DOE Launches Chicago Quantum Exchange – HPCwire (blog)

While many of us were preoccupied with ISC 2017 last week, the launch of the Chicago Quantum Exchange went largely unnoticed. So what is such a thing? It is a Department of Energy sponsored collaboration between the University of Chicago, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, and Argonne National Laboratory to facilitate the exploration of quantum information and the development of new applications with the potential to dramatically improve technology for communication, computing and sensing.

The new hub will be within within the Institute for Molecular Engineering (IME) at UChicago. Quantum mechanics, of course, governs the behavior of matter at the atomic and subatomic levels in exotic and unfamiliar ways compared to the classical physics used to understand the movements of everyday objects. The engineering of quantum phenomena could lead to new classes of devices and computing capabilities, permitting novel approaches to solving problems that cannot be addressed using existing technology.

Lately, it seems work on quantum computing has ratcheted up considerably with IBM, Google, D-Wave, and Microsoft leading the charge. The Chicago Quantum Exchange seems to be a more holistic endeavor to advance the entire quantum research ecosystem and industry.

The combination of the University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, working together as the Chicago Quantum Exchange, is unique in the domain of quantum information science, said Matthew Tirrell, dean and Founding Pritzker Director of the Institute for Molecular Engineering and Argonnes deputy laboratory director for science. The CQEs capabilities will span the range of quantum information, from basic solid state experimental and theoretical physics, to device design and fabrication, to algorithm and software development. CQE aims to integrate and exploit these capabilities to create a quantum information technology ecosystem.

According to the official announcement, the CQE collaboration will benefit from UChicagosPolsky Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, which supports the creation of innovative businesses connected to UChicago and Chicagos South Side. The CQE will have a strong connection with a major Hyde Park innovation project that wasannounced recentlyas the second phase of the Harper Court development on the north side of 53rd Street, and will include an expansion of Polsky Center activities. This project will enable the transition from laboratory discoveries to societal applications through industrial collaborations and startup initiatives.

Companies large and small are positioning themselves to make a far-reaching impact with this new quantum technology. Alumni of IMEs quantum engineering PhD program have been recruited to work for many of these companies. The creation of CQE will allow for new linkages and collaborations with industry, governmental agencies and other academic institutions, as well as support from the Polsky Center for new startup ventures.

IMEs quantum engineering program is already training a new workforce of quantum engineers to meet the need of industry, government laboratories, and universities. The program now consists of eight faculty members and more than 100 postdoctoral scientists and doctoral students. Approximately 20 faculty members from UChicagos Physical Sciences Division also pursue quantum research.

Link to University of Chicagoarticle: https://news.uchicago.edu/article/2017/06/20/chicago-quantum-exchange-create-technologically-transformative-ecosystem

Feature image: Courtesy of Nicholas Brawand

Read the original post:

DOE Launches Chicago Quantum Exchange - HPCwire (blog)

Donald Trump Responds To Supreme Court’s Travel Ban Announcement – HuffPost

WASHINGTON PresidentDonald Trump on Monday hailed the Supreme Courts decision to consider his travel ban as a clear victory after the court said it will allow a watered-down version of the ban to say in place until it hears the case in October.

Todays unanimous Supreme Court decision is a clear victory for our national security. It allows the travel suspension for the six terror-prone countries and the refugee suspension to become largely effective, Trump said in a statement. As President, I cannot allow people into our country who want to do us harm. I want people who can love the United States and all of its citizens, and who will be hardworking and productive.

My number one responsibility as Commander in Chief is to keep the American people safe. Todays ruling allows me to use an important tool for protecting our Nations homeland. I am also particularly gratified that the Supreme Courts decision was 9-0.

Trump again incorrectly emphasized the 9-0 decision in a celebratory tweet on Monday afternoon.

Several federal courts have halted enforcement of the ban because they determined it unlawfully discriminates against Muslims.

In the interim, the court will allow a watered-down version of the ban to go into effect. People witha bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States will not be subject to the ban. That group includes people coming to visit their family or students coming to study.

Trumps celebratory statement incorrectly stated that the justicesdecision Monday was 9-0. The decision was per curiam, meaning that it was unsigned by any particular justices.

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by fellow conservatives Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a separate opinion, agreeing with the overall decision but arguing that the ban should be reinstated in full.

Trump has frequently lashed out against the independent judiciaryin response to multiple lower court decisions that ruled against his administration.

On Monday, Trumps eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., attacked the activism of the Ninth Circuit Court, one of the federal courts which halted the ban nationwide.

Read more about the courts announcement here.

This article has been updated with Trumps tweet from Monday afternoon.

Here is the original post:

Donald Trump Responds To Supreme Court's Travel Ban Announcement - HuffPost

The Case for Paying Less Attention to Donald Trump – RollingStone.com

Donald Trump's presidency has been a disaster, but he has succeeded beyond his wildest expectations in one key way: getting attention attention that fills the void where the rest of us have a soul.

Trump's victory exposed the party establishment as utterly broken now Dems hope to rebuild in time for a 2018 comeback

The bad news for the rest of us is Trump isn't going away anytime soon. But the good news is that it's not only possible but crucial to pay less attention to the president. That's because fighting back against Trumpism doesn't begin at the top, with Trump himself. It begins with winning back the state legislatures that draw electoral maps and make the rules that shape elections.

Yes, state legislatures are a tough topic to get excited about. Most voters cannot even name their state reps. Yet when we think about some of the worst developments in modern politics voter suppression, purged voter rolls, ruthless gerrymandering, abortion restrictions, Neanderthal educational policies, brutal sentencing and policing "reforms" they emanate not from D.C., but from state capitols. Right now Democrats control 31 of 98 partisan state legislative chambers nationwide.

Read that again. That's less than one in three. That's not lagging behind that's getting blown the hell out.

Of course the most regressive parts of the right-wing agenda will become reality when Republicans control state legislatures this lopsidedly. Trump is increasingly the focal point of politics on the left, but he is not the one who stacked the deck in favor of the right over the past two decades. Republican success at every level is built upon control of state legislatures that dictate essential aspects of elections.

How long is the early voting period? Will mail-in or absentee ballots be easy to acquire? How strict is the voter ID requirement? When is the registration deadline? Can felons and ex-felons vote? Are voting locations convenient, and do they have sufficient equipment? How will votes be counted and verified? Don't look to Trump or Congress for answers to any of these critical questions. The GOP uses state-level power to answer them, and has effectively suppressed the vote in recent elections.

Then there's the matter of redistricting. The 2010 Republican victory was both overwhelming and well-timed for the party. Between 2010 and 2012, GOP-dominated redistricting tilted the electoral landscape in Republicans' favor. Redistricting after 2020 will follow the same lamentable trajectory if Democrats cannot make inroads in state houses. In the era of Big Data and geographic information systems, redistricting is a precise science, not an art. The party that controls the process can put its thumb on the scale for a decade.

Institutions matter more than policy in the short run, but it's worth remembering that loosening the GOP stranglehold on state legislatures will also produce policy benefits in areas like education, the administration and distribution of social programs (food stamps, unemployment benefits, public health programs) and criminal justice issues.Some of the things coming out of state legislatures make Paul Ryan look like Trotsky. These are not abstractions, but matters of life and death for many people.

So what can be done?

The payoff of being politically active simply is greater in down-ballot races. House and Senate races are of course important, but the marginal benefit of adding one more volunteer to those campaigns is small compared to what an activist can contribute to a local race. Throwing your donation and evening volunteering hours into the miasma of money and noise that is a modern congressional race is like spitting into the ocean. In a local race, the time and money you can donate will be much more impactful. Knocking on doors and speaking to a few hundred voters on behalf of an unknown candidate in a state assembly primary could make a real difference.

It goes without saying, of course, that Trump matters. His nihilistic brand of politics is a real threat to millions of Americans. Resisting his dangerous agenda remains essential. However, there is a downside to paying so much attention to Trump and so little to less sensational parts of the system. So maybe today, instead of reading a 50th story about Trumpian antics (spoiler alert: He did a stupid thing because he is a stupid person), research who's running or considering running in your state Senate and House elections. Is there a progressive challenger you could support in the primaries? Turnout in midterm election primaries is very low. Getting involved at that stage can make a real difference.

The"midterm loss" phenomenon and the colossal embarrassment that the Trump presidency has been suggest that Democratic candidates will have the wind at their backs in 2018. The timing is perfect to get serious about down-ballot races and start chipping away at the dominant position Republicans hold in state capitols across the country.

Donald Trump is not the problem with the GOP; he is the symptom of the party's top-to-bottom absence of principles and willingness to manipulate rules. If progressives focus exclusively on Trump, that makes it easier it is for Republicans at other levels to push their loathsome agenda forward. So give it a shot: Try paying a bit less attention to the loud-mouthed clown and a lot more to the low-key races that will determine control of America's electoral future. The country will be better off for it.

Sign up for our newsletter to receive breaking news directly in your inbox.

Excerpt from:

The Case for Paying Less Attention to Donald Trump - RollingStone.com

Alec Baldwin will return to ‘SNL’ as Donald Trump – CNN

The 59-year-old actor said that he will be bringing back his famous Donald Trump impersonation to "Saturday Night Live" this fall.

"Yea, we're going to fit that in. I think people have enjoyed it," said Baldwin, who was in New York City on Monday to promote is new movie "Blind." His busy fall schedule will keep the number of Trump impersonations to a minimum, he said, which means SNL fans will be treated to "a couple celery sticks" rather than a "whole meal" of blonde wigs and orange bronzer.

Baldwin has hosted "SNL" a record 17 times and his Trump impersonation has become one of his most memorable sketches.

During his Spike TV roast, which was taped on Sunday night at New York City's Apollo Theater, his Hollywood cohorts, Robert De Niro, Julianne Moore, Tracy Morgan and Horatio Sands all commended Baldwin's spot-on Trump impression during their roasts.

Baldwin's success on "SNL" and in movies means he's in a position to be selective about the projects he works on. Baldwin says that he picks his roles wisely because he doesn't need to work out of necessity.

"You get a little bit older and you think, 'Do I want to work right now?' For me the question is not what do I want to do [it's] do I want to do anything? Do I want to work? I don't need to work. Do I want to work or do I want to just take it easy and smell the roses or do something else? When I decide I want to go to work I look at what's out there and pick something that's the best that's available to me."

"Blind" hits theaters on July 14.

Read the rest here:

Alec Baldwin will return to 'SNL' as Donald Trump - CNN

Donald Trump’s Golf Club in Scotland May Cause Even More Problems for President – Newsweek

The European Tour is considering hosting the 2019 Scottish Open at President Donald Trumps golf course, according to reports, a decision that is expected to be met with resistance.

According to The Guardian, Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeen, Scotland, is the favored venue for Aberdeen Asset Management,sponsorof the 2019 Scottish Open.

On Thursday, the tour revealed that Gullane Golf Club in East Lothian, Scotland,would host next years tournament. An announcement for the following year is not expected anytime soon, but the report says Trumps course is the favorite to host.

Sports Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek Sports delivered to your inbox

Donald Trump at Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeen, Scotland, on June 25. Jeff J Mitchell/Getty

Trump International Golf Linksopened in 2012, with European Tour officials said to have made several visits to the site to consider the viability of holding the event there.

A spokesperson for the European Tour told The Guardian: No decision on future venues of the Aberdeen Asset Management Scottish Open has been taken beyond 2018. Our focus is on delivering a successful championship, with its strongest field to date, at Dundonald Links next month, followed by our return to Gullane next year.

The Donald Trump Organization is currently being run by his sons Donald and Eric, but Trump has indicated how keen he is to see the Tour travel to his course.

In 2015, he said, The Scottish Open is coming. The Scottish Open wants to be here forever, they think this is the best course theyve ever seen.

Next months U.S. Womens Open isbeing held atthe Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey, and there have been protests against the venue.

Trump is a longtime golf fan and competitor, and his time in officehas notquelled his interest. On Saturday, The Independent reported that Trump spent the30th day of his presidency visiting one of his golf courses.

Excerpt from:

Donald Trump's Golf Club in Scotland May Cause Even More Problems for President - Newsweek

Trump: Not ‘that far off’ from passing health overhaul – CNBC

Making a final push, President Donald Trump said he doesn't think congressional Republicans are "that far off" on a health overhaul to replace "the dead carcass of Obamacare."

Expressing frustration, he complained about "the level of hostility" in government and wondered why both parties can't work together on the Senate bill as GOP critics expressed doubt over a successful vote this week.

It was the latest signs of high-stakes maneuvering over a key campaign promise, and the president signaled a willingness to deal.

"We have a very good plan," Trump said in an interview broadcast Sunday. Referring to Republican senators opposed to the bill, he added: "They want to get some points, I think they'll get some points."

Trump's comments come amid the public opposition of five Republican senators so far to the Senate GOP plan that would scuttle much of former President Barack Obama's health law.

Unless those holdouts can be swayed, their numbers are more than enough to torpedo the measure developed in private by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and deliver a bitter defeat for the president. That's because unanimous opposition is expected from Democrats in a chamber in which Republicans hold a narrow 52-48 majority.

Trump bemoaned the lack of bipartisanship in Washington, having belittled prominent Democrats himself.

"It would be so great if the Democrats and Republicans could get together, wrap their arms around it and come up with something that everybody's happy with," the president said. "And I'm open arms; but, I don't see that happening. They fight each other. The level of hostility."

Trump has denigrated Democrats on numerous occasions, including a jab at Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in the same interview: "She's a hopeless case. I call her Pocahontas and that's an insult to Pocahontas."

Warren, a leading liberal and defender of the Affordable Care Act, has opposed efforts to pass a bill to replace the law. The Democrat reiterated her opposition in a statement to The Associated Press on Sunday, saying the health care bill being pushed by Senate Republicans is a "monstrosity."

In a tweet last week after Georgia's special House election, Trump also criticized House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. "I certainly hope the Democrats do not force Nancy P out. That would be very bad for the Republican Party and please let Cryin' Chuck stay!" he wrote.

More:

Trump: Not 'that far off' from passing health overhaul - CNBC

Why Is CNN Getting Nervous About Its Coverage of the Donald Trump-Russia Investigation? – Newsweek

CNNs announcement of new publishing restrictions on articles about President Donald Trump and Russia, as reported by Buzzfeed, has delightedright-wing media.

Populist website Breitbart reported that the very fake news scandal was consuming the network, while Fox News host Sean Hannity taunted CNN's Jeff Zucker on Twitter.

CNN has long been accused of liberal bias by criticsand has been one of the key focuses of President Donald Trumps relentless rhetorical assaultsagainst what he has branded the fake news media.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

A sign reading "CNN SUCKS" is held up as President-elect Donald Trump speaks at the Dow Chemical Hangar on December 9, 2016, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Trump aimed barbs at the network during his 2016 election campaign; White House press secretary Sean Spiceraccused it of spreading unsubstantiated rumoursin a bid to attract viewers. In his first press conference as president, Trump shouted down CNNs Jim Acostaafter denouncing the news network from the podium.

The following month, CNN was one of several media organizations denied access to an off-camera press briefing with Spicer, while handpicked reporters from conservative websites were invited. A pro-Trump Political Action Committee (PAC)even tried to run an ad on CNNin which the words "fake news"were superimposed on an image of networkanchors.

Another factor in CNN's nervousness is likely to be the declining faith in traditional news outlets, with a September 2016 Gallup poll finding that confidence in mass media to "report the news fully, accurately and fairly" had dropped to the lowest level recorded by the pollster, with only 32 percentsaying the media had their trust.

In such an environment, it is hardly surprising that CNN is taking care to make sure the fake news label does not stick, and tightening its coverage of Trump's alleged Russia ties, where key devel0pments have been leaked to media by officials on condition of anonymity.

CNNs retracted story, which allegedthat the Senate Intelligence Committee was probing claims that the chief of a $10 billion Russian investment fund had met with a member of Trumps transition team days before the presidents inauguration,was based on a single unnamed source.

News organizations generally rely on multiple, independent sources to verify key claims.

To avoidanother such situation,stories involving Trump and Russia now requirethe approval of senior executives before publication. The network is aiming to bolster its credibility in the face of unprecedented White House attacksand rising public skepticism about its integrity.

Continued here:

Why Is CNN Getting Nervous About Its Coverage of the Donald Trump-Russia Investigation? - Newsweek

Majority of Americans Would Give Up Alcohol to See Donald Trump Impeached, Survey Says – Newsweek

Donald Trump's presidency has caused stress and anxiety in Americans across the country, many of whom have opted to offset their worries with an extra glass of wine or two or shots of whiskey from time to time. But as it turns out, the majority of citizens say they would quit drinking alcohol tomorrow if it meant the president would be impeached.

Nearly 73 percent of Democrats and 17 percent of Republicans said they would abstain from alcohol for the rest of their lives if they could see the official political process begin to remove Trump, according to a Detox.net survey of 1,013 men and women nationwide. The latest data set showing support for Trumps impeachmentan exhaustive political process that includes no definite promise of his removalcomes at a time when multiple Democratic lawmakers are drafting articles of impeachment and at some point could bringthem to the floor of Congress.

Related: Heres how Donald Trump could actually be impeached

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

Meanwhile, more than 30 percent of Republicans surveyed said theyd quit drinking in order to have the media stop writing negative articles about Trump, compared to 6.5 percent of Democrats.

73 percent of Democrats and 17 percent of Republicans would quit drinking forever if it meant Trump would be impeached tomorrow. Detox

Texas RepresentativeAl Green was the first Democrat on Capitol Hill to demand Trumps impeachment, claiming the presidents words are enough to prove he obstructed justice (an impeachable offense) in firing James Comey, the former FBI director who was conducting a federal probe into the Trump campaigns alleged collusion with the Kremlin during the 2016 presidential election.

"The president is not only intimidating the former FBI director, but any other person that might become FBI director and persons who are working on this case,"Green said in an interview with ThinkProgress. "He is demonstrating that he has the power to dismiss people summarily, with impunity, unless hes impeached."

Donald Trump drinking water during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. Drew Angerer, Getty

Other Trump critics say the president could also beimpeached for his business dealings around the world, as well as for profiting off the presidency at his luxury properties like Mar-A-Lago, where hes hosted world leaders like Japanese President Shinzo Abe. Experts say there are numerous negotiations and deals that could ultimately spur Trump's removal from office, from his properties advertising his surprise appearances at large events, to global business expansion plans and issues with his blind trust (or lack thereof).

Realistically, though, it would take a total shift in the Republican-controlled Congress and Senate in order for Trump to be impeached. The latest polls revealnearly 43 percent of voters support beginning the removal process, while Trump's approval ratings hovered in the high-30s throughout most of June.

All that is to say, Trump's impeachment isn't likely to happen as soon as some may have hoped for. Better order another round.

Read the rest here:

Majority of Americans Would Give Up Alcohol to See Donald Trump Impeached, Survey Says - Newsweek

After Takata’s Bankruptcy, Is Your Airbag Safe? – NBCNews.com

Todays bankruptcy filing by beleaguered Japanese airbag supplier Takata Corp. puts a spotlight on what has become the biggest safety-related recall in automotive history, a deadly defect linked to at least 16 known deaths and more than 100 injuries.

As part of a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department earlier this year, Takata agreed to pay a combination of fines and reimbursements, as well as set up a victims compensation fund, a deal worth $1 billion in total.

The suppliers bankruptcy and sale to Chinese-owned Key Safety Systems isnt likely to impact that settlement. But it's expected to help speed up repairs on the estimated 42 million vehicles sold in the U.S. equipped with the defective airbags. So far, only 38 percent of those vehicles have had their airbag inflators replaced, a situation that could lead to even more deaths and injuries, industry safety experts warn.

Part of the problem is that many of the vehicles using faulty Takata airbags are older some dating back to the 1990s. Some are already off the road but others may have been sold several times, making it hard to track down the current owners.

RELATED: Faulty Airbag Maker Takata Files for Bankruptcy, Sells to Rival

The other issue has been a shortage of replacement parts, said Cliff Howard, service advisor at Ferndale Honda in Michigan. In the beginning, it was a nightmare, he said. We had to put people on a waiting list.

That was especially true in warm, humid regions like Miami, where the Takata airbag defect was first identified. Manufacturing problems at two North American factories meant the companys airbags were especially sensitive to moisture which would cause their inflators to over-inflate, sending shrapnel spewing into the passenger compartment.

Initially, the Takata recall was focused on products sold in places like Southern Florida. But after several deaths occurred in cooler, drier climates, research revealed that the pyrotechnic compound used in those inflators explosive ammonium nitrate can break down over time, with as much as 50% or more of decade-old inflators tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration failing.

But the government still wants automakers to focus their repair campaigns on places like Miami first. That was a real strain, until recently, for dealerships like Toyota of North Miami, where Service Manager Antoine Kerlinst said his repair department is only just now getting good supplies.

The situation has improved, but not for all models, he said, noting that the dealership is telling owners of some Toyota Corolla models they might not be able to be fixed until this December.

Under pressure from federal regulators, automakers have made it easier for owners to check out their vehicles without going into the service shop. Every manufacturers website now has a link to a recall database.

Alternatively, owners can go to the NHTSA site, SaferCar.gov, and enter their VIN to see if theres an outstanding recall.

The "Vehicle Identification Number" is listed on state registration papers and can also be found by peeking through your windshield at the plate bolted to the front of the instrument panel.

What happens if youre on a recall list?

Under the terms of the Takata bankruptcy and sale, the new owners will owner a pledge to set up a $125 million victims compensation program. Experts say it is possible that some instances where airbags malfunctioned havent been reported. If that happened, report your experience on the SaferCar.org website.

The rest is here:

After Takata's Bankruptcy, Is Your Airbag Safe? - NBCNews.com

The Senate Health Care Bill Could Lead to More Personal Bankruptcies – Money Magazine

The revised health care bill drafted behind closed doors by Senate Republicans includes massive cuts to Medicaid that would leave 15 million fewer people enrolled in the program by 2026, according to the Congressional Budget Report released Monday.

Those drastic cuts could result in more personal bankruptcy filings from Americans, reversing course from a decrease after the Affordable Care Act was implemented, health care and bankruptcy experts said.

Unpaid and costly medical bills are a significant contributor in the decision to file for bankruptcy, experts said. And even if the finanical distress from being uninsured doesn't send someone into bankruptcy, high and sometimes unexpected medical costs can still send Americans into a lot of debt.

"The evidence here is to the point where it feels like a pretty robust fact," said Matthew Notowidigdo, an associated professor of economics at Northwestern University who specializes in health and labor economics.

"If you were to roll back the Medicaid expansion, that's going to lead to more bankruptcies," he added.

The largest single health insurer in the U.S., Medicaid covers 74 million low-income Americans about a fifth of the entire country that includes predominantly low-income adults, children, elderly people receiving long-term care and people with special needs.

Former President Obama's signature health care law, which Republican lawmakers have aimed to dismantle since its inception, included hefty Medicaid expansions through the use of federal funding and other measures.

The number of personal bankruptcy filings fell from 1,536,799 in 2010 to 770,846 in 2016 in part due to Medicaid expansion. But the new Senate bill, called the Better Care Reconciliation Act , proposes phasing out federal contribution to Medicaid for states, which under the ACA was used as an incentive for states to have Medicaid cover more Americans. The bill also would lower the annual income limit for subsidies.

Personal bankruptcy offers a remedy for indebtednessbut not a long-term one. While there is no definitive estimate on how many filings come as a result of predominately high medical costs, it is a "significant reason" why consumers may file for personal bankruptcy, said Lois Lupica, a bankruptcy expert and Maine Law Foundation Professor of Law at the University of Maine School of Law.

"It seems absurd that we're using the statutory benefit of debt discharge rather than using a statutory benefit of health insurance, because the people who get sick and defer preventative medicine are going to be sicker," Lupica said.

The CBO score of the revised bill notes that 16% fewer Americans under the age of 65 would be insured through Medicaid if the bill becomes law. In total, the CBO estimates 22 million fewer Americans would be insured in 2026 than those would if the current law stayed in place. The cuts to Medicaid would reduce federal spending on the program by $772 billion by 2026.

"This will make a hugely negative impact on many American lives," Lupica said. "It's scary. If it ever gets to the point where it's law, it will have ripple effects throughout the economy."

One of those effects could land on hospitals, which are often hit with extra costs to cover when medical bills go unpaid. Emergency rooms will not turn away uninsured patients, but prices can quickly reach thousands of dollars just from one visit, both Lupica and Notowidigdo said.

Before the CBO score was released Monday afternoon, the National Association of Medicaid Directors, a bipartisan group of directors of state Medicaid programs, came out against the federal spending cuts Monday, calling it "insufficient and unworkable."

"No amount of administrative or regulatory flexibility can compensate for the federal spending reductions that would occur as a result of this bill," the group said.

Here is the original post:

The Senate Health Care Bill Could Lead to More Personal Bankruptcies - Money Magazine

A Proposed Bankruptcy for Banks That Will Lead to Bailouts – New York Times

A group of professors recently wrote Congress to alert it to the folly of repealing orderly liquidation authority and replacing it with bankruptcy. The professors letter is fine as far as it goes, but it does not go far enough.

The professors largely take Dodd-Frank at face value: When a big bank fails, we should try to use the bankruptcy courts first and resort to orderly liquidation authority only in extreme circumstances. That is fine in the abstract, but it bears thinking a bit more deeply about this issue.

Is it really plausible that any of the top half-dozen or so American financial institutions could resolve their financial distress in bankruptcy court? It could happen, just as I may travel to Mars some day.

More realistically, we have to worry that the hurdles to such a case, and the potential knock-on effects, are so significant that such a bank failure would and should proceed immediately to orderly liquidation authority.

That means that bankruptcy for banks should primarily focus on other creatures. For example, it might make sense to devise a bankruptcy court procedure for the next tier of banks and broker-dealers, should they fail. At present the failure of one of the larger regional bank groups might overwhelm both the F.D.I.C.s traditional bank rescue tools and the bankruptcy code.

Seen in that light, it is at least as important that the bankruptcy code address a wide range of financial institutions as it stands ready to address the failure of the next Lehman Brothers.

This reveals the fundamental problem with Congresss present approach. Not only would it leave regulators with no tools to address the failure of a big financial institution, but it would replace that approach with a form of bankruptcy that would be entirely useless for those financial institutions that might actually use a bankruptcy filing.

In particular, Congresss proposed bankruptcy process for banks tries to move the single point of entry strategy developed for the big banks in orderly liquidation authority to the bankruptcy court. Under this strategy, a bank is recused by forcibly converting junior debt to equity.

All the big American banks are revamping their capital structure to facilitate single point of entry. The medium-size financial institutions are not.

So Congress proposes to kill off orderly liquidation authority, the tool that would be of most use to the really big banks, and replace it with a bankruptcy system that will be irrelevant for the really big banks and wont work for medium-size banks.

As a result, we will bail out both in the next financial crisis.

Stephen J. Lubben holds the Harvey Washington Wiley Chair in corporate governance and business ethics at Seton Hall Law School and is an expert on bankruptcy.

Read more:

A Proposed Bankruptcy for Banks That Will Lead to Bailouts - New York Times

Experts say Affordable Care Act has helped people avoid bankruptcy – WRAL.com

While congressional debate continues over health care, there is another element worth considering.

Personal bankruptcy filings have been cut in half over the past six years. Some experts credit health coverage available under the Affordable Care Act for the drop.

Katie Weber knows the importance of good health insurance.

The 29-year-old is fighting cancer, and she says her treatments would have bankrupted her if not for the financial protections available under the ACA.

"I don't know how many MRIs I've had, but in the dozens for sure," Weber said,.

Bankruptcy courts never ask people why they are filing, but many bankruptcy and legal experts Consumer Reports spoke with agree medical bills were a leading cause of personal bankruptcy before health insurance expanded under the ACA.

"Medical bills are often unexpected, large and unavoidable, so people who don't have insurance can run up massive debt in a relatively short period of time," Consumer Reports' Allen St. John said.

Since 2010, personal bankruptcy filings have dropped by about 50 percent. Experts credit the improved economy for part of the decline, as well as laws passed in 2005 that make it harder to declare bankruptcy.

But nearly all the experts Consumer Reports interviewed also point to expanded health insurance as a major influence on the drop.

"Our reporting found that coverage for pre-existing conditions and also a ban on lifetime limits were really important because it prevented people with serious medical issues from having to file bankruptcy," St. John said.

Weber said she hopes those safeguards remain a part of any new health care legislation.

"Even if I get better, when I get better, the follow-up will be continuous," she said. "The idea that, moving forward, insurers wouldn't cover some of the things that I really need to be covered is really scary to me, to be honest."

Read more here:

Experts say Affordable Care Act has helped people avoid bankruptcy - WRAL.com

Yakima medical supply business to remain open during bankruptcy process – Yakima Herald-Republic

YAKIMA, Wash. -- The owner of a longtime medical supply business said he plans to stay open despite filing for bankruptcy earlier this month.

Chuck Vetsch, president of Keeler's Medical Supply, said several issues, including changes in federal Medicare and Medicaid programs, led the company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 15 with the Eastern District of Washington of U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

Keelers Medical Supply, which has been in business since 1948, sellsa variety of home medical equipment including walkers, bathroom safety products and breast pumps.

Vetsch said he tried to keep the business operating in recent years despite reductions in reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid programs the business once received. In addition, the business was dealing with several audits which the business is fighting that led both programs to reclaim distributed payments.

Sales fell from just under $10 million in 2010 to a little over $1.6 million in 2016, Yakima attorney Roger Bailey wrote in a court document. As of June 1, the company had about $785,000 in assets including pending payments for sales, inventory and office supplies.

Court document show that the company liabilities include nearly $1 million owed in various federal and state taxes, including $862,000 with the Internal Revenue Service.

When it became clear that issues would not be resolved quickly, the company decided to file so it could negotiate payment plans with its creditors, Vetsch said.

We just needed everyone to take a breather, he said.

This story will be updated.

Here is the original post:

Yakima medical supply business to remain open during bankruptcy process - Yakima Herald-Republic

Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Coal Miner with … – PR Newswire (press release)

NEW YORK, June 26, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- The Mesothelioma Victims Center says, "Some of our own family grew up in the mining industry, so we are incredibly passionate about making certain any miner with mesothelioma receives the best possible compensation because of their exposure to asbestos. As we would like to discuss anytime at 800-714-0303, any miner with mesothelioma that does not have the best possible legal representation will probably not receive the very best financial compensation settlement." http://MesotheliomaVictimsCenter.Com

When a person with mesothelioma or their family hires a lawyer or law firm to assist with mesothelioma, they will typically work with that attorney or law firm until the compensation process ends. The major downside to this is that it becomes virtually impossible to fire an attorney part way through a compensation claim if the family becomes aware of how incompetent or inexperienced the attorneys may be.

It is for this reason the Mesothelioma Victims Center urges people with mesothelioma or their family to call them before hiring a lawyer or law form to assist with the mesothelioma financial compensationclaim.

According to the group, "We know most people want nothing to do with lawyers. As we would like to explain anytime at 800-714-0303, when it comes to mesothelioma compensation or getting the best financial settlements, you will need to have the nation's most skilled, experienced, and capable mesothelioma attorneys. Believe it or not, some of the nation's top mesothelioma attorneys will take a coal miner's mesothelioma compensation claim because they are just as passionate as we are about getting their clients the best financial settlement results."

Vital tip for any coal miner or their family from the Mesothelioma Victims Center: "If the lawyer you are talking to cannot produce family references where he/she was the driving force for a coal miner getting a substantial mesothelioma compensation settlement, please call us anytime at 800-714-0303 for direct access to some of the nation's top mesothelioma attorneys who have these kinds of references. Let us explain how to avoid being overcharged by lawyers working on a mesothelioma compensation claim. http://MesotheliomaVictimsCenter.Com

In 2015, roughly 897 million short tons of coal were produced in 25 states. Five states produced a total of about 639 million short tons, or about 71% of total U.S. coal production. The five largest coal producing states with production in million short tons and the share of total U.S. coal production in 2015:

For more information please visit the US Energy Information Energy Administration's website on this topic: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=69&t=2.

Each year about 3000 US citizens will be diagnosed with mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos. High -risk work groups for exposure to asbestos include US Navy Veterans,power plant workers, shipyard workers, oil refinery workers, steel mill workers, miners,manufacturing workers, pulp or paper mill workers, millwrights, welders, plumbers, electricians, auto mechanics, machinists, construction workers, rail road workers, and firemen. Typically, the exposure to asbestos for these types of workers occurred in the 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, or 1980's.

According to the CDC the states indicated with the highest incidence of mesotheliomainclude Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland,New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia,Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Louisiana, Washington, and Oregon.

The Mesothelioma Victims Center says, "As we would like to explain anytime at 800-714-0303 if a person who has been diagnosed with mesothelioma wants the best possible compensation it is vital they have the nation's most skilled, and experienced mesothelioma lawyers." http://MesotheliomaVictimsCenter.Com

For more information about mesothelioma please refer to the National Institutes of Health's web site related to this rare form of cancer: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/mesothelioma.html

Contact: Michael Thomas 800-714-0303 163192@email4pr.com

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mesothelioma-victims-center-now-urges-a-coal-miner-with-mesothelioma-or-their-family-to-call-for-on-the-spot-access-to-some-of-the-nations-top-lawyers-for-compensation-results-300479008.html

SOURCE Mesothelioma Victims Center

Mesothelioma Victims Center

Here is the original post:

Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges a Coal Miner with ... - PR Newswire (press release)

Symptoms of Mesothelioma – Critical Signs to Watch For

Patients in the early stages of pleural mesothelioma do not exhibit many symptoms. Those that do show are not specific to the disease. Mesothelioma symptoms common in the early stages are:

These are similar to symptoms of various other disorders, such as pneumonia, common cold, asthma, influenza, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Pleural effusions and inflammation in the lining of the lungs are the main source of discomfort associated with mesothelioma, but are also linked to pneumonia and COPD.

Up to 25 percent of patients have symptoms like dyspnea and chest pain for approximately 6 months before seeing a doctor.

Pleural thickening is another result of pleural mesothelioma that is common in other diseases. This is caused by the scarring of the pleura. It causes a loss of elasticity in the lungs, which is essential for the lung to expand for normal breathing.

Pleural thickening can also be caused by tuberculosis, pleurisy, and empyema (infection in the lung that causes a buildup of pus in the pleura). However, in mesothelioma, this is specifically caused by scarring of the pleura due to asbestos.

Read the original post:

Symptoms of Mesothelioma - Critical Signs to Watch For

Reserve Bank battle points to dangerous levels of intolerance – Mail & Guardian

Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago. The role of South Africas central bank is at the centre of a heated debate. (Siphiwe Sibeko, Reuters)

What kind of financial system is sure to collapse if the central bank cares about peoples well-being?

The recommendation by the public protector that the Reserve Banks mandate change, says much about Busisiwe Mkhwebane, none of it flattering. It says just as much about mainstream economic debate - and none of that is flattering either.

Mkhwebane recommended that the central banks constitutional mandate, which makes protecting the currency its primary goal, be changed to one which requires it to promote balanced and sustainable economic growth while ensuring that the socio-economic well-being of the citizens are protected. She also said the constitution should require the bank to achieve meaningful socio-economic transformation.

This triggered a wave of protests, as well as an announcement from the South African Reserve Bank that it would take the matter to court. The Reserve Bank had no option. The constitutional court has ruled that the Public Protectors findings are binding unless they are challenged in court. Her recommendation wildly exceeded what she is allowed to do by the constitution or democratic good sense - and the Reserve Bank could not allow it to stand.

Democratic constitutions are changed by large majorities of the people or their elected representatives not by individuals. By making a binding recommendation that the constitution be changed, Mkhwebane signalled that she either doesnt understand or does not care for democracy.

Her report is also very useful to a faction of the governing party which wants to deflect charges of state capture by claiming that white monopoly capital already controls the state. There are real questions about the fitness for office of a Public Protector whose report seems more interested in protecting connected politicians and business people than with taking the peoples will seriously.

But the reaction did not stop at insisting that Mkhwebane has no business telling the people what the constitution should say. Much of it objected not only to her saying what the Reserve Banks mandate should be, but to anyone at all doing that.

The prize for the wildest reaction went to the commentator who declared that Mkhwebanes ideas on the Banks mandate were inspired by someone who denied that the Nazi genocide happened. Others stopped short of tarring constitutional change with the same brush as mass murder but were united in claiming that to suggest that the Reserve Banks mandate be broadened is economically illiterate and deeply damaging.

Absa, who was the subject of a separate finding by the public protector on the issue of a controversial bailout, asked a court to rule that her proposed change posed a serious risk to the financial system. For its part the rating agency Standard & Poors, happy as ever to police the boundaries of economic correctness, warned that any interference with the Reserve Banks independence could trigger new downgrades.

To insist that anyone who proposes changing the Reserve Banks mandate is economically damaging and stupid is as contemptuous of democracy and dangerous to the economy as Mkhwebanes excess. It is undemocratic because it seeks to close down policy debate by declaring that only one view of the Reserve Banks mandate can ensure a healthy economy. It is dangerous because it blocks the search for economic remedies by seeking to bully even those who propose only mild changes to what the country now has.

The idea that the Reserve Bank should have a broader mandate is neither radical nor dangerous. The most famous central bank, the US Federal Reserve, has a broader mandate. Its dual mandate requires it to seek maximum employment as well as price stability.

The Australian equivalents mandate includes maintenance of full employment and economic prosperity and welfare of the people. The European Central Bank, famed for its love of austerity, has a mandate to seek sustainable growth.

And the the Bank of Englands website says that, subject to its goal of price stability, it aims to support the governments economic objectives.

In South Africa, not only has the view that the central banks mandate is too restrictive been repeated periodically but it may well have been implemented for a while. In 2010, then finance minister Pravin Gordhan wrote to then Reserve Bank governor, Gill Marcus, proposing a mandate which included growth and employment. Marcus reacted positively, which suggests that the bank acted on Gordhans letter. The financial system survived.

The US, European and Australian financial systems have also not collapsed. Their mandates have not triggered a downgrade and no one has accused these societies of economic illiteracy.

So either double standards are being applied or we are being told that restrictive central bank mandates are essential only if countries are in particular parts of the world (such as Africa) and governed by particular types of people (Africans).

And why does a change in the Banks mandate undermine its independence? A central bank loses its independence if politicians (or anyone else) can tell it what to do, not if its mandate changes.

For all its flaws, the Public Protectors proposal would retain the Reserve Banks independence, leaving it to the bank to decide what promotes the well-being of the people or transformation.

None of this means that the Reserve Banks mandate must change. Or that central bank independence must go. But it does mean that no one should be discouraged from debating the issue, as people routinely do in other democracies and market economies. What, besides that prejudice which we prettify by the term Afropessimism, explains the insistence that we may not debate what is freely discussed in most other places?

Closing down debate in this way is common in South Africa. It also lies behind complaints of policy uncertainty which does not mean, as it does elsewhere, that government keeps changing its mind and sending mixed messages the macro-economic framework has been stable for more than two decades. It means, rather, that some people who some others may take seriously raise policy ideas the economic mainstream does not like.

This demand that people can say anything they like about economic policy as long as the mainstream likes it too offers a misleading view of the economy. It says that there is nothing wrong with it except political interference and that it will flourish if politicians simply leave alone what is done now.

The contrary evidence is offered by mainstream organisations such as the International Monetary Fund and the South African Reserve Bank itself which have shown that the current economic rut is a product of problems in the private economy as well as what government does.

This means that the economy must change. This, in turn, requires new ideas. They will not emerge unless everything is up for debate and ideas are not silenced because they trigger the fears and prejudices of a few.

Steven Friedman, Professor of Political Studies, University of Johannesburg

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

More:

Reserve Bank battle points to dangerous levels of intolerance - Mail & Guardian

Louisiana’s John Kennedy leads US Senate effort against oppression in India – The Baptist Message

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) led a bipartisan group of Senators in sending a letter to President Donald Trump, June 23, ahead of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modis visit to Washington D.C. The letter implores President Trump to use his meeting with the prime minister as an opportunity to discuss Indias discriminatory policies against foreign religious and humanitarian organizations.

Sens. Blunt, Crapo, Lankford, and Klobuchar signed on to Sen. Kennedys letter encouraging the president to make it clear to Prime Minister Modi that human rights and religious liberty remain a top priority.

Over the past few years, the Indian government has made it difficult if not impossible for religious and humanitarian organizations to get funding to their charitable operations in India. Many of these organizations are simply trying to meet the basic needs of the citizens of India. Compassion International even had to leave India. This humanitarian aid organization had helped feed and provide health care to children in India for nearly 50 years. Now thousands of innocent children will be left without this critical support, said Sen. Kennedy. Discriminating against foreign organizations that help the citizens of India is counterproductive, and it needs to change. I ask that President Trump address this serious issue with Prime Minister Modi during his upcoming trip to Washington.

Below is the text of the letter.

_____________________________

June 23, 2017

The Honorable Donald J. Trump

President of the United States

The White House

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

Thank you for your commitment to protecting and advancing religious liberty around the world. You have made it clear that protecting religious freedom deserves our constant vigilance. We agree that our support for democracy requires persistent efforts to support and advocate for religious liberty around the world.

We are particularly concerned about violations of religious liberty in India. India is the worlds largest democracy and therefore holds a position of importance on the world stage, making the ongoing violations even more disturbing. Despite Indias size and religious diversity, violations of religious liberty have existed for years.

Every year, the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) releases a report outlining the state of religious freedom across the world. India has consistently remained a Tier 2 country, meaning that USCIRF believes it requires close monitoring based on evidence of violations of religious freedom. These include violence, discrimination, and forced conversions, as well as harassment and intimidation.

Of significant concern is Indias recent use of its Foreign Contributions Regulations Act (FCRA) to target humanitarian and religious organizations. Any foreign religious organizations, including missionaries, working in India must comply with this law. In 2011, the Indian Parliament amended FCRA to allow the government to block funds for foreign organizations that conduct any activities detrimental to the national interest.

The Indian government has since used this broad provision to target foreign humanitarian and religious organizations that serve the Indian people, such as Compassion International that was forced to leave India and the 145,000 Indian children it served. Other organizations that have come under scrutiny include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Amnesty International, and Greenpeace. Other evangelical Christian organizations, such as the Southern Baptist Convention, have also faced discrimination of various kinds. The number of organizations that have lost their licenses has exceeded 10,000 since Prime Minister Modi took office.

Based on these troubling developments, we ask that you make religious liberty a top priority when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the United States this month. We request that you use the United States strong, longstanding relationship with India to encourage Prime Minister Modi to alleviate the discrimination against these organizations, particularly religious-based aid groups, and to take steps to advance religious liberty for all of Indias citizens.

The United States has served as an example of religious liberty for the entire world ever since its founding. These principles underlie the essence of what it means to be American. Even more importantly, the freedom to practice ones own religious beliefs underlies the essence of what it means to be human and live in a democracy. We encourage you to bring these violations to Prime Minister Modis attention and continue to work to protect religious liberty across the globe.

Sincerely,

John Kennedy

United States Senator

Roy Blunt

United States Senator

Mike Crapo

United States Senator

James Lankford

United States Senator

Amy Klobuchar

United States Senator

Originally posted here:

Louisiana's John Kennedy leads US Senate effort against oppression in India - The Baptist Message

Government tries to right the wrongs against persecuted tribes – Economic Times

NEW DELHI: Have you heard of the Gadia lohars who fought in the army of Maharana Pratap and several other Rajput rulers against the Mughals or the Maravars of Tamil Nadu who protected the kingdoms of the chola emperors and resisted the British for many years?

Notified as criminal tribes by the British in the nineteenth century largely as a price for their resistance to oppression and then denotifed by the Indian government but never really classified or given their due, the Modi government has decided to assess and improve the living conditions of 10 crore people belonging to nomadic and denotified tribes of the country whose contribution to the freedom struggle has never been popularised.

Last week, the National Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Seminomadic Tribes (NCDNT) that comes under the ministry of Social Justice presented an interim report to the centre charting out a roadmap to improve the lives of these communities, bring out their long forgotten history and make them an important part of the electorate by ensuring government schemes such as Mudra and Jan Dhan Yojna reached them.

An exhaustive household survey for the first time has been launched across the county to study the living conditions of these tribes and document their histories. Secretary of the commission B K Prasad said the history of denotified and nomadic tribes was one of suppression and exploitation that they have faced persecution for more than 150 years. This report and the steps we take based on our interactions is an attempt to reverse this injustice.

Agencies Karvy in the nothern zone, Vimarsh in the western zone, Academy of Management Studies, Life Academy of Vocational Studies in the Eastern zone, Karvy in the North Eastern zone and Vimarsh in the southern zone have been picked to conduct this survey.

These agencies starting June 1 are compiling data about each of these communities, taking a sample size of 9000. They will assess the socio economic conditions and submit a report to us in six months, Prasad added. He added that the commission is now working on a deadline and findings of the survey - first in independent India will help it further in its intervention.

The researchers have studied the history and living conditions of over 200 such communities. For instance, the gadia lohar community found in five north states were blacksmiths in the army of Maharana Pratap. They live under self-imposed taboos not to return to Chittorgarh fort, not to use ropes to draw water or use candles at home as a protest for freedom. Today, due to mechanisation, they work as labourers or sell iron scraps, said Siddharth M, researcher, who added that stories collected from all these communities are being documented.

Similar the maravars, glorifed in the ancient text Thirukkurral, were protectors of Tamil emperors and worked as as Kudikaval (traditional policing communities). But they resisted the British who suppressed them. During our interactions they told us the story of Rani Velu Nachiyar who fought the british but was never given the same importance as Rani Laxmibai. Today the community members work in matchbox factories with bare minimum facilities, the report said.

Experts said the colonial category of criminal tribes may have been denotified but many communities remain unclassified. The Ayyangar Committees recommendations led to the repeal of the CTA in August 1952. In 2008, the National Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Tribes (NCDNT) produced a report where it said, But, to keep effective control over the so-called hardened criminals, the Habitual Offenders Act was placed in the statute book.

To address that, besides listing of ways to make schooling and medical care accessible to these nomadic groups and recommending grazing rights in forests, specific training, scholarship and housing benefits, the commission has sought for a review of the Habitual Offenders Act 1952 which has come provisions from the erstwhile Criminal Tribes Act that add to the harassment faced by these communities.

Here is the original post:

Government tries to right the wrongs against persecuted tribes - Economic Times

Nets Ignore India’s Recent Spike in Christian Persecution – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)


NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
Nets Ignore India's Recent Spike in Christian Persecution
NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
According to Open Doors President David Curry, the Indian government is actually supportive of Christian oppression. Also, it has become increasingly hostile to American NGOs, including Christian ministry Compassion International, which was forced to ...

and more »

Originally posted here:

Nets Ignore India's Recent Spike in Christian Persecution - NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

This ruling allows councils to boycott Israel. It’s a crucial victory – The Guardian

On 11 June Avigdor Lieberman proudly announced that Israel was planning its greatest expansion of settlement homes since 1992. Ramot in the occupied West Bank. Photograph: Ronen Zvulun/Reuters

Two weeks ago I found myself in a sweaty room in the Royal Courts of Justice, packed with fellow Palestine activists, listening to detailed and sometimes arcane legal arguments about pension law. The journey that ended in that courtroom began in September last year when the government announced new guidance intended to prohibit local government pension schemes from pursuing divestment and sanctions against foreign nations and UK defence industries other than where formal legal sanctions, embargoes and restrictions have been put in place by the government.

The key target of these new rules was made clear in the government press release about the decision. This was the government acting to place a ban on boycotting Israel. The regulations were introduced in November 2016 despite a public consultation indicating that 98% of respondents thought this was the wrong thing to do, and a wider public outcry.

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign, of which Im the director, decided to take the government on. We launched a judicial review supported with witness statements from War on Want, Campaign Against the Arms Trade and the Quakers. Finally, on 22 June, we got the verdict we won! Judge Sir Ross Cranston ruled the guidance was unlawful and that the government had acted for an improper purpose.

This is a victory for the rule of law, for local democracy and for freedom of expression. But it is also a crucial moment in the campaign for Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law. This campaign emerged in 2005 in answer to a call from 170 Palestinian civil society organisations, frustrated by the decades in which international governments and bodies had issued condemnations of Israels oppression of the Palestinian people but refused to impose meaningful pressure.

The consequences of this failed policy were underlined in the last month, during which Israels illegal occupation of East Jerusalem, the West bank and Gaza entered its 50th year. On 11 June the countrys foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, proudly announced that Israel was planning its greatest expansion of settlement homes since 1992, one year before the Oslo accords launched the so-called peace process. During that time the number of illegal settlers occupying the West Bank and East Jerusalem has grown by nearly half a million. On 20 June ,as work started on the first illegal settlement to be built outside the existing settlement blocks in 25 years, Benjamin Netanyahu tweeted After decades, I have the privilege to be the prime minister who is building a new community in Judea and Samaria. Or to put it in clearer language , here is a prime minster who feels privileged to be violating international law.

The BDS movement is a response to Israels confidence that it can act with impunity. Modelled on the same tactics used so successfully against apartheid South Africa, it calls on all actors to end economic support for Israels illegal actions.

The UK governments attempts to force though the pension regulations were part and parcel of a wider attempt by Israel and its supporters to push back against the growing success of the BDS campaign. In April a leaked joint report from the Israeli thinktank the Reut Institute and the US Anti-Defamation League boasted of the success since 2010 in establishing a global pro-Israel network to suppress BDS activity, and the use of anti-BDS laws as a key tactic: 14 US states have introduced such legislation.

Theresa May must listen to the growing chorus of voices calling for an approach that truly holds Israel to account

Sir Ross Cranstons judgment last week draws a line in the sand against the attempts to introduce such measures in the UK. It upholds the basic right to invest money on ethical principles.

For BDS campaigners in the UK this gives a huge boost to our work. A recent YouGov poll showed that public opinion is on our side with 43% of the public seeing BDS as a reasonable response to Israels policies and only 13% opposed. This judgment tells us that the law is with us as well. With this legal impediment removed, we will take forward the campaign to persuade all relevant bodies, including pension-fund holders, not to invest money in supporting activities that are illegal and violate human rights.

Margaret Thatcher found herself on the wrong side of history in the 1980s when she tried to prevent boycotts of apartheid South Africa. Last week, Theresa May told us that her government recognised the need to be humble, to listen to public opinion and rethink its approach to a range of issues. Its time for her to acknowledge that current policy in the Middle East has failed and to listen to the growing chorus of voices calling for an approach that truly holds Israel to account.

Link:

This ruling allows councils to boycott Israel. It's a crucial victory - The Guardian