State Poised To Launch Biggest Expansion Of Gambling In Decades, But Some See Trouble Ahead – Hartford Courant

Connecticut is poised to launch the biggest expansion in gambling in two decades: a trifecta of building a third casino, adding more off-track betting venues and laying the groundwork for online sports betting.

But those who advocate for problem and addicted gamblers and others who research the causes don't see the same kind of payoff as some Connecticut lawmakers eager to preserve state revenue and jobs.

They only see trouble ahead.

"What we've seen in many, many jurisdictions that get major introductions of gambling is a sharp uptick in problem gambling for one or two years and then a decline in prevalence," said Rachel A. Volberg, president of Gemini Research in Northhampton, Mass., who studies gambling. "But these people still remain at a greater risk, and that's more people in population with a potential problem with gambling."

The gaming expansion backed by the state legislature two weeks ago does not compare with the introduction of two southeastern Connecticut casinos Foxwoods Resort Casino and Mohegan Sun in the 1990s.

Even so, Volberg and others say the prospect of more access to gambling shouldn't be ignored, despite the already strong presence of the gaming in Connecticut. Hartford-area residents, for instance, can take a short drive to a casino in East Windsor rather than driving to the southeastern corner of the state.

The satellite casino in East Windsor is expected to add 2,000 slot machines and up to 150 table games.

"It's important for people not to be complacent because we've had casinos here and other forms of gambling for several decades," Marc N. Potenza, a professor of psychiatry and director of the Center of Excellence in Gambling Research at Yale University in New Haven.

Tecton Architects / HANDOUT

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy must still sign the legislation. And it could be months before ground is broken, and it could be another two years before the casino actually opens. Court challenges also loom. The Hartford-area gambling venue would be jointly run by the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes that have built vast gambling empires just outside of New London.

The East Windsor casino is intended to blunt the competitive effects of a $950 million casino and entertainment complex under construction in Springfield. The state's 25-percent share of slot revenue has been eroding as casinos in neighboring states have challenged the dominance of Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun. Gaming industry jobs also are at risk, supporters of gambling expansion argue.

But to push through legislation, the addition of OTB sites and setting up a regulatory framework of future, but not yet legal, online sports betting were both critical to gathering enough votes for casino expansion.

The state now draws revenue from OTB operations and regulating sports betting would also bring funds to state coffers, a potent lure for a state that has come to depend on gaming revenue to help balance its budget.

Cloe Poisson / Hartford Courant

Tucked into the legislation creating the third casino, the Mashantucket Pequots and Mohegans have agreed to contribute $300,000 a year for research and treatment for problem gambling.

One gap in understanding gambling problems is knowing the extent of the trouble. No statistics exist for Connecticut because a comprehensive study has gone unfunded, said Marlene Warner, acting executive director at the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling.

The council now has an annual budget of $800,000, compared with about $2.5 million for a similar council in Massachusetts, said Warner, who describes the council's budget as "woefully underfunded."

Warner said the bulk of the Connecticut council's funding, $600,000, is split evenly by Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun. Those funding levels date from when the casinos first opened, a time when the state's gambling landscape was far different from what it is today, Warner said.

The additional $300,000 for the third casino will help, but it will only go so far, Warner said.

Rep. Fred Wilms, R-Norwalk, pushed for more funding for treatment and research for problem gambling when casino expansion was considered by the House earlier this month, his voice joining others warning about the social costs of increased gaming.

Wilms proposed that the East Windsor casino deposit 5 percent of its gross gaming revenue annually into a chronic gamblers fund. The figure, he said, was drawn from statistics showing 2 percent of all adults nationwide are gambling addicts and another 3 percent are considered to be problem or chronic gamblers.

"My familiarity with this is unfortunately a family member of ours has been a gambling addict for the past 35 years," Wilms told his House colleagues. "And so, we have had to spend a lot of time in the addiction and recovery community."

Wilms said he was troubled about casino expansion when the website of state Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services notes that problem gambling is twice as high for individuals who live within 50 miles of a casino.

A Google search yielded 19 towns and cities where Gamblers Anonymous meetings for scheduled for the next week. Two of the towns, Middletown and Norwich, had two meetings.

"And it goes to show it's not somebody else's town, it's not some other place far away," Wilms said. "It's pretty close to where we live."

Wilm's amendment was ultimately defeated, and he voted against the multi-pronged gambling expansion.

Cloe Poisson / Hartford Courant

'Very Few' Become Problem Gamblers

Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun downplayed the affect of casino expansion, arguing that "very, very few people become problem gamers." But the state's original agreements with the tribes that gave the state a share of slot revenue also required the tribes to financially help problem gambling support programs.

Since the casinos opened in the 1990s, Foxwoods has contributed $5.5 million and Mohegan Sun, $6.7 million to the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling.

Just to the north, in Massachusetts, the state is drawing direct links between casino expansion and problem gambling in a 21st-century environment where gambling is increasingly widespread and legal.

Legislation in 2011 allowed three commercial casinos in Massachusetts. One, Plainridge Park Casino, opened in 2015 and two others on are on the way, in Boston and Springfield.

Cloe Poisson / Hartford Courant

As part of the legislation, the casinos must pay up to a $5 million assessment, plus 5 percent of gross gaming revenues annually into a public health trust fund focused on problem gambling. Once all three casinos are open, those contributions could amount to $15-$20 million a year.

Warner, the acting director of Connecticut's problem gambling council who also serves as the executive director of the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling, said the Bay State will have the most aggressive approach to dealing with the problem gambling in the country.

Although the Connecticut problem gambling council operates on a shoestring budget, Warner did note good efforts by the state Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

Connecticut benefits from $2.5 million in Connecticut Lottery Corp funding for gambling treatment and prevention, Warner said. Those services are provided through the state mental health department, she said.

More OTBs

State regulated gambling in Connecticut dates back to 1972 when the lottery sold its first ticket. The introduction led to the opening of the first OTB parlors four years later.

Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun later brought glitz to the state's gambling scene. But there have been other, more recent pushes into gaming, smaller than what is envisioned by the recent legislation.

In April of last year, the state lottery launched Keno, which brought the casino-like game to all its 2,900 retail locations in the state, including some bars and restaurants.

And more gambling now may be on the horizon.

Sportech Venues Inc., the state only licensed OTB operator, has its eye on what many experts say is the inevitable legalization of state-regulated sports betting. Sports betting has long existed in a shadowy world, much the way alcohol production and consumption did during Prohibition.

New Jersey is now leading the charge against a federal ban, and Connecticut and other states have joined a growing list of states preparing for legalization. Gamblers have online access to sports betting tied to sites some of them outside the country where they are legal.

Cloe Poisson / Hartford Courant

In recent years, Sportech has worked to remake the image of OTB, once predominantly sought out by older men.

In 2014, Sportech invested nearly $5 million at Bradley Teletheater in Windsor Locks to bring a Bobby V's Restaurant & Sports Bar to the venue. Bobby V's is intended to also attract visitors who aren't necessarily interested in gambling and a wider range of ages and families.

Ted Taylor, Sportech's president, said he sees sports betting as a logical step for the company. The legislation on Malloy's desk would increase the potential number of OTB locations to 24. Sportech now operates 16 sites, including its newest in Stamford.

"We are already licensed and regulated to manage gaming, so we could implement sports betting rapidly under a new sports betting regulatory framework," Taylor said. "If this occurs, it will strengthen our position against increasing out-of-state competition and provide much needed jobs and revenue to Connecticut."

But Taylor said Sportech also is paying attention to problem gambling.

"Sportech wants to ensue that everyone is playing responsibly," Taylor said. "However, to combat problem gambling, Sportech contributed $180,000 last year to supportive programs."

Read this article:

State Poised To Launch Biggest Expansion Of Gambling In Decades, But Some See Trouble Ahead - Hartford Courant

Live Casino hosts event to connect small firms to gambling industry … – Baltimore Sun

Live Casino & Hotel in Hanover teamed up with the American Gaming Association Thursday to promote business opportunities for small, minority-owned firms and highlight the industry's economic impact in Maryland.

Association representatives are touring U.S. casinos to highlight gambling's impact on local businesses. Events at the Hanover facility included a minority business outreach fair and panel discussion with industry, state and county officials led by Donald Fry, president and CEO of the Greater Baltimore Committee.

"I've seen firsthand the positive impact the industry has had in Maryland" in creating jobs and spurring economic development and tourism, Fry said.

The casino has spent about $100 million for services and products from local and minority-owned businesses and continues to seek such vendors out, said Rob Norton, president of global gaming for casino owner Cordish Cos.,

Panel member Tony Hill, a managing partner of Annapolis-based office furniture supplier Edwards and Hill, said the casino has given his business a boost.

"There are lots of clients where you have some work and have to move on ... but they continue to make sure they are good partners," Hill said. "It helps small businesses like mine to create a pipeline of business, which is what we need to be able to grow."

The U.S. gambling industry supports 350,000 small-business jobs, according to research by Spectrum Gaming Group for the association. The report looked at nearly a dozen markets in the U.S. to assess gambling's direct and indirect impact on small local businesses. It found gambling has the largest impact in small to midsized communities.

The five-year-old Live Casino employs 3,000 people and was the top taxpayer in the state last year, casino officials said.

Geoff Freeman, president and CEO of the gambling association, said the group is trying to correct misconceptions and "shine a light on what the industry's doing."

lorraine.mirabella@baltsun.com

The rest is here:

Live Casino hosts event to connect small firms to gambling industry ... - Baltimore Sun

Amy Poehler realized she hates gambling while filming ‘The House … – New York Daily News

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Friday, June 23, 2017, 6:00 AM

Dont expect to spot Amy Poehler at the craps table.

The actress discovered shes no fan of gambling while filming The House a casino-based comedy that hits theaters June 30.

We had to spend some time in Las Vegas, she told the Daily News. I realized that I get too grouchy when I lose my money. Like my trip is ruined when I have to hand over my money to a man in a shiny vest. I would much rather have a very fancy dinner and go see Britney [Spears].

In The House, Poehler, 45, and Will Ferrell star as a married couple who discover that the scholarship they were counting on for their daughters college tuition hasnt come through. So they open an illegal casino in the basement of their neighbor Franks (Jason Mantzoukas) suburban home. Naturally, things dont go according to plan.

If you take anything away from this movie its never too late to make a bad decision with the one you love, Poehler laughs.

The comedian best known for starring in Parks and Recreation and being a Saturday Night Live cast member admits that the main reason she signed on for the flick was to play opposite Ferrell.

The two havent worked together much their time on SNL only overlapped by a year and they both appeared in the skating comedy Blades of Glory.

He can play super alpha-maniac and then really dumb low-status guy, Poehler said. Hes just the funniest, a great person. I think we work in a similar way. We like to work hard and be nice, normal people.

Poehler, whose impersonations on SNL included Hillary Clinton, was an ardent supporter of the presidential candidate and hosts a website called Amy Poehlers Smart Girls, which showcases women who are changing the world by being themselves.

The actress admits to being disheartened by the election so much of the first half of this year has been recovering from shocking rhetoric, she says but adds that what really helps her get through it is spending time with famous pals like Rashida Jones and Tina Fey.

The news is so bleak, everybody feels so desperate and in these times, deep, hearty laughs feel like oxygen. Sometimes they feel like things that can get through grief, Poehler said.

Poehler, who has two sons, Archie, 8, and Abel, 6, with ex-husband Will Arnett, remembers keeping her sons up to watch the election results.

The night turned into a complete disaster where I had to remind them that theyre white boys who are going to grow up to be white men and theyre going to have to decide what kind of men they want to be in the world, she says. You try to create little compassionate people and try to keep them tenderhearted for as long as you can. God, its hard.

When theyre looking to lighten things up, Poehler and her kids watch The Simpsons.

This summer, Poehler, who now lives in L.A., looks forward to visiting New York.

The secret is to go in the summer, she says. Everyone has split the city. There are tourists, but you can just push them out of the way.

And as for the wafting odors of urine and rotting garbage that are amplified on city streets in summer, Poehlers not concerned.

Look, if you want to win the beauty pageant, go live somewhere else, she says. New York is the best, best, best city in the world.

Original post:

Amy Poehler realized she hates gambling while filming 'The House ... - New York Daily News

Why OLC is Unlikely to Criminalize Online Gambling – Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog)

I have immense esteem for my friend Norm Singleton at the Campaign for Liberty. His lengthy Capitol Hill experience, depth of knowledge, and humor have duly earned him respect from operators across the political spectrum. Therefore, when I read his piece disagreeing with my predictions on the future of Internet gambling, I took it to heart.

Norm wrote that he doesnt share my optimistic assessment that the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), under Attorney General Jess Sessions, is unlikely to reverse OLCs 2011 opinion. This memo, which clarified that the Wire Act of 1961 applied only to sports betting and opened the door for states to legalize Internet gambling within their borders.

It is true that Sessions did promise to review this memo during his confirmation hearingmaking it practically mandatory he do something. However, other forces at play make the chance that OLC will broadly reinterpret or withdraw the memo highly unlikely, even if Sessions or even President Trump demand it.

What is the OLC?

Federal law empowers the attorney general to provide legal advice to the various aspects of the executive branch. The Office of Legal Counsela shop of about two dozen lawyersis the office that provides these opinions. Often referred to as the presidents law firm, the advice of OLC lawyers is sought to clarify some of the most vexing legal questions the federal government faces about the Constitution and federal statutes. These opinions are binding for executive agencies, and because the questions they address are unlikely to surface in the judicial arena, often represent the final word on these matters.

For the most part, OLC advice is sought on a voluntary basis; there is no requirement for the president or agencies to submit legal questions to OLC (except for certain questions arising within the military, disputes between agencies, and review of proposed executive orders). Despite this, and having its own in-house legal counsel, the White House is still one of the most frequent solicitors of OLC advice.

Why would the White Housewhich has its own highly capable in-house counselrequire the opinion of OLC? The answer is that OLC, unlike White House counsel, is perceived as an independent entity with a reputation for serious, even-handed analysis, not mere advocacy. And though the president can overrule OLC opinion (though that is extremely rare), he or she is bound by the oath of office to operate within the confines of the Constitution.

The White House seeks out OLC opinions when it wants to avoid litigation, get cover for politically controversial actions, and point to credible outside support for its decisions. The value of OLC opinions depends on maintaining this credibility, which is already on shaky ground thanks to the actions of President George W. Bush and his OLC.

OLC and precedent

OLCs reputation for integrity is grounded in its adherence to the highest standards of legal interpretation. Part of this has to do with the fact that the office respects the opinions of its predecessors; it doesnt simply reverse decisions each time the nation elects a new administration with a different political ideology.

OLC opinions operate like judicial precedent. OLC internal policy directs statutory interpretation to be guided by the text of the law, give great weight to previous OLC opinions, and not lightly depart from such past decisions, particularly where they directly address and decide a point in question. (See 2005 and 2010 memoranda Best practices for OLC opinions).

Opinions can be overturned, but as with judicial precedent, OLC historically has set a high bar for reversing previous opinions, even when they appear to be wrongly decided. Take, for example, President Bill Clintons executive order eliminating eligibility for government contracts companies that hired permanent employees to replace workers on strike. When asked to review Clintons proposed order, OLC stood by the opinion of George H.W. Bushs OLC, even though the Office believed both the Bush and Clinton orders were erroneous (a suspicion confirmed when courts invalidated Clintons order and questioned the legality of Bushs).

The notable exception to this commitment to precedent occurred under George W. Busha controversy from which OLC is still recovering.

OLC and Politics

Shortly after Congress confirmed Jack Goldmsith as OLC head in 2003, he reviewed and ultimately withdrew his predecessors opinion that enhanced interrogation methods (e.g. waterboarding) were legal. This reversal met OLCs high bar for diverting from precedent, which Georgetown Law Professor David Luban described as aggressive advocacy briefs that barely go through the motions of standard legal argument and represent violation of craft values common to all legal interpretive communities.

After forcing Goldsteins resignation, the Bush administration appointed a new OLC head who quickly reinstated tortures legality by issuing new memos. These would later be withdrawn under the Obama administrationin a manner that, again, met the threshold for reversalbut it came at a great cost.

The revelations of the Bush-era OLCs advocacy, the withdrawing of no fewer than seven opinions during the Obama era, and the invalidation of OLC-approved executive orders by courts in both the Obama and now Trump administrations have severely damaged the Offices reputation as an objective purveyor of legal advice and even led to calls for it to be abolished.

Herein lies the danger for the current administration.

Destroying what you need later

There is still value in obtaining OLC opinions favorable to the presidents agenda items. For example, Trump may seek the Offices advice on the legality of sending troops into foreign nations or new immigration rules. However, strong-arming it into creating an Internet gambling prohibition where none exists in statute could be the straw that breaks the back of OLCs credibility. Considering how politically divisive just about every Trump action seems to be, it would be unwise to destroy any instrument that might provide him with cover.

It is possible that President Trump and Attorney General Sessions are too shortsighted to see this danger. However, Steven A. Engel, Trumps nominee to head OLC, is not ignorant to this risk.

Engel served in OLC as an assistant during the George W. Bush administration and even had a hand in writing and reviewing some of thosenow withdrawnmemos on interrogation. He insists to this day that there was a legal basis to support OLCs opinion on torture, but that scandal still haunts not only the Office, and Engel himself.

Unlike the opinion on enhanced interrogation methods, even the most tortured reading (pun intended) of statute and legislative history would not support interpreting the Wire Act as prohibiting Internet gambling. As the 2011 OLC memo itself documented, Congress was not at all ambiguous about limiting the Act to only sports gambling. Withdrawing or overruling that opinion based simply on the desires of the current administration would eliminate OLCs remaining credibility.

During his Senate confirmation hearing, Engel described OLC as an outfit with a standard for integrity, independence, and professionalism, and he vowed that if confirmed he would be a faithful steward of the Office so as to preserve and build its reputation and to pass on the Office stronger to its future leadership.

It doesnt sound like Engel wants his legacy as the man who helmed OLC as it sunk. I cannot imagine Trump or Sessions could find any viable candidate who would.

Thus, while my friend Norm is right to fear that online gambling is still on Jeff Sessionss hit list, I still think that the OLC is unlikely to aid or abet him in that effort.

The rest is here:

Why OLC is Unlikely to Criminalize Online Gambling - Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog)

Give gambling firms the boot: Xenophon – NEWS.com.au

Australia's football codes should follow the lead of the English Football Association and sever ties to gambling companies, says Nick Xenophon.

The FA has ended its sponsorship deals with betting company Ladbrokes and confirmed it will cease all commercial arrangements with gambling firms.

Senator Xenophon said he believed all Australian football codes should follow the FA's lead.

"The UK has recognised the potential of gambling to undermine and compromise sport and the harm it can do to fans," Senator Xenophon told AAP on Friday.

"Some of the biggest gambling addicts in the country are the AFL and NRL because of their deals with gambling companies."

He said if the codes did not act voluntarily he would seek to legislate the ban.

A "weaning off" period of three to five years would be appropriate, the South Australian senator said.

In April, former Manchester City and Burnley midfielder Joey Barton was banned for 18 months after he was found to have made more than 1200 bets on football matches.

Barton, who said he had a gambling addiction, had pointed out the heavy involvement of the gambling industry in British football where bookmakers act as sponsors at several levels.

Originally posted here:

Give gambling firms the boot: Xenophon - NEWS.com.au

Euthanasia pioneer alarmed by what he unleashed – WND.com – WND.com

The Dutch psychiatrist whose lawsuit opened the door to allowing assisted suicide in the Netherlands for people suffering depression is now having second thoughts.

Boudewijn Chabot

Boudewijn Chabot, in an article titled Worrisome Culture Shift in the Context of Self-Selected Death, decries the new practice of allowing psychiatrists without a therapeutic relationship with a patient to determine whether assisted suicide is permissible under the law.

Wesley Smith, a leading bioethics expert and opponent of assisted suicide and euthanasia, writes in a column for National Review that he predicted the development.

Euthanasia consciousness changes mindsets. It alters societal morality, he said. It distorts our views of the importance of vulnerable lives. It leads to abandonment and various forms of subtle and blatant coercion. Over time, it cant be controlled.

Was Terri Schiavos death really assisted suicide? Get the book that powerfully and comprehensively tells Terris Story: The Court-Ordered Death of an American Woman at the WND Superstore

The Netherlands became the first nation to allow assisted suicide after a series of court cases in the 1980s formalized the criteria for it, culminating in a 2002 law.

Chabot was prosecuted in the early 1990s for assisting the suicide of a deeply depressed woman who wanted to die after the deaths of her two children. He met with the womanfour times over several weeks but never actually treated her, Smith recounted.The psychiatrist then supplied her with poison pills, which she took.

Smith said Chabots lawyer told him in an interview for his book Forced Exit that the Dutch government never had anyintention of actually imprisoning or even sanctioning Chabot.

The purpose, the lawyer said, was to set a precedent to allow deep psychological suffering to justifyassisted suicide.

Smith said the DutchSupreme Court in 1994 ruled, essentially, that suffering is suffering, whether physical or emotional, and its the suffering thatjustifies assisted suicide, not the disease itself.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WNDs Email News Alerts!

Two decades later, he said, Dutch psychiatrists euthanize mentally ill patients, whose organs may be voluntarily harvestedafter their death.

Now, he said, Chabot has been stricken by conscience, recognizing euthanasia groups have recruited psychiatrists to kill.

Chabot argued in his paper that without a therapeutic relationship, by far most psychiatrists cannot reliably determine whether a death wish is a serious, enduring desire.

Wesley J. Smith

Even within a therapeutic relationship, it remains difficult. But a psychiatrist of the clinic can do so without a therapeutic relationship, with less than ten in-depth conversations?

Smith, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institutes Center on Human Exceptionalism, is a consultant for the Patients Rights Council who has been named by the National Journal as one of the nations top expert thinkers in bioengineering for his work in bioethics. He is among the worlds foremost critics of assisted suicide and utilitarian bioethics.

Chabot, in his article, recounted three reports of euthanasia of deep-demented persons who could not confirm their death wish.

One of the three was identified as having been done without due care; her advance request could be interpreted in different ways. The execution was also done without due care; the doctor had first put a sedative in her coffee. When the patient was lying drowsily on her bed and was about to be given a high dose, she got up with fear in her eyes and had to be held down by family members. The doctor stated that she had continued the procedure very consciously.

Smith commented that Chabot is examiningthe social and moral wreckage he helped unleash and wonders: Where did the Euthanasia Law go off the tracks?

Chabot writes that theeuthanasia practice is running amok because the legal requirements which doctors can reasonably apply in the context of physically ill people, are being declared equally applicable without limitation in the context of vulnerable patients with incurable brain diseases.

In psychiatry, Chabot writes, an essential limitation disappeared when the existence of a treatment relationship was no longer required. In the case of dementia, such a restriction disappeared by making the written advance request equivalent to an actual oral request.

Lastly, Chabot says, it really went off the tracks when the review committee concealed that incapacitated people were surreptitiously killed.

Horrible picture

In February, a Dutch doctor carrying out a lethal injection on an elderly woman ordered her family to restrain her when she resisted, creating what even euthanasia advocates called a horrible picture.

The case in Amsterdam, the National Catholic Register reported, was one of several similar instances of resistance, including a sex-abuse victim in her 20s, a 41-year-old alcoholic, a woman with ringing in her ears and now an Alzheimers patient.

In nearby Belgium, euthanasia was broadened three years agoto include children.

Alistair Thompson of the anti-euthanasia advocacy group Care Not Killing told the Register its a typical slippery-slope scenario.

The problem is that the law always evolves. Its always pushed on, a little bit, and a little bit. Once youve crossed the Rubicon, it becomes people who are not mentally competent, people who are frail or weary of life, he said.

In the Netherlands, assisted suicide is legal for infants up to a year old and for children over the age of 12. But doctors are already investigating allowing it for all children.

Duty to die

In the United States, six states allow doctor-assisted suicide, beginning with Oregons 1994 Death with Dignity Act, which was approvedby a voter referendum, 51 to 49 percent.

In an interview last fall with WND and Radio America, Jeff Hunt, director of the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University, warned that where doctor-assisted suicide is legal, it moves from what is generally called a right to die to a duty to die.

He pointed out that former Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm made that argument in 1984, stating elderly people who are terminally ill have got a duty to die and get out of the way. Let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.

Was Terri Schiavos death really assisted suicide? Get the book that powerfully and comprehensively tells Terris Story: The Court-Ordered Death of an American Woman at the WND Superstore

Hunt said that while assisted-suicide advocates paint the practice as the ultimate act of personal liberty, in every case where this is legalized, you are inviting government and youre inviting insurance companies to get involved in this decision and that is a very, very bad deal.

In Oregon, the Medicaid system has become involved with end-of-life decisions, Hunt said.

They would send letters to terminally ill cancer patients saying, Were not going to pay the $4,000 per month required for you to stay alive, but well pay the $100 for you to kill yourself.'

Another argument in favor of doctor-assisted suicide is that it mainly happens at the very end of life when the pain becomes unbearable. Hunt said the facts simply dont bear that out.

What the research actually shows is that most people who choose doctor-assisted suicide do it out of depression or theyre afraid because of their lack of mobility, their quality of life, he said.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WNDs Email News Alerts!

Hunt said in places such asthe Netherlands, physically healthy young people access doctor-assisted suicide over relationships gone bad or the loss of a job.

He said the push for doctor-assisted suicide is especially horrifying for the disabled and those with special needs.

If you look at the organizations that are trying to stop this, it is primarily led by the disabled community, Hunt said. They understand what this is creating in the law. This is creating an entire classification of people that can be killed or choose to be killed.

We should be investing in great palliative care and good hospice care because doctor-assisted suicide brings with it a whole parade of terribles that we do not want in our society, Hunt said.

Original post:

Euthanasia pioneer alarmed by what he unleashed - WND.com - WND.com

Blind elderly couple seeks DIG’s nod for euthanasia | Kanpur News … – Times of India

KANPUR: Alleging police inaction against their neighbour, an elderly visually impaired couple had written to the DIG seeking permission to undergo euthanasia. In the letter, Gaya Prasad, who resides in the staff quarters with their niece, who is a class IV employee, on the premises of Lala Lajpat Rai Hospital, alleged that he and his wife Prem Lata were recently assaulted by their neighbour Kamlesh Kumar when they asked him not to tie cattle in front of their house. The couple also alleged that the police have not taken any action against the accused despite a complaint. The visually impaired couple then wrote a letter to DIG to grant them justice or allow them to undergo euthanasia. Taking cognizance of the letter, circle officer Gaurav Banswal visited the elderly couple's house on Wednesday and assured them of police action. "On the instructions of DIG, we visited the spot and removed the cattle tied up by the accused in front of the couple's house on Wednesday ," the CO said. The couple had alleged that they are being harassed by accused Kamlesh Kumar. No arrests have been made so far.

Go here to read the rest:

Blind elderly couple seeks DIG's nod for euthanasia | Kanpur News ... - Times of India

Wage Theft and Shoplifting: Same Cost, Different Deterrents – The American Prospect

Each year, shoplifters steal roughly $14.7 billion worth of goods from stores. (So says the Retail Theft Barometer.) Each year, employers steal roughly $15 billion from their workers by paying them less than the minimum wage, according to data from the Economic Policy Institute.

The treatment of these two kinds of crime, however, are completely different.

Many more resources go into trying to deter, detect, and punish the guy trying to pinch a video game system off the shelf at the local big-box store than into the grand theft the store itself may be perpetrating against its own employeeseven if the retailer is taking millions of dollars from workers paychecks. Its one more way that the economic crimes of the powerful are treated far less seriously than the transgressions of those with less power.

In a recent study, I compared the damage from shoplifting with that from just one form of wage theft, the failure to pay workers the legal hourly minimum. Other forms include failing to pay overtime, stealing tips, making employees work off the clock, and still more employer schemes to pocket money that workers have legally earned. While it is more difficult to estimate the total loss from these other forms of wage theft, there is no question that they dwarf the losses attributable to shoplifting.

The impact that wage theft and shoplifting have are not remotely comparable. While shoplifting is certainly not a victimless crime, its consequences pale in comparison to wage theft. In fact, an estimated 4.5 million working people are victimized by minimum-wage violations alone, pushing 302,000 families across the nation into poverty.

Yet despite the tremendous magnitude of wage theft, retailers spent 39 times more on security in 2015 than the entire Department of Labor budget for enforcing wage standards that year. This disparity in funding creates a disparity in personnel: While there are 43,930 security guards working for retailers, the Department of Labor only retains 1,000 investigators tasked with enforcing wage laws for 7.3 million U.S. workplaces and 135 million workers. Under Trump administration budget proposals, resources for enforcement would face even greater cuts.

The security guards and federal wage inspectors arent the only enforcers of these respective laws, of course. On the retail security side, other employees, from fitting room attendants at a clothing store to convenience store clerks, are expected to play a role in preventing shoplifting, as are the thousands of local police officers enforcing laws against shoplifting. On the wage-theft side, state and local labor departments and attorneys general can support federal efforts to enforce wage laws, but they generally have access to even fewer resources than the federal government.

What happens when shoplifters and wage thieves get caught? Shoplifters may end up in jail, facing a fine and months behind bars for a misdemeanor conviction. Depending on the state, a thief caught making off with merchandise worth as little as $200 can face felony charges. In contrast, criminal charges of any kind are rare in cases of wage theft, even when millions of dollars are systematically stolen from employees over months or years. The fines imposed by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act often amount to a slap on the wrist; theyre too weak to act as an effective deterrent.

Worse yet, employers increasingly prevent workers from going to court to recover stolen pay by imposing arbitration agreements that curtail employees ability to sue the company or participate in a class-action lawsuit.

A look at the victims and perpetrators reveals a great deal about why the deck is stacked in favor of wage thieves. The victims of minimum-wage violations are, by definition, working people who are supposed to be paid the minimum wage and yet receive lesscertainly not the most politically or economically powerful group in our society. And while any working person can be cheated out of wages, women, people of color, and immigrants (especially undocumented workers) are not only more likely to work in low-wage jobs, but disproportionately become victims of wage theft when they do. Victims of shoplifting, on the other hand, are businesses, including some of the nations most powerful corporations. And while shoplifters may be of any race or ethnicity, the phenomenon of shopping while black reveals that people of color, particularly African American consumers, are disproportionately profiled as potential shoplifters, contributing to the racial disparity that plagues the criminal justice system.

At a time when our economy is clearly tilted in favor of power and privilege, strengthening laws against wage theftand providing more resources for detection and enforcement at the state, local, and federal levelswould help un-rig this part of the system, making it fairer for us all.

Continue reading here:

Wage Theft and Shoplifting: Same Cost, Different Deterrents - The American Prospect

Massachusetts Medical Society Votes To Approve Opioid Injection Facilities – Konbini US

In response to the worrying upward trend in opioid overdoses, the Massachusetts Medical Society voted overwhelmingly in favor of opening supervised injection facilities throughout the state.

Shifting from outright prohibition and criminalization to a focus on life preservation, medical professionals in Massachusetts hope that this will turn the tide in the fight against the opioid epidemic.

Dr. Barbara Herbert, a Massachusetts addiction specialist who voted for the measure, toldNBC Boston:

"You have to stay alive to get better..."

(Photo: Insite/CTV News)

When liberals and progressives point to Portugal as a prime example of a successful shift in drug policy from blanket prohibition to overdose reduction, this is the kind of thing they mean.

In 2001, Portugal decriminalizedalldrugs, reallocating some of the billions of dollars they'd been spending fighting victimless crimes towards investing inhealth clinics, injection sites and other medical initiatives.

And guess what? In just 11 years, the drug use rate in Portugal fell from around 45% to well below 30%.

That's a glimpse of what might just happen in America if we decided to treat addiction like the public health crisis it is, and not a sign of criminality.

(Photo: Insite/Vancourier/Dan Toulgoet)

On this side of the Atlantic, Vancouver, British Columbia has been opening supervised injection sites across the city since 2003, and they've seen a similar drop in addiction rates. Since 2003, Vancouver has seen a 35 percent reduction in overdoses and, perhaps most importantly, a 30 percent increase in users seeking treatment.

So Massachusetts wants to follow something like the Vancouver model, but apply it in the suburban and rural areas in the western part of the state, where opioid abuse rates have been climbing steadily and emergency resources are especially scarce.

Dr. Barbara Herbert laid out the supervised injection site concept, saying:

"The idea that someone would show up and inject in front of me is not an appealing idea.

But the idea that they would go two blocks away and die is so much worse."

While the Medical Society's vote is a big step towards implementing supervised injection sites across the state, the plan still has to be passed into law by the state assembly. While that may be quite the uphill climb, at least the ball is already rolling.

Read More ->What Is A 'Pot Powwow' And How Can It Help The Native American Community?

Original post:

Massachusetts Medical Society Votes To Approve Opioid Injection Facilities - Konbini US

London Theater Review: Topical Drama ‘Terror’ – Variety

Stage trials are nothing new. Ayn Rand had a big Broadway hit with one back in 1935: Night of January 16was designed to put her philosophy, individualism, to the test. Ferdinand von Schirachs Terror, already a commercial success in Germany, does much the same: It tests the mettle of our morality with a very contemporary dilemma. In the wake of recent attacks it should feel essential. Instead, its largely academic.

Major Lars Koch (Ashley Zhangazha) of the German air force sits in a courtroom, a blank stare on his face, accused of 164 counts of murder. Eight months ago, he downed a hijacked passenger jet that was, in all likelihood, heading for a football stadium and its capacity crowd. In launching an air-to-air guided missile, disobeying orders to do so, he saved up to 70,000 lives. The law, however, states he must face trial for the lives his actions ended.

The question, broadly speaking, is whether it is ever justifiable to take one life in order to save others. Emma Fieldings prosecuting lawyer blithely argues that the constitutions owes each and every one of us our human dignity, only for the defense (an ardent Forbes Masson) to parry with the common sense argument: Koch committed the lesser evil; any of us would have done the same. Tanya Moodie presides over both with a firm judicial authority.

Von Schirach ensures the case is far from open and shut, carefully constructing a scenario that pulls in several directions at once. Details complicate the picture the indecision of Kochs commanding officers, the passengers struggling to get into the cockpit but so do emotions. Events are described with painstaking precision, right down to the four passengers sucked out of the blast holes. A dead mans wife describes collecting his shoe from the witness box. Were not just asked to decide between absolutism and relativism, but between action and consequences, intervention and inaction, individual and state.

Terror lets us into the legal system not just to witness the judicial process, but to experience it. We stand in the shoes of jurors, but no matter how seriously one takes the role, each of us, inevitably, falls short. Theres too much information to process, too much at stake to completely detach. Some details snag, others escape you. Its impossible not to tune into emotions to project remorse onto Zhangazhas steadfast certainty, to suspect the prosecution of welling up. How much are you swayed by rhetoric over facts? How much are you persuaded by a soft-spoken woman arguing against a brusque Scottish bloke? The decision, when it comes, comes from the gut, no more or less rational than the pilots pull on the trigger.

If anything, however, the conundrum is too carefully constructed, calibrated to hang in perfect balance. It makes a fun thought-experiment, a riddlesome mind game or an undergraduate ethics seminar, but, as effective theater, its hard to shake the artifice of it all. Youre constantly aware of Von Schirachs manipulating hand. The moment you step back, you see through it. Nothings really at stake here. We are, essentially, deliberating over hypothetical hypotheticals.

The ending the judgment, handed down by the audience blows it. This being a trial, our decision stands. The judge has to defer, and the verdict goes into law. Whether we find the defendant guilty or not, we are, in effect, congratulated on making the right decision. Terror never holds us to account. It never unpicks the ramifications of our verdict, nor examines what that might say about our society. After eight previews, every verdicts been the same: not guilty. Thats huge. It means accepting the idea of self-sacrifice, and that the law can be bent to the circumstances. Terror lets us off scot-free.

Lyric Hammersmith, London; 550 seats; 35 ($45) top. Opened,June 22, 2017reviewed June 20, 2016. Running time:1 HOURS, 55 MIN.

A Lyric Hammersmith production of a play in two acts by Ferdinand von Schirach.

Directed by Sean Holmes; Set design,Anna Fleische;translated by David Tushingham; lighting, Joshua Carr; sound, Nick Manning; costume design, Loren Elstein.

Ashley Zhangazaha, Emma Fielding, John Lightbody, Forbes Masson, Tanya Moodie, Shanaya Rafaat.

View original post here:

London Theater Review: Topical Drama 'Terror' - Variety

The Fountainhead: Hooray for Unions – Patheos (blog)

The Fountainhead, part 1, chapter 9

Ayn Rand wasnt one for understatement. When she had a political point to make, she did it with all the subtlety of a big brass band. This makes it all the more noteworthy when she lets a controversial topic pass without comment. And one of those silences, the topic of todays post, is a surprising one.

It begins with the citys construction workers going on strike:

The strike of the building-trades unions infuriated Guy Francon. The strike had started against the contractors who were erecting the Noyes-Belmont Hotel, and had spread to all the new structures of the city. It had been mentioned in the press that the architects of the Noyes-Belmont were the firm of Francon & Heyer.

Through some plot machinations that arent important, Peter Keating attends a public meeting of the strikers and their supporters. The first speaker is a man named Austen Heller:

Keating looked up at the loud-speaker with a certain respect, which he felt for all famous names. He had not read much of Austen Heller, but he knew that Heller was the star columnist of the Chronicle, a brilliant, independent newspaper that Heller came from an old, distinguished family and had graduated from Oxford; that he had started as a literary critic and ended by becoming a quiet fiend devoted to the destruction of all forms of compulsion, private or public, in heaven or on earth; that he had been cursed by preachers, bankers, club-women and labor organizers; that he had better manners than the social elite whom he usually mocked, and a tougher constitution than the laborers whom he usually defended; that he could discuss the latest play on Broadway, medieval poetry or international finance; that he never donated to charity, but spent more of his own money than he could afford, on defending political prisoners anywhere.

For an Ayn Rand protagonist, Austen Heller is unusual. He went to Oxford even though Randian heroes usually scorn higher education and is cultured and sophisticated even though Randian heroes are usually aggressively uninterested in culture. Youd almost think him a villain, but hes unquestionably on the side she considers right:

and we must consider, Austen Heller was saying unemotionally, that since unfortunately we are forced to live together, the most important thing for us to remember is that the only way in which we can have any law at all is to have as little of it as possible. I see no ethical standard to which to measure the whole unethical conception of a State, except in the amount of time, of thought, of money, of effort and of obedience, which a society extorts from its every member. Its value and its civilization are in inverse ratio to that extortion. There is no conceivable law by which a man can be forced to work on any terms except those he chooses to set. There is no conceivable law to prevent him from setting them just as there is none to force his employer to accept them. The freedom to agree or disagree is the foundation of our kind of society and the freedom to strike is a part of it.

I love that thrown-in unfortunately. He hates having to see or interact with other human beings. If only we could each have our own desert island, this would be a perfect Objectivist world.

But more importantly: Austen Heller, the libertarian, supports the workers strike! Thats surprising by itself, but whats more surprising still is who hes there in company with.

The next speaker is Ellsworth Toohey, whos somehow a celebrity to this crowd even though he hasnt done much other than write a book about the history of architecture. The mere announcement of his name gets thunderous applause:

Ladies and gentlemen, I have the great honor of presenting to you now Mr. Ellsworth Monkton Toohey!

He knew only the shock, at first; a distinct, conscious second was gone before he realized what it was and that it was applause. It was such a crash of applause that he waited for the loud-speaker to explode; it went on and on and on, pressing against the walls of the lobby, and he thought he could feel the walls buckling out to the street.

When Toohey finally speaks, Rand tells us, he holds the crowd spellbound with his oratory (because the devil has a silver tongue):

and so, my friends, the voice was saying, the lesson to be learned from our tragic struggle is the lesson of unity. We shall unite or we shall be defeated. Our will the will of the disinherited, the forgotten, the oppressed shall weld us into a solid bulwark, with a common faith and a common goal. This is the time for every man to renounce the thoughts of his petty little problems, of gain, of comfort, of self-gratification. This is the time to merge his self in a great current, in the rising tide which is approaching to sweep us all, willing or unwilling, into the future. History, my friends, does not ask questions or acquiescence. It is irrevocable, as the voice of the masses that determine it. Let us listen to the call. Let us organize, my brothers. Let us organize.

All Rand characters wear their politics on their sleeves, and this talk of renouncing self-gratification or the voice of the masses is a sure giveaway of a villain. But this leads into a fascinating contradiction.

As well see shortly, Austen Heller will become one of Roarks few friends and also the man who gives him his first and most important commission. Clearly, hes on the side Rand expects us to agree with. On the other hand, Ellsworth Toohey is an insidious advocate of collectivism. As a rule, whenever such a character says something in an Ayn Rand novel, were supposed to boo and hiss. But Heller and Toohey both support the strike!

For a reader of Rands oeuvre, this is disorienting. Normally, every moral issue in her books is binary black and white, with the good guys and the villains lining up on equal and opposite sides. To have a fearless individualist and a soulless socialist on the same side of a political debate is something I cant recall seeing anywhere else in all her writing.

The only way I can explain this is as a particularly glaring example of how Rands views changed and hardened. It seems likely that when she wrote The Fountainhead, she didnt view labor organizing as an important political issue. She saw nothing untoward in having both heroes and villains support unions, each for their own reasons. (Later in the book, well see another good character give an endorsement of collective bargaining.)

By the time she wrote Atlas Shrugged, this had changed. In that book, labor unions are another tentacle of the socialist octopus, and their only purpose is to impede heroic businessmen from doing what they want to do.

Of course, theres nothing inherently bad or unusual about a persons opinions changing over time. It happens to all of us. The evolution of Rands view on unions is worth noting only because she insisted it never happened, that she was ideologically flawless from the beginning and stayed that way throughout her life. But her own writing testifies to the contrary.

Image credit: Tony Werman, released under CC BY 2.0 license

Other posts in this series:

See the article here:

The Fountainhead: Hooray for Unions - Patheos (blog)

REV. TONY ELDER: Be a person of integrity in dealing with others – Rockdale Newton Citizen (press release) (registration)

Recently I was traveling home after speaking at a church conference when my stomach started informing me it was lunchtime. As I weighed my options which were displayed at the upcoming interstate exit, I decided to stop at one of my favorite fast-food restaurants for one of their chicken sandwiches. After placing my order, paying for my meal and receiving my food, I found a seat in their busy dining area.

However almost immediately I questioned in my mind whether or not I had received my several dollars of change back from my payment. It didnt seem like I had, but Im getting where I dont trust my memory as well as when I was younger. I sat down mulling over the possibility, even checking my wallet to see if I could determine the facts by the bills I possessed. Still uncertain, I decided it was probably too late to check into it anyway. Just as I had reconciled myself to the possibility of having made an unintentional extra donation to that restaurant, along came the young lady who had taken my order. She had hunted me down to ask if she had neglected to give me my change. She thought she had failed to do so, graciously apologized, and proceeded to take the steps to correct her mistake.

The actions of that employee illustrate just another reason why this is one of my favorite restaurant chains. It would have been easy for her to dismiss the idea that she had made a mistake, especially since I had already walked away. She wouldnt have had to confess her error or go to the trouble of making it right. However, how she handled the situation revealed traits of honesty and integrity, which I greatly appreciate.

We need to remember the importance of how we treat other people. It not only reveals our character, but it also reflects our relationship with the Lord. The Bible condemns those who take unfair advantage of others or who are unjust in their business practices. Jesus gave us the Golden Rule And just as you want men to do to you, you also do to them likewise (Luke 6:31). He also affirmed that were not only to love the Lord our God with all our heart, but were to love our neighbors as ourselves.

Admittedly were all going to make mistakes in our dealings with others. We might forget to return someones change. We might unintentionally hurt or offend someone. We might say a harsh word, lash out in anger, act selfishly, or otherwise not behave very lovingly or in accord with the Golden Rule. While we need to seek Gods help to avoid such actions, we also need to respond properly when were guilty of that kind of behavior. Dont just sweep it under the rug and forget about it. It might be easier to ignore our mistake and not take responsibility for it. In some cases, it may seem like nobody would ever know about it except for the Lord.

Jesus reminded us of the importance of getting wrongs settled with others before we come to worship God (Matthew 5:23-24). Is there someone you need to go to in order to confess, apologize or make restitution? Maybe youre not sure if you hurt the person or not. Under those circumstances, it would be easy to let it go. But if theres any doubt or if you sense the Holy Spirit tugging at your heart about it, you probably need to hunt down that person and check into it anyway. Hopefully, that person will appreciate your integrity and I know God will.

The Rev. Tony W. Elder is pastor of Wesley Community Fellowship Church. He can be reached at 770-483-3405 or by email at revtelder@aol.com.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

Get Breaking News alerts from the Rockdale Citizen and Newton Citizen delivered to your email.

Daily local news headlines from the Newton Citizen.

Daily sports headlines from Newton Citizen.

Daily local news headlines from the Rockdale Citizen.

Daily sports headlines from Rockdale Citizen.

Go here to see the original:

REV. TONY ELDER: Be a person of integrity in dealing with others - Rockdale Newton Citizen (press release) (registration)

Liberal boss warns of need for unity – 9news.com.au

New Liberal president Nick Greiner says ensuring trust and co-operation in the party is a challenge and the coalition will enter the next election as underdogs.

Mr Greiner, who replaces outgoing president Richard Alston, didn't attend the Liberal Party federal council in Sydney starting on Friday due to overseas commitments.

But in a video recorded for the event, the former NSW premier said the federal coalition were "slight underdogs at the moment but are certainly highly competitive".

"There are also challenges in ensuring a culture of trust, openness and co-operation between all Liberal stakeholders, federal and state parliamentary and organisational," he said.

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has warned of too much power being wielded by factions within the party and wants rules changed to give more power to grassroots members.

Mr Greiner said he was conscious of the challenges in "strengthening the financial and continuous campaigning capacity" of the party's federal secretariat.

The party's financial struggles were highlighted by the fact the prime minister chipped in $1.75 million of his own money to keep last year's campaign going.

However its coffers were bolstered by a $10,000 a table dinner on Friday night featuring guest speaker, former US CIA director David Petraeus.

General Petraeus told the council he believed Australia should assert itself in the South China Sea, along with the US.

He said this included carrying out freedom of navigation operations in the disputed area.

Mr Greiner said his aim was to assist the coalition to victory at the next federal election and four state elections over the next two years.

"We all know that progress towards this goal, towards winning, can only be achieved by a united full count press of all Liberals."

As part of the reset, the Liberal Party is set to appoint Andrew Hirst as its new federal director, replacing veteran Tony Nutt.

Mr Hirst is a former adviser to Liberal leaders John Howard, Brendan Nelson, Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott.

He's considered one of Canberra's most highly experienced political professionals having worked in federal politics for the past 15 years.

The Liberal-Nationals coalition has trailed Labor since just after the tight double-dissolution election in July last year, which delivered Mr Turnbull a one-seat majority and difficult Senate.

Acting Liberal Party director Andrew Bragg is expected to remain in the position until August.

It is understood some senior party members were agitating for Mr Bragg to remain in the role, arguing Mr Hirst was too closely linked to Mr Abbott who Mr Turnbull ousted in 2015.

Mr Turnbull and Foreign Minister Julie Bishop addressed members, speaking on global security and Australia's "deep and heartfelt family tie" with the US.

"The bedrock of our safety in the world has been our alliance with the United States," Mr Turnbull said.

Saturday's council session will focus on economic management with another speech by Mr Turnbull and Ms Bishop as well as addresses by Treasurer Scott Morrison and Tasmanian Premier Will Hodgman.

AAP 2017

Career news: Three common career progression questions answered- seek.com.au

Auto News:2017 Mercedes-AMG E63 S - the one we've been waiting for - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:New BMW M5 detailed - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Ford Australia vs Holden; who will win the battle on the racetrack? - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Suzuki is Australia's lovable underdog - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Jaguar's tough limited-tun XE SW Project 8 sports sedan - caradvice.com.au

Auto news:Battle of the V8 Beasts: 5.0L Ford Mustang vs 6.2L Holden Commodore - caradvice.com.au

Read the original here:

Liberal boss warns of need for unity - 9news.com.au

Stephen King’s TV Show ‘The Mist’ Sprinkles In Liberal Agenda With Blood and Gore – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)


NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
Stephen King's TV Show 'The Mist' Sprinkles In Liberal Agenda With Blood and Gore
NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
I'm sorry, but a person can only handle so many liberal clichs before having to call them out on it. It's only the pilot, and this show is beginning to sound like the writers took whatever headline showed up on Salon and wrote a character around it ...
The Mist | SPIKE.comSpike.com

all 87 news articles »

Read the original post:

Stephen King's TV Show 'The Mist' Sprinkles In Liberal Agenda With Blood and Gore - NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

Would-be Liberal candidate for Prahran pulls out of race after sex book storm – The Age

A Liberal preselection candidate who wrote a book about hissexual exploits titledAroundthe World in 80 Babeshas withdrawn from the race.

In revelations that reignited concerns about the Liberals' vetting process, former self-described "dating coach" NigelGohlcame under fire on Friday after the contents of his book resurfaced ahead of next month's preselection battle for the state seat of Prahran.

Play Video Don't Play

Play Video Don't Play

Previous slide Next slide

'Around the World in 80 Babes,' a fictional dating guide, has landed an aspiring Liberal candidate in hot water ahead of next month's preselection battle for the state seat of Prahran.

Play Video Don't Play

It has been a nightmare on Elgin Street. For several months, remote control on car keys in a tiny part of Carlton had stopped worked, until the surprising culprit was found.

Play Video Don't Play

Angry rainbow-clad protesters waited in vain for tennis legend Margaret Court at a Liberal Party fundraiser in Melbourne on Thursday night.

Play Video Don't Play

Nearby residents said they felt their homes shake after a tanker and car crashed in Tyabb. Vision courtesy: Seven News.

Play Video Don't Play

Dozens gather at a Liberal fundraiser in Melbourne to protest against Margaret Court who is expected to attend the fundraiser.

Play Video Don't Play

Motorists and commuters face 16 days of pain during the school holidays as work ramps up on the Metro Rail Tunnel.

Play Video Don't Play

Colander wearing John McKenzie has a different take on the Jesus bikes warning of a fiery afterlife, so he's been pasting over them with a more upbeat message.

'Around the World in 80 Babes,' a fictional dating guide, has landed an aspiring Liberal candidate in hot water ahead of next month's preselection battle for the state seat of Prahran.

The book is the story of a modern Casanova who spends his days pursuing women around the world,"from European princesses, to Englishslappers, to American cheerleaders".

Its blurb explains that "chicks, babes, women and nudity" were among MrGohl'sfavourite things.

It also warns that the content may some offend women, but most men will be throwing "high fives" at the end of each chapter of this "true story".

From its first sentence, the bookboasts of bringing a woman to "her third orgasm during an intense 40 minute session".

Much of the book follows in a similar fashion, with graphic details about dating conquests, sexual positions and eventhe ability to "fart freely in bed".

While the book was published in 2005, several party members raised concerns in recent weeks about the way it depicts women an issue that is likely to prove particularly sensitive in Prahran, a diverse electorate with high numbers of young people,LGBTIresidents, and families.

And after seeing The Age's story, Victorian Liberal leader Matthew Guy was reportedly furious, making it clear, according to sources, that Mr Gohl "would never be part of his team".

The Liberals are keen to regain Prahran after losing the seat to the Greens in 2014, but the revelations only hours after a candidate for the electorate of Sandringham held a controversial fundraiser with Margaret Court have come at a difficult time for the party.

The preselection battle is now a two-way contest between Rory Grant (a staffer to federal minister Christopher Pyne) and Professor Katie Allen (from the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute).

Mr Gohl, now 42 and married, declined to comment to The Age, other than to confirm he had withdrawn.

However, it is understood that he has previously defended the book on the grounds that it is essentially a story about finding love.

After it was published, he appeared in various media segments and YouTube videos providing relationship advice and espousing his views on women.

For instance, in a short chat show, hosted in 2007,he declares that the business world is still a "masculine world because that's where the best decisions are made".

When told by the presenter some of the best managers are women, Mr Gohl says "but they act masculine to do so. And they're not found attractive by other men because they've got too many masculine traits".

Fairfax Media understands that Liberal Party state director Simon Frost had spoken at length to Mr Gohl about the book, but the former author had not been asked to withdraw.

"Unlike Labor, Liberal Party members have the right to preselect our parliamentary candidates. Every party member is free to nominate. It would be inappropriate to comment further," Mr Frost said on Thursday.

On Friday, Mr Frost did not comment other than to confirm that Mr Gohl had pulled out of the preselection contest.

Link:

Would-be Liberal candidate for Prahran pulls out of race after sex book storm - The Age

Liberal Denigration Of Republicans Is Nothing New – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

Photo Credit: Jason Maoz

One need not be a Donald Trump supporter to view with unease and even distaste the Lefts ceaseless over-the-top denigration of the president and his administration.

A common justification offered by liberals for this Trump Derangement Syndrome is that the current president is so frighteningly unlike any of his predecessors in the White House, so inept and sinister and dangerous to children and other living things, it only stands to reason he would be viewed with such unprecedented fear and contempt by those who have been blessed with souls of the most exquisite sensitivity.

The problem with that argument is that liberals have a long history of mercilessly castigating Republican presidents even the jovial, popular, and generally successful Ronald Reagan was blasted in his day as a warmonger, a racist, an enabler of greed, and brainless to boot an amiable dunce in the words of longtime Democratic poobah Clark Clifford.

But if you want to know about psychopathic-level demonization of a president, consider what George W. Bush went through during his two terms in office.

Exhibiting the behavior theyd repeat 16 years later with respect to Trump, liberals and leftists didnt even wait for Bush to be sworn into office before launching their assaults.

The references to Bush and Republicans as Nazis, which were to prove especially popular among the liberal faithful, began in earnest during the fight over ballot counting in Florida after the 2000 election when the inescapable and insufferable Al Sharpton accused Republicans of wanting to do the same thing to us that Hitler in his wickedness and evil did to Jews.

Well into Bushs presidency the novelist Kurt Vonnegut, still smarting over the result of the 2000 election, opined that The only difference between Bush and Hitler is that Hitler was elected. (Anyone with a working brain can think of about 40 million differences, 40 million being a rough estimate of the total number of dead andwounded during World War II.)

Actor David Clennon, of the television seriesThe Agency, was one liberal not quite ready to liken Bush to Hitler but only because, as he put it, Bush is not as smart as Adolf Hitler.

And the animosity extended well beyond one man sitting in the Oval Office. Liberals spent the better part of eight years spitting scorn and rage at those of their fellow Americans benighted enough to have actually voted for a man routinely likened to a terrorist, a mass murderer, and a war criminal.

In 2004, Newsday columnist Hugh Pearson took a look at the Republican National Convention, held that year in New York City, and was reminded of Nazi rallies held in Germany during the reign of Adolf Hitler.

The New York Posts gossip queen and resident deep thinker Cindy Adams welcomed delegates to that convention with a column stinking of condescension and class superiority. Not all our hotels are goat-friendly, she warned the visiting Republicans. I met one delegates girlfriend. She was a cow. Arealcow.

Adams was just getting started. I welcome them, she wrote of her countrymen whose only crime was attending a political convention in her city. I understand them. Their Architectural Digest is Home Depot. Class is Anna Nicole Smith. Couture is Sears. For their collections, they go to Wal-Mart. Its the Evening Wear section when buying corduroy. Even their faces are polyester.

When Bush was re-elected, the novelist Jane Smiley, marinating in a stew of hate and hysteria, castigated Bush voters for their brutish violence and unteachable ignorance she used the latter word or a variant of it no fewer than 11 times in what was a relatively short essay, as in The error that progressives have consistently committed over the years is to underestimate the vitality of ignorance in America.

The day after Bushs reelection, The New York Times canvassed liberal New Yorkers for their reactions. A Manhattan resident described as a retired psychiatrist told the Times he was saddened by what I feel is the obtuseness and shortsightedness of a good part of the country the heartland. This kind of redneck, shoot-from-the-hip mentality and a very concrete interpretation of religion is prevalent in Bush country the heartland.

Another person quoted in the article declared, New Yorkers are savvy. We have street smarts. Whereas people in the Midwest are more influenced by what their friends say.

(This coming from a liberal Manhattanite a class that has no equal when it comes to sheer insularity and susceptibility to groupthink.)

In an article several years ago for FrontPageMag.com, the academic Keith Burgess-Jackson hit it on the head when he described the liberal mindset in words that ring just as true today:

Conservatives are ignorant, stupid, and evil, or some combination of the three . Liberals, of course, are the opposite of all these. Theyre knowledgeable, intelligent, and good. Note that if you believe your opponents to be stupid or evil, you dont try to reason with them. Stupid people, like animals and children, need guidance by their superiors. That, in a nutshell, is the liberal mentality. It explains why liberals are so angry, hateful and spiteful. Take it from me, a former liberal.

Go here to see the original:

Liberal Denigration Of Republicans Is Nothing New - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Liberal minister leaves cabinet for new role as Speaker – Times Colonist

Former forests minister Steve Thomson was acclaimed as Speaker of the B.C. legislature Thursday to oversee what could be the final days of the Liberal government.

Thomson, Liberal MLA for Kelowna-Mission, said he volunteered for the post once it became clear that the government would put someone forward. He stepped down from cabinet Wednesday night and donned the Speakers robes shortly after the session opened Thursday morning.

Ive always had very high esteem for the legislature, for the work of the legislature, for the role of the Speaker, and Ive always had an interest, he told reporters at the legislature, following his appointment.

He refused to say whether he will remain in the role if, as expected, the Liberal government falls.

The NDP and B.C. Green Party have signed an accord to topple Premier Christy Clark and the Liberals in a confidence vote and Clark has suggested it will be up to the next government to find a new Speaker.

Thomson said only that he would strive to uphold the integrity of the office in the days ahead. He later revised that time frame to weeks.

Its not up to me to speculate about what may happen going forward, he said. My role and my focus will be to manage the house and the legislature with the best of my ability, with fairness and integrity.

Pressed on the issue, Thomson said it has been the practice that if the government changes, that its the government that identifies a Speaker.

Its a critical issue because none of the parties won a majority of seats in the May election.

The Liberals won 43 seats to 41 for the NDP and three for the Greens, and B.C. Green Party Leader Andrew Weaver signed a deal to prop up a minority government led by NDP Leader John Horgan.

If the NDP-Green alliance is forced to provide a Speaker, that will leave both sides of the house with 43 votes and leave the Speaker to break any ties.

Clark praised Thomson, a former member of Canadas national rugby team, for his integrity, compassion and ability to bring people together.

As I often say, politics needs more rugby players, she told the legislature. As the eyes of our province and our entire country are on this House like never before, I cant think of a better choice to set the tone or a bigger man to enforce the rules.

Horgan and Weaver, both rugby enthusiasts, welcomed Thomsons appointment.

I have to say, on behalf of my colleague from Oak Bay-Gordon Head, to have a rugby guy in the chair is absolutely appropriate for the raucous time ahead in the days and months and weeks and years, Horgan said in the legislature.

He later told reporters that hes hopeful Thomson will remain as Speaker if the NDP form government.

Steve Thomson is a quality guy, a man of the highest integrity and Im not convinced that he doesnt take this responsibility very, very seriously not as a week-long adventure, but a commitment to the entire parliament, he said.

Weaver added that Thomson is an exceptional choice as Speaker. He has the respect of the house. He brings honour and dignity to the position and I look forward to him serving as Speaker for many, many months to come.

lkines@timescolonist.com

Originally posted here:

Liberal minister leaves cabinet for new role as Speaker - Times Colonist

Air Force leaders continue to emphasize air and space priorities on Capitol Hill – Schriever Air Force Base

WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein briefed congressional leaders on the Senates Defense Appropriations Committee on the future of air and space power during testimony on Capitol Hill June 21.

The leaders highlighted that efforts to restore readiness and increase the lethality of the force were foremost in their minds. Wilson said any objective evaluation of todays Air Force reached two conclusions: The Air Force is too small for what the nation expects of it and adversaries are modernizing and innovating faster putting Americans technological advantage at risk.

"The fiscal year 2017 budget began to arrest the decline, and restore the readiness of the force, so this fiscal 2018 budget starts us, I hope, on the road to recovery, she said. Air Force in Demand

Looking forward, Wilson and Goldfein do not envision the demand for air and space power diminishing in the coming decade.

Today, the Air Force is manned with 660,000 active, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen, a 30 percent decline since Operation Desert Storm 26 years ago.

"If I'd been talking to the Air Force in 1991, I'd [have] been looking at an Air Force of over 8,600 aircraft, 134 fighter squadrons from which we deployed 34, Goldfein said. Today, the grand total of your United States Air Force, active, Guard, Reserve, is 55 squadrons total. This is a much smaller force that's engaged in the same level of activity as we were in 1991."

The Air Force leaders said while the fiscal 2018 budget request focuses on restoring readiness and increasing lethality, future budgets must focus on modernization and continued readiness recovery.

Restoring readiness

The two testified that maintaining superiority starts with people.

"For Airmen, it's nothing short of a moral obligation to ensure that we establish air superiority quickly whenever and wherever it's required," Goldfein said.

The fiscal 2018 budget will bring the active duty force from 321,000 to 325,100 while also adding 800 Reservists, 600 Guardsmen, and 3,000 civilians, bringing the total force to approximately 669,000. The increased manpower will focus primarily on increasing remotely piloted aircraft crews, maintainers and pilot training capacity by adding two additional F-16 training squadrons and maximizing flying hours to the highest executable levels.

Wilson said next to people, the most obvious readiness need is munitions. In the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the Air Force has delivered approximately 56,000 direct-attack munitions, more than it used in all of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The fiscal 2018 budget funds maximum factory production of the most critical munitions. Modernization

The fiscal 2018 budget focuses on the Air Forces top three modernization programs:

Purchasing 46 F-35A Lightning II fighters and modernizing other fighters; Buying 15 KC-46 Pegasus tankers; Funding the B-21 Raider bomber development

The proposed budget also supports the continuation and modernization of the nuclear triad with funds dedicated to both air- and ground-based capabilities.

Our nuclear enterprise is getting old and we must begin modernizing now to ensure a credible deterrent, Wilson said.

"Standing side-by-side with the United States Navy, we're responsible for two of the three legs of the nuclear triad, Goldfein said. "On our worst day as a nation, our job is to make sure that we have the commander in chief where he needs to be, when he needs to be there, and through nuclear command and control - which we're responsible for - that he stays connected to a ready force to be able to defend this nation and deter adversaries as we also assure our partners."

Space

The Air Force has been the leading military service responsible since 1954. Over the last several years, the service has been developing concepts for space control, changing the way it trains its space force and integrating space operations into the joint fight.

"This budget proposal has a 20 percent increase for space, that means situational awareness -- the ability to not just catalog what's up there, which we would do in a benign environment, but to have a near-real-time understanding of what is going on in space, who is moving and where they're moving to," said Wilson.

The proposed budget increases space funding, including a 27 percent increase in research, development, testing and evaluation for space systems, and a 12 percent increase for space procurement.

On June 16, 2017, Wilson announced the establishment of the new headquarters space directorate. This directorate will be led by the deputy chief of staff for space operations, who will be the advocate for space operations and requirements to meet the demands of a warfighting domain.

"Weve provided GPS for the world. Weve transformed not only the way we fight but the way all of you probably navigate around the city, Wilson added. We must expect that war, of any kind, will extend into space in any future conflict, and we have to change the way we think and prepare for that eventuality.

Innovation for the future

Research, development, testing and evaluation are critically important for the Air Force, Wilson and Goldfein said.

To prevail against rapidly innovating adversaries, the Air Force must accelerate procurement. The service will take advantage of authorities provided in the fiscal 2017 Defense Authorization Act to help field operational capabilities faster than ever before, Wilson said.

The request for funding for long-term research in air dominance increased significantly in the fiscal 2018 budget. The Air Force will seek to increase basic and applied research in areas where it must maintain the competitive advantage over adversaries. This includes hypersonic vehicles, directed-energy, unmanned and autonomous systems and nanotechnology.

Budget stability

Its going to take approximately eight years to be able to get to full spectrum readiness with stable budgets, Goldfein said. The Air Force will be unable to execute the defense strategic guidance under sequester.

If the Budget Control Act limit is not fixed and we have to go through sequester, that will be equivalent to a $15 billion cut, Wilson said. The Air Force is too small for what the nation expects of us now; sequestration would make the situation worse, she said.

According to Wilson and Goldfein, by supporting the budget request, Congress can provide fiscal predictability to the Air Force so it can continue to own the high ground, defend the homeland and project power in conjunction with allies.

Link:

Air Force leaders continue to emphasize air and space priorities on Capitol Hill - Schriever Air Force Base

Baker awarded Helping Hands grant – Devil’s Lake Daily Journal

Allstate agency owner Bill Baker recently secured a $1,000 Allstate Foundation Helping Hands in the Community grant to support Personal Energy Transportation of Southwest Missouris efforts to provide the gift of mobility to thousands of mobility challenged people around the world.

As a volunteer with PET, Baker joins thousands of Allstate agency owners and financial specialists around the country who aim to improve their communities by supporting important local causes, such as raising money for domestic violence programs and empowering youth to reach their full potential.

As a small business owner in Aurora, I see firsthand the opportunities and challenges facing our area, Baker said. Giving back is tremendously rewarding and gives me a sense of purpose. I believe that when we help others, we can be a positive force for change in our communities, which is why Im proud to support PETs work.

PET is one of thousands of organizations this year that will receive Allstate Foundation Helping Hands in the Community grants secured by agency owners and financial specialists on behalf of the nonprofit where they volunteer. The grants support organizations addressing domestic violence, youth empowerment, disaster preparedness, hunger and other causes.

The Helping Hands in the Community grants are one example of The Allstate Foundations legacy of service and giving.

Since The Allstate Foundation was founded in 1952, it has contributed $400 million to support community nonprofits.

In 2016, The Allstate Foundation gave more than $25 million to charitable causes.

About the Allstate Foundation

Established in 1952, The Allstate Foundation is an independent, charitable organization made possible by subsidiaries of The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL). Through partnerships with nonprofit organizations across the country, The Allstate Foundation brings the relationships, reputation and resources of Allstate to support innovative and lasting solutions that enhance peoples well-being and prosperity. With a focus on building financial independence for domestic violence survivors, empowering youth and celebrating the charitable community involvement of Allstate agency owners and employees, The Allstate Foundation works to bring out the good in peoples lives. For more information, visit http://www.AllstateFoundation.org.

View original post here:

Baker awarded Helping Hands grant - Devil's Lake Daily Journal

Expo 2017: Utopia, Rebooted – New York Times

Far more people came to Expo 67 than expected, at a time when Canadas entire population was just 20 million, and the islands were more than just a fairground. They were a cosmopolitan pleasure garden, a place to see and be seen. The swankiest Expo denizens were the 1,800 or so pavilion hostesses, kitted out in polyester or lam uniforms and hired for more reasons than just bilingualism. (Montreal is generally known for its attractive women, a male CBC broadcaster intoned in 1967, but this year the situation has become ridiculous.)

Expo 67s subtitle was Man and His World, an English approximation of the title of Saint-Exuprys Terre des Hommes. The place of women at the fair, and the expression of modernity and national ambitions through clothing, is the subject of Fashioning Expo 67, on view at the McCord Museum downtown. Mannequins display Bill Blasss mod uniforms for hostesses at the American pavilion: a white tent dress with a red-white-and-blue head scarf, plus a killer striped raincoat. At the Quebec pavilion, the attendants wore bulbous cloches, while the Brits toted Union Jack handbags; newly independent African nations went for more traditional designs and wax fabrics. Throughout the Expo, hostesses wore pale blue A-line skirts, blazers and pillbox hats. (Over at MAC, the artist Cheryl Sim wears one of these sky-blue uniforms in a contemplative three-screen video, in which she sings a melancholy remix of the Expo theme song Un Jour, Un Jour.)

The futuristic fashions had a counterpart in the Expos architecture, entrusted to young, experimental engineers and backed by budgets unimaginable today. Many made use of industrial materials and modular construction techniques above all, Frei Ottos West German pavilion, whose swooping tensile roofs were reprised at the 1972 Munich Olympics. The Expos most lasting architectural project was not a pavilion at all, however, but an experimental housing development. The Israeli-Canadian architect Moshe Safdie, then just 28, proposed a new mode of living that married urban density and suburban spaciousness, in the form of concrete cubes stacked like building blocks. Habitat 67 was initially imagined as a self-contained community, similar to the superblocks of Braslia, which could be endlessly repeated. It became upper-middle-class condos, and when I walked past Habitat this week, residents were sunning themselves on the balconies while gardeners buzzed the grass. (Mr. Safdies designs and models are now at the Centre de Design de lUQAM, a university art gallery downtown.)

Many cities have gained an iconic structure from their days hosting the world: the Eiffel Tower in Paris, the Space Needle in Seattle, the Atomium in Brussels. Montreals legacy, along with Habitat, is a massive geodesic dome on le-Sainte-Hlne, designed by Buckminster Fuller, which served as the American pavilion in 1967. Inside were paintings by Warhol, memorabilia from Elvis and Hollywood, and space capsules from the Apollo and Gemini programs, but it was Fullers pavilion itself, pierced in two spots by a monorail track, that enthralled fairgoers most.

At MAC, the Canadian artist Charles Stankievech has assembled a bulging archive of materials that limn the contradictory aims of Fullers dome, as indebted to American military ambitions as to Spaceship Earth environmentalism. But I decided to head out to the island, where Fullers dome gleams beneath the sun. The acrylic panels went up in flames in 1976, and the dome sat vacant for years. Its since been rechristened the Biosphre, and the museum inside hosts exhibitions on the natural world and climate change though, for the summer, a temporary exhibition, Echo 67, includes testimonials from Expo visitors and a small display on environmental impact.

As the clouds went by, and the maple leaf flag fluttered beneath Fullers awing, column-free expanse, I found myself overcome with a feeling I dont often confront when I look at the art of the recent past. That feeling was envy an envy of the certainty in cultural and social advancement felt by the millions who passed across this island, and an envy shared, I think, by many of the artists in MACs exhibition. Its one thing to identify the gaps in Expo 67s narrative, to call out its sexism and nationalism. Harder, and more urgent, is to admit why artists are still infatuated with past visions of the future that didnt come true. We would give anything to believe in progress again.

In Search of Expo 67 Through Oct. 9, Muse dArt Contemporain de Montral, macm.org.

Fashioning Expo 67 Through Oct. 1, McCord Museum, musee-mccord.qc.ca.

Echo 67 Through Dec. 17, Biosphre, ec.gc.ca/biosphere.

Expo 67 A World of Dreams Through Oct. 8, Stewart Museum, stewart-museum.org.

Habitat 67: The Shape of Things to Come Through Aug. 13, Centre de Design de lUQAM, centrededesign.com.

A version of this article appears in print on June 23, 2017, on Page C13 of the New York edition with the headline: Utopia: The Reboot.

More:

Expo 2017: Utopia, Rebooted - New York Times