Astronomy image analysis algorithms adapted to cancer screening method

16 hours ago Credit: The District

Astronomy and oncology do not make obvious bedfellows, but the search for new stars and galaxies has surprising similarities with the search for cancerous cells. This has led to new ways of speeding up image analysis in cancer research.

Despite their red-brick finish, the corridors of the Institute of Astronomy can seem more like an art gallery than a research centre, so beautiful are the images of supernovae and nebulae hanging there. Dr Nic Walton passes these every day as he makes his way to his office to study the formation of the Milky Way and search for planets outside our solar system.

On the screen of Walton's computer is what appears to be a map of stars in our Milky Way. In fact, it is something that is around 25 orders of magnitude smaller (that's ten followed by 25 zeros).

It is an image of cells taken from a biopsy of a patient with breast cancer; the 'stars' are the cells' nuclei, stained to indicate the presence of key proteins. It is the similarities between these patterns and those of astronomical images that he, together with colleagues at the Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, is exploiting in PathGrid, an interdisciplinary initiative to help automate the analysis of biopsy tissue.

"Both astronomy and cell biology deal with huge numbers: our Milky Way contains several billion stars, our bodies tens of trillions of cells," explained Walton.

PathGrid began at a cross-disciplinary meeting in Cambridge to discuss data management. Walton has been involved for many years with major international collaborations that, somewhat appropriately, amass an astronomical amount of data. But accessing data held by research teams across the globe was proving to be a challenge, with a lack of standardised protocols. Something needed to be done and Walton was part of an initiative to sort out this mess.

The issue of data management in an era of 'big data' is not unique to astronomy. Departments across the University from the Clinical School to the Library face similar issues and this meeting was intended to share ideas and approaches. It was at this meeting that Walton met James Brenton from the CRUK Cambridge Institute. They soon realised that data management was just one area where they could learn from each other: image analysis was another.

Walton and his colleagues in Astronomy capture their images using optical or near-infrared telescopes, such as the prosaically named Very Large Telescope or the recently launched Gaia satellite, the biggest camera in space with a billion pixels. These images must then be manipulated to adjust for factors including the telescope's own 'signature', cosmic rays and background illumination. They are tagged with coordinates to identify their location, and their brightness is determined.

Analysing these maps is an immense, but essential, task. Poring over images of tens of thousands of stars is a laborious, time-consuming process, prone to user error, so this is where computer algorithms come in handy. Walton and colleagues run their images through object detection software, which looks for astronomical features and automatically classifies them.

Here is the original post:

Astronomy image analysis algorithms adapted to cancer screening method

Ten-Year Post-Treatment Analysis of German ARO 96-02 Indicates Patients with Detectable PSA After Radical …

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise Fairfax, Va., February 5, 2015Prostate cancer patients with detectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) following radical prostatectomy should receive earlier, more aggressive radiation therapy treatment, according to a study published in the February 1, 2015 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (Red Journal), the official scientific journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). This study is a 10-year post-treatment analysis of the German ARO 96-02 trial, a prospective clinical trial that compared a wait-and-see approach versus an adjuvant radiation therapy approach for patients with node negative prostate cancer who had a prostatectomy.

ARO 96-02 accrued 388 patients from 1997 to 2004 with pT3-4pN0 prostate cancer with positive or negative margins who had already undergone radical prostatectomy. Twenty-two centers in Germany participated in the trial. Three patients were excluded from the study because they received immediate hormonal treatment. Prior to reaching an undetectable PSA post-prostatectomy, 159 patients were randomized to a wait-and-see approach (Arm A) and 148 patients were randomized to receive adjuvant radiation therapy (Arm B). Seventy-eight patients who did not achieve an undetectable PSA were moved to Arm C. Four of the patients in Arm C refused treatment, and 74 patients were treated with salvage radiation therapy in Arm C.

All patients in the study had a pre- and post-operative PSA test, a bone scan and chest radiography. Patients in Arm B received 60 Gy of 3-D conformal radiation therapy. Patients in Arm C received 66 Gy of 3-D conformal radiation therapy. Follow-up was conducted for all eligible patients in the trial quarterly for the first two years, twice a year from three to six years post-treatment, and annually thereafter. The median follow-up time was 112 months (9.3 years).

Of the 74 patients in Arm C, 43 (58 percent) also underwent hormone therapy as a result of recurrence (at the discretion of the attending physician). Seven patients in Arm C, of the 48 who had data available, reached an undetectable PSA after completion of salvage radiation therapy. In Arms A and B, 20 patients (7 percent) experienced distant metastasis, and in Arm C, 12 patients (16 percent) experienced distant metastasis.

Patients with detectable PSA post-prostatectomy (Arm C) experienced limited side effects as a result of radiation therapy. Patients in Arm C did not report any grade 3 or grade 4 acute toxicities. Seven patients experienced severe late effects, with five patients (7 percent) reporting grade 3 bladder impairment, and two patients (3 percent) reporting grade 2 bladder impairment. Fifty patients (68 percent) in Arm C did not report any genitourinary late toxicity, and 59 patients (80 percent) in Arm C did not report any gastrointestinal late toxicity.

Clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In Arm C, patients had a 10-year cRFS rate of 63 percent. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients in Arm C who had a Gleason score <8 (p=.0023), pT<3b (p=.0076) or an extraprostatic tumor extension <2mm (p=.0047) had a better cRFS rate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS). Patients in Arm A had a 10-year OS rate of 86 percent, and patients in Arm B had a 10-year OS rate of 83 percent, compared with patients in Arm C who had a 10-year OS rate of 68 percent.

After patients undergo radical prostatectomy, the marker for PSA should fall below detection limits. Our analysis demonstrates that patients who have detectable PSA post-prostatectomy may benefit from more aggressive, early and uniform treatment that could improve survival outcomes, said Thomas Wiegel, MD, director of the radiation oncology department at University Hospital Ulm in Ulm, Germany, and lead author of the study. The impact of PSA persistence on 10-year overall survival is evident based on this new analysis. Improved imaging or surrogate markers beyond PSA are desirable to distinguish risk groups among men with PSA persistence. Larger, prospectively randomized clinical trials should examine additional treatment options to come to a standardized therapy for prostate cancer patients with PSA persistence.

For a copy of the study manuscript, contact ASTROs Press Office at press@astro.org. For more information about the Red Journal, visit http://www.redjournal.org.

See the original post here:

Ten-Year Post-Treatment Analysis of German ARO 96-02 Indicates Patients with Detectable PSA After Radical ...

Prof.Griff / ZaZa Ali~NMEMINDZ: Artificial Intelligence; BioEngineering 2.0 PART 1 – Video


Prof.Griff / ZaZa Ali~NMEMINDZ: Artificial Intelligence; BioEngineering 2.0 PART 1
Subscribe http://www.pgriff.info http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mindzmatter Please join Professor Griff and ZaZa Ali this Thursday Jan 29th as we dive into the current reality growing science...

By: MrTruth Seeker

Read the original:

Prof.Griff / ZaZa Ali~NMEMINDZ: Artificial Intelligence; BioEngineering 2.0 PART 1 - Video

See Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mind Clones Right Now! – Video


See Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mind Clones Right Now!
Feb. 4 -- Martine Rothblatt, the highest paid female CEO in the U.S., founded and runs a biopharmaceutical company, United Therapeutics. She took home $38 million dollars in 2013. Now she #39;s...

By: Bloomberg Business

Read this article:

See Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mind Clones Right Now! - Video

Hollywood has trivialised the artificial intelligence threat

Things are moving quickly: 12 years ago, I was able to make a room roar with laughter describing how hilarious it was to see Americans debate building killer robots due to a misunderstanding. In the last couple of years, the Oxford Union ran the same debating motion: This house would ban the building of killer robots, utterly straight. What was ludicrous just over a decade ago is now deadly serious.

Plenty of techno-futurists are terrified by the spectre of AI. Of course many of them are crazy, like the believers in Rokos Basilisk. Dont be fooled by the support from nutters though - its far from a niche concern. Here's what three really smart people had to say on the topic:

Elon Musk said: "I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess like what our biggest existential threat is, its probably that. So we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence. Increasingly scientists think there should be some regulatory oversight maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we dont do something very foolish. With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon. In all those stories where theres the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, its like yeah hes sure he can control the demon. Didnt work out."

Bill Gates said: "I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence. First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern. I agree with Elon Musk and some others on this and don't understand why some people are not concerned."

Stephen Hawking said: "So, facing possible futures of incalculable benefits and risks, the experts are surely doing everything possible to ensure the best outcome, right? Wrong. If a superior alien civilisation sent us a message saying, "We'll arrive in a few decades," would we just reply, "OK, call us when you get here we'll leave the lights on"? Probably not but this is more or less what is happening with AI."

Imagine what would happen if the pioneers of any other major industry - petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals - started making public statements that the fruits of their labour could have catastrophic consequences. Is it really plausible that we would be as nonchalant as we are about AI?

See the original post here:

Hollywood has trivialised the artificial intelligence threat

Bill Gates thinks we should be worried about artificial intelligence

By Mary-Lynn Cesar for Kapitall.

In case you missed it, Bill Gates participated inhis third Reddit AMA (Ask Me Anything) last week anddiscussed, among other things,turning poop into water, virtual reality headset technology, and artificial intelligence.

The Microsoft ( MSFT ) founder, like Tesla 's( TSLA ) Elon Musk and physicist Stephen Hawking, thinksartificial intelligence should worry mankind. In reponse to a question asking if machines were an existential threat ,Gates wrote, "I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence."

Althoughwe're 15 years away from Skynet rule , significant advances are already taking place within artificial intelligence, and many high profile tech companiesare joining in.

IBM 's ( IBM ) work in artificial intelligence is probably the most well known. In 2011, the company'sWatson computer beat Jeopardy championsKen Jennings and Brad Rutter, capturing a $1 million prize.

Watson has since moved on to bigger and better things. Bloomberg reports thatIBM now wants doctors to use the technology to diagnose diseases . According to the report,Big Bluehas spent the last two years lobbying Congress for an exemption fromlong clinical trials since Watson isn't a medical device. Turns out the efforts might actually pay off:a draft bill released on Tuesday supported IBM's argument and could put Watson on the fast track tousage in the medical community.

Then there's Facebook ( FB ). The social networkcompany recently entered the artificial intelligence conversation with the December launch of its Facebook Artificial Intelligence Research lab led by NYU researcher Yann LeCun.

And in January,Facebook announced that it was donating artificial intelligence technology to Torch, an open source scientific computing project.

So who else is getting in on the action? Google ( GOOG ) spent 2014 acquiring three British artificial intelligence firms: Dark Blue Labs, Deep Mind, and Vision Factory. The information giant's UK shopping spree is going more smoothly than Hewlett-Packard 's ( HPQ ) infamous 2011 acquisition of Autonomy. Since buying the British software maker, HP has launched its artificial intelligence-powered Enterprise Search, which helps businesses easily find information scattered throughout countless files.

Out in Washington State, Amazon ( AMZN ) and Microsoftare using artificial intelligence to managehumongous data sets and make predictions, including which ad you'll click on and which product you're likely to buy.

See the original post here:

Bill Gates thinks we should be worried about artificial intelligence

New algorithms allow autonomous systems to deal with uncertainty

16 hours ago by Aaron Dubrow Researchers developed a new approach that allows a robot to plan its activity to accomplish an assigned task. Credit: Siddharth Srivastava, Shlomo Zilberstein, Abhishek Gupta, Pieter Abbeel, Stuart Russell

People typically consider doing the laundry to be a boring chore. But laundry is far from boring for artificial intelligence (AI) researchers like Siddharth Srivastava, a scientist at the United Technologies Research Center, Berkeley.

To AI experts, programming a robot to do the laundry represents a challenging planning problem because current sensing and manipulation technology is not good enough to identify precisely the number of clothing pieces that are in a pile and the number that are picked up with each grasp. People can easily cope with this type of uncertainty and come up with a simple plan. But roboticists for decades have struggled to design an autonomous system able to do what we do so casuallyclean our clothes.

In work done at the University of California, Berkeley, and presented at the Association for Advancement of Artificial Intelligence conference in Austin, Srivastava (working with Abhishek Gupta, Pieter Abbeel and Stuart Russell from UC Berkeley and Shlomo Zilberstein from University of Massachusetts, Amherst) demonstrated a robot that is capable of doing laundry without any specific knowledge of what it has to wash.

Earlier work by Abbeel's group had demonstrated solutions for the sorting and folding of clothes. The laundry task serves as an example for a wide-range of daily tasks that we do without thinking but that have, until now, proved difficult for automated tools assisting humans.

"The widely imagined helper robots of the future are expected to 'clear the table,' 'do laundry' or perform day-to-day tasks with ease," Srivastava said. "Currently however, computing the required behavior for such tasks is a challenging problemparticularly when there's uncertainty in resource or object quantities."

Humans, on the other hand, solve such problems with barely a conscious effort. In their work, the researchers showed how to compute correct solutions to problems by using some assumptions about the uncertainty.

"The main issue is how to develop what we call 'generalized plans,'" said Zilberstein, a professor of computer science and director of the Resource Bound Reasoning Lab at UMass Amherst. "These are plans that don't just work in a particular situation that is very well defined and gets you to a particular goal that is also well defined, but rather ones that work on a whole range of situations and you may not even know certain things about it."

The researchers' key insight was to use human behaviorthe almost unconscious action of pulling, stuffing, folding and pilingas a template, adapting both the repetitive and thoughtful aspects of human problem-solving to handle uncertainty in their computed solutions.

By doing so, they enabled a PR2 robot to do the laundry without knowing how many and what type of clothes needed to be washed.

More:

New algorithms allow autonomous systems to deal with uncertainty

Book Review: ‘Nanovision,’ A Technological Thriller by Paul T. Harry

In Nanovision by Paul T. Harry, we are introduced to the subject of nanotechnology or nanomedicine, the medical application of that technology.

A devastating murder and betrayal leaves one person dead and a young teen without both his father and vision due to the fire used to cover up that murder. Daniel wakes up in the hospital with no vision and no memories. He doesn't remember his life before his pain and has nowhere to go.

Upon further search, an aunt that has cut off ties long in the past is located. She is involved in the field of Nanomedicine and works in research. Not sure she is capable of taking on such a tragic young man, she nevertheless does her best. Ethyl Santini is raising her granddaughter and leads a very busy life of research in a nanolab where she is at work on regeneration. The testing of animals has proved to be extremely workable, and she has been able to save many that would not have lived otherwise.

In her heart she knows that she must help Daniel, and while she had not been aware she had a nephew, she is up to the challenge. Armed with her granddaughter's approval she brings him into her family. Aware that while to the outside world he has been declared dead, there are concerns that he may still not be safe.

The fit is perfect, and Ethyl is thrilled to find Daniel so likable. As he bonds with her younger charge life seems to be just right. Yet now her lab is in trouble, and she is uneasy about her own research. Knowing she could be ousted at any time, she does the unimaginable. She puts together a new formula for her own nephew. With his agreement, they begin a series of doses to see if nanotechnology can help his eyesight. None of them are prepared for the changes.

As Daniel's regeneration begins, his memory resurfaces, as well as anger at the death of his father and the assault on himself. Heading back to his home he is after the very man who changed his life. Judy, the FBI special investigator that followed the crime and found his aunt, is notified, and she begins the hunt to find him, for she knows more about this crime then he understands. Can she locate him before he finds those responsible? She is very aware that if he comes upon them first, he will not survive for they have been in the business of death for a long time. With his sudden disappearance, can she find him before it is too late?

Harry has given us characters that are interesting and likable. His use of technology is an interesting foil and creates a plausible storyline. The action and undertakings seem very real and are much like some of the crimes we see reported in the news, yet he takes us on a rocky journey of home and nanomedicine.

His interpretation of the reactions as Daniel's blindness recedes is amazing, and the action and interplay is sharp. You find the possibilities for exciting and strange. He has given us an intriguing thriller full of danger and excitement, and threaded it with the possibility of medical miracles.

If you enjoy action, mystery and suspense with just a touch of the unbelievable you will find this a great book for your library. Once you begin, plan on a full day of reading; this work is difficult to put down.

View the original article on blogcritics.org

Read the original here:
Book Review: 'Nanovision,' A Technological Thriller by Paul T. Harry

Student is finalist in nat'l science contest

Photo Courtesy of Millburn Township Public Schools

Millburn High School senior Alexander Lin, a finalist in the Intel Science Talent Search for 2015, stands with Millburn's science research teacher Paul Gilmore.

Millburn High School senior Alexander Lin was named as one of 40 national finalists in the Intel Science Talent Search 2015, a program of the Society for Science and the Public. Lin is one of four students from New Jersey to attain finalist status this year.

Finalists receive an all-expenses-paid trip to Washington, D.C. from March 5 to 11, where they will undergo final judging, display their work to the public, meet with notable scientists, and compete for just over $1 million in awards, including the three top awards of $150,000 each.

These finalists were chosen from the select pool of 300 high school seniors named semifinalists in the Intel Science Talent Search 2015 on Jan. 7, and more than 1,800 entrants based on the originality and creativity of their scientific research, as well as their achievement and leadership both inside and outside the classroom.

As one of this year's 300 semifinalists Lin and Millburn High School were awarded $1,000 each.

This year's finalist projects are distributed among 17 categories, including animal sciences, behavioral and social sciences, biochemistry, bioengineering, bioinformatics and genomics, chemistry, computer science, earth and planetary science, engineering, environmental science, materials science, mathematics, medicine and health, microbiology, physics, plant science, and space science.

Lin's project is titled, "Approximating the Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph Problem on Dotted Interval Graphs." He was named a semifinalist in the 2014 Siemens Competition in Math, Science and Technology this past December.

Lin's research has been done under the auspices of Millburn High School's science research course, a 3-year program that begins in the sophomore year and offers students an opportunity to perform scientific research and participate in the community of science research.

After identifying a research topic, and obtaining a mentor at an outside university or research lab, students must write a 20-page scientific paper The course is taught by science research teachers Paul Gilmore and Gina Cocchiaro. Lin and Gilmore will be recognized at the Monday, Feb. 9 Board of Education meeting.

More here:
Student is finalist in nat'l science contest

Medical Marijuana for Children with Developmental and Behavioral Disorders?

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise February 5, 2015 As medical marijuana becomes increasingly accepted, there is growing interest in its use for children and adolescents with developmental and behavioral problems such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), according to a review in the February Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, the official journal of the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health.

That's despite a lack of studies showing any clinical benefit of cannabis for young patients with these disorderswhereas evidence strongly suggests harmful effects of regular marijuana use in the developing brain. Scott Hadland, MD, MPH, John R. Knight, MD, and Sion Kim Harris, PhD of Boston Children's Hospital write, "Given the current scarcity of data, cannabis cannot be safely recommended for the treatment of developmental or behavioral disorders at this time."

"Children with severe ASD cannot communicate verbally and may relate to the world through loud, repetitive shrieking and hand-flapping that is very disruptive to their families and all those around them," comments Dr Knight, the study's senior author. "So my heart goes out to families who are searching for something, anything to help their child," he continues. "But in using medicinal marijuana they may be trading away their child's future for short-term symptom control."

Known Harmful Effects of Marijuana in Children and Teens... The review was prompted by rapid changes in US marijuana policy, with marijuana being permitted for medical use in many jurisdictions and legalized in others. "Amidst this political change, patients and families are increasingly asking whether cannabis and its derivatives may have therapeutic utility for a number of conditions, including developmental and behavioral disorders in children and adolescents," according to Dr Knight and colleagues.

They review the important pharmacological properties of cannabis and related compounds, along with data on marijuana use in the population. Adolescents with developmental and behavioral disordersespecially ADHDmay be predisposed to early and heavier substance use. Meanwhile, a growing body of evidence links cannabis to "long-term and potentially irreversible physical, neurocognitive, psychiatric, and psychosocial adverse outcomes."

Over time, regular cannabis use by adolescents has been linked to persistent declines in intelligence quotient and increased risk of addiction, major depression, anxiety disorders, and psychotic thinking. The adolescent brain may be uniquely susceptible to the harmful effects of marijuana, reflecting the role of the cannabinoid receptors in normal neurodevelopment. Brain abnormalities in adults who are heavy marijuana users may have their origin in neurodevelopmental changes starting in adolescence.

...With Little Data on Benefits in Developmental or Behavioral Disorders While cannabis has been proposed to have a broad range of clinical benefits in adults, "At this time, good evidence is almost entirely lacking for its application in pediatric developmental and behavioral conditions," Dr Knight and coauthors write.

"The scant research that we have on adolescent use is alarming enough," says Leonard Rappaport MD, MS, Chief of the Division of Developmental Medicine at Boston Children's Hospital and past president of the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. "But we are really moving into entirely new territory when we consider giving cannabis to children as that has not even been done in neurotypical children, let alone those with developmental or behavioral problems."

Excerpt from:
Medical Marijuana for Children with Developmental and Behavioral Disorders?

Cornell sending strong contingent to annual science meeting

Feb. 5, 2015

As scientific controversies objecting to vaccinations, denying climate change swirl through old and new media, Bruce Lewenstein, chair of the Department of Science and Technology Studies and professor of communication, will moderate a panel, Public Engagement for Scientists: Realities, Risks and Rewards, to kick off the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 2015 annual meeting to be held Feb. 12-16 in San Jose, California.

Lewensteins Feb. 12 panel discussion will be streamed liveat 4 p.m. EST.

Communicating science from the research laboratory through television, radio, print media, social media and other forms of outreach has become a major topic at AAAS meetings in the last several years. The sessions about science communication have been incredibly popular. The rooms are so crowded with researchers, that they regularly overflow into the hallways, said Lewenstein, who expects a sold-out crowd of 600 people with perhaps hundreds more watching the online stream.

Session panelists includeElizabeth Babcock, chief public engagement officer, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco; Heidi Ballard, associate professor of education, University of California, Davis; Anthony Dudo, assistant professor, University of Texas at Austin; and Nalini Nadkarni, professor, University of Utah.

Other Cornell faculty who will be at the AAAS meeting:

Follow this link:
Cornell sending strong contingent to annual science meeting

Dr. Frank Shallenberger's Interview on the IASIS MCN Neurofeedback System – Video


Dr. Frank Shallenberger #39;s Interview on the IASIS MCN Neurofeedback System
Hear what, 40 year veteran of medicine, Dr. Frank Shallenberger has to say about the IASIS MCN Microcurrent Neurofeedback system that he #39;s used to treat his "most difficult" patients. He #39;s...

By: IASIS MCN, Micro Current Neurofeedback

Read more from the original source:
Dr. Frank Shallenberger's Interview on the IASIS MCN Neurofeedback System - Video

Why are so many social scientists left-liberal?

In December a well-argued letter to The Irish Times by David Walsh took the field of womens studies to task for promoting the ideological notion that gender is a social construct in the face of scientific evidence that biology plays a prominent role

Every social scientist I ever met was liberal-left. This uniformity always struck me as very odd. I accidentally came across a new, rigorous academic analysis of this question in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences. The authors are worried by recent problems in social psychology research, including fraud and problems with replicating results. The article, by Jos Duarte and others (none of whom are conservative), is called Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science and is easily accessed through Google.

In the US population as a whole, the ratio of liberals to conservatives is 33 per cent to 66 per cent, but 58-66 per cent of professors of social science are liberals and only 5-8 per cent are conservatives. In social psychology, 90 per cent of professors are liberals and 8 per cent are conservatives. On the other hand, the liberal to conservative ratio is about 50-50 in engineering, computer science, health sciences, business and technical fields.

Psychology has robustly demonstrated the value of diversity of viewpoints for improving creativity, discovery and problem-solving. The authors conclude that lack of political diversity undermines much social-psychological science by embedding liberal values into the research questions and methods, by steering researchers away from politically unpalatable research topics and results, and encouraging conclusions to be drawn that mischaracterise liberals and conservatives. Of course, homogeneously conservative social sciences would face the same problem as homogeneously left-liberal social sciences.

Increasing political diversity would improve the quality of social-psychological research by reducing biases such as confirmation bias (favouring evidence that confirms ones preconceptions) and by allowing dissenting minorities to challenge the majority thinking.

Although lack of political diversity does not threaten the validity of social science research in many areas, it does pose problems in areas relating to the political concerns of the left, for example race, gender, environmentalism, power and inequality, and also in areas where conservatives are studied themselves, such as in moral and political psychology.

To illustrate a typical problem that can arise, the authors cite a social psychology study that found people high in social-dominance orientation are more likely to make unethical decisions, and people high in right-wing authoritarianism are more likely to support their leaders unethical decisions. However, typical examples of decisions defined as unethical in the study included not taking a female colleagues side in a sexual harassment case and a worker placing the wellbeing of his company over unspecified environmental harm attributed to company operations. In both examples insufficient information was presented about the case to make a considered judgment. In other words, the liberal values of feminism and environmentalism were embedded in the ethical assumptions. Embedding ideological values in measures is dangerous to science.

Another example cited concerns about the scope and direction of prejudice. Social scientists have long considered prejudice and intolerance to be the province of the political right. But some researchers noted most studies of prejudice looked at low-status and left-leaning targets. New research designs were devised to include both left-leaning and right-leaning targets, and the results showed that prejudice is potent both on the left and the right: conservatives are prejudiced against stereotypically left-leaning targets (for example, African-Americans) and liberals are prejudiced against stereotypically right-leaning targets (for example, religious Christians).

In December a well-argued letter to The Irish Times by David Walsh took the field of womens studies to task for promoting the ideological notion that gender is a social construct in the face of scientific evidence that biology plays a prominent role.

Read more here:
Why are so many social scientists left-liberal?

Aesthetic Medicine Institute of Miami opens in Brickell Area

Dr. Anna Sottile

Dr. Anna Sottile has opened the Aesthetic Medicine Institute of Miami in the Brickell Avenue area, a practice that focuses on anti-aging injectibles. She brings to her practice 27 years of medical and cosmetic experience, encompassing all leading injectibles including neurotoxins (better known as Botox) and hyaluronic acid (known as fillers) as well as pain management.

The Italian-born Dr. Sottile has extensive training and experience in facial anatomy and injectibles from medical centers of leading universities in the world including Brown and Harvard.

Her treatments are custom tailored to each client. She takes extra care and time to ensure the best possible result, even offering to do a follow-up visit if desired to review the result after the fillers have settled in, all at no extra charge for the visit.

Dr. Sottile is a published author and has been named Best Doctor by Better Living magazine, Top Doctor in the Peers Review and Americas Top Physician by Consumers Research Council. She is a member of the American Society of Aesthetic Medicine.

The Institute is located at 1800 SW First Ave., #103, Miami, FL 33129. To make an appointment, call 786-577-0450.

More here:
Aesthetic Medicine Institute of Miami opens in Brickell Area