This Space Museum in Central Kansas Was Worth the 30 Hour Drive – Gizmodo

All Images: Chris Davidson

Hutchinson, Kansas isnt the kind of place youd wind up if you werent looking to. The placid prairie town sits a solid hours drive south of I-70, the interstate that most travelers use to blow across 425 miles of Kansas cornfield and cattle pasture as quickly as possible. But as soon as I entered the silver-roofed museum, which is flanked by an authentic Mercury-Redstone Launch Vehicle and a Gemini-Titan II rocket, I knew the extra hours of driving were going to be worth it. After all, how often is one greeted at the door by a Blackbird spy plane?

For fans of spaceflight, military history, and standing awestruck next to the most powerful flying machines ever built, the Cosmosphere, home to the largest international collection of Cold War space artifacts on the planet, just gets better from there. The museums expansive entryway not only houses a flown SR-71 Blackbird from 1966the year the famous spy plane officially joined the US Air Forcebut also a scale replica of the Space Shuttle Endeavor, and the twisted remains of an engine thrust chamber from the Saturn V rocket that launched the Apollo 11 astronauts to the Moon. Oh, and a planetarium, and a live rocket science demonstration lab. Its Disney World for space nerds before youve even hit the main exhibits.

With an eight hour drive to the Rocky Mountains ahead of me, I decided to forgo that afternoons planetarium showa documentary on black holes narrated by Liam Neesonand head straight downstairs to the Hall of Space Museum, which kicks off its tour of space history right at the beginning, in the clandestine laboratories of the Third Reich.

In the age of commercial space tourism and missions to Pluto, its easy to forget that humanitys interest in the final frontier sprung out of a desire to kill one another. At the Cosmosphere, youll become palpably aware of that fact as youre walked through the history of Nazi Germanys infamous vengeance weapons, the V1 and V2 rockets. It was these fast-flying missiles, developed to terrorize cities like London, that laid the groundwork for future space travel, including rockets that sent humans to the Moon.

Rockets werent enough to win Nazi Germany the war, but in the years after the Axis powers surrendered, aerospace technology continued to leap forward.

From the dust of World War II, the museum launches visitors into the Cold War, where once again, a need to project military might spurred innovation in rockets, satellites, and eventually, human spaceflight.

A lot of people dont realize that out of the military came the space program, Jim Remar, COO of the Cosmosphere, told me in a phone interview. These rockets, on both sides, American and Soviet, were being developed for military purposes.

A flight-ready backup of Sputnik 1the Soviet satellite that became the first to reach orbit, demoralizing Americans and kickstarting the decades-long Space Racefeatures prominently, alongside an engineering model of Sputnik 2, the second spacecraft into orbit and the first to carry a living creature, the famous space dog Laika. Of course, the United States didnt stay beat for long. The collection is replete with early American space age innovation, including a replica of the Bell X-1 rocket plane, the first manned airplane to break the sound barrier, and the Gemini X spacecraft that slingshotted astronauts John Young and Michael Collins around the Earth 43 times in 1966. Having often considered the risk that modern astronauts take on by venturing off Earth inside giant metal tubes of fire, a glimpse of the cramped, primitive capsules the first space pioneers willingly climbed into to bring glory to their countries made my skin crawl.

By the time I arrived in the museums Apollo gallery, I felt like Id absorbed a college semesters worth of knowledge about early space history. It didnt stop there. Worn American space suits, a Moon rock collected during the Apollo 11 mission, and the command module from the Apollo 13 spacecraft are just a few of the famous artifacts that are unassumingly set on display, inviting visitors to solemnly appreciate their historical significance while inwardly freaking out. (At least, that was me. The rowdy middle school class I happened to be trailing had other ideas.)

From Apollo, the collection peters off into more modern times, with its final gallery showcasing artifacts of the Shuttle era, Russias Mir space station, and the International Space Station. Looking forward, Remar says, the museum would like to continue expanding its collection of new aerospace technology, including commercial innovations from SpaceX and others, because thats obviously the wave of the future.

I think [future] space exploration will be driven in part by the private sector, he said. Museums like us are in a position to tell that story.

The Cosmosphere was founded as a small planetarium in 1962, by lifelong space enthusiast Patty Carey, who grew up in Oklahoma city before marrying and moving to her husbands home town of Hutchinson. Feeling that the central US had a distinct lack of spaceflight-themed entertainment options, she repurposed the poultry building on Hutchinsons state fair grounds to share her love of the stars with the community. By 1966, it had gained popularity, and moved into its present location, on the grounds of Hutchinson Community College, where it became one of the first planetariums associated with a community college in the nation.

Then, Patty started thinking about what other educational opportunities they could provide, Remar said. Science education centers and space museums were starting to develop in larger metropolitan areas, but there wasnt as much serving central US.

Eventually, through partnerships with the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum and NASA, the Cosmosphere was able to acquire several thousand space artifacts in the late 1970s, enough to launch a museum. In the 1980s, it began acquiring Soviet artifacts too, putting it in a position to tell the story of the space race from both countries perspectives.

The Cosmosphere has had its share of hiccups over the years, most notably a scandal in the early 2000s in which a former director was indicted on charges of stealing precious artifacts. But today, it appears to be thriving, sustaining itself off ticket sales, restoration and conservation work, and educational programs that see more than 10,000 school kids walk through its doors each year.

My only personal complaint with my trip to the Cosmosphere is that I didnt budget enough time to properly take everything in. Within two hours, I was back in my overheated rental car, sipping a strawberry limeade from the local burger joint and fueling up for a very long drive.

I couldve easily burned an entire day there.

Maddie is the science editor at Gizmodo

Originally posted here:

This Space Museum in Central Kansas Was Worth the 30 Hour Drive - Gizmodo

Don’t Worry, KFC’s Mission to Send a Zinger Chicken Sandwich to Near Space Will Still Happen – Newsweek

Mother Nature has delayed the launch of a KFC sandwich into the stratosphere. World View Enterprises, the stratospheric exploration company that is hosting theZinger 1 Space Missiona mission to take KFCs new spicy, crispy Zinger chicken sandwich to new heightsblamed wind for the grounding of its high-altitude Stratollite balloon system.

The companywill send updates once officials have confirmed the date and time for the next launch attempt. Those who really want to know when the sammy is headed to the skiesshould tune into KFC and World View social channels. According to World Views Facebook page, the next launch attempt will likely occur on Saturday.

An artist's rendering of the KFC Zinger Stratollite. KFC

Tech & Science Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek Tech & Science delivered to your inbox

The KFC bucket satellite will be carried into the skies for a four-day flight via a specially designed high-altitude hot air balloon. These balloons can serve other slightly more grounded purposes, such as weather monitoring and tourism. According to Space.com, the balloon will reach an altitude of 60,000 to 75,000 feet above Earth, where nearly 20,000 KFC franchises currently reside.

KFC insists the mission isnt just an attention-grabbing marketing ploy. Funding a mission to send its deep-fried sensation out into near-space will provide useful information toWorld View for future, more serious expeditions such as taking real mammals for a ride.

Animalsthe living kindare no strangers to space exploration. Since the 1950s, a variety of companions have joined human astronauts aboard critical missions. The historical list reads like a page out of the biblical tale of Noahs ark. Geckos, monkeys, dogs, mice, rats, frogs, turtles, fish, silkworms, spiders, ants, fruit flies, bees and single-celled organisms have all made their way onto missions. Sadly, many have not survived. In 1989, NASA sent chicken embryos out into the great unknown.

But sending live animals to space is sooo 20th century.

The only crew member that will be (barely) alive on this mission is crisp lettuce that accompanies the fried chicken patty, mayo and sesame bun. Unfortunately, there is limited room in the satellite, which means the potato wedges, cookie and sugar-sweetened beverage that typically comes with the Zinger will be staying home.

But fear not! The moment will not be lost since the souped (sandwiched?) up satellite comes equipped with a custom robotic selfie arm. Even a chicken fillet wants to preserve special memories. The spacecraft has other features that likely have Neil Armstrong rolling around in his grave, including a space tweet module that will broadcast tweets from fans with the hashtags #ZingerSpaceTweet and #Pickme. Theres also a trap door from which the Zinger will drop the first-ever coupons for a chicken sandwich.

And finally, in the tradition of 1970s space travel, aboard the satellite also will be a gold cassette tape to broadcast Colonel Harland Sanders waxing poeticabout his chicken. You know, just in case extraterrestrial lifeforms turn out to be listening.

See original here:

Don't Worry, KFC's Mission to Send a Zinger Chicken Sandwich to Near Space Will Still Happen - Newsweek

Goatwhore, ‘Vengeful Ascension’ Album Review – Loudwire

Metal Blade Records

When a band has been around for a while, sometimes they mellow out as they age, but thats not the case with New Orleans veterans Goatwhore. Their brand of metal is as extreme as ever, evidenced on their latest slab of darkness, Vengeful Ascension.

Twenty years into Goathworescareer, frontman Ben Falgoust says they are still moving forward. I think every song on this record is pretty fking strong, Falgoust says. Each song is a representation of Goatwhore. from day one until now. It really shows our evolution as a band. I dont think that this band has reached its peak yet. I mean, I think were closer now than ever but were still growing; were still evolving.

Instead of their usual bludgeoning beginning, Forsaken kicks off the proceedings with thunderous drums and mid-tempo riffage. That groove continues with Under the Flesh, Into the Soul. The harsh vocals contrast with memorable guitar lines and a blazing solo from Sammy Duet.

While the songs on Vengeful Ascension are as heavy and extreme as usual, this time around they give them more room to breathe. Instead of nonstop brutality, theyll sneak in a brief slower or mellower section before resuming their assault. Even songs that you think will barrel along at maximum intensity throughout, such as Chaos Arcane, dial back to an ominous pace.

That slower tempo makes Where the Sun Is Silent extremely effective, as does the bluesy solo from Duet. As the album progresses, the diversity is even more evident with the Bolt Thrower-esque Mankind Will Have No Mercy and the black metal influenced closer Those Who Denied Gods Will.

The lyrical theme deals with the timeless battle between good and evil, with the cosmic battle applying to earthly concerns. If you look at it from an everyday aspect in life, its the idea of people, hitting the bottom of the barrel or you know, things just arent going right in life emotion plays a huge part in how people react, Falgoust explains.

He adds, Whether its based on love or hatred or sadness or whatever, theres always an aspect of emotion that drives people to an extent. So the whole idea of a Vengeful Ascension is built on being at the bottom, working your way to the top, and realizing along the way that theres other facets to the journey aside from just pure retribution. Within negativity there can exist a positive angle as well.

After working with producer Erik Rutan for the past four albums, this time around Goatwhore worked with Jarrett Pritchard, their live soundman. They wanted a sound that was raw and organic, closer to their live shows. Thats exactly what they got. He managed to effectively capture their power and energy while injecting the dynamics an album needs.

Vengeful Ascension has extremity black metal fans will dig, groove that will appeal to death metal aficionados and potent guitar work thrash lovers can appreciate.

See Goatwhores Sammy Duet in the 11 Most Criminally Underrated Metal Guitarists

Subscribe to Loudwire on

Goatwhore Unleash Lyric Video for Blazing New Track Chaos Arcane

See the article here:

Goatwhore, 'Vengeful Ascension' Album Review - Loudwire

5 arrested in alleged scheme to rob, beat man in Sorrento, Ascension deputies say – The Advocate

GONZALES Five suspects wanted in a robbery that left a man beaten, knocked unconscious and locked in the trunk of his abandoned car have been arrested on attempted first-degree murder and other counts, Ascension Parish sheriff's deputies said Thursday.

Authorities on Thursday booked David Joseph Gonday, 34, of Gonzales, and Richard Allen, 54, of Sorrento, the last two of the five suspects in the robbery scheme.

The two were booked into Ascension Parish Detention Center with counts of attempted first-degree murder, second-degree robbery and simple kidnapping, deputies said.

St. James and Ascension parish sheriffs' deputies announced earlier this week that they were looking for Gonday and Shane Redmond, 47, 7536 Vice President Lane, Baton Rouge, in the robbery. At the time, Allen had not been named as a suspect.

Deputies said then that Redmond and Gonday had confronted the victim on Panama Road near Sorrento and robbed him ofelectronics and clothing before leaving him in the car trunk earlier this month.

With all five in custody Thursday, authorities said that three other suspects were also involved and revealed more details of the robbery scheme.

Deputies said the victim thought he was headed to Allen's home on Panama Road to buy illegal drugs, but was being set up to be beaten and robbed in retribution for some past slight.

Heather Firmin, 40, who lives with Allen at 6100 Panama Road, Sorrento, had called the victim and told him to come over, deputies said.

"We think they lured him over there," said Lt. Col. Ward Webb, Ascension Parish sheriff's chief of operations.

Allen, Gonday and Redmond and a fourth man, Dustin Eddy, 36, 41120 Cannon Road, Gonzales, beat the victim until he was unconscious sometime in the evening hours of June 10 or early morning hours of June 11, Webb said.

St. James Parish sheriffs deputies found an abandoned vehicle along La. 70 in Convent on June 11 and discovered the victim in the trunk.

Webb said it is unclear what the suspects believe the victim may have done to them in the past.

The victim is in the hospital and deputies are reviewing whether to book him when he recovers, Webb said.

Redmond turned himself in Tuesday and was booked on counts of attempted first-degree murder, second-degree robbery and simple kidnapping, jail records show.

Firmin and Eddy were arrested June 15 on counts of being principals to attempted first-degree murder, second-degree robbery and simple kidnapping.Firmin was also booked on counts ofcriminal conspiracy and methamphetamine distribution.Her bail was set at $100,000, jail records say.Eddy has bail of $75,000.

Allen was also picked up June 15 but was only booked on counts of drug possession and drug paraphernalia and was later released on bail of $30,000. He was arrested again Thursday and booked in the robbery scheme.

Gonday, who was also booked on a probation violation, had bail of $80,000 set. Allen and Redmond were waiting on Thursday for bail to be set, online jail booking records say.

Follow David J. Mitchell on Twitter, @NewsieDave.

View post:

5 arrested in alleged scheme to rob, beat man in Sorrento, Ascension deputies say - The Advocate

NASA? More like NASAI: Brainy robots ‘crucial’ to space exploration … – The Register

Autonomous space robots are going to be key to making new discoveries and exploring the furthest reaches of our Solar System and beyond, according to NASA scientists.

By making their own exploration decisions, robotic spacecraft can conduct traditional science investigations more efficiently and even achieve otherwise impossible observations, Steve Chien and Kiri Wagstaff, AI researchers working at NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, wrote in Science Robotics.

Autonomy will allow robots to respond and turn their attention to sudden, unexpected phenomena like the plumes sprouting from distant comets, instead of waiting around to execute the next command sent from Earth.

AI and machine learning has a long history at NASA. Its tough to pinpoint the exact time the technology was used, but Chien said the first time it cropped up onboard a spacecraft was 1999 with the Deep Space One (DS1) Remote Agent Experiment (RAX).

DS1 was a spacecraft that was used to perform a demo of the RAX to test how it could generate its own plans to achieve mission goals over a 48-hour flight.

More modern spacecraft orbiting Earth employ machine learning classifier algorithms to distinguish between snow, water and ice so they can detect more unusual weather events like volcanic activity, fires or floods. The same principle is also used on the Curiosity rover to capture whirling dust devils, kicked up by the Martian wind.

The idea of robots coming up with its own schedule is particularly interesting to Chien as it enables a higher level of autonomy and intelligence.

Understanding the competing objectives, and measurements you are trying to do, so that you can design software that can pack it all in, is quite a challenge. A lot of times it gets quite involved in the science - what you are trying to model, what you are trying to observe - whether it is a plume in the ocean, a the evolution of a volcanic eruption, or the geology behind how a particular site evolved, Chien told The Register.

All of the planning systems rely on modelling the spacecrafts current state and resources and use better search algorithms to decide on a schedule.

NASA is currently developing an automated scheduler for its Mars 2020 rover mission. But to go further, robots will have to be able to explore unknown environments for days, weeks or even months without human support.

There is an ongoing project exploring potential technologies for autonomous submarines to detect signs of life underwater. It is hoped that one day, such submersibles could be used to probe the oceans hidden beneath the icy exteriors on Europa, Enceladus or Pluto.

It is believed that these watery world may have hydrothermal vents that support life, like the extremophile microbes that live near similar vents in Earths oceans - a possible hotbed that could explain the origin of life.

NASA are also looking at newer areas of AI like deep learning. Its important to keep learning to achieve longer term goals, Chien said. But applying them is trickier since space missions are very expensive. We have few opportunities to launch [robots], so NASA does not want to take unnecessary risks, so most of the machine learning deployments are on the ground.

The ultimate challenge would be to visit Alpha Centauri, the nearest star system to the Solar System - only 4.37 light years away. Last year, scientists announced that Proxima b, a possible rocky planet, was orbiting in the habitable zone around Alpha Centauri.

To traverse a distance of over 4 light years, an explorer to this system would likely endure a cruise of over 60 years. Upon arrival, the spacecraft would need to operate independently for years, even decades, exploring multiple planets in the system. Todays AI innovations are paving the way to make this kind of autonomy a reality, the paper said.

Excerpt from:

NASA? More like NASAI: Brainy robots 'crucial' to space exploration ... - The Register

Technical Focus on Shares of NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) – Baldwin Journal

Investors and traders using technical analysis to examine stocks may be interested in taking a look at the ATR or Average True Range. Currently, NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) has a 14-day ATR of 0.01. The Average True Range is an investor tool used to measure stock volatility. The ATR is not used to figure out price direction, just to measure volatility. The ATR is an indicator developed by J. Welles Wilder. Wilder has developed multiple indicators that are still quite popular in todays investing landscape. The general interpretation of the ATR is the higher the ATR value, the higher the volatility.

The Williams Percent Range or Williams %R is another technical indicator worth checking out. NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) currently has a 14 day Williams %R of -70.00. The Williams %R fluctuates between 0 and -100 measuring whether a security is overbought or oversold. The Williams %R is similar to the Stochastic Oscillator except it is plotted upside-down. Levels above -20 may indicate the stock may be considered is overbought. If the indicator travels under -80, this may signal that the stock is oversold. Chart analysts may also use the indicator to project possible price reversals and to define trends.

The Average Directional Index or ADX is technical analysis indicator used to discern if a market is trending or not trending. The ADX alone measures trend strength but not direction. Using the ADX with the Plus Directional Indicator (+DI) and Minus Directional Indicator (-DI) may help determine the direction of the trend as well as the overall momentum. Many traders will use the ADX alongside other indicators in order to help spot proper trading entry/exit points. Currently, the 14-day ADX for NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) is 20.50. Generally speaking, an ADX value from 0-25 would indicate an absent or weak trend. A value of 25-50 would indicate a strong trend. A value of 50-75 would signal a very strong trend, and a value of 75-100 would indicate an extremely strong trend.

Traders may be leaning on technical stock analysis to help with investing decisions. NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) currently has a 14-day Commodity Channel Index (CCI) of -5.84. Despite the name, CCI can be used on other investment tools such as stocks. The CCI was designed to typically stay within the reading of -100 to +100. Traders may use the indicator to determine stock trends or to identify overbought/oversold conditions. A CCI reading above +100 would imply that the stock is overbought and possibly ready for a correction. On the other hand, a reading of -100 would imply that the stock is oversold and possibly set for a rally.

Traders are paying renewed attention to shares of NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK). The current 14-day RSI is presently sitting at 39.11, the 7-day is 40.59, and the 3-day is 48.52. The RSI, or Relative Strength Index is a popular oscillating indicator among traders and investors. The RSI operates in a range-bound area with values between 0 and 100. When the RSI line moves up, the stock may be experiencing strength. The opposite is the case when the RSI line is heading lower. Different time periods may be used when using the RSI indicator. The RSI may be more volatile using a shorter period of time. Many traders keep an eye on the 30 and 70 marks on the RSI scale. A move above 70 is widely considered to show the stock as overbought, and a move below 30 would indicate that the stock may be oversold. Traders may use these levels to help identify stock price reversals.

Some investors may succeed spectacularly in the market while others fail. There is an emotional component to trading and investing which can pose a big obstacle to trading success. Investors frequently try to optimize every decision for success, but sometimes things just dont work out as planned. Consistently beating the market may involve heavy amounts of homework, and a necessary rebalancing of the portfolio. In fast paced markets, indecision can have a drastic impact. Investors may have all the bases covered but fail to make a trade based only on the fear of being wrong. Individual investors may need to conquer self-doubt in order to reach optimal performance when picking stocks. This may not come as easily for some as it does for others. When the market is winning, investors may become too complacent given the ease of gains. Staying on top of the investing scene even when everything is good may help to prepare if conditions change and the climate starts to worsen.

Continue reading here:

Technical Focus on Shares of NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK) - Baldwin Journal

Director Ana Lily Amirpour on Cannibalism, Psychedelics, and ‘Horrifying’ Racism Allegations – Jezebel

Perhaps it is unsurprising that Ana Lily Amirpours sophomore movie, The Bad Batch, is controversialit depicts a harsh dystopian desert world in which characters are dismembered for food and society is brutally divided into the haves and the have-nots (the titular bad batch). Much of the conversation online about the movie, though, has not focused on the political allegory or graphic nature of the films violence, but whom that violence is aimed at. During a screening earlier this month at Chicagos Music Box, a woman named Bianca Xunise asked Amirpour the following questions: Was it a conscious decision to have all the black people have the most gruesome deaths on screen? And then, what was the message you were trying to convey with having this white woman kill a black mother in front of her child and then have her assume to be the mother figure for this little black girl?

Amirpour responded that another white character has her neck snapped and her ribs consumed, which is to say nothing of the brutality that the characters who survive face (it seemed fairly clear to me that one of the movies questions is whether its better to live or die in the violent world depicted). Amirpour abruptly shut Xunise down, ultimately ending with, I dont make a film to tell you a message.

Now, this filmmaking philosophy is not something the Iranian-American Amirpour invented on the spot. In 2014, when I interviewed her about her previous film, the acclaimed vampire tale A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, she wouldnt tell me whether she agreed with those who labeled that film feminist: I am afraid of categorization in general. I dont really see a usefulness to it. For me, what it does is it stops thinking. Amirpours films are provocative but in a way that shirk literal questions of intent. Nonetheless, Xunise tweeted the next day about how she felt humiliated by Amirpours response, and later shared many more thoughts on Amirpours perceived insensitivity (including casting Jason Momoa as a Cuban character despite his lack of Latin descent in his mixed-race heritage) in an interview with Affinity.

Amirpour was in New York promoting The Bad Batch yesterday, so I talked to her about her movie, some of its themes like cannibalism and psychedelic drug use, as well as her response to Xunise. An edited and condensed transcription of our discussion is below.

JEZEBEL: What do you think about the proliferation of movies and TV about cannibalism thats currently underway in pop culture?

ANA LILY AMIRPOUR: Its so weird. We did all make them simultaneously. That means three years ago, [Nicolas Winding Refn] would have been doing [his]. I remember hearing about it when I was editing. The assistant editor I got for my film was like, Im doing a cannibal movie for Refn. Its called The Neon Demon. I was like, Oh shit, awesome. I knew it would be bonkers different. So its just this interesting weird thing. I havent seen [Julia Ducournaus Raw] either.

Its so good.

Yeah, Im gonna see it. When I go back to L.A., Im gonna take Xanax for a week and just watch shit. Just sit on my couch and Netflix shit. I dont know what her film is about, but when I saw Refns and thought about my own, its like you catch onto this whiff or vibe that people are just tearing each other to pieces on this fucking planet. So you just kind of catch onto that. It becomes a shared, cumulative mindhow we feel right now.

And as the earth heats up, it seems like something that might be necessary in our not-so-distant future.

Fuck man, would you do it?

I think I would. Im enough of a pragmatist that I would if I had to.

Yeah, right? People value being alive and staying on earth. One of the things [I was thinking about] when I was making the filmand I think its movies Im attracted to in general, like Westerns or any survival movie, I love like 127 Hours or Touching the Voidis when you reduce a human to barebones survival, what are you able to do? Its like minute by minute. I always wonder what things would come out.

When I interviewed you about A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, you told me that you hate death. Its interesting, then, that you made a movie more brutal than the one we previously discussed.

I think its way more brutal. I think vampires let you off the hook. Everybody knows a vampire is a vampire and theres always rules and they get to get off the hook for killing. But its a vampire! She has to kill Theyre romantic. This is more its rough on earth. This is how I see America. Its my love letter to America.

Is this love letter a critique too?

I mean, were tearing each other to pieces, man! For reasons much harder to understand than hunger, actually. We are pretty fucking heinous to each other. Theres hermits out there. And theres also the potential for one day doing a different type of behavior, heading out of the whole wall that is around you, mentally or literally and seeing in a different way. This is just me getting way heady about it.

Do you personally feel torn apart, or is this something youre observing?

Theres times that I do. Yeah, all the time, actually, I think. Yes. All the time, now that you mention it. I look for comfort, you know, like we all do. Its a survival skill, you cant just sit here and constantly be ravaged by and overwhelmed by how crazy the chaos is. I try to find comfort but its fleeting and its constantly changing and the things that give you comfort might not a moment later.

Regarding the Q&A in Chicago, on Twitter, you said, My only mistake was not talking to [Xunise]. I dismissed her. How would you answer that question if you could go back in time?

Its hard to get basically called a racist when youre not. Thats an unpleasant thing. In the moment, I was thinking, Im not a politician. Its almost like you expect me to have no feelings when Im in this moment, like a politician has no feelings. They just say, This is what Im saying to you. Im a human being and I have feelings and what youre saying is personal and horrifying to hear. It jarred me. And she kind of kept repeating, and I was like, I dont know what to say. I thought about it. She was like, Whats your message? Whats your message? I guess I thought about that.

What I would say if I had a time machine and I could go back, first of all, is I would have made an announcement to the crowd that Im 30 percent hard of hearing, cause people dont know that and I have to get things repeated. I know she said I was being rude, but Im hard of hearing. And then I would have said, I dont have a message but I am asking questions. The question is does one violent act justify another? I dont have the answers but thats the question I want to ask. You have to go through it.

Did you read the Affinity interview?

I couldnt bear to fully read it. When I see that stuff, its horrible. I get the gist of it just from what I see. You must have read the whole thing.

I did.

The other thing I thought of is, like, Maria, Miami Mans baby mama [the black character whose child is then adopted by the films protagonist Arlen], is a deeply sympathetic character. At their [cannibal] dinner scene, shes the one person out loud calling out the world and their reality. Shes deeply sympathetic. Shes a devoted mother. Shes gonna do whatever she has to to keep getting along. She also calls out exactly their situation to Arlen. She puts it right on the table. We are the same. Are you gonna fuckin do this? The thing is everybody is the main star of the movie of their own life. So thats how we are. Im the star of the movie of my life and youre the star of the movie of yours. Everyone believes in their own movie, and they intersect and theres this conflict. [Arlen] does do this heinous, horrible thing and it is the fuckin most gruesome thing to go through.

Theres a picture of you in what appears to be blackface...

I was dressed like Weezy. Im brown!

But was it blackface?

No! Im brown. Im a fuckin Iranian girl. I did the tattoos and I put fronts in and I have a dreadlock wig and I was Lil Wayne, cause I love Lil Wayne.

I wonder if you feel that you have a disproportionate burden resulting from the expectation that what you will do will be especially politicized and meaningful because you are a woman of color whos a director, and thats so rare.

I wonder.

Is that your experience?

I dont know, Scott Derricksons a good friend of mine and he directed Doctor Strange and he got a lot of I feel like these conversations are important. People should have conversations about what theyre upset about. I guess theres this need to do that and especially now it feels like everyones upset all the time in America. And the internet definitely is the internet. Im, like, in the middle of this. Im putting my movie out. Its a crazy, fucked-up movie, its in-your-face, a visceral experience, and I know that. I wrote it three years ago, and there was no Trump. Its so fuckin trippy to me, I dont even fully know what to say. But I will say if empathy is something people are at all interested in, I do think that listening is the key, crucial thing. And what Ive noticed in the last few weeks is, like, no one listening. Theres very little listening. Thats my big observation from this moment of time on a press tour.

I think you pay for being subtle or ambiguous sometimes, as much as those sensibilities can benefit your art as well. People ask you, What is the message? A filmmaker like you isnt interested in dictating like that, but those questions are inevitable as is you being confronted by them given the state of human connectedness.

I think it was two things: Whatever happened in that room between me and her was two people in a room. And then this whole other thing that happened on the internet, I feel like if all these people have then come to a conclusion about a film or something they havent seen, what is that? Is that listening? What is that herd mentality? I dont know, I dont understand it.

This movie has a very extended trip sequence. When we last talked, you also mentioned finding psychedelic experiences valuable. How often do you have a psychedelic experience?

I need to be in a very specific environment. I dont take it lightly. I like to go to Burning Man if I get the opportunity, if Im not shooting or editing a movie. I havent been able to go since 2013, but Im going at the end of this summer, a much-needed break. But a movie can be a psychedelic experience. Love and sex can be a psychedelic experience. I go running, I ran a marathon last month, and it gives you perspective and, I guess, a feeing of freedom. Freedom, man. However you can feel free.

Some Pig. Terrific. Radiant. Humble.

Kinja is in read-only mode. We are working to restore service.

Read more:

Director Ana Lily Amirpour on Cannibalism, Psychedelics, and 'Horrifying' Racism Allegations - Jezebel

The Ultimate Guide To Nootropics | Supplement Critique

Reviewed by: Rob Miller 3 OUT OF 5

Date Published: 05-05-2017

User Reviews: 0

Submit Your Own Review

Note: The information provided in this guide was thoroughly researched and referenced.

That said, we are NOT doctorsand you should not take any of this advice or anything we say in this e-book as medical advice.

It is best to consult with your physician priorto taking any supplement.

Weve heard the debates, the arguments, the never-ending questioning of: whats the most important organ in the body?

Weve seen the mixed results: the liver, the heart, and the brain, generally topping the list.

Though we concur that all three are incredibly vital to the bodys internal functioning, we have to side with the big man: the brain.

Whether the brain is truly the most important organ in the body is indeed arguable, but according to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, its the most complex[1].

And most of us can probably relate.

No doubt about it, the brain is one powerful organ.

Those little neurons in our brain have the monumental responsibility of sending data from the brain to the rest of our body.

In other words, the brain communicates with other organs in the body by transmitting messages through neurons, which also store information as memories.

Despite its seemingly superhuman strength, the brain can be an exasperating organ as well.

Like when you just want to concentrate on a sole idea, but it keeps bouncing schizophrenically from one thing to the next; or when all you desire is sleep, but it insists on keeping you awake.

At times like these, you might wish for a solution, something atypical to medications and their adverse effects.

At times like these, nootropics may be the answer you seek.

We admit, the word nootropics does have a strangely intimidating yet enticing ring to it.

Noo, sounds ominous, or like a warning.

Tropics, sounds deliciously inviting.

In reality though, nootropics is an umbrella term for a class of substances (some natural, and some synthetic) that provide the human brain with cognitive benefits.

Along with promoting cognitive functions, some nootropics have anti-stress and sleep support properties.

Sounds cool?

It gets even cooler

The psychologist and chemist who invented the word nootropics, Dr. Cornelius E.

Giurgea, attached five criteria a nootropic must have to qualify as such.

Giurgeas requirements can be viewed as protective measures to ensure the substance is produced in a way that shields the brain, instead of harming it.

Clearly, Giurgea put a lot of thought into his criteria.

But when it comes to science, its given that other players will come up with their own observations and proposals.

Still, the general consensus is that nootropics should have a well-developed safety profile and little to zero toxicity.

Any healthy adult seeking to improve his or her mental faculties can become a nootropic user.

In fact, the online nootropics community is made up of mostly healthy individuals looking to use nootropics to attain motivation and more lucid thinking.

An online survey on nootropic usage reveals most of the respondents as males.

The survey targeted people in two of the biggest online nootropics communities: Reddit and LongeCity[2].

Participants were asked to describe their experiences with 31 different substances, and rate them on a scale of 1 10 in terms of effectiveness (1 being not effective at all and 10 being very effective).

Here are the results of that study:

As expected, drugs like Adderall and Modafinil (which really arent even classified as typical Nootropics) rated very highly, while many of the lesser known nootropics rated poorly.

However, what was interested to note was that some of the nootropics, most notably Phenibut and Phenylpiracetam, performed very well, considering theyre available over the counter.

Out of the 162 respondents, 92 percent were males and 8 percent were females.

The average age was 25.

But thats not to say that only youngsters use nootropics.

Remember, the survey interviewed only a designated number of people, and only some responded.

So, somewhere out there are probably hordes of other people adding to the nootropics-user base.

But we will stick to what we can support.

Besides being used by enthusiasts for learning, studying and sharpening their mental firepower, nootropics has been shown to help the elderly and those suffering from brain trauma.

Even Russian astronauts got in on the action, taking nootropics to boost their mental capacities in space.

We know, its tempting to believe, or want to believe, that the benefits of nootropics are the cure to all of our mental problems.

From this belief stems the illusion that nootropics will transform us into geniuses or make us more intelligent.

Lets drop-kick this appalling myth

Nootropics are cognitive enhancers.

What Nootropics CAN Do

What Nootropics CANT Do

They do not improve intelligence or produce blinding brilliance.

They simply boost mental capabilities relating to attention, memory and recall.

For instance, nootropics make it easier to concentrate on tasks and improve productivity.

But they will not automatically turn an average thinker into the next virtuoso philosopher.

They can, however, make him more adept at getting things done.

While were at it, lets slash the myth that nootropics should always produce instant results.

The effectiveness of nootropics varies from one person to the next and depends on a myriad of factors, including weight, body chemistry, sleep patterns and diet.

That said, while some nootropics may work within a few minutes, others may take a few weeks to kick in (Page, n.d.).

First-time nootropic users, especially, should be aware of this.

As we read about the impressive benefits of nootropics on various websites and forums, expectations may be exceedingly high going in.

Not experiencing an effect right away might cause frustration and the feeling that the supplement just doesnt work."Q

But hang in there good things come to those who wait.

Chances are, you have already searched the Internet for the word nootropics and got redirected to a bevy of articles referring to them as smart drugs."Q This can get confusing, as many websites dont explain whether theres a difference between nootropics and smart drugs.

Yet there is a difference[3], according to an article written by Dr. Andrew Hill, lead neuroscientist at truBrain.

In the nootropics community, however, the terms are often used interchangeably.

Since its generally acceptable to label nootropics and smart drugs as one in the same, theres nothing wrong with adopting this trend.

But for the sake of knowledge and accuracy, it pays to know the difference.

Lets set the record straight.

Smart drugs are usually prescribed by doctors to treat symptoms of mental or cognitive disorders.

For instance, Ritalin and Adderall are stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Smart drugs typically contain stimulants, which boost energy and focus, but can also be detrimental in someone with heart or cardiac issues.

The stimulants in these drugs increase dopamine and norepinephrine levels, which can cause tolerance and dependence, negatively affecting stress levels, appetite, mood and cardiac function.

Smart drugs operate like amphetamines in that they stimulate the brains neurotransmitters to promote focus and alertness, similar to how caffeine operates.

On the flip side, a nootropic is a non-prescribed natural or synthetic compound made from herbs, vitamins and other supplements.

Its designed to increase or safeguard cognition, and when taken properly by a generally healthy individual, typically does not produce side effects.

As Giurgea stated, the objectives of nootropics should always be to promote cognitive abilities and flow, while avoiding the side effects of harsh substances such as stimulants.

Hopefully, this introduction has given you sound insight into the fundamentals of nootropics.

Now its time to dig deeper and discover the different types of nootropics.

What makes nootropics so beautifully unique is that they are largely derived from natural ingredients and come in an extensive array of types.

You might need a checklist to keep track of them all, but heres a tip: tracking them gets easier if you think of them in terms of families."Q

Once you understand the general purpose of the family, what the individual compound does becomes clearer.

Lets begin with the mother of all nootropics

(piracetam, aniracetam, nefiracetam, levetiracetam, pramiracetam, oxiracetam, phenylpiracetam, noopept, and more)

Thats a whole lot of tams, but each has earned the right to be a member of the family.

As the first nootropic ever, piracetam is special.

Had it not been for Giurgea discovering piracetam, the word nootropics would probably not exist he coined the term only after discovering piracetam (Giurgea 1972).

After the development of piracetam, many other racetams emerged, including aniracetam, nefiracetam, levetiracetam, pramiracetam, oxiracetam, phenylpiracetam and noopept.

All racetams have the same basic chemical structure that promotes cognitive enhancement.

They all share a 2-pyrrolidone nucleus, and as derivatives of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are not naturally occurring, but rather chemically synthesized.

Being the first of its kind, piracetam remains the most widely known and researched racetam.

Next on the popularity scale are aniracetam, oxiracetam and pramiracetam.

Read the original here:

The Ultimate Guide To Nootropics | Supplement Critique

Nootropics Market Is Predicted To Hit USD 6059.4 Mn By 2024, Expanding At A CAGR Of 17.9% From 2016 To 2024. – Technorati

According to the latest report published by Credence Research, Inc.Nootropics Market - Growth, Future Prospects and Competitive Analysis, 2016-2024,theglobal nootropics market was valued at USD 1,346.5 Mn in 2015, and is expected to reach USD 6,059.4 Mn by 2024, expanding at a CAGR of 17.9% from 2016 to 2024.

Browse the fullreport Nootropics Market Growth, Future Prospects and Competitive Analysis, 20162024 at http://www.credenceresearch.com/report/nootropics-market

Market Insights

Nootropics, also known as cognitive enhancers are drugs and natural extracts that improve cognitive functions such as memory, creativity, motivation in healthy individuals. Nootropics have been available in the market for several decades and were made of ingredients such as multivitamins and caffeine substances that the FDA has approved as dietary supplements and classified as GRAS (generally regarded as safe). At present, these products are being repackaged, repurposed and sold to academic and professional overachievers to augment their brain function. Companies operating in this space primarily succeed as lifestyle brands through smart marketing. However they can only be recognized as healthcare brands only after they develop products that secure regulatory approval thus establishing certified efficacy and safety to their products.

Among the key applications of nootropics, memory enhancement currently holds the largest revenue share and it is anticipated that the segment will maintain its lead through the forecast period 2016-2024. Major factors favoring the demand for memory enhancing nootropics include growing awareness among students and executives about the promised benefits of nootropics, easy accessibility, and the booming market for supplements. The memory enhancing nootropic drugs enhance learning and memory effect, enhance the ability of learned behaviors to resist disruption, enhance the efficiency of your brain functions and protect the brain from chemical injuries. Memory enhancement segment for nootropics was valued at USD 391.6 Mn in 2015.

Geographically, North America is the largest consumer of nootropics and is also characterized by domicile of topmost market players. Large population pool, high awareness in consumer population for preventive and cognitive health, rise of the self-directed consumer, and channel proliferation are the key factors driving the dominance of North America nootropics market. On the other hand, Asia Pacific is anticipated to be the fastest progressing regional market for nootropics. While in countries like China and India having a great history of natural and herbal based cognitive drugs that boosts the brain functions and other body functions, the foreign investment in collaboration with the local players have determined substantial growth in the nootropics market and the overall dietary supplements market.

Nootropics is a relatively new entrant in the supplements market and is featured by emergence of several new and niche market entrants. Some of the key players in the global nootropics market are Nootrobox Inc., Cephalon Inc., PureLife Bioscience Co. Ltd., Peak Nootropics, Nootrico, SupNootropic Biological Technology Co. Ltd., AlternaScript LLC, Accelerated Intelligence Inc., Onnit Labs LLC, Powder City LLC, Ceretropics, Nootropic Source, Clarity Nootropics and several others.

Download Sample:http://www.credenceresearch.com/sample-request/58257

Read the original:

Nootropics Market Is Predicted To Hit USD 6059.4 Mn By 2024, Expanding At A CAGR Of 17.9% From 2016 To 2024. - Technorati

Zacks Investment Research Upgrades EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP) to … – The Cerbat Gem

Zacks Investment Research Upgrades EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP) to ...
The Cerbat Gem
Zacks Investment Research upgraded shares of EDAP TMS S.A. (NASDAQ:EDAP) from a hold rating to a strong-buy rating in a research report sent to investors ...
Share Performance in View for EDAP TMS S.A. (NASDAQ:EDAP ...Jonesboro Recorder
EDAP TMS S.A. (NASDAQ:EDAP) & SandRidge Permian Trust ...Geneva Journal
Is EDAP TMS S.A. (NasdaqGM:EDAP) Attractively Priced? | Buckeye ...Buckeye Business Review

all 4 news articles »

Excerpt from:

Zacks Investment Research Upgrades EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP) to ... - The Cerbat Gem

Posted in Tms

Neurotechnology makes a number of updates to the MegaMatcher product line – Biometric Update

June 22, 2017-

Neurotechnology has announced the availability of MegaMatcher 10, the latest update to the MegaMatcher multi-biometric product line.

MegaMatcher 10 provides a number of significant updates across the MegaMatcher line, which includes: MegaMatcher SDK, a multi-biometric SDK for large scale systems; MegaMatcher Accelerator biometric matching engine, and; the MegaMatcher ABIS turnkey solution. Each biometric modality can be used alone or in any combination to provide to meet the needs of small and large-scale biometric identification projects.

This version provides increased accuracy in multiple biometric modalities, as confirmed by third-party independent tests, explained Dr. Justas Kranauskas, R&D manager for Neurotechnology. Together with the fastest biometric engine algorithms and great standards support, these updates enable our clients to create better products in every respect.

The MegaMatcher 10 update also includes a new version of the MegaMatcher Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS).

Earlier this month Neurotechnology added a new Extreme edition to its MegaMatcher Accelerator solution.

comments

Read the original post:

Neurotechnology makes a number of updates to the MegaMatcher product line - Biometric Update

There is always a cost for political correctness – Wahpeton Daily News

Its a miracle I survived my childhood. I wonder how my parents could have been so neglectful and this exactly one week after we celebrated Fathers Day. Gasp. Roll eyes. Tsk. Tsk.

After reading the Dakota Estates news this week, one thing became abundantly clear Dakota Estates cares more for its residents than my parents did for their children. Dakota Estates residents played lawn darts, not to be confused with the lawn jarts we often played when I was a child. Seriously, any excuse my dad could manufacture, he pulled out the lawn jarts. Now I wonder if he was just trying to kill off a child. He had five of us. Wonder which one was expendable? Im betting on the youngest, my brother Tom.

Lawn darts are caricatured versions of a plastic bomb, while lawn jarts could never be mistaken for anything else, not with the sharp metal tip on one end so the jart could sink deep into the earth. Lawn jarts was fun, an evil form of horse shoes.

We played lawn jarts all the time, and lived to tell the tale. No one was injured or maimed. Not even a little scratch. I remember those deadly tournaments with fondness.

It was fun, during an era that posed other obvious safety hazards as children routinely drank from the hose. I remember eating carrots straight out of the vegetable garden without thought to pesticides or dirt. We didnt use Clorox wipes every 15 minutes in case an itinerant germ suddenly sprang out of the air with the speed of a President Trump tweet.

I survived childhood and rarely visited my childhood pediatrician Dr. Dooley, unless it was for stitches that resulted from a dare. I had a lot of stitches in my youth since recklessness and being foolhardy often walk hand-in-hand.

On one hand, I can appreciate that lawn darts are safer, but on the other, I dont like the way they bounce when tossed. Lawn jarts stuck, unless you missed and they skittered across the grass. I understand theres less likelihood of death when playing lawn darts, but I really do miss lawn jarts. Political correctness has its place in the world, but there is always a cost.

See more here:

There is always a cost for political correctness - Wahpeton Daily News

Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence

The last shore-dwelling ancestor of modern whales was Sinonyx, top left, a hyena-like animal. Over 60 million years, several transitional forms evolved: from top to bottom, Indohyus, Ambulocetus, Rodhocetus, Basilosaurus, Dorudon, and finally, the modern humpback whale.

The theory of evolution by natural selection, first formulated in Darwin's book "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, is the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits. Changes that allow an organism to better adapt to its environment will help it survive and have more offspring.

Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology.

The theory has two main points, said Brian Richmond, curator of human origins at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. "All life on Earth is connected and related to each other," and this diversity of life is a product of "modifications of populations by natural selection, where some traits were favored in and environment over others," he said.

More simply put, the theory can be described as "descent with modification," said Briana Pobiner, an anthropologist and educator at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., who specializes in the study of human origins.

The theory is sometimes described as "survival of the fittest," but that can be misleading, Pobiner said. Here, "fitness" refers not to an organism's strength or athletic ability, but rather the ability to survive and reproduce.

In the first edition of "The Origin of Species" in 1859, Charles Darwin speculated about how natural selection could cause a land mammal to turn into a whale. As a hypothetical example, Darwin used North American black bears, which were known to catch insects by swimming in the water with their mouths open:

"I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale," he speculated.

The idea didn't go over very well with the public. Darwin was so embarrassed by the ridicule he received that the swimming-bear passage was removed from later editions of the book.

Scientists now know that Darwin had the right idea but the wrong animal: Instead of looking at bears, he should have instead been looking at cows and hippopotamuses.

The story of the origin of whales is one of evolution's most fascinating tales and one of the best examples scientists have of natural selection.

To understand the origin of whales, it's necessary to have a basic understanding of how natural selection works. Natural selection can change a species in small ways, causing a population to change color or size over the course of several generations. This is called "microevolution."

But natural selection is also capable of much more. Given enough time and enough accumulated changes, natural selection can create entirely new species, known as "macroevolution." It can turn dinosaurs into birds, amphibious mammals into whales and the ancestors of apes into humans.

Take the example of whales using evolution as their guide and knowing how natural selection works, biologists knew that the transition of early whales from land to water occurred in a series of predictable steps. The evolution of the blowhole, for example, might have happened in the following way:

Random genetic changes resulted in at least one whale having its nostrils placed farther back on its head. Those animals with this adaptation would have been better suited to a marine lifestyle, since they would not have had to completely surface to breathe. Such animals would have been more successful and had more offspring. In later generations, more genetic changes occurred, moving the nose farther back on the head.

Other body parts of early whales also changed. Front legs became flippers. Back legs disappeared. Their bodies became more streamlined and they developed tail flukes to better propel themselves through water.

Darwin also described a form of natural selection that depends on an organism's success at attracting a mate, a process known as sexual selection. The colorful plumage of peacocks and the antlers of male deer are both examples of traits that evolved under this type of selection.

But Darwin wasn't the first or only scientist to develop a theory of evolution. The French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck came up with the idea that an organism could pass on traits to its offspring, though he was wrong about some of the details. And around the same time as Darwin, British biologist Alfred Russel Wallace independently came up with the theory of evolution by natural selection.

Darwin didn't know anything about genetics, Pobiner said. "He observed the pattern of evolution, but he didnt really know about the mechanism." That came later, with the discovery of how genes encode different biological or behavioral traits, and how genes are passed down from parents to offspring. The incorporation of genetics and Darwin's theory is known as "modern evolutionary synthesis."

The physical and behavioral changes that make natural selection possible happen at the level of DNA and genes. Such changes are called mutations. "Mutations are basically the raw material on which evolution acts," Pobiner said.

Mutations can be caused by random errors in DNA replication or repair, or by chemical or radiation damage. Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in rare instances, a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism. If so, it will become more prevalent in the next generation and spread throughout the population.

In this way, natural selection guides the evolutionary process, preserving and adding up the beneficial mutations and rejecting the bad ones. "Mutations are random, but selection for them is not random," Pobiner said.

But natural selection isn't the only mechanism by which organisms evolve, she said. For example, genes can be transferred from one population to another when organisms migrate or immigrate, a process known as gene flow. And the frequency of certain genes can also change at random, which is called genetic drift.

Even though scientists could predict what early whales should look like, they lacked the fossil evidence to back up their claim. Creationists took this absence as proof that evolution didn't occur. They mocked the idea that there could have ever been such a thing as a walking whale. But since the early 1990s, that's exactly what scientists have been finding.

The critical piece of evidence came in 1994, when paleontologists found the fossilized remains ofAmbulocetus natans, an animal whose name literally means "swimming-walking whale." Its forelimbs had fingers and small hooves but its hind feet were enormous given its size. It was clearly adapted for swimming, but it was also capable of moving clumsily on land, much like a seal.

When it swam, the ancient creature moved like an otter, pushing back with its hind feet and undulating its spine and tail.

Modern whales propel themselves through the water with powerful beats of their horizontal tail flukes, but Ambulocetus still had a whip-like tail and had to use its legs to provide most of the propulsive force needed to move through water.

In recent years, more and more of these transitional species, or "missing links," have been discovered, lending further support to Darwin's theory, Richmond said.

Despite the wealth of evidence from the fossil record, genetics and other fields of science, some people still question its validity. Some politicians and religious leaders denounce the theory, invoking a higher being as a designer to explain the complex world of living things, especially humans.

School boards debate whether the theory of evolution should be taught alongside other ideas, such as intelligent design or creationism.

Mainstream scientists see no controversy. "A lot of people have deep religious beliefs and also accept evolution," Pobiner said, adding, "there can be real reconciliation."

Evolution is well supported by many examples of changes in various species leading to the diversity of life seen today. "If someone could really demonstrate a better explanation than evolution and natural selection, [that person] would be the new Darwin," Richmond said.

Additional reporting by Staff Writer Tanya Lewis, Follow Tanya on Twitter. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+.

Related:

See the original post here:

Darwin's Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence

In marine bacteria, evolution of new specialized molecules follows a previously unknown path – Phys.Org

June 23, 2017 by David L. Chandler Researchers have discovered that Prochlorococcus varieties can each produce more than two dozen different peptides (molecules that are similar to proteins, but smaller). Credit: Christine Daniloff/MIT

It's one of the tiniest organisms on Earth, but also one of the most abundant. And now, the microscopic marine bacteria called Prochlorococcus can add one more superlative to its list of attributes: It evolves new kinds of metabolites called lanthipeptides, more abundantly and rapidly than any other known organism.

While most bacteria contain genes to pump out one or two versions of this peptide, Prochlorococcus varieties can each produce more than two dozen different peptides (molecules that are similar to proteins, but smaller). And though all of Earth's Prochlorococcus varieties belong to just a single species, some of their localized varieties in different regions of the world's oceans each produce a unique collection of thousands of these peptides, unlike those generated by terrestrial bacteria.

The startling findings, published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, were discovered by former MIT graduate student Andres Cubillos-Ruiz, Institute Professor Sallie "Penny" Chisholm, University of Illinois chemistry professor Wilfred van der Donk, and two others.

"This is incredibly significant work," says Eric Schmidt, professor of medicinal chemistry at the University of Utah, who was not involved in the research. "The authors show how nature has evolved methods to create chemical diversity. What really sets it apart is that it examines how this evolution takes place in nature, instead of in the lab. They examine a huge habitat, the open ocean. This is amazing," he says.

"No one had seen the true extent of the diversity in these molecules" until this new study, Cubillos-Ruiz says. The first hints of this unexpected diversity surfaced in 2010, when Bo Li and Daniel Sher, members of van der Donk's and Chisholm's labs respectively, found that one variety of Prochlorococcus could produce as many as 29 different lanthipeptides. But the big surprise came when Cubillos-Ruiz looked at other populations and found that the same organisms, in a different location, produced similarly great numbers of the peptides, "and all of them were completely different," he says.

After considerable study examining the genomes of many Prochlorococcus cultures and pieces of DNA from the wild, the researchers determined that the way the extraordinary numbers of lanthipeptides evolve is, in itself, something that hasn't been observed before. While most evolution takes place through tiny incremental changes, while preserving the vast majority of the genetic structure, the genes that enable Prochlorococcus to produce these lanthipeptides do just the opposite. They somehow undergo dramatic, wholesale changes all at once, resulting in the production of thousands of new varieties of these metabolites.

Cubillos-Ruiz, who is now a postdoc at MIT's Institute For Medical Engineering and Science, says the way these genes were changing "wasn't following classic phylogenetic rules," which dictate that changes should happen slowly and incrementally to avoid disruptive changes that impair function. But the story is a bit more complicated than that: The specific genes that encode for these lanthipeptides are composed of two parts, joined end to end. One part is actually very well-preserved across the lineages and different populations of the species. It's the other end that goes through these major shakeups in structure. "The second half is amazingly variable," he says. "The two halves of the gene have taken completely different evolutionary pathways, which is uncommon."

The actual functions of most of these thousands of peptides, which are known as prochlorosins, remain unknown, as they are very difficult to study under laboratory conditions. Similar compounds produced by terrestrial bacteria can serve as chemical signaling devices between the organisms, while others are known to have antimicrobial functions, and many others serve purposes that have yet to be determined. Because of the known antimicrobial functions, though, the team thinks it will be useful to screen these compounds to see if they might be candidates for new antibiotics or other useful biologic products.

This evolutionary mechanism in Prochlorococcus represents "an intriguing mode of evolution for this kind of specialized metabolite," Cubillos-Ruiz says. While evolution usually favors preservation of most of the genetic structure from the ancestor to the descendants, "in this organism, selection seems to favor cells that are able to produce many and very different lanthipeptides. So this built-in collective diversity appears to be part of its function, but we don't yet know its purpose. We can speculate, but given their variability it's hard to demonstrate." Maybe it has to do with providing protection against attack by viruses, he says, or maybe it involves communicating with other bacteria.

"Prochlorococcus is trying to tell us something, but we don't yet know what that is," says Chisholm, who has joint appointments in MIT's departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Biology. "What [Cubillos-Ruiz] uncovered through this molecule is an evolutionary mechanism for diversity." And that diversity clearly must have very important survival value, she says: "It's such a small organism, with such a small genome, devoting so much of its genetic potential toward producing these molecules must mean they are playing an important role. The big question is: What is that role?"

In fact, this kind of process may not be uniqueit may be just that Prochlorococcus, an organism that Chisholm and her colleagues initially discovered in 1986 and have been studying ever since, has provided the wealth of data needed for such an analysis. "This might be happening in other kinds of bacteria," Cubillos-Ruiz says, "so maybe if people start looking into other environments for that kind of diversity," it may turn out not to be unique. "There are some hints it happens in other [biological] systems too," he says.

Christopher Walsh, emeritus professor of biological chemistry and molecular pharmacology at Harvard University, who was not involved in this work, says "The dramatic diversity of prochlorosins assembled by a single enzyme raises surprising questions about how evolution of thousands of cyclic peptide structures can be accomplished by alterations that favor large changes rather than incremental ones."

According to Schmidt, "There are many possible practical applications. The first is fairly clear: By using this natural variation, the same process can be used to design and build chemicals that might be drugs or other materials. More fundamentally, by understanding the natural process of generating chemical diversity, this will help to create methods to synthesize desired applications in cells."

Explore further: Ubiquitous marine organism co-evolved with other microbes, promoting more complex ecosystems

More information: Evolutionary radiation of lanthipeptides in marine cyanobacteria, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (2017). http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1700990114

This story is republished courtesy of MIT News (web.mit.edu/newsoffice/), a popular site that covers news about MIT research, innovation and teaching.

William Blake may have seen a world in a grain of sand, but for scientists at MIT the smallest of all photosynthetic bacteria holds clues to the evolution of entire ecosystems, and perhaps even the whole biosphere.

The smallest, most abundant marine microbe, Prochlorococcus, is a photosynthetic bacteria species essential to the marine ecosystem. An estimated billion billion billion of the single-cell creatures live in the oceans, forming ...

Marine cyanobacteriatiny ocean plants that produce oxygen and make organic carbon using sunlight and CO2are primary engines of Earth's biogeochemical and nutrient cycles. They nourish other organisms through the provision ...

Sea experiments show there's a constant shuffling of genetic endowments among tiny plankton, say Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers.

In a proof-of-concept experiment, a 4-billion-year-old protein engineered into modern E. coli protected the bacteria from being hijacked by a bacteria-infecting virus. It was as if the E. coli had suddenly gone analogue, ...

Researchers from David Karl's laboratory at the University of Hawai'i at Mnoa (UHM) and from Professor Jens Nielsen's laboratory at Chalmers University of Technology in Gteborg, Sweden, developed a computer model which ...

Toxins produced by three different species of fungus growing indoors on wallpaper may become aerosolized, and easily inhaled. The findings, which likely have implications for "sick building syndrome," were published in Applied ...

Marine seismic surveys used in petroleum exploration could cause a two to three-fold increase in mortality of adult and larval zooplankton, new research published in leading science journal Nature Ecology and Evolution has ...

Dramatic differences in chimp societies, discovered by researchers at the University of St Andrews, reveal variations in social status and sharing food, as seen in human cultures.

Sometimes, when a science experiment doesn't work out, unexpected opportunities open up.

A host of proteins and other molecules sit on the strands of our DNA, controlling which genes are read out and used by cells and which remain silent. This aggregation of genetic material and controlling molecules, called ...

Plants adopt different strategies to survive the changing temperatures of their natural environments. This is most evident in temperate regions where forest trees shed their leaves to conserve energy during the cold season. ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Follow this link:

In marine bacteria, evolution of new specialized molecules follows a previously unknown path - Phys.Org

Food Evolution Is Scientifically Accurate. Too Bad It Won’t Convince Anyone. – Slate Magazine

A scene from Food Evolution.

Black Valley Films

Several years ago, a county government in Hawaii debated a measure to ban genetically modified crops on the island. The hearings highlighted the divergent views of pro-GMO scientists and anti-biotech activists, many who assert, without credible evidence, that GMOs are linked to numerous diseases.

Those deliberations, contentious as they were, eventually became the focus of a long narrative feature by Pulitzer Prizewinning New York Times journalist Amy Harmon, titled A Lonely Quest for Facts on Genetically Modified Crops. The piece revealed the fraught and bewildering discourse around GMOs and why, even if you took the time to painstakingly verify all the claims and counter-claims (as one lonely councilman did), most people arent interested in listening or changing their minds based on the evidence. Its too much of a slog, and it goes against the very human tendency to accept only information that confirms pre-existing beliefs or mindsets. The majority of councilmembers voted for the GMO ban, an outcome, that as Harmons article shows, was likely preordainedand also nonsensical when considering the evidence.

For those seeking clarity on GMOs, the push to get people to accept the facts is just as lonely now as it was in 2014: The Hawaii case also serves as the dramatic centerpiece of an ambitious new documentary called Food Evolution, opening in select movie theaters this week. Food Evolution travels to major battlegrounds to better understand the GMO conflict, from Hawaii and New York to California and Africa. It is abundantly clear that the film, like any good documentary, is argument-driven, attempting to prove that GMOs, far from how theyve been painted, are in fact safe.

Unfortunately, theres no good reason to think this effort will be any more successful at correcting the popular misperceptions and stereotypes around GMOs than Harmons thoughtful piece (or several others since, including, for example, one in this very magazine). The film, like any good documentary, wants to be the arbiter of a debate over evidence. In reality, it ought to have admitted that what it is facing is an ideologically charged debate that, like climate change, is increasingly immune to facts.

Food Evolution leans heavily on science and scientific authority to make its argument. Exhibit A: Neil DeGrasse Tyson is the films narrator. To dispel unfounded but persistent health fears of GMOs, Tyson points to the nearly 2,000 experiments and foremost scientific institutions that have affirmed the safety of genetically engineered foods. Will this change anyones mind?

As we say in Brooklyn, fughetaboutit. Im skeptical that the film will have any impact on GMO-averse people because I know GMO-averse people. I belong to this tribe. My GMO-averse friends and fellow brownstone liberals havent given a lot of thought to the science that suggests GMOs are safe. Theyre not going to wade through dense National Academy of Sciences reports that provide nuanced discussions on the pros and cons of genetically modified crops. For them, the GMO debate is not about science; it is about emotions. They very much care about the food they feed their families. And they take their cues from the experts they trust on such matters, experts they judge to share their values. And in this tribe, GMOs are not associated with sustainability and healthy foods.

Im skeptical that the film will have any impact on GMO-averse people because I know GMO-averse people.

Maybe this explains why, despite embracing GMO foods myself, I also belong to my local organic co-op, something one friend gleefully reminded me of the last time I brought up misguided GMO fears at a dinner party. Yes, theres a large GMO-free sign hanging on the main wall in the co-op, but I like the vibe and ethic of the place. And yeah, I know the lucrative organic food industry is a racket unto itself and that organic benefits are grossly overstated, but I still identify with the people who shop at the co-op. And that matters more to me.

When the topic of GMOs comes up at dinner parties, I am the skunk who will gently remind everyone of everything Tyson says about GMO safety in Food Evolution. I have a litany of facts and studies that I cite. After listening politely and patting me on the head like a child out of his depth, they always checkmate me with, What about Monsanto?

Its hard to overstate the significance of that albatross on the GMO debate. Monsanto is perhaps best known for producing pesticides and herbicides like DDT in the 1940s and Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. In the 1980s, Monsanto was at the forefront of the nascent agricultural biotechnology revolution, but when it pioneered the first generation of genetically engineered seeds, it conveniently made them able to withstand an herbicide it created. Activists suspicious of the new technology had a field day branding GMOs as the work of mad scientists with a history of poisoning us. Its easy for activists to portray the company as the evil face of industrial agriculture.

Of course, the reality is that it is possible for Monsanto to be terrible and for GMOs to still be safe. But when Ive tried unpacking the companys real problems (calling out its monopolistic, heavy-handed business practices and tone-deaf responses to critics), that only makes people more suspicious. Its become hard for scientists and journalists alike to debunk GMO myths and misinformation without being accused of shilling for Monsanto or Big Ag. Even Harmon, a highly regarded science journalist, cant escape this charge: After one of her (ultimately prize-winning) pieces chronicling a non-industry application of crop biotechnology was published, Michael Pollan tweeted that it contained too many industry talking points. (The science journalism community leapt to Harmons defense and repudiated Pollan.) And after Harmons Hawaii piece was published, an anti-GMO group on its Facebook page photo-shopped her in a leopard-skin bathing suit, holding hands with the Monsanto CEO on a Hawaiian beach.

Given this poisonous milieu, Im not surprised that Food Evolution has already been characterized by activists as a textbook case of corporate propaganda. Several influential GMO critics who appear in the film, including Pollan and New York University professor Marion Nestle, are also crying foul. Its fair to say that the film has an agenda. It does. (Though, to its credit, Food Evolution devotes ample time to the socio-political concerns of GMO opponents.) But to baselessly insinuate that Monsanto has somehow financially underwritten it, as Nestle does in a blog post on her website, is a pretty good indicator of Food Evolutions herculean challenge: to overcome immense distrust of a science dominated and shaped by industry.

There is one scene that left me hopeful that it is possible for a meeting of the minds on this topic. It comes when Alison Van Eenennaam, a professor of animal genomics and biotechnology at the University of CaliforniaDavis, stops to talk with anti-GMO protesters. She engages in a civil, good faith conversation with them. One protester says to her: Dont you think putting all these chemicals in our food and in our animals is dangerous?

After some polite back and forth, Van Eenennaam says, What frustrates me is that I think this [GMO] technology has potential and yet it gets mixed up with a lot of other concerns, like multinational control. The protester seems truly engaged in their dialogue. Maybe its not an and/or [issue], she says.

Van Eenennaam reaches out to shake the womans hand. I agree, she says, smiling. Can we agree on that?

They do. It would be great if more conversations like this resulted from Food Evolution. But the film is an attempt to inject science into a debate that is shaped by values. That tactic, one that I have employed plenty of times in my own life with minimal results, seems destined to fail. Instead, perhaps we should all take a page from Van Eenennaam and try to be more willing to listen to how peoples values inform their opinions and find common ground from there.

More:

Food Evolution Is Scientifically Accurate. Too Bad It Won't Convince Anyone. - Slate Magazine

Review: In ‘Food Evolution,’ Scientists Strike Back – New York Times

The scientific method is under siege, and not just from naysayers who dismiss climate change or fear vaccines. G.M.O.s genetically modified organisms and the crops they enable have become another field of battle.

Directed by Scott Hamilton Kennedy, Food Evolution hopes to demystify G.M.O.s and points to successes like Hawaiian papayas and Ugandan bananas, which were saved from devastating viruses. And while it gives opponents their say, the film rebuts their arguments, including reports that suggest G.M.O.s lead to a rise in farmers suicide rates and an increase in pesticide use. (The response to the first: correlation is not causation; to the second, yes, but those pesticides are far less toxic.)

A preview of the film.

The film also speaks with food journalists (including Michael Pollan, a contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine) as well as farmers who have benefited from the technology. And if trust is an issue, Neil deGrasse Tyson, perhaps the most credible public scientist on the planet, is its narrator.

The documentary acknowledges the gorilla in the garden: Monsanto, a leading exponent of modification, is one of the most-hated companies in the world. There are many reasons Monsanto raises hackles, Dr. Tyson acknowledges, but to be concerned about the safety of their G.M.O.s is to be misinformed.

The food industry recruits scientists to speak on its behalf, but in press notes and email correspondence, the films producers say no funding came from any Big Ag company or lobbying group. Food Evolution was commissioned by the nonprofit Institute of Food Technologists, and the filmmakers retained creative control.

With a soft tone, respectful to opponents but insistent on the data, Food Evolution posits an inconvenient truth for organic boosters to swallow: In a world desperate for safe, sustainable food, G.M.O.s may well be a force for good.

Director Scott Hamilton Kennedy

Stars Raoul Adamchak, Charles Benbrook, Tamar Haspel, Mark Lynas, Emma Naluyima

Running Time 1h 32m

Genre Documentary

Food Evolution Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 32 minutes.

A version of this review appears in print on June 23, 2017, on Page C7 of the New York edition with the headline: G.M.O.s May Not Be an Enemy.

Read the original post:

Review: In 'Food Evolution,' Scientists Strike Back - New York Times

Agenda’s Aaron Levant on the Evolution of the Trade Show – WWD

From the Agenda Long Beach trade show floor.

Courtesy Photo

As Aaron Levant and team put the finishing touches on their ambitious effort to turn the trade show model on its head, the Agenda Show founder cant help but note hes come full circle.

The Agenda trade show for the action sports and streetwear industries will see its first consumer-facing component, Agenda Festival, next month. It's been a long time in the making, but the it hardly strays from the roots Levant laid when he began putting together parties serving up music, food, beer and some limited edition shirts in Los Angeles. It wasnt until 2003 that Levant, in a story well-known within the trade, launched the Agenda trade show in the back of a Long Beach Thai food restaurant. Ten years later, he struck a deal with Reed Exhibitions bringing Agenda into the event organizers fold.

More here:

Agenda's Aaron Levant on the Evolution of the Trade Show - WWD

NASA’s new assignments: Find aliens, prove evolution – WND.com

The National Space and Aeronautics Administration has done some amazing things for the United States over the years: the initial short flights into space, then the longer orbiting missions, the moon visits, the space station and even unmanned trips to every sidewalk in the solar system.

But now it has some new goals: Find aliens.

And prove evolution.

And while the agency is at it, its staff members should identify the origins of life.

Thats according to the new and very religious marching orders the agency was given just weeks ago.

The Atlantic explained just what developed.

The truth about evolution is all found in the WND Superstore, in Evolution: The Grand Experiment, Volume 1, Icons of Evolution, The Lie: Evolution Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, Incredible Creatures that defy Evolution II and more.

On March 21 of this year, both parties in Congress and the Trump administration made a change to a federal document that amounted to only a few words, but which may well change the course of human history.

Every few years, Congress and the administration pass a NASA Authorization Act, which gives the U.S. Space Agency its marching orders for the next few years. Amongst the many pages of the 2017 NASA Authorization Act (S. 422) the agencys mission encompasses expected items such as continuation of the space station, building of big rockets, indemnification of launch and reentry service providers for third party claim and so on.

But in this years bill, Congress added a momentous phrase to the agencys mission: the search for lifes origins, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe. Its a short phrase, but a visionary one, setting the stage for a far-reaching effort, that could have as profound an impact on the 21st century as the Apollo program had on the 20th.

At the NASA Watch bog, Keith Cowing noted the law itself states, The administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies to develop a science strategy for astrobiology that would outline key scientific questions, identify the most promising research in the field, and indicate the extent to which the mission priorities in existing decadal surveys address the search for lifes origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe.

Atlantic speculated on the meaning of the change, noting it will include a new emphasis on the question of whether there are other life forms in the universe.

In the last decade we have made enormous advances in the field of exoplanet studies. Telescopes on the ground have become sensitive enough to discern the faintest stellar wobbles, as orbiting planets tug gently against the gravitational bonds. With the National Science Foundations Atacama Large Millimeter Array, and the Hubble Space Telescope, we have peered into interstellar clouds where new planets are forming and have detected the presence of all the elements necessary for life.

It noted that just last February, a nearby star system was confirmed to have seven planets orbiting, three of which lie with the stars Goldilocks zone, making them potentially habitable.

There have been multiple reports of planets that possibly could sustain life. Whats thought to be needed for life water and energy sources have been located even on Saturns moon, Enceladus.

And just last June, the New York Times said, Yes, there have been aliens.

Even so, the mystery still remains about life on earth, and the report places its faith in the still-unexplained idea that somehow, somewhere, sometime, something turned from inanimate matter into living tissue.

On its own.

Every worm on a deep sea vent, or cactus eking out an existence in the high Andres, every human who hunted on the plains or stood on the moon owes their existence to a single chance meeting of two cells that learned to get along, it continued.

There is a possibility, and even a statistical probability, that life exists on some planet other than earth, reports say.

But at Inverse, bloggers charged Congress sneakily told NASA to, well, find aliens.

And the move is being viewed by those in the faith community as the federal governments endorsement of an effort to prove the biblical creation narrative false.

The work already had begun.

The Atlantic reported: NASA has been putting in place all the necessary building blocks to make the Search for Life possible. NASAs James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), due to launch in late 2018, will begin following up on recently discovered exoplanets, searching for the fingerprints of life, gases that scientists believe can only exist in the presence of living organisms. And NASA and private industry have embarked on ambitious new rockets capable of carrying probes and landers to Europa [one of Jupiters moons which is encrusted in ice], and launching future telescopes capable of finding and characterizing continents and oceans on Earth-like planets. Soon, they will be able to send (human) geologists and biologists to Mars.

At least the marching orders are a change from what ex-President Barack Obama wanted from NASA.

He wanted the agency to be a Muslim feel-good outreach.

According to the Telegraph, Charles Bolden, a retired United States Marines Corps major-general and former astronaut, said in an interview with al-Jazeera that NASA was not only a space exploration agency but also an Earth improvement agency.'

Bolden said: When I became the NASA administrator, he [Obama] charged me with three things. One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering.

The truth about evolution is all found in the WND Superstore, in Evolution: The Grand Experiment, Volume 1, Icons of Evolution, The Lie: Evolution Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, Incredible Creatures that defy Evolution II and more.

Excerpt from:

NASA's new assignments: Find aliens, prove evolution - WND.com

Turkey to stop teaching evolution in secondary schools as part of new national curriculum – The Independent

Evolution will no longer be taught in Turkishsecondary schools after being described as a controversial subject by the government.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has personally approved the change, which will be part of a new national curriculum being published later this month.

The head of the education ministrys curriculum board, Alpaslan Durmu, said a section on Darwinism would be cut from biology classes from 2019.

We have excluded controversial subjects for students at an age unable yet to understand the issues scientific background, he told a seminar in Ankara, according to Hurriyet Daily News.

As the students at ninth grade are not endowed with antecedents to discuss the Origin of Life and Evolution section in biology classes, this section will be delayed until undergraduate study.

Mr Durmu said pupils at elementary schools would still be given an evolutionary point of view and learn evolutionary biology from year five.

Claiming the curriculum was being simplified, he said the government was attempting to educate children in line with local and national values.

Erdogan to Turkish referendum critics: Talk to the hand

Academics from Turkeys most prestigious universities have reportedly criticised the proposals, pointing out the only other country to exclude evolutionary theory from schools was Saudi Arabia.

The omission was first noticed in January, when the Turkish government first announced its new primary and secondary school curricula.

The education ministry said a draft would be discussed and criticism taken into account before the publication of the final version, including a possible replacement chapter entitled Living Beings and the Environment, with all references to Darwinian theory removed.

Other changes included a decrease in the amount of homework and allowing more time for children to play, and the life of Turkeys secularist founder Mustafa Kemal Atatrk being given less focus.

Mustafa Akyol, a senior fellow at the Freedom Project at Wellesley College, said the change appeared to arise from advice given by Egitim Bir-Sen, a conservative education union.

Writing in a column for Al Monitor, he said debates about the theory of evolution date back to the late Ottoman Empire and have repeatedly surfaced under the rule of Mr Erdogans Justice and Development Party (AKP).

Since the early 2000s, religious conservatives have had the upper hand in Turkey, and their distaste for the theory of evolution is well established, Mr Akyol wrote.

Many of them see the theory as corrosive to religious faith and want to protect young generations from such harmful ideas.

The latest move is part of a wider struggle between secularists and right-wing religious groups in Turkey, which is undergoing constitutional reforms to grant the President dramatically increased powers following a referendum held in April.

The vote, which European monitors found did not meet international standards, resulted in the parliamentary system of government being replaced with an executive presidency that has long been the ambition of Mr Erdogan.

He has been accused of undermining Turkeys democratic and secular foundations with in increasingly autocratic and religious agenda, imposing restrictions on alcohol, building new mosques and reintroducing state religious education.

More than 50,000 people have been arrested since a failed coup against Mr Erdogan in July last year, with many more dismissed or detained.

Journalists, prosecutors, soldiers, civil servants and academics are among those targeted in the ongoing purge, which has seen almost 33,000 teachers sacked.

The government has accused suspects of supporting the Gulenist movement blamed for the attempted coup, but critics say baseless accusations are being used for a wider crackdown on dissent.

Fethullah Gulen, a US-bsed cleric,has denied involvement and foreign governments including the UK have found no evidence to support Ankaras allegations or its designation of his Hizmet movement as a terror organisation.

Link:

Turkey to stop teaching evolution in secondary schools as part of new national curriculum - The Independent

Student robotics team sets sights on saving turtles – The Mercury News

An all-girls robotics team from the International School of the Peninsula in Palo Alto will journey to Sydney, Australia in July to compete in the Asia Pacific Youth Robotics Competition.

Its path to success this year also brought the girls to a plastics manufacturer, the Marine Science Institute in Redwood City and the Environmental Protection Agency office in San Francisco.

When the AllGirlRhythm Robotics Team learned that many turtle species are endangered not only because of fishing and poaching, but mainly because of the millions of tons of plastic that end up in the ocean each year, they decided to do something about it.

The team of rising sixth- and seventh-grade students Sofia Cadoret, Alessandra Dodson, Anya Greene, Olivia Hau, Cybille Irissou and Mandi Lee created a turtle toolkit to help schools calculate how much plastic their campuses use each year and devise an action plan.

Turtles die from many things, but plastic is the main thing, Olivia said.

The studentsTurtles Against Nurdles project helped them win the NorCal First Lego League Robotics tournament in January.

Each competition has the students using a robot they built to complete a set of missions in a way that earns them the most points. But tournament judges also evaluate the students on core values as well as a field research project, which is where the turtle project applies.

This years tournament theme, Animal Allies, challenges each team to choose and solve a real-world problem affecting animals.

Alessandra, who goes by Ale, said she learned that plastic doesnt ever really go away.

It just becomes really small and hard to see, Ale said. It just stays in the water and turtles accidentally eat them because they mistake them for jellyfish. It harms their digestive system and takes up space so theyre not hungry anymore and then they starve to death.

Much of the plastic we use are made from nurdles, small plastic pellets that are less than 5 millimeters in size, about the size of a lentil.

Anya said the team brainstormed ways to help turtles and other marine life. She said their ideas included beach cleanups, recycling campaigns and encouraging biodegradable plastics efforts.

After visiting the plastics company and marine center, and doing more research, the students learned that those ideas would likely only have minimal impact: Because of the number and size of nurdles, cleanups are hard to do; only 10 percent of plastics get recycled each year; and biodegradable plastics often harm animals anyway because they still take awhile to break down.

Thats why we focused on preventing plastic use, Ale said. If we remove the trash but trash keeps going into the ocean, it doesnt solve the problem.

So the focus became changing human behavior. The team simplified the EPAs Marine Debris Toolkit, meant for college students, so it can be used in elementary and middle school classrooms.

We decided to focus on changing behavior where its easiest: with kids, Mandi said. Our plastics reduction program can be used by any kids, anywhere.

Starting with their own school, Sofia said the students determined that about 200 single-use water bottles were distributed daily as part of the hot lunch program. They made a pitch to the principal that resulted in the school installing water bottle filling stations and asking students to bring reusable bottles.

Parent Spencer Greene, who serves as one of the coaches, said the girls got good feedback when they met with the EPA earlier this month.

What EPA confirmed for them is that the prevention approach is definitely the area of greatest impact, Greene said. Just reducing the amount of usage compared to recycling, compared to biodegradable bottles, which the girls are working on, provides the greatest opportunity for change.

Parent Tammi Ng, who serves as the teams project and core values coach, said the students accomplishments are amazing.

At the end of the day, while the girls were surprised and happy they won at the regional competition, they were more excited they made such a huge impact putting the toolkit to the test, Ng said. They made a huge impact at the International School and theyre going to get the opportunity to work with the EPA and get it implemented across the nation. This has been an incredible journey for the girls.

These days, the team and their coaches, Ng, Greene and parents Bertrand Irissou and Laura Langone, are busy preparing to compete in Australia starting July 6.

Cybille said the students decided early on to keep things simple and not add too many attachments to their robot, which is named CASOMA, taking an initial from each girls name.

She said the team worked hard, through strategy and trial and error, to pick obstacles they can do within two minutes that maximize the number of points they earn.

Obstacles include using the robot to transport animals built from Lego such as a pig, bee or gecko from one part of the arena to another.

Anya said some of the obstacles the team overcame included figuring out a very bizarre problem where the robot kept tripping over a piece of Velcro and the most efficient way to have the robot move a platform in 180 degrees.

When team members have different ideas about what direction to take, they vote or combine all the ideas, she said.

The competition is a fun and challenging way to teach students to solve problems, manage time efficiently and work together, Coach Irissou said. The team earned 173 points in the first tournament and aim to exceed 300 in their upcoming bout.

There are no two robots that are alike, Irissou said. You can see all the different ways kids come up with to solve the same problems.

Read the original:

Student robotics team sets sights on saving turtles - The Mercury News