A Baby With 3 Genetic Parents Seems Healthy, But Questions Remain – NPR

Mitochondrial diseases can be passed from mothers to their children in DNA. JGI/Tom Grill/Getty Images/Blend Images hide caption

Mitochondrial diseases can be passed from mothers to their children in DNA.

Last fall, the New York-based reproductive endocrinologist John Zhang made headlines when he reported the birth of the world's first "three-parent" baby a healthy boy carrying the blended DNA of the birth mother, her husband and an unrelated female donor.

The technique, called mitochondrial replacement therapy, allowed the 36-year-old mother to bypass a defect in her own genome that had led, twice before, to children born with Leigh syndrome, a devastating neurological disorder that typically culminates in death before age 3.

While heralded in many circles as a breakthrough, the news triggered numerous ethical and scientific questions, many of which remained unanswered at the time. Last week, Zhang and his colleagues at the New Hope Fertility Center provided some answers and raised yet more concerns.

John Zhang of the New Hope Fertility Clinic in Manhattan performed the procedure that used DNA from three people to create a baby boy. Courtesy of the New Hope Fertility Clinic hide caption

John Zhang of the New Hope Fertility Clinic in Manhattan performed the procedure that used DNA from three people to create a baby boy.

Their new report, published in the journal Reproductive BioMedicine Online, describes both the technique and the participants in greater detail, something that fellow researchers had demanded in order to properly scrutinize Zhang's methodology.

But in publishing the new material, the journal editors themselves also noted that Zhang's report still contains "weaknesses and limitations in a number of areas," including lingering questions about informed consent, the full risks of mitochondrial replacement therapy and the long-term health of the child.

"Although we were able to encourage the authors to include more details of their work in the submission," journal editor and clinical embryologist Mina Alikani noted in an accompanying editorial co-written with her colleagues, "some uncertainties concerning methodologies and results still remain."

In a statement provided by the New Hope facility, Zhang conceded that more work needs to be done. "There is always concern about any new procedure and innovation implemented on humans," Zhang said. "We agree that there are still a lot of unknowns about this technique and will make every effort to monitor the boy's ongoing progress and test for any adverse outcomes."

A key weakness in Zhang's work, according to critics, is that the procedure is not approved in the United States, which forced the team to undertake the procedure in Mexico. "This particular experiment is being done almost entirely outside the normal regulatory structure," says bioethicist and pediatrician Jeffrey Botkin of the University of Utah, who participated in an Institute of Medicine committee last year that issued a call for more animal research on mitochondrial replacement therapy.

Without proper oversight, Botkin says, vital questions about the technique, as well as the impact of such experiments on resulting embryos, remain difficult to answer.

As it stands, Congress last year prohibited the Food and Drug Administration from considering applications for research in this area, but in December the U.K.'s Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority agreed to let clinics apply to try the procedure on a case-by-case basis. In March, it granted a license to carry out the first procedure to Doug Turnbull, director of the Wellcome Trust Center for Mitochondrial Research at Newcastle University.

"We're going to look to those in Britain," Botkin says, "to do careful trials and help us better understand how this technique works."

In broadest terms, Zhang and his colleagues lifted the nucleus out of the egg of the original mother, leaving behind most though not all of her defective mitochondria, which would have led to the almost certain development of Leigh syndrome in the fetus. They then placed that nucleus inside a healthy donor woman's egg, whose own nucleus had been removed. The result was a hybrid egg with the original mother's nuclear genes and the donor mother's cytoplasm and mitochondria. The hybrid egg was fertilized by the father's sperm and implanted in the birth mother.

The technique could potentially prevent a wide range of mitochondrial diseases, ranging from hereditary blindness to progressive muscle wasting.

A key problem, however, is that not all of the defective mitochondria can be eliminated. The boy, Zhang reports in the new paper, currently carries between 2.36 and 9.23 percent of potentially defective DNA, according to sampling of his urine, hair follicles and circumcised foreskin.

"That's not surprising," says Doug Wallace, head of the Center for Mitochondrial and Epigenomic Medicine at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, who was not involved in the study. "As far as I know, very few cases have been found where there is absolutely no carryover of mitochondria from the donor nucleus."

Even at a 9 percent load of defective DNA, Wallace said, most people with Leigh Syndrome will appear normal. He added that while it is unlikely, levels could be higher in the boy's other tissues, such as the brain or heart.

Zhang and his team report that physical examination of the boy has included detailed neurological investigation at regular waypoints, including at two weeks, four weeks, two months, three months and four months. All have proved normal, Zhang said, and the boy is still under close monitoring with "a long-term follow-up plan."

Just what such a long-term plan might look like, however, is uncertain particularly given that the parents have publicly said that they do not plan to have the boy regularly tested throughout his life to monitor levels of the errant DNA. University of California molecular biologist Patrick O'Farrell, who was not involved in the Zhang study, suggested that this was worrying, given that there could a rising load of mutations as the boy ages.

In this case, a total five eggs underwent the transfer and were fertilized, Zhang and his team reported. The embryo that was ultimately implanted carried about a 5 percent load of the defective DNA, but the researchers did not examine how much defective DNA was carried over in the embryos that were not used.

The remaining fertilized eggs are still available, says Zhang, but he has not tested them to see how much defective DNA each contains. Should the parents decide they'd like to have another baby, Zhang said he would test the others.

Still, without readily accessible data on the transfer of defective DNA in all of the fertilized eggs, O'Farrell argues that important insights are being overlooked. A three-parent baby, he said, offers the rare chance to study the "segregation and transmission of mitochondrial genomes."

In a telephone interview, Zhang emphasized that analyses are ongoing. "This is new ground, so there are many questions to ask and more studies to come," Zhang said. "With new tests in new studies, we will continue to learn more."

For all of the lingering questions, Zhang's groundbreaking research has sparked a flurry of similar research elsewhere. The editors of the journal carrying his new report credit Zhang with helping to nudge "cautious use" of mitochondrial replacement therapy in the U.K. Meanwhile, the fertility specialist Valery Zukin has used the three-parent technique in the Ukraine to help two infertile women who suffer from a syndrome known as embryo arrest, where their fertilized eggs stop growing before they can be implanted in the uterus.

Both women gave birth to apparently healthy babies this year.

Such news will surely be welcomed by desperate parents looking for new ways to conceive, but experts like O'Farrell continue to worry that the procedure is being deployed too quickly, and with too many question unanswered.

"I feel like extending this work into infertility cases is dangerous," O'Farrell says. "For every gene that compromises fertility, we need to know whether it also is going to affect later aspects of development.

"If you only rescue fertility," he adds, "the other defects that gene might cause will still be there."

Jill Neimark is an award-winning science journalist and an author of adult and children's books. Her most recent book is The Hugging Tree: A Story About Resilience.

A version of this article originally appeared at Undark, a digital science magazine published by the Knight Science Journalism Fellowship Program at MIT.

See the original post:

A Baby With 3 Genetic Parents Seems Healthy, But Questions Remain - NPR

Engineering a solution to genetic uniqueness – Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

By Staff Friday, April 7, 2017

In spite of my hair, no one has ever mistaken me for Einstein. In the gym, after a shower, some people have thought I was Bernie Sanders. But as soon as they started talking to me, they could see that I didnt have his native intelligence.

Science requires no experience, profession, skill or money. Luckily, I was, and am, qualified. If you are a little curious and can think clearly, you can probably do an experiment. I suppose it helps to be a little CDO (which is Obsessive Compulsive Disorder with the letters in the correct sequence). It also helps to be able to focus on a single topic for a long period of time. This requirement has hampered me throughout my career.

Being a scientist probably takes a little money, too, but much less than you might think if you listen to the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Scientists seldom complete all the studies that are possible using a single tool. Every time technology comes up with a new piece of equipment scientists need it to see what they can do with it. Everyone wants the new electric microscopes when we really havent exhausted the old steam-powered microscopes yet.

Science rushes recklessly ahead. Now we have a new method of engineering genetics called CRISPR. This is an acronym for CRISPR/cas9 which stands for Clustered Regularly-Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated protein 9. Id call it CRISPR for sure if I had to say the full name too many times. One could sprain their frenulum or something trying to say all that.

The deal is that CRISPR has decreased the time and costs of genetic engineering by about 99 percent. Generally, reducing time and costs is a great boon to mankind. As a scientist, I am thrilled! However, it just occurred to me that making it faster and cheaper to destroy ourselves may not be in our best interests.

While Monsanto and the two other food monopolies are excited to make more food, now some medical scientists want to eliminate certain neurological and psychiatric diseases that have been the key to producing the great minds of history. Medical scientists seem to see variations in life as problems to be solved. There should be no deviations or abnormalities outside of a normal curve.

However, humans would be smart to notice that genetic variants contribute to psychiatric conditions that may be beneficial depending on ones environment or genetic background. For example, both Thomas Edison and Einstein were considered addled and were kicked out of school. Tennessee Williams feared the process of thought and nearly went mad. The rate of bipolar disorder is 10 times higher among writers than among the general population, and 40 times higher among poets.

I will insert a shameless self-promotion here concerning my book Between Two Mirrors, available on Amazon.

It is a mixture of science essays by a scientist with a spotty record in public school and poetry by the same person, who some continue to believe may have mental problems.

In short, genetic engineering shows a gross misunderstanding of evolution.

Evolution does not progress toward some ideal species where each individual is identical to the others. Instead, it tinkers around the edges of a species toward adaptation to some local niche that itself changes as the species change. It is impossible to predict the result of evolution because the environment selects the species, and the selected species alters the environment. The best one can say is that evolution produces diversity.

Unruly white hair is a characteristic of old, white males of European descent and, in and of itself, is not a sign of genius. However, mental aberrations are not always something to be eliminated. They may be capable of enriching mankind beyond what one might expect. If CRISPR had been available 72 years ago, you might have been spared this column. However, Id have had a lot less fun.

Gary McCallister, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), is a professor emeritus of biological sciences at Colorado Mesa University.

Read more here:

Engineering a solution to genetic uniqueness - Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African … – Genetic Literacy Project

[Nteranya Sanginga is director general of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.]

The role of genetic engineering in agriculture and food has generated enormous interest and controversies, with large-scale embrace by some nations and wholesale bans by others.

Many studies have been done and much research remains to be done on the impact genetically modified organisms (GMO) can have on broader food systems.

Fast-moving developments, however, suggest that lines drawn in the sand both for or against the broader use of GMOs risk becoming a distraction, particularly in Africa.

It appears we are on the brink of a deluge of new discoveries many of which may not need the kind of capital-intensive agricultural operations where GMOs were first developed and can instead directly address the needs of smallholders in developing countries and the specific food and nutrition security and climate change challenges they face.

Genome editing can now economically be applied to the crop cultivars that farmers in a given locale prefer, consisting of highly targeted interventions that can address specific challenges, and dont take years of breeding to consolidate.

Its a new world. Lets have a new debate, not the old one.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:The Challenge Ahead: Harnessing Gene Editing to Sustainable Agriculture

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia

Read the original here:

CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African ... - Genetic Literacy Project

Marthlize Tredoux: Why genetic engineering is not all bad – Wine Magazine

My previous post on pesticides attracted some interest, so I wanted to follow up with simple to digest bits about the upsides of genetic engineering. Ill tie it back to why it might eventually be a critical technology for application in the vineyards too (since this is WineMag). Pass the smelling salts for everyone who just fainted at that and lets get started.

Again, a quick clarification on some terms used.

Since RoundUp/glyphosate is quickly becoming a straw man in this whole debate, Ill pull in a few different examples of existing and potential advancements. There are, of course, concerns about GE tech. Maybe Ill round out this tangent with a third piece focusing on the real issues vs the imagined ones. But for today, I want to focus on the good stuff:

Bt crops with built-in pesticidesBt toxins (proteins from a bacteria called Bacillus thuringiensis) have been inserted into transgenic crops to confer resistance against certain insects. In 2013, Bt brinjals were introduced commercially in Bangladesh as part of GM trials. To date, it has been planted on 12 ha across 120 farms. These farmers have cut pesticide use by 80% so far a rate which would not only alleviate negative environmental effects but also the health of farmers. Farmers are also reporting unprecedented increases in yield, which bodes well for their economic well-being.

Golden Rice the unavailable lifesaverThis one kills me. But not literally. Not like Vitamin A deficiency kills thousands of children annually, and leaves many thousands more disabled. Between 250,000 350,000 children go blind each year due to Vitamin A Deficiency. Golden Rice a GE cultivar enriched with Vitamin A has been available since 2002. Syngenta had been key in developing the technology and essentially made it freely available for use, in an attempt to bypass opposition from the anti-GMO lobby. It didnt work. The technology was opposed and Golden Rice remains unused aside from a handful of free licenses for subsistence farming not nearly the potential scale to make a significant difference in communities severely affected by malnutrition.

Organic cotton a celebrity gets it wrongIn 2016, Emma Watson wore a Calvin Klein dress, made in collaboration with green consultancy Eco-Age. Via Instagram, Ms Watson extolled the virtues of organic cotton above conventional, specifically that organic cotton is farmed without using harmful chemicals. It seems that Hermione didnt do her homework this time around though. The Bt technology I mentioned previously is also in cotton. While not as harmful as, say, copper sulfate, organic cotton farmers do spray their crops with Bt and other substances to battle severe crop damage from insects. Farmers growing Bt cotton have reduced their insecticide spraying significantly. States like Oklahoma report yields doubling over the past 20 years, improved fibre quality, better weed control and insecticide use down by more than 50%. You know what that is? Thats an improvement in sustainability. Impressive, no?

What about grapevine?The potential for GE technology in grapevine (including whats being worked on and what has been proposed) is a topic for discussion all on its own. It should definitely be noted that the potential application for GE technology is not limited to pest control. The creeping effects of climate change will eventually irrevocably change the viticulture landscape. The ability of different regions to produce quality grapes will change as rainfall and temperatures rise or fall outside the ideal conditions for grape growing.

If a technology was available to mitigate these effects a grapevine that can deal with increased CO2 levels, or one that is able to produce equivalent yield at higher temperatures and prolong a wine regions lifespan in the face of major climate shifts, isnt that something we need to consider reasonably, and without hysteria?

Tagged Marthlize Tredoux

More here:

Marthlize Tredoux: Why genetic engineering is not all bad - Wine Magazine

Spark hemophilia B gene therapy clears another early test – FierceBiotech

Spark Therapeutics has posted fresh data from a phase 1/2 trial of its hemophilia B gene therapy, SPK-9001. The data suggest Sparks tapering courses of steroids successfully arrested the factor IX (FIX) declines seen in two patients who appeared to have an immune reaction to the Spark100 vector capsid.

Philadelphia-based Spark first reported on the two patients in December. At that time, the fall in FIX activityfrom 71% to 68% and, more dramatically, 32% to 12%raised concerns about the safety of the treatment. Spark downplayed these concerns, noting that the patient who received steroids more promptly only experienced a 3% decline in FIX activity. The latest set of data backed up Sparks confidence.

Both patients have now completed their tapering courses of steroids. After completing the courses of steroids, both patients saw their alanine aminotransferase levels return to baseline. The FIX activity of the subject whose level fell to 12% has since stabilized. Spark said the patient has been at around 15% over the nine weeks since finishing the course of steroids, a level likely to result in improved clinical outcomes. The other patients FIX activity is back up above 70%.

Our analysis suggests that a tapering course of oral corticosteroids has been well-tolerated and may help control potential capsid immune responses following SPK-9001 infusion, Spark CSO Katherine High, M.D., said in a statement.

Those data could lessen concerns that immune responses will scuttle the gene therapy, which has consistently delivered higher FIX activity levels than its main rival, uniQures AMT-060. UniQure sees safety as an area in which it may have an edge over Spark, although questionmarks hang over the elevated liver enzymes seen in some patients in the study.

Other aspects of the Spark data drop are free from red flags. Mean steady-stage FIX activity in the 10 participants who are 12 weeks or more post treatment stood at 33% at the last count. That is up on the 28% Spark reported in its December update. And with the range of responses spanning from 14% to 81%, it is also well clear of the 3% to 12.7% uniQure recorded in its high-dose cohort in December.

UniQure has argued FIX activity levels are less important than clinical benefits, such as cessation of bleeding and reduction in infusions. Sparks latest data show SPK-001 continuing to perform well against these measures. At the last count, the annualized bleeding rate was down 96%. The fall in the annualized infusion rate was 99%.

Go here to see the original:

Spark hemophilia B gene therapy clears another early test - FierceBiotech

Angionetics Nears Key Gene Therapy Trial for Coronary Heart Disease – Xconomy

Xconomy San Diego

Christopher Reinhard will tell you there is nothing unusual about the 20-plus years hes spent getting an experimental heart therapy to late-stage clinical trials.

Very rarely will you get a short story on development of a drug, said Reinhard (above), who is a principal investor and the CEO of San Diego-based Angionetics. Two decades is about what you would expect for a new drug-making method, Reinhard said.

That may be true, but it doesnt begin to convey the tortuous path that Reinhard has followed to get Angionetics where it is today. The biotech is starting a phase 3 trial in the next few months that seeks to enroll some 320 patients with myocardial ischemiawhen clogged coronary arteries reduce the flow of oxygen-rich blood to the heart.

To treat the disease, Angionetics isnt testing some new type of cholesterol-lowering drug, or a stent to help open clogged arteries.

Rather, its attempting a risky and less-proven methodgene therapy, in which new genetic instructions are transported into the body to help produce a specific protein. Gene therapies have been in development for decades, but are only now starting to come of age thanks to a variety of technological advances. Two therapies are approved in Europe, from UniQure (NASDAQ: QURE) and GlaxoSmithKline, both for ultra rare immune and metabolic diseases. Spark Therapeutics (NASDAQ: ONCE) this year is expected to file the first ever U.S. approval application for a gene therapy, a treatment for a form of childhood blindness.

Angionetics gene therapy, Ad5FGF-4 (Generx), is intended to stimulate the growth of new blood vessels in the heart. A catheter inserted through the groin delivers the genescarried within modified virusesinto heart cells, where they are supposed to produce a protein, fibroblast growth factor-4, that helps grow new blood vessels.

The hope is to ease chest pain and relieve the effects of clogged coronary arteries by stimulating the growth of new blood vessels in areas in the heart where there is insufficient blood flow. Were just taking the heart and trying to enhance its ability to grow more blood vessels, Reinhard said.

Angionetics image highlights growth of collateral blood vessels (Image by Bryan Christie Design, used with permission)

While gene therapies are more advanced than ever, and several experimental treatments aimed at heart disease and heart failure are being tested, none have yet succeeded. A heart failure gene therapy from San Diegos Celladon, for instance, failed in 2015.

Still, the potential prize is substantial. Of the estimated 16.5 million Americans with coronary heart disease, Angionetics Reinhard said about half experience heart-related chest pain.

The current standard of care offers two principal methods of treatment. The first course of therapy is usually to prescribe drugs like nitrates that temporarily dilates blood vessels to Next Page

Bruce V. Bigelow is the editor of Xconomy San Diego. You can e-mail him at bbigelow@xconomy.com or call (619) 669-8788

See the original post here:

Angionetics Nears Key Gene Therapy Trial for Coronary Heart Disease - Xconomy

These Species Can Recode Their Own Genetics – Futurism

In Brief More than any other species on earth, octopuses are particularly smartthey can solve puzzles, use tools, and communicate using color. Now scientists are saying they're also capable of editing their RNA. Gene Editing

A team of scientists led by Joshua Rosenthal at the Marine Biological Laboratory and Noa Liscovitch-Braur and Eli Eisenberg at Tel Aviv University have discovered that octopusesand squid are capable of a type of genetic alteration called RNA editing. The process is rare among other species, leading scientists to believe that the cephalopods have evolved to follow a special kind of gene recoding.

Normally, living creatures use the information contained in DNA to make proteins, and RNA is the go-between, simply transmitting the message in the DNA. More than 60 percent of RNA transcripts in squid are recoded by editing, and similar levels of RNA editing were identified in other cephalopod species, including two octopusesand a cuttlefish. This changes the message that gets sent out, which in turn changes the proteins that get produced. In comparison, other species like fruit flies and humans experience recoding events only a fraction of one percent of the time. But exactly how the gene editing mechanics work is a mystery.

When do they turn it on, and under what environmental influences? It could be something as simple as temperature changes or as complicated as experience, a form of memory, says Rosenthal.

The inherent characteristics of this species have prompted scientists to compare cephalopods to aliens, given their camouflage capability, blue blood, and ability to see polarized light. Their ability to manipulate their RNA demonstrates the importance of editing, which demonstrates how their species have possibly been forgoing standard evolution, sacrificing the ability to quickly evolve in order to develop their impressive brainpower.

Technically, an animal could use RNA editing to change the nature of its proteins without completely altering the underlying DNA instructions. This makes the cephalopods ability to do it a very interesting phenomenon, but its unclear as to why the species requires this much RNA editing.Many of the edited proteins were found in the animals brains, which is why scientists think the editing and their brainpower could be linked.

All of this, however, is still a hypothesis. Further research is needed to determine exactly how the editing mechanism works. Researchers hope to discover the role that RNA editing plays in the development of these species, and whether deeper insight into the process could ultimately lead to treatments for diseases like cystic fibrosis.

Continue reading here:

These Species Can Recode Their Own Genetics - Futurism

With Afro-Futurism, Octavia Butler created her own reality: Larry Wilson – LA Daily News

Lotta good writers out there.

Lotta good novelists.

Few craft an entirely new genre, though. One who did, Octavia Butler, who thousands of acolytes credit with creating Afro-Futurism, left her papers to the Huntington Library, which in a new show celebrates her amazing writing and wonderfully American life story of self-creation after a childhood of poverty in the Northwest Pasadena ghetto.

Telling My Stories, which runs through Aug. 7, is one of those roomful-of-arcana museum biopics that I suppose you have to come to with at least a little interest beforehand in the subject. But once visitors wander past the West Hall of the main library exhibit space at the Huntington, many who otherwise just wanted to get a gander at the Gutenberg will be pulled into Butlers room, first by the oversized black and white portrait of the formidable, 6-foot-tall author staring out, and then by all thats contained on the walls and in the display cases.

This isnt like a visit with the papers of some Ivy League tweedster. Octavia Butlers widowed mother was a maid in a wealthy Pasadena household. Octavias exposure to books but for the Bible was not going to happen at home. But, thanks to the childrens section then known as the Peter Pan Room of the Pasadena Library, she discovered reading for pleasure. She began to scrawl little escapist stories about horses and romance. And then, according to Natalie Russell, the Huntingtons assistant curator of literary collections, Butler saw the 1954 B movie Devil Girl from Mars, and had a simple inspiration in reaction to the dumbed-down tale: I can write better than that.

Once she graduated from Muir High and Pasadena City College, and began hanging out at the Los Angeles Library downtown, reading more science fiction, Russell says Butler grew tired of stories featuring only white male heroes. I can write my own stories and I can write myself in, Butler often said after that.

It almost looks easy, or at least inevitable, a writers life in hindsight. But a shy, gangly girl such as Butler had zero role models for her craft. This exhibit shows the Benjamin Franklin-esque manner in which Butler created herself through the national pastime of over-the-top motivational imagineering. I am a bestselling writer, she wrote in ballpoint on lined three-hole-punched papers in the show. I write bestselling books and excellent short stories. Both books and short stories win prizes and awards.

And so she did. Eventually, because she willed it, she was mentored by Harlan Ellison, the Sherman Oaks sci fi giant, and gained entry to the Open Door Program for minority writers of the Writers Guild of America, West. Not that it was easy. No MFA programs or scholarships for her. In a Dear Mama letter Butler typed but never sent from a workshop, she wrote, Im afraid I cant write and I know I cant do anything else. Im blocked. ... Im alone here. I mean, Im the only Negro. That shouldnt mean anything. It means a lot.

Advertisement

She unblocked, and, working menial L.A. office jobs by day, she wrote at night. She was 28 when she sold her first novel, Patternmaster, to Doubleday in 1975. As she gave me a preview of the show on Thursday, curator Russell noted of Butlers astounding Kindred, in which an African-American woman of today time travels back to a slave plantation, that only a woman protagonist such as the novels Dana had a chance of flying under the radar of the antebellum South and and making it home.

Butler won the Hugo, Nebula and a MacArthur genius grant. The big one. Like a salary, leaving her free to write. The only thing she ever wanted to do.

Larry Wilson is on the Southern California News Group editorial board. lwilson@scng.com.

Here is the original post:

With Afro-Futurism, Octavia Butler created her own reality: Larry Wilson - LA Daily News

The Relationship of The Future: A Man Married a Robot He Built … – Futurism

In BriefA Chinese engineer facing the realities of a widening gendergap in China, and the pressure to marry found a creative andcontroversial solution: he built himself a robot bride. Yingying

While Tindr and other apps might be the height of how technology is shaping human relationships, an engineer in China has taken it to the next level:Zheng Jiajia has married a robot he created.

Zheng, an artificial intelligence expert, spent two months dating Yingying, who he built late last year. Hemade their relationship official in asimple ceremony with his mother and friends in attendance. Or at least as official as the government would allow. Local authorities do not actually recognize the union, through the ceremony did follow Chinese tradition.Click to View Full Infographic

Zhengsdecision to wedthe robot was spurred bymounting pressure for the 31-year-old to marry. Due toChinas one-child policy,sex-selective abortions are common (and preferential to male offspring). China, therefore, has oneworst gender gaps in the world. There are 113.5 men for every 100 women in the country, according to the World Economic Forum. That fact, combined with views on matrimonyamong Chinas middle class, is making itdifficult for men to find wives.

As for Zheng and Yingying, the first hurdle in their relationship may be not dissimilar from human relationships: communication. Yingying is capable of reading some Chinese characters and images and can even speak a few words. Zheng is already working on an update which would hopefully allow her to walk (as of now she must be carried everywhere), do household chores, and converse at a higher level.

Reactions around the world to this unprecedented union have, of course, been mixed but its a very clear demonstration of how relationships and intimacy are evolving in the context of advancing technology.

Futurism explored this concept in previous report:

Technology is pushing human sexuality into uncharted terrain. Its transforming how we express love and intimacy, and holds tremendous potential for deeper emotional and physical connections. While everyone stands to benefit, this is perhaps especially true for those who face sexual challenges due to distance, loneliness, discrimination, or disability.

For many people faced with physical, emotional, and geographic challenges that impact their relationships, turning totechnology for emotional and sexual fulfillment may be their only option. And there are a number of options in that vein, many of which involve the use of remote sex tech, such as long-distance kissing devices, VR haptic body suits, or connected pillows for couples who are in two different geographic locations. Other avenues include adult virtual worlds where users create avatarsand join in virtual gatherings. Similar to Zhengs idea, there are also those creating robotic prototypes equipped with the illusion of sentience and human augmentation which provide companionship for human users.

If anything, these emerging technologies are able to provide context for the integral role that relationships play in human interaction. How these innovations will one day shape human connection and intimacy, however, is very much still evolving.

See the original post:

The Relationship of The Future: A Man Married a Robot He Built ... - Futurism

Scientists Just Created a Material for Self-Healing Smartphones – Futurism

In BriefInspired by Wolverine, the ultimate self-healing hero, aresearcher has created a self-healing polymer that conductselectricity. This material may one day be used in smartphones thatcan repair themselves. Wolverine-Inspired Material

A researcher inspired by the X-Mens self-healing hero, Wolverine, has created a self-healing polymeric material for use in soft robotics and electronic devices like smartphones. Chao Wang, Ph.D. presented his teams research yesterday at the 253rd National Meeting and Exposition of the American Chemical Society.

When I was young, my idol was Wolverine from the X-Men, Dr. Wang said in a press release. He could save the world, but only because he could heal himself. A self-healing material, when carved into two parts, can go back together like nothing has happened, just like our human skin.

Chemical bonding is the key to self-repair, and materials can have two types of bonds: covalent bonds, which are stronger and dont easily reform once they are broken, and non-covalent bonds, which are weaker but more dynamic. The challenge with many non-covalent bonds is balancing that desirable flexibility with the ability to conduct electricity. Most self-healing polymers form hydrogen bonds or metal-ligand coordination, but these arent suitable for ionic conductors, explained Dr. Wang.

Wangs team looked for an alternative approach and settled upon an ion-dipole interaction. Ion-dipole interactions have never been used for designing a self-healing polymer, but it turns out that theyre particularly suitable for ionic conductors, said Dr. Wang. To that end, the team combined a stretchable, polar polymer with a mobile, ionic salt. The polymer, poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene), contains polar groups that interact with the ionic salt to create the ion-dipole force.

The result is a material that is conductive and extremely flexible, capable of stretching up to 50 times its starting size and stitching itself back together again completely within the space of a single day after being ripped in half. The material is also conductive enough for use with electronics and artificial muscles.

The researchers plan to alter the polymer to improve its properties next. For example, they are working toward achieving functionality in very humid conditions and other harsh environments. Previous self-healing polymers havent worked well in high humidity, Wang said. We are currently tweaking the covalent bonds within the polymer itself to get these materials ready for real-world applications.

The team also acknowledged that, while the material was able to self-heal without the application of intense pressure, exactly how much pressure must be applied for it to self-heal is unknown. This remains an area for further study.

All of the materials used to create the polymer are commercially available, so manufacturing it should remain inexpensive, especially at scale. However, the researchers acknowledge that there are many practical hurdles to clear before the material will be available commercially. I think we still have a lot of things to do before we can really use it for smartphones, Wang said at yesterdays press conference.

However, if this material lives up to its promise, dropping your expensive phone might not be such a tragedy one day soon.

Original post:

Scientists Just Created a Material for Self-Healing Smartphones - Futurism

A Space Station That Orbits the Moon May Be on the Way – Futurism

In BriefAs the ISS winds down its mission and scientific work, the aninternational team considers a station in lunar orbit to replaceit. A lunar outpost would support the same scientific research andserve as a way station along the route to Mars. ISS is Passing the Baton

In the latest instance of our human obsession with the Moon, the International Spacecraft Working Group (ISWG), the agency architects of the International Space Station (ISS), recently met to discuss how to replace the station, which is set to be decommissioned in 2024. A plan to construct a space outpost in lunar orbit is evolving, and at this latest meeting the participants agreed to a tentative orbit trajectoryto be finalized by 2018.

The ISS was created as an international scientific laboratory for astronauts to conduct experiments in space. Despite our many technological advances, the environment of space is impossible to recreate on Earth, yet the drive to explore and even colonize space demands scientific experimentation in that environment.

The ISS has also been the center of private, commercial research in support of space colonization initiatives. The work conducted on ISS has greatly improved life back on Earth, supporting global water purification efforts, growing high-quality protein crystals for use in medical research, and providing new technologies for use in a wide range of industries.

A space station in lunar orbit poses significant challenges, but, compared with the ISS, holds more opportunity for testing technologies for deep space missions and greater scientific potential. Much ISS research centers on microgravity, studieswhich could be supported within a lunar outpost. The station would also allow for more study of the Moon itself thanks to its proximity to our natural satellite. A lunar orbit station could also serve as a stepping stoneon a journey to Mars.

Members of the ISWG agreed that the stationshould utilize plug and play parts so that new components can be adapted to existing infrastructure. They also want to make the development of common standards a priority.

At this time, designs for the new station incorperatethe Canadian robotic arm from the ISS, a Russian airlock, and propulsion and power systems from the U.S. Although Russia favors a lunar surface base, NASA is pushing for a higher orbit because of its convenience forMars access. Thus far, the plans cite a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit, a widened oval path 1450 km (900 miles) from the Moon at its closest and 69,000 km (43,000 miles) at its furthest, taking a week to complete one rotation.

Additionalbenefits of a station in this orbit would include good communication with Earth, constant sunlight for solar panels, and reduced need for departing spacecrafts to use height boosts that consume large amounts of fuel. The primary drawback of the design is that trips to the Moons surface would be somewhat difficult based on the distance, which has left Russia carrying on with its investigation of a Moon base. Solutions might include compromising with a modular design, or changing the orbit periodically.

The timeline right now plans for construction throughout the 2020s. This would have the new station ready to serve missions to Mars and elsewhere in the 2030s. Interestingly, if this timeline holds true, by the time the station is in orbit, private companies may already be on the Moon or in orbit around it.Bigelow Aerospace hopes its inflatable space station will be in orbit around the Moon by 2020, and SpaceX may be there even sooner.

Go here to see the original:

A Space Station That Orbits the Moon May Be on the Way - Futurism

We Just Created an Artificial Synapse That Can Learn Autonomously – Futurism

In Brief A team of researchers has developed artificial synapses that are capable of learning autonomously and can improve how fast artificial neural networks learn. Mimicking the Brain

Developments and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have been due in large part to technologies that mimic how the human brain works. In the world of information technology, such AI systems are called neural networks. These contain algorithms thatcan be trained, among other things, to imitate how the brain recognizes speech and images. However, running an Artificial Neural Networkconsumes a lot of time and energy.

Now, researchers from the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)inThales, the University of Bordeaux in Paris-Sud, and Evry have developed an artificial synapse called a memristordirectly on a chip. It paves the way for intelligent systems that requiredless time and energy to learn, and it can learn autonomously.

In the human brain, synapses work as connections between neurons. The connections are reinforced and learning is improved the more these synapses are are stimulated. The memristor works in a similar fashion. Its made up of a thin ferroelectric layer(which can be spontaneously polarized) that is enclosed between two electrodes. Using voltage pulses, their resistance can be adjusted, like biologicalneurons. The synaptic connection will be strong when resistance is low, and vice-versa. The memristors capacity for learning is based on this adjustable resistance.

AI systems have developed considerably in the past couple of years. Neural networks built with learning algorithms are now capable of performing tasks which synthetic systems previously could not do. For instance, intelligent systems can now compose music, play games and beat human players, or do your taxes. Some can even identify suicidal behavior, or differentiate between what is lawful and what isnt.

This is all thanks to AIs capacity to learn, the only limitation of which is the amount of time and effort it takes to consume the data that serve as its springboard. With the memristor, this learning process can be greatly improved. Work continues on the memristor, particularly on exploring ways to optimize itsfunction. For starters, the researchers have successfully built a physical model to help predict how it functions. Their work is published in the journal Nature Communications.

Soon, we may have AI systems that can learn as well as out brains can or even better.

View post:

We Just Created an Artificial Synapse That Can Learn Autonomously - Futurism

Elon Musk’s Attempt to Merge to the Human Brain With AI May Have Serious Problems – Futurism

Musks Neural Lace

When Elon Musk confirmed last week that hes working on a way to combine humans and machines, it wasnt exactly a surprise. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has long been in favor of a human-machine merger in order to keep up with artificial intelligence (AI) development. Not to mentionavoiding the end of humankind at the hands of machines.

Neuralink is Musks unconventionalproposal forpreempting thatfear.The budding company will build a deviceto be implanted into the human brain. This device which is likely to be called aneural lace would give the human brain the ability to directly interface with gadgets and other devices. It could also improve the human brains memory by increasing its storage capacity. Such brain-computer implants could also lead to improved treatments for neurological diseases and cognitive disorders.If that wasnt impressive enough, such a device could potentially be used toreprogram a persons neural code.

In an piece he wrote for CNBC, Dustin McKissen wondered aloud how such a technology would be introduced quite literally into the public consciousness: one question Musk hasnt answered (and in fairness, it may not be his responsibility to answer) is who will have the privilege of getting a neural lace? McKissen is the founder and CEO of PR and strategy firm McKissen + Company, whose work includes analyzing the effects of politics in the U.S. business climate.

If the essentialness of maternity care is up for debate, it goes without saying Elon Musks neural lace probably wont be covered under your insurance plan, McKissen wrote, referring to the Obamacare repeal that has been at the forefront of U.S. political debate as of late. In other words, not only do the rich seem to get richerthey may get the benefit of having a computer-enhanced brain.

McKissen warns of how social inequality could render Musks neural lace beneficial only to a select few, rather than the human race on the whole. What will income inequality look like if only the very wealthy get an upgrade? And will children be able to get a neural lace?, he asked. Such a society is reminiscent of one featured in the science fiction film Elysium, where only the privileged few had access to technologys benefits.

McKissenadded: Research has shown there is already a digital divide contributing to chronic poverty in low-income and rural communities. That digital divide will only grow when some of us can afford a brain enhanced with artificial intelligence. [] most of us are going to have to compete with computer-enhanced peers in an already unequal world.

McKissen isnt arguing that some people would be more deserving of access to advanced technology like a neural lace, but rather, he points out theneed to improve the current playing field whichone could argue extends beyond the question of who gets a neural lace.

As he said, In a world thats growing increasingly class conscious, the ability for a relatively small number of people to become more than human could be a disaster for everyoneespecially if that technology arrives in a time when income inequality is even worse than it is today.

Continued here:

Elon Musk's Attempt to Merge to the Human Brain With AI May Have Serious Problems - Futurism

For $250000, You Can Have a Flying Suit Like Iron Man’s – Futurism

In Brief Gravity is a British technology start-up founded by Richard Browning in March 2017 dedicated to improving aviation across the world. Their first suit, the Daedalus, is expected to travel at speeds of 100 mph and costs around $250,000 to produce. A New Way To Fly

The media is bursting at its seams with what seems to be the superhero revolution. Comic book publishers like Marvel and DC have spilled over onto the big screen, and now it may look as though theyre spilling over into our technology in the real world. While we have been making efforts at a superhero heads up displayor an iron man workout suit, we are also inching our way up to a functional flight suit.

Gravityis a British technology start-up startedby Richard Browning on March 31, 2017. The company has developed a human propulsion system to re-imagine manned flight. With miniaturizedjet engines and a customized exoskeleton, the Daedalus is expected to push us into a new era of aviation. Browning and his team developed the suit over the course of 2016, with the teams journey covered in this short documentary:

Brownings team put together six kerosene-fuelled micro gas turbines to lift the manned-suit upessentially, a man tethered to six compact jet engines. Initial testing began with Browning performing assisted jumps with four engines.Thinking additional engines would help him levitate off the ground, the team added two additional engines with leg mounts. The final design looks slightly different, as it houses two engines within the suits back in conjunction with two engines attached at each arm. The design also has a heads-up display that relays fuel information to the user through a WiFi connection. The suit is expected to reach speeds of 160 km/h (100 mph), but you can test that out yourself.

Gravitys developments marks the beginning of a new era of human aviation. While the suit seems clunky now, so did the first computers when they were built. Were witnessing pockets of intelligent capital develop, and isnt too hard to imagine the future of this technology.

Visit link:

For $250000, You Can Have a Flying Suit Like Iron Man's - Futurism

Freedom Caucus member reveals GOP’s ‘vindictive retaliation’ | New … – New York Post

President Donald Trump took aim at the Freedom Caucus last month after they helped torpedo his ObamaCare replacement bill, claiming they will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they dont get on the team and fast.

But, as Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ken Buckexplains in his new book, Drain the Swamp (Regnery), out Tuesday, the group was founded to give conservative values more leverage in Congress. Here, in an excerpt, Buck explains the groups origins and defends its tactics amidst the GOP backlash.

I was elected to the House of Representatives in January 2015, and shortly after arriving in Washington, the newest GOP members elected me to serve as president of the freshman c lass, which made me their representative to the GOP leadership. At the same time, a group of Republican congressional conservatives set up the Freedom Caucus, and I was among them.

Unlike the Republican Study Committee, which had started as a conservative caucus but was open to all and therefore had been subverted by the Republican leadership (which had encouraged moderates to join), the Freedom Caucus was to be a closed, invitation-only caucus. Republican leadership needed 218 votes to get anything done, half of the House plus one. The aim of our new Freedom Caucus was to get leverage for common-sense solutions and conservative principles. We soon had about 37 members, which was enough to deny then-Speaker John Boehner a majority if everyone voted together. This gave conservatives leverage because Democrats almost always vote as a bloc against anything Republicans want.

The first big test of the Freedom Caucus arrived when Speaker Boehner tried to force us to agree to give President Obama more power (or what had been known as trade promotion authority) to negotiate trade deals with foreign countries. We didnt think that was a good idea.

Now trade promotion authority itself is not a bad thing. Beginning in 1974, Congress had granted special authority to the president to facilitate trade deals in the best interest of America and agreed to expedite the approval of those deals. The idea was to give trading partners reassurance that Congress, and special interests represented in Congress, would not amend trade agreements negotiated by the executive branch. Congress can give guidelines on the front end, but only a yes or no vote on the final agreement.

This fast-track authority was allowed to expire in 2007 when Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate and George W. Bush was the president. Subsequently, the Obama administration began negotiating a Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement assuming that the executives trade promotion authority would eventually be reinstated. In April 2015, several senators introduced a bill to reinstate and expand that authority. The Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 cleared the Senate in May and arrived in the House to mixed reviews.

I had many concerns, frankly, about granting the president more authority to negotiate anything. President Obama had just negotiated with the worlds largest sponsor of terrorism Iran. He had agreed to give $150 billion to the country responsible for the improvised explosive devices maiming and killing thousands of American soldiers in Iraq. His secret nuclear agreement with Iran had side deals he failed to reveal to Congress; and the agreement itself though a treaty in all but name was not deemed a treaty so that Obama could avoid objections from Congress and the constitutional stipulation that treaties be ratified by the Senate.

Of course, as freshmen, we had all been told that we should never vote against our party on procedural motions.

I was not alone in my concern. Many of us did not believe President Obama had proven himself to be trustworthy. As this trade promotion authority bill came before the House, we balked at giving President Obama or any future president broader powers to make even worse deals. At least 33 other Republicans agreed with me.

What came next was a procedural issue. We vote on rules that allow a bill to come to the floor of the House. The majority party controls the process, if all members vote on party lines. Of course, as freshmen, we had all been told that we should never vote against our party on procedural motions.

Obama had insisted that he would only accept a Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill that included an increase in funding of the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, which is usually described as a training program for American workers adversely affected by trade agreements. Really it is a payoff to labor unions. Many Republicans considered the TAA to be nothing more than another opportunity to spend more money.

This particular rule was split into three smaller bills:

1)A TAA bill with Medicare spending cuts;

2)A TAA bill without any Medicare cuts;

3)The TPA legislation itself.

Emma Dumain at Roll Call summed up the purpose of the complex rule: The rule would state that, once passed, the Medicare offset provision also would be considered passed, canceling out the need to hold an actual vote on the Medicare language. In other words, once the rule was passed, the first vote to fund TAA with Medicare spending cuts would be considered passed without members actually voting on it. In this way, no one had to go on record as cutting funding for the elderly even though the reality was that nothing would actually be cut because Congress has ways of shifting money around to cover itself from criticism.

This wasnt simply a procedural motion. Legislative action was inserted into the rule and we were required to vote for a rule that would expand an out-of-control presidents authority and increase funding of the TAA.

I discussed this vote with Republican Congressman Mark Meadows of North Carolina and we both refused to go along with the madness. The whole purpose of this vote was to play the bipartisan game of increasing spending and federal power while giving members plausible deniability by disguising what we were actually voting on.

Thirty-four Republicans, mostly Freedom Caucus members, said no. If we stuck together, we had enough votes to bring the GOP total under the 218-vote majority needed to pass the rule.

As the time came to cast our votes, the party whips, members whose job it is to turn out votes, scurried to get the majority they needed. Speaker Boehner realized the vote could be close, and the usual bullying tactics werent working, at least not yet.

Pete Sessions of Texas, chairman of the powerful Rules Committee, and someone I considered a friend, tried to talk me out of opposing the party leadership. Pete was one of the architects of the Republican majority in 2010 and often referred to me as his little brother.

While Pete voted with Boehner to keep his chairmanship on Rules, he treated conservatives fairly and found ways to achieve harmony within the Republican conference.

When Pete came up to me and asked me to vote for the TPA rule, I paused out of respect for him. Finally, I looked at him and said I just couldnt do it. He told me I should always vote my conscience. I appreciated knowing there were still some good people in Congress.

The next person who tried to whip my vote wasnt nearly as pleasant. Boehner himself came striding up the center aisle towards me, grimacing and clearly unhappy with how the vote was going.

Buck! Put your card in and vote yes!

Sorry, sir, Im going to vote against this one.

What?

Im going to vote against this one, I repeated, and reached for my voting card. Boehner stormed off, looking for someone elses vote to change.

As the votes were being cast, it looked pretty certain that we had enough Republicans to block Boehner. But Boehner and Republican leadership did something unprecedented: They started whipping Democrats to vote for the bill, because they knew that many Democrats wanted to pass the TPA and TAA but needed political cover.

The rule passed by a vote of 217 to 212. It was a bipartisan victory to spend billions of dollars while dodging responsibility for that decision.

We all knew there would be consequences for our decision to stand on principle, but the level of vindictive retaliation still surprised me. Three members of the Republican Whip team, who voted against their party, were removed from their positions Trent Franks of Arizona, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, and Steve Pearce of New Mexico.

Lummis knew what was coming and left the whip team voluntarily. Boehner, she told me, clearly couldnt give a rip about Wyoming and its member of Congress, and had no sympathy for a conservative whip that thought members should vote their conscience. But her resignation wasnt good enough for Boehner. The leadership announced that she had been fired, along with Franks and Pearce.

At the next meeting of all House Republicans, Speaker Boehner called members out publicly in front of their peers to berate and humiliate them. Our committee chairs met with us individually, telling us we would lose our committee assignments if we voted against another rule, and that the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) the recipient of millions in members committee dues would never help us again.

Candidly, that second threat was worthless to members of the Freedom Caucus because the NRCC didnt help any of us anyway. You have to be almost 100 percent loyal to Republican leadership and in a competitive seat to receive any financial help from the NRCC. Freedom Caucus members contributed a lot of money to the NRCC, but we received no financial help in return. So losing NRCC support was a symbolic punishment, but losing committee assignments was a real threat.

Congressman Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, for one, was defeated in his 2016 primary in no small part because Boehner ousted him from his seat on the House Agricultural Committee and supported his primary opponent.

Within days of his vote against the rule, Congressman Meadows got a visit from House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah.

Meadows served as Government Operations subcommittee chairman and had been an exemplary chairman to that point, fully engaged with one of the best attendance records on the committee. Chaffetz had two issues with Meadows: voting against the rule and not paying his dues to the NRCC.

Chaffetz told Meadows he had to be a team player. He told him he had to give money across the street, meaning to the NRCC. The fact was that Meadows had a $21,000 check ready to give but had paused when leadership began to run attack ads against his fellow Republicans. He wanted assurances that his own party wouldnt run attack ads against him hardly an unreasonable request. When Chaffetz told him the speaker didnt have any control over the ads, Meadows told him that was nonsense. It was very clear where the message was coming from.

Chaffetz told Meadows he couldnt have him voting against the rule and not giving to the NRCC. So he took Marks chairmanship away.

But this time, the blowback from angry members of Congress and outraged citizens forced leadership to walk that back, and Chaffetz reinstated Meadows.

Then, Nevada Congressman Cresent Hardy, a fellow freshman, asked if he could talk with me. We walked together from the Capitol to the Cannon Building, where we both had offices on the fourth floor.

Ken, he spoke somewhat hesitantly as we approached my office, theres been a group of us whove met and were going to ask for your resignation as class president. We just dont think youre doing a good job.

I tried not to laugh. After all, there was no job description for class president in the House. The position was what anyone chose to make of it. I had been waiting to see what form the consequences of my vote would take, and now I knew. This was about payback for voting against the rule, pure and simple.

OK, you asked, I said with a shrug, and Im not going to resign.

Well, in that case, were going to have a special meeting to recall you, he replied, then paused before adding, and Im thinking of running for the position. I smiled as more of the plan came to light.

OK, if youve got the votes, I responded with a quick nod, then I guess you can do it. He kept talking, seemingly gaining confidence with each revelation.

They knew they didnt have the votes to do anything, so the meeting ended with no change in leadership.

Weve gone to the House parliamentarian and asked him what the procedure is to recall an officer in the class, Hardy said, and weve got the procedure down.

OK. There wasnt much more to say. We parted ways.

An e-mail went out to all the Republican freshman members except to me and the freshmen most supportive of me to inform them of an important meeting to discuss the performance of the class president. The meeting was scheduled by Congresswomen Mimi Walters of California and Elise Stefanik of New York. The morning before the meeting, I called a friend who worked with a conservative activist group. He got the word out. Radio shows, blogs and social media lit up about the move to oust me.

The House leadership was inundated with angry callers, and the leadership must have known that some members were stepping up to defend me as well.

Still, on Thursday morning, we had the freshman meeting, and I wasnt in control of it Walters and Stefanik were. Instead of removing me as they had originally planned, they gave each freshman member a chance to critique my performance.

They knew they didnt have the votes to do anything, so the meeting ended with no change in leadership.

During the meeting we agreed not to speak with the press about what transpired; I abided by that, but I noticed others didnt.

Still, the Beltway bullies had suffered at least a temporary defeat because the American people had spoken.

See the article here:

Freedom Caucus member reveals GOP's 'vindictive retaliation' | New ... - New York Post

Dream Job Alert: Defend Digital Freedom as an EFF Activist – EFF

Want to spend your days fighting for digital rights and building a grassroots movement across the U.S.? Youre in luck! EFF is hiring.

Were expanding the grassroots advocacy team at EFF. Part of our larger activism team dedicated to defending digital liberty in the public sphere, the grassroots team focuses on outreach to campus and community groups across the country and connecting them to advocacy opportunities, training resources, community organizing best practices and guidance, and allies both nearby and across the country.

The teams signature project is the Electronic Frontier Alliance. Launched in 2016, the Alliance includes 52 autonomous local groups across the country, from small nonprofits dedicated to civil rights to campus student groups and hacker spaces. Every group in the Alliance embraces a shared set of digital liberty principles including privacy, security, access to knowledge, creativity, and freedom of expression.

Groups in the Alliance each set their own agendas and organize their own programs. EFF's grassroots team coaches them in pursuing various forms of public education (including discussion events, teach-ins, movie screenings, and interactive workshops), as well as advocacy opportunities (such as engaging policymakers at both the federal and local level, writing op-eds, and organizing the occasional protest). The team at EFF strives to inspire, coordinate, and amplify their work.

The Alliance is the grassroots wing of EFFs traditional digital advocacy strategy. Were building these connections in offline spaces to strengthen the digital rights movement beyond EFF and defend the rights of all Internet users.

EFF's grassroots team, and our work building and coordinating the Alliance, are also diversifying our community, ensuring that the digital rights movement of tomorrow engages technology users across gender, orientation, race, socio-economic background, age, political affiliation, and location.

The Activist role focuses on building local communities and support their independent efforts to defend digital rights. Every day includes opportunities to connect, encourage, inspire, and support people passionately concerned about free speech, privacy, and technology.

Sometimes those opportunities entail acting as a mentor to a student who wants to make a difference on their college campus. At other times, they involve connecting supporters seeking digital security training to others in their respective areas poised to address their needs. Others include speaking to public audiences about why free speech is vital to a functional democracy, why both values require privacy, and how individuals can meaningfully defend those values in their respective communities.

If you appreciate freedom, share our concerns about how freedom is threatened online, and enjoy facilitating workshops, hosting conference calls, speaking in public, writing articles, connecting allies to each other, and meeting with local digital rights activists to coach and guide their advocacy, youll love this job.

This position offers a chance for frequent travel and speaking engagements, so it is ideal for someone who is curious about seeing new places and eager to connect with new people. When youre in town, youll work from the funky, fun, and fabulous EFF headquarters in San Francisco, a dog-friendly environment with flexible working hours, people from all walks of life, and staff-organized communities united around everything from weekend bike rides and board games to learning Spanish and baking pies. EFF offers unparalleled benefits, including dental & vision coverage, competitive pay, and retirement savings. We also offer further assistance with housing to ensure that employees (both renters and home buyers) can afford to live in the beautiful Bay Area, as well as relocation expenses for candidates moving from elsewhere.

What are you waiting for? Apply today and help us build the future of the digital rights movement.

View original post here:

Dream Job Alert: Defend Digital Freedom as an EFF Activist - EFF

Facing Freedom – Helena Independent Record

The Jewish people are about to embark on a journey. It is an annual ritual filled with song, teachings, food and ceremony. Pesach. Passover. The retelling of the 3,000-plus- year-old Exodus of the Israelites from enslavement in Egypt. We are encouraged to immerse ourselves in this holiday as if each of us, personally, has experienced both the bitterness of slavery and the redemptive power of liberation. Indeed, each of us, in our own way, has our own personal struggles or Mitzrayim (Egypt) to break free of. What better time than the beginning of spring to clean house (both figuratively and literally), embark on a spiritual quest and strive to live more fully, more compassionately in the world?

The story of the Jewish peoples exodus from Egypt, their wandering in the desert and, ultimately, their entering the Promised Land, is a focal point of Jewish tradition, ritual and history. We were once strangers in a strange land. Therefore, we vow to welcome the stranger into our midst. It is not just a matter of freedom from but freedom to. With freedom comes responsibility. We seek not just Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, but the courage and will to fight for the rights of all people to live in freedom, without fear of repression or reprisal because of their otherliness.

Traditionally, the Passover seder, which means order and involves 15 steps in the telling and retelling of our story, continues long into the night: midnight, to be exact. The festival is filled with much more than good food, ritual objects and symbolism. We ask questions; we talk about freedom, justice and faith. Ultimately, we recognize that speaking of such things is not enough. We must act. We must face the challenges that we see in our communities, society and world and then work to change what needs to be righted. We strive to make the world a better, fairer, more justice place for all.

One aspect of the Passover seder that is familiar to many is the recitation of the 10 plagues that befell the Egyptian people before Pharaoh ultimately Let My People Go. Back in the day, those plagues included such things as hail, frogs, darkness and disease. Today, as we recall the plagues of the past, we also acknowledge our modern day stumbling blocks that inhibit freedom for all. Ritualistically, for each plague that is mentioned, we dip one drop of wine or grape juice from our cups, recognizing that our own joy is diminished by the suffering of others. Im certain we can all conjure up at least 10 plagues that the world would be better off without right now: Destruction of our natural resources, xenophobia, extreme wealth inequality, Islamophobia, turning a blind eye to the cries of the refugee, anti-Semitism, homophobia, denial of climate disruption, misogyny, racism. The list could go on and on.

Ideally, at the conclusion of the Passover ceremony, the participants will experience a sense of transformation. We will have moved from a place of a hardened heart to one of compassion, empathy and action. But one night, or even two, may not be enough to ensure that we have fully internalized our desire to not just seek out freedom for ourselves, but to actively work for justice for all. In order to encourage success, on the second of Pesach, we begin a forty nine day spiritual journey: the Counting of the Omer, a process of personal growth, contemplation and introspection. At the conclusion of the Omer, we arrive at Mount Sinai and are ready to enter the Promised Land as a new nation: ready to face the challenges ahead, which are sure to come, but confident in our sense of community, pursuit of justice and freedom for all.

As the symbols of Spring emerge: buds on the trees, blossoming flowers, new Life in all its many forms, let us strive to make a fresh start, a new beginning, a time of peace, justice and security for all.

Chag Sameach (Happy Holiday)!

Janet Tatz, M.Ed., is the Jewish educator at Intermountain childrens home and the lay leader of the Helena Jewish community.

Read more:

Facing Freedom - Helena Independent Record

HS SOCCER ROUNDUP: Garrett scores game-winner for Freedom – Morganton News Herald

The Freedom girls soccer team defeated East Rutherford 1-0 on Friday night at the Catawba River Soccer Complex in a nonconference matchup as junior Erin Garrett scored the only goal of the game for the Lady Patriots from an assist by freshman Riley Carswell.

The Lady Patriots (5-8, 1-7 Northwestern 3A/4A Conf.) were outshot 16-12, and the visiting Cavaliers also held the corner-kick edge, 13-6. But Freedom junior goalkeeper Jalyn McCoy kept the clean sheet with nine saves to help preserve the victory.

The night before, Freedom fell at Watauga 9-0 in a league game played in driving sleet and gale-force winds. The Pioneers outshot Freedom 25-3 and also held a 10-4 corner-kick advantage.

The visiting Lady Panthers (2-8-1, 0-7 NWC) nearly earned their first conference triumph Friday but fell just short.

After an early Indians goal, Pattons Olivia Kirk evened the score in the 28th minute before the hosts tacked on the games final tally before halftime. Saint outshot Patton by a 14-5 margin and took eight corner kicks to Pattons two.

We played a solid second half and controlled the tempo much of the time, PHS coach Keith Scott said.

The host Lady Cavaliers (5-8-2, 4-5-1 South Mountain 2A/3A Conf.) dropped a fourth straight league game Thursday, fighting back from a 1-0 halftime deficit but falling in extra time. Jennifer Xiong scored EBs second-half goal, and keeper Ariana Hawkins posted six saves for the game.

The Lady Wildcats (0-12, 0-11 SMAC) fell Friday in Henrietta as Chase completed the season sweep. No more details were available.

Go here to read the rest:

HS SOCCER ROUNDUP: Garrett scores game-winner for Freedom - Morganton News Herald