Senate passes Russia sanctions bill, pushing back against Trump – CNN

The Senate approved the bill 98-2, with Republican Rand Paul of Kentucky and Independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont voting against the measure. The bill, which includes both Russian and Iranian sanctions, now heads to the House, which still needs to pass it before it goes to President Donald Trump's desk.

The measure is widely seen as a rebuke to Trump, as it hits Russia with new sanctions to punish Moscow for its interference in US elections, as well as over Moscow's aggression in Ukraine and Syria.

The bill establishes a review process for Congress to have a say whether the White House eases Russia sanctions. It also establishes new sanctions against those conducting cyberattacks on behalf of the Russian government as well as supplying arms to Syrian President Bashar Assad, and it allows for sanctions to hit Russia's mining, metals, shipping and railways sectors.

"We moved to make the Congress, not the President, the final arbiter of sanctions relief when necessary," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "Any idea of the President that he can lift sanctions on his own for whatever reason are dashed by this legislation."

The Russia sanctions measure was added as an amendment to an Iranian sanctions bill, after a deal was struck between the heads of the Senate Foreign Relations and Banking Committees. The Russia amendment was added to the sanctions bill in a 97-2 vote on Wednesday.

Despite the overwhelming vote, the Russia sanctions package was no sure thing. Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker of Tennessee had initially been hesitant to take it up, as the administration had expressed a hope it could improve relations with Moscow.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said this week that he was wary of Congress taking actions that could interfere with the administration's efforts to improve relations with Russia.

"What I wouldn't want to do is close the channels off," Tillerson told a Senate committee.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Thursday that the Trump administration is "committed to existing sanctions against Russia" but is "still reviewing the new Russia sanctions amendment."

"We will keep them in place until Moscow fully honors its commitment to resolve the crisis in Ukraine," Sanders said. "We believe the existing executive branch sanctions regime is the best tool for compelling Russia to fulfill its commitments."

Still, Corker and other Republicans said they expect Trump to sign the bill if it's passed by the House.

"I called over myself yesterday and just shared some thoughts with them. But look, this bill is going to become law," Corker told reporters on Wednesday. "I've had conversations with Tillerson more generally about our relationship with Russia, not about details (of the legislation)."

The Senate also passed two amendments before approving the bill. The first was a technical change that the sanctions would not apply to NASA and commercial space launches, as Russian rocket engines are used for the American Atlas V and Antares rockets.

The second reaffirmed "the strategic importance of Article 5" in NATO, the principle that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all members of the alliance.

CNN's Dan Merica contributed to this report.

View post:

Senate passes Russia sanctions bill, pushing back against Trump - CNN

Donald Trump Blocked Me on Twitter for Telling Him He’s Not as Cool as Witches – Newsweek

I reply to President Donald Trump'stweets sometimes.

I'm not proud of it. It's a compulsion, like biting fingernails or eating all the Doritos in the bag at once. When I wake up and see a blustery new message from our tweeter-in-chief, what am I supposed to do?Walk away? Perform yoga stretches? No. I carve out a snarkyretort. If I'm fast enough, I watch the likes and retweets roll in at lightning speed. (This is the 2017 equivalent of commenting "FIRST!" on an explosive message board thread.)

Sometimes, I try to debunk the misinformation Trump sharesthe false claimsabout an apologyletter from The New York Times, for instance, or the lies about his approval ratings. Other times, I just tweet Borat jokes.

Culture Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek Culture delivered to your inbox

Again: Not proud. The sight of some verified nobody pumping out atweetstorm in Trump's mentions has become such aclich that there are now numerous profiles of the people who do this every day. The genre is very ripe forparody:

I won't pretend this is some noble act of resistance (or, as they say, #resistance). It's just a quick shot ofdopamine when my tweet blows up. Plus, it'smomentarily satisfying to be able to talk back to Trump on the public medium he can'tstay away from. There isno historical precedent for Trump'sTwitter. The president of the United States communicates directly with us in unfiltered outbursts when he's at his angriest, and we get to respond. It's weird. Sometimes he even sees the responses. And then he gets madder.

On Thursday, Trump, or somebody with access to his account, must have seen my response to one of his tweets.I know this, because he blocked me.

The block came shortly after Trump tweeted about being caught in"the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history." (Presumably, he is referring to the Russia investigation.) The president's use of the phrase "witch hunt" is curious butahistorical. I sent a snarky reply telling Trump to stop comparing himself to witches, who've been persecuted far more than he is:

A few minutes later, I checked to see if Trump had done any more tweets. Instead, I found that he had blocked me. (If you're new to Twitter, this means I can't tweet at him or read his tweets anymore.)

Was I blocked due to a pattern of behavior or because that one joke hurt Trump's feelings? No idea.It would be flattering to think that the president has read the articles I've written about him, like the one in which I relayed the stories behind his terrible movie cameos or the one where I profiled his celebrity admirers. But that seems unlikely, since they don't get discussedonFox&Friends. Plus, Trump doesn't really seem to read,anyway.

Related: The ridiculous stories behind Donald Trump's movie and TV cameos

I'm not the first to be blocked. Trump has been making liberal use of the feature lately. He blocked the writer Bess Kalb, who frequently mocks his tweets. He evenblocked Stephen King the other day. Fellow author J.K. Rowling kindly offered to DM Trump's tweets to King:

In fact, Ashley Feinberg, over at Wired, has a running list of people Trump has blocked on Twitter. For a certain breed of journalist, being insulted by Trump is a badge of honor. CNN'sChris Cillizza, for instance, has had an unflattering quote from Trump in his Twitter bio for yearsproof that even a broken clock is right twice a day:

Chris Cillizza's Twitter bio. twitter.com

So I'm not alone. After I revealed I'd been blocked, I got some interesting replies. Random Trump-haters started tweeting at me with a strange mix of congratulations ("Welcome to the #BlockedByTrump club drinks are at 6," tweeted@BrandonTXNeely) and messages of condolence. "Wow, another one down," tweeted@MissNeverTrump, as though I'd been slain on the front lines of some war. One person shared a memethat says, "Live your life in such a way that Donald Trump blocks you on Twitter." (I assume this is an ancient Greek proverb.) Even the actress who voicedDil Pickles on Rugrats swung by to voice her support.

Meanwhile, I received a new wave ofvitriol from Trump supporters. One guy asked me if I support the recent shooting ofRepublicanRepresentative Steve Scalise. (I don't!) Another Twitter user called me a "dumb ass dork not worth anybody's time." (Tough, but fair.)

The weird thing about being blocked by Trump is that I can no longer look at his tweets, unless I open an incognito browser that was probably intended for porn, not statements from the president. This has worrisome constitutional implications. TheKnight First Amendment Institute has argued that Trump is violating people's right to free speech when he blocks them on Twitter.The Institute has threatened to file a lawsuit. "If theres any kind of forum the government is operating for expression, it may not discriminate on the basis of viewpoint," a senior fellow at the Institute told Wired.

Meanwhile, I now have no idea whether Trump has tweeted in the last hour. Is this whatfreedom feels like?

Actually, you know what? J. K. Rowling, if you're reading this, can you DM Trump's tweets to me, too?

See the original post here:

Donald Trump Blocked Me on Twitter for Telling Him He's Not as Cool as Witches - Newsweek

Play Video – TIME

In a white-walled suite on the second floor of the West Wing, about a dozen of Donald Trump's top aides gathered with their early-evening coffees on a recent Monday to map out the President's midsummer message. Most people in the country now know that that task is akin to staging an opera in a hurricane. But for a handful of senior aides, imposing order on the chaotic nature of the Trump presidency has become something of an obsession.

Just a few weeks earlier, White House aides had christened June "Jobs Month" only to find the story line's launch upended by a misfired May 31 midnight tweet from the President featuring the nonword covfefe. "Infrastructure Week" largely fell victim to the testimony of former FBI director James Comey, prompting mockery from no less than Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who returned from a trip to the gleaming airports of China to ask, "How did 'Infrastructure Week' go?" And "Workforce Development Week" might have had more success had Trump's visit to Wisconsin not been overshadowed by Attorney General Jeff Sessions' raising his right hand and taking an oath to tell the truth to the Senate Intelligence Committee about the Russia investigation.

Yet this group--including chief of staff Reince Priebus, staff secretary Rob Porter, legislative and policy aides, and press secretary Sean Spicer--has stayed focused on its task, plotting from the second floor where Trump seldom wanders. They tout accomplishments their predecessors have pulled off with greater ease, albeit under relatively easier circumstances. Trump's overseas trip, organized by Jared Kushner and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, proved that a well-scheduled and prepared President could avoid major missteps. Since then, they have pointed to the months of meetings and meticulously staged announcements around Trump's decision to quit the Paris climate accord and to privatize the air-traffic-control system as emblematic of the more ordered West Wing. "What people don't see is that this stuff doesn't just happen by accident," says one senior official involved, who, like most of the 11 White House officials TIME spoke with for this article, asked not to be named in order to speak freely. "You can't take 52 cards and throw them down and have them fall into a neat stack."

Neat is not a word most people would use to describe anything about the Trump Administration to date. Most of the men and women working in the West Wing didn't work with the President on the campaign before they took over the Executive Branch on Jan. 20, and many had never worked in government before. Their politics ran from far-right nationalist to centrist, and internal disagreements were frequent and noisome. Arguments became public, and senior advisers tried to circumvent one another for short-term advantage. The leaks seldom resulted in punished, even when the offenders were easily identified. And Trump's open-door policy left aides vying to be the last voice in his ear, undermining the finality of his decisions. His aides have since pledged to no longer try to outmaneuver the policymaking process by stealing private moments with the President to make their case. "We've all been burned," explains one West Wing staffer. "You can win today, but you pay for it tomorrow."

Trump's self-assurance made things worse. He entered the Oval Office as confident in his abilities as he was unprepared for the task of managing the government. In marked contrast to other Administrations, just one senior staffer, deputy chief of staff Joe Hagin, had prior White House experience in a senior role, and his new job was primarily logistical. A reluctant delegator, Trump initially believed the White House was just a larger-scale version of Trump Tower, with him seeking counsel from a wide circle. As ever, he expected aides to jockey for his favor.

Some things have changed. In late April, Priebus and Porter imposed a strict flow chart for every decision heading the President's way, requiring the buy-in--and, most important, the participation--of all appropriate senior aides, Cabinet secretaries and Capitol Hill liaisons. Dissenting voices are channeled in brief memos and organized meetings for the President, who likes to take in the differing views as if he's watching a judges' table on a reality show. Aides often don't agree, but there is a growing recognition that they're heard regularly. "Increasingly, everyone has more ownership of it," said Porter. "There's a lot more discipline now."

The White House has also fallen into a set rhythm of weekly meetings, despite regular disruptions from the President, who still surprises top aides with inflammatory tweets, impromptu gatherings and unscheduled announcements. The goal is modest: one out-of-town trip and one agency visit a week, bolstered by a handful of White House roundtables and meetings with stakeholders and Capitol Hill lawmakers. The team had already set aside the last two weeks of June for the themes of "technology" and "energy." July is set to have a "Made in America" theme, playing the nationalist strings that helped Trump win the White House in the first place.

What no one controls is Trump himself, who has encouraged the new structure but also takes the opportunity to regularly disrupt it or work outside the process. Trump continues to be critical of many of his senior staff, creating internal tensions and fraying levels of trust. The President punctuates meetings and visits with allies with questions about the performance of everyone, from Vice President Mike Pence to Spicer. The result is a West Wing staff that functions with an unspoken motto akin to the Serenity Prayer, the meditation common among 12-step program participants: aides focus on changing what they can, seeking to accept what they cannot and trying to keep a level-enough head to know the difference between the two.

Trump advisers now talk about the self-inflicted wounds of the first five months as largely out of their hands--forced upon them by an instinctual, impulsive President. They believe their advice will best position the President for success--if he chooses that path. "He has his own opinions as far as reading the tea leaves and watching the news and trusting his gut on how things need to be done," the senior official says.

Maybe so, but Trump has yet to empower any single person to speak authoritatively in his stead, and there is little sign that he trusts his team to steer him in the right direction. Trump has prevented Priebus from assuming the traditional chief-of-staff role as first among equals. If an aide's profile grows too big, the President has a tendency to publicly shoot that person down, or privately raise the specter of a staff change. (Even son-in-law Jared Kushner drew the President's ire over his elevated public profile and contributions to the internal discord.)

As a result, the careful planning in the White House is often upended from within. On June 7, when Trump tweeted that he would pick Christopher Wray to be his new FBI director, his communications operation was left in the dark, rushing to craft a response without forewarning. The same was true when he announced the firing of Comey, or the dozens of times he has redirected the news cycle with an early-morning tweet.

Several senior Republicans expect that a breaking point will come, which will force the President to cede more of his control. "When his numbers go down to 30%, he has got to listen," said one Republican with prior White House experience. "And they are starting to decline." On June 12, Trump hit 60% disapproval in the Gallup daily poll.

Those declining numbers may explain why, inside the West Wing, an alternative mood is sometimes the order of the day. Trump's entire Cabinet gathered steps from the Oval Office for its inaugural meeting in a classic Trump style, with effusive public praise of the President himself. "It is just the greatest privilege of my life to serve as Vice President," Pence began, after which each officer followed. Priebus called the chance to serve Trump's agenda a "blessing." The televised performance offered a rare public glimpse to the sort of praise aides often give Trump in private as they seek to win his favor. But such tactics won't solve the many headaches that still shadow the President. Dozens of key positions throughout the federal government--like deputy Cabinet secretaries, independent agency heads and U.S. Attorneys--have still not been appointed, in part because of disagreement at the White House. Congress is still waiting to be briefed on strategic plans for the wars against Islamic extremism, and there is little hope of passing any of Trump's big-ticket legislative priorities before the end of the summer.

Hours after the Cabinet meeting, White House aides returned to the second floor to focus on the task at hand: cobbling together a message to incorporate disparate agenda items like the budget, health care reform and infrastructure investment. Then, as the group was heading out, the careful planning was thrown off again as a friend of Trump's said in a television interview that the President was considering firing the Russia investigation's special counsel, Robert Mueller. The White House team quickly rushed out denials, but for many top aides--even those central to the planning process--the news had struck a nerve. No matter how much they prepare, they just can't be sure what the President will do next.

--With reporting by MICHAEL SCHERER/WASHINGTON

Read the original post:

Play Video - TIME

Donald Trump Is Now Facing Three Emoluments Lawsuits – Slate Magazine

President Donald Trump departs the White House on June 7 in Washington.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Have you filed an emoluments lawsuit against Donald Trump yet? If not, you better act fastthe docket is getting crowded. The attorneys general of D.C. and Maryland filed a suit on Monday alleging that the presidents receipt of foreign gifts and payments violated the Constitution. Two days later, nearly 200 members of Congress also sued Trump for the same purportedly unconstitutional conduct. Trumps attorneys at the Department of Justice, meanwhile, are busy fighting another emoluments lawsuit, this one filed back in January on behalf of an ethics watchdog and Trumps business competitors.

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.

Do any of these lawsuits have a real chance of success? And what would success even look like in this deeply ambiguous and heretofore uncharted area of constitutional law?

The very first emoluments suit is beginning to provide an answer to those questions. Spearheaded by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, this lawsuit elevated the emoluments problem from academic blogs to front-page headlines. The Constitutions Foreign Emoluments Clause declares that no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state. CREW reads this clause very broadly, arguing that it bars the president from receiving any payment from a foreign government.

CREW hopes to obtain a court order compelling Trump to divest from his business empire, which continues to receive cash from foreign, state-owned corporations. Its secondary goal is much more modest: The group wants to get to discovery, allowing it to demand financial records from Trump and his business empireincluding the presidents tax returns. To get to that point, however, CREW must prove it is an injured party and thus has standing to sue in court. CREW alleges that Trump injured the group by forcing it to divert valuable resources to an investigation into his ethics violations. This theory of standing was clearly a long shot. So, in March, CREW brought a restaurant association and a luxury hotel booker into its suit; both claim Trumps emoluments violations are causing them to lose business, a more solid ground for standing.

Even if CREW cant get past this threshold, it has already scored one political victory: The lawsuit forced the Justice Department to defend Trumps acquisition of wealth. In its lengthy brief, the DOJ argued that the Foreign Emoluments Clause applies only to benefits arising from services the president provides to the foreign state. Under the DOJs theory, Trump wont run afoul of the Constitution unless he receives payment from a foreign government for engaging in some official act.

This cramped interpretation is designed to ensure that private commercial transactions fall outside the clauses scope. To bolster that proposition, the brief embarked upon a comically tone-deaf tour of presidential profiteering through the ages. We learned that, during their presidencies, George Washington owned a gristmill; Thomas Jefferson, a nail factory; James Madison and James Monroe, tobacco plantations. According to the DOJ, these enterprises are constitutionally analogous to Trumps empire which, to give just one of many examples, allows the president to receive millions of dollars from a state-controlled Chinese bank.

The DOJs thesis is probably wrong; a wealth of historical evidence suggests the Framers viewed an emolument as any good or service of value, not one specific kind of bribery. But even if Trumps lawyers are right, their brief is still politically deleterious. The DOJ is now defending the chief executives constitutional right to rake in as much money as he can from foreign states, so long as the exchange doesnt involve a demonstrable quid pro quo. Trump and his lawyers are defining corruption downward. First, we were told the president would separate himself from his businesses. Now we have learned that he wont, but he promises not to take any outright bribes. As far as presidential ethics go, only Richard Nixon set a lower bar.

Top Comment

Birther v. Emoluments. There was no evidence, none, that Obama was born in Kenya. The one misprint was by a literary agent who flat admitted she messed it up. More...

Should a federal judge toss out CREWs suit, Trumps opponents will have at least two more bites at the apple. The Washington and Maryland suit is especially interesting, since both jurisdictions have a strong case for standing. Maryland argues that Trumps D.C. hotel is drawing foreign business out of the state, reducing its tax revenue; the District of Columbia alleges the hotel is drawing business away from its convention center, which is taxpayer-owned. The congressional lawsuit, on the other hand, asserts Trump is injuring members of Congress by depriving them of the opportunity to vote on his emoluments. Because the Constitution allows the president to receive emoluments with the consent of the Congress, these representatives argue they must be able to allow or prohibit Trumps acceptance of foreign payments.

That theory is certainly creative, although law professor and emoluments expert Andy Grewal doubts it will succeed since Congress could vote on Trumps emoluments and has simply chosen not to. Either way, both suits will force the Justice Department to continue defending Trumps profiteering. If one makes it past the standing stage, the plaintiffs will enter the promised land of discovery (and tax returns). The emoluments litigation has already put Trump on the defensive and forced his lawyers to justify presidential enrichment; it now poses a real threat of unveiling his secretive business dealings as well. What started as a single long-shot lawsuit may soon turn into a nightmare for the president.

See the rest here:

Donald Trump Is Now Facing Three Emoluments Lawsuits - Slate Magazine

Tiny mark on Melania Trump’s birthday card to Donald Trump sparks wild theories – AOL

Aris Folley, AOL.com

Jun 15th 2017 4:08PM

Of all of the strange theories about Donald and Melania Trump, this one is possibly the most bizarre.

On Wednesday it was the 71st birthday of President Donald Trump and his wife wished him well via Twitter.

But a subtle detail on the image of a birthday card she tweeted to her husband has left many online scratching their heads -- a small orange dot.

Since she published the image on Wednesday evening, more than 40,000 users have "liked" the first lady's post -- and many have speculated on about whatever could have caused the glaring stain.

RELATED: Donald and Melania Trump through the years

34 PHOTOS

Donald and Melania Trump through the years

See Gallery

Real estate magnate Donald Trump (L) and his girlfriend Melania Knauss leave Hollinger International's annual meeting at the Metropolitan Club in New York on May 22, 2003. Hollinger publishes The Chicago Sun-Times, The Daily Telegraph of London, the Jerusalem Post and other newspapers. REUTERS/Peter Morgan PM/ME

Donald Trump and his girlfriend Melania Knauss arrive at the Vanity Fair Oscar party at Morton's restaurant in West Hollywood, California, February 29, 2004. REUTERS/Ethan Miller REUTERS EM/AS

Real estate tycoon Donald Trump and his friend Melania Knauss pose for photographers as they arrive at the New York premiere of Star Wars Episode I: "The Phantom Menace," May 16. JC/SV/AA

From left, Billy Crystal, host of the 76th annual Academy Awards, his wife Janice Goldfinger, Melania Knauss and her boyfriend Donald Trump, pose together as they leave the Vanity Fair Oscar party at Morton's restaurant in West Hollywood, California, early March 1, 2004. REUTERS/Ethan Miller EM

Developer Donald Trump (R) and his girlfriend Melania Knauss pose for photographers after the final show of "The Apprentice" April 15, 2004 in New York. Bill Rancic, a 32-year-old Internet entrepreneur from Chicago, edged out Kwame Jackson, a 29-year-old New Yorker and Harvard MBA, for the Trump-described "dream job of a lifetime" and its $250,000 salary. REUTERS/Jeff Christensen JC

Donald Trump's new bride, Slovenian model Melania Knauss, waves as they leave the Bethesda-by-the-Sea Episcopal Church after their wedding in Palm Beach, Florida, January 22, 2005. REUTERS/Gary I Rothstein

Sean 'P. Diddy' Combs (R) accepts an award from the Rush Philanthropic Foundation for his efforts to support public education and dedication to youth and social activism, from Donald Trump and his wife Melania (L) at Trump's Trumps Mar-A-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida on March 11, 2005. REUTERS/Jason Arnold MS

Donald Trump and his wife Melania Kanauss watch the Miami Heat play the New York Knicks in the first quarter of their NBA game in New York's Madison Square Garden, March 15, 2005. REUTERS/Ray Stubblebine RFS

Donald Trump (L) and his wife Melania arrive at the Museum of Modern Art for a reception in honor of Britain's Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, in New York November 1, 2005. The Royals are on the first day of an eight-day visit to the U.S. REUTERS/Gary Hershorn

Donald Trump arrives with wife Melania at a reception in honor of Britain's Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, at The Museum of Modern Art in New York, November 1, 2005. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Donald Trump (L) and his wife Melania (R) arrive at the Museum of Modern Art for a reception in honor of Britain's Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, in New York, November 1, 2005. The royals are on the first day of an eight-day visit to the U.S. REUTERS/Gary Hershorn

Real estate tycoon Donald Trump and his wife Melania attend a Miami Heat against the Los Angeles Lakers NBA game on Christmas Day in Miami, Florida, December 25, 2005. REUTERS/Marc Serota

Donald Trump stands next to his wife Melania and their son Barron before he received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in Los Angeles January 16, 2007. REUTERS/Chris Pizzello (UNITED STATES)

Real estate magnate and television personality Donald Trump and his wife Melania stand on the red carpet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute Benefit celebrating the opening of the exhibition "Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty" in New York May 2, 2011. REUTERS/Mike Segar (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT FASHION BUSINESS)

Businessman and real estate developer Donald Trump and his wife Melania watch Rafael Nadal of Spain play against Tommy Robredo during their men's quarter-final match at the U.S. Open tennis championships in New York September 4, 2013. REUTERS/Adam Hunger (UNITED STATES - Tags: SPORT TENNIS ENTERTAINMENT REAL ESTATE BUSINESS)

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump (2nd from L) watches with his wife Melania as Serena Williams of the U.S. plays against her sister and compatriot Venus Williams in their quarterfinals match at the U.S. Open Championships tennis tournament in New York, September 8, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump kisses his wife Melania as he speaks at a campaign rally on caucus day in Waterloo, Iowa February 1, 2016. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks as his wife Melania listens at a campaign rally on caucus day in Waterloo, Iowa February 1, 2016. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump reacts to an answer his wife Melania gives during an interview on NBC's 'Today' show in New York, U.S. April 21, 2016. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Melania Trump gestures at her husband Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump as they leave the stage, after she concluded her remarks at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. July 18, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Melania Trump appears on stage after U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speech at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. July 21, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar

Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump greets his wife Melania onstage after the conclusion of his first debate with Democratic U.S. presidential nominee Hillary Clinton at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, U.S., September 26, 2016. REUTERS/Joe Raedle/Pool

(L-R) Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Tiffany Trump and Ivanka Trump attend an official ribbon cutting ceremony at the new Trump International Hotel in Washington U.S., October 26, 2016. REUTERS/Gary Cameron TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump cuts the ribbon at his new Trump International hotel in Washington, DC, U.S., October 26 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump kisses his wife Melania Trump at a campaign rally in Wilmington, North Carolina Florida, U.S. November 5, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Republican U.S. President-elect Donald Trump kisses his wife Melania at his election night rally in Manhattan, New York, U.S., November 9, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and his wife Melania take part in a Make America Great Again welcome concert in Washington, U.S. January 19, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and his wife Melania take part in a Make America Great Again welcome concert in Washington, U.S. January 19, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump attend the Liberty Ball in honor of his inauguration in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump attend the 60th Annual Red Cross Gala at Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., February 4, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump greet a marching band as they arrive at Trump International Golf club to watch the Super Bowl LI between New England Patriots and Atlanta Falcons in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., February 5, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

U.S. President Donald Trump hugs his wife Melania during a "Make America Great Again" rally at Orlando Melbourne International Airport in Melbourne, Florida, U.S. February 18, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Donald Trump holds up H.R. 321 as his daughter Ivanka Trump (C) and U.S. first lady Melania Trump (2nd R) watch after it was signed in the Oval Office of the White House, in Washington, DC, U.S. February 28, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

HIDE CAPTION

SHOW CAPTION

Here are a few ideas, according to the people of Twitter.

Some argued the small dot came from the president's finger print, given his previous issues with the size of his hands.

Others linked the mark to covfefe -- the president's Twitter typo from late May that's taken on a whole new meaning.

And then came the spray tan jokes.

SEE ALSO: First lady Melania Trump slaps at President Trump's hand on Tel Aviv tarmac in Israel

Go here to see the original:

Tiny mark on Melania Trump's birthday card to Donald Trump sparks wild theories - AOL

‘Soup Nazi’ company files for bankruptcy – CNNMoney

Soupman, made famous by a beloved Seinfeld episode, filed for bankruptcy this week.

The Chapter 11 filing comes less than a month after Soupman's chief financial officer was arrested and charged with tax evasion.

The bankruptcy was caused by a "combination of legal liabilities and recent company developments," Soupman CEO Jamie Karson said in a statement.

Soupman's soups are made from the recipes of Al Yeganeh, a chef who inspired the angry Seinfeld character known to bark: "No soup for you!" to customers who didn't know what to order when it was their turn at the counter.

But customers don't need to worry about going soup-less. Soupman said its soups will remain on grocery store shelves because the company secured $2 million in financing to keep it afloat during the bankruptcy process.

"We anticipate that there will be no disruption in the quality of our product or service," Karson said.

Related: Seinfeld's "Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee" is heading to Netflix

Staten Island-based Soupman owes up to 100 creditors between $10 million and $50 million, according to the bankruptcy filing in Delaware. The company listed $1 million to $10 million of assets.

Last month, Robert Bertrand, Soupman's chief financial officer, was arrested for allegedly failing to pay nearly $600,000 worth of Medicare, Social Security and federal income taxes.

Bertrand, who denied wrongdoing and pled not guilty, also paid workers unreported cash and stock awards worth $2.8 million between 2010 and 2014, according to the indictment.

While the Soup Nazi was made famous by the 1995 Seinfeld episode, Yeganeh opened his first Manhattan store nearly a decade earlier in 1984. Today, the company sells soup to grocery chains and also at its New York-area restaurants under the brand name "Original Soupman."

CNNMoney (New York) First published June 15, 2017: 11:56 AM ET

Go here to see the original:

'Soup Nazi' company files for bankruptcy - CNNMoney

France’s CGG files for bankruptcy protection – MarketWatch

Oil-services company CGG Group filed for bankruptcy protection Wednesday in the U.S. and France after reaching a restructuring deal with lenders and bondholders that will eliminate about $2 billion in debt from the company's books.

Under the deal, bondholders will swap nearly $2 billion in debt for most of the equity in a reorganized CGG, the company said. The restructuring plan calls for up to $500 million of new money to be raised from a $125 million rights offering and the issuance of $375 million in new debt.

CGG's senior lenders, owed about $800 million, will extend the maturity on their loans in return for $150 million payment from the proceeds of the new money investment. Existing shareholders, who will be able to participate in the rights offering, will see their investments reduced to a 4.5% stake in the restructured CGG following completion of the debt swap, according to filings in U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

Beatrice Place-Faget, general counsel of parent company CGG SA, said in court papers the prolonged downturn in oil and natural gas prices left the company unable to pay its debts.

CGG's 2016 annual revenue was roughly one-third of what it was before the current downturn began, she said. In 2012, before oil prices dropped, the company had total operating revenues of more than $3.41 billion. By 2016, that number was $1.195 billion.

In addition, the company has been losing money for years, including losses of $1.14 billion in 2015 and another $404.7 million last year.

CGG was founded in 1931 as " Compagnie Gnrale de Gophysique" and focuses on seismic surveys and other techniques to help energy companies locate oil and natural-gas reserves. The company also makes geophysical equipment under the Sercel brand name.

CGG launched its court-supervised restructuring bid in Paris on Wednesday by opening a "sauvegarde" proceeding, the French equivalent of a chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. Fourteen CGG subsidiaries filed for chapter 11 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York and the parent intends to seek U.S. court recognition of the Paris case under chapter 15, the section of U.S. bankruptcy law dealing with international insolvencies.

CGG's legal advisers are Linklaters LLP and Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP for the sauvegarde and chapter 15 case, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP for the chapter 11 cases. The company's financial advisers are Lazard and Morgan Stanley, and its restructuring adviser is Alix Partners LLP. Judge Martin Glenn has been assigned the case.

Write to Patrick Fitzgerald at patrick.fitzgerald@wsj.com

View post:

France's CGG files for bankruptcy protection - MarketWatch

Lawsuit: Wells Fargo revised mortgages in bankruptcy without permission – USA TODAY

Wells Fargo faces new accusations that it tried to capitalize financially on its customers without their permission this time by allegedly modifying mortgage terms for people who had filed for bankruptcy protection.

With the smoke still lingering from the firestorm that erupted from the bank's opening of fake consumer accounts, Wells was hit with multiple lawsuits alleging that the bank surreptitiously extended loan lengths, potentially costing some homeowners tens of thousands of dollars.

The bank pulled off a "virtual hijacking" with the alleged scam by implementing "illegal stealth modifications" in at least 100 cases across the country, plaintiffs attorneys said in court papers filed June 7 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, where they are hoping to assemble a class-action group.

Wells Fargospokesman Tom Goyda said the bank "strongly denies the claims" because the company clearly identified "modification offers" in letters to customers, their attorneys and the respective bankruptcy courts.

"In no event would we finalize a modification without receiving signed documents from the customer and, where required, approval from the bankruptcy court," Goyda said in an email.

The latest accusations ensure a fresh round of scrutiny over Wells Fargo's practices, not long after the bank reached a $185 million federal settlement over an acknowledgment that aggressive sales incentives and pressure prompted many branchemployees to open fake accounts to meet their goals. That episode led to the resignation of CEO John Stumpf and the clawback of tens of millions in executive pay.

RELATED:

Wells Fargo clawing back $75.3 million more from former execs in fake accounts scandal

Wells Fargo fined $185M for fake accounts; 5,300 were fired

Wells Fargo revamps pay plan after fake-accounts scandal

To be sure, modifications of loan terms, including extending payment over longer periods and lowering monthly amounts, are often helpful to customers who are seeking short-term breathingroom on their finances. But longer loan periods often involve larger payments over time.

The complaint seeking class-action status was submitted on behalf of North Carolina residents Christopher Dee Cotton and Allison Hedrick Cotton, who filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection in February 2014 with a Wells-serviced mortgage balance of $171,215 at a 20-year interest rate of 4.875%. They remained current on their payments before and during the bankruptcy, according to their lawyers.

But the bank nonetheless submitted routine documentation through the legal system that resulted in an extension of their original 20-year loan to 40 years, with a reduced interest rate of 3.875% ultimately costing them an extra $84,939 in interest over the life of the mortgage, according to the suit.

The accusations come fewer than two years after Wells reached a settlement with the U.S. Justice Departmentin which it agreed to pay $81.6 million over an alleged failure to notify customers of payment changes on a timely basis for more than 68,000 homeowners in bankruptcy from December 2011 through March 2015.

The company agreed as part of that process to overhaul its operations and accept oversight from an independent reviewer.

It was not immediately clear whether the latest accusations would carry implications forthe Nov. 5, 2015 Justice settlement.

Contributing: Kevin McCoy

Follow USA TODAY reporter Nathan Bomey on Twitter @NathanBomey.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2stWBPJ

Read more here:

Lawsuit: Wells Fargo revised mortgages in bankruptcy without permission - USA TODAY

Strack & Van Til bankruptcy case moved to Illinois – nwitimes.com

The bankruptcy case of Strack & Van Til parent company Central Grocers has been moved from a Delaware court to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, where creditors tried to force the embattled company into involuntary bankruptcy.

Judge Pamela S. Hollis issued an order moving the case back to Illinois, where Joliet-based Central Grocers is headquartered. The century-old wholesaler filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy after it amassed $225 million in debt, and unpaid creditors filed an involuntary bankruptcy case, seeking to liquidate its assets and get whatever they could.

Judge Hollis consolidated both bankruptcy cases and transferred the proceedings to Illinois because its court has jurisdiction over Central Grocers and many of the other parties involved. Central Grocers once supplied produce, meat, Centrella brand generic products and other supermarket staples to more than 400 independent grocers throughout Chicagoland.

All the orders of the U.S. District Bankruptcy Court in Delaware remain in full force, according to Hollis's order. That court authorized an auction in which Jewel-Osco put in a starting bid of $100 million for 19 remaining Strack & Van Til and Town & Country stores.

Jewel or the highest bidder will take over the stores while Central Grocers will wind down after a century in business.

The troubled wholesaler, which acquired Highland-based Strack & Van Til in the late 1990s, is closing 14 stores, mostly Ultra Foods discount supermarkets, and laying off nearly 2,000 workers. The fate of Ultra Foods stores in Highland, Merrillville and Kankakee remains undecided.

The three Ultra stores were not included in the stalking-horse transaction; however, they are open and operating through the current timeline that has been established through the court-supervised process," a Central Grocers spokesman said in a prepared statement. "The company is continuing to explore all options in pursuit of a sale of those stores.

Visit link:

Strack & Van Til bankruptcy case moved to Illinois - nwitimes.com

Mesothelioma Patients Should Heed FDA Warnings Regarding Miracle Cures – MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog)

In pursuit of its mission to protect the public health by ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sent out warning letters to 14 companies claiming their products can prevent, diagnose, treat or cure cancer. The products, none of which have been approved by the FDA, can be appealing to mesothelioma patients or anyone fighting a terminal cancer, but they could lead to severe illness or, potentially, death.

In each of the 14 letters, found on the FDAs website, the Agency notes that the items being marketed fall under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act due to the intended use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. The letters go on to itemize examples of the claims on the companys website, product label, social media and other media that provide evidence the products are intended for use as drugs.

It is a violation of federal law to market and sell products that claim to prevent, diagnose, treat, mitigate or cure diseases without first demonstrating to the FDA that they are safe and effective for their labeled uses.

Among the 65 products the FDA cited are claims for a tea with cancer killing properties; a vitamin that can stop cancer cells from multiplying, kill cancer cells, and block their blood supply; and drugs that are a chemopreventive agent due to their ability to modulate underlying mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis.

Consumers should not use these or similar unproven products because they may be unsafe and could prevent a person from seeking an appropriate and potentially life-saving cancer diagnosis or treatment, said Douglas W. Stearn, director of the Office of Enforcement and Import Operations in the FDAs Office of Regulatory Affairs, in the April 25 press release announcing the warnings.

Although there are the rare cases of individuals who have survived mesothelioma through holistic care, the saying it takes a village is applicable to the fight against mesothelioma. A mesothelioma care team may include the family physician, a medical oncologist, pulmonologist, surgeon, radiologist, nurses, pathologists, nutritionists, rehab therapists and social workers.

Mesothelioma is caused by the inhalation or ingestion of airborne asbestos fibers. In the case of pleural mesothelioma, the fibers lodge deep in tissue surrounding the lungs, causing inflammation that festers for years. Chronic, persistent inflammation is a known cause of cancer, and in the case of mesothelioma, can take decades to develop into a malignancy. Mesothelioma is deemed an incurable cancer, with an estimated survival of less than 18 months after diagnosis.

Many mesothelioma patients turn to holistic treatments as complementary treatments to help relieve symptoms and to ease stress, but anytime a companymakes a claim that itsproduct can cure cancer, you can be sure the claim is fraudulent.

We encourage people to remain vigilant whether online or in a store, and avoid purchasing products marketed to treat cancer without any proof they will work, said Stearn. Patients should consult a health care professional about proper prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

The companies have 15 days from receipt of the letter to respond to the FDA with information regarding the actions they have taken to correct the violations and to assure violations do not happen again. According to the FDA, failure to correct the violations promptly may result in legal action, including product seizure, injunction and/or criminal prosecution.

Nancy is a blog and content writer with more than 20 years of professional experience. Nancy has been writing about mesothelioma and cancer for close to eight years.

See the original post here:

Mesothelioma Patients Should Heed FDA Warnings Regarding Miracle Cures - MesotheliomaHelp.org (blog)

Nivolumab and Ipillimumab Show Promise in Treating Mesothelioma Recurrence – Mesothelioma.com

Jillian Duff covers pressing news for the Mesothelioma Cancer Alliance. Bio

June 15, 2017

Lille, France - An ongoing phase II clinical trial for nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) shows that the two immunotherapy drugs can slow the growth of malignant pleural mesothelioma after relapse. According to early results, 44 percent of patients cancer did not get worse after taking nivolumab, and 50 percent of patients cancer did not get worse after taking nivolumab with ipilimumab.

Our findings suggest that immunotherapy may provide new hope to patients with relapsed mesothelioma, said lead study author Armaud Scherpereel. This randomized phase II trial may be enough to support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting, but its too early to conclude whether nivolumab alone or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab is better.

The study included 125 patients, 80 percent of whom were male, with a median age of 72 years old. All participants had advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma, had received zero to two mesothelioma treatments before, and were randomly assigned to receive either just nivolumab or a combination of nivolumab with ipilimumab.

Standard mesothelioma treatments include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Gene therapy, photodynamic therapy, and immunotherapy are among the most promising of a number of emerging mesothelioma treatments to be developed in recent years.

Immunotherapy enhances the immune system to treat diseases. It is currently undergoing heavy research in many universities and research hospitals, not only as a potential treatment for mesothelioma but for other cancer types as well.

Immunotherapy comes in active and passive forms. Active immunotherapies stimulate the bodys own immune system to attack and kill cancer cells. Passive immunotherapies introduce synthetic immune proteins into the body to fight cancer.

In the current study, approximately 17 percent of patients who took nivolumab only saw a reduction in tumor size, while 26 percent of those who received the combination treatment had reduced tumors. With just nivolumab, it took a median time of 4 months before cancer worsened, versus 5.6 months with the combination. The median survival time for nivolumab-only patients was 10.4 months, whereas more than 50 percent are still alive for the combination treatment, making it impossible to determine the median survival time at this point.

To date, this is the largest clinical trial testing the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on mesothelioma. Thyroid problems, colon inflammation, and skin rash were the most common side effects observed during the study.

According to Dr. Scherpereel, Mesothelioma cells build a protective tumor microenvironment to shield themselves against the immune systems attacks and even act against anti-tumor immune response. Therefore, therapies that shift tumor microenvironment from a state of immune suppression to one of immune activation may hold promise in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Read the original post:

Nivolumab and Ipillimumab Show Promise in Treating Mesothelioma Recurrence - Mesothelioma.com

Length of Time Between Surgeries a Marker for Mesothelioma Survival – Surviving Mesothelioma

Peritoneal mesothelioma patients who survive more than two years after surgery are the ones most likely to benefit from a second surgery if their cancer recurs.

That is the conclusion of cancer researchers at the City of Hope Cancer Center and Wake Forest School of Medicine in an article newly published in the Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Using a City of Hope database of 1,314 patients who had cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) between February 1993 and December 2015, the team focused on 103 patients who underwent the procedure more than once.

Fourteen of the patients (13.6%) had peritoneal mesothelioma, an aggressive malignancy that starts on the surface of the peritoneal membrane lining the abdomen. The rest of the patients had either appendiceal, colorectal or ovarian cancer-related tumors on the peritoneum.

Overall median survival for all patients in the study was 4.3 years.

Just over 20 percent of patients needed a repeat CRS/HIPEC procedure within a year and 38 percent needed a second operation within two years. But 42 patients with malignant mesothelioma or another peritoneal surface malignancy survived for more than two years before undergoing CRS/HIPEC again.

Although cancer eventually returned for all patients, those who went the longest without recurrence after the first surgery also ended up experiencing the longest overall survival after their second procedure.

In multivariate analysis, the R status [a measure of the completeness of the tumor removal] and a time interval of more than two years were strongly associated with survival with each additional month between the surgeries conferring a 2.6 percent reduction in the risk of death, writes general surgeon Ioannis Konstantinidis, MD, with City of Hope in Duarte, California.

The CRS/HIPEC treatment combination has become the gold standard for treating peritoneal mesothelioma as well as several other kinds of peritoneal tumors. But what happens when cancer returns?

Examining the biology of a patients tumor is one way doctors try to determine how likely it is that a mesothelioma patient will have a good outcome after a second procedure.

Now, the authors of the new article say their study offers another way to help doctors and mesothelioma patients make more informed choices about whether or not to undergo repeat CRS/HIPEC.

The current series validates time interval between cytoreductions as a major surrogate of tumor biology in selection of patients with recurrent peritoneal surface malignancies for repeat CRS/HIPEC, conclude the authors.

Source:

Konstantinidis, IT, et al, Interval between cytoreductions as a marker of tumor biology in selecting patients for repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, June 12, 2017, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Epub ahead of print

See more here:

Length of Time Between Surgeries a Marker for Mesothelioma Survival - Surviving Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma Survivor Deals with Pain 15 Years After Surgery – Asbestos.com (blog)

Pleural mesothelioma isnt an issue for Tim Crisler anymore.

Aggressive surgery that removed a lung and major parts of his diaphragm 15 years ago eliminated the cancer that hasnt returned.

His problem is the residual pain that never subsides and the growing unavailability of the pain medication that once held it in check, allowing him to thrive as a shining, post-surgery success story.

Those days have ended.

Crisler, 61, still lives in Kennesaw, Georgia, but his Harley Davidson Wide Glide motorcycle he rode so defiantly across the country five years ago just sits in the carport collecting pollen and dust.

The roar is no more. The trips to party in Key West, Florida and every place in between dont happen anymore.

Just five minutes on the bike leaves him wincing in pain.

I have absolutely no issues with mesothelioma cancer today. That hasnt touched me in a long time, he told Asbestos.com. Im sure Ill eventually die of something else. But its Johnny law that took my bike, my life, away. The feds, or the CDC, whoever, is pressuring the doctors from providing the pain meds that allowed me to live somewhat normally.

In an effort to lower prescription drug abuse and stop unscrupulous providers, recent government regulations have reduced access to powerful narcotics.

But these stricter regulations leave Crisler and many other cancer patients with nowhere to turn.

Doctors everywhere are facing increased scrutiny over the amount and types of pain medications they prescribe, which is hurting those who need it the most.

My doctor said its like throwing the baby out with the bath water. If this continues, dark days are coming for people with chronic pain. Youre going to see more and more mesothelioma patients, dying cancer patients, not getting the pain relief they need, Crisler said. This is becoming a huge problem that people dont want to talk about.

Crisler said he was managing reasonably well for years with the drug fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid which is a safe, surgical anesthetic when carefully monitored.

Unfortunately, fentanyl became a popular recreational drug often mixed with heroin that caused too many overdose deaths, leading to much tighter restrictions of its use.

I understand where they are coming from. Ive seen serious drug abuse. Its hell to go through. Its not right for kids to get addicted to it, he said. But the regulations have just gone overboard today. Everyone is different. Everyone has different pain levels. Fifteen years and I never had a serious problem with it, except it cost too much.

Crisler has become an exception in more ways than one. Rarely does anyone diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma live more than five years, even with the best multidisciplinary treatment regimen.

He remains a living testament to the effectiveness of the extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) the most aggressive surgery a mesothelioma patient can undergo. In a 12-hour procedure at Brigham and Womens Hospital in Boston, surgeons removed one lung, the lining around his heart and lungs, and parts of his diaphragm.

They gutted me like a catfish, he said. The cancer never returned, but my pain today is a byproduct of that surgery.

Crisler also credits the power of prayer and a God-given miracle. On the eve of his surgery, family and friends held a prayer vigil in his backyard that was attended by more than 60 people.

God healed me. Im sure of that, he said. I think my faith has had a lot to do with this. When I think back over my life, this wasnt the first miracle for me.

Crisler, still a free-spirited rebel, is no stranger to living life on the edge. He has had more than one serious car wreck. He was once nearly shot in the face from point-blank range after an argument turned violent.

He admittedly drank and smoked too much in his younger days.

Crisler was chased by police as a youngster on his first bike after defiantly tearing through a nearby school yard.

I know the difference between right and wrong, but Ive always been one to flirt with the law, he said. God is keeping me around for some reason. But its not because I lived this great, honorable life. Ive raised some hell in my day.

Since his EPP in 2002, Crisler has had his share of complications.

He lived through emergency open-heart surgery a decade ago related to complications from his EPP surgery. He also has been through serious pulmonary issues with his remaining lung.

Yet he has survived and thrived, living longer than anyone thought possible, long enough to spend all his asbestos liability settlement money.

He used some of it to send his three children through college. He also used some of it to live large, traveling extensively and doing things he cant anymore because of the pain.

Tim Crisler with his daughter, Savanna.

I went from never looking at the price on a menu to never eating out now because I cant afford it, he said. The narcotics cost a fortune.

Crisler loves doting on his three grandchildren. He lives now with his 84-year-old mother in the home where he grew up.

They take care of each other.

My pain now really limits what I can do, he said. I hate not being able to ride anymore. That kills me. I dont do much. The fentanyl used to let me do things. I cant do those things anymore.

Read more:

Mesothelioma Survivor Deals with Pain 15 Years After Surgery - Asbestos.com (blog)

Chicago Public Schools Ignoring Asbestos Problem – Mesothelioma.com

Jillian Duff covers pressing news for the Mesothelioma Cancer Alliance. Bio

June 13, 2017

Chicago, Illinois - A report from Univision Chicago recently shed light on the inactivity of Chicago Public Schools (CPS) with respect to removing asbestos from its schools. About a dozen schools were supposed to undergo abatement for friable asbestos per environmental regulations, but it has not yet happened according to multiple sources.

The reports were prompted by concerned parents of children attending CPS, who approached Social Justice News Nexus (SJNN) at Northwestern Universitys Medill School of Journalism and Univision Chicago. Together, SJNN and Univision reviewed inspector recommendations from 2013 and 2015 to see whether CPS had complied.

Any asbestos exposure could eventually lead to the development of mesothelioma, a frequently fatal form of cancer. In fact, the U.S. government issued warnings in the 1970s about exposure to this toxic mineral, but many older buildings, including public schools across the country, still contain asbestos. Insulation, floor and ceiling tiles, and many other products made use of the mineral due its heat- and fire-resistant properties.

As a result of an act established in the 1980s by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, all schools must have asbestos management plans in place. These must be updated with periodic inspections to determine whether any discovered asbestos should be left as is, encapsulated, or removed by an abatement professional. Custodians are also required to be trained to recognize asbestos and taught how to avoid an episode should it pose a health threat to individuals inside a school.

In 2013, inspectors told CPS to remove or repair all asbestos discovered in Little Village Maria Saucedo Academy, Bridgeports Philip D. Armour Elementary School, and Humboldt Parks Roberto Clemente Community Academy. The report reveals that CPS failed to take appropriate action in each of these schools.

According to Investigative Reporter for Univision Chicago Adriana Cardona-Maguigad, a 2016 report by the Environmental Working Group shows only a small percentage of CPS schools are following inspectors recommendations. Out of 184 schools, only 11 followed through with the asbestos work, which means the problem still exists in about 200 CPS schools today.

Students arent the only factor to consider. In a study by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, a substantially elevated rate of mesothelioma cancer was found among teachers where the only known exposure for each participant was on the job.

CPS isnt the only district with an asbestos problem. Although according to Cardona-Maguigad, schools with more resources tend to go ahead and remove the asbestos, not just encapsulate or fail to remove it like CPS.

Go here to read the rest:

Chicago Public Schools Ignoring Asbestos Problem - Mesothelioma.com

Prof. Guy Standing: Every country can afford Universal Basic Income – EURACTIV

99% of people want to improve their lives. And the UBI wont prevent them from wanting it. So if such projects prevent them from having to do terrible jobs, this is positive, says Guy Standing told EURACTIV Poland.

Professor Guy Standing is a professorial research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London and co-president at the Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN).

Standing spoke to EURACTIV.pl Editor-in-Chief Karolina Zbytniewska.

Universal basic income (UBI) means money received unconditionally by everyone in a community. How do we afford such a universal social benefit?

UBI can be justified morally and philosophically, which outweighs any arguments from the field of economic efficiency. It is a matter of eradicating poverty, and more generally of ensuring social justice.

Many liberal economists would argue that at least in Western democracies we live in open, classless and casteless societies, where everyone can rise from rags to riches, as the American dreams slogan goes. It is social justice, theoretically.

However, the truth is that our wealth and income are much more influenced by our parents and older generations than by our own actions. Since so much depends on private inheritance there is a need for a social dividend.

We are not born equal, both in terms of talents and socio-economic background, which determines our situation. But also setting where we develop is determined externally.

And so we move to another fundamental argument for UBI ecological justice. Rich people make money by polluting and depleting natural resources, while poor people and more generally the precariat are the ones who experience this pollution. Taking this into account, UBI would constitute compensation for suffering from profit-making side effects.

Social justice is not the end of positives, however. UBI enhances freedom, which is lacking especially today in the times of ubiquitous control. And the essence of republican freedom is the right to say NO. NO to a humiliating job I dont want. NO to a nasty boss or inhuman conditions. NO to controlling bureaucracy at a social security office.

This is the emancipatory effect of UBI. Not having to humiliate oneself every month to receive unemployment benefit or other social support in situation of poverty.

Theres also the third fundamental advantage of implementing UBI it simply increases human capacity and social capital. The feeling of insecurity diminishes intelligence and its impossible to make rational decisions if you feel insecure. And reversely, the feeling of security increases our mental competence, our general understanding, our tolerance and altruism.

UBI has been now implemented as a pilot project in Finland 2,000 randomly chosen unemployed Finns are receiving 560 euros a month for a 2-year-period since 1 January.

The Finnish experiment does not test UBI.

Because it is not universal but, designed only for the unemployed.

Indeed. And I can already tell the results will be positive it will confirm that it is not necessary to press people to take a job. However, there were and are going on other pilots around the world, much closer to being pure UBI experiments, including three in India. Those programs were so successful that the Indian government is considering UBI implementation on a regular basis. According to the governmental study India can afford it, reverting present subsidies that dont reach the poor today.

Another experiment held in Ontario is also closer to the original idea of UBI, as the sampling method gathers the whole community and measures collective effects. It is very important, as if you give special treatment just to some in a given community, the others brother, uncle, neighbor will come to you for share.

They feel treated unjustly. And its not UBI then, just BI basic income.

This is the case in Finland. But if everyone receives UBI in the community, this imposes a moral pressure on people to act responsibly also on the children. So in my opinion it is important to design pilots as close to the real UBI as possible.

Still the experiment in Finland is a step in the right direction, as it removes the poverty trap, increases security, as well as provides incentive to take low-paid or part-time jobs without any bureaucratic pressure or reducing the benefit. Because under the present-day social security structure the unemployed, the poor are under pressure to do what bureaucrats want.

Is it not so that UBI is not a solution for every culture? In Poland we have one of the lowest levels of social capital in Europe, with minimal public and private trust, which often translates into low social responsibility. Decades of Communism are to blame. So when we see men drinking cheap wine outside a shop theres a tendency to think that alcohol is paid by benefits.

Basic income experiments around the world, whether in South or North America, or in Africa, or in India, or in Japan demonstrate that when people have basic security when they know they will be able to pay their rent and get food they become more responsible, and actually spend less on alcohol, drugs and tobacco.

Such a kind of drunkard lumpenisation you mention has many reasons. It is a symptom of a social illness, of having dealt with failures throughout ones life arriving at the dead-end with no sense of belonging.

They dont drink BECAUSE of benefits. And also giving them benefits without providing help to recover is completely irresponsible, as then those people will collapse indeed. This shop-drinking picture shows that your system is bad that it rejects its own people.

And blames them for effects of this rejection.

Still of course, its impossible to cure everyone with the same medicine. But if it doesnt work on scarce individuals, you dont resign from this medicine penalizing the majority.

In Poland, the present government introduced a Family 500+ program, under which every family receives 500 PLN (120) a month for a child. The condition is that its a family not a single parent. According to market research, it has reduced employment among less educated people, as well as among women aged 35-44. Theres also a rise in passive people who neither work nor look for employment.

Indeed its a controversial program paternalistically imposing conservative Catholic customs. Still, if giving poor people income support leads them to stop doing a job of cleaning public lavatories or doing dangerous works without proper safety measures it is just great. In the long run it may lead to the improvement of employment conditions rising wages, improving job setting, providing training.

You know, 99% of people want to improve their lives. And UBI wont prevent them from wanting it. So if such projects stop them doing terrible jobs, then this is actually a positive outcome. And everyone should ask himself or herself if they would like to do those jobs before criticizing those people or given projects results.

See the article here:

Prof. Guy Standing: Every country can afford Universal Basic Income - EURACTIV

Late Matanzima celebrated as a visionary- Education, development described as his legacy – Daily dispatch

Former Transkei homeland leader and Western Thembu king Kaizer Daliwonga Matanzima was praised by senior government leaders and his own children for having left an indelible mark in education, business and agriculture.

Matanzimas life was remembered through song and dance during a colourful commemoration event held at the Qamata Great Place near Cofimvaba yesterday.

The event was organised by the AmaDlomo royal family.

Among those who came to celebrate his life were Eastern Cape premier Phumulo Masualle, AmaXhosa King Mpendulo Sigcawu, representatives of the Eastern Cape House of Traditional Leaders, UDM leader Bantu Holomisa and ANC provincial secretary Oscar Mabuyane.

Matanzima died on June 15 2003, at the age of 88.

Chris Hani district mayor Kholiswa Vimbayo referred to a contemporary buzzphrase when he told the hundreds of people who attended the event that Matanzima had in fact practised radical socio-economic transformation during his tenure as a bantustan leader.

But it was Matanzimas daughter Xoliswa Jozana who took a subtle dig at the current generation of government leaders for failing to build on some of the infrastructure put in place by her father. She said her father was passionate about education and development.

He initiated several agricultural projects as well as construction of the University of Transkei, which later merged with other tertiary institutions to form Walter Sisulu University.

Some of his agricultural projects could have been inherited by the current government, said Jozana.

Regrettably, all those projects were left to collapse.

In hindsight, we should have built on that.

We are now paying the price. Now we are paying millions and millions to revive irrigation schemes.

She said her father had paved the way for black people to own factories and businesses and manage large hotels.

Matanzima believed in having highly skilled people in government positions.

Leaders with that drive tend to be disciplinarian to an extent that they are viewed as authoritarian, added Jozana.

Masualle, on the other hand, boasted that Matanzima had been the first traditional leader to earn a university degree.

He said there was a need to strengthen working relations between traditional leaders and government as both played a pivotal role in the development of communities.

More here:

Late Matanzima celebrated as a visionary- Education, development described as his legacy - Daily dispatch

I meant every word – Fort Madison Daily Democrat

Terry Altheide took exception to my last letter citing, of all things, the dirt under my fingernails. (They look clean to me) At any rate, I said what I meant, and I meant what I said. In fact, Id advise people to read it again. Other people thought my letter was both detailed and factual, but you cant please everyone.

Mr. Altheide characterizes my letter as wildly wacky, a hate-filled diatribe that shows my splenetic personality. I try not to hate anyone. Its bad for the digestion. What Mr. Altheide calls hate-filled, and Mr. Bindewald calls name calling is merely a description an accurate description of #45.

Elisabeth Parker writes: Trumps America gets uglier with each passing day. I cant really argue with that. A Harris County, Texas deputy and her husband are indicted on murder charges in the senseless death of John Hernandez thanks in part to cell phone video.

Kali Holloway writes: The trickle-down effect of Trumps campaign rhetoric and election is now being felt among kids in schools across the country. Bullying has taken on an alarming twistwith White students using the presidents words and slogans to bully Latino, Middle Eastern, Black, Asian, and Jewish classmates. The articles subtitle is This is Trumps America.

Sixty-three percent of white men and 53 percent of white women (that voted) voted for Trump. Is this the America they voted for? If Trump voters have angst defending their choice, too bad. Resistance is indeed the order of the day. Being anti-education or demeaning teachers wont change our nations history. It wont alter the fact that among the traditional values that this country was founded upon were slavery, attempted genocide, exploitation, and germ warfare.

I choose to stand for other traditional values, like kindness, compassion, honesty, equality, helping those in need, speaking up for and protecting the powerless. I will stand against, and call out anyone, including the president of the United States, who threatens these values or victimizes our citizens. My letter did exactly that.

William Windsor

Fort Madison

Go here to see the original:

I meant every word - Fort Madison Daily Democrat

‘New’ way to look at smallpox – Fiji Times

IN the past two decades there has been a growing interest among historians, students and masses at large, to explore medical history and the impact of medicine and diseases on society. Pacific medical history is one of the most ignored fields among historians. All preceding history has remained Eurocentric. Moreover, medical history is an esoteric field as one needs rigorous training as a medical historian to write clinician history. The vaccine, vaccination and means of production are historically contested fields.

Smallpox, perhaps more than any other disease, has inspired fear and terror in human beings because of its disgusting appearance, its extreme contagiousness and disfiguring consequences, especially in the eighteenth century when it seemed to be particularly virulent.

Pacific Islanders regarded new diseases like smallpox as a "white man's disease" as they indeed have regarded measles (Bach, S, The Colony of Fiji, 1874-1924, Government printer, Suva, Fiji, 1924, P.50) but they were impressed with the idea of vaccination that it was the "white man's cure" for the new disease. A disease such as smallpox had failed to make entry and the white man's medicine was a marvelous thing to them.

Globalisation of disease

The global spread of diseases, with the exception of deliberate attempts at biological warfare, has been largely unconscious and unintended.

According to the "germ theory of disease", the globalisation of disease was primarily unintended byproduct of European expansion and trade. Instead of being a last resort, the lethal microbes were used as hegemonial instrument to colonise the South Pacific in general and Fiji in particular. Military power, contagious diseases spread by microbes/micro-organism and superior technologies were the natural corollary used to colonise the New World.

There were also some deliberate attempts to spread diseases. James A Michener writes in his book Return to Paradise (Bantam Books, USA, 1966) about one such practice of the freebooter in the Pacific.

He describes the process as such: "A freebooter would catch a native, wait till he caught either measles or whooping cough, and then plop him on some island. Sometimes in less than a month 50 per cent of the population will die." (p185)

What is more outrageous is that when the ship will go back to Australia, the satanic captain would "narrate in public their cleverness in getting even with natives who were not willing to become slaves".

Various aspects of vaccination and their effects on society need to be researched, especially the history of the origin of smallpox, starting from Egypt and its further dissemination to distant parts of the New world such as Oceania (including Australia, PNG and New Zealand), the remunerations of local or provincial vaccinators in comparison with the European counterparts have witnessed a huge discrepancy.

Historical background

Fiji was ceded to Britain on October 10, 1874. Before the cession of Fiji to Britain, a report upon the effect of the climate of the newest possession was compiled by surgeon staff of her majesty's ship Pearl, Adam B, who visited in 1873-1874 and documented diseases in Fiji.

He mentioned Fiji was strictly tropical, could materially check the spread of diseases and prevent the accumulation of poisonous miasmatic arising from the enormous quality of decaying vegetable matter. He also mentioned smallpox and fever were as yet nearly unknown in Fiji.

The report on the health of the white population of Fiji mentioned the manner in which it was affected by the climate and modes of living together with some remarks on the different diseases, the nurturing of children, white and half-caste and the general hygienic state of the Islands.

Penalty on absentee

Various repositories such as the National Archives of Fiji reveal the attempts by vaccinators and physicians to carry out a mass vaccination of the islanders soon after the establishment of colonial rule. These efforts were met initially with very cold response from the islanders. In those vaccination campaigns, children were not brought by the parents.

A fine was later imposed by the administration on parents. Thus, some reports and ordinances passed for prevention of smallpox became highly valuable which are kept at the National Archives.

Why vaccination?

After a comprehensive survey of the history of the origin of smallpox and vaccination in the Pacific, especially in Fiji, it can be concluded from first-hand records that the British had several reasons for making the vaccination campaign a success.

Firstly, despite the islanders' resistance of vaccination and inspection, the colonisers had employed a huge administrative set-up by appointing European and native vaccinators to cure not just themselves but also the natives who could be colonised in the long-term. This reflected British's political motives to govern Fiji and simultaneously have a strategic advantage in the South Pacific.

Secondly, in addition to the political motive, they also had economic reasons for the British' vaccination campaign to maintain constant flow of income by using natives and foreign labourers in Fiji's plantations without the disruption of the deadly epidemic. Thirdly, this campaign also had a religious underpinning as smallpox was considered to be a "white man's disease" and a vaccination campaign was used as "white man's cure" to spread Christianity in Fiji.

Therefore, medicine was used as an auxiliary of religion. (Henderson, GC Fiji and Fijian 1835-1856, Angus and Robertson Ltd, Sydney, 1931,P.134) Besides religious mission, this campaign was also used to justify the acceptance of the British in Fijian society and extend their position as a saviour to cure mankind.

Lastly, all possible approaches were adopted for the vaccination campaign to succeed such as the hiring of vaccinators; natives, Europeans, missionaries, traders and private vaccinators; and issuing of vaccination certification; prosecuting and fining the defaulters who avoided vaccination; publishing and conducting lectures; even contesting with the buli and importation of lymph from New Zealand.

Conclusion

Overall it can be said that vaccination campaign had been a combination of economic, political, religious, social and strategic implications to successfully colonise the Fiji Islands by the British. This research probably raises more questions than the answers.

* Dr Mumtaz Alam is an assistant professor in history at the College of Humanities and Education of the Fiji National University. The views expressed are his own and not of this newspaper or his employer. For comments or suggestions, email: mumtazalig@gmail.com

Read the original post:

'New' way to look at smallpox - Fiji Times

Okinawa base activist describes five months of alleged Japanese oppression to UN rights council – The Japan Times

GENEVA A prominent Okinawan activist told the U.N. Human Rights Council on Thursday that the Japanese government has committed clear human rights violations against those opposed to the relocation plan for U.S. Marine Corps Air Base Futenma.

Civilians are protesting the militarization every day. The government of Japan dispatched large police forces in Okinawa to oppress and violently remove those civilians, Hiroji Yamashiro, head of the Okinawa Peace Action Center, said in a speech to the council in Geneva.

Yamashiro, who was detained for five months starting last October for what he and his supporters call minor offenses during base protest activities on Okinawa, said he was forced to confess and give up the protest activity.

These are clear human rights violations by the authorities, he said.

Yamashiro, currently on trial, led a group of protesters who are opposed to the long-delayed Futenma relocation plan, which will shift the base from Ginowan to less populated Henoko, a coastal area of Nago further north.

He was arrested in October for allegedly cutting barbed wire at a U.S. military training area in Higashi and was released on bail in March. During his detention, Yamashiro was not allowed to see anyone except lawyers, not even his family, he said.

However, I and the Okinawan people will never bow to oppression, he said. I demand the government of Japan stop human rights violations, and respect the Okinawan peoples will against the construction of new U.S. and Japanese military bases.

The first arrest was followed by two retroactive arrests that kept him in jail for five months.

Yamashiro and others are suspected of piling some 1,480 blocks in front of the gate to Camp Schwab in January 2016 to prevent the delivery of equipment and materials needed for the relocation work.

He is also suspected of injuring a local defense bureau official by grabbing his shoulder and shaking him last August near the U.S. military training area in Higashi.

The high-profile case prompted human rights groups including Amnesty International Japan to call for Yamashiros immediate release.

The bulk of U.S. military facilities in Japan are situated in Okinawa.

The rest is here:

Okinawa base activist describes five months of alleged Japanese oppression to UN rights council - The Japan Times

Aung San Suu Kyi’s Canadian Visit Exposes Media Blind Spots in … – Karen News

Protest during Suu Kyi's Canada visit (Photo-KCC)

Anyone working for social justice in Burma should be disappointed by the mainstream medias coverage of Aung San Suu Kyis visit to Canada last week. Given ongoing military abuses throughout Burmas ethnic regions, it was frustrating to see headlines focusing again and again that Canada must press Aung San Suu Kyi regarding her governments brutal treatment of Rohingya Muslim communities in Rakhine State, while ignoring the plight of other ethnic peoples in Burma.

Never once during the week was there any mention of the ongoing war in Kachin State that has displaced as many as a 100,000. On June 9, the day that Aung San Suu Kyi attended a Burmese community event at Toronto City Hall, was the sixth anniversary of the resumption of the Kachin war. However, the only Canadian media coverage of the event, an article in the Toronto Star, was silent on this issue. There was also no discussion of ongoing military occupation in ceasefire zones such as Karen State, where thousands of displaced villagers staged demonstrations last month.

In short, media coverage gave the Burmese military a free ride, while focusing all criticisms on Aung San Suu Kyis governments treatment of the Rohingya.

The focus on Rohingya suffering is understandable, and we are certainly not arguing that this coverage should stop. To the contrary, it needs to be set in the context of historical and ongoing patterns of Burmese military abuses. Singularly focusing on the Rohingya does not do justice to the suffering of other non-Burman ethnic peoples in the country. It also creates the simplistic notion that if only the government would uphold human rights of Rohingya, Burmas problems would be solved. However, Burmese military oppression is systemic in nature and permeates all of the militarys dealings with non-Burman ethnic communities.

Simplistic media portrayals of the situation in Burma are very troubling when we consider international development assistance to the central government. If international donors like Canada do not understand the complex situation in Burma, they risk subsidizing the Burmese governments continuing efforts to oppress and control the ethnic peoples. Our Karen community in Canada is very concerned with recent funding announcements by the Canadian government totaling CAD $28.8 million. We are worried that this funding will be distributed through central Burmese government channels, marginalizing ethnic civil society that continues to be a much-needed lifeline for conflict-affected communities.

The following case illustrates the impact of ongoing media marginalization of our Karen community in Canada. On June 9, our Karen community staged a demonstration in front of Toronto City Hall, while Aung San Suu Kyi attended an event with the Burmese community inside. Kachin and Rohingya communities staged concurrent protests. Our protest groups were gathered in the same area, all with strong messages condemning ongoing war, militarization, and human rights abuses in Burma. It was a perfect opportunity for Canadian news media to become more informed about the human rights situation in Burma. However, the resulting Toronto Star article only contained passing reference to the Rohingya protest, completely ignoring the Kachin and Karen demonstrations.

The Irrawaddy article covering our Karen demonstration made the opposite mistake, including reference to the Kachin protest nearby, but never mentioning the demonstration by our Rohingya brothers and sisters.

Media narratives that narrowly focus on single issues can be used to divides us and undermine our common struggle for justice. Following the demonstration, racist elements in the Burmese-Canadian community began attacking the Rohingya online. One of these attackers referenced incomplete coverage in both the Toronto Star and the Irrawaddy to bolster his attacks, taking to social media to claim that our Karen and Kachin protestors keep a distance from the Rohingya.

This is patently untrue. In fact, we collaborated with our Rohingya counterparts in organizing our joint events. Although there were times when our demonstrations diverged, we stood in solidarity together against the same oppressors the Burmese military. We also agreed to work together more closely with our Rohingya brothers and sisters in the future, and to combat racist and Islamophobic attitudes that persist among some in the overseas Burmese community. There is no room for racism or discrimination in our movement.

The mainstream medias singular focus on the Rohingya issue is unhelpful, as it overlooks ongoing suffering of other ethnic peoples under the same military oppression. There is a need for more informed media reporting on Burma issues to demonstrate that the plight of Rohingya and other ethnic nationalities in Burma are all part of the same root problem denial of basic human rights and equal right to life for all ethnic peoples in Burma. This realization should build more unity in our resistance, for only in unity will we have the strength to prevail.

Saw Lay Khu Wah is an informed Karen Community member in Canada. He can be reached at sawsroecho@gmail.com.

Tags: Aung San Suu Kyi, ethnic, Protest

Read this article:

Aung San Suu Kyi's Canadian Visit Exposes Media Blind Spots in ... - Karen News