RWW News: Mike Vanderboegh Promises ‘Second Amendment Remedies’ To Washington Background Check Law – Video


RWW News: Mike Vanderboegh Promises #39;Second Amendment Remedies #39; To Washington Background Check Law
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/anti-government-leader-promises-second-amendment-remedies-washington-background-check-law Right Wing Watch reports on the extreme rhetoric and ...

By: RWW Blog

More:

RWW News: Mike Vanderboegh Promises 'Second Amendment Remedies' To Washington Background Check Law - Video

12.16.14 | Second Scoop: Obama pick conf, Bushmaster sued, Gun Rights WINNING, Good Guys, SilencerCo – Video


12.16.14 | Second Scoop: Obama pick conf, Bushmaster sued, Gun Rights WINNING, Good Guys, SilencerCo
The Second Scoop: Chris Cheng provides humor, insight, and commentary on the top gun stories you should know about. Come back every Tuesday night for a delicious serving of Second Amendment.

By: Top Shot Chris Cheng

See original here:

12.16.14 | Second Scoop: Obama pick conf, Bushmaster sued, Gun Rights WINNING, Good Guys, SilencerCo - Video

The Response to the Hack of Sony — Shame on America!

Sony takes a bold move and exercises its First Amendment rights rights that dont exist in most of the world to make a comedy about an assassination attempt on Kim Jong-un. In return, it suffers an outright attack from North Korea no different than if North Korea had fired a missile onto the Sony lot. Make no mistake about it this was a foreign government military attack on American soil, worse than 9-11 because it was government sponsored. And what does America do? Do we rally around and protect the wounded victim of this attack? Do we counterattack the foreign enemy that perpetrated this outrage? Do we defend our freedom of speech rights? Do we fight back, like we have to all other attacks in our history? Do we stand tall, united?

No! We help the enemy by rubbing salt in the wound of the victim. We pick through the detritus left on the streets from the attack and publish private correspondence that was blown into the wind for the world to see like sick voyeurs. We revel in shadenfreude at Sonys distress. We publicly speculate that the injury will be exacerbated by the firing of the very executives that had the courage to make this film in the first place. The theaters all fold to more threats and pull the film until Sony has to give up on the release. We dont counterattack. We do worse than standing idly by and watching the carnage we cower.

The enemy has won. We have just relinquished our freedoms to a two-bit foreign power. It is as though after 9-11, we gathered up the private papers that fell to the street and published them in the newspapers and laughed at the victims and fired those that survived. And then, instead of counterattacking, we surrendered and gave into Al Qaedas list of demands.

What next, America? Are we now to be held hostage by a tin-pot prison camp dictator? What are the movies, books, and articles that will never see the light of day now? Who else are we afraid of offending? Do you think it ends after the Sony attack? Are you kidding given the success of that attack, the next one is a certainty. The only issue is who is attacked and who does the attacking. And we will have deserved it based on our shameful response to this one.

See original here:

The Response to the Hack of Sony -- Shame on America!

Tor Is Still Safe

Tor is having a bit of a crisis, as it's become increasingly clear that the wildly popular network isn't the internet invisibility cloak it was once thought to be. Don't panic. It's not perfect, but it's still the best we've got.

The Tor network is the most popular way to get online anonymously, and that's not going to change in time in the short term. But the service has been rollicked in recent months. A wave of busts that brought down 17 illegal enterprises hidden behind the Tor network last month illustrated that though Tor is largely safe, it's more vulnerable than the average user wants to admit.

The service has also been attacked by reporters who feel the system is compromised because it was originally developed by the U.S. Navy, and because some of the developers behind it have worked with the government before. In a post on Pando, Quinn Norton does a nice job dispelling the myths surrounding Tor's federal ties, which basically comes down to: No level of government interaction can undermine the basic math of encryption.

And Tor's encryption is solid. For those unfamiliar, Tor is software that conceals the location of users and web servers by firing traffic through a global network of relays. It's an ingenious system that for years facilitated basically untraceable internet activity, both illegal and otherwise. It's been used to traffic weapons and drugs, circumvent censorship, and conceal the identity of whistleblowers like Edward Snowden. If you're not using Tor, your location and activity is constantly being tracked. With Tor, the pitch goes, you're basically invisible.

That sense of security was undermined when an international coalition of agencies including the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Department of Homeland Security (in the U.S.) and Europol and Eurojust (in Europe, duh), laid the smack down. The highest profile bust brought down the drug marketplace Silk Road 2.0 and its alleged proprietor Blake Benthall, but it included a total of 17 people and 27 sites, all of whom had put misguided faith in Tor's ability to mask their online dealings.

But how did it happen? Did the agencies crack the anonymous network? A blog post on the Tor Project's website a few days after the attack was quite frank about the organization's ignorance:

So we are left asking "How did they locate the hidden services?". We don't know. In liberal democracies, we should expect that when the time comes to prosecute some of the seventeen people who have been arrested, the police would have to explain to the judge how the suspects came to be suspects, and that as a side benefit of the operation of justice, Tor could learn if there are security flaws in hidden services or other critical internet-facing services.

The post went on to outline myriad ways that law enforcement might have tracked down the operators of illegal websites and the location of their servers. One-by-one, Tor listed vulnerabilities that might have been exploited. They range from technical ways to exploit the code base to unmask users to capturing relays and analyzing their traffic, or even infiltrating the organizations that were running the sites.

What's most striking about Tor's reaction is that the people in charge are completely aware of its vulnerability. The Tor Project operates much like other open source efforts you're probably more familiar with, like Mozilla's Firefox browser or Google's Android operating system. This is admittedly an oversimplification that will horrify developers, but the point is that like those projects Tor evolves thanks to the contributions of an open community. (In fact, the Tor browser is based on Firefoxand it's where it gets one of its known bugs.)

Original post:

Tor Is Still Safe

Deploy Toshi Bitcoin Node with Docker on AWS in 30 minutes. Beginner Friendly! – Video


Deploy Toshi Bitcoin Node with Docker on AWS in 30 minutes. Beginner Friendly!
Deploy Toshi to an EC2 instance on Amazon Web Services using Docker in 30 minues. Toshi is a Bitcoin Implementation written in Ruby by Coinbase. This step-by...

By: Alexander Leishman

More here:

Deploy Toshi Bitcoin Node with Docker on AWS in 30 minutes. Beginner Friendly! - Video

The New Economy – Bitcoin & Collaborative Consumption Documentary [trailer] – Video


The New Economy - Bitcoin Collaborative Consumption Documentary [trailer]
A documentary about cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, and the new sharing economy that are transforming how economic policy will be established in the comin...

By: Mike De #39;Shazer

View original post here:

The New Economy - Bitcoin & Collaborative Consumption Documentary [trailer] - Video

Bitcoin is the worst investment of 2014 Quartz

There was plenty of ugliness to be found in the markets this year. Ukranian and Venezuelan sovereign debt. High-yield, energy-related corporate bonds. Argentine pesos. Russian rubles. Greek stocks.

But none of these investments has been as atrociously awful as bitcoin, the heavily hyped crypto-currency that stormed onto the financial scene in the last few years, threatening to disrupt thecornerstone of global finance that is fiat currency.

It hasnt worked out. Year-to-date bitcoin is down roughly 52% at last glance.

Clearly bitcoin bulls have found themselves on the bleeding edge. But the question is why? One of the clearest answers seems to be that some of the shadier usages of the currencysay for evading taxes and buying drugshave been tougher to execute as governments increasingly try to clamp down on the dark web sites where bitcoin quickly became the cryptocurrency of choice.Collapses of large, unregulated bitcoin exchangessuch as Mt. Goxhave done little to instill confidence in the currency either.

Some of us have argued that bitcoin actually never was a currency, but rather a plaything of speculators.When such playthings start to lose value, speculators have a tendency to abandon them en masse, which they appear to have done in this case.

Now, its worth noting thatsome argue that the value of bitcoin is not in the currency, but in the technology platform. And who knows? Maybe conventional payment systems will come around someday and start incorporating some of the structural advantagesthat transacting in bitcoins provides.

But in the meanwhile, the saga of relentlessly sagging bitcoin pricesas well as stagnant usage indicatorsunderscores an unpleasant fact for libertarian technologists.Money derives much of its value from its government support, in that the government has the power to make it legal tender. That is, the government says not only that currency can be accepted, but it must be accepted. That political choice is what ensures that the currency has an actual utility, that is, it can be used widely for actual transactions. Thats what makes a currency useful. Bitcoin bulls are learning this the hard way.

Original post:

Bitcoin is the worst investment of 2014 Quartz

Bitcoin worse investment than the ruble in 2014

Bitcoin, the online cryptocurrency recently hailed as the most successful of its kind, has been valued as potentially the worst investment in 2014 by business site Quartz.

Bitcoins value has plummeted massively in the last 12 months, currently showing a bigger drop than the Greek stock exchange or the Argentine peso. According to the Guardian, one bitcoin is now worth less than half of what it was this time last year, having devalued by 52% since the start of 2014.

Even the Russian ruble which was declared the worst performing currency of 2014 and which has registered single day falls worse than those seen in Russias 1998 economic crisis, had outperformed Bitcoin as of Wednesday morning GMT.

Jim Urquhart/REUTERS Some of Bitcoin enthusiast Mike Caldwell's coins are pictured at his office in this photo illustration in Sandy, Utah, January 31, 2014.

Currently the rubles rate of devaluation in 2014 is 51%.

According to Andrew Davies, a Newsweek business writer, it isnt highly surprising the cryptocurrency has hit a rough patch as the novelty of bitcoin makes it highly sensitive to changes in the trading climate.

Right now people are feeling very worried and so are dumping holdings that they fear might fall sharply in value, Davies says.

Bitcoin is a prime candidate for this treatment because its value depends always on what I call the greater fool - i.e. someone who is willing to pay even more for it than you did in order to take it off your hands and give you a profit. Davies adds.

A surge in popularity of bitcoin trading over the first half of 2014 caused the value of the currency to skyrocket, hitting the highest ever rate of $900 per single coin and prompting the number of merchants trading in the currency who have made a billion dollars in revenue to increase from zero to 10 by the end of the year.

In the second half of 2014 however, the excitement surrounding bitcoin decreased and volatility in oil, equities, bonds, currencies and commodities has scared traders away from experimental currency such as bitcoin causing the value to drop to $334 per coin on Wednesday.

See more here:

Bitcoin worse investment than the ruble in 2014

Comets Game on December 27 Sold Out

December 17, 2014 - American Hockey League (AHL) Utica Comets The Utica Comets are proud to announce that the Comets game scheduled for December 27 vs. the Lake Erie Monsters, is now SOLD OUT.

The Comets have sold out The AUD 10 times now. In the previous eight sold out games at The AUD, the Comets have not lost in regulation and have compiled a 6-0-2-0 record. Through 13 games at The Utica Memorial Auditorium, The AUD has seen 47,730 fans walk through the door to attend a Comets game. Comets games average 3,672 fans per game, which is 96.3% capacity. Last year Comets games averaged 3,435 fans, which was 90% of The AUD's capacity.

There are limited seats available for Friday's game against the Texas Stars, and for the home game on December 26th vs. North Division rival, the Adirondack Flames.

Tickets to the all remaining games are now on sale at the Utica Memorial Auditorium box office and online through Ticketmaster. For more information, call 315-790-9070 or visit http://www.uticacomets.com.

Discuss this story on the American Hockey League message board... Digg this story Add to Del.icio.us

Go here to see the original:

Comets Game on December 27 Sold Out

VIDEO: The super-fast Royal Mail robot forced to read your messy Christmas card handwriting – including the red …

A super-fast sorting computer and a team of address dectivesare making lightning quick decisions as they filethrough your Christmas mail this year.

Some MPs have claimed that the public should not use red envelopes as they are harder to read and will be sorted slower.

Dont use red envelopes for Christmas cards: MPs call over festive post

But Royal Mail say that they can deal quickly with all properly addressed post, whether red, blue or gold.

AnIntelligent Letter Sorting Machine reads the addresses on letters at hyperspeed when they are first received in a sorting office. It makes split-seconddecisions about where to send the mail in the office.

But in the event it can not read your handwriting a team of 'address detectives' is on hand to help.

The ISLM emails a photograph of any mail it cannot read - about five per cent - to the teams, who use their human eyes to read the addresses, dealing with thousands of images an hour.

A spokesman for Royal Mail said: "As the universal service provider, Royal Mail is proud to deliver the Christmas post for consumers and businesses.

"Our Intelligent Letter Sorting Machines can process up to 50,000 items an hour.

"Anything the machines are unable to read are almost instantaneously passed through to our data centre where our team of address detectives identify the correct address.

Read the rest here:

VIDEO: The super-fast Royal Mail robot forced to read your messy Christmas card handwriting - including the red ...