Winners named in 2014 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Awards competition

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

6-Nov-2014

Contact: Earl Lane elane@aaas.org 202-326-6431 American Association for the Advancement of Science @AAAS_News

Stories exploring the complexities of human biology, including our interactions with the trillions of microbes we all harbor, the influences of our fishy evolutionary forebears on how we look, and the enduring challenge of understanding cancer, are among the winners of the 2014 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Awards.

The awards, administered by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since their inception in 1945, go to professional journalists for distinguished reporting for a general audience. The Kavli Foundation provided a generous endowment in 2009 that ensures the future of the awards program.

Independent panels of science journalists pick the winners, who will receive $3,000 and a plaque at the 2015 AAAS Annual Meeting in San Jose, Calif., in February.

Rob Stein, a science correspondent for NPR, won the radio award for reporting on the microbial hitchhikers that live on and in the human body. "In addition to revealing potentially profound new insights into human health," Stein said, research on the human microbiome, as it is called, "raises tantalizing questions about our relationship with the world around us, and even in some ways what it means to be human." The growing field of research also raises some tricky ethical concerns, Stein noted. "Altogether, producing this series proved to be a challenging, fascinating and thrilling journey," he said.

Michael Rosenfeld, David Dugan, and Neil Shubin won the in-depth reporting award in the television category for a three-part PBS series on "Your Inner Fish." The winning series described how Shubin, a fish paleontologist, and his colleagues use fossil evidence and our DNA history to trace different features of our anatomy to animals from long ago. Natalie Angier, a science writer for The New York Times, praised the PBS series. "I particularly applaud the segments that reveal what fieldwork is really like," Angier said, "and the graphics really brought the fossils to life."

George Johnson, a contributor to The New York Times, won in the large newspaper category for three insightful essays on cancer and some of the misconceptions about the disease. Hillary Rosner, a freelance writer who was one of the judges, said Johnson's pieces "are gorgeously written and offer fascinating perspectives on a topic we like to think we know a lot about."

Alan I. Leshner, chief executive officer of AAAS and executive publisher of the journal Science, said a new online entry submission system for the contest resulted in a record 606 entries across all categories, suggesting that "there is a tremendous amount of good work being done in many venues of science journalism at a time when public understanding of science and its impact is more important than ever."

Link:
Winners named in 2014 AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Awards competition

Enliven: Journal of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine ISSN : 2374 – 4448 I e001 – Video


Enliven: Journal of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine ISSN : 2374 - 4448 I e001
Left Ventricular Assist Device and Resident Cardiac Stem Cells in Heart Failure: Human Heart #39;s Potential Matter.

By: enlivenarchive

See the original post here:

Enliven: Journal of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine ISSN : 2374 - 4448 I e001 - Video

Dallas Cowboys: ‘Do they have medicine in London?’ [AMBIENT] – Video


Dallas Cowboys: #39;Do they have medicine in London? #39; [AMBIENT]
Tony Romo missed the Dallas Cowboys first practice in London on Wednesday (5th November) but head coach Jason Garrett is optimistic his quarterback may recover from a back injury in time to...

By: SNTV - Inside every story

See the rest here:

Dallas Cowboys: 'Do they have medicine in London?' [AMBIENT] - Video

Developing Tools for Discovery & Implementation in Personalized Medicine – Dan Roden, M.D. – Video


Developing Tools for Discovery Implementation in Personalized Medicine - Dan Roden, M.D.
Dr. Roden received his medical degree and training in internal medicine from McGill University in Montreal and trained in clinical pharmacology and cardiology at Vanderbilt University, where...

By: Mayo Clinic

Read more:

Developing Tools for Discovery & Implementation in Personalized Medicine - Dan Roden, M.D. - Video

QUT Grand Challenge Lecture Series – Biofabrication: The Future of Regenerative Medicine? – Video


QUT Grand Challenge Lecture Series - Biofabrication: The Future of Regenerative Medicine?
Discover how you can be a part of this research: http://ow.ly/DHC7H Presented by Associate Professor Mia Woodruff (QUT). 3D printing is currently taking the world by storm with the ability...

By: TheQUTube

Read more:

QUT Grand Challenge Lecture Series - Biofabrication: The Future of Regenerative Medicine? - Video

International Academy of Cardiology: Hanumanth K. Reddy, M.D.: ATYPICAL AND UNUSUAL – Video


International Academy of Cardiology: Hanumanth K. Reddy, M.D.: ATYPICAL AND UNUSUAL
ATYPICAL AND UNUSUAL CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS OF PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (Invited Lecture) Hanumanth K. Reddy, M.D. St. Louis University Medical School, St. Louis, ...

By: Cardiology Online

Go here to see the original:

International Academy of Cardiology: Hanumanth K. Reddy, M.D.: ATYPICAL AND UNUSUAL - Video

Medical Errors Drop When Docs Communicate Better at Shift Changes

By Steven Reinberg HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Nov. 5, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Changing how doctors communicate during shift changes in hospitals reduced the risk of adverse events in patients by 30 percent, a new study found.

In the study of nearly 11,000 patients, researchers also found that a better method of communication could reduce the rate of medical errors by almost 25 percent.

"We were trying to improve the way doctors were passing on patient information," said lead researcher Dr. Amy Starmer, a lecturer on pediatrics at Harvard Medical School in Boston.

To improve communication between doctors caring for patients, Starmer's team instituted a "handoff" program at nine hospitals. The study authors measured how effective the program was in reducing medical errors and adverse events to patients. They also looked to see if the program interfered with workflow.

Specifically, they developed a method of communication dubbed the "I-PASS Handoff Bundle." For each patient in the doctor's charge, both oral and written data are required to describe:

Doctors were trained to use the system, as well as how to use it in conjunction with the electronic medical record system, Starmer said.

In addition to reducing medical errors, such as prescribing the wrong medications or procedures, the program didn't take a toll on the doctors' workflow, she said.

"We are really excited about the study," Starmer said. "Not only do we see a dramatic reduction in medical errors, but we found that this method is adaptable to other hospitals and to other health care workers, such as nurses and surgeons," she said.

The report was published in the Nov. 6 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Continue reading here:

Medical Errors Drop When Docs Communicate Better at Shift Changes

Some Schools Want Less Healthy Lunches (And Why We Need to Stop This)

Did you know that some schools actually want to make their lunches less healthy?

It's true. Some colleagues of mine, Jennifer Woo Baidal and Elsie Taveras, wrote about it in a terrific article in the New England Journal of Medicine that is a must-read.

Since 2012, public schools have been using updated nutrition standards. The changes, which came from the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA), are simple and sensible: more fruits, vegetables and whole grains, less trans fats and sodium, healthy calorie guidelines. And as an incentive, HHFKA gave the schools more money.

Sounds perfect, huh? Healthier foods for the kids, more money for the schools.

But now, just two years later, many schools want out. Some school officials, food-industry advocates, and the School Nutrition Association have raised concerns--so much so that the House of Representatives included a way for schools to get a waiver and opt out in the 2015 Agriculture Appropriations Bill.

Why would any school want to go back to unhealthy school lunches? The answer is what it almost always is in these kind of situations: Money.

The problem, they say, is that fewer kids are buying the lunches since the changes. Now, it's not clear that this is all because of the changes--while it's true that fewer kids are buying school lunches (even though more qualify for free school meals), this started before 2012. Prices have gone up, and, well, school lunches hardly have a great reputation, if you know what I mean.

But it is true that the healthy lunches don't go over big with all children. Hey, we see this at our own dinner tables. While there are certainly children out there who love broccoli, many more of them love french fries.

However, at our own dinner table, we don't say: Oh, no problem, you don't have to eat your broccoli. Or any vegetables or fruits, today or ever. Just eat french fries. Because we know that this would be bad for our children, and we want them to be healthy. Shouldn't schools want the same thing?

And here's the other thing we need to remember: The more kids are exposed to a new food, the more likely they are to eventually like it and eat it. Not only does seeing healthy foods in school help set kids up for better eating habits, the simple truth is that it may take more than two years for this new way of eating to become normal and accepted--and for kids to start eating more of those apples and salads and stop throwing them out.

Read the original:

Some Schools Want Less Healthy Lunches (And Why We Need to Stop This)