Libertarian Activists Enforce Headlight Law – Free Keene

Manchester PD was one of 7 gangs to receive a share of $1,304,118

(pages 63 and 124) in grants to conduct sobriety checkpoints. One of the checkpoints was conducted this past Thursday, July 20th 10pm through July 21st 2:30am. The checkpoint was located on the westbound lane of Bridge St. Manchester PD records indicate that there were 3 stops on Bridge Street during those hours. There were no arrests, and no citations are listed. No DWI arrests occurred during those hours anywhere in Manchester, according to the gangs website.

As always, a group of libertarians showed up to warn drivers of the presence of the gang members. Though it seems that the MPD gang did not remove any unsafe activity from the roadways, the libertarians warned several drivers, both those who drove through the checkpoint and those who did not, that their headlights were off. One car was pulled over in the right turning lane turning onto Elm St. This was promptly filmed by several libertarians and the driver seemed to me to be let go without any further violations of their rights beyond the initial kidnapping/death threat.

A Utility Work Ahead sign was on the sidewalk next to the right turn lane turning onto Bridge St (towards the checkpoint). There was no visible utility work in the area. The sign was facing away from any traffic that would have seen it. Due to the design of the sign, it was easy to walk behind to walk down the sidewalk with a sign to warn drivers. (These drivers would have seen the blank metal back of the utility work sign.) The only drivers who this sign would realistically been visible to would be a driver driving east on the westbound side of Bridge St.

If you want to be warned of checkpoints in the geographical area occupied by New Hampshire before they happen, you can follow Checkpoint Free New Hampshire on Twitter,Facebook, orsend an SMS saying follow @NoCheckpointsNH to 40404 to get SMS alerts.

Read the original:

Libertarian Activists Enforce Headlight Law - Free Keene

Is Star Trek Icon William Shatner a Libertarian? | The American … – The American Conservative

William Shatner at FreedomFest 2017 in Las Vegas Friday night. Credit: Emile Doak/The American Conservative

Is there a free mind? Are our minds free? Are we programmed by something up there to follow our fate? Or are we programmed by Mom and Dad at a very early age? So is there free will? Do we make choices?

So wondered William Shatner during his July 21 speech at the annual Las Vegas convention of libertarians and other free-marketeers called FreedomFest. He urged the audience to stick to its principles, not compromise as he says he did when he directed Star Trek V by giving up on his original vision of having the real God attack the crew with an army of lava men in the films climax.

Compromising principles is a mistake, suggested Shatner. Nobody can tell you what to do. Somewhere inside us is a core.

Is William Shatner a libertarian, you might ask? If not, whats he doing there? Well, it seems more like hes an environmentalist worried about overpopulationand hes a Canadian, of coursebut hes also expressed some populist longings for someone to sweep away the bureaucrats and make American democracy work again. And he avoids commenting on Donald Trump. Maybe call Shatner a frustrated technocratic populist? Sounds like sort of a Reform Party guy to me, leavened by an inevitable Star Trek-veteran love of science and education.

None of this makes him too much weirder than a previous FreedomFest speaker who went on to bigger things, namely Donald Trump. I suppose the question is how big you want the libertarian tent to be. You probably want a tent big enough to let in optimists who still believe we can invent and build things, but not a tent so big that it lets all the carny-barkers inside. A friend of mine in Colorado reports seeing someone flying around downtown Denver with a jetpack a couple weeks ago, so we know futuristic technological progress is officially going strong, but I worry more about unrealistic promises in politics these days.

I noticed some people joking online that theyd love to hear Shatner tell the assembled libertarians to get a life in the fashion of his notorious 1986 Saturday Night Live sketch about obsessive Trekkie conventioneers. I probably would have laughed harder at that joke myself a decade or two ago, when it seemed that the worst thing that could happen to the libertarian movement is that it might get too screechy and radical and alienate mainstream Americans. Everybody relax, I would have thought.

Nowadays, I worry more that in American politics, even the most radical road always leads back to the same mushy centrist middle, with a few highly predictable TV pundits guarding that middle against the emergence of any truly new ideas. So, if Shatner is unlikely to express a precise, coherent philosophical argument, I should at least root for him to leave crowds slightly confused, even if he says something stupid. That can spur thought. It beats sticking to safely-ambiguous, nigh-universal sentiments that are deployed as if to build coalitions but are really used mainly to make the speaker himself seem as non-threatening as possible, often boosting his career without doing much to shore up the hypothetical broader coalition. Absent utopian unanimity, one should root for competition, always.

Im beginning to feel the same way about fictional continuity in Star Trek, to my surprise.

A sci-fi geek, I have been as eager as anyone over the years to see massive fictional continuities like that of the Star Trek universe or the DC Comics universe kept perfectly consistent. Inevitably, though, things fall apart eventually. New writers and new producers like Star Trek/Star Wars director J.J. Abrams come along and cavalierly decide theres a certain scene they want to depict or a character they want to bring back, and out goes the whole timestream as were asked to pretend vast swaths of prior fictional history never happened. I used to think this process was as heartbreaking as watching footage of the old Penn Station being demolished.

But there comes a point when you realize that the hope of maintaining a consistent continuityor a large political coalitionis probably rooted in a misguided optimism. The editors are too busy to care about all the details, and the politicians and most popular pundits are too busy or corrupt to care about philosophical purity. So, then the disappointed idealist starts to root for chaos. Perhaps thats a little of what happened in November 2016.

Let my fellow libertarians fight viciously and devolve into factions (pausing to enjoy the occasional near-meaningless Shatner speech or other entertainment). Like small and decentralized states, the factionalism might afford a better chance for truth to survive out there somewhere than would one bland, homogeneous consensus version of the philosophy with all the rough edges polished and gleaming.

And if the new Star Trek: Discovery TV series comes out this fall and has a throwaway line in it suggesting that this timeline may replace both the Abrams films and all the TV material we know from the 60s and 90s, well, now Im okay with that possibility, too. I am preemptively embracing that anarchic conclusion before the monarchShatnerhas a chance to insult us all again. Let a hundred Omicron Ceti III flowers bloom.

In Vegas terms, until we really hit the jackpot, Im grateful so long as we can keep rolling the dice.

Todd Seavey is the author of Libertarianism for Beginners. He writes for SpliceToday.com and can be found on Twitter at @ToddSeavey.

Read this article:

Is Star Trek Icon William Shatner a Libertarian? | The American ... - The American Conservative

Libertarian Iowa gubernatorial candidate calls for ‘real changes … – The Gazette: Eastern Iowa Breaking News and Headlines

Jul 19, 2017 at 7:32 am | Print View

CEDAR RAPIDS The politics-as-usual approach to state government by Republicans and Democrats is unsustainable and hurting vulnerable Iowans, according to Jake Porter, a Libertarian who is joining the race for governor.

Were having this huge budget crisis, and I dont see other candidates proposing real changes, Porter said Tuesday.

Instead, Statehouse lawmakers and the governor are using the budget as a weapon, according to Porter, who will formally announce his candidacy on The Simon Conway Show on WHO Radio between 4 and 7 p.m. Thursday.

Theyve decided were having a budget crisis, so were going to cut the services people use most, whether its mental health services, sexual abuse hotlines, domestic abuse shelters (or) hearing aids for kids, Porter said.

Theyre not actually going after any of the waste that could easily be cut. Theyre going after the things that are going to hurt the most people, probably as an excuse to raise the sales tax next year.

Porter, 29, a Council Bluffs business consultant long active in the Libertarian Party, previously ran for secretary of state. He thinks his views and priorities are more closely aligned with voters than either the Democratic or Republican platform.

He wants to make medical cannabis available, restore voting rights for felons who have served their time, end corporate welfare, return Medicaid to its pre-privatization status and phase out the state sales tax.

He opposes corporate welfare on libertarian principles. Its wrong, Porter said, to ask Iowans to pay millions of dollars to financially sound corporations. He singled out the Research Activities Credit that refunds tax money to corporations even if they have no tax liability.

Theyve put the tax bill on the smallest Iowans and smallest companies, he said. I dont think the state should favor one business over another.

Porter believes Libertarians are more serious about cutting the size of government than Republicans.

Ive watched the budget grow from $6.2 billion from the end of the Culver administration to $7.3 billion under Gov. Terry Branstad, he said. So they cant claim theyve actually cut any government. Theyve grown it while giving large tax breaks to big financially sound corporations.

Porter called turning over Medicaid management to private companies an example of big government cronyism by former Gov. Terry Branstads administration. Porter would return management responsibility to the Department of Human Services and then make improvements.

The state has messed around for far too long while people who could benefit from medical cannabis have suffered, Porter said. While he would favor legalization of marijuana for recreational use, I dont think the Legislature is going to pass that.

Despite the changes the Legislature has made, current law makes it difficult, nearly impossible, for Iowans who need cannabidiol to get it, he said.

As a Libertarian, Porter said, he would have the advantage of being able to work with and around the major political parties by using the governors bully pulpit to open a dialogue with voters and pressure lawmakers to act on his priorities.

The only who dont agree are the big corporate interests or those in the Legislature, As governor, you can go around and talk about issues and you can pound the issues until (lawmakers) basically have to do something about it, he said.

Porter said his campaign website, jakeporter.org, will go live Thursday afternoon.

l Comments: (319) 398-8375; james.lynch@thegazette.com

We make it easy to stay connected:

View original post here:

Libertarian Iowa gubernatorial candidate calls for 'real changes ... - The Gazette: Eastern Iowa Breaking News and Headlines

Libertarian group seeks expansion into Rogers County – Claremore Daily Progress

While Rogers County residents may be familiar with the various political party groups that exist within the county, a fledgling political group is hoping to make inroads into Claremore the Northeast Oklahoma Libertarian Party.

Formed earlier this year, the Tulsa-based NEOLP is a group of like-minded Oklahomans who are seeking to gain interest in their philosophies and ideas as an alternative to the traditional two party system.

NEOLP Vice-Chairman Lee Miller of Tulsa explains the groups origins:

In the last presidential election, when (Libertarian candidate) Gary Johnson got more than two and a half percent of the votes (in Oklahoma), that gave the Libertarian party automatic status as an official party in the state, and in response to this, the Northeast Oklahoma Libertarian Party was created, Miller said. The group was formed in April and weve been gaining momentum ever since as people have learned more about us, who we are, what our core ideas are, etc.

Currently, were based in Tulsa, but were wanting to expand, to grow and were hoping to be able to do so in Claremore, to form a smaller, regional group there, he said. Were hoping to inform and educate people in Claremore and Rogers County about the (Libertarian) party to give them another choice besides just Democrat or Republican.

As to Libertarian positions, Miller said the party is less a group of positions than it is a philosophy and set of values, a moral principle of self-ownership, which oftentimes can be misunderstood by those who subscribe to the standard two-party system.

I think the struggle with the party is often that its misunderstood its more of a philosophy, a way of thinking about our rights as citizens in some ways, its more Republican, in other ways, its more Democratic, he said. These misunderstandings (about the party) are simply from people not being informed about what we stand for.

Miller encapsulated the partys key believes in three philosophies:

Firstly, the party is about non-aggression were not going to initiate aggression against another person because of their beliefs, he said. As a party, most of our members are pro-gun, but that doesnt mean its a party of aggression its a party of individual rights and duties.

Secondly, we focus on personal responsibility, he continued. When we make choices in life, there are consequences good choices lead to good consequences, and bad choices lead to bad consequences, and as individuals, those consequences for our actions and choices are ours and ours alone as individuals.

And lastly, were strong proponents of property rights, he said. Whatever you make and can produce, the fruits of your labor whether thats a job you do that earns you a wage or what you can grow out of the ground you should be able to determine what should be done with that. Currently, when we produce something, the government immediately takes a large percentage of it and frequently, theyll take even more again when its time to pay taxes. We feel the individual should have the right the liberty to determine how to distribute what he or she can produce.

What Miller said the group is seeking in Claremore are individuals who want to learn more about the party and to become involved in the groups operations.

There are 800 registered Libertarians in Oklahoma, but right now, the Northeast Oklahoma Libertarian Party group isnt a dues-paying organization, so were not sure how large our membership is, he said. Were wanting to become more-organized, educate the public more, and to be more known for our core values.

Persons interested in learning more about the NEOLP may contact Miller at 918-949-1484 or those wishing to learn more about the Libertarian party may visit the Oklahoma group online at http://www.oklp.org.

Continued here:

Libertarian group seeks expansion into Rogers County - Claremore Daily Progress

Reporter’s notebook: Silicon Valley is changing lives 8000 miles away – CNBC

I had just landed in Bali for a weekend trip from Singapore. The guy on the flight next to me was going for two weeks from Paris, making me instantly envious of France's comfortable vacation policy. He asked if I had researched how to get from the airport to the hotels. "I'm just going to Uber," I replied.

Stunned, he asked me, "You think they have Uber in Bali?"

If there's one thing I've learned during travels, it's that where there are cars and internet, there is usually Uber. I've used it in places from Cairo to Bogota. For North Korea, I assume it doesn't exist. And in Iran, perhaps not yet: The app was usable when I was there, but said "No Cars Available" when I opened the app.

While its availability is near-uniform, whether Uber is allowed by various local regulations is another story.

I ordered an Uber and two minutes later experienced something new: The driver wasn't calling me from a phone number to find my exact whereabouts, but rather through Facebook-owned WhatsApp. He added my number to his phone to find I also use the messaging platform. (I appreciated the move since it uses regular internet data as opposed to a mobile network's phone charges.)

After I entered the car, he offered me a bottled water and later, candy. And then a wifi password. Before I could even ask, he offered me a phone charger offering both Android and iPhone options.

I nervously wondered if I had chosen the default UberX option or accidentally clicked on an Uber Premium/Exec/Luxury/VIP/Pamper ride?

No, it turned out, it was just UberX.

"Is there Uber in Bali?" I heard the French guy's voice in my head. If only he knew: He was probably still standing in the airport's taxi line.

Inside the car was a binder with photos showing a monkey on a tourist's shoulder, exotic waterfalls and people riding jet skis. All covered in a nicely, laminated book.

He asked me what my plans were for the next day, offering to be a tour guide and driver. The cost would be $35 for up to 8 hours.

His job as an Uber driver was just the beginning. An ideal ride for him was far less about a nominal fee and a 5-star rating. Rather, it was a chance to upsell a rider to a private tour in later days.

Before driving for Uber, my driver said, he worked in laundry services at a local hotel, but he made a lot more money now and gets to choose his own schedule.

And it's not just him. He told me he's part of a WhatsApp group with dozens of other drivers doing similar work. They're all using Uber to meet tourists, becoming their personal tour guide, and then getting paid directly in cash of course.

He uses the WhatsApp conversation thread to share and converse with other drivers about best tips for their line or work and recently to share where there are police checkpoints. Bali recently officially banned Uber from the island, but it has had a challenging time enforcing the rules as drivers and passengers alike are still using the service.

At age 26, the driver had a wife (whom he met on Facebook), a 3-year-old daughter and another child on the way. He claimed he made more money than ever before, which made their lives better.

He also had the newest Samsung Galaxy, and his car was quite nice (remember, he was also offering high speed wifi from his vehicle).

The ride took about an hour and cost $6.

Read the original:

Reporter's notebook: Silicon Valley is changing lives 8000 miles away - CNBC

Who left Love Island last night? Montana Brown and Alex Beattie dumped just one day before the final – Mirror.co.uk

Montana Brown and Alex Beattie have been dramatically dumped from the Love Island villa.

The Islanders turned on them in Friday night's show in the ultimate act of betrayal, when they were forced to say who should be ditched.

Three couples decided that Montana and Alex's time was up - with the public agreeing that they needed to go.

Host Caroline Flack entered the villa to announce that viewers gave them the fewest votes, opting to save Jamie & Camilla and Marcel & Gabby instead.

Love Island's Montana Brown gets a nasty shock when her mum tells her off for having sex on TV

The loved-up pair, who just hours earlier were reunited with their parents, will be seeing them again sooner than they thought.

Fans of the couple have no need to worry, as they will probably be coming to a nightclub near you soon.

The tensions started to mount when Chris got a text, which read: Islanders please gather around the fire pit immediately.

Caroline walked in to deliver the news to the nervous Islanders.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

She said: "Islanders, last night you were all asked to secretly choose one couple who you thought should be dumped from the Island.

"Your votes put three couples at risk, which means two couples are definitely safe and through to the Love Island final."

Caroline announced that Chris & Olivia and Kem & Amber were safe and through to the final.

The presenter then said: "That means Alex & Montana, Jamie & Camilla and Marcel & Gabby, following the Islander vote, you are all at risk of being dumped.

She then revealed that Alex & Montana were the unfortunate couple to get tantalisingly close to the final before being dumped.

Montana broke down in tears while saying her goodbyes, before leaving with hunky Alex.

On Friday night, viewers saw the five last couples each vote for their least favourite couple in the villa.

The ultimate act of betrayal saw the close friendships that have grown over the last six weeks torn up, as each Islander fights to go through to Monday night's final.

Branded the "worst bombshell yet", the huge twist was dropped on the Islanders right at the end of the show.

Gabby Allen received the dreaded text, which read: "Islanders, tonight each couple will secretly vote for one other couple that they think should be dumped from the Island.

"You must now discuss in your couples who youre going to choose and why, before submitting your decision by text," it goes on.

"You must not discuss your decision with anyone else. The couples with the most votes face being dumped from the island. #thefinalcountdown."

Montana and Alex got three votes from Gabby and Marcel, Chris and Liv and Jamie and Camilla.

Olivia said to Chris: "I don't think Alex is right for her."

Montana and Alex chose Gabby and Marcel, explaining the secret texts they'd been revealed to have been sending hurt them.

Amber and Kem then chose Jamie and Camilla.

Reeling from the shocking blow, Marcel said: "That's the worst bombshell that has ever been dropped into this villa."

His girlfriend replied: "Out of all the couples now theres not one person who I want to go."

But ultimately it was Montana and Alex who missed out.

*Love Island concludes on ITV2 on tonight at 9pm

Read this article:

Who left Love Island last night? Montana Brown and Alex Beattie dumped just one day before the final - Mirror.co.uk

‘It’s living a dream’: Young couple open hostel in Magdalen Islands – CBC.ca

Last September, Lisa Aucoin, 26, and Mitchell Wood, 25, were exhausted, riding a bus back from a 14-day rotation working in the oilsands near Fort McMurray, Alta.

Tired of the grind of their routine, they started bouncing around ideas of what they could do instead.

They met as teenagers on Quebec's Magdalen Islands, and have been together for more than 10 years. Seasoned travellers, they wantedto do something related to travelling and meeting people.

"Let's go back home. Let's open a hostel at home," Wood suggested.

Aucoin was open to the idea, and three weeks later, the couple was on a plane to the Magdalen Islands, set to visit a building that had been empty for the past four years.

Three months ago, Wood andAucoinwere handed the keys to that building, a former restaurant and bar, and they set to work transforming it into the Auberge Paradis Bleu.

Both Wood and Aucoin are journeymen who work for the Local 1325 Carpenter's Union in the oil sands.

They hired a general contractor to help with the renovations, but also put their own manual skills to work, doing structural work, building bunk beds, and even a couch with pallet wood when the one they had ordered didn't arrive in time for the grand opening July 15.

"I think the oil sand life in camp, the hard work, and determination, and after five days work wanting to go home but you have another two weeks left, it definitely helped us," said Wood.

The commercial kitchen was torn out, the building gutted. Some of the floors were ripped out to the gravel and the walls were nothing but studs.

They spent about $500,000 on the building and renovations. Now, the hostel includes six-bed dorm rooms, private rooms, a kitchen, a large common area with foosball, pool, air hockey and poker tables, as well as a quiet living room with a plush couch, and lots of floor space for yoga sessions.

Co-owner Lisa Aucoin says she relied on her instincts to come up with the interior design look for the hostel. (Marika Wheeler/CBC)

All the rooms are flooded with natural light from sky lights or windows that look out onto the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

Aucoin came up with the interior design herself, opting for a minimalist beach house look with lots of exposed wood, grey tones and turquoise accents.

It's aimed at attracting young people, but anyone can book a stay.

"The guests who come say you guys work so hard because we are always around, there is always something to do," said Aucoin.

"But I'm like you guys have no idea this is vacation!"

Aucoin and Wood estimate they have been to about 30 countries and stayed in about 100 hostels.

They adopted some best practices from those experiences to build what they believe is a perfect hostel.

For Aucoin, that meant having a light and charging station near each bed in the dorms. For Wood that meant open common spaces where travellers don't feel cramped or uncomfortable.

During their travels, the couple befriended Aloha Surf Hostel owners Isaac and Laina Castillo in Maui, Hawaii. Aucoin spent a total of two and a half years at the hostel watching the Castillos closely in their work.

Laina and Isaac Castillo own a hostel in Hawaii and will provide mentorship to Aucoin and Wood. (Marika Wheeler/CBC)

They provided invaluable mentorship to Wood and Aucoin, who don't have much experience running a business, as they came up with the plan for their project.

The Castillos flew out for the grand opening and to provide hands-on guidance for the first three weeks of the hostel's life.

"I couldn't think of a better couple to do it," said Isaac Castillo.

"They have the confidence and know what they are doing, and we are definitely confident in them," said Laina Castillo.

Aucoin and Wood hope the hostel will entice more young people to come visit the Magdalen Islands.

"I think the Islands needed something like this," says Wood.

"The tourism is a lot of older people because it's expensive to get to the Islands, and then when you're here accommodation is expensive."

The rates at the hostel vary from $39 to $85 per night, depending on the room and number of guests, which is considerably cheaper than most other accommodations in the area.

The only way to get to the Magdalen Islands is by ferry from Prince Edward Island, which costs about $100 round trip per adult plus about $200 for a vehicle, or by airplane, which costs hundreds of dollars round trip from Montreal or Quebec City.

When the tourist season winds down in September, Wood and Aucoin will close up the hostel for the winter and head back to the oil sands until next year.

Isabelle Cormier from Quebec City, Que. exchanges tunes with Audrey Keitel from Keene, Ont. after breakfast at the hostel. (Marika Wheeler/CBC)

Six months of work in Alberta secures their living expenses for the rest of the year, so they aren't relying on the hostel's success.

"It's living a dream, coming home, living the best part of the year on the [Magdalen] Islands," says Wood.

"We get the best of both worlds. In the winter we go out and make some money to come back home and spend it on our dream."

Both expect the hostel to be a success. They are already booked up until the end of August.

"It's crazy!" says Aucoin, "but it's good!"

View post:

'It's living a dream': Young couple open hostel in Magdalen Islands - CBC.ca

Sport: Cook Islands wary of "unknown" Tahiti – Radio New Zealand

The Cook Islands insist they will not take Tahiti lightly after naming their squad for next weekend's Oceania Cup rugby playoff in Rarotonga.

Seven overseas based players have been included in the 26-man squad, which will be captained by former Auckland, Northland and Tasman player Francis Smith.

The winner will advance to a home and away playoff against a team from Asia for a spot in the final repechage tournament.

The RWC Qualifying Match between Fiji & Cook Islands, 2014. Photo: Fiji Ministry of Information / Facebook

The Cook Islands have not played an international match since being thrashed 108-6 by Fiji in a Rugby World Cup qualifier three years ago but head coach Walter Tangata said the home side backed themselves to perform.

"I think we have a really good chance and I think that's something our current boys here understand that going forward and it's probably made the pressure a lot more easier going through," he said.

"In saying that we are actually just trying to focus on this one game first before we think ahead but I think everyone is excited about that opportunity to have a fourth team (from the Pacific potentially) in the World Cup."

Cook Islands Rugby Union president Moana Moeka'a said in May that financial constraints would force them to select less players from overseas to play for the national team.

Walter Tangata, who was appointed head coach after the sacking of Stan Wright in February, said funding issues was just one of many obstacles faced in the lead-up to next weekend's one-off clash.

"It's always a challenge really, firstly to get the players who are available to attend, due to work commitments and of course some of those players are playing in the (New Zealand provincial competition) and who are playing in higher levels of rugby.

"So it's a little bit of work to try and negotiate the availability of players but yes money is a concern so that's pretty much why we've tried to restrict a lot of the overseas players involved in this campaign."

The Cook Islands won the Oceania Cup in 2013. Photo: Bruce Southwick/Zoomfiji

The Cook Islands won the 2013 Oceania Cup in Papua New Guinea but did not compete two years ago, when Tahiti finished in second place behind PNG, and Tangata admitted their opponents were something of a mystery.

"Tahiti is an unknown beast aren't they? They're French citizens so I'm not sure what their entire make up is and we haven't really had any footage of late of what Tahiti's capable of, so we're preparing the best we can from previous history," he said.

"But we haven't really contemplated what the mix is going to be so I think it's going to be a tough ask but I think the boys are all prepared and they understand that past results count for nothing.

"So we're actually starting this preparation as we're going from scratch. We're actually treating Tahiti, we're going to give them the respect they deserve and hopefully it's going to be a good result for us."

Cook Islands squad:

Francis Smith, Stephen Willis, Sean Smith, Mathew Mullany, Alex Matapo, James Kora, O'Neal Rongo, Walter Tangata, Li Ponini, Te-Ara Henderson, Tiano Arona, Rangi Piri, Greg Mullany, Longo Leuta, Vatu Sika, Ilai Arona, K C Kora, Christian Hosking, Davey Mato, Mana Havi, Tupou Faireka, James Tofilau, Alex Olah, Timothy Tangirere, Jamian Iroa, Paki Ngaoire-Mani

Read more here:

Sport: Cook Islands wary of "unknown" Tahiti - Radio New Zealand

China opens first cinema on disputed South China Sea island – BBC News


BBC News
China opens first cinema on disputed South China Sea island
BBC News
Everyone needs a bit of entertainment - even if you are on a disputed island in the South China Sea. China this weekend opened what it called a state-of-the-art cinema hall in Sansha, a city it formed on Woody Island, the largest of the disputed ...
China opens movie theater on disputed South China Sea islandDaily Astorian
China opens movie theater on disputed island in South China SeaThe Japan Times
China builds cinema on disputed island in South China SeaSouth China Morning Post
NDTV
all 45 news articles »

See the rest here:

China opens first cinema on disputed South China Sea island - BBC News

Love Island’s Jonny Mitchell takes a dig at ex Tyla Carr during holiday with Chyna Ellis for having sex with ‘Muggy … – The Sun

Reality star took a thinly-veiled swipe at his former lover over her betrayal

LOVE Islands Jonny Mitchell has taken a thinly-veiled swipe at his ex Tyla Carr for having sex with Muggy Mike Thalassitis after leaving the villa.

Thereality star is on holiday with his new Love Island girlfriend Chyna Ellis but he proved hes still bitter about Tylas betrayal in a cheeky post on social media.

Instagram

Jonny told Tyla he would wait for her after he got the boot before her and she told him you f***ing better.

But she ended up bedding Muggy Mike hours after she left the villa.

Jonny has since coupled up with another former Love Island star, Chyna, and they jetted off for a break in Budapest this week.

However, he made it clear hes still angry with Tyla by sharing a snap on Instagram from their holiday of an electric car.

He captioned the snap: Goodbye bae Ill wait for you!

The Love Island reject added emojis of a waving hand and two crying faces with the car a possible reference to Tylas surname.

instagram

Their holiday comes just days after The Sun Online revealed Tyla bedded Mikehours after getting booted out of the villa, in a repeat of his previous romp with Jessica Shears.

A source told The Sun Online the pair sealed the deal following their on-screen romance immediately after leaving the villa.

Mike and Tyla had sex at the first opportunity they could, and were all over each other as soon as they got back to the hotel.

Theres a lot of attraction between them after having to share a bed in the villa and not have sex, there had been a huge build up of sexual tension and after a few drinks one thing led to another.

But while the late night romp has left Tyla wanting more, Mikehas told pals hes not so sure hes ready to commit to one woman even if she is as beautiful as Tyla.

The source added: Tyla has made no secret of her feelings for Mike hes the one she always wanted and and she really wants to take things further.

She said she got what she wanted in the villa and she definitely isnt disappointed but she knows it will be hard to tie him down.

Mike is a young lad and hes said although Tyla is an incredibly beautiful woman, hes got plenty of offers on the table from other girls and he wants to take full advantage of that for now.

Meanwhile Jonny splashed 100,000 on one extravagant date as he took Chyna to a gold hotel in Budapest for a romantic date night this week.

The reality stars who met on this years series of Love Island have grown close since leaving the famous villa, and jetted off for a holiday together in the Hungarian capital.

And it seems Jonny really splashed the cash for the special date, as he told fans:100k for this amazing girl. Well deserved.

The effort didnt go unnoticed as Chyna revealed she felt like a princess on the extravagant date.

Upon exiting the villa, Jonny, 26, denied he was a millionaire and insisted he hasnt worked for over a year.

He previously tried to dispel the myth about his wealth by heading off with Chyna on a Ryanair flight.

Fans immediately started poking fun at him flying economy when hes used to the luxuries of first class.

One wrote: Ryan air love island obviously didnt pay that well .

DONT BE A MELT Youre officially invited to put all your eggs in our basket, bring your bestie or your bae to watch the last episode of the Love Island in style

More here:

Love Island's Jonny Mitchell takes a dig at ex Tyla Carr during holiday with Chyna Ellis for having sex with 'Muggy ... - The Sun

3 Things You Probably Didn’t Know About Humans’ Ancient Relationship with Dogs – AlterNet


AlterNet
3 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Humans' Ancient Relationship with Dogs
AlterNet
Dogs like to stay closer to humans and gaze at us longer than wolves do, a new study of canine genetics at Princeton University observed. And, the likelihood of an animal doing this correlates with that animal's given DNA. As an article in the LA Times ...

Read the original here:

3 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Humans' Ancient Relationship with Dogs - AlterNet

Dogs are genetically predisposed to be the man’s best friend – Pulse Headlines

Scientists have found out why dogs are genetically predisposed to be the mans best friend. Three genes in dogs made themfriendly and socially inhibited, which makes them behave differently towards people than wolves do.

Dogs are terribly obsessed with being close to people. They are basically incredibly social wolves, thanks to these genes. However, according to scientists, the genes thatmake dogs super social can also be present in humans who have the Williams-Beuren syndrome. This study was published on July 19 in the journal Science Advances.

Everyone wants to find the genes that make dogs different from wolves, and try to understand how domestication changed the genome, said Bridgett von Holdt, who studies canine genetics at Princeton University.

Scientists from the Princeton University and Oregon State University wanted to find out what makes dogs and wolves behave that different. They chose 18 dogs and 10 gray wolves to make some behavioral tests, which included sociability and problem-solving exercises. They found out that dogs have a structural variation in 3 of the genes on chromosome 6 that could explain why dogs are so social and so fond of human beings. These three genes are called GTF2I, GTF2IRD1, and WBSCR17. According to lead authors, similar social behaviors can be seen in mice.

VonHoldt said that dogs tend to look more at humans than wolves do. As well, dogs are less independent in problem-solving tests when theyre around humans. When they are close to a person, their affinity remains for the rest of their lives. It might be what scientists call the domestication syndrome, which they have noticed in other animals. However, what astonishes scientists is how the genetic change occurs.

Many dogs maintain their puppy-like enthusiasm for social interactions throughout their life, whereas wolves grow out of this behavior and engage in more mature, abbreviated greetings as they age, said Monique Udell, who studies animal behavior at Oregon State University and co-authored the new study. One might think of how a young child greets you versus a teenager or adult relative.

During the behavioral tests, dogs had to open a puzzle box that had a hidden sausage inside. Only 2 out of 18 dogs opened the box regardless of the presence of a human. Wolves did a better job. Eight of 10 wolves completed this task successfully when a human was there with them, and nine opened when they were alone.

On the other hand, when dogs were with a person, they spent more time looking at the person than looking at the puzzle box; but wolves didnt mind about the person, they spent 100 percent of the time watching the box, forgetting that the human was there with them. Udell says that it was what they expected because dogs are distracted by social stimulation.

Another test consisted of evaluating how much time the animals spent within 1 meter from a person. This experiment was carried out in 4 phases. In the first, astranger sat on a chair making no eye contact with the creatures. In the second one, the same stranger actively engaged with the canine. The third and the four rounds were almost the same as the two first; the difference was that the person who sat was the animals owner or caretaker, instead of a complete stranger.

According to the results, dogs and wolves prefer to be close to people they know. Dogs spent a median of 93 percent of their time near people while wolves spent only 3 percent of theirs. With the strangers, dogs spent 53 of the time close to them while wolves spent 28 percent. This difference is not that dramatic.

Scientists also explain that dogs and humans could have similar genes. The same chromosomal mutation that makes a dog be so friendly and hyper social is linked to a rare disorder in humans, the Williams-Beuren Syndrome, or WBS. One of the symptoms of this condition is that people lack social inhibition making them terribly outgoing and trusting.

People with the Williams-Beuren Syndrome are also very social, and they tend to bond quickly with other people no matter if they are complete strangers. However, other symptoms include difficulty to learn and cardiovascular problems.

In fact, von Holdt started knowing this similarity between dogs and humans. On 2010, von Holdt had explained the entire genome of 225 gray wolves and 912 dogs from 85 breeds. There were clear differences between the genes of dogs and wolves, especially when it came to the WBS gene, WBSCR17. However, she wasnt entirely clear about how affected the behavior of dogs.

Three years ago, she began working with Udell who had developed behavioral data of dogs. Then, putting together elements of both research they were able to find the missing link.

Source: Los Angeles Times

Here is the original post:

Dogs are genetically predisposed to be the man's best friend - Pulse Headlines

New research proves Greeks colonised Sicily and Southern Italy – Neos Kosmos

Ancient Greek DNA from Euboea and Corinth still present in populations in the region

Paestum, Salerno, Italy, Temple Of Athena, Magna Grecia.

No one questions the colonisation of Magna Graecia by the Greeks, the name given to the coastal areas of Southern Italy and Sicily, is proof of that. It was in the 8th century BC that Ancient Greeks came decided to settle in the fertile lands of Magna Graecia, according to artefact and other archaeological finds. New DNA research published in the European Journal of Human Genetics, has just confirmed there is a strong biological influence apart from the cultural. Scenarios ranging from a colonization process based on small groups of males moderately admixing with autochthonous [indigenous] groups... to substantial migrations from Greece and a Hellenic origin for a significant part of the pre-Roman Italian population, explains Lead author Sergio Tofanelli. Tofanelli and his colleagues find fault with previous DNA analyses of Greek colonisation primarily which were using specific lineages of haplotypes as markers, however, contemporary genomes in many cases do not accurately reflect the DND makeup of ancient populations. Using both mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome analysis, the study simulates genetic change over time sequencing the DNA of more than 800 people native to the areas of Euboea and Corinth, where the first wave of Magna Grecia colonisers came from, along with people whose families were native to Sicily and southern Italy.

By modelling the typical mutation rate they recovered a strong signature of Greek DNA between the 8th and 5th centuries BC. "Despite the multiple alternative explanations for historical gene flow," they write, "it is relevant to stress here that a signature specifically related to the Euboea island in East. Sicily was consistently found at different levels of analysis-proving that it was most likely colonised first, in line with the historical and archaeological evidence, attesting to an extended and numerically important Greek presence in this region." Tofanellis finds point that "the migration and settlement process was driven by males. This is one of the few cases of sex-biased gene flow skewed towards an increased male instead of female contribution," the authors conclude. Part of the reason could be due to patrilocality as the norm for men was to stay in their birthplace while women could be offered to spouses in neighbouring kingdoms. This study is the first to use a full set of haplotypes and therefore provides better coverage of possible DNA links than previous studies.

See the rest here:

New research proves Greeks colonised Sicily and Southern Italy - Neos Kosmos

Senate Republicans plan to plow ahead with health-care vote this week – Washington Post

The Senate returns to Washington on Monday with its GOP leaders determined to vote this week on their years-long quest to demolish the Affordable Care Act, even though the goal remains mired in political and substantive uncertainties.

Central questions include whether enough Senate Republicans will converge on any version of their leaders health-care plan and whether significant aspects of the legislation being considered can fit within arcane parliamentary rules.

Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) indicated on Sunday that the majority party may not have enough support to prevail on even a first step a routine vote to begin the floor debate.

Were continuing to work with all of the members. Were getting much closer to that, Barrasso, one of the chambers few physicians, said on CBSs Face the Nation.

Meanwhile, the two Republicans who have been the efforts most outspoken foes in the Senate relaunched complaints that their leaders are leaving them clueless as to what exactly will be put forward.

Late last week, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) adopted a strategy uncharacteristic for a tactician who usually spares his caucus needless difficult votes.

Several days earlier, McConnell had lacked enough support to call for a vote on a bill that would rescind parts of the ACA and replace them with a variety of conservative health policies. He quickly switched, saying the chamber would vote anew on a repeal-only measure passed in late 2015 by both the Senate and House and vetoed by then-President Barack Obama. Less than 24 hours later, that idea faltered, too.

So McConnell has resorted to a plan C: bringing to the floor an anti-ACA bill passed by the House this spring and allowing senators a sort of free-for-all for substituting in either of the Senate measures or new iterations.

We are still on track ... to have a vote early this week, a McConnell spokesman said on Sunday. The Senate will consider all types of proposals, Republican and Democrat.

But Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a centrist who says the Senates Better Care Reconciliation Act would cut Medicaid in ways that would hurt rural and vulnerable Americans, derided that strategy during an appearance on Face the Nation.

Lawmakers dont know whether were going to be voting on the House bill, the first version of the Senate bill, the second version of the Senate bill, a new version of the Senate bill or a 2015 bill that would have repealed the Affordable Care Act now and then said that somehow well figure out a replacement over the next two years, Collins said.

I dont think thats a good approach to facing legislation that affects millions of people and one-sixth of our economy, she added.

Her sentiment was echoed by conservative Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who contends that the main GOP proposal the Senate has been considering does not go far enough to undermine the ACA. The real question is, what are we moving to? What are we opening debate to? Paul said on CNNs State of the Union. He reiterated that he only would support a bill that would remove large portions of the ACA and not legislation continuing federal subsidies that help millions of people afford their insurance premiums.

Such ideological crosscurrents within his own party are what McConnell has been trying to surmount. The GOP has a narrow majority of 52 senators, and Democrats are unified against the effort to dismantle Obamacare. Given this partisan terrain, Senate leaders are relying on a legislative process known as reconciliation, which allows a bill to be passed with a simple majority when it has budget implications, rather than the customary 60 votes needed to ward off a potential filibuster by opponents.

But the reconciliation strategy hit a roadblock late Friday as Senate Democrats released a set of guidance from the chambers parliamentarian, who concluded that aspects of a June26 version of the Better Care Reconciliation Act probably would not fit within the budget rules. The guidance says several parts of the proposal would require a full 60 votes for approval, including limits on funding for Planned Parenthood and health plans that provide coverage for abortion both restrictions conservatives have favored.

The parliamentarian also cautioned against a significant part of the GOP bill meant to encourage Americans to maintain health coverage: allowing health plans to freeze out for six months applicants who have allowed their coverage to lapse.

McConnells spokesman, Don Stewart, noted that the parliamentarian similarly cautioned against portions of the 2015 ACA repeal bill, but it still passed through the reconciliation process. Neither Stewart nor other Senate staffers said what changes could be contemplated to get around the parliamentary problem.

Follow this link:

Senate Republicans plan to plow ahead with health-care vote this week - Washington Post

How health care controls us – Washington Post

If we learned anything from the bitter debate over the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which seems doubtful it is that we cannot discuss health care in a way that is at once compassionate and rational. This is a significant failure, because providing and financing health care have become, over the past half-century, the principal activity of the federal government.

If you go back to 1962, the earliest year with such data, federal health spending totaled $2.3 billion, which was 2.1 percent of the $107 billion budget. In 2016, the comparable figures were $1.2 trillion in health spending, which was 31 percent of the $3.85 trillion budget. To put this in perspective, federal health spending last year was twice defense spending ($593billion) and exceeded Social Security outlays ($916 billion) by a comfortable margin.

The total will grow, because 76 million baby boomers are retiring, and as everyone knows, older people have much higher medical costs than younger people. In 2014, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, people 65 and over had average annual health costs of $10,494, about three times the $3,287 of people 35 to 44. Medicare and Medicaid, nonexistent in 1962, will bear the brunt of higher spending.

At a gut level, we know why health care defies logical discussion. We personalize it. We assume that whats good for us as individuals is also good for society. Unfortunately, this is not always true. What we want as individuals (unlimited care) may not be good for the larger society (overspending on health care).

Our goals are mutually inconsistent. We think that everyone should be covered by insurance for needed care; health care is a right. Doctors and patients should make medical choices, not meddlesome insurance companies or government bureaucrats; they might deny coverage as unneeded or unproven. Finally, soaring health spending should not squeeze wages or divert spending from important government programs.

The trouble is that, in practice, we cant meet all these worthy goals. If everyone is covered for everything, spending will skyrocket. Controlling costs inevitably requires someone to say no. The inconsistencies are obvious and would exist even if we had a single-payer system.

The ACA debate should have been about reaching a better balance among these competing goals and explaining the contradictions to the public. It wasnt.

The ACAs backers focused on how many Americans would lose coverage under various Republican proposals more than 20 million, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated. The ACAs entire gain in coverage would be wiped out, and then some. From 2013 to 2015, the number of insured Americans rose by 13 million, estimates Kaiser. But the ACAs advocates dont say much about stopping high insurance costs from eroding wage gains or strangling other government programs.

Meanwhile, congressional Republicans and the Trump White House proposed huge cuts in health spending $1trillion over 10 years for the ACAs repeal alone while implausibly suggesting that hardly anyone would be hurt or inconvenienced. There was no coherent strategy to reconcile better care with lower costs. Democrats kept arguing that the health cuts were intended to pay for big tax cuts that would go mainly to the rich and upper middle class. Sounds right.

Still, theres no moral high ground. Some Democrats have wrongly accused Obamacare opponents of murder. This is over-the-top rhetoric that discourages honest debate. Its also inconsistent with research. Kaiser reviewed 108 studies of the ACAs impact and found that, though beneficiaries used more health care, the effects on health outcomes are unclear.

We are left with a system in which medical costs are highly concentrated with the sickest patients. (The top 5percent account for half of all medical spending.) This creates a massive resource transfer, through insurance and taxes, from the young and middle-aged to the elderly. (Half of all health spending goes to those 55 and over, who represent just over one-quarter of the population).

And yet, we govern this massive health-care sector representing roughly a third of federal spending and nearly a fifth of the entire economy only haphazardly, because it responds to a baffling mixture of moral, economic and political imperatives. It will certainly strike future historians as curious that we tied our national fate to spending that is backward-looking, caring for people in their declining years, instead of spending that prepares us for the future.

We need a better allocation of burdens: higher eligibility ages for Social Security and Medicare; lower subsidies for affluent recipients; tougher restrictions on spending. But this future is impossible without a shift in public opinion that legitimizes imposing limits on health spending.

We didnt get that with the eight-year Obamacare debate. The compassionate impulse overwhelmed the rational instinct. The result is that health care is controlling us more than we are controlling it.

Read more from Robert Samuelsons archive.

Read the original:

How health care controls us - Washington Post

Many of key players on Trump health care reform team are Hoosiers – USA TODAY

The Republican Party spent Wednesday desperately trying to save its healthcare plan after the GOP's Senate leadership was forced to admit that it doesn't have the votes to repeal and replace Obamacare. Video provided by TheStreet Newslook

Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(Photo: Jack Gruber, USA TODAY)

WASHINGTON Several Hoosiers in key positions in the Trump administration,led by Vice President Mike Pence, are negotiating the future of federal health policy despite the states mixed reputation on health care.

Indiana spendsless on public health funding than any otherexcept Nevada, a handicap when Indiana was home to the nations first HIV outbreak linked to the injection of oral painkillers in 2015.

In addition, the state for years has ranked among the least healthy. Hoosiers smoke more, are less active and die sooner than most Americans.

Before Pence became vice president, however, he was among the minority of Republican governors who expanded their states Medicaid program a move which gave hundreds of thousands of Hoosiers access to health care and helped the state respond to the HIV outbreak.

Pence has been a leader of the Trump administrations so far unsuccessful efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act Obamacare, including phasing out its Medicaid expansion a program Pences successor is using to fight the opioid addiction epidemic.Another former Pence health policy aide now helps Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price a good friend of Pences work with Congress on the agencys legislative agenda.

Long-time Pence aide Matt Lloyd, the top HHS spokesman, is the sherpa to help guide the Trump administrations surgeon general nominee through Congress.

President Donald Trumps pick? Indianas state health commissioner, Dr. Jerome Adams, who was appointed to his position by Pence.

Its certainly significant, Eliot Fishman, the CMS official during the Obama administration who worked with Indiana on granting approval for its alternative Medicaid program, said of the concentration of Hoosiers in health policy positions. But, for myself, I was hopeful that having people who had successfully negotiated, and then implemented, an innovative Medicaid expansion in Indiana would have led to more support for Medicaid expansion nationally. I have not seen evidence of that yet.

Tom Miller, a health policy expert at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, said its understandable that so many Pence people ended up in key health care positions.

It didnt light up President Trump as the thing he was most deeply invested in, and had a range of experience in, Miller said. Mike has some experience, knowledge and engagement in this area of policy more so than most other folks close the issue in the White House. So its not surprising that he is taking the lead on this.

Read more:

With John McCain out, McConnell still plans a Senate health care vote next week

CBO'S score of the GOP 'repeal-only' health care bill is harshest yet

Trump is playing health care games with lives. Where are the grown-ups?

Indiana is home to some significant players in the health care industry. Anthem, one of the largest insurance companies, is headquartered in Indianapolis, as is drug maker Eli Lilly and Co.

Warsaw, Ind., is known as the Orthopedic Capital of the World because of the concentration of medical device makers.

And health savings accounts, the tool Republicans have championed as a way to make consumers more invested in their health care decisions, were pioneered by an Indiana insurance entrepreneur as an alternative to traditional health insurance. (The alternative Medicaid program Verma helped Pence create for Indianas Medicaid expansion mimics aspects of health savings accounts.)

Yet, despite Indianas leadership in sectors of the health care industry, the state ranks near the bottom on many health measures.

On the most recent overall ranking by the United Health Foundation, Indiana comes in at 39th healthiest. That scale takes into account behaviors, environmental health, policies, clinical care and outcomes.

Not surprisingly, the category that stands out the most to Paul Halverson, dean of Indiana Universitys Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, is public health funding. Indiana ranks 49th on spending per capita on preventive and education programs that improve health.

We just have not prioritized public health funding in Indiana in a number of years, Halverson said. Thats despite the fact, he said, that studies show properly funded public health systems can reduce medical care expenditures and increase life expectancy.

The HIV outbreak in Southern Indiana put a spotlight on the weaknesses in the states health infrastructure.

Still, Halverson gives a lot of credit to Adams the state health commissioner poised to become the nations top doctor for how he worked with Pence to respond to the outbreak. The response included allowing needle exchangesdespite Pences initial reservations.

Pences successor, Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb, has made reducing the number of opioid deaths one of his top goals as governor.

But Holcombs strategy to fight the opioid epidemic relies heavily on Medicaid, the jointly funded state and federal program which Pence is pushing hard to curtail.

Pences support, as governor, for expanding Medicaid in Indiana was a departure from his congressional record. He had voted against adding a prescription drug benefit to Medicare and against expanding the health care program for lower-income children whose families make too much to qualify them for Medicaid.

Still, Pence never completely closed to the door to finding a way to acceptthe federal funding made available through the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid eligibility.

Clearly, Governor Pence had policy concerns about expanding Medicaid, said Brian Tabor, executive vice president at the Indiana Hospital Association, which pushed hard for the expansion. But he never said `no.

The alternative Medicaid program Pence and Verma got the Obama administration to sign off on was one of Pences top achievements as governor.

Despite being a conservative state, they generally speaking overcame their conservative credentials to support policies that expanded coverage for people, even though they did it with a conservative flavor to it, said Andy Slavitt, who headed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under former President Barack Obama.

Whether Pences program, which requires participants to make monthly contributions if they want more comprehensive coverage, works better than traditional Medicaid is still being evaluated.

But Verma knows how crucial the ACA funding was to making the expansion possible, said Fishman.

There was just no way from a budgetary perspective that Indiana could have expanded coverage at the regular (federal reimbursement rate), Fishman said.

Thats not something Pence and Verma talk about as theyve tried to sell lawmakers and governors on replacing Obamacare with legislation that would phase out the ACAs extra federal funding for Medicaid while also reducing the federal governments financial support for regular Medicaid.

Governors who heard their pitch at this months National Governors Association summer meeting were skeptical.

He was selling ice beverages in the wintertime, Miller, the think tank expert, said of Pence. (Governors) wanted to know how they were keeping the money they already had, and they were trying to tell them theyd be better off, even though it seemed like they were getting less. Thats hard to pull off.

Pence who has been traveling the country and holding roundtable discussions at the White House to highlight the Obamacare disaster as well as courting lawmakers by phone and in private dinners at his residence has been more active than Trump in trying to pass repeal-and-replace legislation. He played a key role in getting changes to the House bill so it could pass that chamber in May. But the Senates version is stalled.

If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., cant round up enough GOP votes next week to bring any health care bill to the floor, legislation may be shelved for the foreseeable future. That will shift the focus to the changes the administration is able to make through agency action.

Pence and Verma have told governors the Trump administration will be more permissive and act faster on state requests to try new approaches.

It took our state more than two years for the federal government to approve our waiver, Pence told governors at the summer meeting. And even then, they frankly, rejected an awful lot of what we were trying to do.

Fishman, who called the negotiations he conducted with Verma on Indianas request intense but ultimately successful, said that experience likely contributed to Vermas commitment to letting states test their own approaches. But he suspects the administration will push the limits on the federal rules theyre allowed to waive under the law.

Its likely that there will be litigation, he predicted.

Slavitt, who like Fishman has been a vocal opponent of the repeal and replace efforts, said it would be a mistake to take too much of an ideological approach to policy changes.

If people come to the job and do what they did in Indiana, which is focus pragmatically on how to expand coverage, he said, that would be a good thing.

Contact Maureen Groppe at mgroppe@gannett.com. Follow her on Twitter: @mgroppe.

Mike Pence: As vice president, Pence has a lead role in the Trump administrations effort to undo the Affordable Care Act. Obamacare. Pence has been more active than Trump both publicly and privately in trying to get repeal and replace legislation through Congress. As governor, Pence was among a minority of Republicans who took federal funding made available under the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid.

Seema Verma: The administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Verma has been helping the administration explain to lawmakers and governors the Medicaid changes proposed in legislation. Shes also encouraged states to seek permission from her office for local approaches to running Medicaid. A former Indiana-based health care consultant, Verma helped create Indianas alternative Medicaid program and worked with other states on unique approaches.

Brady Brookes: Brookes is Vermas deputy chief of staff. She was legislative director for Pence when he was governor.

Brian Neale: Neale is a deputy CMS administrator, overseeing Medicaid and the health care program for low-income children whose families make too much to qualify for Medicaid. When Neale was Pences health care policy director in the governors office, he and Verma negotiated permission from the Obama administration to expand Indianas alternative Medicaid program.

Tyler Ann McGuffee: A former health care policy director for Pence, McGuffee works on Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Prices legislative agenda and is a liaison between Congress and the agency.

Matt Lloyd: Spokesman for the Health and Human Services Department, Lloyd was Pences deputy chief of staff in the governors office and worked for him for years on Capitol Hill. In addition to his spokesmans job, Lloyd is helping shepherd Trumps surgeon general nominee through the Senate confirmation process.

Dr. Jerome Adams: Indianas state health commission has been tapped by Trump to be the next surgeon general. Adams was appointed to his state position by Pence.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2uVj7mI

Read the original here:

Many of key players on Trump health care reform team are Hoosiers - USA TODAY

Recess looms over Congress’ busy week: Health care, Russia investigations – CNN

Even with the additional two weeks Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell added to the schedule, delaying the start of his chamber's recess, the Senate and the House have their share of several hot button issues -- including health care, Russia, the border wall and sanctions -- to address in the coming days.

The House is expected to wrap up work by Friday. House Speaker Paul Ryan and GOP leaders have said they will only call members back into town if the Senate is able to pass a health care bill and the House needs to take it up. They have vowed to give 72 hours' notice in the event they schedule votes over the recess.

President Donald Trump's family will be in the spotlight as Congress' investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 elections continue to meet with witnesses and hold hearings.

Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner is scheduled to be interviewed by Senate intelligence committee staffers behind closed doors Monday and speak with the House intelligence committee members Tuesday.

In a joint statement, judiciary committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and top Democrat Dianne Feinstein said, "(W)e will not issue subpoenas for them tonight requiring their presence at Wednesday's hearing but reserve the right to do so in the future."

Sources familiar with the matter say no date has been set for his and Manafort's private interviews with the committee. Both the Senate and House probes continue to push ahead and additional witnesses could appear.

The Senate is expected to vote Tuesday on the procedural motion to bring up the House passed Obamacare repeal legislation, but as of this weekend there continues to be confusion on what exactly senators are going to be asked to vote if that passes.

As it currently stands, Senate leaders do not appear to have the votes to advance their health care plans. After McConnell's strategy on his revised bill fell apart last week, a White House session with Republicans with the President urging a vote forced members back to the negotiating table.

If the GOP is unable to get onto the health care bill, there could be a movement to clear some nominations for executive branch appointments.

If health care remains at an impasse, congressional observers will be on the lookout to see whether McConnell sticks with plan and keeps senators in town for votes on issues other than health care.

For House members, this is the last week in Washington before a five-week summer recess, and they are struggling with two major items they hoped to complete this month -- a broad government funding bill and a budget that sets up a major overhaul of the tax code.

Without agreement on the spending measure, House Republican leaders have instead scheduled a vote on a scaled down security-focused bill, that will include money for the next fiscal year for the military, veterans, energy programs and the border wall that Trump promised he would build during the 2016 campaign. Leaders expect dozens of amendments on a range of issues, and a final vote will likely happen Friday. The measure is expected to pass on a mostly party line vote.

House GOP leaders hoped to approve a budget resolution, which is crucial to their effort to pass major tax reform legislation this year. The leadership's plan was approved by the budget committee last week, but there are no plans for a floor vote yet because of continued splits inside the Republican conference on the size of the mandatory spending cuts.

The House will vote Tuesday on the bill that would include new sanctions against Russia, Iran, and North Korea, according to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy's schedule, and the Senate is likely to take it up after that, although Senate leaders haven't yet specified their timing.

"The administration is supportive of being tough on Russia, particularly in putting these sanctions in place," Sanders told ABC's this week.

Trump has not publicly said how he feels about the sanctions package, but did tweet about Russia on Sunday.

House and Senate Democrats will gather Monday for an event in Berryville, Virginia, where they're set to release their economic agenda heading into the 2018 midterm elections.

Their priorities, which they'll campaign on for the next year and a half, consist of three objectives: lower costs for everyday expenses, raise wages and improve job training.

After their devastating presidential election loss last year, Democrats have been soul-searching for a message to help resurrect the party in the Trump era. And the title of the agenda -- "Better Deal: Better Jobs, Better Wages, Better Future" -- invokes memory of the post-depression New Deal launched by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

CNN's Tom LoBianco, Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb contributed to this report.

See the rest here:

Recess looms over Congress' busy week: Health care, Russia investigations - CNN

Barrasso on health care: "It should be done in a bipartisan way" – CBS News

As lawmakers in Washington remain divided over the future of health care in the United States, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming, says there should be a bipartisan approach when it comes to legislation.

"Should have been bipartisan when Obamacare was passed. It should be now as well," Barrasso said Sunday on "Face the Nation."

"For big things that affect the country, it should be done in a bipartisan way," he added.

But while Barrasso is supportive of a bipartisan effort to changing existing health care laws, he said that "with this resistance movement to President Trump and the energy in the Democrat Party," Republicans have been given the impression by top Democrats, like Chuck Schumer of New York and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, that the GOP should "expect no cooperation" in the health care debate.

When pressed if any Republicans had reached out to Democrats in the hopes of creating a bipartisan effort on legislation, Barrasso said he's visited the floor of the Senate with a number of Democrats, but that they have put forth their own contentions to major aspects of the bill.

"They say, 'Well, you know, we do want to work together, but there are a couple things. One is, don't touch the mandate.' Well, the mandate, the individual mandate that says people have to buy a government program, that's the most hated part of Obamacare," said Barrasso.

Meanwhile, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine told "Face the Nation" that she would like to see Congress go back into committee and hold hearings on the matter.

Play Video

Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, discusses the latest on the Russia investigations and the path forward for replacing Obamacare with Face the Nati...

"We could divide this issue into separate bills and take a look at the serious flaws in the Affordable Care Act, the most serious of which right now is the collapse of the insurance market in several counties throughout this country, so that people who have subsidies won't have an insurer that can sell them insurance," Collins said on "Face the Nation."

"That would allow us to hear from expert witnesses, to get input from actuaries and governors and advocacy groups and health care providers, and most important, from members of both sides of the aisle, Republicans as well as Democrats," she added.

Collins was one of three GOP holdouts who along with Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaskaeffectively killed the Republican effort to vote on health care. They announced that they would oppose Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell's efforts to move forward with the latest bill.

While it is still unclear what form of the health bill the Senate willconsider in a vote set for Tuesday, Barraasso says there are a variety of ways for the Senate to replace the "failing Obamacare health care plan," adding that for his fellow Republicans who ran on repealing and replacing Obamacare, "This is our chance."

"We are going to vote this week. And I think until the vote is actually on the floor of the Senate, some people may not tell you what they're actually going to do," he said.

Regarding the back-and-forth in Congress, he said, "I was in the Wyoming legislature for five years. That's what legislation is all about. You get a bill on the floor of the House or the Senate. We get a bill, and then you start adding amendments. You bring your best ideas forward. And then people vote up or down."

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Read more from the original source:

Barrasso on health care: "It should be done in a bipartisan way" - CBS News

WATCH: How would the GOP health care plan affect women? – Salon

My colleague Amanda Marcotte and I sat down for Salon Talks with Carrie Lukas, president of the Independent Womens Forum(IWF), to discuss how the unresolved debate over health care policies in the Republican-dominated Congress impact womens health issues.

IWF is a conservative and libertarian organization that createsmessages about how women and families can be empowered by the free market rather than big government. With headlines like, In the Poconos, Another Small Business Falls Victim to Unnecessary Licensing and Who Cares for the Caregivers? and Trump Education Departments Likely Changes in Campus Sexual-Assault Policy Causes Angst Among Activists, IWF writes about health care, women at work, education, women in politics and more.

When it comes to womens health, is there an imbalance in health care costs?

Carrie Lukas: If youre an infertile woman, lets say or a woman who doesnt want to have kids I can imagine saying, You know what, my insurance has gone up the same as a woman whos had five kids. I dont know why everybody should have to be subsidizing maternity expenses.

Should we have to subsidize other peoples health care expenses in the first place?

Amanda Marcotte: Im happy to pay that money [for another womans maternity costs] so that when I get cancer, her higher premiums cover me.

Should we subsidize each others costs when it comes to beliefs? For example, why should a person who doesnt drink for religious reasons pay for substance abuse programs?

Marcotte: If I get hit by a car driven by a drunk driver, and they didnt get alcohol abuse treatment, then yes, that does affect me. Its a community issue we all depend on each others health care.

Link:

WATCH: How would the GOP health care plan affect women? - Salon

Vets balk at Hill proposal to offer ‘choice’ health care – Washington Times

Several leading veterans groups are voicing opposition to House legislation scheduled for a vote Monday that would shift $2 billion from some veterans programs to fill a budget shortfall in a choice health care plan that allows veterans to see a private doctor.

The groups, representing 21 million veterans, said the legislation is unacceptable because it would divert tax dollars from Department of Veterans Affairs programs without addressing other critical problems in the VA system.

We oppose legislation that includes funding only for the choice program which provides additional community care options, but makes no investment in VA and uses savings from other veterans benefits or services to pay for the choice program, the groups said.

The statement was signed by AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Association, the Military Officers Association of America, the Military Order of the Purple Heart, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Vietnam Veterans of America and the Wounded Warrior Project.

The House Committee on Veterans Affairs released the proposal on Friday, and Republican leaders have scheduled a vote by the full House for Monday night. To offset spending, the VA would trim pensions for some veterans who are in nursing homes covered by Medicaid and collect fees for housing loans.

Lawmakers and the VA are trying to find a solution to a funding shortfall in the Veterans Choice program, which allows veterans to seek a private doctor if they live more than 40 miles from the nearest VA medical facility or if they cant get an appointment in the VA system within 30 days. The legislation would extend that program for six months.

The popular program was created as a response to a scandal in 2014 in the VA system over delayed care and veterans who died waiting for appointments. But the choice program is due to run out of money in mid-August, and the VA already has been cutting back on private care options for veterans in the meantime.

The VA has an annual budget of about $167 billion.

The veterans groups opposed to the legislation said Congress should beef up both the choice program and other services for veterans instead of shifting money around within the VA budget.

If new funding is directed only or primarily to private sector choice care without any adequate investment to modernize VA, the viability of the entire system will soon be in danger, the groups said.

Another veterans group that favors providing veterans with more private-sector options, Concerned Veterans for America, has endorsed the legislation.

CVA policy director Dan Caldwell called the House measure a practical solution that will address the problem quickly and in a fiscally responsible manner.

This plan will ensure that the veterans who have been able to successfully use the choice program will not face any lapses in care due to the program running out of money in the coming weeks, Mr. Caldwell said. We urge Congress to reject straw man arguments from defenders of the status quo who are using this moment to advance their anti-choice agenda instead of doing whats best for veterans. There is no reason to tie fixing the Veteran Choice Program to other unnecessary spending increases, especially considering that a VA appropriations bill, with a nearly $2 billion dollar budget, is already in the works.

Still another group, the Paralyzed Veterans of America, chose not to take a position on the legislation. It said tradeoffs in VA budgeting are nothing new.

Paralyzed Veterans main concern is that using these offsets to pay for VA health care comes at the expense of expanding nonhealth care benefits, such as disability compensation, said executive director Sherman Gillums Jr. However, we are not prepared to simply oppose offsets because we believe VA is open to strengthening health care for our most catastrophically disabled veterans, which matters above all else.

See the original post here:

Vets balk at Hill proposal to offer 'choice' health care - Washington Times