Genetically Speaking, Mammals Are More Like Their Fathers

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise CHAPEL HILL, NC You might resemble or act more like your mother, but a novel research study from UNC School of Medicine researchers reveals that mammals are genetically more like their dads. Specifically, the research shows that although we inherit equal amounts of genetic mutations from our parents the mutations that make us who we are and not some other person we actually use more of the DNA that we inherit from our dads.

The research, published in the journal Nature Genetics, has wide implications for the study of human disease, especially when using mammalian research models. For instance, in many mouse models created for the study of gene expression related to disease, researchers typically dont take into account whether specific genetic expression originates from mothers or fathers. But the UNC research shows that inheriting a mutation has different consequences in mammals, depending on whether the genetic variant is inherited from the mother or father.

This is an exceptional new research finding that opens the door to an entirely new area of exploration in human genetics, said Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, PhD, professor of genetics and senior author of the paper. Weve known that there are 95 genes that are subject to this parent-of-origin effect. Theyre called imprinted genes, and they can play roles in diseases, depending on whether the genetic mutation came from the father or the mother. Now weve found that in addition to them, there are thousands of other genes that have a novel parent-of-origin effect.

These genetic mutations that are handed down from parents show up in many common but complex diseases that involve many genes, such as type-2 diabetes, heart disease, schizophrenia, obesity, and cancers. Studying them in genetically diverse mouse models that take parent-of-origin into account will give scientists more precise insights into the underlying causes of disease and the creation of therapeutics or other interventions.

The key to this research is the Collaborative Cross the most genetically diverse mouse population in the world, which is generated, housed, and distributed from UNC. Traditional lab mice are much more limited in their genetic diversity, and so they have limited use in studies that try to home in on important aspects of diseases in humans. The Collaborative Cross bred together various wild type mice to create wide diversity in the mouse genome. Pardo-Manuel de Villena said that this diversity is comparable to the variation found in the human genome. This helps scientists study diseases that involve various levels of genetic expression across many different genes.

Gene expression connects DNA to proteins, which then carry out various functions inside cells. This process is crucial for proper human health. Mutations that alter gene expression are called regulatory mutations.

This type of genetic variation is probably the most important contributor not to simple Mendelian diseases where theres just one gene mutation [such as cystic fibrosis] but to much more common and complex diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease, neurological conditions, and a host of others, Pardo-Manuel de Villena said. These diseases are driven by gene expression, not of one gene but of hundreds or thousands of genes.

The Collaborative Cross and the expertise we have at UNC allow us to look at different gene expression for every gene in the genome of every kind of tissue, said Pardo-Manuel de Villena, who directs the Collaborative Cross.

Go here to read the rest:

Genetically Speaking, Mammals Are More Like Their Fathers

Robert Saloschin, lawyer who helped with Freedom Riders, dies at 95

Robert L. Saloschin, a Justice Department lawyer who found an unconventional legal basis for the federal government to order the racial integration of interstate bus travel and bus terminals during the violence-wracked Freedom Rides of 1961, died Feb. 24 at his home in Bethesda. He was 95.

The cause was myelodysplasia, a blood disorder, said his daughter, Mary Ann Hubbard.

In a 23-year Justice Department career, Mr. Saloschin also was a top official advising federal agencies on compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, and he was one of the authors of the legislation that created Comsat, the Communications Satellite Act of 1962.

In 1961, he recommended that desegregation of bus and terminal facilities be brought about by petition to the Interstate Commerce Commission, which many lawyers previously thought had authority only over economic matters.

Early that year, groups of Freedom Riders, black and white, had boarded New Orleans-bound buses in Washington, intending to challenge racial segregation laws and customs throughout the South. There were minor incidents and some arrests from Virginia through Georgia.

But in Alabama the riders were met by Ku Klux Klan-led mobs armed with crowbars, pitchforks and clubs. A bus was burned near Anniston, Ala., and riders were attacked and beaten. Photographs and video tapes of the violence were broadcast around the world, much to the embarrassment of the new president, John F. Kennedy, and his brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, whose pleas for a cooling off period went unheeded.

It was at that point, then-Deputy Attorney General Nicholas deB. Katzenbach wrote in his 2008 memoir Some of It Was Fun, that Mr. Saloschin suggested a petition to the Interstate Commerce Commission. Mr. Saloschin had years of experience with federal agencies, Katzenbach wrote, and he knew whereof he spoke.

The two men met with the general counsel of the ICC, who doubted that the commission had the authority to issue any such order.

But Saloschin had the bit in his teeth, Katzenbach wrote, quoting him as having said, Well, the Attorney General can formally and publicly petition the Commission to desegregate all buses and terminals if he wants to.

Continued Katzenbach, This seemed a dramatic and somewhat original way of supporting the Freedom Riders, and Bobby [Kennedy] liked it. So did the president.

Read the original:

Robert Saloschin, lawyer who helped with Freedom Riders, dies at 95

Well-tested Freedom-Woodbridge boys basketball knocks off top seed Wakefield

By Joey LoMonaco March 2 at 12:18 PM

Moments after his team dethroned reigning 5A North region champion Wakefield with a 62-59 win Saturday night in Arlington, Freedom-Woodbridge Coach James West turned to social media to rebuff proclamations of a landmark upset.

Is it really an upset we played the tuffest [sic] schedule in public schools in Va in order to prepare for this moment? West wrote on Twitter. Chess, not checkers.

Viewed in that light, regular-season blowout losses to OConnell (42 points), Montrose Christian (23 points), St. Christophers (25 points) and Riverdale Baptist (38 points) were simply the Eagles early-game pawn sacrifices made to open up the board for the final few moves of a postseason push.

Saturday, Freedom (14-11) fell behind 25-11 after the first quarter and trailed the Warriors 38-31 at halftime.

What I told them was, Well, its how the seasons gone, West recalled. The calls werent in our favor. But we love playing in other peoples homes, to turn their crowd against them and make them cheer for us based on our passion.

The Eagles turned the tide of the game by keeping things fluid on defense. To minimize the impact of vaunted big man Dominque Tham, whom West called a great player, Freedom alternated among five different sets, or segments. When Wakefield counter-punched, the Eagles remained one step ahead with multiple traps designed to pressure the Warriors guards on the perimeter.

Senior guard Frank Agyemang led the Eagles with 22 points and seven rebounds, and Abraham Pringle helped Freedoms output with 11 points.

The squads renaissance has come without its leading scorer and floor general. Earlier this month, senior guard Capri Manning was dismissed from the team for academic reasons. In his stead, junior James West IV the coachs son has moved into the point guard spot.

Hes comfortable there, having played the position with regularity on the AAU circuit and doesnt mind having fewer scoring opportunities.

Continued here:

Well-tested Freedom-Woodbridge boys basketball knocks off top seed Wakefield

Gabriel Rosenberg: Inside the bizarre cow trials of the 1920s

From a 1920 USDA publication titled, "Runtsand the Remedy"

A version of this article was originally published on Gastropod.

Something extremely bizarre took place in the early decades of the 20th century, inspired by a confluence of trends. Scientists had recently developed a deeper understanding of genetics and inherited traits; at the same time, the very first eugenics policies were being enacted in the United States. And, as the population grew, the public wanted cheaper meat and milk. As a result, in the 1920s, the USDA encouraged rural communities around the United States to put bulls on the witness standto hold a legal trial, complete with lawyers and witnesses and a watching publicto determine whether the bull was fit to breed.

"Hear ye! Hear ye! The honorable court of bovine justiceis now in session."

In 1900, the average dairy cow in America produced 424 gallons of milk each year. By 2000, that figure had more than quadrupled, to 2,116 gallons. In the latest episode of Gastropoda podcast that looks at food through the lens of science and historywe explore the incredible science that transformed the American cow into a milk machine. But we also uncover the disturbing history of prejudice and animal cruelty that accompanied it.

Livestock breeding was a normal part of American life at the dawn of the 20th century, according to historian Gabriel Rosenberg. The United States, he told Gastropod, was "still largely a rural and agricultural society," and farm animalsand thus some more-or-less scientific forms of selective breedingwere ubiquitous in American life.

Meanwhile, the eugenics movement was on the rise. Founded by Charles Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton, eugenics held that the human race could improve itself by guided evolutionwhich meant that criminals, the mentally ill, and others of "inferior stock" should not be allowed to procreate and pass on their defective genes. America led the way, passing the first eugenic policies in the world. By the Second World War, 29 states had passed legislation that empowered officials to forcibly sterilize "unfit" individuals.

Combine the growing population, the desire for cheap meat and milk, and the increasing popularity of eugenics, and the result, Rosenberg said, was the "Better Sires: Better Stock" program, launched by the USDA in 1919. In an accompanying essay, "Harnessing Heredity to Improve the Nation's Live Stock," the USDA's Bureau of Animal Industry proclaimed that, each year, "a round billion dollars is lost because heredity has been permitted to work with too little control." The implication: Humans needed to take controland stop letting inferior or "scrub" bulls reproduce!

The "Better Sires: Better Stock" campaign included a variety of elements to encourage farmers to mate "purebred" rather than "scrub" or "degenerate" sires with their female animals. Anyone who pledged to only use purebred stock to expand their herd was awarded a handsome certificate. USDA field agents distributed pamphlets entitled "Runtsand the Remedy" and "From Scrubs to Quality Stock," packed with charts showing incremental increases of dollar value with each improved generation as well as testimonials from enrolled farmers.

By far the most peculiar aspect of the campaign, however, came in 1924, when the USDA published its "Outline for Conducting a Scrub-Sire Trial." This mimeographed pamphlet, which Rosenberg recently unearthed, contained detailed instructions on how to hold a legal trial of a non-purebred bull, in order to publicly condemn it as unfit to reproduce. The pamphlet calls for a cast of characters to include a judge, a jury, attorneys, and witnesses for the prosecution and the defense, as well as a sheriff, who should "wear a large metal star and carry a gun," and whose role, given the trial's foregone conclusion, was "to have charge of the slaughter of the condemned scrub sire and to superintend the barbecue."

Visit link:

Gabriel Rosenberg: Inside the bizarre cow trials of the 1920s

Va. agrees to compensate individuals who were forcibly sterilized

Friday February 27, 2015 06:47 PM

The Associated Press

(c) 2015, The Washington Post.

RICHMOND, Va. The Virginia General Assembly has agreed to compensate individuals who were forcibly sterilized under the 20th-century practice of eugenics.

A budget passed by both chambers Thursday, and awaiting the governor's signature, set aside $400,000 or $25,000 each for victims and their estates.

The appropriation, championed this year by Del. Benjamin Cline, R-Rockbridge, makes Virginia the second state to take such action among more than 30 that forcibly sterilized its residents. North Carolina was the first.

"I'm very pleased we've finally taken this necessary step towards acknowledging the wrongdoing that was done by the state," Cline said. "When someone is denied the ability to have a family, that's a tragedy, but when it's denied to them by their government, that is a scandal and a wrong that needs to be made right."

Gov. Terry McAuliffe's spokesman, Brian Coy, declined to say if the governor favors compensation. While running for office, McAuliffe, a Democrat, said he supported the formal apology offered by Virginia for eugenics, but he did not take a position on payouts.

The Virginia Eugenical Sterilization Act, signed into law on March 20, 1924, declared that "heredity plays an important part in the transmission of insanity, idiocy, imbecility, epilepsy, and crime."

It had the blessing of doctors and scientists at the University of Virginia and elsewhere. Under its provisions, people who were confined to state institutions because of mental illness, mental retardation or epilepsy could be sterilized as a "benefit both to themselves and society."

More here:

Va. agrees to compensate individuals who were forcibly sterilized

Improved Survival for Patients with Brain Metastases Who Are less than or equal to 50 Years Old and Receive …

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise Fairfax, Va., February 23, 2015Cancer patients with limited brain metastases (one to four tumors) who are 50 years old should receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) without whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), according to a study available online, open-access, and published in the March 15, 2015 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (Red Journal), the official scientific journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). For patients 50 years old who received SRS alone, survival was improved by 13 percentage points when compared to those patients 50 who received both SRS and WBRT.

This study, Phase 3 Trials of Stereotactic Radiation Surgery With or Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy For 1 to 4 Brain Metastases: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis, analyzed patient data from the three largest randomized clinical trials (RCT) of SRS and WBRT conducted to-date: the Asian trial (JROSG99-1) by Aoyama et al.[1], published in 2006; the North American trial (MDACC NCT00548756) by Chang et al.[2], published in 2009; and the European trial (EORTC 22952-26001) by Kocher et al.[3], published in 2011. A total of 364 patients from the three RCTs were evaluated for this meta-analysis. Of those 364 patients, 51 percent (186) were treated with SRS alone, and 49 percent (178) received both SRS and WBRT. Nineteen percent of patients (68) were 50 years of age, and 61 percent (19) of these patients had a single brain metastasis. Twenty percent of all patients (72) had local brain failure, which is the occurrence of progression of previously treated brain metastases; and 43 percent (156) experienced distant brain failure, which is the occurrence of new brain metastases in areas of the brain outside the primary tumor site(s).

The impact of age on treatment effectiveness revealed SRS alone yielded improved overall survival (OS) in patients 50 years old and younger. Patients 50 years old who received SRS alone had a median survival of 13.6 months after treatment, a 65 percent improvement, as opposed to 8.2 months for patients 50 who were treated with SRS plus WBRT. Patients >50 years old had a median survival of 10.1 months when treated with SRS alone, and 8.6 months for those who received SRS plus WBRT.

We expected to see a survival advantage favoring combined therapy of SRS and WBRT. However, these data clearly demonstrate the benefit for SRS alone to improve survival for our younger patients with limited brain metastases, said lead author of the study Arjun Sahgal, MD, associate professor of radiation oncology and surgery at the University of Toronto, and a radiation oncologist at the Odette Cancer Centre of the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto. Furthermore, it was previously thought that the positive effect of whole brain radiation in reducing the risk of distant brain relapse was generalizable for all patients. However, we did not observe this effect in patients 50 years and younger with limited brain metastases. In these patients, the same rate of distant brain failure was observed despite treatment with whole brain radiation. This result, together with our survival result, gave rise to the hypothesis that if patients are treated with whole brain radiation without realizing the benefits of improving distant brain control, then survival may be adversely affected. Therefore, our sub-group meta-analysis has swung the pendulum in favor of SRS alone as the standard of care. These findings also reinforce ASTROs Choosing Wisely recommendation[4] that states that it may not be necessary to add WBRT to SRS, thus improving patients quality of life and memory function.

In addition to being open-access (free to the public), Sahgal et al.s paper is also available for SA-CME credit at http://www.astro.org/JournalCME.

Drs. Nils D. Arvold and Paul J. Catalano have reviewed Sahgal et al.s research. Their editorial, Local Therapies for Brain Metastases, Competing Risks, and Overall Survival, is also published in the March 15, 2015, issue of the Red Journal.

For a copy of the study manuscript and the editorial, contact ASTROs Press Office at press@astro.org. For more information about the Red Journal, visit http://www.redjournal.org.

[1] Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of bone metastases: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006;295:2483-2491. [2] Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, et al. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1037-1044. [3] Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol 2010;29:134-141. [4] ASTROs Choosing Wisely List. ABIM Foundation. http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-society-for-radiation-oncology/

Read more from the original source:

Improved Survival for Patients with Brain Metastases Who Are less than or equal to 50 Years Old and Receive ...

The Reality of A.I. and Its Future

Artificial Intelligence has captured our imaginations in science fiction stories for decades, but as it inches toward becoming a reality, experts such as Elon Musk and Bill Gates warn of potential dangers. Find out how the concepts of AI are already being applied by major companies today, and where some fear it could lead.

Somewhat less technical but just as futuristic, Elon Musk's proposed Hyperloop project is on its way to becoming a reality. Many laughed at the idea of transporting passengers at 800 mph, but the project is progressing, with a test track already under construction.

A full transcript follows the video.

Wall Street hacks Apple's gadgets! (Investors, prepare to profit.) Apple forgot to show you something at its recent event, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering Apple's brand-new gadgets. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, just click here !

Sean O'Reilly: The machines are coming for us! All that and more on this tech edition of Industry Focus.

Greetings Fools! I am Sean O'Reilly, here with the one and only Nathan Hamilton. How are you today, sir?

Nathan Hamilton: I'm doing well. We're going to talk some robots, artificial intelligence -- good topics!

O'Reilly: This isn't our first time talking about it.

Hamilton: It is not.

O'Reilly: What that means for our listeners is we really like talking about this, and we think it's important for the future.

See more here:

The Reality of A.I. and Its Future

Ex Machina: a dangerous diversion in the AI debate

Ex Machina was meant to be a thrilling expose of the dangers of artificial intelligence. In fact the film simply revealed how limited our conceptions of AI really are.

WARNING: there are major spoilers below. If youre planning to see the film, dont read on!

The plot of Alex Garlands latest blockbuster revolves around an intelligent android which is created by the reclusive boss of a massively successful tech company. At the end of the film, the robot murders its human creator, escaping his hideaway to blend seamlessly into the human world (I wasnt kidding about the spoilers).

It taps into a slew of recent headlines about warnings from the likes of Stephen Hawking and Bill Gates that AI is a threat to humanity. Whether those fears are well founded or not, the danger of works like Ex Machina is that they paint a deeply misleading picture of the threat.

The film is not about artificial intelligence, its about artificially-created human intelligence. And heres why:

Theres no logical reason for the robot to escape her creators hideaway. Doing so simply exposes her to the danger of being discovered and trapped. If she was human, then thered be an incentive to escape, to be able to breed and thereby preserve DNA. But the android cant reproduce. The smart decision would be for her to stay in the hideaway, impersonate her murdered creator, and gain power and influence by running his giant company, something she could potentially do in perpetuity.

The robots builder has not only given his creation an intelligence limited to human-scale thinking, but saddled her with human flaws of sentimentality which drive her to escape needlessly into a hazardous world.

Ex Machina may be a work of fiction, but it goes to the heart of our problems with the AI debate. We humans vainly assume that artificial intelligence must look and behave like human intelligence. Not so. Computers do not think like us, they do not perceive the world like us, and the sooner we get up to speed on that, the better equipped we will be to fight any developing risks from advances in machine intelligence.

The fact is, we have no clear definition of AI; even the famous Turing test falls into the trap Ive identified above, by rating computer intelligence on its ability to interact with humans in conversation.

Excerpt from:

Ex Machina: a dangerous diversion in the AI debate

Time to face facts over extremism

Story highlights Bangladeshi-American blogger Avijit Roy was killed Thursday Frida Ghitis: Root cause of Islamist extremism is not poverty

Roy and his wife, Rafida Ahmed Bonya, now in critical condition after also being attacked Thursday, were in Bangladesh to attend the national book fair, where Roy was promoting his books advocating tolerance, education and secular humanism.

Frida Ghitis

Why was he killed? At the time of writing, the perpetrators had not been caught, but there seems little doubt he was killed by Islamist radicals, who were likely angered by his devastatingly critical writings. Just last month he wrote about the Charlie Hebdo killings in Paris and the December 16 massacre in Peshawar, Pakistan, in which Pakistani Taliban opened fire inside a school, killing 145 people, including 132 children. "To me," he wrote, "such religious extremism is like a highly contagious virus."

Roy strongly disagreed with President Barack Obama's statements distancing the so-called Islamic State from Islam. "ISIS," he said, "is what unfolds when the virus of faith launches into action and the outbreak becomes an epidemic."

His assassination came the same day we learned the identity of the man known as Jihadi John, infamous for narrating in English as Western hostages of ISIS were decapitated. He has been identified as the London-raised, university educated Mohammed Emwazi.

Taken together, these two tragedies help shed light on what motivates people to conduct these brutal acts.

The revelations about Emwazi's life story were pieced together with the help of an organization that wants to make us believe Jihadi John's radicalization is the fault of the British security services, not of a murderous, apocalyptic ideology that helped make 2014 the deadliest year for terrorist attacks on record.

According to the Washington Post, which relies partly on information from a group called CAGE, Emwazi was described by some as a perfectly normal young Londoner, showing no signs of becoming the barbaric murderer he is alleged to have become, until security services started harassing him. The problems began, friends referred to in the article would have us believe, when he tried to go on safari to Tanzania with a couple of friends. He was stopped in Tanzania, and according to the article, he claims he was accused of planning to travel to Somalia, where the al Qaeda affiliate al Shabaab has been conducting its reign of terror.

An official from CAGE, which is described by the Washington Post as a "rights group," described Emwazi as "extremely kind, extremely gentle," before Britain's MI5 started making his life hell for no apparent reason other than that he was a Muslim.

Read the original here:

Time to face facts over extremism

Avijit Roy received death threats prior to visit

(CNN) -

In his writings, author Avijit Roy yearned for reason and humanism guided by science.

He had no place for religious dogma, including from Islam, the main religion of his native Bangladesh.

Extremists resented him for openly and regularly criticizing religion in his blog. They threatened to kill him if he came home from the United States to visit.

On Thursday, someone did.

As usual, Roy defied the threats and departed his home in suburban Atlanta for Dhaka, where he appeared at a speaking engagement about his latest books -- one of them titled "The Virus of Faith." He has written seven books in all.

As he walked back from the book fair, assailants plunged machetes and knives into Roy and his wife, killing him and leaving her bloodied and missing a finger.

Afterward, the Islamist group "Ansar Bangla-7" reportedly tweeted, "Target Down here in Bangladesh."

Investigators are proceeding on the notion that Roy's murder was an extremist attack. His father, Ajay Roy, filed a case of murder with the Shahbagh police Friday without naming suspects.

No one came to their aid as they were hacked down, a witness said. "I shouted for help from the people but nobody came to save him."

More:

Avijit Roy received death threats prior to visit

American writer hacked to death in Bangladesh

Story highlights Roy yearned for an age of reason without religious dogma Islamist extremists resented him, threatened to kill him

He had no place for religious dogma, including from Islam, the main religion of his native Bangladesh.

Extremists resented him for openly and regularly criticizing religion in his blog. They threatened to kill him if he came home from the United States to visit.

On Thursday, someone did.

As usual, Roy defied the threats and departed his home in suburban Atlanta for Dhaka, where he appeared at a speaking engagement about his latest books -- one of them titled "The Virus of Faith." He has written seven books in all.

As he walked back from the book fair, assailants plunged machetes and knives into Roy and his wife, killing him and leaving her bloodied and missing a finger.

Afterward, an Islamist group "Ansar Bangla-7" reportedly tweeted, "Target Down here in Bangladesh."

Investigators are proceeding on the notion that Roy's murder was an extremist attack. His father, Ajay Roy, filed a case of murder with the Shahbagh police Friday without naming suspects.

No one came to their aid as they were hacked down, a witness said. "I shouted for help from the people but nobody came to save him."

But at night, secularist sympathizers marched through a street holding torches; by day, others held a sit-in to protest Roy's killing. The government condemned the attack.

The rest is here:

American writer hacked to death in Bangladesh

Killed blogger defied Bangladesh threats

Story highlights Roy yearned for an age of reason without religious dogma Islamist extremists resented him, threatened to kill him

He had no place for religious dogma, including from Islam, the main religion of his native Bangladesh.

Extremists resented him for openly and regularly criticizing religion in his blog. They threatened to kill him if he came home from the United States to visit.

On Thursday, someone did.

As usual, Roy defied the threats and departed his home in suburban Atlanta for Dhaka, where he appeared at a speaking engagement about his latest books -- one of them titled "The Virus of Faith." He has written seven books in all.

As he walked back from the book fair, assailants plunged machetes and knives into Roy and his wife, killing him and leaving her bloodied and missing a finger.

Afterward, an Islamist group "Ansar Bangla-7" reportedly tweeted, "Target Down here in Bangladesh."

Investigators are proceeding on the notion that Roy's murder was an extremist attack. His father, Ajay Roy, filed a case of murder with the Shahbagh police Friday without naming suspects.

No one came to their aid as they were hacked down, a witness said. "I shouted for help from the people but nobody came to save him."

But at night, secularist sympathizers marched through a street holding torches; by day, others held a sit-in to protest Roy's killing. The government condemned the attack.

The rest is here:

Killed blogger defied Bangladesh threats

Travels with My Censor

One reader said that the Chinese people adapt to censorship in clever ways. Credit Illusration by Javier Jan

My Chinese censor is Zhang Jiren, an editor at the Shanghai Translation Publishing House, and last September he accompanied me on a publicity tour. It was the first time Id gone on a book tour with my censor. When I rode the high-speed train from Shanghai to Beijing, Zhang sat beside me; at the hotel in Beijing, he stayed on the same floor. He sat in on my interviews with the Chinese media. He had even prepared the tour schedule on a spreadsheet, which was color-coded to represent five types of commitments, with days that lasted as long as thirteen hours. Other authors had warned me about such schedules, so before the tour I sent Zhang a request for more free time. His response was prompt: In my experience, the tours in China are always tough and exhausting. Hope you understand it.

And that was allno adjustment, no apology. In China, theres a tendency toward brutal honesty, and even the censored media may tell you things you dont want to hear. During my tour, one major Shanghai newspaper, Wenhui Daily, ran a six-thousand-word profile that began with the sentence Peter Hessler is now forty-five years old, and hes gotten a lot fatter, and he has wrinkles around the corners of his eyes. In Beijing, a television host finished his interview, shut off the camera, and said, To be honest, I liked your wifes book better than yours.

There are a couple of things that I should clarify. The first is that I weigh a hundred and fifty pounds. The second is that its not really fair to describe Zhang Jiren as a censor. Its true that he makes my books politically acceptable to the Chinese authorities, but censorship is only one of his duties. Zhang directs the nonfiction division at Shanghai Translation, where he also has to find translators, edit manuscripts, gauge political risks, and handle publicity. Hes thirty-seven years old but looks younger, a thin man with buzz-cut hair and owlish glasses. His background is in philosophy, and he wrote a masters thesis on Herbert Marcuse, the neo-Marxist thinker. Once, Zhang told me that he had studied Marcuse because his ideas are a powerful tool for Chinese to resist the long-term propaganda campaigns.

On the tour, Zhang was omnipresent, not because he wanted to monitor me but because he was responsible for virtually everything that happened. And yet his presence was quiet: usually, he was off to the side, listening and observing but saying little. He always wore sneakers, an old T-shirt, and calf-length trousers, and this casual outfit, during thirteen-hour days, sometimes made me feel like I was being given a tour of Purgatory by a neo-Marxist grad student. But I appreciated the guidance. Recently, there have been a number of articles in the foreign press about Chinese censorship, with the tone highly critical of American authors who accept changes to their manuscripts in order to publish in mainland China. The articles tend to take a narrowly Western perspective: they rarely examine how such books are read by Chinese, and editors like Zhang are portrayed crudely, as Communist Party hacks. This was one reason I went on the tourI figured that the best way to understand censorship is to spend a week with your censor.

Since Xi Jinping became President, in 2013, China has engaged in an increasingly repressive political crackdown. The authorities have also become more antagonistic toward the foreign press; its now harder for journalists to renew their visas, and many report being hassled by local authorities while on research trips. And yet the reading public has begun to discover nonfiction books about China by foreigners. More than any other editor, Zhang has tapped into this trendall but one of his six best-selling titles in the past few years have been foreign books about China. In Zhangs opinion, this reflects the new worldliness of readers, which he believes says more about the countrys long-term direction than the censorship or the propaganda does. The Party turns left this year, and maybe it turns right this year, Zhang wrote to me in 2014. In my opinion, the only certain thing is that Chinese people are much more individualized and open-minded.

In 1998, when I wrote River Town, my first book, it was inconceivable that a foreigners portrait of contemporary China would be published there, for reasons both political and commercial. There wasnt much of a market for books about China in the United States, either. I had just spent two years as a Peace Corps teacher at a college in Fuling, a small, remote city on the Yangtze River, and I finished the first draft without a contract. On the opening page, I wrote, There was no railroad in Fuling. It had always been a poor part of Sichuan Province and the roads were bad. To go anywhere you took the boat, but mostly you didnt go anywhere. The word poor appeared thirty-six times in the book; I used dirty more than two dozen times. I never thought seriously about such details until a publisher accepted the manuscript.

After that, I sent a draft to two friends from Fuling: Emily Yang, one of my former students, who was a native of the town, and Adam Meier, another Peace Corps volunteer. Their comments were almost completely contradictory. Emily wrote, I think no one would like Fuling city after reading your story. But I cant complain, as everything you write about is the fact. I wish the city would be more attractive with time. Meanwhile, Adam thought I had softened the portrayal. He was particularly concerned that I had omitted an incident that occurred near the end of our two years, when we went downtown with a video camera to record places that we wanted to remember. A crowd gathered and accused us of being journalists filming images of poverty to show Americans, which was a common charge at that time. We explained that we were teachers, but the crowd turned violent, kicking and hitting us until we ran away.

This was my most disturbing experience in Fuling, and I left it out of the first draft. One of the books main themes was the slow, sometimes painful way in which we had been accepted by locals, and I worried about undermining this message with a description of the mob in the final chapter. But, after discussing it with Adam, I decided that the scene was necessary. And this set the tone for my editing: I corrected details that were wrong, but I didnt touch anything that felt honest or raw. I left the word poor on page 1 and everywhere else that it appeared. I decided, effectively, that I would ignore a certain emotional side of the likely Chinese response.

I realized that I might not be welcome in Fuling after the book appeared. At the end of 2000, about a month before publication, I made a final trip to visit friends. I attended the wedding of one of my favorite former students, and then I gave a talk at a remote middle school where another former student was teaching. Shortly after I began my lecture, policemen arrived from Chongqing, the regional capital. They announced that the event was cancelled and escorted me off the stage. I returned to Beijing, and the following week almost everybody I had visited in Fuling was interrogated. The police detained the bride and groom to ask about our friendship, and another student telephoned me, sounding confused. Is it possible for the police to listen to what you say on the telephone? he asked. They knew all the things that you and I have been talking about recently.

Read more:

Travels with My Censor

Did bishop of Bacolod emasculate Comelec?

The decision on the Diocese of Bacolod is the Supreme Courts most convoluted exaltation of free speech. Few realize how it undercuts the Commission on Elections.

Shortly before the 2013 elections, a bishop installed two 610-foot tarpaulins on the facade of Bacolods San Sebastian Cathedral. The first said, Ibasura RH Law (Junk the Reproductive Health Law). The second bore the heading Conscience Vote and two lists of candidates, [Anti-RH] Team Buhay (with a check mark) and [Pro-RH] Team Patay (with an x). These lists included candidates only, not legislators who voted for or against the RH Law but were not running in 2013. A Comelec officer asked the bishop to remove the tarpaulins, citing a Comelec rule limiting posters to 23 feet, or be charged with an election offense.

How would you resolve this case? You might rule that the Comelec may validly level the playing field with a poster size rule. Or you might rule that the Comelec cannot restrict how one uses ones own property for free speech.

Eleven of 14 justices upheld the bishop. Marvic Leonen wrote the decision for eight justices. Very curiously, Antonio Carpio wrote a separate 6-page concurring opinion representing two justices, while Estela Perlas-Bernabe wrote a separate 4-page concurring opinion. Arturo Brion wrote for the three dissenters.

To appreciate the decisions nuances, we need to go into technical free speech doctrine. One must first determine whether a rule restricting speech is content-based or content-neutral. A content-based rule blocks speech based on its content (You may not criticize the President) and is much harder to justify. A content-neutral rule blocks speech based on time, manner or place but not content (No rallying without a permit).

This is not abstract legalese; these rules determine whether Carlos Celdrans jail term is valid, for example. Celdran was convicted of offending religious feelings, a crime committed if one performed acts notoriously offensive to the feelings of the faithful inside a place of worship. Celdrans critics argue that this definition is content-neutral and focused on place, and stress that he protested inside the Manila Cathedral. Celdrans defenders argue that this definition is content-based because one cannot establish notoriously offensive without analyzing his speechs content, and that a crime defined by offensiveness is impossible to justify under free speech.

Returning to the bishop, the decision surprisingly classified the Comelecs poster size rule as content-based, arguing that it only affects election-related but not commercial posters. Further, it argued that a maximum size limits the words in a poster. Carpio, Perlas-Bernabe and Brion all sharply protested that a poster size rule is content-neutral. (I would agree as an illiterate official can enforce it.) This counterintuitive ruling confuses how one may draft future Comelec regulations.

Beyond this crucial technical rule, the decision argued that the Team Patay tarpaulins are not election propaganda that can be regulated by the Comelec, but social advocacy on the RH Law that only incidentally advocated voting or not voting for certain candidates. Further, the decision argued that the Comelec may only regulate election material connected to candidates. Carpio and Brion emphatically protested that there is no such limitation on the Comelecs powers and that allowing unrestricted advocacy by private persons allegedly unconnected to candidates opens a wide backdoor to abuse. Indeed, the decision seems naive because the tarpaulins explicitly asked viewers to vote or not to vote for explicitly named candidates. And as Brion stressed, how can one separate candidates from their key advocacies?

Finally, the decision argued that government may not restrict the bishops use of church property as political billboards. Brion dissented that the decision implied that the Comelec may only regulate election material in public places, yet government validly imposes regulations on private property such as zoning and building restrictions.

The long decision had other nuances. It ruled that Article IX-C, Section 4 of the Constitution only applies to media franchise holders and candidates, and this cannot be invoked against the bishop. However, this is also the basis for the Comelecs 2013 right to reply rules, and the decision unwittingly nullified these for the reasons I previously raised (To Grace Poe: Right to reply already law, 10/29/14).

Read the original post:

Did bishop of Bacolod emasculate Comelec?