Obama faces deadline on halting NSA snooping

President Obama has a Friday deadline to decide whether to halt his NSA phone-snooping program or to keep it going, and after Congress failed to stop it last month some lawmakers now say the White House should pull the plug on its own.

The Senate had a chance to kill the program outright last month, but Republican senators filibustered, giving the snooping a renewed lease on life.

Still, the administration must seek approval every 90 days from the secret court that oversees intelligence activities, and the current 90-day period expires on Friday, creating a decision for Mr. Obama.

The president can end the NSAs dragnet collection of Americans phone records once and for all by not seeking reauthorization of this program by the FISA Court, and once again, I urge him to do just that, said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Mr. Leahy was the chief sponsor of the bill that would have nixed the intelligence communitys bulk collection abilities under the Patriot Act, which is the authority the administration cites for the National Security Agency phone-snooping. Under that program, the NSA stores five years worth of records of Americans phone calls, including the numbers involved and the time and duration.

The data is supposed to only be checked when officials believe a number is associated with terrorism.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence didnt immediately respond to a message seeking comment Fridaymorning on the administrations plans.

Mr. Obama has called for the phone-snooping program to be curtailed, and has taken steps to limit it, including lowering the number of hops, or connections, investigators can go from the initial number they are investigating. The president also asked that the Justice Department try to ask the secret court for permission before querying the data.

The White House wants phone companies to store the data, which would keep it out of government hands but still make it available when investigators needed to poke through it.

A bill to curb bulk collection passed the House earlier this year, but GOP senators filibustered last month to block a similar bill. Most of them argued that the ability to snoop through phone records was too vital at a time when the U.S. is facing the rise of the Islamic State and lone-wolf terror attacks.

Read more:

Obama faces deadline on halting NSA snooping

Posted in NSA

The Fix: Reports of Chris Christies political demise have been *greatly* exaggerated

When the scandal that became known as "Bridgegate" popped about a year ago, there were plenty of people writing the obituary of or at least suggesting serious harm to Chris Christie's likely 2016 presidential campaign.

Turns out that was premature.

A state legislative investigation led by Democrats now saysthat it foundno evidence that Christie knew about the closures of access lanes from Fort Lee, N.J., to the George Washington Bridge closures that were initiated by top Christie aides in an apparent act of political retribution.

From the Bergen Record:

A report summarizing a yearlong investigation by the legislative panel examining the George Washington Bridge lane closures found no evidence of Governor Christies involvement but concluded that two of his allies acted with perceived impunity when they gridlocked Fort Lees streets apparently for political reasons.

The committees 136-page report, drawing off sworn testimony, private interviews and thousands of subpoenaed documents, also highlights the unsuccessful efforts by a now-shuttered arm of Christies office to court the Fort Lee mayors endorsement, finding that the closures were motivated in part by political considerations.

The report states there is no conclusive evidence as to whether the governor was or was not aware of the lane closures or involved in directing them. But it catalogs several unanswered questions surrounding the scandal and cites a lack of cooperation from several key players who invoked their Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination.

Christie isn't completely out of the woods just yet: The panel is reserving the right to press forwardafter its "interim report" (there are some questions being raised about deleted texts between the governor and an aide), and a U.S. attorney is investigating the matter. In addition,the bridge scandal is hardly Christie'sonly 2016 liability, given that his state has repeatedly seen its credit rating downgradedunder him, among other issues.

But the idea that the bridge scandal negatedChristie's chances of becoming president was always too much of a rush to judgment. For now, Christie can say that Democrats came after him and came up with practicallynothing. And in fact, that's a pretty strong argumentin a 2016 GOP primary.

Look, the Christie obituaries made plenty of sense. After all, the pieces all fit logically into the narrative of Christies political career. The governors opponents view him as a bully, and this seemed to be the ultimate bit of political bullying extremely petty and callously impacting the lives of thousands of people who did nothing to deserve what became days of snarled traffic.

Read this article:

The Fix: Reports of Chris Christies political demise have been *greatly* exaggerated

Appeals Court: Welfare Drug Tests Unconstitutional

Follow CBSMIAMI.COM:Facebook|Twitter

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/ NSF) A federal appeals court on Wednesday, again rejected a Florida law requiring welfare applicants to submit to drug tests before they can receive benefits.

Pushed by Florida Governor Rick Scott, the 2011 law offends the Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches by the government, a three-judge panel ruled in a 54-page opinion authored by Judge Stanley Marcus.

We respect the states overarching and laudable desire to promote work, protect families, and conserve resources. But, above all else, we must enforce the Constitution and the limits it places on government. If we are to give meaning to the Fourth Amendments prohibition on blanket government searches, we must and we do hold that (the Florida law) crosses the constitutional line, Marcus wrote.

The ruling, which upheld a final judgment late last year by U.S. District Judge Mary Scriven, is the fourth time courts have sided with the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida and the Florida Justice Institute, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of Luis Lebron, a Navy veteran and single father. The lawsuit was filed shortly after the law went into effect in mid-2011. Scott used mandatory drug tests as an issue in his 2010 campaign.

This is a resounding affirmation of the values that the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects that none of us can be forced to submit to invasive and humiliating searches at the whim of the government, and that the Constitution protects the poor and the wealthy alike. The court has once again confirmed what we argued all along: that the state of Florida cannot treat an entire class of people like suspected criminals simply because theyve asked the state for temporary assistance, ACLU of Florida associate legal director Maria Kayanan, who argued the case before the court Nov. 20, said in a statement.

Scott can either ask the 11th Circuit for an en banc review by the entire court or pursue an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. The Scott administration did not comment Wednesday afternoon on the ruling. Despite repeated court decisions finding that the welfare drug testing law is unconstitutional, Scott and his lawyers have refused to back down from their position that the urine tests are needed to make sure poor children dont grow up in drug-riddled households.

But the appeals-court judges again rejected the Scott administrations arguments, saying that the state failed to make its case.

In effect from July 1, 2011, until Oct. 24, 2011, when Scriven issued a preliminary injunction putting it on hold, the law required applicants seeking benefits in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program emergency cash benefits for the poorest of the poor, available to expectant mothers and families with children to submit to and pay for urine tests, which range from $24 to $45. The money would be reimbursed if the tests were negative, and parents who failed the tests could designate someone else to receive cash benefits on behalf of their children.

During the period in which the law was in effect, 4,406 applicants submitted to drug testing. Only 108 less than 3 percent tested positive for drugs. Another 2,306 applicants failed to complete the applications or receive the drug screens.

See more here:

Appeals Court: Welfare Drug Tests Unconstitutional

Justice Department cites Cleveland police for pattern excessive force and abuse

CLEVELAND, Dec. 4 (UPI) -- The city of Cleveland has agreed to implement sweeping police reforms after the U.S. Attorney General's office uncovered a lengthy history of excessive force and abusive behavior in the troubled department.

"The reality is that there are problems," Attorney General Holder said in an official statement, adding, "But I also think the people of Cleveland should have a sense of hope ... that these problems have been identified and that they can be rectified."

Among the Justice Department's key findings:

-- The unnecessary, excessive or retaliatory use of less lethal force including Tasers, chemical spray and fists;

Excessive force against persons who are mentally ill or in crisis, including in cases where the officers were called exclusively for a welfare check;

-- The employment of poor and dangerous tactics that place officers in situations where avoidable force becomes inevitable.

"The investigation concluded that there is reasonable cause to believe that Cleveland police officers engage in a pattern or practice of unreasonable and in some cases unnecessary force in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution," summarizes the Justice Department.

To revamp its department to contemporary standards, the city of Cleveland agreed to "develop a court enforceable consent decree that will include a requirement for an independent monitor who will oversee and ensure necessary reforms."

"Cleveland is not alone in its need to address police reform," Venita Gupta, acting Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division, told the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

"These investigations are keystones of Attorney General Holder's legacy, and I think it's very significant that he is coming to Cleveland with a backdrop of these national issues to talk about community policing and constructive reforms."

Read more:

Justice Department cites Cleveland police for pattern excessive force and abuse

Missouri Supreme Court Takes Second Amendment Case

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. -- The question of whether felons should be allowed to own firearms is being addressed in a case on the Missouri Supreme Court docket.

It plans to take up the case Monday.

Cases involving not just constitutional rights, but the right to bear arms, always carry a lot of weight.

This particular case also involves rights or the limited rights of convicted felons.

Starting Monday the Missouri Supreme Court will begin hearing the case State of Missouri v. Marcus Merritt, out of St. Louis.

Merritt was convicted in 1986 of illegal distribution of PCP.

January last year the state charged Merritt with three counts of illegal possession of a firearm.

Merritt wants those charges dismissed.

He believes the statute that states it is illegal for felons to have firearms violates his inalienable constitutional right to bear arms.

That case will be heard by the Missouri Supreme Court next week.

Read the original:

Missouri Supreme Court Takes Second Amendment Case

Parliament passes two bills on shipping industry, ship workers

Parliament Tuesday passed two bills to improve the working condition of ship workers and the shipping industry.

The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Bill, 2013 and the Merchant Shipping (Second) Amendment, Bill 2013, which were passed by the Rajya Sabha on Monday, were cleared by the Lok Sabha Tuesday.

Union Shipping Minister Nitin Gadkari, speaking on the bills, said they were in the interest of the country, workers and the shipping industry and their provisions were in line with the recommendations of the International Labour Organisation (ILO).

The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Bill seeks to add new provisions to the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 to comply with the International Convention for the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships, 2001.

Anti-fouling paints are applied to the bottom of the ships to protect them from erosion from sea water and rusting.

The Merchant Shipping (Second Amendment) Bill proposes to amend the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, to bring it in conformity with the ILO's Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, which lays down the standards for the living and working conditions of seafarers, including their food, accommodation, medical care, social security, and recruitment.

(Posted on 02-12-2014)

Go here to read the rest:

Parliament passes two bills on shipping industry, ship workers

Whistleblowers, Leaks, and the Media: The First Amendment and National Security – Video


Whistleblowers, Leaks, and the Media: The First Amendment and National Security
"Whistleblowers, Leaks, and the Media" is a broad-based introduction to the legal and policy issues regarding the media #39;s coverage of national security. A jo...

By: The Heritage Foundation

Link:

Whistleblowers, Leaks, and the Media: The First Amendment and National Security - Video

Satanists Win Right to Put Up "Hell" Display by Nativity Scene at Florida Capitol – Video


Satanists Win Right to Put Up "Hell" Display by Nativity Scene at Florida Capitol
http://www.undergroundworldnews.com Florida agreed Thursday to let the Satanic Temple put up a holiday display at the Capitol, effectively putting to end a First Amendment lawsuit being filed...

By: Dahboo777

View post:

Satanists Win Right to Put Up "Hell" Display by Nativity Scene at Florida Capitol - Video

California college settles First Amendment suit with student

Published December 04, 2014

This photo, provided by FIRE, shows Citrus College student Vincenzo Sinapi-Riddle.

A California community college has settled a lawsuit with a student who claimed it violated his First Amendment rights when an administrator threatened him for collecting petition signatures outside of a small, designated "free speech zone."

Student Vincenzo Sinapi-Riddle, with help from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, sued Glendora, Calif., Citrus College after the incident, which occurred on Sept. 17, 2013 - the day designated as "Constitution Day." Sinapi-Riddle was collecting signatures for a petition condemning the federal National Security Agency's domestic surveillance activities. When he left the area for a lunch break and headed to the student center, he and another student discussed the petition, prompting an administrator to intervene, according to FIRE. Claiming that a political discussion could not take place outside of the free speech zone, the unidentified school employee threatened to eject Sinapi-Riddle from campus for violating the policy.

- Greg Lukianoff, FIRE

I feel that free speech and the ability to express oneself freely is a very important right for all students, said Sinapi-Riddle.

After a suit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the school agreed to pay Sinapi-Riddle $110,000 in damages and attorneys' fees, as well as to revise its free speech policies. In a statement, the school noted the settlement figure was far less than the anticipated cost of fighting the lawsuit and defended its policies as in compliance "with a long line of U.S. Supreme Court cases relating to speech activities in public places, including college campuses." But the school affirmed its support for free speech and agreed to change some campus regulations.

"Freedom of expression is crucial in the higher education community, and the District and its Board of Trustees have done much to protect and advance this cherished right," the statement read. "As part of the settlement, the District will be implementing new procedures that will expand its current free speech area to include most open spaces on campus, enhance the Districts co-curricular program by streamlining internal procedures that apply to activities of recognized student clubs and organizations, and help to ensure the safety and security of students involved in such activities."

FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said his group had taken on Citrus College before, and reached a similar agreement, only to have the school go back to the old policy.

"Citrus College agreed to eliminate its restrictive 'free speech zone' in the face of a FIRE lawsuit back in 2003, but later reinstated its speech quarantine when it thought no one was watching," FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said in a statement on the group's website. "But FIRE was watching, and well continue to do so. If the speech codes come back again, so will we."

Original post:

California college settles First Amendment suit with student

The limits of free speech in protests

The protests surrounding the police killings of black men have provided fertile ground for a discussion of First Amendment issues and today Providence, Rhode Island, is the latest example.

In Providence, the First Amendment allows this:

but not this:

Why not?

Because hes a Providence firefighter and he saluted the flag-burning while standing in the citys public safety building.

Today, Boston.com reports officials say hell be disciplined.

They have their first amendment right to exercise, but while they are on-duty public safety officers cannot be inciting a crowd of protesters, Providence public safety commissioner Steve Pare tells the Providence Journal.

Bob Collins has been with Minnesota Public Radio since 1992, emigrating to Minnesota from Massachusetts where he was vice president of programming for Berkshire Broadcasting Company. Previously, he was an editor at the RKO Radio network in New York, and WHDH Radio in Boston. He was the founder of MPR News website.

Excerpt from:

The limits of free speech in protests

Warning over fake Bitcoin Foundation sites scamming …

Summary:Fraudsters are targeting Bitcoin users with phoney The Bitcoin Foundation websites and sending potential victims to a fake Bitcoin wallet designed to phish their credentials.

The latest ruse to scam Bitcoin owners out of their holdings is websites posing as The Bitcoin Foundation and capitalising on concerns over the cryptocurrency's falling price.

The Bitcoin Foundation said on Monday that it has seen a spike in complaints to its helpdesk over a fraud campaign where scammers direct Bitcoin users to spoofed versions of the foundation's site.

The two scam domains the foundation is aware of are: bitcompensation.com and bitsecuretransfer.com. According to whois.is, both were registered in mid-November by what appears to be the same person.

"The Bitcoin Foundation's website is being cloned and spoofed at web addresses and domains that have absolutely nothing to do with the Bitcoin Foundation," it said.

"If you are contacted and directed to a page that looks like the screenshot below, please close your browser as you are about to be scammed out of your Bitcoins."

Both sites present a 'compensating the users' campaign, purportedly run by the foundation and another fictitious organisation, and urge users to supply their bitcoin address in a field in order to redeem their 'gift'.

The campaign attempts to trick less knowledgeable users who feel they've "lost too much" as a result of Bitcoin's falling price over recent months. This time last year, it was trading at over $1,100; today it's worth $380.

"Since the price of the bitcoin went down a lot, members of the bitcoin community have lost too much," the scam sites read. "To decrease these loss and to sustain our coin, we, The Bitcoin Foundation together with Blockchain, are going to offer to each of our members a random amount of coins."

See more here:

Warning over fake Bitcoin Foundation sites scamming ...