The wild economy: Changing the way we see and use wildlife and natural resources – Daily Maverick

This article was first published on Roving Reporters.

Young black South Africans are challenging the way we look at our planet and how best to use its natural resources. A new generation on the continent and elsewhere are questioning the way we do things, including deeply ingrained racial bias.

Merlyn Nomsa Nkomo, an aspirant ornithologist and Conservation Biology Masters student at UCT, reminds us of a prevailing stereotype that black people in South Africa believe that the love of nature and wildlife is a white thing.

In a recent article in the student publication iLizwi, Nkomo makes the point that conservationists are frequently detached from social realities. They are, she says, focused on being published in academic journals and travelling and working in remote and picturesque places at the expense of grappling with real problems which threaten the entire conservation project.

These include poverty, social inequality and a prevailing system dating back to the colonial era when parks were fortresses to protect nature from black communities that had lived with it in harmony for centuries before.

This is indeed a tragedy which only a few seem committed to addressing.

With the multiple threats of the Covid-19 pandemic, drought, human population growth, habitat loss and increasing human/wildlife conflict, what we require now, more than ever are African solutions for Africas problems, by African people.

The new generation of youth and leaders in Africa understand and value a growing wild economy that drives rural development through the sustainable use of wildlife, the socioeconomic benefits of ecotourism and co-managed conservation areas.

It creates more jobs than any other sector and is growing at a higher rate than any other. It now needs to become an all-encompassing economy that is generational, responsible and sustainable.

Many of us see this value, but empty stomachs have no ears. We have real pressing issues of poverty, unemployment and hunger to address. Yet, we are blessed with the last remaining megafauna and vast open spaces that exist only in many peoples wildest imagination or on Nat Geo channels.

Yet, for most, the debate on sustainable use and, in fact, the wildlife economy, pivots around hunting, tourism and trade. You are either for hunting or against it. You are either for trade or against it. Why not responsible use? If it is not ethical, equitable, ecologically and economically sound, it shouldnt be permitted. Its as simple as that. In my eyes, a high-end, luxury photographic safari, using thousands of litres of water per person per night, creating only a few jobs falls into the same category as captive lion breeding.

The wildlife economy is not only about hunting, tourism and bioprospecting the use of plants and animal species for medicinal drugs and other commercially valuable products. It is far broader than that diverse, domestic, and demand driven.

And pangolin, rhino, and elephant poaching and foreign vessels raping our shorelines are all symptomatic of a deeper ill that includes poor service delivery and corruption.

People starve while cash-fat tourists photograph or hunt game that indigenous communities rightly have a stake in. Nkomo is on the money when she fingers our colonial history and exclusivity of our parks. Our new wildlife economy needs to start with basic needs.

Why are we not farming diversity? Well-managed rangelands supported many people in the past and ecological agriculture or wild management could well prove the provider. Game meat has massive potential to create hundreds of thousands of jobs alongside a vibrant red meat industry and a self-sustaining ecological approach to landscape management.

And, most importantly, how do we make the wild economy attractive to our next generation, our youth?

What if we really invested in this wild economy? Created roads and infrastructure, and bursaries and discounted tertiary education to support it? Cleaned up our act, removed aliens and cleaned water courses because it makes economic and ecological sense?

We need interventions as simple as homestead gardens, collaborative and large-scaled beekeeping enterprises, job creation through guiding, hunting, tourism development and maintenance. And we need to embrace age-old traditional income generation and practices in iconic locations.

What if we created a 50-year vision to grow our entire economy on the back of a wild economy? Link it to renewables, to clean water, air and soil, to carbon sequestration, to the red meat industry, grazing on open grasslands, not factory farmed via feedlots, but responsible, ethical, equitable, economic and ecologically sound use a natural resource-based economy.

If you had to make a choice between oil, gas and coal or clean air, clean water and clean soil what would you choose? The answer is obvious. It is our constitutional responsibility to look after this for future generations. Lets start talking about responsibility rather than rights.

Too often we turn to international experts for answers. We tend to forget that local is lekker. While international tourists generate fantastic local benefits, jobs and income, the pandemic has taught us just how vulnerable we are. We need to become more self-sufficient. We need to feed ourselves first.

Amid this, our new wild economy must compete with vested commercial economic interests and extractive industries that have decimated landscapes, wetlands and forests in the name of progress.

Our goal should be to foster resilient, empowered, enterprising communities who understand, cherish, own, manage and protect the wild economy, reducing the need for donor and government support, enabling strong, responsible and sustainable communities.

That is what we should aim for, not cheap political points, or short-term economic gain. When the value on the inside of our wildlife reserves is appreciated and benefits realised (economically and socially), then we reduce conflict and begin to move in the right direction.

We need interventions as simple as homestead gardens, collaborative and large-scaled beekeeping enterprises, job creation through guiding, hunting, tourism development and maintenance. And we need to embrace age-old traditional income generation and practices in iconic locations.

In her article, Nkomo quoted Zimbabwean writer, author and publisher Pathisa Nyathi: Keep frowning on African culture and your birds will be driven extinct by what you call myths and superstitions. Beliefs are as real as their consequences.

Last time I checked, we only have one Earth, one Africa, one South Africa. Isnt it time we started looking after it and investing in it, instead of blaming each other for destroying it or worse, tearing it apart for personal gain? DM

Francois du Toit is the CEO of African Conservation Trust, an organisation that envisages a world that is able to sustain human life with abundant natural resources, which people can use not only to survive, but to flourish.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Read this article:

The wild economy: Changing the way we see and use wildlife and natural resources - Daily Maverick

Guest View: The show, and all other arts and culture, must go on – Seacoastonline.com

While many of our businesses have been able to adapt to reopening protocols in a joint effort to protect the health and safety of both employees and consumers, currently it is an entirely different story for New Hampshires arts and culture economy. At best, its journey to recovery is going to be slow and extremely challenging. At worst, without additional support, many are at of risk of having to close despite the creativity and innovation they have shown throughout this pandemic.

In an industry that relies almost completely on bringing people together, the impacts of COVID-19 have been catastrophic. In the latest numbers pulled together by the Granite Stage, a Facebook based resource for New Hampshire theater, over 40 performing arts companies and festivals have either canceled their summer season or canceled the rest of their 2020 season altogether. In a recent presentation to stakeholders, we heard how 71% of arts-based nonprofits have had to lay off staff in order to keep afloat.

In New Hampshire, the creative economy is a $2.6 billion industry, employing over 2,200 full time staff. The ripple effect on our main streets and surrounding businesses is significant. In Portsmouth, for example, The Music Hall brings in 130,000 patrons every year who go on to spend an average of $27 to $37 per person in event-related expenditures including dinner, drinks, and parking. In Concord, at the Capitol Center for the Arts that number is $18 for locals and up to $49 per person for patrons coming in from out of town.

Closure of a theatre, concert hall or museum means more than the loss of a show or a gallery opening. It is the loss of jobs, contracts, and an economic driver that has revitalized downtowns across the Granite State and brings visitors to New Hampshire.

The arts sector is particularly resilient. It has been common practice among professional artists to not only create, but defend the very act of creation and its impact. In the case of New Hampshire, that impact equals $57 million in direct expenditures, local and state government revenues of $6 million, and $60 million in arts-related spending annually.

In response to this crisis our arts organizations have been extremely innovative in reaching out to their clientele, but often with little or no remuneration. Artists have converted their front lawns into drive-by art galleries. Theaters have quarantined together in order to continue the art of live performances which are showcased online. Musicians, who have lost half a years salary in canceled performances, continue to host online free concerts for their audiences. Music teachers have also brought their students online. Dance teachers are sending their students new choreography and checking in to make sure that the years of progress made in training and discipline are not lost in the time they are apart. In short, our arts and culture sector has been bringing us the very thing that we all have been missing, human connection.

As we begin to emerge as a state from the COVID-19 crisis, it will be the role of our arts and culture organizations to continue to help combat the long-term effects of social distancing and isolation. It will be the job of our artists to bring people back together and allow us to share our stories in a meaningful way as well as displacing feelings of loneliness that have become more prevalent, particularly among our most vulnerable populations.

While the stories of perseverance by this vital sector of our economy are inspiring, the loss of actual participation and engagement by attendees, performers and artists cannot be ignored. When someone watches a video online or attends a virtual class, concert, play, exhibition or arts event, the revenue is a fraction of what could be made through in-person attendance. Upon reopening, reduced seating capacity going forward will significantly minimize a venues main revenue stream. Most arts and cultural organizations rely on a combination of direct event revenue, grant funding, and private donations to stay afloat. As the economy as a whole takes a hit, major fundraisers for these organizations have been canceled or postponed and personal liquidity has been put in danger, dramatically decreasing the number of individuals able to make personal donations.

So what do we do? We must continue to support all our arts and cultural organizations by buying virtual tickets, gift cards for our family members and friends, and safely attending their events and programs as they slowly begin to re-open. Arts organizations have worked closely with public health to create guidelines to protect both patrons and artists and their work is to be commended. If you are not already a member, become a member and support the mission of your preferred arts and cultural organizations as they have supported us throughout this pandemic. If you are able, donate in order to keep the impact of fixed overhead costs at bay. We must reach out to local government, state elected officials and our federal delegation to find additional financial support. We must do everything we can to allow these organizations to survive, thrive and do what they do best keep us connected.

Sen. Shannon Chandley represents District 11, Sen. Martha Fuller Clark represents District 21, and Sen. Jon Morgan represents District 23. The views expressed are those of the writers.

See the original post:

Guest View: The show, and all other arts and culture, must go on - Seacoastonline.com

Keep the geeks in charge of the internet – The Japan Times

Los Angeles The coronavirus pandemic has rapidly transformed the internet into the most critical infrastructure on Earth.

By enabling people and businesses to remain connected while under lockdown, the internet has helped to prevent the global economy from collapsing entirely. Indeed, with fear and social distancing continuing to separate many of us, it has become the connective tissue for much human interaction and economic activity around the world.

But few appreciate how this critical global resource has remained stable and resilient since its inception, even as its scope and scale have undergone uninterrupted explosive growth. In an age of widening political, economic, and social divisions, how has the one internet connecting the entire world been sustained? And how can we best continue to protect it?

The answers to both questions start with understanding what makes the Internet which consists of tens of thousands of disparate networks look like and function as one network for all. These components, or unique internet identifiers, include Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, which are associated with every device connected to the internet, and internet domain names (like ft.com, harvard.edu or apple.news), which we use to search for and connect to computers easily.

These unique identifiers ensure that, no matter where you are or which network you are connected to, you will always get in touch with the right computer with the desired domain name, or reach the right target device with an embedded IP number (such as a smart thermostat, for example). This simple, elegant architecture reflects the genius of a handful of brilliant engineers who created the internet a half-century ago. Since then, it has never failed to help us locate the billions of devices that have been added to the thousands of networks that make up todays cyber economy. Should the identifiers fail, we would experience immediate digital chaos.

Given the identifiers critical role, it is imperative that they not be compromised or controlled by any authority that is not committed to maintaining the internet as an open, global, common good. In the wrong hands, they could be used to fragment the Internet and enable top-down control of usage and users by governments with malign intentions. And such fears are real, given authoritarian governments online meddling in elections, national security networks and digital commercial transactions in the last few years.

So, the key question is who should be entrusted today to maintain the security and reliability of internet identifiers. The answer is simple: geeks, not governments.

The same engineers who built the internet established nonprofit institutions, such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), to take responsibility for the unique identifiers and maintain the internets original ethos of openness. These and other institutions coordinate global efforts to manage the protocols necessary for the Internets stable and reliable operation, and the engineers who run them today do so with remarkable independence, precision, dedication, and humility.

The last major assault on these institutions independence came in December 2012, when a group of governments at the United Nations World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) attempted to take control of the unique identifiers. This effort was thwarted thanks to the vigilance of democratic governments that valued the power of a single global internet to foster innovation, commerce, and international cooperation.

But today, in the midst of the chaos caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarian governments are once again using the United Nations to try to seize control of critical internet resources from engineers. During a recent International Telecommunication Union meeting, a proposal for a new standard for core network technology was submitted.

Regrettably, and more worryingly, extreme activist groups and democratic governments also are carelessly intruding on the work of these independent institutions, to police free expression on social media among other things. For example, after Twitter attached a fact-check warning to two of U.S. President Donald Trumps recent tweets, he threatened that his administration would strongly regulate or close down social media platforms that he believes silence conservative voices.

Organizations such as ICANN and IETF have spent decades developing and refining consensus-based decision-making processes, involving inclusive and transparent bottom-up participation by engineers, businesses, civil-society organizations, and governments. The danger is that by subverting these institutions established procedures, official interference and lobbying will make them easy prey for authoritarian regimes.

Attempting to reshape from outside the decisions of bodies like ICANN, or to fuel the efforts of authoritarian regimes to shift control of the internet to governments within the UN framework, contradicts the internets original ethos and could be devastating for us all.

We must commit to safeguarding the resilient system that enables the internet to function free of political interference or control. At a time when our physical and economic health are faltering in the face of a potent virus, protecting the independent, democratic, and transparent institutions that have dependably governed the internet infrastructure since its inception has never been more important.

Fadi Chehade was President and CEO of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) from 2012 to 2016. Project Syndicate, 19952020

See the rest here:

Keep the geeks in charge of the internet - The Japan Times

Room For More Fiscal Support In India In Near Term Given Severity Of Economic Situation: IMF – Inventiva

A top IMF official has said that there is room for more fiscal support in India in the near term, particularly for vulnerable households and SMEs, given the severity of the countrys economic situation due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vitor Gaspar, Director of the International Monetary Funds Fiscal Affairs Department, told PTI that a complete and successful implementation of the existing support measures (in particular, food provision to households) is of paramount importance.

Given the severity of the economic situation, in the near-term there is room for more fiscal support, particularly for vulnerable households and SMEs (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises), he said.

Over the medium-term, India will continue to have a very limited fiscal space, and a credible and well-communicated consolidation plan will be urgently needed once the coronavirus pandemic subsides, Gasper said.

The economic impact of the COVID-19 in India has been substantial and broad-based, he said, adding that high frequency indicators point to a sharp decline in economic activity, as reflected in the industrial production, business sentiment (in the purchasing managers index), vehicle sales and trade.

In the June World Economic Outlook (WEO), growth in fiscal year 20/21 was revised down to -4.5 per cent, he said.

The downward revision compared with the April WEO was driven primarily by the continued rise in the number of COVID-19 cases in India.

This led the International Monetary Fund to make specific two adjustments. First, the assumed length of the partial lockdown was extended somewhat. Second, and more important, we made more conservative assumptions about the speed of recovery given that the health crisis has not yet been contained, Gasper said in response to a question.

He said that the near-term growth outlook in India continues to be clouded by the global and domestic slowdown and uncertainties relating to the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the senior IMF official, Indias general government fiscal deficit is projected to reach 12.1 per cent of the GDP in fiscal year 20/21, primarily due to weak tax revenues, as well as a denominator effect associated with the negative projected nominal GDP growth as with all other macro variables, estimates are highly uncertain.

Consistent with this, and the deterioration in economic activity, Indias public debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach about 84 per cent this fiscal year, Gasper added.

According to Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, the contagion has infected over 12 million people and killed more than 554,000 across the world.

The US is the worst affected country with over 3.1 million cases and more than 1,33,000 deaths. Indias COVID-19 caseload stands at 7,93,802 with 21,604 deaths.

The COVID-19, which originated in Chinas Wuhan city in December last year, has also battered the world economy with the International Monetary Fund saying that the global economy is bound to suffer a severe recession.

Scientists are racing against time to find a vaccine or medicine for its treatment.

Like Loading...

Related

Read the original here:

Room For More Fiscal Support In India In Near Term Given Severity Of Economic Situation: IMF - Inventiva

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans – Middletown Press

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Photo: Photo Contributed By Cimbria Badenhausen

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans

MIDDLETOWN Local stakeholders are hoping to enlighten people about the possibility of creating a public banking system which potentially could become a financial lifeline to struggling communities.

An upcoming Zoom meeting sponsored by Public Bank Connecticut will be conducted in partnership with the East Haddam-based Sanctuary at Shepardfields, a management services company led by the citys energy coordinator, Michael Harris, who owns Harris Management Services, and administrators with the Public Banking Institute.

These lending entities have been shown to respond more rapidly, effectively and equitably to crises than privately-owned banks, according to California-based PBI, led by Ellen Brown, a world-renowned author and founding director.

These things can really benefit Main Street, and communities and municipalities in Connecticut, which is what were trying to spread awareness, Harris said. I want to get Middletowns attention on this topic.

This is an attractive option both to conservative and more progressive people. The money thats produced in the state stays in the state, according to Cimbria Badenhausen, who runs PBIs engagement and support efforts.

The only such bank in the continental United States was established in North Dakota, and made possible after a Supreme Court ruling, she said.

As a bank, its more successful than Goldman Sachs, Badenhausen said.

Wall Streets interests have prohibited the model from being replicated in other states, she said. They fund the big stuff. We can fund the small stuff through community banks.

It can be an incredibly valuable tool for managing life going forward amid the convergence of crises known as climate disruption and COVID-19, and equity, social and economic justice issues that are all inter sectional, Harris said.

Brown will be the guest speaker at Wednesdays 6 p.m. Zoom session.

Expected to attend are veteran public bank advocate state Rep. Susan Johnson, D-Willimantic, along with Reps. Josh Elliot, D-Hamden, and Christine Palm, D-Chester; Chester Selectwoman Lauren Gister; and East Haddam Selectwoman Theresa Govert, as well as other influencers.

New Haven community organizer Jayuan Carter owns a landscaping company. I love economics. Economics to me is a team sport, he said.

Hes keen on offering additional options to people looking to borrow funds. That way, they can have more access to capital so we can have a better quality of life. The system is not quite working for everyone, said Carter, who called the subject a passion of his.

Johnson proposed legislation five years ago, which is now gaining more interest, Badenhausen said.

Currently, there is some opposition to the plan, including consultants who work to steer people toward private loans, Carter said.

Setting up these public financial institutions at the state and municipal levels is a matter of economy of scale, Harris said. Larger cities are more conducive to the concept.

There are two ways these public banks could be set up in Connecticut, he said. The quickest would be for the governor to make an emergency declaration. An alternative, which would take longer, is legislative action.

Privately held banks have capital resources they leverage by creating credit, Harris said. They can create money out of thin air at a ratio of $10 to every $1 of capital resources they have.

These companies have access to extremely low-cost money through federal emergency measures caused by the economic downturn due to COVID, he added.

All that leverage and profits derived from the way banking takes place today in the world accrue to the capital owners, to private investors through a profit modem, Harris said.

Justin Good, co-executive director of the Sanctuary, which is dedicated to community development, sustainability and other missions, said the Connecticut Bankers Association has come out in opposition to the legislation, saying such banks would mean more competition.

Thats absolutely false. It does just the opposite, Good said. Bank of North Dakota has the highest number of community banks per capita in the states. It increases their lending capacities.

For instance, if Hartford needed $4 billion for infrastructure issues, the city, doing business as the Hartford Bank, could lend itself $4 billion at 1 percent interest. It would be paying 101 percent of the loan rather than traditional, much higher interest levels, Badenhausen said.

Banks are not intermediaries, they actually create money when they create loans, Good said.

Carter gives an example of banks whose policy is to keeping deposited checks for two days, which he considers a questioning of his ability to cover that amount in his own account. In holding that check, theyre depositing and making money in the process.

A car dealer cant sell more than they actually have, but a bank can make more money than it actually has, Good said.

A study in Chicago showed banks there loaned more money to those in white neighborhoods than all others combined, he said. Individual banks loaned 20 to 40 times more funds to white families than to those of color, Good said.

The deepest level of social injustice is in the banking industry. They didnt find explicit racial discrimination because of how they factor risk. This is a problem that, even though redlining is illegal, it still continues with a vengeance. A public bank could address that at the deepest level, he said.

If it were to deposit those revenues into its own public bank, they could leverage that capital resource 10:1 and lend the communitys money at extremely low interest rates, Harris said. The articulated mission is for the communitys good instead of for-profit investors and private owners of capital.

To register for the Zoom meeting, go to CTPublicBank. The event will also be livestreamed on Facebook. For information, visit the Public Banking Institute website and its Facebook page.

Read the rest here:

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans - Middletown Press

Canada joins Global Ocean Alliance: Advocates for protecting 30 per cent of the world’s ocean by 2030 – Canada NewsWire

OTTAWA, ON, July 9, 2020 /CNW/ - Canada is an ocean nation with the longest coastline in the world. Canadians rely on healthy marine ecosystems to sustain our economy, our food supply, and our coastal communities. But the ocean is a shared resource that requires a global effort to ensure marine conservation. That is why the Government of Canada is joining other countries to advocate for international action to increase conservation and protection of our oceans by 2030.

Today, during the Protecting the Ocean's Most Important Places webinar, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, the Honourable Bernadette Jordan, announced Canada has joined the United Kingdom and other countries in the Global Ocean Alliance. The Alliance's goal is to advocate with international partners for ambitious ocean action to protect at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans through the establishment of marine protected areas and other effective area-based marine conservation measures by 2030.

Since 2015, the Government of Canada has worked in partnership with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and environmental and industry organizations to increase the protection of our oceans. Canada aimed to conserve 10 per cent of the country's marine and coastal areas by 2020 and has already surpassed this goal, reaching nearly 14 per cent by August 2019. Canada's efforts, including the establishment of new marine protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, have also contributed to the international 10 per cent marine conservation target ahead of the 2020 timeline.

The Government of Canada continues to work toward its ambitious target of protecting 25 per cent of marine and coastal areas by 2025, working toward 30 per cent by 2030. Through the Global Ocean Alliance, we join a growing number of like-minded countries that will advocate internationally for 30 per cent conservation by 2030 around the world. We will work with other countries toward the adoption of new ambitious global biodiversity targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity at the 15th Conference of Parties in Kunming, China in 2021.

Canada is joining the Global Ocean Alliance to help galvanize international efforts towards a 30 per cent conservation goal that allows the marine environment and sustainable marine economies to thrive.

Quotes

Our oceans provide a wealth of opportunity when approached from the position of sustainability and environmental stewardship. Canada is proud to join the Global Ocean Alliance, working alongsidelike-minded countries to advocate for our shared visionof sustainable, healthy oceans around the world. We have made exceptional progress on protecting our own waters, and it is time to move the goal post ahead and reach even farther. Canadians expect our government to be a global leader in environmental protection, and this partnership is another way we will use our voice, leadership, and resources to protect our oceans and make a difference around the world.

-The Honourable Bernadette Jordan, Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard

Our government is working together with provinces, territories, Indigenous peoples, environmental organizations and industry to advance conservation on Canada's lands and waters. Together we have made great progress and achieved the 10 per cent global target for marine conservation ahead of the 2020 commitment. Recognizing we have a responsibility to Canadians, the world, and future generations we are committed to redoubling our efforts to protect the biodiversity of our ocean and support the sustainability of coastal communities. Focused and coordinated action by countries around the world is the only way to stem the decline in biodiversity and rise to the challenge of climate change. Canada's participation in the Global Ocean Alliance demonstrates our commitment to achieving these goals.

-The Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Environment and Climate Change and Minister Responsible for Parks Canada

Quick Facts

Associated Links

Stay Connected

SOURCE Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Canada

For further information: Jane Deeks, Press Secretary, Office of the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, 343-550-9594, [emailprotected]; Media Relations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 613-990-7537, [emailprotected]

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

See the rest here:

Canada joins Global Ocean Alliance: Advocates for protecting 30 per cent of the world's ocean by 2030 - Canada NewsWire

The wild decade: the 1990s laid the foundations for Vladimir Putins Russia – ThePrint

Text Size:A- A+

By securing victory in a national vote on constitutional changes, Vladimir Putin could now remain president of Russia until 2036 if he chooses to stand again. After 20 years in power, the narrative of Russias chaotic 1990s remains core to Putins legitimacy as the leader who restored stability.

Although the decade still divides public opinion, whats not in doubt is that it was a dangerous and exciting period. The ambiguity of the 90s is summed up by the then-popular Russian word, bespredel, the title of a 1989 prison drama meaning anarchic freedom and unaccountable authority.

At the time, Russias turbulent post-Soviet transition was seen as a lurid sideshow to a stable post-cold war west. A generation later, the uncertainties of that period have a wider resonance than they did at the time.

The 1990s began with the Soviet Unions first multiparty elections in March 1990 when Boris Yeltsin emerged as leader of Russia. It ended, punctually, on December 31, 1999, when Yeltsin resigned in favour of Putin, his designated successor.

The decade included two failed coups in 1991 and 1993, and the abolition of both the ruling Communist Party and the USSR. Massive economic dislocation occurred as Soviet economic ties were severed, a market economy was created and shock therapy accompanied by mass privatisation.

The social impact was immense. Life expectancy fell, with up to five million excess adult deaths in Russia in 1991-2001, birth rates collapsed and both of these trends were compounded by widespread crime and trafficking. These negative effects were concentrated in periods of economic crisis in 1991-94 and 1998-99.

Sharply rising inequality and the emergence of a new wealthy class, including some leading reformers, meant that the term democrat had become a term of abuse as early as 1992.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrints future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Also read: India doesnt have a Russia problem. New Delhi must stop trying to fix it

My own research from that period shows how the concentration of power was a trend right from the beginning of the reforms. It was from part of the reform movement itself that the style of government associated with Putin emerged.

I arrived in St Petersburg in 1991, expecting to study the conflict between democratic and communist ideologies. Instead, I found that the conflict was between two groups of reformers those who supported strong executive rule and those in favour of representative or parliamentary rule. It was a re-match of the 19th century Russian debate between protagonists of state and society. In both cases it was the statists who won.

For advocates of strong executive rule, such as the leading reformer and mayor of St Petersburg, Anatoly Sobchak under whom Putin served as deputy elected councillors were an obstacle to efficient governance.

All reformers united in opposing the attempted coup by hardline Soviets in August 1991, but from then on the split in the reform camp between the advocates of executive and representative powers grew wider. It culminated in October 1993, in a brief armed conflict between president and parliament. The parliamentary forces were mostly anti-liberal nationalists, but they were also supported by councils. Among them was the reformer-led St Petersburg council, then deep in a legal conflict with Sobchak, its former chair, over what councillors saw as his excessive concentration of power.

Yeltsin ordered his forces to fire on the parliament to quell the attempted coup. With parliament defeated, most regional and city councils across the country were dissolved and replaced by assemblies with reduced powers.

The conflict between Sobchak and his former allies continued until his death in 1999. By then his former deputy, Putin had reached the apex of executive power at national level taking many of Sobchaks St Petersburg team to form the core of his Kremlin administration.

Concentration of power at all levels of the hierarchy meant a more intensive zero-sum struggle to win it, rather than the compromises inherent to parliamentary systems. Higher stakes meant aggressive mobilisation of media for an information war became a feature of 1990s electoral politics at regional level, following the pattern of the 1996 presidential election.

By then, the corruption associated with privatisation had made Yeltsin and the reformers unpopular and many feared the communists would return to power. The democrats had to resort to desperate measures. Every possible resource was mobilised to ensure that Yeltsin was re-elected including deals with powerful oligarchs with large media empires. The communists were defeated but the price was endemic cynicism about the democratic process.

Also read: How India lined up US, Russia on its side of LAC and China was forced to return friendless

The Yeltsin presidency remained beholden to Russias regional governors and the oligarchs. It fell to Putin to curtail the powers of these groups, campaigning in 2000 under the slogan of the dictatorship of law. That such a slogan could have popular support shows the degree to which the public had become disillusioned in the late 1990s. However, the direction towards concentration of power had been set almost a decade before Putin was elected president.

Russias reformers of the 90s largely achieved the irreversible economic change they wanted. They were less successful in creating a positive narrative for the new Russia. Reform had seemed to be based on the idea that Russia needed to learn as much as possible from the west. Over time, disillusion with this idealised view of the west grew and public opinion became more nationalistic.

By the late 1990s, nationalism was both a threat and an opportunity. As in the era of Putins reputed role model, Tsar Alexander III in the late 19th century, the policy appeared to be for nationalism to provide the state with an ideology while centralisation would contain it from getting out of hand. The new constitutional changes Putin has now introduced continue this dual path of greater concentration of power and emphasis on national identity and sovereignty and both have their origins in the early 1990s.

Adrian Campbell, Senior Lecturer in International Development, University of Birmingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the medias economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the countrys most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building Indias most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we arent even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrints future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Read more:

The wild decade: the 1990s laid the foundations for Vladimir Putins Russia - ThePrint

US Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing highlights need to review on China’s censorship – Tibet Post International

Washington, D.C. The Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing of June 30, 2020, highlighted the need for American policymakers to review their approach toward Chinas censorship, as well as the self-censorship practiced by American entities trading with China.

International Campaign for Tibet Chairman Richard Gere was one of the panelists who testified.

The hearing focused on Censorship as a Non-Tariff Barrier to Trade and made a direct connection between the oppressive policies the Chinese government imposes on its citizens and the negative impact those policies have on foreign companies that are prohibited to censor freedom of expression in democratic countries but banned from the Chinese market for that very reason.

As noted during the hearing, Chinese companies, including state-owned enterprises, are not subject to censorship while operating in the United States, in clear violation of the principle of reciprocity.

Bipartisan concerns

As subcommittee Chairman Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said in his opening remarks, the hearing was an opportunity for Congress to see if such censorship by China constitutes a trade barrier in violation of [World Trade Organization], multilateral and bilateral agreements and practices.

The focus on censorship was bipartisan, with subcommittee Ranking Member Sen. Robert P. Casey, Jr., D-Pa., making this case in his opening remarks. The actions undertaken by the Chinese government include direct barriers, such as blocking movies from entering their market or restricting content, Casey said, to blocking internet firms, to dictating content related to Chinas territorial and economic claims, to demanding action or inaction by businesses related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, and the ongoing human rights abuses in Xinjian[g].

Chinese interference in Hollywood

Among areas touched upon at the hearing was the influence China has over Hollywood and how that affects American creative freedom. Gere recalled his experience on the issue and what it means. He said: His speaking out for human rights in China and Tibet hasnt directly affected his career, but, Im probably an unusual case.

Self-censorship has become an issue in Hollywood. Theres no doubt that the combination of Chinese censorship, coupled with American film studios desire to access Chinas market, can lead to self-censorship and to avoiding social issues that great American films once addressed, he said.

The atmosphere in Hollywood has changed since the 1990s when major studios released several films showing the brutality of the Chinese Communist Party. Imagine Marty Scorseses Kundun, about the life of the Dalai Lama, or my own film Red Corner, which is highly critical of the Chinese legal system, he said. Imagine them being made today. It wouldnt happen.

Chinese actresses and directors have told him they cant work with him because it would end their careers. One Chinese director was in tears with me having to call me up and say that he couldnt work with me, Gere said. That his career would be over, and his family could not travel.

The way China pressures American studios to do such things as remove the Taiwanese flag from movies doesnt merely show the power of the Chinese government. Its also very illustrative of their weakness, Gere said. Its the way that theyre hypersensitive about the Dalai Lama, the kindest, most generous man on the planet, whos consumed and saturated with love and compassion and forgiveness. The mere mention of his name makes them crazy.

Other panelists

Beth Baltzan from the Open Markets Institute, which uses journalism to promote greater awareness of the political and economic dangers of monopolization, had this analysis of Chinese censorship in her testimony at the hearing: The CCPs leverage over the speech of American citizens comes in large part from its economic leverage over the United States. Abating the Chinese governments economic leverage over us, in turn, abates its leverage over the exercise of our constitutional rights. There are different approaches that can be adopted to diminish that leverage.

Nigel Cory, associate director, trade policy, at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, in his testimony, highlighted the impact of Chinas censorship on American business interests. He said, US firms have lost significant revenue by being blocked or inhibited from accessing and operating in the Chinese market.

The impact has been especially damaging given that for many companies, their market access has been denied during a critical, formative period of economic growth in China. This has not only reduced US company global market share but provided Chinese competitors with a protected market from which to launch competitive challenges in other regions, such as South America, the rest of Asia, and Africa.

Self-censorship

Cory also focused on the self-censorship aspect of the issue when he said, Censorship in China is a broad, complicated, and opaque system involving a range of actors, laws, and regulations, and social, economic, and political interests. At the individual level, these come together and result in considerable self-censorship given people realize the potential negative consequences of crossing the many unclear lines on what may or may not be allowed. In this way, Chinas pursuit of censorship has resulted in significant societal changes.

His perspective about self-censorship in China also applies to the American society where corporations and even educational institutions have taken recourse to self-censorship as a way of protecting their economic ties with China.

When asked about recommendations to address this challenge posed by China, the issue of using reciprocity was foremost among the panelists suggestions. Gere talked about it by referring to the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act and its smart approach to responding to Chinas unfair practices.

This is a good, very rational, and systematic response, and we hope the State Department will implement it soon, as required by law now, Gere said.

Need for new tools

Overall, the discussion that followed the panelists opening statements focused on the need to identify new tools for the US government to use to push back against Chinas censorship, reduce reliance on Chinas manufacturingincluding in the pharmaceutical industryand, at the same time, protect the economic interest of US companies that are shut down or severely restricted from accessing the Chinese market in critical industries like the internet and the media.

Questions and comments from Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., highlighted the challenges posed by the interconnectedness of the US and Chinese economies, but also the need for the US to start thinking outside the box to craft policies and remedies that effectively protect both its interests and values.

Continued here:

US Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing highlights need to review on China's censorship - Tibet Post International

Black TikTok creators have long accused the platform of censorship – Reclaim The Net

TikTok, the wildly popular Chinese video-sharing app has long been accused of having a race problem.

While the company is also under fire for privacy problems, with countries such as India banning it already and the US being concerned about user privacy, there have also been accusations of racial bias against the company.

Marc Faddoul, an artificial intelligence researcher, first brought more solid evidence to this idea at the start of the year and stated that there may be a potential glitch in TikTok that may end up fostering racial bias in its algorithm that causes it to censor black people. Faddoul, in a series of tweets, further revealed his findings.

Follow a random profile and TikTok will only recommend people who look almost the same, read a part of Faddouls announcement.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

While what he said may sound pretty normal, going deeper would certainly reveal that users hitting follow on a white persons profile are now more likely to see more white people on the platform over and again and that the appearance of those who users were seeing would determine who theyre shown next.

This would inevitably lead them to follow another random white individual from the recommendations, which not only eliminates the scope for black people and other minorities from gaining traction on the platform, but also ends up creating a ripple effect with individuals of a certain race or other physical attribute being recommended more to a certain user. And it works both ways black people would see more black people and white people would see more white people but those in the majority would have a bigger advantage on the platform and access to a larger audience.

The algorithm censorship accusations were wild but also seemed to be backed up with anecdotal stories.

Cat Zhang from Pitchfork commented on this in a recent podcast, saying that it was hard to prove but, but there definitely have been a lot of black creators, LGBTQ creators who have talked about their posts getting taken down, or censored or something to that effect. They feel like its been ongoing to the point where its not just arbitrary. Like they actually feel like theyre being targeted.

Zhang continues, I interviewed Iman, shes a big activist whos been disseminating a lot of protest info. She says that basically, every black creator she knows has another TikTok account just in case their primary one gets banned or deactivated.

And so black creators have long suspected that they have been primarily targeted for shadow banning, especially for posting about activist-related causes.

In China, TikTok is known as Douyin and implements untold levels of censorship for all different reasons even as far as banning people for speaking Cantonese instead of Mandarin.

In the West, TikTok says that it doesnt censor. But its been caught doing that numerous times, mostly commonly censoring content that would irritate Beijing, such as references to Tiananmen Square, Tibet, and Hong Kong.

And there has also been studies into how it shadowbans and suppresses content using various ranking factors.

Basically, TikTok doesnt tell you that anything is happening, but they just dont promote your video, or maybe your followers dont see it, Zhang says. So the view count is really low and its almost like the content really didnt exist in the first place. Like youre just kind of being siloed into your own world.

And while TikTok has been found censoring anti-China content, its also been accused of censoring content based on the user. For example, it was this year that TikTok faced backlash for censoring content from transgender users and a same-sex couple in India found that TikTok deleted a video of them dancing with no explanation.

The stories are numerous and add weight to the idea that TikToks algorithms do censor based on the user, especially after a report found that TikTok moderators were told to suppress content from obese and disabled people and was weirdly based on the idea that if no one could see their content then they couldnt be bullied.

In other words, it was supposed to be censorship for their own good.

The aforementioned phenomenon is known as collaborative filtering. With visibility being the number one factor that determines a creators success on any social media platform, the so-called collaborative filtering can end up becoming a huge hurdle to a number of creators on the platform, if they arent similar to the majority.

Although, that being said, recent rumors suggest that TikTok isnt long for the US market anyway, and could soon be kicked out of the country for privacy and national security concerns before it even has a chance to add more transparency to its algorithms and correct accusations of censorship.

Read more:

Black TikTok creators have long accused the platform of censorship - Reclaim The Net

The Facebook boycott is illiberal. Who has the courage to oppose it? – Thehour.com

Joe Lonsdale, The Washington Post

Our country has reached a boiling point. In just a few weeks, national narratives have escalated from seeking racial equality to defunding the police, toppling statues of men who abolished slavery and demands that social media companies censor speech on their platforms.

The recent corporate boycott of Facebook must be recognized for what it is: A craven capitulation to a mob that, left unopposed, would destroy free speech. More than 700 companies, including Unilever, Coca-Cola and Starbucks, have joined the #StopHateForProfit movement, led by a group of nonprofits that aims to curtail speech on social media platforms, especially Facebook.

The movement calls for suppressing harmful content or hateful activity such as vaccine misinformation, climate denialism, "dehumanizing language" and arguments for voter IDs.

Already, Facebook employs thousands of unaccountable flaggers who make subjective, ad hoc decisions on what constitutes acceptable speech. Facebook's chief operating officer noted this week that the company strives "constantly to get better and faster at enforcing" its policies against hate, and Mark Zuckerberg announced last month that Facebook would expand prohibitions against certain content in ads and label posts that violate policies. Yet if Facebook caves to this movement's demands, the company would have to install an Orwellian corporate bureaucracy of censors monitoring many types of speech.

Speech is often ugly. But a crown virtue of U.S. society is our commitment to free speech, including what some call hate speech. Social media platforms that aim to encourage speech have a duty to protect it as well.

I have plenty of concerns about Facebook, but I firmly support Zuckerberg's efforts to defend freedom of expression on the platform. Facebook, Twitter and other forums aspire to be, and are, public squares. The cowardice of corporate CEOs who have sacrificed our country's founding principles to appease an illiberal mob demanding to censor our 21st-century public squares is appalling.

Intellectual freedom is part of John Milton's "known rules of ancient liberty," which form the basic habitat of Western culture. This principle was beloved by Cicero, John Locke and the American founders. Tolerance of others' expression - no matter how offensive - is a precondition for democracy.

Globally, free speech is in retreat. And censorship - whether by foreign governments or social media platforms - is always political. This is the moment American CEOs should defend the noble institution of free speech with their reputations and treasure. Instead, many business leaders are selling out a sacred American liberty in an effort to signal virtue. The advertisers boycotting Facebook this month, and possibly longer, are no better than the illiberal mob they cower before.

Those who believe that speech should be moderated have fundamentally given up on the idea that people can come to the right decisions on their own, or that free speech works anywhere. The fact that people can say whatever they want in public squares and media outlets has, over the long run, helped make our country more open and tolerant, even when partisans used those "platforms" to make arguments as vile as the basest forms of discourse.

I'm all for a boycott that fights for justice. But corporations that have temporarily or otherwise recently stopped advertising on Facebook are boycotting because they think the company isn't censoring its users enough. Their statements imply that Americans are not to be trusted with intellectual freedom. This abandons the principle that a marketplace of ideas gradually tends toward truth and progress.

This country has traditionally stood with dissenters and devil's advocates. CEOs should stand with the rational majority who believe in First Amendment rights to offend others and vehemently disagree. Americans should not trade freedom for the supposed comfort of safe spaces. All who believe in First Amendment protections must stand firm and defend our liberal inheritance.

Only with courage can we cultivate the other classical virtues of justice, temperance and wisdom. Facing a radical mob takes courage. So does facing an HR department or other corporate officials who have carried the self-sure illiberalism of higher education into the private sector. It also takes courage to acknowledge the positive, hopeful and just aspects of the recent protests, and to ally in their fight for justice. But this boycott is wrong because censorship will never lead our society to justice.

John Stuart Mill wrote that "If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind." Americans of all stripes are looking for leaders who can demonstrate courage. At a time when authoritarian countries are using technology to corral speech instead of liberate it, our leaders ought to blaze a different path. Do courageous business leaders remain? Who will speak for the American heritage of free and open debate? Our country's future hangs in the balance.

- - -

Joe Lonsdale is founder and partner at 8VC, a venture capital firm. Technology companies he has started include Palantir, Addepar and OpenGov.

Link:

The Facebook boycott is illiberal. Who has the courage to oppose it? - Thehour.com

Official Images Of The Off-White x Air Jordan 4 WMNS Sail – Sneaker News

Official images of Virgil Ablohs Off-White Jordan 4 have surfaced, revealing in detail what could be one of the years most coveted sneaker release. Decked out in a near-tonal cream upper with opaque fixtures on the lace eyelets, tongue/upper netting, and heel-tab, this latest release by the Louis Vuitton figurehead throws in the trademark touches in the Helvetica text on the upper and the AIR boldly bannered above the visible Air unit. The construction of these Off-White Jordans are also consistent with Virgils previous two Air Jordan drops, with exposed sponge at the sockliner and synthetic overlays attributing to that deconstructed look that the entire The Ten has been notable for. Zip-ties and classic Air Jordan hangtags will come attached, while the OG-style shoebox features enlarged holes. Recently, Virgil donated an autographed pair to be auctioned off for charity, raising over $100,000 towards key organizations that support the Black Lives Matter movement.

Prior to the COVID-19 situation, Nike had planned to release a full catalog of imaginative collaborations at the height of the Tokyo Olympics, done by the likes of Virgil Abloh, Yoon Ahn of Ambush, Matthew M. Williams, UNDERCOVER, and sacai. Although this Air Jordan 4 was not previewed at the brands Future Forum fashion show back in February, it was very much assumed that these would be available throughout the scheduled Games. Of course this years Olympics have been cancelled, but the Jordan release is fully expected to go down.

See the full official images of this Off-White x Air Jordan 4 by Virgil Abloh ahead and stay tuned for the official release on July 25th.

Update: Off-White x Air Jordan 4 WMNS Sail confirmed for July 25 release, $200 on Nike SNKRS.Update: Sizes for this release will begin with womens 3.5/mens 2 through womens 16.5/mens 16.

Off-White x Air Jordan 4 WMNSRelease Date: July 25th, 2020$200Style Code: CV9388-100

Make sure to follow @kicksfinder for live tweets during the release date.

Where To Buy

Excerpt from:

Official Images Of The Off-White x Air Jordan 4 WMNS Sail - Sneaker News

The hottest sneaker of 2020, the Air Jordan 1 OG Dior, has arrived – New York Post

The biggest cop of 2020 was so haute, it came and went without ever hitting store floors.

After the Air Jordan 1 OG Dior sneakers debuted during Diors pre-fall 2020 show in Miami in December, sneakerheads and industry insiders alike went into a sartorial tizzy about the first-ever streetwear-meets-luxury mashup from the storied couture house and Air Jordan.

The collaboration celebrates the 35th anniversary of the release of the Air Jordan 1. The makings of that iconic pair are all there on the new one an 80s-inspired high-top silhouette, the Jumpman Wings logo, that signature swoosh while the hand-painted shade of Dior gray is a nod to the French labels signature hue (and a favorite of the founding couturier, Christian Dior).

Originally scheduled to drop in the spring, the coronavirus pandemic caused a delayed release.

On June 25, the public was able to register to shop the drop. According to a report from WWD, 5 million people signed up despite the production of only several thousand sneakers.

With a retail price tag of $2,200 (the low-top version retails for $2,000), the limited-edition high top is now reselling on sites like StockX for over $14,000.

Landing an actual pair is mission impossible, but a newly released video which taps into Dior Creative Director Kim Jones deep-rooted love of the Air Jordan offers swoon-worthy close-ups of this years most coveted sneaker.

Originally posted here:

The hottest sneaker of 2020, the Air Jordan 1 OG Dior, has arrived - New York Post

Whistleblower accusing AG Barr of antitrust misconduct failed to disclose key information, Jordan says – Fox News

EXCLUSIVE:House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, revealed Thursday that a Justice Department(DOJ) whistleblower who alleged antitrust misconduct by Attorney General Bill Barr had failed to disclose information tothe panel about his previous unsuccessful complaints concerning the same matters.

Career DOJ employee John Elias garnered widespread media attention by alleging in testimony that Barr sought unfounded reviews of cannabiscompanies because he "did not like the nature of their underlying business." Elias also charged that the Trump administration sought to harass automakers with antitrust inquiries after the automakers angered the president by announcingthey would comply with state emissions rules.

Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, however, wrote to Jordan on July 1 that Elias -- who previously served as Delrahim's acting chief of staff -- had offered testimony that was "misleading and lack[ing]critical facts." Delrahim added that Elias also lacked any first-hand knowledge about the "matters about which he testified" -- and it also emerged that he had sought a job with House Democrats as they triedto impeach President Trump.

WHISTLEBLOWER ADMITS SEEKING JOB WITH HOUSE DEMS DURING IMPEACHMENT

In a response letter to Delrahim obtained Thursday by Fox News, Jordan noted that the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had reviewed Elias' claims, and rejected both of them.

"The Director and Chief Counsel of OPR, Jeffrey R. Ragsdale -- a career official with over 30 years of experience at various levels at the Justice Department -- found the allegations to be without merit and closed OPRs investigation," Jordan wrote in the letter. "Chairman [Jerrold] Nadler made no attempt to factor in OPRs review and exculpatory findings to the context of Mr. Eliass allegations and thereby deprived the Committee of critical information."

The DOJ's probe into automakers, Jordan added, had been closed quickly after the antitrust division determined that "contrary to initial reports, the automakers had not entered into an [anti-competitive or illegal] agreement" in restraint of trade.

While Trump had publicly attacked the automakers, Delrahim and Jordan each pointed out that the DOJ had begun a preliminary review of potential antitrust violations "weeks before" Trump's comments.

READ JORDAN'S FULL LETTER TO THE DOJ

"Eliass allegations appear to reflect political or policy differences with the Departments political leadership rather than exposing real waste, fraud, and abuse," Jordan continued. "In 2015, Mr. Elias served on detail in the Obama-Biden White House in the office responsible for presidentialappointments. More recently, as Mr. Elias conceded during the hearing, he sought a detail from the Democrats began investigations with the goal of impeaching the President."

Last month, Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., had a testy exchange with Elias, whoadmitted during a House Judiciary Committee hearing that he sought to work for House Democrats during the Trumpimpeachment proceedings.

House Democrats, Jordan asserted in his letter, were all but complicit in the misleading headlines that emerged from Elias' testimony.

"Chairman Nadler has an unfortunate practice of politicizing the Committee to attack the Trump Administration," Jordan wrote. "While whistleblowers play a vital role in rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, we should not mistake policy or political disagreements for misconduct. This is especially true in the context of antitrust, which has historically enjoyed significant bipartisan support."

House Democrats began investing claims earlier this year that Barr engaged in politically motivated overreach as attorney general. The second whistleblower, former Justice Department prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky, testified that Barr and senior staffers gave preferential treatment to Roger Stone during sentencing proceedings due to his relationship with Trump.

Barr is expected to testify before the committee next month.

Fox News' Thomas Barrabi contributed to this report.

Go here to read the rest:

Whistleblower accusing AG Barr of antitrust misconduct failed to disclose key information, Jordan says - Fox News

Twitter turned Will Smith into the 2020 version of the crying Jordan meme and it’s hilarious – For The Win

The Will Smith memes have only existed for just under 24 hours now but we can already tell that this is going to last fora while.

Smith appearance on Jada Pinkett-Smiths Red Table Talk showwhere the couple talked about their split and Jada Pinkett-Smiths relationship or entanglement with August Alsina. They had an interesting conversation about it, certainly. And points were definitely made.

However, we are here to talk about absolutely none of that. Mostly because, well, its none of our business.

What we are here for to discuss, folks, is how the internet took a heartfelt conversation between Will Smith and his wife and turned him into the new crying Jordan meme of 2020.

During the conversation the two were having, Pinkett-Smith began to describe her relationship with Alsina as an entanglement. While she explained, Will Smith madethisface.

And this one.

Now, to be clear, there was no beef between these two during this conversation. They were broken up. It was fine for Jada to be in a relationship with whoever she wanted.

But this is the internet. And in this digital world we live in, jokes are much, much better than facts. And so all the jokes poured in.Twitter went crazy.

But then, even outside of their conversation, the meme just took on a life of its own. Smiths face became the internets face for 2020.

Throw this one in the Twitter history books, folks. Well be seeing it for years to come.

Here is the original post:

Twitter turned Will Smith into the 2020 version of the crying Jordan meme and it's hilarious - For The Win

40 Under 40 Awards: Jaco, Jones And Jordan – The Waterways Journal – The Waterways Journal

For the third year, 40 of the industrys future leaders will be honored at the Inland Marine Expo with the 40 Under 40 award, which recognizes individuals for their outstanding contributions to the inland marine transportation industry in a variety of fields. All 40 honorees were nominated by executives and peers for their hard work and dedication to the industry.

Over the course of 14 weeks, The Waterways Journal is featuring all 40 recipients. This week we recognize James Jaco, Crystal Jones and Josh Jordan.

James Tommy Jaco, 39, is a tankerman involved in maintenance and repair for Florida Marine Transporters.

Jaco started his career with Jacos Tankerman Service in May 2000, trained by his uncles, Neal Jaco and Jesse Jaco. He received his tankerman license in November 2000 and worked for the service for 13 years, loading and discharging barges along the Tennessee, Cumberland, Ohio and Lower Mississippi rivers. He then moved to the Louisville, Ky., area in January 2007 to be a tankerman supervisor in that area.

Tommy Jaco was trained by the old guys, the ones who worked hard, never stopped and always got the job done, said Shannon Jaco, owner and CEO of Barge Transfer Services in Ledbetter, Ky. He entered the industry at a time when safety and the environment were the most important issue of the day. He combines that industrious, self-driven attitude with a safety and environmental consciousness that represents the evolution of the industry into what it has become today.

She added that he was influential in establishing safety policies and procedures for Jacos Tankerman Service and helped train many new tankermen, both about how to load and discharge barges as well as the importance in maintaining personal safety and environmental stewardship while on the job.

Jaco began working for Florida Marine Transporters in June 2014 as a shore tankerman in the St. Louis area. FMT said his eagerness to work and dedication to the job soon had him traveling to surrounding areas.

Within a few years Tommy had become an irreplaceable asset to the company, FMT said in a written statement. He often provides support to our maintenance and compliance departments. In the six years Tommy has been with FMT, he has shown nothing short of excellence. He is always willing to help with whatever it takes to get the job done safely. Florida Marine is grateful to have such a stand-up employee on our side.

Crystal Jones, 40, is senior underwriter for The American Equity Underwriters Inc., of Mobile, Ala.

Jones began her career in the maritime industry when she joined AEU in January 2011 as an underwriting assistant. AEU is the nations leading provider of workers compensation for the marine industry.

As an underwriting assistant, Crystal used her prior five years of customer service experience to help her build productive relationships, resolve issues and win the loyalty of customers, called members at AEU, said Julie Bland, AEUs senior vice president and director of marketing. Her strong ability to work with teams and guide complex problems to resolution led to her promotion to underwriter in 2013, and to senior underwriter in 2019.

A licensed insurance producer, Jones also holds Certified Insurance Service Representative (CISR) and Commercial Lines Coverage Specialist (CLCS) designations. Additionally, she has a bachelors degree in communications and a minor in sociology from the University of South Alabama.

Her profound understanding of the maritime industry not only enables her to underwrite profitable business, but also to build solid relationships and credibility with carrier partners, members, insurance brokers and co-workers, Bland said.

Additionally, Bland said, Jones trains and mentors other members of the AEU underwriting team.

She is an important member of our leadership team and a great resource for both our employees and the waterfront employers who rely on her for guidance on their workers compensation needs, Bland said.

Josh Jordan, 34, is the engine block manufacturing manager for National Maintenance & Repair in Hartford, Ill.

Nicknamed 3G for being the third generation of his family to work for National Maintenance & Repair, Jordan followed the career path of his father and grandfather into the company. He has been with National Maintenance & Repair for 14 years, starting his career as an engine block machinist. He now has become a manager over his group, among taking on other duties, such as purchasing, billing, quoting and other tasks.

Jordan lives in Jerseyville, Ill., and is married with two children. When not working, he enjoys working on motorcycles and small engines.

Jeff Poston, general manager of National Maintenance & Repairs diesel engine group, praised Jordans abilities and work ethic.

Josh is always willing to take on more responsibilities when needed, Poston said. National Maintenance & Repair Inc. has a proven leader for many years to come.

In top photo, from left: James Jaco, Crystal Jones and Josh Jordan.

Continue reading here:

40 Under 40 Awards: Jaco, Jones And Jordan - The Waterways Journal - The Waterways Journal

PETA says Thor should go vegan in ‘Love and Thunder’, gets grilled on Twitter – News Lagoon

The MCU has always shown Thor (Chris Hemsworth) as a god whos also got one of the hottest bods. Sorry Cap, people still cant get over those guns Hemsworth has, even if yours stopped a chopper.

However, the fat Thor we saw in Avengers: Endgame saw an outrageous and hilarious gasp envelop theatres. And while we dont know if we see that avatar again in Thor: Love and Thunder, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) came up with a suggestion to help shed the kilos: Make Thor vegan.

In the letter, Lewis Crary, the PETA representative said: According to his personal trainer, Hemsworth went vegan while filming the original Thor and Avengers films, developing a particular taste for beans and veggie burgers. He added: If Thor is serious about protecting the Earth, going vegan makes a lot of senseaxing animal products from his diet could save more than 1,000 gallons of water, 20 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions and 30 square feet of forest each day as well as the lives of nearly 200 animals a year!

As far as fan reactions go, PETA seems to have just picked the wrong time as Twitterati shared their thoughts, none pleasant, and some indescribable. We picked out a few. Yo, were in the middle of a pandemic, and yet here comes PETA with their stupidity, saying Thor should go vegan? I dont think veganism is really on par with Asgardians, a fan wrote. PETA can eat my ass, tweeted another.

For some, it was cheap publicity. The publicity stunts of #PETA never cease to baffle me. I will admit though, co-opting the popularity of #Marvels #BroThor is one of the more agreeable tactics Ive seen them use., a fan slammed the organization.

Warning: This may have you in thigh-slapping splits@peta want thor to go vegan, piss off, you hypocritical dogooding hippies, a fan said. dont want to think about PETA at the movies. Meat is MARVELous tweeted another. This fan seems to have a concrete explanation as to why this movie is nada. PETA needs to stop pushing their Vegan is better beliefs, because many Vegans end up on Vitamin supplements and eventually go back to a mixed diet so Thor going Vegan would be a poor move on Marvels part and go against his Viking origins.

And to end with, heres a classic: Get a life.

Thor: Love and Thunder is slated to release on November 5, 2021.

If you have an entertainment scoop or a story for us, please reach out to us on (323) 421-7515

Read the original post:
PETA says Thor should go vegan in 'Love and Thunder', gets grilled on Twitter - News Lagoon

Riding the waves: Rock River Safety Patrol sees swell in summertime traffic – Daily Union

With waves of heat come waves of boat traffic on Lake Koshkonong and the Rock River.

And this year, perhaps due to increased interest in outdoor recreation after staying "safer at home" to curb COVID-19, boating traffic is on the increase.

Ryan Peterson, a member of the Rock River Safety Patrol (RRSP) for 15 years and chief for three, shares leadership responsibilities with Capt. Henry Sautin, a retired Rock County deputy whom he described as instrumental in maintaining the patrol while helping to develop its leadership.

The patrol has been in service for over 40 years.

Peterson said that the lake and river traffic last weekend was the busiest hed seen over a Fourth of July holiday.

While the traffic is increasing, the patrols commitment to safety remains constant, as does its practice of offering prevention over punishment: Peterson said the 12 sworn officers on the patrol, on average, hand out more boater safety pamphlets and warnings than they do tickets.

The practice is a kind of community policing focused on boater safety while building trust and communication through a sense of fairness, Peterson said.

Lake, river well-populated

An Adams Publishing Group reporter rode along with the patrol Sunday, June 28, a day Peterson described as well-populated.

It is much busier then other years in June," he said. "June, in general, is always fairly slow. People have graduations and weddings. This year, that has not been the case at all.

We are hearing from the marinas that they are having parts ordered for boats that havent been out for years, Peterson continued, adding that he believed some of that interest was driven by COVID-19 and peoples interest in finding safe outdoor recreation.

There are a lot more people on the water. COVID has changed peoples mindset and gets them out, Peterson said.

The Rock River Safety Patrol is responsible for law enforcement, water rescues and recoveries across the 10,500 acres of Lake Koshkonong and 26 miles of the Rock River, covering surface from Jefferson County to Indianford, in Rock County.

We like to say dam to dam, Peterson said.

It also patrols Clear Lake in Milton, he said.

Members of the patrol operate part time, working to cover high-traffic days from two vehicles: a 21-foot Crestliner boat and a Sea-Doo personal watercraft (PWC). The boat is equipped with supplies similar to those used by fire departments, Peterson said.

While driving the boat, Peterson remained in contact through radio with Patrol Officer Mike Herman, who operated from the PWC. He also was in communication with Rock and Jefferson county sheriff's office dispatch units through a separate radio.

Sunday is usually quieter than Saturday," Peterson said, describing boat traffic. "A typical weekend two years ago, Saturday would be busy. Today (June 28), at its busiest point, would have been a typical busy Saturday.

Traffic is up dramatically, he said.

The nature of the lake, offering diverse appeal in a variety of activities, and its proximity to Illinois, contributes to its popularity, he said.

Over the course of the day, several PWC operators approached the patrol with questions about boater safety. Peterson and Herman were eager to share safety rules and tips, handing out boater safety pamphlets with frequency. Multiple verbal warnings and about five written warnings were issued to PWC operators.

In the afternoon, the patrol, along with members from area fire departments, responded to a dispatched call to help locate and rescue a distressed swimmer. The individual was found and taken to the Rock River Marina in Newville.

A group aboard a pontoon boat, describing trouble with the motor, was towed by the patrol back to its pier of origin.

Addressing concerns of safety and law enforcement, Peterson said, Weve had more stops in June than we typically have because more people are here. They are new people and they dont always know whats expected of them.

Many are new to boating and others are unsure of differences between their state of residency and Wisconsin laws, Peterson said.

"Most people out here are here to have fun," Peterson said. "We make sure other people wont put them in danger. We like to give them a DNR (Department of Natural Resources) pamphlet with a general overview of the rules while they are in Wisconsin.

Of the list of 25 citeable infractions, Peterson said, the one most violated revolves around watercraft and their proximity to shorelines and other vehicles while in the water.

The rule requires PWCs to be at least 100 feet away from other craft and 200 feet away from the shoreline when operating above slow-no wake speed. Violation of the rule carries a fine of $230.

One-hundred feet is one-third the size of a football field. People are not always good at estimating that, Peterson said.

The patrol gives warnings, often verbal, with the goal of helping people understand the rule and promote safety.

If we give them a ticket, its a serious safety violation. We give a lot of warnings, Herman, a member of the safety patrol since 2012, said.

Both Peterson and Herman said they advocate teaching people to be safe. On average, they said, they give six to eight verbal or written warnings before writing a ticket.

Over the summer tourism season, the patrol typically writes between zero and eight tickets each weekend, Peterson said.

So we can expect kids to take off from shore and be too close. Some have no life jackets on board and no throw rings," he said.

They do not always have registrations. It makes me think they are new boaters. They make mistakes when we are right next to them and they have no idea what theyve done until we flag them over.

They are understanding when we explain it to them, Peterson said.

Peterson said he believes the community sees the patrol as helpful and fair.

Some people think the police are in need of a wake-up or a shake-up, but we dont get any of that feedback. We are well received," he noted.

I dont have to nitpick boats. There are plenty of violations happening right in front of us and they dont question us. They know they did something wrong. There is mutual respect. Were fair. When we write a ticket, it is a legitimate ticket, Peterson continued. We want the right balance of fairness.

Boating and alcohol

When giving warnings or tickets, Peterson said, alcohol is not usually involved.

I have yet to stop somebody for being under the influence. They are just usually using bad judgment, Herman said.

You can drink while driving a boat; you just cant be drunk, Peterson said, adding that the affects of alcohol are amplified by the waves and the heat.

Someone might appear more drunk after having very little to drink, he said.

Over the course of his 15 years with the patrol, Peterson said, he might have seen 12 people who were intoxicated. Four went to jail.

A motorboat driver can be cited for drunken driving if he or she has a blood alcohol content of 0.1 percent or greater. That is higher than the 0.08 percent limit for motor vehicle drivers.

Drunken drivers are removed from their boats and taken by the patrol to shore, where they are placed in the custody of county deputies.

The patrol uses GPS to determine which countys jurisdiction they are in at the time of the stop.

The biggest portion the river they patrol is in Rock County. The biggest area, including most of the lake, is in Jefferson County, Peterson said.

About RRSP

The patrol operates on an annual budget of about $38,000, with about 70 percent of those funds coming through the Department of Natural Resources. The rest is funded through the five towns that make up the Rock-Koshkonong Lake District (RKLD), including Milton, Fulton, Koshkonong, Albion and Sumner, although funding does not come through the RKLD, Peterson said.

The patrol is part of a multijurisdictional program, working and training alongside the Edgerton, Fort Atkinson, Lake Mills and Milton fire departments.

A Boat Board, which has one representative from each of the five towns contributing funds, governs the patrol, Peterson said.

Rock River Safety Patrol Sgt. Jim Jelinek is a Milton Firefighter, an EMT and a commissioner on the RKLD board, he added.

Read more here:

Riding the waves: Rock River Safety Patrol sees swell in summertime traffic - Daily Union

How the coronavirus will impact agricultural research and technology – Successful Farming

A plethora of agricultural technology in recent years has been fueled by internal budgets of major agricultural firms and venture capital aimed at start-up ventures. COVID-19, though, has tightened all aspects of doing business, including research and development (R&D).

Still, major agricultural firms say they are committed to research and development. Our R&D is not a short-term investment, says Tim Glenn, executive vice president, chief commercial officer of Corteva Agriscience. Those are long-term decisions we make. Its important to continue to invest in those critical technologies, whether its germplasm, traits, crop protection, or digital solutions. If we fall behind in that space, the market is very unforgiving.

Investors looking to back start-up firms investing in agricultural technology are taking the long-term view, says Han Chen, cofounder and chief executive officer for ZeaKal, a plant traits firm that secured $15 million in Series C financing in September 2019.

Capital is definitely more scarce, Chen says. Raising capital still relies on (developing) personal relationships. It is hard to have the same level of interaction through Zoom meetings.Still, investments are being made, he says. Investors are still looking at fundamentals and long-term needs, he says.

The COVID-19 environment is tough for cash-strapped start-upstrying to raise money, says Mike Miille, chief executive officer of Joyn Bio, a joint venture founded by Bayer and Ginkgo Bioworks to develop engineered beneficial microbes.

Still, some are faring the COVID-19 downturn well. Were in a very envious position, given our cash situation, he adds.

More flexibility will be needed in evaluating investments in start-ups like those in agricultural technology, says Kiersten Stead, managing partner with DCVC Bio, a venture capital fund investing in early-stage computational biology start-ups. Stead spoke at a recent World Agri-Tech webinar last May.

This means liaising with other venture firms in different cities and getting them to do proxy diligence, she says. That means bringing in consultants and friends in cities who we have around the world to help us do that.

When you really look at whats critical to understanding a person and a team and what their capabilities are, we believe that can be done in this environment, she says. Its not optimal. It will take more time, but we believe people just have to be flexible.

More:

How the coronavirus will impact agricultural research and technology - Successful Farming

TownSq Partners with CINC Systems to Provide Integrated Technology to More Clients – GlobeNewswire

Dallas, TX, July 10, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- TownSq(pronouncedTown Square), a groundbreaking, all-in-one app, has teamed up withCINC Systems, a personalized cloud-based association management software,to offernew integrated technologyto clients, boards, homeowners, and business partners.

TownSq is unique in the market as it allows residents to both socialize with their neighbors and enjoy the convenience of direct communication with their community management team and board members. The innovative, user-friendly app enables community members to connect, collaborate, and stay up-to-date with ease.

CINC Systems combines association accounting and management solutions into a single, accessible software program. CINC empowers businesses with access to association management systems, cloud accounting, and integrated banking options, all in one convenient location.

The significance of TownSq and CINCs partnership is the exchange of data between two world-class products and a streamlined user-experience. By integrating the two platforms, the previous need to maintain information across multiple systems has been eliminated, stated Joo David, TownSq CEO. CINC customers will be excited to learn that in addition to leveraging the robust accounting platform to manage their back-office responsibilities, they may now offer a suite of community management products to their boards and homeowners. I am proud to report our first customers to adopt the integrated technology are experiencing great success and we are thrilled to announce CINC as our latest premiere integration partner.

TownSq is available now, oniTunesandGoogle Play.

About TownSq

TownSq is the leading, global solution for better community living. Designed for managing communities, TownSq delivers the most complete, mobile community experience by helping you connect, collaborate and stay informed on everything happening in your community from daily management and ongoing maintenance to community programs and events. Our customers use TownSq to empower community management teams, board members and residents to experience community their waywww.townsq.io.

About CINC Systems

CINC Systems provides transformational technology and services for the community association industry, redefining the way its clients and partners do business. Founded in 2005, CINC Systems became the first Internet-based integrated accounting and property management system for the community association industry. Since its founding, CINC Systems has experienced steady growth, with clients in 26 states and over 100 partner banking branch locations. Learn more atwww.cincsystems.com.

Original post:

TownSq Partners with CINC Systems to Provide Integrated Technology to More Clients - GlobeNewswire

Google to restrict ads that cater to spyware and surveillance technology – BusinessLine

Google is all set to impose restrictions on ads that cater to spyware and surveillance technology.

According to Googles official release, the updated policy will prohibit the promotion of products or services that are marketed or targeted with the express purpose of tracking or monitoring another person or their activities without their authorization.

This policy will roll out globally on August 11, 2020.

Google mentioned that it will restrict spyware and technology used for intimate partner surveillance including but not limited to spyware/malware that can be used to monitor texts, phone calls, or browsing history.

GPS trackers specifically marketed to spy or track someone without their consent; the promotion of surveillance equipment (cameras, audio recorders, dash cams, nanny cams) marketed with the express purpose of spying will also be banned.

These guidelines do not include (a) private investigation services or (b) products or services designed for parents to track or monitor their underage children.

Google also noted that violations of this policy will not lead to immediate account suspension without prior warning.

The tech giant will issue a warning, at least 7 days, prior to any suspension of the violators account.

See more here:

Google to restrict ads that cater to spyware and surveillance technology - BusinessLine