Insurers' health care overhaul doubts ease

INDIANAPOLIS What a difference a year makes.

The nations biggest health insurers entered last fall cautious about a major coverage expansion initiated by the health care overhaul, the federal law that aims to cover millions of uninsured people.

Investors and company executives were worried because they didnt know how expensive new customers from the overhaul would be for insurers. They also were concerned about added costs from the law and funding cuts to government-sponsored Medicare Advantage plans, a key growth area.

But a year later, these challenges are starting to appear manageable, and investors see much less uncertainty ahead for the sector. Insurers have cut costs and raised prices to help mitigate added expenses from the law. Theyve also added new business.

As a result, Aetna Inc., United?Health Group Inc. and the Blue Cross-Blue Shield insurer WellPoint Inc. all posted third-quarter results that trumped Wall Street estimates and raised their forecasts for 2014.

Shares of those companies the nations three largest health insurers have all repeatedly hit all-time highs this year, their growth easily outpacing broader trading indexes.

People are starting to understand that the 2015 landscape is a little less harrowing than 2014, said Jennifer Lynch, an analyst who covers the industry for BMO Capital Markets.

The optimism represents a stark contrast to a year ago. Late last year, the overhauls state-based public health insurance exchanges debuted with the promise to give insurers new customers by making it easier for people to buy coverage, sometimes with help from income-based tax credits.

That new business represents a small slice of total enrollment for most insurers, but it generated an outsized dose of anxiety.

Many of those new customers had gone years with no insurance coverage or regular health care, and a glitch-plagued debut of the exchanges created more ambiguity over how expensive the customer base would be.

Read the rest here:

Insurers' health care overhaul doubts ease

Genetic Engineering – DNA / RNA Probes Part 2 – Anytime Education – Video


Genetic Engineering - DNA / RNA Probes Part 2 - Anytime Education
DNA probes are small segments of DNA which help to detect the presence of a gene of a long DNA sequence, in a biological systems. These DNA probes are are the most sophisticated and sensitive...

By: James Dundon

View original post here:

Genetic Engineering - DNA / RNA Probes Part 2 - Anytime Education - Video

The buildings that won the national lottery jackpot the hits and misses

There are moments in history that leave their mark in buildings. With hindsight, these structures define a period, its ambitions, values, skills and frailties. Like fossils in a geological layer, they are precisely recognisable they could not come from another time. So it is with the baroque churches of the counter-reformation, the colossal palaces of Americas gilded age and the spare modernism of the Attlee governments buildings for health, education and housing.

So it is also with the greying Teflon and white-painted steel, the straining cables, the walls of planar glazing and the gaudy graphics that tell you that a building project was started in the early years of the national lottery. This month, it will be 20 years since Noel Edmonds and Anthea Turner hosted the first draw, and the strange alchemy started by which eminent committees converted the spinning coloured balls into art galleries, sports stadiums, parks, discovery centres, bridges and places of more-or-less vague environmental purpose. This spree of public building was often wasteful and absurd. The way the lottery was set up encouraged constructions of unclear purpose and insufficient means of maintenance. It helped launch the ill-conceived idea that to regenerate a place you need only install a cultural icon and leave the rest to the private sector.

It was confused about its cultural and democratic values. It helped create a bizarre attitude to risk, which is still with us, whereby it is acceptable to blow a billion pounds on something as uncertain as the Millennium Dome, yet the lesser details have to be micromanaged by expensive consultants until the life is squeezed out of buildings or other cultural projects.

The lottery had disasters the short-lived pop music museum in Sheffield, something called The Public in West Bromwich, the dome. The Earth Centre near Doncaster received 41.6m, with the idea of reviving a former mining area with tales of ecological hope. It foundered and ex-pitmen retrained as guides and greeters found themselves out of a job again. But the lottery building boom also had triumphs the Eden Project, Tate Modern and plenty of well-conceived, well-executed projects that continue to enrich the life of the country. It stood for something that had been forgotten, which is the importance of investment in places for shared public experience.

It was only half-intended. John Majors government decided there should be a national lottery, the proceeds of which should be spent on good causes, but there was a concern that they should not be spent on things that would normally be paid for out of taxes, such as teachers or road repairs. So lottery money had to follow the principle of additionality, meaning that it would go to projects that wouldnt happen without it, and it had to be spent only on capital projects. Capital projects, give or take such things as buying instruments for brass bands, are usually buildings and so an era of accidental architectural patronage began.

There were other forces at play. The turn of the millennium was looming, along with a feeling that Something Should Be Done to celebrate an impressive if empty number. There was growing confidence in British art, design and architecture, which would be consecrated in the Blair years as Cool Britannia. There was burgeoning environmentalism. Interest was growing in the renewal of British cities and of the wastelands left by the disappearance of manufacturing. In 1997, the Bilbao Guggenheim would be launched, and with it the idea that iconic buildings could be at the centre of culturally led regeneration.

So optimism and futurism were back in fashion along with some sense, if vague, of social purpose. It was a striking contrast with the preceding decade, when Margaret Thatchers government all but killed off the idea of public building and Prince Charles insisted that whatever was built should look to the past. In the recessionary early 1990s, British architects had looked yearningly across the Channel at the grands projets with which President Mitterrand and other French politicians adorned their cities.

Suddenly it was happening here. Distributors were set up, public bodies handed the Brewsters Millions problem of spending torrents of cash. They included the Arts Council, the Sports Council, the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) and the Millennium Commission. Lord Rothschild, chair of the HLF, invited people of influence to lunch and asked for their ideas to help relieve his embarrassment of riches, a subject in which a Rothschild, of all people, might be expected to be expert.

There was no shortage of suggestions. It was proposed that all British cathedrals should be repaired and restored by the year 2000. Cities and towns raced to claim local specialisms that could be the basis of a museum or centre glass in Sunderland, pop music in Sheffield, space exploration in Leicester and (unsuccessfully) laughter in Morecambe. Ecological themes were spun into multimillion-pound proposals of varying degrees of lameness, some of which were built. Few stopped to notice that its not very green to put up a half-redundant structure.

Newspapers and journalists were bombarded with ideas. Among those I received was a new age-y proposal for celebrating the millennium. It came with a sketch of a large circular structure, with smaller circles attached to its circumference, to be built on the Greenwich peninsula in London. The group in question said this circle had been designed by the celebrated architect Richard Rogers, so I checked with his office. Oh no, came the slightly embarrassed reply, it was not really one of the practices projects. It was just a doodle done by one of Rogerss partners, as a favour to some friends of his.

Follow this link:

The buildings that won the national lottery jackpot the hits and misses

Freedom Wars English Let’s Kouken Part 5 (Missions 3-1, 3-2, 3-3) – Video


Freedom Wars English Let #39;s Kouken Part 5 (Missions 3-1, 3-2, 3-3)
BEATRICE WHY YOUR COSTUME SOOOO CUTE!? And PANTSU Freedom Wars English Playthrough featuring missions 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 CODE 3, People from On High, and finally some missions that ...

By: HOW DA GAME?

Read more from the original source:

Freedom Wars English Let's Kouken Part 5 (Missions 3-1, 3-2, 3-3) - Video

Old Foxy’s Secret Message? Freedom Theory-Five Nights At Freddy’s 2: The Sequel – Video


Old Foxy #39;s Secret Message? Freedom Theory-Five Nights At Freddy #39;s 2: The Sequel
Freedom? Foxy, you really want to leave me that badly ;( Oh, it #39;s because of New Foxy 2.0? I understand. I #39;d jump away too. Vote For What You Guys Want !: http://strawpoll.me/2906532 ...

By: xxProClassGamerxx

The rest is here:

Old Foxy's Secret Message? Freedom Theory-Five Nights At Freddy's 2: The Sequel - Video

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2: Why Foxy Is Screaming Freedom Theory! Or Is He Saying Something Else? – Video


Five Nights at Freddy #39;s 2: Why Foxy Is Screaming Freedom Theory! Or Is He Saying Something Else?
On todays episode of Five Nights At Freddy #39;s 2 we talk about the theory that foxy is screaming FREEDOM! at the end of the trailer and speculate why that is.

By: FusionZGamer

Read more here:

Five Nights at Freddy's 2: Why Foxy Is Screaming Freedom Theory! Or Is He Saying Something Else? - Video

Freedom Camping Bylaw not this summer

Media Release

Release date: 3 October 2014

Freedom Camping Bylaw not this summer

The draft Freedom Camping Bylaw will not come into effect until after the end of the summer camping in 2015.

The season that began on Sunday with the start of daylight savings will continue just as it has in previous years.

The Hearings Committee heard submissions on the draft Freedom Camping Bylaw at a meeting on September 10.

A petition from Rere residents and a total of 16 submissions were received, with seven presented verbally to the Committee.

The issues raised in the overall submissions were sites, fees and permits, restrictions, number of nights and permission for use of prohibited sites.

As a result of submissions, the recommendation was that the Bylaw will not come into effect until after a larger review is completed on how Freedom Camping will be funded. Says chief executive, Judy Campbell.

Council will begin the review during October to consider whether permits will be user-pays, as they are now, or funded by rates, in time to make a decision by the end of summer camping.

More here:

Freedom Camping Bylaw not this summer

Chris Rock Jokes About Boston Marathon Bombing, Freedom Tower in Saturday Night Live Opening Monologue, Offends …

Too soon or comedically edgy? Chris Rock raised some eyebrows on the Nov. 1 episode of Saturday Night Live with his daring stand-up comedy routine during the show's opening monologue. In his 8-minute bit, the seasoned comedian, 49, touched on the Boston Marathon bombings of 2013, September 11th, the Freedom Tower, and gun laws.

PHOTOS: Celebrity feuds

"That Boston Marathon was scary, because I love Boston," SNL alum Rock began. "I love the people there, but that was probably the most frightening, sadistic terrorist attack ever. Just think about it26 miles! People jogging for 26 miles, their knees are hurting, their feet are killing them, if you're a woman, there's blood coming out your titties. You've been training for a year, you finally get to the finish line, and somebody yells, 'RUN!'"

The Top Five actor then began discussing the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 in New York. After saying his home city was able to bounce back, Rock began joking about the newly finished Freedom Tower, which stands next to the former location of the Twin Towers.

PHOTOS: Talk show controversies

"They should change the name from the Freedom Tower to the 'Never Going in There Tower,' 'cause I'm never going in there," he quipped. "Who's the corporate sponsor, Target? They put another skyscraper in the same spot? I am never going in the Freedom Tower. I got robbed on 48th and 8th a few years ago, I have not been back to 48th and 8th."

Chris Rock offended several viewers with his controversial opening monologue on the Nov. 1 episode of Saturday Night Live.

Anticipating some of the negative backlash, Rock noted, "Hey, hey I'm not joking about 9/11, but we live in America and in America there are no sacred days because we commercialize everything."

Before he even finished speaking, Rock's name became a trending topic on Twitter with fans ranging from all ends of the spectrum speaking out.

PHOTOS: SNL's most successful cast members

Originally posted here:

Chris Rock Jokes About Boston Marathon Bombing, Freedom Tower in Saturday Night Live Opening Monologue, Offends ...