On Atlantis’ anniversary, USA’s future space fleet closing in on maiden flights – NASASpaceflight.com

July 21, 2017 by Chris Bergin

The long-awaited return of American astronauts launching on US spacecraft, a capability last seen when Atlantis closed out the Shuttle Program in 2011, is set to return next year. Along with new crew transporters, the Space Shuttles legacy will be honored by the return of a lifting body vehicle, as Dream Chaser makes progress towards her role for uncrewed ISS resupply efforts. Commercial Spacecraft:

Two spacecraft are in a race to launch Americans to the International Space Station (ISS), a capability that has been exclusively conducted by the Russians with a hefty price tag via their Soyuz spacecraft following the 2011 retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet.

The Space Shuttle programs storied 30+ year flight history came to an emotional conclusion six years ago today whenAtlantis dropped from thepre-dawn darkness into the lights illuminating runway 15 at the Kennedy Space Center.

When Atlantis wheels came to a stop just before 5:58am on 21 July 2011, the conclusion of the Shuttle programresulted in a planned crew launch capability gap for the U.S., though few at the time believed the gapwouldlast more than a few years.

Originally, a transition period using the Orion spacecraft in an opening role of launching crew to the ISShad been considered before the demise of the Constellation Program (CxP) created an uncertain future for Orion.

When the SLS program architecture was announced in September 2011, Orion was re-revealed as an exclusivelyBeyond Earth Orbit (BEO) vehicle.

Notably, this change of call sign for Orions future missions was part of a further transition towards handing over Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to the commercial sector, a partnership between NASA and the space launch industry that resulted in the agency contracting out its LEO obligations to commercial companies, all with NASA oversight.

The commercialization of LEO, focused on a supply line to the ISS, began by complementing existing resupply vehicles, such as Russias Progress, Japans HTV and ESAs ATV spacecraft. Joining the resupply team were Orbital ATKs Cygnus and SpaceXs Dragon cargo spacecraft.

Although both vehicles have suffered from a launch vehicle-related failure, the Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) program has proven its worth, paving the way for a second phase, known as CRS2, to continue to provide commercial supply runs into the 2020s.

CRS2 expands the number of flights on the manifest for Cygnus and cargo Dragon whilst also welcoming Dream Chaser to the uncrewed fleet.

A fan favorite in the space flight community, Dream Chaser was one of the main contenders to launch American astronauts to the Station during the Commercial Crew competitionphase.

That crew version of the spacecraft is still technically within NASAs thoughts, as she completes the CCiCAP (Commercial Crew Integrated Capability) element of a NASA contract that was part of the Agencys Commercial Crew Program (CCP) aspirations.

Despite variouslevels of international interest, the crewed version of Dream Chaser faces an uncertain future. However, her new version an uncrewed cargo variant has a lot to look forward to.

As recently noted by SNC, Dream Chaser is currently undergoing a second roundof testing at the Dryden Flight Research Center in California, mirroring the tests conducted in 2013 that resulted in a successful set of milestones, only to be ruined by one of her landing gear gear that was salvaged from a fighter jet failing to deploy during landingthe resulted in the vehicle crashing off the side of the runway.

The spacecraft, a repaired and modified Engineering Test Article (ETA), is currently moving through tow tests ahead of Captive Carry tests and on a date yet to be decided this fall a replay of her free flight and landing that will hopefully conclude the test program with a safe rollout on Edwards Air Force Base runway 22L.

SNC is building two cargo Dream Chasers, each able to fly a total of 30 times over a 10 year lifetime. They, as expected, will be launched by United Launch Alliances Atlas V rocket, with a contract that confirms the partnership signed just this week.

ULA is pleased to partner with Sierra Nevada Corporation to launch its Dream Chaser cargo system to the International Space Station in less than three years, said Gary Wentz, ULA vice president of Human and Commercial Systems, speaking about the deal for the first two launches. We recognize the importance of on time and reliable transportation of crew and cargo to Station and are honored the Atlas V was selected to continue to launch cargo resupply missions for NASA.

Dream Chasers partnership with Atlas V goes back as far as the SpaceDev days, which first provided a fascinating glimpse of the lifting body spacecraft perched on top of the Atlas Vs Centaur upper stage.

The latest version of Dream Chaser is more streamlined and fits inside the large Atlas V fairing. The first launch is expected to take place in 2020.

SNC recognizes the proven reliability of the Atlas V rocket and its availability and schedule performance makes it the right choice for the first two flights of the Dream Chaser, added Mark Sirangelo, corporate vice president of SNCs Space Systems business area.

ULA is an important player in the market and we appreciate their history and continued contributions to space flights and are pleased to support the aerospace community in Colorado and Alabama.

Along with Dream Chasers often-touted dissimilar redundancy by way of being a different type of spacecraft when compared to her capsule based colleagues she will add to NASAs downmass capability, a required element that only Dragon is currently capable of achieving for the CRS program.

This downmass capability which includes time-sensitive science payloads will be returned directly to land, with Dream Chaser utilizing her design by landing on a runway, allowing for quick access to critical experiments.

While Orbital ATKs Cygnus can only look forward to a destructive re-entry at the conclusion of her mission, SpaceXs Dragon returns to a Pacific Ocean splashdown before being shipped back to the Port of Los Angeles and then eventually to Texas for a full mission debrief.

Interestingly, land and sea returns will now be the forward pathfor NASAs two CCP partners, SpaceX and Boeing.

SpaceXs Dragon 2 is nowconfirmed to be returning only to a splashdown in the Pacific, after an anticipatedtransition to a propulsive land landing capability via her SuperDraco thrusters was deleted.

Elon Musk confirmed while noting the related impact on the now-cancelled Red Dragon that propulsive landings are too challenging for the interim, which means Dragon 2 will be heading for water landings via parachutes.

Notably, Dragon 2 was always going to use parachutes, albeit just on the opening crew missions, before transitioning to apropulsive landing.

Regardless of landing style, as previously reported, the first launch of SpaceXs newDragon 2 on an uncrewed demonstration mission to the ISS has now officially slipped into 2018, with the SpX Demo-1 mission now set for February of next year, followed by SpX Demo-2, this time with a crew, in June.

Dragon 2s rival, Boeings Starliner had no plans for propulsive landings, but will interestingly return to land to conclude her crew missions thanks to an invention called airbags, as one Boeing employee cheekily referenced when comparing his spacecraft to other returning vehicles.

Starliner will return under parachutes before inflating itsairbag system at the base of the capsule to allow for a soft touchdown at the landing site. This capability has already been tested during Starliners development program.

The spacecraft like Dream Chaser has partnered with ULA forAtlas V launches en route to the Station.

The first Starliner launch known as the Orbital Flight Test (OFT) is now set to take place in June ahead of a crewed version of themission (the Crewed Flight Test CFT) currently scheduled just two months later in August.

All four missions will be heavily reviewed after each flight prior to NASA working a certification process that will green light the spacecraft for official NASA crew rotation missions.

While Soyuz continues to be contracted for the interim, including an overlap during this initial period as a back-up in case of problems with the commercial vehicles, the ultimate aim is to focus NASA money on American vehicles, as opposed to paying for seats on Soyuz.

(Images: Boeing, SNC, SpaceX, NASA, andL2 artist Nathan Koga The full gallery of Nathans (Starliner to SpaceX Dragon to MCT, SLS, Commercial Crew and more) L2 images can be *found here*)

Read the rest here:

On Atlantis' anniversary, USA's future space fleet closing in on maiden flights - NASASpaceflight.com

NanoRacks airlock moving toward 2019 installation on the ISS – SpaceFlight Insider

Jim Siegel

July 21st, 2017

Astronauts test the accessibility of handrails on the NanoRacks airlock mockup in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory. Photo Credit: NanoRacks

Five months ago, NanoRacks, LLC announced it would partner with Boeing to build the first private airlock for the International Space Station. That initiative is progressing and recently achieved a design milestone with the successful test of a NASA-built, full-scale mockup at the Johnson Space Center in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL).

The NBL features a 6.2 million gallon indoor pool, which is 10 times larger than a typical Olympic-size swimming pool. It contains full-size mockups of ISS modules and payloads, as well as space station visiting vehicles such as SpaceXs Dragon capsule.

An artists rendering of the NanoRacks airlock attached to the Tranquility module. Image Credit: NanoRacks

The purpose of the NBL, which simulates the weightlessness of working in space, is to prepare for missions involving spacewalks. NASA team members use the NBL to develop flight procedures, verify hardware compatibility, train astronauts, and refine spacewalk procedures during flight that are necessary to ensure mission success.

Recent tests involving the airlock confirmed that spacewalking astronauts will be able to successfully maneuver around the structure and mounted external payloads. Astronauts will be able to do this with the assistance of handrails, which will be strategically placed by the NanoRacks design team.

The test lasted about two to three hours and went so well that we cancelled the additional test time scheduled for the next day, said airlock Project Manager Brock Howe. In particular, we were able to validate the handrail locations.

Howe said all is progressing smoothly with the development of the NanoRacks airlock.

We are still targeting launch in 2019 in a SpaceX Dragon trunk, and were thankful for the hard work involving all of our airlock partners, including our friends at Boeing, ATA Engineering, and Oceaneering, Howe said.

NanoRacks airlock will be the solution to the constraints associated with the stations only airlock system used for deploying CubeSats and other items into space. That current airlock, located on the Japanese Kibo module, can only be opened 10 times per year, with only five of those allocated to NASA and commercial companies. The other five go to the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, which owns the airlock. Demand by both NASA and commercial companies now far exceeds that capacity.

The NanoRacks airlock, to be located on the port side of the Tranquility module, will measure roughly 6.6 feet (2 meters) in diameter and 5.9 feet (1.8 meters) long. It will be much larger than the existing Japanese airlock.

The private airlock will be able to discharge five times the volume of payload at a time. Additionally, it will be designed to accept components from outside of the ISS, components that might be in need of repair or adjustment.

ISS astronauts will be able to place payloads inside the airlock, close its hatch, depressurize it, and then detach it from the module using the stations Canadian robotic arm. The arm will extend the airlock aft and 45 degrees down, and the CubeSats and other payloads will be deployed into orbit or tested in the vacuum of space.

Image Credit: NanoRacks

Howe said NASA will provide an air save pump that will recover about 80-90 percent of the air evacuated from the airlock.

There are constraints on the frequency of opening the airlock and deploying payloads, however. Howe said the most significant of these is crew time, followed by the availability of the robotic arm and other activity outside the ISS. At this time, teams are planning for four to six per year, though he added there is talk of as many as 10-12 per year if justified by demand and allowed by crew schedules.

Abby Dickes, NanoRacks director of marketing, communications, and special events, said there is considerable ongoing demand for CubeSat deployment. Over 180 have been launched to date and an additional 30 are scheduled to be included in the manifest for the upcoming SpaceX CRS-12 mission slated for next month.

We are looking pretty full, said Dickes. There are a few slots that are open in the next few launches, but the few that are left are filling fast. We operate on just about every U.S. mission launching to ISS, so there are plenty of new flight opportunities coming up as new customers get signed on.

The fee to deploy a 1U CubeSat going through the NanoRacks CubeSat Deployer is roughly $85,000. Internal payloads start at about $15,000. Dickes estimates that it takes about 12-18 months from the time a customer orders a CubeSat launch until it is deployed.

In addition to internal payloads aboard the ISS and externally-released CubeSats, NanoRacks offers a third alternative to its customers.The NanoRacks External Platform (NREP), manufactured by Airbus, was placed outside the ISS in August 2016.

Our External Platform actually doesnt release CubeSats payloads are however in the CubeSat form factor, Dickes said. The NREP offers a great solution to run a lot of the same systems as a CubeSat but you dont lose the CubeSat to orbit your NREP payload can return to Earth. NREP is robotically maneuvered in and out of station, and then your payload can come home.

The NanoRacks airlock is on track to meet its next project milestones.

We are working through the detailed design and anticipate a critical design review at the end of October, Howe said. The next big milestone will be a Phase II Safety Review with NASA in January or so.

Tagged: International Space Station Johnson Space Center Lead Stories NanoRacks NASA Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory

Jim Siegel comes from a business and engineering background, as well as a journalistic one. He has a degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University, an MBA from the University of Michigan, and executive certificates from Northwestern University and Duke University. Jim got interested in journalism in 2002. As a resident of Celebration, FL, Disneys planned community outside Orlando, he has written and performed photography extensively for the Celebration Independent and the Celebration News. He has also written for the Detroit News, the Indianapolis Star, and the Northwest Indiana Times (where he started his newspaper career at age 11 as a paperboy). Jim is well known around Celebration for his photography, and he recently published a book of his favorite Celebration scenes. Jim has covered the Kennedy Space Center since 2006. His experience has brought a unique perspective to his coverage of first, the space shuttle Program, and now the post-shuttle era, as US space exploration accelerates its dependence on commercial companies. He specializes in converting the often highly technical aspects of the space program into contexts that can be understood and appreciated by average Americans.

Follow this link:

NanoRacks airlock moving toward 2019 installation on the ISS - SpaceFlight Insider

Calling All Gingers: Sperm Banks Are Desperately Seeking Redheaded Donors – Maxim


Maxim
Calling All Gingers: Sperm Banks Are Desperately Seeking Redheaded Donors
Maxim
In fact, a sperm donor matching service, Co-ParentMatch, says that only two percent of their sperm donors are redheads, which, apparently, isn't even remotely close to being enough to supply the growing number of women who want to spawn children that ...

Link:

Calling All Gingers: Sperm Banks Are Desperately Seeking Redheaded Donors - Maxim

Minnesota United FC vs. New York Red Bulls | 2017 MLS Match Preview – MLSsoccer.com

Minnesota United FC vs. New York Red Bulls 2017 MLS Regular Season TCF Bank Stadium Minneapolis, Minn. Saturday, July 22 4 pm ET WATCH: ESPN, ESPN Deportes(USA) | TSN2 (Canada)

A newly resurgent New York Red Bulls side fresh off a 5-1 hammering of the San Jose Earthquakes that moved them back above the playoff game will surely like their chances heading into a nationally-televised clash at an injury-ravaged Minnesota United FC side that has struggled offensively in the last month and dropped points in just over half its home matches.

Still, Red Bulls head coach Jesse Marsch has warned against complacency against a side that has improved markedly on the defensive side of the ball after beginning their expansion season at a historically bad clip.

Minnesota still has not been easy to beat at home in the last couple of months, Marsch said this week. And well have to go on turf. It will be a hot day and theyll challenge us in a lot of different ways.

While Minnesota have a long wayto go (nine points, to be exact) to salvage their already-fading playoff chances after a 0-0 home draw against Houston on Wednesday the third time in 11 home games they have been shut out the Red Bulls are back over the playoff line in fifth place in the Eastern Conference and will be hoping to both move away from the chasing pack.

A battered Loons side heads into this one with 10 players absent via either injury or international duty, plus another five listed as questionable. Its left head coach Adrian Heath with little room to maneuver in terms of his squad selection, especially on the backlinewhere only one true center back is available.

The threadbare nature of the team heading into this weekend means that some of Minnesotas summer transfer window signings, who have spent very little time with the club, could be pressed into immediate service. New Zealand international center back Michael Boxallis a good shout to step into the backline, otherwise Justin Davis could slide over from left back.

Minnesota's other summer pickiup, Scottish winger Sam Nicholson, may not need to be rushed into action, with a little more depth available at that postion, especially if Miguel Ibarra can go after picking up an ankle knock on Wednesday.

Projected Starting XI (4-2-3-1, right to left): Bobby Shuttleworth Jerome Thiesson, Brent Kallman, Michael Boxall, Justin Davis Collen Warner, Ibson Miguel Ibarra, Kevin Molino, Bashkim Kadrii Christian Ramirez

Notes: Following Wednesday nights 0-0 draw with Houston, Minnesota are now winless in their last three home games (1L-2D). They had failed to win only three of their first eight league home games (5W-3L). Minnesotas Christian Ramirez was caught offside twice against Houston. His 18 total offsides this season are tied with Bradley Wright-Phillips for the sixth most offsides in the league.

After a first half that featured some drab play and plenty of hand-wringing from the fans, the Red Bulls exploded coming out of the Gold Cup, dropped five on the San Jose Earthquakes (the first time theyve scored that many since last years infamous 7-0 win over NYCFC). The outburst can be partly attributed to a shift to a 5-4-1 formation (more on that here), but theyre not about to let the midweek pasting they dished out go to their heads.

It was good, Red Bulls head coach Marsch said of the win over San Jose. The game was in grasp. Now, theyre dangerous on counters a couple of times so it could have been tied at some point. I think it was very good and were moving in the right direction, but I still think there is plenty of room for improvement.

Weve been in a good way. Weve had some results pile up for us. Weve rotated the formation a little bit and we think it gets the best out of a lot of guys, but you always have to be careful that you always continue to have your minds in the right places and you dont get too far ahead of ourselves.

Projected Starting XI (5-4-1): Luis Robles Tyler Adams, Michael Murillo, Aaron Long, Damien Perrinelle, Connor Lade Sean Davis, Felipe, Sacha Kljestan, Daniel Royer Bradley Wright-Phillips

Notes: The Red Bulls are searching for their first three-game road winning streak since April 13-May 4, 2013. They have scored five goals in their last two away games after scoring four in their first seven away games this year (1W-6L). The Red Bulls five goals against San Jose on Wednesday night was just the 15th time in franchise history that they scored five or more goals in a league game (14W-1D). It was the second time they have scored five or more in an MLS game under Jesse Marsch.

This is the first meeting between the two teams.

View post:

Minnesota United FC vs. New York Red Bulls | 2017 MLS Match Preview - MLSsoccer.com

These Deep-Sea Worms Could Live More Than a Thousand Years … – Mental Floss

For all the efforts to find another inhabitable planet orbiting a distant star, it might surprise you to learn that a very real Earth 2.0 exists in this solar systemjust one planet over. Not Mars (which actually isn't much like Earth at all), but rather, our other neighbor: Venus. Mental Floss spoke to geophysicist Bob Grimm, a program director at the Southwest Research Institute and chair of NASA's Venus Exploration Analysis Group. Here are a few things we learned about Earth's twin sister.

Venus has a radius of 3760 miles. Earth's is 3963. Its mass and gravity are 82 percent and 91 percent of Earth's, respectivelypretty similar as planets go. Venus is composed of a mostly basalt crust, silicate mantle, and iron core. Earth is the same. The two planets likely share common origins somewhere around 4.5 billion years ago.

In fact, by all accounts, we should be able to land our flying saucers on Venus, saddle up a dinosaur, and start building tract housing. It's perfect for colonization, but for a few minor differences. Its year is shorter, at 224.7 days. (And its days are much longer, at 243 Earth days per Venus day.) The Sun would rise in the west and set in the east because of the planet's retrograde orbit (which, by the way, is the most circular of any planet in the solar system). And then there's another small problem

Venus is hotter than Mercury, despite being 30 million miles farther from the Sun. How hot? Hot enough, on average, to melt a block of lead the way a block of ice would melt on Earth. Venus suffers from a runaway greenhouse effect. Sunlight penetrates the dense clouds surrounding Venus, heating the landscape. The ground in turn blasts out heat, which rises and tries to escape the atmosphere. But carbon dioxide, which makes up 96 percent of its atmosphere, traps the heat, keeping things nice and toasty, around 900F. And those clouds aren't the white, fluffy variety. They're made of droplets of sulfuric acid, which makes its lightning storms especially harrowing.

"'Does Earth-size mean Earth-like?' is a basic problem of planetology," says Grimm. "Understanding how Earth and Venus diverged is essential to understanding comparative planetology, and potentially exoplanetsthese worlds orbiting distant stars that are being discovered telescopically."

Knowing more about Venus would help scientists better distinguish potentially habitable worlds out there, and better understand how a good world can go bad, from a sustaining-life perspective. "Geology and meteorology are intimately related to the evolution of the Earth and the evolution of life on Earth," Grimm notes. "Even though we may not be looking for life on Venus, it's important to understanding Earth's place in the solar system and in the universe."

You might have run across old illustrations of Venus with conditions similar to the Carboniferous Period on Earth. Astronomers have known for just under a hundred years that Venus's atmosphere is devoid of oxygen, without which you can't have water. But even a modest backyard telescope can see the clouds enveloping our neighbor, and as Carl Sagan explained, from there you're only a couple of erroneous jumps from assuming a brontosaurus. (Thick clouds mean more water than land. More water than land means swamps. Dinosaurs lived in swamps. Dinosaurs live on Venus. QED.) Said Sagan: "Observation: There was absolutely nothing to see on Venus. Conclusion: It must be covered with life."

But seeing is believing, and the Mariner and Venera series of probes disabused us of the romantic notion of a swampy neighbor to the left. Still, we should probably send robots there to check. Just to be sure.

Venus was the first planet we visited, with Mariner 2 achieving the first successful planetary encounter in 1962. Four years later, Venera 3 on Venus became the first spacecraft to touch the surface of another planet. (Communications were lost long before impact, but unless a dinosaur ate it, the spacecraft probably touched the ground.) Our first graceful landing on another planet? Venera 7 on Venus. Our efforts to reach its surface go back much further than that, though. The transit of Venus in 1761 practically invented the notion of an international science community. But we abandoned the surface of Venus in 1984, and NASA hasn't launched an orbiter to Venus since Magellan in 1989.

Since then, the Venus-science community has been trying to get another mission to the launch pad. Presently, U.S. planetary scientists have submitted proposals to NASA for a sub-$1 billion New Frontiersclass mission. They are also working with their colleagues in Russia to launch a joint mission called Venera-D. "We need better radar views of the surface," says Grimm, "and that has to happen at some point to understand the geology. We need deep probes into the atmosphere to understand it better, and we need a new generation of landers."

"There is evidence in the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio that Venus once had water, maybe hundreds of meters deep, more like a global sea than an ocean," says Grimm. A theoretical paper published last year posed a climate model for Venus suggesting that water could have existed on its surface as recently as 1 billion years ago. Clouds could form in a certain way, shielding the surface from the Sun and allowing stable water at the surface. Furthermore, near-infrared observations support the argument for a watery Venusian past. ESA's Venus Express orbiter in 2012 found evidence of granite-like rocks on some parts of the planet. Granite requires a multiple melting process in the presence of water. A mission to Venus could confirm this.

Meanwhile, one of the most significant revelations from Magellan is that there are only around 1000 craters on the surface with no differences in density, and it is hard to find craters that are obviously in a state of being wiped out by lava, or being faulted. Venus does not have plate tectonics, one of the central mechanisms that organizes all geology on the Earth. So what happened to the surface of Venus? Where is the evidence of the Late Heavy Bombardment seen on other terrestrial planets and moons? One hypothesis is that all of Venus was resurfaced at once. There may have been a global catastrophe on Venus, perhaps as recently 750 million years ago, that quickly "reset" its surface. Other models suggest a subtler resurfacing at work in which craters might be erased over billions of years.

"So this whole idea of the surface age of Venus is a pivotal question for how planets evolve geologically," says Grimm. "But what was Venus like before that? Was there a single catastrophe, or have there been many? Was there just one catastrophe and Venus was watery before that, or has Venus operated in a steady state going back to the first billion years? There is more consensus that in the first several hundred million years to billion years, there could have been water." Further landings on Venus could help us solve the mystery of when Venus's surface was formed, if there was ever water there, and why, if it existed, it went away.

If Matt Damon were to get stranded on Venus in a sequel to The Martian, he would need to be resourceful indeed to survive the heat and the corrosive air. But what he would find wouldn't be wholly alien. The winds at the surface of Venus are very gentle, around a meter or so per second. The vistas would consist of hills and ridges, with dark lava rocks of various types, mostly basalt. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than Earth at sea level, so walking there would feel a lot like swimming here.

"I don't think [Venus] would look wavy and hot-hazy, because the atmosphere is pretty stable and uniform right at the surface," says Grimm. "It would be harder to walk through the dense atmosphere, but not as hard as walking through water. We know from landings that it's kind of yellow because of the sulfur in the atmosphere. So with the abundance of lavas in many places on Venus, it sort of looks like a yellowish Hawaii."

Original post:

These Deep-Sea Worms Could Live More Than a Thousand Years ... - Mental Floss

Meet the Tully Monster, the Prehistoric Beast That Defies Categorization – Mental Floss

For all the efforts to find another inhabitable planet orbiting a distant star, it might surprise you to learn that a very real Earth 2.0 exists in this solar systemjust one planet over. Not Mars (which actually isn't much like Earth at all), but rather, our other neighbor: Venus. Mental Floss spoke to geophysicist Bob Grimm, a program director at the Southwest Research Institute and chair of NASA's Venus Exploration Analysis Group. Here are a few things we learned about Earth's twin sister.

Venus has a radius of 3760 miles. Earth's is 3963. Its mass and gravity are 82 percent and 91 percent of Earth's, respectivelypretty similar as planets go. Venus is composed of a mostly basalt crust, silicate mantle, and iron core. Earth is the same. The two planets likely share common origins somewhere around 4.5 billion years ago.

In fact, by all accounts, we should be able to land our flying saucers on Venus, saddle up a dinosaur, and start building tract housing. It's perfect for colonization, but for a few minor differences. Its year is shorter, at 224.7 days. (And its days are much longer, at 243 Earth days per Venus day.) The Sun would rise in the west and set in the east because of the planet's retrograde orbit (which, by the way, is the most circular of any planet in the solar system). And then there's another small problem

Venus is hotter than Mercury, despite being 30 million miles farther from the Sun. How hot? Hot enough, on average, to melt a block of lead the way a block of ice would melt on Earth. Venus suffers from a runaway greenhouse effect. Sunlight penetrates the dense clouds surrounding Venus, heating the landscape. The ground in turn blasts out heat, which rises and tries to escape the atmosphere. But carbon dioxide, which makes up 96 percent of its atmosphere, traps the heat, keeping things nice and toasty, around 900F. And those clouds aren't the white, fluffy variety. They're made of droplets of sulfuric acid, which makes its lightning storms especially harrowing.

"'Does Earth-size mean Earth-like?' is a basic problem of planetology," says Grimm. "Understanding how Earth and Venus diverged is essential to understanding comparative planetology, and potentially exoplanetsthese worlds orbiting distant stars that are being discovered telescopically."

Knowing more about Venus would help scientists better distinguish potentially habitable worlds out there, and better understand how a good world can go bad, from a sustaining-life perspective. "Geology and meteorology are intimately related to the evolution of the Earth and the evolution of life on Earth," Grimm notes. "Even though we may not be looking for life on Venus, it's important to understanding Earth's place in the solar system and in the universe."

You might have run across old illustrations of Venus with conditions similar to the Carboniferous Period on Earth. Astronomers have known for just under a hundred years that Venus's atmosphere is devoid of oxygen, without which you can't have water. But even a modest backyard telescope can see the clouds enveloping our neighbor, and as Carl Sagan explained, from there you're only a couple of erroneous jumps from assuming a brontosaurus. (Thick clouds mean more water than land. More water than land means swamps. Dinosaurs lived in swamps. Dinosaurs live on Venus. QED.) Said Sagan: "Observation: There was absolutely nothing to see on Venus. Conclusion: It must be covered with life."

But seeing is believing, and the Mariner and Venera series of probes disabused us of the romantic notion of a swampy neighbor to the left. Still, we should probably send robots there to check. Just to be sure.

Venus was the first planet we visited, with Mariner 2 achieving the first successful planetary encounter in 1962. Four years later, Venera 3 on Venus became the first spacecraft to touch the surface of another planet. (Communications were lost long before impact, but unless a dinosaur ate it, the spacecraft probably touched the ground.) Our first graceful landing on another planet? Venera 7 on Venus. Our efforts to reach its surface go back much further than that, though. The transit of Venus in 1761 practically invented the notion of an international science community. But we abandoned the surface of Venus in 1984, and NASA hasn't launched an orbiter to Venus since Magellan in 1989.

Since then, the Venus-science community has been trying to get another mission to the launch pad. Presently, U.S. planetary scientists have submitted proposals to NASA for a sub-$1 billion New Frontiersclass mission. They are also working with their colleagues in Russia to launch a joint mission called Venera-D. "We need better radar views of the surface," says Grimm, "and that has to happen at some point to understand the geology. We need deep probes into the atmosphere to understand it better, and we need a new generation of landers."

"There is evidence in the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio that Venus once had water, maybe hundreds of meters deep, more like a global sea than an ocean," says Grimm. A theoretical paper published last year posed a climate model for Venus suggesting that water could have existed on its surface as recently as 1 billion years ago. Clouds could form in a certain way, shielding the surface from the Sun and allowing stable water at the surface. Furthermore, near-infrared observations support the argument for a watery Venusian past. ESA's Venus Express orbiter in 2012 found evidence of granite-like rocks on some parts of the planet. Granite requires a multiple melting process in the presence of water. A mission to Venus could confirm this.

Meanwhile, one of the most significant revelations from Magellan is that there are only around 1000 craters on the surface with no differences in density, and it is hard to find craters that are obviously in a state of being wiped out by lava, or being faulted. Venus does not have plate tectonics, one of the central mechanisms that organizes all geology on the Earth. So what happened to the surface of Venus? Where is the evidence of the Late Heavy Bombardment seen on other terrestrial planets and moons? One hypothesis is that all of Venus was resurfaced at once. There may have been a global catastrophe on Venus, perhaps as recently 750 million years ago, that quickly "reset" its surface. Other models suggest a subtler resurfacing at work in which craters might be erased over billions of years.

"So this whole idea of the surface age of Venus is a pivotal question for how planets evolve geologically," says Grimm. "But what was Venus like before that? Was there a single catastrophe, or have there been many? Was there just one catastrophe and Venus was watery before that, or has Venus operated in a steady state going back to the first billion years? There is more consensus that in the first several hundred million years to billion years, there could have been water." Further landings on Venus could help us solve the mystery of when Venus's surface was formed, if there was ever water there, and why, if it existed, it went away.

If Matt Damon were to get stranded on Venus in a sequel to The Martian, he would need to be resourceful indeed to survive the heat and the corrosive air. But what he would find wouldn't be wholly alien. The winds at the surface of Venus are very gentle, around a meter or so per second. The vistas would consist of hills and ridges, with dark lava rocks of various types, mostly basalt. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than Earth at sea level, so walking there would feel a lot like swimming here.

"I don't think [Venus] would look wavy and hot-hazy, because the atmosphere is pretty stable and uniform right at the surface," says Grimm. "It would be harder to walk through the dense atmosphere, but not as hard as walking through water. We know from landings that it's kind of yellow because of the sulfur in the atmosphere. So with the abundance of lavas in many places on Venus, it sort of looks like a yellowish Hawaii."

Read more:

Meet the Tully Monster, the Prehistoric Beast That Defies Categorization - Mental Floss

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP)

The GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) is an estimate of global surface temperature change. Graphs and tables are updated around the middle of every month using current data files from NOAA GHCN v3 (meteorological stations), ERSST v4 (ocean areas), and SCAR (Antarctic stations), combined as described in our December 2010 publication (Hansen et al. 2010). These updated files incorporate reports for the previous month and also late reports and corrections for earlier months.

June 15, 2017: We have added an interactive version of the seasonal cycle plot to the Graphs page.

Apr. 19, 2017: The separate pages for creating plots of "time series of zonal means" and "seasonal cycle of zonal means" have been combined as a single page for making Plots of Zonal Means.

See the GISTEMP News page for a list of announcements and NASA articles related to the GISTEMP analysis.

See the Updates to Analysis page for detailed update information.

Before contacting us, please check if your question about the GISTEMP analysis is already answered in the FAQ.

If the FAQ does not answer your question, please address your inquiry to Dr. Reto Ruedy.

Other researchers participating in the GISTEMP analysis are Avi Persin, Dr. Makiko Sato, and Dr. Ken Lo. This research was initiated by Dr. James E. Hansen, now retired. It is currently led by Dr. Gavin Schmidt.

When referencing the GISTEMP data provided here, please cite both this webpage and also our most recent scholarly publication about the data. In citing the webpage, be sure to include the date of access.

The basic GISS temperature analysis scheme was defined in the late 1970s by James Hansen when a method of estimating global temperature change was needed for comparison with one-dimensional global climate models. The scheme was based on the finding that the correlation of temperature change was reasonably strong for stations separated by up to 1200 km, especially at middle and high latitudes. This fact proved sufficient to obtain useful estimates for global mean temperature changes.

Temperature analyses were carried out prior to 1980, notably those of Murray Mitchell, but most covered only 20-90N latitudes. Our first published results (Hansen et al. 1981) showed that, contrary to impressions from northern latitudes, global cooling after 1940 was small, and there was net global warming of about 0.4C between the 1880s and 1970s.

The early analysis scheme went through a series of enhancements that are listed and illustrated on the History Page.

The analysis method was fully documented in Hansen and Lebedeff (1987), including quantitative estimates of the error in annual and 5-year mean temperature change. This was done by sampling at station locations a spatially complete data set of a long run of a global climate model, which was shown to have realistic spatial and temporal variability. This however only addresses the error due to incomplete spatial coverage of measurements.

As there are other potential sources of error, such as urban warming near meteorological stations, many other methods have been used to verify the approximate magnitude of inferred global warming. These methods include inference of surface temperature change from vertical temperature profiles in the ground (bore holes) at many sites around the world, rate of glacier retreat at many locations, and studies by several groups of the effect of urban and other local human influences on the global temperature record. All of these yield consistent estimates of the approximate magnitude of global warming, which reached about 0.8C in 2010, twice the magnitude reported in 1981.

Further affirmation of the reality of the warming is its spatial distribution, which has largest values at locations remote from any local human influence, with a global pattern consistent with that expected for response to global climate forcings (larger in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere, larger at high latitudes than low latitudes, larger over land than over ocean).

More recent documentation (Hansen et al. 2010) compares alternative analyses and addresses questions about perception and reality of global warming; various choices for the ocean data are tested; it is also shown that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions, where observations are limited. A multi-year smoothing is applied to fully remove the annual cycle and improve information content in temperature graphs. Despite large year-to-year fluctuations associated with the El Nio-La Nia cycle of tropical ocean temperature, the conclusion could be made that global temperature continued to rise rapidly in the 21st century, new record heights being reached in every decade.

One of the improvements introduced in 1998 was the implementation of a method to address the problem of urban warming: The urban and peri-urban (i.e., other than rural) stations are adjusted so that their long-term trend matches that of the mean of neighboring rural stations. Urban stations without nearby rural stations are dropped. This preserves local short-term variability without affecting long term trends. Originally, the classification of stations was based on population size near that station; the current analysis uses satellite-observed night lights to determine which stations are located in urban and peri-urban areas.

Graphs and tables are updated around the middle of every month using the current adjusted GHCN and SCAR files. The new files incorporate reports for the previous month as well as late reports and corrections for earlier months.

We maintain a running record of any modifications made to the analysis on our Updates to Analysis page.

Programs used in the GISTEMP analysis and documentation on their use are available for download. The programs assume a Unix-like operating system and require familiarity with FORTRAN, C and Python for installation and use.

Further reading about the GISTEMP analysis is available in the following:

+ NASA news and features related to the GISTEMP analysis + Frequently Asked Questions, and Answers + The Elusive Absolute Surface Air Temperature

THe following are plain-text files in tabular format of temperature anomalies, i.e. deviations from the corresponding 1951-1980 means.

Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover about two thirds of the Earth's surface.

Users interested in the entire gridded surface air temperature anomaly data may download netcdf files containing selected series on a regular 22 grid or the basic SBBX binary files. Note: These files are large.

More:

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP)

Old NASA Computers, Tapes Found in Dead Man’s Basement – Space.com

Artist's illustration of NASA's Pioneer 10 spacecraft approaching Jupiter in late 1973.

Two huge, Apollo-era NASA computers and more than 300 data-recording tapes were found in the Pittsburgh basement of a dead engineer in late 2015, according to media reports.

In November 2015, a scrap dealer was invited to clean out the basement of the recently deceased IBM engineer, who did some work for NASA at the height of the Space Race, Ars Technica reported. The dealer found about 325 magnetic data tapes and the two giant computers, both of which were marked "NASA Property."

The scrap dealer contacted NASA to inform the agency of the find, and NASA's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation. Ars Technica obtained the OIG's report via a Freedom of Information Act request.

"Please tell NASA these items were not stolen," the engineer's heir told the scrap dealer, according to the OIG report. "They belonged to IBM Allegheny Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15212. During the 1968-1972 time frame, IBM was getting rid of the items, so [the engineer] asked if he could have them and was told he could have them."

The relevant names have been redacted in the OIG report.

NASA officials told the deceased engineer's family that the agency did not need the computers back. After further investigation, an agency archivist determined that 93 of the tapes contained data from Pioneer 10 or Pioneer 11, flyby missions to Jupiter and Saturn that launched in the early 1970s.

A few of the other tapes recorded data from the Pioneer 8, Pioneer 9, Helios 1 and Intelsat IV missions, but most of the recordings about 215 of them could not be identified. The archivist recommended that all the tapes which were moldy and in generally poor condition be destroyed, because they didn't contain anything of historical significance.

You can read the NASA OIG report here and the full story at Ars Technica here.

Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Go here to see the original:

Old NASA Computers, Tapes Found in Dead Man's Basement - Space.com

NASA says unsafe eclipse glasses being distributed – WNCN

Related Coverage

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) Now that a total solar eclipse is just one month away, NASA has issued a warning to let people know unsafe eclipse glasses are being distributed by unscrupulous companies.

The space agency recommends only using eclipse glasses with ISO 12312-2 printed on them that have been printed by the four following companies:

American Paper Optics, Rainbow Symphony, Thousand Oaks Optical, and TSE 17.

NASA says buying your eclipse glasses on Amazon does not ensure their safety.

Make sure to check your eclipse glasses and viewers to verify that they have the correct ISO designation and were manufactured by one of the four companies recognized by NASA as legitimate, the agency noted.

Click here to see the flier put out by NASA

Its unsafe to look at the sun for any amount of time as it can possibly be dangerous and lead to permanent damage, hence why purchasing eclipse glasses is so important. Read more from NASAs website.

The total solar eclipse, considered a once-in-a-lifetime experience for many in this area, takes place in just one month on Aug. 21.

See the original post here:

NASA says unsafe eclipse glasses being distributed - WNCN

NASA alerting people to unsafe eclipse glasses – WCVB Boston

NASA is alerting people about unsafe eclipse-viewing glasses as parts of the country prepare for a solar eclipse.

A total solar eclipse, in which the moon entirely blocks the sun, will last for nearly 3 minutes, depending on where in the country you watch. But you shouldnt look at the sun, even during partial and full eclipses, through a camera or ordinary sunglasses, NASA says.

The only safe way to look directly at the uneclipsed or partially eclipsed sun is through special-purpose solar filters, federal websites say, pointing to eclipse glasses and handheld solar viewers as examples of proper devices.

A total solar eclipse will occur Aug. 21 for people watching from parts of the country. Also, a partial eclipse will last for two to three hours and be visible to everyone in North America.

For eclipse glasses, the federal government recommends that people use American Paper Optics, Rainbow Symphony, Thousand Oaks Optical or TSE 17.

Even when wearing eclipse glasses, one should not look at the sun through a camera, telescope, binoculars or other devices, because you could be seriously injured.

Eclipse glasses are unsafe after three years, according to NASA, and shouldnt have scratches or be wrinkled.

NASA also instructs people to use eclipse glasses that have an ISO international standard icon with reference number 12312-2.

Excerpt from:

NASA alerting people to unsafe eclipse glasses - WCVB Boston

Speedy Mars Moon Zips Around Red Planet in Amazing NASA Video – Space.com

Mars' moon Phobos speeds around the Red Planet in a new view from the Hubble Space Telescope, twinkling against the black cosmic canvas along its orbit.

Phobos and the other Martian moon, Deimos, are named after the sons of Ares, the Greek god of war, who is known as Mars in Roman mythology. Phobos means "panic," but the July 20 NASA video featuring the moon will probably inspire more fascination than fear.

For one, Phobos has little time for scuffles it has places to be! The moon takes only 7 hours and 39 minutes to complete one revolution around Mars, according to a statement by NASA. That means Phobos completes a single orbit around Mars before most Earthlings wrap up their 9-5 workdays. [The Moons of Mars: Phobos and Deimos in Pictures]

Time-lapse Video of Phobos in Orbit around Mars (Annotated and Smoothed).

This is quite remarkable considering how long it takes other moons to orbit their parent planets Earth's moon takes 28 days, which means that by the time the moon completes one orbit, Phobos has completed more than 84 around Mars.This Martian moon is closer to its parent planet than any other moon in the solar system is to its own planet, as Phobos hovers just over 3,700 miles (5,954 kilometers) above the Martian ground. One of the solar system's smallest moons, Phobos has a radius of just 6.9 miles (11.1 km).

Hubble and NASA released the new view of Phobos two weeks shy of the 48th anniversary of NASA's Mariner 7 spacecraft taking the first close-up image of the Martian moon. Almost half a century later, NASA created this new video by compositing 13 frames taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, one after another, to create a time-lapse of Phobos swinging along its orbit. According to NASA, Phobos took a short 22 minutes to travel the distance it did in the video.

A scale image of Phobos and Mars, showing 13 dots that were photographed at different moments of Phobos' orbit around the Red Planet.

Researchers now believe factors like size, speed and proximity are causing Phobos to be torn apart by Mars. According to NASA, the gravitational pull of Mars and the tidal interactions between Phobos and Mars are likely producing long, superficial grooves. According to scientists, the little moon is also getting drawn in to the Red Planet by approximately 6.5 feet (2 meters) every hundred years. In 30 million to 50 million years, Phobos will likely smack down onto the Martian surface or crumble apart into pieces that will then circle the Red Planet.

Follow Doris Elin Salazar on Twitter @salazar_elin.Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.

Read more:

Speedy Mars Moon Zips Around Red Planet in Amazing NASA Video - Space.com

Mishap to delay launch of NASA communications satellite – SpaceNews

TDRS-M is the third and final spacecraft in a series built by Boeing for NASA. The spacecraft provide S-, Ka- and Ku-band communications services for the International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope, and other spacecraft in Earth orbit. Credit: NASA

Updated 5:50 p.m. Eastern.

WASHINGTON NASA announced July 21 that the launch of a communications satellite previously scheduled for early August will be postponed to replace an antenna damaged during launch preparations.

In a statement issued late July 21, NASA said the agency, with satellite manufacturer Boeing and launch services provider United Launch Alliance, are reviewing a new launch date in August for the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) M spacecraft. The launch had been scheduled for Aug. 3.

The statement came a day after NASA said it and Boeing were reviewing plans to replace an omnidirectional S-band antenna on the spacecraft. That antenna was apparently damaged July 14 during final closeout activities at an Astrotech Space Operations payload processing facility in Titusville, Florida. TDRS-M was, at the time of the incident, being prepared for encapsulation into a payload fairing and installation onto an Atlas 5 rocket.

Complicating that process is a separate and unrelated issue with ground support equipment for the spacecraft. NASA said it was evaluating a possible electrostatic discharge event affecting that equipment in the July 20 statement, but did not elaborate on the severity of the problem. In the July 21 statement, NASA said the potential ground support equipment issue was at the Astrotech facility, and not the launch site as previously stated by NASA.

The TDRS-M satellite is equipped with two S-band omnidirectional antennas, located on the forward and aft sides of the spacecraft. Those antennas are used for tracking, telemetry and command of the satellite itself.

The geostationary orbit satellites are also equipped with two parabolic antennas for Ka-, Ku- and S-band communications, a phased-array antenna that supports multiple S-band users and a dedicated space-to-ground antenna. Those antennas support communications with the International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope and other satellites in Earth orbit.

TDRS-M is the third and final satellite in a series built by Boeing under a NASA contract awarded in 2007. The contract originally included two satellites with options for two more. NASA executed the option for just one of the two additional satellites. TDRS-K, now known as TDRS-11, launched in January 2013 and TDRS-L, now TDRS-12, launched one year later.

Read this article:

Mishap to delay launch of NASA communications satellite - SpaceNews

Armstrong moon bag NASA lost sells for $1.8 million – CNNMoney

The bag, which was used by Armstrong to collect samples during the Apollo 11 mission in 1969, sold for just over $1.8 million at an auction in New York on Thursday.

That was less than the $2 million to $4 million auctioneer Sotheby's thought it would fetch, but still 1,821 times the price ($995) collector Nancy Carlson paid for it just two years ago.

The original purpose of the bag was only discovered when Carlson bought it in an online auction of assets seized by the U.S. Marshals Service.

Carlson then sent it to NASA, which identified the bag as the one used by Armstrong. It also confirmed that the bag still contained lunar dust.

A legal battle then followed. According to the U.S. District Court in Kansas, NASA wanted to keep hold of the bag, arguing that the artifact was unique and should never have been sold to a private collector.

The bag ended up in the hands of the U.S. Marshals Service as part of property seized from a space museum president, who was convicted of fraud and stealing from the museum.

It was found in his garage but misidentified. According to the Kansas court documents, the U.S. government said that "no one, including the United States, realized that this bag was used on Apollo 11 and was an historically important item."

The court ruled that Carlson bought the bag lawfully, and ordered NASA to return it to her.

Related: A handbag just sold for $377,000

Armstrong collected roughly 500 grams of dust and 12 rock fragments as he walked through an area of the moon known as The Sea of Tranquility.

CNNMoney (London) First published July 21, 2017: 9:58 AM ET

See original here:

Armstrong moon bag NASA lost sells for $1.8 million - CNNMoney

In search of donations: NASA’s famed Apollo Mission Control Center – CNNMoney

The historic Apollo Mission Control Center at the Johnson Space Center in Houston -- where NASA helped put a man on the moon 50 years ago -- is in desperate need of repair after years of wear-and-tear, a nonprofit group said.

The group, Space Center Houston, operates a large space education center nearby and conducts tours of the Johnson Space Center -- a sprawling and active NASA campus -- and the now-shuttered control room is one stop along the way.

The nonprofit wants to restore the room to its Apollo-era glory, right down to the ash trays and notebooks that used to litter its counter tops.

But the organization needs some help funding the project, which is estimated to cost $5 million. So, its turned to internet crowdfunding.

A new campaign on Kickstarter.com seeks to raise at least $250,000 in a month. If the group doesn't meet its fundraising goals, Space Center Houston won't get any of the money, according to Kickstarter's rules.

Related: NASA's first mission to the star set for 2018

But the campaign is on track. As of Friday afternoon, with 28 days left in the campaign, backers had pledged just shy of $37,500.

To help draw donors, Space Center Houston is offering up some special gifts.

A $55 donation, for example, will earn you a special mission patch designed by Michael Okuda, a designer of the set of "Star Trek: The Next Generation."

The most elaborate prize, for donors who give at least $10,000, is a private tour of the Mission Control room with Apollo-era flight director Gene Kranz.

Space Center Houston says the small nearby city of Webster, Texas has already pledged $3.1 million to revamp the control center, and it plans to match up to $400,000 of funds raised by the Kickstarter campaign.

Related: How NASA recreates the wonders of space on Earth

The group's CEO William Harris says Webster has a long history with the aerospace industry, since aerospace companies and astronauts have long taken up residence there. And, of course, the town has benefited from the local tourism.

Though the Apollo Mission Control Center is located inside NASA facilities, Harris said, NASA doesn't have the budget to fix it up.

"They're future-focused," he explained.

So, Space Center Houston has taken up the mission.

And NASA has plenty to look forward to at Johnson Space Center, which is the space agency's hub for human spaceflight.

Along with training a new class of astronauts, Johnson Space Center could soon oversee the U.S.'s first manned mission to space since the Space Shuttle program retired in 2011. Boeing (BA) is currently working alongside NASA on a spacecraft that could ferry astronauts to the International Space Station by the end of 2018. SpaceX is also underway on its own crew-worthy spacecraft, and it has plans to send tourists on a trip around the moon next year.

The 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission to land the first man on the moon will take place in 2019.

CNNMoney (New York) First published July 21, 2017: 6:56 PM ET

Read the original:

In search of donations: NASA's famed Apollo Mission Control Center - CNNMoney

NASA and companies express growing confidence in commercial crew schedules – SpaceNews

NASA, SpaceX and Boeing expect test flights of their Crew Dragon and CST-100 Starliner vehicles to take place next year after extensive delays. Credit: SpaceX artist's concept and Boeing

WASHINGTON Both NASA and the two companies developing commercial crew vehicles say those efforts remain on schedule for test flights that are in some cases less than a year away.

NASA published July 20 what it called the most recent publicly-releasable dates of the test flights of Boeings CST-100 Starliner and SpaceXs Crew Dragon vehicles. Each company, under terms of Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contracts awarded in September 2014, are required to first fly an uncrewed test flight of their spacecraft, followed by one with astronauts on board.

The latest SpaceX schedule calls for an uncrewed test flight in February 2018, followed by a crewed test flight in June 2018. Boeings schedule anticipates an uncrewed test flight in June 2018 and a crewed test flight in August 2018.

Those scheduled have slipped considerably from the original CCtCap announcement. At that time, NASA expected both vehicles to have completed their test flights and be certified for regular crew transportation missions to the International Space Station by the end of 2017. Both companies have suffered technical problems that have pushed back those flights, in some cases by more than a year.

A leading NASA official, though, sounded more confident about the companies efforts towards those 2018 test flights. Commercial crew is making great progress, said Kirk Shireman, ISS program manager, in a July 18 speech at the ISS Research and Development Conference here.

By the next ISS R&D Conference, I expect to have flown the first Boeing CST-100 Starliner and SpaceX Crew Dragon flight, he said. The 2018 conference is scheduled for late July in San Francisco.

In an on-stage interview with Shireman at the conference July 19, SpaceX Chief Executive Elon Musk also expressed confidence his companys schedule. Our primary focus will be on, particularly over the next year or so, our Dragon 2 spacecraft, he said, using the companys name for what NASA calls Crew Dragon.

Whats our primary focus? Making sure we stay on track for getting crew to station, as we promised NASA, around the middle of next year, he said. Thats going to be real exciting.

Musk acknowledged that developing the Crew Dragon spacecraft has been way more difficult than the cargo version of Dragon currently flying. As soon as people enter the picture, its really a giant step up in making sure things go right, he said. The oversight from NASA is much tougher.

We have some debates going into next year about some of the technical details, he said of SpaceXs relationship with NASA. However, he later described those debates as minor technical bones of contention on unspecified esoteric issues.

Boeing is also confident in its ability to maintain its schedule. We are in the middle of a very aggressive test program, said Chris Ferguson, director of Starliner crew and mission systems at Boeing, during a July 20 panel session at the conference. Prior to the flight tests, he said, is a pad abort test planned for early 2018 at White Sands, New Mexico, as well as ongoing parachute and drop tests.

Ferguson, in his presentation, said the flight test program would run from June through December of 2018, followed by NASA certification, and in an interview earlier in the day said those launches would take place in the latter part of next year. He clarified, though, that the schedule of June and August test flights remains in place.

Our schedule hasnt changed from June, he said in the interview. That said, weve got challenges weve got to deal with and well let the schedule fall out where it will.

Boeing may offer more clarity about that test flight schedule in the near future. Ferguson said that United Launch Alliance, who will launch the CST-100 on Atlas 5 rockets, requires a non-handshake type of agreement about 12 months before launch. If theres going to be movement, of which theres been nothing planned yet, its going have to occur soon just to keep it consistent with what ULA wants, he said.

Another upcoming milestone is the selection of a NASA astronaut to fly on the crewed flight test along with a Boeing test pilot. Traditionally its been about [launch] minus 12 months, he said of prior crew selections. I think what they would like to do is have some schedule assurance before they go ahead and assign crews. Once they feel comfortable that theyre about 12 months out from a crewed flight launch, I think you can see an assignment come out.

Ferguson said the first operational, or post-certification mission (PCM) for the CST-100 could fly as soon as next December, but that schedule is dependent on both the vehicles development as well as ISS needs. I think the next crewed mission to be assigned would launch in May of 2019, he said. Were keeping a close eye on that. NASA has a void theyd like to fill there. Wed like to be there to fill it for them.

Read more from the original source:

NASA and companies express growing confidence in commercial crew schedules - SpaceNews

NASA releases satellite images of Shelly Island development – WAVY-TV

CAPE POINT, N.C. (WAVY) NASA recently released satellite images that show the formation of a new shoal off Cape Point at Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

The first image of the new shoal, nicknamed Shelly Island, was captured by theLandsat 8satellite in November 2016. When the second image was taken in January, waves could be seen breaking on the shallow region off the capes tip. Where those waves were breaking is where Shelly Island eventually formed, which is visible in the third image, taken this month.

What exactly causes a shallow region to become exposed is a deep question, and one that is difficult to speculate on without exact observations, said Andrew Ashton, a geomorphologist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. A likely process would be a high tide or storm-driven water elevation that piled up sediment to near the surface, and then water levels went down exposing the shoal. Waves then continue to build the feature while also moving it about.

The island is about a mile long and 300 yards wide.

While its still mostly unknown how Shelly Island formed, NASA says this phenomenon is not uncommon.

The shoreline and cape tips along North Carolinas coast are constantly changing. Cape tips are sculpted by waves and currents that come from all different directions, while sediment moves up and down the coastline and is often deposited near the cape tips. According to NASA, each cape tip has a so-called cape-associated shoal underwater. These sand piles can be tens of kilometers long and are also very shallow.

Tidal flows moving up and down the coast are diverted by the capes and result in a net offshore current at cape tips and deposition at the shoals, Ashton said. Occasionally, a portion of the shoal becomes exposed and forms an island.

View as list View as gallery Open Gallery

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on Nov. 16, 2016. (NASA Photo)

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on Jan. 28, 2017. (NASA Photo)

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on July 7, 2017. (NASA Photo)

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on Nov. 16, 2016. (NASA Photo)

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on Jan. 28, 2017. (NASA Photo)

Landsat 8 satellite image captured on July 7, 2017. (NASA Photo)

Read more from NASA here.

Like Loading...

More:

NASA releases satellite images of Shelly Island development - WAVY-TV

NanoEHS Webinar Will Address How NNCI Nodes Support Environmental Research – Nanotechnology News

Home > Nanotechnology Columns > Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. > NanoEHS Webinar Will Address How NNCI Nodes Support Environmental Research

Abstract: The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) will hold a webinar on July 27, 2017, entitled "The National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI) Nodes and Environmental Research: Examples from the Field."

July 21st, 2017

The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) will hold a webinar on July 27, 2017, entitled "The National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI) Nodes and Environmental Research: Examples from the Field." See https://events-na12.adobeconnect.com/content/connect/c1/1305935587/en/events/event/shared/1505387415/event_landing.html?sco-id=1721579551 The National Science Foundation (NSF) supports NNCI, which includes 16 user facility sites, their affiliated partners, and a coordinating office. NNCI sites provide researchers, academics, small and large businesses, and government scientists with access to university user facilities with leading-edge fabrication and characterization tools, instrumentation, and expertise within all disciplines of nanoscale science, engineering, and technology. The webinar will provide information on how the NNCI nodes can support research. The webinar will be moderated by Larry Goldberg, Senior Engineering Advisor, Directorate for Engineering, NSF. Speakers include:

- Bruce Clemens, Walter B. Reinhold Professor in the School of Engineering and Professor of Photon Science, and Applied Physics, Stanford University; and - Michael Hochella, University Distinguished Professor, Geosciences, Virginia Tech; Laboratory Fellow, Geosciences, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Webinar participants will be able to submit questions during the question and answer period. Submitted questions will be considered in the order received and may be posted on the NNI website. Registration is required.

Bookmark:

Excerpt from:

NanoEHS Webinar Will Address How NNCI Nodes Support Environmental Research - Nanotechnology News

Chennai firm to produce ayurvedic drugs for cancer thru nanotech – Hindu Business Line

Chennai, July 21:

Chennai-based Dhanvantari Nano Ayushadi Pvt Ltd will produce nano ayurvedic medicine to treat cancer using green nanotechnology. The products are expected to hit the shelves in early 2018 after clinical trial.

Green nanotechnology uses herbs and spices such as cinnamon, tea or soyabean to synthesise gold nanoparticles. The activated gold nano particles are then used to make capsules and tablets that can be consumed. The technology is developed by Kattesh V Katti, Director, Institute of Green Nanotechnology, Medical School, University of Missouri in the US.

Addressing the media today, S Abhaya Kumar, Chairman, Nano Ayushadi, said clinical trials will start from August 1 under the guidelines issued by the Union Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH). Trials will be conducted over a period of 3-6 months on 100 people selected through random sampling. The company has invested 60 crore to license the technology, manufacturing unit and clinical trial. With scientific backing, we expect to sell close to 20 million capsules initially, he added. In the next five years, we expect to be a 1,000-crore company, he added.

The company is in talks with cancer institutes, hospitals and doctors to reach a wider audience. Kumar said products would be available through Ayurveda distributors and e-commerce platforms.

Talking about the effectiveness of the product, Katti , said that from the trials conducted on over 100 animals over a period of four years, nano ayurvedic medicine is found to reduce the tumour without side effects. When the medicine is taken alongside chemotherapy, it has shown to be effective, he added.

(This article was published on July 21, 2017)

Please enter your email. Thank You.

Newsletter has been successfully subscribed.

Link:

Chennai firm to produce ayurvedic drugs for cancer thru nanotech - Hindu Business Line

Silk micrococoons could be used in biotechnology and medicine – Bioscience Technology

It is a common problem in a range of areas of great practical importance to have active molecules that possess beneficial properties but are challenging to stabilise for storage Knowles said. A conceptually simple, but powerful, solution is to put these inside tiny capsules. Such capsules are typically made from synthetic polymers, which can have a number of drawbacks, and we have recently been exploring the use of fully natural materials for this purpose. We are particularly excited by the potential to replace plastics with sustainable biological materials for this purpose.

Dr. Ulyana Shimanovich, who performed a major part of the experimental work as a St Johns College Post-Doctoral research associate, and now works at the Weizmann Institute of Science, said: Silk is a fantastic example of a natural structural material. But we had to overcome the challenge of controlling the silk to the extent that we could mould it to our designs which are more than a factor of a thousand smaller than the natural silk cocoons.

Dr. Chris Holland, co-worker and head of the Natural Materials Group in Sheffield added: Silk is amazing because whilst it is stored as a liquid, spinning transforms it into a solid. This is achieved by stretching the silk proteins as they flow down a microscopic tube inside the silkworm.

To imitate this, the researchers created a tiny, artificial spinning duct, which copies the natural spinning process to cause the unspun silk to form into a solid. The researchers then worked out how to control the geometry of this self-assembly in order to create microscopic shells.

Making conventional synthetic capsules can be challenging to achieve in an environmentally friendly manner and from biodegradable and biocompatible materials. Silk is not only easier to produce; it is also biodegradable and requires less energy to manufacture.

Natural silk is already being used in products like surgical materials, so we know that it is safe for human use, Professor Fritz Vollrath head of the Oxford Silk Group said. Importantly, the approach does not change the material, just its shape.

Silk micrococoons could also expand the range and shelf-life of proteins and molecules available for pharmaceutical use. Because the technology can preserve antibodies, which would otherwise degrade, in cocoons with walls that can be designed to dissolve over time, it could enable the development of new treatments against cancer, or neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimers and Parkinsons Diseases.

To explore the viability of silk microcapsules in this regard, the researchers successfully tested the micrococoons with an antibody that has been developed to act on alpha-synuclein, the protein that is thought to malfunction at the start of the molecular process leading to Parkinsons Disease. This study was carried out with the support of the Cambridge Centre for Misfolding Diseases, whose research programme is focused on the search for ways of preventing and treating neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Professor Chris Dobson, Director of the Centre and Master of St John's, who is also a co-author of this paper, said: "The results of this study are extremely exciting as they suggest that many potentially therapeutic molecules that could not normally be taken forward into the clinic because of their lack of stability, could become life-changing drugs using these encapsulation techniques."

Some of the most efficacious and largest selling therapeutics are antibodies, Michele Vendruscolo, co-director of the Cambridge Centre of Misfolding diseases, said. However, antibodies tend to be prone to aggregation at the high concentrations needed for delivery, which means that they are often written off for use in treatments, or have to be engineered to promote stability.

By containing such antibodies in micrococoons, as we did here, we could significantly extend not just their longevity, but also the range of antibodies at our disposal, Knowles said. We are very excited by the possibilities of using the power of microfluidics to generate entirely new types of artificial materials from fully natural proteins.

The study, Silk microcooons for protein stabilisation and molecular encapsulation, is published inNature Communications.

See the original post:

Silk micrococoons could be used in biotechnology and medicine - Bioscience Technology

Panchagavya… if cow urine could cure cancer – The Hindu

One lady with psoriasis all over the body was under allopathic treatment for over one and a half years. She happened to prepare panchagavya for field use and stir the contents with her forearm. After 15 days, the psoriasis in her forearm got fully cured. Following her own intuition, she smeared panchagavya all over the body and to everyones surprise the psoriasis disappeared in 21 days, the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) website claims.

A claim as tall as they come. And most of the claims about panchagavya fall in the same category. Sample this: According to the TNAU website, the magic potion can cure arthritis within two months and help treat several other diseases and conditions such as epilepsy and Parkinsons. It can reduce blood sugar levels and enable diabetic patients to reduce the dose of anti-diabetic drugs. In the case of TB, it can reduce the duration of treatment by a month. For people with AIDS/HIV, even though the blood tests will be positive, patients will exhibit no symptoms of AIDS and lead a normal healthy life thanks to panchagavya.

Even if we keep the lack of evidence aside, it is beyond me why an agriculture university should be discussing the medicinal benefits of panchagavya.

For its proponents, it doesnt matter that cancer is not a single disease and there is no single cure panchagavya can apparently cure it all. Shankarbhai Vegad, a BJP MP from Gujarat told the Rajya Sabha in March 2015: Cow dung and urine can cure cancer. I am witness to it. Cow dung and urine are a 100 per cent cure for cancer.

For the uninitiated, panchagavya is a concoction of cow dung, cow urine, milk, curd and ghee. Along with the five constituents that come from the cow, it also contains jaggery, banana, tender coconut and water.

Now a 19-member committee has been constituted to select projects that can help scientifically validate the benefits of panchagavya, a report in The Hindu says. It will be headed by Union Science and Technology Minister Dr. Harsh Vardhan and other prominent members such as former CSIR Director R.A. Mashelkar, IIT Delhi director Prof. V. Ramgopal Rao and Prof. V.K. Vijay from IIT Delhi. Of course, the committee will be not influenced by three members who have links to the RSS and the VHP!

Indias National Programme Scientific Validation and Research on Panchagavya (SVAROP) will be coordinated by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in collaboration with IIT Delhi.

At a time when fund crunch at CSIR and ICMR is leaving scientists with little financing for front-line research, a national programme will be trying to validate the benefits of panchagavya for various medical and non-medical purposes. Its a pity that there has not been any scientific laboratory and animal studies carried out with results published in peer-reviewed journals to justify a national programme being launched.

Before launching a large programme such as this, there should be pilot projects and early evidence which shows some benefits. There should be some basis that it would work. Unfortunately, we have not seen any evidence in the form of published work in reputed journals, says Dr. Anant Bhan, a researcher in Global Health Policy. There are five components in panchagavya and one would like to know which of those give benefits for which disease, and in which population and at what dosage and duration. Even the composition of the concoction has not been standardised.

For its proponents, it doesnt matter that cancer is not a single disease and there is no single cure panchagavya can apparently cure it all.

Even if we keep an open mind it has to be conditional on good science being followed, Dr. Bhan adds.

Curcumin, the main ingredient of turmeric, which has been studied for various diseases and conditions has been subjected to tough scientific scrutiny. Unlike curcumin, panchagavya is a mixture of five components. Each component is a complex entity. One is not sure which one is causing what, says Prof. G. Padmanaban, former Director of the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bengaluru who has studied curcumin extensively. Each component is a highly variable entity and the time of collection of the components and how it is collected varies. There should be quality control for each component. I am not sure if we can establish that. So it will be very difficult to validate panchagavya.

It is always possible to validate panchagavya but the ratio of the five components has to be carefully measured and the dosing has to be meticulously done. Most of the therapeutic components are metabolites and they vary at different times of the year. For example in the case of tulsi leaves, the active component wont be the same in a tender leaf and a matured leaf. So the results will not be the same, says Prof. Gobardhan Das from the Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) Delhi.

As scientists we should have an open mind and not be prejudiced. Discoveries cant be made if we dont have an open mind. But we cant approach it with blind faith either. There should be healthy scepticism, says Dr. Girish Sahni, Director-General of CSIR on how he views CSIRs involvement in the National Programme. According to him, a couple of CSIR labs have got some leads on panchagavya, which have not been followed up.

In place of peer-reviewed studies, what we have are patents (No 6410059 and No. 6896907) granted by the United States Patent Trade mark Office. These patents have been granted to an Indian innovation which has proved that cow urine can make antibiotics, anti-fungal agents and also anti-cancer drugs more effective, The Hindu reported in 2002.

What is often not realised is that patents are granted based on uniqueness of an idea or method and surely not on its translation into reality. In the case of drugs, it is not patents but results from animal studies and clinical trials in humans which will attest the effectiveness. Forget animal studies and human clinical trials, panchagavya has not been rigorously tested even on cells lines (in vitro).

The website of the Central AYUSH Ministry lists out many papers published in journals, but none of the links leads to the original papers. What does become apparent is that only a handful of papers discuss panchagavya while a majority deal with cow urine in isolation.

It also becomes abundantly clear that almost all the papers have been published in predatory journals. For instance, the papers such as Antifungal efficacy of panchagavya; Biochemical characterisation and antibacterial activity of panchagavya; Effect of panchagavya ghrita on some neurological parameters in albino rats; and Panchagavya ghrita, a promising drug in ayurvedic psychiatry; have been published in predatory journals. A paper, Evaluation of in-vitro antioxidant activity of panchagavya a traditional ayurvedic preparation, has been published in the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research that finds mention in a credible list of predatory journals but is also UGC-approved. UGC has many predatory journals included in its white list.

Now this is a case not only of lack of evidence, but also of questionable work published in bogus or predatory journals being showcased by the Central Ministry as evidence.

Here is the original post:

Panchagavya... if cow urine could cure cancer - The Hindu