Senate inaction allows NSA to keep collecting phone records

This undated photo provided by the National Security Agency (NSA) shows its headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.  NSA via Getty Images

WASHINGTON - The Senate on Tuesday blocked a bill to end bulk collection of American phone records by the National Security Agency, dealing a blow to President Barack Obama's primary proposal to rein in domestic surveillance.

The 58-42 vote was two short of the 60 needed to proceed with debate. Voting was largely along party lines, with most Democrats supporting the bill and most Republicans voting against it. The Republican-controlled House had previously passed its own NSA bill.

The legislation would have ended the NSA's collection of domestic calling records, instead requiring the agency to obtain a court order each time it wanted to analyze the records in terrorism cases, and query records held by the telephone companies. In many cases the companies store the records for 18 months.

The revelation that the spying agency had been collecting and storing domestic phone records since shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was among the most significant by Edward Snowden, a former agency network administrator who turned over secret NSA documents to journalists. The agency collects only so-called metadata - numbers called, not names - and not the content of conversations. But the specter of the intelligence agency holding domestic calling records was deeply disquieting to many Americans.

The bill had drawn support from technology companies and civil liberties activists. Its failure means there has been little in the way of policy changes as a result of Snowden's disclosures.

Pressured to act, Obama in January proposed curbing the NSA's authority and the House in May passed a bill to do so. While the measure was pending, the NSA continued to collect American landline calling records, though the program does not cover most mobile phone records.

The law authorizing the bulk collection, a provision of the post-9/11 USA Patriot Act, will expire in June 2015. That means Congress would have to pass legislation re-authorizing the program for it to continue.

For that reason, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, abandoned her previous opposition to the bill. "If we do not pass the bill, we will lose this program," Feinstein said on the Senate floor.

"This bill increases trust and confidence and credibility of our intelligence system," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn.

Read the original:

Senate inaction allows NSA to keep collecting phone records

Posted in NSA

NSA reform bill voted down in US Senate amid terror fears

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Photo: Reuters

Washington: In May, reacting to revelations of the National Security Agency's mass collection of Americans' phone records, members of the House of Representatives voted by a wide margin to end the program.

On Tuesday night, their counterparts across the US Capitol could not win enough votes to proceed even with debate on a bill that sought to accomplish much the same thing.

Part of what accounts for the different outcome is a shift in the climate over the past six months, as a steady stream of disclosures about government surveillance has abated. At the same time, Republican opponents of an overhaul of the NSA's programs have been bolstered by a renewed fear of terrorist attacks by the Islamic State militant group and a sense that now is not the time to alter the intelligence community's authorities.

National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade.

Indeed, GOP advocates for the NSA and others appealed to those fears in moving to block the Senate debate.

Advertisement

On the eve of the vote, two former top national security officials campaigned against the bill in a Wall Street Journal op-ed headlined "NSA Reform that Only ISIS Could Love." ISIS is another designation for Islamic State, the Sunni militants battling for control for parts of Iraq and Syria.

Former NSA Director Michael Hayden, who also headed the CIA, and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey warned that IS "uses sophisticated Internet communications to swell its ranks with recruits bearing US, Canadian or European passports who can easily slip back into their native countries and wreak havoc."

That op-ed set the tone for Tuesday's GOP-led assault on the USA Freedom Act, which also specified other surveillance reforms.

Read the rest here:

NSA reform bill voted down in US Senate amid terror fears

Posted in NSA

Senate blocks bill curbing NSA surveillance

By Ted Barrett, CNN

updated 9:08 PM EST, Tue November 18, 2014

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Washington (CNN) -- Republican opponents of White House-backed legislation that would rein in NSA surveillance programs narrowly blocked the Senate from taking up the bill Tuesday after warning it could help terrorists escape detection.

On a tally of 58 to 42, a procedural vote failed to get the supermajority 60 votes it needed to advance.

Supporters of the USA Freedom Act, a rare mix of liberal Democrats and libertarian Republicans, hoped public outrage over the secret mass collection of phone and Internet records -- revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden -- would lead to passage of the reforms. But many opponents argued the changes would hamper the National Security Agency's ability to track nimble and elusive terrorists.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell led the charge against the bill, saying the new rules would prevent the United States from capturing the terrorists who killed Peter Kassig, a U.S. citizen doing aid work in Syria. Kassig was executed over the weekend.

"Many of these fighters are familiar with America's intelligence capabilities, and many are savvy with communications. These are terrorists who know how to use encryption, and they how to change devices quickly," he said. "This is the worst time to be tying our hands behind our backs."

"It basically takes us back to a pre-9/11 lack of capacity to identify terrorists making telephone calls in the United States, said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the second-ranking Senate Republican. "I think that sort of unilateral disarmament would be bad for the country."

McConnell also argued the measure should be debated and voted on in the new Congress next year, not by lawmakers in a lame duck session who are leaving Washington.

More here:

Senate blocks bill curbing NSA surveillance

Posted in NSA

Senate blocks NSA surveillance curb

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Washington (CNN) -- Republican opponents of White House-backed legislation that would rein in NSA surveillance programs narrowly blocked the Senate from taking up the bill Tuesday after warning it could help terrorists escape detection.

On a tally of 58 to 42, a procedural vote failed to get the supermajority 60 votes it needed to advance.

Supporters of the USA Freedom Act, a rare mix of liberal Democrats and libertarian Republicans, hoped public outrage over the secret mass collection of phone and Internet records -- revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden -- would lead to passage of the reforms. But many opponents argued the changes would hamper the National Security Agency's ability to track nimble and elusive terrorists.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell led the charge against the bill, saying the new rules would prevent the United States from capturing the terrorists who killed Peter Kassig, a U.S. citizen doing aid work in Syria. Kassig was executed over the weekend.

"Many of these fighters are familiar with America's intelligence capabilities, and many are savvy with communications. These are terrorists who know how to use encryption, and they how to change devices quickly," he said. "This is the worst time to be tying our hands behind our backs."

"It basically takes us back to a pre-9/11 lack of capacity to identify terrorists making telephone calls in the United States, said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the second-ranking Senate Republican. "I think that sort of unilateral disarmament would be bad for the country."

McConnell also argued the measure should be debated and voted on in the new Congress next year, not by lawmakers in a lame duck session who are leaving Washington.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, the bill's principal author, disputed the critics saying that while it puts checks on the NSA's powerful capabilities, it "does so responsibly."

"The bill contains key reforms to safeguard Americans' privacy by prohibiting the indiscriminate collection of their data. It also provides for greater accountability and transparency of the government's surveillance programs," he said. "The bill also ensures that the intelligence community has the tools it needs to keep our country safe."

Excerpt from:

Senate blocks NSA surveillance curb

Posted in NSA

Gotta love the First Amendment – handing out chemtrail fliers at a Green Festival – Video


Gotta love the First Amendment - handing out chemtrail fliers at a Green Festival
http://StopSprayingUs-SF.com - When I was handing out chemtrail awareness fliers outside a Green Festival in San Francisco #39;s Fort Mason, park officials and police claimed I was breaking the...

By: Patrick Roddie

Originally posted here:

Gotta love the First Amendment - handing out chemtrail fliers at a Green Festival - Video

Volokh Conspiracy: Convicted sex offenders, Jehovahs Witnesses, and the First Amendment

Beginning in the 1930s, shortly after the Supreme Court had incorporated the First Amendment into the due process clause (thereby making it an enforceable constraint not only on the federal government ["Congress shall make no law . . ."] but on State and municipal governments as well) the Jehovahs Witnesses went on a campaign to attack, in court, restrictions on their ability to proselytize door-to-door and to give voice to unpopular views. During one particular 8 year period (1938 to 1946) they brought no fewer than 23 separate First Amendment actions to the Supreme Court (prompting Justice Stone to quip that they ought to have an endowment in view of the aid they give in solving the legal problems of civil liberties). They won some spectacularly important victories West Virginia Board of Ed. v Barnette (1943) (children cannot be forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance or salute the flag), Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (19420 (establishing the fighting words doctrine, and overturning conviction of a Jehovahs Witness who called a local official a damned racketeer and a fascist), Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton (2002) (overturning municipal ordinance requiring government permits for all door-to-door advocacy).***

They were widely reviled especially during World War II and the Korean War, their position asconscientious objectors to military service and their refusal to salute the flag made them the object of great hostility but in retrospect, we all owe them a great debt of gratitude. It took (and it takes) real courage to stand up to the combined forces of public opinion and the state to voice opinions that others find highly objectionable and even inflammatory, and we all enjoy, in a much stronger First Amendment than we might otherwise have, the benefits of their having had the courage to have done so.

Yesterday the 9th Circuit issued its decision striking down Californias CASE (Californians Against Sexual Exploitation) Act as violative of the First Amendment. The Actrequired previously-convicted sex offenders to provide [a] list of any and all Internet identifiers established or used, a list of any and all Internet service providers used, and to sendwritten notice to law enforcement within 24 hours of adding or changing an Internet identifier or an account with an Internet service provider; it also provided for fairly severe criminal penalties for non-compliance.

This is the latest in what is becoming a large series of cases involving First Amendment challenges to state sex offender registration statutes. There have been cases like this one in Nebraska, Indiana, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, to name a few. Ive blogged about some of them before e.g.,hereand here and (full disclosure) Ive been involved in several of them (including this California case) as an expert testifying on behalf of the challengers.

The courts opinion here at least to someone on the side of the fence that Im on has a terrific analysis of the First Amendment issues at stake, and some strong First-Amendment-protective language that will, I promise you, come in very, very handy in future battles the ones that are coming that will not involve just convicted sex offenders. The court struck down the statute on the grounds that it unnecessarily chills protected speech in three ways: the Act does not make clear what it is that sex offenders are required to report, there are insufficient safeguards preventing the public release of the information sex offenders do report, and the 24-hour reporting requirement is onerous and overbroad. There is, in particular, some very forceful language about the right, under the First Amendment, to speak anonymously an issue that, as I keep harping on, is going to be a major First Amendment battleground duringthe the next decade or so. The court wrote:

Although this is not what some might call the classic anonymous-speech case, where speakers allege they are required to disclose their identities directly to their audience, we conclude that the Act nevertheless chills anonymous speech because it too freely allows law enforcement to disclose sex offenders Internet identifying information to the public. . . .We agree with the district court that the standards for releasing Internet identifying information to the public are inadequate to constrain the discretion of law enforcement agencies and that, as a result, registered sex offenders are unnecessarily deterred from engaging in anonymous online speech.

[S]ex offenders fear of disclosure in and of itself chills their speech. If their identity is exposed, their speech, even on topics of public importance, could subject them to harassment, retaliation, and intimidation. See McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 34142 (The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of ones privacy as possible.); Brown v. Socialist Workers 74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio), 459 U.S. 87, 100 (1982) (holding that disclosure requirements may subject unpopular minority groups to threats, harassment, and reprisals). Anonymity may also be important to sex offenders engaged in protected speech because it provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent.

Pretty strong stuff. It has made me think about the Jehovahs Witnesses. Convicted sex offenders are probably one of a very small number of groups that are even more despised than the Jehovahs Witnesses were in the Thirties and Forties, and they have consequently been singled out for very harsh treatment in the law. Fighting back, theyre helping to make some good First Amendment precedent, and when the government starts cracking down on other speech by other speakers, or attempting to restrict our ability to use anonymizing tools in our Internet communications as itwill well be grateful to them for having done so.

***Shawn Peters excellent Judging Jehovahs Witnessess tells this story in great detail, if youre interested.

David Post taught intellectual property and Internet law at Georgetown Law Center and Temple University Law School until his recent retirement. He is the author of "In Search of Jeffersons Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace" (Oxford, 2009), a Fellow at the Center for Democracy and Technology, and an Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute.

Original post:

Volokh Conspiracy: Convicted sex offenders, Jehovahs Witnesses, and the First Amendment

Reddits new Bitcoin loving CEO — Xapo Mobile — Buy it with Brawker and Bitcoins – Video


Reddits new Bitcoin loving CEO -- Xapo Mobile -- Buy it with Brawker and Bitcoins
Sponsored by http://CoinHD.com Donate: https://blockchain.info/address/1LAYuQq6f11HccBgbe6bx8DiwKwzuYkPR3 Subscribe: http://patreon.com/madbitcoins Sponsor: http://MadBitcoins.com ...

By: MadBitcoins

Continue reading here:

Reddits new Bitcoin loving CEO -- Xapo Mobile -- Buy it with Brawker and Bitcoins - Video

BITCOIN FILTER #29 Bitcoin Birthing the New Global Financial System – Video


BITCOIN FILTER #29 Bitcoin Birthing the New Global Financial System
As the Bitcoin rises in price, it seems every week brings more and more interest in the tools and infrastructure that supports this fledgling currency. Modern banking in Bitcoin is being born...

By: consensus Reality.io

Link:

BITCOIN FILTER #29 Bitcoin Birthing the New Global Financial System - Video

Bitcoin Weekly 2014 November 19: Bitcoin Black Friday approaches, BloomNation talks BTC, Circle mobile apps, DPR coins …

Its already November and therefore a good time to prepare for Black Friday and the upcoming Bitcoin Black Friday. November 28th will be a date to save with all the deals that will be released to the Bitcoin community. Be sure to sign up for e-mail updates so you dont miss it!

Also in this issue: BloomNation talks flowers and accepting bitcoins; Circle releases Android and iOS apps; Blockstream receive $21 million in funding; the next round of Dread Pirate Roberts bitcoins being sold by the U.S. Marshals; and Coinbase releases its own tipping button.

November 28th this year is the retail holiday Black Friday and along with it the Bitcoin Black Friday deal-making event is also approaching.

Bitcoin Black Friday Jon Holmquist says that he expects to see 6,000 merchants this yearthats ten times the number who joined in 2013and that the expected deals will be released on November 26th.

This will be the third year that Bitcoin Black Friday as run and it has only gotten bigger each year. For more information see SiliconANGLEs post on the 2014 event.

Internet flower arrangement and delivery service, BloomNation started accepting bitcoin at the same time competitor 1-800-Flowers.com announced it would be taking bitcoins. In January of this year, BloomNation partnered with Coinbase to accept bitcoins for Internet-based flower delivery.

BloomNations mission statement is to disrupt the way that Internet flower delivery works by acting as a service that connects people with local florists and then getting out of the way. The process involves local small businesses, the florists send an image of the final arrangement to the customer before delivery (no stock photos), and it allows for same-day hand delivery.

A lot of people who would not have traditionally sent flowers today, have now sent flowers online because of bitcoin, says Gregg Weisstein, Co-Founder and COO of BloomNation.com. He feels that accepting bitcoins has opened up BloomNation to that niche customer.

According to Weisstein, bitcoin transactions represent a very small amount of total revenueless than 1 percentbut that the team sees bitcoin orders come in all the time.

Its pretty exciting, he adds. The business gets a separate notification from Coinbase on bitcoin orders.

See the original post:

Bitcoin Weekly 2014 November 19: Bitcoin Black Friday approaches, BloomNation talks BTC, Circle mobile apps, DPR coins ...

10 Tips to Manage Psoriasis and Eczema this Winter

Roslyn Heights, NY (PRWEB) November 19, 2014

A shocking number of Americans have psoriasis and eczema39 million adults and childrenwhich is more than four times the population of New York City, the largest city in the US. According to dermatology specialists Dr. Joshua Fox and Dr. Robert Levine with Advanced Dermatology, PC, the seasonal change to cold, dry air creates difficulties for people dealing with these chronic skin disorders.

It is important to manage symptoms, says Dr. Fox, who has served on the board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Psoriasis and eczema can be painful. They can make everyday actions uncomfortable for adults and children, men and women, and they carry a stigma that can lead to a loss of self-esteem, depression, and other health complications.

Symptoms Psoriasis appears on the skin as red or white, scaly patches that often itch and bleed. The patches can also look scaly or silvery in color. Nails can become yellow, ridged and separate from the nail bed. Up to 30 percent of people with the disease develop psoriatic arthritis, and recent studies indicate that patients with moderate to severe disease are also at increased risk for other associated health conditions, including heart disease, heart attack, diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, depression and hypertension.

Eczema, a hypersensitivity disease, inflames the skin, causing pain, itching, dryness, swelling, cracking, weeping and scaling. Eczema lesions can bubble, ooze, and crust over if scratched. Skin infections can occur if bacteria invade the skin lesions.

Diagnosis Once patients understand their psoriasis or eczema is not contagious, they seem to be relieved, says Dr. Fox. They are comforted to know there is help for their symptoms.

Psoraisis is an autoimmune disease apparently cause by an overactive immune system that overproduces skin cells. Eczema, on the other hand, is caused by a deficient immune system in which an imbalance of skin proteins creates skin sensitivities. This is a significant distinction because it informs treatment, explains Dr. Fox. A dermatologist will diagnose the condition and provide the most effective care for individual patients.

Psoriasis treatments:

Eczema treatments:

Dr. Foxs and Dr. Levines tips for managing psoriasis and eczema throughout the winter

See the article here:

10 Tips to Manage Psoriasis and Eczema this Winter