Guest opinion: Montanans must fight for our health care – Billings Gazette

Congress is moving full speed ahead to pass legislation that will increase health-care costs for hard-working Montanans and their families, cut coverage for seniors and kids, and gut protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions all behind closed doors.

Yes, you read that right.

If the U.S. Senate passes legislation similar to their counterparts in the House, thousands of Montanans will lose health-care coverage, thousands will face higher insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs, and still thousands more will be out of a job.

The bill passed in the House, the American Health Care Act, is first and foremost an age tax. If you are 50 or older, youll pay more just because of your age. This bill allows insurance companies to charge older Montanans up to five times more than everyone else for the same coverage.

You read that right as well five times.

And its not just folks over 50 who will pay more. The AHCA hurts almost all middle-class families.

The Congressional Budget Office also concluded that 24 million Americans will be forced to live without health insurance if this bill passes. This includes more than 132,000 Montanans in the first few years alone.

It also threatens to reverse the bipartisan progress we have made in Montana to increase access to health care. I worked with Democrats and Republicans to pass a unique approach to Medicaid expansion, which led to a dramatic drop in the number of our friends and neighbors without insurance. Nearly 80,000 Montanans have gained access to health care through expansion and our uninsured rate has dropped from a staggering 20 percent in 2013 to 7 percent in 2016. Folks have finally started to receive the treatment they deserve.

This bill would decimate Medicaid, cutting Montanas funding by $4.8 billion over the next decade, kick thousands of Montanans off their insurance, and blow a hole in our states budget if we choose to continue coverage leaving taxpayers with the bill. And in addition to pulling $500 million a year from our economy, these changes could result in more than 10,000 Montanans losing their jobs.

We can all agree that health care is still too expensive. But this bill wont fix it. It does nothing to solve the underlying causes of rising health costs, like skyrocketing prescription drug prices. It only makes it worse by giving drug and insurance companies billions of dollars in tax breaks.

And now Republicans in the Senate are refusing to release details on their own bill, which is likely to mirror the AHCA. They may be the majority party in Congress, but they need to listen to the vast majority of Montanans and Americans, people who are at risk of increased health-care costs and lost coverage because Republicans are more interested in catering to wealthy special interests.

The devastating impacts of these proposals are no secret. Weve seen the numbers. Its time for folks in Washington D.C. to start working across the aisle, like we did here in Montana, and find meaningful solutions to actually increase the affordability and quality of health care across America instead of throwing millions of people off of insurance in order to line the pockets of millionaires and CEOs.

Anything less is unacceptable.

Steve Bullock is Montana's governor.

Read this article:

Guest opinion: Montanans must fight for our health care - Billings Gazette

Why Some of the Worst Cyberattacks in Health Care Go Unreported – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Why Some of the Worst Cyberattacks in Health Care Go Unreported
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
A cyberattack last year paralyzed MedStar Health computers, forcing the Maryland operator of 10 hospitals and more than 300 outpatient centers to shut down its entire electronic-record system. Doctors logged patient details with pen and paper ...

See more here:

Why Some of the Worst Cyberattacks in Health Care Go Unreported - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Efforts to Stop Trump ‘Tax Cut in Veneer of Healthcare Bill’ Intensify – Common Dreams


Common Dreams
Efforts to Stop Trump 'Tax Cut in Veneer of Healthcare Bill' Intensify
Common Dreams
suggested the bill is so disliked because it prioritizes providing tax breaks for the wealthy over providing everyone with adequate care. "[T]he Republican bill is not actually a healthcare bill," Ellison concluded. "It is essentially a tax cut wrapped ...

Read more:

Efforts to Stop Trump 'Tax Cut in Veneer of Healthcare Bill' Intensify - Common Dreams

The American Health Care Act’s winners and losers in Tennessee – The Tennessean

As debate rages in Washington and insurers consider a move to the Obamacare turnstiles, Tennessee is on the front lines of a national battle. Holly Fletcher, Kyleah Starling/The Tennessean

One of the biggest consumer complaints about U.S. health insurance is that there are too many out-of-pocket costs. Unfortunately, this problem doesnt seem to be going away anytime soon.(Photo: Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Health policy is complicated for every decision, there are equal and opposite reactions. If the American Health Care Act (AHCA) becomes law, there will be both winners and losers in Tennessee. In other words, some consumers will benefit, and others will be worse off.

This makes it tricky for policymakers to strike a balance. The Affordable Care Act certainly didnt figure this out perfectly, and the Republican Obamacare repeal bill probably wont, either. The AHCA, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month, still has to make it through the Senate. But based on the first pass at repealing Obamacare,we can make some predictions on the AHCAs winners and losers.

More: Predicting which Texas insurance carrier might enter Tennessee

More: Study: AHCA could cost Tennessee 28k jobs

More: What an ACA repeal wont address

The Tennessee consumers who most stand to benefit from the AHCA are people who have individual health plans but make too much money to receive ACA subsidies. Because of the double-digit premium increases over the last few years, the sticker price of ACA coverage can be hundreds or even thousands of dollars per month. More than 80 percent of ACA consumers receive subsidies to offset these costs, but some consumers do not. If you make more than 400 percent of the federal poverty line, you receive no assistance, and premiums have been unaffordable for many of these consumers. The AHCA strives to cut premium costs by reducing what plans have to cover, and allowing insurers to charge people with pre-existing conditions higher rates. If you are pretty healthy, and frustrated by paying so much for ACA health insurance, you will likely benefit from the AHCA. If the AHCA passes, another group of higher income consumers may benefit the uninsured. Lets say Tom is in the situation described above. He makes too much for a subsidy, and paying the penalty for being uninsured is cheaper than paying his premiums all year. Hes healthy, so he decides to be uninsured. But then, he receives a cancer diagnosis. Hes suddenly facing hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. He wants to get coverage, but under the ACA, he cant. Obamacarerequires consumers to sign up for coverage at a certain time of year, called open enrollment. If they dont, theyre locked out until the next year, even if they get sick. On the other hand, the AHCA would allow Tom to sign up at any time. The AHCA would replace open enrollment with whats called continuous coverage, or financial incentives to stay insured. He may pay more for coverage because he went without insurance and because of his diagnosis, but he can sign up.

The Tennessee consumers at risk if the AHCA passes are those who most benefited from the ACAs protections. The Houses version of the AHCA would allow states to opt out of Obamacareinsurance regulations that prohibited carriers from charging sick consumers more than healthier ones and capping coverage after a certain threshold. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 30 percent of Tennesseans have pre-existing conditions. If Tennessee were to opt out of the community rating regulation, these consumers could be charged more for insurance. Insurers would not be able to deny coverage to people with diabetes, canceror asthma, for example, but they could increase their premiums. This will be a particular issue for lower-income, older consumers with pre-existing conditions. The other type of consumer most at-risk is those with extremely expensive medical conditions. The AHCAs waiver could lead to the return of coverage caps for people in the individual market and with employer plans, which means carriers could stop paying after a certain threshold.

Before the ACA, the majority of consumers never hit their threshold. But those who did were back on the hook for all bills after the cap, often $50,000 or $75,000 per year, for example. The policies that these consumers benefited from are partially responsible for healthy consumers increased costs. This is why striking the healthcare policy balance is so challenging. Whether more Tennesseans would benefit from the AHCA than the ACA remains to be seen.

Alex Tolbert is the founder of Bernard Health, a company that provides non-commissioned, expert advice on health, Medicare and COBRA insurance and medical bill consulting. To learn more, visit http://www.bernardhealth.com.

Read or Share this story: http://www.tennessean.com/story/money/industries/health-care/2017/06/18/american-health-care-acts-winners-and-losers-tennessee/404216001/

Continue reading here:

The American Health Care Act's winners and losers in Tennessee - The Tennessean

Georgia race could be a referendum on the GOP’s massively unpopular health care bill – ThinkProgress

Marilyn Matlock, left, answers her door to Jon Ossoff, center, a 30-year-old Democrat running for Congress in Georgias traditionally conservative 6th Congressional District. CREDIT: AP Photo/David Goldman

MARIETTA, GEORGIAAs Congressional Republicans work in secret in Washington to draft their Obamacare replacement, voters in the Atlanta area could send a message this week that they will not stand for an plan that will take health insurance away from millions of Americans.

All eyes are on the sixth district congressional race, which many are calling the first political test of the resistance. But Tuesdays election may be more of a referendum on the GOPs health care plan than on President Trump himself.

The GOPs Affordable Health Care Act (AHCA) is the most unpopular major law in recent decades. Not a single state supports the legislation. A recent Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll found that more than 80 percent of likely voters in Georgias sixth district said health care is an extremely important or very important issue, and just one in four said they approve of the plan Republicans rammed through the House.

Karen Handel, the Republican candidate and former Secretary of State, has said she would have voted for the House bill which passed in early May, three weeks before the non-partisan CBO issued its report finding that the plan would leave more than 23 million Americans uninsured. I reject the premise of the CBO, Handel said in a recent debate.

On Saturday, Trumps Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Pricewho still has not seen the Senates health care billheld a rally for Handel and encouraged voters to elect her to his former House seat.

Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff, meanwhile, has focused on the fact that the bill would take coverage away from people with pre-existing conditions. In a recent debate, he told the story of a seven-year-old boy with a heart condition whose parents would be forced to pay tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars a year if the GOP plan were to become law.

While Trumpcare is not a primary focus of either campaign, voters told ThinkProgress that health care is on their minds.

Knowing that access to affordable health care is equally important to Jon as it is to me is one of the main reasons Im voting for him, Nancy Anderson, a Latina voter who has volunteered with the Ossoff campaign, told ThinkProgress. This whole idea of working in secrecy, it just makes you wonder: Who are they fighting for? Who are they working for if they have to do it behind closed doors?

Anderson said the issue is particularly important because she has a daughter with a pre-existing condition. Although her husband is a Republican, she said Handels support for the AHCA is one of the reasons he wont be voting for her.

I think a lot of people who support the plan and are supporting Ms. Handel do not have a full understanding of what theyre supporting, she said. Every time I ask for more depth, they really only can quote sound bites. If youre educated and know whats happening, theres no way you can stand for that, because were all affected.

Sacha Haworth, a spokesperson for the Ossoff campaign, told ThinkProgress that people are asking Jon to do something about this law.

Theyre worried that the bill making its way through Congress will throw them or their loved ones off of insurance, she said.

Meanwhile, Republican voters in the district told ThinkProgress they see flaws in the House GOP billed, which Trump and Republican lawmakers celebrated in the White House Rose Garden after they passed it May 4.

Obviously Im not happy with what came out of the House, and I dont think any Republican is, said Leo Smith, the chair of the Cobb County GOP. Were still working on it.

Smith, who is black and serves as the state director of minority engagement for the Republican Party of Georgia, said he still supports Handel, even though she said she would have voted for the bill. According to Smith, Handel knows that further deliberations are needed in the Senate to improve the legislation. Weve got to have a place to start from before we can get to our goals, he said.

And Darryl Wilson, chairman of the Republican Party in the sixth district, said he hasnt seen the House bill but he supports the GOP plan of better health care for everyone. He also said he doesnt believe the CBO report.

The Affordable Care Act is coming down and another bill is coming in its place, he said. We hope it works. If it doesnt, well reform and get another bill through.

If Ossoff were to win on Tuesdaya recent poll gives him a narrow leadit could spell doom for the GOP health care plan. Republicans in Congress already know 2018 could be a bad year for their party if the unpopular legislation were to pass. The damage could also be bad for Republican senators, many of whom are still unclear why their plan is trying to do.

Nobody knows, even the Republican senators themselves, dont know whats being worked on. Anything that is done in secrecy is bound to not be good, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), who represents a district adjacent to the sixth, told ThinkProgress. People understand the stakes right now and how important it is that we send a message that were not going to tolerate it.

Visit link:

Georgia race could be a referendum on the GOP's massively unpopular health care bill - ThinkProgress

CNN’s Sellers Blasts GOP for ’13 All-White Males’ Writing Health Care Bill’ ‘Travesty of Justice’ – Breitbart News

Sunday on CNNs State of the Union, CNN contributor Bakari Sellers said the Republican heath care bill is a travesty of justice, being drafted by 13 all white males in the back room.

Sellers said, Even when you compare it to 2009, you had the Democratic party, the House Republican House Democrats at that time under Nancy Pelosis leadership, they had over 20 hearings. You know, this took a year before it passed. So this is not comparable to what happened in 2009. But Id just love to see Mitch McConnell, and everyone else just cloak themselves in such hypocrisy and the travesty and why we need more Republicans with courage like my colleague here to the right, and why we need more Republicans to stand up is because the Republican party right now is trying to take away health insurance from 23 million people, and they are literally drafting up a piece of legislation that affects one-sixth of our economy under the cover of darkness, which is 13 all white males in the back room.

He added, This is the problem that Americans have and why they distrust the process and why they distrust Democrats and Republicans alike, because we moved too fast in 2009, but the Republicans didnt learn a lesson, and they are now the ones who have the ball, and its a travesty of justice.

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

Read more:

CNN's Sellers Blasts GOP for '13 All-White Males' Writing Health Care Bill' 'Travesty of Justice' - Breitbart News

Sen. Durbin, Rep. Davis have ‘civilized’ talk about health care – The State Journal-Register

John Reynolds Staff Writer @JohnReynoldsSJR

While they have different political opinions, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Taylorville, agreed that the time has come for less rhetoric and more bipartisanship in Washington.

Their comments came Saturday outside Grace United Methodist Church, 1612 E. Capitol Ave., after the two talked to the Springfield Ministerial Alliance about health care. The meeting was not open to the media.

Congressman Davis and I just had a debate, and we didnt break out into a fight. It was civilized, and I hope, gentlemanly. We have to encourage more people to do the same, Durbin said.

Davis had similar comments.

I hope this sends a message to everyone that we can disagree on policy, we can have our debates and we can walk away, shake hands, pat each other on the back and still be friends, Davis said.

When it came to the actual issue of health care, the two lawmakers had different approaches. The House of Representatives already has passed a health care bill, and the Senate is working on a bill of its own.

Durbin said the measure that passed the House is opposed by the Illinois Hospital Association, doctors and nurses, community health care clinics, pediatricians, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association and AARP.

I rely on the advice of the experts in this area. (The opposition) tells me there is something fundamentally wrong with what passed in the House of Representatives, Durbin said. Congressman Davis and I debated it this morning. I want to make sure that at the end of the day we have more people covered with health insurance in this country and that its affordable health insurance for those who are arent wealthy and dont have the resources to pay on their own.

Davis said something has to be done to change the current system.

The bottom line is, doing nothing is unacceptable to me as a policy maker, Davis said. As a matter of fact, the system we have in place has failed 29 million Americans who still dont have health care coverage even though the law requires them to. Thirty-one million more, including one of the participants here today, have coverage that they cant afford to use. That to me is a system that is failing 20 percent of all Americans. When that happens, we have to fix it.

Contact John Reynolds: john.reynolds@sj-r.com, 788-1524, twitter.com/JohnReynoldsSJR.

Go here to see the original:

Sen. Durbin, Rep. Davis have 'civilized' talk about health care - The State Journal-Register

MERCER: Solving the health-care puzzle – Rapid City Journal

PIERRE | The people participating on South Dakotas health-care solutions coalition are trying to accomplish good.

They are searching for ways to shift responsibility for the cost of health care.

Ideally, the federal government would pay millions of dollars more for Indian health services. State government then could compensate Medicaid providers at higher rates.

Would the citizens of our state see any relief? I wonder too about federal debt.

That black hole grows deeper and deeper, day after day. Its like a credit card. You can charge and charge some more. Until the card is maxed out and youre finally broke. Then what?

Right now, South Dakota is looking to follow Wyomings lead. Wyoming is arranging a system that would share savings.

Whatever amount Wyomings state government can shave from Medicaid spending for American Indians would be partially shared with tribal health programs.

Wyoming wants to bring its state spending into line.

But Wyomings plan relies, too, on shifting more responsibility for care for American Indians to the federal government.

You can argue that health care is a right. But then you might have to argue about who pays for the care.

The federal Indian Health Service is responsible, but Medicaid kicks in when IHS-eligible people are referred outside IHS. State and federal governments split Medicaid.

The headlines in recent weeks tell us several things.

They say that many of the Republicans who currently run Congress and rule the Oval Office want to repeal Obamacare. They also say that millions of people would lose health insurance without a solid replacement.

I dont know which side would win a national vote.

I do know from earlier times in my life what its like without any health insurance. And I know, from help we gave to our parents, what its like to face bills beyond what most people can pay.

Then there is the role of money for research.

We have three large at least for South Dakota providers of health care that arent government agencies. They receive donations and grants for research.

The work is admirable. Its also a black hole for governments. The research revenue disappears, protected from state and federal taxes.

Gov. Dennis Daugaard commissioned a study while President Barack Obama was still in the White House.

Daugaard wanted to know whether South Dakota could afford to expand Medicaid, so that low-income working people would be covered.

The study changed the Republican governors mind. He seemed ready to recommend pursuing the idea that the Democratic president had offered to state governments.

Then many Republican legislators made clear they didnt support expansion. That probably wont change. The coalition though keeps searching for ways to still get there.

I dont see the political climate for that right now, Sen. Deb Soholt, R-Sioux Falls, said Tuesday about expansion of Medicaid at a coalition meeting.

Shes a member. So is Rep. Jean Hunhoff, R-Yankton.

Youve got to have the money to be able to do it, Hunhoff said.

Right now we dont. It is unlikely a deeply conservative state ever will.

Bob Mercer is the state capitol correspondent for the Rapid City Journal. He can be reached by emailing bobmercer2014@gmail.com.

Go here to read the rest:

MERCER: Solving the health-care puzzle - Rapid City Journal

Personalized Medicine SFSU

Personalized medicine seeks to use genetic variation to develop new diagnostic tests and treatments and to identify the sub-groups of patients for whom they will work best. This approach can also help determine which groups of patients are more prone to developing some diseases and, ideally, help with the selection of lifestyle changes and/or treatments that can delay onset of disease or reduce its impact.

This year, to celebrate our tenth anniversary conference on personalized medicine, we take a longer view, looking at how our lives have changed since the advent of personalized, precision and genomic medicine, and just how far we have yet to go. We revisit the topics we focused upon in previous years, including bioinformatics, oncology, epigenetics, the genomics of rare disease, nth generation sequencing technologies, the microbiome, and the unprecedented developments in gene therapy and genome editing.

We examine the hard science, the clinical applications, the business potential, and the regulatory and ethical implications of personalized medicine in 2017. Where next for our society and our species?

Continue reading here:

Personalized Medicine SFSU

The Upside of Bad Genes – New York Times


New York Times
The Upside of Bad Genes
New York Times
Earlier this year, the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine issued recommendations on editing embryos and other germ line cells, calling for a high degree of caution but not prohibition. An obvious counterargument to the ...
A Crack in Creation review Jennifer Doudna, Crispr and a great scientific breakthroughThe Guardian

all 5 news articles »

More here:

The Upside of Bad Genes - New York Times

With Dow-DuPont merger, food ‘editing’ gets fresh start – Greenwich Time

Photo: Daniel Acker / Bloomberg

With Dow-DuPont merger, food editing gets fresh start

As U.S. regulators approved last week the $130 billion merger between Dow and DuPont, a new agricultural spinoff is on the cusp of moving forward with a DuPont unit that promises to change the world with a pioneering technology designed to improve crops, both in yields and quality.

The big question is whether food activists will yield to the new engineering, after attempting to erect warning signs in Connecticut and nationally in the first wave of genetically modified foods.

In 2013, Connecticut passed a law that would require labeling of foods made with genetically modified organisms but only if neighboring states did so, as well. With Vermont following suit in 2016, Congress passed and President Barack Obama signed federal legislation a year ago preempting states from requiring GMO labeling in favor of a national standard. Fed up with waiting, opponents derisively termed the law the DARK Act as an acronym for Deny Americans the Right to Know.

As the federal law worked through Capitol Hill, back in Hartford activists had taken another crack last year at GMO labeling in Connecticut, with a bill that would have mandated GMO disclosure for baby formulas and foods. Unlike 2013, the bill did not make it to a vote.

In advance of the 2016 debate the previous November, the Food & Drug Administration issued guidance on how companies should label GMO-based foods if they choose to do so, with the FDA continuing to hone final regulations mandated by the federal law.

Among the Connecticut-based manufacturers to adopt GMO labeling on a voluntary basis included the Norwalk-based Pepperidge Farm subsidiary of Campbell Soup.

The Non-GMO Project keeps a running database online of the foodmakers who have had their products verified as GMO-free, with more than 43,600 products listed as of June in Connecticut to include Saffron Road in Stamford, Barefoot and Chocolate in Norwalk, and Reds 100% All Natural in Fairfield.

The new GE in Connecticut and beyond

In the past year, the GMO debate has faded as attention has shifted to the promise of genetically edited foods in which producers trim existing DNA in foods rather than introducing new DNA, as the case in GMO-based genetic engineering.

DuPont has emerged as a major innovation in genetic editing with a new unit called CRISPR-Cas, designed to improve seeds without incorporating DNA from other species. DuPont describes the innovation as a continuation of what people have been doing since plants were first domesticated selecting for characteristics such as better yields, resistance to diseases, shelf life and nutritional qualities.

Research on CRISPR and acronym for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats is being extended to mice used by Jackson Laboratory in Farmington and Maine for medical research, with one staffer calling the technology a tremendously versatile tool in engineering genetic alterations. In March, Jackson Lab received a $450,000 federal grant to improve genome editing for research, drug testing and potential future therapies.

It is one thing to tinker with DNA for medicine, it is another to do it for everyday food people put on their table. To date, genetic editing has yet to spark the universal outcry that Monsanto incurred with its early efforts to produce GMO foods, with activists still absorbing the implications of the emerging technology.

Leading the charge for both Connecticut bills was Tara Cook-Littman, who has worked to marshal support via the lobbying groups Citizens for GMO Free Labeling and GMO Free CT.

Cook-Littman told Connecticut legislators last year that her group agreed in 2013 only reluctantly to the trigger clause compromise that shifted the enabling of Connecticuts GMO labeling law to companion laws in other states. She added that in the run-up to Vermont creating its own GMO law, companies voluntarily changed their labeling there and with sales not impacted by the move.

If Vermont can do it why cant we? Cook Littman asked at the time.

Alex.Soule@scni.com; 203-842-2545; http://www.twitter.com/casoulman

Read more from the original source:

With Dow-DuPont merger, food 'editing' gets fresh start - Greenwich Time

Robot judges and related pseudo-futurist musings – Vail Daily News

As is customary, the courtroom's occupants rise when the judge enters. But that ritual is a vestige of a different age: This particular jurist does not require such ceremony. Being an amalgamation of metal and silicon, JusticeBot4000 needs no genuflection and is concerned solely with the ruthlessly efficient resolution of disputes.

Having just processed the parties' respective, figurative mountains of paperwork in mere seconds, she (the robot was given a remarkably lifelike female appearance) uses her sensors to scan the vitals of the litigants, looking for any last-minute data that may skew her ruling.

Two minutes after first being assigned the case, JusticeBot4000 renders her verdict: The defendant owes the plaintiff $68,242.82. Both judge and collection agent, she wheels herself over to the defendant's table and scans the payment dongle embedded in the skin of his forearm. Case closed, plaintiff paid; an outcome that would have taken three years if sought in 2017 took a scant three minutes.

This perhaps inevitable progression terrifies and titillates me in equal measure. Besides the fact that I have heretofore been something of a Luddite, the former emotion is a fear borne out of sentimentality and solidarity with my species. My immediate reaction to the scenario is that only a person has the requisite combination of intellectual and emotional intelligence to be able to decide the fate of another human.

This perspective is foolish because we are no match for the analytical capabilities of a smartphone, let alone a specifically programmed robot judge. And, as I am fond of repeating, emotions are the kink in the works of an efficient mode of conflict resolution. Just because I do not choose to date a cyborg does not mean that I would be opposed to having one sit on the bench.

I like the idea of an automated justice system for the same reason that I welcome the arrival of autonomous automobiles. An occasional GPS malfunction and accompanying fender bender is a fair trade for a network of distracted, potentially drunken idiots plying our highways piloting half-ton hunks of steel.

Similarly, no matter the issues that may arise on a micro-level with JusticeBot4000 and her ilk, they pale in comparison to the ones that we humans have created. We had our shot and blew it by fomenting a system with ludicrous costs, massive delays, inconsistent outcomes and high levels of dissatisfaction.

I am not merely picking on judges: Lawyers could be replaced fairly easily, as well. As full as my head is with legal principles and strategy, I could never compete with a purpose-built Matloq or PRYMSN on that front. Though I suppose I am not totally useless: I have compassion, I am fueled mostly by rotisserie chicken instead of expensive batteries and I flatter myself by thinking I would look better in a bowtie.

Of course, a shift in this direction would require a fundamental restructuring of our sociopolitical system and of the Constitution that governs it. JusticeBot4000 will have a fresh Constitution on our collective desks within the hour, just before she turns to the task of building electronic replacements for the denizens of our statehouses and Congress. You heard it here first: JusticeBot4000 for President in 2024.

T.J. Voboril is a partner at Reynolds, Kalamaya & Voboril LLC, a local law firm, and the owner-mediator at Voice of Reason Dispute Resolution. For more information, contact Voboril at 970-306-6456 or tj@rkvlaw.com or visit http://www.rkvlaw.com.

Read more:

Robot judges and related pseudo-futurist musings - Vail Daily News

Juneteenth Fair Celebrates Modern-Day Freedom – New Haven Independent

Descendants of New Havens 29th Colored Regiment gathered Saturday in Criscuolo Park, the land where the soldiers once trained for the Civil War.

The descendants gathered to host a fair for Juneteenth, a commemoration of the day in 1876 when soldiers told the remaining 250,000 slaves in Texas that they were free, two and a half years after Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation.

At the event, New Haven businesses and not-for-profits including Hands on Moving, the Kiyama Movement, and the Work Force Alliance ran booths to promote their missions, as did the New Haven Police Department, which is recruiting new officers from the community. Visitors Rperused as a DJ played tunes and Waterburys Berkeley Knights Drill Team and Drum Corps performed.

According to Kelly Mero, president of the Descendants of Connecticuts 29th Colored Regiment, the event sought to celebrate the idea of modern day freedom. To Mero, this means financial literacy, responsibility, education, employment, diversity, opportunity, and (health) maintenance an acrostic of the word freedom itself.

The fair marked the revival of the Descendants of the Connecticut 29th Colored Regiment, which had remained dormant since the group unveiled a monument to their ancestors nine years ago. The black granite stelae, arranged in a circle with an image of two soldiers and a history of the regiment in the center, bear the names of Connecticuts Civil War Veterans.

Mero, inspired by her late father, who was a founding member and president of the Descendants group, reestablished the regiment to maintain his legacy. The group has seven members. Mero shared plans to expand and celebrate all facets of modern freedom in the 2017-2018 year including a black untied event focused on educational advancement. In a year, she hopes fundraising efforts can provide a scholarship for New Haven students.

Cherisa Lloyd was at the event to spread awareness about autism, a condition she said is prevalent in urban communities. After her son was diagnosed at 18 months, she started her not-for-profit Leandres World to provide support for other families with autistic chidlren. She noted that blacks and Latinos especially tend to fear stigma about autism and remain silent on the issue. One parent at her support group expressed hesitance to tell her family in fear of relatives treating her child differently, for instance, she said.

At a nearby booth, Warren Barnett, whose great-great-great-grandfather fought in the Civil War, shared the history of the 29th Regiment. Frederick Douglas actually spoke to the soldiers on that very plot of land centuries ago, he said.

Solomon Maye from the Elephant in the Room Boxing Club and Xavier Richardson from Hands on Moving agreed that few people know about Juneteenth in the first place.

You had slaves who really werent free, Maye noted.

The rest is here:

Juneteenth Fair Celebrates Modern-Day Freedom - New Haven Independent

‘Juneteenth’ event celebrates freedom and embraces community – Roanoke Times

CHRISTIANSBURG In the foreground, six young people of African-American heritage read the history of Juneteenth.

In the background, two boys one white and one a child of color grinned as they occupied opposite ends of a playground seesaw. For a few seconds, one was ascendant. And then the other rose. The cycle repeated, accompanied by the sounds of delight.

In the foreground, Melvin Palmer, 9, read a poem titled We Rose, verse that he penned with assistance from his mother and brother. The poem began, From Africas heart, we rose, and included the line Survive we must, we did.

Juneteenth, a merging of June and nineteenth, celebrates the belated announcement in Texas on June 19, 1865, that all slaves are free. Union Army Maj. Gen. Gordon Grangers related order, announced in Galveston, came more than two years after Lincolns Emancipation Proclamation took effect for rebellious states and two months after the major Confederate armies surrendered.

According to one account, when Granger announced in Texas that slaves were free there were about 250,000 people in bondage in the Lone Star State. History suggests that many slaveholders resisted Grangers order. An essay by Henry Louis Gates Jr. reported that it was not uncommon for [the slaveholders] to delay until after the harvest the sharing of news about freedom.

Regardless, the date on which Granger communicated the order freeing slaves in Texas became embraced by many newly freed slaves as a day to commemorate.

Gates wrote, In one of the most inspiring grassroots efforts of the post-Civil War period, they transformed June 19 from a day of unheeded military orders into their own annual rite.

Over time, Juneteenth became a national celebration of emancipation from slavery.

Saturdays event, held at the Rosa Peters Childrens Playground in Christiansburg, was organized by the Montgomery County-Radford City-Floyd County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Few of the adults attending Saturdays celebration knew anything about Juneteenth in their youth.

That was true of Corey Miles, 26, a native of Weldon, North Carolina, who volunteered to help emcee the event. Miles is pursuing a doctoral degree at Virginia Tech in Africana Studies, and his dissertation will focus in part on this nations disproportionate imprisonment of black men.

Miles was among several people attending the Juneteenth celebration who suggested emancipation for African-Americans remains a work in progress.

He said his family history lacks specific details about ancestors who were slaves. But he said his forebears did not flee the South during the so-called Great Migration, when millions of blacks moved to the North, Midwest and West to escape Jim Crow laws and to seek improved living and economic conditions.

Miles noted that Martin Luther King Jr. spoke about the promise embedded in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution that all Americans should have full access to the benefits of freedom.

I dont think were there yet, he said.

Several community organizations staffed information booths Saturday.

Rita Irvin, president of the NAACP chapter hosting the event, said a key theme for the day was collaboration to identify and support action-oriented solutions to issues ranging from health to social justice.

Andrae Hash staffed a booth for Virginia Organizing. He said he is kin to Nan Hairston, a celebrated civil rights activist in the New River Valley, and attributed his passion for working for social justice to the example she and others set.

Hash said the annual Juneteenth commemoration provides an opportunity both to mark a milestone in freedom and to identify the work that must continue to more fully establish a just society.

Saturdays event featured speakers, presentations, music, dance, food and more, including appearances by politicians courting votes at a park once created to provide a playground in Christiansburg for black children.

Read more here:

'Juneteenth' event celebrates freedom and embraces community - Roanoke Times

Zuma: Political freedom without economic freedom is not complete freedom – Eyewitness News

Zuma: Political freedom without economic freedom is not complete freedom

The president says poverty, inequality and unemployment began when black people were dispossessed of their land.

President Jacob Zuma in Hammarsdale at a Youth Day celebration. Picture: Ziyanda Ncgobo/EWN.

HAMMARSDALE - President Jacob Zuma says political freedom without addressing the economy is an incomplete democracy.

Zuma was speaking in Hammarsdale at a Youth Day celebration organised by the eThekwini region today.

He says poverty, inequality and unemployment began when black people were dispossessed of their land.

Zuma has been warmly welcomed by the eThekwini regions youth who have come to listen to programmes for their development by the municipality.

This is in contrast to the reception the president got in the North West earlier this week.

He says the youth must lead the charge for economic freedom.

Political freedom without economic freedom is not a complete freedom.

Zuma has urged young people to be champions of radical economic transformation.

(Edited by Refilwe Pitjeng)

However, we will NOT condone the following:

- Racism (including offensive comments based on ethnicity and nationality) - Sexism - Homophobia - Religious intolerance - Cyber bullying - Hate speech - Derogatory language - Comments inciting violence.

We ask that your comments remain relevant to the articles they appear on and do not include general banter or conversation as this dilutes the effectiveness of the comments section.

We strive to make the EWN community a safe and welcoming space for all.

EWN reserves the right to: 1) remove any comments that do not follow the above guidelines; and, 2) ban users who repeatedly infringe the rules.

Should you find any comments upsetting or offensive you can also flag them and we will assess it against our guidelines.

EWN is constantly reviewing its comments policy in order to create an environment conducive to constructive conversations.

Read the original post:

Zuma: Political freedom without economic freedom is not complete freedom - Eyewitness News

USS Whidbey Island’s Sailors, Marines Take ‘Freedom Run’ Through Boston – CBS Boston / WBZ


CBS Boston / WBZ
USS Whidbey Island's Sailors, Marines Take 'Freedom Run' Through Boston
CBS Boston / WBZ
SOUTH BOSTON (CBS) The 200 sailors and U.S. Marines of the USS Whidbey Island were hard to miss Sunday morning. The group of service members, escorted by Boston Police, belted out hardcore marching tunes as they ran the nearly three miles ...

View post:

USS Whidbey Island's Sailors, Marines Take 'Freedom Run' Through Boston - CBS Boston / WBZ

Embracing the freedom to ‘hack one’s own body’ – Deutsche Welle

All throughout history and in all cultures around the world, humans have fanaticized about transcending these meat sacks that we were born into. Today we can make deaf people hear again and we can make blind people see again. Enter the bio-backers.

For those not familiar with the term, bio-hacking means applying a hacker ethic to the modification of biology. Where traditional hackers modify computer hardware and software, bio-hackers explore various technologies to modify biological systems. With biological systems we mean anything from bacteria and plants to animals and humans.

The essence of hacking is to take something that is designed for a certain purpose and see if it can be used for another purpose. It does not mean inventing from scratch but making do with what is available. Examples of a bio-hackwould include the modification of bacteria to make them smell like strawberries or growing a yogurt culture using a person's own microbiome.

It can also mean applying electronics to control a cockroach remotely through a smartphone app. Or it can mean taking an ID-chip implant originally designed for pets and inject it in your own hand in order to open the door at your office.

My body, my choice

A core aspect of bio-hacking is the idea of morphological freedom: the freedom to do whatever I want with one's own body. The same freedom also applies to the right to refuse to have anything done to one's body by an external party such as an employer or a government against one's will.

Hannes Sjoblad is a business advisor and bio-hacker from Sweden

I also believe in the power of community and the power of collective thought. If you work together with others, surrounded by positive role models, it will inspire people to do good and meaningful work. The hacker that sits isolated in a basement is a bigger risk than a hacker working with others in a public "maker-space."

Free knowledge

Knowledge is always the best defense. What if a viral agent is released in a subway train and on that same train there are dozens of people with DNA-sequencing devices and the skills to use them. Within seconds, the new agent is identified, sequenced and shared online so that warnings can be shared and counter-vectors applied. Our capacity to identify and act upon a threat is enormously greater with an informed public.

Because of these insights, I do think that the ongoing conversations about emerging technologies are critical. There are two reasons why one has to stay on top of new technologies: one, in order to use them and two, and perhaps more importantly, to understand if they are being used against you.

This commentary is a part of DW'sFreedom of Speech Project which aims to highlightvoices from around the worldon thetopics of freedom of expression and press freedom.

See the rest here:

Embracing the freedom to 'hack one's own body' - Deutsche Welle

The GOP’s new brand of freedom: The privilege of being without health insurance – Salon

When I think of freedom, I think of it in positive, aspirational terms:our First Amendment freedoms, for example, or FDRs Four freedoms or the uplifting songs of freedom sung by oppressed people around the globe.

But right-wing, corporate-funded ideologues have fabricated a new negative notion of freedoms derived from individual choice. Youre free to be poor, free to be politically powerless or free to be ill and uncared for; its all a matter of decisions you freely make in life, and our larger society has no business interfering with your free will.

This is what passes for a philosophical framework behind many of the policies of todays Republican congressional leaders. For example, they say their plan to eliminate health coverage for millions of Americans and do away with such essential health benefits as maternity care for millions more is just a matter of good oldfree-market consumerism. As explained by Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Tea Party Republican, Americans have choices. And so maybe, rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and they want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care.

Lest you think that Chaffetzmust simply be an oddball jerk, heres a similar deep insight from the top House Republican, Speaker Paul Ryan: Freedom is the ability to buy what you want to fit what you need. Yes, apparently, you are as free as you can afford to be. As Vice President Mike Pence recently barked at us, Trumpcares youre-on-your-own philosophy is all about bringing freedom and individual responsibility back to American health care.

The GOPs austere view is that getting treatment for your spouses cancer should be like buying a new pair of shoes,, a free-market decision by customers who can choose their own price point from high-dollar Neiman Marcus to barging-basement Dollar General. And some go barefoot. But then thats their choice.

So thats what Republicans Trumpcare is offering us, this freedom from health care. Well, good news, people: At last, congressional Democrats have gotten a clue, grown some spine and are beginning to act like, well, like Democrats!

In particular, a majority of Dems in the U.S. House are responding to the rising public demand that decent health care be treated as a right for everyone, rather than being rationed by profiteering insurance conglomerates. Nearly 6 of 10 Democrats in the House have now signed on to Rep. John Conyers Medicare for All bill, which is being carried in the Senate by Bernie Sanders.

So, Hallelujah, progress!

Yes, but many speed bumps remain on the Democratic Partys entry ramps onto the moral high road of politics. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, for one. When the leader of House Democrats was asked if the party should make health care for all a major issue in Congress andfor the 2018 elections, she replied with a flat no. Basically, Pelosi is saying the American people arent ready for it, by which she really means that the narrow slice of the public that inhabits her world health industry executives, lobbyists and big campaign donors arent ready. Meanwhile, a good 60 percent of regular Americans are damned sure ready, telling pollsters flat out that our government has a responsibility to ensure that everyone gets the care they need.

Lets be blunt: When it comes to the fiery leadership that Americas grassroots people want and need, the Democratic Party establishment is weaker than Canadian hot sauce. When youve got 60 percent of your partys rank-and-file congressional members ready to go on such a basic issue, and 60 percent of the public is also ready to go, its time to go! The national partys leadership must get going on health care for all, or the leadership itself must go.

Continued here:

The GOP's new brand of freedom: The privilege of being without health insurance - Salon

Slammers rout Freedom to take first two games of series, team tries to avoid sweep today – User-generated content (press release) (registration)

A four-run second inning in which the visiting Joliet Slammers batted through the order set the tone early Saturday night, as the Florence Freedom, presented by Titan Mechanical Solutions, suffered their worst defeat of the season by a final score of 12-2 at UC Health Stadium.

Following a perfect first inning, Freedom (21-11) starter Zach Wendorf (0-2) faced five batters in the second before recording his first out. Despite not collecting a single hit in the inning, the Slammers (14-18) took advantage of three walks and two Florence errors to build a 4-0 lead. Wendorf would recover to toss scoreless third and fourth innings, but gave up a home run to Juan Silva in the fifth before a walk and a hit-by-pitch ended his evening after just four-plus innings of work.

Edwin Gomez, Melvin Rodriguez and Alex Rodriguez would also homer for Joliet in the game, as the onslaught continued against relievers Evan Bickett, Sam Brunner and Laetten Galbraith, each of whom allowed at least one run before Matt Pobereyko struck out the side in a perfect ninth.

Slammers starting pitcher Shane Bryant (0-2) stymied the Freedom through seven innings, limiting the home team to just two runs on sacrifice flies by Ryan Rinsky and Daniel Fraga in the second and fifth innings, respectively. Reliever Gibson Russ held Florence scoreless through the final two innings.

The loss set a new season-high in runs allowed by the Freedom, and the ten-run deficit was the largest for the team all year. Jose Brizuela, Collins Cuthrell and Austin Wobrock each registered two hits, but Andre Mercurio went 0-for-4 in the game, ending his hitting streak at 10 games.

The Freedom will look to avoid the series sweep on Sunday at UC Health Stadium, with first pitch of the series finale scheduled for 6:05 p.m. Right-hander Tony Vocca (4-2) will take the mound for the Freedom against left-hander Tasker Strobel (1-1) for Joliet.

The Florence Freedom are members of the independent Frontier League and play all home games at UC Health Stadium located at 7950 Freedom Way in Florence, KY.The Freedom can be found online at FlorenceFreedom.com, or by phone at 859-594-4487.

Florence Freedom

Original post:

Slammers rout Freedom to take first two games of series, team tries to avoid sweep today - User-generated content (press release) (registration)