China’s newest censorship methods on display – IFEX

This statement was originally published on freedomhouse.org on 13 July 2017.

Sarah Cook, Senior Research Analyst for East Asia

July, more than most other months, is loaded with politically sensitive anniversaries that keep Communist Party of China (CPC) censors and security forces on their toes.

First comes the July 1 anniversary of Hong Kong's transfer from British to Chinese rule. Then there is July 5, marking the 2009 ethnic violence in the Xinjiang region that sparked an unprecedented crackdown on its mostly Muslim Uyghur population. The very next day, July 6, is the Dalai Lama's birthday, and July 9 is the second anniversary of a sweeping repressive action against China's human rights lawyers. Finally there is July 20, the date in 1999 when the CPC banned the popular spiritual practice Falun Gong and began a massive - and often violent - campaign to eradicate it.

This year, the anniversaries overlap with other news stories that Beijing likely wants to quash, including an international uproar surrounding democracy activist Liu Xiaobo's belated release on medical parole with terminal cancer, and a campaign by exiled tycoon Guo Wengui to publicize corruption allegations involving top Chinese leaders.

It is not surprising in these circumstances that the CPC has tightened information controls. But the party has not simply intensified its efforts in the short term. It has also gradually adapted its methods to a changing technological environment, one in which mobile phones, social media applications, and digital surveillance are critical features.

The result is a new level of intrusiveness and sophistication, as well as danger for populations that are already at risk of severe human rights violations.

One of the escalating restrictions that may have the widest reach is a crackdown on virtual private networks (VPNs), which allow users to bypass official censorship. Several VPN applications have been disabled or removed from online stores since July 1. In a June 22 message to customers, prominent VPN provider Green said that after receiving "a notice from the higher authorities," it planned to cease operations on July 1, causing a ripple of conversations on social media about what circumvention tools could still be used. The latest initiative builds on increasing official efforts to stop the dissemination of such tools, including some that the authorities had long tolerated.

The applications' removal will have the secondary effect of cutting off software updates for users, leaving their devices more vulnerable to hacking. And while many use VPNs to access uncensored news or blocked social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, the tools are also used for security purposes, to protect businesses and activists from pervasive state surveillance.

Other recent controls have focused on ethnic and religious minorities. In Xinjiang, authorities in a district of the regional capital Urumqi issued a notice on June 27 instructing all residents and business owners to submit their "personal ID cards, cell phones, external drives, portable hard drives, notebook computers, and media storage cards" to the local police post for "registration and scanning" by August 1. One district employee told Radio Free Asia that the campaign was taking place throughout the city. The goal is ostensibly to identify and purge any "terrorist videos," but the action violates the privacy rights of Urumqi's three million residents and exposes them to punishment for a host of other possible offenses, including those related to peaceful religious or political expression.

In Tibet, the instant-messaging application WeChat has become increasingly popular in recent years, as it has across China. But using it to communicate about the Dalai Lama or his birthday is difficult and dangerous. A test conducted in January by the Canada-based Citizen Lab found that the Tibetan spelling for "Dalai Lama" was automatically deleted in WeChat messages. Meanwhile, at least two Tibetans are known to have been jailed for participating in a WeChat group commemorating the spiritual leader's 80th birthday in 2015. After a new spate of self-immolation protests took place in early 2017, Tibetans in Sichuan Province report that police are monitoring communication on the platform more closely and detaining those suspected of sharing information about self-immolations with overseas contacts.

These developments reflect a broader trend identified in a recent Freedom House report on religion in China. The study found that Chinese government tactics of religious control and persecution have been changing to incorporate new technologies and match the evolving communication habits of the public. Even in the absence of sensitive anniversaries, various modes of electronic surveillance have expanded dramatically at sites of worship and public spaces frequented by religious believers.

The CPC's information controls also appear to be spreading to traditionally less persecuted groups, like state-sanctioned churches and non-Uyghur residents of Xinjiang. Since March, authorities in Zhejiang have reportedly been implementing a campaign to install surveillance cameras in churches and possibly Buddhist temples, in some cases sparking altercations with police and violence against congregants. In Urumqi, the order to turn in digital devices for inspection applies to ethnic Han and Kazakh residents as well as Uyghurs, while local Kazakhs have reported increased monitoring and some prosecutions related to expressions of their Muslim faith in recent months.

The Chinese government's actions are partly a response to creative initiatives by minority activists to share their stories and perspectives in a heavily restrictive information environment.

"It is a nonstop game of cat-and-mouse," journalist Nithin Coca wrote in a June 27 article about China's high-tech war on Tibetan communication. "As the Tibet movement's digital-security abilities and training improve, the Chinese government implements more sophisticated hacking techniques."

Similarly, as Falun Gong practitioners devise new means of disseminating information to debunk vilifying state propaganda and expose abuses they have suffered, security forces have adapted by increasing electronic surveillance and deploying geolocation technology to find and arrest them. Local authorities in places like Jiangsu province have also upgraded anti-Falun Gong propaganda efforts, deploying LED rolling screens, cartoons, microblogs, and QQ messaging - including in schools - last month to demonize Falun Gong and other banned religious groups.

The result of the escalating controls is that there are even fewer avenues for persecuted groups and individuals to defend themselves, offer alternatives to the party line, or expose violence committed by officials. Meanwhile, other Chinese interested in knowing more about these and other censored topics find it increasingly difficult - and risky - to obtain information.

There is also a cost to the CPC. Such aggressive "stability maintenance" methods ultimately increase tensions with key populations, intensify resentment of the party's heavy-handed rule, and inspire anti-government activism and even violence, including among otherwise apolitical citizens.

From that perspective, while the CPC's efforts may successfully silence some critics this year, party leaders may face an even more daunting challenge next July.

This article was also published in the Diplomat on July 7, 2017.

Sarah Cook is a senior research analyst for East Asia at Freedom House, director of its China Media Bulletin, and author of "The Battle for China's Spirit: Religious Revival, Repression, and Resistance under Xi Jinping".

Read the rest here:

China's newest censorship methods on display - IFEX

Ben Shapiro to testify in Congressional hearing on college campus … – The Hill

Conservative authorBen Shapirois expected to testify before a joint Congressional hearing on free speech on college campuses later this month, according to a new report by The Hollywood Reporter.

Comedian Adam Carolla, Shapiro and former American Civil Liberties Union President Nadine Strossen will testify before theCommittee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on Health Care, Benefits and Administrative Rules and the Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Affairs for up to two hours on July 27.

Lawmakers on the committees include Darell Issa (R-Calif.), Mark Sanford (R-Fla.) and Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.).

The hearing comes after protests, and in some cases riots, have broken out on college campuses over guests invited to speakto students.

In February, University of California, Berkeley was on a campus-wide lockdown after protests broke out against Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos, an "alt-right" leader who was scheduled to speak at the school.

Similar protests happened later in the year when Ann Coulter was invited to speak at Berkeley's campus.

Shapiro,one of those invited to testify this month, has also sparked protests among students on campuses.He was escorted off the campus ofCalifornia State University, Los Angeles by police last year after protests broke out over his planned appearance.

Visit link:

Ben Shapiro to testify in Congressional hearing on college campus ... - The Hill

Free Speech Can’t Just Be For Speech We Like | Editorials … – Lynchburg News and Advance

If ever there were a more important time in the last half-century to lift up Americans First Amendment right to free speech, its today. Its a foundation stone of our democratic republic, but one that is under increasing stress with each passing day.

Take, for example, the events of July 8 in Charlottesville.

Earlier this year, the Charlottesville City Council voted to remove statues of Confederate Gens. Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Stonewall Jackson and rename the parks where they now stand Justice Park and Emancipation Park. The actual removal is on hold with a suit by statue supporters making its way through the legal system.

In the meantime, the statues have become a flashpoint in the ongoing culture wars. Richard Spencer, a founder of the alt-right white supremacist movement, has been to town for a rally. Corey Stewart, the fiery anti-immigrant populist who barely lost the June 13 Republican gubernatorial primary, has embraced the statues as his ticket to a larger political stage. A Charlottesville white nationalist blogger has seen his profile rise considerably, and in June there was a torch-lit rally of support for the statues that reminded many of Ku Klux Klan rallies of decades past.

Perhaps most disturbing of all, last weekend more than four dozen members and supporters of a Ku Klux Klan coven from North Carolina, who had obtained an assembly permit from the city, held a rally at the foot of the Lee statue.

Community leaders, from the mayor to the president of the University of Virginia, urged folks to stay away from the KKKs protest. The university and city helped plan and stage several community events designed to blunt the KKKs message of hate. But still, more than 1,000 gathered in and around the two parks theyre just blocks from each other to protest the Klans presence in the city.

Tensions understandably were high. After all, its not every day you see a gathering of Klansmen in their robes and regalia, waving Confederate flags and spouting their hateful rhetoric. Nor is it every day that a thousand or more protesters show up to counter that message. Police officers took elaborate steps to protect the Klansmen as they exercised their First Amendment rights, the same rights the anti-Klan protesters were exercising.

At the conclusion of the rally, specially trained Virginia State Police troopers were on hand to make certain the Klan members were able to exit safely, but they still had a phalanx of protesters to make it through. In those moments, anything could have set off a tragic series of events.

Police asked the thousand-member crowd to disperse and go home as the Klan rally had ended. They begged, they pleaded nothing. They officially declared the crowd an unlawful assembly under Virginia law and warned protesters to leave nothing. They put on their gas masks as a way to tell protesters what was next nothing. Then came the release of three canisters of tear gas, and in the following moments, almost two dozen protesters were arrested and charged with various offenses.

The KKK rally and the counter-protest were difficult to watch, but they illustrate just how important the First Amendment is and why we must protect it. There are legal limits to free speech, but the Klan was well inside the perimeter of whats legal, as were the KKK opponents. The police stoically and professionally did their jobs of protecting the public and making it possible for citizens to exercise their constitutional rights in as safe an environment as possible.

Spencer, the alt-right founder, is planning another rally next month, and already there is trepidation about what could transpire. Let him exercise his right to free speech, though its ugly hate speech. Let his opponents rally against him, but peacefully. We cant let the First Amendment become the victim of mobs, on either the left or the right.

Read more:

Free Speech Can't Just Be For Speech We Like | Editorials ... - Lynchburg News and Advance

Letter: Transparency and free speech – Charleston Post Courier

I had the privilege of addressing the Mount Pleasant Town Council July 11 on an issue near and dear to my heart; ironically enough the topic was the towns plan to update its rules for responding to Freedom of Information Act requests.

As I spoke I was well aware of the time limitations for speaking set forth in the towns ordinances and backstopped by the states FOIA law. I tried to keep my comments brief, but I went over my allotment of free speech. As I was trying to wrap up, the mayor kindly informed me that I had exceeded my time limit, thanked me for my input, and moved on.

I got the distinct impression that the mayor was more interested in moving the meeting along than listening to one of the people she was elected to represent.

Free speech and leadership sometimes means you have to at least listen and be receptive to ideas and opinions you may not agree with. Perhaps if the mayor listened a bit more some of the divisive issues the town is facing today could have been avoided.

Perhaps if issues were openly discussed, ideas fully expressed and a consensus reached, a more transparent administration could be achieved. Instead, the administration appears to be interested in complying with the letter not the spirit of the law, all the while watching the clock.

Anyway, later on closer to election time I hope I can invite the mayor to speak at a campaign event for two minutes.

Timothy C. Kiel

Pelzer Drive

Mount Pleasant

See the article here:

Letter: Transparency and free speech - Charleston Post Courier

Satanic memorial sparks free speech debate in Minnesota city – Fox News

BELLE PLAINE, Minn. A veterans park in Belle Plaine became a ground zero for constitutional debate after the city created a Free Speech Zone where memorials of any religious background could be placed.

In January, a Christian memorial was removed over concerns it violated the establishment clause of the Constitution. Now, a satanic memorial is set to move in, causing protests on Saturday.

The removal of the Christian memorial by the city of Belle Plaine sparked outrage. The city cited complaints that it violated Constitutional obligations to separate church and state. Later, the memorial was returned to the park.

In February, the Belle Plaine city council voted to establish the veterans memorial park a Free Speech Zone, welcoming any religion or group to take part.

This is what we support, this is what the community supports, said one protester. And it doesnt matter if you are Jewish, Muslimwe are all Americans fighting this war together.

But, promises of inclusion were quickly put to the test. The Satanic Temple in Salem, Massachusetts, announced a plan to install a monument of their own: a black cube with a helmet on top.

The monument is intended to honor veterans who may not be Christian.

Counter-protester Army Reserve Lieutenant Kevin Lindow told Fox 9 that he supports any memorial, regardless of religion or background. He said he does not believe in God, but did serve his country and would like the monument to be in the park.

Others at Saturdays gathering believe Constitutional protection comes with exceptions.

My thoughts are, if you are calling Satan to be on your side, you are not going to expect any blessings, Bernard Slobodnik, a protest organizer said.

There is a freedom of speech, but freedom comes at a price, as well, said one protester. They are free to believe whatever they want to, but they need to do it on their own grounds, not on public property.

Read more from FOX 9.

View original post here:

Satanic memorial sparks free speech debate in Minnesota city - Fox News

Denver’s Secular Hub unites non-believers in what one calls an atheist church – The Denver Post

By 10:30 a.m., the assembly room has filled with people. Theyre four dozen strong, swirling about the long rectangular hall like in a hive, standing and laughing in small clusters, shaking hands and hugging latecomers, finishing coffee and doughnuts in the kitchen, leaning in close to hear a weeks worth of gossip whispered too low for lurking passers-by.

The congregations Sunday morning gathering is a cherished communal ritual that brings together newly joined 20-somethings, still groggy from a night on the town, with chatty retirees who have been members since the institutions founding. They come from across metro Denver to hang out and talk about whatevers on their mind: Donald Trump, National Public Radio, last nights Rockies game, the hiking trail du jour.

Inevitably, though, their conversation returns to the supernatural power that unites them: God.

This isnt church, though.

Its atheist church, jokes Ruth McLeod, who moved to Denver from Louisiana in 2012.Church doesnt have a monopoly on community.

Like most members of the Secular Hub, a nontheistic community center in Denvers Whittier neighborhood, McLeod doesnt believe in God. After abandoning her strict Christian upbringing in college, she turned to atheism, a solution to the silence of the cosmos that allowed her to jettison what she considers the contradictions of the Bible and the conservative social program of the church.

Her conversion has increasing resonance in the United States, where one in 13 adults identify as atheist or agnostic. American secularists, though, are not an organized tribe. Nontheists lack the elaborate institutional wherewithal enjoyed by the 160 million Americans who regularly attend religious services. In a country where faith is worth $1.2 trillion equivalent to the entire economy of Mexico God disbelievers have no colleagues in Congress, face pervasivecontemptand control few institutions of their own.

Daniel Brenner, Special to the Denver Post

The Secular Hub aims to curb those realities by providing a central meeting space where the theologically marooned can stake out a home.

We think were the first secular community center in the United States, says Barb Sannwald, a professional computer programmer and founding member. Its much easier to be an atheist in Colorado than elsewhere.

The secular center hosts an assortment of compatible yet distinct deity doubters atheists, agnostics, humanists and freethinkers held together by skepticism, faith in science and a commitment to free-ranging dialogue. Numerous affiliate groups also rent out the building for weekly meetings, including the local chapters of Freedom from Religion Foundation,United Coalition of Reasonand Freethinkers in AA, a nonreligious arm of Alcoholics Anonymous.

Two hundred twenty-five core members pledge $5 a month each for official status. Hundreds more float among groups, dropping in and out of meetings and get-togethers as wanted. Leaders strive to bring together the entire congregation through regular programming, which includes book clubs, movie screenings, meet-and-greets, meal discussions, and public lectures by renowned scientists and skeptics. On Sundays, everyone comes together for Secular Hubs flagship affair, Coffee & Community, which simulates the dependability of weekly church service without ceremony or sermons.

For a few years, Sannwald and other founders attended First Universalist Church of Denver, a liberal Christian group that embraces a wide array of beliefs from Eastern and Western religious traditions. Around 2007, a community newsletter alerted Sannwald to Humanists of Colorado, which held monthly meetings at the church. She began frequenting meetings, where she met a number of like-minded locals who valued the camaraderie of First Universalist Church but demurred on its doctrine, namely the emphasis on God.

There was a small group of us looking for the type of community that a church provides, Sannwald said. Churches are great places to find friends, to find comfort during difficult times and to meet others. But none of us were religious, so we didnt want to go to a church.

So in late 2012, she and a cohort of 20 Coloradans began raising money to open a space for agnostics, atheists, secularists and humanists in metro Denver. They initially considered asking a deep-pocketed donor to underwrite the startup.

Daniel Brenner, Special to the Denver Post

But we decided we wanted this to be a group effort, Sannwald said. So we had 23 founders put up the founding money to ensure broad-based support from the secular community.

In October 2012, representatives from Denver Atheist Meetup and Humanists of Colorado officially formed a nonprofit, which they called Secular Hub. A month later, the founders signed a lease at East 31st Avenue and Downing Street, where the organization still exists today.

The Hubs origin story speaks to a spate of nontheistic organizations popping up across the country. More than a dozen similar secular ventures have opened over the past decade, estimates Nick Fish, national program director of American Atheists.

Its certainly a growing feature of the humanist and atheist community, he said. The great thing about being an atheist is that no one tells you how to do it. But that can also be a struggle, as theres not always community support groups out there. Groups like the Secular Hub provide that for people who want and need that. What theyre doing is really important and worthwhile.

In the 4 1/2 years since the grand opening of Denvers first outpost for nonbelief on Feb. 12, which isDarwin Day,of 2013 the organization has grown from a core of committed nontheists to an emerging community of engineers, artists, immigrants, families, lifelong nonbelievers and recent religious defectors.

Andrew Forlines is one such religious turncoat. The 32-year-old grew up outside Cincinnati, home-schooled by archconservative parents who instilled Christian fundamentalism in their children. Forlines rebelled early. Despite never receiving formal education, he possessed an innate curiosity and habit for self-teaching that gradually led him astray from his anti-science parents and their faith founded inbiblical inerrancy.

When he moved to Denver two years ago, he wanted a community where he could make sense of his unorthodox upbringing. Through a Google search last July, he found Recovering from Religion, an affiliated group that offers guidance for spiritual renegades who have walked away from what Forlines calls indoctrination.

I was looking for a support group for people like me who struggle with a dogmatic religious upbringing, he said. I felt welcomed and embraced. Everyone was very nice. I felt a tremendous amount of relief to have found like-minded people.

Forlines immediately took to the community, where his values and background werent isolated or isolating but shared. In March, he launched two regular events of his own: a book club on social issues, and Dinner & Documentary, which hosts monthly film screenings and open discussions over food.

The Hub is what anyone makes of it, he said, emphasizing the organizations differences from a church. Its in between a stand-alone organization in your traditional sense and a physical meeting space for subgroups to utilize. Ive found that it often brings together people who make decisions based on science and empirical evidence.

As with secularism itself, the Hubs ideological flexibility and lack of firm hierarchy allow members such as Forlines to engage as frequently, widely and deeply as desired. Leaders want to meet nonbelievers where they are, welcoming potential members who might be skeptical about joining an institution devoted to skepticism.New members must pledge to follow only three rules for admission: honoring the separation of church and state; maintaining goodwill among members and avoiding hostility; and not promoting any beliefs in gods or other supernatural entities.

Sannwald and other leaders have been encouraged by a gust of interest, particularly among parents with young children. Yet the current facility with only 1,500 square feet of meeting space has little capacity for kids and no property outside.

Were growing to a point where we might want to move, Sannwald said. Its one of our goals. But we have no concrete plans yet.

A move, though, will require sufficient funds. The Hub currently subsists on membership dues, which help pay rent, utilities and little more. The all-volunteer board and staff take no commission for their work.

Growth will also test the bonds that hold together a piecemeal community with many peripheral groups and members. Religions have core texts that serve as a central spoke around which the community can coalesce. The Secular Hub, which lacks such a common code, lets the burden of communion fall on members themselves. Its a tall task that both challenges and liberates.

In a church, theres this feeling of needing to conform to dogma thats a lie, said Kimberly Saviano, a Hub founder who lives in Denver. Secularism and atheism do not have any particular ethical code. We are responsible to come up with our own.

To secularists such as Saviano, that responsibility poses a uniquely human task, one that reflects the problem and offers hope for all social networks.

Most of us have a deep need for community, somewhere we belong and have people who understand you, she said. Were trying to be there for each other if someones in the hospital or moving or going through a tough time. Thats the organizing force of community, making sure were taking care of each other. And theres nothing religious about that. You dont need God for that.

More here:

Denver's Secular Hub unites non-believers in what one calls an atheist church - The Denver Post

Six Volunteer ‘Astronauts’ Are About to Lock Themselves Inside a Simulated Mars Colony – Futurism

Simulated Mars Mission

Next to an old nuclear bomber hangar in western Poland, a mission to the surfaces of both the moon and Mars is about to begin.

The two-week mission is just a simulation, of course, since no entity on Earth is prepared toinhabit deep space. But the experiment called the Poland Mars Analogue Simulation 2017 will study a group of six volunteer analogue astronauts as they work through a realistic schedule of space exploration, then provide those findings to anyone whos drawing up crewed missions beyond Earth.

This mission will be one of the most comprehensive Mars analogue missions ever conducted in Europe, Mina Takla, spokesperson for thePMAS 2017 mission, told Business Insider in an email.

The experiment, which Business Insider first learned about through theDawn of Private Space Science Symposiumon June 4, is being spearheaded by theSpace Exploration Project Group, or SEPG. (The group is part of the Space Generation Advisory Council and works with the United Nations on its space exploration research and support efforts.)

Many other partners are involved in the mission, too, including The Mars Society, European Space Agency, and European Space Foundation.

The projects central feature is a U-shaped habitat thats connected to a nuclear fighter [plane] hangar near Pila, Poland, Takla said.

To make the mission possible, PMAS 2017 rounded up money from corporate sponsors, and also raised tens of thousands of dollars throughcrowdfundingsites. To create the habitat, the Space Garden Company a partner to the project secured material donations and also did some fundraising.

Organizers have dubbed their faux habitat project the Martian Modular Analog Research Station, orM.A.R.S.

As Marta Bellon of Business Insider Polandreported in May 2016, a previous design for the base, created by British architect Scott Porter, called for four arms and a domed headquarters built by Freedomes (the same company that built the fictional Mars habitats for the blockbuster movie The Martian).

However, organizers have since dropped the four-armed design for a U-shaped one. The habitats planned location in southern Poland also moved to western Poland in the past year.

The new, U-shaped M.A.R.S. facility will have six units, each with its own dedicated purpose, such as scientific research, crew quarters (including a gym), habitation, hygienic facilities, kitchen area, and storage and systems, Takla said. The entry and exit to the habitat will be via an airlock.

Takla did not provide Business Insider with any sketches or photos of the facility in time for publication, nor could he confirm if and when its construction was completed.

Assuming M.A.R.S. is finished in time, sixanalogue astronautswill land in the habitat on July 31, then work and live and work inside it through August 13.

The volunteers hail from Puerto Rico, Israel, Spain, France, India, the US, Nigeria, and other locations. Meanwhile, a larger support team will operate as mission control in the northern Polish city of Torun, including psychologists tomonitor the astronauts.

[PMAS 2017] will be one of the most international, multicultural, and interdisciplinary analogue missions ever conducted, with members from over 28 different countries and representing scientific disciplines ranging from engineering to astrophysics, psychology, geology, and biology, Takla said.

In addition to following a strict schedule of experiments, maintenance, and personal time, mission managers will simulate other realities for a far-off planetary mission, including spacesuits to leave M.A.R.S., and annoying communications delays.

[T]he first three days of the 14 days of the simulation will be in Lunar mode with a real-time communication between habitat and Mission Control, before we go for the remaining 11 days into the Martian mode, Tajana Lui, co-leader of SEPG, told Business Insider in an email.

When the Martian mode starts, Lui said, the time delay will be 15 minutes, and simulates the long distance between Earth and Mars and the related communication delay.

The PMAS 2017 mission isnt the only project trying to figure out how to run a tightly operated lunar or Martian base.

HI-SEAS in Hawaii, for example which former Business Insider reporter Kelly Dickerson visited has astronauts who live and work inside a habitatbuilt on the side of a barren volcano.

Russia, China, and the ESA have also run six willing astronauts through a psychological gauntlet with its $15 millionMars500 experiment.

That project, which ended a few years ago, had the astronauts stay inside for 520 days, or nearly a year and a half, to see what challenges they faced and how to prevent or solve them when real Mars colonization missions actually begin. (Boredom, concludedan exhaustive studyof the project, is one of the greatest hurdles to overcome.)

Such information could prove extremely valuable to the first nation (or private company,like SpaceX) to land people on Mars. Whoever is spending tens of billions of dollars to get the job done, theyll not only want a crew to survive to tell the tale, but also make the best use of their time some 140 million miles from Earth.

Correction (July 10, 2017): Business Insider was initially given and directed to outdated information about M.A.R.S. We have since corrected and updated this story to reflect the projects current details.

Go here to see the original:

Six Volunteer 'Astronauts' Are About to Lock Themselves Inside a Simulated Mars Colony - Futurism

Ukraine to start NATO talks: Russia angry, the West uncertain – FRANCE 24

With your existing account from... {* loginWidget *} With a traditional account... {* #signInForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *} {* currentPassword *} {* /signInForm *} Welcome back, {* welcomeName *} {* loginWidget *} Welcome back! {* #signInForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *} {* currentPassword *}

Sign In

Your account has been deactivated.

You must verify your email address before signing in. Check your email for your verification email, or enter your email address in the form below to resend the email.

Please confirm the information below before signing in. Sign In

We have sent a confirmation email to {* emailAddressData *}. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{| foundExistingAccountText |} {| current_emailAddress |}.

{| existing_displayName |} {| existing_provider_emailAddress |}

Created {| existing_createdDate |} at {| existing_siteName |}

Thank you for verifiying your email address.

Check your email for a link to reset your password.

Thank you for verifiying your email address.

Password has been successfully updated.

We didn't recognize that password reset code. Enter your email address to get a new one.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{* photoManager *}

{* loginWidget *}

{* publicPrivate *} {* journalistContact *} {* aboutMe *} {* usernameTwPublic *} {* preferedContactLanguages *} {* arabicUsername *} {* persianUsername *} {* skypeId *} {* usernameTw *} {* journalistContact *} {* publicPrivate *} {* profession *}

{* newsMenu *} {* optinalert *} {* optinBestofWeek *} {* optinBestofWEnd *} {* optinBestofObs *}

{* newsMenuEn *} {* optinalertEn *} {* optinBestofWeekEn *} {* optinBestofWEndEn *} {* optinBestofObsEn *}

{* newsMenuAr *} {* optinalertAr *} {* optinBestofWeekAr *} {* optinBestofWEndAr *} {* optinBestofObsAr *}

{* newsMenuEs *} {* optinalertEs *} {* optinbestofweekEs *} {* optinbestofwendEs *}

{* optinQuotidienne *} {* optinBreaking *}

{* optinAutopromo *} {* optinPartenaires *}

{* optinActuMonde *} {* optinActuAfrique *} {* optinAlert *} {* optinRfiAfriqueFootFr *} {* optinMfi *} {* optinActuMusique *} {* optinOffreRfi *} {* optinOffrePartenaire *}

{* savedProfileMessage *}

Are you sure you want to deactivate your account? You will no longer have access to your profile.

See more here:

Ukraine to start NATO talks: Russia angry, the West uncertain - FRANCE 24

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania – News & Observer

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania
News & Observer
Some 5,000 troops from NATO and partner countries are staging exercises in Romania watched by a senior NATO official and Romania's president. President Klaus Iohannis and NATO Military Committee head Gen. Petr Pavel, who is on a two-day visit to ...

and more »

Read this article:

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania - News & Observer

Newest Russia Threat? Military Challenges US And Europe By Winning In Syria, Entering Mediterranean – Newsweek

Russia's support for the Syrian government in its war against jihadists and other insurgents has given Moscow a newfound military foothold in the Mediterranean, one that could present a serious challenge to another foe: NATO.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank that monitors global conflicts, released a report Thursday linking Russia's commitment toSyrian President Bashar al-Assad and his armed forces with Moscow's desire to increase its leverage against U.S.-led alliance NATO, which dominates much of Europe. For years, Russia and NATO have been engaged in an international arms race, the likes of which have not been seen since the Cold War, and each side accuses the other of pushing the limits of peace among the world's leading military powers. By coming to the rescue of an old ally in the Middle East, Russia may have secured a new, strategic entrance to the heavily contested theater of Europe.

Related:Trump's War: From bombing Syria to challenging Russia and Iran

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

A still image taken from a video footage and released by Russia's Defense Ministry on June 23, 2017, shows a missile being fired from a Russian warship to positions held by the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) in Syria's Hama province, from the Mediterranean Sea. In helping Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his armed forces defeat the insurgents and jihadists attempting to overthrow him, Russia was able to build up its forces in the Mediterranean Sea. MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS TV

"Russian President Vladimir Putin is establishing a long-term military presence in the Mediterranean Sea in part to contest the United States ability to operate freely and hold NATOs southern flank at risk," the report, authored by analysts Charles Frattini III and Genevieve Casagrande, found.

Casagrande told Newsweek that Russia's approach to the conflict in Syria "almost immediately" showed signs of an underlying campaign to creep into NATO's southern flank, especially in Moscow's interaction with NATO member Turkey. Turkey was a leading sponsor of militants that took arms against Assad's government in 2011, accusing the Syrian leader of perpetrating human rights abuses and political oppression. Early on, rebels began to receive significant support from Western countries such as the U.S. and Gulf Arab states such as Qatar as well. The Syrian military was forced to withdraw from much of the country, leaving only a few major cities as bastions of government support.

This changed in 2015, however, when Russia staged a direct military intervention at Assad's request. Syria's Baathist government and Moscow have kept ties for decades and, under the cover of Russian airstrikes, Syria's armed forces were able to regainmuch of the country. Rebels, whose ranks had already been largely decimated by infighting with ultra-conservative Sunni Muslim fighters from Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State militant group (ISIS), had little choice but to surrender nearly every population center under their control. In what was perhaps the biggest turning point in the war, insurgents were beaten in Aleppo in December. Turkey, which continued to sponsor rebels after rising jihadist influence compelled the U.S. to partially abandon its own backing, entered into an unprecedented agreement with Russia to give up whatwas once a bastion of anti-government support in Aleppo.

The move marked the beginning of the Astana peace process, an effort to find a political solution to the war that parallels ongoing U.N.-sponsored talks. Casagrande said Russia's ability to convince a "conflicted" Turkey, a primary opponent of Assad's government that often disagrees with its NATO partners as well, to come to the table with the Syrian government and Iran, another major ally of Assad, signaled a turn in Moscow's favor.

"Russia is using this to drive a wedge between Turkey and other NATO allies," Casagrande told Newsweek. "It's part of Russia's global plan to constrain and disrupt NATO at large."

A graphic provided by the Institute for the Study of War shows the extent of the Russian Black Sea Fleet's new Mediterranean Task Force. While Moscow's intervention in Syria has turned the tides of war for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, it has also granted a strategic point of access for Russia near NATO's southern flank in Europe. INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF WAR

The strategy appears to be working, too, she noted. On a tactical level, the Syrian army and its allies have made a significant comeback with even French President Emmanuel Macron rescinding Assad's departure as a precondition to ending a war that's raged on for more than six years, killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions more. The Syrian military has largely secured the western part of the country, save for the rebel hub of Idlib, and has begun moving east, rapidly cutting through ISIS territory toward the city of Deir Al-Zour, which has been under siege by the jihadists since 2014.

Russia, on the other hand, is looking west. It's contributed extensive naval resources, including 15 warships from its Black Sea Fleet, toward developing a Permanent Mediterranean Task Force as of July 5. The ships are based out of the coastal Syrian city of Tartous, where Moscow secured permission from Damascus to establish a naval base for nearly the next half a century. Russian warships and a submarinein the Mediterranean have already fired advanced, supersonic Kalibr cruise missiles against ISIS positions in Syria. The same nuclear-capable weapons could soon easily be in range of NATO targets as well, if they aren't already.

"Regarding Russia's engagement in Syria, I think it's absolutely linked to a desire by Moscow to project power on a greater scale in the region as a whole," Neil Hauer, lead analyst at SecDev Group, told Newsweek, noting upcoming renovations to both Russia's naval base in Tartous and air basein Latakia.

"All of this goes far above and beyond what the remaining campaign against Syrian rebels and the Islamic State requires, and thus appears to be pretty clearly aimed at establishing Russia as a major player in the region and challenger to NATO's aims for years to come," he added.

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad visits a Russian air base at Hmeymim, in western Syria in this handout picture posted on the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) on June 27, 2017, Syria. Hmeymim is one of the crucial military installations lent by the Syrian military to its Russian allies for at least 49 years. SANA/Reuters

It may not end with Syria, either. Russia's special forces have already reportedly been spotted in Egypt, potentially courting Libyan military leader Khalifa Hifter, who has become increasingly influential politically over his war-torn nation. Yemen, which has been devastated by a Saudi Arabia-led campaign against a local majority-Shiite Muslim militant group known as the Houthis,could also serve as a venue for Russian military ventures where the U.S. and its allies have significantly struggled to achieve theirown objectives. As Russia and NATO's rivalryplays out in the Baltics and other parts of Europe, the latter may find itself caught off guard by an expandingRussian sphere of influence reminiscent of Moscow's Soviet legacy.

"Putin has already set some pretty strategic conditions in countries like Libya, Egypt and Yemen," Casagrande told Newsweek. "What Russia does pretty well in the Middle East is set itself to benefit from opportunities in the long run."

See the original post here:

Newest Russia Threat? Military Challenges US And Europe By Winning In Syria, Entering Mediterranean - Newsweek

Military cyberoperations headed for revamp after long delay – Minneapolis Star Tribune

Adm. Mike Rogers heads both the NSA and Cyber Command, which would separate under a White House plan.

Jacquelyn Martin - Associated Press

By LOLITA C. BALDOR , Associated Press July 15, 2017 - 5:46 PM

WASHINGTON After months of delay, the Trump administration is finalizing plans to revamp the nation's military command for defensive and offensive cyber operations in hopes of intensifying America's ability to wage cyberwar against the Islamic State group and other foes, according to U.S. officials.

Under the plans, U.S. Cyber Command would eventually be split off from the intelligence-focused National Security Agency.

Details are still being worked out, but officials say they expect a decision and announcement in the coming weeks. The officials weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter so requested anonymity.

The goal, they said, is to give U.S. Cyber Command more autonomy, freeing it from any constraints that stem from working alongside the NSA, which is responsible for monitoring and collecting telephone, internet and other intelligence data from around the world a responsibility that can sometimes clash with military operations against enemy forces.

Making cyber an independent military command will put the fight in digital space on the same footing as more traditional realms of battle on land, in the air, at sea and in space. The move reflects the escalating threat of cyberattacks and intrusions from other nation states, terrorist groups and hackers, and comes as the U.S. faces ever-widening fears about Russian hacking following Moscow's efforts to meddle in the 2016 American election.

The U.S. has long operated quietly in cyberspace, using it to collect information, disrupt enemy networks and aid conventional military missions. But as other nations and foes expand their use of cyberspying and attacks, the U.S. is determined to improve its ability to incorporate cyber operations into its everyday warfighting.

Experts said the command will need time to find its footing.

"Right now I think it's inevitable, but it's on a very slow glide path," said Jim Lewis, a cybersecurity expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But, he added, "A new entity is not going to be able to duplicate NSA's capabilities."

The NSA, for examples, has 300 of the country's leading mathematicians "and a gigantic super computer," Lewis said. "Things like this are hard to duplicate."

He added, however, that over time, the U.S. has increasingly used cyber as a tactical weapon, bolstering the argument for separating it from the NSA.

The two highly secretive organizations, based at Fort Meade, Maryland, have been under the same four-star commander since Cyber Command's creation in 2009.

But the Defense Department has been agitating for a separation, perceiving the NSA and intelligence community as resistant to more aggressive cyberwarfare, particularly after the Islamic State's transformation in recent years from an obscure insurgent force into an organization holding significant territory across Iraq and Syria and with a worldwide recruiting network.

While the military wanted to attack IS networks, intelligence objectives prioritized gathering information from them, according to U.S. officials familiar with the debate. They weren't authorized to discuss internal deliberations publicly and requested anonymity.

Then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter sent a plan to President Barack Obama last year to make Cyber Command an independent military headquarters and break it away from the NSA, believing that the agency's desire to collect intelligence was at times preventing the military from eliminating IS' ability to raise money, inspire attacks and command its widely dispersed network of fighters.

Carter, at the time, also pushed for the ouster of Adm. Mike Rogers, who still heads both bodies. The Pentagon, he warned, was losing the war in the cyber domain, focusing on cyberthreats from nations such as Iran, Russia and China, rather than on countering the communications and propaganda campaigns of internet-savvy insurgents.

Officials also grew alarmed by the growing number of cyberattacks against the U.S. government, including several serious, high-level Defense Department breaches that occurred under Rogers' watch.

"NSA is truly an intelligence-collection organization," said Lauren Fish, a research associate with the Center for a New American Security. "It should be collecting information, writing reports on it. Cyber Command is meant to be an organization that uses tools to have military operational effect."

After President Donald Trump's inauguration, officials said Defense Secretary Jim Mattis endorsed much of the plan. But debate over details has dragged on for months.

It's unclear how fast the Cyber Command will break off on its own. Some officials believe the new command isn't battle-ready, given its current reliance on the NSA's expertise, staff and equipment. That effort will require the department to continue to attract and retain cyber experts.

Cyber Command was created in 2009 by the Obama administration to address threats of cyber espionage and other attacks. It was set up as a sub-unit under U.S. Strategic Command to coordinate the Pentagon's ability to conduct cyberwarfare and to defend its own networks, including those that are used by combat forces in battle.

Officials originally said the new cyber effort would likely involve hundreds, rather than thousands, of new employees.

Since then, the command has grown to more than 700 military and civilian employees. The military services also have their own cyber units, with a goal of having 133 fully operational teams with as many as 6,200 personnel.

Its proposed budget for next year is $647 million. Rogers told Congress in May that represents a 16 percent increase over this year's budget to cover costs associated with building the cyber force, fighting IS and becoming an independent command.

Under the new plan being forwarded by the Pentagon to the White House, officials said Army Lt. Gen. William Mayville would be nominated to lead Cyber Command. Leadership of the NSA could be turned over to a civilian.

Mayville is currently the director of the military's joint staff and has extensive experience as a combat-hardened commander. He deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan, leading the 173rd Airborne Brigade when it made its assault into Iraq in March 2003 and later heading coalition operations in eastern Afghanistan.

Read the rest here:

Military cyberoperations headed for revamp after long delay - Minneapolis Star Tribune

Posted in NSA

Chad Seybold’s bid for Fifth fought – Chronicle-Tribune

The City of Marion is objecting to Chad Seybolds motion to plead protection against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment in a civil lawsuit alleging fraud against Michael An and his companies.

The city filed a brief Friday afternoon in Grant County Superior Court I detailing its opposition, which largely argues that Seybolds request does not meet the legal requirements for the Fifth to be used correctly in this lawsuit.

kAm$6J3@=5 😀 E96 3C@E96C @7 (2J?6 $6J3@=5[ 7@C>6C |2C:@? >2J@C[ 2?5 96 D6CG65 2D 5:C64E@C @C @A6C2E:@?D 2?5 4@?DECF4E:@? @7 E96 ?6G6C 4@>A=6E65 AC@;64E E@ C6AFCA@D6 E96 7@C>6C *|rp @? %9:C5 $EC66E 7@C E96 ?@H56462D65 p?]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ 😀 D66<:?8 7C@> $6J3@=5 2== 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 4@>>F?:42E:@?D C6=2E65 E@ p? 2?5 9:D EH@ 4@>A2?:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 2?J :?4@>6 @C 4@>A6?D2E:@? $6J3@=5 C646:G65[ 2?J 3FD:?6DD A=2?D 7@C E96 @=5 *|rp AC@;64E[ 2?J 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 4@>>F?:42E:@?D C6=2E:?8 E@ 2?J G6?5@C[ 4@?EC24E@C @C DF34@?EC24E@C[ 4@?DECF4E:@? AC@8C6DD 2?5 DE2EFD C6A@CED[ 2== 5@4F>6?ED C6=2E65 E@ E96 7:?2?4:2= A6C7@C>2?46 @7 p?D 4@>A2?:6D[ :?4=F5:?8 E2I C6EFC?D 2?5 42D9 7=@H DE2E6>6?ED[ 2== 32?< C64@C5D C6=2E65 E@ p? 2?5 9:D 4@>A2?:6D 2?5 >@C6] %96 4:EJ 4@?E6?5D E96 Sa]d >:==:@? @7 AF3=:4 >@?6J 7C@> 2 %2I x?4C6>6?E u:?2?4:?8 3@?5 8:G6? E@ p? 😕 a__g 7@C E96 C656G6=@A>6?E H2D ?@E 6?E:C6=J FD65 @? 4@?DECF4E:@? 4@DED[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 4@FCE 5@4F>6?ED]k^Am

kAm%96 =2HDF:E[ E9@F89 7:=65 😕 E96 4:EJD ?2>6[ 😀 36:?8 A2:5 7@C 3J AC:G2E6 5@?@CD]k^Am

kAm$6J3@=5 2?5 9:D 2EE@C?6J y@6 z6:E9 {6H:D 2C6 7:89E:?8 E96 4:EJD C6BF6DED 2?5 2C8F65 😕 2 >@E:@? 7:=65 😕 |2J 3J 2C8F:?8 E92E $6J3@=5 92D 2 C:89E E@ ?@E D6=7:?4C:>:?2E6 😕 2 4:G:= @C 4C:>:?2= =2HDF:E]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ ?@H 2C8F6D[ 😕 2 3C:67 HC:EE6? 3J pEE@C?6J tC:4 y] |4z6@H? @7 E96 4:EJD =2H 7:C>[ x46 |:==6C[ $6J3@=5 D9@F=5 ?@E 36 2==@H65 E@ :?G@<6 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E @7 E96 &]$] r@?DE:EFE:@? 3642FD6 9:D A2CE @7 E96 =2HDF:E H:== ?@E 36 E6DE:>@?:2= 2 7@C>2= @C HC:EE6? DE2E6>6?E F?56C @2E9 E92E E96 2>6?5>6?E 5@6D?E 2AA=J E@ 4@>A2?J 5@4F>6?ED 2?5 $6J3@=5 42?E FD6 E96 2>6?5>6?E 😕 DF49 2 3C@25 H2J] %96 4:EJ 4@?E6?5D $6J3@=5 92D ?@E 56>@?DEC2E65 2 C62D@?23=6 762C @7 AC@D64FE:@? :7 E96 5@4F>6?ED H6C6 92?565 @G6C E@ 4:EJ 2EE@C?6JD]k^Am

kAm%96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E @C5:?2C:=J 5@6D ?@E AC@E64E 282:?DE E96 4@>A6==65 AC@5F4E:@? @7 5@4F>6?ED E92E >2J 4@?E2:? :?4C:>:?2E:?8 :?7@C>2E:@?[ |4z6@H? HC:E6D] ]]] p44@C5:?8=J[ E@ E96 6IE6?E E92E E96 DF3A@6?2 D666?ED[ $6J3@=5D 24E @7 AC@5F4E:@? H@F=5 36 6?E:C6=J ?@?E6DE:>@?:2=] %96 FD6 @7 D62C49 E6C>D H@F=5 6=:>:?2E6 2?J C:D< E92E $6J3@=5 H@F=5 >2<6 6IE6?D:G6 FD6 @7 E96 4@?E6?ED @7 9:D @H? >:?5 😕 C6DA@?5:?8 E@ E96 $F3A@6?2]k^Am

kAmp44@C5:?8 E@ E96 4:EJ[ E96 5676?D6 92D 2=C625J D2:5 E96C6 😀 2 92C5 5C:G6 H:E9 E96 :?7@C>2E:@? E96 4:EJ 😀 2D<:?8 7@C 2?5[ 2D AC@@7 E@ E92E 4=2:>[ :?4=F565 2 |2C49 6>2:= 7C@> {6H:D E@ |4z6@H? 😕 :ED 3C:67] x? E96 6>2:=[ {6H:D E6==D |4z6@H? E92E $6J3@=5 92D 8:G6? {6H:D 9:D A6CD@?2= 92C5 5C:G6 2?5 D2JD E96J H@F=5 =:<6 E@ 8@ 29625 2?5 56E6C>:?6 E96 D62C49 E6C>D D:?46 E96C6D 2=D@ A6CD@?2= :?7@C>2E:@? @? E96 92C5 5C:G6]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJ 2=D@ 4@?E6?5D $6J3@=5D >@E:@? E@ A=625 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E 😀 E@@ 3C@25[ 4:E:?8 2 92?57F= @7 AC6G:@FD 42D6D H96C6 4@FCED 92G6 CF=65 282:?DE 3=2?<6E :?G@42E:@? @7 E96 u:7E9 p>6?5>6?E]k^Am

kAm%96 DF3A@6?2 :?4=F56D ac D6A2C2E6 C6BF6DED] *6E[ $6J3@=5 92D ?@E @776C65 2 32D:D 2D E@ 6249 C6BF6DE H9J E96 24E @7 AC@5F4E:@? H@F=5 E6?5 E@ :?4C:>:?2E6 9:>[ |4z6@H? HC:E6D] x?DE625[ E96 |@E:@? 3C@25=J DE2E6D E92E $6J3@=5 C62D@?23=J 36=:6G6D E92E 4@>A=:2?46 H:E9 E96 C6BF6DE 7@C AC@5F4E:@?[ @C 2?J A@CE:@? @7 :E[ H@F=5 7FC?:D9 2 =:?< :? 2 492:? 6G:56?46 E92E 4@F=5 =625 E@ 2 AC@D64FE:@? 7@C 2? 2==6865 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 24C:>:?2= 6?E6CAC:D6] %96 =2H 56>2?5D E92E E96 |@E:@? >@C6 DA64:7:42==J 2DD6CE E9:D AC:G:=686 @? 2 C6BF6DE3JC6BF6DE 32D:D] %96C67@C6[ 6G6? 😕 :7 E96 AC:G:=686 5:5 2AA=J 96C6 H9:49 :E 5@6D ?@E $6J3@=5 92D ?@E 256BF2E6=J :?G@<65 :E]k^Am

kAm%96 4:EJD 7:=:?8 4@>6D ;FDE 52JD 367@C6 E96 4:EJ 2?5 $6J3@=5 2C6 D4965F=65 7@C 2 962C:?8 @? E96 >2EE6C 2E `ib_ A]>] %F6D52J[ yF=J `g 😕 $FA6C:@C r@FCE x H96C6 yF586 y677C6J %@55 >2J CF=6 6:E96C 282:?DE @C 7@C $6J3@=5D >@E:@?]k^Am

See the rest here:

Chad Seybold's bid for Fifth fought - Chronicle-Tribune

Man Confronts NJ Officer Searching Van Apparently Without Permission – HuffPost

Prosecutors office in New Jersey are reviewing a video filmed by a man who caught a plainclothes law enforcement officer searching through his parked minivan, apparently without permission.

The Passaic County Prosecutors Office in Paterson confirmed to the PatersonPress that the officer in the video is a member of the Passaic County Sheriffs Office. The prosecutors office said they were reviewing the footage, apparently filmed by the vehicles owner.

The undated video, whichwent viral on Friday, shows a plainclothes officer in a red shirt looking through the trunk of the van. When the man who is filming asks the officer why hes in his car, the officer shuts the trunk door and walks away.

As heard in the video, the man accuses the officer of searching his car illegally and tells the officer that he knows his rights.

William Maer, a spokesman for the sheriffs office, told the Paterson Times the matter has beenreferred to the prosecutors officein an effort to assure an independent investigation of the circumstances around the video. The sheriffs office would not identify the officer in the video.

Maer did not reveal whether anyone was arrested in the incident. The date the video was filmed also is unclear

The Facebook page Mediatakeout shared the video, which has been viewed more than 1.7 million times.

When the man filming asks the officer, What the fuck is you doing, yo ... What is you in my van for, the officer shuts the vans rear door and walks away.

The officer, still walking away, tells the man filming to follow him, but the man refuses. The man asks the officer again, What is you in my car for when Im sitting down eating with my family?

The officer tells the man that were getting a lot of complaints about guns, to which the man replies, Listen, I dont care about none of that. What are you in my van for?

When the man asks the officer how he accessed his trunk, the officer replies,Its open. Its wide open.

Still. Still, the man filming says in return. Youre not supposed to be in my van sir.

After the plainclothes cop is joined by a uniformed officer, the man asks the officers for their names and badge numbers.

Yall doing shit that yall aint supposed to be fucking doing, the man says while filming the license plates of police cars.I know my rights.

Ed Barocas, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, called the footagetroubling and disturbing,in an interview with the Paterson Times.

You have an individual who appears to be a law enforcement officer entering someones vehicle without permission and seemingly without any lawful authority, Barocastold the online news site. Not only is it improper, its a crime.

Although the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures, New Jersey police officers may search vehicles without a warrant or the owners permission if they believe probable causeexists that a crime has been or is being committed.

In 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court overturned one of its previous rulings andrelaxed the standards for warrantless searchesby police officers.

Read more from the original source:

Man Confronts NJ Officer Searching Van Apparently Without Permission - HuffPost

Court decision: Rowan County Commissioners violated First … – WLOS – WLOS

When Rowan County commissioners opened their meeting with a prayer specific to one religion, and a call that those in attendance join them in that prayer, said Meno, that violates the First Amendment to the Constitution. (Photo credit: WLOS staff)

County commissioners across western North Carolina are reviewing an appeals court decision that ruled that Rowan County Commissioners are in violation of the Constitution for opening their commission meetings with Christian prayer and a request for those attending the meeting to participate in the invocation.

The court ruling stated that the commissioners delivered only Christian prayer, and veered from time to time into overt proselytization."

Mike Meno, spokesman for the ACLU of North Carolina, spoke on behalf of the organization that played a role in the lawsuit brought to the court.

When Rowan County commissioners opened their meeting with a prayer specific to one religion, and a call that those in attendance join them in that prayer, said Meno, that violates the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Go here to see the original:

Court decision: Rowan County Commissioners violated First ... - WLOS - WLOS

No, Donald Trump Jr. Doesn’t Have a First Amendment Right to Get Freebies From the Russians – New York Magazine

Don Jr. Photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

As shoe after shoe after shoe keeps dropping about the Trump Tower meeting Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort had with a Russian lawyer and other questionable intermediaries, there has been a quiet but significant effort by prominent legal minds to defend, or at least be skeptical of, the whole affair. The thrust of these counterarguments is that the main characters did nothing wrong because the law simply doesnt penalize anything that happened at the meeting.

The defenses run the gamut: The Trump team couldnt have broken campaign finance laws because seeking and receiving damning materials on a political adversary is what campaigns do all the time, so federal law doesnt apply. Or, if the law does reach what transpired at the meeting, the promised dirt on Hillary Clinton isnt the type of in-kind contribution or thing of value that federal law forbids foreign nationals from making. Or if the damaging information does count as an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign national, that the penalties would only be civil in nature which means Robert Mueller, the Russia special counsel, cant just prosecute Trump Jr or his associates over what happened at that fateful June 2016 gathering.

By far the most intriguing of all these defenses is the suggestion, advanced by First Amendment expert and UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, that Trump Jr. and crew were merely exercising their constitutional right to solicit and receive a campaign boost from Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Kremlin-linked attorney who requested the meeting. And that she may also have been acting within her rights to share the Clinton dirt with Trumps inner circle. As if theres somehow a free-standing, free-speech right to exchange opposition research, no matter the nationality of the source. And the Constitution would suffer if we criminalize these acts.

Volokhs arguments and hypotheticals are thoughtful, compelling even: If the Clinton campaign heard that Mar-a-Lago was employing illegal immigrants in Florida and staffers went down to interview the workers, that would be a crime, he writes as one of his examples. A Slovakian student temporarily in the U.S., he writes in another, would similarly be forbidden from sharing potentially explosive information about Trumps dealings in her home country. These and other scenarios are meant to illustrate how the federal ban on foreign nationals making election-related contributions including anything of value to a campaign, which would encompass the Clinton dirt would sweep far too broadly. And when a ban lends itself to such a substantially broad reading, Volokh explains, that means the ban itself is unconstitutional on its face.

But Adav Noti, an attorney with Campaign Legal Center, isnt convinced. His organization filed a complaint on Thursday with the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice alleging that the Trump campaign effectively solicited an illegal campaign contribution by procuring the incriminating Clinton evidence from Veselnitskaya. Noti told me in an interview that most of the hypos Volokh laid out in his article arent covered by the statute because the law already contains an exception for volunteer services to a campaign information that is offered voluntarily and that you otherwise cant ascribe value to.

But opposition research by a person flying in from Moscow at no cost to the campaign that the campaign actively sought can indeed be very valuable. And if its part of a larger, coordinated effort by a foreign power to sway an American election, a scheme to obtain it would be largely distinguishable from, say, undocumented workers dishing to the Clinton camp for free on shoddy working conditions at a Trump property.

Bob Bauer, an election law expert who has written extensively on the campaign finance implications of Trumps flirtations with Russia, acknowledged in a Friday post on the blog Just Security how the federal ban on foreign national contributions might run into First Amendment problems if the right facts come along. But were not dealing with those facts right now. In his view, everything that has come out from the Trump campaign vis--vis Russia is an entirely different animal. A court would likely go out of its way to uphold the law in a case where, as alleged against the Trump campaign, a candidate and his organization enters into a systematic understanding with a foreign government to assist its bid to win the presidency, Bauer wrote.

In other words, what weve seen so far in the recent onslaught of revelations about Trump Jr. and his wish to get an assist from Russia is analogous to the kind of conduct that courts have already said falls outside the scope of the First Amendment. In Bluman v. FEC, a case Noti litigated and won, a three-judge district court reaffirmed the principle that prohibiting foreign nationals from spending money in the electoral process is perfectly consistent with our constitutional ideals. The court said:

It is fundamental to the definition of our national political community that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to participate in, and thus may be excluded from, activities of democratic self-government. It follows, therefore, that the United States has a compelling interest for purposes of First Amendment analysis in limiting the participation of foreign citizens in activities of American democratic self-government, and in thereby preventing foreign influence over the U.S. political process.

That was written by U.S. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative the Trump administration has been eyeing for a promotion to the Supreme Court. The high court, for its part, didnt even bother hearing an appeal over the case; it just affirmed the ruling summarily with no dissenting opinions. All of which suggests that other judges would follow suit if presented with the Trump Tower scenario: a meeting where no actual money may have changed hands, but where something more nefarious, coordinated, and potentially criminal may have taken place. Theres yet more to come.

Courts have a way of salvaging perfectly constitutional laws if they have to, limiting their analysis to the specific fact patterns before them. Since the documented Russian connections to the Trump campaign is unlike anything this country has seen, its easy to see how the First Amendment wouldnt stand as an obstacle if it were shown that there was a coordinated attempt to strike at the core of American self-government.

The courts have already been pretty consistent on this issue of foreign citizens not being able to participate in Americas self-government.

McCain is expected to recover, but the same cant be said for the GOPs haphazard effort to repeal and replace Obamacare.

And, yes, hes going to write about his experience dealing with Trump.

Looks like the Trump campaign thought there was something in that nothingburger.

And yet, it still might pass in the next few days.

The new plan would dramatically expand where and when the government could target immigrants for deportations which bypass immigration courts.

Voters are worried about his voter-fraud commissions attempt to gather information on them.

Shes totally open, the future president clearly says to the young pop singer in 2013. But what else?

Most of Trumps Christian right allies dont bother to take his own slight religious pretensions very seriously. A new book apparently will.

Trump may be pushed by a lawsuit to keep his 2016 promise to kill DACA and deport Dreamers or they could become a pawn for nativists in Congress.

One golfer said his attendance would be a debacle, but Trump doesnt care.

At this point it would take a strange coincidence for hacking not to have been discussed.

He ordered the government not to enforce the seemingly arbitrary restrictions on which relatives can enter the country.

Soon Republican centrists will have to decide if big insurance losses due to Medicaid cuts are okay after all.

President Trump has hired lawyer Ty Cobb to help keep a lid on Russia-related stories.

The onetime fight promoter tells Politico Trump knows what its like to be a black man.

The facts, research, and science behind the climate-change article that explored our planets worst-case scenarios.

The president loves a good parade.

Republicans who dislike Warren have a new champion in Shiva Ayyadurai, a Trump fan whose attacks on Warren as a fake Indian are relentless.

Continued here:

No, Donald Trump Jr. Doesn't Have a First Amendment Right to Get Freebies From the Russians - New York Magazine

Bitcoin Fans: Cryptocurrency Token Economy Is the Future …

Ever since Bitcoin first appeared on the scene several years ago, fans of the cryptocurrency have been searching for a way to apply the idea that might capture the public imagination and broaden the use of the technology beyond just geeks and programmers.

Now, some believe that application has appeared with the rise of the "token" economy, in which companies or startup ventures fund their operations by handing out units of cryptocurrencies. Some companies have even done what are known as "initial coin offerings" or ICOs, in which they distribute tokens instead of shares to investors.

The cryptocurrency market is seen by some as a bubble with hugely inflated prices. Some observers say bitcoin and other similar ventures are similar to Linux , an open-source alternative to Microsoft's Windows operating system that has never really achieved mainstream success.

But entrepreneur and investor Balaji Srinivasan, a partner at Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, believes that token-based systems "may eventually create and capture more value than the last generation of Internet companies."

Get Data Sheet , Fortune s technology newsletter.

In an essay published recently on the blogging platform Medium, Srinivasan and his partner Naval Ravikant, co-founder and CEO of a popular online VC community called AngelList, said they believe the token economy has the potential to become "a Kickstarter on steroids."

The two men, both of whom have been investing in bitcoin-related technology for several years, argue that using tokens as a financing option has the potential to improve the liquidity options that companies have by several orders of magnitude, as well as increasing the size of the available audience that might want to invest in such ventures.

All of this is possible because of an explosion in the cryptocurrency market over the past few years, they argue, in which Bitcoin has survived internal strife but also given birth to alternative currency systems and platforms such as Ethereum.

Initial coin offerings or ICOs are one way of using these new currencies, Srinivasan and Ravikant say. Canadian messaging-app maker Kik recently announced that it is launching its own cryptocurrency called Kin, and plans to offer units of it to supporters through a crowdfunding campaign. The currency is based on Ethereum's blockchain technology.

Kik plans to issue 10 trillion Kin tokens to developers and users via a separate non-profit foundation called the Kin Foundation, which will ultimately hold 60% of all the Kin tokens and be run by a group of independent directors.]

Srinivasan and Ravikant warn that some uses of cryptocurrency tokens, including some ICOs, may be subject to regulation by governments if they are seen as equivalent to doing a traditional equity offering or IPO, in which investors receive shares of the company. But they argue other uses of tokens for crowdfunding could essentially be unregulated.

Token supporters say they aren't really equity but more of a digital IOU, which entitles the holder to redeem their tokens in return for access to a platform like Ethereum's.

That access has value because it can be used to generate Bitcoin-style currency through a computer-intensive process known as "mining," and those coins can in turn be exchanged for other more familiar currencies like U.S. dollars. One bitcoin is currently worth about $2,300.

Some skeptics say token-based fundraising has the potential to turn into a huge boondoggle if it is unregulated, with unwary investors being fleeced of their savings with little to show for it.

Ravikant and Srinivasan, however, argue that tokens will allow companies to raise money much more quickly for new ventures than existing systems do, and will also allow for startups to build valuable services without having to rely on advertising as their only revenue source.

Large technology companies like Google and Facebook offer "have sometimes come under fire for making billions of dollars while early adopters only receive the free service," their essay says . "After the early kinks are worked out, the token launch model will provide a technically feasible way for tech companies to spread the wealth and align their user base behind their success."

Originally posted here:

Bitcoin Fans: Cryptocurrency Token Economy Is the Future ...

Japan’s Cryptocurrency Business Association Plans for August 1 Guidelines – Bitcoin News (press release)

This week we reported on upcoming events that might be taking place on August 1, concerning potential interruptions connecting to the Bitcoin network. Now the Japan Cryptocurrency Business Association made up of various regional exchanges is preparing to draft service suspension directives for bitcoin users in the country for that specific date.

Also read:Mining, Merchants, and TradersThailands Got the Bitcoin Fever

Japan has had bitcoin fever over the past few months. Since this past April interest in the decentralized currency has grown quite a bit since the Japanese government legalized bitcoin as a form of payment. Now as the country continues to progress in adoption a possible blockchain split may happen in two weeks, and Japanese bitcoin businesses want to be prepared.

According to the Nikkei Asian Review, the Japan Cryptocurrency Business Association (JCBA) is currently deliberating guidelines for a one day to one week freeze on bitcoin transactions. The JCBA organization says it aims to actively investigate and research necessary information, consolidate knowledge and exchange opinions, and aim for sound industry development in Japan. As far as August 1 is concerned, the association made up of fourteen regional cryptocurrency exchanges says it wants to protect customer assets.

The publication also details the trading platform Bitflyer is still undecided on its decision but will release an announcement next week. The Japanese exchanges Bitbank and Tech Bureau has detailed trading will be allowed, but deposits and withdrawals will be suspended until the possibility of a fork is resolved.

The statement from the JCBA and a few Japanese exchanges follows the announcement from the GDAX exchange on July 13. The exchange announced the suspension of deposits and withdrawals on August 1 and the possibility of halting trades as well. GDAX executive Adam White says the decision was based on technical risks and the possibility of network instability.

Masayuki Tashiro, a data analyst at the Japanese trading platform Fisco, says the chance of instability could make some transaction records inaccurate.

If there really is a fork, some transaction records could disappear

Theres still a possibility that nothing happens on August 1 and the industry is just playing it safe as they did this past March. This weekend the code for Segwit2x will be delivered and Segwit activation could happen, which might stop the potential August 1 fork. The JCBA is just following protocol, and other exchanges will likely do so leading up to the next two weeks in order to protect their businesses from legal repercussions.

What do you think about Japan Cryptocurrency Business Association drafting August 1 guidelines? Let us know in the comments below.

Images via Pixabay, Bitcoin.com, Japan Cryptocurrency Business Association.

Do you want to vote on important Bitcoin issues? Bitcoin.com has acquired Bitcoinocracy, and rebranded the project to Vote.bitcoin.com. Users simply sign a statement with a non-empty Bitcoin address and express their opinions. The project focuses on determining truth backed by monetary value and transparency.

Go here to read the rest:

Japan's Cryptocurrency Business Association Plans for August 1 Guidelines - Bitcoin News (press release)

Why India is Perfect for the Bitcoin (R)evolution – CryptoCoinsNews

On the 8th November 2016, the Indian government announced its demonetization plans that would see 86% of all the cash money in the nation rendered useless. This rather drastic action was taken as a measure to quell illegal activities and attempt to destroy the shadow economy in the country. The Indian government aimed to prevent the use of illicit and counterfeit money to fund activities such as terrorism. India had begun their war on cash.

Although the Indian government were publicising this positively, the disruption it caused was severe. The severity of this policy was largely fuelled by a number of reasons but the sudden nature of the announcement caused a nationwide frenzy followed by cash shortages and a significant disruption to the economy.

With the Indian population now over 1.3 billion people, potentially more than China, such a drastic change hit many hard in the largely cash-based country and led to nationwide disillusionment. As a result, people wanted to find an alternative that they could use and trust to transact, store wealth and evade government intervention.

They found Bitcoin.

It is often a topic of discussion about Bitcoins place in the developing world. In the developing world, only 41% of people have bank accounts compared with 89% in the developed world. Within developing nations, cash is king and has been for many years. Most individuals in these nations wont have experienced the modern forms of banking that the developed world are used to and any change to this would require a gradual introduction of change to ensure an efficient deployment. However, people in developing nations now have a chance to skip the current banking infrastructure we have in place and move straight towards a trustless, decentralised and immutable financial system.

India has announced their aggressive plans to become the first digital society and Bitcoin will play a major part in that.

One of the major reasons as to why India is perfect for the Bitcoin revolution is due to their populations lack of banking infrastructure. India is the 7th largest economy in the world, based on their nominal GDP of $2.5 trillion. However, there are 233 million people in India who do not have a bank account, which is one of the highest figures in the world. To put that in perspective, the population of the UK is 65 million. This means there are 3.5 times more people in India that do not have a bank account then people living in the UK.

Bitcoin has the potential to bridge that gap. In order to get a bank account, a person must have a form of identification and a fixed address, alongside some other information, which for many people in India just isnt a possibility. As a result of this, these individuals are limited to a cash based system by no fault of their own and thus stifling their economic reach. Bitcoin does not discriminate in the same way. Instead, the unbanked in the world can essentially skip the troublesome financial system today and utilise a transnational cryptocurrency called Bitcoin.

Another major reason why India is a perfect place for Bitcoin adoption is due to the overall populations attitude towards their existing financial system. As mentioned at the beginning of this article, India recently went through an aggressive demonetisation period that forced people to deposit their high-value Rupee notes into banks, so that they can be removed from the money supply. This resulted in 86% of the countrys cash to be rendered worthless should people not deposit money into their bank accounts. The problem with this is, as mentioned, a large number of people simply do not have bank accounts and therefore were unable to exchange their currency. Prior to this, India was largely a cash based society with people opting not to use banks due to a lack of trust, infrastructure and also to keep their wealth away from the prying eyes of the government.

The demonetisation in India resulted in the country experiencing a Bitcoin boom. New startups were being formed and a large premium was placed on the price of Bitcoin as the demand was so high. At times this premium reached $300 a coin and is symbolic of the emotions felt by the Indian population towards demonetisation and Indias war on cash, as people were now waking up to a new type of system away from government and bank control.

On the 2nd July 2015, Indian President, Narendra Modi, announced his digital reformation plan called Digital India. This campaigned aims to make the Governments services available electronically, improve the digital infrastructure in India and increase the internet connectivity in the country. This digital aim to empower technology in India has also aided in the positive outlook on Bitcoin on a governmental level as well.

For a number of months now, it has been widely speculated that India is about to legitimise Bitcoin in a similar method to Japan. The meteoric rise of Bitcoin in India has not gone unnoticed by the Government and more specifically Indias finance minister, Arun Jaitley. According to local reports, Jaitley had attended and inter-ministerial meeting in order to discuss the risks involved with cryptocurrencies. The meeting was attended by some key figures from the Indian parliament in which the risks associated with Bitcoin were discussed. Following this, Jaitley made an official statement highlighting an in-depth report on Bitcoin will be released in July and will outline the vision of Bitcoin moving forward.

Bitcoin legitimisation in India could be just months away, despite the Government highlighting risks associated with Bitcoin which seem to be focused on companies as opposed to the technology itself. The precedent has been set by Japan and India look likely to follow.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

See the article here:

Why India is Perfect for the Bitcoin (R)evolution - CryptoCoinsNews

Bitcoin Miners Miss the First BIP 148 Deadline – Bitcoin Magazine


Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Miners Miss the First BIP 148 Deadline
Bitcoin Magazine
As Bitcoin's scaling dispute appears to be heading for a climax, the next couple of weeks could prove pivotal. One scaling solution in particular, Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 148 (BIP 148), is scheduled to trigger activation of Segregated Witness ...
Bitcoin Crashes as Chain-Split Risks IncreaseCryptoCoinsNews
Markets Update: Bears Drag the Bitcoin Price Down to New LowsBitcoin News (press release)
Total Cryptocurrency Market Cap Continues to Shrink, Bitcoin Price Heads Toward Sub-US$1900The Merkle
CoinTelegraph -Finance Magnates -Investing.com
all 57 news articles »

Link:

Bitcoin Miners Miss the First BIP 148 Deadline - Bitcoin Magazine

Possible Bitcoin Network Spam Attack is One User’s Moby Dick … – Bitcoin News (press release)

A Twitter user namedLaurentMT has been battling his very own Moby Dick. He impliedtheWhite Whale has come in the form of a spam attack on the network, which has caused blocks to consumetoo many utxos (unspent transaction outputs) in the systemin recent weeks. The user commented on Twitter in a series of charts, primarily containinginformation on block size and utxos.

Also read:Morgan Stanley Believes Bitcoin Acceptance is Shrinking

Most interestingly, LaurentMT suggested recent mempool backlog causing slow transaction times and higher fees has been a result of this Moby Dick spam attack. For anyone curious about utxos, they are merely unspent bitcoins that can potentially eat up block space and clog the network.

LaurentMT Tweeted the attack on the network has been in effectfor 18 months, until Janurary 2017. He went on to say spamming the network with fan-out transactions is a multi-stage operation, and people generallyonly notice the first stage and then forget an attack was under way. Laurent mentioned these type of attacks are insidious and can lastmonths or years without anyone knowing.

LaurentMT isnt the only individual to suggest the network has been attacked. Ian Freeman of Freetalk Live wrote an article celebrating reduced fees on the bitcoin network.

However, he mentioned the network could have been backlogged as a result of a possiblenetwork spam attack. He said this kind of thinking obviously leads into conspiracy theory territory, but the halted attack does coincide with agreements for activating Segwit, especially the New York Agreement or Segwit2x.

Ian said, Some have suggested that the Bitcoin network was being spammed with junk transactions and that whoever was spamming it, ceased after the agreement was put in place. Thats obviously speculation, but if its true, then who was doing the spamming? Was it the people supporting small blocks? The people supporting large blocks? Both of them?

No one really knows for sure if the network was being spammed. But LaurentMTs accumulated evidence gives people pause to consider the network may have been dealing with the White Whale for some time. LaurentMT called for more research to discover the truth.

Do you believethe network has had to deal with a White Whale (spam) attack on the network? Let us know in the comments below.

Images viaShutterstock

Bitcoin is cool, and you know everyone wants in even the ones who say they dont. Show the world how cutting-edge you are with abitcoin T-shirt, hoodie, bag, key-ring, even a Trezor hardware wallet.Shipping all over the world, quality merchandise and, of course, a payment system that makes people say wow!

Read this article:

Possible Bitcoin Network Spam Attack is One User's Moby Dick ... - Bitcoin News (press release)