New exoplanet challenges formation models – Astronomy Magazine

Finding exoplanets these days has become blas, yet taking an image of one remains exceedingly difficult. So difficult that, of the thousands of exoplanets discovered, only a handful have been found through imaging. Against the odds, a team of European astronomers has just directly imaged a new giant exoplanet orbiting the star HIP 65426. This planet is roughly the size of Jupiter, but has an estimated six to twelve times the mass of the jovian giant. Its characteristics make the exoplanet a unique object not easily explained by existing models of planet formation.

Not just another planet HIP 65426b resembles Jupiter in size, but any comparisons end there. Not only is the exoplanet more massive than its jovian cousin, but its much hotter, coming in around a toasty 1,880-2,420F (1,026-1,326C). Based on models that match the data to simulations, the astronomers expect HIP 65426b has a dusty atmosphere, thick with clouds. The exoplanet was found at 92 AU from its star, putting it at three times the distance Neptune is from the Sun. The discovery has been detailed in a paper accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Despite more than 3,000 exoplanets discovered to date, we are far from understanding how giant planets form, which is vital as they represent the largest mass within the planetary systems they completely shape, says Gal Chauvin, lead author on the paper and researcher at University of Grenoble and the University of Chile. They also play a key role in the dynamics of smaller planets similar to Earth, and therefore to ultimately understanding how life forms. The group of European astronomers who made the discovery has been at work in the Atacama Desert of Northern Chile at the Very Large Telescope for three years, conducting a survey of 600 young, nearby stars. Now halfway through their survey, they have discovered many potentially planet-forming disks around their surveyed stars, but HIP 65426b is the first exoplanet they have discovered. Another similar campaign, the Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey, has also only racked one exoplanet discovery to date, though multiple new disks and brown dwarfs have been found.

These results show that giant exoplanets at wide separations from their host stars are much less common than initially expected.

Picture-perfect Taking a snapshot of an exoplanet is all but impossible for anything but the youngest and brightest exoplanets. In order for the exoplanet to show up against the blinding glare of the host star, the planet needs to be bright itself, and young planets, still radiating their own light from formation, are ideal candidates for this technique. Specialized instruments have been designed with coronagraphs, which block the light of the star and allow the astronomers to see the fainter exoplanets. Current technology limits these instruments to seeing only wide-orbit exoplanets. Consequently, this technique is thus complimentary to the more common radial velocity method, which watches for wobbles in the stars movements and is most sensitive to giant planets on close orbits.

Here is the original post:

New exoplanet challenges formation models - Astronomy Magazine

Dubai is set to become a destination for ‘astronomy tourism’ – What’s On

The Al Thuraya Astronomy Centre will be home to4.5 billion year-old meteorites and allow visitors to experiencewhat its like to live on Mars

Fancy yourself a bit of a stargazer? Well, youre in luck as Dubai is set to get its first observatory before the year is out.

Located in Mushrif Park, the Al Thuraya Astronomy Centre will open its doors in conjunction with the 46th UAE National Day on 2 December 2017.

In an interview withGulf News, Hasan Al Hariri, CEO of the Dubai Astronomy Group, said that unlike other museums and observatories, the new centre will have a hands-on approach, encouraging visitors to touch the various exhibits on display including several pieces of meteorites which are 4.5 billion years old.

Shaped to look a bit like a UFO (which we dont think is by coincidence), the centre is estimated to have cost around Dhs50 million and will be open to visitors 24/7.

The centre features a 10m steel dome that is able to withstand Dubais hot climate

It will also house the countrys largest telescope boasting a lens with a one-metre diameter that, thanks to its size, will help to see far-off stars and galaxies with minimal light pollution. The centre will be able to share the telescopesfindings with NASA as well as collaborateas part of a global network of similarly-sized telescopes.

Smaller telescopes will be available to rent for the general public and can be used within the park or the centres terrace.

Aside from the main observatory, the project will also feature a museum, a library, an academy, an observation deck, as well as an astronomy-themed food court and souvenir shop and a Mars habitat where people can experience what life would be like onEarths closest neighbouring planet.

Our aim is to make this centre a place for people to come and socialise and learn about the universe in a friendly and interactive way. said Al Hariri, who also noted that events such as star gazing parties, zero gravity experiences, astrophotography and astro-sports sessions will be held at the centre.

Ticket prices for the observatory have yet to be finalised, however entry to the other parts of the centre will be free of charge.

For more about Dubai straight to your newsfeed, follow us on Facebook

Image: Getty, Gulf News

Dubai Police app now lets you report double-parked drivers First pics: This is what La Perle theatre looks like inside

Read more:

Dubai is set to become a destination for 'astronomy tourism' - What's On

Neil deGrasse Tyson Wiki: Family, Career, Quotes, & Facts about the Astrophysicist – Earn The Necklace

American astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson went on Celebrity Family Feud and won $25,000 with his family, and it comes as no surprise as they all clearly share the genius gene. The episode isnt set to air until next week, but it was so predictable that ABC already released the clip of their win. Want to learn more about the man behind Netflixs The Inexplicable Universe and Cosmos? Then check out our Neil deGrasse Tyson wiki!

Neil deGrasse Tysons age is 58, and he was born and raised in New York City. He attended the Bronx High School of Science and went to earn his BA in Physics at Harvard, and then his PhD in Astrophysics from Columbia. Now, he is an author and science communicator dealing with topics like star formation, exploding stars, dwarf galaxies, and the structure of our Milky Way.

When he was nine years old, Tyson began to develop an interest in astronomy after a trip to the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Little did he know that he would someday become its director. In 1994, hejoined the planetarium as a staff scientist. His research involved issues relating to galactic structure and evolution. In 1995, he became the acting director, and one year later secured the position as director. For the next 10 years, he wrote monthly essays for Natural History magazine, and in 2000, he wrote an autobiography. Neil deGrasse Tysons books include Astrophysics for People in a Hurry, Welcome to the Universe: An Astrophysical Tour, StarTalk: The Book, Origins: Fourteen Billion Years of Cosmic Evolution, Just Visiting this Planet, and more. He produced 13 research publications, and has made numerous major media appearances. Neil deGrasse Tysons net worth is an estimated $2.0 million.

Neil deGrasse Tysons wife is Alice Young, whom he wed in 1988. They live in Lower Manhattan with their two children. The couple met while Tyson was in a physics class at the University of Texas at Austin. She is a former IT Manager with Bloomberg Financial Markets. Alice and Neil deGrasse Tysons kids are Miranda, and Travis. Miranda was named after the smallest of Uranus five major moons.

Known for his achievements as a scientist, Neil deGrasse Tysons quotes have become widely known among academics and fans of all things space and exploration. Here are some of his most famous quotes.

Check out the video below to watch Neil deGrasse Tysons family answer some fun questions on Celebrity Family Feud!

See the original post:

Neil deGrasse Tyson Wiki: Family, Career, Quotes, & Facts about the Astrophysicist - Earn The Necklace

Astronomers identify ‘Saraswati’ galactic supercluster – The Space Reporter

A team of astronomers has found one of the largest superstructures in the universe about four billion light-years from Earth.

According to UPI, the enormous galaxy cluster called Saraswati measures over 600 million light-years across and has a mass of about 20 million billion suns.

The research was conducted by a team of astronomers from Inter University Centre for Astronomy & Astrophysics (IUCAA), and Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), both in Pune, India, along with two other Indian universities.

We were very surprised to spot this giant wall-like supercluster of galaxies, visible in a large spectroscopic survey of distant galaxies, known as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, study authors Joydeep Bagchi from IUCAA and Shishir Sankhyayan from IISER said in a statement. This supercluster is clearly embedded in a large network of cosmic filaments traced by clusters and large voids.

The vast collection of galaxies is located in the direction of the constellation Pisces. Astronomers estimate that the supercluster formed when the universe was about ten billion years old.

The age and size of Sarawati suggest that forces beyond the gravitational effects of visible matter were at play when the superstructure formed. The influence of dark energy could explain how the cluster formed and held together.

Our work will help to shed light on the perplexing question; how such extreme large scale, prominent matter-density enhancements had formed billions of years in the past when the mysterious Dark Energy had just started to dominate structure formation, Bagchi and Sankhyayan said.

The study was published in the Astrophysical Journal.

Kathy Fey is a freelance writer with a creative writing degree from Mount Holyoke College. She is an active blogger and erstwhile facilitator of science and engineering programs for children.

Go here to read the rest:

Astronomers identify 'Saraswati' galactic supercluster - The Space Reporter

These animals will live on Earth until the Sun dies – The Verge

We already know tardigrades those tiny eight-legged water creatures are as tough as they are ugly. They can survive for 30 years in a freezer and live in space and other extreme temperatures. But a new study paints things in bleaker terms: these creatures will outlive all of us. They will be around for 10 billion years. They will survive until the Sun dies.

For the study, published in Scientific Reports, astrophysicists at Oxford and Harvard University calculated the probability of objects in space colliding into the Earth, boiling the oceans dry, and killing everything.

The key finding, write the scientists, is that no space phenomena are strong enough to dry up the oceans completely, and so the tardigrades can make do with whats left. There are a few known asteroids that could end everything, but none of these are expected to hit Earth. A supernova could get the job done, but its probably not going to explode near us. Its also unlikely that gamma ray bursts which are even stronger than supernovas are going to wipe us all out.

Therein lies the irony: humans are delicate creatures and climate change has a high risk of taking us out or at least making our lives nearly unbearable but tardigrades will only go down when the Sun does, too.

See the article here:

These animals will live on Earth until the Sun dies - The Verge

This is the Tiniest Star Scientists Have Ever Seen – NBCNews.com

Space

Jul.14.2017 / 2:24 PM ET

Scientists have discovered the smallest star known to science; in fact, it is so tiny that it barely qualifies as a star. Called EBLM J055557Ab, it is only slightly larger than Saturn. The star is part of a binary system, orbiting a much bigger star approximately 600 light-years from Earth.

"Our discovery reveals how small stars can be," astronomer Alexander Boetticher from the University of Cambridge said in a press release. "Had this star formed with only a slightly lower mass, the fusion reaction of hydrogen in its core could not be sustained, and the star would instead have transformed into a brown dwarf."

The issues that make this star a bit of a "borderline" case are the same that cause brown dwarves to be called "failed stars." EBLM J055557Ab is just massive enough to enable hydrogen fusion to occur in its core, forming helium, as the researcher describes in their study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics. However, it remains very faint and difficult to see; it is approximately 2,000 to 3,000 times fainter than our Sun.

This, along with its proximity to parent star EBLM J055557A, made finding the tiny star a real challenge. Initially, EBLM J055557Ab was suspected of being an exoplanet as it orbited in front of its parent star. Only closer examination of the measurements revealed its true nature.

Dim, smaller stars like this one are prime candidates for hosting worlds that could support life because they provide the milder environments in which liquid water on planetary surfaces is more likely to survive. However, these minuscule stars are mysterious to us, not just because we rarely spot them. Hopefully, scientists will have more clues for finding them moving forward, having learned from this first discovery.

Related Stories

This article was originally published on Futurism.

Link:

This is the Tiniest Star Scientists Have Ever Seen - NBCNews.com

Artificial intelligence is going to change every aspect of …

AP Photo/Laurent Cipriani

You've probably heard of artificial intelligence by now. It's the technology powering Siri, driverless cars, and that creepy Facebook feature that automatically tags your friends when you upload photos.

But what is AI, why are people talking about it now, and what will it mean for your everyday life? SunTrust recently released a report that breaks down how AI works, so let's tackle those questions one at a time.

What is AI?

AIis what people call computer programs that try to replicate how the human brain operates. For now, they only can replicate very specific tasks. One system can beat humans at the complicated and ancient board game called Go, for example. Lots of these AI systems are being developed, each really good at a specific task.

These AI systems all operate in basically the same way. Imagine a system that tries to identify whether a photo has a cat in it. For a human, this is fairly easy, but a computer has a hard timefiguring it out. AI systems are unique because they are set up like human brains. You feed a cat photo in one end, and it bounces around a lot of different checkpoints until it comes out the other end with a yes or no answer just like your eyes passing your view of a cat through all the neurons in your brain. AI is even talked about in terms of neurons and synapses, just like the human brain.

AI systems have to be trained, which is a process of adjusting these checkpoints to achieve better results. If one checkpoint determineswhether there is hair in the photo, training an AI system is like deciding how important the presence of hair in a photo is to decide whether there is a cat in the photo.

This training process takes a huge amount of computer process to fine tune. The better a system is trained, the better results you can get from it and the better your cat photo system will be able to determine whether there is a cat in a photo you show it. The huge amount of processing power required to run and train AI systems is what has kept AI research relatively quiet until recently, which leads to the next question.

DeepMind

Why are people talking about AI all the time now?

There is a famous AI contest where researchers pit computers against humans in a challenge to correctly identify photos. Humans usually are able to identify photos with about 95% accuracy in this content, and in 2012, computers were able to identify about 74% of photos correctly, according to SunTrust's report. In 2015, computers reached 96% accuracy, officially beating humans for the first time. This was called the "big bang" of AI, according to SunTrust.

The big bang of AI was made possible by some fancy new algorithms, three specifically. These new algorithms were better ways of training AI systems, making them faster and cheaper to run.

AI systems require lots of real-world examples to be trained well, like lots of cat photos for example. These cat photos also had to be labeled as cat photos so the system knew when it got the right answer from its algorithms and checkpoints. The new algorithms that led to the big bang allowed AI systems to be trained with fewer examples that didn't have to be labeled as well as before. Collecting enough examples to train an AI system used to be really expensive, but was much cheaper after the big bang. Advances in processing power and cheap storage also helped move things along.

Since the big bang, there have been a number of huge strides in AI technology. Tesla, Google, Apple and many of the traditional car companies are training AI systems for autonomous driving.Google, Apple and Amazon are pioneering the first smart personal assistants. Some companies are even working on AI driven healthcare solutions that could personalize treatment plans based on a patient's history, according to SunTrust.

What will AI mean for your life?

AI technology could be as simple as making your email smarter, but it could also extend your lifespan, take away your job, or end human soldiers fighting the world's wars.

SunTrust says AI has the capability to change nearly every industry. The moves we are seeing now are just the beginnings, the low hanging fruits. Cities can become smarter, TSA might be scanning your face as you pass through security and doctors could give most of their consultations via your phone thanks to increased AI advancements.

NVIDIA

SunTrust estimates the AI business will be about $47.250 billion by the year 2020. Nvidia, a large player in the AI space thanks to its GPU hardware and CUDA software platform, is a bit more conservative. It only sees AI as a $30 billion business, which is four times the current size of Nvidia.

There is no doubt AI is a huge opportunity, but there are a few companies you should watch if you're an investor looking to enter the AI space, according to SunTrust.

One is for sure. AI is exciting, sometimes scary, but ultimately, here to stay. We are just starting to see the implications of the technology, and the world is likely to change for good and bad because of artificial intelligence.

Continue reading here:

Artificial intelligence is going to change every aspect of ...

The ‘bias’ of artificial intelligence – The Boston Globe

The Ideas piece, by Emily Kumler, The bias in the machine (July 9), states, Typically, a programmer instructs a machine with a series of commands, and the computer follows along.

This statement captures in broad stokes the larger contours of the here and now of computing and artificial intelligence though far from entirely so, of course. Reality isnt that lock-step the computer [slavishly] following along with a series of commands. To that point, the essay further assumes a straight-line development of AI, such that whats expected longer term is more sophisticated programming leading to still-genuflecting computer obedience.

Advertisement

The future of AI, however, will likely be very different than that. Rather, AI will depend decreasingly on human intervention for its thinking and increasingly on its self-programming, as machines learn more and more heuristically. That is, the trajectory of AI systems will be to independently acquire, curate, adapt, and apply knowledge in order to inform and shape and reshape its own behaviors and eventually to do so, if human egos can relinquish some of AIs executive functions, far more competently than erstwhile human programmers.

Keith Tidman

Bethesda, Md.

Go here to read the rest:

The 'bias' of artificial intelligence - The Boston Globe

Miller: Artificial intelligence a life-altering technology – Auburn Citizen

The industrial revolution emerged in the 18th century and altered life for mankind. The computer age that came along in the 20th century did likewise. Now, artificial intelligence, an advanced technology that utilizes algorithms a sequence of actions that combines calculations, data processing and automated reasoning will allow computers to read, understand and analyze as the human mind does. Thus, America is poised to embark on an innovative boom of historic proportions that will transform our everyday life and make some alert investors very wealthy.

Ninety percent of all data produced and collected since the beginning of our time has been done in the last two years, and will be doubled (at the present rate) in the next five years. This incredible statement of facts is difficult to absorb even for the highly intelligent mind. The human brain has astonishing capability. Once our technologists are freed from the monotonous task of sorting out the billions of pages of data now published daily by computer software, our minds can focus on creative research such as medical science, financial analysis and robotics (to name only a few). Just recently, an automobile drove itself and four passengers through the Albany area for 6.1 miles in the first ever test of an autonomous vehicle in New York state.

Artificial intelligence will also enhance human productivity growth. The McKinsey Global Institute recently reported that almost half of all paid technology research work can be automated by AI. This would increase human productivity by .8 percent to 1.4 percent, compounded every year. This will give our country a substantial manpower economic boost.

Unfortunately, artificial intelligence has also empowered a cast of twisted minds, criminals and terrorists who are building a worldwide audience to promote their views. However, AI technologists are already busy creating algorithms that can sweep digital networks and automatically purge incorrect and extremist content.

Amy Hirsh Guarino, an expatriate from upstate New York (who happens to be my niece) has been living and working in Silicon Valley for many years now. Recently, she was recruited by Kyndi (kyndi.com), one of the leading companies in the growing field of artificial intelligence technologists. She is now chief operating officer and considered to be one of the top 100 women technologists in Silicon Valley.

The time is coming when humans can no longer keep up with the volume of reading in our modern age. We foresee a time when every technologist worker must be partnered with an artificial intelligence assistant, she told me during my interview with her. Next, Guarino explained digital forensics as understanding how and why something happens (the TV series "Forensic Files" is a dramatized example of digital forensics).

AI will be able to utilize all the current medical journal information plus medical reports and patient reports to tailor the diagnosis and treatment plans based on individual symptoms, genetics and patient history, Guarino said.

The key of artificial intelligence is being able to process lots of combinations of systems in real time, plus being aware of the latest research. AI will never replace doctors, but it will help them make the right decisions since the systems will be able to recall all known diseases, and, in theory, they dont have bias. With that said, doctors know their patients, and AI will help them provide a filter based on that knowledge.

America is entering a new age call it the information technology age where there will be wonderful opportunities among technologists, innovators and businessmen alike. The key to it all is education.

Harold Miller is a businessman and Auburn native. He can be reached at hmillermod@aol.com.

Read the original:

Miller: Artificial intelligence a life-altering technology - Auburn Citizen

4 fears an AI developer has about artificial intelligence – MarketWatch – MarketWatch

As an artificial intelligence researcher, I often come across the idea that many people are afraid of what AI might bring. Its perhaps unsurprising, given both history and the entertainment industry, that we might be afraid of a cybernetic takeover that forces us to live locked away, Matrix-like, as some sort of human battery.

And yet it is hard for me to look up from the evolutionary computer models I use to develop AI, to think about how the innocent virtual creatures on my screen might become the monsters of the future. Might I become the destroyer of worlds, as Oppenheimer lamented after spearheading the construction of the first nuclear bomb?

I would take the fame, I suppose, but perhaps the critics are right. Maybe I shouldnt avoid asking: As an AI expert, what do I fear about artificial intelligence?

The HAL 9000 computer, dreamed up by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke and brought to life by movie director Stanley Kubrick in 2001: A Space Odyssey, is a good example of a system that fails because of unintended consequences. In many complex systems the RMS Titanic, NASAs space shuttle, the Chernobyl nuclear power plant engineers layer many different components together. The designers may have known well how each element worked individually, but didnt know enough about how they all worked together.

That resulted in systems that could never be completely understood, and could fail in unpredictable ways. In each disaster sinking a ship, blowing up two shuttles and spreading radioactive contamination across Europe and Asia a set of relatively small failures combined together to create a catastrophe.

I can see how we could fall into the same trap in AI research. We look at the latest research from cognitive science, translate that into an algorithm and add it to an existing system. We try to engineer AI without understanding intelligence or cognition first.

Systems like IBMs Watson and Googles Alpha equip artificial neural networks with enormous computing power, and accomplish impressive feats. But if these machines make mistakes, they lose on Jeopardy! or dont defeat a Go master. These arent world-changing consequences; indeed, the worst that might happen to a regular person as a result is losing some money betting on their success.

But as AI designs get even more complex and computer processors even faster, their skills will improve. That will lead us to give them more responsibility, even as the risk of unintended consequences rises. We know that to err is human, so it is likely impossible for us to create a truly safe system.

Read: Job of the future is robot psychologist

Im not very concerned about unintended consequences in the types of AI I am developing, using an approach called neuroevolution. I create virtual environments and evolve digital creatures and their brains to solve increasingly complex tasks. The creatures performance is evaluated; those that perform the best are selected to reproduce, making the next generation. Over many generations these machine-creatures evolve cognitive abilities.

Right now we are taking baby steps to evolve machines that can do simple navigation tasks, make simple decisions, or remember a couple of bits. But soon we will evolve machines that can execute more complex tasks and have much better general intelligence. Ultimately we hope to create human-level intelligence.

Along the way, we will find and eliminate errors and problems through the process of evolution. With each generation, the machines get better at handling the errors that occurred in previous generations. That increases the chances that well find unintended consequences in simulation, which can be eliminated before they ever enter the real world.

Another possibility thats farther down the line is using evolution to influence the ethics of artificial intelligence systems. Its likely that human ethics and morals, such as trustworthiness and altruism, are a result of our evolution and factor in its continuation. We could set up our virtual environments to give evolutionary advantages to machines that demonstrate kindness, honesty and empathy. This might be a way to ensure that we develop more obedient servants or trustworthy companions and fewer ruthless killer robots.

While neuroevolution might reduce the likelihood of unintended consequences, it doesnt prevent misuse. But that is a moral question, not a scientific one. As a scientist, I must follow my obligation to the truth, reporting what I find in my experiments, whether I like the results or not. My focus isnt on determining whether I like or approve of something; it matters only that I can unveil it.

Read: 10 jobs robots already do better than you

Being a scientist doesnt absolve me of my humanity, though. I must, at some level, reconnect with my hopes and fears. As a moral and political being, I have to consider the potential implications of my work and its potential effects on society.

As researchers, and as a society, we have not yet come up with a clear idea of what we want AI to do or become. In part, of course, this is because we dont yet know what its capable of. But we do need to decide what the desired outcome of advanced AI is.

One big area people are paying attention to is employment. Robots are already doing physical work like welding car parts together. One day soon they may also do cognitive tasks we once thought were uniquely human. Self-driving cars could replace taxi drivers; self-flying planes could replace pilots.

Instead of getting medical aid in an emergency room staffed by potentially overtired doctors, patients could get an examination and diagnosis from an expert system with instant access to all medical knowledge ever collected and get surgery performed by a tireless robot with a perfectly steady hand. Legal advice could come from an all-knowing legal database; investment advice could come from a market-prediction system.

Perhaps one day, all human jobs will be done by machines. Even my own job could be done faster, by a large number of machines tirelessly researching how to make even smarter machines.

In our current society, automation pushes people out of jobs, making the people who own the machines richer and everyone else poorer. That is not a scientific issue; it is a political and socioeconomic problem that we as a society must solve. My research wont change that, though my political self together with the rest of humanity may be able to create circumstances in which AI becomes broadly beneficial instead of increasing the discrepancy between the 1% and the rest of us.

Read: Two-thirds of jobs in this city could be automated by 2035

There is one last fear, embodied by HAL 9000, the Terminator and any number of other fictional superintelligences: If AI keeps improving until it surpasses human intelligence, will a superintelligence system (or more than one of them) find it no longer needs humans? How will we justify our existence in the face of a superintelligence that can do things humans could never do? Can we avoid being wiped off the face of the Earth by machines we helped create?

The key question in this scenario is: Why should a superintelligence keep us around?

I would argue that I am a good person who might have even helped to bring about the superintelligence itself. I would appeal to the compassion and empathy that the superintelligence has to keep me, a compassionate and empathetic person, alive. I would also argue that diversity has a value all in itself, and that the universe is so ridiculously large that humankinds existence in it probably doesnt matter at all.

But I dont speak for all humankind, and I find it hard to make a compelling argument for all of us. When I take a sharp look at us all together, there is a lot wrong: We hate each other. We wage war on each other. We do not distribute food, knowledge or medical aid equally. We pollute the planet. There are many good things in the world, but all the bad weakens our argument for being allowed to exist.

Fortunately, we need not justify our existence quite yet. We have some time somewhere between 50 and 250 years, depending on how fast AI develops. As a species we can come together and come up with a good answer for why a superintelligence shouldnt just wipe us out. But that will be hard: Saying we embrace diversity and actually doing it are two different things as are saying we want to save the planet and successfully doing so.

We all, individually and as a society, need to prepare for that nightmare scenario, using the time we have left to demonstrate why our creations should let us continue to exist. Or we can decide to believe that it will never happen, and stop worrying altogether. But regardless of the physical threats superintelligences may present, they also pose a political and economic danger. If we dont find a way to distribute our wealth better, we will have fueled capitalism with artificial intelligence laborers serving only very few who possess all the means of production.

Now read: 5 ETFs that may let you profit from the next tech revolution

Arend Hintze is an assistant professor of integrative biology & computer science and engineering at Michigan State University. This first appeared on The Conversation What an artificial intelligence researcher fears about AI.

See the original post here:

4 fears an AI developer has about artificial intelligence - MarketWatch - MarketWatch

Elon Musk Says Artificial Intelligence Is the ‘Greatest Risk We Face as a Civilization’ – Fortune

Appearing before a meeting of the National Governors Association on Saturday, Tesla CEO Elon Musk described artificial intelligence as the greatest risk we face as a civilization and called for swift and decisive government intervention to oversee the technologys development.

On the artificial intelligence front, I have access to the very most cutting edge AI, and I think people should be really concerned about it, an unusually subdued Musk said in a question and answer session with Nevada governor Brian Sandoval.

Musk has long been vocal about the risks of AI . But his statements before the nations governors were notable both for their dire severity, and his forceful call for government intervention.

AIs a rare case where we need to be proactive in regulation, instead of reactive. Because by the time we are reactive with AI regulation, its too late," he remarked. Musk then drew a contrast between AI and traditional targets for regulation, saying AI is a fundamental risk to the existence of human civilization, in a way that car accidents, airplane crashes, faulty drugs, or bad food were not.

Those are strong words from a man occasionally associated with so-called cyberlibertarianism, a fervently anti-regulation ideology exemplified by the likes of Peter Thiel, who co-founded Paypal with Musk.

Get Data Sheet , Fortunes technology newsletter.

Musk went on to argue that broad government regulation was vital because companies are currently pressured to pursue advanced AI or risk irrelevance in the marketplace:

Thats where you need the regulators to come in and say, hey guys, you all need to just pause and make sure this is safe . . . You kind of need the regulators to do that for all the teams in the game. Otherwise the shareholders will be saying, why arent you developing AI faster? Because your competitor is.

Part of Musks worry stems from social destabilization and job loss. When I say everything, the robots will do everything, bar nothing," he said.

But Musk's bigger concern has to do with AI that lives in the network, and which could be incentivized to harm humans. [They] could start a war by doing fake news and spoofing email accounts and fake press releases, and just by manipulating information," he said. "The pen is mightier than the sword.

Musk outlined a hypothetical situation, for instance, in which an AI could pump up defense industry investments by using hacking and disinformation to trigger a war.

Im against overregulation for sure, Musk emphasized, But man, I think with weve got to get on that with AI, pronto.

Musks comments on AI only took up a small part of the hour-long exchange. He also speculated about the future of driverless cars and space travel, and mourned that meeting the sky-high expectations surrounding him was "quite a difficult emotional hardship" and "a whole lot less fun than it may seem."

Excerpt from:

Elon Musk Says Artificial Intelligence Is the 'Greatest Risk We Face as a Civilization' - Fortune

These AI bots are so believable, they get more dates than you – CNBC

Here's how it works: When a company signs up with Conversica, they get to pick the name, gender and title of their new assistant. As leads come in, the AI assistant gets in touch with them through email or text message. If a lead is interested, the AI assistant routes the communication to a real-life member of the sales team to close the deal.

One advantage over humans is the AI isn't put off by unanswered emails it doesn't mind being ignored or forget to follow up, so it can be programmed to be more persistent, emailing weeks after the initial contact.

"She has a name. She has a title, an email address and a phone number," said Alex Terry, CEO of Conversica. "She reads and writes emails and SMS text messages back and forth with leads."

Conversica has about 1,000 companies that use the platform, Terry said, and about 250 million messages have been sent so far, giving the company a pretty robust sample size to see what makes an AI assistant successful. A lot of that has to do with how they're set up in the first place. For one thing, the data suggest that the gender of the assistant is important and customers often like to think they're communicating with someone young.

"What we tend to find is female names outperform male names in general," Terry said. "And most commonly names that were popular 24 or 25 years ago tend to do pretty well."

The most common names for companies to name their AI assistants are popular female names from the 80s and 90s like Ashley and Stephanie: They're both in the top five in terms of the most leads worked.

View original post here:

These AI bots are so believable, they get more dates than you - CNBC

Why China’s Aerospace Industry Needs Technological Heroes – Sixth Tone

On the evening of July 2, China launched the Long March 5 rocket at the Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Center in Hainan, Chinas southernmost province. Shortly afterward, an engine failure sent the rocket plummeting into the Pacific Ocean.

The specter of failure always looms over space launches; however, setbacks have become somewhat more frequent for Chinas space program in recent years. On June 19, just a couple of weeks before the failed launch of Long March 5, the Long March 3B carrier rocket launched from Xichang Satellite Launch Center in the southwestern province of Sichuan with the ChinaSat 9A communications satellite as its payload. However, another engine malfunction initially prevented the satellite from entering its planned orbit. Two failed launches also occurred in 2016.

Some might say that the failure of the Long March 5 is to be expected, as it is a relatively new model. Concerningly, however, the other failures all occurred with more established rocket models. And for me, whats most worrying of all is the recent attitude change inside the China National Space Administration (CNSA) regarding these failures.

On Aug. 18, 2011, the launch of the Long March 2C-Y26 rocket from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northern Chinas Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region was unsuccessful due to a connection failure between one of the engines and its control system. The failed test cast doubt on the launch centers planned space dock between the Tiangong-1 space module and the Shenzhou-8 spacecraft, a maneuver that would be a first for China.

Some said that Tiangong-1 could be launched as scheduled, claiming that the rocket propelling it into orbit also a member of the Long March class was built to a different, better-tested specification. However, the mission command center was resolute that the launch of Tiangong-1 should be halted so that the malfunction in the Long March 2C rocket could be located. While the two Long March rockets were different from one another, they still belonged to the same series. As a result, the launch of the Tiangong-1 was pushed back 40 days until the connecting mechanism was strengthened.

This delay came at a cost. For one thing, it caused a great deal of trouble for the launch center, located out in the Gobi Desert. It rained heavily around Jiuquan that year, and the storage space for Tiangong-1 became dangerously humid. The launch sites staff had to think on their feet to maintain the humidity levels that Tiangong-1 required, working around the clock to ensure that the machine remained functional. Eventually, they succeeded.

There are many other stories like this. However, in the last few years, an oppressively bureaucratic atmosphere has spread through Chinas aerospace industry.

Last September, after the Long March 4C carrier rocket failed during its launch of the Gaofen-10 satellite at Xichang Satellite Launch Center, I attended the teleconference held to analyze the malfunction. It is a standard operation procedure to have such meeting after each launch failure. As soon as I entered the venue, a member of staff informed me that the conference could not be filmed. I replied that this was unacceptable: The experts from the launch site were in attendance, and since my company had been instructed to come and shoot the proceedings, I needed to return with footage.

After debating this for quite some time, it was finally decided that I could only film the crew from the launch site. No members of the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), the space programs main contractor, could appear in any shots. The argument left a bitter taste in my mouth, because this individual made me feel stifled. This was not the atmosphere that a scientific research organization was supposed to have. It smacked of politicians trying to weasel their way out of speaking frankly about the failed launch.

In the end, the entire conference was stymied by red tape. Experts from the CASC, the launch site, the Xian-based rocket manufacturing plant, and the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) all came up to the podium, but many of their speeches rambled on without attempting to assume any responsibility for the issue. Since then, I have been unable to recover that unified, issue-focused feeling that once characterized these kinds of conferences.

The bureaucratization of the aerospace industry was followed by anothercorrespondingtrend. Gradually, key players in Chinas space program have left the industry and gone into politics. Around 2013, four high ranking officials in CASC and CNSA were promoted as provincial governors.

Throughout the history of the Peoples Republic, the aerospace industry has enjoyed a status that far outshines that of other industries. Even today, its profound impact on ordinary Chinese serves as a rallying point for national cohesion; it is an irreplaceable symbol of this countrys thriving development. It is only natural for the people who emerge from this industry to become provincial governors and national leaders. However, Id rather Chinas aerospace industry produced more technological heroes like the celebrated rocket scientist, Qian Xuesen, and the father of Chinas atom bomb, Qian Sanqiang.

In China, we have always taken great pride in our space program. While we still feel deeply proud of it today, there is a lingering sense that the program isnt what it once was. I hope that the space program can divest itself of the stench of bureaucracy that currently enshrouds it. This is not an atmosphere befitting of true scientific inquiry.

Translator: Zachary Haluza; editors: Wu Haiyun, Yang Xiaozhou, and Matthew Walsh.

(Header image: A Long March 5 Y2 rocket blasts off at the Wenchang Space Launch Center in Hainan province, July 2, 2017. Shi Yan/VCG)

See the rest here:

Why China's Aerospace Industry Needs Technological Heroes - Sixth Tone

Tuskegee University aerospace engineering program ascends with industry – Alabama NewsCenter

Tuskegee University has made significant contributions to the U.S. aerospace industry, and that influence is poised to grow.

Since it started in 1983, the schools Aerospace Science Engineering Departmenthas produced more than 200 graduates who are working across the nation.

In the last five years, enrollment in the program has been increasing, and a new plane manufacturing projectplanned for the region is expected to bring even more prominence to this program.

Global aerospace and defense firm Leonardo plans to assemble its T-100 jet trainerat Tuskegees Moton Field, if it wins a U.S. Air Force competition to supply the next-generation aircraft.

The project would create 750 high-wage, full-time jobs over a 10-year period starting in 2019, and total investment is estimated at up to $250 million. Moton Field is where the legendary Tuskegee Airmen, the first African-American military pilots, trained during World War II.

Climbing enrollment

The implications for Tuskegee students and faculty are exciting, said Dr. M. Javed Khan, a professor of aerospace science engineering who has taught at Tuskegee since 2000 and was appointed head of the department in 2011.

The number of undergraduate students in the department has increased from 75 to about 140 the last five years.

The numbers have really ratcheted up, Khan said. There was a time when we used to graduate five or six a year. This 2017 academic year, the department graduated 21 African-American aerospace engineers.

We have been really growing recently. Weve done a better job of marketing the program, and weve added activities that have sparked interest, such as a rocket competition, an Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) design-build-fly program and a zero gravity program.

Tuskegee is the first and only historically black institution of higher learning to offer an accredited Bachelor of Science degree program in this field.

Our graduates are working at all the big aerospace companies, and there are also many graduates who go into the military, NASA, the FAA and other agencies, Khan said. We contribute very substantially to the workforce and to the diversity of it.

Industry connections

Alabamas thriving aerospace industry has benefited the program.

One of the biggest advantages of having industry in the area is that some of our students are involved in some of the engineering hands-on activities/projects. In addition, students get internships, and after graduation, many of them are recruited by these companies, Khan said.

Theres also a big advantage for our students to go and visit and get an understanding of how the industry works. We also invite people from industry to provide professional talks to our students.

The Leonardo project could be a great addition to the internship and work opportunities available to Tuskegee students, he said.

It would be a great asset to us in that we could always invite the experts in the facility there to come and talk to students, and students could go there to see all the different parts of the airplane and the different stages and processes of assembly, he said. For us, its going to be a great learning opportunity.

Faculty at Tuskegees Aerospace Science Engineering Department also could benefit by being involved in different research opportunities related to Leonardos work, Khan added.

Aircraft design

Khan, who received his undergraduate degree in aerospace science engineering from the Pakistan Air Force College of Aeronautical Engineering, is also personally excited about the project, because of his own background in aircraft design.

Prior to joining Tuskegee, he served in the Pakistan Air Force and attained the rank of brigadier general. While in the PAF, he served as head of the Aerospace Engineering Department at his alma mater and chief of engineering of the largest operational base. He also was responsible for the F-16 fleet, among other aircraft.

In addition, Khan was the deputy chief project director (aerospace) of the joint Sino-Pakistan military aircraft development program, the JF-17. In this capacity, he led the design and development contractual negotiations andconducted the Air Staff Requirements verifications, conceptual design and preliminary design reviews. He also supported the financial reviews.

Leonardos plan for Moton Field is very exciting because it brings back a lot of memories, he said.

Khan received his masters degree in aeronautical engineering from the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Texas A&M University.

He is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers (Pakistan), a Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society (U.K.) and an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. His research interests include vortex-dominated flows, aircraft design and engineering education, and he has received more than $2 million in research grants from organizations including the National Science Foundation and NASA.

Rich legacy

Greg Canfield, secretary of the Alabama Department of Commerce, said Tuskegee has a rich legacy when it comes to aerospace and aviation, and the region is in line to make an even greater impact.

From the preeminence of Tuskegees Aerospace Science Engineering Department to Leonardos plans to build world-class training aircraft at Moton Field, all of the pieces are in place to influence the industry for generations, much like the courageous Tuskegee Airmen did for the military many years ago, he said.

Khan said the success of the Tuskegee students and faculty are part of the Airmens legacy.

Just as they were facing a challenge in the second World War, and were very successful, here we are in the 21st century, meeting the challenge of staying on the cutting edge of technology, he said.

This story originally appeared on the Alabama Department of Commerces Made in Alabama website.

See the original post:

Tuskegee University aerospace engineering program ascends with industry - Alabama NewsCenter

This Private Island Off the Coast of Maine Could Be Yours for $8 Million – TownandCountrymag.com (blog)

Scorpio Island Corporation

Ever want to get away from it all? Well, theres Hope, an 86-acre Maine island off Portland that comes with everything you need to live life large. Hope Island includes an 11,000-plus-square-foot mansion and a $7.95 million price tag. "Inquiries have come in from across the globe," says listing agent John Saint-Amour with LandVest. Developer John Cacoulidis bought the island in 1993 for $1.3 million. "I sold this to the owner, and he's put $12 million to $13 million into it," Saint-Amour says. This bargain includes guest and staff quarters, boathouse, barns, paddocks, and storage buildings that support all the duck, geese, chickens, and peacocks that call Hope Island Home.

Hope is a dream island 25 minutes (by boat) from Portland.

The 86-acre island's 11,050 feet of coastline is mainly rocks and cliffs dotted by a few sandy beaches. The property includes a deep-water dock, fixed pier, and six moorings. The offering also features three "picnic" islands good for sipping a sunset cocktail.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The owner made millions of dollars of capital improvements.

Cacoulidis upgraded the island with submerged utility cables and roadways throughout the property.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Among the outbuildings is a private tavern.

The property's brochure calls the property a "magical island kingdom" with its own tavern, a "perfect entertainment venue." Other buildings include a boat house with an apartment, wood frame chapel, barn with staff quarters, water supply building, 10-stall horse stable, large and small chicken coops, and several dedicated houses for geese, duck and peacocks. The property, however, does not include a pool.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The horses are not included.

The island currently houses nine horses, which are not part of the sale. But the pastures, paddocks, and barns are part of the property's appeal and demonstrate the owners' passion for wildlife, Saint-Amour says.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

The mansion tops 11,000 square feet with sweeping ocean views.

The brick home with a Mediterranean-style tile roof includes three bedroom suites, an open floor plan, and a huge kitchen with a granite center island. The second-floor master suite includes a bar, exercise room, "shower room," and soaking tub.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Watch this video for 16 of the best beaches in the world.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Here is the original post:

This Private Island Off the Coast of Maine Could Be Yours for $8 Million - TownandCountrymag.com (blog)

Historic Scottish castle with two private islands yours for 3.75m – Deadline News

A STUNNING historic Scottish castle with two huge islands could be yours for an eye-watering 3.75m.

The astonishingly vast Glenborrodale Castle boasts an incredible 16 bedrooms as well as a walled garden, a gate house and an impressive 133 acres of land.

Located on the idyllic Ardnamurchan peninsula in Lochaber, Scottish Highlands, the early 20th century baronial home comes with an incredible two islands.

Prospective buyers will be met with wrought iron gates, stone pillars and a cattle grid as they make their way onto the grounds of the estate.

Inside, the elegant castle offers a beautiful feature staircase with marble steps, a dining room with an open fireplace and a turret with panoramic views of the surroundings.

According to estate agents Bell Ingram who are selling the property, Glenborrodale Castle is situated on the southern shore of the picturesque Ardnamurchan Peninsula.

They continue: The area offers some of the most outstanding coastline scenery together with an abundance of wildlife.

Glenborrodale Castle dates from 1902 and is a five storey Scots baronial mansion built of red Dumfriesshire sandstone.

The castle itself dominates the steep south facing hillside which overlooks Loch Sunart. However, the most astounding aspect of the sale is the inclusion of two picturesque islands.

The estate agent added in the brochure: The panoramic view takes in the islands of Risga, Carna and Oronsay and the Morven Hills on the far North side of the loch.

The grounds of the Castle extend to about 132.99 acres (53.82ha) and include the Isle of Risga and Eilean an Feidh.

The isolated islands are uninhabited and are accessed on by boat but they can be gazed upon from the comfort of the castle.

Also included in the remarkable property is a gym featuring a sauna a tennis court, a commercial kitchen, a games room and a boat house complete with a jetty.

According to the Glenborrodale Castle website, the A-listed building is currently under private ownership and is not open to the public, but it has previously been used as a wedding venue and for exclusive accommodation.

The castle was built as a guest house by the South African diamond merchant Charles Rudd the main business associate of Cecil Rhodes.

The home was also once in the ownership of Jesse Boot, who was the founder of Boots the chemist.

Currently the luxury home is owned by Donald Houston, the owner of Ardnamurachan Estate and the nearby Adelphi distillery, the westernmost in the UK.

During the 2014 Scottish independence campaign Houston was notable for donating 600,000 to the Better Together campaign.

Go here to see the original:

Historic Scottish castle with two private islands yours for 3.75m - Deadline News

From elite retreat to public treasure, Jekyll remains the same – The Brunswick News (subscription)

And while enjoying the flora and fauna that is so carefully preserved on parts of Jekyll Island, you can thank some of the most ruthless industrialists and power brokers in American history. No kidding. The islands present protected status can trace its inception to the Gilded Age of the late 19th century, when Jekyll was the private playground of Rockefellers, Morgans, Vanderbilts, Pulitzers and other turn-of-the-century titans.

Most everyone around here knows at least an inkling about the storied Jekyll Island Club. Remnants of that reign of the nations wealthy elite (1886 - 1947) are readily evident still today. Folks can visit William Rockefellers Indian Mound cottage or tour the Jekyll Island Historic District and see it for themselves.

But the sight of a bird of prey plucking lunch from a lazy creek winding through an unblemished marsh near Jekylls Driftwood Beach also is a legacy of these avaricious tycoons. The conservation movement as we know it today was hardly the point of the Jekyll Island Club, which a popular national magazine of the era described as the richest, the most exclusive, the most inaccessible club in the world ...

But the truth is, these upper crust snowbirds really loved Jekyll Island just the way they found it. Except for the clubhouse, several extravagant cottages and a golf course, they barely touched the place. Coastal Georgia historian Buddy Sullivan considers the Jekyll Island Clubs exclusive membership among the regions first conservationists.

By the time the progeny of the clubs founders had grown bored of Jekyll and migrated south to Palm Beach and Miami, exclusive ownership of the island had left it pretty much unblemished. The state of Georgia bought the island for $675,000 in 1947, and opened it to the public as a state park a year later.

Jekyll Islands journey from private ownership to public preservation is a pattern Sullivan traces all along the coast in his book, The First Conservationists?: Northern Money and Low Country Georgia, 1866-1930. In the decades following the Civil War, rich Yankees bought up six of Coastal Georgias eight barrier islands. This includes Howard Coffin (Hudson Motors) on Sapelo Island, Thomas Carnegie (steel, brother of Andrew) on Cumberland Island and John Wanamaker (retail/marketing pioneer) on Ossabaw Island.

This to me was the first real conservation movement in Coastal Georgia, Sullivan said recently. They fell in love with the ecosystem and environment of our Georgia Coast. That is why Ive called them the first conservationists.

But back to Jekyll Island. British Gen. James Oglethorpe established an outpost there in the 1730s, after establishing Fort Frederica next door on St. Simons Island. He named the island for Sir Joseph Jekyll, a barrister and politician who supported Oglethorpe in founding the Colony of Georgia.

Oglethorpe later granted Jekyll Island to Maj. William Horton, who established a plantation using indentured servants to grow food for the Frederica settlement. Horton died in 1749. The two-story remnants of his 18th century estate are open to the public at Horton House on Jekyll Island.

By the 1790s, the island wound up in the hands of Christophe Poulain DuBignon, an aristocratic French sea captain who made his mark and his fortune as a privateer. The Dubignon familys cotton plantation thrived for the next several generations, although British troops ransacked the place and liberated nearly 30 slaves during the War of 1812.

Emancipation of all slaves and the end of the Antebellum era came with Souths defeat in the Civil War. So John Eugene DuBignon and his brother-in-law Newton Finney, who served as an officer in the Confederate Army, turned to the only people with money to burn at the time: rich Northerners.

The great-grandson of the DuBignon patriarch, John Eugene DuBignon busied himself buying up the whole of Jekyll Island. Finney, the former Confederate, wooed New York financiers on the idea of a private hunting club on Jekyll Island. It must have been a big hit. The tight-knit group of movers and shakers bought Jekyll outright from the two shrewd Southern salesmen in 1886.

And thus the Jekyll Island Club was born. From Christmas through Easter these barrier island barons would wile away their days amid luxury and mild Southern breezes on their own private island.

And it is all still there for us to see, pretty much as they left it. Their Jekyll Island Club is now the heart of the Jekyll Island Club Resort, a registered Historic Hotel of America. In addition to Indian Mound, there is the Goodyear Cottage, the DuBignon house and J.P. Morgans San Souci, considered the first condominium building.

That is not all. There is that sparkling shimmer on still waters as a blue heron stalks the marsh for his supper, the spartina grasses cast in shades of green and gold by the setting sun. I am most partial to that legacy.

Have ideas for a future local history column? Shoot me an email

See the rest here:

From elite retreat to public treasure, Jekyll remains the same - The Brunswick News (subscription)

As EYE17 closes, ‘peacemakers’ make a path home – Episcopal News Service

More than 1,300 teenagers gathered as the sun was setting at the Oklahoma City National Memorial on July 12 for a candlelight vigil. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

[Episcopal News Service Edmond, Oklahoma] As the sun began to set July 12 on Oklahoma City, Episcopal youth assembled by diocese and processed from St. Pauls Cathedral four blocks south on North Robinson Avenue to the Oklahoma City National Memorial for a candlelight vigil.

The vigil followed an earlier visit to the memorials museum, which traces the timeline beginning 30 minutes before the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 168 people and wounded 680 others, through the 2001 execution of Timothy McVeigh.

The way that its set up, you move through time and its a stunning thing, said Kiera Campbell, 16, an Episcopal Youth Event 2017 planning committee member from the Diocese of Olympia. Its amazing to see how a city pulled together and how a city was able to find peace in each other.

Thirteen hundred youth from 90 of the Episcopal Churchs 109 dioceses attended the 13th annual Episcopal Youth Event from July 10 to 14 at the University of Central Oklahoma in Edmond, a 20-minute drive from downtown Oklahoma City. The Beatitudes, particularly Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the Peacemakers for they will be called children of God, inspired EYE17s theme, Path to Peace. (Absent were some youth from Province IX, the Latin America- and Caribbean-based dioceses, who were denied visas into the United States.)

Teenagers attending the Episcopal Youth Event 2017 in Edmond, Oklahoma, visited the Oklahoma City National Memorial & Museum on July 12. Here, they visit the Gallery of Honor, where photos of the 168 people, including 19 children, hang on the walls. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

The night before the museum visit and vigil, bombing survivors shared their personal experiences with the youth during an on-campus plenary session. During the candlelight vigil, the youth sat cross-legged on the grass opposite 168 empty chairs 19 smaller chairs for children representing each of the victims. A reflecting pool set between two pillars marked 9:01 and 9:03 isolated the minute, 9:02 a.m., that the truck bomb exploded, destroying the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.

It was the history, but more importantly, the human response and its lasting impact that Oklahoma Bishop Ed Konieczny wanted the youth to experience. The bombing, he said, brought together the people of Oklahoma in a spirit of unity, in what became the Oklahoma Standard, that continues today.

If you come to Oklahoma and you become an Oklahoman [the story] becomes a part of who you are because in many ways it was a huge turning point, not only for OklahomaCitybut for the state, said Konieczny, a priest in Texas at the time of the bombing. It was an unfortunate way for things to go, but it energized and brought to light all the good of the people in Oklahoma City and Oklahoma and it didnt stop.

Photos of the victims hang in the Gallery of Honor, the last exhibit, at the Oklahoma City National Memorial & Museum. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

Even though the youth werent yet born in 1995 they range in age from 13 to 18 they live in an increasingly violent world. For that reason, Konieczny wanted to co-host EYE17 in his diocese and share Oklahoma Citys story as an example of peace and resilience.

The event is relevant because it helps them see all of the other things that happen in our world and our society and the other incidences of violence that take place, Columbine or Virginia Tech or Florida. It seemslike every day there is something else, some big, some minor, he said. I hope the story is that we as a society have to do something about this. And they have the ability to do that The message of this is not going to be the bomb. The message of this is life, and that we are going to put our faith where our faith needs to be, and we are going to stand up for justice and say, no, we are not going to live this way, were going to do something different.

Responding to violence and hatred with love was packed into the Path to Peace message.

The reality is that hatred doesnt work and violence doesnt work. Human beings were made bylove,because I believe that God is love, and we were made to love and life only works when we love. And this memorial is a painful reminder that hatred hurts and harms, and we werent made for that, said Presiding Bishop Michael Curry, at the site of the memorial. Weve been put on this earth to find a better way. To find life and love for everybody, and so coming to this memorial and being here this day is an opportunity to be reconsecrated and rededicated to creating a world where love rules.

There was some fun at EYE17. Here, the Rev. Tim Schenck, left, rector of St. John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in Hingham, Massachusetts, and the Rev. Scott Gunn, executive director of Forward Movement, sit by while Sierra Palmer of the Diocese of Kansas casts a vote for one of two saints. Saint Quiteria defeated Saint Longinus, 72 percent to 28 percent, and will be included in Lent Madness 2018. The rest of the saints in next years bracket will be announced in November. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

A year ago, the 16-member EYE17 youth planning committee visited Oklahoma City and the museum and memorial, to get a sense of what their peers would experience. Immediately, it was clear that Oklahoma Citys story is one everyone needs to hear, Andres Gonzalez Bonilla, 16, of the Diocese of Arizona, who served on liturgy and music planning team. The citys response to an act of domestic terrorism is a tragic, but beautiful, moving story.

The EYE mission planning team started imaging what this event might be like over 18 months ago. They based the event in Matthews scripture and the Beatitudes, said Bronwyn Clark Skov, the Episcopal Churchs director of formation, youth and young adults, who oversees youth ministry. We are very much taken with that entire package, but also because of what has been happening in the world, we really honed in on blessed are the peacemakers.

The triennial youth event, a mandate of the churchs General Convention, drew 1,400 people in all, including 35 bishops, as well as chaperones, chaplains, medical and other volunteers. Every preacher, speaker, exhibitor and praxis session presented the theme in one way or another.

Presiding Bishop Michael Curry preached and presided during the opening Eucharist of EYE17. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

Curry preached during the July 11 opening Eucharist and later that day offered two back-to-back workshops on the Jesus Movement, followed by a question-and-answer period. Other speakers, including President of the House of Deputies the Rev. Gay Clark Jennings, bishops, Episcopal Church staff members, representatives from Episcopal Relief & Development, Forma, Episcopal Service Corps and others, offered workshops ranging from advocacy to nonviolent communication in a violent world to living in intentional communities as a path to peace.

I think that Path to Peace has beenarticulated in many different ways during this event, and my hope is that it has been contagious enough so that when all of the young people who go home from this event start telling the story of what they experienced here and what they learned here that they will feel empowered to actually actupontheir own good and right and God-gifted inclination to do something, said Skov.

During a press conference on July 11, Trevor Mahan of the Diocese of Kansas, a member of the planning committee, said the youth intentionally designed the event to introduce youth to church leadership and the wider Episcopal Church, offering ways to engage further at all levels.

Mahans planning team colleague, Campbell, of the Diocese of Olympia, concurred.

We want people to be able to go back home and connect with other Episcopal organizations, she said, and bring back the Path to Peace message to encourage other youth to become involved.

Konieczny sees real hope in todays young people, who are far more inclusive than previous generations. The makeup of EYE17, the most diverse group ever, attested to that.

As I said during my homily at the vigil, todays young people can make a real difference in the world, he said.

They are at that age now where theyre setting the stage for how their generation is going to live together, and you can already see the level of acceptance, inclusion and willingness to live in diversity and honor each other. And thats not always been the case for generations that have gone before; its this is us, thats them and lets just keep our distance, said Konieczny.

Plans for EYE20 are underway, and with the help of a Constable Fund grant, the Episcopal Church plans to hold the event in Latin America.

-Lynette Wilson is managing editor of Episcopal News Service.

Link:

As EYE17 closes, 'peacemakers' make a path home - Episcopal News Service

Space tourism – Wikipedia

This article is about paying space travellers. For other commercial spacefarers, see Commercial astronaut. For entrepreneurial space ventures and colonization, see NewSpace.

Space tourism is space travel for recreational, leisure or business purposes. To date only orbital space tourism has taken place provided by the Russian Space Agency, although work continues developing sub-orbital space tourism vehicles by Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic. In addition, SpaceX announced in 2017 that they are planning on sending two space tourists on a lunar free return trajectory in 2018 aboard their Dragon V2 spacecraft launched by the Falcon Heavy rocket.[1]

The publicized price for flights brokered by Space Adventures to the International Space Station aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft have been US$2040 million, during the period 20012009 when 7 space tourists made 8 space flights. Some space tourists have signed contracts with third parties to conduct certain research activities while in orbit.

Russia halted orbital space tourism in 2010 due to the increase in the International Space Station crew size, using the seats for expedition crews that would have been sold to paying spaceflight participants.[2][3] Orbital tourist flights were set to resume in 2015 but one planned was postponed indefinitely and none have occurred since 2009.[4]

As an alternative term to "tourism", some organizations such as the Commercial Spaceflight Federation use the term "personal spaceflight". The Citizens in Space project uses the term "citizen space exploration".[5]

The Soviet space program was aggressive in broadening the pool of cosmonauts. The Soviet Intercosmos program included cosmonauts selected from Warsaw Pact members (from Czechoslovakia, Poland, East Germany, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania) and later from allies of the USSR (Cuba, Mongolia, Vietnam) and non-aligned countries (India, Syria, Afghanistan). Most of these cosmonauts received full training for their missions and were treated as equals, but especially after the Mir program began, were generally given shorter flights than Soviet cosmonauts. The European Space Agency (ESA) took advantage of the program as well.

The US space shuttle program included payload specialist positions which were usually filled by representatives of companies or institutions managing a specific payload on that mission. These payload specialists did not receive the same training as professional NASA astronauts and were not employed by NASA. In 1983, Ulf Merbold from ESA and Byron Lichtenberg from MIT (engineer and Air Force fighter pilot) were the first payload specialists to fly on the Space Shuttle, on mission STS-9.[6][7]

In 1984, Charles D. Walker became the first non-government astronaut to fly, with his employer McDonnell Douglas paying $40,000 for his flight.[8]:7475 NASA was also eager to prove its capability to Congressional sponsors. Senator Jake Garn was flown on the Shuttle in 1985,[9] followed by Representative Bill Nelson in 1986.[10]

During the 1970s, Shuttle prime contractor Rockwell International studied a $200300 million removable cabin that could fit into the Shuttle's cargo bay. The cabin could carry up to 74 passengers into orbit for up to three days. Space Habitation Design Associates proposed, in 1983, a cabin for 72 passengers in the bay. Passengers were located in six sections, each with windows and its own loading ramp, and with seats in different configurations for launch and landing. Another proposal was based on the Spacelab habitation modules, which provided 32 seats in the payload bay in addition to those in the cockpit area. A 1985 presentation to the National Space Society stated that although flying tourists in the cabin would cost $1 to 1.5 million per passenger without government subsidy, within 15 years 30,000 people a year would pay $25,000 each to fly in space on new spacecraft. The presentation also forecast flights to lunar orbit within 30 years and visits to the lunar surface within 50 years.[11]

As the shuttle program expanded in the early 1980s, NASA began a Space Flight Participant program to allow citizens without scientific or governmental roles to fly. Christa McAuliffe was chosen as the first Teacher in Space in July 1985 from 11,400 applicants. 1,700 applied for the Journalist in Space program, including Walter Cronkite, Tom Brokaw, Tom Wolfe, and Sam Donaldson. An Artist in Space program was considered, and NASA expected that after McAuliffe's flight two to three civilians a year would fly on the shuttle.[8] After McAuliffe was killed in the Challenger disaster in January 1986 the programs were canceled. McAuliffe's backup, Barbara Morgan, eventually got hired in 1998 as a professional astronaut and flew on STS-118 as a mission specialist.[8]:8485 A second journalist-in-space program, in which NASA green-lighted Miles O'Brien to fly on the space shuttle, was scheduled to be announced in 2003. That program was canceled in the wake of the Columbia disaster on STS-107 and subsequent emphasis on finishing the International Space Station before retiring the space shuttle.

With the realities of the post-Perestroika economy in Russia, its space industry was especially starved for cash. The Tokyo Broadcasting System (TBS) offered to pay for one of its reporters to fly on a mission. For $28 million, Toyohiro Akiyama was flown in 1990 to Mir with the eighth crew and returned a week later with the seventh crew. Akiyama gave a daily TV broadcast from orbit and also performed scientific experiments for Russian and Japanese companies. However, since the cost of the flight was paid by his employer, Akiyama could be considered a business traveler rather than a tourist.

In 1991, British chemist Helen Sharman was selected from a pool of 13,000 applicants to be the first Briton in space.[12] The program was known as Project Juno and was a cooperative arrangement between the Soviet Union and a group of British companies. The Project Juno consortium failed to raise the funds required, and the program was almost cancelled. Reportedly Mikhail Gorbachev ordered it to proceed under Soviet expense in the interests of international relations, but in the absence of Western underwriting, less expensive experiments were substituted for those in the original plans. Sharman flew aboard Soyuz TM-12 to Mir and returned aboard Soyuz TM-11.

At the end of the 1990s, MirCorp, a private venture that was by then in charge of the space station, began seeking potential space tourists to visit Mir in order to offset some of its maintenance costs. Dennis Tito, an American businessman and former JPL scientist, became their first candidate. When the decision to de-orbit Mir was made, Tito managed to switch his trip to the International Space Station (ISS) through a deal between MirCorp and US-based Space Adventures, Ltd., despite strong opposition from senior figures at NASA; from the beginning of the ISS expeditions, NASA stated it wasn't interested in space guests.[13] Nonetheless, Dennis Tito visited the ISS on April 28, 2001, and stayed for seven days, becoming the first "fee-paying" space tourist. He was followed in 2002 by South African computer millionaire Mark Shuttleworth. The third was Gregory Olsen in 2005, who was trained as a scientist and whose company produced specialist high-sensitivity cameras. Olsen planned to use his time on the ISS to conduct a number of experiments, in part to test his company's products. Olsen had planned an earlier flight, but had to cancel for health reasons. The Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics Committee On Science of the House of Representatives held on June 26, 2001 reveals the shifting attitude of NASA towards paying space tourists wanting to travel to the ISS. The hearing's purpose was to, "Review the issues and opportunities for flying nonprofessional astronauts in space, the appropriate government role for supporting the nascent space tourism industry, use of the Shuttle and Space Station for Tourism, safety and training criteria for space tourists, and the potential commercial market for space tourism".[14] The subcommittee report was interested in evaluating Dennis Tito's extensive training and his experience in space as a nonprofessional astronaut.

By 2007, space tourism was thought to be one of the earliest markets that would emerge for commercial spaceflight.[15]:11 However, as of 2014[update] this private exchange market has not emerged to any significant extent.

Space Adventures remains the only company to have sent paying passengers to space.[16][17] In conjunction with the Federal Space Agency of the Russian Federation and Rocket and Space Corporation Energia, Space Adventures facilitated the flights for all of the world's first private space explorers. The first three participants paid in excess of $20 million (USD) each for their 10-day visit to the ISS.

After the Columbia disaster, space tourism on the Russian Soyuz program was temporarily put on hold, because Soyuz vehicles became the only available transport to the ISS. On July 26, 2005, Space Shuttle Discovery (mission STS-114) marked the shuttle's return to space. Consequently, in 2006, space tourism was resumed. On September 18, 2006, an Iranian American businesswoman named Anousheh Ansari became the fourth space tourist (Soyuz TMA-9).[18]) On April 7, 2007, Charles Simonyi, an American businessman of Hungarian descent, joined their ranks (Soyuz TMA-10). Simonyi became the first repeat space tourist, paying again to fly on Soyuz TMA-14 in MarchApril 2009. Canadian Guy Lalibert became the next space tourist in September, 2009 aboard Soyuz TMA-16.

As reported by Reuters on March 3, 2010, Russia announced that the country would double the number of launches of three-man Soyuz ships to four that year, because "permanent crews of professional astronauts aboard the expanded [ISS] station are set to rise to six"; regarding space tourism, the head of the Russian Cosmonauts' Training Center said "for some time there will be a break in these journeys".[2]

On January 12, 2011, Space Adventures and the Russian Federal Space Agency announced that orbital space tourism would resume in 2013 with the increase of manned Soyuz launches to the ISS from four to five per year.[19] However, this has not materialized, and the current preferred option, instead of producing an additional Soyuz, would be to extend the duration of an ISS Expedition to one year, paving the way for the flight of new spaceflight participants. The British singer Sarah Brightman initiated plans (costing a reported $52 million) and participated in preliminary training in early 2015, expecting to then fly (and to perform while in orbit) in September 2015, but in May 2015 she postponed the plans indefinitely.[4][20][21]

Several plans have been proposed for using a space station as a hotel:

In February 2017, Elon Musk announced that substantial deposits from two individuals had been received by Space X for a Moon loop flight using a free return trajectory and that this could happen as soon as late 2018.[33] Musk said that the cost of the mission would be "comparable" to that of sending an astronaut to the International Space Station, about $70 million US dollars in 2017.[34]

No suborbital space tourism has occurred yet, but since it is projected to be more affordable, many companies view it as a money-making proposition. Most are proposing vehicles that make suborbital flights peaking at an altitude of 100160km (6299mi).[35] Passengers would experience three to six minutes of weightlessness, a view of a twinkle-free starfield, and a vista of the curved Earth below. Projected costs are expected to be about $200,000 per passenger.[36]

Under the Outer Space Treaty signed in 1967, the launch operator's nationality and the launch site's location determine which country is responsible for any damages occurred from a launch.[50]

After valuable resources were detected on the Moon, private companies began to formulate methods to extract the resources. Article II of the Outer Space Treaty dictates that "outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means".[51] However, countries have the right to freely explore the Moon and any resources collected are property of that country when they return.

In December 2005, the US government released a set of proposed rules for space tourism.[52] These included screening procedures and training for emergency situations, but not health requirements.

Under current US law, any company proposing to launch paying passengers from American soil on a suborbital rocket must receive a license from the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST). The licensing process focuses on public safety and safety of property, and the details can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Chapter III.[53] This is in accordance with the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act passed by Congress in 2004.[54]

In March 2010, the New Mexico legislature passed the Spaceflight Informed Consent Act. The SICA gives legal protection to companies who provide private space flights in the case of accidental harm or death to individuals. Participants sign an Informed Consent waiver, dictating that spaceflight operators can not be held liable in the "death of a participant resulting from the inherent risks of space flight activities". Operators are however not covered in the case of gross negligence or willful misconduct.[55]

A 2010 study published in Geophysical Research Letters raised concerns that the growing commercial spaceflight industry could accelerate global warming. The study, funded by NASA and The Aerospace Corporation, simulated the impact of 1,000 suborbital launches of hybrid rockets from a single location, calculating that this would release a total of 600 tonnes of black carbon into the stratosphere. They found that the resultant layer of soot particles remained relatively localised, with only 20% of the carbon straying into the southern hemisphere, thus creating a strong hemispherical asymmetry.[56] This unbalance would cause the temperature to decrease by about 0.4C (0.72F) in the tropics and subtropics, whereas the temperature at the poles would increase by between 0.2 and 1C (0.36 and 1.80F). The ozone layer would also be affected, with the tropics losing up to 1.7% of ozone cover, and the polar regions gaining 56%.[57] The researchers stressed that these results should not be taken as "a precise forecast of the climate response to a specific launch rate of a specific rocket type", but as a demonstration of the sensitivity of the atmosphere to the large-scale disruption that commercial space tourism could bring.[56]

Several organizations have been formed to promote the space tourism industry, including the Space Tourism Society, Space Future, and HobbySpace. UniGalactic Space Travel Magazine is a bi-monthly educational publication covering space tourism and space exploration developments in companies like SpaceX, Orbital Sciences, Virgin Galactic and organizations like NASA.

Classes in space tourism are currently taught at the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York,[58] and Keio University in Japan.[59]

A web-based survey suggested that over 70% of those surveyed wanted less than or equal to 2 weeks in space; in addition, 88% wanted to spacewalk (only 14% of these would do it for a 50% premium), and 21% wanted a hotel or space station.[60]

The concept has met with some criticism from some, including politicians, notably Gnter Verheugen, vice-president of the European Commission, who said of the EADS Astrium Space Tourism Project: "It's only for the super rich, which is against my social convictions".[61]

As of October 2013, NBC News and Virgin Galactic have come together to create a new reality television show titled Space Race. The show "will follow contestants as they compete to win a flight into space aboard Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo rocket plane. It is not to be confused with the Children's Space TV show called "Space Racers"[62]

Many private space travelers have objected to the term "space tourist", often pointing out that their role went beyond that of an observer, since they also carried out scientific experiments in the course of their journey. Richard Garriott additionally emphasized that his training was identical to the requirements of non-Russian Soyuz crew members, and that teachers and other non-professional astronauts chosen to fly with NASA are called astronauts. He has said that if the distinction has to be made, he would rather be called "private astronaut" than "tourist".[63] Dennis Tito has asked to be known as an "independent researcher",[citation needed] and Mark Shuttleworth described himself as a "pioneer of commercial space travel".[64] Gregory Olsen prefers "private researcher",[65] and Anousheh Ansari prefers the term "private space explorer".[18] Other space enthusiasts object to the term on similar grounds. Rick Tumlinson of the Space Frontier Foundation, for example, has said: "I hate the word tourist, and I always will ... 'Tourist' is somebody in a flowered shirt with three cameras around his neck."[66] Russian cosmonaut Maksim Surayev told the press in 2009 not to describe Guy Lalibert as a tourist: "It's become fashionable to speak of space tourists. He is not a tourist but a participant in the mission."[67]

"Spaceflight participant" is the official term used by NASA and the Russian Federal Space Agency to distinguish between private space travelers and career astronauts. Tito, Shuttleworth, Olsen, Ansari, and Simonyi were designated as such during their respective space flights. NASA also lists Christa McAuliffe as a spaceflight participant (although she did not pay a fee), apparently due to her non-technical duties aboard the STS-51-L flight.

The US Federal Aviation Administration awards the title of "Commercial Astronaut" to trained crew members of privately funded spacecraft. The only people currently holding this title are Mike Melvill and Brian Binnie, the pilots of SpaceShipOne.

A 2010 report from the Federal Aviation Administration, titled "The Economic Impact of Commercial Space Transportation on the U. S Economy in 2009", cites studies done by Futron, an aerospace and technology-consulting firm, which predict that space tourism could become a billion-dollar market within 20 years.[68] In addition, in the decade since Dennis Tito journeyed to the International Space Station, eight private citizens have paid the $20 million fee to travel to space. Space Adventures suggests that this number could increase fifteen-fold by 2020.[69] These figures do not include other private space agencies such as Virgin Galactic, which as of 2014 has sold approximately 700 tickets priced at $200,000 or $250,000 dollars each and has accepted more than $80 million in deposits.[70]

Go here to see the original:

Space tourism - Wikipedia

The Space-Age Origins of ‘Planet of the Apes’ – Space.com

"Planet of the Apes" has strong ties to space exploration. Here, a still from the famous 1968 film that kicked off the franchise and the upcoming "War for the Planet of the Apes."

When "War for the Planet of the Apes" hits theaters Friday (July 14), viewers will see genetically engineered chimpanzees at war with humans, carrying on a storyline that started with two previous films in 2011 and 2014. It's a nasty parable about the dangers of meddling with nature something that has a great legacy in film history ("Jurassic Park," anyone)?

But probe down into the franchise's roots (including the original 1963 book by Pierre Boulle), and the history is not about genetics it's actually about space. The famous 1968 film that kicked off the movie franchise "Planet of the Apes," starring Charlton Heston began with astronauts crashing into an unknown planet. A rebooted series in 2001, starring Mark Wahlberg, starts off with astronauts and apes working together, exploring space in the future.

So here's a brief primer to bring you up to speed on "Planet's" history. A warning the plots below include major spoilers. [Strange Cinema: Space.com's FavoriteOff-Beat Space Movies]

Some context here is helpful. When the first five "Planet" movies were in theaters between 1968 and 1973, NASA astronauts were busy exploring the moon. The first moon mission Apollo 8 took place in 1968, when three astronauts orbited Earth's lunar companion. The first moon landing quickly followed in 1969, followed by six attempted landings (five were successful) between 1969 and 1972.

So space exploration was a big freaking deal back then, in a world that was dominated by television coverage rather than social media. And this was reflected in many films of the era, ranging from "2001: A Space Odyssey" (1968) to "Marooned" (1969).

"Planet of the Apes" (1968) kicked off the franchise with astronaut Taylor (Charlton Heston) and crewmates in deep hibernation; they are voyaging for nearly a light-year and need the hibernation to slow down their natural aging processes, since the voyage takes a long time. Their spaceship crash-lands in a lake, killing one of the astronauts and waking up the rest of the crew.

(Just a warning, again spoilers for these movies ahead.)

The crew members discover that it's the year 3978, about 2,000 years since their 1972 departure. They quickly come across some armed and very unhappy gorillas that attack the crew, killing more astronauts and capturing Taylor. From here, we'll skip straight to the end, where Taylor discovers the Statue of Liberty on a beach and realizes this planet is actually Earth after a nuclear holocaust.

The sequel "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" (1970) saw another spacecraft crash on a future Earth in a search for Taylor and his crew. Suffice it to say, the gorillas are no less friendly, and Taylor ends up killing all life on the planet with a "doomsday" bomb that he discovers.

Luckily for the franchise, three apes escape in Taylor's spaceship in "Escape from the Planet of the Apes" (1971). The shock wave creates a time warp a familiar plot device in space films and transports the apes to 1973 Earth, where they are captured and put in the Los Angeles Zoo. While the apes agree among themselves not to speak of their origins, a commission is formed to figure out how Taylor's spaceship arrived back on Earth with the apes on board. [Why DoWe Love Space Movies?]

From here, the franchise lessened the emphasis on space, focusing instead on conflicts between humans and apes in the movies "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes" (1972) and "Battle for the Planet of the Apes" (1973).

Meanwhile, the franchise spun off a brief 1974 television series, "Planet of the Apes," that had pretty much the same premise. Astronauts landed on a future Earth, but in this case, the astronauts were clearly identified as originally going to Alpha Centauri, and they deduced almost right away that they had landed on the wrong planet.

Another television series, this one animated, took place between 1975 and 1976, with Earth astronauts being hurtled into the future and landing on a planet full of apes. This was called "Return to the Planet of the Apes" and only lasted 13 episodes not long enough for us to know if the astronauts escaped.

Hollywood then revisited the franchise in 2001, with Mark Wahlberg starring. Although the 2001 movie shares the 1968 movie's name "Planet of the Apes" the plot is pretty different. Wahlberg plays an astronaut named Leo Davidson in the year 2029, working with primates on the United States Air Force Space Station Oberon. One of the apes, Pericles, goes to the sun in a small space pod to investigate a coming storm. After Pericles disappears, Oberon disobeys a direct order and follows her in a second pod.

The pod enters a time-travel warp, and Davidson crash-lands on a planet called Ashlar in the year 5021. This is no less nasty a place than the 1968 future Earth, as the primates here use human beings as slaves. Predictably, Davidson is taken as a slave and has some misadventures as a result.

His ship, funny enough, becomes an object of worship by the apes, who are convinced it is related to the apes' god. They call their temple-ship Calima because those are the visible letters on its surface. In reality, the visible letters are a part of the phrase, "Caution LIve aniMAls."

In the 2001 movie, space comes into play once again: Davidson escapes Ashlar and uses the same geomagnetic storm to bring his ship back to "present-day" Earth (which is the year 2029 in the film). Unfortunately, it turns out that time is forever altered; Davidson is greeted by news reporters, police officers and the like all apes.

And there you have it: our handy guide to the space origins of the "Planet of the Apes" films. While the recent reboot films have all been bound to Earth, we can't wait to find out if future entries might take the series back to its cosmic roots.

Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.

Read the original:

The Space-Age Origins of 'Planet of the Apes' - Space.com