Human lives and economy: Can there be a trade off? – The Daily Star

Coronavirus pandemic has changed not only actions and attitudes but also the doctrines and philosophies of states and economies worldwide. The market doctrinaires and market fundamentalists have overnight converted to state interventionists, the authoritarians and totalitarians showing liberal attitudes and liberal democracies are imposing bans on free movements. These are all the compulsions of the time and fundamentals to existence.

The old classical capitalist attitude towards society is, people are needed for economy and production. People's labour power is more important than their lives. The cleaver and enlightened capitalists since world war two transformed themselves to welfarists for generational supply of labour power for a sustainable productive system of capitalist growth and capitalist reproduction. The recent outbreak of Covid-19 added radically new dimensions to it. Because, it is not only a threat to economy and production, it poses threat to the very existence of Homo Sapiens on the planet irrespective of economic and social positions.

Political stars like first line heir to the British Crown, British Prime Minister, Iranian Ayatollahs to Canadian First lady; film stars, sports stars, business and media stars who are not in the attack and death list! Globally it created a "pandemic war" like situation which may be moving towards a new world order, which is unprecedented in world history of economic crisis, pandemics and wars. No hither to fought wars affected so many countries and states at a time within five months. No pandemic after 1800 CE has been so devastating in terms of spread. A new world order is going to emerge which is creating a new economic order too, may be known as "pandemic driven economic order" for a decade.

The USA may be in the lead. The current US administration declared a two trillion-dollar pandemic package which is about 10 percent of US GDP. The Indian government's initial package is Rs 1.7 lac crore which is 1 percent of their GDP. The great economic minds of India globally famous such as Amartya Sen, Avijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo, Aravind Subramanium, Kausik Basu, Amit Seru and many others are advising government to increase the package to at least 6-7 lac crore, 4-5 percent of the GDP. Bangladesh also declared a stimuli package of Tk 72,750 crore. All these are initially hesitant or careful steps towards the mitigation of the crisis. Still there are a lot of uncertainties around it.

We have not heard yet any notable statement from Bangladeshi economists, only politicians are making all optimistic and stray comments. TV talk shows are busy airing corona guidance and sporadic talk shows. Philanthropy and donation news are also seen along with community and voluntary initiatives from concerned citizens. I may be wrong and also not properly informed. But our corona responses are too little, too late. We still lack far sightedness and seem unready for long-term consequences. Our stimulus package is industry, production and economy based, not human centred. Garment seems at the centre of our industrial stimulus package which contribute 6 percent to the GDP. The agriculture, rural and urban informal sector, expatriate workers and rest of other industries and services contribute the other 94 percent of the GDP. Growth is important but as a non-economist I believe at this moment, people and people's lives are more important than growth and all medium and long term economic concerns. Our immediate concern is saving lives.

I like to echo here what the world famous economist are suggesting to Indian government. First of all, what they are saying is, growth and economic sustainability is important. There cannot and should not be any trade-off between economy and lives. Economic sustainability is also important for supporting lives. But the crisis of a particular "time" is a very important factor to fix priority. Their advice is, within the next 12 months, economic recovery is possible. At least for the next three months, all efforts need to be devoted to combat the virus with all the possible ways and means and keep the food supply along with supply of other bare basic minimum necessities running. Three month's regimented effort is needed for taking total control of the pandemic crisis.

The Chinese and South Korean experience shows the way in that direction. Our health infrastructure (Bangladeshi) does not match theirs. We live under a very fragile health care situation. We have village based community clinics, union health centres, Upazlia health complexes, district level hospitals and medical colleges. Eighty percent investments of health are contributed in buildings and ninety percent revenues are spent on salaries. Real health service capacity is under scrutiny. Rich people do not take treatment here, middle class depends on private sector, and part of the poor only depend on public hospitals and clinics. Under the above circumstances, we have to have quick assessment of our capacity in terms of means, materials and health professionals (which include doctor, nurses, medical technologist, hospital beds, ICU, ventilation facilities, etc.) and the demands of the crisis. The whole nation needs to be mobilised under a single agenda, i.e. combating the coronavirus. The health professionals here are the front line fighters. They are the infantries, the artillery, armour, supply, signal, all have to be in their support. The general administration, police, army, politicians, local government leaders, all should be in the second line in support of the frontline. On the other hand, community management is another front which has to be strictly managed.

The four priority actions at this moment though late, but better late than never, are suggested for consideration of the government and the people: i) Completely lockdown all the "hotspots" for at least one month and restrict indiscriminate movement everywhere; ii) Massive efforts for identification through proper tests and separation and treatment of identified patients; iii) Ensuring food and other necessities at the door step of the needy; and iv) Procurement of medical essentials and their supply and utilisation (equipment and medicines) in all competent hospitals and health outposts.

The relaxation in people's movements may not be started before mid-May, 2020. Allow limited train movements with half the seat capacity, in the same way domestic airlines by filling half of the seats may start flying and the truck movements with all medical precautions have to be kept going from mid-April. A large truck fleet can be mobilised for the easy movement of goods all over the country. The Chittagong port may operate with its utmost capacity. All offices and educational institutions may start limited operation online after April 15 to keep the country on the move.

In the second line of priorities are the followings: i) Farmers and farm families have to be supported to keep agricultural production flow intact and public procurement of farm products need to be thought of as an option. It is not only rice or paddy, other perishable products as well may be procured to make those available to the people and also to keep control on price. It will be an incentive to sustain growth and employment in agriculture; ii) Natural calamity season is also in the offing, adequate preparation for that is also to be kept in mind; iii) In cities like Dhaka, dengue outbreak has to be kept in check; iv) The greatest Muslim religious occasion Ramadan and Eid festival are going to be observed during the month of April and May. Necessary support and restraint need to be observed in observance of Ramadan and eid; v) Side by side, in dealing with coronavirus, hospitals and doctors have to be separated to treat other critical patients. Current arrangements for advising patients with minor complains through medical hotlines are appropriate measures.

This is the time also to consider massive enhancement of resources for building our health care system. We can also consider spending 4 to 5 percent of our GDP in health care. Government may appoint a taskforce to identify the projects and sectors from where money can be diverted to health. Total safety net budget, PM's special fund, and community and NGO efforts may be directed towards feeding the people in need in the cities and villages. Designing complicated projects with target group is irrelevant under the current situation, especially safety net, anybody and everybody irrespective of former economic status are entitled to have support. Then people will not be desperate to move and stay calm. At this time, we need not be very wise but must act quick and smart in distributing food for the needy. It is not a trade-off, only a crash programme for six months on health and social safety. Economic recovery could be the agenda we will be pursuing from the end of May this year. But for now, saving lives must come first. The economy cannot flourish on the dead bodies of people.

Dr Tofail Ahmed is a local governance expert and vice-chancellor of Britannia University, Cumilla. E-mail: tofail101@gmail.com

Continued here:
Human lives and economy: Can there be a trade off? - The Daily Star

Sex[Positive] Education: With no federal mandates on sex ed, students receive vastly different information, affects college experience – The Badger…

Erica Koepsels sex education experience didnt start in middle school or high school like other students it started years later, in college.

Im born and raised in Kansas and then went to college in a small school in Topeka, Kansas, where we had a gender and womens studies course that I took, Koepsel said. [The course] brought in a sexual health educator who taught us all about contraception. And leaving that class, I was livid that no one had taught me that in high school and that I didnt have the information that I or really that my friends needed.

Koepsel said she was so interested in why she lacked sex education in high school and making sure other high schoolers wouldnt have that experience that she started to intern, volunteer and work in sexual health education, she said.

Ten years after her gender and womens studies course, Koepsel is now the Program Manager for Providers and Teens Communicating for Health, a youth-driven, Madison-based program working to ensure all adolescents are able to receive high-quality health care services in their community.

In the cult classic film Mean Girls, the grossly incompetent gym teacher, Coach Carr, doubles as the sex ed instructor. Dont have sex, because you will get pregnant and die, he proclaims. Just dont do it, OK, promise?

This is just one example of what teens grow up hearing about sex education and sexual health. These messages, along with the ones received in high school, tend to stick with students throughout their lives, according to Assistant Professor of Gender and Womens Studies at the University of Wisconsin Chris Barcelos.

The problem with students remembering these messages, Barcelos said, is while some people receive comprehensive sex education in high school, others receive no sex education or even incorrect information.

And Koepsel said in her work she too has found that many issues can arise with poor or nonexistent sexual health education.

If you have poor sex education if you have sex education thats bad, wrong or shaming that can cause a lot of identity crisis issues, Koepsel said. Especially with young LGBTQ people or people that might just be exploring their own identity, if they have had a sexual health [program] that has only shown sex as penile-vaginal intercourse theres a huge part missing.

Koepsel said one of the biggest problems she faces with the sex education her PATCH students receive is that students are not taught communication skills around sex. This creates problems with consent and students not having agency in their own sexual experiences because they havent been taught how to say yes or no to things, or even what theyre talking about to begin with.

Barcelos said even when schools teach comprehensive sex education, its typically abstinence-only and heteronormative. Not only can this create negative gender power dynamics it doesnt stress other crucial elements. If you have poor sex education if you have sex education thats bad, wrong or shaming that can cause a lot of identity crisis issues. Especially with young LGBTQ people or people that might just be exploring their own identity, if they have had a sexual health [program] that has only shown sex as penile-vaginal intercourse theres a huge part missing.Erica Koepsel, Program Manager at PATCH

Even when sex education is comprehensive or evidence-based, it [often] doesnt talk about consent, it doesnt talk about pleasure, Barcelos said. It still positions women and girls as passive defenders of boys and men who are going to try to convince them to do things they dont want to do. You know, its very heterosexist. So even sex education thats good is pretty [hard to come by] and is often pretty stigmatizing around sexual health.

Barcelos added that stigmatizing sexual health education, combined with the misinformation found in movies and pop culture, can create life-long problems for people resulting in not being ready to handle situations that will likely come up in their lives.

Young people get a lot of wrong and harmful information, and not the skills they need either like how to negotiate consent, or how to deal with an unintended pregnancy, or how to cope with living with an STI or any of the skills they may need as adults, Barcelos said.

But, Barcelos said the biggest problem the United States faces in sex education is the huge discrepancy of what students learn state-to-state.

Most states do not require that their sex education be medically accurate, so theres no guarantee that the sex education you actually got was accurate, Barcelos said. Some states actually have laws where you can only talk about LGBTQ people as bad.

In the U.S., 29 states mandate sex education, with only 17 of those states requiring the information to be medically accurate, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

Wisconsin does not fall into either one of those categories.

In Wisconsin, school districts are required to teach HIV education, which must stress abstinence. Additionally, when sex education is provided in schools, abstinence must be stressed as well as the importance of sex only within a marriage. Information on dating and sexual violence prevention also needs to be distributed.

Koepsel said with these mandates, so much of the sex education that happens in Wisconsin schools is left open for each school to decide. Because of this, each school is different, so students from neighboring towns can have vastly different knowledge.

In the state of Wisconsin, no one knows whats happening in any given school, minus the students. And I think thats the biggest challenge, Koepsel said.

Associate Director of Teaching & Learning in the Green Bay School DistrictEric Conn said their schools teach abstinence-only sex education in high school with information on puberty and reproduction in fourth through sixth grade. Conn said he believes they have a comprehensive sex education curriculum.

Our Human Growth and Development curriculum in middle and high school provides students instruction in a wide variety of knowledge and skills in the subject, as well as exceeding the minimum requirements outlined in state statute, Conn said in an email to The Badger Herald.

But, Morgan Healey, a junior at UW who went to Green Bay Southwest High School, said she remembers learning more about performance-enhancing drugs in health class than sex education in middle school.

Looking back I never had high school sex education that I can remember so if we did it clearly didnt have much of an impression on me, Healey said. I do remember a small amount of sex education in middle school.

Koepsel said when students from across the country come together in college, all with the different levels of sex education, it can be difficult to navigate those differences.

Were coming in with so many different areas of knowledge as educators who dont know what other educators are doing, as teens who dont know what other teens have learned and all meeting in that common space at colleges or universities, or in workforces, Koepsel said. So I think the fact that its so different and that no one really knows whats happening makes it so much harder.

Barcelos said with the messages about sex kids see in pop culture as they grow up, students come to college pressured to be part of hookup culture which exposes the discrepancies in sex education and leads to unpreparedness and stigma when something goes wrong.

[Students] are in a situation where theres pressure to be part of hookup culture, and so then when someone gets an STI or has an unplanned pregnancy or something like that, they are totally stigmatized, Barcelos said. Then that stigma is part of what prevents people from not just having safer sex, but having a fulfilling sex life.

Different levels of sex education can also present inequalities, Barcelos said, as families who can afford to send their student to private school may receive better sex education, as they are not bound by federal and state funding. On the flip side, however, high schoolers attending religious private schools can often be taught misleading or incorrect information.

This was the case for John Spengler, a sophomore at UW who went to a private Catholic school in northwest Ohio and received no sex ed outside of Catholic family planning methods. For Spengler, coming to college was a large culture shock.

The extent to which [UW], especially dorms, was open about sexual topics was somewhat surprising, Spengler said. While I always figured that there would certainly be sexual education opportunities available to all students, I cant say I anticipated walking into the Witte bathrooms at 9 a.m. on a Friday and seeing dozens of condoms spread out on the counter.[Students] are in a situation where theres pressure to be part of hookup culture, and so then when someone gets an STI or has an unplanned pregnancy or something like that, they are totally stigmatized. Then that stigma is part of what prevents people from not just having safer sex, but having a fulfilling sex life.Chris Barcelos, UW Assistant Professor of Gender and Women's Studies

While he does believe there should be general better sex education in private schools, Spengler said he believes better sexual education was not necessary for him in high school, as he attended public school until 9th grade where he received comprehensive sex ed.

Sex education can vary even more for international students, as depending on their countries, talking about sex may be considered taboo. This was the case for Arushi Gupta, a freshman at UW who went to high school in Delhi National Capital Region, India. She did not receive explicit sex education whatsoever.

Even though Im from a pretty big city, I still come from a country where talking about sex is taboo, Gupta said. The education system requires all sophomores to study menstruation and reproduction, but safe sex is not mentioned in any textbook until your senior year, if you choose to continue studying biology.

Gupta said while she does not think the lack of sex education she received affected her experience coming to UW, she does believe every person should receive sex education in high school because puberty takes place at this time. It is also important to know about STIs, how to practice safe sex and about different contraception methods, she said.

For students who feel that culture shock at UW, there are programs and clubs on campus to help. One of these organizations is Sex Out Loud, UWs peer-to-peer sexual health resource. It provides students with inclusive and accessible comprehensive sexuality education programs, events and resources, and creates safe spaces where students can freely discuss these issues,Chair of Sex Out Loud Song Kim said.

Kim said one of the biggest problems the organization faces is realizing the shallowness of sex education programs students receive before coming to UW.

As amazing as it is to hear how life-changing the information provided at Sex Out Loud can be for some folks, that reality is disheartening, Kim said. Much of the sex education that the average American teenager receives is often based in purely preventative reproductive healthcare. Meaning, there often is no discussion of sex as part of human nature for many people, or a discussion on steps to take after testing positive for a sexually transmitted infection or a pregnancy test.

Kim, like Barcelos, said this form of sex education can be uninclusive to many, as it is typically heteronormative and sex-negative.

No matter how comprehensive the sex education curriculum is at a school, Barcelos said it is hard to imagine there ever being a completely inclusive, sex-positive focus. But, Barcelos believes there is a way to educate young people accurately on sexual health and education with the internet.

We know from research that a lot of young people learn about sex from peers and the internet, Barcelos said. I think that that is only going to continue, and that cultivating those as useful and reliable sources of information [is] maybe a better strategy than trying to fix sex education in schools, which I kind of feel like is unfixable.

And while there are definite problems within sex education in schools, Healey said talking about it is really the first step.

I think the first step to anything is talking about it, as cliche as that might sound, Healey said. Learning to have a conversation definitely prepared me to be more comfortable with the idea, but there is definitely more work to be done if the current education is anything like eight years ago.

See the article here:
Sex[Positive] Education: With no federal mandates on sex ed, students receive vastly different information, affects college experience - The Badger...

Biology Basics: What is a Virus? Bacteria? Fungus? And How Can We Kill Them? – Clare County Review

April 13, 2020

Dear Editor:With the coronavirus is on everyones mind, lets go back to some basics. Like what is a virus and how do we get rid of it? Modern medicine seems to cure most anything, so why is it so hard to destroy the coronavirus?There are three major pathogens (biological structures that can make humans ill). They are bacteria (bacterium), fungi (fungus), and viruses (virus). Each one is unique in its structure and complexity. Therefore, the way to destroy each of them is also unique.

We are exposed to thousands, if not millions, of unique pathogens. Our immune system must learn how to destroy each and every one. When we are born, we have almost no immune system; we are incredibly vulnerable to infection and sickness. We must build up our immune system with antibodies. Antibodies are how the immune system can identify, tag, and destroy the pathogens making a person sick. The only way an immune system can build up antibodies is to be exposed to a pathogen and learn how to identify, tag, and destroy the pathogen. The only short cut to this is when a mother can pass some antibodies to a nursing infant through her breast milk. (This is only one of the many reasons why a newborn should be breast fed.)

However, once our immune systems have the antibodies needed to identify, tag, and destroy a specific pathogen, it will remember that pathogen. So, the next time you are exposed to it, your immune system will produce the antibodies to destroy the pathogen much quicker, ideally even before you feel sick.

Sometimes our immune systems cannot do it on its own, that is where medicine is required. Remember, there are bacteria, fungal and viral pathogens.

First, fungi tend to be external organisms that live on surfaces. Mold, mushrooms, and mildew are some classic examples and good to use as a reference. They grow in dark, moist places on decaying matter. The hypha or roots borrow into the organic matter to extract the nutrients it needs for life. Athletes foot, jock itch, and yeast infections are all common pathogens many of us have suffered. Although, internally fungi are lethal, they are rare. Most external fungi can be destroyed with an anti-fungal cream or pill. Fungi tend to be on the low side of complexity and relatively easy to kill.Bacterial pathogens are individual living organisms. They are the germs that we think of swimming around under a microscope. There are millions of varieties of them. They live on their own, on surfaces within the air, in foods and water. Many ear, throat, and sinus infections are bacterial.

Fortunately, our immune system is pretty good at identifying these foreign organisms living within our bodies and can destroy them on its own. And if it cannot, a doctor can prescribe an antibiotic (penicillin) to finish the job.On the other hand, viruses are non-living, they are DNA pirates. They cannot live or reproduce on their own. Think of a virus as a blob of grease or oil with a single strand of DNA within it. No nucleus, no organelles, just a microscopic ball of fat with a code to cause some biological mutiny.

Viruses require a host cell for reproduction. The virus does this by taking over a host cell and forcing the cell to reproduce the virus and it fatty shell, much like a pirate hijacking a ship for its own purposes. Unfortunately, the cell will no longer able to perform the life sustaining job it was intended to be doing; hence you fell sick. The host cell will continue to perform the pirates task, reproduce the virus, until it destroys itself. Then, liberating more DNA pirates to repeat the process.

The fact that the virus lives inside the cell makes it hard for the immune system to identify the pathogen, let alone destroy it. The only way to destroy the virus is to destroy the cell itself. The pirate will never leave the ship, the ship must be destroyed to kill the pirate.

This is what our immune systems does, anti-bodies identify, tag, and destroy the living cells that have the virus within them. This explains our symptoms which can range from minor aches and pains to lethal tissue and organ damage. Your immune system is literally destroying your own cells.

Fortunately, we have billions of cells and our immune system can be very targeted once the anti-bodies have figure out which cells have been pirated by the virus. White blood cells can then effectively destroy only the pirated cells and recovering will begin.

A major problem with the Coronavirus in humans is our immune systems have hard time identifying which cells have been pirated by the virus and which cells are still healthy. Human immune systems seem to be over-reacting and destroying ALL the surrounding cells. Since the virus is often found in the lungs, heart, and kidneys these are the organs that seem to be suffering the most.

So how do we destroy the Coronavirus? They only thing that can destroy a virus is our own immune system. The medical field has had little success in developing anti-viral medications. We can only support our immune system to learn quicker, to produce the antibodies needed and then the immune system can become much more targeted.

Vaccines do this by providing a weaken version for the immune system to learn from. Anti-body therapy takes the anti-bodies from one immune system that has already learned how to identify the virus and directly gives it to an un-learned immune system.

Unfortunately, we do not have any solutions yet! So, the best way to be healthy is to not get sick in the first place. Stay away from the pirates! You all know what to do, washing your hand, social distance, etc. Be safe.

Andrew J. FrischFarwell High School.

View original post here:
Biology Basics: What is a Virus? Bacteria? Fungus? And How Can We Kill Them? - Clare County Review

CSL Behring and SAB Biotherapeutics Join Forces to Deliver New Potential COVID-19 Therapeutic – MDJOnline.com

KING OF PRUSSIA, Pa. and SIOUX FALLS, S.D., April 8, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Global biotherapeutics leader, CSL Behringand innovative human antibody development company SAB Biotherapeutics(SAB) announced today their partnership to combat the coronavirus pandemic with the rapid development of SAB-185, a COVID-19 therapeutic candidate on track for clinical evaluation by early summer. The partnership joins the forces of CSL Behring's leading protein science capabilities with SAB's novel immunotherapy platform capable of rapidly developing and producing natural, highly-targeted, high-potency, fully human polyclonal antibodies without the need for blood plasma donations from recovered patients.

The therapeutic candidate, SAB-185, is generated from SAB's proprietary DiversitAb platform producing large volumes of human polyclonal antibodies targeted specifically to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Driven by advanced genetic engineering and antibody science, SAB's novel approach, leveraging genetically engineered cattle to produce fully human antibodies, enables a scalable and reliable production of targeted, higher potency neutralizing antibody product than has been previously possible. SAB's approach has expedited the rapid development of a novel immunotherapy for COVID-19 deploying the same natural immune response to fight the disease as recovered patients, but with a much higher concentration of targeted antibodies.

"COVID-19 is a nearly unprecedented public health crisis," said CSL Behring's Executive Vice President and Head of R&D Bill Mezzanotte, M.D. "That's why we're combining our leading capabilities in plasma product development and immunology with external collaborators to help find multiple, rapid solutions. In the near-term, SAB Biotherapeutics' novel immunotherapy platform provides a new and innovative solution to rapidly respond without the need for human plasma adding a different dimension to the industry-wide plasma-derived hyperimmune alliance effort we recently launched for the COVID-19 crisis. For future pandemics, SAB's platform may allow us to even more rapidly respond to patients' needs."

"Our targeted high-potency immunotherapies leverage the native immune response thereby providing a highly-specific match against the complexity, diversity and mutation of a disease," said Eddie J. Sullivan, PhD, SAB Biotherapeutics president, CEO and co-founder. "Our partnership with CSL Behring shifts our development trajectory to more rapidly scale-up and delivery of our highly targeted and potent COVID-19 therapeutic candidate, and deploy our unique capabilities to help combat this crisis. We have a successful preclinical track record for addressing infectious disease targets including Ebola, MERS, and SARS with our proprietary platform and appreciate that this collaboration with a global biopharmaceutical powerhouse will magnify the potential impact of a COVID-19 immunotherapy and provide an important framework for establishing sustainable solutions for the future."

CSL Behring has provided seed funding to offset some initial development costs that were funded by SAB in good faith, responding to the global pandemic as quickly as possible. SAB has already secured approximately $7.2 million in funding through an interagency agreement with the Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense (JPEO - CBRND) and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)to support SAB to complete manufacturing and preclinical studies. CSL Behring will then commit its clinical, regulatory, manufacturing and supply chain expertise and resources to deliver the therapeutic to the market as soon as possible, on terms to be agreed with SAB.

Earlier this year, the companies announceda collaboration to investigate SAB's platform technology as a new source for human immunoglobulin G (IgG) and the potential for new therapies to treat challenging autoimmune, infectious and idiopathic diseases by leveraging SAB's DiversitAb platform.

About CSL Behring CSL Behring is a global biotherapeutics leader driven by its promise to save lives. Focused on serving patients' needs by using the latest technologies, we develop and deliver innovative therapies that are used to treat coagulation disorders, primary immune deficiencies, hereditary angioedema, inherited respiratory disease, and neurological disorders. The company's products are also used in cardiac surgery, burn treatment and to prevent hemolytic disease of the newborn. CSL Behring operates one of the world's largest plasma collection networks, CSL Plasma. The parent company, CSL Limited (ASX:CSL;USOTC:CSLLY), headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, employs more than 26,000 people, and delivers its life-saving therapies to people in more than 70 countries. For more information, visit http://www.cslbehring.com and for inspiring stories about the promise of biotechnology, visit Vita http://www.cslbehring.com/Vita

About SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc.SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. (SAB), headquartered in Sioux Falls, S.D. is a clinical-stage, biopharmaceutical development company advancing a new class of immunotherapies leveraging fully human polyclonal antibodies. Utilizing some of the most complex genetic engineering and antibody science in the world, SAB has developed the only platform that can rapidly produce natural, highly targeted, high-potency, immunotherapies at commercial scale. The company is advancing programs in autoimmunity, infectious diseases, inflammation and exploratory oncology. SAB is rapidly progressing on a new therapeutic for COVID-19, SAB-185, a fully human polyclonal antibodies targeted to SARS-CoV-2 without using human donors. SAB-185 is expected to be ready for evaluation as early as summer 2020. The company was also recently awarded a $27 million contract from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to leverage its unique capabilities as part of a Rapid Response Antibody Program, valued at up to $27 million. For more information visit: http://www.sabbiotherapeutics.com.

See the original post:
CSL Behring and SAB Biotherapeutics Join Forces to Deliver New Potential COVID-19 Therapeutic - MDJOnline.com

Cardiol Therapeutics says its nanotechnology successfully delivers anti-fibrotic drugs to diseased heart – Proactive Investors USA & Canada

Results showed an exponential increase in the uptake of Cardiols nanoparticles in heart failure hearts compared to a control group

Inc () (OTCQX:CRTPF) announced promising new study data on Tuesday highlighting the effectiveness of its nanotechnology approach to drug delivery.

Results showed that there was an exponential increase in the uptake of Cardiols nanoparticles in heart failure hearts compared to a control group in a pre-clinical model of non-ischemic heart failure.

Nanoparticles preferentially gathered within cells in fibroblasts, indicating the potential to successfully deliver anti-fibrotic drugs such as cannabidiol to the diseased area of the heart.

According to the study, the nanoparticles localized within the diseased hearts in areas known as fibrosis, which is largely responsible for the stiffening and reduced function of the heart muscle.

The data provides new insights into how nanotherapeutics could be used to target the anti-fibrotic properties of cannabidiol to fibrous tissue in a failing heart, according to Dr Arvind Bhimaraj, interim division chief of the Division of Heart Failure and co-director of the Heart Failure Translational Research Laboratory at Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, where the study was conducted.

Dr Bhimaraj is a member of the Clinical Steering Committee for Cardiol's planned international clinical trial in acute myocarditis.

"The specific targeting of the fibrotic tissue in the heart offers the potential to utilize drugs more effectively to prevent the progression of heart failure, Bhimaraj said in a statement.

Data from the study was accepted for presentation at the American College of Cardiology's 69th Annual Scientific Session & Expo together with the World Congress of Cardiology, held virtually at the end of March.

Cardiol is focused on producing pharmaceutical cannabidiol products and developing innovative therapies for heart diseases, including acute myocarditis and other causes of heart failure. Its proprietary nanotechnology is designed to enable the distribution of water-insoluble drugs within the blood circulation, improve pharmacokinetics, and facilitate drug accumulation in the failing heart.

The company is planning an international clinical trial of its flagship drug CardiolRx in acute myocarditis, which is caused by inflammation in heart tissue.

Contact Angela at [emailprotected]

Follow her on Twitter @AHarmantas

Read the rest here:
Cardiol Therapeutics says its nanotechnology successfully delivers anti-fibrotic drugs to diseased heart - Proactive Investors USA & Canada

Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment top key players, industry trends, size, type and applications analysis report by 2026 – WhaTech Technology…

The main objectives of the research report elaborate the overall market overview on Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment dynamics, historic volume and value, robust market methodology, current & future trends, Porters Five Forces Analysis, upstream and downstream industry chain, new technological development, cost structure, government policies & regulations, etc

This Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment research report is focused on providing its reader with all the necessary details that can help them make necessary business decisions. It provides wholesome information that is necessary to understand the market inside-out.

ReportsnReports has recently added a new research report to its expanding repository. The research report, titled Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment, mainly includes a detailed segmentation of this sector, which is expected to generate massive returns by the end of the forecast period, thus showing an appreciable rate of growth over the coming years on an annual basis.

The research study also looks specifically at the need for Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment.

Download A Sample Report atwww.reportsnreports.com/contactme=2906851

Report Includes:

Detailed overview and current and emerging applications of nanotechnology in cancer treatment Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2017 to 2019, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024 Coverage of types of nanostructured materials, nanodevices, and nanotools used for research, diagnosis, and therapy of various types of cancer Information on evolving trends and patterns, recent achievements in nanotechnology-based cancer treatment, regulatory environment, and demographic shifts that influence the overall market outlook Strategies adopted by leading market participants within the life sciences industry, their market share analysis and key competitive landscapeSummary

According to the National Science Foundation (NSF) the term nano refers to particles, structures, or devices having at least one dimension below 100 nm. Development, manufacturing and sale of these products have spawned a multibillion industry, commonly referred to as the nanotechnology sector.

As shown in the next table, there are three main product groups of products that contribute to this industry: nanostructured materials, nanotools, and nanodevices.

Nanostructured materials are materials with at least one internal, external, or surface characteristic measurable in nanometers. They include nanomaterials, nanointermediates, surface nanostructures, nanocomposites, and nanoporous materials.

Nanomaterials (also called nano-objects) represent the largest category of nanostructured materials and are classified based on how many dimensions fall below 100 nm

Please Share Your Specific Interest To Serve You Better | Download PDF Brochure atwww.reportsnreports.com/contactme=2906851

Recent Industry Trend:

The report contains the profiles of various prominent players in the Global Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment. Different strategies implemented by these vendors have been analyzed and studied in order to gain a competitive edge, create unique product portfolios and increase their market share.

The study also sheds light on major global industry vendors. Such essential vendors consist of both new and well-known players.

In addition, the business report contains important data relating to the launch of new products on the market, specific licenses, domestic scenarios and the strategies of the organization implemented on the market.

Scope of the Report:

Through following the Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment through depth, the readers should find this study very helpful. The aspects and details are depicted by charts, bar graphs, pie diagrams, and other visual representations in theNanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment study.

This intensifies the representation of the pictures and also helps to improve the facts of the Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment industry. At a substantial CAGR, the Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment is likely to grow.

Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment reports main objective is to guide the user to understand the market in terms of its definition, classification, industry potential, the latest trends, and the challenges facing the Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment.

Access Full Report atwww.reportsnreports.com/purchasme=2906851

And More

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Here is the original post:
Nanotechnology Market in Cancer Treatment top key players, industry trends, size, type and applications analysis report by 2026 - WhaTech Technology...

Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery Market Is Thriving Continuously By Top Key Players like Camurus, Alkermes, Aquanova, Celgene – Jewish Life News

The study conducts SWOT analysis to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the key players engaged in the Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery market. Moreover, the report undertakes an elaborate examination of drivers and constraints operating in the market. The report also evaluated the trends observed in the parent market, along with the macro-economic indicators, prevailing factors, and market appeal according to different segments. The report also predicts the influence of different industry aspects on the Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery market segments and regions.

Get Sample of the Report at https://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW00013335363/sample

The key manufacturers covered in this report

Access Pharmaceuticals

Camurus

Alkermes

Aquanova

Celgene

Capsulution Pharma

The research report on Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery Market provides a comprehensive analysis of the market status and development trend, including types, applications, growth, opportunities, rising technology, competitive landscape and product offerings of key players. Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery Market report covers the present and past market scenarios, market development patterns, and is likely to proceed with a continuing development over the forecast period. Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery Market report provides in-depth statistics and analysis available on the market status of the Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery key players and is a valuable method of obtaining guidance and direction for companies and business enterprise insider considering the Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery market. It contains the analysis of drivers, challenges, and restraints impacting the industry.

Segmentation by product type

Targeted Delivery

Drug Package

Get Discount for This Report @ https://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW00013335363/discount

Segmentation by application

Cancer

Tumor

Other

Reason to Buy:

Inquire for Report @ https://www.reportsweb.com/inquiry&RW00013335363/buying

About ReportsWeb:

ReportsWeb.com is a one stop shop of market research reports and solutions to various companies across the globe. We help our clients in their decision support system by helping them choose most relevant and cost effective research reports and solutions from various publishers. We provide best in class customer service and our customer support team is always available to help you on your research queries.

Contact Us:

Call: +1-646-491-9876Email: [emailprotected]

View post:
Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery Market Is Thriving Continuously By Top Key Players like Camurus, Alkermes, Aquanova, Celgene - Jewish Life News

Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market 2020: Insights and Regional Forecast to 2026 Duolingo, Babbel, Rosetta Stone, Memrise and Others – Science…

Global Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market 2020 is analyzed in details, to provide accurate and useful insights and market data that players can perform strong growth in the future. Experts and Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment industry analysts, which makes it legitimate and dependable compile the analysis. Readers have a thorough inspection of historical and futuristic Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment market scenarios to have a good understanding of other issues that are important with the market competition. The report offers Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment information on key players, key sections, market dynamics and assorted niches. It is a complete collection of Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment research and in-depth analysis of the market.

Global Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment market trends provide a basic summary of the including definitions, classes, applications and industry chain analysis. The Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment market analysis is provided for the international markets, including key regions, development status, competitive landscape, and development trends. Plans and policies are discussed, as well as cost structures are analyzed and processes. This Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment report also claims ingestion, demand and supply figures, cost, price, revenue and gross margins.

Get Sample Copy @ https://www.futuristicreports.com/request-sample/65976

Key Players Mentioned at the Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market Trends Report:

Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market: Segmentation

The report gives a breakdown of the Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment market sections, focusing on potential market size, market share and their CAGR for future growth. The industry is divided by product type, application and region. Each segment in these types is the subject of comprehensive Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment research to familiarize yourself with its growth prospects and key trends. The segmental analysis is essential to identify the most important growth factors of a sector. The Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment report offers specific details on market development and demand for applications and products that players may concentrate on their industrial growth.

On the end-users/applications basis, the Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment report concentrates on the status and prognosis for revenue quantity, important applications market share and growth rate for each application, including

On the basis of types, this report shows the revenue quantity, revenue (USD), Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment market share and growth rate, largely split into

Get Impressive Discount with this particular account at: https://www.futuristicreports.com/check-discount/65976

Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market: Regional analysis includes:

Global Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market Report Structure at a Brief:

Enquire more about the report at: https://www.futuristicreports.com/send-an-enquiry/65976

Email:[emailprotected]

Visit our website:https://www.futuristicreports.com

Phone: +1 (408) 520 9037

Country: United States

Go here to read the rest:
Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment Market 2020: Insights and Regional Forecast to 2026 Duolingo, Babbel, Rosetta Stone, Memrise and Others - Science...

Hebrew University Gets $4.2 Million From Rothschild Foundation for Coronavirus Fight – Algemeiner

The entrance to Hebrew University of Jerusalems Mount Scopus campus. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem has received a $4.2 million donation from the Edmond de Rothschild Foundation to fund coronavirus research.

The money will be used to fund 60 Hebrew University research teams that are working to find a vaccine, produce faster and cheaper testing methods, and develop targeted treatments for those afflicted by COVID-19, a press release said.

Professor Asher Cohen the president of Hebrew University stated, Since the outbreak of the pandemic, many researchers and laboratories at the Hebrew University have been working tirelessly to develop a scientific solution to the corona challenge. Several of these efforts are already close to market.

Baroness Ariane de Rothschild said, We see science as a key tool for enhancing human capabilities, and it is symbolic that Israel, with its world-leading academic institutions and medical centers, would lead also on this front. The Rothschild family stands beside Israel and I am sure that together, we will overcome this crisis.

April 14, 2020 1:06 pm

Miki Kliger the Rothschild Foundation vice chairman noted, As in the past, the Rothschild family stands by the State of Israel during its difficult times. Alongside its day-to-day activities to reduce gaps in Israeli society through higher education, the Edmond de Rothschild Foundation is committed to helping the State of Israel and its residents through this current pandemic.

Professor Reem Sari Hebrew Universitys vice president for research and development said, The Edmond de Rothschild Foundations generous donation will shorten the timeline for much needed corona diagnostic kits and treatments. I would like to personally thank all the researchers, lab assistants and students who have mobilized 24/7 to wipe out the virus.

Professor Uriel Lev the director of Hebrew Universitys Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology said, My deepest thanks to the nanotechnology researchers at Hebrew University. Theyve been working around the clock to find diverse solutions for this global threat, efforts that will ensure a swift return to our pre-corona lives.

More here:
Hebrew University Gets $4.2 Million From Rothschild Foundation for Coronavirus Fight - Algemeiner

Alex Garland on ‘Devs,’ free will and quantum computing – Engadget

Garland views Amaya as a typical Silicon Valley success story. In the world of Devs, it's the first company that manages to mass produce quantum computers, allowing them to corner that market. (Think of what happened to search engines after Google debuted.) Quantum computing has been positioned as a potentially revolutionary technology for things like healthcare and encryption, since it can tackle complex scenarios and data sets more effectively than traditional binary computers. Instead of just processing inputs one at a time, a quantum machine would theoretically be able to tackle an input in multiple states, or superpositions, at once.

By mastering this technology, Amaya unlocks a completely new view of reality: The world is a system that can be decoded and predicted. It proves to them that the world is deterministic. Our choices don't matter; we're all just moving along predetermined paths until the end of time. Garland is quick to point out that you don't need anything high-tech to start asking questions about determinism. Indeed, it's something that's been explored since Plato's allegory of the cave.

"What I did think, though, was that if a quantum computer was as good at modeling quantum reality as it might be, then it would be able to prove in a definitive way whether we lived in a deterministic state," Garland said. "[Proving that] would completely change the way we look at ourselves, the way we look at society, the way society functions, the way relationships unfold and develop. And it would change the world in some ways, but then it would restructure itself quickly."

The sheer difficulty of coming up with something -- anything -- that's truly spontaneous and isn't causally related to something else in the universe is the strongest argument in favor of determinism. And it's something Garland aligns with personally -- though that doesn't change how he perceives the world.

"Whether or not you or I have free will, both of us could identify lots of things that we care about," he said. "There are lots of things that we enjoy or don't enjoy. Or things that we're scared of, or we anticipate. And all of that remains. It's not remotely affected by whether we've got free will or not. What might be affected is, I think, our capacity to be forgiving in some respects. And so, certain kinds of anti-social or criminal behavior, you would start to think about in terms of rehabilitation, rather than punishment. Because then, in a way, there's no point punishing someone for something they didn't decide to do."

More here:
Alex Garland on 'Devs,' free will and quantum computing - Engadget

RAND report finds that, like fusion power and Half Life 3, quantum computing is still 15 years away – The Register

Quantum computers pose an "urgent but manageable" threat to the security of modern communications systems, according to a report published Thursday by influential US RAND Corporation.

The non-profit think tank's report, "Securing Communications in the Quantum Computing Age: Managing the Risks to Encryption," urges the US government to act quickly because quantum code-breaking could be a thing in, say, 12-15 years.

If adequate implementation of new security measures has not taken place by the time capable quantum computers are developed, it may become impossible to ensure secure authentication and communication privacy without major, disruptive changes, said Michael Vermeer, a RAND scientist and lead author of the report in a statement.

Experts in the field of quantum computing like University of Texas at Austin computer scientist Scott Aaronson have proposed an even hazier timeline.

Noting that the quantum computers built by Google and IBM have been in the neighborhood of 50 to 100 quantum bits (qubits) and that running Shor's algorithm to break public key RSA cryptosystems would probably take several thousand logical qubits meaning millions of physical qubits due to error correction Aaronson recently opined, "I dont think anyone is close to that, and we have no idea how long it will take."

But other boffins, like University of Chicago computer science professor Diana Franklin, have suggested Shor's algorithm might be a possibility in a decade and a half.

So even though quantum computing poses a theoretical threat to most current public-key cryptography and less risk for lattice-based, symmetric, privacy key, post-quantum, and quantum cryptography there's not much consensus about how and when this threat might manifest itself.

Nonetheless, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the US government agency overseeing tech standards, has been pushing the development of quantum-resistant cryptography since at least 2016. Last year it winnowed a list of proposed post-quantum crypto (PQC) algorithms down to a field of 26 contenders.

The RAND report anticipates quantum computers capable of crypto-cracking will be functional by 2033, with the caveat that experts propose dates both before and after that. PQC algorithm standards should gel within the next five years, with adoption not expected until the mid-to-late 2030s, or later.

But the amount of time required for the US and the rest of the world to fully implement those protocols to mitigate the risk of quantum crypto cracking may take longer still. Note that the US government is still running COBOL applications on ancient mainframes.

"If adequate implementation of PQC has not taken place by the time capable quantum computers are developed, it may become impossible to ensure secure authentication and communication privacy without major, disruptive changes to our infrastructure," the report says.

RAND's report further notes that consumer lack of awareness and indifference to the issue means there will be no civic demand for change.

Hence, the report urges federal leadership to protect consumers, perhaps unaware that Congress is considering the EARN-IT Act, which critics characterize as an "all-out assault on encryption."

"If we act in time with appropriate policies, risk reduction measures, and a collective urgency to prepare for the threat, then we have an opportunity for a future communications infrastructure that is as safe as or more safe than the current status quo, despite overlapping cyber threats from conventional and quantum computers," the report concludes.

It's worth recalling that a 2017 National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report, "Global Health and the Future Role of the United States," urged the US to maintain its focus on global health security and to prepare for infection disease threats.

That was the same year nonprofit PATH issued a pandemic prevention report urging the US government to "maintain its leadership position backed up by the necessary resources to ensure continued vigilance against emerging pandemic threats, both at home and abroad."

The federal government's reaction to COVID-19 is a testament to the impact of reports from external organizations. We can only hope that the threat of crypto-cracking quantum computers elicits a response that's at least as vigorous.

Sponsored: Webcast: Build the next generation of your business in the public cloud

Read the original here:
RAND report finds that, like fusion power and Half Life 3, quantum computing is still 15 years away - The Register

Making Sense of the Science and Philosophy of Devs – The Ringer

Let me welcome you the same way Stewart welcomes Forest in Episode 7 of the Hulu miniseries Devs: with a lengthy, unattributed quote.

We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at any given moment knew all of the forces that animate nature and the mutual positions of the beings that compose it, if this intellect were vast enough to submit the data to analysis, could condense into a single formula the movement of the greatest bodies of the universe and that of the lightest atom; for such an intellect nothing could be uncertain and the future, just like the past, would be present before its eyes.

Its a passage that sounds as if it could have come from Forest himself. But its not from Forest, or Katie, or evenas Katie might guess, based on her response to Stewarts Philip Larkin quoteShakespeare. Its from the French scholar and scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace, who wrote the idea down at the end of the Age of Enlightenment, in 1814. When Laplace imagined an omniscient intellectwhich has come to be called Laplaces demonhe wasnt even saying something original: Other thinkers beat him to the idea of a deterministic, perfectly predictable universe by decades and centuries (or maybe millennia).

All of which is to say that despite the futuristic setting and high-tech trappings of Devsthe eight-part Alex Garland opus that will reach its finale next weekthe series central tension is about as old as the abacus. But theres a reason the debate about determinism and free will keeps recurring: Its an existential question at the heart of human behavior. Devs doesnt answer it in a dramatically different way than the great minds of history have, but it does wrap up ancient, brain-breaking quandaries in a compelling (and occasionally kind of confusing) package. Garland has admitted as much, acknowledging, None of the ideas contained here are really my ideas, and its not that I am presenting my own insightful take. Its more Im saying some very interesting people have come up with some very interesting ideas. Here they are in the form of a story.

Devs is a watchable blend of a few engaging ingredients. Its a spy thriller that pits Russian agents against ex-CIA operatives. Its a cautionary, sci-fi polemic about a potentially limitless technology and the hubris of big tech. Like Garlands previous directorial efforts, Annihilation and Ex Machina, its also a striking aesthetic experience, a blend of brutalist compounds, sleek lines, lush nature, and an exciting, unsettling soundtrack. Most of all, though, its a meditation on age-old philosophical conundrums, served with a garnish of science. Garland has cited scientists and philosophers as inspirations for the series, so to unravel the riddles of Devs, I sought out some experts whose day jobs deal with the dilemmas Lily and Co. confront in fiction: a computer science professor who specializes in quantum computing, and several professors of philosophy.

There are many questions about Devs that we wont be able to answer. How high is Kentons health care premium? Is it distracting to work in a lab lit by a perpetually pulsing, unearthly golden glow? How do Devs programmers get any work done when they could be watching the worlds most riveting reality TV? Devs doesnt disclose all of its inner workings, but by the end of Episode 7, its pulled back the curtain almost as far as it can. The main mystery of the early episodeswhat does Devs do?is essentially solved for the viewer long before Lily learns everything via Katies parable of the pen in Episode 6. As the series proceeds, the spy stuff starts to seem incidental, and the characters motivations become clear. All that remains to be settled is the small matter of the intractable puzzles that have flummoxed philosophers for ages.

Heres what we know. Forest (Nick Offerman) is a tech genius obsessed with one goal: being reunited with his dead daughter, Amaya, who was killed in a car crash while her mother was driving and talking to Forest on the phone. (Hed probably blame himself for the accident if he believed in free will.) He doesnt disguise the fact that he hasnt moved on from Amaya emotionally: He names his company after her, uses her face for its logo, and, in case those tributes were too subtle, installs a giant statue of her at corporate HQ. (As a metaphor for the way Amaya continues to loom over his life, the statue is overly obvious, but at least it looks cool.) Together with a team of handpicked developers, Forest secretly constructs a quantum computer so powerful that, by the end of the penultimate episode, it can perfectly predict the future and reverse-project the past, allowing the denizens of Devs to tune in to any bygone event in lifelike clarity. Its Laplaces demon made real, except for the fact that its powers of perception fail past the point at which Lily is seemingly scheduled to do something that the computer cant predict.

I asked Dr. Scott Aaronson, a professor of computer science at the University of Texas at Austin (and the founding director of the schools Quantum Information Center) to assess Devs depiction of quantum computing. Aaronsons website notes that his research concentrates on the capabilities and limits of quantum computers, so hed probably be one of Forests first recruits if Amaya were an actual company. Aaronson, whom I previously consulted about the plausibility of the time travel in Avengers: Endgame, humored me again and watched Devs despite having been burned before by Hollywoods crimes against quantum mechanics. His verdict, unsurprisingly, is that the quantum computing in Devslike that of Endgame, which cites one of the same physicists (David Deutsch) that Garland said inspired himis mostly hand-wavy window dressing.

A quantum computer is a device that uses a central phenomenon of quantum mechanicsnamely, interference of amplitudesto solve certain problems with dramatically better scaling behavior than any known algorithm running on any existing computer could solve them, Aaronson says. If youre wondering what amplitudes are, you can read Aaronsons explanation in a New York Times op-ed he authored last October, shortly after Google claimed to have achieved a milestone called quantum supremacythe first use of a quantum computer to make a calculation far faster than any non-quantum computer could. According to Googles calculations, the task that its Sycamore microchip performed in a little more than three minutes would have taken 100,000 of the swiftest existing conventional computers 10,000 years to complete. Thats a pretty impressive shortcut, and were still only at the dawn of the quantum computing age.

However, that stat comes with a caveat: Quantum computers arent better across the board than conventional computers. The applications where a quantum computer dramatically outperforms classical computers are relatively few and specialized, Aaronson says. As far as we know today, theyd help a lot with prediction problems only in cases where the predictions heavily involve quantum-mechanical behavior. Potential applications of quantum computers include predicting the rate of a chemical reaction, factoring huge numbers and possibly cracking the encryption that currently protects the internet (using Shors algorithm, which is briefly mentioned on Devs), and solving optimization and machine learning problems. Notice that reconstructing what Christ looked like on the cross is not on this list, Aaronson says.

In other words, the objective that Forest is trying to achieve doesnt necessarily lie within the quantum computing wheelhouse. To whatever extent computers can help forecast plausible scenarios for the past or future at all (as we already have them do for, e.g., weather forecasting), its not at all clear to what extent a quantum computer even helpsone might simply want more powerful classical computers, Aaronson says.

Then theres the problem that goes beyond the question of quantum vs. conventional: Either kind of computer would require data on which to base its calculations, and the data set that the predictions and retrodictions in Devs would demand is inconceivably detailed. I doubt that reconstructing the remote past is really a computational problem at all, in the sense that even the most powerful science-fiction supercomputer still couldnt give you reliable answers if it lacked the appropriate input data, Aaronson says, adding, As far as we know today, the best that any computer (classical or quantum) could possibly do, even in principle, with any data we could possibly collect, is to forecast a range of possible futures, and a range of possible pasts. The data that it would need to declare one of them the real future or the real past simply wouldnt be accessible to humankind, but rather would be lost in microscopic puffs of air, radiation flying away from the earth into space, etc.

In light of the unimaginably high hurdle of gathering enough data in the present to reconstruct what someone looked or sounded like during a distant, data-free age, Forest comes out looking like a ridiculously demanding boss. We get it, dude: You miss Amaya. But how about patting your employees on the back for pulling off the impossible? The idea that chaos, the butterfly effect, sensitive dependence on initial conditions, exponential error growth, etc. mean that you run your simulation 2000 years into the past and you end up with only a blurry, staticky image of Jesus on the cross rather than a clear image, has to be, like, the wildest understatement in the history of understatements, Aaronson says. As for the future, he adds, Predicting the weather three weeks from now might be forever impossible.

On top of all that, Aaronson says, The Devs headquarters is sure a hell of a lot fancier (and cleaner) than any quantum computing lab that Ive ever visited. (Does Kenton vacuum between torture sessions?) At least the computer more or less looks like a quantum computer.

OK, so maybe I didnt need to cajole a quantum computing savant into watching several hours of television to confirm that theres no way we can watch cavepeople paint. Garland isnt guilty of any science sins that previous storytellers havent committed many times. Whenever Aaronson has advised scriptwriters, theyve only asked him to tell them which sciencey words would make their preexisting implausible stories sound somewhat feasible. Its probably incredibly rare that writers would let the actual possibilities and limits of a technology drive their story, he says.

Although the show name-checks real interpretations of quantum mechanicsPenrose, pilot wave, many-worldsit doesnt deeply engage with them. The pilot wave interpretation holds that only one future is real, whereas many-worlds asserts that a vast number of futures are all equally real. But neither one would allow for the possibility of perfectly predicting the future, considering the difficulty of accounting for every variable. Garland is seemingly aware of how far-fetched his story is, because on multiple occasions, characters like Lily, Lyndon, and Stewart voice the audiences unspoken disbelief, stating that something or other isnt possible. Whenever they do, Katie or Forest is there to tell them that it is. Which, well, fine: Like Laplaces demon, Devs is intended as more of a thought experiment than a realistic scenario. As Katie says during her blue pill-red pill dialogue with Lily, Go with it.

We might as well go along with Garland, because any scientific liberties he takes are in service of the seriess deeper ideas. As Aaronson says, My opinion is that the show isnt really talking about quantum computing at allits just using it as a fancy-sounding buzzword. Really its talking about the far more ancient questions of determinism vs. indeterminism and predictability vs. unpredictability. He concludes, The plot of this series is one that wouldve been totally, 100 percent familiar to the ancient Greeksjust swap out the quantum computer for the Delphic Oracle. Aaronsonwho says he sort of likes Devs in spite of its quantum technobabblewould know: He wrote a book called Quantum Computing Since Democritus.

Speaking of Democritus, lets consult a few philosophers on the topic of free will. One of the most mind-bending aspects of Devs adherence to hard determinismthe theory that human behavior is wholly dictated by outside factorsis its insistence that characters cant change their behavior even if theyve seen the computers prediction of what theyre about to do. As Forest asks Katie, What if one minute into the future we see you fold your arms, and you say, Fuck the future. Im a magician. My magic breaks tram lines. Im not going to fold my arms. You put your hands in your pockets, and you keep them there until the clock runs out.

It seems as if she should be able to do what she wants with her hands, but Katie quickly shuts him down. Cause precedes effect, she says. Effect leads to cause. The future is fixed in exactly the same way as the past. The tram lines are real. Of course, Katie could be wrong: A character could defy the computers prediction in the finale. (Perhaps thats the mysterious unforeseeable event.) But weve already seen some characters fail to exit the tram. In an Episode 7 scenewhich, as Aaronson notes, is highly reminiscent of the VHS scene in Spaceballswe see multiple members of the Devs team repeat the same statements that theyve just heard the computer predict they would make a split second earlier. They cant help but make the prediction come true. Similarly, Lily ends up at Devs at the end of Episode 7, despite resolving not to.

Putting aside the implausibility of a perfect prediction existing at all, does it make sense that these characters couldnt deviate from their predicted course? Yes, according to five professors of philosophy I surveyed. Keep in mind what Garland has cited as a common criticism of his work: that the ideas I talk about are sophomoric because theyre the kinds of things that people talk about when theyre getting stoned in their dorm rooms. Were about to enter the stoned zone.

In this story, [the characters] are in a totally deterministic universe, says Ben Lennertz, an assistant professor of philosophy at Colgate University. In particular, the watching of the video of the future itself has been determined by the original state of the universe and the laws. Its not as if things were going along and the person was going to cross their arms, but then a non-deterministic miracle occurred and they were shown a video of what they were going to do. The watching of the video and the persons reaction is part of the same progression as the scene the video is of. In essence, the computer would have already predicted its own predictions, as well as every characters reaction to them. Everything that happens was always part of the plan.

Ohio Wesleyan Universitys Erin Flynn echoes that interpretation. The people in those scenes do what they do not despite being informed that they will do it, but (in part) because they have been informed that they will do it, Flynn says. (Think of Katie telling Lyndon that hes about to balance on the bridge railing.) This is not to say they will be compelled to conform, only that their knowledge presumably forms an important part of the causal conditions leading to their actions. When the computer sees the future, the computer sees that what they will do is necessitated in part by this knowledge. The computer would presumably have made different predictions had people never heard them.

Furthermore, adds David Landy of San Francisco State University, the fact that we see something happen one way doesnt mean that it couldnt have happened otherwise. Suppose we know that some guy is going to fold his arms, Landy says. Does it follow that he lacks the ability to not fold his arms? Well, no, because what we usually mean by has the ability to not fold his arms is that if things had gone differently, he wouldnt have folded his arms. But by stipulating at the start that he is going to fold his arms, we also stipulate that things arent going to go differently. But it can remain true that if they did go differently, he would not have folded his arms. So, he might have that ability, even if we know he is not going to exercise it.

If your head has started spinning, you can see why the Greeks didnt settle this stuff long before Garland got to it. And if it still seems strange that Forest seemingly cant put his hands in his pockets, well, what doesnt seem strange in the world of Devs? We should expect weird things to happen when we are talking about a very weird situation, Landy says. That is, we are used to people reliably doing what they want to do. But we have become used to that by making observations in a certain environment: one without time travel or omniscient computers. Introducing those things changes the environment, so we shouldnt be surprised if our usual inferences no longer hold.

Heres where we really might want to mime a marijuana hit. Neal Tognazzini of Western Washington University points out that one could conceivably appear to predict the future by tapping into a future that already exists. Many philosophers reject determinism but nevertheless accept that there are truths about what will happen in the future, because they accept a view in the philosophy of time called eternalism, which is (roughly) the block universe ideapast, present, and future are all parts of reality, Tognazzini says. This theory says that the past and the future exist some temporal distance from the presentwe just havent yet learned to travel between them. Thus, Tognazzini continues, You can accept eternalism about time without accepting determinism, because the first is just a view about whether the future is real whereas the second is a view about how the future is connected to the past (i.e., whether there are tram lines).

According to that school of thought, the future isnt what has to happen, its simply what will happen. If we somehow got a glimpse of our futures from the present, it might appear as if our paths were fixed. But those futures actually would have been shaped by our freely chosen actions in the interim. As Tognazzini says, Its a fate of our own makingwhich is just to say, no fate at all.

If we accept that the members of Devs know what theyre doing, though, then the computers predictions are deterministic, and the past does dictate the future. Thats disturbing, because it seemingly strips us of our agency. But, Tognazzini says, Even then, its still the case that what we do now helps to shape that future. We still make a difference to what the future looks like, even if its the only difference we could have made, given the tram lines we happen to be on. Determinism isnt like some force that operates independently of what we want, making us marionettes. If its true, then it would apply equally to our mental lives as well, so that the future that comes about might well be exactly the future we wanted.

This is akin to the compatibilist position espoused by David Hume, which seeks to reconcile the seemingly conflicting concepts of determinism and free will. As our final philosopher, Georgetown Universitys William Blattner, says, If determinism is to be plausible, it must find a way to save the appearances, in this case, explain why we feel like were choosing, even if at some level the choice is an illusion. The compatibilist perspective concedes that there may be only one possible future, but, Flynn says, insists that there is a difference between being causally determined (necessitated) to act and being forced or compelled to act. As long as one who has seen their future does not do what has been predicted because they were forced to do it (against their will, so to speak), then they will still have done it freely.

In the finale, well find out whether the computers predictions are as flawless and inviolable as Katie claims. Well also likely learn one of Devs most closely kept secrets: What Forest intends to do with his perfect model of Amaya. The show hasnt hinted that the computer can resurrect the dead in any physical fashion, so unless Forest is content to see his simulated daughter on a screen, he may try to enter the simulation himself. In Episode 7, Devs seemed to set the stage for such a step; as Stewart said, Thats the reality right there. Its not even a clone of reality. The box contains everything.

Would a simulated Forest, united with his simulated daughter, be happier inside the simulation than he was in real life, assuming hes aware hes inside the simulation? The philosopher Robert Nozick explored a similar question with his hypothetical experience machine. The experience machine would stimulate our brains in such a way that we could supply as much pleasure as we wanted, in any form. It sounds like a nice place to visit, and yet most of us wouldnt want to live there. That reluctance to enter the experience machine permanently seems to suggest that we see some value in an authentic connection to reality, however unpleasurable. Thinking Im hanging out with my family and friends is just different from actually hanging out with my family and friends, Tognazzini says. And since I think relationships are key to happiness, Im skeptical that we could be happy in a simulation.

If reality were painful enough, though, the relief from that pain might be worth the sacrifice. Suppose, for instance, that the real world had become nearly uninhabitable or otherwise full of misery, Flynn says. It seems to me that life in a simulation might be experienced as a sanctuary. Perhaps ones experience there would be tinged with sadness for the lost world, but Im not sure knowing its a simulation would necessarily keep one from being happy in it. Forest still seems miserable about Amaya IRL, so for him, that trade-off might make sense.

Whats more, if real life is totally deterministic, then Forest may not draw a distinction between life inside and outside of his quantum computer. If freedom is a critical component of fulfillment, then its hard to see how we could be fulfilled in a simulation, Blattner says. But for Forest, freedom isnt an option anywhere. Something about the situation seems sad, maybe pathetic, maybe even tragic, Flynn says. But if the world is a true simulation in the matter described, why not just understand it as the ability to visit another real world in which his daughter exists?

Those who subscribe to the simulation hypothesis believe that what we think of as real lifeincluding my experience of writing this sentence and your experience of reading itis itself a simulation created by some higher order of being. In our world, it may seem dubious that such a sophisticated creation could exist (or that anything or anyone would care to create it). But in Forests world, a simulation just as sophisticated as real life already exists inside Devswhich means that what Forest perceives as real life could be someone elses simulation. If hes possibly stuck inside a simulation either way, he might as well choose the one with Amaya (if he has a choice at all).

Garland chose to tell this story on TV because on the big screen, he said, it would have been slightly too truncated. On the small screen, its probably slightly too long: Because weve known more than Lily all along, what shes learned in later episodes has rehashed old info for us. Then again, Devs has felt familiar from the start. If Laplace got a pass for recycling Cicero and Leibniz, well give Garland a pass for channeling Laplace. Whats one more presentation of a puzzle thats had humans flummoxed forever?

See the rest here:
Making Sense of the Science and Philosophy of Devs - The Ringer

Technology alliances will help shape our post-pandemic future – C4ISRNet

Theres no question the post-corona world will be very different. How it will look depends on actions the worlds leaders take. Decisions made in coming months will determine whether we see a renewed commitment to a rules-based international order, or a fragmented world increasingly dominated by authoritarianism. Whomever steps up to lead will drive the outcome.

China seeks the mantle of global leadership. Beijing is exploiting the global leadership vacuum, the fissures between the United States and its allies, and the growing strain on European unity. The Chinese Communist Party has aggressively pushed a narrative of acting swiftly and decisively to contain the virus, building goodwill through mask diplomacy, and sowing doubts about the virus origin to deflect blame for the magnitude of the crisis and to rewrite history. Even though the results so far are mixed, the absence of the United States on the global stage provides Beijing with good momentum.

Before the pandemic, the worlds democracies already faced their gravest challenge in decades: the shift of economic power to illiberal states. By late 2019, autocratic regimes accounted for a larger share of global GDP than democracies for the first time since 1900. As former U.K. foreign secretary David Miliband recently observed, liberal democracy is in retreat. How the United States and like-minded partners respond post-pandemic will determine if that trend holds.

There is urgency to act the problem is now even more acute. The countries that figure out how to quickly restart and rebuild their economies post-pandemic will set the course for the 21st century. It is not only economic heft that is of concern: political power and military might go hand in hand with economic dominance.

At the center of this geostrategic and economic competition are technologies artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and 5G that will be the backbone of the 21st century economy. Leadership and ongoing innovation in these areas will confer critical economic, political, and military power, and the opportunity to shape global norms and values. The pre-crisis trajectory of waning clout in technology development, standards-setting, and proliferation posed an unacceptable and avoidable challenge to the interests of the worlds leading liberal-democratic states.

The current crisis accentuates this even more: it lays bare the need to rethink and restructure global supply chains; the imperative of ensuring telecommunication networks are secure, robust, and resilient; the ability to surge production of critical materiel, and the need to deter and counteract destructive disinformation. This is difficult and costly and it is best done in concert.

Bold action is needed to set a new course that enhances the ability of the worlds democracies to out-compete increasingly capable illiberal states. The growing clout of authoritarian regimes is not rooted in better strategy or more effective statecraft. Rather, it lies in the fractious and complacent nature of the worlds democracies and leading technology powers.

In response, a new multilateral effort an alliance framework is needed to reverse these trends. The worlds technology and democracy leaders the G7 members and countries like Australia, the Netherlands, and South Korea should join forces to tackle matters of technology policy. The purpose of this initiative is three-fold: one, regain the initiative in the global technology competition through strengthened cooperation between like-minded countries; two, protect and preserve key areas of competitive technological advantage; and three, promote collective norms and values around the use of emerging technologies.

Sign up for the C4ISRNET newsletter about future battlefield technologies.

(please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Subscribe

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the C4ISRNET Daily Brief.

Such cooperation is vital to effectively deal with the hardest geopolitical issues that increasingly center on technology, from competing economically to building deterrence to combating disinformation. This group should not be an exclusive club: it should also work with countries like Finland and Sweden to align policies on telecommunications; Estonia, Israel, and New Zealand for cyber issues; and states around the world to craft efforts to counter the proliferation of Chinese surveillance technology and offer sound alternatives to infrastructure development, raw material extraction, and loans from China that erode their sovereignty.

The spectrum of scale and ambition this alliance can tackle is broad. Better information sharing would yield benefits on matters like investment screening, counterespionage, and fighting disinformation. Investments in new semiconductor fabs could create more secure and diverse supply chains. A concerted effort to promote open architecture in 5G could usher in a paradigm shift for an entire industry. Collaboration will also be essential to avoiding another pandemic calamity.

Similar ideas are percolating among current and former government leaders in capitals such as Tokyo, Berlin, London, and Washington, with thought leaders like Jared Cohen and Anja Manuel, and in think tanks around the world. The task at hand is to collate these ideas, find the common ground, and devise an executable plan. This requires tackling issues like organizational structure, governance, and institutionalization. It also requires making sure that stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society from around the world provide input to make the alliance framework realistic and successful.

No one country can expect to achieve its full potential by going it alone, not even the United States. An alliance framework for technology policy is the best way to ensure that the worlds democracies can effectively compete economically, politically, and militarily in the 21st century. The links between the worlds leading democracies remain strong despite the challenges of the current crisis. These relationships are an enduring and critical advantage that no autocratic country can match. It is time to capitalize on these strengths, retake the initiative, and shape the post-corona world.

Martijn Rasser is a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

Follow this link:
Technology alliances will help shape our post-pandemic future - C4ISRNet

Longevity Gene May Protect against a Notorious Alzheimers Risk Gene – Scientific American

Consumer genetic tests can sometimes result in a terrible surprise appearing in the same report that divulges whether one has a cilantro aversion or wet or dry earwax. Test takers may receive the devastating news that they have a version of a geneapolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE e4)that greatly increases their chances of getting Alzheimers disease. The shock can be so great that some will seek solace in a support group to help them adjust to the possibility that they could run into cognitive problems beginning in their 50s or 60s.

One thing that makes the information so difficult to absorb is that there is no certainty about it. A person with one copy of the APOE e4 gene is more than three times as likely to wind up with Alzheimers (one copy can be inherited from each parent). A hit of two copies increases the risk by 10 times or more. APOE e4 may also reduce the age of the diseases onset by up to a decade.

Still, not everyone who is an APOE e4 carrier will ultimately receive a diagnosis for Alzheimers, the most common form of dementia. Given the ambiguities, scientists have long wondered whether other genes might counterbalance APOE e4's effects. A new paper may have found a candidate for just such a gene.

An analysis across multiple studieswith results from more than 20,000 individualsfound that APOE e4 carriers between the ages of 60 and 80 who also had a particular variant of a gene called klotho (named for Clotho, one of the Greek Fates, who spins the threadof life) were 30 percent less likely to receive an Alzheimer's diagnosis than carriers without it. People in their late 70s with a single copy of the klotho variant were also less apt to experience the initial cognitive losses (mild cognitive impairments) that often precede an Alzheimers diagnosis. Study participants with the relevant variant also had reduced signs of the hallmark clumps of beta-amyloid protein that turn up in the brain before symptoms arise.

The new study was published on Monday in JAMA Neurology. Two smaller investigations conducted in recent years had looked at whether klotho, a purported longevity gene, might provide some benefit for APOE e4 carriers. One of those studies affirmed thatthe gene variant did so, and the other suggested the opposite. Michael Greiciussenior author of the JAMA Neurology paper, an associate professor of neurology at Stanford University and medical director of the Stanford Center for Memory Disordershad been considering doing research on klotho when he learned of the study with negative results. I was kind of prepared to throw in the towel, he says. But Michael Belloy [of Stanford], the first author on the [new] paper, had already gotten his teeth into this, thankfully. And we got all of these data sets about these APOE e4 interactions. And [they are] really quite strong and consistent.

The klotho variant studied by Greicius and his Stanford colleagues is not rare. Of the 10,000 subjects with at least one copy of APOE e4 examined by the researchers within the larger data compilation, there were 2,700 who carried the advantageous variant. APOE e4 is not uncommon either: the gene turns up in at least 15 to 20 percent of the population. It is present, however, in about half of the more than five million Alzheimers cases in the U.S.

The new finding may add precision to the design of clinical trials and could potentially provide ideas for therapeutics. APOE e4 carriers are sometimes recruited for studies of drugs to prevent Alzheimers because of the likelihood that they will get the disease. Excluding carriers who have the klotho variant might ensure that the pool of study participants is truly at high risk, as intended. Greicius and his colleagues conclusions might also lead to new drug targets. The whole pathway of proteins that involve klotho and its interaction with APOE e4 is now worth pursuing, he says.

Other scientists who were not involved with the research agree that the new results warrant taking a closer look at klotho. I think these are important findings, and this genetic variant should be considered for incorporation into ongoing and future clinical research related to [Alzheimers], says David M. Holtzman, a professor and chair of the department of neurology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. He says that human-, animal- and cell-based research should now investigate why the klotho variant may partially protect APOE e4 carriersand whether it might help early or late in the course of the disease. New studies must also focus on people who are not of northwestern European descent, as were those in the Stanford paper.

I think this is an exciting finding, says Guojun Bu, who researches the APOE gene and is a professor and chair of the department of neuroscience at the Mayo Clinic. He points out that whereas klotho is considered a longevity gene, APOE e4 has been found to shorten life spans in humanseven when its link to Alzheimer's was discounted. But scientists have suspected that there are other genes that protect against its ill effects. In the case of klotho, a longevity gene may be countering an antilongevity one.

The Stanford study, Bu says, needs support from other research that examines klotho levels in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid and compares them with various measures of Alzheimer'sbiomarkers andpathology. Mice carrying a human version of the APOE e4 gene might also be used to look for relevant biological pathways that could explain these findings. And even some behavioral factors could be scrutinized.As several lifestyle factors, including exercise and diet, are known to protect against APOE e4related risk, Bu says, it would also be interesting to examine whether they alter the levels of klotho as a potential underlying mechanism.

Dena Dubal, a klotho researcher who is an associate professor at the University of California, San Francisco, and an associate editor for JAMA Neurology, co-authored an accompanying commentary that called for further research on questions such as whether the gene could diminish APOE e4s disruption of cellular and brain-network activity. The study carries exciting implications for future therapies, she says. One wonders whether giving a boost of the klotho hormone itself, which drops in aging and Alzheimers disease, could be a new treatment for individuals in preventing or treating Alzheimers disease.

Read the original:
Longevity Gene May Protect against a Notorious Alzheimers Risk Gene - Scientific American

Conversion Labs Appoints Award-Winning Physician, Dr. Jeremy Fine, to Advisory Board to Advance Telemedicine Brand Portfolio – Benzinga

NEW YORK, April 14, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Conversion Labs, Inc.(OTCQB:CVLB), a direct-to-consumer telemedicine and wellness company, has appointed Dr. Jeremy Fine, a noted expert in internal medicine, to its medical advisory board.

Dr. Fine will be involved in guiding and advancing Conversion Labs' expanding portfolio of telemedicine brands that include Rex MD, Shapiro MDand SOS Rx, as well as future brands and products under development.

Dr. Fine brings to Conversion Labs more than 15 years of award-winning medical experience, innovation and accomplishment. Los Angeles Magazine named Dr. Fine one of LA's Best Physicians for his exemplary skills and innovative approach to medicine. He has also been named one of California's Favorite Physicians by Patients' Choice and Most Compassionate Doctor by Consumer Research. He has been ranked as a Top 10 Doctor by Vitals and among Top Doctors by Castle Connolly for delivering the best in American medicine.

Dr. Fine has practiced medicine and lectured in cities across the globe, including Oslo, Sydney, Nagasaki, and Tel Aviv. Board certified in Internal Medicine, Dr. Fine completed his medical training at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, which is rankedamong the top 10 hospitals in the country. The hospital appointed Dr. Fine as its Chief Resident to teach physicians and medical students the art of medicine.

"We expect Dr. Fine's leadership and extensive medical experience to provide valuable insights and guidance as we continue to grow our portfolio of telemedicine and wellness brands," commented Justin Schreiber, CEO of Conversion Labs. "Dr. Fine's background and top ranking among his peers reflects the exceptional quality of our team of advisors which is helping us fulfill our mission of creating proprietary prescription and OTC products that can dramatically improve health or health security, and are convenient and accessible for patients."

Dr. Fine has been a clinical instructor of medicine at David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Keck School of Medicine of USC, and served on the bioethics committee and the medical informatics committee at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. He earned his Bachelor of Arts in Biology from UCLA and Yeshiva University, and medical degree from the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv.

"I'm excited to join Conversion Labs at this pivotal time in its growth and development, especially with the recent launches of Rex MD and SOS Rx," said Dr. Fine. "Telehealth is an important part of the future of medicine, as patients increasingly seek a more convenient way to obtain medical treatment and prescription medications. Conversion Labs has done a phenomenal job integrating telemedicine with an exceptional product offering designed to provide a higher quality of healthcare for a large number of patients across the country."

The company launched Rex MD as its first telemedicine brand last December. Rex MD has been initially focused on treating erectile dysfunction (ED), with the global ED market expected to exceed $2.9 billion by 2023. Rex MD plans to soon offer treatments for longevity, strength and endurance, hair loss, skin care and other indications.

Conversion Labs recently reportedits sales jumped 50% to $12.5 million in 2019. Extensive investments in telemedicine, technology, brand development, and customer acquisition in 2019 have been helping to accelerate the company's growth. Its annualized revenue run rate hit $18 million in the first quarter of 2020, setting revenue on track to exceed $30 million for the year.

Telemedicine sales of newly launched brands and brand extensions support this positive outlook. Under development long before the global outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus, Conversion Lab's new SOS Rx Disaster Pack provides a formulated package of prescription drugs for use in the event of similar disaster scenarios, including flu epidemics, radiological exposure or bioterrorism.

The company also recently receivedFDA 510(k) clearance for its new hair regrowth product, the Shapiro MD Laser Hair Restoration Device. The device addresses the global hair restoration market that is growing at a 4.6% compounded annual growth rate and expected to exceed $12 billion by 2026.

About Conversion LabsConversion Labs, Inc. is a health and wellness focused e-commerce company with a portfolio of online direct-to-consumer brands. The company's proprietary over-the-counter products and formulated medications can be prescribed online by Conversion Labs' network of licensed telehealth physicians across the U.S. To learn more, please visit ConversionLabs.com.

Important Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This news release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding, among other things our plans, strategies and prospects -- both business and financial. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this news release may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "should," "planned," "will," "may," "intend," "estimated," and "potential," among others. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this news release include market conditions and those set forth in reports or documents that we file from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements attributable to Conversion Labs, Inc. or a person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary language.

Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Company ContactConversion LabsJuan Manuel Pieiro DagneryCFOEmail Contact

Conversion Labs Investor & Media Relations ContactRon Both or Grant StudeCMA Investor RelationsTel (949) 432-7566Email Contact

Read the original here:
Conversion Labs Appoints Award-Winning Physician, Dr. Jeremy Fine, to Advisory Board to Advance Telemedicine Brand Portfolio - Benzinga

the healing-power-of-magic psilocybin-mushrooms – Longevity LIVE

Psilocybin mushrooms are making a comeback after decades of being demonized. Magic mushrooms were banned in the 70s, despite having important medicinal qualities. Today scientists from leading institutions are acknowledging that under medical supervision and in small amounts, psilocybin mushrooms have the potential to treat serious psychological disorders.

Some historians believe that psilocybin mushrooms may have been used as far back as 9000 B.C. in North African indigenous cultures. Evidenced by representations in rock paintings. Statues and other representatives of what appear to be mushrooms have also been found in Mayan and Aztec ruins in Central America. The Aztecs used a substance called teonancatl, which means flesh of the gods, that could refer to magic mushrooms. Along with peyote, morning glory seeds and other naturally occurring psychotropics, the mushrooms were used to induce a trance, produce visions, and communicate with the gods. When Spanish Catholic missionary priests came to the New World in the 16th century, they wrote about the use of these psychotropic substances.

There is further confirmed use among several contemporary tribes of indigenous peoples in Central America, including the Mazatec, Mixtec, Nauhua and Zapatec.

As mentioned, humans have consumed psilocybin, the naturally occurring psychedelic compound found in magic mushrooms, for more than 10,000 years. By the mid 20th century, the context was religious and for healing purposes. That all changed on June 29, 1955, when a banker at J.P. Morgan named R. Gordon Wasson traveled to Mexico with a photographer to the mud hut of the Mazatec curandera (medicine woman) called Mara Sabina. She shared a magic mushroom preparation that her tribe had been taking for thousands of years. Wesson and his photographer became first white men in recorded history to eat the divine mushrooms.

The banker went on to share his experiences in a LIFEmagazine in 1957, in an article titled Seeking the Magic Mushroom,

Leading French botanist Roger Heim read about Wassons experience. Known for his studies describing the anatomy of mushroom hymenium, Heim enlisted the help of Albert Hofmann (the father of LSD), who isolated and extracted psilocybin and psilocin from some mushrooms Wasson brought back. [Source: Harvard University].

Timothy Leary, perhaps the most famous proponent of psychotropic drugs such as LSD, also read the LIFEarticle and was intrigued.

From 1960 already Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert, two promising young psychologists at Harvard University, had started to investigate the effects of psychotropic substances on the human mind.

Psychology, they argued, had a legitimate interest in how cognition, perception, and emotion are affected by mind-altering substances. At the time, the possible dangers of researching such substances were not as well known as they were in subsequent decades.

Leary began experimenting with psilocybin mushrooms at Harvard University. From there, magic mushrooms became inextricably tied to the hippie movement and its search for a new form of spirituality for the rest of the decade. [Source: Harvard University].

At the time of Leary and Alperts research at Harvard, neither LSD nor psilocybin were illegal substances in the United States.

By 1962 various faculty members and administrators at Harvard were concerned about the safety of Leary and Alperts research subjects, and critiqued the rigor of their unorthodox methodology. Leary and Alperts colleagues challenged the scientific merit of their research, as well as what has been described in reports as the seemingly cavalier attitude with which it was carried out (e.g. poorly controlled conditions, non-random selection of subjects). Editorials printed by Harvard Crimson accused Alpert and Leary of not merely researching psychotropic drugs, but also actively promoting their recreational use.

I learned more about my brain and its possibilities and more about psychology in the five hours after taking these mushrooms than in the preceding 15 years of studying and doing research in psychology. Dr. Timothy Leary

Leary and Alpert insisted on the scientific purpose of their endeavors, and agreed to policies intended to protect their subjects. This included a prohibition on participation by undergraduate students. Initially, Leary and Alpert only used volunteer (if not fully informed) graduate students in their research.

Leary and Alpert developed pioneering concepts in psychedelic therapy such as set and setting. They tested whether ingesting psilocybin could reduce recidivism in prison inmates (in the Concord Prison Experiment) and catalyze religiou

s experiences in divinity students (in the Marsh Chapel Good Friday Experiment). The results were ringing endorsements of psilocybins mystical and therapeutic potential. However, the experiments were later discredited due to unsound methodology. Also for omitting details related to the intense anxiety experienced by many of the participants. However, in the spring of 1963 Harvard was forced to dismiss Alpert after he administered psilocybin to an undergraduate student off-campus. Leary was also fired from the university. The Harvard Psilocybin Project came to an abrupt end.

Discredited by their lack of scientific rigor and failure to observe established research guidelines, Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert were both banished from academia.

This did not end their public lives: both men went on to become icons of the psychedelic drug, counterculture, and human potential movement. Indeed, Leary became famous for the slogan Tune in, Turn On, Drop Out: Alpert, Alpert traveled to India and according to articles written in the day came back bearded, wearing a dhoti, and calling himself Ram Dass. By 1966, psilocybin and LSD were illegal in the United States. Under the name Baba Ram Dass, Alpert wrote a popular book called Be Here Now, described as a modern spiritual classic.

Unknowingly, when all was said and done Wesson had opened a Pandoras Box that would see, among other things, the birth of the American psychedelic counterculture, but also the defilement of the ancient mushroom ritual. In the end, psilocybin mushrooms were banned across much of the world.

According to a story published Timeline, by Ahmed Kabil; The article in LIFE and subsequent attention also led to Sabinas ruin, as Westerners came to her by the hundreds. The publicity was disastrous for the Mazatec community, who blamed Sabina for bringing misfortune to the village and defiling the velada ritual. Sabinas house was burned down, and federales frequently raided her home. He was accused of selling drugs to foreigners. Hippies rented cabins in neighboring villages and on some bad trips and went raving naked through town.

I realized the young people with long hair didnt need me to eat the little things. Kids ate them anywhere and anytime, and they didnt respect our customs.

Mara Sabina

It was inevitable that the misuse of a sacred tradition would result in a widespread ban. After 1970, as the US led a war on drugs, LSD, psilocybin and mescaline were designated Schedule 1 substances in the UN Conventions on Drugs. This meant they could not be prescribed by medical doctors outside of an authorised research study.

Mexican authorities also banned the use of psilocybin mushrooms.

Funding for such studies dried up in the wake of hardening socio-political attitudes towards psychoactive substances. Clinical research in psychiatry came to a standstill without a clear view about whether the drugs were safe and effective when compared to placebo or other treatments.

This is how psilocybin mushrooms became demonized over three decades. Until recently.

Forty years later, there has been a rethink about the health benefits of these mushrooms. While this may be slow, there appears to be a steady resurgence of clinical research interest into psilocybin.

Indeed, in October 2018, the Food & Drug Administration granted Compass Pathways permission to research mushrooms as a treatment for depression. Researchers plan to combine intense therapy with psilocybin. They hope to find better ways to combat treatment-resistant depression, which they say affects about 100 million people worldwide.

In September 2019, Johns Hopkins University unveiled its Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research. Scientists at Johns Hopkins plan to evaluate psilocybin as a possible treatment for everything. From opioid addiction, Lyme disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, nicotine and alcohol dependency, and many other ailments.

There are growing numbers of studies supporting their claims. All of them seek to unlock the way magic mushrooms and their compounds interact with our brains and bodies. Perhaps their work will unlock the doors of perception in our minds in ways we cant yet even begin to imagine.

It may well be that the once outlawed, magic mushrooms may now be used in a manner much closer to what Mara Sabina considered to be their true purpose: to heal the sick. Today, magical fungi are finding broader acceptance in popular culture. Some people have taken up whats called microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms. Consuming tiny amounts of the chemical. They dont experience full-blown trips. Instead, they feel a boost in mood and creativity that lowers their anxiety and makes them more productive.

Psychedelics could help some people who are stuck in the process of therapy. Psilocybin mushrooms delivered within a medically controlled environment with a trusted therapist could be very helpful and lower any risk of serious adverse events.

Researchers caution that psychedelics are most likely not safe for people with psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Or for people who were predisposed to developing these conditions.

According to the researchers at Kings College, psilocybin mushrooms work on the serotonin system, relaxing the brain mechanisms that mediate thought and behaviour. As this happens, old patterns dissolve and a therapeutic window of opportunity is introduced. Patients receiving psilocybin describe it as like a waking dream, with new insights and understanding emerging about why they are suffering.

Kings College in London is also in the process of determining if and how these mushrooms could be used as a legitimate treatment for depression.

After treatment, therapists would then work with patients to help them solidify more helpful perspectives on their difficulties. This would include a plan of what they are going to do on an ongoing basis to change their lives for the better.

The findings to date are hopeful. Some patients are reporting enduring, positive benefits from only a single treatment dose of psilocybin. And with no ongoing need for daily medication.

Experiences under psilocybin are not dangerous, but can be psychologically challenging because strong emotions or memories may arise. This affirms the need for a safe environment and a trusting relationship with an experienced therapist.

Importantly, researchers who are testing the efficacy of this substance will only give people psilocybin mushrooms in a dedicated hospital facility. Along with full support from doctors, nurses and psychotherapists. They will never give people psilocybin to take home. Also, the psilocybin used in trials is not derived from pure mushrooms. Its manufactured to the same standard as any medicine prescribed by your doctor.

The science also suggests that this therapy may not work for everyone.

Other scientists interested in mushrooms include Dr. Stephen Ross, associate professor of psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry at NYU Langone Health. He told CNN their studies had also delivered promising results.

A single dose of psilocybin, a compound found in magic mushrooms, provides long-term relief of anxiety and depression in cancer patients. Dr Ross confirmed.

In fact, cancer patients who were given psilocybin reported reductions in anxiety, depression, hopelessness, demoralization, and death anxiety more than four years after receiving the dose in combination with psychotherapy.

Our findings strongly suggest that psilocybin therapy is a promising means of improving the emotional, psychological, and spiritual well-being of patients with life-threatening cancer.

The findings build on improvements first reported by the team already back in 2016, before the Compass grant. Then 29 patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression were given either a single dose of psilocybin or a vitamin placebo called niacin.

Seven weeks later, they were given the opposite. This was in combination with nine psychotherapy sessions.

By 6 months, after all patients had received psilocybin, about 60% to 80% showed clinically significant reductions in depression, anxiety and existential distress and improved attitudes toward death.

A study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirmed people who had recently used psychedelics such as psilocybin reported a sustained improvement in mood and feeling closer to others after the high had worn off.

The results of a field study of more than 1,200 people attending multi-day arts and music festivals in the United States and United Kingdom confirm previous laboratory research indicating that psychedelic substances enhance feelings of social connectedness and improve mental well-being, the authors say.

Our results show that people who take psychedelics in the wild report positive experiences very similar to those observed in controlled laboratory studies, said Yales Matthias Forstmann, postdoctoral fellow and first author of the paper.

Senior author and assistant professor of psychologyMolly Crockett and her team visited half a dozen festivals. They asked attendees who were not then under the influence of psychedelics about their recent social experiences, mood and substance use. By surveying them, the researchers were able to characterize the psychological effects of the afterglow of psychedelic experiences.

The team found that people who recently took psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin, more commonly known as magic mushrooms, were more likely to report having transformative experiences. They were so profound that they came out of the experience radically changed, including changes to their moral values.

Transformative experiences, in turn, were associated with feelings of social connectedness and positive mood. The most pronounced effects were reported by psychedelic users who had taken the drugs within the past 24 hours.

People who abstained from substance use, drank alcohol or took other drugs such as cocaine or opioids did not report transformative experiences, increased connectedness with others or a positive mood to the same degree, the study showed.

Crockett cautioned that the study was not designed to assess negative reactions, which have been reported with recreational drug use.

Further studies are necessary to learn which environmental factors are associated with positive versus negative psychedelic experiences, she said. But the findings add to a body of evidence suggesting psychedelic substances may have potential as therapy for mood disorders.

We are encouraged that our study is consistent with previous laboratory findings showing mood benefits of psychedelics in healthy people and in patients suffering from anxiety and depression, she said.

Subjects who undergo other clinical trials say they feel like they have undergone five years of therapy in five hours. Others attest to life-changing experiences. We can believe this statement because theres scientific research to prove it.

Researchers at Princeton University also found that people who recently took psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin, or magic mushrooms, were more likely to report having transformative experiences. Apparently, these experiences were so profound that they came out of the experience radically changed, including changes to their moral values. Transformative experiences are associated with feelings of social connectedness and positive mood. Subjects stated that they experienced the effects within the first 24 hours.

In other studies psychedelics like psilocybin mushrooms were to be shown to help change how information moves through our brains. This is groundbreaking because depression and anxiety are only getting worse. Theyre such common conditions amongst mental health diagnoses. Thats why we need more medicinal studies to determine if we can use psychedelic drugs as a potential treatment option.

Depression isnt going anywhere. In fact, its getting worse and our anti-depressants are not even close to perfect. We need something else to bridge the gap. If you are able to legitimately access psilocybin mushrooms, it could offer benefits that current depression treatments do not. Mental health experts are working hard to find alternatives to anti-depressants. In essence, we havent moved much since 1950s when it came to treating depression.

Current antidepressants have barely changed since 1980s. Sadly, these antidepressants can only reduce symptoms for most people by the two-month mark. However, if youre somebody whos dealing with suicidal thoughts then this isnt ideal, more immediate treatment is needed. Scientists state that the risks of psilocybin are low, but only if they are conducted under medical observation and support.

This article outlines the use of psilocybin mushrooms for strictly medical reasons. Its important that this substance is not abused. Be mindful of taking a kind of psychedelic mushroom and bear in mind that theyre not for everyone. Importantly, classical psychedelics are not considered safe for people with psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, or even for people who were predisposed to developing these conditions.

Researchers who are testing the efficacy of this substance will only give people psilocybin in a dedicated hospital facility with support from doctors, nurses and psychotherapists. They do not give people psilocybin mushrooms to take home. Also, the psilocybin used in trials is not derived from pure mushrooms. It is manufactured to the same standard as any medicine prescribed by your doctor.

If you are interested in this therapy you need to find a medically trained person to assist you. Where you live may determine availability and acceptable medical approach. Meanwhile, mushroom excursions like those espoused by the likes of celebrity Gwyneth Paltroware gaining in popularity. While this may all seem cool, its not if youre genuinely seeking a medical solution.

Harvard University: R. Gordon Wasson (1898-1986) Archives: http://botlib.huh.harvard.edu/libraries/wasson/BIOG.html

Tek-Gnostics Archives Intelligence Engineering Department. Dr Timonthy Leary Archives: https://www.tekgnostics.com/leary.htm

This Mexican medicine woman hipped America to magic mushrooms, with the help of a bank executive https://timeline.com/with-the-help-of-a-bank-executive-this-mexican-medicine-woman-hipped-america-to-magic-mushrooms-c41f866bbf37

Timothy Leary: Noted for: the effects of psychotropic drugs; the 1960s counterculture https://psychology.fas.harvard.edu/people/timothy-leary

Transformative experience and social connectedness mediate the mood-enhancing effects of psychedelic use in naturalistic settings Matthias Forstmann,Daniel A. Yudkin,Annayah M. B. Prosser,S. Megan Heller, andMolly J. Crockett PNASFebruary 4, 2020117(5)2338-2346;first published January 21, 2020https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918477117 Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved December 17, 2019 (received for review October 24, 2019)

More on staying healthy:

Were reading increasingly about the potentially significant threat of toxins to our health, but what exactly are they? And how will they impact our longevity?

Follow this link:
the healing-power-of-magic psilocybin-mushrooms - Longevity LIVE

The World on its Knees – Daijiworld.com

April 14, 2020

Predictions about the disasters are useless, unless someone take a note of such predictions beforehand and be well prepared for the devastation or more effectively, prevent them from happening.

Yuval Noah Hariri is the celebrity author of the popular science bestsellers Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (2014), Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow (2016), and 21 Lessons for the 21st Century (2018).

In Sapiens he surveys the entire length of human history, from the evolution of Homo sapiens about 70000 years ago along with other human like species Homo neanderthals and Homo erectus, the development of their cognitive abilities, up to the political and technological revolutions of the 21st century.

Where as in Homo Deus he is examining possibilities of the future of Homo sapiens. The book's premise outlines that, in the future, humanity is likely to make a significant attempt to gain happiness, immortality and God-like powers. The book goes on to openly speculate various ways this ambition might be realised for Homo sapiens in the future based on the past and present. He predicts the possible consequences of a futuristic biotechnological world in which intelligent biological organisms are surpassed by their own creations. He speculate that we as a species will mutate ourselves into new God-like species, Homo Deus.

And we all believed that with its technological advancements in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI), bio technology and nano technology, human race is going to achieve that in the near future.

The scientific advancements in the field of AI predicted that by the year 2040, we would achieve technological singularity. Intelligence explosion, in which an upgradable intelligent agent will eventually enter a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, with each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an 'explosion' in intelligence and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that may achieve self-awareness and qualitatively far surpasses all human intelligence.

The advancements in the field of medicines, bio technology and nano technology predicted that the death will be optional for us by the year 2040.

Advancements in space science and technology predicted that we will be capable of colonizing Moon, Mars and beyond.

We believed we have the best of the political systems governing the different parts of the world. Every system, be its communist, democratic, imperialistic or some other, boasted its own superiority over the other and claimed to be the best equipped to manage its population to the best of its knowledge. Most advanced countries boasted the best of the medical facilities that equipped to face any kind of medical problems, and ridiculed the others, the less privileged.

Our Gods and religious systems did not stay behind in this race and claimed the solutions to the each of the problems faced by the humanity and offered answers to the questions of our existence and purpose. Every God, every religion claimed its supremacy over the other and we did not hesitate to kill each other in the very name of the Gods supposed to protect and bring peace to humanity.

Then it hit us

Its not even a living thing. Just a few RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) strands covered with a protein sheath, so small that normal microscopes cant see it. It was there all along, but novel because of its new avatar or strain. It requires a living cell to start its activities and all it does is replicate itself. Nevertheless, in this process, it created havoc and chaos and succeeded to bring down the whole, mighty world down on its knees without any discrimination. The powerful, highly developed nations, their poor counterparts, democratic, communist or imperialistic, it treated them all the same. It did not see the religion, language, qualification, financial status, economical background or the geographical location and easily be termed as a great equalizer.

Yes, novel coronavirus.

We had several warnings. We had so many pandemics those wiped off millions of lives in the history. Apart from that, Bill Gates and former US President George W Bush and many others scientists and visionaries have warned well in advance about such out breaks and suggested the ways to be prepared.

There are few pictures and videos in social media going viral now about some books and movies, which predicted about the pandemics.

Funny thing about such predictions, including that of the famous Nostradamus are that they all surface after the event and everyone jumps into the bandwagon to say, Look, I told you so.

Predictions about the disasters are useless, unless someone take a note of such predictions beforehand and be well prepared for the devastation or more effectively, prevent them from happening.

Interestingly, in his latest book 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, Yuval Noah Hariri discusses about challenges and possible solutions for 21 different things like Work, Liberty, Equality, Religion, Immigration, Terrorism etc., but misses a Health Pandemic.

Our Gods, religious, political, technological and medical systems did not know what hit them. Its proved beyond doubt that all Gods and religious systems, all kinds of political systems, scientific advancements have failed in their current avatars and they are not equipped to face a pandemic of this kind.

There is not a solution in the horizon. We have not reached a plateau as of today and the number of positive cases and deaths are steadily rising all over the world. Moreover, nobody knows for sure if there will be a solution and if at all, when.

And if we survive this pandemic, and I dont know how many would survive, the world as we know will change. A change like never seen before. However, a change thats the need of the hour.

The survivors of this new world order need to sit together and retrospect about the way we ran our world so far. They should determine if they need Gods and Religions, and if yes, in which format? They need to revamp all the political, technological, economical and medical systems in their current avatars and design totally new effective systems which are well equipped to run the world in a just and fair way.

A new world that gives every human being an equal opportunity of existence and well-being.

The Risen Ape is yet to find its ground in the larger schemes of things.

Read more here:
The World on its Knees - Daijiworld.com

Cashing in on the crisis: More FDA warning letters – NutraIngredients-usa.com

As the coronavirus overwhelms many parts of the world, fake treatments continue to spread throughout the internet.

Bogus claims have prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to take action against several individuals and companies, including prominent social media influencer Alex Jones of the site Infowars. The agency recently issued a warning letter to the conspiracy theorist demanding he stop promoting products he sells on his website as cures for the deadlyvirus.

The FDA cited several examples of Jones fake claims that date back to February. The letter stated,Described below, you sell products that are intended to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-19 in people. We request that you take immediate action to cease the sale of such unapproved and unauthorized products for the mitigation, prevention, treatment, diagnosis, or cure of COVID-19.

In one video posted on March 10, Jones claimed that "the patented Nano Silver we have, the Pentagon has come out and documented, and Homeland Security have said this stuff kills the whole SARS corona family, at point blank range.

In a subsequent broadcast, Jones advised listeners to boost your immune system, adding, We have the products that are documented on record to be good for your body, before promoting gels and toothpaste that he claims contain silver. The FDA has previously warned that colloidal silver is not safe or effective for treating any disease or condition.

Prior to the warning from the FDA, New York Attorney General Letitia James sent a cease-and-desist letter in March demanding Jones stop promoting his bogus medicine.

US Attorney General William Barr directed US attorneys' offices in every state to make enforcement a priority, and states' attorneys general are handing companies cease-and-desist letters demanding they stop misleading the public.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra issued a consumer alert that warned the public,Do not be hustled by opportunistic tricksters claiming to have a miracle cure. There is not a cure for COVID-19...I encourage anyone who has been the victim of a snake oil scam or who otherwise has information about products that are falsely touted as coronavirus treatments, tests, or cures to immediately file a complaint through my offices website.

Last month, the Missouri Attorney General sued prominent televangelist Jim Bakker and his company, Morningside Church Productions Inc., for claiming on a broadcast featuring a naturopathic doctor, that the product Silver Solution can cure coronavirus. This led to a joint warning letter from the FDA and FTC.

In the past few weeks, the FDA and FTC issued several more warning letters to companies claiming their products prevent, treat or cure coronavirus. This follows several other warning letters jointly issued by the agencies in early March.

A recent press release stated that The FDA considers the sale and promotion of fraudulent COVID-19 products to be a threat to the public health. We have an aggressive surveillance program that routinely monitors online sources for health fraud products, especially during a significant public health issue such as this one, said FDA Commissioner Dr. Stephen M. Hahn.We understand consumers are concerned about the spread of COVID-19 and urge them to talk to their health care providers, as well as follow advice from other federal agencies about how to prevent the spread of this illness. We will continue to aggressively pursue those that place the public health at risk and hold bad actors accountable.

FTC Chairman Joe Simons added that there is already a high level of anxiety right now. What we dont need in this situation are companies preying on consumers by promoting products with fraudulent prevention and treatment claims. These warning letters are just the first step. Were prepared to take enforcement actions against companies that continue to market this type of scam.

Last month, the FDA and FTC jointly issued warning letters to Vital Silver, Quinessence Aromatherapy Ltd., Xephyr, LLC (who does business as N-Ergetics), GuruNanda, LLC, Vivify Holistic Clinic, Herbal Amy LLC, and The Jim Bakker Show for hawking teas, essential oils, tinctures and colloidal silver making coronavirus claims.

Several dietary supplement industry trade associations are also urging retailers to not stock products that make coronavirus claims.

The American Herbal Products Association, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, the Council for Responsible Nutrition and the United Natural Products Alliance recently issued a press release applauding the FDA forcalling out marketers who make illegal and unsubstantiated drug claims related to COVID-19.

The statement noted that the trade associationssupport the responsible sale and use of vitamins, minerals, herbs and other dietary supplements that provide many positive benefits promoting better health and wellness. As we face the unprecedented threat of this global pandemic, illegal and unsubstantiated drug claims misdirect consumers toward ineffective products, divert them from seeking critical medical care, and endanger the public health.

There are currently no products on the market that are approved to treat or prevent coronavirus. While there are investigational COVID-19 vaccines and treatments under development, these have not been fully tested for safety or effectiveness. Even if there was an ingredient that could treat or prevent the virus, dietary supplement companies are banned by DSHEA from making any disease treatment claims.

Read more from the original source:
Cashing in on the crisis: More FDA warning letters - NutraIngredients-usa.com

Beer-label immortality is there for the taking as Stanley Park Brewery looks for artists to help celebrate Earth Day – Straight.com

Ever wondered who illustrated some of the greatest beer labels youve ever had the pleasure of peeling off the bottle?

Like the Old Style Pilsner Beer classic with the cartoon biplane, stagecoach, and vintage-20s automobile.

Or the Adventure Time-like King Louie DIPA artwork for Aeronaut Brewing.

Now youve got the chance to impress not only your fellow beer connoisseurs, but also the Amateur Art Critics Association of B.C.

To celebrate this years Earth DayStanley Park Brewing is looking for original submissions for a special edition of its Hollow Tree Lager. By entering a piece of original art, you not only get the chance to see your work on a bottle of the brewerys best-selling beer, but also a $500 cash prize and a prize pack. That pack presumably includes beer, which is reason enough to enter. Two runners up will receive $200 each and a prize pack.

Normally, this is the time of year when the micro-brewery would be getting ready to celebrate Earth Day as part of on-site activities organized by the Stanley Park Ecology Society (SPES), a non-profilt charity dedicated to stewarding conservation efforts, habitat restoration, and educational activities.

Instead, with the crown jewel of Vancouver parks currently being reclaimed by the racoons and squirrels during the COVID-19 lockdown, Stanley Park Brewing is getting creative with its efforts to help with SPES fundraising.

To celebrate Earth Days 50th anniversary on April 22, $1 from every limited edition label bottle of Hollow Tree Lager sold, $1 will be donated to the ecology society.

Whether youre the second coming of Andy Warhol or someone who has trouble drawing a stick man with a ruler, youre invited to submit a design that pays tribute to Earth Day, Stanley Park, and the experiences that are part of any visit.

Here are the ground rules as laid out by Stanley Park Brewing:

Entry to the contest is open until 11:59PM PST Thursday, April 16, 2020 to Canadian residents aged 19 and over.

Six submissions chosen by Stanley Park Brewing will be put to a public vote on Instagram Stories to determine three finalists on 12pm PST Saturday, April 18, 2020 to 12pm PST Sunday, April 19, 2020. Stanley Park Brewing will select and announce the grand prize winner (1), and runners up (2) on the Stanley Park Brewing website on Monday, April 20, 2020. Winners will be contacted within 48 hours of the contest closing.

All artwork must be your own and original. Art may include a tagline; however, it should be separate from the artwork. Winning entries must meet the outlined theme, submission criteria and agree to the terms & conditions.

For more details or to submit your design, go here.

Read this article:
Beer-label immortality is there for the taking as Stanley Park Brewery looks for artists to help celebrate Earth Day - Straight.com

5 Plausible Fan Theories About Code Geass: Lelouch Of The Re;surrection (& 5 Hilariously Bad Ones) – CBR – Comic Book Resources

Code Geassis no stranger to intense, twisted fan theories. From meticulously detailed ideas that blend in immaculately with the plot to some down-right absurd theories that don't even make any sense,Code Geassfans sure have outdone themselves.

RELATED: Code Geass: 5 Anime Heroes Lelouch Lamperouge Could Easily Outsmart (& 5 He Couldn't)

Here are a few cherry-picked fan theories that will surely keep you entertained. Some because they're so incredibly plausible, and some because they're so hilariously horrible.

Many fans have been speculating that Lelouch might be alive in Code Geass: Lelouch of the Re;surrection because he possessed the Code at the time of being stabbed.

But the question is, where and when did he get that Code? Well, it is believed that he got it from his father, Charles, who got it from V.V. Lelouch was able to kill Charles since his Geass was fully evolved at that time. But before doing that, he used his powers to transfer Charles's Code to him.

Allthe Code holders in the show bear a brand. So, if Lelouch had SUPPOSEDLY gotten the Code from his father, where was his brand? Well, recall that shortly before dying, Charles grabbed his neck with his hand that bore the brand. And well, you know how Lelouch started wearing clothes that conceal his neck?

Fans have theorized that that was his way of hiding the brand that was given to him after he transferred the Code on to himself.This theory is pretty absurdbecauseit is understandable that he would want his immortality to be concealed, but isn't it possible that he just wore cooler clothes tofit his newfound power? Collars are cool.

Going back to R2's episode 15, "C's World," notice that Lelouch 'Geassed' Charles intoshooting himself in the heart. Since Charles had received the Code from V.V., he didn't die.

RELATED: 5 Reasons Why Resurrecting Lelouch In Code Geass Was A Great Idea (& 5 Why It Was Terrible)

He affirmed his immortality but notice how it happened after he 'died' once. Well, many fans believe that it is an activation of the Code and that the only way to attain immortality is to die once, how poetic. That's why at the end of R2 when Lelouch 'died', he actually ACTIVATED the Code that he had received from Charles. So, he might still be alive.

Whenever the world map appears, Australia is clearly shown not to be under anyone's rule. Now, goback to episode 15 of R1, "Cheering Mao," where Mao expressed his intention of running away and living with C.C. to a house that he had built IN AUSTRALIA. Creepy, but could Lelouch be disguising himself as Mao and living in that house with C.C.? What do you think?

Well, this one's pretty obvious because, of course, death is inevitable; for some, much sooner than others. All through R2, you can clearly see Li Xingke bleeding from his mouth for no specified reason.

Apparently, that's the most common way that Tuberculosis is portrayedin TV shows and movies. Safe to say that you'll probably be saying goodbye to him in R3.

You're probably wondering where these guys come in. The ancient Geass civilization, AKA the builders of the Thought Elevators, are perceived by fans to make their way into R3 because WHY NOT? Let's throw everyone in the mix. What would they even do?

In the series, we've only seen the Red Geass and the Blue one but the trailer showed a Green Geass without revealing the identity of the person possessing it. Sounds pretty shady.

Fans believe that it could be Lelouch's new 'Code Geass' since he possessed both the Code and the Geass, which had never been done before.

Humor this one for a minute. Sayoko has a perfect mask of Lelouch, right? Brace yourselves for this: IT WAS C.C. DRESSED UP AS LELOUCH.

It's one thing to say that Lelouch got the Code from his dad, but another thing to say it was just a cosplay show. Would've been hilarious had she unveiled herself then and there, TA-DA!

In the very last episode of R2, "Re:," you can see C.C. praying for Lelouch. She kept talking about the price of everyone's happiness that Lelouch was about to pay.

RELATED: D&D Moral Alignments Of Code Geass Characters

It was evident that she was referring to him being killed. However, fans have speculated that she could have been referring to the fact that Lelouch was about to make himself immortal and the 'price' was actually never being able to die. It does go very nicely with all the, 'he's still alive' uproar.

One last nugget from the trailer. If you watched it closely, you know that Jeremiah is not alone in the lake with the flamingos. In fact, Anya can be seen just standing there next to him doing nothing while he's CLEARLY getting electrocuted. Does that mean Anya is evil? No, maybe she's just slow. Some fans read too much into things.

NEXT:Code Geass: 5 Things The Movie Trilogy Did Great (& 5 Things The Original Anime Did Better)

NextJojo's Bizarre Adventure: 10 Corny Things That Only This Franchise Can Get Away With

More:
5 Plausible Fan Theories About Code Geass: Lelouch Of The Re;surrection (& 5 Hilariously Bad Ones) - CBR - Comic Book Resources