What is the aerospace sector?

A:

The aerospace sector, one of the largest and most powerful industries in the United States, supplies five markets: military aircraft, missiles, space, commercial airliners and general aviation. The U.S. aerospace sector is considered the largest in the world and is the main supplier of both military and civil aerospace hardware to the rest of the world. This sector directly employs about 500,000 workers in scientific and technical jobs, and supports more than 700,000 jobs in related fields. Because of the great emphasis on research and development, about 25% of those who work in aerospace are engineers, scientists and technicians. Aviation is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States, and it has increased yearly at the rate of at least 14%.

The aerospace industry's product line is broad because its primary products, flight vehicles, require up to millions of individual parts. In addition, many support systems are needed to operate and maintain the vehicles. In terms of sales, military aircraft have the largest market share, followed by space systems, civil aircraft and missiles. According to a recent study by the U.S. Department of Commerce, aerospace exports directly and indirectly support more jobs than the export of any other commodity. In 2012, the U.S. aerospace industry contributed $118.5 billion in export sales to the U.S. economy.

In 1958, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration succeeded the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics and initiated the Mercury manned space program. In 1959, the U.S. Aircraft Industries Association, which was formed in 1919 to promote American civil aviation, changed its name to the Aerospace Industries Association. U.S. aerospace industry interests are represented through the AIA, an aerospace-industry-funded organization that provides a forum for technical and policy issues, and whose membership consists of the major companies in the field. In 2000, America's largest aerospace companies, ranked in terms of total revenue, were Boeing, Lockheed Martin, United Technologies, Honeywell, Raytheon and Textron. Among the leading companies in the American corporate aircraft market are Raytheon, Cessna and Gulfstream, which is part of General Dynamics.

The aerospace sector's origin in the United States dates back to December 1903, when Wilbur and Orville Wright demonstrated an airplane capable of powered, sustained flight. In 1908 the Wrights secured a contract from the U.S. Army to make a single aircraft, and also licensed their patents to allow the Astra Company to manufacture aircraft in France. Glenn Curtiss of New York began selling his own aircraft in 1909, prompting many American aircraft hobbyists to turn entrepreneurial.

Air and space travel have become entrenched in daily life. Federal programs and recent or pending legislation are in place to ensure the future of the aerospace industry in the United States. This legislation includes the 2010 National Space Policy, which is intended to give U.S. commercial space companies the opportunity to provide new services to the government such as cargo transportation to the International Space Station as well as human transport for exploration.

Go here to see the original:

What is the aerospace sector?

What are common risks associated with investing in the aerospace sector?

A:

Investors considering the aerospace sector should carefully consider the challenges and opportunities the industry presents. Aerospace companies are very closely linked to the defense sector and experience many of the same challenges. Many investors choose to reduce risk by spreading their investment across multiple companies with an ETF investment.

These funds are heavily concentrated in the United States. Many American aerospace companies depend on government contracts and are vulnerable to cuts in government spending. As industry competition increases, reducing supply chain costs becomes more important and more difficult to accomplish. Due to the sensitive nature of defense operations and aerospace competition, mergers and acquisitions are difficult and costly. The usual means of reducing corporate costs are more challenging for the aerospace industry than many other sectors. Investors should note that cost containment is an ongoing issue for many companies.

Growing airline demand around the world for new aircraft is helping the aerospace industry grow. Investors may benefit tremendously from this demand increase caused by growing airlines and air traffic. This increase also has aerospace companies identifying and repairing supply chain problems before they threaten aircraft production. Fixing the problems caused by rapid growth is not easy for the industry and may pose problems for the industry's investors.

Individual aircraft models may almost individually drive demand as airlines rush to order new products. This rush may leave the industry vulnerable to changes in defense funding, as many of the same supplies serve both the defense and private sides of the industry. Defense departments are powerful buyers that have significant leverage and often control suppliers. If commercial demand levels differ strongly from defense demand, then the aerospace industry may be pulled in conflicting directions by major clients.

High demand for aerospace products may be both a blessing and a curse. Commercial airlines have a high passenger load, averaging 80 percent of available seats in 2013. Purchasing new aircraft creates backlogged orders when the supply chain forces down aircraft supply in the economy.

Investors should be aware of the influence emerging market economies and strong economic performance have on aerospace companies' ability to meet the demand for new aircraft. Over time, higher demand for new aircraft may substantially raise consumer pricing and increase consumer spending on air transportation as a result. This positive news for airlines may pose new challenges for aerospace companies. Increased competition may push some products out of the market, and aerospace companies often invest substantially in a small product line. If one or two products lose popularity, then the company may sustain a significant loss.

In spite of these risks, many investors find airlines attractive as more passengers around the world are able to afford air travel. The growth of new global markets increases interest in this sector.

Go here to read the rest:

What are common risks associated with investing in the aerospace sector?

What are the most popular ETFs that track the aerospace sector?

A:

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are popular with investors who want a reduced-risk means of investing in a sector. ETFs lower risk by spreading investment across many different companies within the same industry. Return rates generally track average returns across the sector. Many aerospace-based funds are available, including the SPDR S&P Aerospace and Defense (XAR) and iShares US Aerospace and Defense (ITA). As of 2014, the year-to-date value of both of these funds increased by over 50 percent. Both are very popular with investors seeking solid returns and risk management.

Another popular fund is the Aerospace & Defense Profile (PPA) ETF. In 2014, this fund tracked 51 different securities, with Boeing Co., Lockheed Martin and Honeywell International the top three securities held in the fund.

XAR follows the S&P index's aerospace and defense companies and is one of 19 sector funds that have the S&P Select Industry Indices classification. Over 99 percent of XAR's companies are within the United States, but a small number of foreign companies are included. The fund had 39 securities in 2014, with Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Class A, Alliant Techsystems and Boeing Co. being the top three.

ITA holds securities listed in the Dow Jones US Aerospace & Defense Index. As of 2014, this ETF held 39 securities with over half heavily concentrated in the fund. The top three holdings are Boeing Co., United Technologies and Precision Castparts.

PPA holds 51 securities and tracks the SPADE Defense Index. This index identifies the businesses that support and maintain U.S. defense, the aerospace industry and homeland security operations.

The aerospace industry as a whole experiences supply chain issues, is influenced heavily by defense spending and is heavily concentrated within the United States. These potential risks are not completely mitigated by investing in ETFs, so investors should be aware of the challenges facing the aerospace industry as a whole and the impact these challenges may have on aerospace sector ETFs.

When demand for new aircraft is high, competition makes repairing supply chain problems and increasing production efficiency more important. The aerospace industry is heavily influenced by government and defense spending. Defense purchasing means governments are often the biggest clients and have substantial leverage in contracts. Changes in government spending are immediately felt by aerospace companies. Austerity measures resulting in smaller defense budgets may dramatically impact product research and development and change product lines. Since commercial investment also plays an important role, aerospace companies must manage a broad client base with diverse product needs. Commercial clients grow in importance when demand for air travel is strong.

ETFs offer a popular method of investing in the aerospace industry and may bring substantial returns to investors who are mindful of the investing risks.

Read more:

What are the most popular ETFs that track the aerospace sector?

Paul Allen's Vulcan Aerospace to ULA: Change that rocket's name!

An artist's rendering of what the newly named Vulcan rocket would look like upon liftoff. (Photo courtesy United Launch Alliance)

( | )

United Launch Alliance's new Vulcan rocket very well may live long and prosper ... but under a different moniker, if Vulcan Aerospace has a say in the matter.

"Vulcan is a trademark of Vulcan Inc. and we have informed ULA of our trademark rights," Chuck Beames, president of Vulcan Aerospace, a division of Paul Allen-backed Vulcan Inc., told Reuters. "Paul Allen and Vulcan were early leaders within space exploration with the launch of SpaceShipOne more than a decade ago."

United Launch Alliance on Monday unveiled the Vulcan as the company's next big thing a reusable and powerful replacement for the Atlas and Delta rockets.

The name, which was determined by a public vote, was cleared by ULA's legal department prior to being offered as a ballot choice.

ULA spokeswoman Jessica Rye is confident the company took all necessary steps to use the name.

"We have done our due diligence regarding the legal right to use the name Vulcan," she said via e-mail. " ULA is committed to taking every reasonable step to avoid any confusion with other entities using this name and we are confident we can do so."

ULA allowed to the public to vote on the name and more than 1 million votes were cast balloting that began March 23. Vulcan won by a landslide, garnering about two-thirds of the votes, ULA CEO Tory Bruno told The Denver Post on Monday.

Vulcan was not among the original three potential rocket names that ULA put up for a public vote. The original ballot included Eagle, Freedom or GalaxyOne, but due to poplar demand, the ballot was expanded to include Vulcan and Zeus.

Originally posted here:

Paul Allen's Vulcan Aerospace to ULA: Change that rocket's name!

How does government regulation impact the aerospace sector?

A:

The aerospace sector, primarily including companies operating airlines as well as aircraft manufacturers, is heavily regulated in the United States and in other nations. Airlines have security concerns, potential safety issues with aircraft and ongoing issues related to international aviation regulations. Aerospace manufacturers often produce aircraft for both government and private clients. Government projects are often very sensitive and require different treatment than projects for commercial airlines. American deregulation of the airline industry occurred in 1978 and somewhat reduced government restrictions. Since deregulation, government regulation of U.S. airlines has refocused on safety and efficiency interests. The Department of Transportation no longer controls ticket prices and services. Now, airlines may freely fly at any price on any domestic route they choose. This freedom increased the popularity of air travel with consumers and boosted profitability for airlines and aerospace manufacturers.

Airline deregulation resulted in dramatically reduced prices for U.S. flights and increased air traffic. Between 1975 and 2000, the number of air passengers in the United States increased from 200 million a year to nearly 700 million, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Consumers have more routes available at a fraction of the cost of flights before deregulation. By 2000, average ticket costs fell to less than half of 1975 prices. While many regulations were completely relaxed, some aspects of air travel are still tightly regulated. For example, state and local governments control access to gates and runways, and often do not use a formal bidding process for access. Aircraft are thoroughly inspected for safety and restricted from flying if necessary. Some airports are restricted more than others, and federal regulations designed to minimize air traffic are common.

International flights are more heavily regulated than domestic flights. Some nations have open sky agreements with the United States, allowing any airline between the two countries to freely fly. Many countries operate monopolies with local or regional major airlines given preferred standing or exclusive territories, and foreign airlines are forbidden from the market. These foreign restrictions force many U.S. and foreign airlines to negotiate partnerships allowing for full coverage of a route through restricted markets.

Aircraft manufacturers are closely linked to the defense industry and often obtain government contracts. The U.S. government is a significant buyer of aerospace technologies and has tremendous influence on the research and development direction of aircraft and defense companies. Government regulation can change the course of research and impact key suppliers the aerospace industry relies on for product manufacturing. Industry investors must stay knowledgeable about the impact of the U.S. government, often the industry's biggest client. Competition for government contracts is strong, and funding is vulnerable to changes in defense spending. Strong demand from commercial airlines and other business customers may help offset losses during years of decreased defense spending, but the sector remains sensitive to government demand for aerospace products.

Read the rest here:

How does government regulation impact the aerospace sector?

AAR Amends OEM Support Agreement with Liebherr-Aerospace

WOOD DALE, Illinois, April 13, 2015 AAR (NYSE: AIR) has amended a long-term general terms agreement with Liebherr-Aerospace. Under terms of the deal, Liebherr-Aerospace will provide full support of AARs nose-to-tail comprehensive solution on the Bombardier fleet. The services are performed by Liebherr-Aerospace Saline, Inc., and Liebherr-Aerospace Toulouse SAS, which is the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Under the existing agreement, Liebherr-Aerospace grants access to technical documentation, spare parts and technical support to AARs component repair centers in Garden City, New York, and Amsterdam, both of which perform repairs on Liebherr-Aerospace equipment.

The agreement strengthens AAR's position in the aviation component support business and covers products Liebherr-Aerospace designs and manufactures for Bombardier, including the integrated air management system (ATA 21, 25, 30, 36) on board the CRJ700/900/1000 regional aircraft.

"Not only does this relationship enhance AAR's ability to provide comprehensive support for the Bombardier fleet, it also allows us to provide customers with OEM quality at competitive prices, along with technical support including engineering and reliability improvements," said Frank Landrio, Senior Vice President Strategy and OEM Development.

Alex Vlielander, President, Liebherr-Aerospace Saline, concurred on the benefits of the expanded partnership. Successfully working with AAR on various programs over the years has resulted in strong cooperation and trust. This agreement builds on that mutual appreciation and allows each company to focus on what it does best -- its core competency.

About AAR

AAR is a global aerospace and defense company that employs more than 5,000 people in over 20 countries. Based in Wood Dale, Illinois, AAR supports commercial, government and defense customers through two operating segments: Aviation Services and Expeditionary Services. AARs Aviation Services include inventory management; parts supply; OEM parts distribution; aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul; and component repair. AARs Expeditionary Services include airlift operations; mobility systems; and command and control centers in support of military and humanitarian missions. More information can be found at http://www.aarcorp.com.

Follow this link:

AAR Amends OEM Support Agreement with Liebherr-Aerospace

NAB 2015: Grass Valley Unveils 4K Slo-Mo LDX, IP Workflow

LAS VEGASThe new 4K LDX addresses two issues that Grass Valley President Marco Lopez said were problematic in live 4K sports production. The inability to get close and slow down.

We were hearing that existing 4K cameras have limited storytelling capability for sports, he said. They have limited depth of field and zoom range. The LDX 86 has the same zoom range and depth of field as HD cameras.

Another key problem that exists is that producers have had to choose between 4K and higher frame rates.

The LDX 86 Universethe new flagship of the LDX lineis switchable between 6x, 4K and HD. The switching is done through a software license, so if you need 4K capability for an event, you can activate it with a software key, he said.

The LDX 86 has Grass Valleys proprietary Xensium-FT CMOS, and can be used in any camera position where a 1x, 3x or 6x camera is required.

The 86 was introduced in conjunction with the new K2 Dyno Universe, which does replay optimized for 6x and 4K.

Existing 4K servers support only a fraction of the channels they support in HD, so they require double the servers, double the rack space and double the operators, Lopez said.

The new K2 Dyno Universe does replay optimized for 6x and 4K in the same rack space, with the same number of servers and the same number of operators as an HD workflow, he said. It relies on solid state storage and is scalable by networking multiple systems over 10GigE. Grass also developed a new fiber transmission system, the XCU XF Universe to support the system.

With the IP transition is accelerating like a waterfall, Grass is trying to get in front of it. Lopez said that in talks with 200 customers around the world, three main points emerged about IP workflows: multiple video streams over a single Ethernet cable; format agnosticism; and the ability to integrate video from multiple remote facilities.

He said Grass created a glass-to-glass IP production system that incorporates both proprietary and generic routing from Cisco, HP and Arista, software-defined networking and commercial off-the-shelf hardware.

Go here to see the original:
NAB 2015: Grass Valley Unveils 4K Slo-Mo LDX, IP Workflow

Thomas Jeffersons torturous afterlife: How Ronald Reagan and the Tea Party try to steal his legacy

Today is Thomas Jeffersons birthday. Number 272, if youre counting. Democrats safely claimed ownership of the founder of their party for the longest time. Nowadays, however, Republicans seem better equipped to do so, regularly isolating quotes that fix on Jeffersons small-government credentials. No less curious and intriguing than Jeffersons malleability in partisan politics is his universality: he continues to possess an aura that none of the other founders can claim. Mikhail Gorbachev proudly acknowledged that his college study of Jefferson influenced his own commitment to reform in the Soviet Union. After the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, the president of Bulgaria asserted that Jefferson was being widely quoted in his country. The Dalai Lama made his own pilgrimage to Monticello.

Jefferson may be Americas best-known slaveowner, but everyone still wants a piece of him; all politicians want to salvage something of the man Im dubbing democracys muse. As an ideal, as the beloved blueprint of human governance, democracy cannot do without the historical figure most closely associated with its name. Democracys Musehas had a hold on Democrats and Republicans alike over the past 75 years, from FDR to Obama. Evidence abounds. But will Jefferson continue to matter? And do we even know what a Jeffersonian democracy, as it was construed when Jefferson lived, would look like in our world?

On April 13, 1943, the Revolutionarys 200th birthday, President Roosevelt dedicated the Jefferson Memorial. In fact, FDR had a major hand in bringing the structure to life, down to approval of the dome element and the featured quotes on several sculpted panels. In keeping with New Deal initiatives on behalf of the little man, the most eloquent of the founders was almost everywhere regarded as a big government liberal once Roosevelt adopted him. Indeed, back in 1924, with big-business Republicans in charge of Washington, FDR had mused in print: Is there a Jefferson on the horizon? Either you were a Hamiltonian back then, comfortable with an alliance between the moneyed few and government; or you were a Jeffersonian who thought government should speak for the voiceless majority of citizens.

During World War II, Jefferson helped symbolize the fight against Nazism. In 1942, a U.S. senator from Utah projected the as yet uninvented United Nations in his patriotic book, Thomas Jefferson, World Citizen. Harry Truman called Jefferson my favorite character in history. And in April 1962, at the lavish party he threw at the Executive mansion for forty-nine Nobel Laureates, John F. Kennedy ad libbed: I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge . . . ever gathered at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone. In eulogistic reflection on the life of his friend Robert F. Kennedy, astronaut-turned-Senator John Glenn said of RFK: Hed quite often quote Thomas Jefferson, who said that if our democracy was to work, every man must have his voice heard in some council of government.

It is open to debate, however, whether any Democrat loved Jefferson as much as Ronald Reagan did. It was President Reagan who, more than anyone else, enshrined the third president as the champion of a small, non-intrusive federal government, and who insisted that the most Jeffersonian thing of all was an abhorrence of taxes and of passing on debt. In his First Inaugural Address, in 1801, Jefferson waxed eloquently about a wise and frugal government and called his nation the worlds best hope. In his Second Inaugural Address, in 1985, Reagan channeled that Jefferson: Let history say of us, these were golden yearswhen the American Revolution was reborn, when freedom gained new life, when America reached for her best.

Republicans ever since the Reagan era have relished that kind of assertive patriotism. And what politician wouldnt? When a totalitarian enemy is seen to exist, whether Fascist, Communist, or terrorist, the words (circa 1800) that circle the interior of the Jefferson Memorial are democracys catechism: I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN.

If Reagan resurrected Jefferson as a small government advocate, the meaningfully named William Jefferson Clinton began his 1993 inaugural journey by replicatingalbeit by busthe third presidents ride from Monticello to Washington, D.C. For Clinton, as for FDR and JFK, Jefferson was an agent of progressive change. On the founders 250th birthday that year, Clinton said: We can honor him best by remembering our own role in governing ourselves and our nation: to changefor it is only in change that we preserve the timeless values for which Thomas Jefferson gave his life over two centuries ago. In the year 1993 alone, President Clinton invoked Jefferson on twenty-five separate public occasions.

Why Jefferson? He is the closest to flesh and blood among the founders. George Washington was kind of a cold fish, and little that he said addressed the human spirit; history, therefore, likes him better in his marble, statuesque incarnation. James Madison is viewed in cerebral terms alone (which is dead wrong, if youll consult my earlier, coauthored book, Madison and Jefferson). John Adams was quite colorful, but not inspirational. Jeffersons nemesis Alexander Hamilton was contentious, conniving, disdained democracy, and had no room for popular protest of any kind. Plus his writing is thick and unpretty and unmemorable. He was a snob of the first order.

Jefferson loved language. He was not an exciting public speaker, but his written words were, and remain, iconic. Americans have been debating the meaning of the phrase life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for two centuries. Did he simply crib from John Locke? No, but he employed a vocabulary that his peers around the political world understood, one that captured Enlightenment values. Happiness had a philosophical ring then, one that only exists in academic circles now. Jeffersons pursuit of happiness connoted individual freedom and the realization of a broad moral community ideas that might even seem contradictory in todays partisan environment.

One thing is for certain, though: Jefferson would be thrown for a loop if he suddenly appeared, messiah-like, and witnessed all that was taking place in his political name. Among his present-day admirers, government haters aggressively quote one hyperbolic outburst from his time as the American minister in Paris: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure. (Timothy McVeigh was wearing his Tree of Liberty T-shirt in 1995, when he blew up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City with chemical, rather than natural, manure.) As president of the National Rifle Association, actor Charlton Heston quoted Jefferson: No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

See the original post:

Thomas Jeffersons torturous afterlife: How Ronald Reagan and the Tea Party try to steal his legacy

FCC CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER. NO NET NEUTRALITY = INTERNET CENSORSHIP. – Video


FCC CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER. NO NET NEUTRALITY = INTERNET CENSORSHIP.
Massive Double Speak here. Tom Wheeler recently said that if we don #39;t make up a bunch of new regulations that the ISP #39;s are going to suddenly have total power over the internet and will be...

By: grindall61

Read more here:

FCC CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER. NO NET NEUTRALITY = INTERNET CENSORSHIP. - Video

'Great Cannon of China' turns internet users into weapon of cyberwar

A receptionist works behind the logo for Baidu.com, the Chinese search engine whose customers were hijacked by the first firing of the Great Cannon. Photograph: NG HAN GUAN/AP

The Great Cannon has entered the cyberwar lexicon alongside the Great Firewall of China after a new tool for censorship in the nation was named and described by researchers from the University of Toronto.

The first use of the Great Cannon came in late March, when the coding site GitHub was flooded by traffic leaving it intermittently unresponsive for multiple days. The attack, using a method called distributed denial of service or DDoS, appeared to be targeting two specific users of the site: the New York Times Chinese mirror, and anti-censorship organisation GreatFire.org.

Both users focus their efforts on allowing Chinese residents to bypass the countrys Great Firewall the system China uses to restrict access to parts of the internet.

The attack, which continued for almost two weeks, was observed by researchers led by the University of Torontos Bill Marczak. They concluded that it provides evidence of a new censorship tool above and beyond the Great Firewall.

While the attack infrastructure is co-located with the Great Firewall, the attack was carried out by a separate offensive system, with different capabilities and design, that we term the Great Cannon, the researchers write.

The Great Cannon is not simply an extension of the Great Firewall, but a distinct attack tool that hijacks traffic to (or presumably from) individual IP addresses, and can arbitrarily replace unencrypted content as a man-in-the-middle.

Where the Great Firewall was a tool for largely passive censorship preventing access to material and providing the Chinese state with the ability to spy on its residents the Great Cannon provides the ability to effectively rewrite the internet on the fly.

When used offensively, that ability can turn a normal internet user into a vector of attack. In the case of the GitHub attacks, the Great Cannon intercepted traffic sent to Baidu infrastructure servers, web servers run by Chinas largest search engine that host commonly used analytics, social, or advertising scripts. Roughly 1.75% of the time it took that traffic and returned a malicious script, unwittingly enlisting the web surfer in the hacking campaign against GitHub. The scripts were not complex, doing little more than sending requests for content to GitHub; but the sheer quantity of users affected proved difficult for the site to handle.

The researchers conclude that the Great Cannon, like the Great Firewall before it, is likely to be operated by the Chinese government. Both systems appear to be hosted on the same servers, and appear to share source code for intercepting communications. As such, its operation points to a shift in Chinese censorship tactics, and has a highly visible impact, the research says. It is likely that this attack, with its potential for political backlash, would require the approval of high-level authorities within the Chinese government.

Read more here:

'Great Cannon of China' turns internet users into weapon of cyberwar

Uganda: Judiciary Will Jealously Guard Freedom of Speech

By Bart Katureebe

It is an honour and privilege to officiate at the second edition of the Uganda National Journalism A ward ceremony. This award is aimed at improving the quality of journalism in Uganda by inspiring and recognizing excellence in reporting on public affairs.

Journalists in any democratic society play a critical role in holding, receiving and imparting all forms of opinions, ideas and information. Therefore, the importance of recognizing and inspiring those gallant men and women, who devote their time, energy and effort to excel in this profession, cannot be overemphasized. It is because of this critical role played by the press and the media that any democratic society must uphold freedom of speech and expression.

Indeed, a democracy cannot exist without freedom to express new ideas and to put forward opinions about the functioning of public institutions. The concept of free and uninhibited speech permeates all truly democratic societies and institutions.

Uganda, like any other democratic society, is committed to uphold, protect and promote the right to freedom of speech and expression. It is for that reason that the right is entrenched in the most binding instrument on the land, the Constitution. The Constitution guarantees to every Ugandan the right of freedom to hold opinions, receive and impart ideas and inform without interference. This commitment is not only found in the Constitution but also in other legislation.

The Uganda Constitution provides in Article 29(1) (a) that: "Every person shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, which include freedom of the press and other media." Article 41 (1) states that: "Every citizen has a right of access to information in the possession of the state or any other organ or agency of the state ex- cept where the release of the information is likely to prejudice the security or sovereignty of the state or interfere with the right to privacy of any other person."

Article 20(1) of the same Constitution acknowledges that: "Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual are inherent and not granted by the state ."

In addition, Article 20(2) enjoins all organs and agencies of government and all persons to respect, uphold and promote the rights and freedoms of the individuals and groups enshrined in the Constitution.

It is, however, worth noting that the right to freedom of speech and expression is not absolute. They may be restricted. However, any such restriction or limitation must be within strictly and narrowly defined parameters.

Article 43 of the Constitution provides general limitations on fundamental and other human rights and freedoms, which include freedom of speech and expression. It states that:

More:

Uganda: Judiciary Will Jealously Guard Freedom of Speech

Know what is Net Neutrality and Save The Internet: Explained

With internet freedom on the brink of facing extinction, the social media is abuzz with trending hashtags like #NetNeutrality and #SaveTheInternet.

In the present scenario, at the time when Internet has become an integral and incredible part of one's life, the Internet Service Providers are trying to control the online traffic.

As many netizens continue to wonder what exactly net neutrality is, here is a complete guide on what all you should know about Net Neutrality in India.

What is Net Neutrality?

Network neutrality is the idea that your cellular, cable, or phone internet connection should provide access to all websites and online traffic in 'neutral' and 'equal' manner, without giving priority to any other website.

In simple terms, Net Neutrality is the Internet's guiding principle that "preserves our right to communicate freely online".

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) is mulling to form proper guidelines regarding net neutrality. Till now, India has no laws governing net neutrality.

Even though the internet had been neutral and unregulated since 1998, in 2006, TRAI had invited opinions regarding the regulation of net neutrality from various telecom industry bodies and stakeholders.

Why is free and open internet important?

Free and open Internet stimulates ISP competition, helps prevent unfair pricing practices, promotes innovation, promotes the spread of ideas, drives entrepreneurship and most importantly protects freedom of speech.

Read this article:

Know what is Net Neutrality and Save The Internet: Explained