Patchy progress on fixing global gender disparities in science – Nature.com

Although women are publishing more studies, being cited more often, and securing more coveted first-author positions than they were in the mid 1990s, overall progress towards gender parity in science varies widely by country and field. This is according to a massive report released on 8 March that is the first to examine such a broad swath of disciplines and regions of the world over time.

The report1 by the publisher Elsevier found that despite their moderate advances, women still published fewer articles than men, and were much less likely to be listed as first or last authors on a paper. Citation rates, however, were roughly equal: although female authors were cited slightly less than male authors, work authored by women was downloaded at slightly higher rates.

Elsevier used data from Scopus, an abstract and citation database of more than 62 million documents. The reports authors broke the data down into 27 subject areas, and compared them across 12 countries and regions and two 5-year blocks of time: 19962000 and 201115. The report included only researchers who were listed as an author on at least one publication within either of the two five-year periods.

Although women might be publishing less research, the citation rates indicate that their work is equally scientifically important, says Holly Falk-Krzesinski, vice-president of global academic and research relations at Elsevier who is based in San Diego, California.

However, Cassidy Sugimoto, an information scientist who studies gender disparities at Indiana University Bloomington, notes that she would expect to see men and women cited at similar ratios because many papers have multiple authors representing more than one gender. The small number of female first authors, she says, reflects the inequalities that still exist in science today.

I think this report does a tremendous job of demonstrating and reinforcing that the leaky pipeline is still in effect, says Sugimoto, referring to the decline seen in the proportion of women at succesive stages in research. We see an increase in the number of women researchers and an increase in the number of women first authors, but those rates are not progressing equally. We have a pipeline problem, and time is not erasing it.

But patching that pipeline has proved extremely difficult. Women must overcome a number of barriers in science, says Sugimoto, ranging from conscious and unconscious sexism to expectations of womens roles in child care and care for the elderly.

In response to its own findings, Elsevier has been addressing issues of gender imbalance on its journal boards by setting benchmarks for the number of men and women included on them. But Sugimoto cautions that simply putting women in positions to review papers may not solve the problem: in some studies, she says, women in science were just as likely to discriminate against other women when hiring as men were2, although other studies have failed to find such hiring bias3.

This report confirms the results of many past studies on gender disparities in research, says Shulamit Kahn, an economist at Boston University in Massachusetts who studies gender differences in science. But the multinational, multidisciplinary scope of this study allows for more in-depth analysis, she says.

Although the overall proportion of women in science has grown, the rates have hardly been equal across countries or disciplines. In Japan, the proportion of female researchers rose by only 5% between the two study periods, whereas in Brazil, it rose by 11%. Women were also represented unequally in different scientific fields. Although they were strongly represented in life and biomedical sciences, few women specialized in the physical sciences. And when the report analysed patent data from the World Intellectual Property Organization, they found that only 14% of people filing patent applications in 201115 were women.

What our report demonstrates is that gender disparities arent the same all over. What works to fix them in one place and one field might not work in another, says Falk-Krzesinski.

Here is the original post:

Patchy progress on fixing global gender disparities in science - Nature.com

Robot Tax = Protectionism Against Progress – Hit & Run : Reason.com – Reason (blog)

Ndoeljindoel/DreamstimeProphets of the impending automation apocalypse predict that robots will soon take 7 percent to almost 50 percent of all American jobs. Recently, billionaire Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates suggested that the job-stealing robots should be taxed just like the workers they replace. In an interview last month with Quartz, Gates suggested,"Certainly there will be taxes that relate to automation. Right now, the human worker who does, say, $50,000 worth of work in a factory, that income is taxed and you get income tax, social security tax, all those things. If a robot comes in to do the same thing, you'd think that we'd tax the robot at a similar level."

Of course, taxing anything means that it raises the price and less of it is produced. For example, if you want to have people use less electricity produced by fossil fuels because you are worried that the carbon dioxide emitted contributes to possibly dangerous climate change, you impose taxes on that. In a sense then, Gates' proposal is treating automation as a negative externality. In fact, automation (and the productivity it enhances) is the key to economic growth. Doing more with less is how people achieve prosperity.

In an insightful op/ed over at The Washington Post, Harvard University economist Lawrence Summers asks ...

...why tax in ways that reduce the size of the pie rather than ways that assure that the larger pie is well-distributed? Imagine that 50 people can produce robots who will do the work of 100. A sufficiently high tax on robots would prevent them from being produced. Surely it would be better for society to instead enjoy the extra output and establish suitable taxes and transfers to protect displaced workers. It is hard to see why shrinking the pie, rather than enlarging it as much as possible and then redistributing, is the right way forward.

This last point has long been standard in international trade theory. Indeed, it is common to point out that opening a country to international trade is like giving it access to a technology for transforming one good into another. The argument, then, is that since one surely would not regard such a technical change as bad, neither is trade, and so protectionism is bad. Gates's robot tax risks essentially being protectionism against progress.

Taxing robots will slow down progress and ultimately make most of us poorer than we would otherwise be.

Nevertheless, with regard to the future of automation, Summers seems to buy into the notion that this time it is different. However, there are voices cautioning against dire forecasts of automation making humans economically redundant. MIT economist David Autor makes a persuasive case in which he identifies ...

...the reasons that automation has not wiped out a majority of jobs over the decades and centuries. Automation does indeed substitute for laboras it is typically intended to do. However, automation also complements labor, raises output in ways that lead to higher demand for labor, and interacts with adjustments in labor supply. Indeed, a key observation of the paper is that journalists and even expert commentators tend to overstate the extent of machine substitution for human labor and ignore the strong complementarities between automation and labor that increase productivity, raise earnings, an augment demand for labor. ...

Changes in technology do alter the types of jobs available and what those jobs pay. In the last few decades, one noticeable change has been "polarization" of the labor market, in which wage gains went disproportionately to those at the top and at the bottom of the income and skill distribution, not to those in the middle. I will offer some evidence on this phenomenon. However, I will also argue that this polarization is unlikely to continue very far into the foreseeable future.

When considering whether Summers or Autor is right, I come down on the side of Autor. More on why the automation apocalypse is overstated at another time. In the meantime, a tax on robot "labor" is a dumb idea.

Continue reading here:

Robot Tax = Protectionism Against Progress - Hit & Run : Reason.com - Reason (blog)

Hyperloop One shows off progress on its full-scale test site in Nevada – TechCrunch

Hyperloop One is building its first full-scale test track, which is meant to demonstrate every aspect of its eventual first shipping Hyperloop transportation system, in the Nevada desert and its making good progress. The so-called DevLoop site is under construction currently, and the company released the first images and video of its progress on Tuesday morning.

As you can see from the photos, thats a big stretch of tubing, and it looks like theyre actually quite far along. The goal is to get a test run in sometime in the first half of thisyear, using the 500 meter long DevLoop as a proof of concept to prepare for the construction of its first commercial installation, which is set to link up Dubai and Abu Dhabi across a roughly 100 mile stretch.

Hyperloop One tested itspropulsion system in the Nevada desert, which showed how its pods would be propelled in an open-air demonstration at a fraction of the speed of the final version. Since that test in May of last year, the company has undergone considerable changes and corporate drama, but CEO Rob Lloyd told me in January at CES that its now at the point where the technology is a reality, and all that remains is successful execution of the concept.

The use of Hyperloop tech would enable shipping of cargo between Abu Dhabi and Dubai in as little as 12 minutes, which is a tiny chunk of the current two hour trip time. Hyperloop One will first focus on ferrying goods, and eventually hopes to transport passengers at high speeds, too, cutting commute times and potentially broadening the definition of a suburb for major urban centres.

DCIM102MEDIADJI_0120.JPG

DCIM102MEDIADJI_0128.JPG

DCIM102MEDIADJI_0129.JPG

DCIM107GOPROGOPR9508.JPG

View post:

Hyperloop One shows off progress on its full-scale test site in Nevada - TechCrunch

A Day in the U.S. Economy Without Women – Center for American … – Center For American Progress

On March 8, International Womens Day, women worldwide are planning to strike in the name of equal rights. Dubbed A Day Without A Woman, the strike encourages women to take a day off from both paid and unpaid labor. Women comprise almost half of the U.S. workforce and thus could make a large economic impact by taking off work.

How exactly would a day without women affect the economy? According to the Center for American Progress calculations based on the labor share of the gross domestic product, or GDP, and womens relative pay and hours of work, womens labor contributes $7.6 trillion to the nations GDP each year. In one year, women working for pay in the United States earn more than Japans entire GDP of $5.2 trillion. If all paid working women in the United States took a day off, it would cost the country almost $21 billion in terms of GDP. Moreover, women contribute many millions of dollars to their states GDP each day, making their work crucial to the health of their local economies as well. (see Methodology for more detail)

However, this number does not fully represent the hit the economy would take if all women took a day off. Womens paid labor contributions are undervalued because women are overrepresented in sectors of the economy that are low-profit. Many of these sectors are inherently less likely to have significant productivity gains since they are face-to-face service occupations, but they still matter a great deal to the overall functioning of the economy. Women make up 94 percent of employees at child day care services, 88 percent of home health service workers, 97 percent of preschool and kindergarten teachers, 90 percent of registered nurses, 94 percent of secretaries and administrative assistants, and 89 percent of maids and housekeeping cleaners. These supportive and caregiving services contribute to the productivity of the individuals and families who are the recipients of this work. For example, children who receive a high-quality education earn higher lifetime earnings, and high-paid managers productivity often relies on skilled assistance. If the earnings of female-dominated service and caregiving sectors accurately reflected the long-term value created by these jobs, womens labor share contribution to the GDP would be even higher.

Even if womens paid work was valued more accurately, this still would not include the other ways in which women contribute to the economy. This is because economic measures such as GDP do not include unpaid labor, which is mostly taken on by women. Women in the United States spend 150 percent more time on housework than men and more than twice the time men spend on caregiving. This unpaid labor includes child care, caretaking, and cooking along with a variety of other tasks that are vital to the economy.

Although many women who care for their families do not receive a paycheck for doing this work, their labor is valuable and should be included in GDP. Economist Nancy Folbre notes the irony that the measure we call gross domestic product excludes the value of most domestic work. If a woman did not do that unpaid work, the family would have to hire someone and pay them a wage, contributing to GDP. Since unpaid work is not included in GDP measures, it could be said that the nation is consistently and significantly underestimating GDP. Using a conservative assumption, a 2015 report by McKinsey Global Institute estimates that womens unpaid work amounts to about $10 trillion per year, or about 13 percent of global GDP. Additionally, a paper from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis found that incorporating unpaid domestic work into U.S. GDP would have raised it 26 percent in 2010.

Women have always been a valuable and integral part of the economy, and womens paid work is becoming increasingly important to family well-being. In 2015, 42 percent of mothers in the United States were breadwinners, and an additional 22.4 percent were co-breadwinners, making between 25 percent and 49 percent of household earnings. The womens strike offers an opportunity to reflect on how important womens labor is to the country and remind Americans of what remains to be done to accurately value the work that women do to sustain the nations families and economy.

Using data on average hours worked per week and employment from the 2014 Current Population Survey, the authors calculate the proportion of hours women work out of total hours worked by all workers. They found that women provide 43.8 percent of all labor hours in the U.S. economy. If all their labor were withdrawn, it would lead to a roughly proportional reduction in GDP.

Data used for national calculations: 2014 Current Population Survey data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Table 22: Persons at work in nonagricultural industries by age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, marital status, and usual full- or part-time status) and 2014 data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Table 1.1.5: Gross Domestic Product)

Data used for state calculations: 2014 Current Population Survey data at state level from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Table 21: States: Employed people, by class of worker, gender, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2014 annual averages and Table 22: States: people at work, by gender, age, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, and hours of work, 2014 annual averages) and 2014 regional data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (Gross domestic product (GDP) by state)

Kate Bahn is an Economist and Annie McGrew is a Special Assistant for the Economic Policy team at the Center for American Progress.

Read more:

A Day in the U.S. Economy Without Women - Center for American ... - Center For American Progress

HHS Secretary Tom Price: House Obamacare bill a ‘work in progress’ – Washington Examiner

Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price downplayed some of the divisions among Republicans about the Obamacare repeal bill released on Monday, and said the bill itself is just a "work in progress" that is likely to undergo various changes before it becomes law.

"This has been a work in progress," Price told reporters in the White House. "As you know, this has been going on for over a year."

Conservative lawmakers complained as soon as the bill was released that it keeps in place the Obamacare infrastructure, and doesn't eliminate some key pieces of the law for several years. But Price further downplayed the bill as a "step" in the process, indicating changes are likely to be made.

"The president and the administration support this step in... what we believe is in the right direction," Price said.

Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox.

Sorry, there was a problem processing your email signup. Please try again later.

Processing...

Thank you for signing up for Washington Examiner News Alerts. You should receive your first alert soon!

Price dodged questions about whether he or the administration support everything in the bill, and again indicated he sees the bill as something that could change as it moves along.

"This is a work in progress, and we'll work with the House and the Senate in this process," he said. "As you know, it's a legislative process that occurs."

"You start at a starting point, people engage and they get involved in the process, sometimes to a greater degree," Price added. "Nothing focuses the mind like a bill that's currently on the table as a work in progress, or in process."

"We'll work through it. This is an important process to be had," he said.

Also from the Washington Examiner

"This is a big issue. This is not like the latest spending bill we're going to live with healthcare reform forever."

03/08/17 8:13 AM

Original post:

HHS Secretary Tom Price: House Obamacare bill a 'work in progress' - Washington Examiner

WATCH: Price says GOP health care a ‘work in progress’ – PBS NewsHour

White House spokesman Sean Spicer, along with Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, addressed the GOPs health care overhaul Tuesday during a news briefing.

WASHINGTON Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price says the new House Republican health care legislation is a work in progress that represents a step in the right direction.

Price says at the daily White House briefing that the administrations goal is to improve health care and coverage while reducing costs and making plans more affordable.

He says the bill is just one of three phases. He says the administration is also planning a regulatory overhaul and additional legislation to accomplish things that cant be done through the reconciliation process.

As for an early wave of opposition from conservative groups like Club for Growth, he says this is the beginning of the process. He says the administration looks forward to working with the groups through this process.

READ MORE: As Trump praises health care legislation, GOP tries to sell it.

See the original post here:

WATCH: Price says GOP health care a 'work in progress' - PBS NewsHour

Progress towards a circuit diagram of the brain – Science Daily


Science Daily
Progress towards a circuit diagram of the brain
Science Daily
Progress towards a circuit diagram of the brain. Date: March 7, 2017; Source: Heidelberg, Universitt; Summary: Precise knowledge of the connections in the brain the links between all the nerve cells is a prerequisite for better understanding this ...

See the article here:

Progress towards a circuit diagram of the brain - Science Daily

Creigh Deeds: Progress on mental health | Guest Columnist … – Virginian-Pilot

COMING UP SHORT again on mental health, The Pilots Feb. 26 editorial, is correct in many ways. While we have made progress in recent years, much work remains.

But this is a long game. I disagree that the accomplishments made during the 2017 General Assembly session were insignificant.

The Joint Subcommittee on Mental Health Services in the 21st Century had three broad goals for the session.

First, we wanted to redefine the mandated services provided by our community services boards. Current law only requires CSBs to provide emergency services and case-management services if funds are available. A longer list of services is enumerated in the Code of Virginia that the CSBs may provide. The Joint Subcommittee sought to expand the list of mandated services, beginning with same-day access and coordination with primary health care, by 2019. Our goal for this session was to add those two services and set a schedule for the delayed implementation of the remaining services. We accomplished that goal.

HB1549, sponsored by Del. Peter Farrell, and SB1005 from Sen. Emmett Hanger establish the new service requirements and are accompanied by a $6.2 million appropriation. Beginning on July 1, 2021, CSBs will be required to provide crisis services; outpatient mental health and substance abuse services; psychiatric rehabilitation services; peer and family support services; veterans services for those who are not able to access care at VA hospitals; care coordination; and case management.

Our second goal was to respond to problems made clear by the horrific 2015 death of Jamycheal Mitchell at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail in Portsmouth.

I remain shocked by the circumstances of Mitchells death and cannot fathom how this young man was allowed to die.

Someone must be responsible for investigating suspicious jail deaths. At the last minute, we were able to reach an agreement giving the Board of Corrections funding for an additional investigator and clear responsibility to perform investigations. Del. Rob Bell and Sen. John Cosgrove carried the legislation on behalf of the Joint Subcommittee. I carried a similar bill for the governor. The final budget also included language to mandate prompt assessments for people in our jails shown to have a mental illness during an initial screening. The budget also directs the Compensation Board to report to the money committees the impact of this change and any recommendations for adjusting staffing standards.

Our third goal was to increase funding for permanent supportive housing, which has demonstrable positive effects for people with mental illness. Long-term recovery and success requires a safe place to which someone can go, and those services must be available throughout the commonwealth. We received an additional $5 million for these services. Given the tight fiscal times, getting this infusion of new dollars is significant.

I am very proud of the accomplishments made this year. In the past, such advancements would be viewed as the end of the reform effort. However, the legislature acknowledged the need for a continued focus on mental health and extended the work of the Joint Subcommittee until 2019. The action reflects a level of commitment necessary to expand on our progress.

Some big questions remain unanswered. More than 30 years ago, the late Sen. Elmon Gray pointed out that we dont really have a system of mental health care. We have an array of services that are good in wealthy communities but limited everywhere else. Sadly, to some extent that is still true. Would we be better off reorganizing our public mental health system? What about the state Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services and our 10 public psychiatric facilities? Can we improve upon the function of and the relationships between those entities?

Our questions are not limited to the general structure and function of our mental health system. How can we improve our jail diversion efforts so that people like Mitchell get treatment instead of being arrested? How can we streamline and improve the process for getting services for children? What more do we need to do as a commonwealth to reduce the stigma and raise awareness about mental illness?

The volume of work ahead does not diminish what we have accomplished thus far. I am reminded every day of the urgency of this work by the calls from scared or desperate families, but I am confident in the future.

Creigh Deeds, a Democrat,

represents the 25th District in the Virginia Senate and is chairman of the Joint Subcommittee to Study Mental Health Services in the 21st Century.

View original post here:

Creigh Deeds: Progress on mental health | Guest Columnist ... - Virginian-Pilot

NieR: Automata Starts With Nihilism and Futility at the Installation Screen – Geek

Plenty of games can impress me in their first hour. NieR: Automata impressed me through philosophical trolling, and thats a completely new one to me. Square-Enix just sent me a code for the game, which I started downloading to my PlayStation 4 when I got home from work. Its a 48 GB installation, and as I write this, it isnt half done. However, it let me start playing early.

This is only a spoiler for the beginning of the game, and if you played the NieR: Automata demo it isnt even a spoiler. Still, I offer a line break or two so you can avoid any spoilers you might fear.

The opening of NieR: Automata is the demo Square-Enix put out a few months ago. Thats it. Its the entire opening section, where you play as 2B fighting through a robot factory and then fight a giant robot both on foot and using 9S flight unit.

Its a pretty good section that shows off what will likely be NieR: Automatas various combat mechanics, using both melee and ranged attacks along with timed dodges. In other words, it feels like Platinum Games developed it because Platinum Games developed it.

The opening section ends with 2B and 9S, exhausted and injured, surrounded by three Goliath units. One Goliath unit was the entire level I just played through, an oil refinery platform with giant excavator arms that took several minutes of straight combat and three cutscenes to destroy. 2B and 9S appear to sacrifice themselves and destroy the three other Goliath units using Black Box reaction, taking mysterious black cubes out of their chests and touching them together to make a huge explosion.

Then NieR: Automata jumps into an in-universe system check menu. And it starts asking me questions. Heres a clip of the menu, so you can appreciate the choices.

Its exactly what it looks like. While NieR: Automata installs, it puts you in a question loop where the answers can be God, nothingness, randomness, and will. And if you give up, it lets you go back to the title screen and eliminates all of your progress from the opening section.

In other words, it is the most Yoko Tara installation screen ever. Nihilism and futility, and false divinity all wrapped up in a way to not spend time while waiting for the other 24 GB of the game to install.

You better believe its going to be thematically consistent with the rest of NieR: Automata. I havent played the rest of the game, and I know its going to be thematically consistent with the rest of NieR: Automata.

Because NieR: Automata is a sequel to a game where, after you get the secret final ending, it completely deletes your save file.

Because NieR: Automata is part of a spin-off series based on the joke ending of Darkengard where the protagonist, his dragon ally, and a giant cosmic abomination are shot down by jets over Tokyo.

Because NieR: Automata is the fifth game based around a universe where everything and everyone is terrible, and nihilism is the closest thing you can have to a philosophy because reality is built around horrible things that want to eat you, including huge demon babies with shark teeth.

Because NieR: Automata is developed by Yoko freaking Taro.

Follow this link:

NieR: Automata Starts With Nihilism and Futility at the Installation Screen - Geek

Jose Cuervo’s Apocalyptic Vision Encourages Hedonism 03/08/2017 – MediaPost Communications

Given the apocalyptic tone of the real news these days, Jose Cuervos new campaign, Tomorrow Is Overrated, could turn out to be positively prescient.

Lets hope not. But its certainly a direct, if tongue-in-cheek, attempt to tap into Americans current fears and need for an occasional release like a shot of no-nonsense liquor, ideally in the context of a madly romantic moment.

The brand describes the creative as seeking to resurrect the original intensity of tequila by celebrating Cuervos historic disregard for anything but celebrating the moment as contrasted with other tequilas focus on refinement and conformity.

advertisement

advertisement

But Kevin Jones, chief creative officer of Cuervos agency of record, Crispin Porter + Bogusky LA, cuts to the chase: This campaign bluntly points out that whatever awaits us tomorrow might not be that great of a reason to miss out the fun you could be having tonight, he says. And with all the uncertainty there is in the world now, this message seems particularly relevant.

The campaigns centerpieces are a two-minute video (below) and a 60-second TV spot adapted from it.

Directed by Ringan Ledwidge known for unnerving films like Gone and Voodoo in My Blood, as well as ads for Nike (Winner Stays) and Planters (Planters Holiday Party) the video depicts a handful of people who are in a bar out West somewhere when an announcement comes over the television: The end of civilization is upon us. Hold your loved ones close.

As a powerful wind (nuclear firestorm?) blows fellow citizens past the bars windows, one handsome, be-jeaned dude puts Elviss Its Now or Never on the juke box and makes like Astaire with the woman nearest him. (Luckily, shes gorgeous, in an unpretentious, cow-gal kinda way.)

Other watering hole denizens are inspired to follow suit and enjoy Cuervo shots relishing the moment even as the roof blows off and the end is nigh.

Read more here:

Jose Cuervo's Apocalyptic Vision Encourages Hedonism 03/08/2017 - MediaPost Communications

A French Surrealist’s Eclectic Remembrances of His Cohort, Finally in English – Hyperallergic

Philippe Soupault, Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism

Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism is a diminutive, stylish book that kicks off by appreciatively documenting a curiously seedy period of transition within the anti-rationalist French avant-garde: from Dada to Surrealism. Published by legendary City Lights in late 2016, this alluring collection of amiable reminiscences was penned by co-founding Surrealist poet Philippe Soupault (18971990) and first appeared in French in 1963 as Profils perdus. City Lights has bracketed this English translation with an introduction by Mark Polizzotti, the director of the publications program at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and an afterword by poet Ron Padgett.

Polizzottis contribution is essential, as he not only contextualizes Soupault within the Parisian avant-garde but corrects some dating errors of Soupaults and reverses some of Andr Bretons bowdlerizing, revealing the essential conceptual contribution that psychologist, philosopher, and psychotherapist Pierre Janet played in Soupault and Bretons budding Dada-cum-Surrealist movement. (Breton had neglected the erudite Janet in his accounts.) On the other hand, Polizzotti keenly reports that Soupault tends to assign himself the starring role a bit more than is warranted, thus advancing the thesis that every biography is a disguised autobiography.

Though essentially about his experiences as a rather blissful young man, Soupault wrote this book of portraits at age 66, sparing it the typical excesses of literary juvenilia. Indeed, his generally urbane tone is neither ironic and frivolous, nor competitive and facetious. His clipped, fluid prose avoids academic stodginess with lan, and there is nothing insolent, narcissistic, lecherous, or self-protective about it.

The translation by poet Alan Bernheimer has flair too, delivering Soupaults appealingly eclectic text in delightful form to the Anglophone audience for the first time. Soupaults sharp but sweet anecdotal memories of fellow experimental artists and antagonists include laudable short portraits of Guillaume Apollinaire, Marcel Proust, James Joyce, sad surrealist Ren Crevel, novelist Georges Bernanos, painter Henri Rousseau, poet Charles Baudelaire (whom he sketches as a precursor avant-gardist) and lesser-known poets Pierre Reverdy and Blaise Cendrars. Given the heroic stature of some of these audacious subjects, within their chapters Soupault seems to delight in making large small and small large, humanizing the celebrated with intimate particularization and paeanizing the obscure with encomium.

With a seductive cubist cover painting by Robert Delaunay of a scowling Soupault ignoring a quaking Eiffel Tower, this enjoyable collection of crisp recollections popularizes what was once essentially arcane. Like Marc Dachys essential Discoveries: Dada: The Revolt of Art, Soupaults book with its pocket size, short chapter format, and reasonable price makes for the perfect travel companion. Even though the essays presume a certain level of familiarity with the French avant-garde, they have an engaging quality that transmits Soupaults palpable love for experimental art and for his quelle surprise exclusively male subjects. Lost Profiles offers witty and unexpurgated views of venturesome men during a daring era, but it is in no way a sufficiently broad-spectrum historical overview of the birth of the avant-garde in Paris.

Soupault, whose style of disaffection favored plain living and high thinking, lived a lengthy literary life, never ceasing to write improbable tales. Rather young during World War I when he served in the French army, he saw the Parisian art spirit of the times as one based in Dada iconoclastic destruction, bent on devastating conventional systems of representation, traditional morality, and all sorts of rational social organization (which the Dadaists saw, in light of the war, as depraved and crazed). This effervescent mood, which fted scandal, was particularly incited in Paris by the arrival of Tristan Tzara. This closed a circuit, as Dadaist Tzara had been influenced by Parisian Cubism: borrowing and intensifying the anti-logic of juxtaposition, condensation, and displacement specifically from Synthetic Cubist collage. For Soupault, Tzaras tipsy Dada showed the nonsense latent in all sense.

As Soupault writes, Dada was out to destroy all the established values, the literary practices, and the moral bias in the interests of what Apollinaire (an outspoken and thought-provoking defender of Cubism) called the new spirit in art. Perhaps that is one reason that the essay Steps in the Footsteps (Les pas dans les pas) has been moved from the end in the French edition to open the collection in English: It is here that Soupault recalls how he and Breton were first affiliated through Apollinaires friendship and encouragement as they came to know Tzara and participate in the earliest performances of the Paris Dada movement. In 1919, with Breton and Louis Aragon, Soupault co-founded the Dada journal Littrature. That same year, Soupault collaborated with Breton on Les Champs magntiques (The Magnetic Fields), the text of automatic writing that inspired Andr Massons automatic drawings. Together, these works are widely considered the foundation of the Surrealist movement and the greatest contributions by the original Surrealist group.

Of course, Soupault had a famous falling out with Bretons goatish brand of Surrealism (a term taken from Apollinaires text Onirocritique that was itself snatched from Artemidoruss ancient Greek treatise on dream interpretation) arising from the movements increasingly Soviet Communist ties and Bretons self-anointment as leading arbiter. In 1927 Soupault and his wife Marie-Louise translated William Blakes Songs of Innocence and Experience into French, and the following year Soupault authored a monograph on Blake, arguing that he had anticipated the Surrealist movement.

After putting down this fulfilling read, a few nasty thoughts kept haunting me. Soupaults anti-rational Dada-Surrealism was largely the art of generalizing where the particular was in play. Dada-Surrealism rejected the tight correlation between words and meaning, which perhaps sounds familiar in our era of Trump post-factuality: slippery conceptual bullshit moves that exploit Soupault-type forms of verbal extrapolation in the interests of far-right political manipulations. It seems to me that what Soupault wanted to show us was that verbal impossibilities could produce astonishing transgressions that liberate the mind from conservative militaristic convention something quite the opposite of spectacular post-factual speculative conspiracy theories (think Pizzagate) that support Trump by liberating thought from a concern for credibility.

In that sense (and that one alone), Soupaults avant-gardism helped cultivate a taste for the ambiguity of the post-truth political economy of the alt-right, with its toxic mix of white supremacy, misogyny, xenophobia, militarism, and oligarchic tendencies. Indeed, hard-right Trump trolls are similar to their Dada predecessors in that they do not recognize any limits to truth claims. For some, merely saying things that are not usually said openly is part of the transgressive thrill of Trumpism. Even when Trump himself is caught in an egregious lie, his anti-globalist, nationalist supporters manage to believe that he is instead revealing critical truths, and that any reporting to the contrary actually exposes the anti-conservative bias of the perceived media and cultural lite.

Like the Dadaists, the trolling radical right has always been acutely sensitive to the emotions of shockingly vulgar communications whose primary goal is cognitive manipulation. Trump panders to prejudice by liberating previously repressed aggression, viciousness, and mockery and redirecting it at immigrants, people of color, women, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people. So it saddens me to say that I could not help but notice that the alt-right trolls and the Dada-Surreal heroes share many of the clever cognitive-dissonant techniques in their messaging. Of course, the evil onus is on the alt-right (already a pass term, as this groups objectives are no longer an alternative to anything but central to sites of forceful power). Therefore, it is important to note that Soupault did not stop his intellectual pursuits with the anti-rational Magnetic Fields. Following his co-founding of Surrealism, he practiced journalism and directed Radio Tunis from 1937 to 1940 after he was arrested in Tunisia by the pro-Vichy regime during WWII. After the war, he resumed his journalistic activities, worked for UNESCO, and taught at Swarthmore College while writing essays and novels.

The reality of Trump has now sunk in, and the sense of trauma on the cultural left has deepened (with the stakes only likely to get higher). As a starting point for political activism/artivism, perhaps artists engaged in increasingly vehement expressions of dissent may wish to consider how best to combat the normalization of Trumps impulsive anti-rationalism through the refusing anti-rationalist eyes of Soupaults disaffection, conversely tempered by his journalistic rigor and educational commitment. This double-bladed approach of utilizing anti-rational (post-truth) mind games and facts-based objective accuracy may best frustrate Trumps insatiable desire for recognition and get under his oh-so-thin skin.

Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism is now available from online booksellers and City Lights.

Continued here:

A French Surrealist's Eclectic Remembrances of His Cohort, Finally in English - Hyperallergic

SBCC Presents ‘A Flea in Her Ear’ – Santa Barbara Independent

Theatre Group at Santa Barbara City College Performs OutlandishFarce

Bedroom farces, such as the current Theatre Group at SBCC production A Flea in Her Ear, are excursions into a universe liberated from the consequences of social grievances. The outlandish mad-cappery of Flea is set in motion when two socialite wives, Raymonde (Addison Clarke) and Lucienne (Courtney Schwass), conspire in an ill-fated plot to trap Raymondes husband in flagrante, by sending him a steamy proposition letter soaked in perfume. Three acts worth of mistaken identities, doppelgangers, slapstick, innuendo, and skirt chasing ensue but rest assured that conclusion brings complete resolution, and all the characters forget and forgive the buffoonish offenses theyve both suffered and perpetuated throughout theplay.

SBCCs production of Flea, which runs through March 18 at the Garvin Theatre, is a surprisingly honest presentation of farce. Featuring several suitably over-the-top characterizations and tireless physical performances, the cast tore the set to shreds literally. Doors were slammed off their hinges, and costumes were bursting at the seams, which provided a strangely apt sense of destruction within a piece where the humor depends on a reality exaggerated far beyond rationalism. Commanding performances by Sean Jackson (as both Victor Chandebise and his double, drunk bellhop Poche) and Pacomio Sun, as jealous, deranged Spaniard Don Carlos Homenides de Histangua, kept a stumbling performance on its feet, forcing the story to stay in scene despite numerous chaotic moments that brought the cast desperately close to completebreakdown.

While slow to start, A Flea in Her Ear hit its stride in the second act when the characters all meet up through coincidence and deceptive design at the Frisky Puss Hotel. There was an atmosphere of true mirth onstage that conveyed the deliciously ridiculous elements of the story in a satisfying manner. The Theatre Group at SBCCs Flea doesnt have polished choreography, but it still delivers joyful, vigorous performances that inspire genuinelaughter.

Presented by the Theatre Group at SBCC. At Garvin Theatre, Sat., Mar. 4. Shows through Mar.18.

Be succinct, constructive, and relevant to the story. Leaving a comment means you agree to our Discussion Guidelines. We like civilized discourse. We don't like spam, lying, profanity, harassment or personal attacks.

More:

SBCC Presents 'A Flea in Her Ear' - Santa Barbara Independent

The Victim Of Populism Is Democracy – Huffington Post

PARISJean dOrmesson was born in Paris in 1925. A writer and philosopher, he received the Grand Cross of the Legion of Honor in 2014. I spoke to him recently in Paris about the upcoming elections in France and the rise of populism globally.

Do you see a real possibility that Marine Le Pen and the National Front can win the French elections?

The National Front is clearly making steady progress. I remember when the party of the extreme right in France at the time of [Jean-Louis] Tixier-Vignancour reached a maximum of 2 percent of the vote. Later Jean-Marie Le Pens party gained a maximum of 3 to 4 percent of the vote. But now there is a populist wave all across the world I am thinking for example of Brexit, of Trump, of the Dutch elections and today Le Pen is at 26-27 percent.

For several months Le Pen has been the only candidate to be certain of going into the second round; the others, I am not sure. As I said before Le Pen will have approximately 25-30 percent of the votes but I do not think that she can be elected. She will face the Socialist Party led by [Benot] Hamon and the extreme left led by [Jean-Luc] Mlenchon. If they were united they would represent 25 percent, more or less the same percentage as Le Pen.

Anyway, I think that in the end Le Pen will be defeated. In my opinion, [Francois] Fillon if he is still in the race despite the scandal that has engulfed him or Macron will win the elections in the end. I do believe that Le Pen will be elected in the elections of 2022, but even now all possibilities are open. If, unfortunately, there should be a horrible attack two days before the elections, it would be a catastrophe, and in that case Le Pen could win.

Lukas Schulze via Getty Images

Are the French anxious and worried?

France has changed. For many years it was a country organized into two parties: the conservatives and the socialists, the right and the left. Macron has said correctly that bipartisanship is finished and it has been replaced by quadri-partisanship: Le Pen at the extreme right and the extreme left of Mlenchon, and then the traditional left and the traditional right. But it is not only politics that have changed but also the French people, who were once happy and carefree. As Cocteau rightly said they have become like Italians in a bad mood. The democratic system has been threatened and people are tending towards extremes. The victory of the National Front would be an economic catastrophe the return to the Franc, the closing of borders in short a great chaos.

Brexit and the election of Trump seemed to be unforeseeable events. They are, however, things that have happened.

You cannot absolutely trust the polls today, and also for many years people did not dare to admit that they voted for the National Front. Today, this trend has changed, and people are less afraid to say that they vote for the National Front. This could increase the partys vote to 30 percent.

What kind of a country is France today?

Its a country in bad shape. The five years of the Hollande presidency have been disastrous. He has not kept his promises and he was not able to reduce unemployment and increase the standard of living. Today France may seem to be turning the page, but the danger of terrorism and the problem of migrants is strong. Security is one of the main priorities, and with Le Pen there will be no more migrants because the borders will be closed. A large number of Christians vote for the National Front and I do not understand how they can support a political party that wants to close doors. I have to say that Hollande was better on the topic of security than he was on the economic front.

Do you worry about the world of culture, how are things for French culture?

The French language is doing very badly; it is hard to fight against English. It is also true that books and newspapers are in difficulty. Some publishers are doing well, but there is a negative trend and bookstore sales have been reduced by between 5 to 15 percent. Current events have certainly invigorated peoples desire to read newspapers, and for the moment the freedom of the press is total in France.

And if the National Front wins?

It will not only be a disaster for the poor and for the rich, but it will also affect culture, and the freedom of the press will be threatened.

Do intellectuals still have a voice in France today?

I am not an intellectual, I consider myself a humble writer. The left wing intellectuals went further right than myself. All of France is moving to the right. The Communist Party and the Socialists no longer seem to exist in France. However, writers still have a privileged situation. A writer in France still has a voice in society, although the myth of the great writer, such as Victor Hugo or Franois Mauriac or Andr Gide, no longer exists. The people have violently rejected the political class, all politicians are unpopular and the press is not seen in a very good light. Writers do still enjoy a certain respect.

You are a French academician. What is the role of the Academy of France today?

It does not have very much to do with literature, it is more like a meeting place for interesting people. Neither [Jean-Paul] Sartre nor [Andr] Malraux nor [Albert] Camus were French academicians, but the Academy of France definitely has an undeniable prestige, especially abroad, because it represents a certain French esprit. The French esprit prevailing at the time of Voltaire and Descartes.

One thing remains at the Academy that has otherwise disappeared in France I am talking about conversation. Formerly there were literary salons, but they disappeared. In the last 60-70 years, they were replaced by literary cafes, but now even those have disappeared and conversation has gone with them.

Does France still have a leading cultural role in Europe today?

France follows the destiny of Europe. For centuries the dominance of Europe was total, but I would like to say that culture goes hand in hand with a flourishing economy and military power. Both Louis XIV and Napoleon understood this very well. Tomorrow, the most important philosophers will be Indian, Chinese and Brazilian. The advance of populism is due to the weakness of Europe.

What about the United States?

Who would ever have expected four months ago an America with [Donald] Trump as president? And that is the opposite of what the world thinks about America. In both America and Europe today, there is great hostility toward the system. The real victim of all this is democracy.

What kind of a world do we live in nowadays?

It is a difficult period. The world has always changed, but today it is changing with a faster pace. I am not among those who say that it was better before. In spite of the great success of science it is unequivocally important to save a clear concept of humankind, and to reconcile the triumph of science with humanism.

Do you think that there will be new wars?

There should be no more wars, because we have created Europe, but if populism triumphs, things will change. We absolutely must safeguard the idea of Europe. Europe has succeeded in two things: the single currency and the absence of war. Wars will certainly continue in Africa, in Asia, but we must ensure absolute vigilance against populism. Young people have a tendency to be extremist, but we must prevent them from voting for the National Front.

In conclusion, what is your opinion about your country?

It is definitely somewhat anxious and unhappy. The French language, as I said at the beginning, is becoming less important, and France is not the first country in a Europe that is no longer the center of the world. It is wrong, though, to be talking about decline all the time. What I believe is that Africa will have an increasingly important role. The future is Africa.

Read more:

The Victim Of Populism Is Democracy - Huffington Post

Grapevine: Shimon Peres Day in the Big Apple – Jerusalem Post Israel News

During his lightning solidarity visit to Israel, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo met with Chemi Peres, chairman of the Peres Center for Peace and Innovation, and told him that every Sunday in the Big Apple throughout the month of June will be called Shimon Peres Day, as a fitting tribute to the legacy of Israels ninth president.

The people of New York are proud to participate in something like that, said Cuomo.

Chemi Peres said that it was extremely moving to know that such an honor was being bestowed on his late father.

In the Shimon Peres Day Proclamation that Cuomo presented to Chemi Peres, it states: Whereas New York is home to more than 1.7 million Jews the largest Jewish community outside of Israel in the world and always had a special relationship with Israel, and president Peres served as a tremendous ally in promoting and strengthening the bond....

LAST WEEK, when he learned of the death of legendary photographer David Rubinger, Chemi Peres recalled that there were several Rubinger photographs in the Peres family album, and a quick search revealed a happy moment for Peress parents, Sonia and Shimon, and another showed Shimon Peres asleep in a deck chair by the pool of the King David Hotel.

Rubinger was famous for catching his subjects in unguarded moments, and even in his 90s never went anywhere without his Leica.

Still working till the end of his days, albeit no longer chasing news stories, Rubinger was involved in two important projects at the time of his death. He was working with the Government Press Office on its National Photo Collection, and he was also the mentor for a photo contest for photos of Jerusalem taken anywhere in the city at any time. As far as the GPO was concerned, We considered him family, said GPO director Nitzan Chen.

FRENCH-AMERICAN producer, director, screenwriter and actor Philippe Martinez, a former president of the famed Odeon Theater in Marseilles, which is one of the largest in Europe, was the guest of honor at the Peres Academic Center in Rehovot, at a wide-ranging discussion on the rights of women in Israel and around the world. He was greeted by the centers founder and CEO, Ofra Elul, its president, Prof. Ron Shapira, and its dean of behavioral sciences, Prof. Malka Margalit.

Martinez, who has an impressive list of film credits to his name, spoke about his latest film, of which he is a co-producer. Finding Soraya, directed by Najia Khaan, deals extensively and in a universal context with womens rights.

The event also included a womens panel, moderated by television personality Dana Weiss, in which Deputy Foreign Minister Likud MK Tzipi Hotovely, Yesh Atid MK Aliza Lavie, clinical psychologist Dr. Michal Einav, Buba Levi from Kol Hanashi, an advocacy group for single mothers, and mental health expert Osnat Vaturi participated.

Recalling conversations with Shimon Peres, Weiss said that Peres had often stated that the future of the Middle East depends on the freedom and education given to its women.

Hotovely emphasized the importance of education toward equality from the earliest possible age, and also noted that even now, when women are reaching the highest ranks in almost every field, there is still a wage gap instead of equal pay for equal work.

WHEN HE officiated at the wedding last week of Asael Shabo and Saray Cohen and recited the Shehehiyanu prayer, Blessed are You, Lord our God, King of the Universe, who has granted us life, sustained us and enabled us to reach this time, it had far greater meaning for Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau, chief rabbi of Tel Aviv and former chief rabbi of the State of Israel, than at most other weddings, with the possible exception of the one he attended earlier last month in which the bride was his granddaughter Yael.

The groom in the more recent wedding was the child survivor of a terrorist attack, in which his mother and three of his siblings were murdered. Lau is a child survivor of the Holocaust, with a large family of children and grandchildren who would not have been born had he not survived. Similarly, newlyweds Shabo and Cohen will build a home and a family in Israel.

Amid all the joy that accompanies a wedding, there were many tears, as people remembered what the Shabo family had endured. In June 2002, when a terrorist invaded the Shabo family home in Itamar, he murdered Rachel Shabo, 40, and three of her children. Asael, who had also been shot, played dead, which is how he was saved. He was nine years old.

The terrorist who infiltrated the settlement shot in all directions before firing at the Shabo family. He shot Rachel Shabo in the back; then he shot Avishai, five, Zvika, 13, and Neria, 16, as well as a neighbor, Yosef Twito, who came to help them. Asael and his 13-year-old sister, Avia, were wounded, Asael more so than Avia. He had three bullets in his leg as well as shrapnel. Doctors tried to save the leg, but couldnt and in the long run had no choice but to amputate.

Despite the loss of a leg, Asael became an athlete, a champion basketball player and swimmer and represented Israel in the Paralympics in Rio de Janeiro. Among those who recited one of the seven blessings under the bridal canopy was M, a border policeman who rescued Asael from the carnage, but whose name still remains classified.

At the time of the attack, Boaz Shabo, the father of the family, was not at home, nor were the two eldest children, Yariv, 17 and Atara, 15. The Shabos were among the founders of Itamar.

Seeking to rehabilitate what remained of his family, Boaz Shabo remarried six years after the tragedy. His new wife, Hila Susan, had five children of her own. Together, in 2009, they produced a set of triplets. The family lives in Kedumim.

Three years ago, Avia married her stepbrother David Susan. Very soon after the two families became one, a very close bond developed between Avia and David, and no one was surprised when they decided to get married.

Last year, while attending the Israeli Final Four basketball semifinal between Hapoel Jerusalem and Hapoel Eilat at the Jerusalem Arena, Asael publicly proposed to Saray and presented her with an engagement ring, to the cheers of the crowd. Although they had been going steady for some time, Saray had no idea that Asael was going to propose, and as she accepted, tears of joy washed her cheeks. At her wedding, she was all smiles.

THE GOVERNMENT is finally waking up to the appalling conditions under which the mentally ill are kept under lock and key, and the cruel treatment to which senior citizens are subjected in certain nursing homes. The government might still be oblivious or derelict in its duty, were it not for Israel Radios Keren Neubach and Israel Hayom health reporter Ran Reznick, who for months have been pursuing both issues and broadcasting ongoing revelations of the mistreatment of patients in facilities for the mentally ill as well as those in homes for senior citizens.

Patients in both are abused, put in solitary confinement not just for days, weeks or months, but for years, and if they misbehave they are denied visitations by their families. When they beg to be allowed to go to the toilet, their cries fall on deaf ears, and they have no option but to answer calls of nature in the beds to which they are strapped. Because they are locked away, the general public does not spare any thought for the inhuman conditions to which they are subjected or the fact that they are deprived of basic rights.

Still, its unlikely that either Neubach or Resnick will be nominated for the Israel Prize which they richly deserve.

DURING THE period leading up to International Womens Day and in the immediate aftermath, the volume of publicity given to women achievers in almost every field of endeavor makes one doubt that there ever was a glass ceiling, or alternately, makes one realize that the glass ceiling has been smashed to smithereens.

Emunah, the religious Zionist Womens Organization, chose as its Woman of the Year Frumit Cohen, a lawyer by training and in charge of human resources for the Prisons Service, which means that she is responsible for some 9,000 people. She will be officially recognized as woman of the year at an official ceremony on March 15.

She has worked with the Prisons Service for 22 years, during which time she has held a number of different positions. She also works for the benefit of prisoners to help them find their places in society once they are released from prison. Notwithstanding the complexities of her job, when anyone comes to her with a problem, she is unfailingly supportive.

Raised in Ramat Gan in a staunchly religious Zionist family, Cohen, 46, a mother of five and a grandmother of two, now lives in Nof Ayalon. She earned her law degree at Bar-Ilan University. The Emunah Woman of the Year is chosen by a public committee headed by Emunah chairwoman Liora Minka. As has happened every year for the past decade, the committee received numerous nominations that included extremely outstanding women in their respective fields, but Cohen proved to be the most outstanding.

FOR MUCH too long, Holocaust survivors in Israel have been cheated of their rights more often than not because they were not fully aware of their entitlements. Now, those who are left may have a chance to get what is due to them.

Holocaust survivors, social workers and representatives of organizations working on behalf of Holocaust survivors are invited to attend a conference taking place at Kfar Hamaccabiah in Ramat Gan on Tuesday, March 28, from 9:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. The conference is jointly sponsored by the Claims Conference, the Authority for the Rights of Holocaust Survivors, the Center for Holocaust Survivors Organizations in Israel and the Social Equality Ministry.

Speakers will include Colette Avital, who chairs the Center of Holocaust Organizations; Ofra Ross, the CEO of the Authority for the Rights of Holocaust Survivors, and Udi Mozes, legal adviser to the Israel branch of the Claims Conference.

HOLLYWOOD MOVIE star Richard Gere, who came to Israel for the premiere of Norman, the most recent film by acclaimed director Joseph Cedar, is also a political activist who may anger some right-wing politicians in Israel.

According to an interview that he gave to Yediot Aharonots Tzipi Shmilovitz, Gere intends to meet with various political figures, including the leadership of Breaking the Silence. The occupation has to end and Jerusalem should be the capital of two nations, Gere told his interviewer.

On his previous visits to Israel, he said, he had listened to opinions from all sides, but now the situation has become almost intolerable.

The occupation is destroying everyone from both sides, and a binational state will not solve anything. It will only lead Israel to apartheid. There must be two states for two peoples, with Jerusalem as the capital of both, he said.

SIMILAR THOUGHTS were expressed on Monday by Ayman Odeh, head of the Joint List in the Knesset. At a meeting at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem with members of the Foreign Press Association, Odeh also warned of the dangers of apartheid and the increase in settlements, unless the two-state solution is implemented.

After voicing his support for Palestinian aspirations for self-determination, Odeh was also asked his views about Hezbollah. Most people are against Hezbollah, he said. Do you think I could live under the fundamentalism of Hezbollah? Do you think my secular wife, who is a gynecologist, could live under Hezbollah? The soft-spoken and amazingly candid Odeh was very well received by his audience, and his popularity was enhanced by the fact that unlike most other guests of the FPA, both Israeli and Palestinian, his was not a hit-andrun affair. Crowded by journalists who wanted to ask him more questions after the official lecture and Q&A session had concluded, Odeh stayed behind and patiently satisfied the curiosity of all.

By the way, the fact that he identifies with the Palestinian struggle has no bearing on his views about Jewish rights to self-determination in the territory shared by Jews and Palestinians.

In his view, there is room for both to be sovereign nations.

CULTURE, HUMOR, gastronomy, nature tours and rabbis in residence are some of the attractions being marketed by hotels to lure domestic tourism. The idea of going away for the weekend simply to relax is fast becoming obsolete. The weekend often begins on a Thursday and runs through Friday and Saturday, with checkout on Saturday night soon after the conclusion of the Sabbath.

At the Yearim hotel located at Kibbutz Maaleh Hahamisha in the Judean Hills, theyve really gone overboard this weekend, meaning from March 9 to 11, inclusive.

Billed as a weekend of humor and laughter, it includes Rivka Michaeli, Roni Weiss, Rafi Shragai, Rubik Rosenthal, Dudi Ben Zeev and Tami Sirkis, with subject matter that includes cabaret, humor in movies, the complexities of modern Hebrew and standup culinary comedy. Taking into account the identities of the above, its going to be a real nostalgia kick.

ON THE subject of nostalgia, last week Zemereshet, a voluntary enterprise dedicated to the preservation of pre-state and early state Hebrew songs, last week paid tribute to Israel Prize laureate composer, pianist and lyricist Moshe Wilensky on the 20th anniversary of his passing. The tribute would have been more appropriate in January, but better late than never.

The auditorium at the Ben-Zvi Institute in Jerusalem was packed, mostly with senior citizens who were paying much more for a ticket than many senior citizens can afford, but they had the time of their lives singing Wilenskys marvelous tunes, many of which were composed by Natan Alterman.

Classically trained at the Fryderik Chopin University of Music, also known as the Warsaw Conservatory, the Warsaw-born Wilensky, who came to Tel Aviv in 1932, was shown in a film clip in which he said that when he arrived in the country, the people were very serious and expected him to compose serious music.

They were disappointed that he opted to compose lighthearted tunes. But he wanted his music to be sung not only by professionals but by people who simply came together to sing. Had he written symphonies, he said, they would have remained in a drawer and no one would ever have heard them.

Leading the community singing was Noga Eshed, who is not exactly a spring chicken herself, but who plays guitar and has a wonderfully flexible voice at times sounding almost like Shoshana Damari.

Film clips were also shown of Damari at the peak of her career beautiful to look at, impressive and charismatic in her dramatic caftan.

Coming up in the Zemereshet programs is a memorial sing-along for Netiva Ben-Yehuda on the sixth anniversary of her death. The event will take place at her graveside on March 24 at 11 a.m. at Klil in the Western Galilee, east of Nahariya and close to the Arab villages of Kafr Yasif and Yanuh-Jatt. The event will not take place if it rains.

Claude Buchbinder, producer of Ben-Yehudas late-night radio programs, Raya Admoni, the program editor in recent years, and Dalia Horesh, who was the editor of most of the programs, were all present at the Wilensky memorial tribute.

Ben-Yehuda was an author and broadcaster who appealed particularly to the generation of the Palmah, playing their songs and recalling their history. Despite the fact that she didnt have a radiophonic voice, was often forgetful and occasionally impatient, her fans adored her and protested so forcefully when the powers that be at the Israel Broadcasting Authority wanted to take her off the air that she stayed almost until the day she died.

One of her great claims to fame was co-authoring a book on Hebrew slang, which today would be barely relevant, as there have been so many changes and innovations in the language.

WARSAW WAS the birthplace or temporary home of some great Jewish figures in the arts. Also born in Warsaw was photojournalist Dawid Szymin, later called David Seymour, but known professionally as Chim. Considered one of the greatest photojournalists of all time, he was among the pioneers of the golden age of political photojournalism. He was also a co-founder, with Henri Cartier-Bresson and Robert Capa, of Magnum, whose stable includes some of the worlds greatest prizewinning photographers.

This being the 70th anniversary year of the founding of Magnum, Beit Hatfutsot the Museum of the Jewish People is presenting a retrospective exhibition of the life and work of Chim, who took portraits of leaders, artists and intellectuals that appeared in the worlds major magazines. His depictions of the Spanish Civil War, Europe devastated by World War II, and the first years of the State of Israel helped form the collective memory of the 20th century. These iconic photographs reflect Chims technical expertise and visual intuition, but also the compassion, humanism and optimism that characterize his work.

A highlight of this exhibition will be Chims stunning photographs of the young State of Israel, including color works on display for the first time. Other features include personal items from Chims estate. Like many photojournalists who get too close the action, Chim was killed in 1956 while covering the Suez Crisis.

The exhibition, which opens on Tuesday, March 28, was developed in collaboration with Helen Sarid and Ben Shneiderman, Chims niece and nephew. The chief curator is Dr. Orit Shaham-Gover, the exhibition curator is Asaf Galay, and the exhibition director is Michal Houminer.

AND IN Jerusalem at Beit Avi Chai, there will be a memorial tribute to stunning prizewinning actress, film director and fashion model Ronit Elkabetz, who died in April last year after a failed struggle with cancer. The tribute will take place in the course of the Maghreb festival honoring Jews from North Africa and those of North African background.

The festival will be held from March 27 to 30.

Elkabetz, the eldest of four siblings, was born in Beersheba to parents from Essaouira in the western Moroccan region known as Marrakesh- Safi. She divided her time between Israel and France, where she also worked in films.

The tribute will be made with the participation of her brother Shlomi Elkabetz, who is a film director, actress and model Yael Abecassis and several other entertainment personalities of North African extraction.

greerfc@gmail.com

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

Excerpt from:

Grapevine: Shimon Peres Day in the Big Apple - Jerusalem Post Israel News

Death Threats and Censorship Can’t Stop ‘Naughty Muslim’ Comic Mona Shaikh – NBCNews.com

Mona Shaikh performing at the Laugh Factory Courtesy of Mona Shaikh

Shaikh was 8 years old when she knew she wanted to become a performer after watching Indian actress Madhuri Dixit.

"You can literally have the world on your finger, spinning, because of so much charisma and charm and funny that you bring to the table, and I just loved her," Shaikh said.

She was 15 when she narrowed her interest to stand-up comedy, the same year she immigrated to the United States from Pakistan with her parents and four older brothers.

Shaikh spent much of her youth in Pakistan alone because her mother was frequently in America to get treatment for two of her brothers who suffered from polio. She credits her early life as having contributed to the foundation she needed to become an artist and to the perspectives she shares through comedy.

"I think it really kicked off my imagination and it just gave me this opportunity to dream and think what would it be like to be a performer. To travel the world, to connect with so many people who don't share the same background as you, but to bring these people together and convey to them artistically?" she said. "I think it really fed the artist that needed to be fed as a kid."

Although Shaikh knew early on what she wanted to do with her life, she didn't share her dreams with her family until she was 18. They didn't support her, Shaikh said, and she was given an ultimatum of either studying physical therapy or being sent back to Pakistan to get married.

She rejected both options, moved to New York, dropped out of college and invested her money into acting classes with no backup plan.

"Here's the thing: if you don't burn your boats, you never know what you're capable of," she said. "With a backup plan, you're not going to give it your all because at the back of your mind, you always think you can always go back to that other life. I didn't want to do that. I burned my boats and it's not easy, but it's working out."

Since then, Shaikh has become the first Pakistani female comedian selected for the Laugh Factory's Funniest Person in the World Competition and to headline Hollywood Improv. In 2015, she launched a diverse comedy show called Minority Reportz, which features a diverse slate of comedians.

Across Los Angeles, she has performed at multiple venues, including The Ice House in Pasadena and Flappers Comedy Club in Burbank.

With the recent presidential election, Shaikh has incorporated current political events into her set and has been vocal about her dislike of President Donald Trump. As a Muslim, she joked that she's OK with the Muslim registry Trump had proposed, but that she would have her rear end photographed for it.

Despite the fact that politics can be a sensitive subject, Shaikh said having lived in Pakistan is why she includes the topic in her routines.

"I grew up in a politically unstable country so politics is weaved into my fabric," she said. "I can't be an artist now and not talk about things that impact people."

But Shaikh isn't always able to include that subject in her shows. During a set in Dubai, she was censored from discussing human rights violations or criticizing the government of Saudi Arabia, which is an ally of the United Arab Emirates, she said. Had she violated that instruction, she was told she would have been banned from going back to the country.

While she wasn't able to make those jokes live, Shaikh has taken to YouTube to poke fun at how women in Saudi Arabia aren't allowed to drive and how some Muslims imams have sanctioned domestic violence. In one clip, she jokes about how Pakistani men are obsessed with virgins because they don't like criticism. Shaikh's material has earned her the nickname

Sometime in 2012 or 2013, Shaikh said she was notified via email by her fans that her website website had been banned in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Last year, she received an email from YouTube saying her channel had been banned in the two countries, she said.

Shaikh said she has even received death threats via email, but said she isn't fazed and hasn't been deterred from continually bringing up those topics.

"They don't like the fact that I talk about these things, but when I see my fellow Pakistani sisters being physically assaulted or murdered by their own family for honor killings and such backward cultural things, how do you as a human being not speak up against that, especially as an artist? Especially if you have a platform?" she said.

"If the Pakistani government doesn't like it, maybe they can start changing their laws and start treating minorities, women, transgender and gay people with some more love and respect," she added.

Shaikh noted that either way, some people will take offense to her content and disagree with it, so she would rather talk about things that matter.

"I've seen when people don't speak up and they don't provide resistance against tyrants or evildoers," she said. "There's a big price to pay for that, and I think artistically and as a human, I try to be on the right side of history. I guess there's a price for that, too."

Through comedy, Shaikh says she hopes to do for audiences what two of her role models, comedians George Carlin and Chris Rock, did for theirs.

"What they did for people is they made them think," she said. "That's my goal."

Follow NBC Asian America on

More:

Death Threats and Censorship Can't Stop 'Naughty Muslim' Comic Mona Shaikh - NBCNews.com

Violence on Facebook Live presents censorship dilemma – CBS News

A person armed with a gun is seen on a live video posted to social media onApril 31, 2016 in Chicago.

Facebook/WBBM

Facebook Live gives people an easy way to broadcast live video, but it has also reportedly given Facebook a real live headache: how to decide when to censor video depicting violent acts.

In the year since its launch, the feature has been used to broadcast at least 50 acts of violence, according to theWall Street Journal, including murder, suicides and abeating of a special-needs teenagerin Chicago earlier this year. One of the problems is that Facebook didnt grasp the gravity of the medium during the planning process for the feature, an unidentified source told the newspaper.

Facebook Live, which lets anyone with a phone and internet connection live-stream video directly to Facebooks 1.8 billion users, has become a centerpiece feature for the social network. In the past few months, everyone from Hamilton cast members to theDonald Trump campaignhas turned to Facebook to broadcast in real time.

Soon, we believe a camera will be the main way to share, instead of the traditional text box, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during an earnings conference call last November. We think its pretty clear video is only going to become more important.

But the focus on video has prompted some tough philosophical questions, like what Facebook should and shouldnt show.

In July, a Minnesota woman named Diamond Reynolds used the service tolive-stream her fiance Philando Castileafter he was shot by police. The next day, Facebook Live captured the scene as five Dallaspolice officers were gunned downduring a peaceful demonstration.

Play Video

Police are searching for the gunman who fatally shot two people and wounded one more in a Chicago alley. The incident was captured in a Facebook ...

Both the Castile and Dallas videos were initially streamed unedited and uncensored. The Castile video temporarily disappeared from the social network because of a technical glitch, according to Facebook. It was restored later with a warning about its graphic nature.

Zuckerberg addressed this issue last month inan open letter to the Facebook community, conceding that errors in judgment were made.

In the last year, the complexity of the issues weve seen has outstripped our existing processes for governing the community, he wrote, referencing how some newsworthy videos were handled.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This article originally appeared onCNET.com.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.

See the rest here:

Violence on Facebook Live presents censorship dilemma - CBS News

‘This Is Free Speech 101’: Professor ‘Horrified’ After Campus Speaker Silenced – Fox News Insider

A Vermont college professor upset with the disintegration of discourse on his campus released a "statement of principle" for staff to sign to highlight the importance of free speech on campus.

Middlebury College English Professor Jay Parini said on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" that he does not agree at all with the ideology of controversial author Charles Murray, but that Murray should not have been silenced by students.

Murray was to speak at Middlebury, but was overpowered by chanting protesters in the auditorium, and a professor who escorted Murray out after his event was forced to be canceled was injured by the demonstrators.

"Nothing I wrote was brain surgery," Parini said, "I was frustrated and horrified by what happened at Middlebury last Thursday."

O'Reilly Presses Sen. Cotton: Who Ordered Flynn Wiretap?

Rep. Brady: GOP Health Care Bill Isn't 'ObamaCare Lite,' It's 'ObamaCare Gone'

Some of the principles Parini laid out in his statement include:

Only through the contest of clashing viewpoints do we have any hope of replacing mere opinion with knowledge.

The incivility and coarseness that characterize so much of American politics and culture cannot justify a response of incivility and coarseness on the college campus.

Exposure to controversial points of view does not constitute violence.

A protest that prevents campus speakers from communicating with their audience is a coercive act.

Parini said he was "distressed by the unwillingness of students to hear from opposing views."

People are fed up with the coarseness of discourse in the United States, he added, calling the context of his petition "enlightenment values."

He said he met with several colleagues after the Murray incident, and the group eventually agreed with the basic principles of free speech.

"This is Free Speech 101," he said.

Krauthammer: 'You Cannot Retract an Entitlement Once It's Been Granted'

Freedom Caucus Slams ObamaCare Replacement, Promises 'Clean Repeal'

Read this article:

'This Is Free Speech 101': Professor 'Horrified' After Campus Speaker Silenced - Fox News Insider

UMaine System considering new free speech policy – Press Herald

Amid increasing anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant tensions nationwide, the University of Maine System is considering a new free speech policy that would affirm constitutionally protected speech, but also would allow campus officials to prohibit speech that harasses others.

The executive committee of the board of trustees will discuss and vote on the proposed changes at a meeting Wednesday.

This is a timely issue as many universities nationally have been and are facing questions about campus climate and civility, according to the narrative accompanying the suggested changes.

The policy is based in part on the findings of the University of Chicago Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression, and the model language suggested by that committee.

One of the biggest differences between the UMS and Chicago language is that the model language has a strongly worded and lengthy defense of free speech, with a narrow section spelling out the exemptions. The UMS policy uses the Chicago exemption language almost verbatim and has a more limited description defending all speech. The final section of the UMS policy says this policy shall not be construed or applied to restrict academic freedom within the University, nor to restrict constitutionally protected speech.

In December, the trustees directed an ad hoc committee chaired by Chancellor James Page to consider whether changes were needed to policies regarding free speech and expression, campus climate, and political impartiality. Also on the committee were trustees James Erwin and Gregory Johnson, University of Southern Maine President Glenn Cummings, UMaine Machias Interim President Sue Huseman and general counsel James Thelen.

Here is the original post:

UMaine System considering new free speech policy - Press Herald

Free speech is more than a right – The Crimson While

By Carter Yancey | 03/06/2017 7:02pm

CW / Kylie Cowden

It is astonishing that discussion over the extent to which free speech applies is taking place in the United States of America. The right of free expression is fundamental and absolute, just as it ought to be. Hate speech is free speech, offensive cartoons are permissible, calls to insurrection are totally legal and vile advocations of Nazism should be ignored but by no means silenced. So far, the United States Supreme Court has done a supreme job at preserving and protecting these rights. But free speech is more than just a right; it is a fundamental moral principle.

As a human being, your ability to express yourself is a necessary by-product of your right to exist; if it is denied or suppressed, your humanity itself is being compromised. It is not only necessary to protect this right from government intervention, but also to protect speakers from other citizens. Those who would advocate assault against preachers of hate or endorse the banning of trolls from social platforms are undermining one of the most necessary concepts for a civilized society to prosper. Defenders of liberty, when citing the First Amendment to speak out against such cases, are often met with a defense that goes something like: "Free speech means the government can't punish you for giving your opinion. It doesn't mean that you don't have to face the consequences of what you say." To that, I have several responses.

First of all, we need to be ever conscious about the direction legislation is taking in first world countries. Canada has already passed laws preventing a person from using speech that could be deemed offensive by others. The phrase "hate speech is not free speech" is an attack on free speech which is clearly intended to influence political action. To dismiss the defense of free speech by calling it inapplicable to the private sector is to ignore the fact that such ideas are infiltrating our political sphere. It is not an overreach to proudly invoke the Constitutional right to free speech as a defense against current events when the other side of the debate, if left to its own devices, would gladly pass laws to limit this fundamental freedom.

Secondly, a right is something that the government has an obligation to preserve, meaning it is the duty of the government to protect me from those who would try to prevent me from or attack me for speaking my mind. You cannot relieve the government from that responsibility and then accuse me of misusing the First Amendment to defend hate speech. Anyone who commits assault should be punished by law, even if the victim of the assault is a Nazi. When riots ensue and property is damaged in the heart of protesting a speaker and the government sits by idly, reminding people that free speech is a right becomes of dire importance.

But most importantly, people who say that free speech doesnt apply to the private sector are missing the point. Of course universities have the right to deny speakers a platform on their premises, and of course Twitter has the right to ban those who would harass other users from using their site. The question is not should they be allowed to do so, the question is should they do so. No honest and proud institute of education would shy away from the opportunity to discuss and dismantle ideas. Listening to your opponents does not grant them legitimacy cowering from them does. It is good for a free market to bring bad ideologies to ruin by boycotting the lectures and writings of their supporters, but the difference between a University not accepting a speaker because there is no profit to be made and prohibiting a talk because it is contrary to an established agenda is extraordinary.

Free speech is more than a legal right to be protected by the government; it is a moral necessity that every individual should be encouraged to exercise. For readers of this column, as students of a university, this idea is of particular relevance. Campuses across our country are making a habit of creating zones where students are safe from being exposed to dissenting opinions. We have seen Universities go through great lengths to prevent certain influential people from appearing on their grounds. With this in mind, students should not only be reminded that free speech is a right, but should be taught that it is inherently a good thing even when the words spoken are bad.

Carter Yancey is a sophomore majoring in computer science and mathematics. His column runs biweekly.

Here is the original post:

Free speech is more than a right - The Crimson While

UNL’s GSA passes bill to protect grad student free speech – Daily Nebraskan

The Graduate Student Assembly of the University of Nebraska met for its second to last meeting for the year in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Nebraska Union on Tuesday, March 7 to discuss four bills.

The four bills presented include the allocation of funds for Graduate Student Appreciation Week, an endorsement for the March for Science in Lincoln, a bill to support the protection of political speech for graduate students and an endorsement for the event #HackUNL.

GSA Bill 28 proposed an allocation of $2,000 from GSAs social budget to go toward Graduate Student Appreciation Week. Graduate Student Appreciation Week is a week that celebrates grad students through different activities throughout the week. The bill passed unanimously.

GSA Bill 29 asked for the assembly to endorse the March for Science on April 22. The March for Science is a march that supports scientists and the scientific community, while allowing the community to publicly take a stand. The bill passed unanimously.

GSA Bill 30 focused on supporting the protection of academic freedom, diversity and political speech for graduate students.

English representative Daniel Clausen proposed the bill to the assembly.

There is no current policy that directly pertains to protecting free speech, he said.

Clausen continued by saying the bill presented to the Graduate Student Assembly supports freedom of speech and asks the university to adopt a policy that explicitly defends graduate students right to free speech.

Lauren Segal, the co-chair of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee, wanted to know if the bill asking for protection of free speech could be used against students regarding hateful political speech.

I was thinking of that as I wrote the bill, and I dont want to protect someones right to put up a swastika, Clausen said. But thats why I think having a policy that deals with deciding what is and isnt hate speech and then following a protocol is important.

Before the assembly voted on the bill, GSA President Ignacio Correas commented on how the bill would be enforced.

I will make sure that if this bill is passed that I will work with the appropriate university authorities to make sure that the regulations to determine what is and isnt hate speech has grad student input, he said.

After brief debating, the bill passed unanimously.

GSA Bill 31 asked for endorsement toward #HackUNL. #HackUNL is a 24-hour event in which UNL students can use coding and graphic design to come up with ideas to end cyberbullying and harassment. The bill passed unanimously.

news@dailynebraskan.com

Read the original:

UNL's GSA passes bill to protect grad student free speech - Daily Nebraskan