Why the super-rich are ploughing billions into the booming ‘immortality industry’ – Evening Standard

Imagine a world in which youre 90 years old and nowhere near middle-aged. An app on your phone has hacked your DNA code, so you know exactly when to go to the doctor to receive gene therapy to prevent all the diseases you dont yet have. A microchip in your skin sends out a signal if youre at risk of developing a wrinkle so you step out of the sun and hotfoot it to your dermatologist. Every evening you sync your brain-mapping device with The Cloud, so even if you were caught up in a fatal accident youd still be able to cheat death every detail of your life would simply be downloaded to one of the perfect silicon versions youd had made of yourself, ensuring you last until at least your 1,000th birthday.

This may sound like science fiction but it could be your fate provided you can afford it. If current research develops into medicine, in the London of the future the super-rich wont simply be able to buy the best things in life, theyll be able to buy life itself by transforming themselves into a bio-engineered super-race, capable of living, if not forever, then for vastly longer than the current UK life expectancy of 81 years.

The science of turning back the clock has never been more advanced. In Boston, a drug capable of reversing half a lifetime of ageing in mice is about to be tested on humans in a medical trial monitored by Nasa. NMN is a compound found naturally in broccoli which boosts levels of NAD, a protein involved in energy production that depletes as we get older. Professor David Sinclair, who headed up the initial research at Australias University of New South Wales, doses himself with 500mg daily, and claims that he has already become more youthful. According to blood tests analysing the state of the 48-year-olds cells, prior to taking the pills Sinclair was in the same physical shape as a 57-year-old, but now hes 31.4.

Meanwhile, Hollywood stars looking for the elixir of youth might want to keep a close eye on developments at Newcastle University where last February Professor Mark Birch-Machin identified, for the first time, the mitochondrial complex which depletes over time, causing skin to age. Mitochondria are the battery packs that power our cells so if we want to slow down ageing we need to keep them topped up; doing so would be transformative for our appearance. In the future, Birch-Machin believes, well not only be taking pills and applying cosmetics, well have implants in our skin. Implants will tell us the state of it how well our batteries are doing, how many free radicals, and will inform us how we are doing with our lifestyle, he says. You can store it, log it, have that linked to your healthcare package.

Such medical discoveries are being translated into treatment at an unprecedented rate. The day after the results of Birch-Machins study were published in The New York Times, his department was contacted by nine companies hoping to turn his research into revolutionary pharmaceuticals. In 2009, Elizabeth Blackburn, a professor of biology and physiology at the University of California, won a Nobel Prize for her work on telomeres, the protective tips on our chromosomes that break down as we get older, leaving us prone to age-related diseases. Blackburn discovered an enzyme called telomerase that can stop the shortening of telomeres by adding DNA like a plastic tip fixing the end of a fraying shoelace. Today, rich Californians now use telomeres therapy to prolong the life of their pets.

Last year, in Monterey, California, the start-up Ambrosia (founded by Dr Jesse Karmazin, a DC-based physician) began trialling the effect of blood transfusions, pumping blood from teenagers into older patients, following studies thatfound that blood plasma from young mice can rejuvenate old mice, improving their memory, cognition and physical activity.

Dr Richard Siow, who heads up the Age Research department at Kings College London, believes we may be soon reach a significant point in anti-ageing research because of the massive amounts of money allocated by governments and charities worldwide in the hope of making a breakthrough. Indeed, according to a survey by Transparency Market Research, by 2019 the anti-ageing market will be worth 151 billion worldwide. Life expectancy in many countries has already increased from 65-68 all the way through to 70, 80, 85 because people are now surviving heart disease, strokes and cancer, points out Siow, who has been studying anti-ageing compounds found in Indian spices and tea. We are now redefining what ageing means. How can we extend that period of health so were not a burden?

It is in Silicon Valley, however, that the really radical advances seem likely to be made. Freshly minted internet tycoons appear willing to pay any price to prolong their lives and a critical mass of geeks is working furiously towards understanding our biology at an unprecedented rate. Take Dmitry Itskov, the Russian billionaire founder of the life-extension non-profit 2045 Initiative, who is paying scientists to map the human brain so our minds can be decanted into a computer and either downloaded to a robot body or synced with a hologram. Or Joon Yun, a physician and hedge fund manager who insisted at an anti-ageing symposium of the California elite in March that ageing is simply a programming error encoded in our DNA. If something is encoded, you can crack the code, he told an audience which, according to The New Yorker, included multi-billionaire Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Goldie Hawn. Thermodynamically, there should be no reason we cant defer entropy indefinitely. We can end ageing forever.

And then theres PayPal founder (and Donald Trump supporter) Peter Thiel, who has a net worth of 2.1 billion and has reportedly invested in start-up Unity Biotechnology which aims to develop drugs that make many debilitating consequences of ageing as uncommon as polio. Thiel has also offered funding to individual researchers, such as Aubrey de Grey, the Chelsea-born, Cambridge and California-based gerontologist who ploughed the 11 million he inherited from his artist mother, Cordelia, into founding the Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence Research Foundation in Mountain View, which promotes the use of rejuvenation biotechnology in anti-ageing research.

Of course, the best known element of the immortality industry is cryogenic freezing. Despite its reputation as the last resort of wealthy cranks, it remains in business; at the Alcor cryonics facility in Arizona, 149 corpses have already been preserved in liquid nitrogen at a temperature of minus 196C since it was founded in 1972. Worldwide there are thousands of people signed up for cryogenics services, including Alcors 28 clients in the UK. The service doesnt come cheap (full-body freezing costs 165,000, while having your head cut off and frozen is around 60,000) but it has some impressive-sounding clients, including de Grey and Dr Anders Sandberg, research fellow at Oxford Universitys Future of Humanity Institute.

Its a gamble but its still much better than being dead, says Sandberg. He envisages a world in which the brain is paramount, so when his is revived it could be transformed into a sort of computer programme containing all of his memories of life on earth. If you actually exist as software you have a lot of options. I do enjoy having a physical body but why have just one when you could have lots of different ones?

Of course, if such experiments do come to fruition, they could have far reaching implications for our society. Already, a rapidly ageing population is placing enormous stress on healthcare and pension systems worldwide. De Grey sees the problem of over-population being cured by a dwindling birth-rate. Buthe says little about the impact this would have on the young.

Then theres the question of whether we will one day be living in a world defined by gaping differences in life expectancy where the haves live for 10 times longer than the have nots. Mortality has been the great equaliser from beggars to kings to emperors, says Dr Jack Kreindler, medical director at the Centre for Health & Human Performance in Harley Street. If people embark on really sophisticated, targeted therapies to repair damage to their cells... I think were definitely entering into them and us territory. As projected in Homo Deus, the best-selling book of Israeli academic Yuval Noah Harari, Kreindler adds, we could witness a schism in humanity where we have some people so bioengineered that only the very, very rich can sustain the amount of maintenance required to look after their enhancements, while others simply cant afford to do anything but be natural.

Nevertheless, the quest to overcome mortality continues apace. Last year, at a TEDx symposium Kreindler convened at the Science Museum, Daisy Robinton, a post-doctoral scientist at Harvard University, put forward the theory that ageing should be considered a disease in itself. She described the excitement in the medical community at the discovery of CRISPR/Cas9, a protein that seems to allow us to target and delete genetic mutations in our DNA. Gene editing provides an opportunity to not only cure genetic disease but also to prevent diseases from ever coming into being, Robinton claimed. To treat our susceptibilities before they ever transform into symptoms.

If this theory became fact, dying of old age might one day seem as outmoded as being felled by one of the mass killers of the past for which we get vaccinated. If gene editing on this scale is possible, Kreindler says we have to ask: Can your cells become immortal, can they live forever?

At the Centre for Health & Human Performance, treatments may still be firmly rooted in the 21st century, focused as they are on helping athletes optimise their fitness and celebritiessuch as David Walliams complete gruelling challenges for Sport Relief. But Kreindler is clearlyin awe of what the latestmedical advances might mean for the future of the human race.

I dont believe this should be only for the very rich, he says. If youre going to do things, dont just do it for the billionaires, do it for the billions.

Continued here:

Why the super-rich are ploughing billions into the booming 'immortality industry' - Evening Standard

Can The Harry Potter Fandom Survive A New Canon? – BuzzFeed News

I found the Harry Potter fandom in 2000. Giddy with the thrill of internet access at home, I googled my way from the official Warner Brothers website which was promoting the imminent first movie to the unofficial world of fan-made websites and Yahoo groups. Of course I joined HP4GU (Harry Potter for Grown-Ups), a busy hub of fan theories, but I also joined a Yahoo group dedicated only to the manners and motivations of Lucius Malfoy, because the fandom was already large enough to support niche interests. Nascent but already obsessive, the Harry Potter fandom was on the brink of an unprecedented revolution. It was about to move from mailing lists to LiveJournal and, from there, grow like one of Hagrids hatchlings into the beast we see today.

There are many reasons why the Harry Potter fandom became one of the most far-reaching and recognisable the world has ever seen: partly because of the immense international success of the books and films themselves, partly because of the way personal internet use grew as Harry did. But a great deal of it was because, at the turn of the millennium, every Harry Potter fan was about to wait three long years between the publication of the fourth book, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, and the fifth, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, and a lot of fans filled that void with fan-made content. Goblet of Fire ends with a nail biting cliffhanger: Voldemort is back, Cedric is dead, Dumbledore has told the still-enigmatic Snape to go off and do something mysterious. With so many beloved characters in limbo, the Harry Potter fandom exploded, filling that void with fanfiction, fan art, and fan theories about what would happen next.

Millions of words of fanfiction were produced, shared on mailing lists, LiveJournal, and, later, dedicated archives like Fiction Alley, Sugar Quill, and the ubiquitous fanfiction.net. Often these fics were about relationships that didnt happen on the page. There are thousands of stories about Hermione and Dracos potential star-crossed romance, and even more about Sirius Black and Remus Lupins tragic puppy love. For Remus and Sirius, fandom did what it often does and stepped up to expand on the queer relationships that languished in subtext. For me, fandom became all-consuming. I wrote fic and essays. I was even part of huge online roleplaying communities, one set in the Hogwarts of the 1970s, one set in a future where Voldemort had won. By the time Order of the Phoenix finally arrived, the fandom had a momentum that wouldnt stop.

It grew colossal. It had eras. Harry Potter fandom at its height was so huge, so multi-faceted and balkanised that there were parts of it that had no idea what it happening in other parts. I was so busy in my part of the fandom, writing stories about Remus Lupin and Sirius Black and the other characters of the Marauders era, I was never aware of the massive ship wars being fought over whether Hermione ought to date Ron or Harry. I only discovered some of those factions when I went to one of the earliest Potter fan conventions, Phoenix Rising, in New Orleans in 2007, as part of a panel about fanfiction and conventional publishing with fandom academic Henry Jenkins.

As the rest of the Harry Potter series was published we, the thrilled fandom, never wanted our tale to end. In the Mirror of Erised all we would have seen was more and more Harry Potter books, endless stories. But an end came, as we knew it must. Harry Potter is a story about mortality, about the complexity of death. It teaches us that death is something we must learn to accept. No matter how hard.

And you know who didnt agree with that? Voldemort, thats who. And, like Voldemort, the Harry Potter series came back from the dead, faster than you could say, Hang on, what is Peter Pettigrew doing in the graveyard?

The final book might have been published, but that didnt mean the story was done. In interviews, J.K. Rowling began to reveal more about the world of Harry and his friends. She responded to critique of the lack of queer characters by saying Dumbledore was gay, which frustrated fans given that Sirius Black and Remus Lupin and the line where Remus "embraced Black like a brother" are, like, RIGHT. THERE. And one of the plots of book seven was Rita Skeeters scurrilous tell-all book about Dumbledore, which said nothing about Dumbledores romantic life. Did Skeeter really miss a scoop that big?

Then came the revelation that Ron and Hermione may not have been happy together after all, causing the reignition of one of the biggest Harry Potter shipping wars, long after that epilogue had closed the issue.

And then the Potter franchise revealed its first Horcrux Pottermore and it was clear that the Harry Potter story really was going to reach for immortality as if it had never read Deathly Hallows.

New Harry Potter canon became more expansive, causing more clashes with fandom. When Pottermore revealed details of the North American wizarding school Ilvermorny, not only were fans dismayed at the way the descriptions of the houses origins made disrespectful use of Native American myths, but American fans who had long considered themselves Slytherins, say, or Ravenclaws, didnt want to be sorted into a US house that didnt have the same resonance for them as one of the big four from the books, when part of the point of claiming yourself a member of a particular Hogwarts house was part of a richer imagining of yourself as part of the beloved story.

These revelations, now the books are done, seem like afterthoughts and small in scope compared to the theories that Harry Potter fans have already come up with. There are essays and videos postulating that that Snape is a vampire, that Draco is a werewolf, and that Voldemorts pet and soul-holder Nagini is the same snake that Harry frees from London Zoo in the first Harry Potter book. J.K. Rowling has claimed that none of these theories are true, but does that really matter? Now the books are done, Harry Potter belongs to the fans. And, look, there really is a lot of evidence that Draco got bitten by Fenrir Greyback.

What I am saying here is, do we really need Pottermore when fanfiction.net alone houses over 700,000 waxings on the past and future of every Harry Potter character imaginable? Can you really expect the reveal that Dumbledore is gay to have that much impact on a fandom that has already convincingly argued that Dumbledore is both a time-travelled Ron Weasley and death itself?

In 2015, when the stage play Harry Potter and the Cursed Child was announced with a plot shrouded in secrecy and a marketing campaign saying that this was the eighth part of the series, fans were initially excited by the idea of a substantial new slice of Harry Potter.

In the run-up to the first night, hopes were high, the secrets of the plot were well-kept, and the show was positively reviewed by theatre critics. Tumblr had already buzzed with approval at the news that a black actor, Noma Dumezweni, had been cast as Hermione. (Fan theories placing both Hermione and Harry as people of colour had long been popular in fandom, drawing on the books explicit plots about the Death Eaters' efforts to preserve wizarding racial purity.) But when the book of the script was released to great fanfare and huge sales, the Harry Potter fandom was almost universally scathing.

The plot of Cursed Child was described by the fandom as being like bad fanfiction, with many even comparing it to My Immortal notoriously the worst fanfiction story ever written (and a personal favourite of mine). Its not to hard to see why fans drew these conclusions: My Immortals plot also revolves around time-turners, young Voldemort, and a mysteriously beautiful girl. A ridiculous line from the show worthy of Ebony Darkness Dementia Raven Way herself Youre ruining Voldemort Day! became a running joke on Tumblr.

Cursed Child also leans hard on one of fandoms earliest obsessions, the fractious relationship between Harry Potter and Draco Malfoy, focusing on the intense friendship between Harrys son Albus and Dracos son Scorpius. Fans saw this relationship as toying with the way Harry and Draco were shipped back in the day, making it feel like queer-baiting.

The jumping-off point for Cursed Child is the death of Cedric Diggory, which happens at the end of Goblet of Fire. This is the very same point from which the fandom leapt when we were left on that cliff for a three-year hiatus, meaning a lot of the material in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child the Marauders Era, the grown-up golden trio is inevitably well-covered by the fandom. Its our territory. The Cursed Child plot about a world where Voldemort had won was something Id explored as part of that roleplaying group 15 years earlier.

Theres a quote that goes around on Tumblr that is often attributed to Henry Jenkins, who I sat with on that Phoenix Rising panel a decade ago, although there seems to be some confusion about whether he said it. Its almost as if the quote itself is a piece of Henry Jenkins fanfiction. It runs: Fan fiction is a way of the culture repairing the damage done in a system where contemporary myths are owned by corporations instead of by the folk. The popularity of this idea on Tumblr suggests that fandom doesnt always see canon as a benevolent source of inspiration. Sometimes its something we need to rescue our characters from. More canon can just mean more stories we need to repair. Or, worse, canon returning to mess up the fixes weve made to a story we found lacking.

Fandom, though, is the last place anyone should feel that their ideas of how a story should be told arent welcome. When its the creator with all the extra weight that brings and when their ideas feel like a retread of things fans were doing decades ago, fan disappointment is inevitable. Especially when, by coming back from the dead, the Harry Potter canon is undermining the key message of the books about the acceptance of endings.

Perhaps the solution lies in what Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has chosen to do. There are fan concerns about the Fantastic Beasts movies around the casting of Johnny Depp and the first film's lack of characters of colour but these issues seem resolvable, unlike the horrorstruck reaction to Cursed Child. And by telling a story (the rise of Grindelwald) that was detailed far later in the book series, its found a place where there is much less fandom content to compete with. Back in 2000, we had barely even heard of Grindelwald.

Interestingly, Fantastic Beasts is already developing a fandom of its own, with fans spotting slash-y potential in the charged relationship between Colin Farrells Percival Graves and Ezra Millers tormented Credence Barebone. Tumblr has also noted that thanks to that comment by Rowling about Dumbledores sexuality, we should be seeing a young, hot, gay Dumbledore in the Fantastic Beasts movies. Given fandoms frequent preoccupation with male/male relationships, this seems like something that could generate a lot of excitement.

With fandom coming along to fill in the gaps left by Fantastic Beasts, the natural order is being restored. Fantastic Beasts feels like a new story, not a reanimated noseless monster. Once again, fans are playing with the creators toys, and not the other way around. Like Fawkes the Phoenix, the Harry Potter fandom rises again to spread its wings. So while we're waiting for the second movie can I interest you in a controversial fan theory that Fawkes is Dumbledores own Horcrux?

Excerpt from:

Can The Harry Potter Fandom Survive A New Canon? - BuzzFeed News

A last-ditch attempt to stave off extinction as Sudan goes on Tinder – Irish Times

Wed, Jun 28, 2017, 22:00 Updated: about 24 hours ago

Sudan, slow, unhappy and torpid as he pads glumly around the Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya, his retirement home

The love life of Sudan, the last male northern white rhinoceros in the world, is understandably complicated. Currently, it is as slow, unhappy and torpid as he is, padding glumly around the Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya, his retirement home.

In Sudan: The Last of the Rhinos (Wednesday, BBC Two, 9pm), he makes for an unlikely celebrity, but extinction can do a lot to raise your profile.

Recently, in an occurrence this nature documentary finds too trivial to mention, Sudan joined Tinder. For a creature with no opposable thumbs, this really seemed like a last throw of the dice for the species. Otherwise, mention of his predicament trends under the hashtag: #lastmalestanding.

Both social media campaign are gloomily ironic, because although there are two remaining females, there is no procreational hope for the once-plentiful African species. It is already extinct. Humans did this, says the biologist Thomas Hildebrant, and humans should correct it.

Directed by Rowan Deacon and prepared to travel the world for its detail, the documentary is unsure whether to proceed with a light step or a heavy heart. It proceeds with biographical cinereel, before building up a dual picture of threat: poachers in an unstable continent on one side, peddling its horn as an aphrodisiac, and safari park rustlers on the other. Sudan was captured by the latter and brought, of all places, to the former Czechoslovakia in 1974.

Repairing to present-day Dvur Kralove, where Josef Vgners zoo once held seven white rhinos, family and staff recall the animals passivity in captivity. I guess they had no choice, says one keeper. If anything, though, Sudan himself had grown violently disturbed; refusing to mate, attacking the females and killing one of his keepers. Once again, though, its the humans who take the blame.

Even before we follow the international efforts to revive the species by flying Sudan to Garamba Make love and multiply, instructs a Czech politician, with an ill-fitting levity that informs much of the programme. You are not tourists. the programmes focus shifts to human efforts. Cryonics, gamete harvesting, surrogate species and artificial insemination will play a more significant role in re-starting the northern white rhino than Sudan will.

Its morally incumbent on us to try to make this happen, says Hildebrandt. The programme wishes it had better news on that front a breakthrough is hoped for this year but so far nothing. It ends then, not as a lament for a celebrity rhino and his species, but as a study in human endeavours, whether perverse and ruinous, or shame-faced and progressive.

The northern white rhino is extinct, it knows, but were the ones who are threatened.

Follow this link:

A last-ditch attempt to stave off extinction as Sudan goes on Tinder - Irish Times

Not all wellness is bullshit – Quartz

Nearly every female lifestyle journalist worth their Himalayan pink salt descended on the first-ever Goop conference earlier this month. The result was a litany of take-downs ranging from the snarky to the overtly political.

The wellness industrial complex certainly deserves close scrutinyas does the rise of a celebrity vanity project thats turned pseudoscience into an aspirational lifestyle choice. However, as fun as it is to write about the radioactive swan-like qualities of Gwyneth Paltrow, theres a downside to sneering at wellness wholesale: We may wind up inadvertently dismissing science-backed forms of alternative and non-Western healing in the process.

Just ask Moroccan researcher and pharmacologist professor Adnane Remmal. Remmal was recently awarded a European Inventor Award for developing a new form of antibiotic that he created to fight multidrug-resistant (MDR) superbugs. According to a February report from the World Health Organization, if we rely on market forces to develop suitable treatment options to address such bugs, a new drug is unlikely to arrive in time. So what is the magic ingredient that Remmal has proved to be effective at boosting the efficacy of antibiotics? Cineolea molecule found in the essential oil derived from the eucalyptus plant.

The drug is currently under clinical trials in the country, and is slated to enter the market there in late 2017 or early 2018. A preliminary study, albeit with a very small sample size, found that 100% of 25 subjects who were treated for a MDR urinary tract infection were cured when they took a course of antibiotics boosted with this molecule. (While these results have yet to be published, there are several other studies that show the efficacy of this synergistic effect.)

Botanicals have long been known to have antimicrobial and antibacterial properties, and have been responsible for success stories such as the naturally-derived cancer drug Taxol. (Other naturally-found molecules and compounds have also made their way into mainstream medicinethe active ingredient in aspirin is a synthetic version of a compound found in willow bark and other plants, and artemisinin, used to fight malaria, is derived from sweet wormwood.) Still, when Remmal began experimenting with cineole, he was unsure if the mainstream medical establishment would accept it.

In the beginning I had a resistance to the idea myself, but at the same time, in Morocco using plants to cure some diseases is not newso I was quite sure there was some active agent in botanicals, Remmal said. However in the field of infectious disease, it was difficult to convince the scientists that we can obtain better efficacy with this drug than with antibiotics. This is why I combined them together.

Indeed, Remmal believes that the molecule alone could prove as effective at battling infections as it is when paired with antibiotics, but more clinical trials on humans are needed to confirm. He has already developed an animal feed additive in Morocco that has allowed some farmers to ditch their antibiotic-laden feed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention note that the misuse of antibiotics in animal feed contributes to the development, persistence, and spread of resistant bacteria.

Remmals discovery serves as a good illustration of the nuance that is often lost in the wellness vortex. On one hand, a bias against complementary and alternative medicine may lead both doctors and patients to write off treatments that actually have proven benefits. On the other, the fact that a molecule found in eucalyptus oil may be useful in stopping superbugs doesnt mean that we should all give up penicillin and start munching on the plants leaves like koalas. As Remmal notes, cineole is just one molecule of about 40 that make up eucalyptus essential oil, and the quantity one would have to ingest to benefit from its antibacterial properties would likely come with severe side effects, too. In other words: details matter.

With essential oils, Id never say you cant inhale it, or put it on your skin, or put it in olive oil and make a balm for your scalp, for example, he says. The quantity which would traverse the skin in those cases will be acceptable. But to take it orally is not good. Not just useless, but dangerous.

Remmals guidance points to the need to stick to good old-fashioned science when considering the efficacy of the latest Instagram trend. If you dont, you end up putting all your faith in coconut oil or turmeric, only to find they dont live up to the hype.

But its equally important not to dismiss all alternative forms of healing as guff. Aside from botanicals, there are numerous forms of alternative or non-Western treatments shown to have real results. In the US, reputable medical colleges are increasingly offering courses in CAM topics to their students. Even Britains National Health Servicewhich, as a single-payer system, tends to be risk-averse when it comes to experimental treatmentsendorses treatments such as osteopathy, chiropractic treatments, and acupuncture. Furthermore, a growing number of studies show the measurable results of meditation and mindfulness practice to reduce problems like stress, anxiety, and high blood pressure.

To separate the wellness wheat from the chaff, its useful to train yourself about what evidence to look for when youre evaluating alternative medicine. The National Center for Complimentary and Integrative Health provides guidance for the kind of information thats often missing from media write-ups of these alternative treatments, including how well one treatment approach works compared with another, potential side effects, whether study results are statistically significant, and whether the study was done in animals or in people.

Innovations like Remmals that integrate alternative healing traditions and go against the mainstream medical establishment have the potential to bring vital gains to health care. So lets not be too quick to roll our eyes at wellness as a whole. When it comes to jade eggs for your vagina, however? Laugh away.

Learn how to write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.

____________________________________________________________________________

Read next: All the wellness products Americans love to buy are sold on both Infowars and Goop

See original here:

Not all wellness is bullshit - Quartz

Sports minister Vijay Goel says import and sale of dope-laced nutritional supplements a worry – Firstpost

New Delhi: Sports minister Vijay Goel on Thursday said that the import and sale of dope-laced nutritional supplements was a cause to worry for his ministry as it sought to re-confirm its commitment to take tough anti-doping measures against drug offenders.

Inaugurating a conclave on 'Nutritional Supplements for Sports' at New Delhi to work out a doping free model, Goel said time has now come to provide safe and quality nutrition to the athletes in the wake of increasing international competition and high incidences of dope.

Goel said tackling the causes of doping was a priority for his ministry.

File photo of Sports minister Vijay Goel. AFP

"The import and sale of sub-standard and dope-laced nutritional supplement was a cause of worry as an unsuspected athlete gets banned under the Anti-Doping Code because of use of these supplements," Goel said in a ministry release.

"Supplements laced with prohibited substances have been found to be a major cause of doping in India. NADA has taken up the matter with Food Safety and Standards Authority due to which an advisory stand issued by them to the Food Safety Commissioners," said the minister.

He said to protect the clean athletes and meet their requirement for quality supplements, the convergence of various regulatory authorities to work out a dope-free model for nutritional products was a good initiative and a welcome step.

"A collaboration of NADA with FSSAI and other agencies will have far reaching impact in improving physical fitness standards in the country and help athletes in making informed choices," he said.

Goel called upon the stakeholders to create mass awareness about doping and its vicious effects on the career of athletes. He said he will personally understand the level of awareness among athletes by meeting them in different states and training camps during his visits there.

The minister further stated that while collaboration with Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority has enabled India to adopt international practices in dope testing, resulting in a high detection rate, there was also a need for strengthening preventive aspects to reduce the incidence of doping in the country.

He said the deliberations during the conclave will provide a road map of regulatory mechanism for dope free nutritional supplements which can be consumed by athletes without fear of inadvertent doping.

Pawan Kumar Aggarwal, the chief executive officer, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, eminent scientists, nutritionists, sportspersons, office bearers of sports federations, laboratory directors and regulatory authorities from various parts of the country attended the day-long conclave.

Link:

Sports minister Vijay Goel says import and sale of dope-laced nutritional supplements a worry - Firstpost

SES and MDA Announce First Satellite Life Extension Agreement – Space Daily

SES and MDA, a global communications and information company, has announced an agreement for an initial satellite life extension mission using an on-orbit refuelling vehicle being built by SSL, a US based subsidiary of MDA and a leading provider of innovative satellites and spacecraft systems.

SES will be the first commercial customer to benefit from the satellite refuelling service, and will be able to activate the service whenever required with minimal disruption to spacecraft operation. The agreement also includes an option for further life extension missions.

SES will work with a new venture, Space Infrastructure Services (SIS), which will commercialise sophisticated satellite servicing capabilities. SIS has contracted SSL to design and build the highly-capable satellite servicing spacecraft vehicle to meet the needs of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)'s Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) programme, which is designed to inspect, repair, relocate and augment geosynchronous satellites and plans to include a refuelling payload to extend the life of satellites that are low on propellant.

"Satellite in-orbit servicing is of upmost importance to next-generation architectures for communications satellites. It enables satellite operators like us to have more flexibility in managing our fleet and meeting our customers' demands," said Martin Halliwell, Chief Technology Officer at SES.

"After witnessing the due diligence of SSL's and MDA's technical expertise, we are confident that its new venture is the best partner in the refuelling mission field, and will be able to help SES get more value out of an on-orbit satellite."

"As a pioneer in next-generation fleet capabilities, SES is clearly committed to improving the space and satellite ecosystem," said Howard L. Lance, President and CEO at MDA. "We are very pleased to have this refuelling contract with SES and are excited to provide them with more options in fleet management."

The satellite servicing spacecraft vehicle is planned for launch in 2021.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.

Read the original post:

SES and MDA Announce First Satellite Life Extension Agreement - Space Daily

Possible mine-life extension good news for contractors – Otago Daily Times

Contractors and suppliers to Oceana Gold in Macraes, East Otago have been buoyed by news the mine could have its life extended to a decade.

Like Rio Tintos aluminium smelter at Tiwai Point, near Bluff, the company employs hundreds of staff but the flow-on effect of contract work accounts for many more pay packets overall.

Oceanas chief executive earlier this week raised the possibility of Macraes mine life being pushed out from beyond 2020 to 10 years, on the back of positive exploration results during the past quarter.

Oceana general manager at Macraes Dale Oram was contacted and confirmed exploration at Macraes was accruing at a rate that in two years could mean a formal five-year mine life.

Oceana has more than 500 employees at Macraes, using a further 60 contractors on site and for shut-down maintenance, and can employ a further up to 150 casual staff.

Skevington Contracting managing director Blair Skevington said the potential for a 10-year mine life was "pretty huge for us", being one of the larger contractors to Oceana.

"Yes, there should be some potential for [company] growth for us," he said.

Skevington is a preferred contractor at Macraes and has been there 14 years, employing up to 13 staff operating the smaller earthmoving equipment such as diggers, bulldozers and lighter trucks.

Amalgamated Workers Union secretary Calvin Fisher said "any life-of-mine extension had to be welcomed".

"There would be a significant economic down side to Dunedin, and wider Otago, if Macraes closed. They have one of the biggest payrolls in the area."

Because of the high pressure on cost controls, it was always "unsettling" for staff when they faced restructuring, such as changes to hours, rostering or salaries.

"We have differences of opinion ... but wed like to think we can do it collaboratively," Mr Fisher said.

Waikouaiti Auto & Engineers Dunedin workshop branch manager Barin Black said the potential extension was "great news for us and the community".

"People dont realise just how many jobs, directly and indirectly, there are," he said.

Between Dunedin and Waikouaiti the company had almost 40 staff, doing most of the engineering work on the Macraes ore-processing equipment.

Mr Black said the length of mine life was "all important", as Oceana was more likely to upgrade equipment sooner if the formal mine life was five years and not three years.

Waikouaiti Auto & Engineers also supplied casual staff for maintenance shutdowns when processing equipment was refurbished.

Mr Oram highlighted Macraes had to "compete" with Oceanas other sites for exploration cash each calendar year.

Exploration spending this year at Macraes is likely to come in at the budgeted $US8 million ($NZ10.9 million).

He was "hopeful" Macraes would attract similar, up to $US8 million, amounts for exploration for both 2018 and 2019.

He said not all areas had been explored as planned this year, but more drilling was proposed at the Round Hill site, where studies had been undertaken into dual tungsten and gold mining.

However, the price of tungsten had since fallen and there were processing issues that were still being studied, he said.

"More than likely it will be a gold site, but its make or break if it goes ahead."

He had appointed a community and environment manager this year, given the interaction with local stakeholders, such as farmers, who saw the greatest impact from mining activities, he said.

"Some locals mentioned the other day they were expecting us to be here for five or seven years, but here we are 27 years on," he said.

simon.hartley@odt.co.nz

More here:

Possible mine-life extension good news for contractors - Otago Daily Times

The F-22 Raptor Will Fly For Another 43 Years – Jalopnik

A U.S. military policeman stands in front of a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor fighter jet at the Siauliai airbase, some 230 km (144 miles) east of the capital Vilnius, Lithuania, Wednesday, April 27, 2016. Two US F-22 fighter, which are part of the Operation Atlantic Resolve, a U.S. commitment to NATOs collective security and regional stability, arrived from their base in Britain as a show of force to help Baltic members protect their borders with Russia. (AP Photo/Mindaugas Kulbis)

The United States Air Force will keep the Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor in service until 2060, extending the life of the aircraft for another 43 years.

All of this is made possible thanks to a series of forthcoming upgrades that will maintain its already robust structure, known more specifically as its aircraft structural integrity program, or ASIP. To pay for it all, $624.5 million dollars in Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) money and $398.5 million in procurements for hardware and software upgrades are included in the FY18 budget.

As The National Interest reports, the F-22 was built with an 8,000-hour airframe life, but the jet can be flown safely without modifications for up to 12,000 hours and can even max out at 15,000 hours. Tom McIntyre, a program analyst for F-22 requirements at Air Combat Command, said 10 design missions were built into the structure during the late 80s and early 90s:

Thats what during EMD [engineering, manufacturing, development] we did the full scale testing on against those missions. We came to find out we have not been flying the Raptor nearly as hard as those design missions nor as what we found out during the structural testing, so actually the airframe itselfwithout any service life extension programis good out to approximately 2060.

Corrosion has not been a factor for the F-22 either, unlike the F/A-18 Hornets that the U.S. Navy uses.

In June of 2015, Navy Rear Adm. Michael Manazir said the Hornet fleet required far more maintenance than expected, according to Military.com. Part of the problem, Manazir said, was an assumption the Navy made decades ago that the Hornet, as a composite aircraft, wouldnt need the same level of corrosion-prevention work as older, mostly metal planes, such as the F-14 Tomcat, A-6 Intruder and the A-7 Corsair II.

Metal tends to have problems with saltwater, you see.

As for the Raptor, most of its issues dealt with galvanic corrosion tied to the aircrafts stealth material, though none of it was on any critical airframe structures of the Raptor, McIntyre told The National Interest. To eliminate the corrosion problem, the Air Force is replacing a specific kind of conductive stealth coating.

So we know the Raptor has staying power, but the real challenge is if the upgrades it will undergo stand against China and Russia, both countries that are working to counter the Raptor. So far, the Raptor matches up pretty well against Russias Su-30SM Flanker-H and Su-35S Flanker-E, for example.

Additionally, as The National Interest notes, the F-22 may partner with the sixth-generation Penetrating Counter Air (PCA), similar to how fourth and fifth-generation aircraft are partnered up. It would take the place of the F-15C Eagle.

When the PCA comes online, it will be designed to operate and be interoperable with fifth-generation aircraft such as the F-22 and F-35, McIntyre said.

There will come a time whether it is 2030, 2040 or 2050 when the F-22 will be kind of like a fourth-generation aircraft today.

But dont expect new F-22 Raptors to roll of the assembly line. It is too expensive.

A new study released this month found that it would cost $50 billion to procure 194 F-22s, estimated to cost between $206 million to $216 million per jet. To put this in context, the F-35 cost per aircraft is around $100 million.

But, at least for folks who are fans of F-22 Raptor will have 43 more years to enjoy the aircraft. In the meantime, check out this mock dogfight between one F-22 against five F-15s:

View post:

The F-22 Raptor Will Fly For Another 43 Years - Jalopnik

Forsyth County’s top agricultural adviser heads back to the farm after 30- year career – Winston-Salem Journal

Mark Tucker found his passion early, spending his entire 30-year career more than half his life working for the Forsyth County Cooperative Extension Service.

Tucker, the countys extension director, retires today, which he describes as bittersweet.

Every time Im working on a project it hits me that I wont be able to see this through and my stomach kind of sinks, Tucker said.

At the same time, Im looking forward to retirement and Im very confident everyone here will continue to do great things.

Working for the countys Cooperative Extension Service was Tuckers first job after graduating from N.C. State University with a Bachelor in Science degree and a masters degree in 1987.

The organization is made up of county agents, professors, scientists and volunteers who work to improve the quality of life in the state at an agricultural and environmental level.

The department is a partnership between county government, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at N.C. State and the School of Agriculture at N.C. A&T State University.

Tucker said he spent the first half of his career working directly with farmers to increase profitability and sustainability.

Farming is hard work and not the highest-paid profession in the world, he said. Working hand-in-hand with farmers was enjoyable, helping with new techniques and new varieties to make their work easier and more profitable.

In the second half of his career, Tucker became director, which he said was gratifying in that he helped initiate new programs and projects.

Tony Bost, a retired extension agent who worked with Tucker for 20 years, said Tucker is leaving big shoes to fill.

As a person, you wont find a person with higher integrity or moral character, Bost said.

Marks fantastic, a gem of a person, and hes known locally and nationally for his leadership, Bost said.

Bost, the chairman of the Forsyth Soil and Water Conservation Districts board of supervisors, said perhaps Tuckers greatest legacy is helping local farmers transition from the tobacco quota program that was phased out roughly 20 years ago.

Mark helped farmers with the logistics of shifting from quota to contracts and understanding what their options are, Bost said. He has been a tremendous advocate for farmers.

Tuckers passion for farming is rooted in his childhood, which he spent on a 100-acre farm in Rockingham County. His parents grew grains, vegetables and tobacco a major cash crop at the time.

I was not the typical high school student. I lived and breathed farming, he said. I was lucky to be able to continue that with the extension service.

Some of Tuckers proudest career achievements include the establishment of Voluntary Agricultural Districts and the recently completed Farmland Protection Plan, which aims to preserve farmland in the county.

Will Strader, the director of the Rockingham County Cooperate Extension Service,said Tuckers dedication to the service will be missed.

He has been a huge asset to the organization over the years, and his leadership has really set an example for the rest of us, said Strader, who will be Forsyth Countys interim director during the search for Tuckers successor over the next couple months.

Im happy for his retirement, but sad to see him go, Strader said.

In retirement, Tucker plans to spend more time with his wife, Ronda, and three children, Kaitlyn, 26; Morgan, 23 and Luke, 21.

He is living on the same farm he grew up on and would like to devote more of his spare time to farming.

Thirty years is a good bit of time. Ive spent over half my life here doing this, Tucker said of his career. Ive been very fortunate to have a job Ive loved the entire time.

Read the original post:

Forsyth County's top agricultural adviser heads back to the farm after 30- year career - Winston-Salem Journal

Oxford English Dictionary extends its definition of the word ‘woke’ – Evening Standard

Language is flexible, and definitions can easily turn on a moment or a movement. Change can grip even the most literal of terms: adjectives can go from functional one day to charged the next. Which is what has happened to woke a word that once invoked the state after sleep but this week officially entered the Oxford English Dictionary in its socially conscious, online-friendly 2017 form.

To recap: to be woke is to be sensitive to social issues and how they shape the world we live in, but moreover it suggests that you will call them out, noisily, online and offline. It implies a distrust of elites, imparts exasperation with the status quo, and connotes action and change. The wakeful cohorts tend to be young, and obviously Left-leaning. Incidentally, the term has shades of entitlement: ultimately, you can only wake up to the existence of deeply etched social issues if they havent really affected you much until now.

Furthermore, the term is complicated by the allegation that it has been appropriated from the Black Lives Matter movement. Stay woke became a watch word in parts of the black community for those who were self-aware, questioning the dominant paradigm and striving for something better, explains the Merriam-Webster dictionarys blog. Following the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the word woke became entwined with the Black Lives Matter movement [and] became a word of action.

Perhaps sensitive of this, the OED justified the words addition to this years book with characteristic straightness. By the mid-20th century, it notes, woke had been extended figuratively to refer to being aware or well-informed in a political or cultural sense. Though Urban Dictionarys version is less generous, calling it a state of perceived intellectual superiority one gains by reading The Huffington Post.

Inclusion in the OED signifies a words transition from counterculture to mainstream. And wokes shift has undeniably been in process for a while. But perhaps the definitive moment of its evolution into a buzzword for (gently) entitled modern activism was Brexit.

Just over a year ago to the day, the country woke up literally to the news that we had voted to leave the European Union, and 48 per cent of us also woke up figuratively to the idea that the country was mired in a battle of ideals. The top line, Leave versus Remain, disguised a rather more opaque clash of ideologies which are still being thrashed out, and tripped off a summer of protest and prevarication, led mainly by the woke.

Inevitably, the dismal summer became a dismal autumn, which became a desperate winter, when the world woke up literally to the news that Trump had been anointed President and liberals woke up figuratively to the reality that they definitely hadnt called this, and they definitely didnt know who or what to call on now.

2016 crescendoed into a loud backlash against Trump: the liberal echo chambers roared while the fake news sites catered to the illiberal versions of the same cacophony. Memes lampooned the President and rumours impugned his campaign; zeitgeist television shows such as Saturday Night Live the distillation of woke entertainment satirised his verbal ticks and physical curiosities.

As the year turned, we remained wakeful: in January, women marched in pussy hats, so-called after Trumps infamous instruction to grab women indelicately. Woke boys or, woke baes marched with them, determined to show wakefulness does not discriminate on gender grounds.

It was a frantic few months, although not everything that is political is, by definition, woke. And so when the general election was called, it seemed like it could mark a settled, sleepy period. Certainly, the early stages of the campaign had a somnambulant feel: no one seemed very invigorated by the prospect of going to the polls at all, and many hypothesised that turnout would be abysmal. Politicians seemed only to be going through the motions: the Tories kicked off on a vow to be strong and stable, Corbyn didnt seem to have kicked off at all.

And then, suddenly, the electorate animated. Pundits did not predict it, though if theyd been more sensitive, they might have realised the restfulness of the preceding months was unlikely to fall suddenly dormant. Defying expectations from both camps, Jeremy Corbyn animated a youth base that is typically too apathetic to turn up on election day. It is estimated that turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds was as high as 64 per cent for this election, making it the highest turnout since 67 per cent voted in 1992, and ended two decades of disproportionately low turnout in that cohort. They had woken up and roared, and in the mean time got in the way of a neat Tory majority. This in turn drove May towards the DUP, and ignited change.org after a Facebook page about how to agitate.

So it is perhaps poetic that, on Saturday, Jeremy Corbyn (at 68, a notable exception to the rule that the woke tend to be young) addressed the unwashed and underslept crowds on the Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury, which is where many bereft Remoaners found out last year that we would be leaving the EU. He quoted Shelley, while the crowd retorted with choruses of Oh, Jeremy Corbyn to the tune of the White Stripes Seven Nation Army.

In a year, the woke have acquired an official conference, a protest song and a namecheck in the Oxford English Dictionary. No ones sleeping for the foreseeable future.

@phoebeluckhurst

Continued here:

Oxford English Dictionary extends its definition of the word 'woke' - Evening Standard

New Battle of the Sexes poster with Stone and Carell – ComingSoon.net

Fox Searchlight Pictureshas revealed a newretro 70s-style poster for Battle of the Sexes, telling the story of the infamous tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. Featuring Emma Stone and Steve Carell, you can check out the Battle of the Sexesposter in the gallerybelow!

The electrifying 1973 tennis match between World number one Billie Jean King (Stone) and ex-champ and serial hustler Bobby Riggs (Carell) was billed as the Battle of the Sexes and became the most watched televised sports event of all time. The match caught the zeitgeist and sparked a global conversation on gender equality, spurring on the feminist movement. Trapped in the media glare, King and Riggs were on opposites sides of a binary argument, but off-court each was fighting more personal and complex battles. With a supportive husband urging her to fight the Establishment for equal pay, the fiercely private King was also struggling to come to terms with her own sexuality, while Riggs gambled his legacy and reputation in a bid to relive the glories of his past. Together, Billie and Bobby served up a cultural spectacle that resonated far beyond the tennis courts and animated the discussions between men and women in bedrooms and boardrooms around the world.

Directed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, creators of the Oscar-winning Little Miss Sunshine and indie favorite Ruby Sparks, the film also starsElisabeth Shue, Sarah Silverman,Alan Cumming, Andrea Riseborough , Eric Christian Olsen, Natalie Morales, Austin Stowell, Wallace Langham, Jessica McNamee, Mickey Sumner and Bill Pullman.

Battle of the Sexeswill debut in theaters September 22.

More:

New Battle of the Sexes poster with Stone and Carell - ComingSoon.net

Improving Canadians’ income mobility is the next big policy challenge – The Globe and Mail

Intergenerational income mobility is so much more than your kids doing a little bit better than you did. The expectation that each generation will be more prosperous than the one that came before helps to erode class barriers, persuades the struggling immigrant that her sacrifices will ensure a better life for her children, sends the teenager from his small town to a distant college thrilled by the possibility of the world, allows Canadians, no matter where they live or where they come from, to believe that the future could be better than the past.

And so The Globe and Mails analysis of a study by Miles Corak of the University of Ottawa on the impact of geography on income mobility raises troubling questions about what steps, if any, governments should take to improve the prospects of people living in places where the child is less likely to do better than the parent.

Will Canada evolve into a mix of both urban hubs and prosperous and self-sufficient hinterland communities, or are we destined to become a country of a few big cities with nothing but empty or poor in between? And is there anything that can be done to shape that future? These are the choices facing policy makers today.

A tale of two Canadas: Where you grew up affects your income in adulthood

Prof. Coraks analysis reveals that income mobility is greatest in Canadas growing cities: places such as Greater Toronto or Saskatoon or B.C.s Lower Mainland or Montreal or Halifax.

That growth will accelerate. Warren Mabee, head of geography and planning at Queens University, thinks federal and provincial governments might, through targeted investments, be able to create mini-hubs in places such as Prince George or Thunder Bay. But in the main, vertical mobility depends on horizontal mobility: The best chance for your son or daughters income to be higher than yours is for your family to move to the city.

This wasnt always true. In the past, farming and forestry and mining offered stable, secure incomes for people and communities generation after generation. Governments provided the roads, railroads and ports and the rest of the infrastructure that sustained Canadas natural-resource economy, and then relied on market forces to do the rest.

Even now, children in rural Alberta and Saskatchewan are more upwardly mobile than children in some other parts of Canada, thanks to the oil boom that for decades fuelled the regions economy, a boom sustained by federal and provincial infrastructure investments.

But over all, rural Canada is struggling. The farms and forests and mines, and the mills and factories they generated, no longer provide the income security they once did. Competition and automation have weakened the economic base of rural Canada.

This is why so many who look at the question of preserving the rural economy focus on the importance of high-speed Internet as the new infrastructure priority.

We really need to move that forward, Prof. Mabee in an interview said. One thing that would level the playing field, at least a little bit, and provide people with opportunities in small communities by allowing them to take part in the knowledge economy, is going to be broadband connectivity.

The Trudeau government has committed $500-million over five years to expanding rural and remote access to broadband. Last December, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announced a $750-million fund, to be financed by telecommunications companies, to expand broadband access in rural and remote areas. On Wednesday, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities delivered its brief to the CRTC on how the federation thinks the program should be rolled out.

If schools, businesses and homes in rural communities dont have the same high-speed access as the nearest city, you dont have the same opportunities, said Jenny Gerbasi, the federations president, who is also a Winnipeg city councillor and deputy mayor. Thats what were trying to overcome.

Universal, affordable access to the digital universe is vital to moving beyond a declining resource-based economy, she says. Even if you are in a remote area or a northern area or a very small community, you have the ability to connect to the digital economy.

Education is essential to income mobility. Children do better when they have access to high-quality daycare, to early childhood education, to excellent primary and secondary schools, to nearby colleges and universities. Federal, provincial and municipal governments struggle to provide such resources in rural areas.

There may be little or no education offered prior to kindergarten; school may involve a long daily bus ride; postsecondary education may be unavailable anywhere nearby. Improved Internet access in rural communities wont solve that problem, but it will at least help by bringing knowledge resources into the home and school.

Herb Emery, an economist at University of New Brunswick, observes that the spread of universal public education after the Second World War ensured that each generation did better than the one that came before.

But now, with 85 per cent of Canadians completing high school and more than half receiving degrees or diplomas, the overall population may be as educated as its ever going to get.

A highly educated population engaged in a knowledge-based 21st-century economy will inevitably be attracted to urban hubs, he believes. The only policy priority that matters is ensuring people in rural areas are able to move or stay as their own preferences and market conditions permit.

Federal programs such as transfer payments and equalization programs may do more harm than good in the long run by retarding labour mobility and the pace of much-needed economic transformation in the Atlantic region, he said in an interview.

Children in some First Nations communities have particularly low odds of doing better than their parents. Justin Trudeau campaigned on the promise of a new relationship between the federal government and Indigenous Canadians. We are very much focused on building new infrastructure, new schools, new opportunities, he told reporters earlier this week. But progress is slow.

Connecting remote reserves to the digital universe could help overcome their isolation. Better schooling is also essential, although what looks from the outside like programs to improve Indigenous education can look to First Nations leaders like the latest attempt at assimilation.

But a truly revolutionary approach to ending poverty on reserves would require massive investments, funded by higher taxes than most Canadians appear willing to pay. More likely, young Indigenous Canadians will migrate from the reserve to cities, continuing the rural drain.

We cant know whether the expansion of digital infrastructure will improve income mobility in rural parts of Canada, or slow the migration of the young to urban hubs. We cant know whether, having reached Peak Education, intergenerational income mobility generally is destined to slow. All government can do is try to ensure that every Canadian is as well-educated and as connected as possible, regardless of where they live. After a century and a half of building Canada, this is the next big challenge.

Follow John Ibbitson on Twitter: @JohnIbbitson

Read more from the original source:

Improving Canadians' income mobility is the next big policy challenge - The Globe and Mail

Maine Compass: LePage misinforms public in push to end land trust tax exemptions – Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel

At the 11th hour and with state government teetering on the edge of a shutdown, the governor has stirred up a cloud of misinformation to distract the Legislature from its work. In his press statement from June 27 and again during a talk-radio appearance, Gov. LePage threatened legislators with a government shutdown unless they support his initiative to tax conservation land owned by land trusts.

Lets look at the facts. Already this session, the Legislature overwhelmingly defeated two bills designed to remove tax-exempt status from land trusts. Both bills were unanimously rejected in the Senate. Why? Because most lands conserved by Maine land trusts fully 95 percent are already on the tax rolls.

Moreover, eliminating land trusts eligibility for a property tax exemption will have little or no impact in addressing property tax concerns in Maine and will not help state lawmakers arrive at a balanced budget. The governors proposal will also not get the state to 55 percent in education funding or allow elderly residents to keep their homes, as he has claimed in the past.

Interestingly, earlier this session the Legislature unanimously approved a bill introduced by the conservation community to allow land trusts to make voluntary tax payments to local governments to support land holdings in rural Maine. This proposal offered the governor a chance to support legislation to ease the property tax burden on Maine landowners. Yet this bill went into law without the governors signature after sitting on his desk for 10 days.

As for the governors current proposal, the latest bargaining tool in the state budget discussions, it would affect fewer than 95,000 acres statewide, less than half of 1 percent of the state. And on roughly 20 percent of these acres the land trusts are already making payments in lieu of taxes. At the same time, the fiscal impact of eliminating the property tax exemption would be negligible.

For example, in legislative testimony in 2015, a licensed appraiser estimated that tax exemptions held by all the land trusts in Bath added roughly $1 per year to the property tax bill on a $300,000 home.

More importantly, the return on investment in land conservation greatly outweighs any costs.

There are examples in every corner of the state of land trusts benefiting their home communities. These conserved lands are an essential part of the foundation for Maines natural resource-based economy, our quality of life and the Maine brand. These lands guarantee access for commercial fishermen, protect working farms, ensure forests for forest products, create opportunities to hunt, fish, hike, swim, walk dogs, snowmobile and canoe, protect important wildlife habitat and serve as vital classrooms for students across the state.

Lastly, there is a growing understanding of the tax benefits generated by conservation land. The latest indication can be found in President Donald Trumps fiscal year 2018 budget proposal, where the president indicates evidence shows that (National Wildlife) Refuges often generate tax revenue for communities in excess of what was lost, by increasing property values and creating tourism opportunities for the American public to connect with nature.

With the important role that trust-conserved lands play providing access to hunters, hikers, birdwatchers, snowmobilers, anglers and other outdoor enthusiasts one only needs to get out of Augustas Capitol complex to see businesses and communities enjoying similar economic benefits throughout the state.

Maine people love and support conservation lands. Through six overwhelming statewide votes in favor of the Land for Maines Future Program and generous private donations, Maine citizens have made these investments in the future of the state they cherish.

Conservation lands, including those held in land trusts, are a crucial component of our economy and a valued part of our Maine way of life. They deserve more respect than to be treated as an 11th-hour bargaining chip in budget negotiations that could lead to a government shutdown.

Tim Glidden is president of Maine Coast Heritage Trust, David Trahan is executive director of the Sportsmans Alliance of Maine and Kate Dempsey is state director of The Nature Conservancy in Maine.

Link:

Maine Compass: LePage misinforms public in push to end land trust tax exemptions - Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel

Further troubles lie ahead as Ottawa’s attempt at modernizing project reviews reveals a divided Canada – JWN

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in his parliament office in Ottawa. Image: Flickr/Justin Trudeau

Call it an exercise in herding cats.

Only one year into the federal governments efforts to reshape Canadas environmental and regulatory processes surrounding resource development, and its already revealed a country deeply divided on how to assess environmental concerns with new projects and how to regulate industry to mitigate any issues.

The federal government launched its multi-department review last June after instituting a temporary system in January for projects already under environmental assessment. The goal is to replace the environmental assessment legislation put in place by Stephen Harpers Conservatives in 2012, while modernizing the National Energy Board (NEB), Fisheries Act, and Navigation Protection Act.

The rationale for the review is to restore Canadians trust in environmental assessments, said Catherine McKenna, the federal minister of environment and climate change.

Check out the latest Oilweek now for insight into Canada's oilpatch people, technology and trends.

The review of Canadas environmental and regulatory practices will ensure that decisions are based on science, facts and evidence, added Kirsty Duncan, the federal minister of science.

Over the last year, the government has been gathering submissions and holding public hearings to get input from Canadians across the country. In early April, the expert panel reviewing the environmental assessment process released its recommendations. A similar report concerning the modernization of the NEB was released in mid-May.

The preliminary results from the environmental review show the challenges of trying to balance environmental stewardship with industrial growth.

Views about federal environmental assessment across the various interests ranged from support to all-out opposition, the environmental panel said in its report to the government.

The view from industry

Industry was looking for a number of things from the review, including assurances that any new regulations wouldnt further harm the countrys competitiveness.

Canada is competing globally for capital investment in our oil and gas resources, and it is imperative for the Canadian economy that Canada remain competitive with other jurisdictions, Jim Campbell, Cenovus Energys vice-president of government and community affairs, told the task force on behalf of his company.

Campbell pointed to a recent study and survey showing the Canadian industry is falling behind competitors when it comes to competing for capital. Primary reasons cited Canadas decline include regulatory duplication and inconsistencies and complexity of environmental regulations, he noted.

In its submission to the task force, Suncor Energy, like most others from industry who offered input, said the federal review process should dovetail with, rather than overlap, provincial and local review processes. The process should, accent, not duplicate, provincial reviews, said Suncor. One project, one assessment. Duplicate reviews do not add additional protections and can add years to project applications.

The federal assessment should be a process to assess residual environmental risks in areas of federal jurisdiction, Suncor added.

Cenovus, with most of its primary assets in Alberta, agreed primary responsibility for environmental assessments should remain with the provinces.

Local regulators have the experience and technical expertise to best evaluate projects, work with local communities and perform follow-up monitoring and compliance, noted Campbell.

Campbell also said federal and provincial environmental assessment processes should be streamlined by allowing for substitution and equivalency agreements based on the principles of the best-placed regulator to do the work and a single-window approach.

When it comes to addressing First Nations concerns, Suncor said the federal government, rather than industry, must take a leadership role, pointing out that the review must ensure the Crown is upholding its duty to consult.

Proponents have the responsibility to support the Crown through direct engagement and partnership with affected communities, incorporating traditional knowledge through applications and developing projects in a sustainable manner, Suncor added.

The oilsands giant said the people and communities closest to projects should be at the front of the line when it comes to consultations in environmental assessments.

Reviews must allow those most directly affected by the outcome of a particular project to have the greatest opportunity to participate and have a voice in the process, it noted. Input from affected stakeholders can get diluted when the process is used for purposes other than gathering information on a specific project.

Suncor and other resource companies and associations also said they dont believe the review process should be hijacked by groups wanting to debate larger public concerns outside the boundaries of the project. Governments should first set public policy direction on these broader issues like climate change, and then the review process should ensure public policy standards are met.

The review process is not the appropriate venue for debating broader public policy, the company said.

Another key element for industry and provinces with resource-based economies in the review process was ensuring the designated projects section of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 remained in place. Projects including minerals mining (such as potash), linear developments (transmission lines and highways) that do not cross provincial boundaries, extraction of non-potable groundwater, in situ oilsands developments and natural gas facilities were removed from the list of projects requiring federal assessments in the 2012 legislation.

Removing these projects from federal [environmental assessment] review saved time and cost by greatly reducing unnecessary duplication of [assessments] and other regulatory processes, reducing red tape for proponents while maintaining robust provincial environmental safeguards, said the government of Saskatchewan in its submission. The province advocates for the exclusion of such projects from federal review, recognizing mature and effective provincial environmental regulatory review processes.

Green groups, First Nations look for greater participation in process

While industry looked to streamline the environmental assessment process and provide certainty to investors, environmentalists and First Nations looked for greater input into the process and for the federal government to expand the list of designated projects that require federal approval. Many also requested a climate test be included in the process.

West Coast Environmental Law said it was looking for a next-generation assessment law that accounted for the economic, ecological and social aspects of sustainability, that respected First Nations authority and governance, that provided for full public participation, and that connected the assessment, decision-making and action of different levels of government.

They also wanted the law to address the causes and effects of climate change, include strategic and regional assessment as fundamental components, and to require appropriate assessment of the thousands of smaller projects currently not being studied.

This isnt the time to make small adjustments to a deeply flawed processwe need a new law that ensures the health of Canadians and the environment, and this is our chance to get it right, said Stephen Hazell, the director of conservation and general counsel at Nature Canada.

Recommendations favour expansion of federal role in assessments

The initial report from the expert panel is promising many of the big changes environmentalists and others who submitted opinions wanted. The first is a major expansion in the assessment process beyond the environmental impacts of a project.

We outline that, in our view, assessment processes must move beyond the bio-physical environment to encompass all impacts likely to result from a project, both positive and negative. Therefore, what is now environmental assessment should become impact assessment, the panel said. Changing the name of the federal process to impact assessment underscores the shift in thinking necessary to enable practitioners and Canadians to understand the substantive changes being proposed in our report.

This new assessment process would cover what the panel calls the five pillars of sustainability: environmental, social, economic, health and cultural impacts.

While industry said it would like to see public input limited to those most affected by the project, the panel also sided with environmental groups wanting to see broader public input. The panel also said that more meaningful public participation in the assessment process is a must.

An overarching criterion of public participation opportunities in impact assessment processes is that these opportunities must be meaningful, the report added. A meaningful participation process needs to have the inherent potential to influence decisions made throughout the assessment, provide inclusive and accessible opportunities for early and ongoing engagement from the public and indigenous groups, and provide the capacity required for active participation in the engagement.

The panel said current rules regarding public participation are lacking and have been perceived as having been designed to limit public participation in the assessment process.

The panel believes the NEBs adoption of the standing test has greatly hindered trust in its assessments.

The degree to which this test has limited participation is evident through NEB participation data. The outcome of this is not an efficient assessment process or timely incorporation of public input into a decision-making process, the panel said. In the case of the Trans Mountain Expansion project review, a ministerial panel was convened after the NEB assessment process was completed, at least in part to hear from those who felt shut out of the initial process. In short, limiting public participation reduces the trust and confidence in assessment processes without bringing any obvious process efficiency.

The panel recommends thatlegislation require that [an impact assessment] provide early and ongoing participation opportunities that are open to all, the report said. Results of public participation should have the potential to impact decisions.

The expert panel also questioned the need for time limits on the review process, suggesting that instead, the time frame of the review process be project-specific. The current process, put in place in 2012, requires environmental assessments of projects that occur on federal lands, such as pipelines, to be completed within one or two years, depending on the projects size and complexity.

This has not met the objective of delivering cost- and time-certainty to proponents, the report said. Our recommended approach seeks to build public confidence in the assessment process. We believe that public trust can lead to more efficient and timely reviews. It may also support getting resources to market.

The expert panel also recommended a number of ways to increase First Nations participation in the assessment process, including implementing the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), especially with respect to the manner in which environmental assessment processes can be used to address potential impacts to potential or established aboriginal or treaty rights.

The panel recognized that there are broader discussions that need to occur between the federal government and indigenous peoples with respect to nation-to-nation relationships, overlapping and unresolved claims to aboriginal rights and titles, reconciliation, treaty implementation and the broader implementation of UNDRIP. According to the panel, many of these discussions will be necessary prerequisites for the full and effective implementation of the recommendations contained in the report.

Among its recommendations regarding indigenous people, the panel suggested that indigenous peoples be included in decision-making at all stages of the assessment process, in accordance with their own laws and customs.

It also suggests First Nations be funded adequately to allow meaningful participation in the process and be given the time to review information.

The panel report defines the criteria for the type of projects that should be federally reviewed and limits the criteria of projects that are included for federal review in the designated projects list.

Many participants favoured the continued use of a project list approach to trigger federal assessments because it is predictable and clear and places the focus on major resource projects, wrote the panel.

Requiring an assessment for projects with minor impacts was described as too burdensome and time-consuming for proponents and lacking proportionality. Participants also said, however, that the current project list is too focused on certain industries, such as mining, and should be revisited to ensure that the list more accurately reflects projects with the highest potential for adverse effects, with some participants indicating that in situ oilsands projects and hydraulic fracturing activities should be included.

The committee recommended only projects that affect federal interests should be included on the list. This differs from the current approach that includes projects that may not affect matters of federal interest. And it said there should be an appropriate threshold for effects on federal interests so that a trivial impact does not trigger an assessment.

A new project list should be created that would include only projects that are likely to adversely impact matters of federal interest in a way that is consequential for present and future generations, said the committee.

On the issue of government jurisdiction, there was widespread support for the idea of one project, one assessment.

However, a key goal of the assessment process is to leverage the knowledge of all government levels.

In Canada, many jurisdictions have the expertise, knowledge, best practices and capacity to contribute to impact assessments, said the panel. For example, the federal and provincial governments may focus on closely related issues, such as impacts to water quality versus impacts to a fishery. Yet indigenous groups also have relevant knowledge on these topics related to the practice of their aboriginal and treaty rights, their traditional and ongoing land use, and their laws, customs and institutions. Similarly, municipalities are the custodians of land use and the full range of local impacts that affect residents and their communities.

The committee said it believes the best way to connect all these areas of expertise is through a co-operative approach.

To date, the best examples of co-operation among jurisdictions have been joint-review panels backed up by general co-operation agreements between Canada and many provinces, said the committee. As such, expanding the co-operation model to include all relevant jurisdictions is the preferred method to carry out jurisdictional co-ordination.

Climate change a sticky issue

The expert panel said the issue of climate change has proved difficult to address under existing environmental assessment regulations.

Current processes and interim principles take into account some aspects of climate change, but there is an urgent national need for clarity and consistency on how to consider climate change in project and regional assessments, it said.

The panel said criteria, modelling and methodology must be established to assess a projects contribution to climate change, consider how climate change may impact the future environmental setting of a project, and consider a projects or regions long-term sustainability and resiliency in a changing environmental setting.

Industry is concerned the issue of climate change has sidelined project assessments and turned them into debates over government policy. The panel addressed this issue by recommending the federal government lead a strategic impact assessment or similar co-operative and collaborative mechanism on the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change to provide direction on how to implement the framework and related initiatives in future federal project and regional assessments.

Like this? You should be reading Oilweek.

Read the rest here:

Further troubles lie ahead as Ottawa's attempt at modernizing project reviews reveals a divided Canada - JWN

Robots stealing human jobs isn’t the problem. This is. – USA TODAY

A new report from Paysa suggests automation jobs will put 10,000 people to work, and big companies will spend $650 million on annual salaries to make it happen. Sean Dowling (@seandowlingtv) has more. Buzz60

Chiquola Manufacturing Co. employees work with Whitin roving frames in Honea Path, S.C.(Photo: Gannett)

A 15-hour work week. That's what influential economist John Maynard Keynes prophesied in hisfamous 1930 essay"Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren,"forecasting that in the next century technology would make us so productive we wouldn't know what to do with all our free time.

This is not the future Keynes imagined.

Many higher income workers put in 50 or more hoursper week, according to an NPR/Harvard/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation poll. Meanwhile, lower-income workers are fighting to get enough hours to pay the bills, as shown in a University of Washington report on Seattle's $15 minimum wage publicized this week.

Yet some of today's best minds are making Keynes-like predictions. This month, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak said robots will one day replace us but we needn'tworry for a fewhundred years.

In May, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Harvard's 2017 class that increased automation would strip us not only of our jobs but also of our sense of purpose.

Mark Zuckerberg told graduating students at Harvard, the university he dropped out of to create Facebook, to create a purpose for today's world. (May 25) AP

Automation. Artificial intelligence. Machine learning. Many experts disagree on what these new technologies will mean for the workforce, the economy and our quality of life. But where they do agree is that technology will change (or completely take over) tasks that humans do now. The most pressing question, many economists and labor historians say,is whether people will have the skills to perform the jobs that are left.

"We are moving into an era of extensive automation and a period in which capitalism is just simply not going to needas many workers,"said Jennifer Klein,a Yale University professor who focuses on labor history. "It's not just automating in manufacturing but anything with a service counter:grocery stores, movie theaters, car rentals ... and this is now going to move into food service, too.

"What are we going to do in an era that doesn't need as many people? It's not a social question we've seriously addressed."

Instead of worrying about the mass unemployment a robot Armageddon could bring, we should instead shift our attention to making sure workers particularly low-wage workers have the skills they need to compete in an automated era, saysJames Bessen, an economist, Boston University law lecturer, and author of the book Learning by Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth.

"The problem is people are losing jobs and we're not doing a good job of getting them the skills and knowledge they need to work for the new jobs," Bessen said.

Addressing this skills gap will require a paradigm shift both in the way we approach job training and in the way we approach education, he said.

"Technology is very disruptive. It is destroying jobs. And while it iscreating others, because wedont have an easy way to transition people from one occupation to another, were going to face increased social disruption," he said.

In this new age, Bessen said, we can't treat learning as finite.

"We need to move to a world where there is lifelong learning," he said. "You have to get rid of this idea that we go to school once when were young and that covers us for our career. ... Schools need to teach people how to learn, how to teach themselves if necessary."

A universal basic income (UBI) has been proposed as one possible solution to the loss of jobs caused by automation. A UBIwould give everyone a fixed amount of money, regularly, no matter what. Proponents say not only would it help eradicate poverty, butit would be especially useful forpeople whose jobs are eliminated by automation, giving them the flexibility to learn new skills required in a new job or industry, without having to worry about howthey'd eat or pay rent.

Some also suggest it would breed innovation. In his Harvard speech, Zuckerberg told the audience:"We should have a society that measures progress not just by economic metrics like GDP, but by how many of us have a role we find meaningful. We should explore ideas likeuniversal basic incometo give everyone a cushion to try new things."

Several countries are exploring or experimenting with a UBI, including Kenya, Finland, the Netherlands and Canada.

Americans have been worrying about automation wiping out jobs for centuries, and in some occupations, automation has drasticallyreduced the need for human labor.

But the relationship between automation and employment is complex. When automation replaces human labor, it can also reduce cost and improve quality, which, in turn,increases demand.

Marlin Steel in Baltimore, Maryland, was able to stay in business by automating its processes to stay competitive when many other manufacturing jobs went overseas. Video by Jasper Colt, USA TODAY

Such was the case in textiles. In the early 19th century, 98% of the work of a weaver became automated, but the number of textile workers actually grew.

"At the beginning of the 19th century, it was so expensive that ... atypical person had one set of clothing," Bessen said. "As the price started dropping because of automation, people started buying more and more, so that by the 1920s the average person wasconsuming 10 times as much cloth per capitaper year."

More demand for cloth meant a greater needfor textile workers. But that demand, eventually, was satisfied.

When ATMs were introduced in the 1970s, people thought they would be a death knell for bank tellers. The number of tellers per bank did fall, but because ATMs reduced the cost of operating a bank branch, more branches opened, which in turn hired more tellers.U.S. bank teller employment rose by 50,000 between 1980 and 2010.But the tasks of those tellers evolved from simply dispensing cash to selling other things the banks provided, like credit cards and loans. And the skills those tellers had that the ATMs didn't like problem solving became more valuable.

Whencomputers take over some human tasks within an occupation, Bessen's research showsthose occupations grow faster, not slower.

"AI is coming in and its going to make accountants that much better, its going to make financial advisers that much better, its going to make health care providers that much more effective, so were going to be using more of their services at least for the next 10 or 20 years," Bessen said.

These examples, though, are of occupations where automation replaces some part of human labor. What about when automation completely replaces the humans in an entire occupation? So far, that's been pretty rare.Ina 2016 paper, Bessen looked at271 detailed occupations used in the 1950 Census and found that while many occupations no longer exist, in only one case was the demise of an occupation attributed mostly to automation: the elevator operator.

A 2017 report from the McKinsey Global Institute found that less than 5% of occupations can be completely automated.

History has taught us a lot about how automation disrupts industries, though economists admit they can't account for the infinite ways technology may unsettle work in the future.

When a new era ofautomation does usher in major economic and social disruption which Bessen doesn't predict will happen for at least another 30 to 50 years it's humans that will ultimately decide the ways in which robots get to change the world.

"It's not a threat as much as an opportunity," he said. "Its how we take advantage of it as individuals and a society that will determine the outcome."

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2tsZ7ag

Read more from the original source:

Robots stealing human jobs isn't the problem. This is. - USA TODAY

Women, Minorities Are More Likely To Lose Jobs To Automation – KNPR

The next wave of job automation has landed in Las Vegas.

A bar staffed by robots, called The Tipsy Robot, will open Friday on the Strip and the trend is likely here to stay. (Ed. Note:The bar is also staffed by people. The robots are are an entertainment attraction, but robot bartenders could become more common in the future.)

Of all American cities, Las Vegas is most susceptible to automation due to its high number of service industry job, and a new study from the University of Redlands says that women, minorities, and teenagers hold jobs that are most likely to be automated.

Johannes Moenius is a professor at the University of Redlands who helped conduct the survey. He was quick to point to the reason for that.

If you look at the jobs that are most susceptible to automation ... there'sa lot more women working in those jobs than men," he said.

Moenius pointed to the grocery store clerk as an example of a job that is slowly being taken over by self-serve kiosks and bank teller positions are almost entirely taken by ATMs.

It is not just about the job, Moenius said, it is really about how much education a person has.

People who have no high school degree, no high school diploma, have an almost a 75 percent chance of being automated away, he said.

Moenius said the higher the degree a person obtains the lower the chances that his or her jobwill be replaced by automation. In the survey, Asians fared much better at having a job that wasn't going to be replaced by a robot, he said. He credited that to the fact that Asians are more likely to have at least a bachelor degree.

The more education you have the higher insurance you have, he said.

Many people have decried the high cost of a college degree, which is why a technical degree is often suggested as an alternative to a bachelor degree. Moenius agrees that a technical degree has its merits he believes it only goes so far.

It is definitely true that if you get a technical degree and you continue to get an education on the side then you will get work less and less repetitive type tasks that make you less likely, less susceptible to getting a job automated away," he said."However, its the creative, problem-solving part that allows people to avoid the risk of automation.

One of the trickiest parts of the equation is young people. The study found that teenagers are also more likely to have their jobs automated away. However, many don't have the job experience to get a highly skilled job. Moenius also said young people who haven't gone to college should look to go to college. His concern is the people who didn't make that choice.

If youre dropping out of high school at age 16, you start working, you get some expertise, you become even a schooled artisan in your job, the probability that you wont have a job 10 years or 20 years down the road is very, very, very high, he said.

Continue reading here:

Women, Minorities Are More Likely To Lose Jobs To Automation - KNPR

Automation benefits outweigh losses, says Genpact CEO – Economic Times

BENGALURU: Genpact does not believe in balancing out the im pact of au tomation on its top line as the bene fits far outweigh the losses, the CEO of the business pro cess management (BPM) company told ET.

BPM companies are typically considered to be the first in line to be hit by automation, as a more people-intensive business is replaced by software robots and platforms. "You shouldn't try to balance it out. Clients are looking to us to help them transform themselves and if in that process revenue reduces, then it is all right. We are such an under-penetrated company that the opportunity is very large," NV 'Tiger' Tyagarajan, told ET.

"In some global clients, we are actually growing at about 19% but when we give back the gains from automation, we grow at about 13%." Genpact has launched a new plat form that combines analytics, automation and artificial intelligence.

The platform, called Genpact Cora, is built using the company's original process and industry domain knowledge with new digital capabilities from its acquisitions of Rage Frameworks, PNMsoft, and others.

"We believe this is a unique industry platform that combines automation, analytic engines and artificial intelligence. It is modular and includes governance around the implementation," Tyagarajan said.

The platform can be sold with a number of ways of pricing, including transaction-based and outcome-based pricing. There will also be a component of licensing fees as part of the contracts, Tyagarajan said.

Genpact has acquired artificial intelligence services provider Rage Frameworks and insurance service company Brightclaim in the last six months. Genpact has raised its guidance for 2017, helped by its acquisitions. It expects revenue of $2.63-2.70 billion in 2016.

Read more here:

Automation benefits outweigh losses, says Genpact CEO - Economic Times

UK workers optimistic about automation – BetaNews

Every second office worker in the UK (48 percent) is optimistic about what automation technologies will do to their workplace in the future. The only problems are thatits expensive and infrastructure is lacking.

This is according to a new report byCapgemini, based on a poll of more than 1,000 UK office workers.

Four in ten (40 percent) believe machine learning will have a positive impact, while 32 percent said the same for robotics. Only 10 percent said automation might have a negative impact.

Almost half (47 percent) have seriously thought about how automation can support their departments on a daily basis. When it comes to finances, the percentage jumps to 85. Business owners and directors think as much as 40 percent of business tasks could be automated before 2020. That includes invoicing, managing expense claims and admin tasks.

Office workers, however, arent afraid of losing their jobs. They see automation as a way to free up time, so that they could do tasks of higher value.

"Its really heartening to see the optimism for automation technologies among the UKs office workers --particularly when nearly half have given serious thought to implementation in their own workplace," said Lee Beardmore, vice president and chief technology officer of Capgeminis Business Services Unit.

"At present our survey estimates that around 13percent of businesses in the UK are benefiting from automation, but theres still a lot that havent seen anything yet. We certainly expect this figure to rise in the near future as more and more businesses realize the transformational power of technologies such as AI, robotics and automation. All of these technologies represent an opportunity for growth for businesses in every industry sector."

Published under license from ITProPortal.com, a Future plc Publication. All rights reserved.

Photo Credit: Wright Studio/Shutterstock

Read more from the original source:

UK workers optimistic about automation - BetaNews

Perfect storm of cutting-edge automation is imminent – Independent Online

To accelerate growth across the continent, Rockwell acquired Hiprom in 2011. Hiprom, a Johannesburg-based corporation, is a leading process control and automation systems integrator specialising in mining and mineral processing.

When Rockwell acquired Hiprom, a company spokesperson revealed that the acquisition was a strategic play to strengthen their global project management and delivery capabilities in the mining, metals and minerals industries.

According to John Lewis, Rockwells current director of business partnering, Hiprom - which is still run out of South Africa - is now the groups global mining competency centre of excellence.

In a recent podcast conversation I had with Lewis, he shared how Rockwell is adapting to changing times by hiring software developers and tech-savvy business specialists who can speak to the myriad of optimisation challenges faced by their clients all over the world.

When asked what percentage of Rockwells output, in terms of the solutions they deliver to clients, is hardware versus consulting services and software, Lewis stated that the ratio is roughly 70percent hardware, 20percent engineering services and 10percent software.

He hastened to add that the mix is changing rapidly, moving away from hardware and growing towards solutions and software because of to the broad global trend towards digital transformation.

When Lewis first joined Rockwell in 1979, the company was almost 100percent a hardware business and their service proposition to factory owners was Buy our stuff, and well come out and replace anything that breaks.

Over time, that concept grew to include: Enlist us to help you engineer solutions.

Lewis admits their clients had a hard time adjusting to being charged for consulting services, but apparently soon enough realised the benefits of having a competent technical partner on call to keep machine downtime to a minimum.

As computing played a more significant role in how leading industrialists hacked operational efficiency issues, software development and deployment became more and more important.

Today, Rockwell is expeditiously researching and testing various software applications and service delivery models which often involve the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and the Internet of Things (IoT).

When asked how he responds to pro-labour critics who assert that companies like Rockwell undermine livelihoods by helping industrialists harness automation to completely eliminate the need for human participation in factory processes, Lewis stated that he is yet to encounter a lights out, no humans involved industrial operation.

He reckoned that it is largely unsafe and onerous tasks, as well as repetitive jobs which are difficult for humans to do consistently, that are being automated.

UNIQUE SKILLS

Lewis insisted that while all such work is being taken over by machines, many other jobs are being created requiring different and more unique skills.

He did, however, admit that such jobs are not necessarily created at a rate of one for one, referencing the growing need for individuals possessing higher tech competencies to install, programme and maintain cutting-edge industrial equipment, as well as write and integrate software.

Babusi Nyoni is a Zimbabwean senior user experience (UX) designer at Thomson Reuters and is based in Cape Town.

Nyoni happens to be low-key, but one of the continents leading AI and machine learning practitioners.

In October 2016, he gave a TEDx talk on how predictive modelling and historic data could be used to anticipate Africas next refugee crisis.

Shortly afterwards, the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) in Geneva reached out to rope him in as a consultant.

Since then, he has helped the UNHCR build a prototype that uses conflict and food security data to predict the magnitude of displacement in one of the worlds war-torn nations.

A production version of the tool is already in the works, and once it is ready, the UNCHR plans to make it fully accessible for use by governments, civic organisations, corporations, and individuals looking to pre-empt impending humanitarian crises.

I have come to value Nyonis views on how advances in robotics and automated software are likely to change everyday life, not least because we share a fairly idealistic world view.

During a recent interview, Nyoni told me that despite spending a great deal of time working on retail AI applications, he is most excited about the future of AI in biotech.

He cited how the beginning of 2017 saw the approval of the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved application of machine learning and deep learning for diagnosing heart conditions. (Yes, there is a difference between machine learning and deep learning, but I will not be diving into that.)

Not only is Nyoni excited by innovations such as the current use of AI-led computer vision to help visually impaired people perceive the world around them, but he is especially enlivened by the prospect of fast-learning software being deployed in ailing bodies.

As the likes of Rockwell continue to promote the trend towards mechanised automation across the worlds leading industries, the potential use cases for IoT will undoubtedly multiply.

As that happens, we should expect a spike in the demand for AI and machine learning applications that will be used to make sense of the vast amounts of data that connected devices collect.

Ultimately, our need to perform accurate big data analysis needs to keep up with such advances if mankind is to benefit from IoT deployment. Nyoni reckons that if we fail at this, the consequences could be cataclysmic - picture hundreds of thousands of pacemakers malfunctioning, factories melting down and hundred-car pileups.

What Nyoni and I most decidedly do not have in common is his Elon Musk-esque view that humanity is speedily edging towards a singularity with the machine. He would point to the way social media footprints are becoming an extension of peoples existence as opposed to an alternate plane, as might have been the case initially.

OUTSOURCED

Nyoni believes that because many of us have outsourced decision-making power to AIs such as Googles to inform how we navigate our daily lives, ie interact with fellow humans, relate to our physical environment, and plan for the future, we might be opening ourselves up to catastrophic events should the AIs weve allowed to run our lives be compromised.

On one hand, I totally discard the very notion of singularity.

On the other, I take John Lewis assertion that industrial automation wont compromise livelihoods with a massive pinch of salt, particularly within the context of the developing world.

The livelihoods debate aside, I do think that there are far more complex issues we would all do well to stay awake to as business interests look to embrace robotics and exploit software automation.

I believe that as cutting-edge automation technologies converge, the perfect storm is imminent. And before it hits, we ought to decide what kind of human beings we want to be.

Shall we passively allow new age industrialists free rein to pursue any profit-driven automation projects they wish, or should we lobby for the complete democratisation of historic data currently held by proprietary entities and insist that any innovations launched in the automation space be judged solely on the basis of tangible public benefits such as improvements in healthcare delivery and food production?

Andile Masuku is a broadcaster and entrepreneur based in Johannesburg. He is the executive producer at AfricanTechRoundup.com. Follow him on Twitter @MasukuAndile and The African Tech Round-up @africanroundup

Read more:

Perfect storm of cutting-edge automation is imminent - Independent Online

White House considers effects of automation "a policy challenge" – Axios

Hawaii is asking a federal judge to rule that President Trump's move to re-introduce parts of his travel ban is at odds with a Supreme Court ruling earlier this week. From the court filing:

"The Government does not have discretion to ignore the Court's injunction as it sees fit. The State of Hawaii is entitled to the enforcement of the injunction that it has successfully defended."

The issue: The ruling stated that citizens of the countries subject to the ban who have "bonafide" relationships with people in the U.S. could not be barred. The Trump administration's interpretation of that ruling excludes grandparents, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, in-laws, and other extended family members.

The travel ban protocol went into effect at 8pm ET. More on who Trump's protocols would affect, here.

Update: The State Department website says fiancs now counts as close relationships, per Reuters.

Read this article:

White House considers effects of automation "a policy challenge" - Axios