The Relationship of Health Insurance and Mortality: Is Lack of Insurance Deadly? Free – Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

About 28 million Americans are currently uninsured, and millions more could lose coverage under policy reforms proposed in Congress. At the same time, a growing number of policy leaders have called for going beyond the Affordable Care Act to a single-payer national health insurance system that would cover every American. These policy debates lend particular salience to studies evaluating the health effects of insurance coverage. In 2002, an Institute of Medicine review concluded that lack of insurance increases mortality, but several relevant studies have appeared since that time. This article summarizes current evidence concerning the relationship of insurance and mortality. The evidence strengthens confidence in the Institute of Medicine's conclusion that health insurance saves lives: The odds of dying among the insured relative to the uninsured is 0.71 to 0.97.

In several specific conditions, the uninsured have worse survival, and the lack of coverage is associated with lower use of recommended preventive services.

The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment, the only available randomized, controlled trial that has assessed the health effects of insurance, suggests that insurance may cause a clinically important decrease in mortality, but wide CIs preclude firm conclusions.

The 2 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study analyses that include physicians' assessments of baseline health show substantial mortality improvements associated with coverage. A cohort study that used only self-reported baseline health measures for risk adjustment found a nonsignificant coverage effect.

Most, but not all, analyses of data from the longitudinal Health and Retirement Study have found that coverage in the near-elderly slowed health decline and decreased mortality.

Two difference-in-difference studies in the United States and 1 in Canada compared mortality trends in matched locations with and without coverage expansions. All 3 found large reductions in mortality associated with increased coverage.

A mounting body of evidence indicates that lack of health insurance decreases survival, and it seems unlikely that definitive randomized, controlled trials can be done. Hence, policy debate must rely on the best evidence from observational and quasi-experimental studies.

The IOM committee also reviewed evidence on the effects of health insurance in specific circumstances and medical conditions. It concluded that uninsured patients, even when acutely ill or seriously injured, cannot always obtain needed care and that coverage improves the uptake of essential preventive services and chronic disease management. The report found that uninsured patients with cancer presented with more advanced disease and experienced worse outcomes, including mortality; that uninsured patients with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, HIV infection, and mental illness (the five other conditions reviewed in depth) had worse outcomes than did insured patients; and that uninsured inpatients received less and worse-quality care and had higher mortality both during their hospital stays and after discharge.

Table 1. Summary of Studies on Relationship Between Insurance Coverage and All-Cause Mortality*

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar on May 19, 2017, for English-language articles by using the following terms: [(uninsured) or (health insurance) or (uninsurance) or (insurance)] and [(mortality) or (life expectancy) or (death rates)]. After identifying relevant articles, we searched their bibliographies and used Google Scholar's cited by feature to identify additional relevant articles. We limited our scope to articles reporting data on the United States, quasi-experimental studies of insurance expansions in other wealthy nations, and recent cross-national studies. We contacted the authors of 4 studies to clarify their published reports on mortality outcomes.

We excluded most observational studies that compared uninsured persons with those insured by Medicaid, Medicare, or the Department of Veterans Affairs because preexisting disability or illness can make an individual eligible for these programs. Hence, relative to those who are uninsured, publicly insured Americans have, on average, worse baseline health, thereby confounding comparisons. Conversely, comparisons of the uninsured to persons with private insurance (which is often obtained through employment) may be confounded by a healthy worker effect: that is, that persons may lose coverage because they are ill and cannot maintain employment. Nonetheless, most analysts of the relationship between uninsurance and mortality have viewed the privately insured as the best available comparator, with statistical controls for employment, income, health status, and other potential confounders.

In sum, the OHIE yields a (nonsignificant) point estimate that Medicaid coverage reduced mortality by 0.13 percentage points, equivalent to a (nonsignificant) odds ratio of 0.84.

Several routinely collected federal surveys that include information about health insurance coverage have been linked to the National Death Index, allowing researchers to compare the mortality rates over several years of respondents with and without coverage at the time of the initial survey. One weakness of these studies is their lack of information about the subsequent acquisition or loss of coverage, which many people cycle into and out of over time. This dilutes coverage differences and may lead to underestimation of the effects of insurance coverage.

Two studies have analyzed the effect of uninsurance on mortality using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which obtains data from physical examination and laboratory tests among participants.

Several researchers have used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS)a longitudinal study that has followed cohorts enrolled at age 51 years or olderto assess the effect of insurance coverage on mortality. The HRS periodically surveys respondents and their families and has been linked to Medicare and National Death Index data.

The evidence accumulated since the publication of the IOM's report in 2002 supports and strengthens its conclusion that health insurance reduces mortality. Several newer observational and quasi-experimental studies have found that uninsurance shortens survival, and a few with null results used confounded or questionable adjustments for baseline health. The results of the only recent RCT, although far from definitive, are consistent with the positive findings from cohort and quasi-experimental analyses.

Table 2. Why the Causal Relationship of Health Insurance to Mortality Is Hard to Study

Finally, our focus on mortality should not obscure other well-established benefits of health insurance: improved self-rated health, financial protection, and reduced likelihood of depression. Insurance is the gateway to medical care, whose aim is not just saving lives but also relieving human suffering.

Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act, H.R. 676, 115th Cong. (2017).

Institute of Medicine; Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. Care Without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2002.

McWilliams JM. Health consequences of uninsurance among adults in the United States: recent evidence and implications. Milbank Q. 2009;87:443-94. [PMID: 19523125] doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00564.x

Hadley J. Sicker and poorerthe consequences of being uninsured: a review of the research on the relationship between health insurance, medical care use, health, work, and income. Med Care Res Rev. 2003;60:3S-75S. [PMID: 12800687]

Levy H, Meltzer D. The impact of health insurance on health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:399-409. [PMID: 18031224]

Freeman JD, Kadiyala S, Bell JF, Martin DP. The causal effect of health insurance on utilization and outcomes in adults: a systematic review of US studies. Med Care. 2008;46:1023-32. [PMID: 18815523] doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185c913

Rosen H, Saleh F, Lipsitz S, Rogers SO Jr, Gawande AA. Downwardly mobile: the accidental cost of being uninsured. Arch Surg. 2009;144:1006-11. [PMID: 19917936] doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.195

Hsu CD, Wang X, Habif DV Jr, Ma CX, Johnson KJ. Breast cancer stage variation and survival in association with insurance status and sociodemographic factors in US women 18 to 64 years old. Cancer. 2017. [PMID: 28440864] doi:10.1002/cncr.30722

Fox JB, Shaw FE; Office of Health System Collaboration, Office of the Associate Director for Policy, CDC. Relationship of income and health care coverage to receipt of recommended clinical preventive services by adultsUnited States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:666-70. [PMID: 25102414]

Baicker K, Taubman SL, Allen HL, Bernstein M, Gruber JH, Newhouse JP, et al; Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon experimenteffects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1713-22. [PMID: 23635051] doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1212321

Weathers RR 2nd, Stegman M. The effect of expanding access to health insurance on the health and mortality of Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries. J Health Econ. 2012;31:863-75. [PMID: 23000873] doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.004

Finkelstein A, McKnight R. What did Medicare do? The initial impact of Medicare on mortality and out of pocket medical spending. J Public Econ. 2008;92:1644-68.

Morriss FH Jr. Increased risk of death among uninsured neonates. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:1232-55. [PMID: 23402526] doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12042

Currie J, Gruber J. Saving babies: the efficacy and cost of recent expansions of Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women. J Polit Econ. 1996;104:1263-96.

Currie J, Gruber J. Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care, and child health. Q J Economics. 1996:431-66.

Baicker K, Finkelstein A. The effects of Medicaid coveragelearning from the Oregon experiment. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:683-5. [PMID: 21774703] doi:10.1056/NEJMp1108222

Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, et al; Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year. Q J Econ. 2012;127:1057-1106. [PMID: 23293397]

Newhouse JP. Free for All: Lessons from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Pr; 2003.

Keeler EB, Brook RH, Goldberg GA, Kamberg CJ, Newhouse JP. How free care reduced hypertension in the health insurance experiment. JAMA. 1985;254:1926-31. [PMID: 4046121]

Kass EH. Special clinics for hypertensionthe role of the hypertension detectionand follow-up programme. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;13:81-6. [PMID: 7066158]

Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. I. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. JAMA. 1979;242:2562-71. [PMID: 490882]

Weathers RR 2nd, Silanskis C, Stegman M, Jones J, Kalasunas S. Expanding access to health care for Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries: early findings from the accelerated benefits demonstration. Soc Secur Bull. 2010;70:25-47. [PMID: 21261168]

Sorlie PD, Johnson NJ, Backlund E, Bradham DD. Mortality in the uninsured compared with that in persons with public and private health insurance. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2409-16. [PMID: 7979836]

Kronick R. Health insurance coverage and mortality revisited. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:1211-31. [PMID: 19453392] doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00973.x

DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:267-75. [PMID: 16336622]

Polsky D, Doshi JA, Escarce J, Manning W, Paddock SM, Cen L, et al. The health effects of Medicare for the near-elderly uninsured. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:926-45. [PMID: 19674430] doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00964.x

Franks P, Clancy CM, Gold MR. Health insurance and mortality. Evidence from a national cohort. JAMA. 1993;270:737-41. [PMID: 8336376]

Wilper AP, Woolhandler S, Lasser KE, McCormick D, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. Health insurance and mortality in US adults. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2289-95. [PMID: 19762659] doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.157685

Sommers BD, Baicker K, Epstein AM. Mortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid expansions. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1025-34. [PMID: 22830435] doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1202099

Sommers BD. State Medicaid expansions and mortality, revisited: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Health Econ. 2017. doi:10.1162/AJHE_a_00080

Sommers BD, Long SK, Baicker K. Changes in mortality after Massachusetts health care reform: a quasi-experimental study. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:585-93. [PMID: 24798521] doi:10.7326/M13-2275

McWilliams JM, Zaslavsky AM, Meara E, Ayanian JZ. Health insurance coverage and mortality among the near-elderly. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:223-33. [PMID: 15318584]

Baker DW, Sudano JJ, Durazo-Arvizu R, Feinglass J, Witt WP, Thompson J. Health insurance coverage and the risk of decline in overall health and death among the near elderly, 1992-2002. Med Care. 2006;44:277-82. [PMID: 16501400]

Hadley J, Waidmann T. Health insurance and health at age 65: implications for medical care spending on new Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:429-51. [PMID: 16584457]

Black B, Espn-Snchez JA, French E, Litvak K. The long-term effect of health insurance on near-elderly health and mortality. Am J Health Econ. 2017. doi:10.1162/AJHE_a_00076

McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Health of previously uninsured adults after acquiring Medicare coverage. JAMA. 2007;298:2886-94. [PMID: 18159058]

Lichtenberg FR. The Effects of Medicare on Health Care Utilization and Outcomes. Frontiers in Health Policy Research. Vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pr; 2002.

Card D, Dobkin C, Maestas N. Does Medicare save lives? Q J Econ. 2009;124:597-636. [PMID: 19920880]

Card D, Dobkin C, Maestas N. The impact of nearly universal insurance coverage on health care utilization: evidence from Medicare. Am Econ Rev. 2008;98:2242-58. [PMID: 19079738]

Lurie N, Ward NB, Shapiro MF, Brook RH. Termination from Medi-Caldoes it affect health? N Engl J Med. 1984;311:480-4. [PMID: 6379458]

Lurie N, Ward NB, Shapiro MF, Gallego C, Vaghaiwalla R, Brook RH. Termination of Medi-Cal benefits. A follow-up study one year later. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1266-8. [PMID: 3517642]

Fihn SD, Wicher JB. Withdrawing routine outpatient medical services: effects on access and health. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:356-62. [PMID: 3404297]

Christopher AS, McCormick D, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, Bor DH, Wilper AP. Access to care and chronic disease outcomes among Medicaid-insured persons versus the uninsured. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:63-9. [PMID: 26562119] doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302925

Wilper AP, Woolhandler S, Lasser KE, McCormick D, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. Hypertension, diabetes, and elevated cholesterol among insured and uninsured U.S. adults. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:w1151-9. [PMID: 19843553] doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1151

Egan BM, Li J, Small J, Nietert PJ, Sinopoli A. The growing gap in hypertension control between insured and uninsured adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988 to 2010. Hypertension. 2014;64:997-1004. [PMID: 25185135] doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04276

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health statistics. 2017. doi:10.1787/health-data-en

GBD 2015 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2017. [PMID: 28528753] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8

Moreno-Serra R, Smith PC. Does progress towards universal health coverage improve population health? Lancet. 2012;380:917-23. [PMID: 22959388] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61039-3

Lee YC, Huang YT, Tsai YW, Huang SM, Kuo KN, McKee M, et al. The impact of universal National Health Insurance on population health: the experience of Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:225. [PMID: 20682077] doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-225

Wen CP, Tsai SP, Chung WS. A 10-year experience with universal health insurance in Taiwan: measuring changes in health and health disparity. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:258-67. [PMID: 18283203]

Hanratty MJ. Canadian national health insurance and infant health. American Econ Rev. 1996;86:276-84.

Stephenson AL, Sykes J, Stanojevic S, Quon BS, Marshall BC, Petren K, et al. Survival comparison of patients with cystic fibrosis in Canada and the United States: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:537-46. [PMID: 28288488] doi:10.7326/M16-0858

See original here:

The Relationship of Health Insurance and Mortality: Is Lack of Insurance Deadly? Free - Annals of Internal Medicine

Stanford School of Medicine Communication office wins six national awards – Stanford University News

by Susan Ipaktchian on June 26, 2017 4:04 pm

The School of Medicines Office of Communication & Public Affairs has received national recognition for the quality of its news releases and magazine stories, including the top prize in the best articles of the year category.

Overall, the office received six awards one platinum award, two golds and three silvers in the 2016 Circle of Excellence Awards contest sponsored by the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education.

Writer Tracie White earned the sole platinum award in the best-articles category for The puzzle solver, which was published in the spring 2016 issue of Stanford Medicine magazine. The article described the efforts of genetics professor Ron Davis, PhD, to find a cure for chronic fatigue syndrome, the crippling illness afflicting his son. Contest judges said it was a powerful story, deeply compassionate and compelling in its expression. The reader feels this family tragedy while also appreciating the science being done at Stanford. This is the second time that White has won the platinum award in the category.

The magazine also won a gold award for periodical staff writing. Judges said the magazine stories met the difficult task of relaying complex medical and scientific ideas clearly and concisely, in a way that appeals to both lay readers and a professional audience, and did so while drawing readers in with compelling writing that emphasizes the human aspect behind the science. The articles demonstrated how Stanford is on the forefront of medical education, research, and development, yet each story was written with a focus on the human perspective, which demonstrates the why.

The five stories in the staff-writing entry included:

The news releases written by the offices staff earned a gold award in the Research, Medicine and Science News Writing category. The judges commended the entry for high-end writing that presents topics in ways in which the average reader can peruse them comfortably. Good use of quotes, which drive but do not overpower the writing. The news releases were edited byJohn Sanford.

The five news releases included in the entry were:

This illustration received a silver award in the annual Circle of Excellence Awards. (Image credit: Jason Holley)

Stanford Medicine magazine received a silver award in the special-constituency magazine category. Judges cited the magazine for deeply personal and affecting stories and for exploring pressing issues affecting health care, often detailing the human impact on physicians, patients and families. The magazine is edited by Rosanne Spector and Kathy Zonana.

An illustration by Jason Holley that accompanied the story Building a better drug, in the winter 2016 issue of the magazine, won a silver award in the design category. Judges said the drawing showed strength in the forced perspective, the asymmetry and the abstract narrative of the background.

CASE is a professional organization for those in the fields of communications, alumni relations and development at educational institutions. It includes more than 3,600 colleges, universities, and independent elementary and secondary schools in 82 countries. To recognize the best work in these fields, CASE sponsors its annual Circle of Excellence Awards.

More:

Stanford School of Medicine Communication office wins six national awards - Stanford University News

Senate Republicans’ health care bill is bad medicine – The Denver Post

Scott Olson, Getty Images

Lets say your state faces an opioid epidemic. And a shortage of psychiatric care. And one of the highest suicide rates in the nation.

Lets say you live in Colorado.

If youre an optimist, you might turn to Congress for help. At the very least, youd expect your representatives and senators not to make matters worse.

Unfortunately, the Senate Republicans new health care plan would do real harm to Colorado and to the rest of the country. Since the Senate may vote on this proposal before the end of the week, its important to speak out right now.

The GOP plan is called the Better Care Reconciliation Act. But if you or someone you love is or might someday become old, disabled or sick, theres almost nothing better about it.

Consider these provisions:

The Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency, is calculating the costs and consequences of the Senate proposal. But if the House version is any guide, this health care plan would hurt millions of Americans and help relatively few.

At Mental Health Colorado, were seeking ways to improve care, expand coverage, and lower costs. Were building a statewide network of advocates to advance those goals. We call it the Brain Wave, and we invite you to join us.

In the meantime, we urge you to call Colorados senators. Tell them how youd vote on this bill before its too late.

Andrew Romanoff, a former speaker of the Colorado House of Representatives, is president and CEO of Mental Health Colorado.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

Read the original post:

Senate Republicans' health care bill is bad medicine - The Denver Post

I learned how to break bad news to patients and loved ones more from business school than medical school – Los Angeles Times

I practiced the words in my head one more time before I picked up the phone and dialed. When my patients son answered, I froze for a moment, imagining the roles were reversed and I was about to receive the news that I had to give him. After collecting my thoughts, I introduced myself, reminding him that we had met the previous night.

Then I said: Im calling with bad news. Your fathers illness worsened this morning. He is going to die. I encourage you and your family to come to the hospital as soon as possible to say goodbye.

My patients son will probably remember this phone call for years. I still remember everything about it six months later. It was only the third time Id had to tell someone that their loved one was dying. Looking back on the conversation now, Im glad that I prepared for it. But I am also concerned to realize that the practical steps I took get the facts, write out the objective, address my own emotions, prepare for possible reactions, practice aloud came not from my medical training but from a business-school course on hiring and firing employees.

Like most doctors, I spent four years in medical school learning to treat hundreds of illnesses and help patients manage their health. I spent very little of this time learning how to work with patients when modern medicine runs out of miracles and only a few hours, spread over four years, learning to lead end-of-life conversations and deliver bad news.

This breakdown is typical of medical education across the country. A recent study of medical curricula, published last year in the American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, found that the average time dedicated to end-of-life care is 13 hours spread across multiple courses over four years. In a recent survey of graduating medical students, 42% reported that they were never taught how to talk to patients about dying, and 48% reported that they never received feedback on how they deliver bad news.

No doubt this is one reason why so many people have personal stories of the I cant believe my doctor said that to me variety. Just the other day, I listened as one of my patients described the anger she felt when, days before her husband died of cancer, a doctor checked his phone while they were discussing her husbands treatment.

By contrast, many business leaders direct much of their energy toward mastering the art of difficult conversations. As one of my business school professors liked to say, leadership is all about getting the details right in critical conversations.

Why do medical schools devote so little time to cultivating these communication skills in their students? Few conversations are of greater consequence than those in which a doctor must tell someone their loved one is dying. Our conversational shortcomings in these moments prevent patients from understanding difficult diagnoses, leading some to pursue futile end-of-life treatments that do not increase the quality or duration of their lives.

There isnt one way to teach these skills, but a handful of medical schools are pointing the way forward. Weill Cornell Medical College requires all students to complete a two-week palliative care clerkship. During the course, students are relieved of clinical responsibility so that they can focus on improving end-of-life care. At Stanford University School of Medicine, 20 students a year take Managing Difficult Conversations, a class in which students role-play challenging scenarios. Courses like these should be required at all medical schools.

Recently, I found myself on the other side of an end-of-life conversation. My grandmother was in an intensive care unit, and my grandfather called me in a frantic state because he couldnt figure out what was happening.

I called the hospital and got through to a nurse, who relayed every detail: The amount my grandmothers blood pressure had dropped, the number of times she was given epinephrine, the rounds of CPR. After what felt like an eternity, I finally asked: She died, didnt she? Her answer: Yes. The nurse had spent so much time on the details, she had forgotten to tell me the only thing I needed to know.

After I got off the phone, I practiced what I needed to say to my family. Then I called them and said it: Grandma died.

One of my most respected business professors someone with more than 60 years of experience in his profession told me he still practices difficult conversations before he has them. It helps him clarify his goals and the means by which he can achieve them. Medical schools need to teach doctors to do the same.

Tom Roberts is an internal medicine resident at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He received his MD/MBA from Stanford University.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook

Follow this link:

I learned how to break bad news to patients and loved ones more from business school than medical school - Los Angeles Times

Proposed Monroe medical school offers different approach to medicine – KTBS

A proposed medical school at the University of Louisiana in Monroe could offer an alternative path to a healthcare career.

Within two years, ULM could offer a doctor of osteopathy degree in conjunction with the New York Institute of Technology.

The Louisiana Board of Regents has approved a license for the New York school to operate a medical school on the ULM campus, but the schools must work out details of the partnership.

Osteopathy schools offer the same foundation in science and health as programs like the LSU medical schools in Shreveport and Monroe that offer MD degrees, said Dr. Jane Eggerstedt, vice dean of the Shreveport medical school.

Both types of medical schools require entrance exams, and applicants have at least a bachelor's degree. Doctors of osteopathy and medical doctors undergo three to seven years of additional training in residencies and fellowships after graduating from medical school.

The key difference is in the traditional approach each of the programs takes.

"The DO philosophy, and again, speaking from the MD side, they would say that they have a greater holistic approach, that they look at how the different systems work and intertwine with each other," Eggerstedt said.

DO graduates also tend to go into general medicine more. Fifty to 60 percent of doctors of osteopathy end up in general fields, compared with about 30 percent of MD graduates, according to Eggerstedt.

There are 33 accredited colleges of osteopathic medicine in the United States. Six are publicly operated and the rest privately operated. This year, more than 27,000 students -- about 20 percent of all medical students nationwide -- attended a college of osteopathic medicine.

Read more from the original source:

Proposed Monroe medical school offers different approach to medicine - KTBS

Splash Financial Partners with Bank of Lake Mills to Launch Medical School Debt Refinancing Program – PR Newswire (press release)

"Splash Financial's innovative approach to financial services is what Bank of Lake Mills looks for in its partners," said Peter Schleicher, the Bank's EVP / Chief Financial Officer. "We look forward to growing with Splash to help them meet the needs of medical residents, fellows, and doctors."

"Bank of Lake Mills is exactly the type of forward-thinking bank that we want to work with in order to have a greater impact on the medical student loan market," added Steve Muszynski, Splash Financial CEO and Founder. "This partnership demonstrates our continued momentum as we work to transform the medical lending industry."

About Splash Financial Splash Financial is a finance company that provides an online lending option for medical residents and fellows looking to refinance their student loan debt. Through unique program benefits such as deferred payment options, Splash gives trainees a sense of financial relief and the freedom to make better life choices during their training. To learn more, visit http://www.makeasplash.com. Banks or credit unions interested in Splash Financial partnership opportunities should contact Mick Boyle at mboyle@makeasplash.com.

About Bank of Lake Mills Bank of Lake Mills is a Wisconsin State Chartered Bank that was organized in 1893 and prides itself on a commitment to the communities and customers it serves.

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/splash-financial-partners-with-bank-of-lake-mills-to-launch-medical-school-debt-refinancing-program-300480427.html

SOURCE Splash Financial

http://www.makeasplash.com

Visit link:

Splash Financial Partners with Bank of Lake Mills to Launch Medical School Debt Refinancing Program - PR Newswire (press release)

Supreme Court strikes blow for religious liberty – Philly.com

Normally, the most notable part of a Supreme Court decision is not the dissent. Except for the times when the late, lamented Antonin Scalia would express his fury at what he considered to be a moronic decision by his peers, justices who disagreed were not all that interesting in their disagreement. Even Oliver Wendell Holmes, the so-called Great Dissenter, wore on your nerves with his righteous indignation.

But Monday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned a dissent that is much more interesting in its transparency than the relatively mild majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts in a case being watched by everyone interested in the tension between church and state, and the status of that crumbling wall.

In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer, a seven-person majority held that the state of Missouri could not single out faith-based organizations for exclusion from grants that would have paid for property maintenance. The facts are fairly simple. Trinity Lutheran is a church that also ran a preschool program. In 2012, it applied for a grant from a state program to make playgrounds safer. Its request for funds to resurface its playground was denied based on a state constitutional provision that forbade the use of taxpayer funding to religious institutions.

That provision was modeled on what is known as the Blaine Amendment, a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution based in an antipathy toward Catholics. Over a century ago, in the wake of the Civil War, a Republican congressman named James Blaine proposed the amendment to prevent, in part, public money going to parochial schools that were filled with immigrant children.

Many states adopted the language of the original federal amendment, even though it had failed to muster a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Some of these mini-Blaines are still on the books.

Which brings us to Missouri.

Trinity Lutheran sued the state, claiming that the only reason it was being denied funding was because it was a religious institution. And, as Roberts wrote in a you think? moment, thats pretty self-evident:

There is no question that Trinity Lutheran was denied a grant simply because of what it is a church.

So the only question that remained was, is this exclusion constitutional?

Seven members of the court, including some of the more liberal justices, said no. According to the chief justice, the exclusion of Trinity Lutheran from a public benefit for which it is otherwise qualified, solely because it is a church, is odious to our Constitution all the same, and cannot stand.

I like the use of the word odious. Every now and then a Supreme Court justice has to tell it like it is, and cut through that genteel lexicon that makes it difficult to believe that there are human beings on that highest of benches. This was not simply an illegal, distasteful bit of discrimination against people of faith. It was odious.

Of course, not everyone would agree with that conclusion, including most of the members of the ACLU. Every time there is a suggestion that public funds are going to assist religious organizations, the fearsome prospect of a theocracy raises its head. Whether it be a caliphate or Christendom, the church-state separatists are immediately mobilized.

And one of the true believers, excuse the pun, sits on the court. Sotomayor, a woman who wore a Catholic school uniform for many years, railed against the majority decision. Her words seem particularly over the top, since Roberts took great pains to limit the majority holding to cases involving playground resurfacing, and reserved judgment on whether it could be extended to other types of discrimination. It was more about discriminating against entities solely because they were churches or, as Roberts wrote churches need not apply.

Sotomayor wasnt buying that. She clearly saw the diagrammed sentence on the wall:

If this separation [of church and state] means anything, it means that the government cannot tax its citizens and turn that money over to houses of worship. The court today blinds itself to the outcome this history requires and leads us instead to a place where separation of church and state is a constitutional slogan, not a constitutional commitment.

Thats powerful stuff.

Sotomayor sets this up as if the poor taxpayers of Missouri were being forced to pay to prevent some Christian kid from scraping his knees on a rough playground. She makes this seem as if its then a slippery slope to having taxpayers subsidize the erection of a Mormon Temple, or buy new central air for a mosque. Funny, right?

Well actually, maybe not. While I strongly reject the idea that the wall between church and state was built to keep religion out of the public square, it is clear that this case isnt just about playgrounds. It could change the way that we think about people and places of faith, and their relation to the secular state.

Christine Flowers is a Daily News columnist. Listen to her Sundays from 8 to 11 p.m. on WPHT-AM (1210). cflowers1961@gmail.com

Published: June 26, 2017 3:01 AM EDT | Updated: June 26, 2017 4:43 PM EDT

We recently asked you to support our journalism. The response, in a word, is heartening. You have encouraged us in our mission to provide quality news and watchdog journalism. Some of you have even followed through with subscriptions, which is especially gratifying. Our role as an independent, fact-based news organization has never been clearer. And our promise to you is that we will always strive to provide indispensable journalism to our community. Subscriptions are available for home delivery of the print edition and for a digital replica viewable on your mobile device or computer. Subscriptions start as low as 25 per day. We're thankful for your support in every way.

Original post:

Supreme Court strikes blow for religious liberty - Philly.com

Liberty Global CEO’s Pay Prompts Backlash in Shareholder Vote – Bloomberg

Mike Fries, chief executive officer of Liberty Global Plc.

Liberty Global Plc encountered one of the biggest scoldings for a U.K company over executive compensation, with about 32 percent of votes cast going against the media companys pay plan, according to a regulatory filing on Monday.

The non-binding vote at the cable operators annual meeting on June 21 covered 2016, a year in which Chief Executive Officer Mike Fries saw his compensation jump 45 percent to $40.1 million. While all resolutions passed, the protest was significant. Billionaire ChairmanJohn Malone and other insiders control 30 percent of the votes at the London-based cable company. That means almost half of the non-affiliated votes objected to the amounts paid to Fries and his top lieutenants.

The most important business stories of the day.

Get Bloomberg's daily newsletter.

The protest follows a 17 percent stock decline last year for Liberty Global, which operates pay-TV systems in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. At the annual meeting last year, 34 percent of shares were voted against the pay policy for Fries and other board members. Advisory group Institutional Shareholder Services recommended that shareholders vote against Liberty Globals 2016 pay plan and the remuneration policy, arguing the board didnt address shareholder concerns over pay from last year.

The compensation committee failed to demonstrate adequate responsiveness to last years low say-on-pay vote and CEO incentive opportunities remain excessive and subject to automatic annual increases, ISS said in its report in advance of the meeting. Friess 2016 pay was 1.68 times the median of his peers, ISS said.

The vote announced Monday to approve director remuneration policy for future years, which is binding, had 72 percent of votes cast in favor.

The increase in pay for Fries was as a result of the board front-loading his awards for 2016 and 2017, according to a proxy statement in advance of the shareholder meeting in London. The company also changed stock awards for Fries and about 385 other employees to better align these incentives over a longer term, promote achievement of goals and keep people on their jobs, the filing said.

Liberty Global operates in a hotly contested, talent-driven global market, the company said Monday in an emailed statement. We have a pay-for-performance compensation program which aims to attract, retain and motivate the best so we can deliver the products and services that our customers deserve and create value for our shareholders.

Investors and politicians in the U.K. have become more vocal about the gap between the pay of top executives and ordinary workers. A number of companies have either scrapped their pay policies or made changes to avert a rebellion at annual meetings this year, including Thomas Cook Group Plc, Imperial Brands Plc, Aggreko Plc.

Malones voting clout exceeds his financial interest in Liberty Global, thanks to a 79 percent stake in the Class B shares that carry 10 votes each. He has a 26 percent voting stake, according to company filings. Malone, Fries and other directors and officers together have almost 30 percent of the votes.

Opposition of 30 percent or more is generally considered the informal threshold for a losing vote and an outcome that should prompt directors to address investor concerns, according to governance experts.

The most notable shareholder revolt in the U.K. so far this year has been at Pearson Plc, where about 61 percent of those who voted opposed the education companys pay report.

See original here:

Liberty Global CEO's Pay Prompts Backlash in Shareholder Vote - Bloomberg

Celebrate Independence Day in Liberty, July 3 – Liberty Vindicator

Having nailed down all the particulars, the City of Liberty announced today its plans for the towns annual Third of July celebration.

At the Liberty Municipal Park beginning at 6 p.m. on Monday there will be an inflatable obstacle course and bounce houses, face painting and the LYBA All-Star teams selling food and drinks to raise funds for their trips to the state championships.

Timothy Wayne and The Abbot Creek Band will perform at 7 p.m.

Mayor Carl Pickett will act as M.C. and offer welcoming remarks at 9 p.m., and the fireworks display will begin at 9:15 p.m.

The weather looks like it will cooperate with Monday evenings festivities. Today, forecasts call for Monday to be partly cloudy with only a 10 percent chance of rain. The high during the day should be 89 degrees, and the low that night is expected to be 75, so the temperature when the fireworks go off should be in the very low 80s or high 70s. The sun will set at 8:24 p.m.

Anyone enjoying the park, or the outdoors anywhere, during the day Monday, should wear sunscreen. The UV index for Monday is extreme.

The city invites everyone attending the fireworks show that night to bring a blanket and relax on the grass. Bringing bug spray would probably also be a good idea, but remember no alcoholic beverages are permitted in the park.

Historians tell us that it was really on July 3, 1776 that the Continental Congress voted to adopt the Declaration of Independence. John Adams himself once wrote that July 3 would be remembered as the day American became independent.

That is not why Liberty holds its celebration on July 3, but it is good to know.

View original post here:

Celebrate Independence Day in Liberty, July 3 - Liberty Vindicator

After 170 Years, The Northland’s Liberty Tribune Prints Last Paper – KCUR

The Northlands Liberty Tribune newspaper, one of the oldest weeklies in the country, recently rolled off the printing press for the last time. Since 1846, residents had unfurled their own paper published under the motto, Willing to praise but not afraid to blame.

However, with circulation figures in slow decline, a merger with the Kearney Courier and the Smithville Herald allowed the owners, the News-Press & Gazette Company, to cut costs.

Three positions are gone, bringing total staff down to 15. TheSmithville office has also closed.

Essentially it was formalizing that collaboration that had been happening already, says managing editor Amy Neal.

At 32 pages, the new print publication, the Courier-Tribune, is longer than its three component papers used to be, but there is less space for stories just about Liberty.

During its 170-year history, the Liberty Tribune covered a surprising range of local, national and international events.

In 1973, the papers scribes were there for tenor Luciano Pavarottis American debut performance at Libertys William Jewell College. In 1980, presidential candidate Ronald Reagans campaign stop made the front page.

Joe Roberts lives in Arlington, Virginia but grew up in Liberty and his great grandfather, Irving Gilmer, owned, edited and published the paper from about 1890 until 1929.

Roberts says in those days the paper was known for stories on local history. Like todays big national news organizations, it also covered Americas overseas wars.

I think he published it daily during the Spanish American War and I think the only daily that Liberty ever had was during that period of time.

That was in 1898. In 1846, the year it was founded, the Liberty Tribune had a correspondent covering the Mexican War.

There was Colonel John Hughes that sent letters in to the Tribune covering the Alexander Doniphan expedition to Mexico, says Roberts.

Robert Hugh Miller was the editor and owner then, and he was only 19 at the time. He arranged a loan of $5000 to start the Liberty Tribune. Like most of its readers, the paper was anti-union and pro-slavery. But Miller, who ran the paper for forty years, did have nobler aspirations. In an early editorial, he hoped the Tribune would become a focus of intelligence and literature.

With such a rich and sometimes controversial history associated with his great grandfathers paper, Roberts was disappointed to hear about the merger.

I think thats a sad thing, he says. Im happy that at least theres a remnant of it left. And Im sorry that the name of Liberty Tribune is fading from the scene.

Perhaps the biggest change at the Tribune in recent years, rather than the merger, is its move away from investigative reporting.

I always used to just follow the money, says Angie Borgedalen. Until a few years ago Borgedalen was the papers editor, reporter and opinion writer. During her 37-year tenure she liked nothing better than a political scandal.

During the mid-1980s some of Liberty Hospitals administrators were illegally using hospital money. One illegal perk exposed by Borgedalen was a tropical holiday taken by some administrators and doctors while their hospital was struggling to stay open through a winter snowstorm. The former editor says Liberty residents formed queues outside her office eager to read the next installment in what became a hospital corruption saga lasting many months.

Like any good journalist exposing corruption, she made enemies.

The politicians are kind of like sharks if they smell one drop of blood in the water theyre just after you, she says.

Borgedalen says its hard for newspapers to be courageous unless they have a financially stable owner prepared to back them "no matter what. She received that level of support in Missouris 2004 Congressional race. During the election, political consultant Jeff Roes campaign for Republican incumbent Sam Graves included attempts to tarnish his opponent, Charlie Broomfield, for being married three times.

One day, I wrote an editorial saying that was pretty low down for them to bring that up when they know darn well that Charlies wife died of cancer and he was left to raise two little girls on his own. They were four and six when his first wife died, she says.

Roe, who also ran Texas Senator Ted Cruzs recent presidential bid, was unrepentant. Borgedalen says he threatened to get her fired.But Liberty Tribune owner, David Bradley, supported his feisty editor.

He said, Dont you take any s*** off of Jeff Roe, and I said, Dont worry I wont!

Over the years Borgedalens stories led to arrests and convictions for some corrupt local officials.

Today, her successors at the now Courier Tribune have different editorial tastes but the Bradley familys News-Press & Gazette Company are still the owners. Managing editor Amy Neal remains optimistic about the future.

What we really pride ourselves on today is covering those stories of what are the people in our communities doing, whether its their hobbies, whether its their businesses, whether its whats going on in the schools. Neal says.

Time will tell whether the Liberty Tribunes merger and current editorial preferences extend its impressive longevity, or hasten its demise.

Danny Wood is a freelance reporter for KCUR.89.3.

See original here:

After 170 Years, The Northland's Liberty Tribune Prints Last Paper - KCUR

Behind the scenes: The Princeton-Fung Global Forum asks ‘Can Liberty Survive the Digital Age?’ – Princeton University

Americans experience daily threats to their liberty in a world filled with cyber hacks, fake news, communication silos and government surveillance.

The hacking of the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 presidential election brought home just how vulnerable we are, and more recently, the BBC reported that sensitive personal details related to almost 200 million U.S. citizens was accidentally exposed by a marketing firm contracted by the Republican National Committee.

The Princeton-Fung Global Forum, held in March2017 in Berlin, Germany, addressed the timely and urgent question, Can Liberty Survive the Digital Age?

The two-day forum, organized by the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs in coordination with campus partners, looked at the balance between privacy and security and how it affects liberty and democracy. About 450 industry experts, scholars and students, as well as 30 reporters and editors from German and American media outlets, gathered in Berlin to hear 40 speakers discuss liberty in the digital age as part of the fourth Princeton-Fung Global Forum.

Eight Princeton faculty members from computer science, engineering, public affairs and sociology served as panelists. The faculty joined outside panelists from the tech industry, academia, government, and nonprofits, including, among others: Amazon; Facebook; Google; Microsoft; Humboldt University of Berlin; Stanford Law Schools Center for Internet and Society; McGill University; University of Zurich; Haifa Center for Law & Technology; WZB Berlin Social Science Center; the Institute for Technology & Society of Rio de Janeiro; the Center for Democracy & Technology; Big Brother Watch; andthe Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Keynotes were presented by: Vinton Cerf, vice president and chief internet evangelist at Google and a principal architect of the original internet; Microsoft President Brad Smith, Class of 1981; Roger Dingledine, project leader for The Tor Project, a nonprofit working on anonymity development; andNeelie Kroes, former EU commissioner for competition policy and commissioner in charge of the digital agenda in Europe.

Please take a behind-the-scenes look at the creation of the Princeton-Fung Global Forum, as well as highlights from each panel.

Read more:

Behind the scenes: The Princeton-Fung Global Forum asks 'Can Liberty Survive the Digital Age?' - Princeton University

Liberty University already spends more on athletics than ODU and JMU – Virginian-Pilot

Liberty University doesn't move up to the Football Bowl Subdivision for another year, but according to figures from a Department of Education web site, the Flames already have an FBS budget.

The Lynchburg school spent a little more than $45 million on athletics in 2015-2016, the last year for which the Department of Education has numbers. To put this in perspective, that's more than Boise State, New Mexico and every school in Conference USA, including Old Dominion, spent that year.

It was the largest budget in the country for a Football Championship Subdivision school, nearly twice as large as the budget at FCS powerhouse North Dakota State. Only Virginia and Virginia Tech spent more among state schools.

No wonder the NCAA said yes when Liberty applied for special permission earlier this year to play as an FBS independent.

Because it has an endowment of more than $1 billion and an administration with designs on competing on the highest level, it was generally thought that Liberty was spending heavily on athletics, but how much was a matter of conjecture.

As a private school, Liberty isn't subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Credit for digging out these numbers goes to John O'Connorof the Richmond Times-Dispatch, who recently compared the football and basketball budgets of all Virginia Division I schools.

ODU's budget of nearly $39.4 million was the largest in C-USA. If you add debt payments of $4.5 million, the school spent about $44 million in 2015-2016.

The Flames are in a transition season this year and don't yet offer a full complement of 85 football scholarships. Nonetheless, in 2015-2016, Liberty spent $10.7 million on football or $1.1 million more than ODU.

ODU opens in 2018 at Liberty, and the Monarchs will be paid a $1.32 million guarantee. Clearly, the cash flow in Lynchburg is sufficient to cover the check.

Virginia became the first school in state history to top $100 million in athletic spending in 2015-2016. According to the federal web site, the school reported spending $100,165,988. Virginia Tech spent a more modest $84 million.

Because the Hokies and Hoos receive tens of millions of dollars in ACC revenue sharing, their resources dwarf those at other state schools. U.Va. spent more than William and Mary, Hampton University, VMI, Norfolk State, Radford and Longwood combined.

U.Va. raised $31 million in contributions and got $16 million in TV revenue, according to the Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts. The Hokies, meanwhile, invest heavily in the sport that offers the biggest return: football. Tech spent $30.1 million on the sport, compared to $20.3 million at U.Va. The Hokies' football program generated $48.9 million in revenue.

The federal database also revealed budget figures for the state's two other Division I private schools: Richmond and Hampton.

Richmond spent $27.6 million on all sports, just slightly more than William and Mary ($26.5 million), including $4.9 million on basketball. The Spiders were outspent in basketball only by Virginia and Virginia Tech and Atlantic 10 rival VCU.

Hampton's budget of $13.8 million was slightly larger than VMI ($13.6 million) and Norfolk State ($11.4 million). The Spartans have the state's second-smallest budget, ahead of only Longwood, which spent $10 million but doesn't have football.

Virginia Wesleyan, a Division III school that does not offer athletic scholarships, reported an athletic budget of nearly $2.4 million. Christopher Newport, a Division III public school that plays football, reported a budget of $9.1 million.

There is no better example of how much weight being a Power 5 school carries with the NCAA than how JMU got hosed in the NCAA softball tournament.

The Dukes posted a 50-6 regular-season record, beat Auburn on the road when the Tigers were ranked second, had a 7-1 record against the ACC and won their last 19 games of the regular season.

The Dukes featured Megan Good, a junior who hit .383 with 12 home runs and had a 38-3 pitching record. She was named national Player of the Year. Teams with great pitchers generally serve as regional hosts, as the Dukes did in 2016.

JMU, ranked higher than Baylor in both the RPI and national polls, yet the NCAA sent them to Baylor for the Waco Regional.

JMU, predictably, dropped two heartbreakers to the homestanding Bears.

When Auburn recently announced that it had hired assistant baseball coach Karl Nonemaker away from ODU, it was a double loss for athletic director Wood Selig. Katie Kiefner Nonemaker, Karl's wife, is Selig's long-time assistant.

"She was like having Radar O'Reilly from M*A*S*H on staff," Selig said. "She was always one step ahead. She was like the chief of staff. She kept everyone in the department organized and on target."

Before coming to ODU in 2010, she worked with Mike Aresco at CBS Sports in New York. Aresco is now commissioner of the American Athletic Conference.

It was a delight dealing with Katie, who served as Selig's liaison with the media, although I admit some personal bias. I lived next door to her family for nearly a decade in Larchmont and watched her grow up.

Katie's maiden name should be familiar to ODU fans. Her father, Rick Kiefner, has been part of ODU's football radio broadcasts since the team began and the school's basketball broadcasts for decades.

Sign up now and get breaking news alerts delivered to your inbox.

View post:

Liberty University already spends more on athletics than ODU and JMU - Virginian-Pilot

Rochester Rep switches to Libertarian Party – Foster’s Daily Democrat

CONCORD Rep. Brandon Phinney (Strafford 24-Rochester), formerly a member of the Republican Party, announced Tuesday on the State House steps he is changing his party affiliation to Libertarian.

For the third time this year, a sitting state legislator has left his party and joined the LP. Rep. Caleb Q. Dyer (Hillsborough 37) switched to Libertarian from Republican in February, and Rep. Joseph Stallcop (Cheshire 4) left the Democratic Party in May.

Darryl W. Perry, chair of the New Hampshire Libertarian Party, welcomes any others, unhappy with their party leadership, to join the LP.

When the Libertarian Party had ballot access in the 1990s, the Libertarian House Caucus had four members, Perry said. It is my hope and desire that the civil libertarians, classical liberals, and philosophical libertarians in the New Hampshire General Court will show the same courage shown by Reps. Dyer, Stallcop, and, now, Rep. Brandon Phinney, and abandon the two-party system that has for so long burdened us with taxation, regulation, and legislation that has trampled our freedoms.

Phinney will work with Dyer and Stallcop in the N.H. House Libertarian Caucus to minimize state government, lower taxes, and eliminate barriers to conducting business, and will work hard to increase individual freedom and personal liberty while protecting the rights of individuals and businesses within New Hampshire.

Phinney brings his experience serving in the New Hampshire National Guard and the states Department of Corrections to the caucus.

We were elected to the peoples house to serve their will, their interests, and limit government interference in their lives, Phinney said of his differences with the GOP. I was not elected to do the bidding of a political party at the expense of my principles. Establishment partisan politics do nothing to protect the rights of people, but instead only serve to prop up and expand government with arcane plans to irresponsibly spend our money and enact burdensome regulations on businesses, small and large alike. The Libertarian Party platform gives us, as legislators, the best possible framework to expand social freedoms, support a free-market economy, and ensure the checks and balances on government power are enforced.

Visit link:

Rochester Rep switches to Libertarian Party - Foster's Daily Democrat

Red Dirt Liberty Report: Where We All Agree – Being Libertarian

Ordinarily, it seems, I write about topics which are slightly more controversial for this column. I believe difference of opinion is a great and wonderful thing that should be embraced. However, this week I have chosen to do something that doesnt always gain readership, but I think its important to every once in while remind ourselves of our commonalities. Unfortunately, almost all the readers of this article will be libertarian thinkers, but the message applies to all. I hope you will share these ideas with others, because they are ideas I believe people generally support.

Every person knows, deep down, that he or she is a free individual. We are born with the knowledge that we have certain inalienable rights, and those rights have not been granted, but rather are a part of simply existing as a human being. Nearly everyone recognizes that when certain rights are taken from them that it just isnt right. Among these rights are the right to live, the right to our own property, the right to pursue our own version of happiness (so long as it does not infringe on others), and the right to do with ourselves whatever we please (so long as it does no harm to others).

Whenever any of these rights are infringed, people inherently know that something isnt right. It is only when someone manages to convince them that infringing on these rights are only affecting other people and not themselves, or when it somehow serves the greater good then it is acceptable to infringe on these rights. It is truly rare when people argue that other humans have no inherent rights. At their core somewhere, nearly everyone is a libertarian.

Its about the things we learn at a very early age. Dont act out violently toward another person, dont take other peoples things without permission, if someone insists on fighting first turn the other cheek but then defend yourself, dont lie or try to trick people in a harmful way, dont cheat, dont say hurtful things (but if someone says hurtful things to you, dont act out against that person), be generous but only willingly, and keep your hands to yourself. If you are someone who teaches your children these things, Im sorry to tell you but you are teaching libertarianism at its basic level. For some, this must be a horrifying realization, but what we teach our children are things which still apply as we become adults. Thats the reason why we teach children such things to prepare them for adulthood. Maybe it sounds simplistic, but expanded out to logical conclusions, these basic principles we teach work very well for society at large.

A favorite pastime of children is making up games. Weve all done it in our youth. Someone comes up with an idea for a new game and begins laying out the rules, while others join in with their own ideas. At first, the rules are simple, and everyone seems to be enjoying themselves simply trying to somehow score points in some certain way. Then, other children begin getting ideas for new rules that they believe make things fairer, or even attempt to advantage themselves or others in some way. Before long, no one can remember all the newly invented rules. People are getting called out and they have no idea why. There are points being made that result in nothing arguments and debates about what the rules actually are. Eventually, the game just isnt fun anymore and everyone quits playing. The hopes for a new Olympic event are dashed, and everyone goes home feeling a little miffed for their troubles.

Again, its a simplistic, childish view of the way things happen, but it does still apply. The difference is that we dont get to simply quit playing the game, and the stakes are far higher. We have no choice but to continue to play or we are kicked out of society (which some people may actually prefer). The simpler rules work the best. When things are boiled down to what rules best make a society function well, they generally fall into the sort of simple things we teach our children. Its when we start adding to these simple rules that we begin to compound problems and start to try to outsmart ourselves into believing we can complicate our way into better societies.

Ive kept this article on a childish level for a reason. Because, I think its important that we sometimes all remind ourselves of our commonalities at a basic, core level. We are children at heart, and while the world always benefits from disagreement, its also good to be reminded of the common ground on which we all likely stand. My hope is that everyone reading this article will consider what you teach your children. If you teach your children these basic principles of protecting the natural rights they inherit as being human, then also please attempt to apply it to yourself as an adult. If its good enough for your kids, its good enough for you. Sure, adult life is more complicated, but somewhere at its core, the truths are basically the same. It is likely that nearly everyone believes in libertarianism to some degree. By reading this article, I hope that libertarians are reminded of where we a free, and that non-libertarians can see where they might agree with libertarians.

We libertarians arent out to get you. We just happen to believe in the same kinds of things you teach your kids.

This post was written by Danny Chabino.

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

Like Loading...

Read the rest here:

Red Dirt Liberty Report: Where We All Agree - Being Libertarian

After Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, worries shift to Virgin Islands – MyAJC

CHARLOTTE AMALIE, Virgin Islands

The U.S. Virgin Islands is best known for its powdery beaches and turquoise bays, a constant draw for the tourists who frequent this tiny American territory.

Yet away from the beaches the mood is ominous, as government officials scramble to stave off the same kind of fiscal collapse that has engulfed its neighbor Puerto Rico.

The public debts of the Virgin Islands are much smaller than those of Puerto Rico, which effectively declared bankruptcy in May. But so is its population, and therefore its ability to pay. This tropical territory of roughly 100,000 people owes some $6.5 billion to pensioners and creditors.

Now, a combination of factors insufficient tax revenue, a weak pension system, the loss of a major employer and a new reluctance in the markets to lend the Virgin Islands any more money has made it almost impossible for the government to meet its obligations. In January, the Virgin Islands found itself unable to borrow and nearly out of funds for basic government operations.

The sudden cash crunch was a warning sign that the financial troubles that brought Puerto Rico to its knees could soon spread. All of Americas far-flung territories, among them American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, appear vulnerable.

I dont think you can say its a crisis, but they have challenges high debt, weak economies and unfunded pensions, said Jim Millstein, whose firm, Millstein & Co., advised Puerto Rico on its economic affairs and debt restructuring until this year and has reviewed the situation in Guam and the Virgin Islands. He called the combination of challenges in the territories a recipe for trouble in the future.

For decades, these distant clusters of islands in the Caribbean and the Pacific have played critical roles as U.S. listening posts, wartime staging grounds, practice bombing ranges and even re-entry points for astronauts splashing down in the Pacific.

The military presence buoyed their small economies, and a federal tax subsidy made it relatively easy for them to issue bonds. Over the years, they have collectively borrowed billions of dollars to build roads, run schools, treat drinking water and fund hospitals.

Congress has generally relied on the Government Accountability Office to monitor the financial health of the territories, but it did not intervene over the years when the auditors brought back reports of formidable fiscal challenges or serious internal control weaknesses on the islands. Not, at least, until Puerto Rico went over the edge.

Now the GAO auditors are back, re-examining the debt and repayment ability of each territory, amid concerns that other crushing debt burdens may have escaped notice. An agency spokesman, Fuller O. Griffith, said it would report by the end of the year on federal options to avert the future indebtedness of territories. It is not clear what those options will be.

Washington cant appropriately manage its relationship with the states, much less the territories, said Matt Fabian, a partner at Municipal Market Analytics.

Even the states are not immune, despite their legal status as sovereigns. Illinois, stuck in political gridlock, is just days from entering its new fiscal year without a balanced budget, in violation of its own constitution. The ratings agencies warn that Illinois bond rating is in peril of being downgraded to junk. Once that happens, as the territories show, hedge funds move in and economic management becomes a series of unpleasant choices.

American Samoa, one of the smallest territories, lost one of the biggest engines of its economy in December when a big tuna cannery closed after being required to pay the federal minimum wage. Moodys Investors Service then put the territorys debt under negative outlook, citing its fragile economy.

In the Northern Mariana Islands, the depleted public pension fund was wreaking such fiscal havoc in 2012 that the territory declared it bankrupt, but the case was thrown out. The government then tried cutting all retirees pensions 25 percent, but the retirees have been fighting the cuts, and the fund is nearly exhausted anyway.

Even Guam, which enjoys the economic benefit of several large U.S. military installations, has been having qualms about its debt after Puerto Ricos default.

Puerto Ricos troubles provide a teachable moment for Guam, said Benjamin Cruz, speaker of the Legislature, who recently helped defeat a proposal to borrow $75 million to pay tax refunds. Spending borrowed money is too easy.

But the debt dilemma is now most acute in the Virgin Islands the three main islands are St. Thomas, St. Croix and St. John where the government has been struggling ever since a giant refinery closed in 2012, wiping out the territorys biggest nongovernment employer and a mainstay of its tax base.

Its troubles began to snowball in July, when Puerto Rico defaulted on most of its debts. In August, Fitch downgraded the Virgin Islands debt to junk, citing the territorys chronic budget deficits and habit of borrowing to plug the holes, like Puerto Rico.

More downgrades followed, and in December, Standard & Poors dealt the territory a rare superdowngrade seven notches in one fell swoop leaving it squarely in the junk-bond realm. That scared away investors and forced it to cancel a planned bond offering in January.

The failed bond deal meant there was not enough cash to pay for basic government operations in February or March. As a stopgap, the territory diverted its workers pension contributions.

The Virgin Islands governor, Kenneth E. Mapp, said he had no intention of defaulting on any bonds.

I didnt ask anybody for debt relief, so dont put me in the debt-relief boat, Mapp said in an interview at Government House, the ornate seat of the territorial government, perched on a hillside overlooking the lush palms and bougainvillea of the capital, Charlotte Amalie, on St. Thomas.

Still, Mapp is contending with many of the same problems that proved too much for Puerto Rico, driving it in May to seek bankruptcy-like protection under a new law for insolvent territories, known as Promesa. Puerto Rico is now embroiled in heated negotiations over how to reduce its roughly $123 billion in debts and unfunded pensions.

When Congress drafted the Promesa law last year, it made it possible for the other U.S. territories to seek the same kind of help.

Now, even though the Virgin Islands maintains it has no intention of defaulting on its debts and has even given creditors new protections the mere prospect of bankruptcy has spooked the markets, putting borrowed money beyond the territorys reach and greatly limiting its options.

In something of a self-fulfilling prophecy, by giving territories the option to declare bankruptcy, Congress seems to have made such an outcome more likely.

That innocuous provision, when sent to the bond market, said, Heres an escape valve for your debt obligations,' Mapp said. That changed the whole paradigm.

The problem is that in Puerto Rico, Promesa is turning out to shred the many legal mechanisms that governmental borrowers use to make their debts secure. These include liens and allowing creditors access to the courts.

Under Promesa, all the security structures are dissolving, Fabian said.

Investors who thought they were secured creditors before now find themselves holding moral obligation pledges, which are not enforceable.

After the Virgin Islands bond offer fell through in January, the fuel supplier to its electric authority stopped shipments, saying it had not been paid; the authority was in court with its previous fuel supplier, which had not been paid either.

Then came the House of Representatives plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Mapp saw the federal money that the Virgin Islands relies on for its public hospitals going up in smoke.

Mapp scrambled. He reactivated a five-year economic plan that had been languishing and pushed higher taxes on alcohol, cigarettes and soft drinks through the Legislature. He fought for a permanent electric rate increase. He got $18 million in new federal funds for health care. He struck a deal to tax Airbnb rentals.

He hired collection agents to go after delinquent property and income taxes. He scheduled auctions for delinquent properties. He hired a team to work on the pension system, which is in severe distress, with only about six years worth of assets left.

Until recently, the pension system was chasing high returns by investing in high-risk assets, like a $50 million placement in life viaticals an insurance play that is, in effect, a bet that a selected group of elderly people will die soon. It also made loans to an insolvent inter-island airline, a resort that went bankrupt, and a major franchisee of KFC restaurants. The territorys inspector general has declared the loans illegal.

Mapp said he hoped to start restructuring the pension system in the fall. Already, he said, the government had stopped diverting the workers pension contributions, as residents began filing their tax returns and payments in April. The tax payments eased the immediate liquidity crisis.

Recently, he met with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to discuss possible incentives to attract tech business to the Virgin Islands. And he hopes to return to the capital markets.

The fact that we didnt complete the sale in January gives the impression that our market access is constrained, said Valdamier O. Collens, the territorial finance commissioner.

Investors have nothing to worry about, said the governor. For decades, the Virgin Islands has used a lockbox arrangement that makes default all but impossible.

Merchants collect sales taxes and send the money to a trustee for the bondholders. Not a cent goes to the territorial government, including the pension fund, until the bond trustee gets enough to make all scheduled bond payments for the coming year.

We have no access to the moneys before the bondholders are paid, Mapp said. These moneys are taken out of the pie before the pie is even in the oven. Our debt has never been in jeopardy.

But in Puerto Rico, such lockbox arrangements have turned out to be one of the thorniest disputes of the bankruptcy proceedings. And Collens, the finance commissioner, is all too aware that the same dynamic could upend the Virgin Islands, too.

We know that there has been a contagion effect with Puerto Rico, Collens said. The market saw that by the stroke of a pen, Congress could create a Promesa for the rest of the territories.

Original post:

After Puerto Rico's debt crisis, worries shift to Virgin Islands - MyAJC

Egypt’s Sisi Approves Deal to Hand Over Strategic Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia – Algemeiner

Email a copy of "Egypts Sisi Approves Deal to Hand Over Strategic Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia" to a friend

The Straits of Tiran and Tiran Island in the Red Sea. Photo: Marc Ryckaert via Wikimedia Commons.

JNS.org Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi ratified a treaty that hands over two strategic islands in the Red Sea to Saudi Arabia, despite protests about the move in Egypt.

The deal to hand over the two islands of Tiran and Sanafir was reached in 2016 after a visit to Egypt by Saudi Arabias King Salman. Yet the deal has faced widespread opposition and legal challenges by opponents who accuse Sisi of selling out the country for Saudi money. Nevertheless, the deal was approved by Egypts parliament and was signed Saturday by Sisi.

The uninhabited islands that sit on the southern entry to the Gulf of Aqaba were originally given to Egypt in 1950 by Saudi Arabia, in order to protect them from Israel. Later, the islands played an important role in setting off the 1967 Six-Day War when Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships, preventing Israeli access to the Red Sea and Indian Ocean.

United Nations peacekeepers maintain a presence on Tiran Island as part of the 1979 Israel-Egypt peace treaty. Under the treatys terms, Israel gave its approval for the Egyptian-Saudi agreement as long as the Saudis maintained the treatys clauses pertaining to Israeli shipping through the Straits of Tiran.

Go here to see the original:

Egypt's Sisi Approves Deal to Hand Over Strategic Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia - Algemeiner

Fighting for freshwater amid climate change | PBS NewsHour – PBS NewsHour

By Mori Rothman and Melanie Saltzman

MIKE TAIBBI: Two men mix sand and shovelfuls of cement, spending hours on end building their seawall no, re-building it, and higher each time.

Banga Roriki is working with his nephew, Robin, who has been living in this house, on Majuro, one of the Marshall Islands, for 22 years.

BANGA RORIKI: The high tide comes very high.

MIKE TAIBBI: He says the wall is meant to stop massive high tides, known here as king tides, like the one that surged through his home last year.

On another of the Marshall Islands, Ebeye, those same tides eat away the shoreline everywhere you look. Tombstones shoved free and even swept out to sea. What used to be a park surrounding Ebeyes power plant, gone.

74-year-old Belma Marok has already seen king tides destroy several homes here.

BELMA MAROK: The corner of the house was right over there, right outside that piece of concrete there.

MIKE TAIBBI: These big slabs were part of the foundation of the house?

BELMA MAROK: Yeah.

MIKE TAIBBI: The Marshall Islands, a nation of slender atolls and five more substantial islands, sit in the South Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and Australia, no more than six or seven feet above sea level.

Climate scientists warn if the current pace of global warming and sea level rise continues, then low-lying islands like the Marshalls could become incapable of sustaining their population within a generation or two.

CHIP FLETCHER: Sea level is rising in certain parts of the pacific faster than anywhere else in the world.

MIKE TAIBBI: Chip Fletcher studies climate science at the University of Hawaii. He says that well before the Marshall Islands might disappear they could face a more immediate impact from climate change: fresh water shortages.

MIKE TAIBBI: Whats the biggest threat now to the Marshall Islands?

CHIP FLETCHER: Depends on your time scale. I think the longer time scale sea level rise is probably the biggest threat. Simply because it has the potential to rise above the average elevation of the Marshall Islands. Shorter timescale though, its the fundamental need for fresh water.

MIKE TAIBBI: On Ebeye, fresh water is Belma Maroks biggest worry in his home the spigots hooked up to the town water system are dry.

His son lugs buckets of water so their family can shower and flush their toilets. the family relies on rainwater catchment tanks for water but those remain practically empty because of a relentless drought.

Getting fresh water has always been a preoccupation for the Marshall Islands. Most communities rely on rainwater collection rooftop gutters connected to water tanks outside of virtually every home and a few underground freshwater aquifers they can access through wells.

The fresh water is essential for cleaning, personal hygiene, doing laundry and of course, drinking.

But as life in the islands became more westernized, and the population grew to more than 50-thousand people, those limited freshwater sources became more stressed than ever.

And now, because of climate change the traditional water sources are at increased risk. the droughts are getting so long that collecting enough rainwater is becoming harder and harder.

The freshwater wells and underground aquifers are at risk of being fouled by salt water from frequent flooding some wells already spoiled because of high tides driven by rising sea level.

Those so-called king tides now sweep over the Marshalls more intensely and more frequently.

Its an irony not lost on some climate change experts that while the Marshall Islands are among the sovereign nations that contribute the least to global warming, theyre also among the nations that face threats that are the most profound and immediate.

Hilda Heine, the President of the Republic of Marshall Islands is keenly aware of the paradox of living here its the old cliche water water everywhere and not a drop to drink.

PRESIDENT HILDA HEINE: Weve been fighting this climate change for the last, what, maybe five to 10 years. And our islands are still livable. So we continue to have hopes. And so I think were able to make sure that people are safe during droughts. Were able to provide water, food and so on. So thats what we need to do. Its the new norm, but that doesnt mean giving up.

MIKE TAIBBI: President Heine says the government has made fresh water access a priority and points to improvements in the centralized water systems on the two most crowded islands Majuro and Ebeye. But those systems supply only a fraction of the population and for limited hours each week.

On Majuro, home to 27,000 residents, severe weather events put enormous pressure on the main water source seven reservoirs that store rainwater collected from the airports runway.

Halston deBrum is operations manager for Majuros government-run water company. he says the drought last year nearly depleted their supply.

HALSTON DEBRUM: This reservoir was half. That one, empty. Reservoir number one and two were pretty empty as well. The only water we did have was pretty much in the covered reservoir, the treated water.

MIKE TAIBBI: deBrum says a more severe weather event could leave them scrambling.

So if the big one hits next month, you guys arent ready for it?

HALSTON DEBRUM: No, if the big one hits next month, we wont be ready for it. And then well have to find other ways to provide water.

MIKE TAIBBI: But deBrum says hes confident coming improvements will one day provide all residents 24/7 water access, even during droughts.

HALSTON DEBRUM: I think if we improve what we have here what we have. the infrastructure work that we have now. Improve the pipeline. Improve our catchment area on the runway. And then build more reservoirs. Bigger reservoirs so that we can store more.

MIKE TAIBBI: On Ebeye, the main freshwater source is a 14-year-old desalination thats undergoing a nearly 5 million dollar upgrade. but right now its less than a panacea for the more than 10-thousand people living in this densely populated setting.

For one thing, the water is piped into households only 45-minutes a day, two days a week and it isnt safe to drink without boiling it.

For most of their water needs, residents come to this public tap. But even though this water is tested on a regular basis, many residents are skeptical.

MIKE TAIBBI: Do you use it to drink, or just cook with it? What do you do with it?

JIM SHIMA: I do both cook and eat with it, and also bath and shower.

MIKE TAIBBI: But do you drink it straight?

JIM SHIMA: Eh, not really. I dont drink the water here, I drink the water from Kwaj.

MIKE TAIBBI: Kwaj is the US military base on neighboring Kwajalein Island. Ferries throughout the day from Kwaj bring jugs of good, free and safe water from the bases own state of the art desalination plant.

These five gallon jugs from the ferry weigh more than 40 pounds apiece and they are a load to carry. Health risks from contaminated water are a constant worry in the Marshall Islands. Waterborne illnesses are one of the top three conditions treated at Ebeyes hospital. When we journeyed to one of the more remote Marshall Islands Arno, home to just 15-hundred people we saw a health worker educating children and adults about the risks of contaminated water and how to clean and test water to make sure its safe.

Still, after the lecture we met Tarjadik Arwan, who was drawing fresh water from one of the few wells still producing. she says children in the village have contracted pink eye, diarrhea, and typhoid fever from the wells.

A few miles away, a man named Konio Joe relies on this tank to provide water for his familys home which he built it after a king tide last year swept away his old house a few yards closer to the shore. Climate scientist Chip Fletcher says there are ways to at least delay the impact of sea level rise and saltwater intrusion.

CHIP FLETCHER: Whats the rule of thumb? If you wage war with water, you will lose. Yield and elevate. Yield to the water, and elevate.

By that Fletcher means accepting the consequences of seawater rise and moving homes inland and to higher ground. Thats why Fletcher and his team are creating 3-dimensional models of the Marshalls, like this one of Hawaiis Oahu island to show where flooding is most likely to occur as sea level rises, and what could be done to defend against it, like building more robust seawalls around the perimeter of the islands.

Fletcher says thats an approach that should be considered by the Marshall Islands and by other low-lying Pacific ocean countries, like Tuvalu, the Cook Islands, and the Carteret Islands of Papua New Guinea, all of which are seeing an exodus driven partly by climate change.

CHIP FLETCHER: There are communities that are sort of poised on the edge of the cliff, I believe. All it takes is one event, a king tide event, and that might be the killer event to push you over the edge.

MIKE TAIBBI: How close are you, do you think, to the kind of destructive weather event which will signal a profound change in the way that you should or the world should look at climate change?

PRESIDENT HEINE: Well, were practical, and I think were looking at the mitigation efforts, adaptation, how we can make the country resilient, people resilient to the effects of climate change. And we continue to do that. Because the option is not an option for us. We cannot think about evacuating our country, our island, because people are connected to their land. If were not on these islands, then were another people, another country.

The president does fret about the seawall she showed us that stands between her own home and the water that rises higher each year, a barrier that she says, erodes with every king tide.

In the meantime, the presidents across-the-street neighbor on majuro, Banga Roriki, keeps building and re-building his seawall hoping his home can survive.

Continue reading here:

Fighting for freshwater amid climate change | PBS NewsHour - PBS NewsHour

In Brandenburg, You Take Your Beach Where You Can Get It – Vogue.com

Theres a feeling of Jurassic Park, in the fact that its closed off. You can go in the winter and its this tropical world, says Maciek Pozoga, the Paris-based photographer who traveled to Brandenburg, Germany to capture the Tropical Islands Resort, an all-season theme park about 35 miles from Berlin that carries the nearly ominous boast of the worlds largest indoor beach.

Contained within an old zeppelin hangar in the former Brand-Briesen Airfieldin Brandenburgs Dahme-Spreewald district, the resort, which opened in 2004, has a 6,000-visitor capacity, a tropical sea, a lagoon, the highest waterslide in the country, and a rainforest featuring 50,000 plants and various wildlife, all of which are enclosed within a 70,000-square-meter dome. Windows let the light pour in. Its quite photogenic, says Pozoga, who shot the photographs in this portfolio on assignment for Vogue. The light was good, but I tried to keep something mysterious about it. He endeavored to keep his work surreptitious. As in other regions that were formerly under the control of the Soviet Union (once, in Belarus, a man took his camera from him, asking, What are you doing? Are you a spy?), Pogozawhose own background is Polishfound plenty of suspicion among his would-be subjects in Brandenburg. But for the photographer, it was less about showing intimate details of the overpriced bottled water or the tourists carving out space on imported sand than something fantastical.

I didnt want it to be social, or too journalistic, said Pozoga. Its kind of the point of view of a child who would go there. I didnt want to be harsh on the people . . . The feeling I had was of a beach resort on another planet, an Elysium. Thats what I was trying to bring in.

Read more:

In Brandenburg, You Take Your Beach Where You Can Get It - Vogue.com

Baylor named site for NCI proteogenomics analysis, research – Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

The Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research announced today its multi-institutional program to further the convergence of proteomics with genomics, or proteogenomics, to better understand the molecular basis of cancer and accelerate research in these areas by spreading research resources within the scientific community. Among these participating Proteogenomic Translational Research Centers (PTRCs) is the Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, part of the NCI-designated Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, the only site executing these tasks in the South.

Bringing centers together under CPTAC

The announcement of the PTRCs builds on the recently launched Proteome Characterization Centers (PCCs) and Proteogenomic Data Analysis Centers (PGDACs), which comprehensively characterize biospecimens and integrate/analyze resulting proteogenomic data to extrapolate cancer knowledge.

Baylor also has been awarded as a PGDAC site.

These three variations of proteogenomic centers of excellence (PCCs, PGDACs, and PTRCs) form the interdisciplinary pillars of the NCIs Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), which centers on using the analysis of genomic and proteomic data to eventually help solve clinically relevant cancer questions, such as drug response and drug sensitivity.

This is an emerging method of collaboration, said Dr. Bing Zhang, professor in the Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and the Department of Molecular and Human Genetics at Baylor. The CPTAC program encourages and allows multiple institutions to come together to share and contribute varied types of data, which is then studied and analyzed in a cooperative, mutually beneficial way.

Data generation and clinical implications through PTRCs

The Proteogenomic Translational Research Center at Baylor is jointly run by the Broad Institute and focuses on breast cancer specifically. The two institutions, and other PTRCs, will be working to generate and analyze proteogenomics data to further understand the behavior and functions of cancer cells in the advancement of precision oncology.

In the past, there has been an information gap between the data generation and the clinical implications, said Zhang, who is a McNair Scholar. The creation of the PTRCs addresses that gap, linking the molecular data with the clinical data.

The PTRCs will apply proteogenomics to questions of toxicity and resistance in clinical trials, using NCI-sponsored clinical trial samples.

Proteogenomics has great potential to unleash new insights in oncology. The combination of proteomic, transcriptomic, and genomic data can now reproducibly identify proteins in cancer genomes that were difficult or not possible to infer by genomics alone, said Dr. Henry Rodriguez, director of the Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. We envision that PTRCs will collaborate with NCI-sponsored clinical trials to expand/deepen our knowledge of drug response and resistance, ultimately improving our understanding of the cancer and the tumor proteome.

As a Proteogenomic Translational Research Center, we are transitioning the proteogenomics technology and bioinformatics into clinical utility, giving us a deeper look at what the cancer cells are doing in patients, said Dr. Matthew Ellis, director of the Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and co-PI for the PTRC at Baylor. The ability to access the clinical trial samples from the NCI will help us achieve big wins in cancer research in big populations, as opposed to smaller wins in more limited populations.

Data analysis through PGDACs

Whereas the Proteogenomic Translational Research Centers integrate clinical trial data and clinical implications, the Proteogenomic Data Analysis Centers focus on applying algorithms and computational tools to develop proteogenomic data to help the NCI expand its study of clinical trial and tumor samples beyond the existing colon, breast and ovarian cancers.

The establishment of the Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center at Baylor is a truly exciting development for our proteomics group, said Dr. Anna Malovannaya, assistant professor in biochemistry and molecular biology at Baylor. Cancer is a multifaceted disease, where personalized molecular medicine is not onlymuch needed, butalsoattainable, given the right diagnostic tools. It is now clear,in large part due to research performed in CPTAC laboratories,that integration of genomic and proteomic characterization, rather than either discipline alone, propels our ability to understand the underlying etiology of this complex disease.

As Baylor is both a Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center and Proteogenomic Translational Research Center site, the physical proximity of the facilities and research teams is beneficial to the project, encouraging integration among groups of scientists.

Proteogenomics and advancing precision oncology

The CPTAC program is the largest effort in the nation to advance precision medicine through proteogenomics, added Zhang. Through the PTRC and PGDAC sites, Ellis, Zhang and their team members will develop novel bioinformatics infrastructure for the integrative analysis of cancer genomic and proteomic data to advance cancer research and clinical care.

Proteogenomics will soon lead the discussion in cancer treatment, continued Zhang. We will analyze the genomic and proteomic data from individual tumors in order to determine what and how to target within the tumor, thereby allowing us to provide highly specialized care.

Proteogenomic analyses, where Zhangs group has done pioneering work, require momentous bioinformatics effort and innovation to help researchers sift through the wealth of next-generation data and pinpoint only the most critical, causal and targetable molecular events, explained Malovannaya, also the academic director for the Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core. We are looking forward to being a part of CPTAC through these new consortium centers, and to fully utilizing Baylors proteomics, informatics and clinical expertise in transforming cancer research, Malovannaya said.

Its an entirely new way of looking at clinical specimen to drive therapies, said Ellis, who also is a McNair Scholar. Not only are these centers executing very exciting work, but Baylor is the only site involved in this project our region, with speaks to its strengths in both clinical and bioinformatics areas.

Continued here:

Baylor named site for NCI proteogenomics analysis, research - Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

When Cutting Access to Health Care, There’s a Price to Pay – New York Times

And the American deficit has been getting worse. Each year, other high-income countries are improving their health at a much faster rate than the United States, and the United States currently ranks lowest on a variety of health measures, the report by the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council noted.

I bring this up, senators, because you are considering a bill that would drive a stake through the Affordable Care Act. As you mull the legislation over your holiday recess, think about the consequences of cutting access to care for millions of mostly poorer, sicker and older Americans.

Of course, the dismal health situation is not all the fault of the health care system which, until the passage of the Affordable Care Act, was the only one in the developed world that routinely barred access or limited care for millions of people of modest means.That is because violence accounts for a large share of Americans excessive mortality, and accidents take a disproportionate toll. Nor is the health care system entirely to blame for the nations elevated obesity rate a leading cause of problems like diabetes.

Americans die from noncommunicable diseases at higher rates than citizens of many other advanced countries. And many people here have at times been reluctant to see a doctor because of the cost.

Mortality rate from noncommunicable diseases

Age-standardized deaths per 100,000 people,

selected countries, 2008

Percentage who say they have

skipped seeing a doctor because of cost

Among respondents to the 2016 Commonwealth

Fund International Health Policy Survey

Whats more, the United States higher tolerance of poverty undoubtedly contributes to higher rates of sickness and death. Americans at all socioeconomic levels are less healthy than people in some other rich countries. But the disparity is greatest among low-income groups.

Still, senators, you are not off the hook. Limited access to health care may not entirely account for the poor health and the early deaths of so many of your fellow Americans. But it accounts for a good chunk.

A study about equity in access to health care for 21 countries in 2000 revealed that the United States had the highest degree of inequity in doctor use, even higher than Mexico which is both poorer and generally more inequitable.

And as noted in a 2003 study by the Institute of Medicine, insurance status, more than any other demographic or economic factor, determines the timeliness and quality of health care, if it is received at all.

It doesnt require an advanced degree to figure out what limited access to a doctor can do to peoples health. A review of studies published this week in Annals of Internal Medicine reported that health insurance substantially raises peoples chances of survival. It improves the diagnosis and treatment of high blood pressure, significantly cutting mortality rates. It reduces death rates from breast cancer and trauma. Over all, the review concluded that health insurance reduces the chance of dying among adults 18 to 64 years old by between 3 and 29 percent.

Another assessment, published last week in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that access to health insurance increases screenings for cholesterol and cancer, raises the number of patients taking needed diabetes medication, reduces depression, and raises the number of low-income Americans who get timely surgery for colon cancer.

It said that expansions in three states of Medicaid, the federal health insurance for the poor whose rolls Republicans are prepared to trim by 15 million over a decade, were found to reduce mortality by 6 percent over five years, mostly by increasing low-income Americans access to treatment for things like H.I.V., heart disease, cancer and infections.

I understand, senators, that this sort of analysis may not sway all of you. Im aware of the view on the rightmost end of the political spectrum that ensuring peoples well-being, which I assume includes their health, is a matter of personal responsibility and not the governments job.

Yet there is a solid economic argument for protecting your fellow citizens access to health care that does not rely on arguments from empathy, charity or the like. A sickly, poorly insured population can be expensive.

As noted by a study from the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, poor health and limited access to health care not only raise the cost of providing such care but also reduce productivity, eat into wages, increase absenteeism, weigh on tax revenues and generally lower the nations quality of life.

The study, which focused on the disadvantages of African-Americans, Latinos and Asians, added up the costs of inequalities in health and premature death between 2003 and 2006 and came up with a price tag of $1.24 trillion.

The good news, senators, is that solving these inequities neednt be particularly expensive. The analysis relayed in The New England Journal of Medicine suggested that each additional life saved by expanding Medicaid costs $327,000 to $867,000. That is much cheaper than other public interventions, such as workplace safety and environmental regulations, which achieve a similar reduction in mortality for each $7.6 million spent on compliance.

Even better: Instead of taking away the health insurance of more than 20 million Americans, what if you could offer nearly universal access and still make that work within your broader agenda?

In 2015, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States government spent 8.4 percent of its gross domestic product to pay for health care for about half of all Americans, including Medicare, Medicaid and subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. That year, Britain spent 7.7 percent to cover virtually all of its citizens. Finland, Canada and Italy spent even less.

I understand, senators, that these places have what is known as single-payer systems which tend to stick in the craws of some of you. But think about it. If your primary motivation to repeal the Affordable Care Act is to provide a large tax cut for high-income Americans, think what you could do with a full percentage point of G.D.P. It could even be worth the effort to provide health care for all.

Read more:

When Cutting Access to Health Care, There's a Price to Pay - New York Times