Vaccine ‘durability’: COVID-19 immunizations coming soon but will they last? – Genetic Literacy Project

As the days unfold with a seeming sameness in this odd summer of the pandemic, news of vaccine clinical trials begins to trickle in, and another buzzword from epidemiology is entering the everyday lexicon: durability.

To be successful, a vaccines protection must last or booster shots periodically restore it. Some vaccines lose efficacy over time, including those for yellow fever, pertussis, and of course influenza.

For some vaccines, antibodies and the B cells that make them persist and protect for a long time. For other infectious diseases, like TB and malaria, T cells are needed in vaccines too. B and T cells (lymphocytes) are types of white blood cells, which are part of the immune system.

Give amanafishand you feedhimfor a day.Teach himhow tofishand you feedhimfor a lifetime, said Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu, founder of Taoism.

Tzu might have been referring metaphorically to the immune systems response to viral infection: an initial rush of antibodies that fades as a longer-lasting cell-based memory builds that primes the body to rapidly release antibodies upon a future encounter with the pathogen.

Antibodies are proteins, so they dont make more of themselves as cells might. Thats why antibodies collected from plasma from a person whos recovered from COVID-19 lasts a few weeks. Its also why an antibody medicine like Regenerons dual-antibody REGN-COV2 provides only short-term protection, a bridge until a vaccine becomes available.

To remain effective over a reasonable period of time, a vaccine must mimic the memory component of an immune response, which arises from B and T cells and is therefore called the cellular immune response. The shorter-term release of antibodies into the bloodstream is the humoral immune response (humor means fluid).

A strong antibody response to a vaccine may be a harbinger of lasting B and T cell protection, but vaccines may be marketed before their durability is known a complete understanding of how long a vaccines protection lasts can take years. The vaccine against the mumps, for example, went on the market in 1967, but in 2006, several colleges had outbreaks, among students whose childhood mumps vaccine had worn off. A booster extends the coverage.

Clues to a COVID-19 vaccines durability come from natural immunity from past coronavirus infections. The antibody response to SARS and MERS persisted less than a year. But so far, the cellular immune response to SARS, the older of the two, has lasted eleven years.

Clinical trials to evaluate COVID-19 vaccines in people consider both antibody production and the building of cellular immunity. And a vaccine can be even more protective than natural immunity.

A vaccine elicits memory B and T cells so the immune system remembers how to fight the disease in the future. Natural infection is not likely to produce durable immunity and vaccination will be essential to produce herd immunity to reduce the probability of viral transmission, said Arlene Sharpe MD PhD co-director of the Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital on a recent zoom that MassCPR, a group of Boston-area institutions that formed in early March in response to the pandemic, held.

The immune system isnt as easy to visualize as a skeleton splayed out in a Halloween decoration, the flattened entrails of a roadkill, or the circulatory system, which even Groucho Marx in the film Horse Feathers could easily explain. (Let us follow a corpuscle on its journey through the body.)

Instead, the immune system is an army of billions of cells and their secretions that stand ready to attack newly encountered pathogens, remember old ones, and at the same time recognize self, protecting the bodys own tissues. The cells travel in clear lymph fluid, passing through lymph nodes that filter out debris.

The immune system reacts in three stages. First, physical barriers keep pathogens out: skin, earwax, waving cilia in the throat, stomach acid, diarrhea. Next, innate immunity unleashes a bath of inflammatory molecules that are a generalized response to infection.

Finally comes adaptive immunity, which is specific and provides the memory that a vaccine emulates. In addition to T and B cells, innate immunity includes the wandering, blobby macrophages, which engulf pathogens and are festooned with bits of a pathogens surface antigens that alert other immune defenses.

Antibody production begins when a stimulated B cell divides in the bone marrow, giving rise to two types of cells. One, a plasma cell, has a clear oblong area that is a ginormous Golgi apparatus, which processes 2,000 antibodies per second that enter the circulation.

The second daughter cell of a dividing B cell is a memory B cell. Like the name suggests, a memory B cell hangs around, and if the pathogen shows up again, jumps into action and pumps out more antibodies, cutting off the new infection fast.

An important part of the antibody response is that its polyclonal differently-shaped antibodies are produced, each recognizing and binding to a different part of a pathogen, like using different weapons to tackle different parts of an enemys body.

Some antibodies just bind to a pathogen, but others neutralize it, and those are the ones that make a vaccine or immune response effective. Yet certain other antibodies actually enhance infection; vaccines are designed to block this from happening.

T cells come in several varieties and exert complex effects.

Tracking T cells is important in evaluating potential vaccine durability. And although we only have a half-year of data, the natural infection suggests that antibody responses may be short-lived or not strong enough.

Investigators are reporting the antibody response in humans infected with COVID who recover tends to drop relatively quickly. To some people thats an alarm bell and they guess that a vaccine will show little durability. But following recovery from an acute infection, a decline in antibodies is normal B cell biology and is exactly what we predict, said Daniel Barouch, MD, PhD, professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School and director, Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

One of the first reports showed antibodies decreasing by half in just 37 days among a small sample of people who had mild cases. Thats similar to SARS and MERS, in which antibodies fade away within a year. But so far, reports of phase 1 clinical trial results for two COVID vaccines are encouraging.

The first interim report, published in The New England Journal of MedicineJuly 14, found that all 45 participants who received one of three doses of Modernas mRNA-1273 vaccine made antibodies, more with the higher dose. Binding antibodies appeared by day 15 and neutralizing antibodies after a second dose on day 28. Neutralizing antibodies are a biomarker of vaccine protection for other respiratory viruses, so thats good news.

Responses are comparable to what occurs with natural infection, and perhaps a little higher. Data are encouraging; the strategy elicits immune responses that are targeted against the virus, said Lindsey R. Baden, MD, associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School and director of clinical research, Brigham and Womens Hospital. The study used antibodies in plasma from recovered patients as a control for the natural immune response, and the vaccine exceeded that comparison.

Even better news: participants made T cells. Helpers appear first, which pump out a specific soup of cytokines, and then after the second dose of vaccine, killers appear, making sure that any remaining viruses cant replicate.

The phase 1 trial showed that the middle of three doses is best for tempering efficacy with side effects. Phase 2 began in May and phase 3, began on July 27. Overall, depending on the number of trials that progress, hundreds of thousands of people may participate.

Modernas vaccine (mRNA-1273) is designed to enhance visibility to the immune system. The target cell translates it into an engineered version of the viruss spike protein that tames the inflammatory response. The spike is also tweaked to be more stable than the natural one.

On July 20 the second clinical trial report came from the Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Groups candidate ChAdOx1, in The Lancet. That vaccine consists of the genetic instructions for the spike protein delivered in a chimpanzee virus.

Like the mRNA vaccine, Oxfords candidate is given in doses 28 days apart. And it, too, evokes both a humoral (antibody) and cellular (T cell) response.

So far, the numbers of vaccinated people are small, but the reports are optimistic.

With clever variationson the clinical trial theme, like overlapping phases and designing spike proteins to be more visible to the immune system, it may indeed be possible to barrel through phase 3 clinical trials that test a statistically significant number of people. But post-marketing surveillance, a normal part of drug development, is going to be critical.

The participants in the MassCPR zoom marveled that vaccine development for COVID-19 is so far taking 5 to 10 months, compared to the historical 5 to 10 years.

We are only months into knowing about this virus, so any longevity of the immune response we have to interpret with care because our understanding of the biology and durability of the biology will take time. The virus will evolve and we have to take that into consideration, said Baden. He showed data from monkeys that suggest a long-lasting effect is possible.

Practically speaking, the phase 3 trials will take time because the participants arent being injected with virus, for ethical reasons. Instead, investigators must wait for the volunteers to encounter the virus in their communities, to see if a smaller percentage of vaccinated people become infected than the unvaccinated control groups. And thats why a vaccine by the end of the year would be quite a surprise for many of us, said Ken Mayer, MD, of the Fenway Institute.

Well have increasing clarity as the next 3 to 6 months proceed with a suite of clinical trials underway or soon to be. Most optimistic is late fall for first availability for an Emergency Use Authorization. But a tremendous number of things would have to go perfectly to achieve that. Early 2021 is more realistic, said Barouch. An EUA brought COVID-19 treatment remdesivir to patients before the official FDA approval.

Baden agreed that early 2021 is more feasible. He points out the potential savings of 6 to 12 months from beginning to manufacture candidate vaccines before their clinical trials conclude, well before. Financial risks are acceptable, safety not, and thats why it will take at least 3 to 6 months more.

Once a vaccine is out there, attention will turn to epidemiology. What percentage of the population must be vaccinated or have natural immunity to induce herd immunity? And how many people will actually take a vaccine?

If several vaccines make it to the finish line, how will people be assigned to them? People over age 65, for example, would benefit most from a vaccine that includes an adjuvant, which is a chemical that affects the immune response. A vaccine candidate from Australian biotech company Vaxine Pty Limited, for example, includes a complex sugar that lowers the risk of the vaccine triggering an excessive immune response. The sugar adjuvant has worked well in vaccines against influenza, hepatitis B, and West Nile virus, according to Nikolai Petrovsky, PhD, research director at the company.

Assessing the all-important T cell response will take time, too, because thats the way the cellular immune response unfurls in nature. Gradually. A full immune response is a finely-tuned process that is a consequence of millennia of evolution not of politics, PR, potential profits, or wishful thinking.

Ricki Lewis has a PhD in genetics and is a genetics counselor, science writer and author of Human Genetics: The Basics. Follow her at her website or Twitter @rickilewis.

Read more:

Vaccine 'durability': COVID-19 immunizations coming soon but will they last? - Genetic Literacy Project

Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Announces a Second Clinical Trial with Funding from MTEC to Evaluate Razuprotafib for the Prevention and Treatment of…

CINCINNATI, Aug. 04, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Aerpio) (Nasdaq: ARPO) and The U.S. Government operating through the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) announced today that an agreement has been reached to evaluate razuprotafib in a new randomized, investigational trial for the prevention and treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in adult patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 as part of MTEC-20-09-COVID-19 Treatment Military Infectious Disease Research Program (MIDRP) Development of Treatments for COVID-19. MTEC will provide up to $5.1 million in funding toward the clinical trial. Aerpio will support the trial with in kind spending in the amount of $2.8 million. MTEC is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization constructed by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRDC). The Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) was established as an enterprise partnership including industry and academia to facilitate research and development activities. Protecting U.S. forces from COVID-19 is a key priority for the U.S. military. The partnership between Aerpio and MTEC will provide resources to support a second COVID-19 Phase 2 clinical trial with razuprotafib, a drug candidate being investigated for its potential to prevent and treat the severe respiratory distress observed in COVID-19 patients.

Aerpio Pharmaceuticals is developing a potent and selective small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP), razuprotafib (AKB-9778), that restores Tie2 pathway activation in endothelial cells to stabilize blood vessels during vascular injury and inflammation. Emerging data indicate that SARS-Cov2, the virus that causes COVID-19, may attack vascular endothelium and destabilize blood vessels in multiple organs including the lung, kidneys and heart leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Based on these findings, Aerpio and a distinguished team of clinical investigators have developed a plan to investigate the therapeutic potential of subcutaneous razuprotafib for the prevention and treatment of ARDS in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Wesley H. Self, MD, MPH Associate Professor and Vice Chair for Research in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Aerpio COVID-19 Steering Committee stated, A Tie2 activator that can be administered without an IV to stabilize the pulmonary vasculature would be a breakthrough for reducing the devastating effects of COVID19 associated pulmonary pathology. This therapeutic could result in fewer COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, earlier recovery with decreased time in the hospital and ICU and an overall reduction in morbidity and mortality.

Jeff Sabados MPP MBA, member of Aerpios COVID-19 Steering Committee, who served for 20 years in both Active and Reserve Duty in the U.S. Navy, commented, The subcutaneous administration of razuprotafib to activate Tie2 makes this particularly attractive to active duty military personnel around the globe because razuprotafib has the potential to save lives in the next pandemic and return soldiers back to the front lines. I am very proud to be a part of this effort.

About the MTEC TrialWe hypothesize that razuprotafib, a first-in-class Tie2 activating compound, will exhibit an acceptable safety profile and show efficacy for treatment of ARDS in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 and be a life-saving therapeutic for service members in the field suffering from the devasting respiratory and vascular effects of COVID-19. Aerpio, through the support of MTEC will conduct a Phase 2 clinical trial of subcutaneous razuprotafib for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. The Phase 2 trial will be conducted at approximately 10 clinical sites and is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2021.

About MTECThe Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) is a 501(c)(3) biomedical technology consortium collaborating under an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) with the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRDC) that serves those who serve our nation.

About Razuprotafib (previously AKB-9778)Razuprotafib binds to and inhibits vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP), an important negative regulator of Tie2. Decreased Tie2 activity contributes to vascular instability in many diseases including diabetes. Razuprotafib activates the Tie2 receptor irrespective of extracellular levels of its binding ligands, angiopoietin-1 (agonist) or angiopoietin-2 (antagonist) and may be the most efficient pharmacologic approach to maintain normal Tie2 activation. As seen preclinically, activation of Tie2 by razuprotafib stabilizes vasculature which may have beneficial effects in a variety of disease states, including COVID-19.

About Aerpio PharmaceuticalsAerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing compounds that activate Tie2 to treat ocular diseases and diabetic complications. Recently published mouse and human genetic data implicate the Angpt/Tie2 pathway in maintenance of Schlemms canal, a critical component of the conventional outflow tract. The Companys lead compound, razuprotafib (formerly AKB-9778), a first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP), is being developed as a potential treatment for open angle glaucoma, and the Company intends to investigate the therapeutic potential of razuprotafib in other indications. The Company is also evaluating development options for ARP-1536, a humanized monoclonal antibody, for its therapeutic potential in the treatment of diabetic vascular complications including nephropathy and diabetic macular edema (DME). The Companys third asset is a bispecific antibody that binds both VEGF and VE-PTP which is designed to inhibit VEGF activation and activate Tie2. This bispecific antibody has the potential to be an improved treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration and DME via intravitreal injection. Finally, the Company has exclusively out-licensed AKB-4924 (now called GB004), a first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF). GB004 is being developed by AKB-4924s exclusive licensor, Gossamer Bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: GOSS). For more information, please visit http://www.aerpio.com.

Forward Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, the Companys product candidates, including razuprotafib, ARP-1536 and the bispecific antibody asset, the clinical development plan therefor and the therapeutic potential thereof, the Companys plans and expectations with respect to razuprotafib and the development therefor and therapeutic potential thereof in addressing COVID-19 and the intended benefits from the Companys collaboration with Gossamer Bio for GB004, including the continued development of GB004 and the milestone and royalty payments related to the collaboration. Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to several risk factors. Such factors include, among others, the continued development of GB004 and maintaining and deriving the intended benefits of the Companys collaboration with Gossamer Bio; ability to continue to develop razuprotafib or other product candidates, including in indications related to COVID-19; the inherent uncertainties associated with the drug development process, including uncertainties in regulatory interactions, the design of planned or future clinical trials, commencing clinical trials and enrollment of patients in clinical trials; obtaining any necessary regulatory clearances in order to commence and conduct planned or future clinical trials; the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the Companys business operations, including research and development efforts and the ability of the Company to commence, conduct and complete its planned clinical activities; and competition in the industry in which the Company operates and overall market conditions; and the additional factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our other subsequent filings with the SEC.

These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Investors should consult all the information set forth herein and should also refer to the risk factor disclosure set forth in the reports and other documents the Company files with the SEC available at http://www.sec.gov.

Contacts for Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc:Investors & Media:

Gina MarekVP Financegmarek@aerpio.comOrInvestors:Irina KofflerLifeSci Advisorsikoffler@lifesciadvisors.com

See the article here:

Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Announces a Second Clinical Trial with Funding from MTEC to Evaluate Razuprotafib for the Prevention and Treatment of...

When the First Amendment meets the Second Amendment | Our Columnists – Aitkin Independent Age

The First Amendment met the Second Amendment in June when a Missouri couple were confronted with protestors over police brutality in the wake of the George Floyd murder on May 25 in Minneapolis.

The couple, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, drew firearms on the crowd to defend their home, they said. This happened after the large group of protestors marched past their front gates, proceeded to their mansion, and made threats, according to the McCloskeys in a Fox News interview.

Patricia McCloskey stated that member(s) from the protest group said they were going to kill them, live in their house after they were dead (while pointing to different rooms they would live in), burn down their home, and that threats were made against their dog which was outside the home.

No shootings from the rifle or the handgun that the couple was wielding occurred.

But what did occur were felony charges made by the St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner against the McCloskeys, citing unlawful use of a weapon.

The couples attorney, Joel J. Schwartz, was quoted in a July 20 Washington Post article saying the charges were disheartening, and he believes, unequivocally, that no crime was committed. He went on to say that he supports the First Amendment right of every citizen to have their voice but that the First Amendment must be balanced with the Second Amendment and Missouri law which entitles people to protect their home and family from potential threat under the Castle Doctrine Law.

The prosecutor went one step further beyond the charges; the McCloskeys had their firearms seized. A search warrant was obtained and the guns were seized by law enforcement.

Situations like the one the McCloskeys found themselves in are perhaps why a large group of Second Amendment supporters attended the Mille Lacs County Second Amendment Sanctuary Resolution public hearing at the Historic Courthouse last Tuesday, July 21. Their voices were heard as they exercised their First Amendment rights in defense, or in one case, against, the proposed resolution.

Both Amendments, First and Second, have come under attack as of late. Some reason that hate speech incites violence and believe the First Amendment must be revisited. And were now in a cancel culture where if a group of individuals deems certain words as hateful, their livelihoods are canceled.

Of course we know terroristic threats must never be tolerated, but as Americans, we must reject this new form of attack on personal liberties. Whether its sending someone to jail over lawfully exercising their Second Amendment rights or canceling someone for disagreement over the choice of their words, we must reject this and stand for liberties.

The group Human Rights Watch, in their fight against all forms of repression of speech in the media and around the globe, states: How any society tolerates those with minority, disfavored, or even obnoxious views will often speak to its performance on human rights more generally.

The press must remain free to exercise independence, uncontrolled by a government, a political force or social system. This needs to happen in order to maintain transparency for those very entities which the people should dictate, not the powers given within those institutions. In the same manner, individuals must remain free in speech as liberation depends on such. And when our Second Amendment doesnt exist, weve lost our ability to protect ourselves against the most lethal of threats.

I was pleased to see the First Amendment exercised last Tuesday at the Courthouse in a respectful, non-violent way. We dont know that the outcome would have been the same for the McCloskeys had they not been able to exercise their Second Amendment right.

Traci LeBrun is the editor of the Messenger.

View original post here:

When the First Amendment meets the Second Amendment | Our Columnists - Aitkin Independent Age

Help Us Safeguard the Second Amendment – National Review

A man inspects a handgun at the National Rifle Association annual meeting in Indianapolis, Ind., April 28, 2019.(Lucas Jackson/Reuters)Youre not paranoid: Democrats do want to take your guns away.

There are many great reasons to contribute to the National Reviewwebathon, but I believe that none is more important than the publications steadfast defense of the Second Amendment.

After the outbreak of the coronavirus, millions of Americans, feeling helpless and besieged by forces outside their control, began purchasing firearms to protect their families, property, and community. Once the lawlessness and fanaticism of the Antifa protests began spreading across the country, the number of gun owners continued to climb. When Democrats began embracing the notion of defunding the police, even more citizens saw gun ownership as a necessity of contemporary life.

All of this has added up to the largest surge in gun ownership in American history. According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, gun sales have nearly doubled in the first six months of 2020 compared with sales a year ago. If gun manufacturers could keep up with demand, there would probably be an even bigger buying spree.

The spike in gun ownership has occurred within diverse populations, creating millions of first-time gun owners, many of them women and minorities. All of which means that making the philosophical, legal, and historical case for the Second Amendment a right that undergirds all our other liberties has never been more important.

No one does it as well as National Review. And were busy. Attacks on the Second Amendment have been coming from all sides. As Mairead McArdle recently reported, it is likely that conservative justices declined to take up an important Second Amendment case after John Roberts signaled he would side with the left-wing faction of the court. Even before the pandemic broke out, David B. Kopel, one of the nations leading intellectuals on gun issues, warned that District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the Second Amendment as an individual right, was in a precarious legal situation, as courts abdicate their responsibility to uphold the rights of gun owners around the country.

As the pandemic spread, and states began using COVID-19 as a pretext to shutter gun shops, attorney Howard Slugh made the case that such intrusions were unconstitutional, especially given that Americans had an even greater need to protect themselves in the middle of a national emergency.

The gun historian and lawyer Stephen P. Halbrook warned that history has proven that tyrannical government diktats, like the ones being signed by governors and mayors in many municipalities, might long outlast the crisis that inspired them.

Second Amendment champion and editor of NRO, Charles C. W. Cooke, argued that only the cops need guns and cops are racist and will kill you are irreconcilable positions. The right to defend your life and property, whether you are abandoned by the authorities or not, should be nonnegotiable.

One of most vital ways that National Reviewfights against gun restrictionists is by exposing the torrent of misleading coverage from the corporate media. As I recently noted in a piece about Politicos coverage of background checks, there is no issue in political life that is covered as poorly and dishonestly as guns, with the possible exception of religion. Reporters might let the mayor of Chicago deflect from her incompetence by blaming law-abiding gun owners. We dont.

If we dont debunk the New York Times 1619 Project fabulists, who now claim that the Second Amendment was adopted only so that Southerners could use guns to subdue slaves, who will?

With an election coming, its also crucial to point out the increasingly radical position that Democrats have staked out on the guns issue. At National Review, we understand that Joe Bidens often hysterical and inaccurate rhetoric on firearms is merely a warning sign for the type of harmful policies he and his party would support if Biden were to become president.

Since National Reviewhas no sugar daddy, no giant corporate sponsors, we rely on your generosity to keep doing our work. Please support us here, knowing you have our deep appreciation.

View original post here:

Help Us Safeguard the Second Amendment - National Review

Militias’ warning of excessive federal power comes true but where are they? – The Conversation US

Militias and many other Second Amendment advocates have long argued that their primary desire to own firearms often, many of them is rooted in a need to protect themselves and their families from a tyrannical federal government, or to discourage the government from becoming tyrannical in the first place.

But with the mayor of a major U.S. city warning that tyranny and dictatorship have already arrived on the streets in the shape of unidentified federal troops using questionable tactics militia groups appear reluctant to throw their lot in with protesters. In fact, many have been supporting government action to suppress peaceful demonstrators.

Certainly the scenes in Portland have alarmed civil liberties groups:Heavily armed and camouflaged federal officers, wearing no name tags or other insignia, are on the streets of Portland, Oregon, and have teargassed and arrested seemingly peaceful protesters with little or no provocation. President Donald Trump has said similar forces are coming to other cities many run by Democrats.

To some, it may look exactly like what the militias have been warning of.

As a scholar of the U.S. domestic militia movement, I have seen in recent months a new divide emerging in these groups.

Some, often calling themselves the boogaloo movement, see the current political unrest as an opportunity to wrest power from an overbearing federal government. Others support police and their enforcement of strict law and order, even if that means authorities using powerful weapons and overwhelming force.

Assessing what these groups are doing, and how they are discussing recent events, has become more difficult for observers like me in recent weeks. On June 30, Facebook announced it had removed hundreds of accounts and groups allegedly related to the boogaloo movement.

The move came in the wake of several arrests of alleged boogaloo adherents across the country, including three in Nevada accused of plotting to firebomb federal land and one in Texas accused of killing one police officer and critically injuring another.

Boogaloo groups still have a social media presence and, until recently when the portion of the site they used was closed, a large presence on the Reddit discussion site, where comments are loosely regulated and people can post anonymously.

Now the movements public face is smaller and harder to find without insider knowledge. For instance, until recently it was common to see groups with the words big igloo in their names, a play on the word boogaloo. After Facebooks crackdown, some groups are using the word icehouse or other synonyms that may not be as obvious. They are therefore harder for algorithms to find, but also for people to find whether to observe or to join in.

The groups who back the boogaloo imply, or even outright declare, that the U.S. is no longer a free country, and generally call for supporters to oppose, violently if necessary, federal forces and the government they represent.

In the days after George Floyds death, I saw some of these groups call for members to participate in protests opposing police violence. But I have not seen similar calls in response to federal officers violence in Portland.

That may change if federal forces do appear in other places, especially areas geographically closer to active back the boog supporters. It is also possible that the groups are discussing protests or other actions in less public ways, in private messages or on platforms like Parler, that have marketed themselves as friendlier toward a variety of conservative views.

There are still militia members who support police, often called back the blue groups. Commentators have observed that silence from them and other Second Amendment supporters certainly seems to be hypocritical, at best, and possibly supportive of tyranny in the current context.

Thats not the way they see it. They argue that one of the few legitimate functions of the federal government is to protect citizens from others who might infringe on their rights or safety. They support police who say that Portland authorities have failed to protect regular people from violent protesters.

Thats also what these groups claimed happened in Seattles autonomous zone though they rely on news sources that describe the protesters as inherently dangerous and hampering business and free association. They seemingly ignore or discount other reports that these characterizations are exaggerated. In my research, I found that militia members were likely to exclusively trust sources like Fox News or even more conservative sites for their information, and recent data confirms that such sources may strongly shape viewers understanding of political and other events.

This view of protesters as violent is amplified by some back the blue members belief that the demonstrators are Marxist members of antifa, a mostly nonviolent leaderless collective movement generally opposing fascism.

For example, one Facebook group shared a video of Christopher David, the Navy veteran beaten by federal officers in Portland, talking about his experience. A commentator responded, The end of the video tell[s] the tale, hes going to raise money for [Black Lives Matter]! He is a liar he went there to stand with his commie comrades.

Scholarship on conservative groups argues that they use anti-communist language to cast political opponents as not real Americans who have thus have forfeited any protections U.S. citizens should have.

Some other back the blue members see hypocrisy in liberals, noting that few, if any, on the left objected when federal officers killed LaVoy Finicum during the 2016 standoff between federal officials and armed supporters of rancher Cliven Bundy during a land dispute elsewhere in Oregon.

There are sharing pages like one on a well-known conservative satire site that suggests the same Oregon authorities opposing federal officers tolerate violent behavior from protesters because of identity politics the idea that certain groups favored by liberals, in this case, Black people, are held to a different and more lax standard.

Several Facebook pages shared an image of a modified Gadsden flag, with a Black Lives Matter fist and promising we will tread as proof that Portland protesters would take away others rights, including the right to bear arms, if given the chance and thus do not deserve protection themselves. One comment in support of such a post read, I[m] glad to see Im not the only person happy to see these commies being snatched up and dragged away. Yes, I know that this could just as easily be turned around and that we could also be dragged away in broad daylight. But if they arent stopped now, and they do somehow manage to gain complete power, well get dragged away anyways. Better them than us, before its too late.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter.]

Federal intervention has not stopped the Portland protests from growing, but some analysts expect Trump to increase the response in an attempt to appeal to his supporters as the country heads into the November election. Many people fear that move would spark violence.

The back the blue militia members generally respect law and order enough to not fulfill their threats of violence or criminal action but the back the boog groups may not be so restrained. The back the blue groups may also act if federal action escalates, and members believe they are needed or useful to help defend the interests of average citizens.

Excerpt from:

Militias' warning of excessive federal power comes true but where are they? - The Conversation US

Ron Rivera will stand for anthem, but fully supports First Amendment rights – Yahoo Sports

When the regular season begins (and hopefully it will), the head coach of The Washington Football Team will be standing for The National Anthem. But Ron Rivera will not question the decision of players to use the anthem as a platform for protest.

Well, the truth of the matter is again, lets go back to our Constitution, to our Bill of Rights, the amendment, Rivera recently told TheAthletic.com. Lets go back to the oath of office to serve and protect. Part of the Constitution is the First Amendment. Theres a lot of people out there that support the Second Amendment vehemently. Well, if you support the Second Amendment vehemently, why wouldnt you support the first one, which is freedom of expression, freedom of speech? And thats all that is. Thats an extension of one of our unalienable rights, one of our God-given rights, one of the things written into the Constitution. So, again, lets at least applaud that. Lets celebrate that as well.

Rivera said hell stand because his father served in the military, his brother was a first responder, and his wifes family has a history of military service.

My dad had brothers that served in World War II, Rivera added. So to me, standing at attention is what Im going to do. Thats how Im going to honor them. I might kneel during the coin toss because I do support Black Lives Matter. I do support the movement to help correct the policing. But at the same time, I think everybody has to celebrate what the Constitution of the United States entitles us to do as Americans. Thats the thing that everybodys got to understand. We got to get past all this other stuff and quit making this a political fight. Theres nothing political about the Constitution. Its clear cut the Supreme Court rules on it, follow it, and then were supposed to defend it.

As the pandemic continues to consume so much of footballs focus, issues regarding the anthem will become front and center if/when games are played. Given the uncertainty created by COVID-19, criticism and controversy over players not standing for the anthem should be regarded as the proverbial good problem to have, because it will mean that games are being played.

Ron Rivera will stand for anthem, but fully supports First Amendment rights originally appeared on Pro Football Talk

Visit link:

Ron Rivera will stand for anthem, but fully supports First Amendment rights - Yahoo Sports

OICCI concerned over rollback on Companies Ordinance amendments – The Express Tribune

KARACHI:

The Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) has expressed concern over the abrupt rollback of amendments to the Companies Ordinance without any prior warning or consultation with key stakeholders.

Members of the OICCI have expressed surprise over the Companies (Second Amendment) Ordinance 2020, issued on July 7, 2020 in which some amendments promulgated as recently as May 2020 vide Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2020 and appreciated by the OICCI, were rolled back without any prior warning or consultation with key stakeholders, wrote OICCI Secretary General Abdul Aleem in a letter to Adviser to Prime Minister on Finance Dr Abdul Hafeez Shaikh.

What has surprised OICCI members is that, against the norm and past practice, we were not consulted in respect of the second amendment, especially in relation to Section 452 parameters and learnt about reversals from the media, which obviously creates quite a stir in all the international chambers and headquarters of our member companies about the policymaking procedures in Pakistan, he said.

The key concern of foreign investors relates to reverting back to the original wording of Section 452 - Companies Global Register of Beneficial Ownership - which requires the declaration of all shareholdings in foreign companies, irrespective of the quantum being very minor, he said.

During discussions the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) had with the stakeholders in 2018, the OICCI had recommended that Section 452 should be deleted entirely from the Companies Act as the matter fell within the domain of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and there was no global precedence of such a law being included in the Companies Act.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 5th, 2020.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

Read the original:

OICCI concerned over rollback on Companies Ordinance amendments - The Express Tribune

Beyond the Paint in Worcester to showcase Black Lives Matter mural artists – Worcester Telegram

WORCESTER - The work of 17 local artists who contributed their time, talent and support to the Black Lives Matter mural on Major Taylor Boulevard will be featured in an ArtsWorcester exhibition called Beyond the Paint.

Beyond the Paint will be on view from Aug. 14 to Sept. 13 in the North Corridor, directly next to ArtsWorcesters main galleries, at 44 Portland St.

A team of artists and hundreds of volunteers painted the Black Lives Matter mural on the pavement near the DCU Center on July 15. Each letter in the slogan has a unique design.

The exhibit is really to highlight the artists that helped with the mural, said Em Quiles, president of PaLante Latinx Moving Forward, a co-organizer of the Black Lives Matter mural, and the curator of the exhibit. When we organized the Black Lives Matter mural, we assigned one artist per letter, and each artist came up with their own design, and a lot of volunteers came out to help them bring their vision to life. Among those volunteers were artists, so this exhibit is to showcase those artists who helped the lead artists do their letters.

Seventeen items, one from each artist, will be showcased in the exhibit. Quiles said Monday that she didnt yet have specifics about the mediums.

The Black Lives Matter mural is a powerful artwork made by many artists working in solidarity, and this partnership is a way for us to thank them for their gift to this city, said Juliet Feibel, executive director of ArtsWorcester, in a news release. The anti-racism of the Black Lives Matter movement challenges ArtsWorcester to be more intentional about how we reach and work with artists, and we thank Ms. Quiles for the opportunity to do so.

The artists featured in Beyond the Paint are Amora Andino, Mr. Boom, Jennessa Burks, Joshua Croke, Slim Dawg, Narvicto DeJesus, Brian Denahy, Fogger, Alexandria Marie, Olivia Melendez, Emma Mesa-Melendez, Arli Ortiz, Edmy Ortiz, Jailene Ramos, Edgardo Rodriguez, Laura Steinman and Amber Totorelli.

We wanted to really highlight their experiences and what it meant to them to be part of such a historic event here in Worcester, Quiles said, and what it meant for them not only to be part of the mural, but of the whole Black Lives Matter movement as an artist.

Also, Quiles continued, this exhibit is going to help with ArtsWorcester and build the bridges, the relationships, with local artists. The majority of the lead artists for the mural were Black and the majority of the supporting artists were Latino, so when working with ArtsWorcester we wanted to make sure Black and brown artists have a space in their galleries as well and they feel welcomed. This is a way for them to get their feet wet with the gallery and for ArtsWorcester to show their appreciation for these artists.

All visitors to ArtsWorcester must wear masks. No appointments are required, but only five people are allowed to be in the North Corridor at any one time. ArtsWorcester gallery hours are noon to 5 p.m., Thursday through Sunday.

Go here to read the rest:

Beyond the Paint in Worcester to showcase Black Lives Matter mural artists - Worcester Telegram

Grants offered to artists responding to Black Lives Matter – AroundtheO

Oregon artists will have the opportunity to share their creative visions of the Black Lives Matter movement through a new grant program established by Jordan Schnitzer in partnership with the University of Oregons Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art and the Lyllye Reynolds-Parker Black Cultural Center.

The museums Artist Grant Program in Response to Black Lives Matter will distribute $2,500 grants to 20 artists across Oregon, excluding Multnomah, Clackamas, Columbia and Washington counties. Artists will be asked to use their voices, experiences and artistic expression to reflect on social justice efforts in response to systemic racism.

I have often said artists are chroniclers of our time. We all feel anguish about the death of George Floyd and many others at the hands of racial oppression, said Schnitzer, president of The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer CARE Foundation and the Jordan Schnitzer Family Foundation. We, more than ever, need artists to help us understand this issue and help us heal.

The call for grant applications is part of a broader $150,000 effort funded by Schnitzer that funds a total of 60 grants across two states. Jordan Schnitzer museums of art at Washington State University and Portland State University will also administer grant programs. Oregon artists from Multnomah, Clackamas, Columbia and Washington counties will apply to the PSU program.

The Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art at the UO will work in partnership with the Lyllye-Reynolds-Parker Black Cultural Center to determine grant recipients in Oregon, excluding Multnomah, Clackamas, Columbia and Washington counties, responding to the Black Lives Matter movement. The Artist Grant Program is funded through a generous donation of $50,000 from The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer CARE Foundation.

We believe museums and cultural centers have a responsibility to educate and teach from an anti-racist and equity lens through our cultural and education programs, and to amplify the voices of artists engaging in this critical work, said John Weber, the UO museums executive director. I want to thank Jordan for establishing this program. When words are not enough, art can move people to change. Art can be a powerful tool for social justice. We need to do more, we can and we must. The museum stands in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.

Artists residing in Oregon, excluding Multnomah, Clackamas, Columbia and Washington counties, are encouraged to submit proposals for new work or projects or recently created work directly responding to the current Black Lives Matter movement;responding to marginalized communities; experiences with systemic racism and inequality; and artists whose work thematically connects to those experiences. Artists working in all mediums are invited to apply.

Interested artists should submit their applications no later than Sept. 30. Submission instructions are on the art museums website.

Artist submissions will be reviewed by a panel that will include Weber; Aris Hall, coordinator of the Lyllye Reynolds-Parker Black Cultural Center; Sabrina Madison-Cannon, Phyllis and Andrew Berwick Dean of the School of Music and Dance; Jamar Bean, program director at the Multicultural Center; and Jovencio de la Paz, an assistant professor in the Department of Art. Grantees will be notified by Oct. 31.

This grant provided by Jordan Schnitzer will allow for artists to display the pain and hurt that is felt within the Black community and mark a time in history that will forever remind the UO and Eugene-Springfield community of the importance to why Black Lives Matter, Hall said. Lyllye Reynolds-Parker embodies what activism in our community is, and the works of art will be an ongoing display of activism for the Black community.

The exhibition history at the UOs Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art includes Carrie Mae Weems The Usual Suspects and a companion exhibition to the universitys common reading of Ta-Nehisi Coates Between the World and Me. The latter featured contemporary artists Mark Bradford, Theaster Gates, Mildred Howard, Chris Johnson, Rashid Johnson, Glenn Ligon, Hank Willis Thomas, Kara Walker and Kehinde Wiley.

In 2014, the museum exhibited Emancipating the Past: Kara Walkers Tales of Slavery and Power from the Collections of Jordan Schnitzer and His Family Foundation. Other exhibitions from Jordan D. Schnitzer and the Jordan Schnitzer Family Foundation collections featuring artists of color include Mirror, Mirror: The Prints of Alison Saar, Beyond Mammy, Jezebel & Sapphire: Reclaiming Images of Black Women, Second Look, Twice; Social Space, and Witness: Themes of Social Justice in Contemporary Printmaking and Photography.

The museums Artist Grant Program in response to Black Lives Matter is made possible by the generous donation from the Jordan Schnitzer Family Foundation, which is committed to fostering greater equity, inclusion and diversity in the Northwest.

By Debbie Williamson Smith, Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art

Read the original:

Grants offered to artists responding to Black Lives Matter - AroundtheO

Portlands Wall of Moms is now Moms United for Black Lives – Vox.com

Last Wednesday, the Wall of Moms Facebook group descended into chaos. One woman said a group of Black moms was left unprotected at a rally in downtown Portland, Oregon. Another claimed that group leader Bev Barnum had co-opted Black Lives Matter for her own gain. There were endless threads of comments from women disappointed that the protest group made up of mothers and grandmothers who had gained international recognition for standing on the front line of the citys protests seemed to have lost its way.

The Wall of Moms, at least the original version, was collapsing. It had lasted for all of 10 days.

When the group assembled on July 18 through a call to action from Barnum on Facebook, the mission was simple: Be physically present for Black lives. Last month, federal agents descended on the city to protect federal buildings, which only intensified the protests that have been ongoing since the police killing of George Floyd. Portland mothers, most of them non-Black, were called on to act as a shield against the tear gas and excessive force that police officers used to terrorize protesters.

But by the middle of last week, many of the mothers in the private Wall of Moms Facebook group, which had garnered nearly 20,000 members, were questioning the direction of the organization, disappointed that it no longer seemed to center Black lives. A number of the moms accused Barnum, who is Mexican American, of only being interested in pressuring federal troops to leave Portland, not in the greater issue of justice for Black lives; Barnum had tried to register Wall of Moms as a business without the approval of fellow Black leaders. (Barnum has not responded to Voxs request for comment.)

In response, longtime activist Teressa Raiford, who had been providing guidance to Wall of Moms and is the founder of the nonprofit Dont Shoot Portland along with two other Black mothers and activists, Demetria Hester and Danialle James organized under another group: Mothers United for Black Lives. The new group has made it clear that its mission is to address the problems plaguing Portlands Black communities, like the number of Black teens recently slain, the damage done by the coronavirus, and a police department that reportedly isnt working to investigate gun violence.

We are fighting for liberation, but [Barnum] ended up using Black bodies when she centered herself as an individual and incorporated the Wall of Moms through three agencies. That is violence and doesnt liberate Black people, Raiford told Vox.

Raiford, who started Dont Shoot Portland in 2016 after police arrested her amid the Michael Brown uprisings, was careful to explain that many if not most of the moms in the group have not tried to co-opt the movement.

However, the Wall of Moms is ultimately a cautionary tale of what happens when Black people arent centered in a movement thats about the fight for their lives: People who are interested in getting involved must realize that they have to take directives from Black leaders and show up through the mutual aid response system, Raiford said. That means creating not just a wall of bodies but a wall of resources, financial and otherwise, to bolster activists who will put their lives on the line long after Portland is out of the national spotlight.

Wall of Moms began as a response to the federal law enforcement officers who began patrolling the streets of Portland in early July, forcibly snatching anti-racism protesters off the street and detaining them in unmarked vehicles. The incidents, sometimes recorded on video, caused much confusion across the country before the Trump administration announced that it had deployed officers from Border Patrol and other agencies to protect federal buildings amid ongoing protests.

As Voxs Alex Ward reported, Trump administration officials defended the aggressive tactics, claiming they were necessary to dispel protests led by a violent mob of lawless anarchists. But demonstrators, who had been on the streets protesting for Black lives for more than 50 days, recognized the presence of the federal officers as a further impingement on their civil liberties. Portlanders, many of whom had never protested before, took to the streets to push back against the federal troops. It was during this moment that the Wall of Moms was born.

By July 19, a group of a few dozen mothers, most of them white and wearing white, were seen being tear-gassed by federal officers.

By July 21, the group of mothers would grow to include thousands of women who showed up at downtown protests clad in yellow shirts and masks, helmets, and goggles, and carrying yellow roses and sunflowers. In videos, the women can be seen marching toward Portlands Justice Center chanting in favor of Black Lives Matter. In one early video of the group, the women proclaimed, No cops, no KKK, no racist USA.

Around the same time, news stories poured out with headlines that read Wall of Moms shields protesters from federal agents in Portland and Wall of Moms Protects Portland BLM Protesters, with photos that showed overwhelmingly non-Black women standing in formation linked by the arms. Many of the stories characterized the women as selfless citizens who were eager to stand up and use their bodies to protect the less privileged. Stories characterized the activation as novel, something that would really send a fresh message to the Trump administration.

While most of the mothers were well-intentioned, critics were quick to point out how the women managed to gain international acclaim because of the very privilege they were able to exercise while out on the front lines: whiteness. While whiteness was part of the tactic of getting noticed many of the mothers were aware that their white bodies would yield attention and were intentional about their positioning at the protests Black mothers, who have been losing their children to police violence at an alarming rate for decades, have received little attention for their activism.

Keisha N. Blain, an associate professor of history at the University of Pittsburgh, told Vox there are many factors that go into what images capture the publics interest and attention during social unrest and that it is not uncommon for white activists to receive greater attention for their work, particularly in Black spaces.

Because many people are still struggling to get people to accept Black Lives Matter, the media often privileges the appearance of white protesters in these spaces. Part of this has to do with the perceived novelty of white participation, Blain told Vox. We must also acknowledge that anti-Black racism helps to explain why members of the general public are often more enthralled with white activists in social justice movements even when Black people are at the forefront of these movements. We should also be mindful of the way the media fuels these racist narratives when journalists choose to focus on the efforts of some and not others.

According to Blain, groups like Mothers of the Movement, a collective of Black moms whose children have been killed by police officers or by gun violence, are constantly pursuing this work but dont receive the same kind of visibility and certainly not for a sustained period of time. In Chicago, for example, Black moms formed Mothers/Men Against Senseless Killings in 2015 to build community through violence prevention and other measures like food security and housing, but have not received the national attention in five years that Wall of Moms did in 10 days.

Wall of Moms organizer Barnum, meanwhile, seemed more interested in marketing the group (at one protest, she told the women to get on their knees for a photo, according to Demetria Hester, a mom leading Moms United for Black Lives; Barnum was also called out for doing too many interviews and not passing the mic to women like Raiford) than solely focusing on Black Lives Matter. Despite publicly announcing that the groups administration would cede control to Black moms on July 24, five days later, Barnum had announced in the group that Wall of Moms was now a 501(c)3 and would be partnering with leaders across the nation.

Backlash against Barnum was quick, with moms alleging that she co-opted Black Lives Matter for her own profit. Many called on her to step down immediately. In response, Barnum wrote that she didnt intend to hurt anyone, and that the group will be led by a board made up of Black, Indigenous, and people of color and a BIPOC advisory committee. However, WOM is a group that supports BLM, but it is not a BLM group, she wrote. If that is not good enough for you, please feel free to leave this group. And if you currently volunteer your time, feel free to leave your positions. Again, I am so sorry the 501c3 hurt some of you.

A number of moms in the group immediately said they were out, citing dissatisfaction with how non-Black women failed to listen to Black leaders. The groups impromptu communications director, Emma Pattee, when explaining her reason for stepping away, wrote in a Facebook post:

I have been working 20 hours a day for nearly two weeks, unpaid, and going out at night to protest leaving an infant at home because I was under the impression we were in support of Black Lives Matter, and that Black leadership would be brought in ASAP. It has become clear that that is not the plan for Wall of Moms and so I can no longer volunteer my time here and need to find other ways to support BLM. True racial equity depends on non-Black people relinquishing power and control.

That day, as Wall of Mom chapters launched in cities including Los Angeles and Chicago, Black organizers unveiled Moms United for Black Lives, a space that would keep Black Lives Matter at the forefront and direct the thousands of moms on how to best leverage their privilege. Organizer Danialle James welcomed the moms to the new group with a message: Hi, everyone Thanks for coming over. This is a trying time. I encourage you all to keep your chins up, stay steadfast and moving forward. Be the change you wish to seek. Love to you all.

The private Facebook group for Moms United for Black Lives grew quickly as women abandoned Wall of Moms. The page has almost 12,000 followers and is very active with moms sharing resources for safety, protest locations, and grim stories about the latest Portland killings. Meanwhile, the Wall of Moms Facebook group is still up, though posts are mostly to clear up misinformation and offer articles about effective allyship.

Blain noted that this kind of fallout is not uncommon with social movements that have advocated for equity. With the Womens March, for example, organizers were called out for how it excluded women of color and initially boasted an agenda that largely advanced the goals of cisgender white women. The founders eventually needed to cede the floor to women of color and broaden its objectives to support intersectionality. Meanwhile, with Black Lives Matter, early coverage of the movement hardly mentioned that it was founded by three Black women.

Whenever money enters into social movements, it can cause all sorts of tension, Blain said. And with Wall of Moms, in particular, she said that multiracial organizing can only work effectively when there is clear communication and full transparency. Without communication and transparency, perceptions of anti-Black behavior whether they are intentional or not can bubble up to the surface and undermine the work.

In other words, for there to be progress, all leaders, especially those organizing across racial lines, must be on the same page about the movements objectives.

Once the media cameras focused their lenses on the line of white mothers and grandmothers, Raiford knew it could jeopardize the kind of infrastructure that she and other Portland activists had been establishing for years. More worrisome was the fact that no one was talking about what was truly impacting Portlands Black communities from killings that were going uninvestigated to the coronavirus that was getting residents evicted to poverty that prevented students from participating in school due to a lack of technology. In the predominantly white city less than 6 percent of the population is Black the inequities facing Black communities and other communities of color are often overlooked.

While there are people at the protests getting hit with rubber bullets and theyre getting banged on with the tear gas, weve been getting murdered in our communities and there is literally zero response, Raiford said. In our community since July 1, weve had over 40 shootings.

Raiford has been calling for action in the case of 18-year-old ShaiIndia Harris, a recent high school graduate who was fatally shot in broad daylight on July 10; police recently named a suspect in the case. According to the Oregonian, Harriss death is one of 15 reported homicides in Portland in July, which recorded the highest rate of homicide in more than 30 years. Last week, 32-year-old Black trans woman Aja Raquell Rhone-Spears was fatally stabbed at a vigil for Tyrell Penney, who was recently killed in a shooting.

Raiford sees the collective of moms as a welcome addition to the movement but wants leaders to proceed with transparency, accountability, and deference to the mothers who laid the groundwork. Mutual aid through the ambitious movement of the moms, and having them cater to the needs of our community by sharing Cash App, setting up vigils, ordering flowers, or Postmating these are the resources and things that Black families literally cannot get or do because of inequity, not having money to sustain this movement during the coronavirus crisis, she said.

Hester, a mom leading Moms United for Black Lives, says shes protested every day for the past two months in an effort to dismantle a generational cycle of inequity thats affected her family and Portlands Black communities. In 2017, Hester was attacked by white supremacist Jeremy Christian, who was recently sentenced to life in prison for fatally stabbing two people and injuring another on the MAX train. The day before the murders, Christian had assaulted Hester on the train. The incident has left Hester traumatized but invigorated to fight for justice.

That is what brought me to this revolution, Hester told Vox. We need strong Black people in charge of these movements. Were making our own team of people that we can trust and know are for the cause. And the moms are finding their niche of how to help because there are different ways that white people can help but they dont yet know it, whether its fundraising or using their connections to order computers for Black kids so they can have computers.

As far as how long the moms will keep organizing, Hester says theres no deadline: until we get everything we want.

Right now, Moms United for Black Lives is keeping busy with members answering the calls of Black mothers in need and building a supply chain to provide gear and supplies for activists who are protesting. And theyre still showing up at protests to hold the line and chant, following Hesters lead. Once Black communities are on point, we need to teach other countries to do the same thing for Black communities, as other cities across the country are already on it, Hester said. Its about uniting.

Support Voxs explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Voxs work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Here is the original post:

Portlands Wall of Moms is now Moms United for Black Lives - Vox.com

From Black Lives Matter to Bleak House: David Lammy picks the best books about justice – The Guardian

In 2016, the writer and lawyer Michelle Alexander said the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, would come to be seen as a critical turning point. If it winds up not being a turning point, it will be because we did not do our job.

Nearly two months on since the death of George Floyd, Black Lives Matter has become one of the largest demonstrations in history, but it is still not clear whether a turning point has been reached.

If I have one reason to be optimistic, it is that hundreds of people have written to me asking: what can I do? There is a renewed awareness of racial disproportionality in criminal justice systems, a subject Alexander explores in The New Jim Crow. She makes a chilling comparison between the Jim Crow laws in the United States following the civil war, which segregated the newly emancipated black population, and the countrys system of mass incarceration today, in which one in three black men are sent to prison.

The US is often cited as the centre of racial injustice, but the relationship between criminal justice and racial injustice is global. Edited by Justin Healey, Indigenous People and Criminal Justice examines the disproportionality of indigenous imprisonment in Australia. Healeys research is a vital piece of work on decolonising a criminal justice system in which the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island population account for 27% of Australias prisoners, despite making up less than 3% of the total population.

During the coronavirus crisis, prisoners have been subject to an emergency lockdown regime that has seen offenders in England and Wales spending 23 hours a day in their cells, without access to education, rehabilitation or visits. Measures to limit the spread of Covid-19 are vital, but without a comprehensive plan to relax these extreme policies, prisons could start to resemble Bleak House. Charles Dickens published the first instalment of this satirical portrait of a decaying British judicial system in 1852. Today, Bleak House reads less like satire and more like an omen. After cuts to the Ministry of Justice of a quarter in real terms over the past decade, our outdated system is starting to look dystopian even by Dickensian standards.

As cuts deepen, the backlog of criminal cases grows, leaving defendants sitting in their cells waiting for a trial. Defendants such as Walter McMillian, who was sentenced to death in Alabama in 1988 for killing a white woman, serving six years before his conviction was overturned. In his powerful memoir, Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson tells McMillians story and recalls his own struggles against injustice as a young lawyer. Thankfully, we do not have the death penalty in the UK. But our backlog of 41,000 criminal cases means some people are being held on remand for an even longer period than they would serve if convicted of their alleged offence.

Our system is creaking because its foundations have been weakened by a decade of underfunding. In The Secret Barrister, an anonymous criminal advocate exposes deep faults in our legal system. As a former barrister myself, I know that junior professionals working on legal aid cases come from a variety of backgrounds, and often work in impossible conditions. If we fail to support these people, we fail to support those who rely on them the most. In the wake of Black Lives Matter, no prizes will be awarded for guessing which defendants, victims and communities will end up paying the price.

Tribes by David Lammy is published by Constable (20). To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

View post:

From Black Lives Matter to Bleak House: David Lammy picks the best books about justice - The Guardian

De Blasio didnt submit application for Black Lives Matter street murals but asks others to apply – SILive.com

NEW YORK, N.Y. -- Mayor Bill de Blasio appears to not have gone through the citys application process for street art when he commissioned Black Lives Matter street murals across the city but is asking groups wishing to paint messages of their own on city streets to do so.

De Blasio previously indicated he would not allow Blue Lives Matter and other groups to paint similar messages on city streets.

And City Hall also confirmed it would specifically not allow pro-police group Blue Lives Matter to paint their message near the NYPD headquarters.

However, de Blasio walked back his decision Monday, claiming he never said no to people, only that there is a process for applying.

What I decided to do with the Black Lives Matter murals ... this came out of a meeting at Gracie Mansion weeks ago with community leaders and activists who said this would be such an important thing for this city to declare officially, that is something again, transcends all normal realities because we are in a moment of history where this had to be said and done, de Blasio told reporters during a press conference with reporters Monday.

Thats a decision I made, but the normal process continues for anyone who wants to apply, he said.

Last month, de Blasio announced the city would paint Black Lives Matter street murals in every borough and rename streets to match the message on the heels of nationwide racial injustice protests following the death of George Floyd.

But his decision opened him up to scrutiny when he prevented others from painting messages of their own on city streets. His administration said groups would need to submit a Department of Transportation application in order for their public art request to be considered.

Civil liberties lawyer Norman Siegel, who previously served as the head of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the Advance/SiLive.com that once the government allows one message on a public street theyre opening the door for other groups or individuals to want the same equal right.

Siegel also pointed out that it becomes problematic if the mayor did not submit an application to paint his Black Lives Matter street murals but is asking other groups to apply.

If you have a position that no expression [can be] on the public streets, thats one thing, but the government cant pick and choose which messages, which expression they approve of and which they reject based on the content of the message, Siegel said.

De Blasio said he would not allow police advocacy group Blue Lives Matter to paint their own message near the NYPD headquarters, prompting the group to threaten to sue the city to allow them to do so.

A conservative womens group has sued the city for blocking them from painting a mural of their slogan Engaging, Inspiring and Empowering Women to Make a Difference! the New York Post reported.

And the city recently sent Staten Island artist Scott LoBaido a cease and desist letter asking him to remove a bright blue line he painted along a divider on Hylan Boulevard outside of the 122nd precinct or face getting hit with summonses or legal actions.

LoBaido painted the line without city approval, arguing the mayor never got a permit to do that street art, so I guess its fair game.

City Hall and DOT had repeatedly avoided elaborating on its criteria for approving public street art and whether the mayor submitted an application before he proceeded with his street murals

Asked to elaborate on its approval process Monday, DOT Commissioner Polly Trottenberg was vague about the departments criteria.

Anyone can apply through our public art program but I think as the mayor has said the city does have discretion on those projects, Trottenberg said.

Officials In Redwood City, California ran into a similar problem when they allowed a local resident to paint Black Lives Matter on a downtown street.

The city decided to wash the street mural away after being contacted by a local real estate attorney who asked to paint MAGA 2020 on a street, KPIX reported.

The attorney argued that the street was now a public forum.

FOLLOW SYDNEY KASHIWAGI ON TWITTER.

Link:

De Blasio didnt submit application for Black Lives Matter street murals but asks others to apply - SILive.com

Wendy Osefo on Her Involvement with Black Lives Matter: This Is My Lifes Work – Bravo

As the newest Wife on The Real Housewives of Potomac, Wendy Osefo is bringing her incredibly impressive professional background to Season 5. The RHOP newcomer is a professor, political analyst, entrepreneur, and a mother. Wendy is also a philanthropist who has been advocating for the Black Lives Matter movement for years, which she recently discussed in an interview with The Washington Post.

Noting that the entire cast is very aware of the current climate, Wendy said that civil rights is a topic that will certainly be highlighted this season.

I know BLM has caught the nations attention at this time, but I have been doing this work for years. I marched when Trayvon Martin was killed and that was years ago. Im excited that people are catching wind to this now, but this is my lifes work. This is what I do, Wendy explained. Something that I focused on while we were filming is getting Black women out to vote. Thats something Im passionate about not just to get out and vote but to know the power of their vote.

I think this group is very engaged with these current issues, and Im excited because Ive been doing this for a while and Im glad people are coming on board, she continued. We need to propel this movement forward.

Wendy also opened up about how she and her husband are navigating discussions about the current civil rights movement with her two young sons, 7-year-old Karter and 5-year-old Kruz.

Mommy is on the news and if you walk into my house, youll see a TV tuned into a national news network. Theyre hearing people protesting, theyre hearing, No justice, no peace, so we had to explain to them why these people are in the streets and why theyre seeing these images on the television, said Wendy, adding that soon, they will need to have the conversation that every Black household with boys has.

The talk is about what happens when youre pulled over by a police officer, said Wendy. That in-depth conversation we have not had, but weve let them know why the current climate in the country is the way it is and the history of racism in this country.

Want more RHOP? New episodes air every Sunday at 9/8c or catch up on this season through the Bravo app.

The Daily Dish is your source for all things Bravo, from behind-the-scenes scoop to breaking news, exclusive interviews, photos, original videos, and, oh, so much more. Subscribe to The Daily Dish podcast, join our Facebook group, and follow us on Instagramfor the latest news hot off the presses. Sign up to become a Bravo Insider and be the first to get exclusive extras.

Excerpt from:

Wendy Osefo on Her Involvement with Black Lives Matter: This Is My Lifes Work - Bravo

Covid-19 Forces Gene Therapy Companies to Shift… – Labiotech.eu

Amid the Covid-19 pandemic, gene therapy companies are suffering, with clinical trials delayed and investors remaining cautious in an increasingly volatile market. Yet many have set their sights on what could potentially turn into a gold mine: applying their technology to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus.

The UKs Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult is the latest example of these uncertainty dynamics last week, it received a 100M investment from the UK government to boost its manufacturing capacity in order to scale up the countrys ability to make Covid-19 vaccines, once a vaccine is approved. With this investment, the center will be able to produce millions of doses of vaccine a month.

Gene therapy companies are particularly well-positioned to research and manufacture Covid-19 vaccines, since they often employ viral vectors to get genes into cells. These same vectors could also be used to carry genetic material from the coronavirus in order to elicit an immune response.

The Covid-19 pandemic has prompted many companies to highlight the potential of their programs for treating this disease. Gene therapy is no exception, and indeed several vaccine programs are employing gene therapy, said Stephan Christgau, co-founder and Managing Partner of EiR Ventures, who pointed out at companies such as Moderna, BioNTech and the CGT Catapult.

Data will show whether this approach works for the coronavirus, and, as an investor, ultimately data is king.

Many gene therapy companies may see the opportunity to join the struggle against Covid-19 as life support. When it comes to traditional gene therapies such as those targeting cancer or rare genetic diseases recent data paints a bleak picture.

According to analytics firm GlobalData, 59 gene therapy clinical trials involving 80 drugs and 63 companies have been delayed to date due to the pandemic. The main reasons being that hospitals are overwhelmed and lockdown measures have limited patient access to clinical trials.

It certainly has gone quiet in cell and gene therapeutic products, a representative of Voisin Consulting, a Paris-based life sciences consultancy, told me. Delayed clinical trials, reduced patient enrollment, and possible regulatory delays alongside wavering investor confidence likely contribute to that situation, she added.

These statistics mirror widespread delays of other non-emergency treatments and interventions. The problem is so significant that many experts fear a flood of undiagnosed cancers and other life-threatening diseases down the road.

On top of that comes the roaring economic crisis that lockdowns are triggering around the globe, which may force gene therapy developers to radically rethink their business model. The therapies they provide, even those that are still experimental, are often hugely expensive, often running into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars for a single course of treatment.

Due to the economic recession in most of the countries worldwide, governments will discuss more carefully with pharma companies and payers how to price these high-cost therapies, as the healthcare system is already under pressure, Alessio Brunello, Senior Pharma Analyst at GlobalData, told me. The important factor in addressing this issue could be lowering production costs.

There is a clear mid to long-term impact resulting from Covid-19 pandemic such as clinical trials slowing down, therefore impacting the amount of data available for companies to secure more funding; or prioritization of facilities for COVID-19 work to delay commitment of companies coming to the UK, said a representative from the CGT Catapult.

This however may present opportunities for the cell and gene therapy industry in the UK and its ecosystem in the long run. For instance, the distance between manufacturing facilities may be reduced as companies realize that in such circumstances they would want to ensure easy access to them. This may well result in increased clustering of facilities. The UK already has the largest cluster of cell and gene therapy companies outside of the US and this will remain a key asset to ensure business continuity, similarly international companies already setup int eh UK may be more likely to centralise operations here.

Cover image via Shutterstock, figures courtesy of GlobalData

See the article here:

Covid-19 Forces Gene Therapy Companies to Shift... - Labiotech.eu

Cell and gene therapies: For biotechs, collaboration is key to successful innovation – BioPharma Dive

Cell and gene therapies are expected to represent one of the biggest advances in medical treatments since the introduction of monoclonal antibodies. Cell therapies are having a major impact on hematological malignancies, while gene therapy programs for rare and non-rare diseases could potentially benefit some 2.4 billion patients worldwide. A number of different technologies are enabling gene therapy for patients using different vectors and platforms. We anticipate an increase of gene therapy products that can address monogenic inherited diseases, such as those that involve metabolic disorder and neurological conditions.

Cell therapy products include bispecific T-cell engager antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (better known as CAR T), stem cell therapy, T-cell receptor therapy, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy. Gene therapy may be used in conjunction with these cell products. Gene therapy is not just a type of medicine, but a platform that will enable many different medicines to treat diseases across multiple therapeutic areas, for patient populations of all sizes. Note that CAR T products are classified as both cell and gene therapy.

The FDA is taking a collaborative stance in encouraging innovative product development and clinical trial design and has approved nine cell and gene therapy products.The FDA anticipates approving 10 or more products per year by 2025. As of June 2019, the EMA has approved 14 advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP), including gene, cell and tissue products.Oncology is currently the leading therapeutic area, and trials are also underway for therapies in cardiovascular, ophthalmology, Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer's disease and diabetes. Because of the great promise of these advances, companies focusing on cell and gene therapy products in these areas are well positioned to raise funds to support their research and development initiatives.

Without doubt, this is an exciting environment for those devoting their careers to bringing innovative treatments to people who need them. And needless to say, there is enormous opportunity in this field for biotech companies. In fact, many critical and innovative new therapies for rare and untreated diseases occur in the biotech pipeline.

However, the path to developing and commercializing a cell and gene therapy product is complex and there are many hurdles to overcome. This is especially true for biotechs which typically do not have full internal logistical or operational expertise, long-term relationships with manufacturers, or deep financial resources. For example, a biotech developing an autologouscell product might not easily be able to partner with local or central GMP manufacturers. Each detail has the potential to significantly slow down the clinical trial process and put biotechs at a disadvantage. Logistical challenges pose considerable obstacles, for example:

Collection, transportation and GMP manufacturing for allogeneic products

Short half-life of cell products, typically 24 to 96 hours

Storage capacities requiring very low temperatures for frozen products

Limited manufacturing capacity in many regions

Complex country-specific environmental safety regulations

Operational delivery can be equally problematic:

Selection of appropriate sites with accreditation for cell and gene therapy products

Limited on-site training and inconsistency among sites

Rare patient indications requiring intense patient recruitment strategies

The small number of patients participating in these trials

Unique toxicities that require early identification and management for patient safety

Coordination of multiple sites during trial enrollment to manage limited product availability

That said, biotechs might be in the best position to find new avenues to push innovation forward by virtue of their agility and flexibility, compared to their larger counterparts. In this fast-changing environment, the key to overcoming logistical and manufacturing concerns is to establish a partnership with a CRO one with a global team with direct experience in cell and gene therapy trials.

Most importantly, the CRO partner should be knowledgeable in cell products tracking, coordination and delivery in the tight timelines necessary for these compounds. Local knowledge from regulatory experts can help minimize time to trial opening and increase the chance of success. For example, a gene therapy clinical trial process in the United States is very different compared to such a process in Japan.

Further, biotechs need to choose clinical sites very carefully. Targeted locations should include accredited locations with teams in place to handle the complex requirements for these studies. The CRO partner should provide constant updates about clinical sites supporting cell and gene therapies, as an increasing number of sites establish capabilities in this field. Access to data that will help identify locations and patient volumes for rare-disease indications is also crucial.

Due to the unique potential side effects and safety concerns for cell and gene therapy trials, clinical research teams need to be well trained for operational success. Other important considerations include:

Prior indication experience

Specific training modules for team members

Clear communication standards

Strong pharmacovigilance expertise

As part of one of the world's leading CROs, Parexel Biotech offers essential services ideally suited to supporting biotech companies in these initiatives, with comprehensive expertise covering every critical area. Our lean operational structure and flexible processes enable biotechs to take advantage of regulatory, commercialization and operational expertise developed over years of experience with leading biopharma companies. The objective of our team is to bring together best practices to help our clients succeed with their important new therapies.

Follow this link:

Cell and gene therapies: For biotechs, collaboration is key to successful innovation - BioPharma Dive

The Time for DMD Gene Therapy is Now: A Chat with the MDA – BioSpace

After almost 15 years since the first gene therapy trial for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) began, the dream of a DMD gene therapy drug is getting closer to a reality.

BioSpace sat down with Sharon Hesterlee, Ph.D., chief research officer at the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA), to talk about the history and challenges of developing gene therapy for DMD and the DMD gene therapy field as a whole, including Pfizers and Sarepta Therapeutics latest clinical data.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)

DMD is a progressive muscle wasting disease caused by a genetic mutation. The mutated gene is on the X chromosome, making DMD an X-linked disease. This explains why it largely affects boys as they dont have a backup copy of the gene (they only have one X chromosome).

The first signs of DMD appear as the young boys begin to walk and get more mobile, typically between the ages of 2 to 5. They have trouble walking, arent walking as well as their peers, and cant jump, Hesterlee commented. Most boys stop walking and need a wheelchair between 9 and 14 years old.

But the disease doesnt just affect their legs it affects muscles all over their body. The most troublesome symptoms are breathing difficulties. Eventually, they will need ventilation to help them breathe.

The life span of boys with DMD has been growing steadily (from in their teens to early 30s) due to improvements in heart and respiratory care. Despite this progress, most DMD patients pass away in their 20s to 30s due to respiratory failure, infection, or cardiomyopathy (dilation of the heart due to overwork).

Discovering DMDs cause

Although we now know DMD is a genetic disease, it wasnt that long ago that researchers didnt know why or how the disease came about.

Back in the mid-1980s, the cause of DMD was still unknown all we knew was that it ran in families, there were no genes associated with the disease yet, Hesterlee explained. MDA gave research grants to four labs tasked with finding the cause. One of those labs, Louis Kunkels lab, identified the dystrophin gene first in 1986.

Dystrophin, the largest gene in the human body, encodes a muscle protein responsible for keeping muscle cells from pulling themselves apart when the muscle is working, like a shock absorber for the cell, as Hesterlee described. Without dystrophin, the muscle cells suffer from microtears, leading to their demise and progressive muscle wasting.

Once we identified the culprit gene, we thought Oh great! We know whats wrong, well fix it! Hesterlee added. But it took another 30 years to be able to apply this knowledge to develop effective drugs.

Although corticosteroids can slow the progression of DMD to some extent, they dont address the underlying issue the lack of functional dystrophin. Corticosteroids help dampen down inflammation, said Hesterlee. They can help slow down disease progression, but tackling inflammation only addresses one downstream effect.

Fixing the mutated gene (through gene editing) or providing cells with a new healthy copy of the gene (through gene therapy) would provide the best benefit, possibly even leading to a lifelong cure.

Gene therapy for DMD

As the name suggests, gene therapy involves delivering a healthy copy of a mutated gene (in DMDs case dystrophin) into cells. The tricky part is getting the gene inside the cell. This is accomplished using a vector, usually a virus or nanoparticle, as a trojan horse to sneak the healthy gene into the cell.

Viruses are very well evolved to get into cells, commented Hesterlee. Take out the viral genes required to make copies of itself and put in the healthy copy of dystrophin, then the virus can get inside cells but not replicate.

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are commonly used because they dont naturally cause disease or many immune system side effects in humans. But there is a limit to how much cargo you can stuff inside these tiny viruses, about 5 kb for AAV. The whole 2.2 Mb dystrophin gene over 440 times as big is too large to fit inside any AAV.

Throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s, researchers tinkered with the dystrophin gene, figuring out what parts were needed and how much they could trim out to still have a functional protein. They finally found the perfect balance, naming the shortened genes microdystrophins.

Sometimes called minidystrophins, there are slight variations between different versions of these shortened genes, but the key is they are all small enough to fit into AAV, explained Hesterlee.

Other hurdles of developing a DMD gene therapy

Now that the dystrophy gene was brought down to a useful size, the next challenge researchers faced was getting the gene therapy from the blood stream into the muscle.

Could we use histamine? What about a tourniquet and pressure? Or higher doses to drive the virus into the muscles? Hesterlee added. But we were cautious after the high profile death of Jesse Gelsinger in 1999.

Thats why the first DMD gene therapy trial in the US, which began in 2006, involved injecting the gene therapy directly into the biceps of the children who participated. That allowed researchers to test the gene therapy proof-of-concept in DMD patients without worrying about systemic administration right off the bat. Subsequent gene therapy trials have moved to intravenous (IV) administration typically only requiring one fairly quick dose.

The trick was using higher doses and the right serotypes of AAV to move the vector out of the bloodstream and into muscle, Hesterlee added.

Now, researchers had to find the best time during the course of the childrens disease to test the therapy.

The earlier you treat, the better, but its hard to measure benefit if the children are not yet manifesting a lot of symptoms, so you want to test the children at a stage when theyre progressing, said Hesterlee. Also, if you were to treat infants, its important to remember that they will be making new muscle cells without the modified gene in them, so there is a balance of when to treat.

Children with DMD tend to get stronger between 3 to 7 years old, then start to decline, Hesterlee explained. This is why many Duchenne drug studies traditionally havent involved children younger than 7 years old.

Testing the children when they are starting to lose the ability to walk can avoid the natural history noise, Hesterlee added. You can compare outcomes to natural disease due to a rich natural history of DMD. In recent years, weve gotten much better at detecting benefits in the boys even when they are in the early stages and improving, so trials have started to skew younger, including children as young as 4 years old.

Another challenge hinges on the fact that the gene is delivered using a virus, making the gene therapy an immunization in a way. The patients body will react to the viral vector just like it would any other virus, creating antibodies to hunt and destroy the gene therapy viruses. This not only quickly diminishes the amount of therapeutic virus in the body, but it could also mean the patient would only be able to get one dose of therapy - any subsequent doses would be destroyed too quickly by the body or, worse, potentially cause a severe immune reaction.

AAVs are also common viruses some people have already been exposed to AAVs naturally and would never know because they cause no symptoms.

Anywhere from 10 to 80 percent of DMD patients, depending on the serotype in question, have preexisting antibodies against AAVs, meaning they are not eligible for gene therapy, Hesterlee elaborated. Antibody status can be quite divisive in the DMD community.

DMD gene therapies in development

Despite all the challenges faced over the years, there are a handful of gene therapies being developed for DMD currently, with a few pivotal Phase III trials close on the horizon. There are currently three companies with competitive trials in the US: Solid Biosciences, Sarepta Therapeutics, and Pfizer (who bought the DMD platform in 2016 from AskBio, a company involved in early DMD gene therapy trials).

Top DMD Gene Therapies in Development

Solid Biosciences

Sarepta Therapeutics

Pfizer

Treatment name

SGT-001

SRP-9001

PF-06939926

Phase

I/II (clinical hold)

[NCT03368742]

I/II (active, not recruiting)

[NCT03375164]

II (active, not recruiting)

[NCT03769116]

Ib (active & enrolling)

[NCT03362502]

III (not yet recruiting)

[NCT04281485]

Ages enrolling

Boys 4-17 years

I/II: Boys 4-7 years

II: Boys 4-7 years

Ib: boys 4-12 years

III: boys 4-7 years

AAV type

AAV9

AAVrh74

AAV9

Dystrophin gene

Microdystrophin

Microdystrophin

Minidystrophin

Gene includes nitric oxide binding spot?

Yes

No

No

Solid Biosciences therapy, called SGT-001, involves a microdystrophin gene carried by an AAV9 viral vector. AAV9 is a type of AAV that is particularly good at getting into muscle cells.

The company recently presented a clinical update at the virtual American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (ASGCT) meeting in May. Microdystrophin expression was seen via muscle biopsies 90 days after treatment (at a dose of 2E14 vg/kg), which stabilized dystrophin-associated proteins and restored activity of a key enzyme (called neuronal nitric oxide synthase, or nNOS) in the muscles. Unfortunately, their Phase I/II trial (IGNITE DMD) is still on hold by the FDA.

All three companies are using different versions of minidystrophin, explained Hesterlee. Solids is different because it contains the binding spot for an enzyme called nitric oxide synthase both Sarepta and Pfizer cut that portion out.

Sarepta Therapeutics has two DMD gene therapies, SRP-9001 Micro-dystrophin and GALGT2 (Nationwide Childrens), in clinical trials and one therapy, GNT0004 Micro-dystrophin (Genethon), in preclinical development. SRP-9001 includes a different serotype of AAV, called AAVrh74 (which also gets into muscle and heart cells well), and a microdystrophin gene.

SRP-9001 (2E14 vg/kg dose) is currently being investigated in open-label Phase I/II study (Study 101). In mid-June, Sarepta announced that preliminary results from four boys ages 4-7 years were published in JAMA Neurology. SRP-9001 was safe and well-tolerated up to one-year post-administration. At 12-weeks post-treatment, the mean percent of dystrophin expressed in muscles was a whopping 95.8 percent. All functional improvement the boys gained (measured by the NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) rating scale) was also maintained for at least one year post-treatment. Importantly, there were no serious adverse events (only mild to moderate events).

Sarepta had higher dystrophin gene expression and no serious adverse events, like Pfizer saw, Hesterlee added.

SRP-9001 is also being studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II trial (Study 102) in 41 boys ages 4-7 years with results expected in early 2021. In fact, the FDA recently granted SRP-9001 Fast Track designation.

Instead of delivering the dystrophin gene, GALGT2 delivers the GALGT2 gene, which is also important for muscle function. It is currently being investigated in a Phase I/II study in six boys ages 4 and up.

While they arent gene therapies, Sarepta also has two FDA-approved genetic medicines: Exondys51 (eteplirsen) and Vyondys53 (golodirsen). Both employ exon skipping, redirecting DNA processing inside the muscle cells to create minidystrophin right in the cells much like the researchers did in the lab, but directly in the children themselves. They also have 12 other exon skipping-based genetic medicines in their pipeline.

The problem is exon skipping, in its current form, is not very efficient and each therapy only works in a subset of children with certain gene mutations, Hesterlee commented. Gene therapy is more efficient and covers everyone, regardless of genetic mutations, but its still good to have options while new therapies are in development.

Pfizers gene therapy drug, called PF-06939926, is an AAV9 virus carrying a minidystrophin gene. The companys most recent Phase Ib results were released in May at the ASGCT meeting (abstract no. 617). Although the Phase I trial is not placebo controlled, they can compare treated children to the known natural history of DMD. According to the companys press release, preliminary data from nine boys with DMD (ages 6-12) showed the therapy was well-tolerated during intravenous infusion.

At 12 months post-injection, the boys had sustained, significant improvement in minidystrophin expression and improved muscle function (measured via the NSAA rating scale). The three patients receiving the low dose (1E14 vg/kg) had a mean percent dystrophin expression in muscles of 28.5 percent at two months and 21.2 percent at 12 months, compared to the six patients receiving the high dose (3E14 vg/kg) had 48.4 percent dystrophin expression at two months, three of whom had 50.6 percent at 12 months.

Three serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, but they fully resolved within two weeks. Pfizer plans to begin a Phase III study with PF-06939926 by the end of 2020.

Both Sarepta and Pfizer have collected some promising functional data, commented Hesterlee. It is very likely that one or both of these gene therapies could be approved.

This opens up the door for combination therapies, such as gene therapies to stabilize the muscle and small molecule drugs to deal with downstream events like fibrosis and inflammation, Hesterlee concluded. It could convert this disease from a devastating diagnosis to a manageable disease in the next 10 years.

Check out the MDAs Facebook Live Q&A event MDA Frontline COVID-19 Response: Back-to-School in the Midst of COVID-19 Concerns for the Neuromuscular Disease Community with Dr. Christopher Rosa and Justin Moy. Tune in live this Friday, July 31 at 3pm ET to join the discussion.

Read more here:

The Time for DMD Gene Therapy is Now: A Chat with the MDA - BioSpace

Gene Therapy Beats the Blood-Brain Barrier To Cure Cat Disease – Technology Networks

A lone genetic mutation can cause a life-changing disorder with effects on multiple body systems. Lysosomal storage diseases, for example, of which there are dozens, arise due to single mutations that affect production of critical enzymes required to metabolize large molecules in cells. These disorders affect multiple organs including, notably, the brain, causing intellectual disability of varying degrees.Gene therapy holds promise to address these conditions, but the brains own protective mechanism the blood-brain barrier has been a formidable challenge for researchers working to develop one.

In a new study published in the journal Brain, a team led by John H. Wolfe, a researcher with Penns School of Veterinary Medicine and Perelman School of Medicine and the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, successfully applied a gene therapy platform to completely correct brain defects in a large animal model of a human genetic disease.

This is the first example of a large-brain mammal with a bona fide human genetic disease that has intellectual disability as part of the human syndrome where weve been able to correct the biochemistry and pathologic lesions in the whole brain, says Wolfe.

Wolfe has worked on models of human genetic diseases that impact the brain for many years. With gene therapy, a delivery vehicle typically a viral vector is used to provide the normal version of a mutated gene to correct a condition. Wolfe and other scientists working in this area have made steady progress to treat neurogenetic diseases in rodents. However, applying the same treatment to the much larger brain of higher mammals has only been able to produce partial corrections.

Theres been a lot of excitement for the last 10 years or so that specific vectors can be injected into the blood and enter the brain, says Wolfe. They do cross the blood-brain barrier. One such treatment with restricted distribution has been effective in treating a disease that primarily affects the spinal cord.

And while scientists have shown these therapies can reverse the pathology throughout the brains of mice, its been hard to judge what effect it would have in patients, as the rodent brains have a much smaller cerebral cortex than larger mammals, like humans.

In the current study, the team used an animal model with a brain more similar to humans, cats, to assess the effectiveness of a gene-correcting therapy for one type of lysosomal storage disease: a condition called alpha-mannosidosis, which naturally occurs in cats and results from a mutated copy of the alpha-mannosidase gene.

Having refined the gene delivery technique during many years of work, the researchers selected a specific vector that they showed, in mice, was capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier to reach sites throughout the brain.

They next delivered the vector, containing a reporter gene, to normal cats. Several weeks later, they were able to find evidence that the corrected gene had distributed to various parts of the brain, including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and mid-brain.

Finally the research team assessed the therapy in cats with alpha-mannosidosis, using either a low or high dose of the vector. They injected the therapy into the carotid artery, so that it would go directly to the brain before traveling to other parts of the body. Compared to untreated cats, treated animals had a significant delayed onset of certain neurological symptoms and a longer lifespan; those that received the higher dose of the vector delivered through the carotid artery lived the longest.

Its a big advance, says Wolfe. Nobody has been able to treat the whole brain of a large-brained animal before. Were hopeful that this will translate into clinical use in humans.

Wolfe cautions, however, the findings dont amount to a cure.

These were significant improvements, but they were only just improvements on a serious condition, Wolfe says. The cats werent cured, and we dont know what impact this has on mental ability. However, since the pathology is found throughout the brain, it is thought that complete correction will be necessary.

As alpha-mannosidosis is a childhood-onset disease with no cure, however, any improvements that lessen the severity of symptoms are welcome. The approach the researchers developed may potentially be employed to treat many other diseases that affect the whole central nervous system.

In future work, Wolfe and his collaborators hope to refine their methods to achieve the same outcomes with a lower dose, making an effective treatment safer as well as more affordable. And they will continue to work to understand the details of why their treatment works, including precisely how the vector travels through the brain, a line of investigation that could shed light on additional strategies to address these serious disorders.

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

Link:

Gene Therapy Beats the Blood-Brain Barrier To Cure Cat Disease - Technology Networks

World-first gene therapy reverses Alzheimer’s memory loss in mice – New Atlas

Scientists in Australia have made an exciting breakthrough in Alzheimers research, demonstrating what they describe as the first gene-therapy-based approach for treating advanced forms of the disease. Through experiments in mice, the team was able to show how activating a key enzyme in the brain can prevent the kind of memory loss associated with advanced forms of Alzheimer's, and even reverse it.

The research was carried out at Macquarie University, where dementia researchers and brothers Lars and Arne Ittner were investigating the role of a key enzyme in the brain called p38gamma. Through previous research, the brothers had shown that by activating this enzyme in mice with advanced dementia, they could modify a protein that prevents the development of Alzheimers symptoms.

Seeking to build on this, the scientists conducted experiments on mice with advanced Alzheimers disease to see not just how cognitive decline could be slowed, but how the function of this protective enzyme might be restored to normal levels for even greater benefit.

The naturally protective enzymatic activity in the brain is unfortunately lost the further you progress down the Alzheimers disease track so the more memory you lose, the more you also lose this natural protective effect, says Lars Ittner.

The researchers found that by introducing genetic material, they could activate the p38gamma enzyme in a way that not only stopped memory decline in the mice, but actively improved their memory despite the advanced nature of their disease.

We were completely surprised, says Lars Ittner. They actually recovered their memory function and their ability to learn returned. So, two months after we treated the mice at very old ages, these mice suddenly behaved like their normal siblings. We were really stoked. There is no comparable therapy out there and no other gene therapy either.

Macquarie University

While exciting, there is a lot to play out before we see this kind of therapy enter clinical use. Work is underway on determining the best pathway toward clinical trials with the team eyeing commercialization thereafter, possibly five to 10 years down the track. And the technique's potential mightnt end with Alzheimers, with the team hopeful it could prove useful in treating other dementia-related diseases, such as fronto-temporal dementia, which typically affects younger people between the ages of 40 and 65.

The brain is a black box and some days we get lucky and get glimpses of how it functions and we learn we can interfere with the mechanism in this black box, says Arne Ittner. Now we have detailed understanding of the mechanisms involved down to the amino acids, which is just quite unprecedented.

A paper detailing the discovery will be published in the journal Acta Neuropathologica in September, while you can hear from the researchers in the video below.

New hope as dementia therapy reverses memory loss

Source: Macquarie University

Read the rest here:

World-first gene therapy reverses Alzheimer's memory loss in mice - New Atlas

Analysis of COVID-19 Gene Therapy Market – Market Research Posts

Gene Therapy Market Snapshot

Introduction of new production, availability of reimbursement together with high occurrences of cancer are estimated to propel growth of the global gene therapy market in the years to come. Gene therapy refers to an experimental technique, which utilizes genes for the prevention and treatment of various diseases. It is expected that in the near future, this technology could assist doctors to place a gene into the cells of a patient for the purpose of his treatment. This therapy could be used as an alternative to surgery or drugs. Scientists are examining various approaches to this therapy, which could comprise

Gene therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for a large number of diseases such as certain viral infections, certain cancers, and inherited disorders. This factor is likely to work in favor of the global gene therapy market in the years to come.

Request Sample Of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=1838

Progress in Gene-editing and Genomics Tools to Stoke Demand of Gene Therapy

CAR T-cell use has recently garnered considerable attention from the sponsors following the exhibition of its immense promise in the treatment of several diseases. The promising future of CAR T-cell is estimated to amplify the growth opportunities of the global gene therapy market. Sponsors hail CAR T-cell use as a brand new business model of the future.

In the pipeline of pharmaceutical industry, gene therapy account for a considerable share and this trend is likely to continue in the years to come. In addition, significant advancement has been made in the fields of cellular and molecular biology is likely to fuel growth of the global gene therapy market in the years to come. rapid technological progress made in the gene-editing and genomics tools are further estimated to drive the demand for gene therapy.

Request the Coronavirus Impact Analysis on this Markets https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=1838

Global Gene Therapy Market Snapshot

Expanding at a stellar, double-digits CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 40% over the forecast period of 2018 to 2026, the global gene therapy market is a dizzying trajectory, marking out a rosy landscape for players operating in the playfield. As per a Transparency Market Research report, based on extensive primary and secondary research, states that over the period states, the market would accrue a worth of USD 5164.03 million a steep and impressive increase from the USD 17 million worth noted in 2017.

Fixing defective genes via introduction of new and healthy ones to fix severe genetic and chronic disorders is seeing an upward curve in demand for reasons of improved medical outcomes, major leaps in terms of technological advancement and minimal die-effects as compared to alternatives. Some of the most significant alternatives include surgery, and drug use.

Some of the most significant factors that the analysts of the report note include focused efforts towards marketing and commercialization, and a slew of approvals of new products hitting the global gene therapy market. Additionally, there are factors such as growing demand experienced for this treatment by a large pool of patients.

It is pertinent to note here that the global gene therapy market is consolidated and is dependent on clinincal research and development of the highest standards in order to chart growth. And, some of the players that operate the market landscape, and are into significant research projects include Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis AG, Sibiono GeneTech Co. Ltd., Spark Therapeutics, Inc., CELGENE CORPORATION, and Orchard Therapeutics Limited.

Yescarta to Dominate Global Gene Therapy Market over the Forecast Period

The global gene therapy market report by TMR is segmented based on type, application, and region. The former includes the only five products that have been approved so far for commercial use. These include Gendicine, Yescarta, Strimvelis, Kymriah, and Luxturna. Riding the first mover benefits, Yescarta helf the dominant position in the market in 2017, and the trend will continue, adding more worth to the sub-segment. This is the product that brought out the initial CAR T therapy in the market for large B-cell lymphoma that relapse.

It is worth noting here that as per the global gene therapy market report, the high incidence of DLBCL and massive commercialization efforts directed towards Yescarta, particularly in Europe, will contribute positively and significantly to the overall growth of the global gene therapy market. The other sub-segment to make a mark over the global gene therapy market landscape will be Luxturna, owing to rising awareness levels and massive efforts towards comercialization.

Europe to be Ahead of the Global Gene Therapy Market Growth Curve over the Forecast Period

The global gene therapy markets regional segmentation includes incisive growth insights into some of the most significant areas that will shape up the overall growth in the market. These include North America, Europe, and Rest of the World. Researchers involved with the preparation of report claim that a massive chunk of about 40% would be accounted for by Europe over the forecast period. Some of the factors backing-up the market dominance of the region include high incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and increase in number of treatment centers into gene therapy.

This growth would be followed by North America region, owing to huge contributions from the United States of America which witnesses about 7500 cases of refractory DLBCL each year. These are ones that qualify for the CAR T therapy.

More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research https://www.biospace.com/article/joint-replacement-device-market-rise-in-the-geriatric-population-drives-the-market-demand/

Here is the original post:

Analysis of COVID-19 Gene Therapy Market - Market Research Posts

Gene Therapy Market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of 45%, till 2030 – Market Research Posts

Encouraging clinical results across various metabolic, hematological and ophthalmic disorders have inspired research groups across the world to focus their efforts on the development of novel gene editing therapies. In fact, the gene therapy pipeline has evolved significantly over the past few years, with three products being approved in 2019 alone; namely Beperminogene perplasmid (AnGes), ZOLGENSMA (AveXis) and ZYNTEGLO (bluebird bio). Further, there are multiple pipeline candidates in mid to late-stage (phase II and above) trials that are anticipated to enter the market over the next 5-10 years.

The USD 11.6 billion (by 2030) financial opportunity within the Gene Therapy Market has been analyzed across the following segments:

Key therapeutic areas

Type of vector

Type of therapy

Type of gene modification

Route of administration

Key geographical regions

For more information, please visit https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/view_document/gene-therapy-market-3rd-edition-2019-2030/268.html

The Gene Therapy Market (3rd Edition), 2019-2030 report features the following companies, which we identified to be key players in this domain:

Table of Contents

For more information, please click on the following link:

https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/view_document/gene-therapy-market-3rd-edition-2019-2030/268.html

About Roots Analysis

Roots Analysis is one of the fastest growing market research companies, sharing fresh and independent perspectives in the bio-pharmaceutical industry. The in-depth research, analysis and insights are driven by an experienced leadership team which has gained many years of significant experience in this sector. If youd like help with your growing business needs, get in touch at [emailprotected]

Contact Information

Roots Analysis Private Limited

Gaurav Chaudhary

+1 (415) 800 3415

[emailprotected]

Read more:

Gene Therapy Market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of 45%, till 2030 - Market Research Posts