the case of 1984, is a casualty. Merely scratching the surface reveals how this storm in a teacup is merely an exercise to browbeat Facebook for allowing certain opinions to even exist.

It is no secret globally that Facebook has been hauled up by various government bodies for controlling the flow of facts. The Singapore Parliamentary hearings in this context have become rather famous representatives of Facebook were pulled up for their smug attitude. In its parent country, the United States, a Senate hearing had laid bare the hoax of neutrality by cornering Facebook on using the powers of monopoly to censor political speech, particularly conservative viewpoints. In India, too, we have seen examples of Facebook actually filtering out non-Left and non-Congress viewpoints through manufactured labels of fake news. They are even accused of using shadow banning algorithms.

What the Left wants is not control over hate speech but unfettered freedom of hate speech to its ideologically-aligned members. That is why you would hear Mark Zuckerberg quote Kapil Mishra but say nothing on Sonia Gandhi who exhorted people in Delhi to do aar paar ki ladai (prepare for the final battle). There are millions of posts mocking Hindu gods and abusing right-of-centre leaders. But Facebooks advanced algorithms and community standards fail to catch them. However, unsuspecting common people running pro-right-of-centre pages are suspended with no right to appeal.

What the Left wants is not diversity in organisational culture. It wants full compliance. Hence, it does not suffice for them if most hirings in Facebook India come from Left-Congress background. There are examples of current and former Facebook executives with links to the former government and opposition parties, and some of them have been openly critical of the prime minister as well. To accuse them of being pro-BJP is laughable.

Nor does it bother the gatekeepers that the Congress party was caught hand-in-glove with Cambridge Analytica, an infamous big-data-enabled democracy manipulator that has interfered in several countries electoral processes and has used Facebook as its weapon. They actually had the Congress hand symbol in their office but this controversy was silently buried. Imagine the uproar if the same linkage had been found with a BJP members son-in-laws fathers nephews brothers son.

The problem, however, is much larger, and intellectually rooted in the fake post-truth world phenomenon bandied about by a bunch of elitists afraid to lose their power of labelling views as thoughtcrimes. Scared of being shown the mirror of reality, an entire cabal has decided to rally their comrades and undertake hit jobs on those who do not fully comply with their dictums.

Sadly, the real story has been missed in the entire discussion the actual scam by Facebook that has been brushed under the carpet for too long. Funding and validating eminent journalists belonging to the pro-Left cabal and empowering them to become the arbiters of truth on Facebook is the game, whereas anything that goes against their views and opinions is deemed fake. Out-of-job Left-leaning journalists and their views count as gospel truth to the gatekeepers, but the Prime Ministers speech on Independence Day got labelled as fake news. Is it just a coincidence that the battery of Facebook certified eminent fact-checkers havent yet been able to fact-check any of Rahul Gandhis claims?

It is surprising but not shocking to note that Facebook even allowed paid promotion of posts using morphed pictures of PM Modi with a Pakistan flag, whereas pages that allow opposing viewpoints often lose their monetisation for merely stating facts.

After the decline of the grip of mainstream media as the sole arbiter of truth, the battle for narratives has moved to social media. Originally, these were not platforms that the Left-Congress controlled, because there were no gates or gatekeepers. However, since then, a planned campaign has taken over these platforms too.

This latest round of manufactured outrage should be seen as the Lefts internecine warfare to control an already-Congress and Left-leaning platform and punish them for even the most minor of thoughtcrimes allowing alternative viewpoints. This is yet another attempt to regain a monopoly over narratives and disenfranchising alternate versions. Armed with the power of an organised cabal, the gatekeepers believe that they can continue to perpetuate the same one-sided monopoly.

The more social media platforms fall to tendentious voices from the Left and become echo chambers, the more they will lose their credibility. We should all stand up and resist this organised assault by the Left-Congress ecosystem on our fundamental right to exercise our free speech within the boundaries set by Indian law.

The writer is a former Minister of State of Information and Broadcasting (2018-19) and a BJP MP

The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

More here:

Facebook is in the dock; we need to resist Left-Congress assault on free speech - The Indian Express

#CancelCon to Explore Cancel Culture and the Threats to Free Speech – Capital Research Center

As 2019s biggest political documentary at the box office, No Safe Spaces, releases to digital platforms and DVD, the films co-stars have announced a historic online free speech event, #CancelCon, which will address todays increasingly hostile environment where cancel culture and the U.S. Constitution clash.

People are being shut down or canceled at an increasingly alarming rate for simply wanting to speak their mind, said Dennis Prager. The Constitution is in jeopardy and our nation stands on the brink.

Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report will be hosting the event and will be joined by No Safe Spaces co-stars Dennis Prager, Adam Carolla, the Daily Wires Ben Shapiro, and others who will share an in-depth analysis of the current anti-free speech cancel culture phenomenon. Cancel culture has made America uglier and less interesting. Its time to cancel it, adds Ben Shapiro.

Young Americas Foundation (YAF) is co-sponsoring this free event, simulcasting live on YouTube, Facebook, and http://www.NoSafeSpaces.com at 8:00 p.m. EST on Thursday, September 17Constitution Day. YAFs extensive nationwide network of student groups and campus activists will participate in the online program throughout the evening.

The very thesis of No Safe Spaceswhat happens on campus will not stay on campusis playing out in front of our eyes, noted Carolla. Its time to flex the muscle of resistance and refuse to be bullied.

If we lose the right to free speech, we lose everything, noted Young Americas Foundation President Ron Robinson. YAF has stood up for and defended the First Amendment on and off campus throughout our 60-year history. We are thrilled to partner with No Safe Spaces to shed more light on this important issue.

No Safe Spaces earned $1.3m at the box office and was the highest-rated film of 2019 as ranked by the Rotten Tomatoes audience score.

Related Link

CancelCon Takes on Greatest Threat to Free Speech in American History, Newsweek, August 17, 2020.

No Safe Spaces was partially funded by CRCs Dangerous Documentaries.

Go here to see the original:

#CancelCon to Explore Cancel Culture and the Threats to Free Speech - Capital Research Center

CancelCon Takes on ‘Greatest Threat to Free Speech in American History’ – Newsweek

Some folks who have butted heads with social-media giants like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube over politically incorrect things they have said or written, and who have battled college administrators for their right to say uncomfortable things on a college campus, are banding together for something dubbed CancelCon.

Organizers are billing their digital convention as "The biggest free speech event of the year." Speakers include Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Dennis Prager and Adam Carolla, all of whom appear in a movie about the so-called "cancel culture" at universities called No Safe Spaces, a co-sponsor of the event.

Many of the participants have been outspoken on the topic of free speech, including some who have testified at congressional hearings.

"I speak on dozens of college campuses every year, so I have some first-hand experience with the anti-First Amendment activities. I've encountered anti-free speech measures, administrative cowardice, even physical violence," Shapiro told members of Congress in 2017.

Get your unlimited Newsweek trial >

At that same hearing three years ago, Carolla spoke sarcastically about "white privilege" and college kids who "grew up dipped in Purell," making a couple of prescient jokes considering the Black Lives Matter protesting and constant hand-washing amid the coronavirus pandemic that have marked 2020.

Now, they are taking their acts to CancelCon, to be streamed online September 17 and co-sponsored by Young America's Foundation, one of the nation's largest organizations for conservative youth.

Organizers say it is the first in what they hope will be an annual event "for as long as the cancel culture exists," as one insider put it. The hope is that in the post-pandemic future it would be a physical convention, much like PolitiCon, which was last held in October in Nashville, Tennessee, and included appearances by former Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazille, former FBI Director James Comey and conservative commentators Ann Coulter and Tomi Lahren.

Get your unlimited Newsweek trial >

"People are being shut down or 'canceled' at an increasingly alarming rate for simply wanting to speak their mind," Prager told Newsweek. "We are living through the greatest threat to free speech in American history. Free Speech was the one thing virtually every American agreed on. That this is changing is a far greater threat to America's future than any foreign enemy."

The talk-show host's PragerU, consisting of dozens of five-minute educational videos, has been at war for years with YouTube, which deems some of the content harmful to children and therefore restricts much of it in the same way it does pornography.

One of PragerU's videos consists of Prager testifying to lawmakers last year when he told Sen. Ted Cruz that YouTube restricted a video about the Ten Commandments because it speaks of murder. "I will appeal to Google by re-releasing it as the Nine Commandments," Prager quipped at the hearing.

While Prager and Shapiro are conservative and Carolla is libertarian, Rubin, who was once part of the left-leaning Young Turks Network, describes himself as a "classical liberal," though his detractors allegedly seeking to "cancel" him label him far right and accuse him of hobnobbing with alleged white nationalists.

Ironically, the event will be featured on some of the platforms the four have battled with, including Facebook and YouTube, and it will include clips of No Safe Spaces, which was the top political documentary at the box office in 2019 and in March became the first film to be digitally distributed by Salem Media Group, the leader in conservative talk radio. Mill Street Entertainment releases the film on DVD and various streaming services on Sept. 15.

"The very thesis of No Safe Spaces 'what happens on campus will not stay on campus' is playing out in front of our very eyes," Carolla told Newsweek. "It's time to flex the muscle of resistance and refuse to be bullied."

Continue reading here:

CancelCon Takes on 'Greatest Threat to Free Speech in American History' - Newsweek

The Reviews Are In… – Free Speech TV

In this clip from #TheRandiRhodesShow, Randi discusses the latest anti-Trump ad from #thelincolnproject, the new birtherism, Trump lies, and more!

The Randi Rhodes Show delivers smart, forward, free-thinking, entertaining, liberal news and opinion that challenge the status quo and amplifies free speech.

Dedicated to social justice, Randi puts her reputation on the line for the truth. Committed to the journalistic standards that corporate media often ignores, The Randi Rhodes Show takes enormous pride in bringing the power of knowledge to her viewers.

Watch The Randi Rhodes Show every weekday at 3 pm ET on Free Speech TV & catch up with clips from the program down below!

Missed an episode? Check out The Randi Rhodes Show on FSTV VOD anytime or visit the show page for the latest clips.

#FST

Birther Movement Donald Trump Lincoln Project Randi Rhodes The Randi Rhodes Show

Read more:

The Reviews Are In... - Free Speech TV

Is This Our Last Chance To Return Manufacturing Jobs To The US? – Free Speech TV

Can the US restore manufacturing jobs before Trump breaks off all sensible business and imports from China? Why has our manufacturing all gone offshore? It is all about subsidies and tariffs.

Rob E. Scott joins Thom Hartmann to discuss the possibilities of reversing the decline in manufacturing.

The Thom Hartmann Program covers diverse topics including immigration reform, government intrusion, privacy, foreign policy, and domestic issues. More people listen to or watch the TH program than any other progressive talk show in the world! Join them.

The Thom Hartmann Program is on Free Speech TV every weekday from 12-3 pm EST.

Missed an episode? Check out TH on FSTV VOD anytime or visit the show page for the latest clips.

#FreeSpeechTV is one of the last standing national, independent news networks committed to advancing progressive social change.

#FSTV is available on Dish, DirectTV, AppleTV, Roku, Sling and online at freespeech.org

China Donald Trump Economy Manufacturing Rob E. Scott The Thom Hartmann Program Thom Hartmann Trade United States

See the original post here:

Is This Our Last Chance To Return Manufacturing Jobs To The US? - Free Speech TV

The Tune Into Right Here To Watch Night 1 Of The Democratic National Convention – Free Speech TV

Americans are coming together August 17-20. Be a part of it. Tune in to the 2020 Democratic National Convention from 9-11pm ET each night.

Watch Live at freespeech.org/watch-live

The theme of Monday's program isWe the People.America is facing a series of monumental challengesas the COVID-19 pandemic continues its rampage, tens of millions of people are out of work, and our nation confronts a legacy of racial injustice that has marginalized too many. But as we have learned throughout our history, when we stand united, we can overcome anything.

Tonight the nation will hear from the many Americans who are rising up to take on these three crises, and who will join Joe Biden in building back better and moving this country forward. With Joe Biden as president, we the people will mean all the people.

Highlights from tonights program are listed below, with additional special guests slated to join throughout the evening:

WE THE PEOPLE

IntroductionEva LongoriaAmerican actress

We the People Gavel In

Everyday Americans will read the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, beforeConvention Chair and The Honorable Bennie Thompsonofficially gavels in the 2020 Democratic National Convention.

Call to OrderThe Honorable Bennie ThompsonPermanent Chair of the 2020 Democratic National ConventionMember of the U.S. House of Representatives, Mississippi

Pledge of Allegiance

National AnthemA multicultural choir performing virtually with singers representing all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Cheyenne Nation and five territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands.

InvocationReverend Gabriel SalgueroPresident of the National Latino Evangelical CoalitionCo-lead pastor of The Lambs Church in New York, New York

RemarksThe Honorable Gwen MooreSergeant-at-Arms of the 2020 Democratic National ConventionMember of the U.S. House of Representatives, Wisconsin

WE THE PEOPLE DEMANDING RACIAL JUSTICE

RemarksThe Honorable Muriel BowserMayor of Washington, D.C.

PerformanceLeon BridgesAmerican singer

The Path Forward: A Conversation with Vice President Biden on Racial JusticeVice President Biden engages with, and listens to,social justice activist Jamira Burley, Chicago Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot, Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo, NAACP President Derrick Johnson, andauthor Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner,about how America can move forward towards equality, fairness, and justice for all.

RemarksThe Honorable James ClyburnHouse Democratic WhipMember of the U.S. House of Representatives, South Carolina

WE THE PEOPLE HELPING EACH OTHER THROUGH COVID-19

RemarksThe Honorable Andrew CuomoGovernor of the State of New York

RemarksKristin UrquizaA woman whose father lost his life to COVID-19.

A Conversation with Healthcare Workers on the Front LinesA conversation with a doctor, paramedic, and two nurses on the front lines of this pandemic about what theyve endured, and whats at stake in this election for Americas essential medical workers.

Introduction of PerformerThe Honorable Sara GideonSpeaker of the Maine House of Representatives

PerformanceMaggie RogersAmerican singer-songwriter

RemarksThe Honorable Gretchen WhitmerGovernor of the State of Michigan

WE THE PEOPLE PUTTING COUNTRY OVER PARTY

RemarksThe Honorable Christine WhitmanFormer Governor of New Jersey

Meg WhitmanFormer CEO of Hewlett Packard

The Honorable Susan MolinariFormer Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, New York

RemarksThe Honorable John KasichFormer Governor of the State of Ohio

RemarksThe Honorable Doug JonesUnited States Senator, Alabama

RemarksThe Honorable Catherine Cortez MastoUnited States Senator, Nevada

RemarksThe Honorable Amy KlobucharUnited States Senator, Minnesota

United We StandFormer 2020 Democratic candidates for president of the United States will come together once again to talk about why they ran, what theyre fighting for, and why they believe Joe Biden will bring the nation together, move the nation out of crisis and chaos, and move us forward featuringVice Presidential Nominee and Senator Kamala Harris, Senator Cory Booker, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Governor Jay Inslee, Senator Amy Klobuchar, U.S. Representative Seth Moulton, Former U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, Tom Steyer,andAndrew Yang.

WE THE PEOPLE RECOVERING

RemarksThe Honorable Cedric RichmondMember of the U.S. House of Representatives, Louisiana

RemarksThe Honorable Bernie SandersUnited States Senator, Vermont

WE THE PEOPLE RISE

Keynote RemarksMichelle ObamaFormer First Lady of the United States

PerformanceBilly Porter and Steven StillsAmerican singer-songwriters

BenedictionReverend Dr. Jerry Young18th President of the National Baptist Convention, USA

Democratic Democratic National Convention DNC Free Speech TV

See more here:

The Tune Into Right Here To Watch Night 1 Of The Democratic National Convention - Free Speech TV

The Venus In Scorpio starts an empowering LGBTQIA+ party with Blissed – Alternative Press

Maxim Faster, aka the Venus In Scorpio, is an electro-pop star in the making. Powered by a battery of synthesizers and a voice thats more rock god than pretty android, VIS is merging the synthetics of the 80s with boisterous rock vocals. Described as the mysterious and moody They next door, the Venus In Scorpios agender queer synth-pop defies the calendar. Hear for yourself below, as Alternative Press is premiering Blissed today.

According to its creator, Blissed is a triumph over the struggles of learning to love yourself. Once you learn to love yourself enough to stop focusing only on yourself, youre able to come together with other people and celebrate under the same sun, experiencing each others joy and being a part of the universal recovery and evolution of humanity. The Venus In Scorpio is bringing an unapologetic message of self-empowerment, liberation and sex positivity in a world where everybody is simply too damned uptight.

Were completely down with VIS ransacking of decades past to color our decidedly dragging 2020. They spoke to us about their influences (likely, unlikely, other), relocating to Berlin and how sometimes getting over ones self is paramount to everything else in life.

Wow, thank you so much! I definitely love all that stuff. I got into Depeche Mode at a really young age, and they were a big influence for me, for sure. In my 20s, I was heavy into groups like Ladytron, Peaches, Ladyhawke, CSS and Goldfrapp. I really dug that electro-pop scene at the time, and my tastes were really defined by it. My style largely has to do with the production at my disposal. For someone who primarily wants to sing, synth patches have always been easiest to work with. I never knew what I was doing when I started playing around with my synthesizers as a kid. I guess this result is just from years of trying to figure out how to make something on my own.

Its funny: I think as humans, we search high and low for this connection with others. We look for love in all these other places and things and people, often before looking inward and finding it within ourselves. Its been quite a journey of finding myself and loving who that person is. But I think once you do, youre able to stop obsessing about whatever it is that youre not, whatever you want to be, and you start connecting with those around you.

I guess Blissed is almost like this sublime feeling you get when youre kind to yourself and you start to attract those around you that amp you up. I think when a person is stoked on whatever their thing is, its contagious. People just cant help but vibe with someone whos high on their own supply, so to speak. As a kid, I was really inspired by Andrew W.K. His whole thing is so positive. He just wants everyone around him to feel empowered and have a good time. Hes like this big puppy you cant help but love. I took a lot of inspiration from him.

I grew up in George W. Bushs America, I was born on 9/11, and the World Trade Center tragedies really set the tone for my generation. Were all so sad and jaded, but I never thought in my wildest nightmares that wed have the shit show we have today with Trump. I really didnt want to stick around to see whats going to come next. I love L.A., but I was starting to feel hopeless there. There are few other places in the country Id feel safe or happy living in. I was talking to my therapist one day, and she was like, Oh, do you know Im moving to Barcelona? She inspired me to seek a similar path.

I have a few friends who have expatriated here from the States, and I loved the few days I got to spend here in 2017. So I just thought, Why not Berlin? Its been really great. I havent had anxiety or been stuck in a car anywhere. Everyone is super-weird, but its so safe. You really feel the peace and the chillness. My mental health has never been this stable, and it doesnt feel like Im working to survive anymore. Theres something special here for me, for sure. And my German sucks, but Ive been trying, and people have been super-sweet about it.

My friend gave me Maxim, and Faster was just my first association after that. I had been making music under the Venus In Scorpio for about two years. But my real name up until about March was Philip Moak. Its a weird and uncommon name itself, and I love it, but I definitely never felt like a Phil. Maxim is a name that my friend thought looked more like me. I was into it.

My Venus is in Scorpio in my personal astrology birth chart, which is where I got the name. Most of my music definitely weaves that dark and mysterious Scorpio energy with the more lighthearted aspects of my personality and chart. Ive always wanted to sound like a full band, so Ive always named my projects like theyre a band instead of going by my name. I want fans to infer that the Venus In Scorpio and Maxim Faster are the same thing, maybe like a persona behind a persona. Because thats the other thing: Ive had a crazy past, but a day in my current life is pretty chill. So with my music, I like to dive fully into this fantasy realm. Im definitely a different person when I hit the stage, someone I wouldnt expect to exist just walking down the street.

Thats whats really fun about it for me, taking these parts of my astrological pattern and mixing them with this space alien energy I feel to create art that personifies my fantasy self. These iconic characters like David Bowie or Grace Jones or Freddie Mercurythey just dont exist anymore. I want to be that for my generation.

I wanna make music that explores the darker depths and lows of life just as much as the highs. At the end of the day, this world is really fucked up, and we have to do our best to stick together and party until it gets better. But I think you can only come down so far before you go back up. I think we have no choice but to have hope and believe that things have to get better. Theres nothing left for us to do but evolve. Blissed happens in a time of revolution, and after it gets this bad, theres only room for evolution.

Check out Blissed below. Pro tip: Add copious amounts of volume.

View original post here:

The Venus In Scorpio starts an empowering LGBTQIA+ party with Blissed - Alternative Press

New Jersey Sociologist: Gloria Bozor and author of new children book ABC’s of Child Sexual Abuse a must have 3 in 1 book for parents, educators,…

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAE PRESS RELEASE

New 3 in 1 Childrens book bring forth awareness, education, and prevention of child sexual abuse

An EDUCATED child is a SAFE Child.

West Orange, NJ 08/17/2020 Child safety crusader and philanthropist, Dr. Gloria Bozor, has announced the release of a childrens education book titled ABCs of Child Sexual Abuse. While making the announcement, the new author said that children today are at a high risk of being abused and molested, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic where virtual learning have compromised their safety, about 90% of children who are abused know their abuser. Being a two-time survivor of child sexual abuse (CSA) herself, Dr. Gloria says that the book was written from personal experience. My story is somebody elses survival kit.

In her book, Dr. Gloria attempts to explore uncomfortably and provoking questions like, If you were sexually abused as a child, did you know what was happening? Could it have been prevented? Who would you tell? How would you tell it? Written in language children can understand, ABCs of Child Sexual Abuse uses the 26 English alphabet letters with accompanying words, insightful images, and specifically crafted key message, the author uses as an eye-opener to start these safety conversations when your kids are young. 30% of children who are abused are abused by a family member, 60% are molested by someone they trust. In addition, the younger the victim the more likely is it by a family member.

Dr. Gloria, who is also a New Jersey-based sociologist and a caseworker, attributes the book to intensive education, training, and inspirations as well as personal experience in writing the book. She aims at creating awareness of, educating about, and preventing child sexual abuse for families, children, educators, and professionals who work with the children. The book, which will be released this winter, has been hailed as a revolutionary three in one design that causes awareness of, educates on, and prevents this horror in society.This is a must-have book, a one of kind educational tool that will help our children be safe while at home, at school, and in the community, said the author while calling on parents, educators, and other professionals to get a copy for themselves and their children. The book also comes with a safety tool kit which includes: an Underwear Rule bookmark, a No Secrets magnet,My Body Belongs o Me empowerment sticker, body safety activity worksheets, Big Little Talk conversation cards, a safety whistle, and list of child (sexual) abuse hotline numbers for all 50 states.

Through this new childrens educational book, she is investing in the current and future generations, arming them with the life skills that will help them lead safer lives in their communities.We can help make our community and environment safe for our children;, urged Dr. Gloria, adding that we can empower the children to use their voices as well as speak up for their rights.

About the author

Dr. Gloria Bozor is a New Jersey-based sociologist, child advocate, caseworker, and author as well as a first-time mother. She writes character education books to bring awareness, education, and prevention of childhood trauma, with over a decade of working, training, and reading her subjects for FaFa and GloGlo, series that ranges from child sexual abuse, illness, death, colorism, and more. Dr. Gloria has also dedicated herself to helping survivors of interfamilial child sexual abuse through her awareness campaign, Victim II Survivor, her support group I.S.A.A as well as investing her time in creating a childrens and family YouTube channel Big Little Talk, with educational content through activities and role- playing.

ABCs of Child Sexual Abuse is scheduled to be realease winter of 2020 and will be available in hardcover format. Readers can get their copy on the authors website. The book will be available for pre-orders on the authors website November 1, 2020. For further information please visit https://www.drgloriabozor.org

Media contactWebsite: http://www.drgloriabozor.org Email: gloriah.isaa@gmail.com

(Visited 39 times, 39 visits today)

Read more:

New Jersey Sociologist: Gloria Bozor and author of new children book ABC's of Child Sexual Abuse a must have 3 in 1 book for parents, educators,...

The Return of Anonymous – The Atlantic

At the end of May, as protests against the police killing of George Floyd got under way, reports started to circulate that the shadowy hacker group Anonymous was back.

The rumors began with a video depicting a black-clad figure in the groups signature Guy Fawkes mask. Greetings, citizens of the United States, the figure said in a creepy, distorted voice. This is a message from Anonymous to the Minneapolis Police Department. The masked announcer addressed Floyds killing and the larger pattern of police misconduct, concluding, We will be exposing your many crimes to the world. We are legion. Expect us.

Justin Ellis: Minneapolis had this coming

The clip generated a wave of renewed enthusiasm for Anonymous, particularly among young people. Twitter accounts associated with the group saw a surge of new followers, a couple of them by the millions.

At the height of its popularity, in 2012, Anonymous had been a network of thousands of activists, a minority of them hackers, devoted to leftist-libertarian ideals of personal freedom and opposed to the consolidation of corporate and government power. But after a spate of arrests, it had largely faded from view.

Now a new generation was eager to join. How does one apply to be a part of Anonymous? I just wanna help out, Ill even make the hackers coffee or suttin an activist in the United Kingdom joked on Twitter, garnering hundreds of thousands of likes and retweets.

Anonymous stan (super fan) accounts remixed the video on TikTok to give the shadowy figure glamorous nails and jewelry. Others used the chat service Discord to create virtual spaces where thousands of new devotees could celebrate the hackers with memes and fan fiction. One of the largest Anonymous accounts on Twitter begged people to stop sending us nudes.

A series of hacks followed the release of the video. News outlets speculated that it was Anonymous who had hijacked Chicago police scanners on May 30 and 31 to play N.W.As Fuck tha Police and Tay Zondays Chocolate Rain, a 2007 song that served as an unofficial anthem for the group. Likewise, when the Minneapolis Police Department website went offline from an apparent DDoS attacka hack that overwhelms a target site with trafficsocial media credited Anonymous.

Three weeks later, on Juneteenth, a person identifying as Anonymous leaked hundreds of gigabytes of internal police files from more than 200 agencies across the U.S. The hack, labeled #BlueLeaks, contained little information about police misconduct. However, it did reveal that local and federal law-enforcement groups spread poorly researched and exaggerated misinformation to Minnesota police officers during the unrest in May and June, and made efforts to monitor protesters social-media activity.

I had recently published a book that detailed the tangled origins of Anonymous, and until last month, Id thought the group had faded away. I was surprised by its reemergence, and wanted to understand how and why it seemed to be coming back, starting with who had made the new video. It didnt take me long to find out.

The video was watermarked, which is uncharacteristic for Anonymous. The mark is blurred out in copies, but appears in the original post in white font: anonews.co. That URL led me to a news-aggregation site, which brought me to the sites Facebook page, where the first iteration of the video had been posted on May 28. A British company called Midialab Ltd. controlled the page. I wrote to the email listed on the page, and the companys owner replied the same day. This person requested anonymity but was willing to put me in touch with the creator of the video.

I suspected I was chasing the tail of some Russian troll farm whose business it was to promote radical division of all stripes. The first place to report on the video, on May 29, had been RT, the state-owned Russian media outlet. And the millions of new followers flocking to Anonymous Twitter accounts? As the accounts themselves pointed out, many were bots.

Within an hour of receiving the email, I got a call from a suburb in Harford County, Maryland, just north of where I live. The man on the line told me his name was John Vibes. Hey, man, he said. Surprised Im local? I made the video.

Vibes told me he had worked as a party promoter organizing raves in Baltimore and Philadelphia for the past decade, which had led him into countercultural thought and, eventually, activism. I had been writing things about police brutality and I was contacted by the guy that runs anonews.co, a tech entrepreneur in the U.K. who agreed with Anonymouss politics and wanted to support it. Vibes is a freelance writer who writes and produces videos for the Facebook page, which functions as a news hub. Mostly we just cover news about what Anonymous would be interested inthe banking system, corruption, he said. A couple of times a month well look at the big stories and well aggregate the general sentiment into a video.

Indeed, the Facebook page releases Anonymous videos regularly, many of them made by Vibes. But he was not the masked figure speaking to the camera in the most recent viral video. The page often recycles the same footage and simply uses new audio.

Vibes emphasized that he wasnt a hacker, but a journalist who was echoing the sentiment of Anonymous members on social media and chat rooms. The purpose of the Facebook page was to create an outlet for that message. To be clear, were not a Russian troll farm, Vibes said.

Read: Russias troll operation was not that sophisticated

Still, my conversation with Vibes left me feeling uncertain about whether Anonymous was really back. The new hacks in May and early June were tied to the group largely through rumors. And the video wasnt put out by Anonymous hackers, but by an activist who supported their message. In some sense, Vibes was simply another fan, remixing a remix. Was it all just smoke and mirrors?

But when I spoke with a variety of current and former Anonymous hackers over the past month, they all insisted that Anonymous was indeed reactivating. To understand why, and what that really means, its helpful to keep in mind the two somewhat-competing interpretations of Anonymous.

In one sense, Anonymous is a decentralized community of tech activists who collaborate in small groups on projects they call operations.

But then there is the second definition of Anonymous. Anonymous members will tell you that Anonymous has no members, that it is not a group, but rather a banner. People rally to it. And like a pirate flag, anyone can run it up their mast and start doing deeds in Anonymouss name.

Its the vigilante, Gregg Housh, one of the creators of a 2008 Anonymous anti-Scientology video, told me. Anonymous was designed specifically to be that way. In its initial founding, it existed as trolls people doing whatever they wanted, with that hint of vigilantism. It was designed to be totally open. Anyone can be Anonymous.

In the new video Vibes made, Anonymous represents extrajudicial justice, the superhero entering to right what the normal course of the law cannotan idea that can seem deeply appealing now that the ordinary enforcers of justicethe policeappear to some to be the source of the crime.

My sources affiliated with Anonymous all told me the same thing: People were flowing back into the chat rooms to coordinate new operations. This is how Anonymous has always worked. A viral video generates a wave of enthusiasm. Then the leaderless collective debates what to do. Sometimes it settles on performative acts of protest, such as hacking police scanners or briefly downing a website. But as occurred with BlueLeaks, oftentimes more skilled hackers steal and leak documents intended to buttress a political cause with substantive evidence.

However, both the group of people and the movement have changed over the years. And to track Anonymouss trajectory, its necessary to understand how the entire project began: as a joke by teenagers.

In the mid 2000s, Aubrey Cottle was part of a crew of online pranksters who called themselves trolls and orbited two anarchic online message boards: Something Awful and 4chan. Thousands of users were on these boardsalmost all young menbut among them was a more die-hard band who hung out in the same chat rooms, feuded online, and met up in real life. They called themselves Anonymous. The name was derived from the way 4chan presented usernames. If none was specified, the site displayed Anonymous by default.

In 2007, a man appeared at Cottles door. Cottle was 20 and still living with his mother in Toronto. As Cottle tells the story (confirmed in part by a friend of his), the man was from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the nations equivalent to the CIA. Curious, Cottle led him to his room, which was littered with hard drives, server equipment, and old copies of the 90s hacker magazine 2600.

Would you be willing to use your abilities against al-Qaeda and terrorist groups? the agent asked him. A number of thoughts flashed through Cottles mind: Is this guy for real? I would never work for the feds. Should I delete everything? But mostly he felt like a fraud. The man thought he was something he wasnt.

You want me to raid internet forums for you? Cottle asked.

Anonymous trolls loved to conduct raids on other sites, flooding online games and chat rooms with their army of users to disrupt the space. Like cruel older brothers, they often picked the easiest target they could findyounger kids. They loved raiding a childrens game called Habbo Hotel by lining up their avatars to block access to the online pool.

When 4chan began cracking down on organizing raids, Anonymous migrated to Cottles copycat site, 420chan, which hed created to discuss his principal interests: drugs and professional wrestling. And Cottle became the de facto leader of Anonymous, a role he relished. It was during this time, Cottle told me, that he codified a set of half-joking rules for the group that became known as the infamous Rules of the Internet. They included 3. We are Anonymous 4. Anonymous is legion 5. Anonymous never forgives.

Cottle and his friends also were the first to start using the Guy Fawkes mask. They chose it simply because they loved the movie V for Vendetta, a 2005 film adaptation of a dystopian-fiction comic book. V, the films protagonist, dons the disguise to fight a future fascist police state by firebombing buildings, inverting the story of the original Guy Fawkes, who is vilified in English folklore for attempting to blow up Parliament in 1605.

Read: The misunderstood legacy of Guy Fawkes

Cottle told CSIS hed think about its offer (which he later declined) and went back to cyberbullying. But not long after the authorities came to Cottles door, Anonymous would make the news. A Fox affiliate in Los Angeles had run a segment on the group, framing them as hackers on steroids. The report implied that Anonymous was perhaps a terrorist organization, overlaying the segments narration with stock footage of a van exploding.

The segment delighted Anonymous. Hacking was something its members did for their own amusement. Now in the eyes of the mediaand the governmentthey were a shadowy and powerful cabal, capable of anything. It was something people wanted to believe about them, something they could use.

Anonymous spent much of 2007 harassing Hal Turner, a neo-Nazi radio host, not because the group was at all political during this period, but because Turner proved to be an easy target. Each week, Anonymous would clog his phone lines, down his website, or order hundreds of pizzas to his house. But the fun ended abruptly when it hacked Turner so thoroughly that it discovered he was an FBI informant.

After Turner, Anonymous needed a new target. They shifted to the Church of Scientology, a recurrent enemy of hackers and freedom-of-information activists since the early 1990s. The catalyst for the new operation was a video, the one made by Housh. It used the Fox news piece as inspiration, hinting that Anonymous was a powerful ring of international hackers. Over the years we have been watching you, it announced in a text-to-speech computer voice. We are legion.

When the video went viral, enthusiasm hit an all-time high. Anons flowed into the same chat rooms they had once used to coordinate raids, this time channeling their numbers into a series of street protests against Scientology in major cities around the world. (Anonymous accused Scientology of bilking its adherents with pseudoscience and of illegally silencing critics.) Several hundred people attended a protest I reported on in New York, almost all of them dressed in Guy Fawkes masks.

For many, the cynicism of trolling was shattered when they realized they could effect change in the real world. To the surprise of even themselves, Anonymous had inherited a conflict that had been raging since the 1980s. On one side were hackers who wanted to employ the internet as a tool for personal empowerment; on the other stood governments and corporations, who used it as a panopticon for personal-data collection.

Presently, the Anonymous movement split into competing factions of trolls and activists. Cottle led the trolling side, but his contingent soon lost control.

The watershed moment came in late 2010, when an Anonymous operation to support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks snowballed into a massive attack against PayPal and Mastercard for blocking WikiLeaks donations. Once again, following media attention, thousands of Anons flooded into chat rooms they had previously used to coordinate invasions into computer games, this time in an attempt to disable corporate websites.

Read: The radical evolution of WikiLeaks

Before long, Anonymous had uncovered plans for HBGary Federal, a security company; Palantir, the tech-surveillance giant; and the private security company Berico Technologies to embarrass WikiLeaks using Nixonian dirty tricks. The story of the HBGary leak became front-page news. And Anonymouss ranks swelled even more.

The Anons involved in the hack formed a splinter group, LulzSec (Lols Security), and went on a high-profile hacking spree, targeting major corporations like Sony and several government agencies whenever they felt that these organizations were trampling individual freedomsor simply to show that they could. But in 2012, the FBI arrested one of LulzSecs members, Hector Sabu Monsegur, a 28-year-old man living in New York City public housing. Sabu became an informant and the center of an elaborate sting operation that resulted in the arrest of many of the groups principal participants. (Monsegur has denied being responsible for those arrests, though does not deny being an FBI informant.)

Anonymous never fully recovered. Small groups of Anons remained, but the energy behind the banner dissipated.

Anonymouss most high-profile hack in the following years came in support of the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri. In response to the police-shooting death of Michael Brown, the group downed the citys web servers and publicized the home address of the police chief. When officials were not forthcoming about the details of Browns death, Anonymous leaked audio recordings of emergency dispatchers discussing the incident. However, when Anonymous announced the name of the shooter, it named the wrong person, damaging its reputation.

Then Anonymous weathered another blow: the alt-right.

Fredrick Brennan was 12 years old when he discovered 4chan in 2006. When I interviewed him for my book, It Came From Something Awful, he recalled the fun and camaraderie of the days when Anons piled into chat rooms to attack PayPal and Mastercard. But he spent his late teens struggling financially, bouncing between low-paying jobs in the gig economy. Eventually, he decided that he was doomed to forever be on the bottom as an incel (involuntary celibate) dropout. The copy of 4chan he founded in 2013, 8chan, became a wildly popular breeding ground for far-right extremism. However, Brennan managed to shed what he described as the toxic ideology of the chans; his tipping point came last year, when a wave of mass shooters who self-identified as fascist incels all cited 8chan as their inspiration. Since then, hes been working to shut down 8chan, now known as 8kun.

The seeds of the alt-right had always been a part of Anonymouss culture. Though Anonymous troll armies had started out by harassing neo-Nazis in 2007, theyd also coated sites in swastikas and racist slurs for shock value. And eventually, the neo-Nazis they targeted began using 4chan in their online recruitment efforts.

So by 2016, Anonymous hacktivists had turned back to the places where they had once organizedchat rooms and forums that are adjacent to 4chanand begun to fight a rearguard action. In 2018, Anonymous declared war on QAnon, a bizarre alt-right conspiracy theory that had been started on 4chan the previous year by far-right trolls but has since spread into mainstream Republican discourse.

From the June 2020 issue: The prophecies of Q

Some Anonymous hackers now spend their time tracking and outing alt-right organizers, often in the same networks they occupied in the mid-2000s trolling era.

What does all of this mean for the future of Anonymous?

Some members have shifted their modus operandi. Several told me they now work quietly, rarely if ever repeating the mistake that had landed many of them in jail: publicizing what they do. (This has not been the case with BlueLeaks, however. A hacker involved in the leak identified as Anonymous, and other Anonymous groups were happy to adopt the hack under their banner.)

They are more wary than ever, often openly wondering who among them are police or informants. They no longer organize on the archaic Internet Relay Chat (IRC), believing it to be compromised, instead preferring more modern end-to-end encrypted chat clients, such as Wire, Gajim, or Signal. For social media, they almost exclusively use Twitter, feeling that other companies do not do enough to protect users privacy.

And age has brought temperance. Weve grown up a lotat least I havesince the beginning of all of this, an Anonymous activist who runs the Twitter account @Anon2World told me. Back in 20102012, we would have decimated anything we could to make a point; now we realize how we could inadvertently affect people in negative ways.

This time around, many members emphasized, they would like to play a supporting role to Black Lives Matter, as they had during the 2014 Ferguson protests, when despite their stumbles, their presence was appreciated by some BLM activists. And in the long term, it now appears that Anonymous might be with us perennially, blooming in revolutionary moments, when it feels as if one big push might effect change.

But there is another possibilitythat once again Anonymous will be recast.

Anonymous began with teens hanging out in chat rooms. They put on the mask of the anti-fascist superhero for fun, but over time learned to play the role first with style, then conviction.

When teens began hanging out in Discord chat rooms last month wondering how they could join Anonymous, the answer from the largest Anonymous Twitter accounts was simple: Do it yourself.

Many of the new Anonymous stans had come from TikTok and the K-pop (Korean pop) community. At the end of May, the K-pop stans clogged the Dallas Police Departments tip-line app with dance videos. Then, spurred on by Anonymous Twitter accounts, they reserved hundreds of thousands of tickets to Trumps ill-fated rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in which the president found himself addressing largely empty seats.

Read: The hackers who hate Donald Trump

The pattern felt familiar: a group of teens meeting online to consume media, then realizing that their numbers were so strong, they could pull some epic pranks, or become a political collective, or maybe both. As the former Anonymous member Jake Davis put it on Twitter, the TikTok/Kpop stuff feels like a more viral version of old 4chan invasions/raids Fully expecting Fox News to make some spooky video calling them hackers on steroids.

In V for Vendetta, after a pandemic leads to a fascist dictatorship in the year 2020, everyone puts on the Guy Fawkes mask to topple the regime.

Thats at least how the movie version ends.

And if there were ever any difference between our world and the other side of the screen, it feels as if it were effaced long ago.

Continue reading here:

The Return of Anonymous - The Atlantic

Givingli: Step Aside Hallmark, Theres A New Gifting Platform In Town – Forbes

Growing up, my mother would take my sisters and I along with her to the Hallmark store to buy cards and assorted gifts. It was engrained in me that anytime someone did something nice or was going through something, whether it was good or bad, that the thoughtful (and mannerly) thing to do was to send a card. Its is also a personal gesture that I have learned to love.

Givingli

More recently, I wanted to send a thank you card to someone I wanted show a little gratitude to, so I set out to find the perfect paper and matching envelope to write a handwritten thank you note. It was a lot harder than I had expected. It got me thinking. When did it become so hard to find a card?

Los Angeles-basedNicole Emrani Green and her husband Ben Green, founders of the newgifting app,Givingli, experienced something similar when they were planning their wedding, which is why they chose to go digital for their invitations. Going digital for our wedding was ten times cheaper than sending physical invites. When it came time for us to send greetings cards and gifts for our friends' weddings, birthdays and special moments, we realized there was nothing design-forward and easy that we could do on the fly. The use case was there, but no one was filling the need. So we decided to build our own, Nicole tells me of why they created Givingli.

Givingli Founders: Ben Green (l) Nicole Emrani Green (r)

Givingli officially launched in February 2019 and the pair launched the Givingli Gift store with the majority of the brands they have partnered with a few months later. With Givingli starting out as a side passion project, we decided to bootstrap it with help and support from our families, responds Nicole when I ask her if they self-financed. We generated revenue from day 1 and grew quickly after our first few months, especially once Apple started featuring our app in the App Store. At some point in the future we may be open to strategic partners.

Earlier this year,Hallmark cut 400 jobs,Papyrus, owned by Schurman Fine Papers, declared bankruptcyand closed all of its stores, and retailers like CVS and Walmart are cutting back their card offerings recognizing the upward trend of digital e-cards.WSJ reportedthat the United States sales of printed greeting cards, estimated at 4.5 billion in 2019 fell 13% over the last five years.

Givingli

Givingli

Personally, I dont enjoy seeing other companies like Hallmark and Papyrus taking a hit. I love greeting cards and stationary myself. However, I believe it shows that there is a major shift going on in our world right now, says Nicole. Whether its because of convenience or sustainability...who knows? But what we do know is that paper greetings are becoming less popular and digital options are becoming more and more appealing.

Addressing the shift in the greetings and gift space is Givinglis sweet spot.

Were re-thinking how we gift in the modern day with convenience, endless personalization, and design at the top of mind. Our customization tools allow for a complete personalized experience via text, stickers, video, photos, brushes, and more. If you choose, you can add an optional e-gift, and then send it all from your phone, instantly, explains Nicole. We partner with incredible independent artists, notable designers, and popular gift brands and bring them together in unique and creative ways. Weve made the entire gifting process digital from start to finish because we care about providing a sustainable solution for quality modern gifting.

Givingli

When it came to creating the platform, convenience and design were first priorities for the pair.

We are the first digital greetings company to partner with independent artists alongside recognized design brands like Pantone. Our personalization tools are similar to Snapchat or Instagram, in that you can literally make your Givingli any way you want; there are no limits with stickers, text, video, photos, brushes, and more, shares Nicole. But honestly, I think what makes any company great is the intangibles and the feeling behind it. First and foremost, we wanted Givingli to be a place where people can lift each other up and put a smile on a friend's face. So, the most important thing for us is that Givingli enables the human connection that we all desire: supportive, empowering, and positive. We're just providing a platform for it.

Givingli has partnered with a variety of artists, some of which took a chance on the platform before it was in beta.Melanie Johnssonis one of them and is known for using bold and powerful colors with a modern aesthetic.Zoe Wodarzis another, who Nicole tells me is the queen of pattern work and helped create Givinglis icons on the Create page: Text, brushes, stickers, and photos. I can call her up anytime I need help or advice on anything design related.

Givingli

Givingli

Givingli

One of my personal favoritesisSpaghetti & Meatballs (Marie Castiglione)who uses dry, clever humor. Another artist isAshley Le Quere, who Nicole tells me is all about expressing support and empowerment through her work.These are just a few of our artists. They are all incredible, extremely talented, and hard-working women. Theyve been such a pleasure to work with and Im excited to grow Givingli with them, and with all of our artist partners.

Since the launch, Givingli has partnered up with some big brands including Wine.com, Sephora, Saks Fifth Avenue, Crate And Barrel, AirBnB, and Pantone. Working withPantonehas been a dream come-true, states Nicole. With Pantone as the leader for color standards in the fashion industry and a major staple in the design world, a collaboration with them has always been a dream. We were able to launch a collection of 18 color-matched greetings with real Pantone colors, including this years Color of the Year, which can also be tied to celebrating special life moments and events.

In addition to partnering with big brands, Givingli also actively tries to partner with local businesses too.

Partnering withDayglowis a partnership I was really excited about, Nicole tells me. Theyre a small business with only two locations in LA, yet they source and distribute the best coffee from all around the world and attract all types of people from true coffee fanatics to A-list celebs (yes, Ive seen a few while grabbing my morning coffee). Were so lucky to have them as our go-to coffee spot across the street, which is why onboarding them as a gift partner was really special.

Givingli

Givingli

Givingli

With Givingli being the first time to step into the entrepreneurial space (Nicole has a background in both marketing and psychology and Ben was a intellectual property lawyer), I was curious to know what it has been like getting Givingli off of the ground.

I truly couldnt have imagined the growth we saw in 2020. From incredible collaborations with some of the biggest brands to being featured at the top of the App Store on Mother's Day and crashing from too many downloads, it's been a whirlwind, responds Nicole. Who knows what will happen going forward, but we're exploring integrating with other platforms, growing our gift list, partnering with and supporting small businesses, adding physical gifts, and even expanding internationally.

When I ask what folks can expect from the app moving forward, Nicole tells me that they have big things in store for their users. We have a super-secret major partnership we're really excited about. I cant share details now but if you follow us on social @givingli or keep up with us on the app, youll surely hear about it in the next month or so.

See the rest here:

Givingli: Step Aside Hallmark, Theres A New Gifting Platform In Town - Forbes

Book Digest: Stories of women in leadership, trends empowering them and more – Down To Earth Magazine

From accounts of the Spanish Flu to COVID-19, DTE tracks contemporary books on development from leading authors

Our Livable World: How Scientists Today Are Creating the Clean Earth of Tomorrow | Marc Schaus | Diversion Books | October 13, 2020

Theauthor leads readers to an exploration of the newest and upcoming innovations in green technology poised to prevent the climate apocalypse and usher in a sustainable, livable world.

It features interviews with the innovators, real talk on the revolutionary technology, and a clear picture of a cleaner planet in the future.

Conscious Change Today: From Me to We ~ COVID, Climate Change, and the Rise of Feminine-Energy | Kashonia Carnegie | August 9, 2020.

Conscious Change Todayuses world news events, personal stories, activities, diagrams and pictures, to explain the undeniable trends currently empowering women, and Gen Zs like Greta Thunberg, resulting in dramatic global change.

Unearthing Justice: How to Protect Your Community from the Mining Industry | Joan Kuyek | Between the Lines | June 15, 2020

Brimming with case studies, anecdotes, resources, and illustrations, Unearthing Justice exposes the mining process and its externalised impacts on the environment, indigenous peoples, communities, workers and governments.

But, most importantly, the book shows how people are fighting back. Whether it is to stop a mine before it starts, to get an abandoned mine cleaned up, to change laws and policy or to mount a campaign to influence investors.

Rivers and Sustainable Development: Alternative Approaches and Their Implications | S Nazrul Islam | Oxford University Press | August 15, 2020

In this book, Nazrul Islam points to the ways in which river policies need to change to ensure sustainable development. He offers a new conceptual framework, using such concepts as the commercial and cordon approaches to rivers and their opposite, the Ecological and Open approaches.

He shows that while the former generally work against sustainability, the latter are conducive to sustainable development.

The book illustrates this reality by drawing upon worldwide experience regarding rivers. Going forward, river policies, therefore, should be based on ecological and open approaches.

The Pandemic Century: A History of Global Contagion from the Spanish Flu to COVID-19 | Mark Honigsbaum| WH Allen | July 1, 2020

Theauthor chronicles 100 years of history in 10 outbreaks. Bringing us right up-to-date with a new chapter on the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), this fast-paced, critically acclaimed book combines science history, medical sociology and thrilling front-line reportage to deliver the story of our times.

Echo T Calling: Towards People Centric Governance| Shailendra Joshi | Pratap Chowdary | July 15, 2020

The book is all about administration, public policy, and governance in India as narrated by a career bureaucrat with experience spanning over almost four decades. The book covers a wide array of topics ranging from laughter is the best medicine to the relevance of swadeshi in the modern perspective.

The author has treated the various topics in this book with an innate simplicity that is likely to be of interest to each and every reader who is connected to the present and concerned about the future of India.

The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World | S Jaishankar| HarperCollins India| September 7, 2020

The decade from the 2008 global financial crisis to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic has seen a real transformation of the world order. The very nature of international relations and its rules are changing before our eyes.

For India, this means optimal relationships with all the major powers to best advance its goals. It also requires a bolder and non-reciprocal approach to its neighbourhood.

In The India Way, S Jaishankar, Indias Minister of External Affairs, analyses such challenges and spells out possible policy responses. He places this thinking in the context of history and tradition, appropriate for a civilisational power that seeks to reclaim its place on the world stage.

When Your Right Hand Man Is A Woman: Empowerment Essentials for Women in Ministry and Leadership | Sylathia Hollie | August 10, 2020

This book seeks to explore the role women have played in the last 2,000 years and provides practical tools and insights into how women can deliver effective leadership.

Thebook shows why the role of women in ministry is now more important than ever and should be celebrated rather than stifled.

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

The rest is here:

Book Digest: Stories of women in leadership, trends empowering them and more - Down To Earth Magazine