NASA Rocket explosion – Aerial view – Exclusive Video | Studio N – Video

Posted on by


NASA Rocket explosion - Aerial view - Exclusive Video | Studio N
Aerial view of NASA rocket #39;s spectacular explosion while carrying supplies and equipment to the International Space Station. Watch Studio N, the 24-hour Telugu news channel, for all the breaking...

By: studionchannel

Link:

NASA Rocket explosion - Aerial view - Exclusive Video | Studio N - Video

Russian Progress 57 Cargo Ship Launches To The International Space Station – Video

Posted on by


Russian Progress 57 Cargo Ship Launches To The International Space Station
Filled with almost three tons of food, fuel and supplies for the Expedition residents on the International Space Station, the unpiloted Russian ISS Progress 57 cargo craft launched from the...

By: NASA

Follow this link:

Russian Progress 57 Cargo Ship Launches To The International Space Station - Video

Warnings about hazardous material form exploded spaceship in US – Video

Posted on by


Warnings about hazardous material form exploded spaceship in US
There are concerns that hazardous material from a rocket which exploded after take off could be dangerous to the public. The unmanned spaceship was carrying food and supplies for the International...

By: euronews (in English)

See more here:

Warnings about hazardous material form exploded spaceship in US - Video

Humongous explosion destroys space station supply rocket

Posted on by

A private Orbital Sciences-built cargo launch to the International Space Station ended in a fiery explosion just seconds after liftoff Tuesday night (Oct. 28).

Orbital's unmannedAntares rocket exploded in a brilliant fireballshortly after launching from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia at 6:22 p.m. EDT (2222 GMT), crashing back down to the launch pad in a flaming heap. The Antares was carrying Orbital's unmanned Cygnus spacecraft, which was toting 5,000 pounds (2,268 kilograms) of food, scientific experiments and other supplies on this flight the third cargo mission to the space station under a $1.9 billion contract the company holds with NASA. You cansee photos of the Antares rocket explosion here.

A NASA spokesman described the explosion as a "catastrophic anomaly" during a NASA TV webcast.While the assessment and investigation of the accident have just begun, NASA emergency operations officials report no injuries, Orbital Sciences representatives said. Property damage is limited to the south end of Wallops Island, they added. [Listen to a first-hand account of the rocket explosion]

"It is far too early to know the details of what happened," Orbital executive vice president Frank Culbertson, a former NASA astronaut,said in a statement. "We will conduct a thorough investigation immediately to determine the cause of this failure and what steps can be taken to avoid a repeat of this incident. As soon as we understand the cause we will begin the necessary work to return to flight to support our customers and the nations space program."

The combined value of the Antares and Cygnus lost during Tuesday's mishap is about $200 million, Culbertson said during a post-crash news conference Tuesday.

People who live near Wallops have been warned not to touch any objects that may be pieces of the Antares rocket, as such debris could be contaminated with rocket fuel or other hazardous material. If you find something that may be Antares debris, call NASA's incident response team at(757) 824-1295.

Orbital Sciences representatives were tracking no problems in the leadup to the launch. But upon ignition it soon became clear that something was wrong, said Robert Pearlman, editor of the space history news websitecollectSPACE.com(a Space.com partner).Pearlmanwatched the launch failure from just a few miles away at NASA's press site observation area.

"As the vehicle was climbing off the pad, there was something trailing a smoke and fire plume from the rocket itself trailing from the rocket all the way up," Pearlman told Space.com. "As it cleared the top of the water tower, there was a clear break-apart, and the booster's integrity failed. There was then a tremendous fireball, trailed by a very loud explosion. Parts were sent flying everywhere, and then the vehicle fell back to the pad, exploding in an even larger fireball, setting the entire area on fire."

Tuesday night's launch try was Orbital's second attempt to launch the Antares rocket in two days. A launch attempt on Monday night was scrubbed when a boat wandered into the launch range safety area offshore.

NASA has tappedOrbital Sciencesto provide eight cargo delivery missions to the International Space Station using the company's Antares rockets and unmanned Cygnus spacecraft.The Virginia-based company launched its first official cargo mission to the space station earlier this year in January, with a second mission following in July. Both missions, as well as two test flights in 2013, were a success.

Read more:

Humongous explosion destroys space station supply rocket

Humongous explosion destroys space station supply rocket (+video)

Posted on by

A private Orbital Sciences-built cargo launch to the International Space Station ended in a fiery explosion just seconds after liftoff Tuesday night (Oct. 28).

Orbital's unmannedAntares rocket exploded in a brilliant fireballshortly after launching from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia at 6:22 p.m. EDT (2222 GMT), crashing back down to the launch pad in a flaming heap. The Antares was carrying Orbital's unmanned Cygnus spacecraft, which was toting 5,000 pounds (2,268 kilograms) of food, scientific experiments and other supplies on this flight the third cargo mission to the space station under a $1.9 billion contract the company holds with NASA. You cansee photos of the Antares rocket explosion here.

A NASA spokesman described the explosion as a "catastrophic anomaly" during a NASA TV webcast.While the assessment and investigation of the accident have just begun, NASA emergency operations officials report no injuries, Orbital Sciences representatives said. Property damage is limited to the south end of Wallops Island, they added. [Listen to a first-hand account of the rocket explosion]

"It is far too early to know the details of what happened," Orbital executive vice president Frank Culbertson, a former NASA astronaut,said in a statement. "We will conduct a thorough investigation immediately to determine the cause of this failure and what steps can be taken to avoid a repeat of this incident. As soon as we understand the cause we will begin the necessary work to return to flight to support our customers and the nations space program."

The combined value of the Antares and Cygnus lost during Tuesday's mishap is about $200 million, Culbertson said during a post-crash news conference Tuesday.

People who live near Wallops have been warned not to touch any objects that may be pieces of the Antares rocket, as such debris could be contaminated with rocket fuel or other hazardous material. If you find something that may be Antares debris, call NASA's incident response team at(757) 824-1295.

Orbital Sciences representatives were tracking no problems in the leadup to the launch. But upon ignition it soon became clear that something was wrong, said Robert Pearlman, editor of the space history news websitecollectSPACE.com(a Space.com partner).Pearlmanwatched the launch failure from just a few miles away at NASA's press site observation area.

"As the vehicle was climbing off the pad, there was something trailing a smoke and fire plume from the rocket itself trailing from the rocket all the way up," Pearlman told Space.com. "As it cleared the top of the water tower, there was a clear break-apart, and the booster's integrity failed. There was then a tremendous fireball, trailed by a very loud explosion. Parts were sent flying everywhere, and then the vehicle fell back to the pad, exploding in an even larger fireball, setting the entire area on fire."

Tuesday night's launch try was Orbital's second attempt to launch the Antares rocket in two days. A launch attempt on Monday night was scrubbed when a boat wandered into the launch range safety area offshore.

NASA has tappedOrbital Sciencesto provide eight cargo delivery missions to the International Space Station using the company's Antares rockets and unmanned Cygnus spacecraft.The Virginia-based company launched its first official cargo mission to the space station earlier this year in January, with a second mission following in July. Both missions, as well as two test flights in 2013, were a success.

Here is the original post:

Humongous explosion destroys space station supply rocket (+video)

Destination Station From NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center Discusses Technology Aboard The ISS – Video

Posted on by


Destination Station From NASA #39;s Marshall Space Flight Center Discusses Technology Aboard The ISS
Recorded during a live event, Destination Station forum is the second in a series of interactive panel discussions about the International Space Station and how technologies are tested aboard...

By: NASA

More here:

Destination Station From NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center Discusses Technology Aboard The ISS - Video

Human Space Flight Manned Space Flight – Human Ever Higher In Space – Video

Posted on by


Human Space Flight Manned Space Flight - Human Ever Higher In Space
The machines that have taken us ever higher in space. After earth what #39;s out there and when is next manned space flight find answers to first and latest human space flight mission and how far...

By: Suggested By You - Amazing Science Facts

The rest is here:

Human Space Flight Manned Space Flight - Human Ever Higher In Space - Video

NASA Chief Calls ISS, Talks Crab Cakes and Gets Advised | Video – Video

Posted on by


NASA Chief Calls ISS, Talks Crab Cakes and Gets Advised | Video
NASA administrator Charles Bolden called the Space Station from the Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama. He asked NASA astronauts Reid Weismen and Butch Wilmore what they would like to...

By: VideoFromSpace

Originally posted here:

NASA Chief Calls ISS, Talks Crab Cakes and Gets Advised | Video - Video

Trying to go to space on the cheap has had disastrous consequences in the past

Posted on by

When reporters asked the first U.S. man in space, Alan Shepard, what he thought about as he sat atop a Mercury launch vehicle, he's said to have responded, "The fact that every part of this ship was built by the low bidder."

That sentiment may hang heavy over the launch failure at a NASA facility near the coast of VirginiaonTuesday night. An Antares rocket fromcontractor Orbital Sciences came crashing back down onto the launch pad within momentsof the launch of a flight intended to deliver supplies to the International Space Station. The mission was unmanned, and there were no injuries reported on the ground.

The cause of the failure remain unknown. But Orbital has marketed the Antaresas a "cost effective" way to launch payloads, due at least in part on its reliance on recycled Soviet-era rocket engines a move that has drawn criticism from some, including competitor SpaceX's founder, Elon Musk. Here's what he told Wired in a 2012 interview:

One of our competitors, Orbital Sciences, has a contract to resupply the International Space Station, and their rocket honestly sounds like the punch line to a joke. It uses Russian rocket engines that were made in the 60s. I dont mean their design is from the 60s I mean they start with engines that were literally made in the 60s and, like, packed away in Siberia somewhere.

Orbital has previously acknowledged some issues with the engines, with Executive Vice President Frank Culbertson telling Space Flight Now last year that the company hasdone refurbishing work on the supply. "As we went through testing, we did discover there were some effects of aging since they had been in storage for a while, including some stress corrosion cracking," he said. "That's what we're correcting with the weld repairs and other inspections."

In May, one of the refurbished engines was destroyed in a ground testat a NASA center in Mississippi with some sourcessaying it "exploded" although the exact cause has not been disclosed. In a newsconference Tuesday night, Culbertson said a thorough investigation would need to be completed before it could determine whetherthe engine was a factor in the failure.

NASA's share of the federal budget has shrunk dramatically since the peak of the space race, and it has faced significant challenges even maintaining its ability to support current missions in recent years.

Past U.S. launch failures have sometimes been blamed on poor work by contractors, who became more directly involved in U.S. government launches after a push toward privatization aimed at lowering costs in the 1980s and 1990s.

In the late 1990s, the U.S. space industry suffered astring of problems, including three military and two civilian flight failures. The military launch failures resulted in the loss of payloads totaling more than $3 billion dollars. A broad area review report of the issues ordered by President Bill Clinton cited contractor mishaps for the bulk of the problems, saying "factory-introduced engineering and workmanshiperrors predominate."

The final report from the board that investigatedthe 2003 Columbia disaster, which cost the lives of all seven crew members aboard the space shuttle, cited "years of resource constraints" as among the factors that resulted in the accident.

Read the original post:

Trying to go to space on the cheap has had disastrous consequences in the past

Russian space station resupply rocket launches, doesn't explode

Posted on by

WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 (UPI) -- A day after a space station resupply rocket exploded in midair only seconds after launching from Wallops Island, in Virginia, the Russian space agency made things look embarrassingly easy -- successfully linking up a ship full of precious cargo with the International Space Station.

Launched early Wednesday morning, the Progress M-25M spacecraft (also known as 57P) docked and delivered supplies to ISS astronauts only hours after taking off from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. The cargo ship was carried into space by a Russian Soyuz rocket -- three tons of supplies in tow.

The successful launch and linkup completed a reversal of fortunes and upturned the recent narratives surrounding the space programs of the U.S. and Russia. A series of high profile mistakes have had Russian space officials blushing in recent months, while commercial space flight companies in the U.S. have forged ahead with expanding capabilities and new, improved technologies.

But with the explosion of Orbital Sciences' Antares rocket Tuesday evening -- just a day after its the launch was postponed by the unexpected presence of a stray boat -- Russia's tried and true Soyuz rockets are looking a bit better.

Tuesday's explosion not only destroyed the robotic cargo ship and rocket built by the Virginia-based company, but also obliterated more than 2 1/2 tons of supply materials. NASA officials said they were investigating the mishap, but insisted ISS astronauts would manage fine without the delivery and that NASA's work with Orbital would be undeterred.

"Orbital has demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in its first two missions to the station earlier this year, and we know they can replicate that success," William Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator of NASA's Human Exploration and Operations Directorate, said in a press release after the incident.

"Launching rockets is an incredibly difficult undertaking, and we learn from each success and each setback," Gerstenmaier added. "Today's launch attempt will not deter us from our work to expand our already successful capability to launch cargo from American shores to the International Space Station."

Ahead of Tuesday's rescheduled Antares rocket launch, NASA officials predicted the blastoff would be visible (weather permitting) up and down the Eastern Seaboard. They didn't expect, however, that it would be an exploding fireball lighting up the skies.

Antares rocket explosion seen from passing plane. (Ed Sealing/Gizmodo/YouTube)

2014 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

The rest is here:

Russian space station resupply rocket launches, doesn't explode

Yoenis Cespedes Future With Red Sox Not As Complicated As It Sounds

Posted on by

Cespedes recent switch to Jay Zs Roc Nation Sports turned heads, as did a New York Daily News report in which the writer cited a rift between the outfielder and Bostons coaching staff. But while the Red Sox have 99 problems going into this offseason, Cespedes aint one.

To say Cespedes changing agents will be instrumental in his departure from the Red Sox is silly. It might lessen the chances of Boston working out a contract extension with the Cuban slugger Jay Zs group landed Robinson Cano a 10-year, $240 million contract on the open market last offseason, so Cespedes could be inclined to test free agency next winter but it shouldnt be viewed as a game-changer in negotiations.

Cespedes positioned himself for a lucrative deal long before he switched agents. And the Red Sox, for what its worth, just settled on a seven-year, $72.5 million contract with fellow Cuban defector Rusney Castillo, who happens to be a Jay Z client.

Its far more reasonable to say Cespedes being on a different wavelength than the Red Soxs coaching staff will lead to his exodus, but manager John Farrell shot down the existence of any tension during a radio appearance Tuesday. Bostons new hitting coach, Chili Davis, also expressed his admiration for Cespedes during an introductory conference call last week. Davis coached Cespedes in Oakland.

Cespedes future or lack thereof in Boston instead is rooted in whether he makes sense from a personnel standpoint. If Cespedes is traded this offseason, it will be because general manager Ben Cherington decided to leverage one of his more valuable assets to improve the major league roster.

Cespedes, who is set to earn $10.5 million in 2015, has tremendous power, which is the most sought-after commodity in baseball these days. The Red Sox could choose to sell high based on demand, their abundance of outfielders and their dire need for starting pitching.

If, say, the Cincinnati Reds or New York Mets two teams positioned to deal pitching for offensive upgrades blew up Cheringtons phone with reasonable offers, hed certainly entertain the idea of trading Cespedes, even if the ideal scenario is to keep the bopper and acquire arms by some other means.

The Red Soxs lineup had a new look and feel once Cespedes was acquired from the Athletics in exchange for Jon Lester and Jonny Gomes. He added a dynamic the unit lacked middle-of-the-order pop, particularly in the clutch and looked like someone capable of providing adequate right-handed protection for David Ortiz, who, while still unbelievable, wont be around forever.

But there also were negatives, including Cespedes lackluster on-base percentage (.296 in 51 games), his inconsistent plate discipline and defensive lapses that were enough to make one question whether hell ever truly adapt to left field at Fenway Park.

Originally posted here:

Yoenis Cespedes Future With Red Sox Not As Complicated As It Sounds