The Owl at the Window review: They the living – Irish Times

Carl Gorhams grieving memoir of his partners death is most effective when it focuses on their daughter, writes Molly McCloskey

Carl Gorham: Days. Weeks. Months. Faster and faster. We have no time to lose. Because life is uncertain. We dont wait. We do.

Book Title: The Owl at the Window: A Memoir of Loss and Hope

ISBN-13: 978-1473642324

Author: Carl Gorham

Publisher: Coronet

Guideline Price: 14.99

It may be middle age, but it seems to me that everyone is talking about death. On the one hand are the transhumanists, proponents of radical life extension, mind uploading, and cyrogenics the latter in the news recently when a terminally ill 14-year-old in the UK won the right to be cyrogenically preserved.

Then there are those who exhort us to live well and accept death. In this camp are the death doulas, the death positivity movement, and the Order of the Good Death (Accepting that death itself is natural, but the death anxiety of modern culture is not). Death cafes where strangers gather to discuss death are springing up around the world.

I cannot imagine these salons and I wouldnt want to try one, though as Raymond Tallis notes in The Black Mirror, a work in which he observes himself from the imagined vantage point of being dead, talking about death may be even more evasive than remaining silent: we cant but sound portentous or hollowly laconic.

While transhumanists want to live forever, or at least for a lot longer, many of us (and I include myself here; few things cause me greater anxiety than the thought of thawing out, defenceless, in an unimaginable future) want to fear death less and die feeling human. Atul Gawandes hugely successful Being Mortal is about improving the quality of end-of-life, as is the well-known work of BJ Miller, a triple amputee and hospice and palliative medicine physician.

Perhaps the increase in people narrating their own last days Christopher Hitchens, Jenny Diski, Oliver Sacks, Tom Lubbock, Paul Kalanithi is a reflection of the growing desire to claim ownership of this final process. Of course, it may also be the logical next step to our having narrated every other aspect of our existence.

What also proliferates are the memoirs of those left grieving. One of the latest is The Owl at the Window by Carl Gorham, the award-winning creator of the animated sitcom Stressed Eric and numerous other sitcoms and film scripts.

In 1997, Gorham and Vikki Sipek are two thirtysomethings living the dream she flying high in the fashion industry and he enjoying a US bidding war for his work, their lives a living, breathing Sunday supplement. Then Vikki finds a lump in her breast. So begins 10 years of operations, chemotherapy and scans, awaiting results, fearing the worst.

[W]ere in a different race now, Gorham writes. Were running, running, trying to stay ahead of it. And time feels different. It seems to race by. Days. Weeks. Months. Faster and faster. We have no time to lose. Because life is uncertain. We dont wait. We do.

They give birth to a daughter, Romy, who is three when her mothers cancer returns. On a family trip, passing through Hong Kong, Vikki lapses into a coma. While she lies in hospital, Gorham and his daughter wander, dazed, through the surreal landscape. A friend of a friend offers them a house. Imagining a luxurious refuge, they instead find themselves in a ramshackle cottage, its environs distressingly apposite: to get there they must walk through an unlit wood and across a graveyard where snakes and Komodo dragons lurk.

Vikki dies in Hong Kong, and Gorham embarks on the business of grieving and of single-parenting, the day-to-day of keeping Romy connected to her mother: too much talk of Vikki sounds false and hectoring, but too little and Romy may lose the sense of Vikki altogether.

Grief, like all abstract nouns, is difficult to narrate, and when such a narration has power it is because an intense particularity has been brought both to the day to day and to the person being mourned. Vikki, unfortunately, remains frustratingly distant. She is always quiet and unassuming but also bustling with brilliant energy, and she never quite assumes dimensions. Grief itself falls victim to too much telling and too little showing: I cant accept it. Not now. Not yet. I cant contemplate it. The thought of never seeing her again. Its too much. Too utterly terrifying.

It is Romy who animates the narrative, enacting her grief in a way that seems instinctive, primal and delicate. Nine months after her mothers death, Romy constructs a cardboard reproduction of Vikki, which she christens Cardboard Mummy. Cardboard Mummy is one of the family, watching TV, propped up at the dinner table, belted into the passenger seat on trips to the supermarket. Romy talks to Cardboard Mummy about all manner of things and solicits her advice.

When Romy decides to bring Cardboard Mummy to school for show-and-tell, her father fears the worst bullies tearing Mummy to pieces, his daughter a laughingstock. But Romy manages the performance with exceptional poise, telling the class about her mummys illness and everything that happened in Hong Kong . . . and how Mummy is in the ground at the church now and how we are all so sad and how we will always be sad.

This turns out to have been an astonishingly intuitive act of catharsis, because after that, Cardboard Mummy begins to recede. She sits in the hall, and Romy doesnt pick her up as often, though shes happy Mummy is there. Mummy is now spoken of with fondness and nostalgia, like an old friend who has moved away to the other side of the world.

In exteriorising her mothers presence through a cardboard effigy, Romy seems to have marked for Vikki a territory in her own life and psyche. It is a reminder of how, with our sophistication and our lack of ritual, we have lost the hang of being with the dead.

It also reminds us of what we all vaguely know and which may give us solace or pause as we contemplate our own demise: that biological death is an endpoint to existence on one plane only. The impact we have on others doesnt cease when we do.

As philosopher Gabriel Rockhill noted in a recent New York Times column on discussing death with his son and how these psychosocial dimensions of ourselves persist: In living, we trace a wake in the world.

Molly McCloskeys new novel, When Light Is Like Water, will be published by Penguin Ireland in April.

Originally posted here:

The Owl at the Window review: They the living - Irish Times

Tax Software: The Basics Work, but Peace of Mind Costs Extra – The … – New York Times


New York Times
Tax Software: The Basics Work, but Peace of Mind Costs Extra - The ...
New York Times
These programs have gotten much better, and are now selling added, and perhaps unnecessary, features. What's next? Tax reviews over cocktails?

and more »

Here is the original post:

Tax Software: The Basics Work, but Peace of Mind Costs Extra - The ... - New York Times

How to Install WordPress in Under 30 Minutes – AllBusiness.com

WordPress is the most popular blogging and CMS platform in the world. Everyone whowants to have control over their website without spending a lot of money on maintenance should look to WordPress.

Ive personally installed hundreds of WordPress installations for clients in my past jobs. In fact, all of the web properties we manage at Bacic Media Group currently run on the WordPress platform, and we have no intentions on changing to anything else right now.

In this article, well go over how to install a fresh copy of WordPress on any host with cPanel in under 30 minutes.

Keep in mind that if your web host has a 1-click option to install WordPress, then you should use that as it does all the work for you. But for those that do not have that option, follow these simple instructions to get the job done.

The first thing you will need to do is download the WordPress files on WordPress.org. My preference is tar.gz version because it is smaller in filesize, but the zip version works just as well.

The next thing we need to do is create a MySQL database. To do that, we need to log in to our cPanel account. Once were in the cPanel dashboard screen, we will click on MySQL Database Wizard and follow the steps in order to create the database and database user.

Step 1

In the first step, we simply create a database by specifying what name we want it to be. Just make sure you write this down as we will need it later when we run the WordPress installation.

Step 2

The second step is creating the actual MySQL user by specifying the username and password. You will also need to write down these credentials somewhere for later use.

Step 3

The last step is to associate the database user with the database. The easiest way is to simply check off the All Privileges checkbox and click next.

The next step is to upload the WordPress files we downloaded in the first step.

So again, login to cPanel and click on File Manager. As an option, you may also upload using FTP, but for simplicitys sake, we will use the cPanel File Manager.

Step 1

When youre in the File Manager, click on the public_html folder, which will take you to the root of your website.

Step 2

Once inside the public_html folder, click on the Upload button in the File Manager toolbar and select the WordPress zip file we downloaded in the first step.

Step 3

Once uploaded, click on the Go Back link to go back to the File Manager.

Step 4

Click once on the file we uploaded to highlight it, and then click on Extract button in the File Manager toolbar. If you would like to install it in a specific folder, specify it in the textbox in the confirmation dialog. Otherwise, just leave that setting unchanged.

Go here to read the rest:

How to Install WordPress in Under 30 Minutes - AllBusiness.com

Dear Angelica Review: If Someone Cries in a VR Headset, Does Anyone See It? – UploadVR

Its been almost a year since the latest round of VR headsets were released, and while hardware and technology is all fine and dandy, it doesnt mean squat without solid experiences. Thats what 2017 is all about: content, content, content. While 2016 saw creators doing some amazing stuff in VR, 2017 is already shaping up to be the year that defines and advances the medium, and thats exactly what Oculus Story Studio has done with Dear Angelica.

With a run time of about 12 minutes, Dear Angelica is a brief yet powerfully emotional journey like no other Ive experienced in VR. The story of the relationship between a child and mother isnt overly unique or full of surprises, but it is a universal narrative of connection, comfort, joy, sadness and eventually loss that everyone can relate to, and that makes for an engaging and far-reaching piece.

Dear Angelica begins in a sparse, dark room, with Jessica (Mae Whitman) burrowed in her bed writing a letter to her late mother actress Angelica (Geena Davis) as Jessica watches her old movies on a seemingly weightless television, a set piece that pops up again and again and acts as Jessicas lifeline to her mother. You stand over Jessica as ribbony script appears before you, syncing with Whitmans voiceover. Its simultaneously intimate and detached, serene and unsettling, and I felt as if I was both an unwelcomed intruder yet trusted confidant in both Jessicas room and mind as I heard her deepest thoughts.

While the scenes in Jessicas room are placid and subdued, as Jessica reminisces about her mothers movies and the time they spent together, you are hastily enveloped by a torrent of vibrant, colorful brushstrokes. Frantic images appear all around, and its as if youre in the middle of a painting during creation. Tying in with the calligraphic style of the script, illustrator Wesley Allsbrook uses a ribbon-like style in her artwork which draws the eye across vast spaces, compels you to look to and fro and conveys a sense of frantic motion. Its beautiful and overwhelming all at the same time, and I felt as if I was surrounded by an ever-growing paint tornado.

Because of her mothers time in the limelight, Jessica admits that she cant always remember what was a personal family experience and what was part of one of her movies. As such, Dear Angelica moves between impossible scenes to more mundane settings such as a mother-daughter ketchup fight in a diner. The art itself even fits the emotional feeling of the piece as an ephemeral, dreamlike memory as individual ribbons contract and break up as you get closer to them, giving a sense that you can never really touch what is there. Its all very intense and powerful. Ive been fairly unimpressed with realistic 360-video experiences in VR thus far, but Dear Angelicas use of animation and illustration in VR is magical. Because of this constant movement and the fact that the art is all-encompassing, I never felt at a loss for where to look nor did I feel like I was missing anything.

I was also impressed with the little details in Dear Angelica. Crouching to look under Jessicas bed revealed a nest of dirty clothes and junk shoved in the corner, which is something youll never see in a flat-screen experience, and I noticed some smaller Jessicas tucked away yet still overlooking the action in certain scenes that compelled me to watch Dear Angelica multiple times to see what else I could find.

Ultimately, Dear Angelica is an emotional vehicle meant to stir the brain and heart, and the illustrations, voice acting, music, story and direction all come together impeccably to build on the poignancy of the piece. The transition from dim, quiet and mournful to vivid, chaotic and bustling then back again takes you up, up, up only to slam you forcefully into the concrete and make you face the inevitability of what Jessica is going through. The use of scale also plays a big part in the emotional impact as the colorful, movie-like scenes are portrayed with gigantic figures and the real-life, somber scenes appear as tiny, desaturated dioramas.

Dear Angelica is beautiful and brutal, heart-warming and gut-wrenching. Experiences like Dear Angelica show the power of the medium to be a conduit for emotion and empathy, and perfectly exemplify why VR is the most immersive, transformative, transportive, and powerful storytelling medium to date. This is a must-see experience, and one you should share to display the piquancy of VR storytelling.

Dear Angelica was released on January 20th, 2017 and is available for free at the Oculus Store. Check out our Review Guidelinesfor more information on how we arrived at this score.

Tagged with: Dear Angelica, oculus story studio, vr review

Continue reading here:

Dear Angelica Review: If Someone Cries in a VR Headset, Does Anyone See It? - UploadVR

Become Tech Savvy: How to save your data manually with iPhone, iPad, and Mac – 9 to 5 Mac


9 to 5 Mac
Become Tech Savvy: How to save your data manually with iPhone, iPad, and Mac
9 to 5 Mac
... have to have an external device, you can access your data from any device that you're logged into your iCloud account or any computer from icloud.com. Just keep in mind it does use your iCloud storage and is usually best for uploading one file at a ...
The State of iBooks in Early 2017TidBITS

all 2 news articles »

See the original post here:

Become Tech Savvy: How to save your data manually with iPhone, iPad, and Mac - 9 to 5 Mac

Smartphones are revolutionizing medicine – Phys.Org

February 18, 2017 by Jean-Louis Santini Researchers are finding new benefits to smartphone features such as camera and flash, which can help examine and diagnose patients

Smartphones are revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses, thanks to add-ons and apps that make their ubiquitous small screens into medical devices, researchers say.

"If you look at the camera, the flash, the microphone... they all are getting better and better," said Shwetak Patel, engineering professor at the University of Washington.

"In fact the capabilities on those phones are as great as some of the specialized devices," he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) annual meeting this week.

Smartphones can already act as pedometers, count calories and measure heartbeats.

But mobile devices and tablets can also become tools for diagnosing illness.

"You can use the microphone to diagnose asthma, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder)," Patel said.

"With these enabling technologies you can manage chronic diseases outside of the clinic and with a non-invasive clinical tool."

It is also possible to use the camera and flash on a mobile phone to diagnose blood disorders, including iron and hemoglobin deficiency.

"You put your finger over the camera flash and it gives you a result that shows the level of hemoglobin in the blood," Patel said.

An app called HemaApp was shown to perform comparably well as a non-smartphone device for measuring hemoglobin without a needle. Researchers are seeking approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for its wider use.

Smartphones can also be used to diagnose osteoporosis, a bone disorder common in the elderly.

Just hold a smartphone, turn on the right app in hand and tap on your elbow.

"Your phone's motion picture sensor picks up the resonances that are generated," Patel said.

"If there is a reduction in density of the bone, the frequency changes, which is the same as you will have in an osteoporosis bone."

Such advances can empower patients to better manage their own care, Patel said.

"You can imagine the broader impact of this in developing countries where screening tools like this in the primary care offices are non-existent," he told reporters.

"So it really changes the way we diagnose, treat and manage chronic diseases."

Lower costs

Mobile smartphone devices are already helping patients manage cancer and diabetes, says Elizabeth Mynatt, professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

"Someone who is newly diagnosed with diabetes really needs to become their own detectives," she said.

"They need to learn the changes they need to make in their daily lifestyle."

For women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, researchers provided a tablet that allows them real-time access to information on the diagnosis, management of their treatment and side effects.

The technique also helps patients who may not be able to travel to a medical office for regular care, reducing their costs.

"Our tool becomes a personal support system," Mynatt said. "They can interact to get day-to-day advice."

Research has shown this approach "changes dramatically their behavior," she added.

"The pervasiveness of the adoption of mobile platform is quite encouraging for grappling with pervasive socio-economic determinants in terms of healthcare disparities."

A growing number of doctors and researchers are turning to smartphones for use in their daily work, seeing them as a useful tool for managing electronic health data and figuring out the most effective clinical trials, said Gregory Hager, professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University.

Clinical trials currently cost around $12 million to run from start to finish, he said.

"The new idea is micro-randomized trials, which should be far more effective, with more natural data," he said.

Although the costs could be dramatically lower, too, the field is still new and more work needs to be done to figure out how to fully assess the quality and the effectiveness of such trials.

Explore further: HemaApp screens for anemia, blood conditions without needle sticks

2017 AFP

In the developing world, anemiaa blood condition exacerbated by malnutrition or parasitic diseaseis a staggeringly common health problem that often goes undiagnosed.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) would benefit if pulmonary function testing was used more consistently to diagnose the condition, according to a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal)

Food and Drug Administration officials say they will begin regulating a new wave of applications and gadgets that work with smartphones to take medical readings and help users monitor their health.

UK doctors and nurses are routinely using their own smartphonesincluding apps and messaging systemsfor patient care, reveals a survey of frontline staff, published in the online journal BMJ Innovations.

People suffering from asthma or other chronic lung problems are typically only able to get a measure of their lung function at the doctor's office a few times a year by blowing into a specialized piece of equipment. More ...

Two reports from AmericanEHR Partners based on a survey of nearly 1,400 physicians suggests that tablets are of greater use for clinical purposes than smartphones.

Smartphones are revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses, thanks to add-ons and apps that make their ubiquitous small screens into medical devices, researchers say.

You may not realize it but alien subatomic particles raining down from outer space are wreaking low-grade havoc on your smartphones, computers and other personal electronic devices.

BYU engineering professors have created an origami-inspired, lightweight bulletproof shield that can protect law enforcement from gunfire.

When vertebrates run, their legs exhibit minimal contact with the ground. But insects are different. These six-legged creatures run fastest using a three-legged, or "tripod" gait where they have three legs on the ground at ...

The cutting-edge biocompatible near-infrared 3D tracking system used to guide the suturing in the first smart tissue autonomous robot (STAR) surgery has the potential to improve manual and robot-assisted surgery and interventions ...

When people suffer spinal cord injuries and lose mobility in their limbs, it's a neural signal processing problem. The brain can still send clear electrical impulses and the limbs can still receive them, but the signal gets ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more:

Smartphones are revolutionizing medicine - Phys.Org

Request For Abstracts: The Practice Of Medicine – Health Affairs (blog)

Health Affairs

February 17, 2017

Health Affairs seeks submissions for a series of articles focusing on the practice of medicine that we will begin publishing in early 2017. The series will explore the broad practice environment and how features of that environment affect physicians, other clinicians, and the practice of medicine on a number of dimensions. The practice environment includes forces that physicians and other clinicians respond to (both on a daily basis and in a strategic sense), such as regulatory requirements, payment policy, quality measurement, economic and market influences, the organization of care, technology, professional standards, etc. We are interested in papers that reflect on and explore how such factors affect care delivery, including consideration of broader implications for health care spending, access to care, and health outcomes.

We will consider new empirical research, essays, reviews, and analysis/commentaries that address these topics.

We invite submissions from anyone with an interest in this topic. Health Affairs reaches a wide audience that includes policymakers; academics and researchers from many disciplines; health and public health professionals and officials; health industry executives; lawyers; consultants; students; and members of the media. Authors should be mindful of this breadth and aim to write for readers who have an interest in health policy issues, but should not assume expertise among readers on any particular topic.

We welcome essays and commentaries, but submissions should have a strong basis in evidence and reflect a thorough understanding of the state of knowledge of the subjects explored as well as the policy issues and questions that surround those subjects.

Please consult our online guidelines for additional formatting instructions and answers tofrequently asked questions.If you have questions about the suitability of a particular paper, please e-mail us at POM_queries@projecthope.org.

We thank you for your time and consideration. Please feel free to pass this invitation along to colleagues who might be interested, as well.

We are grateful to the Physicians Foundation for providing support for this series.

Read more here:

Request For Abstracts: The Practice Of Medicine - Health Affairs (blog)

Family Medicine Faculty More Diverse Than Most, but Still Wanting – AAFP News

Departments of family medicine employ a higher percentage of female and underrepresented minority faculty members than do those of other specialties as a group, but there is still a way to go before medical schools catch up with the nation's changing demographics, according to a recent study.

Researchers at the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care analyzed the number of women and racial and ethnic minorities in family medicine departments and compared that figure with averages among all other medical faculty.

The study, "Increasing Family Medicine Faculty Diversity Still Lags Population Trends,"(www.jabfm.org) was published in the January/February issue of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

From 1980 to 2015, the number of full-time family medicine faculty increased nearly fourfold, from 1,396 to 5,507 positions. The proportion of female and minority faculty in family medicine departments more than doubled during that period.

"The fact that FM departments are becoming more diverse is encouraging, given that primary care faculty are charged with training the source of first-contact, continuous, coordinated and comprehensive care for underserved minority patients," the researchers wrote.

Still, women and minorities hold a higher percentage of the lower-ranking faculty positions.

Women occupy 51 percent of family medicine assistant professorships and ethnic minorities hold 12.6 percent, a higher average percentage of both groups than is found among other medical faculty departments. But when it comes to full professor positions in family medicine, women occupy just 30 percent, and minorities occupy only 7 percent, according to data from the AAMC Faculty Roster.

Progress can be seen, but diversity among faculty still does not reflect that among the U.S. population as a whole, where ethnic minorities grew from 18 percent of the population in 1980 to 31 percent in 2015.

More rapid gains are being made in gender equality than in racial and ethnic diversity. More undergraduate students entering universities are female, and researchers noted that the majority of black physicians are female.

Imam Xierali, Ph.D., a senior researcher at the AAMC, told AAFP News that incoming minority faculty members could benefit from a mentorship program that offers assistance with writing grants and conducting research, two essential factors that determine eligibility for promotion.

Although the medical profession has pushed to expand the number of physicians, and several new medical schools have opened since 2003, overall diversity ratios have remained flat during that period.

A diverse faculty is important because incoming medical students say that diversity is a consideration when they select a school. It's particularly problematic that the proportion of minority faculty is lower than that of minority students who are entering medical school.

"We need to double down on our efforts regarding the value of diversity," Xierali said. "The population base is changing, and we need to acknowledge that."

Admittedly, achieving diversity will take longer among medical faculty than among the student population because of slow turnover, but that should not discourage family medicine departments and all other medical faculty from rededicating their efforts.

"Medical schools and academic FM departments may need to review their current practices and policies with an eye toward enabling more faculty diversity through institutional transformation and moving diversity from the periphery to the core of institutional excellence," the researchers wrote.

Related AAFP News Coverage High Court Affirms Value of Diversity in Meeting Educational Mission Carefully Tailored Nod to Race in Med School Admissions Benefits Patients, Say AAFP Experts (7/6/2016)

AAFP Joins Brief Supporting Diversity in Med School Admissions Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments Dec. 9 (11/20/2015)

More From AAFP Policy on Workforce Reform

Policy on Diversity in the Workforce

Policy on Medical Schools, Minority and Women Representation In Medicine

More:

Family Medicine Faculty More Diverse Than Most, but Still Wanting - AAFP News

Was Andy Cohen the Shadiest Person at the Married to Medicine Reunion? 5 Fierce Moments You Need to Check Out – Bravo (blog)

It was time for the Married to Medicine ladies to face the heat this week after a contentious Season 4. Allegations, shade, and sass abounded when the crew sat down with Andy Cohenfor the epic post-season chat and Andy didn't hold back with his own witty barbs while rehashing everything that went down this past season. We're breaking down some of the buzziest moments from last night in The Daily Dish Morning After.

Listen, even thissquad can't handle all the shade that Andy brings to the stage. That guy can mess around with the best of them, as you can see above.

With all the debate about the ladies' marriages and husbands, the fellas will get to weigh in on all the drama during Part 2 of the reunion, airing Friday at 8/7c.

...and better than ever, if you ask us. The Charleston gang returns to the airwaves on Monday, April 3 at 9/8c. In the meantime, preview all the feisty ups and downs above.

While most parents pray their adult kids will move out, The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills mom and self-confessed buritto lover is all about her police officer son, Tommy, residing with her. "I actually love having my son there. He's free security, OK?" she joked.

In fact he oozes so much pride for his daughters, that they sometimes even make him cry. All together now, "Awww!"

Check back every morning as we'll be recapping the 5 must-see moments from the night before. And don't forget to tune in toThe Daily Dishpodcastto get the latest on what's happening in the Bravo galaxy, currently available oniTunes,Soundcloud,Google Play, and Amazon's Alexa.

Read the original post:

Was Andy Cohen the Shadiest Person at the Married to Medicine Reunion? 5 Fierce Moments You Need to Check Out - Bravo (blog)

Medicine Hat unveils proposal to assist residents dealing with poverty – The Globe and Mail

The race to eradicate poverty has moved to the forefront of issues confronting Albertas cities, large and small. The provincial capital has End Poverty Edmonton, a 10-year plan to address the more than 100,000 people living in poverty. In Calgary, Enough For All: The Calgary Poverty Reduction Initiative is working to help the more than 114,000 people who live below the poverty line.

Now, Medicine Hat has joined the fight. On Wednesday, its Poverty Reduction Leadership Group unveiled Thrive, its own proposal to assist the one in 10 residents dealing with poverty defined as someone who earns less than what they need to meet the necessities of life.

But what makes Medicine Hat so uniquely qualified to end poverty is its reputation as a place where things get done.

Two years ago, it became the first Canadian city to solve homelessness. It succeeded by taking 1,072 people, including 312 children, off the streets and providing them with a place to live, be it a house, an apartment, basement suite, trailer, townhouse or condo. The rent was set at 30 per cent of a persons income, and pride of ownership has helped keep homelessness from making a significant comeback.

Medicine Hat has been so vigilant at monitoring homelessness, it has attracted the interest of city officials from Victoria, B.C. to St. Johns, Nfld., to Texas, Washington State and the United Kingdom. The program was so successful it became the springboard for ridding an even bigger problem.

When we announced a functional end to homelessness, the next step was logically poverty reduction, said Medicine Hat Councillor Celina Symmonds, who was involved in the homelessness project as a member of the Community Housing Society. It is a very co-ordinated effort [taking on poverty], but this community does pull together. I like to call it the little community that can.

Emanuel Akech, 44, can attest to that. He arrived alone in Medicine Hat in 2008, after leaving his war-torn homeland of Sudan and spending 14 years in Cuba, before eventually becoming a Canadian citizen. When he reached Medicine Hat, he had only a backpack with him.

Community Housing put him in a place for the night, got him into the Canadian Mental Health Associations Housing First program, which ultimately placed him in a fourplex. He pays his rent from the income support he receives from the federal government. He is aware of how fortunate he is.

I see some suffering the same way. Ive been there, he said of his early days in Alberta. To not suffer like that, I like that way.

Medicine Hats approach is to streamline a one-stop system where all services and social needs can be met. Assistance will come from a myriad of sources including the city, Medicine Hat College, the school board and the food bank, all of them committed to making things work and work well.

Theyre all on the inside and theyre pushing the agenda through their different networks, said Jaime Rogers, manager of the Homeless and Housing Development Department. Thats why this is working, because you have all these background players who have connections and legitimacy in the community.

Measuring poverty in Canada is not an exact exercise. The federal government has defined the low-income measuring point as having half the median income of an equivalent household. In Statistics Canadas most recent survey, nearly five million Canadians were considered impoverished.

End Poverty Edmonton was unveiled in September of 2015 as united task force involving the city, the provinces Poverty Reduction Strategy and the United Ways Capital Region. Its members are business people, academia and health-care and social-service workers. Their research told them one in eight Edmontonians earn less than $16,968 per year.

In Calgary, the Poverty Reduction Initiative first surveyed the public to understand what poverty meant and how it impacted people. Enough For All is a collaborative effort between the city and the United Way of Calgary designed to assist the one in 10 Calgarians living below the poverty line. The goal is to be poverty free in a generation.

I think its a worthy initiative, said John Kolkman, research and policy analysis co-ordinator for the Edmonton Social Planning Council. Is it overly ambitious? Some have argued that theres so much attention on the overarching developments that we miss what it really is a series of small steps.

Mr. Kolkman pointed to Medicine Hat as proof that social ills can be cured.

Medicine Hat has largely eliminated chronic homelessness thats when people cant hold a place to stay no matter what is done. Medicine Hat has the gold standard for eliminating that, he said. Ive been to Medicine Hat and Ive been impressed with how cohesive it is there between the city, the non-profit organizations, businesses, the labour unions. Its helped by having the population it has [being the right size to see positive results].

Medicine Hats approach to poverty has 17 milestones to gauge how its performing. Yearly suicide rates will be monitored. So will the waiting lists for social housing. It will be, its administrators believe, very much a made-in-Medicine-Hat success story.

I think communities now are starting to take a look at themselves and saying, What can we do to be part of the solution? Ms. Symmonds said. Yes, provincial and federal governments are going to have to be a part of this. There has to be changes in systems across the board. That said, we have a lot to offer here.

A House of Commons committee on human resources, skills and social development will be in Medicine Hat Thursday for a public hearing. The committee is gathering information on how to reduce poverty.

Editor's Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said Medicine Hat homeless persons were granted new purpose-built housing. In fact, they were granted housing in existing homes, apartments and townhouses.

Follow Allan Maki on Twitter: @AllanMaki

Read more:

Medicine Hat unveils proposal to assist residents dealing with poverty - The Globe and Mail

Married to Medicine’s Quad Webb-Lunceford Aims to Prove She’s … – E! Online

Alex Martinez/Bravo

Prepare yourselves for a double dose of doctors and drama.

After a successful fourth season, the cast of Married to Medicine is coming together for a two-part reunion special. As you likely could have predicted, all of these ladies are not on the same page.

Before part one airs tonight on Bravo, E! News chattedwith Quad who expressed her delight at being seated next to Dr. Simone, Dr. Heavenly and Toya.

"I was right where I needed to be. I was prime-time television and right where I needed to be," she told E! News exclusively. "To be honest, I'm really good with almost everyone from the show excluding the person who drove my name through the mud the entire season and her little minion."

If you haven't already guessed, Quad is talking about Mariah and Lisa Nicole.

Throughout the season, these three haven't seen eye-to-eye and based on previews, it's only going to continue at the reunion.

"I have purged those people from my life and when you get bit by a snake, you got to get all of the poison out and you don't let that snake come around again and I'm okay with where I am with Lisa and Mariah and I," Quad explained. "If the question was would we ever be friends again, I can tell you absolutely not.I can tell you I do not trust Mariah or Lisa Nicole. That ship has sunk to the bottom of the ocean."

She added, "My advice to Lisa is never be a pawn in someone else's game and she was a pawn in Mariah's chess game."

During the two-part reunion, fans will also see the husbands join the conversation and discuss some hot-button issues of the season. Toya will open up about her financial situation while Dr. Jackie will share new details about her marriage.

As for Mariah calling her co-star "Quad the Fraud," you better believe there will be some heated discussion about that as well.

"Sometimes people are doing a lot of projecting," Quad teased to E! News. "I didn't appreciate the Quad the Fraud' thing but then again, it didn't really affect me because I know that's not who I am."

Married to Medicine airs Friday night at 8 p.m. only on Bravo.

(E! and Bravo are part of the NBCUniversal family)

E! Online - Your source for entertainment news, celebrities, celeb news, and celebrity gossip. Check out the hottest fashion, photos, movies and TV shows!

See the original post here:

Married to Medicine's Quad Webb-Lunceford Aims to Prove She's ... - E! Online

Friendship Public Charter School scraps plan to offer courses from Liberty University – Washington Post

A D.C. public charter school network scrapped plans to award Liberty University a contract to offer online courses to high school students, including a class that would have taught them how to apply a biblical perspective to speech writing.

Friendship Public Charter School published a notice about the contract with the evangelical Christian university in a community newspaper and on its website in early February. But after The Washington Post on Tuesday asked about the courses the charter school planned to offer through the university, Friendship said it had nixed the plans altogether.

In a statement released Friday, Friendship spokeswoman Candice Burns said that after they received and reviewed the textbooks and other materials Tuesday, the charter system decided not to proceed with the contract.

It was not a fit for what we needed, Burns said.

Charter schools have more autonomy than traditional public schools to decide their curriculum and whom they hire to provide courses. But the D.C. Public Charter School Board, which oversees Friendship and other charters in the District, says religious curriculums cannot be offered or taught at charters.

Public charter schools must follow the same legal requirements regarding religious instruction as traditional public schools, the charter board states on its website.

The board did not respond to several requests for comment.

Many high schools across the country partner with universities to offer courses to students for college credit. And public schools can offer college courses through private religious universities so long as the content of the courses is not based on religion, said Charles C. Haynes, vice president of the Religious Freedom Center at the Newseum.

That was not the case in at least one of the courses that Friendship wanted to offer its students.

The courses under consideration were screenwriting, graphic design and speech. According to Libertys website, students enrolled in the speech course learn a foundation for developing communication skills, including speaking before audiences and small groups, and in other conversations.

It also states that the learning outcomes for the course include the ability to apply a biblical perspective to topics such as the natural world, human identity and relationships, and culture and civilization.

The textbook used in the class is Speech Communication: A Redemptive Introduction, which the publishing company says helps Christian college students develop a Biblical understanding of communication and challenges them to apply it to their intended occupations in a way that makes a redemptive difference in the world.

The course material and descriptions on Libertys website for the graphic design and screenwriting courses make no reference to religion.

The charter network has asked Liberty to remove its name as a partner school from its website.

Liberty University did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Friendship is the second-largest charter system in the District, with more than 4,200students enrolled at its 12campuses during the 2015-2016 school year.

Burns said that as part of the early-college program, students have taken courses at the University of the District of Columbia, the University of Maryland, Harvard University and Georgetown.

Friendship wanted to give its students more course options, so the network was considering several online resources that offer a rolling admissions schedule ... such as Liberty University Online, Burns said.

We are currently examining instructional materials from several schools to determine the best options for our students, she added.

The notice Friendship published in the community newspaper Northwest Passages stated that the charter system intended to enter into a sole-source $30,000 contract with Liberty. Burns said that posting a procurement notice does not obligate an organization. It is, however, a necessary step in the procurement process.

Burns said the charter system considered Liberty no different from other religious-affiliated schools such as Georgetown or Trinity. But Haynes, with the Religious Freedom Center, said that the difference is in the content, and that Liberty often infuses its courses with religious teachings.

I would be very surprised if there were many courses at Liberty that were taught without a religious perspective, Haynes said. Any public school that looked at this would know that upfront. Thats not a hidden thing.

Haynes commended Friendship for vetting the curriculum before offering the courses to its students.

It would have been unconstitutional, Haynes said. Its a good thing it was stopped.

Link:

Friendship Public Charter School scraps plan to offer courses from Liberty University - Washington Post

West Liberty group home closes after license revoked, staff shortages – Springfield News Sun

A Logan County group home whose license had been revoked recently has closed after leaders say it wasnt able to maintain a trained workforce.

The Adriel School in West Liberty housed and taught about 40 kids with behavioral issues from across Southwest and Central Ohio. In the past several years, West Liberty Police had responded to the campus hundreds of times for everything from fights to stolen cars.

RELATED: State alleges Logan Co. group home workers taught kids to snort, smoke

With them being closed, itll reduce our calls for service and well be able to focus on some other things, West Liberty Police Chief Shane Oelker said.

The decision to close was difficult, Adriel CEO Todd Hanes said, since the campus has been a residential facility for more than 100 years.

There is no question that this is painful, he said.

Earlier this month, a letter from the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services said the state had revoked the homes license and alleged employees violated regulations on several occasions, including reportedly showing kids how to snort pills to get high and not seeking prompt medical care for injured children.

Hanes hasnt denied the allegations but said that the employees involved were terminated and the home took steps to improve.

But those issues werent the main reason Adriel closed, Hanes.

MORE COVERAGE: Fights lead to 9 juvenile arrests at Adriel group home in Logan Co.

Our top reason is finding a sufficient number of staff here in this area, he said.

It wasnt possible to hire enough qualified workers in a small town like West Liberty, he said.

We have no intention of operating a residential facility, he said, and thats independent of ODJFS.

On Friday, the remaining seven children at the home were picked up, he said. Workers began finding other placements for the children two weeks ago, he said, and were able to find foster homes for some children. Others were picked up by the counties theyre from.

Neighbors have complained over the past few years about vandalism and thefts. But some neighbors, like Janet Yoder, are worried about the well-being of the children.

The things that have happened are wrong and they need to be taken care of in the right way, she said. But where are these children going to go?

She used to raise money for the home, she said, and saw how it gave children a stable environment.

EARLIER COVERAGE: Spike in police calls to youth home challenges community

The bad things you hear are always going to overshadow the good things because thats what we focus on, she said. And thats a shame.

Adriel will now focus on the other services it provides, Hanes said, including its foster care network, family preservation and visitation programs.

Its leaders are looking to discuss options with the local school district or educational service center for the school building on its campus that will now go unused, he said.

Adriel has assisted the 52 employees who will lose their jobs because of the closure, he said. Theyve offered job fairs and interviews on campus.

Things do change and this organization has undergone changes several times in its past, he said. I think well come through this stronger.

Its in the best interest of the children to close the school, Oelker said, if the company isnt able to keep a qualified staff.

Were going to continue to work with them if they ask for our help with things, the police chief said.

He plans to focus more on community policing.

Adriel had previously appealed the the states decision to revoke its license but Hanes said no decision has been made as to whether the home will continue that appeal.

DOWNLOAD OUR FREE NEWS APPS FOR THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS

Staying with the story

The Springfield News-Sun has reported on problems at the Adriel School in West Liberty for nearly three years, including stories digging into complaints from neighbors and police officials and state investigations of the group home.

By the numbers

40: Approximate number of children housed at the Adriel group home

52: Employees laid off because of the group home closure

100: Years Adriel has had a residential home in West Liberty

Read more here:

West Liberty group home closes after license revoked, staff shortages - Springfield News Sun

Liberty Mutual’s CEO earned $17 million pay package in 2016 – The … – The Boston Globe

Liberty Mutual CEO David Long.

David Long, the chief executive of Liberty Mutual, earned nearly $17 million in 2016, an 8 percent increase, even as the companys profits faltered, the insurer disclosed on Friday.

The Boston-based mutual insurance company saw its profits plunge in 2015 and for the first half of 2016 due to losses related to energy investments and its withdrawal from the Venezuelan market. In 2015, the company reported that profits fell by more than 70 percent, to $514 million, from $1.8 billion in 2014. Energy losses continued to drag down Liberty Mutuals bottom line during the first half of 2016.

Advertisement

The company, which sells home, auto, and business insurance, is expected to report full-year 2016 results next month.

Yet even with those losses, Longs pay grew from $15.7 million in 2015 to $17 million last year.

Get Talking Points in your inbox:

An afternoon recap of the days most important business news, delivered weekdays.

The companys other top executives also saw their compensation packages increase by between 6 and 9 percent, Liberty Mutual reported.

Long, who has been leading the company since 2011, earned much of his compensation through long- and short-term bonuses; perks such as security protection, parking, and personal use of the corporate aircraft; as well as other incentives. His base salary last year was $1.2 million.

Liberty Mutual officials said that Longs short-term bonus, which is tied to the insurers lagging 2015 performance, barely budged from the previous year, a reflection of the companys falling profits that year.

Advertisement

But his long-term bonus is based on Libertys Mutuals 2013 and 2014 performance, which officials have described as strong, boosting Longs overall compensation.

Liberty Mutual disclosed its pay packages to comply with state regulations that require insurers to report the compensation of their top executives each year.

As a mutual insurer, Liberty Mutual is owned by its policyholders, rather than shareholders.

However, in mutual insurance companies, policyholders, despite their status as owners, have very limited oversight over how firms spend their money.

Read more:

Liberty Mutual's CEO earned $17 million pay package in 2016 - The ... - The Boston Globe

Bishops’ Statement on Religious Liberty Misses the Mark – Commonweal (blog)

In a recent letter to our elected officials, I expressed pride in the U.S. Catholic Churchs support of religious liberty. Over recent years, the bishops in particular have offered a necessary check on certain federal agencies that have not prioritized our first and most cherished liberty. Since the HHS mandate became a major topic of debate, I have explained the position of the USCCB countless times in myriad settings: classrooms, meetings, in print, on air, as an invited panelist, or simply over coffee to friends who didnt understand the issues at stake.

But the document released yesterday by the USCCB on religious liberty is a major disappointment. Far from reading the signs of the times, this document makes it seem like its authors cant read at allat least not the daily news.

I dont level this criticism lightly. My customary and habitual attitude toward episcopal authority in the public sphere is deferential. I am on good terms with my own bishop, one of the documents authors. But a document on religious liberty todaythat does not mention Muslims or migrants is simply unacceptable.

The most pressing threat to religious liberty in our country right now concerns Muslims and those falsely assumed to be Muslims (e.g. Sikhs) by know-nothing aggressors. Anti-Muslim sentiment has been exacerbated by the floating of ideas about a Muslim registry during last years presidential campaign and now by the proposed travel ban on certain countries with large Muslim populations. And Sikhs are constantly harassed or even killed for their appearance, even in their place of worship.

Instead of incorporating these pressing matters into a broad statement on religious liberty, the bishops emphasize only the matters from the Obama administration, such as health coverage, adoption, accreditation, tax exemption, and government grants and contracts. These are worthy goals; they attempt to fine-tune our system of religious liberty for Christians, which already functions quite well. The statement goes on to hope that, with this new leadership, basic protections for religious practice may be restored and even strengthened.

But what is more basic as a religious liberty protection than the freedom to peaceably assemble with ones coreligionists, or to walk down the street wearing ones religious clothing? What is more basic in American history than to not need to registers ones individual religious affiliation with the government or worry that ones house of worship is under surveillance?

The document concludes by saying it focuses on the most vulnerable of Americans. But there is no way to look at America and conclude that Christian employers negotiating the details of health insurance premium support are the most vulnerable people in our society.

Nor do the bishopsmention the second most important religious liberty issue at stake right now, which is the plight of migrantsboth those who want to come here to escape religious persecution and those already here who fear deportation.

But just a few years ago, the excellent 2012 document of the Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty eloquently criticized immigration laws that would prevent pastors from carrying out their religious duties to the Catholics in their pastoral care. In contrast with that statement, notably absent from the list of authors of the current statement is Bishop Daniel Flores, who is busy serving the needs of Catholics in border towns and organizing his brother bishops in evangelism and service to them.

Perhaps he was not available for this new document on religious liberty because he convened other bishops and the faithful this week to offer spiritual, legal and material assistance to immigrants in the face of President Trumps crackdown on illegal immigration.

We have seen the pain, the fear, and the anguish suffered by the persons who have come to us, who may be facing having to live among us in the periphery of our society. They have lived under the constant threat of deportation and have suffered the fear of the possible separation from their families.

The most basic religious freedoms do not involve taxes or bureaucratic forms. Religious libertythe kind that is "first, and most cherished"means not to be harassed, surveilled, or killed for ones religion. And to welcome those fleeing such conditions abroad, to the extent that we can, and prevent those conditions within our borders. In addition to these basics, keeping religious families intact ought also to be at the center of our churchs mission during these times.

The signs of these times are not hard to read.

Read the original:

Bishops' Statement on Religious Liberty Misses the Mark - Commonweal (blog)

Blue Jays Fall Short Against Wentzville Liberty, 56-54 – The Missourian

It was another heartbreaking conference loss for the Washington basketball Blue Jays.

For the third time in four games, the Blue Jays (11-11, 3-5) dropped a one possession game. This time, it was to Wentzville Liberty (16-6, 8-0) at home Friday, 56-54.

Weve had a lot of heartbreakers lately with very close games, said Washington Head Coach Grant Young. The good thing is our kids are playing with some of the top teams in our conference, we just cant get that one little inch to get over the top. Liberty has a really good team and we were right with them the whole game.

The Eagles led 14-10 after the first quarter and 24-22 at halftime.

By the end of the third quarter, the Blue Jays had taken the lead at 38-37.

In the fourth quarter, the Blue Jays led late after a three-pointer by junior Zach Harms, but Liberty junior Kaleb Overall answered with a three of his own.

The Overall kid hit a big three and that was huge for them, Young said. They hit four threes in the fourth quarter and they were kind of daggers. We had a chance at the end down three. Conlan (Jarvis) made the first free throw and then tried to miss intentionally, but he missed the rim.

Liberty closed out the game by outscoring Washington 19-16 in the fourth quarter.

Despite the close losses recently, Young said his team isnt down on themselves.

You fight so hard to lose by such a shortcoming, he said. Our last four games have been decided by a total of nine points. It could be disheartening, but our kids came to practice this week ready to get (Ft. Zumwalt North Friday). We had a great practice Monday and its been really fun with the kids. Its been a fun year coaching. They come to practice every day with a lot of leadership.

Young hasnt lost any belief in his team, either.

I think that people have to worry about us because were a really good team, he said. Were right there. We have to make those timely shots, and then we can get over that hump.

Washington was led by junior Conlan Jarvis, who scored 21 points and drained three three-pointers.

Conlan had a really great game for us, Young said.

Junior Cason Suggs was next with 13 points.

Senior Austin Lewis scored six points.

Freshman Dayton Turner put in five points.

Senior Connor Lewis added four points.

Sophomore Alec Brinkmann finished with two points.

Junior Jaylen Sims put in 22 points for Wentzville Liberty.

Overall scored 19 points.

Senior Brian Jones had six points.

Andy Jorris put in four points. Alex Hines had three points.

Senior Blake Stricker scored two points.

Washington is off until Friday, when they host Zumwalt North (7-13, 3-5) at 7:30 p.m.

Go here to read the rest:

Blue Jays Fall Short Against Wentzville Liberty, 56-54 - The Missourian

Liberty, Haywood to play for District 15-AA title – Jackson Sun

Michael Odom , USA TODAY NETWORK Tennessee Published 11:19 p.m. CT Feb. 17, 2017 | Updated 16 hours ago

The District 15-AA semifinals were held Friday night at Oman Arena.(Photo: JEAN ODOM/The Jackson Sun)Buy Photo

After a change of venue earlier on Friday, Oman Arena housed a packed crowd to see the top two seeds in District 15-AA advance to the championship game.

Top-seeded Liberty knocked off city-rival North Side 80-60, while second-seeded Haywood beat its own rival Ripley 62-56.

Liberty (15-9) and Haywood (21-7) will play for the district title on Monday at 7:30 p.m., while North Side (10-12) will play Ripley (19-13) in the consolation at 6 p.m.

"We have to focus on defense and rebounding on Monday," Liberty coach Terrell Green said. "Haywood probably has the best scorer in the district in Tristan Jarrett. We have to slow him down and try to control everything else out there."

The Crusaders jumped on North Side early, taking a 21-5 lead in the first quarter, but before halftime, North Side went on a 8-0 run to cut Liberty's lead to six (38-32) at halftime.

Liberty's Demarius Bond scored a game-high 29 points, while Martavious Moore added 15. Malik Cross and Elijah Harris finished with 12 apiece.

The Indians continued to make a run in third quarter and took a 41-40 lead with 5:34 remaining, but Liberty took the lead back before the end of the quarter and scored 27 points in the fourth quarter to extend the lead out to 20.

"Teams are going to to make runs," Green said. "It showed out character in how we responded to those runs."

Dexter Pirtle led North Side with 24 points with 16 coming in the second half, while Josh Cole added 13 points.

In the first semifinal, Haywood and Ripley started slow by turning the ball over in the first half, but the Tomcats opened the third quarter on a run to a 45-30 lead with 1:07 remaining.

But Famous Jones got hot in the fourth quarter with three 3-pointers in the first 3:15 of the quarter to cut Haywood's lead to 51-45.

Jones finished with 27 points with 14 coming in the fourth quarter, while Jamari Bostic added 13 points.

But Haywood hit enough free throws down the stretch to keep the lead and advance to the title game.

"We played solid defense, but Famous Jones hit some tough shots," Haywood coach Kendall Dancy said. "We didn't help ourselves missing free throws. We made enough plays down the stretch to come away with the win."

Tristan Jarrett led the Tomcats with 15 points, while Keithon Powell and Demarius Boyd added 12 points each.

Reach Michael Odom at michodom@jacksonsun.com or 731-425-9754. Follow him on Twitter @JSWriterMichael.

View post:

Liberty, Haywood to play for District 15-AA title - Jackson Sun

Who Really Controls Liberty Media Corporation? – Forbes


Forbes
Who Really Controls Liberty Media Corporation?
Forbes
John Malone, the billionaire chairman of Liberty Media Corporation, is widely understood to be in control of the Nasdaq-listed company but its recent acquisition of Formula One auto racing has called this into question. Last month Liberty closed its ...
FIA denies conflict of interest in F1 sale to Liberty MediaMotorsport.com, Edition: Global

all 8 news articles »

Read more here:

Who Really Controls Liberty Media Corporation? - Forbes

Trump’s Dangerous Anti-Libertarian Nationalism – Hit & Run … – Reason (blog)

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order claiming that in the future the total number of federal regulations will shrink, via the elimination of two regulations for every new one. He has nominated an FCC chief and a department of education chief who advocate choice-enhancing changes in the way their agencies run. He says he's a hardcore Second Amendment supporter (although he also supports taking away the right to bear arms based on mere suspicion). He's offered up a Supreme Court justice willing to seriously question government regulatory and police powers. He at least claims he wants to see spending cuts and tax cuts.

Ron Sachs/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom

Should libertarianswho are supposed to advocate those goals as part of a larger vision of reducing government power over our property and choicesadmire and support Trump? Even a little?

Libertarianism is more than just advocating a random checklist of disconnected actions that in some respect limit government's reach or expense. (See Steven Horwitz, an economist in the Hayekian tradition, for valuable thoughts on why judging Trump via a checklist of discrete changes in specific government behavior doesn't work in libertarian terms.)

Libertarianism is a unified skein of beliefs about how the human social order should be shaped. What binds the philosophy is the understanding (or belief, for the skeptical) that using violent force against the peaceful both makes us, overall, poorer and is, at any rate, almost always or always wrong.

For most libertarians, the practical and moral arguments against aggressive force on the innocent support each other; the sense of what's morally right for most libertarians is rooted in a generally rule-based sense of what furthers human flourishing overall. To most libertarians, that is, freedom is both a valuable part of human flourishing, and a necessary part of most other aspects of it.

That we should be free to do what we want with ourselves, and with our justly owned property, is the core of libertarianism. (A swirling, complicated debate surrounds questions about what behavior is truly about ourselves alone, and how, why, and under what circumstances property is justly owned and what that implies about how we can use it. Such questions can't be resolved in a blog post.)

Given the nature of human beings' productive powers, the best way to ensure the collective "we" gets richer faster is to ensure the individual freedom to exchange with others as we choose, and by doing so build long and complex chains of production and exchange that benefit us all (or even just some/many of us), irrespective of accidents like national boundaries.

Free trade and free migration are, then, the core of the true classical liberal (libertarian) vision as it developed in America in the 20th century: if you don't understand and embrace them, you don't understand liberty, and you are not trying to further it.

The Trump administration may not in every specific policy area do the wrong thing in libertarian terms. But whatever it gets right is more an epiphenomenon of certain alliances within the Republican Party power structure or the business interests he's surrounding himself with. Trump and his administration can't be trusted to have any principled and reliable approach to shrinking government or widening liberty, since Trumpism at its core is an enemy of libertarianism.

What appears to be the core of Trumpism, based on his earliest priorities and his closest advisers? The blatant, energetic, eager violation of the right to freely choose what to do with one's justly owned property and energy, and fierce denial of the principle that through such freedom we create immense and unprecedented wealth for the human race. (Again, most libertarians don't just clutch "freedom" as a value disconnected from all other values, although they privilege it in most cases. They also believe freedom is conducive to the greatest human wealth and happiness, overall. It's a philosophy of social betterment as well as a philosophy of individual rights.)

Not yet a month into his administration, Trumpism is most surely centered on a poorly considered nationalism. His administration, with each swift and relentless bit of dumb bullying over our businesses' right to choose what to do with capital, our right to buy from abroad unmolested, other humans' ability to move peacefully into our country, acts on the principle that it's best if we don't trade with people outside our borders, that the Leader gets to decide what private businesses do with their capital and resources, and that we should beggar ourselves for the sour joys of keeping fewer people not born here from coming here (in a time when that alleged "problem" barely exists).

Trump is openly a type of illibertarian leader we haven't seen in a while. The "open" part is important. Those wanting to downplay the threat of Trump can, justly, point to all sorts of crummy and illiberal policies that past administrations and imagined alternate administrations did or might also pursue. In the context of the current political debate, that scarcely matters. Trump is the president we have, and his policies are what we have to face, and fight. It may fit any given person's amour propre to not ever risk seeming to overstate or overguess exactly how bad Trump is or might be, but it doesn't necessarily help the cause of promoting liberty.

It does matter whether a president encases even protectionist or trade-managing or restrictionist policies with a stated appreciation for lower tariffs and more open migration, which at least on the margins likely keeps bad things from happening. By paying that tribute of statist vice to libertarian virtue, at least doesn't deliberately imbue Americans with the belief that the country will be stronger by making goods and labor more expensive.

A president who openly and firmly rejects the principle of, and fails to grasp the benefits of, economic liberty is indeed worse than one who merely casually violates those principles. (And economic liberty is the core of human liberty, in a world where we must produce and trade to live).

Trump and his administration don't merely violate the core principles of individual liberty carelessly or as a byproduct of other goals; he is against economic liberty, deeply and sincerely. More than anything else, Trump is a loud and proud enemy of libertarianism.

The continued presence and dominance of Steve Bannon in his inner circle indicates that Trumpian nationalism, though the administration doesn't spell this out explicitly, yearns toward ethno-nationalism. Bannon believes American "civic society" necessarily excludes too many immigrants from Asia (even though people of that descent make up over 5 percent of America.)

While he's been careful since taking his powerful position in the White House not to say much of what he thinks about anything, Bannon's stated belief that the news organization he ran, Breitbart, was "a platform for the alt-right" and his own site's definition of that often deliberately ill-defined term, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that his nationalism has an ethnic component.

The administration's choice, apparently at the driving of Bannon and his ally Steven Miller, to launch their administration with an expensive and absurd "border wall" and for a spate of pointless (except in their disruptive cruelty) blows at movement of people from a small set of mostly-Muslim countries (that are not the Muslim countries from which any serious terror threat to the U.S. has ever actually arisen) show that the "public safety" rationale doesn't hold up. They are either idiots, or the restriction has another purpose.

What the limited travel restrictions so vital to the Trump administration have demonstrated is that they are eager to build from the most speculative and phantom of fears an expensive and disruptive apparatus of control, one that Miller considers a test run to prove the president's unrestricted power over certain matters, even in the face of the courts. And the fears they decide to focus on are fears of the foreign "other," even if that foreign other is a legal resident of the United States or wants nothing more than to work for or with existing Americans.

If you are judging how to view Trump's administration, and make reasonable guesses about its future actions based on demonstrated core commitments, those demonstrated preferences, goals, and methods are seriously bad, and more serious than (so far) semantic stunts about cutting regulation or taxes.

Trump v. Mises

Free trade and migration is not just one of a random pile of "freedom-increasing policies" that one can grab from and hope the whole number ends up large enough. It's the heart. Trump's disdain for them shows he can't be trusted to stand for our core freedoms, for any reason other than pure political contingency, or perhaps as part of his unlovely desire to humiliate the enemies and opponents his administration is obsessed with. (Yes, someone out to stick it to the modern liberals may occasionally posit a freedom-enhancing policy. This doesn't make "sticking it to the liberals" itself inherently a libertarian attitude.)

Is it just a sign of pants-wetting Trump Derangement Syndrome to call Trump the quintessential anti-libertarian? The modern American libertarian tradition is not unitary or invented by one personI wrote an over-700-page book about it, called Radicals for Capitalism.

That said, given his influence on nearly every thinker or institution that comprised modern American libertarianism from World War II to the dawn of the 21st century, Ludwig Von Mises, the Austrian emigre economist and social philosopher, can be relied on to reveal what is core about modern American libertarianism.

Mises, driven from his beloved Austria by the Nazis and firsthand witness to the death of liberal principles via strongman ethno-national fascism, thought and wrote diligently and brilliantly about every aspect of social philosophy. From the start of his career to the end he identified free trade and free migration in a regime of legal respect for individual private property as the core of a free society. Those, again, are the principles Trump has nothing but contempt for.

Mises' personal and intellectual experience taught him vividly why the nationalism at the heart of Trumpism is the worst enemy of classical liberalism, the humane and liberating and wealth-generating tradition Mises sustained and furthered.

Mises' liberalism, and thus modern libertarianism, was built not solely in reaction to Marxist communism but equally against the wealth- and life-destroying evils of autocratic ethno-nationalist autarkic statism.

As Mises wrote in his first magisterial work of social and political philosophy, Socialism (1922), almost as if he foresaw a Trump who would try to bamboozle a nation into thinking it could enrich "the people" as opposed to special interests via protectionism and exclusionary immigration policies, and wanted to warn the liberty-minded that would be not just one concession on a liberty checklist but the end of the benefits and glories of free markets (as well as a clear violation of any pretense that one is working for "the people" vs some privileged elite):

It becomes a cardinal point of the particularist policy...to keep newcomers out.

It has been the task of Liberalism to show who bear the costs of such a policy....

A system that protects the immediate interests of particular groups limits productivity in general and, in the end, injures everybodyeven those whom it began by favouring. How protection finally affects the individual, whether he gains or loses, compared with what he would have got under complete freedom of trade, depends on the degrees of protection to him and to others....

As soon as it is possible to forward private interests in this way and to obtain special privileges, a struggle for pre-eminence breaks out among those interested. Each tries to get the better of the other. Each tries to get more privileges so as to reap the greater private gain. The idea of perfectly equal protection for all is the fantasy of an ill-thought out theory.

For, if all particular interests were equally protected, nobody would reap any advantage: the only result would be that all would feel the disadvantage of the curtailment of productivity equally. Only the hope of obtaining for himself a degree of protection, which will benefit him as compared with the less protected, makes protection attractive to the individual. It is always demanded by those who have the power to acquire and preserve especial privileges for themselves.

In exposing the effects of protection, Liberalism broke the aggressive power of particular interests. It now became obvious that, at best, only a few could gain absolutely by protection and privileges and that the great majority must inevitably lose....

In order to rehabilitate protection, it was necessary to destroy Liberalism....Once Liberalism has been completely vanquished, however, and no longer menaces the protective system, there remains nothing to oppose the extension of particular privilege.

When it came to free immigration, Mises was so intellectually and emotionally attached to it that this generally quite pacific man thought that immigration barriers nearly rose to a legitimate excuse for the excluded to wage war.

His writing after seeing the horrors that ethno-national autarky brought to Europe in his 1944 book Omnipotent Government bookend his explanation of the vital, core importance of free trade and migration:

....imagine a world order in which liberalism is supreme....In this liberal world, or liberal part of the world, there is private property in the means of production. The working of the market is not hampered by government interference. There are no trade barriers; men can live and work where they want. Frontiers are drawn on the maps but they do not hinder the migrations of men and shipping of commodities. Natives do not enjoy rights that are denied to aliens. Governments and their servants restrict their activities to the protection of life, health, and property against fraudulent or violent aggression. They do not discriminate against foreigners. The courts are independent and effectively protect everybody against the encroachments of officialdom. Everyone is permitted to say, to write, and to print what he likes. Education is not subject to government interference. Governments are like night-watchmen whom the citizens have entrusted with the task of handling the police power. The men in office are regarded as mortal men, not as superhuman beings or as paternal authorities who have the right and duty to hold the people in tutelage. Governments do not have the power to dictate to the citizens what language they must use in their daily speech or in what language they must bring up and educate their children....

....In such a world the state is not a metaphysical entity but simply the producer of security and peace. It is the night-watchman....But it fulfills this task in a satisfactory way. The citizen's sleep is not disturbed, bombs do not destroy his home, and if somebody knocks at his door late at night it is certainly neither the Gestapo nor the O.G.P.U.

The reality in which we have to live differs very much from this perfect world of ideal liberalism. But this is due only to the fact that men have rejected liberalism for etatism.

It's not merely that of a grabbag list of "libertarian positions" Trump is picking a few and neglecting the others and thus libertarians have reason to be hopeful; it's not merely that, oh, free trade and immigration were among Mises' many positions, and his reasons for positing them as core to liberalism were whimsical.

They were, as he explained and knew in his bones from the horrible history of Austria and Germany he lived through, the core of liberalism (libertarianism). If one doesn't understand that, as Trump and his people do not, then their instincts and intelligence can't be trusted for anything when it comes to liberty.

Why Some Libertarians Might Not Seem Particularly Alarmed by Trump

Conflicting concerns and perspective have dictated many libertarians' reactions to Trump. (In the social networking age, it is much easier, for better or worse, to understand a very wide range of perspectives not mediated through existing approved brands.) Libertarians tend to already see so much of what the American state has done, under control of both parties and a variety of politicians, as hideous evils that our sense of loud public outrage at what the government is up to generally has had to be kept in some form of polite abeyance, lest we become the sort of constant wild ranters that tend to be filtered out of any public discussion.

This sociological reality, perhaps, makes libertarians less likely to be the loudest and most panicked about Trump. Trump is, as we've heard from many in the past few weeks, inheriting powers and a system that have long existed and long been abused, from travel restrictions to deportations. I have seen an understandable wave from those of libertarian bent of "wait, you are telling me the government is scary now?" reaction to the more, let's say, acutely panicked complaints about Trump.

This is a time of high rhetorical tension in American political discourse. One with a contrarian streak (and libertarians of necessity have contrarian streaks) might be inclined to discount the apocalyptic sense that Trump represents a unique and freshly unacceptable blow to American liberty. Predicting an unusually dire event occurring has social and intellectual costs; even someone highly alarmed by Trump might be reluctant to predict severe and unprecedented domestic repression.

But Trump's very rise to power was unprecedented in many respects, and his core and proud illiberalism is fresh in modern America. (Again, governmental vice paying some tribute to the virtues of liberty is important.) The presence and growing power of Steve Bannon, a man near as we can tell genuinely and enthusiastically dedicated to ethno-nationalism, is what makes it hard to believe that Trump doesn't want to take his economic autarky and restrictionism as far as he can get away with.

And from the perspective of the first few weeks of Trump, any remnants of dedication to free markets and freedom in these realms has seemingly already been flushed out of the body of the GOP in order to make room for an injection of pure malignant Trumpism, so we can't count on his Party or its old rhetorical commitments to hold him back.

Trumpian nationalism and restrictionism is a philosophy that has already caused and will continue to cause misery, both direct and obvious in the lives of people whose movement is restricted and indirect and harder to see in the choking of the wealth-generating properties of international trade.

The president has chosen to make his leading adviser, one who seems to have outsized influence on the administration, a man whose sole political concern is both dumb and evil, and whose approach to that goal is, according to something historian Ronald Radosh reports Bannon said to him (though Bannon later said he did not recall saying this to Radosh, or meeting him at all), "Leninist," that is, dedicated to the revolutionary scorched-earth destruction of all existing institutions.

I know many libertarians who smile at that. Why, even early libertarian movement linchpin Murray Rothbard at times thought in Leninist strategic terms! Don't libertarians hate the system and want to see it fall?

I, and most libertarians, hate lots about the "system" and would like to see lots about it fall. But Bannon's hatred for modern institutions has almost no overlap with libertarians'. He doesn't want more freedom. He wants ruthless state power supporting his particular vision of a favored class.

He doesn't hate modern institutions for being tyrannical, for illegitimately bossing around or destroying people's lives. Bannon sees libertarians as his enemies, and he's right to do so. He hates the current establishment because he feels it insufficiently promotes war to the death against radical Islam. He hates it for insufficiently pushing an autarkistic ethno-nationalism that will make poorer and more miserable not only Americans but the world.

Trump's Temperament (And Why it Matters)

There is another reason to find Trump especially alarming as president. It touches on what's always undergirded why I was attracted to libertarianism on a sub-intellectual level when I was young, an inclination that made the explicit philosophy ring true. It is another reason I find it wrongheaded from a libertarian perspective to be a bloodless Vulcan tallyer of pluses and minuses for specific policies Trump has spouted or appointments he's made.

Many libertarians don't dislike the state out of some disconnected dislike for "government" qua government, but because they dislike cruelty and the needless causing of pain and misery to other human beings, and that underlies most of what government does, and appears to be Trump's favorite parts of government.

Yes, government is an institution whose very function is control backed by violence and funded via extortion and is thus inherently cruel. But not everything government does is inherently wrong, considered outside the funding mechanism. Some things government does, were they not done by government, are perfectly proper things to do. Trump and his people seem most focused on the things that aren't, like punishing and restricting the harmless and taking away our rights to trade outside barriers the leader thinks are appropriate.

From immigration to eminent domain to the drug war to asset forfeiture Trump seems to be particularly malign, particularly contemptuous of the shopkeeper virtues of trade and the American virtues of live and let live liberty, with a sort of Viking streak that appeals to many of his fans who love seeing an "alpha male leader" take the reins and punish their perceived enemies.

Trump tries very hard to delegitimize any countervailing structures, such as a free press or the courts, that could possibly make it harder for him to do what he wants. He is for making police stronger and will lie to make you agree with that. His attorney general Jeff Sessions is a pure exemplar of governing as a source to punish.

Even given any particular set of policies, even given whatever you know or think about past or potential other future presidents, these are a terrible, terrible set of attributes from a libertarian perspective for the president. Those long concerned about the fragility of our debt and monetary structures, or potential reactions to a new terror attack, should indeed I think be uniquely frightened by this caudillist sitting in the White House.

Some in the libertarian thoughtworld believe passionately that Trump will prove to be less likely to cause destruction and death abroad via war than the average American president. I simply don't think there is a good reason to believe that will prove true, though it will be wonderful if it does.

Trump's first week priorities indicate that what motivates him the most is ignorant malign cruelty, autocratic acts that disrupt other peaceful human beings' plans and lives and business, acts that don't need to be done and that cause immense harm.

Such acts are embraced by Trump and his supporters through some combination of economic ignorance (the trade autarky and desire to force companies to do with their property as the leader wishes) and mindless unsupported fearmongering (the border wall, the immigrant and refugee foolishness).

One may temperamentally enjoy seeing modern liberals cry because they presided over a growing state, or are contemptuous of other people's peaceful chosen values, or are smug, or you don't like the way they look, or whatever, but the ol' drinking of modern liberal tears is a large price to pay for someone who likely doesn't care if he wrecks international trade to show he's tough.

Through the bad luck of elections, Trump runs a pretty much one-party state. He is advised by a proud ethno-nationalist. He likes to govern by executive ukase. None of these clear and dominant qualities of Trump and his administration are at all promising for a libertarian.

The best one could say about Trump for libertarians playing the long game in American political culture is it could be a teaching moment about the dangers of centralized executive power, of centralizing our culture's institutions of humane care in a machine whose lever of control is won and lost as easily as is control of the federal government.

Previous administrations of course violated the principles of free trade and cosmopolitanism. But they did not gleefully and malignly and publicly reject them and expect the nation to come along. This devotee of Ludwig Von Mises is suitably alarmed. Instructing other libertarians on specific strategies isn't really my bag. But not being publicly obstructionist regarding Donald Trump, who represents a special and revived threat to liberty from the populist right, well, I can't see how it will do libertarianism's future in the United States in the 21st century much good.

Anti-regulatory preening or not, libertariansthose dedicated to the entire fabric of liberty and social peace and prospertyshould consider it vital to defend the entire edifice of libertarianism, particularly in the face of a leader such as Trump who, no matter what else he does, admires authoritarian strength, hates allowing people or companies to make their own choices about what to do with their money and property, and has chosen, of everyone in the world he could have chosen, as his ideological consigliere a man like Bannon willing to tear down the fragile but vital benefits of modern international civilization in pursuit of his mad, ugly dream.

It might not end up as bad as it looks for libertarians, and those who paint the ugliest picture of the next four years may end up seeming overwrought. But from what has already happened with travel restrictions and trade restrictions and the overarching ideas and attitudes that infuse the Trump administration, it looks extraordinarily bad.

Continued here:

Trump's Dangerous Anti-Libertarian Nationalism - Hit & Run ... - Reason (blog)

Libertarians And President Trump – Daily Caller

5489504

In DecemberPoliticoargued that libertarians were emerging as the opposition to then President-elect Trump, and Nick Gillespie, one of the editors at the flagship libertarian publication, Reasonmagazine, agreed. James Hohman and Matea Gold wrote in The Washington Post about how libertarian philanthropist Charles Koch was emerging as a major force of opposition to the Trump administration.

Onimmigrationpolicy that may be true, but as several writers have pointed out the Koch-seeded world of libertarian-lite non-profits that attempt to influence the GOP have many connections to both Vice PresidentPenceand to the people likely to staff the TrumpEPA. If you apply for ajob listedwith one of the many Koch-connected firms FreedomPartners, I360 and ask the recruiter (as I have) why so many jobs are open at these campaign and data science firms, you may be told that it is because many people have left their old jobs to work for the Trump administration.

But what about the young people?

You might expect the oppositional, radical, protesting, left libertarians to be found among the young. This weekend marks the 10th International Students for Liberty Conference, where a couple of thousand libertarians descend on D.C. for their own 3 day version of next weeks CPAC (the Conservative Political Action Conference). The libertarians have even moved as theyve grown to the Woodley Park Marriot Wardman Hotel, which was the venue for CPAC through the last CPAC that flame throwing publisher Andrew Breitbart attended before he passed away. (Officially CPAC moved out to the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center because it had outgrown the Marriot, though if you check the number of voters before and after the move in its presidential straw poll, the numbers did not grow. Some say it moved to the inaccessible Gaylord in Oxon Hill, Maryland because Occupy protesters some hired off Craigslist were protesting CPAC. So far, they dont protest the libertarians.)

SFL was started by a small group of east coast, mainly Ivy-educated students, including Alexander McCobin, who very ably ran and grew the group to ahuge international federation operating on every inhabited continent, whilesimultaneously trying to finish a graduate degree in philosophy. McCobin, who speaks at ISFLC this weekend, has left the group to run an SFL for adults, Whole Foods founder John Mackeys organizationConscious Capitalism. Besides a change in leadership, this years ISFLC seems to have a change in political coloration.

In the past the libertarian students keynote speakers have included former Mexican president Vincente Fox (best known as an answer to a trivia question about Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnsons memory lapse) on ending the drug war, and featured panelists have included film maker Oliver Stone andInterceptfounding editor Jeremy Scahill. Edward Snowden has Skyped in as a speaker.

This years keynote speaker is Senator Rand Paul, only a day after appearing on TV standing behind President Trump with Senator Manchin and other coal country union leaders and politicians, as the President signed directives easing regulations that had decimated that industry. Other speakers include Steve Forbes, tax cut advocate Grover Norquist, and historian Amity Shlaes.

The optics are more accommodation and less opposition, or if opposition definitely a GOPish, right of center, free trader, #NeverTrump opposition.

These more GOP-leaning, conservative-seeming panelists are mainly Friday afternoon and evening. Saturday and Sunday pick up with a more left-leaning or liberal-tarian assortment of speakers: AntiWar.coms Angela Keaton, Israel critic Sheldon Richman, Institute of Justice litigator Rob Pecola on civil asset forfeiture, Electronic Frontier Foundation anti-surveillance state critic and organizer ShahidButtar, and Cato Institute pollster Dr. Emily Ekin on the central question for libertarians now President Trump: How did we get here, and where do we go now?

For the past several years many of the major speakers at ISFLC would be featured on John StosselsFox Businessshow, which mined ISFLC for content in a happysymbiotic relationship. No one else (Kennedy? Tucker?) seems to have picked that up this year, so to learn what the future of the libertarian movement is thinking, youll actually have to travel to Woodley Park.

See the rest here:

Libertarians And President Trump - Daily Caller