UNC-W professor Mike Adams talks campus free speech and the codes that regulate it – The Daily Tar Heel

Will Arrington | Published 7 hours ago

Mike Adams, a UNCW professor and conservative columnist, gave a speech in the auditorium in the student union Monday evening.

UNC-Wilmington criminology professor Mike Adams argued that speech codes on college campuses don't do what some students think they do.Adams gave aspeech sponsored bythe UNCCollege Republicans, the Carolina Liberty Foundation and the Carolina Review at the Student Union on Monday.

Adams spoke about his perception that campus speech codes rules that prohibit hate speech across the country are unconstitutional and dangerous. Hesaid he thinks sometimes speech codes backfire and can reinforce negative stereotypesagainst the minorities they are trying to protect.

If there is a negative stereotype thatblacks have a chip on their shoulder, a negative stereotype that women are emotional; if there is an awfulnegative stereotype that someone who is gay has an emotional disturbance, guess what? Comingalong and saying that (speech codes) are going to defend only them, because theyre too weak to makearguments on their own, reinforces the stereotype, Adams said. I think it is an ugly source of bigotry, thesespeech codes.

Adamscited several cases in which these codes werefound to violatethe FirstAmendment, including one case at Georgia Tech wheretwoconservative students objected to the subject matter and coarse language in a performance of theVagina Monologues at their school. These students created a poster that expressed their opinions, andwere found to be in violation of the schools speech code. With the encouragement of Adams, thestudents sued the universityand were in court for two years before a court ruled in their favor.

Adams sued UNC-W in 2007for denying him a promotion, which Adams said was due to his outspoken conservatism.He spent several years in court before the jury ruled in his favor. More recently, he faced astorm of controversy over his denouncement of Nada Merghani, a UNC-W student, as a queer Muslim social justice warrior on a private blog. Adams did not mentionthe incident at the event.

Despite the controversy surrounding Adams, organizers said the eventwas not designed to inspirefurther division.

Carolina Liberty Foundation CEO, Alec Dent, said the event was designed toeducate people about their right to free speech on campus.

Thats certainly been a major issue, I think, over the past year for conservatives and liberals alike, Dent said. Conservatives have really been concerned over the politically correct culture, and liberals have grown concerned about how theyll be able to speak their minds under our currentpresidential administration.

Sophomore WilliamMarshall said he was inspired to attend the event due to his growing concern over censorship andother free speech issues on college campuses, including UNC-Chapel Hill.

I see that its a major issue in the 21st century on college campuses, that the First Amendment isconstantly not well represented, he said. I heard about this talk and I heard about what Dr. Adamsstood for and figured I should go and listen to see what he has to say.

university@dailytarheel.com

Read the original:

UNC-W professor Mike Adams talks campus free speech and the codes that regulate it - The Daily Tar Heel

Does American have a free speech problem? Readers answer our … – Redlands Daily Facts

We asked readers, Does America have a free speech problem?

In the United States, free speech is in big trouble

Free speech in America is in big trouble. Take the recent case of Orange Coast College student Caleb ONeil, who would have been punished by administration were it not for the exemplary defense mounted by Freedom X attorney Bill Becker and others who rallied at his side.

This mindset that declares that Trump supporters are racist white supremacists is ludicrous. Many on the left are blinded by their own hysteria and this shuts down any chance of reasonable discourse on issues.

Read the free speech column by John Phillips, Its a college campus run by bullies. You will be shocked. If not, you may have blind hysteria syndrome.

Tressy Capps, Fontana

Limited speech is not free speech

I do not believe that America has a free speech problem. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted society freedom of speech and we are grateful for it.

Some people dont want to hear what others have to say, but do we not wish for freedom of speech? Some may argue we should have freedom of speech but only to a certain extent. What is the point if we are restricted from expressing ourselves?

Itd be ironic to be a country that has freedom of speech but only to a certain point. We should be allowed to voice our thoughts and feelings regardless of the topic. That is freedom of speech.

Karla Davalos, Ontario

Respect First Amendment

When the U.S. Constitution was written, it included individual freedom of speech; therefore there is not too little or too much freedom of speech.

With freedom of speech comes disagreements, and when a person expresses their political views it becomes a sensitive subject, especially regarding hatred of Donald Trump.

Therefore, many Trump supporters feel they cannot fully express their opinion and that is not right. People allow their emotions to take over and cannot separate political views from other issues and that is why many feel they are not able to speak and write freely.

And California Democratic leaders need to respect that everyone has the right to the First Amendment instead of removing people from the floor.

Lesle Chicas, Rancho Cucamonga

Advertisement

View original post here:

Does American have a free speech problem? Readers answer our ... - Redlands Daily Facts

Does America have a free-speech problem? Readers respond: Letters – Long Beach Press Telegram

Our Question of the Week asked readers, Does America have a free-speech problem?

Free speech comes with obligation to tell the truth

Characterizing this as a free speech issue is a disservice. When the president labels our patriotic intelligence agencies as Nazis and politically driven; when speech results in anti-Semitic attacks at graveyards and Jewish centers; when speech furthers bigotry, racism and xenophobia that results in people being shot and killed; and when speech labels groups as thieves, drug peddlers and criminals, that speech undermines our Constitution and national identity.

Free speech does not give one the right to shout fire. It comes with a responsibility to be truthful and with a commitment to further dialogue.

Gary Murph, Bellflower

A founding principle

This hasnt changed in 241 years. As long as you dont physically threaten someone, you can say whatever the hell you want.

Educated people know you defeat your enemies by outsmarting them with intelligence, brain power and articulation not force.

Don Venitsky, Lakewood

A problem for both sides

Yes, despite our First Amendment rights to free speech, there does seem to be an increase in free-speech problems due to a lack of sensibility from both dissidents and their opponents. There is an even greater wave of dissension since President Trump is attempting to disband many of the Obama administrations policies, fueling more conflict.

Fortunately, we have a constitutional right to peaceful assemble, but still there needs to be greater tranquility when dealing with protestors as well as more civility used by those expressing dissension.

Isadora Johnson, Seal Beach

Cherish it while we have it

The problem with free speech is that we only want other people to have it when they agree with us! George Orwells Nineteen Eighty-Four should be mandatory reading for everyone so they appreciate freedom of speech. When you no longer have it, its too late.

How long will it be before Donald Trump establishes the Ministry of Truth? His comment that Fox News is a reputable member of the media is laughable. It is the largest purveyor of faux news.

Shirley Conley, Gardena

Advertisement

Visit link:

Does America have a free-speech problem? Readers respond: Letters - Long Beach Press Telegram

Transhumanist Wants to Run for California Governor Under Libertarian Banner – The Libertarian Republic

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By Kody Fairfield

After realizing his chances to be President were over, Zoltan Istvan ofthe Transhumanist Party, has decided to take his platform and run for another elected office, and under a different political party.

Istvan didnt have much of a chance at being president, but that didnt stop him from campaigning as the Transhumanist Partys candidateto promote his pro-technology and science positions. Now, hes setting his sights a bit lower, and with a different party. Istvan announced this morning that he plans to run for governor of California in 2018 under the Libertarian Party, explainsEngadet.com.

In aNewsweekarticle Istvan wrote, We need leadership that is willing to use radical science, technology, and innovationwhat California is famous forto benefit us all. We need someone with the nerve to risk the tremendous possibilities to save the environment through bioengineering, to end cancer by seeking a vaccine or a gene-editing solution for it, to embrace startups that will take California from the worlds 7th largest economy to maybe even the largest economybigger than the rest of America altogether.

Engadet mentions that Istvan told the publication that he notonly identifies as libertarian, but that he also saw the benefit of working with a more established political party, instead of starting one from the ground up. The Transhumanist even mentioned to the website that should he run for President again, he would do as a Libertarian.

The most important thing I learned from my presidential campaign is that this is a team sport, Istvan said in an email to Engadet. Without the proper managers, volunteers, spokespeople, and supporters, its really impossible to make a dent in an election. Thats part of the reason I joined the Libertarian Party for my governor run. They have tens of thousands of active supporters in California alone, so my election begins with real resources and infrastructure to draw upon. Thats a large difference from my Presidential campaign, where we essentially were shoe-stringing it the whole time.

According to the article fromEngadet, Istvan has considered running for a lesser office, but has describe the competition for those lower seats a being much more fierce. Explaining that he sees an opening with disgruntled members of the two major parties, especially againstGavin Newsome, the rumored front-runner for the Democrats.

Istvan also toldEngadet that he seems a dire need for a pro-science candidate like himself, citing what he called PresidentTrumpsdisdain forfor science.

This idea that we should drop environmental science, or be cautious on genetic engineering, or focus on the revitalization of nuclear weaponry is something I disagree with, he said. I believe we should bet the farm on various radical technologies: artificial intelligence, gene therapies, 3D printed organs, driverless cars, drones, robots, stem cell tech, exoskeleton tech, virtual reality, brain wave neural prosthetics, to name a few. This is the way to grow an economywith much creative innovation, what California is famous for.

It should be noted that Istvans jump to the Libertarian Party does not guarantee him the Partys nomination for governor. He would have to face off versus any other primary challengers prior to taking that role. At this point, his comments are a mere statement of intent to seek the nomination, rather than his title.

Democratsgavin newsomeGovernor of Californialibertarian partyRepublicansscienceTranshumanist PartyZoltan Istvn

See the original post here:

Transhumanist Wants to Run for California Governor Under Libertarian Banner - The Libertarian Republic

The Hubble telescope won’t crash into Mars, but it may look that way – Poughkeepsie Journal

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

108

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

The Hubble Space Telescope will pass in front of Mars on Friday night and because of our depth perception it will look like the decades-old telescope is slamming into the Red Planet.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

USA Today Network Bernie Badger Published 11:40 a.m. ET March 3, 2017 | Updated 3:17 p.m. ET March 3, 2017

NASA released the largest photo ever of the Andromeda Galaxy. The panoramic image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope is 1.5 billion pixels. 1-20-15

In this image released by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Hubble Space Telescope is backdropped against black space.(Photo: Getty Images/file)

The Hubble Space Telescope will pass in front of Mars on Friday night and because of our depth perception it will look like the decades-old telescope is slamming into the Red Planet.

The Hubble's expected pathputs it right in front of Mars at 7:58:42 p.m.People think that they can see in 3-D, but this isnt true. Our retinas are fundamentally two-dimensional. We see light in different positions but not truly at different depths.

So, thanks to our lack of true depth perception, we'll see the illusion of a Mars-Hubble collision, even though Mars is about 140 million miles from Earth.

Scientists find incredible fountains shooting from Jupiter's moon

If you are looking through the observatory telescope, you may or may not see the Hubble Space Telescope zoom through the field of view. I cannot predict it with that much accuracy. A low power eyepiece will offer the best chance. But for anyone looking without optical aid, you should see the Hubble Space Telescope glide right over Mars. No explosions will ensue but perhaps a feeling that the Red Planet has just dodged a bullet.

The Hubble, according to NASA, was launched in 1990 from Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Since then it's been orbiting Earth, snapping photos and collecting data that has been used in more than 14,000 scientific papers. It's roughly the size of a school bus and moves orbits at a speed of about 17,000 miles per hour. So far, it's traveled more than 3 billion miles.

Far out: Most distant galaxy cluster discovered

The Hubble Space Telescope will pass in front of Mars on Friday evening.(Photo: USA TODAY)

Mr. Badger is Project Coordinator at the Eastern Florida State College Planetarium in Cocoa. Send questions, suggestions, or comments tobadgerb@easternflorida.edu

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2lHDTOl

15:38

0:46

1:53

1:20

0:57

1:00

1:31

1:37

1:09

0:59

0) { %>

0) { %>

Read the original:

The Hubble telescope won't crash into Mars, but it may look that way - Poughkeepsie Journal

British defense officials call for more cooperation between NATO, EU on cyber – The Hill

Officials with Britains Defense Ministry on Monday called for greater cooperation on cybersecurity between NATO and the European Union.

The demands come in the wake of Britains vote to leave the EU, which British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon indicated Monday would not affect Britains security cooperation with other European nations.

Fallon and Stephen Lovegrove, the Defense Ministrys permanent secretary, both said in separate remarks on Monday that NATO and EU should strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity.

Against evermore complex problems, we must bring together military and nonmilitary responses, and that means making the most of the agreement at Warsaw last year to invigorate the strategic relationship between NATO and the EU, including cooperation on cybersecurity and boosting cooperation counter-hybrid capabilities, Lovegrove said.

He specifically cited threats from Russias hybrid model of warfare.

Separately, Fallon made a similar call for deepened cyber cooperation between the two partnerships during a meeting of the European Union defense ministers in Brussels on Monday.

Today I have urged the EU to cooperate more closely with NATO, to avoid unnecessary duplication and to work together on new threats, including cyber, Fallon said, according to quotes posted on the ministrys website.

Russias cyber and influence campaign targeting the United States presidential election has stoked fears about the potential for future cyberattacks aimed at European elections.

In February 2016, NATO and the EU agreed to a technical arrangement to boost information sharing on cyber-related matters. NATO member states also recognized cyberspace as a domain of operations in which the alliance must defend itself and pledged to boost their cyber defenses at the Warsaw Summit last July.

More recently, NATO deepened cooperation on cyber defense with Finland, which shares a border with Russia.

NATO has also boosted its traditional defenses in Europe in the face of mounting Russian aggression in Ukraine. Moscow has described the buildup as a threat to its own security.

See the original post here:

British defense officials call for more cooperation between NATO, EU on cyber - The Hill

EU’s Alternative to NATO – WhoWhatWhy / RealNewsProject (blog)

Ubers Greyball ; A Tax on Robots? ... and more Picks In the News: In one of his first acts as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt withdrew a requirement for the oil and gas industry to report about methane emitted during operations. About this photo. Flaring from start-up operations on the deepwater Atlantis oil and gas platform.Photo credit: USGS

PICKS are stories from many sources, selected by our editors or recommended by our readers because they are important, surprising, troubling, enlightening, inspiring, or amusing. They appear on our site and in our daily newsletter. Please send suggested articles, videos, podcasts, etc. to picks@whowhatwhy.org.

Former FBI agent, and private investigator Robert A. Levinson went missing on March 7, 2007 while on a rogue CIA recruiting mission on an Iranian island. Many believe his disappearance was related to the defection of a top Iranian spy, who, months earlier, possibly leaked secrets to the West about Irans nuclear program.

Under Bush and Cheney, media institutions cheered us into Iraq. Under Obama, they ignored drone warfare and Middle East conflict. What will happen under Trump?

Uber has a contentious reputation throughout the world, even being banned in some places. Its greyball tool has been able to subvert authorities in areas of the world that do not welcome Ubers service.

A comprehensive rundown on the ever expanding Russia-gate scandal.

Economist Yanis Varoufakis discusses the good and bad of Bill Gatess ideas on a robot tax and universal basic income.

Trump, and Obama before him, has urged NATO allies to increase their military spending to 2% of GDP. Some NATO allies, like France and Germany, are increasingly seeing this as a chance to develop their own alternative military forces. Especially after the Euro-skeptic UK left the EU.

We are 100% reader funded. Your tax-deductible contribution enables our next investigation. Make an impact now.

Keep it civilized, keep it relevant, keep it clear, keep it short. Please do not post links or promotional material. We reserve the right to edit and to delete comments where necessary.

The Conscience of the Media Is Impressed by WhoWhatWhy. Find Out Why Here:

CJR isn't alone. Every day more discover our unprecedented, relevant form of deep inquiry.

Let's keep the momentum going. Act now to increase our public-powered impact!

First Name:

Last Name:

Email address:

City

State

Country United States Afghanistan land Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Runion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthlemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Weekly WhoWhatWhy WhoWhatWhy Now

Ubers Greyball ; A Tax on Robots? and more Picks for 3/6.

Four Hidden Bits of Trumps Immigration Policy ; Fears of a Pension Tsunami and more Picks 3/3.

New Use for Police Body Camera ; The Billionaires Behind Trump and more Picks for 3/2.

Yemen Gets Worse ; Jack Abramoff Returns and more Picks for 3/1.

Germany: No Debt Relief for Greece ; CEO Predicts More Media Consolidation Under Trump and more Picks for 2/28.

Read the original post:

EU's Alternative to NATO - WhoWhatWhy / RealNewsProject (blog)

8,000 NATO troops launch exercise near Russian-Norwegian … – RT

Published time: 6 Mar, 2017 18:48Edited time: 6 Mar, 2017 21:18

A total of 8,000 NATO soldiers have been deployed to the Finnmark region of northern Norway, 160-300 km from the Russian border, for a series of joint military exercises.

The Joint Viking 2017 exercises, which involve British, American and Norwegian troops, kicked off Monday and are expected to last until March 15. According to the Norwegian Armed Forces website, the exercises primary goals are to practice crisis management and the defense of Norway.

A total of 8,000 troops are taking part, including 700 soldiers from the US Marine Corps, US Army and the British Royal Marines, which have been integrated into Norwegian units. The British and American troops took part in preparatory exercises to acclimatize them to the harsh Norwegian weather.

For the duration of the exercise, drones have been banned from local airspace.

The Armed Forces will have a lot of activity in the air, with fighter jets, helicopters and transport aircraft. To ensure safety in the air, we therefore introduced a drone ban, military spokesman Ivar Moen told the Norwegian public radio station NRK.

Read more

In previous years, Joint Viking exercises have been held in Hordaland in 2013, Tromso in 2014, Finnmark in 2015 and Trndelag in 2016. The previous exercise in Finnmark was seen as a provocation in Russia, where in response a large-scale exercise was launched in the Kola Peninsula.

This year, however, Moscow was notified of the planned maneuvers in advance, Moen told NRK.

In January, 300 US Marines from Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, were deployed to Norway. Both Norway and the US denied the notion that the deployment was meant to irk Russia as part of NATOs wider campaign to oppose what it calls Russian aggression in Europe, by sending additional troops and weapons closer to the Russian border.

A founding member of NATO, Norway pledged not to host foreign forces to allay Moscows concerns that it could serve as a platform for a surprise attack. For decades, the Scandinavian country only allowed in other allies troops for training purposes. Oslo dismissed the notion that the deployment goes against the old commitment, saying that American troops would be rotated rather than stationed permanently. NATO routinely applies the same reasoning to all its deployments in Eastern Europe as a way of circumventing the alliances agreement with Russia, which bans permanent deployments of significant forces near Russia.

The rest is here:

8,000 NATO troops launch exercise near Russian-Norwegian ... - RT

Shaky commitments to NATO – North Texas Daily

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has long been a symbol of the free world, enforcing humanitarian agendas and committing itself to universalrights for all. Such a noble force has the support of currently 28 of the most powerful countries in the world including the U.S., Germany, France and the U.K., and one would assume that out of all these members, it would be logical and fair that each country contribute the same percentage. After all, not just the U.S. is committed in making the world a better place.

The U.S. government currently contributes almost a quarter of NATOs operating budget, which is weird considering that NATO has 28 member states. One could argue that not all countries can afford such a huge financial burden, but per capita, many richer European countries such as Luxembourg, which has an annual GDP per capita of $110,697.03, twice the amount of Americas do not put forth the required amount to NATO.

Regulations dictate that all NATO members must spend at least 2 percent of their yearly GDP on defense and so far, a measly five of them have met the bare minimum.

Not only does direct contribution to NATO by the states overshadow any other country, indirect spending eclipses even that. It is estimated that nearly 73percentof all NATO spending comes from the U.S.

American presidents have long held resentments for being forced to be the main economic pillar supporting NATO. There is widespread bipartisan resentment for this issue, which draws the support of Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, George Bush and most recently, President Donald Trump.

While many liberals contest any word that comes out of Trumps mouth, pulling the U.S. out of an obsolete Cold War relicis a cause that everyone should get behind. Having the U.S. spend so muchto act as world police is unnecessary and a remnant of the past.

The money that the U.S. would save, by reinvesting its NATO expenditures back into its economy, would bolster the economy and create more jobs. Direct spending overseas in Americas own military is already more than enough, and we dont need to give even more money to other countries who do the same thing as us.

If other countries dont even care enough about world security to provide for NATO, then the U.S. shouldnt have to pick up the burden. The U.S. should be content in its current overseas involvement, and by staying out of conflicts it doesnt relate to,the nation could save money and lives.

If other countries dont care for the brutalities that occur and arent investing enough to stop it, the U.S. no longer needs to be the paradigm of freedom in the world. Secretary of Defense General Mattis has said that unless other countries can contribute the same as the U.S., then we would be forced to moderate [our] commitment to NATO.

The need for all countries to be free should not rest merely on Americas shoulders. Freedom and liberty for all should be pursued by all countries. If continued U.S. investment is wanted in NATO, then other members must step up their commitments to world peace.

Featured Illustration: Samuel Wiggins

Read the original post:

Shaky commitments to NATO - North Texas Daily

New York: ‘No NATO, no Trump, US out of Ukraine!’ – Workers World

Home Global New York: No NATO, no Trump, U.S. out of Ukraine!

By Greg Butterfield posted on March 6, 2017

Opponents of the U.S.-Ukraine war against the Donbass region of eastern Europe picketed in frigid weather at United Nations headquarters in New York on March 5.

They chanted: No NATO! No Trump! U.S. out of Ukraine! Signs demanded: Trump, Poroshenko Stop bombing Donbass and Down with oligarchs and fascists from Kiev to Washington.

The protest was part of the International Day Against Genocide of People in Donbass, held in at least 16 cities worldwide. Demands included an immediate end to Ukrainian military attacks on the independent Donetsk and Lugansk republics; an end to the economic blockade of the Donbass region; that the international community force Kiev to respect the terms of the Minsk peace agreement; and an International War Crimes Tribunal for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

In New York, activists also raised the case of Alexander Kushnarev of Odessa, who was detained by the Kiev regime on Feb. 23. He is the father of Gennady Kushnarev, one of 48 anti-fascists killed by Ukrainian nationalists on May 2, 2014, at the Odessa House of Trade Unions.

Larry Holmes of Workers World Party emphasized: We are opposed to the [U.S President Donald] Trump regime and its attack on the workers and oppressed here and around the world. And we are opposed to the campaign by Trumps bourgeois opponents to whip up a war fever against Russia and our brothers and sisters in Donbass. International solidarity against imperialism is essential to stopping the threat of a wider war.

The New York action was called by the International Action Center.

Read more:

New York: 'No NATO, no Trump, US out of Ukraine!' - Workers World

EU ministers agree to create joint military command center in NATO footsteps – RT

The European Union is to create a special military command center for operating foreign missions, the German defense minister announced amid criticism from some bloc members that the initiative is financially unreasonable and merely copies NATO's steps.

EU foreign ministers founded, or put in motion, today a European command center for foreign missions, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen said at a meeting in Brussels on Monday, according to AP.

Membership in the program is not obligatory, von der Leyen stressed, adding that EU members not wishing to take part could act as observers.

Read more

For those who are not members of the European Union, like for example Norway or the British, there will be the possibility to join in selectively with certain projects or missions, she said.

The Norwegians have great interest in this, the British have great interest in this, the German minister noted.

Meanwhile, Britain has long criticized the blocs aspirations to launch its own army, saying the EU should not waste money on creating structures that match those set up by NATO. British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon, who was also present at the meeting, called on other EU ministers to cooperate more closely with NATO to avoid unnecessary duplication and structures.

Nevertheless, von der Leyen called the move a very important step that was long overdue.

We took a very important step toward a European security and defense union, because we have become very concrete, she said.

Federica Mogherini, the EU foreign affairs chief, shared her opinion, saying that the command center will provide a more efficient approach to the existing military training missions we have.

Reports on the EU establishing a so-called Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) center aimed at stepping up security and defense cooperation among the bloc's military missions first appeared in media outlets on Friday, March 3.

Read more

The MPCC is expected to manage the blocs non-executive military missions, including the three missions currently in progress in Mali, Somalia, and the Central African Republic.

The idea of tightening cooperation among EU states on defense matters had long been off the table inside the bloc. However, the topic has again emerged on the agenda after Crimea joined Russia following a referendum in 2014. The EU described it as an annexation while the growing threat from Islamic militants also created additional pressure.

Britain opposed the idea for years, although after the UK voted to leave the EU in June last year, Germany and France, joined by Spain, were quick to try to revive the plan.

In November, von der Leyen urged the EU to modernize its military defense and security to match NATO, which has been beefing up its security forces most of them located along Russias borders.

We have seen an enormous modernization drive by NATO over the past three years because of the Kremlins behavior," von der Leyen said at a press conference, Reuters reported.

That was correct and important, but I believe that we must invest at the least same energy into a modernization of the European security and defense union, she said.

In June, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia will have to adequately respond to NATOs military activities along its borders.

Read more here:

EU ministers agree to create joint military command center in NATO footsteps - RT

Trump, NATO, and the Burden of the Past – American Thinker

In his first speech to members of NATO, American Secretary of Defense Mattis said, Americans cannot care more for your childrens future security than you do. This echoes his boss Donald Trumps campaign statement,"Number one it (NATO) was obsolete, because it was designed many, many years ago.Normally, a new president can count on the backing of his own party, but on this issue there is a rare consensus on both sides of the aisle in support of the existing policies.

The core divergence of geopolitical views is this:

TheNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, is a case in point. Established in April 1949, NATO was designed to serve three objectives:

At that moment in time Europe was in ruins and facing a formidable threat from the Red Army, and later from the combined forces of the Warsaw Pact. Givenstrategic and political realities, the United States emerged as the principal guarantor of peace. With the demise of the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact disintegrated as well. So, if you are Vladimir Putin, you would ask the United States about NATO, Against whom are you maintaining this beautiful friendship?

And if you are Donald Trump, you realize that seventyyears later the kids have grown up and the geostrategic reality is fundamentally different. Today, the European Union is a massive economic power, with a population of 500 million and a combined GDP akin to the United States. Russias GDP is comparable to South Korea or Australia. The EUis sufficiently strong to maintain the regional order.

However, despite economic strength and manpower, Western democracies, having downgraded their military capabilities, continue to rely on the United States for maintaining their security.The absurdity is that while Europeans are enjoying a 35-hour work week, generous benefits and extended vacations, American workers have to put in 40 to 50 hours per week to support Europes defense.

And it gets better! With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the disintegration of the Warsaw Pact, NATO found itself without a mission. Mission accomplished is not good news for a military alliance it needs enemies for self-preservation.

Hence, the concept of an alliance was quietly converted into a doctrine of collective security. The significance is that while alliances identify potential adversaries and serve clearly defined objectives, the doctrine of collective security carries much broader implications. It may oppose any aggressive conduct anywhere in the world that may be interpreted as a threat to the peaceful international order. In this spirit NATO, paraphrasing John Quincy Adams, has gone around the world in search of monsters to destroy -- often pursuing not strategic but moral goals in an attempt to promote Western values.

But the most troublesome aspect of this conversion is that in a violation of the verbal agreement between Secretary of State James Baker and Russian Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO launched a massive expansion to the east, growing from 16 countries before the reunification of Germany to 28 today. This expansion can be seen from Moscow only as a strategy to encircle Russia and turn its neighbors into hostile countries. It provokes Russias paranoia and couldlead to a direct confrontation with the United States reminiscent of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

As George Kennan,American diplomat and author of the concepts of Cold War and containment, prophetically wrote in theNew York Timeson February 5, 1997:

..expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold war era.... Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking.

President Clinton, who was an architect of the expansion, ignored George Kennans warning and subsequently created a destabilizing environment in Europe, which was further exacerbated by the Obama administration. Idealism and affinity have led to the over-extension of American commitments and resulted in financial burdens that, according to Trump, America can no longer afford.

As Lord Salisbury observed,The commonest error in politics is sticking to the carcass of dead policies.

Alexander G. Markovsky is a Soviet migr. He holds degrees in economics and political science from the University of Marxism-Leninism and an MS in structural engineering from Moscow University. He resides in Houston, Texas, with his wife and daughter, where he owns a consulting company specializing in the management of large international projects. Mr. Markovskyhas also written for the The Hill, Israpundit, New York Daily News, RedState, and WorldNetDaily.He can be contacted atalex.g.markovsky@gmail.com

In his first speech to members of NATO, American Secretary of Defense Mattis said, Americans cannot care more for your childrens future security than you do. This echoes his boss Donald Trumps campaign statement,"Number one it (NATO) was obsolete, because it was designed many, many years ago.Normally, a new president can count on the backing of his own party, but on this issue there is a rare consensus on both sides of the aisle in support of the existing policies.

The core divergence of geopolitical views is this:

TheNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, is a case in point. Established in April 1949, NATO was designed to serve three objectives:

At that moment in time Europe was in ruins and facing a formidable threat from the Red Army, and later from the combined forces of the Warsaw Pact. Givenstrategic and political realities, the United States emerged as the principal guarantor of peace. With the demise of the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact disintegrated as well. So, if you are Vladimir Putin, you would ask the United States about NATO, Against whom are you maintaining this beautiful friendship?

And if you are Donald Trump, you realize that seventyyears later the kids have grown up and the geostrategic reality is fundamentally different. Today, the European Union is a massive economic power, with a population of 500 million and a combined GDP akin to the United States. Russias GDP is comparable to South Korea or Australia. The EUis sufficiently strong to maintain the regional order.

However, despite economic strength and manpower, Western democracies, having downgraded their military capabilities, continue to rely on the United States for maintaining their security.The absurdity is that while Europeans are enjoying a 35-hour work week, generous benefits and extended vacations, American workers have to put in 40 to 50 hours per week to support Europes defense.

And it gets better! With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the disintegration of the Warsaw Pact, NATO found itself without a mission. Mission accomplished is not good news for a military alliance it needs enemies for self-preservation.

Hence, the concept of an alliance was quietly converted into a doctrine of collective security. The significance is that while alliances identify potential adversaries and serve clearly defined objectives, the doctrine of collective security carries much broader implications. It may oppose any aggressive conduct anywhere in the world that may be interpreted as a threat to the peaceful international order. In this spirit NATO, paraphrasing John Quincy Adams, has gone around the world in search of monsters to destroy -- often pursuing not strategic but moral goals in an attempt to promote Western values.

But the most troublesome aspect of this conversion is that in a violation of the verbal agreement between Secretary of State James Baker and Russian Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO launched a massive expansion to the east, growing from 16 countries before the reunification of Germany to 28 today. This expansion can be seen from Moscow only as a strategy to encircle Russia and turn its neighbors into hostile countries. It provokes Russias paranoia and couldlead to a direct confrontation with the United States reminiscent of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

As George Kennan,American diplomat and author of the concepts of Cold War and containment, prophetically wrote in theNew York Timeson February 5, 1997:

..expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold war era.... Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking.

President Clinton, who was an architect of the expansion, ignored George Kennans warning and subsequently created a destabilizing environment in Europe, which was further exacerbated by the Obama administration. Idealism and affinity have led to the over-extension of American commitments and resulted in financial burdens that, according to Trump, America can no longer afford.

As Lord Salisbury observed,The commonest error in politics is sticking to the carcass of dead policies.

Alexander G. Markovsky is a Soviet migr. He holds degrees in economics and political science from the University of Marxism-Leninism and an MS in structural engineering from Moscow University. He resides in Houston, Texas, with his wife and daughter, where he owns a consulting company specializing in the management of large international projects. Mr. Markovskyhas also written for the The Hill, Israpundit, New York Daily News, RedState, and WorldNetDaily.He can be contacted atalex.g.markovsky@gmail.com

Original post:

Trump, NATO, and the Burden of the Past - American Thinker

NSA Whistleblower: Spy Agencies Eavesdrop Without Warrants … – Daily Caller

5517634

NSA surveillance program architect and later whistleblower Bill Binney told Sean Hannity on his radio program Monday that the intelligence community routinely listens in on Americans conversations without court ordered FISA warrants.

President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama on Twitter Saturday of wiretapping Trump Tower during the election.

Under executive order one two triple three, they do surveillance of everybody in the United States without warrants and thats done through various upstream programs Fairview, Stormbrew, Blarney and also in cooperation with other countries in terms of collection worldwide, said Binney.

So its all done without warrants and that was testified to by Adrian Kinney and David Murfee Faulk, who were transcribing at Fort Gordon George. They were transcribing conversations between U.S. citizens with no warrant at all.

ABC News reported in in early October 2009, Murfee Faulk, a Navay Arab linguist, said he and other NSA intercept operators in Baghdads Green Zone from late 2003 to November 2007 listened to hundreds of Americans private phone conversations.

Calling home to the United States, talking to their spouses, sometimes their girlfriends, sometimes one phone call following another, said Faulk.

Hey, check this out, Faulk says he would be told, theres good phone sex or theres some pillow talk, pull up this call, its really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, Wow, this was crazy.

Binney, who resigned from the NSA in 2001 out of disgust wit how the program was being abused, told Hannity, I will put it this way. The IC is becoming more like the Praetorian Guard. You know, where theyre trying to determine who the emperor is and also influence what the emperor does, so I just think that this is getting out of hand.

He added, And I think, you know, President Trump is absolutely right. The intelligence community needs to be revamped.

Are you say that every American can be wiretapped against their will without any warning at any point? Hannity asked.

No. Im saying they are, Binney replied.

Hannity later asked, And by wiretapping that means what? Recording my phone conversations, taking my emails, my texts?

Binney responded, Thats correct and also storing it for mining, noting that the storage was also under the executive order 12333 section 2 -2.3C. The executive order, Binney explained, is the one President Obama opened it up to all the other agencies in the intelligence community. Originally it was just restricted. The only ones that had access were NSA CIA and FBI.

So was Donald Trump being surveilled even without the FISA court? Hannity asked.

Thats correct. And actuallyhes being targeted now. Theyre going into the database looking for data on him, said Binney.

A spokesman for Obama said neither the former president nor any White House official ordered any surveillance on Trump when he was still in the White House. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told NBCs Chuck Todd on Sunday that he was not aware of a FISA court order to monitor Trump Tower.

Not to my knowledge, Clapper said. I cant speak for other authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.

Follow Kerry on Twitter

View original post here:

NSA Whistleblower: Spy Agencies Eavesdrop Without Warrants ... - Daily Caller

Posted in NSA

Ex-NSA analyst: Intel community thinks Trump’s wiretapping paranoia about Obama is a ‘kooky fantasy’ – Raw Story

A former NSA intelligence analyst poured cold water on President Donald Trumps statements that former President Barack Obama has his phone lined taped, saying the intelligence community considers Trumps charges to be a kooky fantasy.

Writing for the Observer, ex-analyst John Schindler said that there are already enough questions about the Trump administrations ties to the Russians to warrant a full investigation, but that the presidents foray into a massive conspiracy involving Obama and the highest levels of the intel community is absurd.

Calling Trumps allegations against Obama on Twitter, the most bizarre public statements from any American president, Schindler took up what little specifics Trump provided and spoke with his contacts at the NSA who unanimously dismissed them as a presidential fantasy.

Lets be perfectly clear here: The scenario painted by President Trump of his predecessor tasking the IC with wiretapping Trump Tower simply could not have happened without a far-reaching and highly illegal conspiracy involving the White House and several of our spy agencies, above all the National Security Agency, Schindler wrote. My friends still at NSA, where I served as the technical director of the Agencys biggest operational division, have told me without exception that Trumps accusation is wholly false, a kooky fantasy.

Schindler, who has an extensive background in domestic surveillance, explained how improbable Trumps allegations were.

In the first place, the White House doesnt ask for such wiretaps, ever; such requests come directly from NSA, the FBI, or the Justice Department. Involvement of any White House in such highly classified requests would immediately set off enormous red flags in the IC and DoJ due to their glaringly politicaland therefore illegalaim, he explained.

Having worked with a lot of FISA collection during my time in the spy business, I can state without reservation that President Trumps accusations are so inherently implausible as to render them an absurdity Schindler continued. He needs to offer hard evidence for such incendiary claims or back down publicly, preferably with an apology to his predecessor, whom he has maligned without cause.

The former analyst did leave the door open to the notion that there might be wiretaps at Trump Tower just not ones aimed specifically at Trump and none involving Obama.

Its very plausible that NSA and other spy agencies intercepted Kremlin communications which might have incidentally involved associates of our current president, he explained. But neither Donald Trump nor his surrogates were being spied on as themselves. If they didnt realize their shady Russian friends might be considered foreign intelligence targets by NSA and other Western intelligence services, thats on them.

According to Schindler, if Trump hoped that his wild allegations about Obama will make the Russian contact with administration officials scandal go away, he couldnt have been more wrong.

Whats certain is that KremlinGate isnt going away, and the presidents bizarre efforts to make his links to Moscow a non-story have only made it a bigger one he concluded. Now the media is more curious than ever about Trumps Russian connections, and no amount of chanting fake news will alter that. Neither will Team Trumps obsession with the alleged deep state save them from awkward questions.

You can read the whole piece here at the Observer.

Follow this link:

Ex-NSA analyst: Intel community thinks Trump's wiretapping paranoia about Obama is a 'kooky fantasy' - Raw Story

Posted in NSA

CIA, DOJ sued over leaks of classified info about former NSA Flynn – Fox News

The CIA and Departments of Justice and Treasury are being sued by a prominent legal organization for their role in leaking highly classified material as part of an effort to undermine the credibility of former Trump administration National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, according to an announcement.

Judicial Watch, known for its role in exposing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, announced on Monday that it has sued several federal agencies for information related to Flynn's discussions with Russian officials before he officially entered the White House.

Flynn was forced to resign from the White House for apparently misleading President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence about the substance of these conversations.

However, theWashington Free Beaconand multiple other news outlets havereportedon a campaign by former Obama administration officials and loyalists to spread highly classified information in a bid to handicap the Trump administration.

In addition to Flynn, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and White House adviser SebastianGorkahave been the subject of multiple leaks aimed at jeopardizing their positions in the administration.

Click for more from The Washington Free Beacon.

See the original post:

CIA, DOJ sued over leaks of classified info about former NSA Flynn - Fox News

Posted in NSA

US spies have ‘considerable intelligence’ on high-level Trump-Russia talks, claims ex-NSA analyst – The Independent

A member of the Tinstix of Dynamite aerobatics team flies in front of a wall of fire during the Australian International Airshow in Melbourne

Getty Images

A participant stretches on the beach before the start of an annual two-mile sea swimming competition in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Reuters

Participants jump into water during the annual two-mile sea swimming competition in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Reuters

Japan's Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko wave to bid farewell as they depart for Thailand from Phu Bai International Airport in the central city of Hue, Vietnam, ending their six-day long visit to the country

EPA

Reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on display indoors at the International Defence Exhibition in Iraq (IQDEX) 2017

Getty Images

A participant presents hisr vintage vehicle during the 59th International Vintage Car Rally Barcelona-Sitges, at plaza Sant Jaume in Barcelona, Spain. Some 50 vintage vehicles take part in the two-day long event, through the coastal line of Mediterranean Sea from Barcelona to Sitges

EPA

Participants present their vintage cars during the 59th International Vintage Car Rally Barcelona-Sitges, at plaza Sant Jaume in Barcelona, Spain

EPA

New York Governor Mario Cuomo looks around the 'Hall of Names' in the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem. The hall has portraits of some 600 individuals exterminated by the Nazis during the Holocaust of World War II

EPA

The Chinese police officers on self balancing police vehicles patrol in Tiananmen Square before the opening of the fifth Session of the 12th National People's Congress (NPC) outside the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China

EPA

A general view shows the opening session of the National People's Congress, China's legislature, in Beijing's Great Hall of the People

Getty Images

Hostesses jump as they pose for a picture during the opening of the National People's Congress in Beijing

Getty Images

A picture taken in the Iraqi capital Bahgdad shows rocket launchers on display indoors at the International Defence Exhibition in Iraq (IQDEX) 2017

Getty Images

A Pakistani army helicopter flies past floodlights as it patrols over The Gaddafi Cricket Stadium in Lahore, ahead of the final cricket match of the Pakistan Super League (PSL) between Quetta Gladiators and Peshawar Zalmi

Getty Images

A Buddhist devotee dashes barefoot through flames during the Nagatoro Hi-Matsuri, or fire walking festival, to herald the coming of spring, at the Fudoji temple in Nagatoro town, Saitama prefecture

Getty Images

A resident inspects their personal house belongings after a moderate earthquake hit the Surigao city, southern Philippines

Reuters

People with portraits of Soviet leader Joseph Stalin gather outside his museum in his native town of Gori, some 80 kms outside Tbilisi, on the 64th anniversary of Stalin's death. While historians blame Stalin for the deaths of millions in purges, prison camps and forced collectivization, many in Russia still praise him for leading the Soviet Union to victory over Nazi Germany in World War I

Getty Images

Head of Ukraine's tax and customs service Roman Nasirov, who is under investigation over the suspected embezzlement and who according to several unconfirmed local media reports recently suffered a heart attack, lies inside the defendant's cage during a court hearing in Kiev, Ukraine

Reuters

Flag bearer Jesslyn Swirka rides her horse down Harrison Avenue in Leadville, Colorado at the start of the 68th annual Leadville Ski Joring weekend competition in Leadville, Colorado. Skijoring, which has its origins as a competitive sport in Scandinavia, has been adapted over the years to include a team made up of a rider and skier who must navigate jumps, slalom gates, and the spearing of rings for points. Leadville, with an elevation of 10,152 feet (3,094 m), the highest incorporated city in North America, has been hosting skijoring competitions since 1949

Getty Images

A rider races down Harrison Avenue while a skier navigates the course during the 68th annual Leadville Ski Joring weekend competition in Leadville, Colorado

Getty Images

A demonstrator in opposition of US President Donald Trump sets a hat on fire during a 'People 4 Trump' rally in Berkeley, California

Reuters

A demonstrator in support of US President Donald Trump swings a stick towards a group of counter-protesters during a 'People 4 Trump' rally in Berkeley, California

Reuters

A bloodied supporter of US President Donald Trump is seen after a 'People 4 Trump' rally and counter-protest turned violent in Berkeley, California

Reuters

Women take part in a performance to protest against the disappearance of the 43 students of Ayotzinapa College Raul Isidro Burgos in Guerrero, in Mexico City, Mexico

Reuters

A woman looks on as she takes part in a performance to protest against the disappearance of the 43 students of Ayotzinapa College Raul Isidro Burgos in Guerrero, in Mexico City, Mexico

Reuters

An Iraqi special forces soldier fires at a drone operated by Islamic State militants Islamic State militants in Mosul, Iraq

Reuters

A man cries while carrying his daughter as he walks from Islamic State controlled part of Mosul towards Iraqi special forces soldiers during a battle in Mosul, Iraq

Reuters

Iraqi special forces soldiers walk in a street in Mosul, Iraq

Reuters

An Iraqi special forces soldier helps a family carry their child to cross from Islamic State controlled part of Mosul to Iraqi forces controlled part of Mosul, Iraq

Reuters

A man looks towards a Russian helicopter as it flies over ruins in the historic city of Palmyra, Syria

Reuters

Policemen and a passerby look at pictures of the ones killed due to alleged involvement in illegal drugs, during a protest against extra-judicial killings at an open area of a Roman Catholic Church in Paranaque city, metro Manila, Philippines

Reuters

Families with slain loved ones who they say were killed due to alleged involvement in illegal drugs, weep during a Holy Eucharist mass against extra-judicial killings (EJK) inside a Roman Catholic Church in Paranaque city, metro Manila, Philippines

Reuters

People hold photos of their family members, who they say were killed due to their alleged involvement in illegal drugs, during a protest against extra-judicial killings (EJK) while marching in an open area of a Roman Catholic Church in Paranaque city, metro Manila, Philippines

Reuters

More:

US spies have 'considerable intelligence' on high-level Trump-Russia talks, claims ex-NSA analyst - The Independent

Posted in NSA

EFF to Court: Forcing Someone to Unlock and Decrypt Their Phone Violates the Constitution – EFF

The police cannot force you to tell them the passcode for your phone. Forcing you to turn over or type in your passcode violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incriminationthe privilege that allows people to plead the Fifth to avoid handing the government evidence it could use against them. And if you have a phone thats encrypted by default (which we hope you do), forcing you to type in your passcode to unlock the device means forcing you to decrypt your phone, too. That forced translationof unintelligible information to intelligiblealso violates the Fifth Amendment.

But theres a problem: not all law enforcement officers have received the memo. In one particularly egregious case, military investigators forced the defendant, Sergeant Edward J. Mitchell, to unlock and decrypt his iPhone 6 after he asked for a lawyer. Not only was the investigators continued interrogation of Sgt. Mitchell without a lawyer a clear violation of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, but compelling him to unlock and decrypt his phone also violated the Fifth Amendment. The case is currently on appeal to a federal military appeals court, and we filed an amicus brief with the court explaining why.

The Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination protects testimonial communications. Testimonial communications are those that require a person to use the contents of his own mind to communicate some fact. Testimonial communications dont have to be verbal; the key is that the information conveyed must come from the suspects own mind. As we explain in our brief, compelled passcode-based decryption is inherently testimonialand thus always prohibited by the Fifth Amendmentfor two reasons.

First, the compelled entry of a memorized passcode forces a person to reveal the contents of their mind to investigatorscontents that are absolutely privileged by the Fifth Amendment. As far as the Fifth Amendment is concerned, theres no difference between forcing a person to type their passcode directly into their phone and forcing them to say it out loud to an investigator. The trial judge in this case understood that and found that typing in a passcode was a testimonial act. So just by forcing the defendant to unlock his phone, the investigators violated his Fifth Amendment right.

Second, the process of decryption itself is testimonial because it involves translating unintelligible, encrypted evidence into a form that can be used and understood by investigatorsagain relying on the contents of the suspects mind.

Encryption transforms plain, understandable information into unreadable letters, numbers, or symbols using a fixed formula or process. When information is encrypted on a phone, computer, or other electronic device, it exists only in its scrambled format. If Sgt. Mitchells phone had merely been locked but not also encrypted, had the officers broken into the phone, they would have been able to access and understand the information stored on the phone. But since the phone was encrypted, if they had tried to break into the phone, they would have found only scrambled, encrypted data; they wouldnt have been able to understand it. The officers needed Sgt. Mitchell, and his unique knowledge, to translate the information on the phone into its unscrambled, intelligible state for them to be able to use it against him. In other words, they were seeking transformation and explanation of data by an accused of the very data they sought to incriminate him with. This thus violated the Fifth Amendment for a second and independent reasonbecause of the nature of compelled decryption.

Oral argument in this case is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. on April 4, 2017 at the University of Notre Dame Law School in Indiana, as part of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces student outreach program. We hope the court holds that, because of the very nature of decryption, compelled passcode-based decryption hits at the heart of the Fifth Amendments privilege against self-incrimination.

Thanks to the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of the District of Columbia for joining our brief.

Originally posted here:

EFF to Court: Forcing Someone to Unlock and Decrypt Their Phone Violates the Constitution - EFF

ONLINE-ONLY OPINION: Tester’s assault on corporate rights is an assault on people’s rights – The Missoulian

The year is 2019. The government sends in a SWAT team to seize any corporate property it wants without the due process or just compensation required by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The government also has the power to swipe bank assets, raid newspaper offices without warrants or just cause, and even censor any news published by a media corporation. No, its not the plot of a newly unearthed Orwell novel. These tactics, and more, would be legal under an amendment to the U.S. Constitution just introduced by Montana Sen. Jon Tester.

Testers amendment aims to strip rights from corporate entities. His amendment would provide that (1) The rights enumerated in this Constitution and other rights retained by the people shall be the rights of natural persons; (2) As used in this Constitution, the terms people, person, and citizen shall not include a corporation, a limited liability company, or any other corporate entity established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state.

Senator Tester justifies his proposal by arguing that a corporation doesnt hop on the combine to try and get harvest done. Well.

Seven years after Citizens United, the whole corporations arent people and therefore shouldnt have rights bit is getting pretty tiresome. Certainly, our elected officials should be held to a higher standard of debate.

Yes, its true that if youve never thought about it, the idea that corporations are people seems absurd on its face. Corporations are not people, of course. But, for many purposes, it makes perfect sense that the law treats them as such. For example, if the law did not treat corporations as people, they couldnt be sued.

The bigger point, though, is that corporations have rights because people have rights, and people form and own corporations. This is a principle as old as the American Republic, re-emphasized by the Supreme Court as early as 1819 in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. A corporation, the Court noted, is an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. But that didnt mean that people gave up their rights when they formed a corporation. Rather, the decision emphasized that when people join together to accomplish things, they usually need some form of organization, and shouldnt have to sacrifice their rights just because they organize. Individuals, wrote the Court, find it impossible to effect their design securely and certainly without an incorporating act. Corporate rights are the rights people have when they act together.

Oddly enough, in the momentous Citizens United decision that prompts Testers proposal, not even the Courts dissenters ever mentioned the issue of corporate personhood. Why? Because they all understood that corporate personhood is a longstanding doctrine that is not controversial in law, and was not what the case was about.

So lets think about Testers reasoning. There are over 29,000 farms and ranches in Montana. Many of these are incorporated. And indeed, around the country a great many, perhaps most, family farms are incorporated. So in a sense, when your local family farmer gets to work, it is indeed a corporation who hops on that combine. In fact, Testers family farm is incorporated it is T-Bone Farms, Inc. Does Tester think it should be illegal for him to post a political sign on his farms property?

Under Testers proposed constitutional amendment, the government could deprive him of a right to a jury trial any time a lawsuit involved his farm. The government could simply take his land, without due process, for any reason, and without compensation, all in violation of the takings clause. All this because, by incorporating his farm, he would give up his constitutional rights.

Constitutional amendments, such as that offered by Tester, will not pass in the next few years but they indicate the general hostility to free speech that many senators have, and their willingness to silence speakers they dont like. They also show the willingness to advocate rash and dangerous proposals to accomplish that end. In the long term, that should concern us all.

Brad Smith is the chairman of the Center for Competitive Politics and the former chairman of the Federal Election Commission.

Here is the original post:

ONLINE-ONLY OPINION: Tester's assault on corporate rights is an assault on people's rights - The Missoulian

Man’s murder conviction, life sentence upheld on appeal – The Telegraph


The Telegraph
Man's murder conviction, life sentence upheld on appeal
The Telegraph
Dinkins also challenged his conviction on the grounds that Lowe, who invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, could have given some useful testimony without incriminating himself. Dinkins' allegation of error, however, is not ...

See the rest here:

Man's murder conviction, life sentence upheld on appeal - The Telegraph

Drop Second Amendment ‘rights’ pretense – DesMoinesRegister.com

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

1

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

It is time to drop the pretense of defending our constitutional rights and call it what it is.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

John Rose, West Des Moines, Letter to the Editor 6:48 p.m. CT March 6, 2017

A federal firearms transaction record, which includes a background check, lays near a selection of guns at Ron's Pawn and Gun in Des Moines.(Photo: Christopher Gannon/The Register, Christopher Gannon/The Register)Buy Photo

It seems as though the Republican majority in the Legislature is about to ram through a flurry of new gun laws that they falsely label Second Amendment rights. The Second Amendment, like all of the others included in the Bill of Rights, is not an absolute. Like all others, is defined by interpretation of the federal courts. Therefore when some say that it enables open or concealed carry of guns with virtually no restrictions, they are simply voicing an opinion.

At this point, the Supreme Courthas ruled that the Second Amendment does indeed apply to the private ownership of guns by private citizens, but they also ruled that governments have the right to impose reasonable restrictions on that ownership. Several states have placed severe restrictions on concealed or open carry and others have all but removed all restrictions. The federal courts have declined to overturn any state law thatseverely restricts concealed or open carry. Therefore, the right to carry may be termed a legal right granted by state government, but it is not a constitutional right.

It is time for proponents of relaxing Iowas gun laws to drop the pretense of defending our constitutional rights and call it what it is. What they really want is to legislate their opinion into law, and if public opinion polls are to be believed, their opinion is at odds with the majority. Therefore, I challenge them to drop their attempts to ram these proposals through the legislature. If we really must have gun laws that are more lax, let the people decide through the referendum process.

John Rose, West Des Moines

Read or Share this story: http://dmreg.co/2myzBMX

3:46

3:28

4:00

2:18

3:15

3:05

3:38

3:12

2:41

3:38

0) { %>

0) { %>

See more here:

Drop Second Amendment 'rights' pretense - DesMoinesRegister.com