Erased from utopia: the hidden history of LA’s black and brown resistance – The Guardian

In August 1965, thousands of young Black people in Watts set fire to the illusion that Los Angeles was a youth paradise.

Since the debut of the TV show 77 Sunset Strip in 1958, followed by the first of the Gidget romance films in 1959 and then the Beach Boys Surfin USA in 1963, teenagers in the rest of the country had become intoxicated with images of the endless summer that supposedly defined adolescence in southern California.

Edited out of utopia was the existence of a rapidly growing population of more than 1 million people of African, Asian, and Mexican ancestry. Their kids were restricted to a handful of beaches; everywhere else, they risked arrest by local cops or beatings by white gangs. As a result, Black surfers were almost as rare in LA as unicorns. Economic opportunity was also rationed.

During the first half of the 60s, hundreds of brand-new college classrooms beckoned to white kids with an offer of free higher education, while factories and construction sites begged for more workers. But failing inner-city high schools with extreme dropout rates reduced the college admissions of Black and brown youth to a small trickle. Despite virtually full employment for whites, Black youth joblessness dramatically increased, as did the index of residential segregation. If these were truly golden years of opportunity for white teenagers, their counterparts in South Central and East LA faced bleak, ultimately unendurable futures.

But LAs streets and campuses in the 60s also provided stages for many other groups to assert demands for free speech, equality, peace and justice. Initially these protests tended to be one-issue campaigns, but the grinding forces of repression above all the Vietnam draft and the LAPD drew them together in formal and informal alliances.

Thus LGBT activists coordinated actions with youth activists in protest of police and sheriffs dragnets on Sunset Strip, in turn making Free Huey one of their demands. When Black and Chicano high school kids blew out their campuses in 196869, several thousand white students walked out in solidarity. A brutal LAPD attack on thousands of middle-class antiwar protesters at the Century Plaza Hotel in 1967 hastened the development of a biracial coalition supporting Tom Bradley, a liberal Black council member, in his crusade to wrest City Hall from rightwing populist Sam Yorty.

In the same period, the antiwar movement joined hands with the Black Panthers to form Californias unique Peace and Freedom Party. There are many other examples. By 1968, as a result, the movement resembled the music of LA free jazz pianist Horace Tapscotts Pan Afrikan Peoples Arkestra: simultaneous solos together with unified crescendos. Historians of 60s protests have rarely studied the reciprocal influences and interactions across such broad spectrum of constituencies, and these linkages are too often neglected in memoirs, but they provide a principal terrain of our analysis.

The 60s in LA have obvious bookends. The year 1960 saw the appearance of social forces that would coalesce into the movements of the era, along with the emergence of a new agenda for social change, especially around what might be called the issue of issues: racial segregation. In LA, those developments overlapped with the beginning of the regime of Sam Yorty, elected mayor in 1961. 1973, on the other hand, marked not only the end of protest in the streets but also the defeat of Yorty and the advent of the efficient, pro-business administration of Tom Bradley.

There were also three important turning points that subdivide the long decade. 1963 was a rollercoaster year that witnessed the first: the rise and fall of the United Civil Rights Committee, the most important attempt to integrate housing, schools and jobs in LA through non-violent protest and negotiation. (Only Detroit produced a larger and more ambitious civil rights united front during what contemporaries called Birmingham Summer.) In California it brought passage of the states first Fair Housing Act repealed by referendum the following year in an outburst of white backlash.

1965, of course, saw the second turning point, the so-called Watts Riots. The third, 1969, began as a year of hope with a strong coalition of white liberals, Blacks and newly minted Chicanos supporting Bradley for mayor. He led the polls until election eve, when Yorty counterattacked with a vicious barrage of racist and red-baiting appeals to white voters. Bradleys defeat foreclosed, at least for the foreseeable future, any concessions to the citys minorities or liberal voters. Moreover, it was immediately followed by sinister campaigns, involving the FBI, the district attorneys office, and both the LAPD and LA county sheriffs, to destroy the Panthers, Brown Berets and other radical groups.

This is the true context underlying the creeping sense of dread and imminent chaos famously evoked by Joan Didion in her 1979 essay collection, The White Album. If helter skelter was unleashed after 1970, the Manson gang were bit players compared to the institutions of law and order. For the past half century, a number of stereotypes have framed our recollections of this age of revolt, but the Los Angeles experience confounds most cliches. In the standard narrative, for instance, college students, organized as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), and the Free Speech Movement (FSM) in Berkeley, were the principal social actors, and the great engine rooms of protest were found at huge public university campuses in places like Berkeley, Madison, Ann Arbor, and Kent. (The exceptions, according to this narrative, were some historical Black colleges and Ivy League Columbia.)

In Los Angeles, however, it was junior and senior high schools that were the principal battlefields, and the majority of protesters were Black and brown. Indeed, as many as 20,000 inner-city teenagers and their white Westside allies participated in walkouts and demonstrations between 1967 and 1970. Members of college radical groups as well as the Black Panther party played significant roles as advisers to these protests, but the indigenous teenage leadership was most important. These struggles recruited hundreds of kids to groups like the Panthers and Brown Berets and gave birth to a unique high school New Left formation, the Red Tide.

The terrain of college protest in Los Angeles also differed from that of the mainstream. Of the two flagship local universities, the University of Southern California was a citadel of campus Republicanism, birthplace of Nixons so-called USC Mafia (and, as it turned out, the alma mater of several Watergate conspirators). UCLA, for its part, saw only episodic mass protests, most notably during Nixons invasion of Cambodia in spring 1970. The real homes of sustained student activism were the three inner-city community colleges (LA City College, Southwest College and East LA College), along with Cal State LA and Valley State (later Cal State, Northridge).

The latter was the site of a 196970 uprising by the Black Student Union and SDS that was quelled by police batons, mass arrests, and a staggering 1,730 felony charges against Black students: repression on a scale that rivaled or exceeded the more famous battles at San Francisco State.

Historians and political scientists have generally conceded that the one hundred or so ghetto insurrections of the 1960s should be regarded as genuine protests, but they have usually described them as leading to mere chaos and demoralization. Conventionally, rioters have been portrayed as the opposites of organizers and builders. This does not describe events in Los Angeles.

The 1965 explosion unified and energized a generation of young Black people, ended gang conflict for a number of years, and catalyzed the extraordinary Watts Renaissance, the citys most important arts and literary movement of the decade. Black Power became an aspiration shared by thousands, and in 1967 this grassroots unity found expression in the emergence of LAs Black Congress the more radical successor to the United Civil Rights Committee. It included SNCC, the Black Student Alliance, the Che-Lumumba Club of the Communist Party, the Black Panthers, and the powerful Us organization (or Organization Us) led by Ron Karenga. (The congress would later be destroyed by a violent conflict between Us and the Panthers, instigated and fueled by the FBIs secret Cointelpro program.)

Contests over public space were also extraordinarily important in Los Angeles. In part this was the legacy of earlier decades when the LAPDs notorious Red Squad had been the enforcer of the anti-union open shop doctrine, and when city hall supplied draconian anti-picketing and antifree speech ordinances. The 60s saw a renewal of this unsavory tradition.

The LAPD, aided by the LA county sheriffs, conducted an unending siege of bohemian Venice, tried to drive teenyboppers and hippies off Sunset Strip, regularly broke up peaceful love-ins and rallies in Griffith and Elysian Parks, suppressed lowriders on Whittier Boulevard, harassed kids selling the underground LA Free Press, raided coffeehouses and folk clubs, and invoked obscenity as an excuse to crack down on artists, poets and theater groups. No other major city outside of the deep south was subjected to such a fanatic and all-encompassing campaign to police space and control the night. Along with minorities, many young whites were also routinely victimized, leading hatred of the LAPD to grow into a common culture of resistance.

The cops, however, had a formidable opponent in the ACLU of Southern California, the national organizations most hard-charging and activist affiliate. When national ACLU director Roger Baldwin and a majority of the national leadership publicly embraced anti-communism in the late 1940s, AL Wirin, ACLU SoCals legendary chief counsel, pointedly challenged the ban on representing Communist party members in trial proceedings, taking on several cases in private practice.

Moreover, in 1952, the local branch chose as its new director Eason Monroe, a state college professor from San Francisco who had been fired for refusing to sign a loyalty oath. A decade later, Monroe charted a novel course for the affiliate by not only defending the local civil rights coalition in court but also joining in its leadership. Significantly, it was an ACLU team, led by UCLA professor John Caughey and his wife LaRee, that launched the legendary 1963 lawsuit to force integration of LAs de facto Jim Crow school system an effort that would reverberate for three decades. No other ACLU branch claimed such a large role in the decades protest movements.

Understanding Los Angeles in the 60s also requires rewriting the histories of gay liberation and the womens movement. Indeed, New York City was not the origin and center of everything. Los Angeles had the first gay street protest in America over police raids on the Black Cat Bar in Silver Lake, two years before the Stonewall uprising; it had the first gay church the Metropolitan community church, now the largest gay institution in the world; and it had the first officially recognized gay pride parade on Hollywood Boulevard in 1970. LA also witnessed the nations first police raid on a womens health clinic, following which the organizers were tried for practicing medicine without a license.

Finally, the course of events in Los Angeles challenged the myth that the Old Left was irrelevant in the 60s and that the New Left had invented itself ex nihilo. The Communist party, for its part, never appears in the standard narrative except as an unattractive corpse. But in Los Angeles its most unruly and dissident branch remained very much alive under the charismatic and eventually heretical leadership of Dorothy Healey.

Despite the partys devastating losses following Soviet secretary Nikita Khrushchevs 1956 Crimes of Stalin speech, Healey was determined to resurrect what she could of the 1940s Popular Front and to reach out to the new radicals on campus, in the ghettos and in the barrios. Still under the threat of a prison sentence, she found a niche at KPFK, the new 75,000-watt Pacifica Radio FM station, in 1959, where her Communist Commentary impressed even hostile listeners with its intelligence and wit although it almost cost the station its license. In 1966 she ran in the primary for county tax assessor and received a staggering 85,000 votes. By then the local Communist party had confidentially rebuilt many of its links with progressives in the Democratic party and had assumed an important role in the Peace Action Council. Its youth members, relatively unconstrained by a party line or adult control, played innovative roles in the early 60s, including participation in Southern Freedom Rides, and later, more influentially, as the Che-Lumumba Club which would become the political base of Angela Davis. For two generations Healey defined radicalism in the public eye.

This is a movement history of Los Angeles that looks at the city from the vantage points of its flatland neighborhoods and bohemian beaches where the young heroes of this story lived. We have tried to give human faces to social forces, to understand rebellion as a constant debate about goals and tactics, and to recall the passions of struggle, especially the power of love. It was also important to describe in some detail the machinery of racial oppression that kept good schools, well-paid jobs and suburban homes out of the reach of people living inside the citys ghettos and barrios.

At epic moments in the long decade the United Civil Rights campaign in 1963, the Watts uprising in 1965, and the wave of high school revolts from 1966 to 1969 the movement tried mightily to break through to the other side, only to face the batons and drawn guns of the LAPD. By 1973, repression had dug nearly 100 graves and put more than 10,000 protesters in jail or prison. An enormous effort has been made to trivialize the 60s and to bury its dreams in a paupers grave. But its unruly ghost, like that of the 1930s, still shakes its chains in the nightmares of elites.

View original post here:

Erased from utopia: the hidden history of LA's black and brown resistance - The Guardian

Animal Crossing Has Some Crazy HousesHere Are the Best – HouseBeautiful.com

It's been more than a month since much of America began social distancing in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, and we're all turning to different indoor activities. While some have embraced binge-watching TV shows like Tiger King to pass the time, others have picked up a bit of a video game habitnamely, by obsessively playing Animal Crossing: New Horizons.

Launched on March 20, the life simulation video game is the fifth in Nintendo's Animal Crossing series, which debuted in 2001, and is the first developed specifically for the Nintendo Switch console. It begins at the airport. You, a cute little cartoon character, are whisked away to a private island, where you and some new anthropomorphic animal neighbors are going build your own utopia with the help of a company called Nook Inc. Sound idyllic? It is! And a little creepy? You betcha!

But truthfully, the game is more adorable than ominous. You spend your days fishing, collecting seashells, and catching butterflies as you explore your scenic island, plus and building everything your new society might need, like a shop and a museum. You're not stuck on your island forever, eitherif you pay for an online subscription (the payment is IRL, mind you), you can actually visit your friends' islands. It's more or less the ultimate form of escapism in the age of social distancing.

Of particular interest to us at House Beautiful, however, is the fact that you can customize your home, la The Sims. While you start out by camping in a very basic tent, you can take out an interest-free loan to upgrade to a house, which is highly customizable. Players have created mansions with some pretty gorgeous roomsand some really unusual ones. Check out a few standouts we've seen across social media below.

We'll start nice and straightforward. How lovely is this study-like basement, complete with a library corner, a fireplace, and a model train table?

2. Chill Onsen

We *wish* we had a Spirited Awaythemed onsen like this in our house during quarantine.

3. Flower Power

A touch Van Gogh with the sunflowers, a touch Scandi-chic with the wood furniture. We like.

4. Zen Garden

Sure, this is a little trippy, but what's a video game if not the perfect escape from our daily lives?

5. Plant/Garden/Spa Room

What exactly is the purpose of this Japanese-style room? Not sure, but we love it all the same!

6. Witchy Room

In Animal Crossing: New Horizons, you can get a little alternative with your decor. As a commenter tweeted, "[L]ooks like a place I could get a tarot card reading and a cheap tattoo."

7. Bunny Day Room

Yes, this is an Easter themed room. There are special events throughout the game tied to real-world occurrences like Easter and cherry blossom season, in which you can craft special decorations for your house.

8. Star Room

Sign us up for one ticket to the moon, please!

9. Golden Room

We might be a *touch* concerned that we'll be sacrificed in this room, but props for the cool Indiana Jones vibes.

10. Turnip Room

Sometimes you can buy turnips for really low prices during gameplay. Sometimes players might hoard them they like would toilet paper during a real-life pandemic, which leads them to create turnip storage rooms. We're not here to judge. (Okay, we are judging you about the toilet paper...)

Follow House Beautiful on Instagram.

Excerpt from:

Animal Crossing Has Some Crazy HousesHere Are the Best - HouseBeautiful.com

Nervous Recs: ‘Little Fires Everywhere’ Shows That the 90s Weren’t ‘Simpler Times’ – VICE

It's not every day that a new series unites two of my favorite actresses: Kerry Washington and Reese Witherspoon. It's been almost two decades since my introduction to Washington as she portrayed Chenille, a single teen mother in Save the Last Dance, and Witherspoon as Annette, the bad girl posing as a goody-two-shoes in Cruel Intentions. I could have spent quarantine diving into the hysteria of Tiger King, but I was craving a show something that had nothing to do with Joe Exotic.

Little did I know, Little Fires Everywhere, a new Hulu drama series, would bring elements of those characters to the series' Ohio suburb. Little Fires Everywhere is what happens when underlying tensions within race and class coalesce. It dismantles the whitewashed, homogenous 90s utopia that Friends embraced, revealing a less sunny version of the decade highlighting its subtle but still pervasive racism. (Warning: Spoilers ahead.)

The series, based on the novel by Celeste Ng, chronicles two families in Shaker Heights, Ohio. Mia Warren (played by Washington) and her daughter Pearl have never lived anywhere for more than a few months, and the Midwestern suburb is their newprobably temporaryhome. Elena Richardson (played by Witherspoon) is a journalist for the local paper, striving to be the quintessential supermom to four teenagers. Mia and Elena couldn't be more different; Mia smokes weed while working on her artwork, while Elena can't even say "vagina" at her book club about The Vagina Monologues. When Elena becomes Mia's landlord, we see life has dealt each mother different hands, and their respective social stigmas show that they've each made poor choicesjust different ones based on their places in this world.

Little Fires Everywhere doesn't only contextualize race in black and white terms; it also analyzes how race factors into motherhood and whom society considers a fit parent. When the neighborhood learns that the baby Elena's friend Linda plans to adopt is the child of Mia's coworker, a Chinese immigrant named Bebe, all hell breaks loose. This is Shaker Heights, after all, a community so concerned with appearances that you'll be fined if the grass on your lawn is over six inches. Worried that the biological mother might want to reclaim her maternal rights, Linda launches into a nasty rant about how Bebe is an "illegal alien" who doesn't deserve her baby. By episode six, we see Elena's journey with motherhood has been overwhelming for her, tooeven as a married woman with two homes and blinding white privilege. But Elena and Linda never consider why Bebe, an undocumented immigrant with few resources, might choose to leave her newborn child at a fire station.

At a glance, Little Fires Everywhere seems like your typical dose of middle-aged neighborhood drama, but it's so much more than that. The set design and soundtrack are spot-on (Chumbawamba's "Tubthumping" at the school dance is peak 1997), but the real beauty is in the details of how the mothers interact with each other. Elena, afraid to be perceived as racist, asks Mia to be her "house manager," though she really means her maid. Elena's daughter Lexie uses a racist experience Pearl had at school for her Yale admission essay, turning it into a bogus story about sexism and third-wave feminismand somehow, it isn't even the worst thing she does to Pearl. The Richardsons are rigid in how they cling to calling Black people "African Americans," despite discussing the term as antiquated over dinner. It's a clever window into how the family dismisses race, even though their lives are consumed by it.

"You made this about race the day you stood on the street and begged me to be your maid," Mia tells Elena. "White women always be friends with their maid. I was not your maid, Elena. And I was never your friend."

Mia's outburst to Elena stands to be the crux of the entire series. There is a constant need to reboot the sitcoms of the 90s, holding on to the idea that somehow they were simpler times. But for some, they weren't. The microaggressions were always there, and they still are. Racism is not always outfitted in a Southern drawl. Sometimes, it looks like the white picket fences, otherwise known as the American dream.

Little Fires Everywhere is available to stream on Hulu.

Kristin Corry is a staff writer for VICE.

See original here:

Nervous Recs: 'Little Fires Everywhere' Shows That the 90s Weren't 'Simpler Times' - VICE

Abigail Thernstrom, conservative voice on voting rights and education, dies at 83 – Thehour.com

Political scientist Abigail Thernstrom and her husband, historian Stephan Thernstrom, in 1997.

Political scientist Abigail Thernstrom and her husband, historian Stephan Thernstrom, in 1997.

Photo: Photo By Michele McDonald For The Washington Post

Political scientist Abigail Thernstrom and her husband, historian Stephan Thernstrom, in 1997.

Political scientist Abigail Thernstrom and her husband, historian Stephan Thernstrom, in 1997.

Abigail Thernstrom, conservative voice on voting rights and education, dies at 83

Abigail Thernstrom, a political scientist who was steeped in left-wing politics from childhood but became an influential conservative voice on racial equality, voting rights and education, died April 10 at a hospital in Arlington, Virginia. She was 83.

Her death was confirmed by her daughter, author and journalist Melanie Thernstrom, who said that Dr. Thernstrom went into a coma about a week earlier. She had tested negative for the novel coronavirus, and it was unclear what had caused her decline, her daughter said.

Thernstrom was launched to national prominence with the publication of "America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible" (1997), an optimistic and polarizing survey of race relations in America written with her husband, Harvard historian Stephan Thernstrom. Across 700 pages thick with charts, graphs and academic citations, they argued that African-Americans had made extraordinary gains over the past five decades, while lamenting that not enough progress had been made.

In television appearances and essays for publications including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, the Thernstroms went on to champion a "colorblind" society while opposing the use of racial preferences, which they deemed divisive, inessential and largely ineffective. Their work made them two of America's leading conservative opponents of affirmative action - and stunned former allies on the left, who knew the Thernstroms from their earlier activism on behalf of liberal causes.

Thernstrom, who was raised on a left-wing commune outside New York City, had sung alongside Pete Seeger at the progressive Little Red Schoolhouse in Greenwich Village, picketed a Woolworth's department store to protest segregation and campaigned for presidential nominee George S. McGovern, voting for a Republican presidential candidate for the first time in 1988.

A year earlier, she challenged the creation of "majority-minority" electoral districts in her book "Whose Votes Count?," arguing that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 successfully opened polling booths to Southern blacks but should never have been used to create "safe" seats for minority politicians.

The book was later described by the American Prospect as "a virtual bible among conservative jurists, including Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas." But it was far from a right-wing treatise, winning the Anisfield-Wolf Book Award (given to works focused on racism and diversity), and marked what Thernstrom described as a continuation of her longtime views.

"I'd say we've stuck to our principles over the years: Don't judge people on the basis of the color of their skin," she told The Washington Post in 1997. It was a shame, she said, that "the classic civil rights message is now called conservatism."

Thernstrom ultimately identified with the neoconservative movement, her husband said, and developed affiliations with a host of libertarian and conservative organizations, including the Center for Equal Opportunity, the Institute for Justice, the American Enterprise Institute and the Manhattan Institute, where she was a senior fellow.

She also served on the Massachusetts Board of Education for more than a decade, championing charter schools and overhauls to state testing, and was vice chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights during the George W. Bush administration. In an email, her daughter recalled that Thernstrom "infuriated her fellow Republicans (whom she disliked and referred to as 'political hacks') by voting with the Democrats more than with them."

Thernstrom remained best known for "America in Black and White," which she and her husband described as a spiritual sequel to "An American Dilemma," Gunnar Myrdal's classic 1944 study on race relations. Progress had been made since then, they argued, but "black crime," black nationalism and race-conscious programs such as affirmative action had stalled the march toward racial equality.

"I really believe it is the biggest book on race in a long time," Clint Bolick, then litigation director of the Institute for Justice, told The Post after its release. "I think that it is testimony to the deep substance of the book. They are out to prove their case, not simply throw rhetoric."

Some scholars, including economist Glenn Loury, argued with the Thernstroms' interpretation of crime and education data. Liberal critics said that the authors' opposition to preferences for African Americans ignored the enduring effects of slavery and racial discrimination; others accused them of striking a condescending tone.

"Here are two white people who are essentially lecturing black Americans," political scientist Andrew Hacker told the Times, "saying: 'What are you complaining about? Stop your griping. Here are the data. You're better off than ever before.' "

Thernstrom, who said she had hoped to elevate the national dialogue surrounding race, was invited to a confrontational town hall meeting on race by President Bill Clinton, who sparred with her over abolishing the Army's affirmative-action program and later invited the Thernstroms to the Oval Office for further discussion.

"This is simply an effort to draw a series of maps, to supply data, to teach how to weigh evidence," Thernstrom told The Post in 1997, responding to some of the criticism of her book. "Other people are going to be critics of our analysis. That's great. The data are there for them to analyze."

Abigail Mann was born in New York City on Sept. 14, 1936, and grew up in nearby Croton-on-Hudson. Her mother was a Jewish emigre from Germany, and her father owned a collective farm, home to left-wing intellectuals as well as Holocaust refugees.

"Unfortunately neither he nor any of the other people involved knew anything about farming," Thernstrom's daughter said in a phone interview. "They were all highly educated radicals, with the idea of living on the land and creating this utopia. . . . Animals were always dying, and nothing ever worked out."

Both parents sympathized with the Soviet Union, turning toward secular communism as a replacement for the Orthodox Judaism in which they were raised, and Thernstrom recalled early years "in a very racially integrated scene." She graduated from Elisabeth Irwin High in Manhattan and studied modern European history at Barnard College.

After receiving a bachelor's degree in 1958, she entered Harvard as a graduate student. She soon met Stephan Thernstrom, then a PhD student in American history, and switched from Middle Eastern studies to the government department, with a focus on constitutional law. "We just seemed to magically fit," her husband said in a phone interview, recalling their initial attraction.

They were married in 1959, a few months after they started dating.

While Stephan launched his academic career at the University of California at Los Angeles, Abigail delayed her doctoral research to focus on raising their two children: Melanie, of Palo Alto, California; and Samuel, of Arlington, Virginia. They survive her, in addition to her husband, of McLean, Virginia; and four grandchildren.

Thernstrom received her master's in 1961 and doctorate in 1975. She began teaching in Harvard's social studies program that same year and also reviewed books for the New Republic (then owned by a friend from Harvard, Marty Peretz), wrote for the Economist magazine and published some of her first voting rights articles in the Public Interest, a neoconservative journal.

With her husband, she edited the essay collection "Beyond the Color Line" (2001) and wrote "No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning" (2003). She later published the solo volume "Voting Rights - and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections" (2009).

Thernstrom could be mischievous, telling the American Prospect that she and her husband had hung a framed photograph of Thomas, the Supreme Court justice and conservative icon, above their office fireplace "to make reporters faint."

"I've got a problem with being stuffed into boxes," she told the magazine. "Put me in a room of conservatives and I start running to the left; put me in a group of liberals and I start running to the right. I mean, I just have problems with ideologically coercive environments - I get claustrophobic."

Read the rest here:

Abigail Thernstrom, conservative voice on voting rights and education, dies at 83 - Thehour.com

Surveillance Capitalism: Bigger Brother | by Tim Wu – The New York Review of Books

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power

by Shoshana Zuboff

PublicAffairs, 691 pp., $38.00

In the 1970s, when Shoshana Zuboff was a graduate student in Harvards psychology department, she met the behavioral psychologist B.F.Skinner. Skinner, who had perhaps the largest forehead youll ever see on an adult, is best remembered for putting pigeons in boxes (so-called Skinner boxes) and inducing them to peck at buttons for rewards. Less well remembered is the fact that he constructed a larger box, with a glass window, for his infant daughter, though this was revealing of his broader ambitions.

Zuboff writes in The Age of Surveillance Capitalism that her conversations with Skinner left me with an indelible sense of fascination with a way of construing human life that wasand isfundamentally different from my own. Skinner believed that humans could be conditioned like any other animal, and that behavioral psychology could and should be used to build a technological utopia where citizens were trained from birth to be altruistic and community-oriented. He published a novel, Walden Two (1948), that depicted what just such a society would look likea kind of Brave New World played straight.

It would risk grave understatement to say that Zuboff does not share Skinners enthusiasm for the mass engineering of behavior. Zuboff, a professor at Harvard Business School since 1981, has made a career of criticizing the lofty ambitions of technoprophets, making her something of a cousin to the mass media critic Neil Postman, author of Technopoly (1992). Her intimate understanding of Skinner gives her an advantage that other technoskeptics lack. For as she posits in her latest book, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, we seem to have wandered into a dystopian version of Skinners future, thanks mainly to Google, Facebook, and their peers in the attention economy. Silicon Valley has invented, if not yet perfected, the technology that completes Skinners vision, and so, she believes, the behavioral engineering of humanity is now within reach.

In case youve been living in blissful ignorance, it works like this. As you go through life, phone in hand, Google, Facebook, and other apps on your device are constantly collecting as much information as possible about you, so as to build a profile of who you are and what you like. Google, for its part, keeps a record of all your searches; it reads your e-mail (if you use Gmail) and follows where you go with Maps and Android. Facebook has an unparalleled network of trackers installed around the Web that are constantly figuring out what you are looking at online. Nor is this the end of it: any appliance labeled smart would more truthfully be labeled surveillance-enhanced, like our smart TVs, which detect what we are watching and report back to the mothership. An alien might someday ask how the entire population was bugged.

This is exclusive content for subscribers only.Get unlimited access to The New York Review for just $1 an issue!

View Offer

Continue reading this article, and thousands more from our archive, for the low introductory rate of just $1 an issue. Choose a Print, Digital, or All Access subscription.

If you are already a subscriber, please be sure you are logged in to your nybooks.com account. You may also need to link your website account to your subscription, which you can do here.

Read the original post:

Surveillance Capitalism: Bigger Brother | by Tim Wu - The New York Review of Books

What Were the Origins of the Holocaust? – The New York Times

Still, Aly has a masterly command of the facts of the Nazi catastrophe, its bricks and mortar amassed in all their mountainous detail. And the details he captures are all the more crucial because they are generally inaccessible in secondary sources elsewhere.

Curiously, Aly sees his new book as something more than a historical narrative: It is, he suggests, a guide for how to prevent similar horrors from happening in the future. Thus, it begins (this a jarring turn for a study of the backdrop to Nazi genocide) with Zionisms progenitor, Theodor Herzl. In Alys version, Herzl sought to guide the construction in the Middle East of a European-inspired, Jewishly homogeneous nation-state, with its predictable outcome: the dismissal of the lands indigenous population, a tragedy that festers to the present day.

Herzl is portrayed, at the same time, as a prescient prophet of doom, who sees more starkly than most the dangerous development in Europe of a view of Jews as disruptive immigrants, subversive radicals and intolerable economic competitors. Herzls solution, as Aly sums it up, is Jewish settlement on the empty spaces on earth so that Jews can create a homogeneous nation at peace with itself.

This he culls from Herzls diaries. But the problem once again is with Alys inclination to flatten his details. Herzl does indeed say all that Aly attributes to him, but as the Harvard historian Derek Penslar has observed, Herzls diaries are not a readily transparent source for his politics since theyre often punctuated by fevered speculations on matters contradicted by Herzl elsewhere. This is especially true with regard to his late-life novel Old-New Land, the work probably dearest to Herzls heart, where Palestine is depicted as a social utopia with Arabs and Jews living peacefully side by side. There the villain is a heinous Jewish ethnocentric.

Alys book appears, of course, at a moment when anti-Semitism seems ascendant, yet also when the chasm between proponent and foe is more confounding than ever. Israels Benjamin Netanyahu is now the most articulate, respectable proponent of much the same far-right nationalist populism that has historically nurtured anti-Jewish hatred. And in the United States the White House continues to stoke anti-Semitisms embers, branding others as purveyors of hate while itself remaining the bearer of insidious messages that cut deep into public life.

Alys reminder of the usefulness of taking a close look at the quiet horrors of Europes interwar years thus, despite the shortcomings of his new book, feels all the more valuable today. And his acknowledgment that comparisons between now and then once the province of the ill-informed deserve more serious attention from historians and others is just one of many reminders as to how far weve stumbled into an age of troubled sleep.

See the rest here:

What Were the Origins of the Holocaust? - The New York Times

Brought to you by nature: Death, destruction, and pandemics – Grist

News on climate in the time of coronavirusSubscribe today

The natural world can be wonderful, but its often terrible. It tortures the creatures within it, kills infants, and, oh yeah, produces pandemic viruses. This isnt incidental; its central, the very engine of evolution. Yet, when people see the word natural in the grocery store aisle, it conjures up sunshine, happy chickens, and warm hugs. You forget all the nasty bits.

Theres no chance that supermarket shoppers will mistake all natural for a warning instead of an endorsement, writes Alan Levinovitz in his new book. Natural: How Faith in Natures Goodness Leads to Harmful Fads, Unjust Laws, and Flawed Science. It scrutinizes the way people use the idea of natural goodness to justify their position whether its free-market boosterism, opposition to birth control, or supporting farm-to-table restaurants. This naturalness, he writes, is a mercenary ethic that anyone can hire to fight for their cause.

Levinovitz teaches religion at James Madison University, and to him, the way we embrace the idea of natural goodness looks exactly like religion. So when the coronavirus began to spread earlier this year, Levinovitz waited for people to react as if it were an act of a vengeful God, retribution for humans sinning against nature. He didnt have to wait long. Youve probably seen the memes suggesting that We are the virus.

Get Grist in your inboxAlways free, always fresh

The Beacon Other choices

Ask your climate scientist if Grist is right for you. See our privacy policy

We asked Levinovitz what he means when he says allegiance to nature has the hallmarks of religion, why nature has such a strong grip on our collective unconscious, and how we might think differently if we stopped believing in a God-like nature.

Q. Lets start with the coronavirus. Why are people drawn to this idea of nature taking retribution on destructive humans?

A. When confronted with unexpected suffering we want to take universalizable lessons from it. It feels like we should have an existential solution to what feels like an existential problem. So with coronavirus, the real solutions arent universal truths. They are very local, specific fixes: Figure out how to better regulate our interactions with wild species; figure out how to slow the spread of viruses quickly; figure out the infrastructure to deal with sick people. But those kinds of solutions dont address the existential angst, so people turn to things like, This is our punishment for living wrong, or the meme that humans are the virus, which is taken from the movie The Matrix.

Q. So people are looking for a more meaningful way to explain the pandemic?

A. There are more sophisticated versions of the humans are the virus messages, but in the end they all boil down to: There is a harmony in nature, and humans disrupt it in a variety of ways whether its through burning forests, or industrial agriculture, or eating the wrong kind of animal. At the end of the day its this search for universal laws that we have violated. If you can explain the pandemic as the consequence of violating natures laws that is reassuring because it means you know what went wrong, you know how to fix it, and you know how to fix the future. Thats extremely important, especially in times of crisis. If you are not going to locate those universal laws in God, you have to locate them in some other harmonious entity.

Its no coincidence that the same narrative comes up all the time with religion: Why was there a hurricane? Because people were having unnatural sex. This idea that living unnaturally results in a punishment, has been around for a very long time. So Im not surprised to see the same kinds of things coming up. The important thing to note is that this time they look secular, even when they are actually religious.

Q. Some people might be thinking, Wait, I say things like, its only natural, all the time! Is that a sign of stealth religious faith?

A. The idea that natural is good is so baked into our language, our consciousness, and even the subconscious myths that guide us through the world, that it can sometimes be difficult to get out of those myths and see them for what they are. One way to make it visible is to point to its inverse, the futurists myth. So the futurist looks to a utopia in which nature has disappeared and things are harmonious because humans have complete control. And to most people, myself included, that way of thinking makes no sense. We would never say, The computer works because it is unnatural. We would never say, Eyeglasses are beneficial because they are artificial. That is a bizarre way to think about things! Yet we attribute the same kind of causal goodness to nature all the time: This food is good for kids because it is natural. And we invert it too: Screens are bad for our children because they are unnatural. What I want people to understand is that that makes no more or less sense than saying things are good because they are artificial.

Q. Why does this way of thinking have so much power over us?

A. The word natural itself has to do with origins and birth. It really is an organizing force from beyond and before humans. Nature really did give birth to our solar system, to life, to humans, plants, and animals. So theres something tremendously compelling about that force. And theres an intuition that we ought to be grateful for it, right? Its a respect for a cosmic force, like the respect one might have for their parents. Surely its a good force, surely its a force we should not violate. So thats a big part of why we have this reflexive respect for nature and naturalness.

Q. I wrote a book, All Natural, on the same subject, and one of the conclusions I came to was that this nostalgia for a pre-industrial Eden was really a nostalgia for childhood. What do you think about that?

A. Nostalgia takes you back to a simpler time. But that simplicity comes from the fact that you are ignorant of the complexity. The childlike vision of the world is one where you dont understand how things work: The dishes just magically get washed, and the food magically appears, and theres something wonderful about that. People who dont study the pre-industrial past have that same childlike vision of what life was like because they dont know all of the bad things about it. Nostalgia is a selective forgetting.

Q. How did your own belief system change as you investigated this?

A. I went into this book thinking it was going to be a straight debunking of naturalness. Thats not where I ended up. I ended up thinking it makes sense to value things simply because they are natural: Yellowstone National Park is valuable because it is more natural than other places. Its fine to value naturalness in the same way that we might value freedom or beauty. The problem is that its not the only value which is where you get when you confuse nature with God. That means there are going to be tradeoffs sometimes. Sometimes whats natural is not going to be good for our health. Sometimes whats natural take Yellowstone is not going to be good for something else we value, like accessibility. You have to have a road through Yellowstone Park or people cant get to it, so you make it slightly less natural. I came out of this project thinking we need to be able to love and value nature without worshipping it. That is to say, without assuming that any departure from nature is corrupt or bad.

Q. But where does that leave you? Practically, in your daily life.

A. My editors asked the same thing. Whats the alternative? We run into these questions all the time. How do I parent my kid? What do I eat? How should I choose to give birth? When you take away that simple and existentially satisfying rule of thumb that natural is good, you need to put something in its place.

My answer to that is that we need to be comfortable with uncertainty. Sometimes the natural approach will be better. Sometimes the natural approach will be worse. Its unfortunate because thats not a satisfying theological answer.

Q. It can be an exciting answer though. Embracing uncertainty means embracing dynamism and wonder.

A. I love the word wonder because wonder is an optimists synonym for doubt or uncertainty. To wonder is to not know. But its to not know in a way that makes for awe and joy rather than anxiety and ignorance.

One thing thats really helped me, especially during this uncertain time, is that I dont see uncertainty as something that needs to be overcome, but celebrated instead. As I was talking to the experts I interviewed for this book, I noticed that the most knowledgeable people are more attuned to complexity: The more you learn, the more your expectations are overturned, and that experience of uncertainty becomes normal.

This is really important at this time of the pandemic. Its OK imperative even to change our minds. When a scientific body or a government shifts its position on something because new data has come in, that does not represent weakness or a violation of a law that we used to think was universal. It just means that they are being responsible rather than dogmatic. Reframing uncertainty as wonder, and certainty as dogmatism, can do a lot for feeling more secure in our uncertainty.

The way that humanity tackles this pandemic parallels how it might fight climate change. Sign up for our semi-weekly newsletter,Climate in the Time of Coronavirus.

Follow this link:

Brought to you by nature: Death, destruction, and pandemics - Grist

Has Coronavirus Made the Internet Better? – The New York Times

For a time, futurists dreamed, optimistically, that cyberspace might exist as a place where humankind could hit reset on society. The idea was that the arrival of networked computers would create an imaginary space where bodily markers of difference would be masked by a Utopian fog. In 1996, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, John Perry Barlow issued a manifesto titled A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, which stated, We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force or station of birth. Barlow continued that the civilization he and others hoped to create would be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before.

By now we know that those dreams were a fantasy, informed by the same imperialistic and colonial urges that underpinned the creation of the internet itself. No dream internet Utopia ever emerged. Instead, societal woes have been compounded by the rise of technology. The internet has been oriented around an axis of maximizing profits, almost since its inception. In The Know-It-Alls, the journalist (and my former colleague) Noam Cohen documents the emergence of Stanford University (nicknamed Get Rich U.) as the birthplace of Silicon Valley, a place where a hackers arrogance and an entrepreneurs greed has turned a collective enterprise like the web into something proprietary, where our online profiles, our online relationships, our online posts and web pages and photographs are routinely exploited for business reasons. Today, it feels almost impossible to imagine another way of thinking about the internet.

And yet, in the aftermath of the arrival of the novel coronavirus, one has emerged that feels, at least for the moment, closer to John Perry Barlows embarrassingly earnest speech. Its worth noting that he also said that cyberspace was an act of nature, and it grows itself through our collective actions.

Historically speaking, new infrastructures tend to emerge as a response to disasters and the negligence of governments in their wake. In the 1970s, for example, an activist group called the Young Lords seized an X-ray truck that was administering tuberculosis tests in East Harlem, where the disease was prevalent, and extended the operating hours to make it more readily available to working residents. In the days since the crisis began, Ive been turning to Adrienne Maree Browns 2017 book, Emergent Strategy, which offers strategies for reimagining ways to organize powerful movements for social justice and mutual aid with a humanist, collective, anticapitalist framework. She describes the concept as how we intentionally change in ways that grow our capacity to embody the just and liberated worlds we long for. Her book asks us not to resist change. That would be as futile as resisting the deeply embedded influence technology has on our lives. Its the same as resisting ourselves. But rather, it asks that we adapt, in real time, taking what we know and understand and applying it toward the future that we want. The internet will never exist without complications already, many of the tools that are helping acclimate to this new cyberreality have been called out for surveillance but perhaps people are learning how to work the tools to their advantage now.

View original post here:

Has Coronavirus Made the Internet Better? - The New York Times

Review: Sideshow Theatre’s The Happiest Place on Earth Now Available to Stream – thirdcoastreview.com

Phillip Dawkins. Photo by Michael Brosilow.

Playwright Phillip Dawkins 2016 solo show, The Happiest Place on Earth, uses Disneyland as a means to investigate his family history. The park, which opened in 1955, became a crucial institution for his mother, her sisters, and his grandmother after they visited it for the first time in the 1960s, shortly after Dawkins grandfather, a popular sportscaster in Albuquerque, New Mexico, died after suffering an aneurism live on-air. Presented as a monologue on a set that resembles a classroom, the original production from Sideshow Theatre Company and Greenhouse Theater Center is now available to stream from Sideshows website.

Shifting in and out of impressions of his grandmother, his mother and his aunts, Dawkins tells their tale concurrent to the opening of the park itself, and much of the narration places their tragic reality in stark contrast to the Technicolor magic of Disneys parks and films. Cinderella, Snow White, Dumbothese are creation stories for us all, Dawkins argues, a sort of unified American religion that delivers the promise of happiness, even when life takes its toll.

The false utopia of our American entertainment has certainly been interrogated before, but Dawkins remains firmly in the personal here, allowing the playwright to sidestep cynicism in favor of poignancy. The reverence he has for his familys origins gives the show an engaging through-line, and when Dawkins plainly asks the audience Have you ever been happy? it registers as a genuine attempt at connection. Never does he seem to deem the pursuit of happiness as a futile endeavor.

Though most of the piece does have a straightforward approach to storytelling, director Jonathan L. Green develops several moments of welcome theatrical invention: the sequence of his aunts trip through the Alice in Wonderland ride shortly after she lost her father delivers one of the shows most thrilling moments, as Dawkins switches between lines of dialogue from the film and an imagined, combative conversation between the little girl and her mother, all under shifting lights and sounds.

This is an obvious choice for streaming the action of the piece is limited to Dawkins using an overhead projector to show pictures of his family and of maps of the park (the quality of the video does make it difficult to make out some slides, but luckily Dawkins always explains what were looking at). And Dawkins voice, which evokes the pitch of an antique newscaster, conveys the story with easy charm.

And, as everything seems to these days, the work has a fascinating connection with the presentthe park only saw two unscheduled closures in its operating history, the first being the Kennedy assassination, and the next being 9/11. Of course with the current COVID-19 crisis, the park, and its sister in Orlando, will remain closed until further notice, according to the companys website. The world was noticeably shifting politically in 2016, and The Happiest Place on Earth, with Dawkins hesitant but warm optimism, celebrated the heroics of an ordinary life. Its good medicine today, for our new, isolated reality.

You can request a streaming link for The Happiest Place on Earth from Sideshow Theatre Companys website. The link is pay-what-you-can with a prompt to donate to help support the company. Running time is 90 minutes.

Related

Read the original:

Review: Sideshow Theatre's The Happiest Place on Earth Now Available to Stream - thirdcoastreview.com

Life After Capitalism and the New ‘al Shatir-Copernicus’ Revolution – Manifesto of Hope-II – Kashmir Times

By Aditya Nigam. Dated: 4/16/2020 12:29:34 AM

In the previous instalment of this article in Parapolitics, I had discussed the situation arising out of the Covid 19 pandemic in terms of the possible implications of the global lockdown and 'quarantine of consumption', for post-capitalist futures. In this part, I will discuss (a) the conditions that make such futures not just imaginable but possible and (b) indicate certain directions that such futures are already taking - for the paths that we tread now are the ones that lead to the future.Theory/ Concept/ DiscourseSince all talk of post-capitalist futures only sounds outlandishly utopian and out of sync with what we see around us with the 'naked eye' as it were, it is necessary to first clear our field of vision a little. And, let us be very clear here that this 'clearing of the field of vision' is not, in the first instance, about practices on the ground but about the field of knowledge - and theory in general. And before any hard-boiled hysterical-materialist tries to tell us that all this is idealism and that the 'real' stuff is materiality and things only happen in practice, I want to make three general points here. First, for the more theologically oriented: it was Lenin who said repeatedly that 'without revolutionary theory, there cannot be any revolutionary movement.' (What is to be Done?) Not only that, he also insisted (after Kautsky) that left to its own, the working class movement could only produce 'trade union consciousness' and that 'socialist theory' had to be imported from outside (basically bourgeois intellectuals) into the working class movement. This understanding was to lead to all kinds of problems including vanguardism but we will let that be for now.Second, (and here matters get a bit more compicated) look at any 'movement' anywhere in the world and it will be clear that the relationship between theory/ discourse and practice reveals the same pattern. What Lenin said is, in a different way, not just true of Marxism/ socialism but also feminism, environmentalism, queer politics and so on. Indeed, it is equally true of the great religious movements of yore - every one of them had to first pronounce the idea that distinguished it from previously dominant ones. It is no less true of the nationalist and fascist movements of our times. In fact, this is also true of 'modernity', which too, we often forget, was the outcome of a set of movements in different domains. The discourse of modernity did not simply describe a set of phenomena, practices and institutions - but actually produced them as normatively desirable and instituted them. Its discourse laid out the contours of what the modern State and Law were all about and how states should act.The 'theory' or the concept does not have to be true (think of Hindutva, for example), but as Deleuze and Guattari would say 'it produces resonances' and orders the field in a particular way. (Deleuze and Guattari, What is Philosophy?) What the enunciation of a concept does is either to make visible (and intelligible) certain practices that might already have been there or, make possible the articulation of a certain set of experiences in a way that they immediately start making sense to a large number of people. So, we can legitimately say, in retrospect, that 'queer' sexual practices perhaps have existed through all ages but they are only brought into our field of vision once theory itself has been 'queered' in a manner of speaking. Not only does it allow us to see the existence of such practices in the past but as a precondition, first makes visible the 'heterosexual matrix' (Judith Butler) that has so long invisibilized all but the male and the female. Its enunciation immediately makes it possible to see how much of effort, time and investment goes into maintaining this binary sexual division and how so often 'abnormal', in-between cases, are subjected to medical intervention.Something of that sort happens with the 'economy' as J.K. Gibson-Graham showed very convincingly in their book The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy (1996). Essentially what Gibson-Graham did was to 'queer' capitalism by showing that the economy did not simply consist of Capital and Labour (a capitalocentric notion analogous to the phallocentric one with regard to gender); rather, it comprised a series of different economic and social forms and transactions that had been made invisible by our theoretical frames. Their (Gibson-Graham was the single authorial persona adopted by Julie Graham and Katherine Gibson) intervention was made from their own locations in the United States of America and Australia but it made it possible for us to see a whole range of forms in societies like India's that constituted such 'non-normative economies'. These include the different forms of informal economies, peasant production, cooperatives, small credit and self-help groups run by women (called 'committee' dalna in northern India), hawking, rickshaw pulling, vending and so on, not as remnants of a past that had to be 'eradicated' and subsumed into the formal (read: corporate) economy, but as forms that should be strengthened. I will return to these forms in greater detail later but for the present it should be underlined that already, more than two and a half decades before Gibson-Graham, the International Labour Organization's (ILO) Employment Mission to Kenya found something astonishing: what had been called the 'traditional' sector till then had actually expanded rather than diminishing as per expectations. Just a few years before that economic anthropologist Keith Hart reached exactly the same conclusions from his work in Ghana and proposed the concept of 'informal sector' in place of 'traditional sector'. The idea was to recognize it as contemporaneous rather than see it as a remnant of the past to be eliminated. The ILO adopted Hart's terminology and it acknowledges that the 'conceptual discovery' of the idea of informality had changed the terrain.Another intervention by scholars like Timothy Mitchell (Rule of Experts) and Michel Callon took a decisive step in this regard: instead of saying that the 'economy' is an imagined construct, they (especially Mitchell) showed that the 'economy' was in fact, actually put in place by the emerging discipline of economics/ macroeconomics, more particularly in the early decades of the twentieth century. Its materiality is nowhere denied but the fact that it is put in place via a series of conceptual interventions and apparatuses is underlined.Third, the question of technology as we have inherited it from the vulgar Marxist tradition: This way of seeing it understands it as a 'secular development of the productive forces'; as an objective process that supposedly constitutes the 'material basis' of all that happens in the domain of ideas (even the relations of production are determined by such developing productive forces). While many Marxists have given up on the notion that 'ideas' arise on the economic base in some crude fashion, most of them still hold that this is an objective process which is therefore irreversible. Now, a moment's reflection is enough to show that any - even the smallest - development in technology is a result of some development in the area of scientific knowledge - it simply does not happen of its own accord. A scientific development or breakthrough (as in the case of Artificial Intelligence [AI]) is a consequence of theoretical development in the field of knowledge. However, which technology is adopted and becomes dominant is determined by specific decisions that are tied to decisions of corporations based on matters like estimations of future profits, scale of investments, pushing through by government policy. No technology develops 'on its own', and since it is put in place through specific decisions of profit (e.g. labour saving) and surveillance etc, they can also be reversed.Yes, we cannot go back to the 20th century and reverse decisions regarding technology taken then but the effects of many such decisions can be reversed or re-envisioned in a new way. Such things keep happening anyway, especially when it suits the needs of capital. Thus for example, the large factories and plants of the early twentieth century Fordist production era, were simply abandoned and dismantled once capital moved to 'flexible accumulation' of late-twentieth century. The landscape of abandoned factories still exists in many parts of the world including Europe and the USA - some of them having already been repurposed into parks or museums, even shopping malls. Decommissioning of large dams too is not a process unknown to humanity. China, the current industrial hub of the world (and at the centre of the COVID 19 controversy) has not just abandoned factories but abandoned ghost cities across different provinces.In short, neither is technology (or development for that matter) a demiurge, an objective power before whose will the world must bow, nor does the irreversibility argument have legs to stand on.The New 'Copernican' RevolutionI borrow this term 'Copernican Revolution' from the work of US environment analyst Lester R. Brown who talked about it two decades ago. Where Brown talked of the need for a new Copernican revolution, I argue that it has actually been underway for quite sometime. Parenthetically, we should perhaps call it the 'Al-Shatir-Copernicus Revolution', considering that today we know that Copernicus actually worked with the great Syrian astronomer, Ibn al-Shatir's model - a fact that the Polish Copernicus in the 16th century never hid but which was erased from subsequent history. If the Al-Shatir-Copernicus revolution completely blasted the idea that the earth was the centre of the universe and the sun revolved around it, we are confronted with a similar earth-shaking revolution today. Its elements have been with us for sometime now and they have increasingly led to the realization that there is something fundamentally wrong in the belief that has been our lodestar from the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries on - that nature was something to be exploited and dominated/ tamed for serving the needs of the new sovereign - Man. 'Nature' was seen as merely a provider of 'resources' and 'raw materials' for what later came to be known as 'the Economy'. The 'Economy' was the larger set; 'nature' was its subset. The roots of this idea actually go back to the Cartesian moment and to what Bruno Latour has called the 'Great Divide' - that point in the emergence of the modern world when 'Society' became separated from 'Nature', 'Humans' separated from 'Non-humans'. Humans became the centre of the universe and 'the Economy' - in the specific sense of an entity with its own laws - the centre of human existence. This new entity would actualize the creation of more and more wealth as a marker of Progress. We can call this the point of emergence and dominance of the Western episteme.The contours of the new revolution have still to be spelt out and it has to be named, but in a sense it is already telling us that just as the Earth was not the centre of the Universe (in natural sciences), so are its inhabitants not the Universe's centre (in the social sciences and philosophical sense). The new revolution is simply telling us that it is a vain and puerile idea for humans to start believing in the fiction of their sovereignty, and to think that they and their 'economy' over-rides that larger entity - call it Nature, call it Ecology or whatever else you want to. As a matter of fact, we are now facing a situation of widespread disenchantment with the all-powerful, world-conquering Western episteme. As more and more cultures across the world face the destruction of their cultures, their environment, their ways of living and being, they have begun to articulate different kinds of relational ontologies drawing on traditional ideas of living - Ubuntu (the Zulu idea that a person is a person through others), Buen Vivir or Sumak Kawsay in its Quechuan indigenous version, Suma Qamana in the language of the Aymara people of Bolivia, idea of happiness in our neighbouring Bhutan - all of which articulate a notion that is directly opposed to, (1) the idea of the 'homo economicus' - the self-maximizing 'rational' individual given to us by the ruling Western episteme. (2) the idea that 'Man' is sovereign, meant to rule over nature. They see humans as themselves belonging to a larger cosmos where they are but partners like other species. These ideas are no longer related to some marginal practices attributed to indigenous communities that we had, under the spell of the Western episteme, assumed to be 'past forms' destined to go extinct. These ideas have been enshrined in the Ecuadorian and Bolivian constitutions. There is of course strong political reaction from powerful corporate capitalist interests and the struggle to establish these ideas will certainly go through ups and downs but the fact that these constitutional provisions were publicly debated and accepted - in the Ecuadorian case through a referendum - shows that these are gaining massive acceptance within larger publics. The mainstream itself is changing.And it is not just among indigenous people that the turn towards such 'relational ontologies' is being articulated; we can see serious efforts to reconnect with such ideas within say the Chinese or Indian, especially Buddhist thought. It is a different matter that the Chinese and Indian elites still live in the fantasy world of neoliberal capitalism but there is little doubt that slowly but surely the spell is breaking outside the charmed circle of political elites. In the first instalment of this essay, I had referred to people from the corporate world moving into different lifestyles - outside the frenetic speed of the city life - into slower but more meaningful activities dedicated to anything from teaching poorer children to organic farming to the arts. They do not intend to go back to the caves as most unrepentant modernists still seem to believe; they seek more meaningful lives outside the world of state and capital. In the last section of this essay, I want to now briefly sketch a picture of the possible new directions in which our future thinking will have to move - and these are based entirely on what is actually happening in the world today.Post-Capitalist Futures: A Guide MapIt is obviously impossible for anyone to lay out a guide map - leave alone a blue-print for the future. And since my own proclivities are decidedly against apriori programmes and blueprints, I will only map out what is already there but which we might hopefully now be better able to see.At one level, many of the things I will identify below have been in existence for a very long time but we could either not see them or saw them as 'remnants of past forms' destined to go extinct.Let us begin then by asserting (once we have figured out that all entrepreneurship, trade and commerce are not capitalist) that post capitalist futures are likely to be composed of a rainbow of economic and social forms. It will mean the co-existence of a range of different forms of ownership of property ranging from the commons to cooperatives, private artisanal/ craft to peasant, from simple usufruct rights to urban or forest lands to direct state/ public ownership. Matters like public health and education will most likely be in the hands of the state, as is being increasingly recognized now.One of the difficulties in our being able to imagine a world without capital has to do with that biggest fiction of economics - that for creation of employment, we need capital. We (read: governments) therefore, need to woo capital, to let it come on whatever terms it demands - tax holidays, freedom from adherence to labour laws, subsidized electricity, decent 'investment climate' and so on. The first thing to remember is that unemployment is a creation of capitalism; it cannot therefore be its solution. In the first world ('advanced capitalist countries'), where it has destroyed all other forms of property (commons etc) and has over the years moved from 'jobless growth' to what has been called 'jobloss growth', there now hangs the spectre of AI that will in the near future eat up almost forty percent of the jobs in the USA. In countries like India too it can have disastrous consequences.It is in fact, against the backdrop of the endemic unemployment and insecurity of ordinary lives that the idea of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) has come up in Europe. At one level, the roots of the idea have been traced to the 16th century, to Thomas More's Utopia but it has been taken up more seriously as a possibility from sometime in the 1970s. Andre Gorz in fact argued in favour of this idea in the 1980s and it has lately acquired an even more serious dimension as it has found its way into policy debates. It has been acknowledged, as for example in James Ferguson's Give a Man a Fish, that large parts of the population have become redundant in contemporary capitalism and they are not really ever going to get jobs. Demanding employment is chasing a chimera. Hence the demand for UBI. In the West, it has been a longstanding demand of intellectuals on the Left but it is only recently that it has entered the arena of policy debates indicating a much bigger shift. The reality also is that in most of the West, all forms of small property and the commons have been so thoroughly privatized/ destroyed that UBI looks like the only possible option.I had briefly discussed how the situation created by the Covid 19 pandemic has led to a serious discussion on at least a temporary UBI even in the UK and the USA. The Spanish government has now states that it is seriously consdering rolling out a permanent UBI plan to cope with the situation. It is also worth remembering that in India, Sikkim already has started implementing some form of UBI and in the run-up to the last general election, Rahul Gandhi as Congress President had proposed his NYAY program (Nyunatam Aay Yojana) - a version of the UBI. That the UBI demand was a left wing demand that is now being seriously discussed is because there is urgent need (even before the Covid-19 outbreak) to put some purchasing power in the hands of ordinary people. This is already an acknowledgement that the global capitalist economy has to be put on ventilator - it has been in a permanent crisis of sorts ever since the financial crisis of 2008 and that is now only going to aggravate further.It may be useful at this point to return briefly to the question of the informal economies that we discussed earlier since, for most of the non-West that is an issue of central importance. More than 60 percent of the world's employed are today employed in the informal economies. As a matter of fact, is now no longer a matter of the non-Wesern 'developing economies' alone. According to Martha Chen, by the 1980s, informalization and the debate around it was expanding even in the first world, though for entirely negative reasons, namely the move to post-Fordist 'flexible accumulation'.'By the 1980s, the terms of the informal sector debate expanded to include changes that were occurring in advanced capitalist economies. Increasingly, in both North America and Europe, production was being reorganized into small-scale, decentralized, and more flexible economic units. Mass production was giving way to "flexible specialization" or, in some contexts, reverting to sweatshop production (Piore and Sabel 1984). These changes were (and are still) associated with the informalization of employment relations. Standard jobs were being turned into non-standard or atypical jobs with hourly wages but few benefits, or into piece-rate jobs with no benefits; production of goods and services was being subcontracted to small-scale informal units and industrial outworkers. In the process, the informal economy had become a permanent, but subordinate and dependent, feature of capitalist development (Portes, Castells and Benton 1989).'Elsewhere, I have discussed how the financial crisis of 2008 led to a large-scale debate among economists and policy-makers regarding the informal economy. In most of the third world, it seemed to be the place that provided employment to people who had lost jobs in the formal economy. The reappraisal is important because it had so long been seen as comprising enterprises that evaded taxes and generally remained 'unaccountable' but is now increasingly acknowledged as a segment of the economy that functions on a logic that is very different from that of what Kalyan Sanyal has called the 'accumulation economy'. Sanyal in fact explicitly calls this informal economy a 'need economy' and characterizes it as the domain of 'non-capital'. The point to be underscored here is that the often sub-optimal and subsistence level functioning of many of the units in the informal economies is often a consequence of the fact that it often has to function against great odds. Contrast those odds with the massive support and protection that big corporate enterprises get from governments and it will become clear that if these units were to get similar policy support they could function at an altogether different level.What happens to the big corporations in the scenario of post-capitalism we are envisaging? Certainly, they too will continue to exist alongside all the other forms but with one important difference. If decisions taken in corporate board rooms affect the lives of the community around either by polluting air or water, or are destructive of nature in any other way, then they must be subjected to severe periodic social auditing. Decisions like technological choices will also have to be included in such auditing.Over and above these, there are important initiatives that have very consciously tried to build alternatives - the idea of the solidarity economy for instance or the idea of commoning. Rather than explain what these are, let us hear from their proponents themselves - and bear in mind that these are now very significant initiatives involving reasonably large numbers of people. So here is Emily Kawano on the idea of the solidarity economy:'The solidarity economy is a global movement to build a just and sustainable economy. It is not a blueprint theorized by academics in ivory towers. Rather, it is an ecosystem of practices that already exist-some old, some new, some still emergent-that are aligned with solidarity economy values. There is already a huge foundation upon which to build. The solidarity economy seeks to make visible and connect these siloed practices in order to build an alternative economic system, broadly defined, for people and the planet''Over the past thirty-five years, solidarity economy practices have surged in response to the long-term crises of neo-liberalism, globalization, and technological change. These trends have generated punishing levels of political and economic inequality and created long-term un- and under-employment, acute economic insecurity, and reductions in government social programs and protections. The wealthy elite are able to use their wealth and influence to skew political priorities toward corporate profits and away from social and environmental welfare' 'In this context, many people and communities have become tired of making demands on a deaf or under-funded government. Moved by a combination of desperation, need, practicality, and vision, people have turned their energy to building their own collective solutions to create jobs, food, housing, healthcare, services, loans, and money. These practices operate both inside and outside of the formal and paid economy.'Such practices include a range of activities from workers' cooperatives to community initiatives, credit unions, self-help economy, alternative local currencies and so on. 'Commoning', on the other hand, draws its inspiration from the old idea of the commons but insists on the practice of making things common. Here is David Bollier explaining the idea of commons and commoning:'I believe the commons-at once a paradigm, a discourse, an ethic, and a set of social practices-holds great promise in transcending this conundrum. More than a political philosophy or policy agenda, the commons is an active, living process. It is less a noun than a verb because it is primarily about the social practices of commoning-acts of mutual support, conflict, negotiation, communication and experimentation that are needed to create systems to manage shared resources. This process blends production (self provisioning), governance, culture, and personal interests into one integrated system''Commoners are focused on reclaiming their "common wealth," in both the material and political sense. They want to roll back the pervasive privatization and marketization of their shared resources-from land and water to knowledge and urban spaces-and reassert greater participatory control over those resources and community life. They wish to make certain resources inalienable-protected from sale on the market and conserved for future generations. This project-to reverse market enclosures and reinvent the commons-seeks to achieve what state regulation has generally failed to achieve: effective social control of abusive, unsustainable market behavior''But rather than focus on conventional political venues, which tend to be structurally rigged against systemic change, commoners are more focused on creating their own alternative systems outside of the market and state. It is not as if they have abandoned conventional politics and regulation as vehicles for self-defense, or progressive change; it's just that they recognize the inherent limits of electoral politics and policy-driven solutions, at a time when these channels are so corrupted.'Every single one of the practices indicated here - including those like the social auditing of corporations - are indicative of the pathways to a future that is diverse and plural as well as more oriented to equity and fairness. Many of the activities that today exist outside the domains of the state and corporate controlled-market and may seem quite marginal can emerge as very significant players in that future, if the fate of the informal economies over the decades is any indication. The fact is that is where a large majority of people made redundant by the coming technological changes, especially AI, will find their place - earning and living-in-common with others. This imagination of the future is fundamentally liberated from the 'unemployment' framework. It proceeds by making capital increasingly redundant.-- (Courtesy: Kafila)--To be concluded

Read more here:

Life After Capitalism and the New 'al Shatir-Copernicus' Revolution - Manifesto of Hope-II - Kashmir Times

The future will not follow any of the already imagined Hollywood movie scripts – Spectator.co.uk

We often hear that what we are going throughis a real life case of what we used to see in Hollywood dystopias. So what kind of movie are we nowwatching?

When I got the message from many US friends that gun stores sold out their stock even faster than pharmacies, I tried to imagine the reasoning of the buyers: they probably imagined themselves as a group of people safely isolated in their well-stocked house and defending it with guns against a hungry infected mob, like the movies about the attack of the living dead. (One can also imagine a less chaotic version of this scenario: elites will survive in their secluded areas, as in Roland Emmerichs 2012where a couple of thousand selected survive with the admission price of $1billionper person.)

Another scenario along the same catastrophic lines came to my mind when I read the following news headline: 'Death penalty states urged to release stockpiled drugs for Covid-19 patients. Top health experts sign letter saying badly needed medications used in lethal injections "could save the lives of hundreds".' I immediately understood that the point is to ease the pain of the patients, not to kill them; but for a split of a second, I recall the dystopian Soylent Green (1973),which takes place in a post-apocalyptic overpopulated earth, where old citizens, disgusted with life in such a degraded world, are given the choice to 'return to the home of God': in a government clinic, they take a comfortable seat and, while watching scenes from pristine nature, they are gradually and painlessly put to sleep. When some US conservatives proposed that the lives of those over-70 should be sacrificed in order to get the economy running and save the American way of life, would the option staged in the film not be a 'human' way to do it?

But we are not yet there. When coronavirus began to spread, the predominant idea was that it is a brief nightmare which will pass with the weather getting warmer in the spring the movie rerun here was that of a short attack (earthquake, tornado etc.) whose function is to make us appreciate in what a nice society we live. (A subspecies of this version is the story of scientists saving humanity at the last minute by inventing the successful cure orvaccine against a contagion the secret hope of most of us today.)

Now that we are forced to admit the epidemics will stay with us for some time, and will profoundly change our entire life, another movie scenario is emerging: a utopia masked as dystopia. Recall Kevin Costners The Postman,a post-apocalyptic mega-flop from 1997, set in 2013, 15 years after an unspecified apocalyptic event left a huge impact on human civilisation and erased most technology. It follows the story of an unnamed nomadic drifter who stumbles across the uniform of an old United States postal service mail carrier and starts to distribute post between scattered villages, pretending to act on behalf of the 'Restored United States of America'; others begin to imitate him and, gradually, through this game, the basic institutional network of the United States emerges again.The utopia that arises after the zero-point of apocalyptic destruction is the same United States we have now, just purified of its postmodern excesses a modest society in which the basic values of our life are fully reasserted.

All these scenarios miss the really strange thing about the coronavirus epidemic, its non-apocalyptic character. It is neither an apocalypse in the usual sense of the utter destruction of our world, and even less an apocalypse in the original sense of the revelation of some hitherto concealed truth. Yes, our world is falling apart, but this process of falling-apart just drags on with no ending in sight. When the numbers of infected and dead rise, our media speculate how far from the peak are we are we already there, will it be in one or two weeks? We all eagerly attend the peak of the epidemic, as if this peak will be followed by a gradual return to normality, but the crisis just drags on. Maybe, we should gather the courage and accept that we will remain in a viral world threatened by epidemics and environmental disturbances. Maybe, even if the vaccine against the virus will be discovered, we will continue to live under the threat of another epidemic or ecological catastrophe. We are now awakening from the dream that the epidemic will evaporate in the summer heat. There is no clear long-term exit plan. The only debate is how to gradually weaken the lockdown measures. When eventually the epidemic recedes, we will be too exhausted to take pleasure in it. What scenario does this imply? The following lines appeared at the beginning of April in a major British daily, outlining a possible story:

'Radical reforms reversing the prevailing policy direction of the last four decades will need to be put on the table. Governments will have to accept a more active role in the economy. They must see public services as investments rather than liabilities, and look for ways to make labour markets less insecure. Redistribution will again be on the agenda; the privileges of the elderly and wealthy in question. Policies until recently considered eccentric, such as basic income and wealth taxes, will have to be in the mix.'

Is this a rehash of the British Labour manifesto? No, its a passage from an editorial in theFinancial Times. Along the same lines, Bill Gates calls for a 'global approach' to fighting the disease and warns that, if the virus is left to spread through developing nations unhindered, it will rebound and hit richer nations in subsequent waves:

'Even if wealthy nations succeed in slowing the disease over the next few months, Covid-19 could return if the pandemic remains severe enough elsewhere.It is likely only a matter of time before one part of the planet re-infects another. [...] Im a big believer in capitalism but some markets simply dont function properly in a pandemic, and the market for life-saving supplies is an obvious example.'

Welcome as they are, these predictions and proposals are all too modest: much more will be demanded. At a certain basic level, we should simply bypass the logic of profitability and begin to think in terms of the ability of a society to mobilize its resources in order to continue to function. We have enough resources, the task is to allocate them directly, outside the market logic. Healthcare, global ecology, food production and distribution, water and electricity supply, the smooth functioning of theinternet and phone this should remain, all other things are secondary.

What this implies is also the duty and the right of a state to mobilize individuals. They have a problem now (not only) in France. Its the time of harvesting spring vegetables and fruits, and usually thousands of seasonal workers come from Spain and other countries to do the job. But since now borders are closed, who will do it? France is already looking for volunteers to replace foreign workers, but what if there aren't enough? Food is needed, so what if direct mobilization will be the only way?

As Alenka Zupancic put it in a simple and clear way, if reacting to the pandemic in full solidarity can cause greater damage than the pandemic itself, is this not an indication that there is something terribly wrong with a society and economy which cannot sustain such solidarity? Why should there be a choice between solidarity and economy? Should our answer to this alternative not be the same as: 'Coffee or tea? Yes, please!' It doesnt matter how well call the new order we need, communism or co-immunism, as Peter Sloterdijk does (a collectively organised immunity from viral attacks), the point is the same.

This reality will not follow any of the already imagined movie scripts, but we desperately need new scripts, new stories that will provide a kind of cognitive mapping, a realistic and at the same time non-catastrophic sense of where we should be going. We need a horizon of hope; we need a new, post-pandemic Hollywood.

More:

The future will not follow any of the already imagined Hollywood movie scripts - Spectator.co.uk

Minecraft RTX beta launches this week, and it looks incredible – TrustedReviews

Microsoft and Nvidia have partnered up to announce the Minecraft RTX beta will becomeavailable to the public on 16th April.

The new beta marks the first time the public will be able to play the blocky sandbox title with ray tracing activated. This realistic light-rendering technology gives Minecraft a significant visual upgrade, with water and metallic objects becoming reflective, objects now casting realistic shadows and sunlight suddenly visible.

The update comes with several other new features, including new properties for physically based materials, support for DLSS 2.0 and six free pre-built RTX worlds to explore that offer guidance and inspiration for your own creations.

If youve got the Windows 10 edition of Minecraft and the required ray tracing capable hardware, youll be able to jump into the beta within a matter of days. For now though, read on for more details and keep an eye on Trusted Reviews for our upcoming hands-on review of Minecraft RTX.

Explained: What is ray tracing?

The Minecraft RTX beta opens to the public on 16th April 2020. Anyone with compatible hardware and a copy of the Windows 10 Minecraft edition will be able to play in the beta.

An official launch is expected before the end of 2020. The official release will apparently allow those without an Nvidia RTX graphics card to visit worlds created within Minecraft RTX, although the advanced lighting effects will of course not be visible to those without the necessary hardware.

Related: Nvidia Ampere

Minecraft RTX will be a free update for anyone who owns the Windows 10 edition of the sandbox game. The Windows 10 edition of Minecraft currently costs 22.49.

There are a couple of requirements to play Minecraft RTX: firstly, youll need a Windows 10 edition of Minecraft, along with an Nvidia Geforce RTX graphics card (from the RTX 2060 up to RTX 2080 Ti).

Unfortunately, those with an AMD or less powerful Nvidia GPU wont be able to access the beta, nor will they be able to visit any worlds that have been created via the RTX update, at least for the duration of the beta.

Related: Best Graphics Cards 2020

Minecraft RTX is the new enhanced version of the Windows 10 edition of Minecraft, featuring ray tracing technology for a stunning visual boost of lighting and shadow effects.

As Minecraft utilises a more advanced version of ray tracing (called path tracing) compared to the technology found in other games such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Battlefield 5, the visual effects are substantially more noticeable and put a greater strain on the GPU, despite Minecrafts simplistic textures.

To combat this, Nvidia has ensured this will become one of the very first games to support DLSS 2.0, which uses artificial intelligence to boost the pixel count in real-time, allowing you to view games at high resolutions without being a significant drain on the graphics card.

Microsoft is also introducing a slew of new physical elements for objects. Previously, blocks only differed in terms of colour and opacity. Now, physically based materials also feature properties such as Metallic, Normal, Roughness and Emissive, allowing certain blocks (such as lava) to radiate light while metallic objects will appear shiny.

On left: RTX turned off. On right: RTX turned on

If all these new features sound overwhelming, theres no need to worry as Nvidia is offering various tools and guides to help you adjust, including a physically based materials guide, Razzleberries RTX Texture Showcase and some HD resource packs. A Minecraft Java to Bedrock Conversion Guide will also help you transport any Minecraft worlds created in the Java edition to the Minecraft RTX beta.

Need some inspiration to get started? Microsoft has enlisted the help of several famous Minecraft creators to produce six pre-built RTX worlds that youre free to explore. These worlds include puzzles and stunning set pieces that take advantage of the new ray tracing upgrade, ranging from an underwater utopia to a neon-lit city.

If youre excited by the beta launch of Minecraft RTX and have questions regarding the new update, let us know by messaging us via the @TrustedReviews Twitter account.

Deputy Computing Editor

Formerly the Staff Writer at Stuff Magazine, Ryan's been writing about tech since he graduated from Cardiff University. At Trusted Reviews he is focussed on everything computer-related, giving him a v

Unlike other sites, we thoroughly review everything we recommend, using industry standard tests to evaluate products. Well always tell you what we find. We may get a commission if you buy via our price links.Tell us what you think email the Editor

See the original post here:

Minecraft RTX beta launches this week, and it looks incredible - TrustedReviews

WATCH: An episode of John Dalli and his new Club of Weird – The Shift News

Christmas brings thoughts of jolly old Santa and his cabin in Lapland to mind. Easter, on the other hand, doesnt quite have the same analogy. But former European Commissioner John Dalli changed all that when he joined the Free Republic of Liberland for its fifth anniversary celebrations on Easter Saturday to tell them his story and The Shift joined the conversation.

First, we had a round of awkward questions on where the hell is Liberland? Only to find out the place does not actually exist. It is a figment of the imagination. The second question, what on earth is John Dalli doing there?, then slowly fell into place.

Of late, Dalli appears to have re-invented himself as a blockchain guru helping people navigate the dodgy crypto Wild West even if he cant navigate a virtual conference. He was even organising Malta blockchain-themed tours as recently as December.

Dallis presentation for the Liberland conference was titled Learning from the Mistakes of other Governments. It was a lesson in audacity, delivered by a former politician deemed disgraced by not only the European Parliament and the European Commission, but also by the Council of Europe. But Dalli evidently wasnt letting that get in the way.

In 2015, a somewhat loopy Czech politician planted a flag in a marshy uninhabited area on the western side of the river Danube and proclaimed that this place was now the Free Republic of Liberland.

Unsurprisingly, given there was just him, his girlfriend and a college friend by the flag on that day, the politician Vt Jedlika was also elected as the countrys first president by a whopping majority of two to zero (he correctly abstained on the vote).

The tiny mosquito-infested parcel of land sits right on the uncomfortable border between Croatia and Serbia.

Historically, the two countries had a natural border that followed the winding course of the Danube. Engineering feats to ease navigation in 1947 by altering the rivers flow changed this.

The result, seen as unfair by Croatia since it lost 10 times as much land as Serbia, left the two countries locked in a longstanding dispute over who owns what.

The area, the size of Gibraltar, that Jedlika chose on the Croatian side of the river was previously part of Serbia. Croatia let it go when borders were redrawn, not to be seen as giving up its claim over much larger tracts of land on the Serbian side.

Although initially treated as a joke, Jedlikas then highly-publicised stunt risked jeopardising Croatias position on the border. The end result was that Jedlika was briefly arrested and banned from ever going back to that piece of land.

In an effort to discourage repeat episodes, Croatia even cordoned off the area and demolished the only property on the land, an abandoned old barn.

Liberland has, to date, only been recognised by three other equally unrecognised and self-declared microstates, the Kingdom of North Sudan (a place claimed by an American that promised his daughter shed be a real princess), the Kingdom of Enclavia (an enterprising neighbour) and the Principality of Sealand (a rusty offshore platform near Suffolk).

Undeterred by derision, being prohibited from setting foot on the land and the lack of any international recognition, Jedlika markets Liberland as a place where his libertarian beliefs can take root with little to no government and laws.

Liberland sells its citizenship, embraces crypto-currencies and all things blockchain since few banks would open a bank account for a citizen of the equivalent of La La Land. And, naturally, the country plans to charge its so-called citizens zero taxes.

Essentially, its a wet dream for uber capitalists wanting an exclusive club with minimal government interference.

If Malta was briefly gunning for the misguided moniker of Blockchain Island, Liberland wants to be the Blockchain Neverland.

Unsurprisingly, Liberland is frequently either described as a madmans project or a money laundering scheme, each of which tends to attract a host of interesting characters for different reasons. The conference laid this bare.

After online registration, we were sent a Zoom link to join the virtual celebrations.

The Zoom video stream started at 2.15pm CET upon which we were presented with a 10-minute countdown with a quaint hill-side chalet in the background, probably meant to evoke images of the Liberland barn.

At the two minute mark, the camera cut to Jedlika on the porch who gleefully announced, with his girlfriend awkwardly dancing in the background: Ladies and gentlemen, we are starting in two minutes. Then the camera cut back to the side of the chalet next to a desiccated vineyard.

At the end of the countdown, the camera zoomed into Jedlika who welcomed what we suspect to be little more than a handful of viewers (and us) to a conference that brought together the most famous and greatest scholars in the liberty world.

Some people are impatient. They think that starting a country is a summer holiday job, but these things take time. And right now we have the best experts, the founder of Liberland said introducing the conference.

The first presenter excitedly asked Jedlika how Liberland managed to get a connection with Dalli a question Jedlika dodged. Instead, he said Dallis experience as a European Commissioner could help us a lot.

We were keen to see where this would go despite the experience being surreal.

First up was a four-way video conference with members of the Liberland Aid Foundation describing how they were raising crypto-donations to assist them with their diplomatic efforts to get recognition of Liberland.

This talk was followed by, among others, a 20-minute networking session that consisted of watching a pixelated pair of floating digital hands roam around the digital landscape of what looked suspiciously like Second Life. We were, however, assured that this digital utopia was a fully blockchain-powered, crypto-currency based economy existing in a video game, whatever that means.

Liberland has recently opened its first embassy there, we were told, planted between a badly drawn tree and a river that digital avatars of online users kept accidentally tumbling into.

After what felt like an age, a bow-tied presenter with a heavy Eastern accent anxiously announced that Dalli was next up. Evidently uncomfortable with live speaking as he read off a script while someone filmed him, Dalli sent a pre-recorded video.

A random persons face popped up on the screen only to be quickly taken down, then the video started playing. There was Dalli in what looked like his dining room with a scribbled name label reading Dalli John, in case viewers werent quite sure who he was.

Dalli extolled the power of democracy at the start of his speech. All people should be equal before the law, said the man accused of evading justice in his home country.

Unsurprisingly, his strained speech was all about himself. He nurtured his relations in the Club of Weird by ranting against the evil bureaucracy in Brussels those he called megalomaniacs while occupying 10 minutes of peoples time spreading wild accusations of a web of conspiracy that couldnt have been put together to bring down a person who actually mattered.

He was the victim of attacks, defamation and hate-mongering, he told the few people bothering to follow his views on a dystopian dream of a country that does not exist and could only meet virtually, COVID-19 or not.

He kept repeating that the top honchos in Brussels, Giovanni Kessler the OLAF prosecutor who had the misfortune of believing bribery to be a prosecutable offence in Malta as well as both political parties in Malta, came together to launch a campaign that sought to quell the support of the Maltese people for his work.

It was the bureaucracy and corruption in institutions that levelled him in their ambition to grab power. He kept referring to evidence that proved all this was fraudulent a strategy created by lobbyists only different to the ones he blasts for not agreeing with his version of events.

His cause was noble, Dalli kept insisting to the handful of people watching an episode from the Land of Narnia. The mythical people supported his cause and this led to envy and hate and the animals from the brothers in the bureaucracy spoke ill of him to serve another agenda.

Dalli ended his rambling monologue by praising Liberland, although he conceded that investing in a piece of contested land claiming to be a country was perhaps a somewhat nebulous concept.

After a slip of the tongue in which he referred to the future citizens of Liberland as my citizens, which he corrected, Dalli ended his videotaped rant with a direct message to Liberlanders everywhere: Yours is a long, uphill climb good luck.

Dalli finally dialled in for the Q&A session after yet another series of talks, including:

Given that the few people actually watching him must have taken the opportunity to put the kettle on while he rambled on about Kessler and former Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, there were no questions for Dalli.

Like a true sport, Dalli stayed on fumbling with his camera turned on but with a muted microphone throughout the pained 15-minute Q&A to answer two planted questions.

Next up, there was yet another session of networking in Second Life that they swore wasnt Second Life. We stayed on if only out of pure masochism at this point, but it didnt last long.

Before the digital nightmare ended, we watched an over-excited guest speaker describe how a crypto operator can offer quasi-banking services without being actually licensed as a bank. Another speaker claimed, in between rather suspect charts, that global warming is just a hoax and that, in any case, a warmer planet would be good for biodiversity.

It was enough to finally switch off the freakshow.

Read more here:

WATCH: An episode of John Dalli and his new Club of Weird - The Shift News

Dual disaster planning, communication and reason for hope: a discussion with professor Sam Montano – temblor

By Tiegan Hobbs, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Seismic Risk Scientist, Temblor (@THobbsGeo)

Sam Montano, professor of emergency management and disaster science, talks about COVID19 and what recovery might look like.

Citation: Hobbs, T.E. (2020), Dual disaster planning, communication and reason for hope: a discussion with professor Sam Montano http://doi.org/10.32858/temblor.086

Since seeing the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, Sam Montano, Ph.D., has made it her lifes work to better understand how emergencies are handled, and how disasters affect communities. Shes a world-renowned expert in emergency management for recovery, disaster volunteerism and communicating disaster information to the public. In between working on her upcoming book, Disasterology, and teaching as a Professor of Emergency Management & Disaster Science at University of Nebraska Omaha, Montano took the time to talk about how emergency management is tackling COVID19, how the burden will be shouldered by our communities, and what recovery might look like.

Tiegan Hobbs (TH): Pandemics come without the same data emergency managers might usually have. For a wildfire, you know where was burned and roughly how badly. For an earthquake, you at least know the epicenter and magnitude. Whats it like for emergency managers to work when they are flying blind?

Sam Montano (SM): Its really difficult, because our decisions are very often only as good as the data we have. In one sense, emergency managers are used to operating without having all the information they would ideally have say, if communication lines are down during a hurricane but it certainly makes the response more difficult. Emergency managers around the world are all saying similar things. Theyre preparing for what they think is going to happen, but they dont know exactly what its going to look like in their communities. Especially in the absence of widespread testing in the U.S., theres a point where you can only do so much.

TH: We know that people with comorbidities and older people are at greater risk, medically. Can you speak to some of the non-medical categories of people who are at risk that were not hearing as much about?

SM: In the past couple of weeks, there have started to be more news stories written about the disproportionate impacts of COVID19 on low-income communities of color. These articles that Ive seen have primarily focused on New York City and New Orleans: two of our hotspots in the U.S. Theyre both places where weve seen folks who work essential jobs not having the privilege of being able to physically distance and stay home. So were starting to see that the rates of COVID and the impacts of COVID in those communities are going to be higher than in more affluent communities.

Any community where people are still having to leave their houses to go to work, people who cant afford to stay home, people who dont have the money to pay to have groceries delivered all of those factors are going to play into who actually contracts COVID.

In terms of the [comorbidity] component, this illness collides with communities that have higher rates of chronic illness, so we can expect to see that lower-income communities will likely have a much higher death toll.

Disinfection of New York City Subway cars against coronavirus. Image Credit: CC BY 2.0.

TH: Are there things that we can still do to improve this outcome?

SM: Yeah! Many people are already doing it, but I would encourage folks to pay attention to their own community. There are many mutual aid groups that have formed or repurposed around the country, that are helping with grocery shopping for elderly folks or babysitting their neighbors kids so they can still go to work. Its through these grassroots, one-on-one helping actions that stuff actually happens during disasters.

You should be calling in to check in on your neighbors to see if theyre ok. In emergency management we think of a whole of community response, which includes government, businesses and nonprofits but it also includes individuals. If you are in a position to donate, do so! A lot of food banks are struggling right now. Any local nonprofits are probably struggling right now, so if you can throw them any cash, that would be a helpful thing as well.

TH: What happens if a natural hazard strikes while COVID19 is still spreading?

SM: There are not a lot of easy answers. Any major disaster that happens during a pandemic isnt going to go well. Almost everything we do in terms of how we respond to and recover from a major disaster requires us to be close to one another: evacuation, search and rescue, sheltering displaced persons, rebuilding.

That said, there are trends that we can look toward that can make us more hopeful. The convergence of spontaneous volunteers is now online. After the 2010 Haiti earthquake, folks from all over the world were coming together to help map earthquake damage. After Hurricane Harvey [hit Houston in 2017], there was a call system to coordinate rescue all done virtually. The big takeaway here is that we just need to be creative. Its going to look different than were used to. And people will show up: There was a tornado in Nashville in early March, right as COVID started to explode in the U.S., but thousands of volunteers still showed up to help.

[On the government side,] I have talked to a lot of emergency managers in this country who are in the midst of rewriting their plans for hurricane season, or for how to deal with sheltering for tornadoes. [The idea of simultaneous disasters is] on their radar, for sure. The agencies that have resources to dedicate to reworking those plans are doing that.

Flooding in Port Arthur, Texas on August 31, 2017. Image Credit: Public Domain.

TH: How could we better prepare for compounding disasters?

SM: Its not that people didnt plan for dual disasters, its that we have systematically under-invested in our emergency management systems across the country. Most communities have a part-time emergency manager. They work maybe 15-20 hours a week on emergency-related stuff, and you cannot possibly expect that part-time emergency manager in a rural community in the Midwest to be able to create these plans to address not only a pandemic but also think through adjusting all their other plans for another disaster.

It gets back to the core philosophy of emergency management, where we take an all-hazards approach to planning. We focus on creating systems that are versatile, resilient and flexible no matter what the hazard is. What makes a response to a hurricane or tornado during the pandemic more challenging is primarily tied to the issue of physically needing to be apart from one another, but the system that we use to organize a response like the National Incident Management System should be the same as for a hurricane with no pandemic. Looking forward, its important for us to still focus on those core systems, but maybe we need to talk about how to make them more flexible.

TH: Youve said that the data clearly support sharing uncensored information directly with the public. Some have claimed this is a scare tactic. How has that played out here so far?

SM: The public deserves to know what is happening around us. Withholding information from the public leads to people not being able to make the best decisions for themselves and their families. I think it stems from a persistent belief that we need command and control during the response to a disaster, but research suggests that the public has to be active participants in a response because theyre making decisions that are going to impact that overall response. So instead of taking a top-down approach where officials are trying to disguise or withhold information from the public, a more bottom-up approach relies on those in positions of authority to provide information to the public so that they can be participants.

There needs to be clarity from anyone in a position of authority: the president, the health institutions, the media, your local mayor. Uncertainty leaves space for poor decisions, and the research supports that it is better to be honest with public. None of us are happy with the news were hearing, but it empowers us to make the right choices for ourselves and our families.

TH: Theres an idea that people turn into their worst selves during a crisis looting, hoarding, the negative sides of society. Is this borne out by data?

SM: Going back to the 1950s, disaster sociologists did a bunch of studies following disasters in the U.S. and they found that people were most likely to exhibit prosocial behavior during and following disasters, rather than antisocial. Theres a myth that people are running around panicking, looting, increases in violence, and that the whole situation is chaotic. In fact, research finds that people come together. They look around at the resources they have and seeing how they can improvise or use those resources to help. Thats where we see this convergence of people coming in to help, as well as emergence where the survivors of the disaster are the real first responders to the disaster. They begin search and rescue immediately after an earthquake. Theyre not waiting for official urban search and rescue teams to come in. It doesnt mean its a utopia, but its a time where people are coming together to help one another.

TH: The Imperial College study projected that well need to keep social distancing in place in some form until theres a vaccine widely available. Now theres interest in loosening restrictions earlier, and clamping back down when the numbers spike. Is there any precedent for this pulse-and-suppression strategy?

SM: No, I cant think of any precedent. The idea that we are going to minimize shelter-in-place orders and then put them back in place, and maybe do this multiple times, is logistically very complicated. It would require extensive and very clear communication from people in positions of authority that the public trusts. Given how the response has unfolded thus far I find it difficult to believe that we would be successful in navigating such a sophisticated order to the public.

Modeling suggests that the virus can be slowed below the capacity of the healthcare system so long as aggressive social distancing measures remain in place. A surge is expected if restrictions are loosened prior to development of a vaccine. Image Credit: Modified from Ferguson et al., 2020.

TH: Given the wealth of data that we will collect during this crisis, do you think disaster management will change?

SM: Obviously I hope that it does, but I am a bit more of a pessimist about it. We see differential impacts among gender, race, class lines, and their intersections, in just about every disaster. This is extremely well known among the disaster research community. Still, people think that disaster is this great equalizer and of course thats not true. All of those social inequalities that exist pre-disaster are exposed and made more prominent during and after a disaster. So perhaps this will make the public more aware of these disparities. That would be the optimistic take here.

That being said, this is exactly why we need to view emergency management through a social justice lens, because thats how we can get at not just the systematic inequalities in our communities, but we can also assess the systematic inequalities within our approach to emergency management.

TH: Do you think individual people will change their response in the future? With the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, communities where people had memories of a fatal tsunami had no fatalities in the 2011 event. Do you expect a similar effect from this?

SM: Yeah. Preparedness research is messy, but there is definitely some indication that previous disaster experience influences preparing for future disasters. I am particularly curious because FEMA has been talking a lot about creating a culture of preparedness in the United States. This shared experience across the country of being in the midst of this crisis has people realizing that they were not really prepared to go through this. Maybe there will be a lingering culture of preparedness that comes about because of it. Again, though, this is very closely tied to resources. Its much easier for a millionaire to stockpile a month of food in their basement than it is for somebody whos living paycheck to paycheck. Hopefully it will help people have preparedness on their mind moving forward.

Further Reading:

Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934.

Ferguson, N., Laydon, D., Nedjati Gilani, G., Imai, N., Ainslie, K., Baguelin, M., & Dighe, A. (2020). Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand.

Montano, S., & Savitt, A. (2016). Rethinking our approach to gender and disasters: Needs, responsibilities, and solutions. Journal of emergency management (Weston, Mass.), 14(3), 189-199.

Montano, S. (2019). Disaster volunteerism as a contributor to resilience. The Routledge Handbook of Urban Resilience.

Postdoctoral Seismic Risk Scientist at Natural Resources Canada

See the original post here:

Dual disaster planning, communication and reason for hope: a discussion with professor Sam Montano - temblor

‘We are powerless’: Italians offer window into life in second month of COVID-19 lockdown – National Post

Ilaria Piotto thought she was doing OK. She was focussed on the things she could control. She had built a routine. Sure, she was home all day, almost every day. But she was studying and chatting and keeping busy. I felt fine, she said. I didnt think all this was impacting me. And then, in the grocery store, she saw a friend.

It wasnt her best friend. Thats the thing. Before all this, they werent all that close. They ran in the same group. They saw each other at parties. But when she saw him that day, in the store, wearing his gloves and mask, she was overwhelmed. She barely stopped herself from crying.

It was so strange, so moving to see him after all this time, she said. You get used to a situation. You kind of forget things used to be different. Something like that reminds you of how they were.

Most Italians, including Piotto, have been in some form of mandated isolation for more than a month now. The COVID-19 pandemic struck northern Italy earlier and harder than it had any other Western country at the time. (The United States has since passed Italy in both total cases and fatalities.)

In early March, the National Post spoke to four Italian residents about life in that country in the early stages of the lockdown. The goal was to get a sense of what might soon be coming here. A month later, three of those four spoke to the Post again about their lives now and in the month since. The fourth person was unavailable to comment.

All three spoke about boredom and fear and the value of doing what has to be done. For Canadians, their reflections offer another window into our very near future, a place where the situation may just be turning the corner, but where much work and sacrifice remains to be done.

The comments below have been edited for clarity, style and space.

Jake Rupert is a former newspaper reporter from Ottawa. He now operates a villa and tour company in Abruzzo, east of Rome, with his wife, Lisa Grassi-Blais.

About a month ago, the numbers were going up so fast. They couldnt cremate the bodies fast enough in Bergamo, which is a pretty big city with several crematoriums. They were sending them out on military trucks. And that was the tipping point where I thought, OK. It was weird and a bit scary before, but this is very stark. Ive never seen anything like this in my life. I dont think anybody has.

So that was the tipping point for me. Well deal with the business. Were going to be OK, but were going to do our part. Im not going to complain about anything. Were going to follow the rules and hopefully get out of this without too much carnage. And I think most people have been that way. Even though our town has only one confirmed case, people know people in other villages that have passed away. Its like: my great uncle, my uncle, my grandfather, that kind of thing. So nobody here is really complaining about the quarantine.

In the last 10 days, it sort of plateaued and now were getting fewer cases. But the government isnt taking any chances. Theyre talking about possibly relaxing things, but its not going to be any time soon. They want to do what China did to pretty much eliminate the number of new cases before people start to resume daily life and then theyre going to do it in stages.

People here are doing what they have to do to get through. Our friend is the town clerk. Before this she was processing birth certificates and citizenship applications and zoning applications. All shes been doing for the last 30 days is doling out food stamps.

The good thing about our business is, weve been very conservative. We didnt take on debt and mortgages. So were OK. Its different for the 10 people that work with us. A couple of our cleaning ladies are getting food stamps. Were trying to help them out as best we can, but we have negative income. Were getting a lot of people cancelling. But well go broke before we see our staff members suffering.

Hezar Abbas is a 22-year-old asylum seeker originally from Pakistan. He came to Europe more than four years ago and has lived in Florence, where he has worked in a leather factory, for the past year-and-a-half. Hes been out of work and stuck at home since early March.

Right now our condition is like last month. Everything is the same. We are worried about our finances, our work and the things we need in our daily lives. Last week I sent a message to my boss because the Italian government announced a 600 euro ($910) bonus for workers. I wanted some information on how we could apply for it. My boss told us we have to wait. We are still waiting. And our boss has not paid us yet, so money is a big problem.

There are five of us in the house. We are playing cards, improving our language and trying to get Italian lessons. We have all our cricket stuff in the house, ball, bat, everything. But we havent broken anything because we play very slowly. We cook for each other. Today is my turn. I am going to make rice because it is easy to cook and you dont need too much stuff to put into it.

Obviously we are getting bored. If you spend more than a month at home, you are going to get bored. But it was worse in the first two or three weeks. I had nothing to do then. Then I thought, maybe I can try some online courses, or maybe I can try to improve my Italian. So now Im trying that and its going better.

If I go outside, to the market, if the police see me, they ask me, what are you doing here? Why are you outside? I must tell them that Im here to buy groceries. We can only go outside to buy the things we need for our daily lives. Buying anything takes at least an hour. We have to wait in a line. And one by one we can go in to buy our things.

One good thing is, everyone is the same now. Im treated like an Italian and the Italians are treated like me. At first, I thought they thought we were different, but now I think, they know we are equal.

Ilaria Piotto, 21, is a student at the Ca Foscari University of Venice. She lives with her parents in Padua, about 40 kilometres west of the city.

At the beginning I felt very anxious. I didnt know what was going on. I was struggling to create a routine. If youre at home, you can study. Thats fine. But its difficult to make yourself do things when you dont have a schedule, when you dont have places to be. I was worrying so much about the situation, about the news, but then, slowly, I was able to create a routine, I accepted the situation. I accepted that we are powerless.

Now, Im just trying to live my regular life, to focus on school and to stay busy basically. It feels almost normal not going out now, whereas at the beginning it was so strange. I cant even remember the last time I went out casually without anything important to do.

Imagining that things will go back to normal seems almost like a utopia

I didnt realize how much the isolation was affecting me until I saw one of my friends at the grocery store and I almost started crying. I felt like I was fine. I didnt think about that that much. That moment helped me understand, that maybe even if I thought I was fine, there was something deeper happening to me.

I dont know what life will look like when this is over. I cant imagine it. At this point my friends and I have all kind of accepted it. We came to terms with the situation. So imagining that things will go back to normal seems almost like a utopia. I dont know. I think it will take a long, long time before things return to the way they used to be.

Email: rwarnica@nationalpost.com | Twitter:

Read the original:

'We are powerless': Italians offer window into life in second month of COVID-19 lockdown - National Post

India’s COVID-19 cases rise to 11933, districts to be classified in three categories – News Live

New Delhi: The government continued to gear up its preparations in the fight against COVID-19 with three-way categorisation of districts as the total number of positive cases mounted to 11,933.

Out of total number of cases, 10,197 are active while 1,344 patients have been cured/discharged/migrated and 392 people have died.

The Ministry of Home Affairs issued revised guidelines on Wednesday about the extension of lockdown which also said that wearing of face cover is mandatory in all workplaces and public places.

With 117 new cases, Maharashtra continues to have the largest number of 2,801 COVID-19 positive cases. Of these, Mumbai has 1936 cases followed by Pune with 44, according to the state Health Department. Dharavi area in Mumbai has reported 60 COVID-19 positive cases.

As many as 35 staff members of a Mumbai hospital have tested COVID-19 positive.Fresh cases have been reported several states including West Bengal, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh.

In Indore, the number has gone up to 555 with 117 new cases.

A COVID-19 patient died in Meghalaya while six of his contacts have also tested positive for the infection.

While no case was reported from Gurugram for the sixth consecutive day, the number of cases in Haryana rose to 190.

Delhi Lt Governor Anil Baijal said that Delhi will use plasma technique for treatment on a trial basis to save lives of critical COVID-19 patients.

The Gautam Buddh Nagar administration added seven new areas in the district as hotspots including Sector 50 Noida, Shatabdi Rail Vihar Sector 2 Noida, Eldeco Utopia Sector 93A Noida, Gaur City 14 Avenue Noida Extension, ETA-1 Greater Noida and Kulsera Greater Noida.

Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba held a high-level review meeting through video conference with all chief secretaries, health secretaries, DGPs, District Collectors, Municipal Commissioners, SPs, CMOs and other officials of States/UTs and held a detailed discussion on a range of issues including large outbreak containment strategies and cluster containment strategies.

Stones were pelted at an ambulance carrying a team of medical personnel and police in UPs Moradabad, which had gone to escort family members of a person who died of COVID-19 here, to a quarantine facility.

Sharing details regarding the incident, SSP Amit Pathak said, A COVID-19 positive patient had passed away in Nagphani area. In this regard, the patients first contact, his family members, were to be quarantined. A medical team and police team had visited here for the same.

When the family members came out, a crowd pelted stones. The ambulance and police vehicle got damaged. We are sending the family members to the quarantine centre. The situation is under control now. We will identify the people involved in this incident and strict action will be taken against them, he said.

Addressing the daily regular press briefing, Indian Council of Medical Researchs (ICMR) head scientists Dr Raman R. Gangakhedkar said that according to research in China, it was found that coronavirus might have mutated in bats so as to infect humans.

There is also a possibility that bats might have transmitted it to pangolins, and from pangolins, it got transmitted to humans, he said.

We also conducted surveillance. We found that there are two types of bats, and they carried coronavirus which was not capable of affecting humans. Its rare, maybe once in 1000 years that it gets transmitted from bats to humans, he added.

Union Health Ministry Joint Secretary Lav Aggarwal said the districts of the country will be classified into three categories hotspot districts, non-hotspot districts with cases being reported from there and the green zone districts.

The Home Ministry guidelines said a few relaxations have been given to the movement and operations of some more industries in areas that have not been declared as hotspots or containment zones.

However, precautionary measures such as social distancing and wearing masks have to be followed.

The MHA also said that no unchecked movement of people except those maintaining essential services and providing medical care will be permitted from the COVID-19 hotspot zones.

The ministry emphasized that even the activities allowed under the new guidelines will not be permitted in the hotspot zones or the areas/clusters with high occurrence of COVID-19 cases.

As per the guidelines, all educational, training, coaching institutions shall remain closed. However, these establishments are expected to maintain the academic schedule through online teaching during the lockdown.

The bank branches and ATMs, IT vendors for banking operations, banking correspondents, ATM operation and cash management agencies will remain functional during the period.

Union Health Minister Harsh Vardhan held a high-level meeting through video conferencing with the World Health Organization (WHO) officials on measures to combat COVID-19.

A Health Ministry release said districts have been told to classify hospitals as: COVID Care Centres for mild cases or very mild cases, COVID Health Centres for clinical moderate cases requiring oxygen support and COVID Dedicated Hospitals for severe and critical cases with ventilator support.

Heres a quick read on the COVID-19 related updates:1. Delhi Lt Governor Anil Baijal said that Delhi will use plasma technique for treatment on a trial basis to save lives of critical COVID-19 patients.2. An FIR was registered here against nine Bangladeshi nationals for allegedly misusing their travel visa by being involved in religious preaching under Tablighi Jamaat and for trying to spread coronavirus, police said on Wednesday.3. Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on Wednesday launched a COVID-19 portal on its website to disseminate relevant information in relation to the novel coronavirus.4. The United Kingdom will receive nearly 3 million units of paracetamol from India.5. Andhra Pradesh government has set up an additional 471 temporary Rythu Bazars, which are government-run vegetable markets where farmers directly sell their produce.6. OYO Hotels and Homes has decided to open the doors to its hotels and offering free stays to doctors, nurses and other medical first responders who are helping in the fight against Coronavirus (COVID-19) in India.7. The Jharkhand Police has issued a set of guidelines for promoting safe usage of social media by citizens.8. Delhi High Court on Wednesday extended the suspension of the functioning of the High Court and its subordinate courts till May 3, when the extended lockdown is scheduled to end.9. Cab aggregator Ola on Wednesday announced its partnership with Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to support essential mobility amid the lockdown.10. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) administration informed that no deductions will be made from the salaries and Resident doctors who wish to contribute to the PM-CARES Fund should voluntarily do so. (ANI)

Read the original:

India's COVID-19 cases rise to 11933, districts to be classified in three categories - News Live

The testosterone myth – The Week Magazine

We place unreasonable trust in biological explanations of male behavior. Nowhere is this truer than with testosterone. Contemporary pundits invoke the hormone nicknamed "T" to prove points about maleness and masculinity, to show how different men and women are, and to explain why some men (presumably those with more T) have greater libidos. Yet, despite the mythic properties popularly associated with T, in every rigorous scientific study to date there is no significant correlation in healthy men between levels of T and sexual desire.

Beginning in the 1990s and really picking up steam in the 2000s, sales of testosterone replacement therapies (TRTs) went from practically zero to over $5 billion annually in 2018. This was either because there was a sudden outbreak of "Low T" when a major medical epidemic was finally recognized, or because T became marketed as a wonder drug for men thrown into a panic when they learned that their T levels declined 1 percent annually after they hit 30.

The answer is not that men's bodies changed or that Low T was horribly underdiagnosed before but that, in the minds of many, T became nothing short of a magic male molecule that could cure men of declining energy and sexual desire as they aged.

What's more, many have been taught that, if you want to know what causes some men to be aggressive, you just test their T levels, right? Actually, wrong: the science doesn't support this conclusion either. Some of the famous early studies linking T and aggression were conducted on prison populations and were used effectively to "prove" that higher levels of T were found in some men (read: darker-skinned men), which explained why they were more violent, which explained why they had to be imprisoned in disproportionate numbers. The methodological flaws in these studies took decades to unravel, and new rigorous research showing little relation between T and aggression (except at very high or very low levels) is just now reaching the general public.

What's more, it turns out that T is not just one thing (a sex hormone) with one purpose (male reproduction). T is also essential in the development of embryos, muscles, female as well as male brains, and red blood cells. Depending on a range of biological, environmental, and social factors, its influence is varied or negligible.

Robert Sapolsky, a neuroscientist at Stanford University in California, compiled a table showing that there were only 24 scientific articles on T and aggression in 1970-80, but there were more than 1,000 in the decade of the 2010s. New discoveries about aggression and T? No, actually, although there were new findings in this period showing the importance of T in promoting ovulation. There is also a difference between correlation and cause (T levels and aggression, for example, provide a classic chicken-egg challenge). As leading experts on hormones have shown us for years, for the vast majority of men, it's impossible to predict who will be aggressive based on their T level, just as if you find an aggressive man (or woman, for that matter), you can't predict their T level.

Testosterone is a molecule that was mislabeled almost 100 years ago as a "sex hormone", because (some things never change) scientists were looking for definitive biological differences between men and women, and T was supposed to unlock the mysteries of innate masculinity. T is important for men's brains, biceps and that other word for testicles, and it is essential to female bodies. And, for the record, (T level) size doesn't necessarily mean anything: sometimes, the mere presence of T is more important than the quantity of the hormone. Sort of like starting a car, you just need fuel, whether it's two gallons or 200. T doesn't always create differences between men and women, or between men. To top it all off, there is even evidence that men who report changes after taking T supplements are just as likely reporting placebo effects as anything else.

Still, we continue to imbue T with supernatural powers. In 2018, a U.S. Supreme Court seat hung in the balance. The issues at the confirmation hearings came to focus on male sexual violence against women. Thorough description and analysis were needed. Writers pro and con casually dropped in the T-word to describe, denounce, or defend the past behavior of Justice Brett Kavanaugh: one commentator in Forbes wrote about "testosterone-induced gang rapes"; another, interviewed on CNN, asked: "But we're talking about a 17-year-old boy in high school with testosterone running high. Tell me, what boy hasn't done this in high school?"; and a third, in a column in The New York Times, wrote: "That's him riding a wave of testosterone and booze"

And it is unlikely that many readers questioned the hormonal logic of Christine Lagarde, then chair of the International Monetary Fund, when she asserted that the economic collapse in 2008 was due in part to too many males in charge of the financial sector: "I honestly think that there should never be too much testosterone in one room."

You can find T employed as a biomarker to explain (and sometimes excuse) male behavior in articles and speeches every day. Poetic license, one might say. Just a punchy way to talk about leaving males in charge. Yet when we raise T as significant in any way to explain male behavior, we can inadvertently excuse male behavior as somehow beyond the ability of actual men to control. Casual appeals to biological masculinity imply that patriarchal relationships are rooted in nature.

When we normalize the idea that T runs through all high-school boys, and that this explains why rape occurs, we have crossed from euphemism to offering men impunity to sexually assault women by offering them the defense "not guilty, by reason of hormones."

Invoking men's biology to explain their behavior too often ends up absolving their actions. When we bandy about terms such as T or Y chromosomes, it helps to spread the idea that men are controlled by their bodies. Thinking that hormones and genes can explain why boys will be boys lets men off the hook for all manner of sins. If you believe that T says something meaningful about how men act and think, you're fooling yourself. Men behave the way they do because culture allows it, not because biology requires it.

No one could seriously argue that biology is solely responsible for determining what it means to be a man. But words such as testosterone and Y chromosomes slip into our descriptions of men's activities, as if they explain more than they actually do. T doesn't govern men's aggression and sexuality. And it's a shame we don't hear as much about the research showing that higher levels of T in men just as easily correlate with generosity as with aggression. But generosity is less a stereotypically male virtue, and this would spoil the story about men's inherent aggressiveness, especially manly men's aggressiveness. And this has a profound impact on what men and women think about men's natural inclinations.

We need to keep talking about toxic masculinity and the patriarchy. They're real and they're pernicious. And we also need new ways of talking about men, maleness, and masculinity that get us out of the trap of thinking that men's biology is their destiny. As it turns out, when we sift through the placebo effects and biobabble, T is not a magic male molecule at all but rather as the researchers Rebecca Jordan-Young and Katrina Karkazis argue in their book Testosterone a social molecule.

Regardless of what you call it, testosterone is too often used as an excuse for letting men off the hook and justifying male privilege.

This article was originally published by Aeon, a digital magazine for ideas and culture. Follow them on Twitter at @aeonmag.

Read more from the original source:
The testosterone myth - The Week Magazine

Earth Day: 3 ways to care for your own health while boosting the planet’s well-being – Straight.com

Whats good for your self is good for the planet: it doesnt need to get any more complicated than that. As we celebrate Earth Day, here are a few ways you can take care of your own health while benefiting the glorious planet we call home.

Even if you cant spell it, youve probably heard of phthalates, chemical substances that are used to make plastics flexible. There are several different forms, and they can be found in everything from food and beverage containers to vinyl floors, shower curtains, and cosmetics. Turns out theyre also found in many sex toys.

The problem?

Phthalates contaminate the environment during product use and storage through leaching and other means. Their presence has been detected in air, drinking water, rivers, sewage, and soil.

One phthalate, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), is an endocrine disruptor and can cause cancer, according to the U.S.-based National Institutes of Health. Certain types may adversely affect human and animal reproduction. It is believed that dibutyl phthalate (DBP) is responsible for a steady decrease in the number of reptile species worldwide, according to a study published in Ecological Chemistry and Engineering.

Some countries, including Canada, have restrictions in place around the use of certain phthalates in childrens toys. But the same doesnt go for adult toys. A German study of jelly-rubber sex toys found extremely high concentrations of phthalates due to off-gassing (releasing trapped or absorbed volatile organic compounds in the form of gas).

Womyns Ware prides itselfon being a leader ineliminating phthalate-leaching products from its inventory. A perennial favourite in the Georgia Straights Best of Vancouver awards, the Commercial Drive shop only carries toys made of silicone, hypoallergenic elastomer, and food-grade vinyl. Among the brands it promotes is Swedens Lelo, which includes fair labour practices, employee health and safety requirements, and environmental accountability in its code of conduct.

The good news is you can still have fun in the bedroom while protecting the planet with some dildo due diligence.

Our dietary choices have enormous ramifications for the environment. (Seeour Earth Day Food storyfor more.) Fish deserves its own mention. We know its one of the healthiest foods out there: its lean and a terrific source of protein and vitamin D; fish is also abundant in brain-boosting omega-3 fatty acids. Some studies suggest that eating fish might improve sleep and even prevent depression.

However, our oceans and its inhabitants face dire threats due to pollution and overfishing.

Some fish stocks are being dangerously depleted. Other species are contaminated with pollutants such as mercury or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), both of which are highly toxic. Although Canada stopped the import, manufacturing, and release of PCBs into the environment decades ago, the industrial organic compounds still enter the environment from certain hazardous-waste sites, fires, leaks, and spills. The substances do not readily break down and can remain in air, water, and soil for extremely long periods of time. Small ocean organisms and fish (and other animals that eat them) can take them up, accumulating PCBs to hazardous effect.

PCBs have probable negative effects on immune, endocrine, and reproductive systems, and are probable causers of cancer in humans. Birth defects have been linked to mothers who have been exposed to PCBs.

Not very appetizing.

With C Restaurant as its founding restaurant partner, the Vancouver Aquariums Ocean Wise program released its first dining guide on Earth Day 15 years ago. It consisted of 16 participating businesses; now the program has more than 750 restaurants promoting sustainable seafood across Canada.

The program defines sustainable seafood as species that are caught or farmed in a way that ensures the long-term health and stability of that species, as well as the greater marine ecosystem. This includes limiting bycatch of endangered species and using harvesting methods that minimize damage to marine and aquatic habitats.

Examples of Ocean Wiserecommended sustainable seafood include Arctic char, Pacific cod, Alaska and B.C. sablefish (black cod), Pacific halibut, and albacore tuna (B.C. and Atlantic).

You can download a free printable guide from the Ocean Wise.

Its a no-brainer that using cars less means fewer CO2 emissions. If theres one sliver of a silver lining that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought, its a global reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions and an improvement in air quality, with travel of many forms coming to a halt.

Now that were staying closer to home and not driving to work, opportunities to walk, run, and ride our bikes are way up. We know that exercise is crucial to our well-being: it reduces blood pressure, cholesterol, and stress; it improves circulation and energy; and it diminishes the risk of diseases like cancer and Type 2 diabetes, to name just a few of its benefits. Using your own power to get around town helps the Earth itself breathe.

See the original post here:
Earth Day: 3 ways to care for your own health while boosting the planet's well-being - Straight.com

Good news from the front: Australian COVID-19 innovations – The New Daily

Each week, were endeavouring to provide a sample of what scientists and researchers are doing to meet and defeat the coronavirus crisis.

This week, we look at some of what has been happening in Australia.

In countries where COVID-19 has hit hardest, hospitals have been overwhelmed by more patients they can readily care for, especially intensive care units.

How well is Australia placed to deal with a sudden outbreak of seriously ill people?

According to a report in Australian Doctor, researchers led by intensive-care specialist Dr Ed Litton from the Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth surveyed all 191 intensive care units (ICUs) across the country to determine their baseline bed capacity and their ability to respond to predicted increased demand.

They found that the number of ventilators in ICUs could be more than doubled to cope with an expected surge in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

These include 179 human-model ventilators from veterinary clinics that could be deployed to hospitals.

The findings, published in the Medical Journal of Australia, suggest that ICUs could almost triple their bed capacity if need be, although it would be more of a challenge to find enough appropriately trained nurses.

Of the 178 ICUs representing 2261 intensive care beds (95 per cent of national capacity) that responded to the survey, it was estimated a maximal surge would add an additional 4261 beds to deal with the crisis, an increase of 189 per cent.

This suggests Australias intensive care units will cope comfortably if the rate of new cases and serious cases remains on trend, with the continued flattening of the curve.

Early modelling from the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity found that, without adequate intervention, our ICUs would have been overwhelmed by up to 35,000 coronavirus patients a day.

Social distancing has saved us from what would have been a hopeless position.

University of Melbourne researchers working in collaboration with Western Health have designed a personal ventilation hood for hospital beds to help contain the droplet spread of COVID-19 in ICUs.

According to a statement from the university, the transparent, movable personal ventilation hood sucks air away from the patient while creating an effective droplet containment barrier.

The device is also large enough to accommodate other medical equipment that might be attached to the patient.

Patients trials are due to start at Footscray Hospital this week, with use on COVID-19 patients possible from next week.

The prototype device has been made using readily accessible components at a low cost, making it suitable for low- to middle-income countries, the university said.

A team of Monash researchers has produced a 3D-map of a SARS-CoV-2 protein at atomic resolution using the Macromolecular Crystallography beamlines produced by the Australian Synchrotron.

SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes the COVID-19 illness.

Determining the crystal shape of a protein is a key step in understanding its function and role in replication of the virus.

The non-structural protein 9 (Nsp9) mapped by the scientists is thought to mediate viral replication and virulence.

As they write in a research paper: Current understanding suggests that Nsp9 is involved in viral genomic RNA reproduction.

This is a big deal because it meansNsp9 could be targeted to block the ability of the virus to infect and replicate in the body.

According to a statement from the researchers, the COVID-19 virus only produces 27 or so proteins.

Scientists across the world are currently trying to understand how to prevent the production of these proteins inside our cells when the virus repurposes our bodies to promote its lifecycle.

Research Fellow Dr Dene Littler has been examining some of the lesser-understood proteins produced by SARS-CoV-2.

This will be part of a broad strategy by the worlds scientists to develop entirely new drugs that are specifically targeted at corona viral proteins, blocking the viruss ability to infect and reproduce in human cells, said Dr Littler, in a prepared statement.

Viruses such as those that cause the common cold havent had sufficient health implications before to warrant large-scale drug research programs.

However, in the face of the current pandemic that has obviously changed and we are playing a fast-paced game of catch up.

Macromolecular crystallography is a technique used to study biological molecules such as proteins, viruses and nucleic acids (RNA and DNA).

The technique affords a high enough resolution for researchers to study the detailed mechanism by which macromolecules carry out their functions in living cells and organisms.

Read the rest here:
Good news from the front: Australian COVID-19 innovations - The New Daily

Coronavirus crisis: What would happen if Trump administration pulled its majority funding from the WHO? – Fox News

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox.Sign up here.

As the coronavirus pandemic continues its assault across the world, red flags have been raised over the role played by the World Health Organization (WHO) in initially downplaying the virus to appease Chinaand just how effectively its money funded overwhelmingly by U.S. taxpayers is spent by the U.N. agency.

President Trump last week threatened to withhold funding from the WHO, insisting that his administration would be "looking into" its operations igniting a blistering response from its controversial chiefTedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who warned that "politicizing" the virus would only result in "more body bags."

Experts weighed in on the possibility of the U.S. abruptly pulling its majority funding and on the threatened move's impact on the agency.

"In the short run, not a lot [would change]because WHO management will hope for a change in leadership in November and/or that other nations fill the void," Dr. Roger Bate, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and an expert on public health and emerging markets, told Fox News. "Budgets and fiscal years are months, so they wouldn't feel a problem for a while."

CORONAVIRUS: US GIVES 10 TIMES THE AMOUNT OF MONEY TO WHO THAN CHINA

In addition to repeating Beijing's flawed theory on Jan. 14 that "there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission" of the novel pathogen and ignoring warnings from Taiwan, the WHO a heavily centralized outfit also failed to necessitate that Chinese officials share the viral strains that would have allowed diagnostic tests to have been produced significantly earlier worldwide.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization speaks during a news conference on updates regarding on the novel coronavirus COVID-19, at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland earlier this month. On Monday, he said the pandemic was accelerating as the number of confirmed cases continue to increase. (Salvatore Di Nolfi/Keystone via AP)

Yet many experts also contend that now ishardly the right time for the United States to yank its many millions.

The U.S has been the WHO'slargest funder since it was founded in 1948 and currently gives almost 10 times the amount of moneyas China, both in assessed and voluntary contributions andwhich total more than $500 million per year compared to Beijing's $48 million.

Brett Schaefer, senior research fellow in international regulatory affairs at the Heritage Foundation, also underscored that the U.S.'total contributionsaccount for 15.9 percent of the organization'soverall budget and the impact would not be immediately crushing.

"This funding would be unaffected because the decision to pull funding would only apply going forward. Nonetheless, suspending funding immediately would represent a big cut to WHO funds right when developing countries, which depend far more on international assistance to address health issues, are being impacted by COVID-19," he explained. "Although the U.S. is providing significant assistance through other channels, withholding funding to WHO could negatively impact the COVID-19 response in these countries."

But even with all the money voluntarily poured in from the U.S., the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other countries and organizations such as South Korea, Australia, and Japan, there have been murmurs in the sustainable health world that even that is not enough.

Firefighters disinfect a street against the new coronavirus, in western Tehran, Iran, Friday, March 13, 2020. The new coronavirus outbreak has reached Iran's top officials, with its senior vice president, Cabinet ministers, members of parliament, Revolutionary Guard members and Health Ministry officials among those infected. The vast majority of people recover from the new coronavirus. According to the World Health Organization, most people recover in about two to six weeks, depending on the severity of the illness. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

Many analysts have highlighted that without the U.S., other member states all of who are battling to contain the crippling virus within their own borders likely would not be able to step up and fill the financial void anytime soon. Instead, theburden could fall on private donors such as the Gates Foundation, the Gavi Alliance and even the U.N.'s own Emergency Response Fund.

A November 2018 report published by BioMed Central underscored that the WHO "continues to experience immense financial stress," and that has consistently illuminated that it is "underfunded," although its need for financial reform was paramount.

"The WHO must establish its presence as a trustworthy leader in the global health space," the report stated, acknowledging that member states had declined to dish out more money," for reasons including "a lack of political will and financial commitment of member states especially by the rich donor countries as they found inefficiency, lack of transparency, and minimal accountability within the organization."

The report also surmised that the organization has struggled to carry out its mandate as a result of the United States, which "has repeatedly opposed WHO taking any action which might run counter to the interests of transnational corporations," and has created a "conflict of interest"framework with such maneuvers as opposing the Code on the Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, WHO's rational use of medicines initiative, and its ethical criteria for drug marketing to ensure that pharmaceutical companies can profit.

CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE

According to the WHO's own admission, internal audits are conducted by the Office of Internal Oversight Services and are "designed to add value and improve the Organization's operations and to enhance the integrity and reputation of the Organization.All systems, processes, operations, functions, and activities of the Organization can be subject to IOS review and oversight."

The most recent accountability report, issued in May last year, ranked majority of programs and regional offices from Ethiopia, Somalia, Chad, Myanmar, Afghanistan and the global malaria headquarters as being "partially satisfactory."

Several, such as offices in Yemen and Mongolia and deemed "unsatisfactory," and Ukraine was stamped with a rare "satisfactory."

In this Tuesday, July 16, 2019 photo, health workers dressed in protective gear begin their shift at an Ebola treatment center in Beni, Congo DRC. The World Health Organization has declared the Ebola outbreak an international emergency after spreading to eastern Congo's biggest city, Goma, this week. More than 1,600 people in eastern Congo have died as the virus has spread in areas too dangerous for health teams to access. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)

Moreover, the U.N. agency as revealed in internal rather than published reports obtained by the Associated Press last year found that in 2018 they spent more on travel expenses occasionally unauthorized and exploitive on donors' dimes than on fight some of the biggest problems in public health.

CORONAVIRUS UNKNOWNS IGNITE CONCERNS FOR PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORNS

In a single year, the "cash-strapped" WHO is alleged to have forked out almost $200 million onjet-setting, with staffers sometimes breaking the agency's own rules by traveling in business class, booking expensive last-minute tickets, staying infive-star hotels and traveling without approval.

By contrast, that same year, the WHO invested $59 million in curbing tuberculosis and around $71 million AIDS and hepatitis.

"WHO solicits money from countries around the world every year and rarely if ever meets its budget," lamented Curtis Ellis, an economic expert and policy director with America First Policies and former advisor to the Trump 2016 election campaign. "If the U.S.withheld its money, it would have to recalibrate its actions, and stop its officials from flying business class."

The U.S. government typically advises officials not to fly business class, but provisions are made under certain circumstances such as disabilities or upgrades at their own expense.

Nonetheless, the WHO purports to spend most of its money on communicable diseases, followed by corporate services and enabling functions, health emergencies, health systems, promoting health through the life course, non-communicable diseases; and an array of other areas such as polio eradication, tropical disease research, and research in human reproduction.

Of the total $6.27 billion in WHO financing, only $554 million about 9 percent went to the WHO Health Emergency Program and another $306 million to preventing and controlling outbreaks under the "Humanitarian Response Plans and Other Appeals" budget category.

"In other words, it appears that less than 15 percent of WHO financing in 2018-2019 was directed at detecting and combatting international pandemics. More funds went to Corporate Services and Enabling Functions that to the WHO Health Emergency Program," Schafer noted.

Other health issues that the WHO dedicates resources to include: equity, social determinants, gender equality, and human rights ($21.5 million); reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health ($230 million); violence and injuries, such as those from road accidents, ($27.5 million); and mental health and substance abuse ($50.3 million).

"While these are legitimate health concerns, unlike communicable diseases and pandemics, they are primarily a domestic health matter and do not pose a threat to spread from one country to another," Schafer said. "The focus of WHO should be on truly international threats to health."

From his lens, instead of ending funding during the current crisis, the U.S. should condition future financing for the approval and completion of an investigation into the WHO response to COVID-19 and the potential influence of China over its decisions,revision of WHO policies to enable it to respond more quickly to emerging pandemics and restructuring WHO financing to concentrate on communicable diseases and responding to international health emergencies.

"If WHO refuses, the U.S. should explore setting up a new international organization focused on communicable diseases and responding to international health emergencies," Schafer said.

Members of the Trump team are said to be compiling information and crafting options to present to the president with regards to what to do about WHO's funding and working to untangle the multipronged funding stream as it is not submitted to them in a single lump sum. No financial decisions have yet been made.

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

According to Brett Bruen, a former U.S. diplomat who previously served as director of global engagement at the White House and now runs communications firm Global Situation Room, freezing the finances now is akin to "suggesting we pull out of NATO in the middle of the battle against the Taliban."

"Sure, we would like them to do more and can get frustrated with multilateral diplomacy. But, they are critical to our fight, and WHO is essential to turning the tide against COVID-19.There is no path out of this epidemic on our own.We need other countries," he stressed. "There is no substitute for the WHO.WHO has its challenges, but for now, it's our best hope for ending this crisis quickly."

View post:
Coronavirus crisis: What would happen if Trump administration pulled its majority funding from the WHO? - Fox News