A quick introduction to Plaid Cymru – Free Speech: Series 4 Episode 2 – BBC Three – Video


A quick introduction to Plaid Cymru - Free Speech: Series 4 Episode 2 - BBC Three
http://www.bbc.co.uk/freespeech Do you know who to vote for? Can you tell the difference between the parties? Here #39;s our effort to introduce Plaid Cymru in under a minute.

By: BBC Three

View post:

A quick introduction to Plaid Cymru - Free Speech: Series 4 Episode 2 - BBC Three - Video

Free Speech Outside the Abortion Clinic

The Supreme Court has given pro-life advocates free rein, even if it distresses patients. But getting people to listen is more complicated.

When Kelsey McLain, then a 25-year-old in the midst of the first trimester of her pregnancy, arrived at the abortion clinic closest to her home, her car couldnt get past the entrance of the parking lot. Protestors loomed toward the front of her vehicle. The group of 12 wielded signs covered in photos of aborted fetuses with the word murder printed across them in big block letters. McLains mother was behind the wheel, and with her foot on the brake, she gave the road blockers a choice of moving or getting run over.

The encounter didnt end after the protesters moved off to the side. As McLain got out of the car, louder shouts greeted her, accusing her of turning her back, of not wanting to know the truth. She felt growing anger but resisted the urge to lash out. She dashed inside the clinic, her mother close behind. It wasnt what I needed to deal with that day, McLain recalls.

In the clinics waiting room, McLain noticed that many of the patients seemed rattled. At that point, all they knew was that there were people outside and they were screaming at them. They didnt know their motivations or if they were good or bad people. As a woman with a self-proclaimed interest in reproductive rights, McLain had thought she was prepared for what she was going to face when she arrived at the clinic. But she, too, felt jarred. Protesters are always going to be a scary thing, no matter how much knowledge you have about them, she says.

Today, McLain witnesses pro-life activism on a weekly basis, when she volunteers as a clinic escort. Her role is to offer patients moral and physical support as they make their way past protestors, some of them quietly praying, others approaching the women with an intensity that that borders on harassment. She says protesters are quick to remind escorts and clinic staff that theyre legally entitled to be there. They comment to us that they have great lawyers, and they know their rights, and if we ever violate their right to free speech, theyll sue us, she says.

In June 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously struck down a Massachusetts law forbidding protesters from standing within 35 feet of the entrance to a reproductive health care facility. After that decision came down, the demand for escorts like McLain sharply increased, says Marty Walz, the recently retired CEO of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. The protesters definitely have greater access to our patients, right up to the front door, Walz says. And they take advantage of it. When the buffer zone was in place, the Boston clinic used escorts only on Friday and Saturdayits busiest days. Now, every day, a swarm of people descends on the building. Along with the patients, the protesterswho now number anywhere from 20 to 80 each day and the pedestrians, there are 20 to 30 additional escorts at the Boston clinic.

This growing horde of people has made the atmosphere outside the clinic tenser, more chaotic, and in general, a lot less comfortable for the patients, says Sarah Cyr-Mutty, the community relations coordinator at the Boston clinic and a regular clinic escort. No one wants to drive up to their doctors office and see over 100 people standing outside.

The activists are now able to walk right up to patientspraying, pleading, and handing out flyers. They can follow women up to the clinics doors, which means that once the patients are in the waiting room, they can still hear the chants from outside. As such, Cyr-Mutty says that the patients she escorts through the clinics doors now are often in need of more consoling than they were before the Courts decision. Whether theyre just a presence outside, or theyre really trying to interact with them, its always really upsetting to the patient.

But apart from the commotion, its not clear how much has changed since the Supreme Courts ruling in McCullen v. Coakley nine months ago. Theres no evidence that activists are succeeding in changing womens minds. What is succeeding is the one thing the Supreme Court intended: People who believe abortion is murder are able to share that message with those who least want to hear it.

It is no accident that public streets and sidewalks have developed as venues for the exchange of ideas, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the Courts opinion. Even today, they remain one of the few places where a speaker can be confident that he is not simply preaching to the choir. With respect to other means of communication, an individual confronted with an uncomfortable message can always turn the page, change the channel, or leave the Web site. Not so on public streets and sidewalks.

Follow this link:

Free Speech Outside the Abortion Clinic

Aamir Khan wants ‘FREEDOM of Speech’ | India’s Daughter | AIB Knockout Controversy | CENSORSHIP – Video


Aamir Khan wants #39;FREEDOM of Speech #39; | India #39;s Daughter | AIB Knockout Controversy | CENSORSHIP
Mr. Perfectionist Aamir Khan is NOT in favour of any censorship at all and believes in freedom of speech! Watch as the actor opens his heart out to this sensitive issue. For more Bollywood...

By: BollywoodCIA

View original post here:

Aamir Khan wants 'FREEDOM of Speech' | India's Daughter | AIB Knockout Controversy | CENSORSHIP - Video

Tickets still available for Sunday Herald's freedom of speech debate at Comedy Fest

Je Suis Comedian: What Are You Laughing At? forms part of the Glasgow International Comedy Festival and will be chaired by our head of news Neil Mackay.

He will be joined by comedians Imran Yusuf and Bruce Morton, Scottish journalist Stuart Cosgrove, theatre critic Joyce McMillan, human rights lawyer Aamer Anwar, and the Kirk's Rev Sally Foster-Fulton as they debate the role of comedy and satire in the modern world.

Loading article content

In the wake of the tragedy in Paris, in which 12 people were killed at the offices of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, supporters of freedom of speech around the world adopted the slogan "Je suis Charlie" to express their affiliation with the victims of the massacre and their opposition to censorship imposed by violence.

Debate has raged over what these events mean for free speech and whether in a multi-faith, multi-cultural society, religion should or shouldn't properly be the object of humour.

The event will discuss whether comedy can bring people together in the wake of tragedy and whether unrestricted free speech is essential to the functioning of our democracy, as well as the idea that we may be more tolerant to free speech in some contexts more than others.

Tommy Sheppard, Festival Director and owner of The Stand comedy club, said: "Originally we were going to poke fun at the general election, but this just seemed so much more important. The debate on free speech versus causing offence goes right to the heart of what comedy is and what comedians do, and it's fitting that we're going to have this discussion at the Glasgow International Comedy Festival"

Je Suis Comedian: What Are You Laughing At? takes place on Thursday 26 March 2015 at 8pm at the Citizens Theatre. Tickets are available for 8 from the festival website http://www.glasgowcomedyfestival.com and via the box office on 0844 873 7353.

Read the original post:

Tickets still available for Sunday Herald's freedom of speech debate at Comedy Fest

Mardi Gras: SBS wrong to dump ad opposing same sex marriage, say MPs Dean Smith and David Leyonhjelm

By Matthew KnottMarch 9, 2015, 1:25 p.m.

Prominent politicians who support gay marriage have accused public broadcasterSBS of supressing freedom of speech by pulling an anti-same sex marriage advertisement from its telecast of the Sydney Mardi Gras parade.

Liberal senator Dean Smith Photo: Stefan Postles

Liberal senator Dean Smith Photo: Stefan Postles

Liberal senator Dean Smith Photo: Stefan Postles

Prominent politicians who support gay marriage have accused public broadcasterSBS of suppressing freedom of speech by pulling an anti-same sex marriage advertisement from its telecast of the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras parade.

The advertisement by the Australian Marriage Forum claimed that marriage equality forces a child to miss out on a mother or father. It was broadcast on Channels Seven and Nine but was pulled from SBS on Sunday night.

Liberal senator Dean Smith, who is openly gay, said: "I am opposed to the censorship of any of the arguments for or against same-sex marriage.

"Same-sex marriage proponents need to be prepared to meet head-on the arguments of those who disagree with them.

"Obnoxious ads should be aired because they undermine the cause of their sponsors - the obnoxious views will be seen for what they are."

Read the original here:

Mardi Gras: SBS wrong to dump ad opposing same sex marriage, say MPs Dean Smith and David Leyonhjelm

Atheism no smarter than Christianity

WITHOUT a Supreme Being (God) to account to, and in the absence of an ultimate authority in the universe, it logically follows that human beings are their own masters and a law unto themselves. In fact, more graphically, it translates to this: the wicked massacres of defence-less citizens by the wicked regimes of this world; the wanton rape; the abuse of the innocent; the senseless genocides and the numerous injustices witnessed over the centuries will be perfectly in place as there is no answerability and, consequently, no judgment.

This is precisely what the devil craves for the human race to believe. Atheism, by rejecting the existence of God, is nothing but a secreted way of propping up lawlessness, anarchy and transgression in the universe. Atheism represents the mindset that Satan (whom they think is imaginary), desires humans to have. Atheism, by design or default, is an adroit satanic ideology meant to promote immorality throughout the world. Where it not for space, I would have had readers realize the striking and salient similarities between verses from the satanic bible (written by Antony Lavey) and independent atheistic writings.

I have also realized that atheists, eccentrically, suffer from an extremely developed smarter-than-thou-complex. They claim to be more enlightened than the manic lunatics of religion. A sister from Netherlands wrote, I have suffered much grief debating with atheists as they trash the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ and God. This is not strange, personally I have debated with decorated atheists and one thing that surely stands out in the atheistic argument is their smarter-than-thou attitude. Atheists view themselves as having a monopoly over truth and knowledge, an accusation they ironically direct at Christians. Atheism is anchored in the belief that no deities exist. Building on this belief, atheists go on the rampage attacking everything in their path that is religion.

Atheists points of attack, particularly on Christianity, centre on the purported crimes and abusive practices found in the Old Testament; practices such as slavery, sanctioned murders and generally, the massive suffering in the world today. These things equip the deluded atheistic mind with unholy zeal to go on an offensive against Christianity. For long, I have realized the futility of debating with atheists mainly because of their preoccupation with attacking personalities.

The ill-advised part of atheism is that it ridiculously demands proof of the existence of God by intending him to prove himself in a way they (fallible humans) have codified. They think of God as some petite being they can tinker with; they do not want God operating on his own terms. They want a God who would yield to their (warped) ideology of how he should operate before they validate him. Why doesnt God end the wars in various states? Why does he allow the suffering to continue? Why didnt he fight for Christ when he was being crucified? The list of the sanctimonious questions goes on. Sadly, the answers to these questions lie in the very bible which they spurn.

Atheists claim that their belief system is morally superior to religion largely because it does not lead to murderous fanaticism. Paradoxically, atheists have been the most fanatical hatred spreaders against those who believe in religion. In the 20th century, millions were slaughtered by communist regimes that embraced militant atheism as part of their creed Atheist intolerance exists in unbridled proportions and they simply cant claim the moral high ground to be better than Christianity. They seek to justify their nearly-insane ideology by incessant attacks on the bible itself. While atheists may cite biblical incidences and treacherously seek for loopholes, it is imprudent for them to claim the high moral ground over Christianity.

Whether from a scientific or religious view, atheism is no smarter than religion. Unreligious scientists, for centuries, confirm by a mere dissection of the human body that 100% someone designed the human body. Science, in recent years, continues to make a case for God. Theorist Physicist Paul Davies has said that The appearance of design is overwhelming. Oxford professor Dr John Lennox has said the more we get to know about our universe, the more the hypothesis that there is a creatorgains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are here.

The system we call the universe, itself. Its structure and how it operates, from a purely scientific point of view incontrovertibly proves the existence of One who designed it. The evidence is simply overwhelming. The Bible is a collection of scores of books which were written years apart yet there is striking harmony in the message. Every book, for example, in the Old Testament points to the coming Messiah, Jesus Christ. Like I mentioned, its too much to ask atheism to comprehend such a thing as the pre-existence of Jesus Christ which they viciously attack using a carnal mind. Jesus existed from the beginning (John 1:1); he did not father himself as they blasphemously claim.

In all honesty, atheists should do some soul-searching. God operates on principle which, if flouted, consequences result. For example, Aarons sons were advised not to use fire and they disobeyed and that had consequences. Annanias and Sapphira knew what was expected of them when they sold a piece of their land yet they chose to disobey and certainly too that brought consequences. Its the same story with Adam and Eve. God cannot be held in error for operating on principle. We cant use terrorist acts by Islamic extremists as a basis for bastardizing religion. Surely, it befuddles the mind why atheism would choose this route of appalling ignorance. Surely, it can only be the fool who has said there is no God.

Learnmore Zuze can be reached on lastawa77@gmail.com

Original post:

Atheism no smarter than Christianity