Best returns since 1900? Resource based countries, including … – Financial Post

Through two world wars, the Great Depression and relentless redrawing of national boundaries since 1900, one group of countries gave investors the best stock returns.

Commodity-rich nations such as South Africa, Australia, the U.S. and Canadaenjoyed buffers against global turbulence because of their natural resources, but have developed their economies to rely on newer industries such as financials, technology and services, according to a joint study by Credit Suisse Group AG and the London Business School that scanned data going back 117 years.

The study shows that no single industry can provide a lasting competitive advantage. In 1900, more than 80 per cent of the U.S. stock-markets value was in businesses such as railroads, which are today small or extinct. Nearly half of U.K. companies by value are in sectors that didnt exist a century ago. Gold, once key to South Africas wealth, has waned in importance and the biggest Australian companies are now banks.

South African stocks have returned an average 7.2 per cent, more than 2 percentage points above the global average and the most among 23 nations tracked by Credit Suisse and LBS. The nation is Africas biggest coal and iron-ore producer, and the worlds largest of platinum, manganese and ferrochrome.

South Africa performed well partly because it is a resource rich country that has successfully developed into a broader diversified economy, and because it has made a peaceful transition from apartheid and remained stable,according to researchers including Professor Paul Marsh of LBS.

Because it has performed well in the past, however, this does not mean it will continue to be a world beating performer over the next century.

Denmark tops the list for bond returns with an average 3.3 per cent. Equities were the best-performing asset in every country, showing over the long run there has been a reward for higher risk. Investors lost all their money in Russia in 1917 and China in 1949 because of revolutions. Japanese stocks, the worlds second-best equity performers from 1900 to 1939, lost 96 per cent of their real value in World War II.

Read this article:

Best returns since 1900? Resource based countries, including ... - Financial Post

The Venus Project Plans to Bring Humanity to the Next Stage of Social Evolution. Here’s How. – Futurism

Since1975, Roxanne Meadows has worked with renowned futurist Jacque Fresco to develop and promote The Venus Project. The function of this project is to find alternative solutions to the many problems that confront the world today. She participated in the exterior and interior design and construction of the buildings of The Venus Projects 21-acre research and planning center.

Daniel Araya: Roxanne, could you tell me about your background and your vision for The Venus Project? How was the idea originally conceived?

Roxanne Meadows: My background is in architectural and technical illustration, model making, and design. However, for the last 41 years, my most significant work has been with Jacque Fresco in developing models, books, blueprints, drawings, documentaries and lecturing worldwide. We are the co-founders of The Venus Project, based out of Venus, Florida where we have built a 21-acre experimental center. The Venus Project is the culmination of Jacque Frescos lifes work to present a sustainable redesign of our culture.

In our view, The Venus Project is unlike any political, economic or social system thats gone before it. It lays out a sustainable world civilization where technology and the methods of science are applied to redesigning our social system with the prime concern being to maximize quality of life rather than profit. All aspects of society are scrutinized from our values, education, and urban design to how we relate to nature and to one another.

The Venus Project concludes that our social and environmental problems will remain the same as long as the monetary system prevails and a few powerful nations and financial interests maintain control over and consume most of the worlds resources. In Jacque Frescos book The Best That Money Cant Buy, he explains If we really wish to put an end to our ongoing international and social problems, we must ultimately declare Earth and all of its resources as the common heritage of all of the worlds people. Anything less will result in the same catalogue of problems we have today.

DA: One of the more interesting aspects of The Venus Project vision is its futuristic design. Have you been approached by companies or governments interested in using The Venus Project as a model? Do you foresee experiments in smart urban design that mirror Jacque Frescos thinking?

RM: No company or government, as yet, has approached The Venus Project to initiate a model of our city design, but we feel the greatest need is in using our designs to usher in a holistic socio-economic alternative, not just our architectural approach itself. As Jacque very often mentions, Technology is just so much junk, unless its used to elevate all people.

We would like to build the firstcircular city devoted to developing up-to-date global resource management, and a holistic method for social operation toward global unification. The city would showcase this optimistic vision, allowing people to see firsthand what kind of future could be built if we were to mobilize science and technology for social betterment.

I have not seen what is called smart urban design mirror Jacque Frescos thinking. I see smart cities as mainly applying technology to existing and new but chaotically designed, energy- and resource-intensive cities without offering a comprehensive social direction or identifying the root causes of our current problems. Our technology is racing forward but our social designs are hundreds of years old. We cant continue to design and maintain these resource- and energy-draining cities and ever consider being able to provide for the needs of all people to ensure that they have high-quality housing, food, medical care and education. Smart cities within a terribly dysfunctional social structure seem contradictory to me.

DA: My understanding is that technological automation forms the basis for The Venus Project. Given ongoing breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and robotics, do you imagine that we are moving closer to this vision?

RM: Our technological capacity to initiate The Venus Project is available now, but how we use artificial intelligence today is very often for destructive purposes through weaponry, surveillance, and the competitive edge for industry, often resulting in technological unemployment. In the society we are proposing, nothing is to be gained from these behaviors because there is no vested interest. In our project, we advocate concentrating on solving problems that threaten all of us climate change, pollution, disease, hunger, war, territorial disputes, and the like. What The Venus Project offers is a method of updating the design of our society so that everyone can benefit from all the amenities that a highly advanced technologically-developed society can provide.

DA: I know The Venus Project is envisioned as a post-capitalist and post-scarcity economy. Could you explain what you mean by resource-based economics?

RM: Money is an interference factor between what we want and what we are able to acquire. It limits our dreams and capabilities and our individual and societal possibilities. Today we dont have enough money to house everyone on the planet, but we do still have enough resources to accomplish that and much more if we use our resources intelligently to conserve energy and reduce waste. This is why we advocate a Resource Based Economy. This socio-economic system provides an equitable distribution of resources in an efficient manner without the use of money, barter, credit or servitude of any kind. Goods and services are accessible to all, without charge. You could liken this to the public library where one might check out many books and then return them when they are finished. This can be done with anything that is not used on a daily basis. In a society where goods and services are made available to the entire population free of charge, ownership becomes a burden that is ultimately surpassed by a system of common property.

When we use our technology to produce abundance, goods become too cheap to monetize. There is only a price on things that are scarce. For instance, air is a necessity but we dont monitor or charge for the amount of breaths we can take. Air is abundant. If apple trees grew everywhere and were abundant you couldnt sell apples. If all the money disappeared, as long as we have the technical personnel, automated processes, topsoil, resources, factories and distribution we could still build and develop anything we need.

DA: I know that the scientific method forms the basis for decision making and resource management within your project. Could you explain how this approach is applied to social behavior? For example, what is the role of politics in The Venus Project?

RM: Today, for the most part, politicians serve the interest of those in positions of wealth and power; they are not there to change things, but instead to keep things as they are. With regard to the management of human affairs, what do they really know? Our problems are mostly technical. When you examine the vocations of politicians and ask what backgrounds they have to solve the pressing problems of today, they fall far short. For instance, are they trained in finding solutions to eliminating war, preventing climate change, developing clean sources of energy, maintaining higher yields of nutritious, non-contaminating food per acre or anything pertaining to the wellbeing of people and the protection of the environment? This is not their area of expertise. Then what are they doing in those positions?

The role for politics within the scientific and technologically organized society that The Venus Project proposes would be surpassed by engineered systems. It is not ethical people in government that we need but equal access to the necessities of life and those working toward the elimination of scarcity. We would use scientific scales of performance for measurement and allocation of resources so that human biases are left out of the equation. Within The Venus Projects safe, energy-efficient cities, there would be interdisciplinary teams of knowledgeable people in different fields accompanied by cybernated systems that use sensors to monitor all aspects of society in order to provide real-time information supporting decision-making for the wellbeing of all people and the protection of the environment.

DA: In your view, is abundance simply a function of technological innovation? I mean, assuming we get the technology right, do you believe that we could eventually eliminate poverty and crime altogether?

RM: Yes, if we apply our scientists and technical personnel to work towards those ends. We have never mobilized many scientific disciplines giving them the problem of creating a society to end war, produce safe, clean transportation, eliminate booms and busts, poverty, homelessness, hunger, crime and aberrant behavior. For instance, one does not need to make laws to try and eliminate stealing, when all goods and services are available without a price tag. But scientists have not been asked to design a total systems approach to city design, let alone to planetary planning. Scientist have not been given the problem to develop and apply a total holistic effort using the methods of science, technology and resource management to serve all people equitably in the development of a safe and sustainable global society. Unfortunately, only in times of war, do we see resources allocated and scientists mobilized in this way.

DA: I assume schooling and education are important to Jacques vision. How might schools and universities differ from the way they are designed today?

RM: The education and values we are given seem to always support the established system we are raised in. We are not born with bigotry, envy, or hatred we do pick them up from our schools and culture. In fact, even our facial expressions, the words we use, notions of good and bad, right and wrong, are all culture bound. A healthy brain can, in fact, simply become a Nazi faster in a Nazi society. It has no way of knowing what is significant or not, that is all learned by experience and background. The manipulation is so subtle that we feel our values come from within. Most often we dont know whom our values are really serving.

Yes, education will differ considerably from that of today. As Fresco explains in his book The Best That Money Cant Buy The subjects studied will be related to the direction and needs of this new evolving culture. Students will be made aware of the symbiotic relationship between people, technology, and the environment.

DA: I can only assume that critics routinely dismiss The Venus Project as a kind of hopeful utopia. How do you respond to that criticism?

RM: Critics very often reject or dismiss new ideas. What is utopian thinking is to believe that the system we are living under today will enable us to achieve sustainability, equality or a high standard of living for all when it is our system which generates these very problems in the first place. If we continue as we are, it seems to me that we are destined for calamity. The Venus Project is not offering a fixed notion as to how society should be. There are no final frontiers. It does offer a way out of our dilemmas to help initiate a next step in our social evolution.

Many are working at going to other planets to escape the problems on this one, but we would be taking our detrimental value systems with us. We are saying that we have to tackle the problems we face here on the most habitable planet we know of. We will have to apply methodologies to enable us to live together in accordance with the carrying capacity of Earths resources, eliminate artificial boundaries, share resources and learn to relate to one another and the environment.

What we have to ask is, what kind of world do we want to live in?

DA: My last question is about the challenges ahead. Rather than taking the necessary steps to reverse climate change, we seem to be accelerating our pollution of the Earth. Socially, we are witnessing a renewed focus on nativism and fear. How might the values of The Venus Project manage against these negative tendencies in human beings?

RM: The notion of negative tendencies in human beings or that we possess a certain human nature is a scapegoat to keep things as they are. Its implying that we are born with a fixed set of views regarding our action patterns. Human behavior is always changing, but there is no human nature, per se. Determining the conditions that generate certain behaviors is what needs to be understood.

As Jacque elaborates, We are just as lawful as anything else in nature. What appears to be overlooked is the influence of culture upon our values, behavior, and our outlook. It is like studying plants apart from the fact that they consume radiant energy, nutrients, require water, carbon dioxide, gravity, nitrogen, etc. Plants do not grow of their own accord, neither do humans values and behavior.

All social improvement, from the airplane to clean sources of energy undergoes change, but our social systems remain mostly static. The history of civilization is experimentation and modification. The Free Enterprise System was an important experiment and tremendous step along the way that generated innovation throughout our society. What we now advocate is to continue the process of social experimentation, as this system has long outlived its usefulness and simply cannot address the monumental problems it is facing today. We desperately need to update our social designs to correspond with our technological ability to create abundance for all. This could be the most exciting and fulfilling experiment we as a species could ever take on; working together cooperatively to deal with our most pressing problems which confront us all and finding solutions to them unencumbered with the artificial limitations we impose upon ourselves.

Daniel Araya is a researcher and advisor to government with a special interest in education, technological innovation and public policy. His newest books include:Augmented Intelligence(2016),Smart Cities as Democratic Ecologies(2015), and Rethinking US Education Policy (2014). He has a doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and is an alumnus of Singularity Universitys graduate program in Silicon Valley. He can be found here:www.danielaraya.com and here: @danielarayaXY.

Read the original post:

The Venus Project Plans to Bring Humanity to the Next Stage of Social Evolution. Here's How. - Futurism

Event promotes innovation and technology expansion – News – Castlegar News

Shirley Vickers, President & CEO, BC Innovation Council.

image credit: Submitted

The BC Innovation Council (BCIC) was in Castlegar last week as part of their Regional Innovation Opportunities tour encouraging local companies and individuals to delve into the innovation and technology sector.

According to BCIC the initiative is intended to bring business and local tech companies together and spark further innovation and job growth in our regional economies.

The instructional and networking event promoted the idea that communities and businesses in the Interior can join in the new job economy through technology and innovation. Representatives from several companies from Kamloops were on hand to share how their companies had grown through introducing innovation and technology aspects to their businesses.

You can do the same type of thing in small towns like Castlegar, Nelson and Trail, said Castlegar Councillor Arry Dhillon, who attended the event.

The group was given examples of some challenges that large corporations are trying to overcome and encouraged that solutions could come from anywhere.

The point of the event was to spark discussion around innovation and how that can be brought into regions like ours, explained Dhillon. He thinks the ideas presented are a step in the right direction as we see resource-based economies faltering and tech-based sectors driving the future.

The tour is visiting seven cities with stops in Terrace, Kelowna and Nanaimo still to come in the next few weeks. BCIC is a Crown Agency of the Province of British Columbia. Locally BCIC is one of the funding partners for the Kootenay Association of Science and Technology.

Read more:

Event promotes innovation and technology expansion - News - Castlegar News

HR International to hold confab on African economy – Guardian

Mining

HR International has announced a plan to hold a conference in Lagos, on the economic challenges and potential in Africa, particularly Nigeria.

The confab, Human Capital Summit Africa, would hold from March 9 to 10, at the Landmark Centre, Victoria Island, Lagos.

The summit is a broad-based human resource platform that attracts a wide spectrum of practitioners and other professionals in the private and public sectors of the economy from across the world.

With the topic Managing New Economy Efficiencies and Old Economy Relationships), the summit is designed to capture the existing mood, while also shedding light on ideas and efforts that are already defining a way forward.

According to the organisers, the overall objective of the conference is to bring to the fore, ideas with transformative potential to engender sustained productivity.

They stressed that participants would benefit from the defining features of the summit, which are empowerment, access to high-value network, expanding the information pool and laying out strategic plans for professional and social impact.

The summit is expected to feature eminent keynote speakers from around the world in 60 sessions that would accommodate multiple areas of interest.

Expected at the conference are over 100 notable session speakers from around the world, 3000 delegates from across Africa, 500 participating organisations and over 100 top executives of organisations.

As part of the confab, international certifications by Coventry University and London South Bank University would be accorded the participants.

Also to feature is an international exhibition by over 50 companies, followed by a high-profile awards event to celebrate human resource strategy, management and performance in Africa.

An international job fair would hold to provide on-the-spot access to training, skills acquisition, business orientation, funding and job opportunities.

1 hour ago Nigeria

1 hour ago News

2 hours ago Nigeria

Read this article:

HR International to hold confab on African economy - Guardian

How to assess security automation tools – Network World

Linda Musthaler is a Principal Analyst with Essential Solutions Corp., which offers consulting services to computer industry and corporate clients to help define and fulfill the potential of IT.

This column is available in a weekly newsletter called IT Best Practices. Click here to subscribe.

During my recent trip to Tel Aviv to attend CyberTech 2017, I had a one-on-one conversation with Barak Klinghofer, co-founder and CTO of Hexadite. He gave me a preview of an educational presentation he was to give two weeks later at the RSA Conference. His insight is worth repeating for anyone looking to add automation tools to their security toolset.

As I saw at CyberTech, and Im sure was the case at RSA, the hottest topics were security automation, automated incident response and security orchestration. These can be confusing terms, as every vendor describes them a little bit differently.

In this article, Klinghofer gives his definition of security automation and an overview of several hot market trends today. Klinghofer and the other Hexadite co-founders all worked as security analysts before they started their company, so they have walked in the shoes of the people who are most likely to use security automation tools.

Klinghofer defines security automation as an active process of the following:

1. Mimicking the ideal steps a human would take to investigate a cyber threat. The tool should not just assist or provide more insight or more data about a threat, but really mimic the same steps and the logic an analyst should take when doing a cyber investigation. If you can train people to do an investigation, you can probably codify the logic in a system.

2. Determining whether the threat requires action. This goes beyond running something in a sandbox or comparing it to a threat intelligence list, to include using the results of those kinds of tests and really questioning the evidence. A SOC analyst would do this, so its reasonable to expect a security automation tool to do this as well.

3. Performing the necessary remediation actions. This isnt as easy as it sounds because there are so many configuration permutations and ramifications for possible actions taken. You want to know that your automation solution is aware of as many use cases as possible because you are expecting the same result as you would get from a human analyst.

4. Deciding what additional investigations should be next. Many security automation tools stop after the first three steps, but a SOC analyst would go a step further and try to verify or validate that the threat was removed and is no longer a risk to the organization. For example, if there is an alert about a phishing instance, who else in the organization might have that same phish sitting in his inbox?

The big trend in the cybersecurity market is security orchestration. Most of these types of tools are API-driven as opposed to logic-driven, and the basic premise is to get different types of security tools to work together to drive a process. To get value from orchestration, you really need to define the outcome you are expecting.

Orchestration is the means to an end; its not the goal itself. If you can find use cases where connecting two devices or solutions gives you extra value that you couldnt get from either of the devices or solutions alone, then orchestration is worthwhile. That said, there are several types of tools that say they are doing orchestration or automation.

One example is workflow tools. Vendors say these tools will enhance alert data and automate the information sent to your SOC analyst to streamline your incident response (IR) communications. What they actually mean is they will provide you with a framework to better organize your teams IR flow with built-in ticketing, playbooks and user rules. What you get is something that will tell your IR staff what they should do and in what order, if they have the time to do it. Plus, everything will be documented.

Suppose one of your end-users received a phish. The workflow tool receives the phishing alert from the detection system and starts the process. First the tool will collect the data on the different entities within the email to get more context.The tool will scan and analyze the URLs within the email, and if there is an attachment, it will run it in a sandbox and try to find all of the threat intel. Next the tool will open and assign a ticket which includes the enriched data to assist in the manual investigation. The analyst will take over with a manual process to deep dive into the alert, but there might be additional steps the workflow tool can help facilitate. The main objective of the tool is to speed up the process and keep it moving along, especially if multiple people are involved.

Another type of security automation tool does threat prioritization. Vendors say they will enhance the alert data and prioritize the information sent to your security analysts to streamline your incident response process. This way you wont need to analyze everything. What they actually mean is they will ignore everything that is under a specified threshold.

Prioritization is essentially a conscious decision about what you are willing to let go without investigationbut you are never 100% sure that you can ignore something. Its hard to determine if something is a legitimate risk or not without investigating it. Many breaches have occurred when alerts were not investigated. The advantage of prioritization is that your SOC analysts arent overwhelmed with too much to do.

Scripting tools are another type of security automation tool. Vendors say they will provide a way to enhance your IR by integrating your SecOps solutions in order to get a good result. What you really get is an open development framework with some of the APIs already pre-built, but eventually you need to build the playbooks you want. It will take you longer to do this and you need to have experts who know exactly what they are doing. Defining, building and testing the use cases can be very complicated. While the scenarios might sound easy, the fact is that there are many complications and the scripts wont work in all situations. Basically you end up trading security analysts for programmers.

Klinghofer says Hexadites security orchestration and automation tool, Automated Incident Response Solution (AIRS), investigates every alert. AIRS receives alerts from multiple detection and endpoint security systems, adds contextual intelligence and then automatically launches an investigation.

He says the system analyzes data from the network and endpoint devices using algorithms and tools to determine whether the alert is a false alarm, low-level threat, or security breach. Based on pre-defined policies and best practices codified in the logic of the solution, AIRS applies targeted mitigation efforts to stop the full extent of the breach. It follows the same processes and logic that SOC analysts would follow, but without human intervention. (See Hexadite's Automated Incident Response Solution narrows the gap between detection and response.)

With an increasing number of security threats being detected, and the growing shortage of security analysts, most enterprises will be looking for some sort of security automation tool to improve their IR capabilities. If your company is in the market for such a tool, be sure you understand just what it will do for you.

The rest is here:

How to assess security automation tools - Network World

How The Coming Wave Of Job Automation Will Affect You And The US – Forbes


Forbes
How The Coming Wave Of Job Automation Will Affect You And The US
Forbes
The 227,000 jobs added to the payroll in January marked the 76th straight month of expansion. The headline number is impressive. But if you dig a little deeper, you'll find these jobs aren't what they used to be. Since 2000, the creation of full-time ...

Read more here:

How The Coming Wave Of Job Automation Will Affect You And The US - Forbes

The App Architecture Revolution: Microservices, Containers and Automation – Data Center Knowledge

Scott Davisis EVP of Engineering & Chief Technology Officer for Embotics.

With the explosive growth of cloud and SaaS-based business applications and services, the underlying software architectures used to construct these applications are changing dramatically. Microservices architecture is not a brand new trend but has been picking up momentum as the preferred architecture for constructing cloud native applications. Microservices provide ways tobreak apart large monolithic applications into sets of small, discrete components that facilitate independent development and operational scaling. Key to this architecture is making sure that each microservice handles one and only one function with a well defined API. Microservices must also have no dependencies on each other except for their APIs.

When mixed with automation as a dynamic management solution for the individual application components, applications become less limited by the infrastructure they run on. Through automation and infrastructure as code technologies, applications now have the ability to control their underlying infrastructure technologies, turning them into services to be harnessed on demand and programmatically during application execution. While weve seen cloud native pioneers such as Uber, Netflix, Ebay, and Twitter publicly embrace this method of building and delivering their services, many organizations arent sure where to begin when it comes to achieving effective and efficient operations through this app architecture revolution.

Before microservices, it would take engineers months or years to build and maintain large monolithic applications, but today microservices design methodology makes it easier to develop systems with reusable components that can be utilized by multiple applications and services throughout the organization, saving developers valuable time. This enables better continuous delivery, as small units are easier for developers to manage, test and deploy.

In order to successfully deliver microservices and container solutions cost-effectively and at scale, its important to have a proper design framework in mind. Microservices must have a well formed, backward and forward compatible API and only communicate with its peers through their API. Each Microservice should perform one and only one dedicated function. Each microservice is ideally stateless and if needed typically has its own dedicated persistent state that is not exposed to others. When all of these principles are rigorously followed, each microservice can be deployed and scaled independently because they do not require information about the internal implementation of any other services all that is required is that they have well-defined APIs.

At the same time, microservices are well matched to and driving the adoption of container technologies as the two often work in conjunction. Each microservice has to run somewhere, and containers are often the preferred choice because they are self-contained, rapidly provisioned or cloned, and usually stateless. Developers can easily construct a container with all the required code to execute the microservice, allowing them to break a problem into smaller pieces, which was not previously possible at this scale. Containers offer developers a way to package their function into this self-contained block of code, creating efficient, isolated and decoupled execution engines for each app and service.

The problem? This creates more component parts that need to be dynamically managed to achieve their promise of scalable, cost-effective cloud services. Automation can provide the dynamic management needed to deliver microservices and container solutions cost effectively and at scale. With microservices-based designs, developers and operations staff are left with many more component parts that need to grow and shrink independently. Automation can be harnessed to reduce this complexity and deliver the desired results.

Microservices-based designs fundamentally enable faster development and deployment of highly scalable applications, whether for the cloud or on-premise. Flexible automation via both portals and APIs is the key ingredient for effectively deploying and managing these next generation, distributed applications, across todays multi-cloud environments.

Opinions expressed in the article above do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Data Center Knowledge and Penton.

Read the original post:

The App Architecture Revolution: Microservices, Containers and Automation - Data Center Knowledge

Linux Foundation Forms New Open Network Automation Project – EnterpriseNetworkingPlanet

There are a lot of networking projects operating under the auspices of the Linux Foundation Collaborative Project umbrella. In fact it's easy to argue there are too many networking projects.

Today the Linux Foundation consolidated the ECOMP and OPEN-O project to form the new Open Network Automation Project (ONAP). ECOMP perhaps has had the shortest life-span of any Linux Foundation project, lasting barely a month. ECOMP only becamean official Linux Foundation project a few short weeks ago, after being donated by AT&T. The Enhanced Control, Orchestration, Management and Policy (ECOMP) is an effort that AT&T has been building for several years to help enable its network transformation for virtualization.

OPEN-O on the other hand was announced a year ago, as the Open Orchestrator effort.

"AT&T is excited to be working with a larger team on the future, open source network operating system for SDN automation," Chris Rice, SVP of Domain 2.0 Architecture and Design at AT&T said in a statement. "Creating a combined team of the initial 10 open source ECOMP members with the existing OPEN-O members bodes well for the project's success."

He added, that, AT&T expects more consolidation in this space, and we expect many more service providers and other technology leaders to join us in this important work, which benefits the entire industry.

The ONAP effort already includes a who's who of big global carriers with the participation of AT&T, China Mobile and the world's leading operators are driving ONAP with a diverse group of Amdocs, AT&T, Bell Canada, China Mobile, China Telecom, Cisco, Ericsson, GigaSpaces, Huawei, IBM, Intel, Nokia, Orange, Tech Mahindra, VMware , ZTE,BOCO Inter-Telecom, Canonical, China Unicom, Cloudbase Solutions, Metaswitch and Raisecom.

The basic promise of ONAP is to deliver a comprehensive open-source framework for carrier-grade network orchestration and automation.

The consolidation of ECOMP and OPEN-O is hardly the first, or likely the last consolidation in the Linux Foundation's portfolio of networking projects. In October 2016 the Open Networking Foundation (ONF) and ON.Lab announceda merger

Sean Michael Kerner is a senior editor at EnterpriseNetworkingPlanet and InternetNews.com. Follow him on Twitter @TechJournalist.

Go here to see the original:

Linux Foundation Forms New Open Network Automation Project - EnterpriseNetworkingPlanet

Why automation doesn’t necessarily remove the need for QA – TechRepublic

Image: iStock/VectorStory

In software development, the rise of automation tools has largely eliminated human involvement. ON one hand, it's easy to say that automation has further eliminated the need for QA but that's not the case. As experts have noted, QA is still essential, as is human intervention in some cases, to ensure a quality product is deployed.

"Test automation may largely eliminate the need for manual testing in some scenarios, but it will never eliminate the need for QA," said Chris Marsh, director of technology for AKQA. Test automation will be a part of QA engineers' toolboxes and will help focus testing efforts, he added, noting that unit tests are cheap to produce and run and therefore the most likely to be automated. Integration and UI tests, however, may be subject to more manual intervention.

The problem with traditional approaches like this is in trying to eliminate all defects before launching new software, which can prevent feedback from actual users as well as reducing ROI. No piece of software is truly defect-free, according to Marsh. QA engineers need to be involved in the build pipeline and consult on quality across the entire project lifecycle, he added.

Testing is as only as good as the test

Automation does make some aspects of QA easier, but if the test itself isn't up to snuff, it won't provide the desired result, according to Greg Hoffer, VP of engineering at Globalscape. "Because technology development is a complex, dynamic process, automated QA...is doomed to fail unless someone is able to make sure that the tests are current, or new bugs and vulnerabilities will not be detected," he said, citing the case of a serious security bug in the CryptKeeper app that wasn't found during the QA process.

Additionally, fully automated QA may result in perfectly accurate yet completely unusable software that doesn't meet any business needs, Hoffer said. Any automation in DevOps needs to be validated for usability to meet the needs of humans.

"Automated QA, continuous integration (CI), and continuous deployment (CD) are all great advances in the efficiency of DevOps. But we should not expect them to be perfect. It is still incumbent on the developer community to be vigilant," he said.

QA may actually become more important

As a result of automation, more QA work will move to the front end of the software development lifecycle, and CI tools will become more important for testing, according to Rupinder Singh, senior vice president, expert services at Software AG. "As confidence in CI and automation increases, there is a very likely scenario of customers using Continuous Delivery for selective parts of their applications, although it still is not something that is completely reliable," he said. However, the QA role may become more important in technical communities as automation takes over manual test cycles, Singh noted.

QA automated tests can prove whether known paths still work or identify new features or code that might have introduced issues, said Mark Doyle, software architect at Collabroscape. "However, it still takes ... human creativity and ingenuity to explore those paths, and then write automated tests against expected outputs," he said. "Companies must - and should - continue to employee QA teams, and they need to invest in training and software licenses for the automation platforms, but the benefit is still there."

More stable software systems is one such benefit, according to Doyle. First, running an automated test can validate the build to save time and energy on the QA personnel side before testing. Secondly, if the failed tests automatically entered issues into a defect tracking system, QA is able to come up with more comprehensive test plans, he said.

Ultimately, automation isn't a bad thing - it saves time and helps focus efforts on more human-intensive processes while removing the low-hanging fruit. It makes QA testing easier for routine tests. But it does need to be taken with a grain of salt to ensure that accurate, useless software isn't being deployed.

Also see: 80% of IoT apps not tested for vulnerabilities, report says 3 ways to prevent your app developers from blowing off QA testingHow to use scrum for app development QA testingHow to build a solid workflow for updating mobile apps

Read the original post:

Why automation doesn't necessarily remove the need for QA - TechRepublic

Linux Foundation Creates New Platform for Network Automation – Wall Street Journal (subscription) (blog)

Linux Foundation Creates New Platform for Network Automation
Wall Street Journal (subscription) (blog)
The Linux Foundation said Thursday that it had created a new platform for automating the management of communications networks, a labor-intensive process that is widely viewed as a bottleneck in the the world of corporate information technology. The ...

Read more:

Linux Foundation Creates New Platform for Network Automation - Wall Street Journal (subscription) (blog)

Washington State Rep Endorsed Slavery When Confronted by Voter – The Pacific Tribune

Welcome to 2017, here our President is a misogynisticandxenophobic, pathological liar, and our state representatives openly endorse slavery. What fun! Washington State Rep. Matt Manweller, whohas been largely outspoken against raising the minimum wage, recently stated that he would be fine with a $0 minimum wage. When confronted by a voter who explained such wages were eliminated by the Civil War, Manweller said, add that to the list of mistakes made during the Civil War. Does this mean he believes the freeing of slaves was a mistake made by our nation during the Civil War?

This story was brought to light by Working Washington who has put out the call to ask Washington State Rep. Manweller what exactly he meant in his email with a local voter.Working Washington is a statewide workers organization that fights to raise wages, improve labor standards, and change the conversation about wealth, inequality, and the value of work, according to their website.

We reached out to Working Washington and a representative of the organization had this to say: Washington voted overwhelmingly in November to raise the minimum wage because its good for workers, good for communities, and good for the economy. We need to move forward to advance labor standards to ensure prosperity for all not turn back the clock to rehash the emancipation proclamation.

Washington State Rep. Manweller has been a huge opponent of raising the minimum wage in Washington State. His Twitter is literally filled with claims that higher minimum wage is dangerous for children, employment, and the economy.

The federal minimum wage was introduced in 1938 during the Great Depression under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. It was initially set at $0.25 per hour and has been increased by Congress 22 times, most recently in 2009 when it went from $6.55 to $7.25 an hour. Currently, twenty-nine states, plus Washington DC, have a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage. Approximately 2,561,000 workers (or 3.3% of the hourly paid working population) earn the federal minimum wage or below.

Proponents of a higher minimum wage state that the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour is too low for anyone to live on stating that a higher minimum wage will help create jobs and grow the economy. They also say that the declining value of the minimum wage is one of the primary causes of wage inequality between low- and middle-income workers. It is believed that a majority of Americans, including a slim majority of self-described conservatives, support increasing the minimum wage.

Opponents say that many businesses cannot afford to pay their workers more, and will be forced to close, lay off workers, or reduce hiring. They say increases in pay have been shown to make it more difficult for low-skilled workers with little or no work experience to find jobs or become upwardly mobile. They believe raising the minimum wage at the federal level does not take into account regional cost-of-living variations where raising the minimum wage could hurt low-income communities in particular.

Excerpt from:

Washington State Rep Endorsed Slavery When Confronted by Voter - The Pacific Tribune

Mayor Betsy Hodges says tip credits are bad for women – City Pages

For many months, the city of Minneapolis has been working on a plan to raise the minimum wage for all employees, including tipped employees. Advocates and some council members are eyeing a city-wide minimum set at $15 an hour, a level some detractors say is unsustainable.

That includes many restaurant owners, who insist the hike would be catastrophic, and might just force them out of business.

An off-record source says he ran the numbers for his three small food businesses, hypothetically hiking everyones hourly wage up to $15, and the difference in labor costs approached half a million dollars annually. He said this number didnt account for the inevitable price increases of ingredients and restaurant services he relies on -- as those businesses will be trying to cover their own labor cost increases.

He added that between wages and gratuity, his tipped employees already make between $17 and $20 an hour, and says the city ought to leave them alone.Operators like him are pleading with the city to offer a tip credit where tipped employees will earn a lower rate of pay than the across-the-board $15 minimum for other employees.

But Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, for one, isnt having it. She says based on her own research, tip credits -- or tip penalties, as she calls them -- are bad for workers, and especially bad for women.

In a lengthy statement Hodges released earlier this week, she says the notion that all tipped employees in Minneapolis are working in high-end restaurants and bars and are making far more than $15 an hour is false. She cited a federal Bureau of Labor Statistics study showing that from 2012 to 2015, the average wage for restaurant servers in the Twin Cities metro came to not much more than $10 an hour, including tips. Only 10 percent of restaurant servers in our region averaged $15 or more an hour with tips.

Moreover, Hodges said, women make up two-thirds of tipped workers. Women who are tipped workers are "three times as likely to live in poverty" as others, she said, and "twice as likely to receive food stamps." And, she added, research clearly shows "the more women are forced to rely on tips for income, the more likely they are to be sexually harassed."

Ladies, remember the creepy guy (or guys?) who needed all that extra attention so that hed feel good about leaving that extra tip? Yeah, studies show thats a real thing.

Finally, she added that states with one fair wage for all (including Maine, Michigan, and Missouri) are producing faster job growth, higher sales, and higher tips than the 43 states that have had a tip penalty.

The minimum wage hike is expected to pass, and soon. But Hodges says that it should be done in such a way, and in a timely enough fashion, that businesses can thrive while they absorb it... without also taking away workers' livelihoods

Read Hodges' full statement below.

As we continue to debate raising the minimum wage in Minneapolis, and as the City continues to hold listening sessions on the topic across the city, several of which I have attended, I was lucky to listen to a talk today at the Carlson School at the University of Minnesota by the dynamic Saru Jayaraman of the Restaurant Opportunities Center. Her talk left me more persuaded than ever that if the City Council continues forward with an ordinance to raise the minimum wage in Minneapolis, any new minimum wage must continue to be one fair wage. That is, it must not contain a tip penalty that will leave tipped workers falling behind and subject to sexual harassment, nor must it be an unworkable compromise that will expose businesses to new costs and liability, and tipped workers to greater insecurity. Any minimum wage ordinance must also be phased in over a period long enough that our businesses, including restaurants and other sectors that rely on tipped workers, will not be harmed and can continue to thrive while they absorb it. There is ample evidence that a tip penalty is harmful and yet, a minimum-wage proposal that includes a tip penalty is making the rounds of the Minneapolis City Council. A tip penalty, if passed by the City Council, would harm the work were doing in Minneapolis to actually close the income gap between low-wage and other workers and grow an economy that includes everyone. Contrary to some popular perceptions, wages for tipped workers in the restaurant sector are in fact low: so low that nationally, 46 percent of tipped workers rely on federal public benefits. Tipped workers are almost twice as likely to live in poverty than other workers. The stereotype that in Minneapolis, tipped workers all work in high-end bars and fine-dining restaurants and thus make far more than $15 an hour is also false: on the contrary, a federal Bureau of Labor Statistics study that covered the years 201215 showed that in our metro area, the average wage for restaurant servers came to not much more than $10 an hour, including tips. Only 10 percent of restaurant servers in our region averaged $15 or more an hour with tips. Its already the case that the average hourly wage for servers in our region is only a little more than half the average hourly wage for all workers. If we in Minneapolis roll back the existing one fair wage, that gap will widen, not close. In my view, it is not only economically wrong, it is morally wrong: we should not be deciding which workers and which kinds of work are more worthy of raises than others. A tip penalty would also especially penalize women, who make up two-thirds of tipped workers: women who are tipped workers are three times as likely to live in poverty as other workers and twice as likely to receive food stamps. Worse, research clearly shows that the more that women are forced to rely on tips for income, the more likely they are to be sexually harassed. Think about it. I simply cannot countenance a scheme that would actually keep tipped women workers at a lower wage and continue to subject them to sexual harassment. It is unconscionable to me. Some have floated the idea of a compromise tip penalty in Minneapolis that would for the first time create a sub-minimum wage for tipped workers, but require an employer to cover the difference between the sub-minimum wage plus tips and everyone elses minimum wage if the former is smaller than the latter. This compromise would be a logistical nightmare for Minneapolis businesses, as it would add new layers of cost, complexity, and liability to doing business, and would be extremely difficult to comply with. (Indeed, a study by the U.S. Department of Labor of states with a tip penalty found an 84-percent rate of noncompliance with this practice.) Moreover, it would create a perverse incentive for unprincipled businesses to eliminate higher-paid minimum-wage positions and transfer the work to lower-paid, sub-minimum-wage positions, leaving tipped workers even more vulnerable and overworked. This compromise is still a tip penalty. Even if this compromise tip penalty could be shown to work, a tip penalty would still leave behind women who, once again, would not be earning a fair wage for their work, and who would continue to be subject to sexual harassment because they rely on tips just to make ends meet. I find that outcome offensive. Finally, one of the most important arguments against passing a tip penalty in Minneapolis is that it would do violence to our states proud tradition of having one fair wage for all workers, one of only eight states to do so. It would be harmful enough to women and low-income workers in Minneapolis to pass a tip penalty just in our city for the first time. If Republicans in the Legislature were to follow suit by passing a tip penalty statewide on the logic that progressive Minneapolis did it first, it would be devastating to tipped workers in other part of Minnesota most especially women who earn even less than their counterparts in Minneapolis. It is critically important to all Minnesotans that we in Minneapolis maintain our states proud tradition of one wage. We in Minneapolis owe it to low-wage workers across our state, especially women, not to set this bad precedent. At the federal level, our Senators Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar, and Congressman Keith Ellison, are setting a great example by supporting a bill to raise the national minimum wage, phase out the shockingly low federal sub-minimum wage of $2.13 per hour for tipped workers, and transition gradually to one higher, fair national wage for everyone, in every sector and every state. Amy, Al, and Keith have the right idea. It is not widely known that tipping as an institution is rooted in the history of slavery. The notion of tipping is not native to America, but was imported from Europe just as slaves were emancipated. At that time, restaurants and railroads insisted that the now-former slaves who were working in those industries were not worthy of earning a wage, and should subsist on the kindness of customers tips alone. In Europe where tipping began, it was a sign of gratitude for good service; but from the moment tipping came to America, it has been treated as a substitute for a decent, fair, and equitable wage. Now, a movement is gaining steam across the country to redeem this history and join states like Minnesota that have refused to legalize paying some low-wage workers less. Just last November, the people of Maine voted to eliminate their tiered wage, and Michigan and Missouri are currently considering doing the same thing. The reasons are both moral and economic: restaurants and tipped workers in the seven states, including Minnesota, that have had one fair wage for many years are producing faster job growth, higher sales, and higher tips than the 43 remaining states that have had a tip penalty. Moreover, in this time of acute labor shortages, restaurants around the country are voluntarily moving to pay one fair wage because they recognize that it slashes employee turnover and increases sales. If we go forward in Minneapolis with a higher, city-only minimum wage, we owe it to low-income and female workers not only in Minneapolis, but across Minnesota, to enact a wage that is one fair wage with a long enough runway that our workers and businesses can continue to thrive, with no one left behind. As Saru Jayaraman concluded earlier today, It would be a tragedy if Minnesota regresses while other states are going forward. I agree.

Continued here:

Mayor Betsy Hodges says tip credits are bad for women - City Pages

Netflix is Allowing 13th to be Shown to the Public Without a Subscription – The Urban Twist

In October of last year I watched Ava Duvernays 13th on Netflix and it changed my life. I am a staunch advocate of the phrase a child educated solely in school is an uneducated child. Duvernays documentary 13th is a clear example of why that statement holds weight.

In school, we are taught about the constitution its amendments. The 13th amendment is often hailed as the saving grace of Africans in America. In the 13th amendment, President Abraham Lincoln gave the right of freedom to those of the African diaspora who had previously been held captive in slavery. While some think Lincoln was a good man who wanted what was just and fair, many of us know it was just politics.

The 13th amendment did not actually abolish slavery however, as in many political battles, all it did was change the way slavery was perceived. The 13th amendment stopped what had become race based slavery (which started as indentured servitude and had no racial motives behind it) and made slavery legal only for those convicted of a crime.

The 13th amendment to the United States Constitution says the13th amendment to the Constitution declared that Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. What Lincoln did is say that only criminals could be used as slaves, which we later saw through chain gangs and now the prison industrial system that produces many of the products we use daily.

Duvernays 13th takes a real look at the school to prison pipeline as well as explores that methods that have been used by various presidential administrations to lock up more people. The more people in jail working at slave wages, the less jobs are available for the everyday citizen on the street. Companies such as WalMart and Victoria Secrets have been called out for selling products made by inmates in the past.

When I say these prisoners are working as slaves its apparent in their wages. The average prisoner makes as little as $0.12 to $0.93 cent per hour. Some high paying federal prison jobspay as much as $1.15 per hour forjobs that would pay on a scale fromminimum wage to over $13.00 per hour for furniture makers.

Following the release of 13th on Netflix, the network doubled down with a sit down chat between Ava Duvernay and Oprah Winfrey to further discuss the problem with legalized slavery. Now Netflix is taking its mission to educate and inspire through 13th to a new level. Netflix is a streaming movie and television platform, you cant walk into a store and buy any of its original content on DVD. You cant even download to watch at your own leisure. In order to enjoy anything streamed through Netflix, you needed to have a personal account

Netflix is allowing 13th to be screened publicly as long as it is watched in group setting. This is huge, its indication that Netflix and Duvernay feel the information in this documentary is so invaluable that people shouldnt miss it just because they dont have a subscription. I hope you understand the significance of this. What is happening in this society to bolster the prison community affects us all. The bills being passed in the name of law and order are smoke and mirrors to a much more sinister plot to keep slaves of any race working in America.

As I often try to tell people, we do not have a race problem in America, we have a class problem. The 1% owns the banks that lend to the government to build prisons then they invest in the prisons and products coming out of it too. For them its just more money and those beneath them are disposable.

Relevant Magazine named 13th as one of the most relevant pop culture releases of 2016, the documentary is nominated for an Best Documentary Feature Oscar this year.

Lisa Nishimura, Netflixs vice president of original documentary programming said in a prepared statement

We have been overwhelmed and inspired by the response to 13th from people of all ages. Communities across the country are feeling the full weight of this particularly divisive moment in time. And, when some are capitalizing on this fear, we are especially inspired by the next generation, who are able to acknowledge the complex system they have inherited while simultaneously vowing to change it. Like DuVernay, they understand that we must come face to face with our past before we can fix our future.

13th can now be screened for groups in public settings such as coffee houses, libraries, schools, churches and community centers. Its an amazing thing on the part of Netflix to play such importance on something the media refuses to report on since its owned by the same people who own the banks and invest in the prisons.

13th has won 15 awards thus far and has been available for less than a year.

See the article here:

Netflix is Allowing 13th to be Shown to the Public Without a Subscription - The Urban Twist

New York dockers’ union calls for abolition of crime-busting … – The Loadstar

Vice president of the International Longshoremens Association (ILA) Kenneth Riley has called for the abolition of the Waterfront Commission of New York.

He claims it has overstepped its remit to investigate waterfront crime and is now seeking to regulate and reduce dockworker numbers.

Mr Riley told The Loadstara planned protest in Washington DC originally intended for27 February but delayed for a week or so was not something the ILA wanted but was forced to do to address untenable conditions.

He said: The Waterfront Commission was set up to rid the New York waterfront of crime. But now it is overstepping its mandate and is seeking to regulate the docks and cull the workforce.

In one incident, Mr Riley said, commission staff had refused a work permit for a US military veteran due to potential links to crime.

This is not acceptable, he said. That young man subsequently went on to work for the New Jersey Highway Department as a highway patrolman youre telling me that he can work for a body protecting people but cannot work on the docks?

The US Maritime Alliance (USMX) said the threat of a coastwide work stoppage was disturbing, and added that the ILA-USMX Master Contract forbade any unilateral work stoppage by the dockworkers union.

If the ILA engages in any unilateral walkout, USMX will enforce the contractual rights of its members to the fullest, said the USMX, urging the ILA to remain in compliance with the contract.

Mr Riley said the protest had been postponed to educate rank and file members, as well as industry stakeholders, on the problems faced by dockworkers, but said a new date would be announced within the week and the protest would proceed if the commission remained in place.

We will bus our members up to Washington to protest while Congress is in session, so those in government that want to help can come and show their support for our cause, he said.

Everyone agrees that in New York, more than 700 waterfront workers and 120 clerical staff are needed for the safe and effective running of the port.

The ILA and USMX held informal contract discussions last week to discuss the current master contract, which is due to expire in September 2018, and both sides described the discussions as productive and fruitful.

The meeting followed a two-day workshop when leaders from ILA locals at Atlantic and Gulf Coast ports examined both the contract and their respective local bargaining agreements.

The ILA and USMX are confident that holding informal contract discussions 19 months prior to expirationdemonstrates the commitment each side has to maintaining stability and growth at all ports covered by the agreement, the statement added.

However, Mr Riley, who also presides over the ILA Local 1422 Charleston South Carolina, said the problems faced by workers in New York would spread out across other US east and Gulf coast ports.

What happens in New York sets a precedent for the rest of the community, which is why we are building solidarity and promising this protest, he added.

Asked by The Loadstar if ILA president Harold Daggett had given his support to the planned protest, Mr Riley said that they had not consulted the national branch of the ILA, noting that this was a rank and file decision.

His comments came during a visit to European ports, including Algeciras, to build solidarity with Spanish longshore workers protesting against the Spanish governments decision to alter legislation, which could threaten 6,500 jobs.

He was accompanied by ILA executive vice president Dennis Daggett, who told Spanish dockworkers to not take even one step back.

The ILA is with you all the way, he added.

The Waterfront Commission was set up in 1953 to investigated reputed mob ties to the port of New York and New Jersey. In 2008, charges dating back more than three decades, including racketeering, conspiracy and extortion, were brought against leaders of the Gambino crime family, their associates and union officials.

The following year, New York state inspector general Joseph Fisch issued a report after a two-year investigation of the Waterfront Commission, which detailed extensive illegal, corrupt and unethical behaviour among staff.

The reports release resulted in many commission executives losing their jobs, including New Jersey commissioner Michael Madonna.

Read the original:

New York dockers' union calls for abolition of crime-busting ... - The Loadstar

Jim Goetsch: Abolition of abortions means changing the way we think – The Union of Grass Valley

In his Feb. 4 column, Darrell Berkheimer used an interesting argument to support the need for abortion namely that making abortions an exception rather than a rule would lead to increase costs to care for the mothers and the children who resulted from the births. He suggested that the public was not ready to pay the extra costs that would result.

I wonder if Mr. Berkheimer, had he lived in the early 1800s, would have justified slavery on the basis that it would cost the slave masters too much to give up slaves, the public would be forced to support the now-freed slaves, and the cost of paying decent wages to the laborers would increase the cost of clothing to the consumers. Those arguments were no doubt made at that time, and those reasons are as false in supporting slavery as the reasons Mr. Berkheimer used to support the abortion mind-set that has pervaded our culture since Roe v. Wade?

Now in the early 21st century, most of us in the United States consider that slavery was, and still is, an evil. Many of us believe that the killing of live fetuses for convenience is just as much an evil as slavery. Women, who have been nurturing life for thousands of years, have justified this evil by calling it "a woman's right to choose." A woman certainly has a right to choose, but shouldn't that be done prior to engaging in sexual intercourse? And what about the female fetus, is she granted the same right to choose? I will admit that there are exceptional circumstances where abortion might be considered, but I believe we need to change the mind-set that abortions should be the rule, not the exception.

Along with most Christians, I believe that life begins at conception. I hear explanations by abortion supporters that life only starts when the fetus is viable. Is the fetus viable (able to live without its mother) within the first two years? I don't think so. Should we then be able to kill babies as well? Didn't we just put Dr. Kermit Gosnell in prison in 2013 as a serial baby killer for executing babies immediately after birth? Why is that wrong if we allow fetuses to be killed just a few months earlier?

A second step is to change the publics mind-set to recognize that abortion is actually murder, and is unacceptable to educated, reasonable people.

What is the solution? Just as the abolition of slavery required a major change to our thought processes and our economic structures, the abolition of abortions as generally accepted procedures requires the same changes. We need to continue to educate boys and girls concerning the dangers of unprotected sex, one of which is an unwanted baby.

A second step is to change the public's mind-set to recognize that "abortion" is actually "murder," and is unacceptable to educated, reasonable people. As long as we split hairs about when a fetus is viable in order to condone the killing of living human beings, aren't we acting in the same way that slave owners did when they claimed that slaves were not really human beings?

A third step is to make adoptions more accessible to more people who actually want to have children. We place high costs and a lot of hoops to jump through as part of our adoption process. We certainly need to screen parents before putting other's unwanted babies in their hands, but we have made it exceedingly difficult in the U.S. for would-be parents to become real parents.

A fourth step is to shift the funding of abortions to the funding of adoptions and to the care of unwanted children who may not be adopted. I don't want my taxes to fund abortions, but I am willing that those taxes be used to facilitate the care of unwanted children and mothers who need a helping hand.

As an aside: why am I against the support of Planned Parenthood? While it claims that only 3 percent of its "procedures" include abortions, that amounts to one-third to one-half of all the abortions performed in the United States. Planned Parenthood counts "services," not the time spent in providing those services. Since many of their "services" involve handing out condoms and referring women for mammograms, I believe the manpower spent handling abortions is far higher than 3 percent of the total work effort.

It's time for all of us to recognize an evil in our world and eliminate it in the 21st century, as the abolitionists did for slavery in the 19th century!

Jim Goetsch lives in Lake of the Pines.

Read more:

Jim Goetsch: Abolition of abortions means changing the way we think - The Union of Grass Valley

Molly McGrath: Fight ID laws one voter at a time – Virginian-Pilot

I FIRST MET Cinderria, an 18-year-old woman of color, in a library in downtown Madison, Wis. She approached the table marked Voter ID Assistance and explained that with the 2016 presidential primary only a few months away, and despite several trips to the DMV, she still didnt have a valid ID as mandated by Wisconsins strict new laws. It turned out that she needed a Social Security card, but she wasnt sure how to obtain one.

Proponents of voter ID laws dont want to acknowledge that Cinderrias case is far from unusual. Experts project that in Wisconsin alone, 300,000 eligible voters lack the ID necessary to cast a ballot. Across the country, 32 states have some form of voter ID law, creating a crisis of disenfranchisement not seen since the civil rights era. These ID laws dont touch all groups equally: Voters of color, such as Cinderria, are hit hardest. The elderly, students and low-income voters also are disproportionately affected. (A new study published in the Journal of Politics, for instance, found that strict ID laws lower African-American, Latino, Asian-American and multiracial American turnout.)

States that have implemented voter ID laws have shown little to no interest in helping their citizens comply. And the advocacy organizations that oppose these laws have few resources for direct voter assistance. Instead, groups like the American Civil Liberties Union have focused on challenging voter ID mandates in court. Thats essential, but its not enough. As court battles proceed, we must acknowledge our collective obligation to voters like Cinderria by investing in on-the-ground, in-person support.

Before the 2016 election, a group of us in Madison recognized the problem and got to work, partnering with local organizations like the League of Women Voters and NAACP. We collaborated with social service agencies, churches, food pantries, employers, schools and election administrators.

Our democracy deteriorates every single time an older voter cant find transportation to a distant DMV, and every single time a working mother cant afford the fees associated with redundant paperwork to prove her citizenship.

Having worked one-on-one with would-be voters, a nefarious truth about these laws has become clear: Not only do the requirements hamper individuals in the short term, they also can signal to historically disenfranchised communities that theyre not invited into their countrys democratic process a feeling all too familiar to those who were born before the abolition of Jim Crow.

We cannot return to the era of literacy tests and poll taxes. Its crucial that all voters are offered help because they must not lose the belief that their vote is precious and that their participation essential to our democracy. These voters rights are as valuable as those of any top campaign donor.

Cinderria was finally able to obtain an ID, but only weeks after we first met; I traveled with her to the DMV to make sure nothing went wrong. Claudelle, a voter in his 60s whose mother mistakenly spelled his name Clardelle on his birth certificate, was refused an ID with his correct name twice. On a trip to the DMV with a 34-year-old named Zack, we were given inaccurate information on how to receive a free ID to vote. A recording of that interaction prompted a federal judge to order retraining of DMV workers across Wisconsin.

The voters affected by these laws who are more likely to be low-income, transient and elderly often cant be reached through online campaigns. That makes in-person outreach indispensable. A young Madison woman named Treasure, for instance, was unable to obtain an ID until neighborhood canvassers knocked on her door and gave her accurate information and help.

Such work is not an admission that voter ID laws arent worth fighting; they are. It represents, rather, a commitment to fight suppression at every level. We have no choice but to organize and meet would-be voters where they live and work.

Molly J. McGrath

is an attorney,

voting rights advocate and organizer. She can be found @

votermolly or votermolly.com. She wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.

Here is the original post:

Molly McGrath: Fight ID laws one voter at a time - Virginian-Pilot

Google Cousin Develops Technology to Flag Toxic Online Comments – New York Times


New York Times
Google Cousin Develops Technology to Flag Toxic Online Comments
New York Times
Jared Cohen, president of Jigsaw, formerly known as Google Ideas, in 2015. Jigsaw said it had developed a tool for web publishers to identify comments that ...
Google and Jigsaw create Perspective technology to identify abusive commentsBetaNews
Google technology tackles abusive commentsRTE.ie
Google's new innovative technology aims to combat online trollsAndroid Authority (blog)
Google Blog -Data & Society -WIRED
all 66 news articles »

View post:

Google Cousin Develops Technology to Flag Toxic Online Comments - New York Times

Google Self-Driving Car Unit Accuses Uber of Using Stolen Technology – New York Times


New York Times
Google Self-Driving Car Unit Accuses Uber of Using Stolen Technology
New York Times
Otto and Uber have taken Waymo's intellectual property so that they could avoid incurring the risk, time, and expense of independently developing their own technology, the company said in the filing. Ultimately, this calculated theft reportedly ...
Google and Uber Are Fighting Over Lidar Technology. What Is It?Bloomberg
Uber using stolen Google technology for self-driving cars, lawsuit allegesChicago Tribune
Uber accused of 'calculated theft' of Google's self-driving car technologyThe Guardian
Waco Tribune-Herald -Business Insider -Vox
all 103 news articles »

See more here:

Google Self-Driving Car Unit Accuses Uber of Using Stolen Technology - New York Times

New York Firm Makes New Oscars Using 3-D Technology – Voice of America

The original Oscar statue was hand carved by Los Angeles sculptor George Stanley. For decades the statuettes have been made by a Chicago trophy company and gold-plated.

But last year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences decided they wanted to return to the original bronze figure made using the lost wax process. The Academy chose Polich Tallix as the foundry to cast the bronze figures.

3-D Scans Merge Previous Versions

They started by scanning a classic Oscar from 1928 and the 2015 model and entering the information into a 3-D printer.

"We have the three different versions," said Daniel Plonski, the 3-D artist and the head of production. "We have the classic statue, the recent 2015 version and the third version which we created."

The new design is then 3-D printed in wax and a mold of that statue is made to make another wax figurine for each statuette.

Plonski says the 3-D printing makes the process much quicker, but just as faithful to the Art Deco original.

So before it required a great deal of hand-sculpting and carving," hei said. "And now all of that can be done completely with a digital environment. Once we have our design created we can send it to our 3-D printer which produces the 3-D wax patterns.

Lost Wax-casting Process

The new Oscar is then dipped in a ceramic slurry, and once it is cured, fired in an oven at 871 degrees Celsius. Molten bronze is then poured into the ceramic mold and allowed to cool.

Production manager Paul Pisoni says the molds are not reused that each Oscar is a brand new casting.

"One mold is only good for one Oscar and then it gets cracked and destroyed so therefore we have to make one of these molds for every piece of metal that we cast in the foundry," he said.

After some cleanup, the bronze statuettes are polished to a mirror finish and electroplated with 24 karat gold at another firm in Brooklyn, New York. The base of each Oscar is also cast in bronze, and is given a smooth, black finish.

Pisoni says since they dont know who wins, they have to engrave a bronze plate with all the nominees names.

And the Oscar Goes to...

When the actual winner is announced, the correct plate is attached in the center of the base.

The whole process takes about three months. The final product stands about 34 centimeters tall and weighs about 3.9 kilograms. And the gleaming statues will be on full display at Sundays ceremony in Los Angeles.

Go here to read the rest:

New York Firm Makes New Oscars Using 3-D Technology - Voice of America

Are technology firms madly overvalued? – The Economist

YoB"I$ufLS@MD]I#sP|"? i;]LjHe9qFIMH`;jkFQ=ga;-Y? $*t3&ca.(w61Ku}>[+Z~=:YqciP=_Z3n*V3"Zp.j*}f!0L :z)_"Q0*v }L[F*Vv/_/v P-_vA`KiT;:5k(U/;,D6R]9Qh$hVU/mf hgZpJ\/~r.ln-B!`Kp (E]P0g=-Nt[Ct H%|^]vcH`.:?>%D!F/M{jh aM0 P]@_^5t!+FPl"'- 1N-udxKS?4}[l ]7&8yBph=asqCqB}>_{;?<7>JYW*jn4/eJGNP+w%3T;G/C(PQ*VUrGSnh+Zhcw@X)n\Cez8:f/Ls4n 3{<. 1.k; Zp^;uU|p|n[[[,eJr$)4N8;Jef=7k8~Uu-pMn><[%]FK 8tSO$FhuO! Buafa 3;H>13$b qF+-%9u;JBrB2cIX2sg"At_a]0ig tC"yY'I,+q"Re%E") Hb^X4TT "e I:CFp03C81"SHeV9e(b)#4+$,r8eYU"Mx.s$FY(K(O1 F .% B$cJ9 4$*1AcF>^0IbN&1,}0w:nG9"Cj9!}9">s>*j[@LmvLN-#l;lR [|x^g/hi'@j{a A?#i>}:!x P2k{ a{F?O't&+Io&E.b5pr?ox"F@}"H"^z=laTeI (jlzJZ wzJg>8a9}WPb)tb{{?H>ojp#:;A"CC]Ma_+]_sNtGdm^o6KmY<>~~B's m5p5ZlpFO9foT<1=.cwGD>.N6MjfpBwO3o@*obyX_@GzrwDAc;nHWDr[d~GD0>Xv'mZfKno'`z_-n,A`Zf_LW g=.=7 _9Oy(*RsT]v*T#1F* yCi+>uV&@n${N(Vdc7My{<^s rmP'IJYwQ{i1wQr8]+vIxCj$v^`5 Av3}_.tkKb?D hIcOSl,b2HcD(OaU%s* QrMP5&HqnmmFo|H"PG*e=[2D]j28TcEg2z=+YYs]`L&gYR#7pHK2.XS(Joy^ cZZ7H&uUvt>xd8U5A03cg8GXo76E;"XF-8}poYz'rBOi& Pn-9U~-=qPjA ++NrCyP/B,lc,-UIP #w.bJyjM 1Gf8-4lFtjTZg A#s;$#>|qt"5s8[dsEcv1EfcZ cDxbe1r,[eYS|ONAt/H[$`BIz0FXoV|a+b!?Jh'n_x3qnPoJ@$[CHE&JE.g-b|E+-3s>LDar^ sT-P[/0vTS&_E'C54jxGY`BBy+l#clra ]Vgf8$314 o'1Q6W Gsy=^>dqL-xJjrI IY09pS7OGRJ9in3$R!QO*={4o@-ZzKv%]n0RM8^n@ !R}gl4D){lfgg<:D>_~SNmM'{C~SRncq#z[w>>O ?k9-'omAF,$]uH ny; /8{(zaef(*+tVqAa Xd`LyohB\#uT!dRsHs^J^X1U^{rcV&%*c@LFS'%rwF wUwl7>66^_etmiYq$aq0nH8zV28 EO&.@P"n9M@fngqo|M(BlFI7dSK-QAKDNkGlAyp9mG&ecLLyh8dIem+mW8o|4YhB(=Ue"5GfK.2S&XsJgk3]j0/,Y^s/nRv-AKZYfM#:W,F_x%/NfHkq< ?S GD)WBoB^SE wpv eJ#x>sGg8$`LmI4",Nd`8I8gq:i'z1l5 m dd{Pi'AIP`S_5As V]$i -B`I,Q+L$-z lr:$.|LLI#lJ@wAFf&zAkBrtn4j05yG_YcuM'm(c6Ll7RsYnw?|pAu/~/o7Ko@ ;2Dito$1PLZ|G0gB8b2m5FW,oBu6W',R}5FLch|YMn8u~G~?M`yCT[n8uR95R{Q`*DU G4) T)U)Uhp@qk6Lz _MU+5bdBKiB :!dp J8Y%,RB|mS^~JNh69UqOOF_ETtW[s(q"b$kp a8@;_jRG{_#0`lwc:[fCx vu>x= NEAhAxO&0@V= [[aPffK}5yC3w[>4s /0sK,21*L+V|&y1w>}&1X/b=2#}#E0%SgC,mi}l{3>i%y}tyRzi,,n1nI

Read more here:

Are technology firms madly overvalued? - The Economist