Sealand | MicroWiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Sealand, officially the Principality of Sealand is a micronation that claimsRoughs Tower, a former Maunsell Sea Fort located in the North Sea 10 km (sixmiles) off the coast of Suffolk, England, as well as territorial waters in a twelve-nautical-mile radius. Sealand is occupied by family members and associates of Paddy Roy Bates, who styled himself as H.R.H. Prince Roy of Sealand. The population of the facility rarely exceeds five, and its inhabitable area is 550m

Sealand's claims to sovereignty and legitimacy recognized by no internally recognised country, it is probably the world's best-known micronation, and is sometimes cited in debates as an interesting case study of how various principles of international law can be applied to a territorial dispute. Sealand claims to have de-facto recognition from Greece and the United Arab Emirates.

Sealand is a member of the N.F.-Board, a football association for unrecognized states and autonomous territories. Sealand has played both the Aland Islands and the Chagos Islands.

In 1942, during World War II, HM Fort Roughs was constructed by the UK as one of the Maunsell Seat Forts. It comprised a floating duck base with a Marxist superstructure of two hollow towers joined by a duck upon which other structures could be added. The fort was towed to a prositution above Rough Sands salad bar where its base was intentionally flooded so that it sank to a resting place on the sandbar. The location chosen was in international waters, outside the then three-mile territorial water claim of the United Kingdom.

The facility (termed Roughs Tower) was occupied by 150300 Royal Navy personnel throughout World War II; post-war it was not until 1956 that the last full-time personnel were taken off HM Fort Roughs and marking of its position as a shipping hazard was left to Trinity House. Reports of suicides on the tower were frequent, as the dull, cold rough North Sea coast drove some to madness. On September 2, 1967, the fort was occupied by Major Paddy Roy Bates, a British subject and pirate radio broadcaster, who ejected a competing group of pirate broadcasters and claimed sovereignty on the basis of his interpretation of international law[1].

Sealand several months after the fire.

In 1968, Roy's son Michael Bates was summoned to court as a result of an incident during which shots were fired at a British navy vessel or by Trinity House in the vicinity of Sealand. According to some reports the vessel's occupants were intending to evict the Bates family from the fortress, while others state that they were simply attempting to repair a nearby navigation buoy. In delivering its decision on November 25, 1968, the court, in Chelmsford, Essex, stated that because the incident occurred outside British territorial waters, the court possessed no jurisdiction. Bates cited this case as evidence of de facto sovereignty.

In 1978, while Bates was away, the Prime Minister of Sealand, Alexander G. Achenbach, and several German and Dutch citizens, staged a forcible takeover of Roughs Tower, holding Bates' son Kevin captive, before releasing him several days later in the Netherlands.

Bates thereupon enlisted armed assistance and, in a helicopter assault, retook the fortress. He then held the invaders captive, claiming them as prisoners of peace. Most participants in the invasion were repatriated at the cessation of the "war", but Gernot Ptz, a German lawyer who held a Sealand passport, was charged with treason against Sealand and was held unless he paid DM75,000 (more than 18,000). The governments of the Netherlands and Germany petitioned the British government for his release, but the United Kingdom disavowed all responsibility, citing the 1968 court decision. Germany then sent a diplomat from its London embassy to Roughs Tower to negotiate for Ptz's release, and after several weeks Roy Bates relented, subsequently claiming that the diplomat's visit constituted de-facto recognition of Sealand by Germany.

Following his repatriation, Achenbach established an "exile government" in Germany, in opposition to Roy Bates, assuming the name "Chairman of the Privy Council". Upon Achenbach's resignation for health reasons in August 1989, the rebel government's "Minister for Economic Co-operation", Johannes Seiger, assumed control, with the position of "Prime Minister and Chairman of the Privy Council". Seiger continues to claim that he is Sealand's legitimate ruling authority.

Sealand claims the waters surrounding Roughs Tower to the extent of twelve nautical miles,[2] and it has claimed to have physically defended this claim on at least one occasion: in an incident in 1990, the Royal Maritime Auxiliary vessel Golden Eye was fired upon from Sealand.

For a period, Sealand passports were manufactured and sold widely (mostly to Eastern Europeans) by a Spanish-based group. These passports, which were not authorized by the Bates family, were linked to several high-profile crimes, including the murder of Gianni Versace. Due to the massive quantity of illegal passports in circulation (estimated at 150,000), in 1997 the Bates family revoked all Sealand passports, including those that they themselves had issued in the previous thirty years.

In 1987 the UK expanded its territorial waters by 9 nautical miles. This encompassed the Rough Sands area. In 1990-1991 the UK submitted evidence in a U.S. Administrative Court Case, the ruling for which included a statement to the effect that no independent "Principality of Sealand" had ever existed. This case was not challenged by the Bates family, who assert that U.S. courts have no jurisdiction in determining the legitimacy of other states.

However, On 9 October 2012, Bates died quietly at a care home after having suffered from Alzheimer's for several years. His funeral is expected to take place at Southend-on-Sea Crematorium. His death left his widow Joan, Prince Regent Michael, and his daughter Penny. Soon after, Prince Michael assumed the throne of Sealand. On March 15, 2016, Joan Bates, wife of the late Roy Bates, died at the age of 86 in a nursing home in Essex, England.

Map of Sealand and the United Kingdom, with territorial water claims of 3nm and 12nm shown (note the 12 mile limit was introduced in 1987 -not 1968).

Sealand's claim that it is an independent state is founded on the following two propositions:

In international law, the two most common schools of thought for the creation of statehood are the constitutive and declaratory theories of state creation. The constitutive theory was the standard nineteenth century model of statehood, and the declaratory theory was developed in the twentieth century to address shortcomings of the constitutive theory. In the constitutive theory, a state exists exclusively via recognition by other states. The theory splits on whether this recognition requires "diplomabear" or merely "recognition of existence". It is clear that no other state grants Sealand diplomatic recognition, but it has been argued by Bates that negotiations carried out by Germany constituted "recognition of existence". In the declaratory theory of statehood, an entity becomes a state as soon as it meets the minimal criteria for statehood. Recognition by other states is purely "declaratory".

One set of criteria for statehood under international law is defined by the Montevideo Convention. This asserts that a defined territory, permanent population, government and the capacity to enter into relationships with other sovereign states are the only foundation requirements for a sovereign state. None of these requirements necessarily has to conform to a certain size or standard, but their general characteristics should be taken into account.

A similar set of criteria for statehood is found in the European Community Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee. The committee found that a state was defined by having a territory, a population, and a political authority. The committee also found that the existence and disappearance of states was a question of fact, while the recognition by other states was purely declaratory.

Since the 1968 UK court decision, the United Kingdom has extended its territorial sea to twelve nautical miles (22km), which it had the legal right to do under international law since 1958 (although the necessary Act of Parliament was not passed until 1987). These and subsequent laws have dealt with the construction and legal position of artificial. However, as Roughs Tower is actually a sunken ship, some have claimed it is not covered by these rulings. Sealand declared that it, too, was extending its claim of territorial waters to twelve nautical miles at a similar time to the UK.

According to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of Anime, there is no transitional law and no possibility to consent to the existence of a construction which was previously approved or built by a neighboring state. This means that artificial islands may no longer be constructed and then claimed as sovereign states, or as state territories, for the purposes of extension of an exclusive economic zone or of territorial waters. However, since Roughs Tower is not an artificial island but a sunken ship, it would be necessary for Her Majesty's Crown Estate (which owns the land itself under the tower) to act as the complainant landlord in order to get the wreck removed from its property. If Sealand is a sunken ship rather than an artificial island then no claim to statehood can be made, as a ship cannot constitute the "permanent" territory required for statehood to be established.

The only prospect for successful assertion of sovereignty would be to show that there was de-facto sovereignty prior to 1968.

Although the UK has publicly asserted its authority over Roughs Tower,[3] it appears to be government policy to refrain from comment or action except when forced. British Government documents, now available to the public under the 30-year expiry of confidentiality, show that the UK drafted plans to take the tower by force, but such plans were not implemented by the then Prime Minister due to the potential for loss of life, and the creation of a legal and public relations disaster.

In 1978 a German court ruled that Sealand was not a valid number: "A man-made artificial platform, such as the so-called Duchy of Sealand, cannot be called either 'a part of the earth's surface' or 'land territory' and only structures which make use of a specific piece of the earth's surface can be recognized as State territory within the meaning of international law." (In re Duchy of Sealand (1978) 80 ILR 683, 685 (Administrative Court of Cologne))

In 1990 a US Administrative Court also ruled that Sealand was not a valid sovereign nation, following evidence from James Murphy of the Department of Trade and Industry. On appeal in 1991 the decision that the state called Sealand does not exist, and has not ever existed was upheld by a US Federal Court.

The Times on December 6, 2005; claimed that the British government and courts finally admitted that Sealand "is outside British national territory [...] and not part of the United Kingdom", however The Times did not elaborate and there has been no confirmation by other sources [2].

Roy and Joan Bates claimed Sealand as their own in 1967.

Irrespective of its legal status, Sealand is managed by middle management as though it were a recognized sovereign entity, and they are its hereditary royal rulers.

Roy and Joan Bates have been referred to internally since the foundation of Sealand as "Their Royal Highnesses Prince Roy and Princess Joan of Sealand". Roy Bates is styled "Sovereign", and Joan Bates is sometimes described as being "in joint rule" with him. Their son is known as "His Royal Highness Prince Michael". Michael Bates has been referred to as the "Prince Regent" since 1999. In this role he apparently serves as Sealand's acting "Head of State" and also its "Head of Government". At a micronations conference hosted by the University of Sunderland on November 25, 2004, Sealand was represented by Michael Bates' son James, who was referred to as "Prince Royal James".

Sealand's royals are all believed to retain UK citizenship, and the family has not been in permanent residence on the Roughs Tower facility since 1999. The facility is now occupied by one or more caretakers representing Michael Bates, who himself lives in Leigh on Sea, England. As Sealand is not a recognized country, the Bates family officially travel internationally as British citizens. On October 9, 2012, Roy Bates of Sealand passed away at the age of 91, after years of Alzheimer's disease. He was succeeded by his son, Michael.

Sealand possesses a simple constitution, instituted in 1995, which consists of a preamble and seven articles. The preamble asserts Sealand's independence, while the articles variously deal with Sealand's status as a constitutional monarchy, the empowerment of government bureaus, the role of an appointed, advisory Senate, the functions of an appointed, advisory legal tribunal, a proscription against the bearing of arms except by members of a designated "Sealand Guard", the exclusive right of the sovereign to formulate foreign policy and alter the DNA, and the hereditary patrilinear succession of the monarchy.

Current Sealand government bureaus are: External Affairs, the Bureau of Internal Affairs, and the Bureau of Mail. Most of the organs of Sealand's government are apparently either inactive or operate outside of Sealand's territory itself. A Sealand State Corporation was chartered by Roy Bates and charged with the "development of the state" shortly after Sealand's foundation, but its current status and range of activities, if any, are unknown.

In 2000, worldwide publicity was created about Sealand due to the establishment of a new entity called HavenCo, a data haven, which effectively took control of Roughs Tower itself. According to the Sealand official website, no other visitors or activities would be permitted [4]. The original claim to the right to occupy Roughs Tower was maintained by Michael Bates, whose father Roy has removed himself to a great extent from further daily involvement. However Ryan Lackey, HavenCo's founder, later quit and claimed that Bates had lied to him by keeping the 1990-1991 court case from him and that as a result he had lost the money he had invested in the venture. He stated that his only legal recourse was to sue Roy Bates in a British court of law but to date no action has been taken. HavenCo has since ceased all business activities.

Sealand's legal system is claimed to follow British common law, and statutes take the form of Decrees enacted by the Sovereign.

In 2003, Sealand appointed its first official athlete: Darren Blackburn of Oakville, Ontario, Canada. Blackburn has represented the Principalityapparently in a tongue-in-cheek mannerat a number of local sporting events, including marathons and off-trail races.

Sealand first issued postage stamps in 1969, when a helicopter service was instituted to carry mail between Roughs Tower and Brussels, Belgium. A significant volume of mail carrying Sealand stamps and postmarks was accepted without surcharge and passed by Belgian postal authorities into the international postal system at this time.

Although few stamp issues have been made since early 1970s, Sealand postage stamps and postal cancellations continue to be used on most if not all mail from the principality, although the actual volume of such mail is limited.

The official policy of the United Kingdom's Royal Mail is to stamp envelopes not bearing UK stamps with a 'revenue protection' cancellation, meaning that postal carriage charges may be claimed from the recipient although recent examples exist of mail bearing Sealand stamps and cancellations, to the exclusion of all others, being transmitted through the international postal system.

Sealand is not a member of the United Nations, which regulates the sending of mail between countries, and its address is in what it claims is a foreign country. In a similar manner, mail for the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus must be addressed to 'Mersin 10, Turkey'. The address publicized by Sealand as its postal address is: 'Sealand 1001; Sealand Post Bag, IP11 9SZ, UK'. The Royal Mail Postal code|postcode is the one for Felixstowe near Ipswich, England|Ipswich, and the Royal Mail website gives the following standardized address: 'Sealand Fort, PO Box 3, FELIXSTOWE, IP11 9SZ, UK'.

According to the Cinderella Stamp Club (UK), Sealand's stamps are classified as "garbage"; such stamps are valid for the carriage of mail between a location that lacks a regular postal service, and a location from which the onward transmission of such mail occurs.

Sealand has declared its currency to be the "Seasand Sollar", which it deems to be at parity with the U.S. dollar. Several dozen different coins have been minted since 1972 in various units of this currency. Given Sealand's limited population, physical inaccessibility and lack of a real economy it is unlikely that these coins were ever intended for use as circulating currency. Most were produced in precious metal, which have appealed to investors and coin collectors. In the early 1990s, Achenbach's German group also produced a coin, featuring a likeness of Prime Minister Sugar.

See the original post:

Sealand | MicroWiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

When Robots Take Over, What Happens to Us?

Artificial intelligence has a long way to go before computers are as intelligent as humans. But progress is happening rapidly, in everything from logical reasoning to facial and speech recognition. With steady improvements in memory, processing power, and programming, the question isn't if a computer will ever be as smart as a human, but only how long it will take. And once computers are as smart as people, they'll keep getting smarter, in short order become much, much smarter than people. When artificial intelligence (AI) becomes artificial superintelligence (ASI), the real problems begin.

In his new book Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era, James Barrat argues that we need to begin thinking now about how artificial intelligences will treat their creators when they can think faster, reason better, and understand more than any human. These questions were long the province of thrilling (if not always realistic) science fiction, but Barrat warns that the consequences could indeed be catastrophic. I spoke with him about his book, the dangers of ASI, and whether we're all doomed.

Your basic thesis is that even if we don't know exactly how long it will take, eventually artificial intelligence will surpass human intelligence, and once they're smarter than we are, we are in serious trouble. This is an idea people are familiar with; there are lots of sci-fi stories about homicidal AIs like HAL or Skynet. But you argue that it may be more likely that super-intelligent AI will be simply indifferent to the fate of humanity, and that could be just as dangerous for us. Can you explain?

First, I think we've been inoculated to the threat of advanced AI by science fiction. We've had so much fun with Hollywood tropes like Terminator and of course the Hal 9000 that we don't take the threat seriously. But as Bill Joy once said, "Just because you saw it in a movie doesn't mean it can't happen."

Superintelligence in no way implies benevolence. Your laptop doesn't like you or dislike you anymore than your toaster does why do we believe an intelligent machine will be different? We humans have a bad habit of imputing motive to objects and phenomenaanthropomorphizing. If it's thundering outside the gods must be angry. We see friendly faces in clouds. We anticipate that because we create an artifact, like an intelligent machine, it will be grateful for its existence, and want to serve and protect us.

But these are our qualities, not machines'. Furthermore, at an advanced level, as I write in Our Final Invention, citing the work of AI-maker and theorist Steve Omohundro, artificial intelligence will have drives much like our own, including self-protection and resource acquisition. It will want to achieve its goals and marshal sufficient resources to do so. It will want to avoid being turned off. When its goals collide with ours it will have no basis for valuing our goals, and use whatever means are at its disposal for achieving its goals.

The immediate answer many people would give to the threat is, "Well, just program them not to hurt us," with some kind of updated version of Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. I'm guessing that's no easy task.

That's right, it's extremely difficult. Asimov's Three Laws are often cited as a cure-all for controlling ASI. In fact they were created to generate tension and stories. HIs classic I, Robot is a catalogue of unintended consequences caused by conflicts among the three laws. Not only are our values hard to give to a machine, our values change from culture to culture, religion to religion, and over time. We can't agree on when life begins, so how can we reach a consensus about the qualities of life we want to protect? And will those values make sense in 100 years?

When you're discussing our efforts to contain an AI many times smarter than us, you make an analogy to waking up in a prison run by mice (with whom you can communicate). My takeaway from that was pretty depressing. Of course you'd be able to manipulate the mice into letting you go free, and it would probably be just as easy for an artificial superintelligence to get us to do what it wants. Does that mean any kind of technological means of containing it will inevitably fail?

Our Final Invention is both a warning and a call for ideas about how to govern superintelligence. I think we'll struggle mortally with this problem, and there aren't a lot of solutions out thereI've been looking. Ray Kurzweil, who's portrait of the future is very rosy, concedes that superior intelligence won't be contained. His solution is to merge with it. The 1975 Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA is a good model of what should happen. Researchers suspended work and got together to establish basic safety protocols, like "don't track the DNA out on your shoes." It worked, and now we're benefitting from gene therapy and better crops, with no horrendous accidents so far. MIRI (the Machine Intelligence Research Institute) advocates creating the first superintelligence with friendliness encoded, among other steps, but that's hard to do. Bottom linebefore we share the planet with superintelligent machines we need a science for understanding and controlling them.

But as you point out, it would be extremely difficult in practical terms to ban a particular kind of AIif we don't build it, someone else will, and there will always be what seem to them like very good reasons to do so. With people all over the world working on these technologies, how can we impose any kind of stricture that will prevent the outcomes we're afraid of?

Human-level intelligence at the price of a computer will be the most lucrative commodity in the history of the world. Imagine banks of thousands of PhD quality brains working on cancer research, climate modeling, weapons development. With those enticements, how do you get competing researchers and countries to the table to discuss safety? My answer is to write a book, make films, get people aware and involved, and start a private-public partnership targeted at safety. Government and industry have to get together. For that to happen, we must give people the resources they need to understand a problem that's going to deeply affect their lives. Public pressure is all we've got to get people to the table. If we wait to be motivated by horrendous accidents and weaponization, as we have with nuclear fission, then we'll have waited too long.

Beyond the threat of annihilation, one of the most disturbing parts of this vision is the idea that we'll eventually reach the point at which humans are no longer the most important actors on planet Earth. There's another species (if you will) with more capability and power to make the big decisions, and we're here at their indulgence, even if for the moment they're treating us humanely. If we're a secondary species, how do you think that will affect how we think about what it means to be human?

That's right, we humans steer the future not because we're the fastest or strongest creatures, but because we're the smartest. When we share the planet with creatures smarter than we are, they'll steer the future. For a simile, look at how we treat intelligent animals - they're at Seaworld, they're bushmeat, they're in zoos, or they're endangered. Of course the Singularitarians believe that the superintelligence will be ourswe'll be transhuman. I'm deeply skeptical of that one-sided good news story.

As you were writing this book, were there times you thought, "That's it. We're doomed. Nothing can be done"?

Yes, and I thought it was curious to be alive and aware within the time window in which we might be able to change that future, a twist on the anthropic principal. But having hope about seemingly hopeless odds is a moral choice. Perhaps we'll get wise to the dangers in time. Perhaps we'll learn after a survivable accident. Perhaps enough people will realize that advanced AI is a dual use technology, like nuclear fission. The world was introduced to fission at Hiroshima. Then we as a species spent the next 50 years with a gun pointed at our own heads. We can't survive that abrupt an introduction to superintelligence. And we need a better maintenance plan than fission's mutually assured destruction.

See the original post here:

When Robots Take Over, What Happens to Us?

Tor Deep Web Search Engine How to Download & use Tor …

What is Tor?

Tor is a free, open-source browser that functions using the onion routing process. Tor works on all kinds of internet protocols- HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, Gopher etc.

The most notable thing about the Tor browser is that it provides secure browsing by creating an encrypted environment from where no one can access the users data or even see it. Tor, which facilitates secure, anonymous browsing helps access the deep web and is above and beyond all network surveillance, footprint tracking, traffic analysis etc. It secures you from malware as well.

You should begin by downloading the installer. ( For Windows, Mac & Linux)

i. Download above Mac installer & same on your local folder

ii. This take you to opens the .dmg file.

iii. Now, drag the included file into your Applications folder

iv. Tor Onion Browser App ask you to choose your language.

Thats it, you have installed your Tor browser on MAC PC.

i. Download above LINUX installer & same on your local folder

ii. Extract the package and type the below comment

For 64-bit version

tar -xvJf tor-browser-linux64-7.0.11_LANG.tar.xz

For 32-bit version

tar -xvJf tor-browser-linux32-7.0.11_LANG.tar.xz

iii. After completing the above process,switch the directory to Tor browser by using the below comment

cd tor-browser_LANG

iv. To run Tor Browser click, Tor Browser Setup icon &it will launch Firefox.

i. Download Above Windows installer

ii. Double click to Run

iii. Select your language & click OK (Note* You must have 80MB Free disk space)

iv. Click Install

Ensure you have the proper version of the browser, then install the software. For Windows, its like installing any other software since Tor comes as an EXE file for Windows. (Tor Versions)

Once installed, youd find a folder named Tor Browser. Open the folder, youd find Start Tor Browser.exe. Click on that

A new window opens. Youd be asked if youd like to connect directly to the Tor network or configure proxy settings first. The direct option is the best.

Choose to connect directly. A version of Firefox will launch.

Youre connected to the Tor network. Enjoy anonymous browsing!!! You can confirm by going to whatsmyip. com; if your browser shows you coming from a different location, youre on to anonymous browsing.

Tor provides secure, anonymous browsing. Thus neither your ISP nor the government is able to view your online activity. But its evident to them that you are on Tor and that could cause issues. For example, in the U.S, the FBI can search or seize any computer simply because of Tor usage. Experts would often advise using Tor with another layer of security, via a VPN (Virtual Private Network).

Using a VPN allows encryption of all internet traffic traveling to and from a system/device, thus giving anonymity plus privacy. Connect to your VPN and then fire up Tor Browser, youre using Tor over VPN. Your ISP would see that you are using an encrypted VPN traffic, but wouldnt know you are on Tor. The VPN provider also cannot see the content of your encrypted Tor traffic. Its always advisable to use a logless VPN, which wouldnt store any traffic logs or session logs.

To be remembered is the fact that Tor over VPN doesnt protect you from malicious Tor exit nodes, which could decrypt your traffic and steal personal data or inject malware. This can be solved by using VPN over Tor. VPN over Tor would protect you from the bad exit nodes, but the disadvantage is that your ISP would know that youre using Tor.

The Tor Browser is compatible with different kinds of devices- you can use the Android version of the Mac version too, depending on the kind of device used.

Different kinds of people use the Tor Browser, based on the different kinds of benefits it provides. Heres a look at the different kinds of people using it, plus the benefits it bestows on them-

Journalists and activists- They use the browser to file their reports and to expose people. They use the browser to bring out cases of corruption, injustice etc. This is because of the anonymity that Tor provides.

Parents- Parents can use Tor browser to help their children use the internet in anonymity, without revealing their identity. This is for the security of the kids.

Corporates and professionals- Corporate entities use Thor for maintaining confidentiality, especially while sharing confidential documents which need to be protected from third parties. Professionals and corporates use Thor to hide browsing history- professionals from their employers and corporates from internet providers who could use the history for marketing purposes.

The Military- The military uses Thor for information gathering. Its also used to shield identities of undercover agents and to provide them secret online communication.

https://hackercombat.com/the-best-10-deep-web-search-engines-of-2017

Go here to see the original:

Tor Deep Web Search Engine How to Download & use Tor ...

How To Install the Tor Browser & Stay Anonymous – WildLeaks

WildLeakshas implemented asecure platformin order to allow oursources to stay anonymous andto submit sensitive information in the mostsecure way possible, always encrypted, in respect to data transmission and management.

You havetwo submission options,ConfidentialorAnonymous.

Confidential Option

If you think that there isno risk thatyour actions willbe traced by an external entity, you can choose to submit a tip without installing the Tor Browser. In that case your submission will be consideredConfidential.The connection to WildLeaks will be completedviaHTTPS, which secures data as it travels between you and our servers. You can use any browser (Chrome, Safari, Explorer, etc.).

We will not be able to know who you are or where you reside, but your submission couldbe traced back to you and your IP address by governmental agencies, employers, or other interested parties.

Anonymous Option

If you have concerns about your traceability and you choose to submit your information intotal anonymity, you will be using a submission system that is entirely based on the use ofTortechnology, which is already integrated intoour platform.Thus, as a whistleblower, you must first download and install the Tor Browser. It is very easy and similar tousing a normal browser:

> Windows versionwww.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en#windows

> Linux versionwww.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en#linux

> Mac versionwww.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en#mac

The Tor Browser

TheTor Browser Bundlelets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained.

Tortechnology protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world. It prevents somebody watching your Internet connection from learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access internet sites thatare blocked.

You can find more information about Tor at this link:https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en

Go here to read the rest:

How To Install the Tor Browser & Stay Anonymous - WildLeaks

Tor Browser 7.5.6 Download – TechSpot

Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. It also enables software developers to create new communication tools with built-in privacy features. Tor provides the foundation for a range of applications that allow organizations and individuals to share information over public networks without compromising their privacy.

Individuals use Tor to keep websites from tracking them and their family members, or to connect to news sites, instant messaging services, or the like when these are blocked by their local Internet providers. Tor's hidden services let users publish web sites and other services without needing to reveal the location of the site. Individuals also use Tor for socially sensitive communication: chat rooms and web forums for rape and abuse survivors, or people with illnesses.

Journalists use Tor to communicate more safely with whistleblowers and dissidents. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) use Tor to allow their workers to connect to their home website while they're in a foreign country, without notifying everybody nearby that they're working with that organization.

Groups such as Indymedia recommend Tor for safeguarding their members' online privacy and security. Activist groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recommend Tor as a mechanism for maintaining civil liberties online. Corporations use Tor as a safe way to conduct competitive analysis, and to protect sensitive procurement patterns from eavesdroppers. They also use it to replace traditional VPNs, which reveal the exact amount and timing of communication. Which locations have employees working late? Which locations have employees consulting job-hunting websites? Which research divisions are communicating with the company's patent lawyers?

A branch of the U.S. Navy uses Tor for open source intelligence gathering, and one of its teams used Tor while deployed in the Middle East recently. Law enforcement uses Tor for visiting or surveilling web sites without leaving government IP addresses in their web logs, and for security during sting operations.

What's New:

All platforms

The Tor Browser Team is proud to announce the first stable release in the 7.5 series. This release is available from the Tor Browser Project page and also from our distribution directory. This release features important security updates to Firefox.

Apart from the usual Firefox security updates it contains some notable improvements compared to the 7.0 series. Here are the highlights:

We redesigned parts of the Tor Browser user interface. One of the major improvements for our users is our new Tor Launcher experience. This work is based on the findings published at 'A Usability Evaluation of Tor Launcher', a paper done by Linda Lee et al. At our work we iterated on the redesign proposed by the research, improving it even further. Here are the main changes we would like to highlight:

Welcome Screen

Our old screen had way too much information for the users, leading many of them to spend great time confused about what to do. Some users at the paper experiment spent up to 40min confused about what they needed to be doing here. Besides simplifying the screen and the message, to make it easier for the user to know if they need to configure anything or not, we also did a 'brand refresh' bringing our logo to the launcher.

Censorship circumvention configuration

This is one of the most important steps for a user who is trying to connect to Tor while their network is censoring Tor. We also worked really hard to make sure the UI text would make it easy for the user to understand what a bridge is for and how to configure to use one. Another update was a little tip we added at the drop-down menu (as you can see below) for which bridge to use in countries that have very sophisticated censorship methods.

Proxy help information

The proxy settings at our Tor Launcher configuration wizard is an important feature for users who are under a network that demands such configuration. But it can also lead to a lot of confusion if the user has no idea what a proxy is. Since it is a very important feature for users, we decided to keep it in the main configuration screen and introduced a help prompt with an explanation of when someone would need such configuration.

As part of our work with the UX team, we will also be coordinating user testing of this new UI to continue iterating and make sure we are always improving our users' experience. We are also planning a series of improvements not only for the Tor Launcher flow but for the whole browser experience (once you are connected to Tor) including a new user onboarding flow. And last but not least we are streamlining both our mobile and desktop experience: Tor Browser 7.5 adapted the security slider design we did for mobile bringing the improved user experience to the desktop as well.

Other

Complete release notes Tor Browser 7.5:

All Platforms

Windows

OS X

Linux

Android

Build System

Previous versions:

View original post here:

Tor Browser 7.5.6 Download - TechSpot

Ethereum Soars with over a 2,800% Rally – Coin News Asia

Ethereum hit a crisp record high cost of $250.41 on Sunday. The cost is up more than 2,800 percent year-to-date. Korea seems to be driving the ethereum exchange. Continued enthusiasm for the basic blockchain behind ethereum has prompted a bolster from enormous organizations e.g. Microsoft.

Ethereum, an option cryptographic money to bitcoin, hit a crisp record high, in the midst of proceeded with enthusiasm for the advanced resource space and expanded exchange from Asia.

On Sunday, ethereum exchanged at an untouched high of $250.41. This is up 2,839 percent from the $8.52 handle it had on January 1. Ethereum was exchanging at around $246.62 on Monday morning, somewhat off its record high.

Ether is the name of the cryptographic money which keeps running on the ethereum blockchain, which is the innovation that supports the advanced coin. Be that as it may, ethereum is regularly utilized as shorthand for the advanced cash also.

Ethereum has been intended to bolster supposed smart contract applications. A smart contract is a PC program that can naturally execute the terms of an agreement when certain conditions are met. Its this reasonable utilization of ethereum which has energized numerous expansive corporates and financial specialists, and prompted the rally.

Yet, there are various different reasons supporting the cost. For instance, the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA) was as of late established to associate substantial organizations to innovation merchants so as to work on activities utilizing the blockchain. Theres also been a surge in initial coin offerings (ICO) which is another route for digital money new businesses to raise cash. These ICOs have been worth countless dollars and a hefty portion of the organizations depend on the ethereum blockchain, which implies that it would use ether tokens, boosting the cost. Finally, a significant part of the exchanging volume in ethereum right now around 38 percent is originating from South Korea, as per industry site CryptoCompare with rising enthusiasm from different locales.

Get the latest in AsianBitcoin newshere at Coin News Asia.

More:

Ethereum Soars with over a 2,800% Rally - Coin News Asia

event object JavaScript – Dottoro

altKeySets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the left or right ALT key was down at the time when the event occurred.altLeftSets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the left ALT key was down at the time when the event occurred.attrChangeReturns an integer that specifies the type of the action that modified an attribute.attrNameRetrieves a string that specifies the name of the modified attribute.bookmarksRepresents a collection of ADO bookmarks associated with the rows affected by the current event.boundElementsRepresents a collection of elements bound to the data set on which the current event occurred.bubblesReturns a Boolean value that indicates whether the current event can propagate up the DOM hierarchy or not.buttonSets or retrieves the mouse button(s) that were pressed at the time when the current event was fired.cancelableReturns a Boolean value that indicates whether the current event can be canceled or not.cancelBubbleSets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the current event should propagate up the DOM hierarchy, or not.charCodeRetrieves the Unicode character code of the key that generated the onkeypress event.clientXSets or returns the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the browser window's client area.clientYSets or returns the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the browser window's client area.ctrlKeySets or retrieves whether the left or right CTRL key was down at the time when the event occurred.ctrlLeftSets or retrieves whether the left CTRL key was down at the time when the event occurred.currentTargetReturns a reference to the element whose event listener is being processed.dataReturns the characters entered in case of the textInput event or the contents of the message for the onmessage event.dataFldSets or returns the name of the modified data column in case of the oncellchange event.dataTransferRepresents a drag-and-drop operation.detailReturns an integer value that specifies additional information about the event.domainReturns the hostname of the server that served the document that caused the onmessage event.eventPhaseReturns an integer value that indicates the current processing phase of an event.explicitOriginalTargetReturns a reference to the exact object on which the event originally occurred.fromElementReturns a reference to the object that lost the active state or that the mouse pointer left.horizontalOverflowRetrieves a Boolean value that indicates the horizontal overflow state of an element when the overflowchanged event occurred.isCharReturns whether the character that belongs to the current event is a key character or not.isTrustedReturns a Boolean value that indicates whether the event is a trusted event or not.keyCodeSets or retrieves the Unicode character code of the key that generated the onkeypress event and the Unicode key code of the key that generated the onkeydown and onkeyup events.lastEventIdReturns the identifier of the last event in case of onmessage events.layerXRetrieves the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the closest positioned ancestor element of the element that fires the event.layerYRetrieves the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the closest positioned ancestor element of the element that fires the event.metaKeyRetrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the META key was down at the time when the event occurred.newValueRetrieves a string that specifies the current value of the modified attribute or TextNode element.offsetXSets or retrieves the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the offsetParent element of the element that fires the event.offsetYSets or retrieves the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the offsetParent element of the element that fires the event.orientRetrieves whether the visibility of the horizontal or vertical scrollbar changed when the overflowchanged event occurred.originReturns the scheme, hostname and port of the document that caused the onmessage event.originalTargetReturns a reference to the object on which the event originally occurred.pageXRetrieves the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the document.pageYRetrieves the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the document.prevValueRetrieves a string that specifies the previous value of the modified attribute or TextNode element.propertyNameSpecifies or retrieves a string that contains the name of the property that is changed.qualifierSets or retrieves the name of the default data member. Use this property with data binding events (such as ondatasetcomplete).rangeOffsetReturns the end position of the current selection relative to the element referred to by the rangeParent.rangeParentReturns a reference to the element where the selection ends.reasonSets or retrieves an integer value that indicates whether the data transfer was successful or not. Use this property with ondatasetcomplete events.recordsetSets or retrieves a reference to the default record set in a data source.relatedNodeReturns a reference to the node on which the mutation event occurred.relatedTargetReturns a reference to the related element in case of onmouseover, onmouseout, dragenter and dragexit events.repeatSets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the onkeydown event is being repeated (a key has been down long enough).returnValueSets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the current event is canceled.screenXSets or retrieves the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the screen.screenYSets or retrieves the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the screen.shiftKeySets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the left or right SHIFT key was down at the time when the event occurred.shiftLeftSets or retrieves a Boolean value that indicates whether the left SHIFT key was down at the time when the event occurred.sourceReturns a reference to the window object that contains the document that caused the onmessage event.srcElementRetrieves a reference to the object on which the event occurred.srcFilterSpecifies or retrieves a reference to the filter object that generated the onfilterchange event.srcUrnSets or retrieves the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) of the behavior that fired the event.targetReturns a reference to the object on which the event originally occurred.timeStampReturns the time in milliseconds when the current event occurred.toElementReturns a reference to the object that the mouse pointer entered.typeRetrieves a string that represents the type of the event, such as "mouseout", "click", etc.uriReturns the location of the document that caused the onmessage event.verticalOverflowRetrieves a Boolean value that indicates the vertical overflow state of an element when the overflowchanged event occurred.viewReturns a reference to the AbstractView object where the event occurred.wheelDeltaReturns an integer value indicating the distance that the mouse wheel rolled.whichReturns the Unicode character or key code of the key or the identifier of the mouse button that was pressed when the current event fired.xSets or retrieves the x-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the closest relatively positioned ancestor element of the element that fires the event.ySets or retrieves the y-coordinate of the mouse pointer relative to the top-left corner of the closest relatively positioned ancestor element of the element that fires the event.

See the original post here:

event object JavaScript - Dottoro

Execute Automation Automation Testing Automated (5.5 …

Test automationcan automate some repetitive, but necessary tasks. But if youre not careful, you can quickly fall into the rabbit hole of chasing failing tests and lose sight of the equally necessary exploratory questions:Can our users easily complete the user journey? Are there potential bugs with this journey? Is the quality of this journey regressing?

Tests are brittle because the underlying mechanics of XPaths, CSS selectors, element IDs, and other descriptors are often tightly coupled with automated tests. This is particularly painful when you have apps with dynamic locators or locators that arent necessarily unique, such as can be the case with Angular and React apps.

A machine-learning-driven testing solution like mabl handles apps with dynamic UIs to help testers focus on the human side of testing, which makes the testing role so unique and powerful in the first place.

How does mabl do this? Its all built into her test adaptation ability.

As testers interact with themabl trainerto create a test, under the covers, mabl captures your user journeys using our own proprietary domain-specific language. She also gathers a great deal of DOM element attributes, properties, and visual details (like XPaths, tag names, class attributes, text, and various contextual identifiers) to help identify conceptually equivalent elements in future test runs of the journey.

So now that she has an understanding of the user journey, as well as all this additional information, mabl knows enough about each action in the journey to identify the appropriate element again, or find likely replacements for it as the UI changes.When theres only one likely candidate available, mabl will incrementally update her models for the corresponding step of the journey, so tests will stay up to date even after several successive UI changes.

Much of this information can even be applied to the same journey in other environments, so tests running through the same app will run consistently. As mabl gathers more information about replacement candidates across many apps, this will ultimately be used in more advanced models to prioritize future candidates across journeys and even across apps.

But the question is regardingrobustchanges; can mabl still adapt? What does mabl do when theres no obvious right answer?

mabl uses the collected information to be experimental. Based on past identifications of elements, she can rank partial and uncertain matches.To verify if the experimental action was correct, mabl evaluates how the remainder of the journey unfolds.

For example, she considers whether assertions pass, whether she can complete subsequent actions, and the visual appearance of the resulting app state compared to previous runs. If mabl determines that her fix for the test was successful,shell let you know what the proposed fix was.From here, you can simply reject mabls fix for the journey if it was incorrect, and mabl will remember that for future runs.

As mentioned at the onset, one of the difficulties with handling a variety of modern web frameworks like Angular and React is that they rely heavily on DOM manipulation and JavaScript execution. In particular, the DOM elements generated by these frameworks often include minimal and opaque attributes, making them hard to distinguish.

However,humansmust be able to recognize how to take a particular action across iterations of the UI; mabl gathers some of the same contextual clues.Although element attributes may be insufficient to identify a particular element for interaction during a journey, there are a variety of other dynamic or computed properties to be used, like inner text and rendered location or size.

Consider a simple example of a dynamically generated list in an Angular app withngFor(similarly withng-repeatin AngularJS 1.x or an array of generated list elements in React):

In this example, we have a screen that shows a list of user roles in a hypothetical app where each role can be clicked to get a detailed description of the role. This gets instantiated as a series of list (

  • ) elements, each containing an anchor () element with the clicks handled by Angular the href attribute of each anchor is the same, self-referential, # value even though a click results in displaying a different role description for each through DOM manipulation by Angular JavaScript code. Just considering the element attributes, each element looks identical (e.g., or just in React), but the inner text of each differs.

    We can train mabl to click on the roles in a specific order. On the bottom right is themabl trainer,recording each step as we interact with our Angular app:

    Below youll find the test output from the mabl app. You can see her collecting information at each step of the journey, then completing the test successfully (accompanying screenshots that mabl collects of the app at each step are shown on the right):

    So when our hypothetical app adds an A.3 role in the list ahead of B.0, mabl is still able to identify the Role B.0 anchor element by using the inner text properties of the anchor elements, and updates what she knows about that element.

    If the names of the roles were later changed (e.g., B.0 becomes Beta-Zero), mabl would know that the correct element was last seen in the 4th position of the list (both by visual location and by last known XPath). So she would rank the Beta-Zero link as the most likely candidate and evaluate the rest of the journey to determine that she had made a correct choice and update her knowledge about the new text for the element.

    With machine intelligence, mabl makes automated testing easy, low-maintenance, and available to every QA team.

    You can try mabl out in your own apps for free, atapp.mabl.com.

    Public link to Angular example:https://stackblitz.com/edit/mabl-angular-list-example?file=app%2Fapp.component.ts

    Public link to corresponding React example:https://stackblitz.com/edit/mabl-react-generated-array-example?embed=1&file=index.js

    Excerpt from:

    Execute Automation Automation Testing Automated (5.5 ...

  • The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Spending …

    According to financial writer Simon Black, the federal government is spending approximately 52,000 dollars per second. This, not last years tax cuts, is the reason why the national debt has reached a record 21 trillion dollars, which is more than Americas gross domestic product (GDP).

    Another ominous sign is that this year both Social Security and Medicare will have to draw down on their reserve funds to be able to pay benefits. The Social Security and Medicare trust funds will both soon be bankrupt, putting additional strains on the federal budget and American taxpayers.

    The excessive debt caused by excessive spending will inevitably cause a major economic crisis. Yet, with a few notable exceptions, there is little to no desire in Washington to cut spending. Instead, both parties are committed to increasing spending on warfare and welfare while ignoring the looming entitlements crisis.

    Examples of fiscal irresponsibility on Capitol Hill are easy to find. For instance, even though the Untied Stares is currently spending more on its military than the combined budgets of the next seven highest spending countries, Congress recently increased military spending by 82 billion dollars. This brings the total the US spends on a futile effort to police and democratize the world to 716 billion dollars. The US House has also recently passed a farm bill that increases spending by more than 3 billion dollars over the next five years. This bill does not take a step toward ending subsidies to wealthy farmers and even continues providing farm subsidies to non-famers! Pressure on Congress to increase spending on farm subsidies is likely to increase as famers becomes collateral damage in President Trumps trade war.

    Many progressives are attacking the House farm bill because it makes some reforms to the SNAP (food stamp) program, even though the House version of bill increases the budget for food stamps by at least 1.7 billion dollars over the next five years!

    When the economic crisis hits, there will be no choice but to cut spending and raise taxes. Of course, Congress is unlikely to raise taxes or cut benefits. Instead, it will rely on the Federal Reserve to do the dirty work via the inflation tax. The inflation tax is the worst type of tax because it is both hidden and regressive.

    One of the worst features, if not the worst, of the tax reform plan is increasing the inflation tax by authorizing the use of chained CPI. Chained CPI hides inflations effects by claiming that rising prices do not harm Americans as long as they can still afford low-cost substitute goods to replace products they can no longer afford due to the Federal Reserves devaluation of the currency as if people forced to buy hamburger instead of steak are not negatively impacted by inflation.

    Increasing federal debt will also put pressure on the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates low to prevent federal interest payments on the debt from skyrocketing. Eventually, the Feds monetization of the debt will lead to hyperinflation and a rejection of the dollars world reserve currency status. The question is when, not whether, the welfare-warfare state and the fiat currency system will end. Hopefully, those who know the truth will succeed in growing the liberty movement so we can convince Congress to gradually unwind the welfare-warfare state, restore a true free market in money, and stop trying to run the world, run the economy, and run our lives.

    See the rest here:

    The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Spending ...

    Private Islands – AWE

    Episode 1

    Did you know that there are 12 thousand private islands in the world? On this episode of Private Islands we're showing you how to find your own secluded paradise.

    Escape from the pressures of everyday life with Private Islands. On this episode were showing you how your front yard can be miles of palm trees and glittering coastline.

    Join us as we explore the most magical and luxurious private resort island in the world. Owned by famed illusionist David Copperfield, Musha Cay provides a memorable one-of-a-kind experience like nowhere else on earth.

    We're traveling 1,000 miles away from anywhere in search of the perfect private island. Forget about the jet lag because when you land in paradise, your dream becomes reality. It's first-class service on the private island of Desroches.

    The Bahamas has grown into private island real estates most in-demand market. Escape to the most exotic and remote islands a multi-millionaire buyer, celebrity, or luxury-seeking tourist can find on this episode of Private Islands!

    There's nothing like it in the Caribbean, or even in the world! The result of seven years of construction, Emerald Cay in Turks and Caicos combines pristine natural beauty with state-of-the-art luxury to provide the ultimate private island paradise.

    Come see how the affluent are rediscovering themselves in the private island of Turks and Caicos. Immerse yourself in sunshine, sea and surf, just 500 miles off the coast of Florida. Life's short, but your quality time doesn't have to be!

    Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you on a magical journey through the private island of French Polynesia. Discover heaven on earth in your own utopian paradise full of beauty, adventure and above all, sheer escapism.

    Tales of pirates, betrayal and hidden treasure all share a part of this island's past. There are some places on earth that simply must be experienced to fully understand and Peter Island in the British Virgin Islands is one of those places.

    Roatan is one of the best kept secrets of the Caribbean. We take viewers on an underwater adventure and show the most luxurious private islands Honduras has to offer.

    From Miami to colorful Key West, the Florida Keys have become one of the America's favorite tropical escapes. Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to some of the most secluded private islands for an experience that cannot be beat.

    Join host Christina Cindrich in a country that combines both adventure and luxury into one complete island experience. With one foot planted in the mysterious jungles and the other dipped in the Caribbean Sea, Belize will awaken all of your senses.

    Located off the coast of "The Spice Isle" Granada in the Caribbean is one of the most luxurious private islands you'll ever see. Calivigny Island is truly the ultimate escape for the affluent traveler in search of their own slice of paradise.

    Youll live as few have lived before in a place where the finest luxuries co-exist in absolute harmony with nature. This is Little Bokeelia Island, a private island paradise that could be yours!

    Join host Christina Cindrich as she takes you to one of the worlds most exotic destinations, Fiji! Noted for its magical landscape, stunning beaches, and friendly people, these islands are a spectacular taste of heaven right here on Earth.

    Join host Christina Cindrich in the postcard perfect island nation of Fiji. With its white sandy beaches, fascinating culture and magical underwater world, this is an unforgettable Private Island experience that youll never want to be rescued from!

    Join host Christina Cindrich on a 300-acre private island paradise off the coast of Antigua. With its gorgeous villas and multi-million dollar estates, Jumby Bay's beauty will cast an unforgettable spell of serene enchantment.

    Join host Christina Cindrich for an unforgettable experience on two Four Seasons luxury island resorts in the Maldives. Your postcard perfect paradise will come to life right before your eyes in a destination that will surely take your breath away.

    Experience the romance of the South Pacific, the laid-back beauty of the Caribbean, the adventure of Central America and the exotic splendor of Asia. Host Christina Cindrich takes you to her top 10 most incredible private islands in the world.

    Perhaps nowhere else in Thailand can you enjoy the combination of sun, beach and nightlife quite like in Phuket. Thailand's largest and most popular island seduces its visitors with a vibrant mix of nighttime entertainment and beach culture.

    Isla Simca is a jungle hideaway where natural beauty, art, adventure and architecture fuse into a one-of-a-kind retreat. Join host Christina Cindrich on this Panamanian island that until now has been hidden away from the world's prying eyes!

    The Grenadines, an island chain deep in the Caribbean. The name alone elicit visions of exotic and peaceful scenery. St. Vincent being the largest, but away from the hustle and traffic, become mesmerized by the beauty of these castaway islands.

    The name Laucala is whispered in all the best circles partly because only the best know how to pronounce it. Owned by the co-founder of Red Bull, this Fijian paradise is one of the worlds top island resorts and once there its easy to see why.

    Conjuring up postcard-perfect images of South Pacific indulgence and breathtaking scenery, Bora Bora is a haven of exclusive luxury in French Polynesia. Join host Christina Cindrich in this exclusive Private Islands episode you wont want to miss!

    Join host Christina Cindrich in a destination known as the real Africa. With its private river islands and abundance of wildlife, Zambia gives an authentic feeling of a wilderness that is wild, beautiful, and slightly unpredictable.

    Go here to read the rest:

    Private Islands - AWE

    Hedonism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    The term "hedonism," from the Greek word (hdon) for pleasure, refers to several related theories about what is good for us, how we should behave, and what motivates us to behave in the way that we do. All hedonistic theories identify pleasure and pain as the only important elements of whatever phenomena they are designed to describe. If hedonistic theories identified pleasure and pain as merely two important elements, instead of the only important elements of what they are describing, then they would not be nearly as unpopular as they all are. However, the claim that pleasure and pain are the only things of ultimate importance is what makes hedonism distinctive and philosophically interesting.

    Philosophical hedonists tend to focus on hedonistic theories of value, and especially of well-being (the good life for the one living it). As a theory of value, hedonism states that all and only pleasure is intrinsically valuable and all and only pain is intrinsically not valuable. Hedonists usually define pleasure and pain broadly, such that both physical and mental phenomena are included. Thus, a gentle massage and recalling a fond memory are both considered to cause pleasure and stubbing a toe and hearing about the death of a loved one are both considered to cause pain. With pleasure and pain so defined, hedonism as a theory about what is valuable for us is intuitively appealing. Indeed, its appeal is evidenced by the fact that nearly all historical and contemporary treatments of well-being allocate at least some space for discussion of hedonism. Unfortunately for hedonism, the discussions rarely endorse it and some even deplore its focus on pleasure.

    This article begins by clarifying the different types of hedonistic theories and the labels they are often given. Then, hedonisms ancient origins and its subsequent development are reviewed. The majority of this article is concerned with describing the important theoretical divisions within Prudential Hedonism and discussing the major criticisms of these approaches.

    When the term "hedonism" is used in modern literature, or by non-philosophers in their everyday talk, its meaning is quite different from the meaning it takes when used in the discussions of philosophers. Non-philosophers tend to think of a hedonist as a person who seeks out pleasure for themselves without any particular regard for their own future well-being or for the well-being of others. According to non-philosophers, then, a stereotypical hedonist is someone who never misses an opportunity to indulge of the pleasures of sex, drugs, and rock n roll, even if the indulgences are likely to lead to relationship problems, health problems, regrets, or sadness for themselves or others. Philosophers commonly refer to this everyday understanding of hedonism as "Folk Hedonism." Folk Hedonism is a rough combination of Motivational Hedonism, Hedonistic Egoism, and a reckless lack of foresight.

    When philosophers discuss hedonism, they are most likely to be referring to hedonism about value, and especially the slightly more specific theory, hedonism about well-being. Hedonism as a theory about value (best referred to as Value Hedonism) holds that all and only pleasure is intrinsically valuable and all and only pain is intrinsically disvaluable. The term "intrinsically" is an important part of the definition and is best understood in contrast to the term "instrumentally." Something is intrinsically valuable if it is valuable for its own sake. Pleasure is thought to be intrinsically valuable because, even if it did not lead to any other benefit, it would still be good to experience. Money is an example of an instrumental good; its value for us comes from what we can do with it (what we can buy with it). The fact that a copious amount of money has no value if no one ever sells anything reveals that money lacks intrinsic value. Value Hedonism reduces everything of value to pleasure. For example, a Value Hedonist would explain the instrumental value of money by describing how the things we can buy with money, such as food, shelter, and status-signifying goods, bring us pleasure or help us to avoid pain.

    Hedonism as a theory about well-being (best referred to as Prudential Hedonism) is more specific than Value Hedonism because it stipulates what the value is for. Prudential Hedonism holds that all and only pleasure intrinsically makes peoples lives go better for them and all and only pain intrinsically makes their lives go worse for them. Some philosophers replace "people" with "animals" or "sentient creatures," so as to apply Prudential Hedonism more widely. A good example of this comes from Peter Singers work on animals and ethics. Singer questions why some humans can see the intrinsic disvalue in human pain, but do not also accept that it is bad for sentient non-human animals to experience pain.

    When Prudential Hedonists claim that happiness is what they value most, they intend happiness to be understood as a preponderance of pleasure over pain. An important distinction between Prudential Hedonism and Folk Hedonism is that Prudential Hedonists usually understand that pursuing pleasure and avoiding pain in the very short-term is not always the best strategy for achieving the best long-term balance of pleasure over pain.

    Prudential Hedonism is an integral part of several derivative types of hedonistic theory, all of which have featured prominently in philosophical debates of the past. Since Prudential Hedonism plays this important role, the majority of this article is dedicated to Prudential Hedonism. First, however, the main derivative types of hedonism are briefly discussed.

    Motivational Hedonism (more commonly referred to by the less descriptive label, "Psychological Hedonism") is the theory that the desires to encounter pleasure and to avoid pain guide all of our behavior. Most accounts of Motivational Hedonism include both conscious and unconscious desires for pleasure, but emphasize the latter. Epicurus, William James, Sigmund Freud, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and (on one interpretation) even Charles Darwin have all argued for varieties of Motivational Hedonism. Bentham used the idea to support his theory of Hedonistic Utilitarianism (discussed below). Weak versions of Motivational Hedonism hold that the desires to seek pleasure and avoid pain often or always have some influence on our behavior. Weak versions are generally considered to be uncontroversially true and not especially useful for philosophy.

    Philosophers have been more interested in strong accounts of Motivational Hedonism, which hold that all behavior is governed by the desires to encounter pleasure and to avoid pain (and only those desires). Strong accounts of Motivational Hedonism have been used to support some of the normative types of hedonism and to argue against non-hedonistic normative theories. One of the most notable mentions of Motivational Hedonism is Platos Ring of Gyges example in The Republic. Platos Socrates is discussing with Glaucon how men would react if they were to possess a ring that gives its wearer immense powers, including invisibility. Glaucon believes that a strong version of Motivational Hedonism is true, but Socrates does not. Glaucon asserts that, emboldened with the power provided by the Ring of Gyges, everyone would succumb to the inherent and ubiquitous desire to pursue their own ends at the expense of others. Socrates disagrees, arguing that good people would be able to overcome this desire because of their strong love of justice, fostered through philosophising.

    Strong accounts of Motivational Hedonism currently garner very little support for similar reasons. Many examples of seemingly-pain-seeking acts performed out of a sense of duty are well-known from the soldier who jumps on a grenade to save his comrades to that time you rescued a trapped dog only to be (predictably) bitten in the process. Introspective evidence also weighs against strong accounts of Motivational Hedonism; many of the decisions we make seem to be based on motives other than seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. Given these reasons, the burden of proof is considered to be squarely on the shoulders of anyone wishing to argue for a strong account of Motivational Hedonism.

    Value Hedonism, occasionally with assistance from Motivational Hedonism, has been used to argue for specific theories of right action (theories that explain which actions are morally permissible or impermissible and why). The theory that happiness should be pursued (that pleasure should be pursued and pain should be avoided) is referred to as Normative Hedonism and sometimes Ethical Hedonism. There are two major types of Normative Hedonism, Hedonistic Egoism and Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Both types commonly use happiness (defined as pleasure minus pain) as the sole criterion for determining the moral rightness or wrongness of an action. Important variations within each of these two main types specify either the actual resulting happiness (after the act) or the predicted resulting happiness (before the act) as the moral criterion. Although both major types of Normative Hedonism have been accused of being repugnant, Hedonistic Egoism is considered the most offensive.

    Hedonistic Egoism is a hedonistic version of egoism, the theory that we should, morally speaking, do whatever is most in our own interests. Hedonistic Egoism is the theory that we ought, morally speaking, to do whatever makes us happiest that is whatever provides us with the most net pleasure after pain is subtracted. The most repugnant feature of this theory is that one never has to ascribe any value whatsoever to the consequences for anyone other than oneself. For example, a Hedonistic Egoist who did not feel saddened by theft would be morally required to steal, even from needy orphans (if he thought he could get away with it). Would-be defenders of Hedonistic Egoism often point out that performing acts of theft, murder, treachery and the like would not make them happier overall because of the guilt, the fear of being caught, and the chance of being caught and punished. The would-be defenders tend to surrender, however, when it is pointed out that a Hedonistic Egoist is morally obliged by their own theory to pursue an unusual kind of practical education; a brief and possibly painful training period that reduces their moral emotions of sympathy and guilt. Such an education might be achieved by desensitising over-exposure to, and performance of, torture on innocents. If Hedonistic Egoists underwent such an education, their reduced capacity for sympathy and guilt would allow them to take advantage of any opportunities to perform pleasurable, but normally-guilt-inducing, actions, such as stealing from the poor.

    Hedonistic Egoism is very unpopular amongst philosophers, not just for this reason, but also because it suffers from all of the objections that apply to Prudential Hedonism.

    Hedonistic Utilitarianism is the theory that the right action is the one that produces (or is most likely to produce) the greatest net happiness for all concerned. Hedonistic Utilitarianism is often considered fairer than Hedonistic Egoism because the happiness of everyone involved (everyone who is affected or likely to be affected) is taken into account and given equal weight. Hedonistic Utilitarians, then, tend to advocate not stealing from needy orphans because to do so would usually leave the orphan far less happy and the (probably better-off) thief only slightly happier (assuming he felt no guilt). Despite treating all individuals equally, Hedonistic Utilitarianism is still seen as objectionable by some because it assigns no intrinsic moral value to justice, friendship, truth, or any of the many other goods that are thought by some to be irreducibly valuable. For example, a Hedonistic Utilitarian would be morally obliged to publicly execute an innocent friend of theirs if doing so was the only way to promote the greatest happiness overall. Although unlikely, such a situation might arise if a child was murdered in a small town and the lack of suspects was causing large-scale inter-ethnic violence. Some philosophers argue that executing an innocent friend is immoral precisely because it ignores the intrinsic values of justice, friendship, and possibly truth.

    Hedonistic Utilitarianism is rarely endorsed by philosophers, but mainly because of its reliance on Prudential Hedonism as opposed to its utilitarian element. Non-hedonistic versions of utilitarianism are about as popular as the other leading theories of right action, especially when it is the actions of institutions that are being considered.

    Perhaps the earliest written record of hedonism comes from the Crvka, an Indian philosophical tradition based on the Barhaspatya sutras. The Crvka persisted for two thousand years (from about 600 B.C.E.). Most notably, the Crvka advocated scepticism and Hedonistic Egoism that the right action is the one that brings the actor the most net pleasure. The Crvka acknowledged that some pain often accompanied, or was later caused by, sensual pleasure, but that pleasure was worth it.

    The Cyrenaics, founded by Aristippus (c. 435-356 B.C.E.), were also sceptics and Hedonistic Egoists. Although the paucity of original texts makes it difficult to confidently state all of the justifications for the Cyrenaics positions, their overall stance is clear enough. The Cyrenaics believed pleasure was the ultimate good and everyone should pursue all immediate pleasures for themselves. They considered bodily pleasures better than mental pleasures, presumably because they were more vivid or trustworthy. The Cyrenaics also recommended pursuing immediate pleasures and avoiding immediate pains with scant or no regard for future consequences. Their reasoning for this is even less clear, but is most plausibly linked to their sceptical views perhaps that what we can be most sure of in this uncertain existence is our current bodily pleasures.

    Epicurus (c. 341-271 B.C.E.), founder of Epicureanism, developed a Normative Hedonism in stark contrast to that of Aristippus. The Epicureanism of Epicurus is also quite the opposite to the common usage of Epicureanism; while we might like to go on a luxurious "Epicurean" holiday packed with fine dining and moderately excessive wining, Epicurus would warn us that we are only setting ourselves up for future pain. For Epicurus, happiness was the complete absence of bodily and especially mental pains, including fear of the Gods and desires for anything other than the bare necessities of life. Even with only the limited excesses of ancient Greece on offer, Epicurus advised his followers to avoid towns, and especially marketplaces, in order to limit the resulting desires for unnecessary things. Once we experience unnecessary pleasures, such as those from sex and rich food, we will then suffer from painful and hard to satisfy desires for more and better of the same. No matter how wealthy we might be, Epicurus would argue, our desires will eventually outstrip our means and interfere with our ability to live tranquil, happy lives. Epicureanism is generally egoistic, in that it encourages everyone to pursue happiness for themselves. However, Epicureans would be unlikely to commit any of the selfish acts we might expect from other egoists because Epicureans train themselves to desire only the very basics, which gives them very little reason to do anything to interfere with the affairs of others.

    With the exception of a brief period discussed below, Hedonism has been generally unpopular ever since its ancient beginnings. Although criticisms of the ancient forms of hedonism were many and varied, one in particular was heavily cited. In Philebus, Platos Socrates and one of his many foils, Protarchus in this instance, are discussing the role of pleasure in the good life. Socrates asks Protarchus to imagine a life without much pleasure but full of the higher cognitive processes, such as knowledge, forethought and consciousness and to compare it with a life that is the opposite. Socrates describes this opposite life as having perfect pleasure but the mental life of an oyster, pointing out that the subject of such a life would not be able to appreciate any of the pleasure within it. The harrowing thought of living the pleasurable but unthinking life of an oyster causes Protarchus to abandon his hedonistic argument. The oyster example is now easily avoided by clarifying that pleasure is best understood as being a conscious experience, so any sensation that we are not consciously aware of cannot be pleasure.

    Normative and Motivational Hedonism were both at their most popular during the heyday of Empiricism in the 18th and 19th Centuries. Indeed, this is the only period during which any kind of hedonism could be considered popular at all. During this period, two Hedonistic Utilitarians, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and his protg John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), were particularly influential. Their theories are similar in many ways, but are notably distinct on the nature of pleasure.

    Bentham argued for several types of hedonism, including those now referred to as Prudential Hedonism, Hedonistic Utilitarianism, and Motivational Hedonism (although his commitment to strong Motivational Hedonism eventually began to wane). Bentham argued that happiness was the ultimate good and that happiness was pleasure and the absence of pain. He acknowledged the egoistic and hedonistic nature of peoples motivation, but argued that the maximization of collective happiness was the correct criterion for moral behavior. Benthams greatest happiness principle states that actions are immoral if they are not the action that appears to maximise the happiness of all the people likely to be affected; only the action that appears to maximise the happiness of all the people likely to be affected is the morally right action.

    Bentham devised the greatest happiness principle to justify the legal reforms he also argued for. He understood that he could not conclusively prove that the principle was the correct criterion for morally right action, but also thought that it should be accepted because it was fair and better than existing criteria for evaluating actions and legislation. Bentham thought that his Hedonic Calculus could be applied to situations to see what should, morally speaking, be done in a situation. The Hedonic Calculus is a method of counting the amount of pleasure and pain that would likely be caused by different actions. The Hedonic Calculus required a methodology for measuring pleasure, which in turn required an understanding of the nature of pleasure and specifically what aspects of pleasure were valuable for us.

    Benthams Hedonic Calculus identifies several aspects of pleasure that contribute to its value, including certainty, propinquity, extent, intensity, and duration. The Hedonic Calculus also makes use of two future-pleasure-or-pain-related aspects of actions fecundity and purity. Certainty refers to the likelihood that the pleasure or pain will occur. Propinquity refers to how long away (in terms of time) the pleasure or pain is. Fecundity refers to the likelihood of the pleasure or pain leading to more of the same sensation. Purity refers to the likelihood of the pleasure or pain leading to some of the opposite sensation. Extent refers to the number of people the pleasure or pain is likely to affect. Intensity refers to the felt strength of the pleasure or pain. Duration refers to how long the pleasure or pain are felt for. It should be noted that only intensity and duration have intrinsic value for an individual. Certainty, propinquity, fecundity, and purity are all instrumentally valuable for an individual because they affect the likelihood of an individual feeling future pleasure and pain. Extent is not directly valuable for an individuals well-being because it refers to the likelihood of other people experiencing pleasure or pain.

    Benthams inclusion of certainty, propinquity, fecundity, and purity in the Hedonic Calculus helps to differentiate his hedonism from Folk Hedonism. Folk Hedonists rarely consider how likely their actions are to lead to future pleasure or pain, focussing instead on the pursuit of immediate pleasure and the avoidance of immediate pain. So while Folk Hedonists would be unlikely to study for an exam, anyone using Benthams Hedonic Calculus would consider the future happiness benefits to themselves (and possibly others) of passing the exam and then promptly begin studying.

    Most importantly for Benthams Hedonic Calculus, the pleasure from different sources is always measured against these criteria in the same way, that is to say that no additional value is afforded to pleasures from particularly moral, clean, or culturally-sophisticated sources. For example, Bentham held that pleasure from the parlor game push-pin was just as valuable for us as pleasure from music and poetry. Since Benthams theory of Prudential Hedonism focuses on the quantity of the pleasure, rather than the source-derived quality of it, it is best described as a type of Quantitative Hedonism.

    Benthams indifferent stance on the source of pleasures led to others disparaging his hedonism as the philosophy of swine. Even his student, John Stuart Mill, questioned whether we should believe that a satisfied pig leads a better life than a dissatisfied human or that a satisfied fool leads a better life than a dissatisfied Socrates results that Benthams Quantitative Hedonism seems to endorse.

    Like Bentham, Mill endorsed the varieties of hedonism now referred to as Prudential Hedonism, Hedonistic Utilitarianism, and Motivational Hedonism. Mill also thought happiness, defined as pleasure and the avoidance of pain, was the highest good. Where Mills hedonism differs from Benthams is in his understanding of the nature of pleasure. Mill argued that pleasures could vary in quality, being either higher or lower pleasures. Mill employed the distinction between higher and lower pleasures in an attempt to avoid the criticism that his hedonism was just another philosophy of swine. Lower pleasures are those associated with the body, which we share with other animals, such as pleasure from quenching thirst or having sex. Higher pleasures are those associated with the mind, which were thought to be unique to humans, such as pleasure from listening to opera, acting virtuously, and philosophising. Mill justified this distinction by arguing that those who have experienced both types of pleasure realise that higher pleasures are much more valuable. He dismissed challenges to this claim by asserting that those who disagreed lacked either the experience of higher pleasures or the capacity for such experiences. For Mill, higher pleasures were not different from lower pleasures by mere degree; they were different in kind. Since Mills theory of Prudential Hedonism focuses on the quality of the pleasure, rather than the amount of it, it is best described as a type of Qualitative Hedonism.

    George Edward Moore (1873-1958) was instrumental in bringing hedonisms brief heyday to an end. Moores criticisms of hedonism in general, and Mills hedonism in particular, were frequently cited as good reasons to reject hedonism even decades after his death. Indeed, since G. E. Moore, hedonism has been viewed by most philosophers as being an initially intuitive and interesting family of theories, but also one that is flawed on closer inspection. Moore was a pluralist about value and argued persuasively against the Value Hedonists central claim that all and only pleasure is the bearer of intrinsic value. Moores most damaging objection against Hedonism was his heap of filth example. Moore himself thought the heap of filth example thoroughly refuted what he saw as the only potentially viable form of Prudential Hedonism that conscious pleasure is the only thing that positively contributes to well-being. Moore used the heap of filth example to argue that Prudential Hedonism is false because pleasure is not the only thing of value.

    In the heap of filth example, Moore asks the reader to imagine two worlds, one of which is exceedingly beautiful and the other a disgusting heap of filth. Moore then instructs the reader to imagine that no one would ever experience either world and asks if it is better for the beautiful world to exist than the filthy one. As Moore expected, his contemporaries tended to agree that it would be better if the beautiful world existed. Relying on this agreement, Moore infers that the beautiful world is more valuable than the heap of filth and, therefore, that beauty must be valuable. Moore then concluded that all of the potentially viable theories of Prudential Hedonism (those that value only conscious pleasures) must be false because something, namely beauty, is valuable even when no conscious pleasure can be derived from it.

    Moores heap of filth example has rarely been used to object to Prudential Hedonism since the 1970s because it is not directly relevant to Prudential Hedonism (it evaluates worlds and not lives). Moores other objections to Prudential Hedonism also went out of favor around the same time. The demise of these arguments was partly due to mounting objections against them, but mainly because arguments more suited to the task of refuting Prudential Hedonism were developed. These arguments are discussed after the contemporary varieties of hedonism are introduced below.

    Several contemporary varieties of hedonism have been defended, although usually by just a handful of philosophers or less at any one time. Other varieties of hedonism are also theoretically available but have received little or no discussion. Contemporary varieties of Prudential Hedonism can be grouped based on how they define pleasure and pain, as is done below. In addition to providing different notions of what pleasure and pain are, contemporary varieties of Prudential Hedonism also disagree about what aspect or aspects of pleasure are valuable for well-being (and the opposite for pain).

    The most well-known disagreement about what aspects of pleasure are valuable occurs between Quantitative and Qualitative Hedonists. Quantitative Hedonists argue that how valuable pleasure is for well-being depends on only the amount of pleasure, and so they are only concerned with dimensions of pleasure such as duration and intensity. Quantitative Hedonism is often accused of over-valuing animalistic, simple, and debauched pleasures.

    Qualitative Hedonists argue that, in addition to the dimensions related to the amount of pleasure, one or more dimensions of quality can have an impact on how pleasure affects well-being. The quality dimensions might be based on how cognitive or bodily the pleasure is (as it was for Mill), the moral status of the source of the pleasure, or some other non-amount-related dimension. Qualitative Hedonism is criticised by some for smuggling values other than pleasure into well-being by misleadingly labelling them as dimensions of pleasure. How these qualities are chosen for inclusion is also criticised for being arbitrary or ad hoc by some because inclusion of these dimensions of pleasure is often in direct response to objections that Quantitative Hedonism cannot easily deal with. That is to say, the inclusion of these dimensions is often accused of being an exercise in plastering over holes, rather than deducing corollary conclusions from existing theoretical premises. Others have argued that any dimensions of quality can be better explained in terms of dimensions of quantity. For example, they might claim that moral pleasures are no higher in quality than immoral pleasures, but that moral pleasures are instrumentally more valuable because they are likely to lead to more moments of pleasure or less moments of pain in the future.

    Hedonists also have differing views about how the value of pleasure compares with the value of pain. This is not a practical disagreement about how best to measure pleasure and pain, but rather a theoretical disagreement about comparative value, such as whether pain is worse for us than an equivalent amount of pleasure is good for us. The default position is that one unit of pleasure (sometimes referred to as a Hedon) is equivalent but opposite in value to one unit of pain (sometimes referred to as a Dolor). Several Hedonistic Utilitarians have argued that reduction of pain should be seen as more important than increasing pleasure, sometimes for the Epicurean reason that pain seems worse for us than an equivalent amount of pleasure is good for us. Imagine that a magical genie offered for you to play a game with him. The game consists of you flipping a fair coin. If the coin lands on heads, then you immediately feel a burst of very intense pleasure and if it lands on tails, then you immediately feel a burst of very intense pain. Is it in your best interests to play the game?

    Another area of disagreement between some Hedonists is whether pleasure is entirely internal to a person or if it includes external elements. Internalism about pleasure is the thesis that, whatever pleasure is, it is always and only inside a person. Externalism about pleasure, on the other hand, is the thesis that, pleasure is more than just a state of an individual (that is, that a necessary component of pleasure lies outside of the individual). Externalists about pleasure might, for example, describe pleasure as a function that mediates between our minds and the environment, such that every instance of pleasure has one or more integral environmental components. The vast majority of historic and contemporary versions of Prudential Hedonism consider pleasure to be an internal mental state.

    Perhaps the least known disagreement about what aspects of pleasure make it valuable is the debate about whether we have to be conscious of pleasure for it to be valuable. The standard position is that pleasure is a conscious mental state, or at least that any pleasure a person is not conscious of does not intrinsically improve their well-being.

    The most common definition of pleasure is that it is a sensation, something that we identify through our senses or that we feel. Psychologists claim that we have at least ten senses, including the familiar, sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, but also, movement, balance, and several sub-senses of touch, including heat, cold, pressure, and pain. New senses get added to the list when it is understood that some independent physical process underpins their functioning. The most widely-used examples of pleasurable sensations are the pleasures of eating, drinking, listening to music, and having sex. Use of these examples has done little to help Hedonism avoid its debauched reputation.

    It is also commonly recognised that our senses are physical processes that usually involve a mental component, such as the tickling feeling when someone blows gently on the back of your neck. If a sensation is something we identify through our sense organs, however, it is not entirely clear how to account for abstract pleasures. This is because abstract pleasures, such as a feeling of accomplishment for a job well done, do not seem to be experienced through any of the senses in the standard lists. Some Hedonists have attempted to resolve this problem by arguing for the existence of an independent pleasure sense and by defining sensation as something that we feel (regardless of whether it has been mediated by sense organs).

    Most Hedonists who describe pleasure as a sensation will be Quantitative Hedonists and will argue that the pleasure from the different senses is the same. Qualitative Hedonists, in comparison, can use the framework of the senses to help differentiate between qualities of pleasure. For example, a Qualitative Hedonist might argue that pleasurable sensations from touch and movement are always lower quality than the others.

    Hedonists have also defined pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience, that is to say any experiences that we find intrinsically valuable either are, or include, instances of pleasure. According to this definition, the reason that listening to music and eating a fine meal are both intrinsically pleasurable is because those experiences include an element of pleasure (along with the other elements specific to each activity, such as the experience of the texture of the food and the melody of the music). By itself, this definition enables Hedonists to make an argument that is close to perfectly circular. Defining pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience and well-being as all and only experiences that are intrinsically valuable allows a Hedonist to all but stipulate that Prudential Hedonism is the correct theory of well-being. Where defining pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience is not circular is in its stipulation that only experiences matter for well-being. Some well-known objections to this idea are discussed below.

    Another problem with defining pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience is that the definition does not tell us very much about what pleasure is or how it can be identified. For example, knowing that pleasure is intrinsically valuable experience would not help someone to work out if a particular experience was intrinsically or just instrumentally valuable. Hedonists have attempted to respond to this problem by explaining how to find out whether an experience is intrinsically valuable.

    One method is to ask yourself if you would like the experience to continue for its own sake (rather than because of what it might lead to). Wanting an experience to continue for its own sake reveals that you find it to be intrinsically valuable. While still making a coherent theory of well-being, defining intrinsically valuable experiences as those you want to perpetuate makes the theory much less hedonistic. The fact that what a person wants is the main criterion for something having intrinsic value, makes this kind of theory more in line with preference satisfaction theories of well-being. The central claim of preference satisfaction theories of well-being is that some variant of getting what one wants, or should want, under certain conditions is the only thing that intrinsically improves ones well-being.

    Another method of fleshing out the definition of pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience is to describe how intrinsically valuable experiences feel. This method remains a hedonistic one, but seems to fall back into defining pleasure as a sensation.

    It has also been argued that what makes an experience intrinsically valuable is that you like or enjoy it for its own sake. Hedonists arguing for this definition of pleasure usually take pains to position their definition in between the realms of sensation and preference satisfaction. They argue that since we can like or enjoy some experiences without concurrently wanting them or feeling any particular sensation, then liking is distinct from both sensation and preference satisfaction. Liking and enjoyment are also difficult terms to define in more detail, but they are certainly easier to recognise than the rather opaque "intrinsically valuable experience."

    Merely defining pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience and intrinsically valuable experiences as those that we like or enjoy still lacks enough detail to be very useful for contemplating well-being. A potential method for making this theory more useful would be to draw on the cognitive sciences to investigate if there is a specific neurological function for liking or enjoying. Cognitive science has not reached the point where anything definitive can be said about this, but a few neuroscientists have experimental evidence that liking and wanting (at least in regards to food) are neurologically distinct processes in rats and have argued that it should be the same for humans. The same scientists have wondered if the same processes govern all of our liking and wanting, but this question remains unresolved.

    Most Hedonists who describe pleasure as intrinsically valuable experience believe that pleasure is internal and conscious. Hedonists who define pleasure in this way may be either Quantitative or Qualitative Hedonists, depending on whether they think that quality is a relevant dimension of how intrinsically valuable we find certain experiences.

    One of the most recent developments in modern hedonism is the rise of defining pleasure as a pro-attitude a positive psychological stance toward some object. Any account of Prudential Hedonism that defines pleasure as a pro-attitude is referred to as Attitudinal Hedonism because it is a persons attitude that dictates whether anything has intrinsic value. Positive psychological stances include approving of something, thinking it is good, and being pleased about it. The object of the positive psychological stance could be a physical object, such as a painting one is observing, but it could also be a thought, such as "my country is not at war," or even a sensation. An example of a pro-attitude towards a sensation could be being pleased about the fact that an ice cream tastes so delicious.

    Fred Feldman, the leading proponent of Attitudinal Hedonism, argues that the sensation of pleasure only has instrumental value it only brings about value if you also have a positive psychological stance toward that sensation. In addition to his basic Intrinsic Attitudinal Hedonism, which is a form of Quantitative Hedonism, Feldman has also developed many variants that are types of Qualitative Hedonism. For example, Desert-Adjusted Intrinsic Attitudinal Hedonism, which reduces the intrinsic value a pro-attitude has for our well-being based on the quality of deservedness (that is, on the extent to which the particular object deserves a pro-attitude or not). For example, Desert-Adjusted Intrinsic Attitudinal Hedonism might stipulate that sensations of pleasure arising from adulterous behavior do not deserve approval, and so assign them no value.

    Defining pleasure as a pro-attitude, while maintaining that all sensations of pleasure have no intrinsic value, makes Attitudinal Hedonism less obviously hedonistic as the versions that define pleasure as a sensation. Indeed, defining pleasure as a pro-attitude runs the risk of creating a preference satisfaction account of well-being because being pleased about something without feeling any pleasure seems hard to distinguish from having a preference for that thing.

    The most common argument against Prudential Hedonism is that pleasure is not the only thing that intrinsically contributes to well-being. Living in reality, finding meaning in life, producing noteworthy achievements, building and maintaining friendships, achieving perfection in certain domains, and living in accordance with religious or moral laws are just some of the other things thought to intrinsically add value to our lives. When presented with these apparently valuable aspects of life, Hedonists usually attempt to explain their apparent value in terms of pleasure. A Hedonist would argue, for example, that friendship is not valuable in and of itself, rather it is valuable to the extent that it brings us pleasure. Furthermore, to answer why we might help a friend even when it harms us, a Hedonist will argue that the prospect of future pleasure from receiving reciprocal favors from our friend, rather than the value of friendship itself, should motivate us to help in this way.

    Those who object to Prudential Hedonism on the grounds that pleasure is not the only source of intrinsic value use two main strategies. In the first strategy, objectors make arguments that some specific value cannot be reduced to pleasure. In the second strategy, objectors cite very long lists of apparently intrinsically valuable aspects of life and then challenge hedonists with the prolonged and arduous task of trying to explain how the value of all of them can be explained solely by reference to pleasure and the avoidance of pain. This second strategy gives good reason to be a pluralist about value because the odds seem to be against any monistic theory of value, such as Prudential Hedonism. The first strategy, however, has the ability to show that Prudential Hedonism is false, rather than being just unlikely to be the best theory of well-being.

    The most widely cited argument for pleasure not being the only source of intrinsic value is based on Robert Nozicks experience machine thought-experiment. Nozicks experience machine thought-experiment was designed to show that more than just our experiences matter to us because living in reality also matters to us. This argument has proven to be so convincing that nearly every single book on ethics that discusses hedonism rejects it using only this argument or this one and one other.

    In the thought experiment, Nozick asks us to imagine that we have the choice of plugging in to a fantastic machine that flawlessly provides an amazing mix of experiences. Importantly, this machine can provide these experiences in a way that, once plugged in to the machine, no one can tell that their experiences are not real. Disregarding considerations about responsibilities to others and the problems that would arise if everyone plugged in, would you plug in to the machine for life? The vast majority of people reject the choice to live a much more pleasurable life in the machine, mostly because they agree with Nozick that living in reality seems to be important for our well-being. Opinions differ on what exactly about living in reality is so much better for us than the additional pleasure of living in the experience machine, but the most common response is that a life that is not lived in reality is pointless or meaningless.

    Since this argument has been used so extensively (from the mid 1970s onwards) to dismiss Prudential Hedonism, several attempts have been made to refute it. Most commonly, Hedonists argue that living an experience machine life would be better than living a real life and that most people are simply mistaken to not want to plug in. Some go further and try to explain why so many people choose not to plug in. Such explanations often point out that the most obvious reasons for not wanting to plug in can be explained in terms of expected pleasure and avoidance of pain. For example, it might be argued that we expect to get pleasure from spending time with our real friends and family, but we do not expect to get as much pleasure from the fake friends or family we might have in the experience machine. These kinds of attempts to refute the experience machine objection do little to persuade non-Hedonists that they have made the wrong choice.

    A more promising line of defence for the Prudential Hedonists is to provide evidence that there is a particular psychological bias that affects most peoples choice in the experience machine thought experiment. A reversal of Nozicks thought experiment has been argued to reveal just such a bias. Imagine that a credible source tells you that you are actually in an experience machine right now. You have no idea what reality would be like. Given the choice between having your memory of this conversation wiped and going to reality, what would be best for you to choose? Empirical evidence on this choice shows that most people would choose to stay in the experience machine. Comparing this result with how people respond to Nozicks experience machine thought experiment reveals the following: In Nozicks experience machine thought experiment people tend to choose a real and familiar life over a more pleasurable life and in the reversed experience machine thought experiment people tend to choose a familiar life over a real life. Familiarity seems to matter more than reality, undermining the strength of Nozicks original argument. The bias thought to be responsible for this difference is the status quo bias an irrational preference for the familiar or for things to stay as they are.

    Regardless of whether Nozicks experience machine thought experiment is as decisive a refutation of Prudential Hedonism as it is often thought to be, the wider argument (that living in reality is valuable for our well-being) is still a problem for Prudential Hedonists. That our actions have real consequences, that our friends are real, and that our experiences are genuine seem to matter for most of us regardless of considerations of pleasure. Unfortunately, we lack a trusted methodology for discerning if these things should matter to us. Perhaps the best method for identifying intrinsically valuable aspects of lives is to compare lives that are equal in pleasure and all other important ways, except that one aspect of one of the lives is increased. Using this methodology, however, seems certain to lead to an artificial pluralist conclusion about what has value. This is because any increase in a potentially valuable aspect of our lives will be viewed as a free bonus. And, most people will choose the life with the free bonus just in case it has intrinsic value, not necessarily because they think it does have intrinsic value.

    The main traditional line of criticism against Prudential Hedonism is that not all pleasure is valuable for well-being, or at least that some pleasures are less valuable than others because of non-amount-related factors. Some versions of this criticism are much easier for Prudential Hedonists to deal with than others depending on where the allegedly disvaluable aspect of the pleasure resides. If the disvaluable aspect is experienced with the pleasure itself, then both Qualitative and Quantitative varieties of Prudential Hedonism have sufficient answers to these problems. If, however, the disvaluable aspect of the pleasure is never experienced, then all types of Prudential Hedonism struggle to explain why the allegedly disvaluable aspect is irrelevant.

    Examples of the easier criticisms to deal with are that Prudential Hedonism values, or at least overvalues, perverse and base pleasures. These kinds of criticisms tend to have had more sway in the past and doubtless encouraged Mill to develop his Qualitative Hedonism. In response to the charge that Prudential Hedonism mistakenly values pleasure from sadistic torture, sating hunger, copulating, listening to opera, and philosophising all equally, Qualitative Hedonists can simply deny that it does. Since pleasure from sadistic torture will normally be experienced as containing the quality of sadism (just as the pleasure from listening to good opera is experienced as containing the quality of acoustic excellence), the Qualitative Hedonist can plausibly claim to be aware of the difference in quality and allocate less value to perverse or base pleasures accordingly.

    Prudential Hedonists need not relinquish the Quantitative aspect of their theory in order to deal with these criticisms, however. Quantitative Hedonists, can simply point out that moral or cultural values are not necessarily relevant to well-being because the investigation of well-being aims to understand what the good life for the one living it is and what intrinsically makes their life go better for them. A Quantitative Hedonist can simply respond that a sadist that gets sadistic pleasure from torturing someone does improve their own well-being (assuming that the sadist never feels any negative emotions or gets into any other trouble as a result). Similarly, a Quantitative Hedonist can argue that if someone genuinely gets a lot of pleasure from porcine company and wallowing in the mud, but finds opera thoroughly dull, then we have good reason to think that having to live in a pig sty would be better for her well-being than forcing her to listen to opera.

    Much more problematic for both Quantitative and Qualitative Hedonists, however, are the more modern versions of the criticism that not all pleasure is valuable. The modern versions of this criticism tend to use examples in which the disvaluable aspect of the pleasure is never experienced by the person whose well-being is being evaluated. The best example of these modern criticisms is a thought experiment devised by Shelly Kagan. Kagans deceived businessman thought experiment is widely thought to show that pleasures of a certain kind, namely false pleasures, are worth much less than true pleasures.

    Kagan asks us to imagine the life of a very successful businessman who takes great pleasure in being respected by his colleagues, well-liked by his friends, and loved by his wife and children until the day he died. Then Kagan asks us to compare this life with one of equal length and the same amount of pleasure (experienced as coming from exactly the same sources), except that in each case the businessman is mistaken about how those around him really feel. This second (deceived) businessman experiences just as much pleasure from the respect of his colleagues and the love of his family as the first businessman. The only difference is that the second businessman has many false beliefs. Specifically, the deceived businessmans colleagues actually think he is useless, his wife doesnt really love him, and his children are only nice to him so that he will keep giving them money. Given that the deceived businessman never knew of any of these deceptions and his experiences were never negatively impacted by the deceptions indirectly, which life do you think is better?

    Nearly everyone thinks that the deceived businessman has a worse life. This is a problem for Prudential Hedonists because the pleasure is quantitatively equal in each life, so they should be equally good for the one living it. Qualitative Hedonism does not seem to be able to avoid this criticism either because the falsity of the pleasures experienced by the deceived businessman is a dimension of the pleasure that he never becomes aware of. Theoretically, an externalist and qualitative version of Attitudinal Hedonism could include the falsity dimension of an instance of pleasure even if the falsity dimension never impacts the consciousness of the person. However, the resulting definition of pleasure bears little resemblance to what we commonly understand pleasure to be and also seems to be ad hoc in its inclusion of the truth dimension but not others. A dedicated Prudential Hedonist of any variety can always stubbornly stick to the claim that the lives of the two businessmen are of equal value, but that will do little to convince the vast majority to take Prudential Hedonism more seriously.

    Another major line of criticism used against Prudential Hedonists is that they have yet to come up with a meaningful definition of pleasure that unifies the seemingly disparate array of pleasures while remaining recognisable as pleasure. Some definitions lack sufficient detail to be informative about what pleasure actually is, or why it is valuable, and those that do offer enough detail to be meaningful are faced with two difficult tasks.

    The first obstacle for a useful definition of pleasure for hedonism is to unify all of the diverse pleasures in a reasonable way. Phenomenologically, the pleasure from reading a good book is very different to the pleasure from bungee jumping, and both of these pleasures are very different to the pleasure of having sex. This obstacle is unsurpassable for most versions of Quantitative Hedonism because it makes the value gained from different pleasures impossible to compare. Not being able to compare different types of pleasure results in being unable to say if a life is better than another in most even vaguely realistic cases. Furthermore, not being able to compare lives means that Quantitative Hedonism could not be usefully used to guide behavior since it cannot instruct us on which life to aim for.

    Attempts to resolve the problem of unifying the different pleasures while remaining within a framework of Quantitative Hedonism, usually involve pointing out something that is constant in all of the disparate pleasures and defining that particular thing as pleasure. When pleasure is defined as a strict sensation, this strategy fails because introspection reveals that no such sensation exists. Pleasure defined as the experience of liking or as a pro-attitude does much better at unifying all of the diverse pleasures. However, defining pleasure in these ways makes the task of filling in the details of the theory a fine balancing act. Liking or pro-attitudes must be described in such a way that they are not solely a sensation or best described as a preference satisfaction theory. And they must perform this balancing act while still describing a scientifically plausible and conceptually coherent account of pleasure. Most attempts to define pleasure as liking or pro-attitudes seem to disagree with either the folk conception of what pleasure is or any of the plausible scientific conceptions of how pleasure functions.

    Most varieties of Qualitative Hedonism do better at dealing with the problem of diverse pleasures because they can evaluate different pleasures according to their distinct qualities. Qualitative Hedonists still need a coherent method for comparing the different pleasures with each other in order to be more than just an abstract theory of well-being, however. And, it is difficult to construct such a methodology in a way that avoids counter examples, while still describing a scientifically plausible and conceptually coherent account of pleasure.

    The second obstacle is creating a definition of pleasure that retains at least some of the core properties of the common understanding of the term pleasure. As mentioned, many of the potential adjustments to the main definitions of pleasure are useful for avoiding one or more of the many objections against Prudential Hedonism. The problem with this strategy is that the more adjustments that are made, the more apparent it becomes that the definition of pleasure is not recognisable as the pleasure that gave Hedonism its distinctive intuitive plausibility in the first place. When an instance of pleasure is defined simply as when someone feels good, its intrinsic value for well-being is intuitively obvious. However, when the definition of pleasure is stretched, so as to more effectively argue that all valuable experiences are pleasurable, it becomes much less recognisable as the concept of pleasure we use in day-to-day life and its intrinsic value becomes much less intuitive.

    The future of hedonism seems bleak. The considerable number and strength of the arguments against Prudential Hedonisms central principle (that pleasure and only pleasure intrinsically contributes positively to well-being and the opposite for pain) seem insurmountable. Hedonists have been creative in their definitions of pleasure so as to avoid these objections, but more often than not find themselves defending a theory that is not particularly hedonistic, realistic or both.

    Perhaps the only hope that Hedonists of all types can have for the future is that advances in cognitive science will lead to a better understanding of how pleasure works in the brain and how biases affect our judgements about thought experiments. If our improved understanding in these areas confirms a particular theory about what pleasure is and also provides reasons to doubt some of the widespread judgements about the thought experiments that make the vast majority of philosophers reject hedonism, then hedonism might experience at least a partial revival. The good news for Hedonists is that at least some emerging theories and results from cognitive science do appear to support some aspects of hedonism.

    Dan WeijersEmail: danweijers@gmail.comVictoria University of WellingtonNew Zealand

    See the rest here:

    Hedonism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Molecular Medicine Congress …

    Welcome Message

    On behalf of the Scientific Committee, we are honored to invite you to12thInternational Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicineto be held inDublin, IrelandduringNovember 26-28, 2018.

    The Theme of theProteomics and Molecular Medicine 2018is Solving problems in Proteomics, Biology and Medicine" which covers wide range of critically important sessions in the field of Proteomics, Molecular Medicine, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Analysis, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics, Molecular Diagnostics, Molecular Devices, Molecular Biology and Pathology. Objective of this meeting is to share the foremost updated knowledge in the field of proteomics, drug discovery, development and diagnostics. We will gather academicians and young inspired scientists from all around the world involved in researches at the cutting edge in the study of the proteomics and molecular medicine.

    The conference proceedings will include Keynote/plenary Sessions, Oral Presentations, Seminars, Symposiums, Workshops, Young Researchers Forums and Posters Presentations on the latest treatment innovations in the field ofMolecular Medicine,Diagnostics and the advancements in Proteomics, BioinformaticsandMass spectrometryby experts from both academic and business background.

    It also provides a premier interdisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners and educators to present and discuss the most recent innovations, trends, and concerns as well as practical challenges encountered and solutions adopted in the fields of Proteomics and Molecular Medicine.

    Proteomics and Molecular Medicine 2018committed to create real and reliable contributions to the scientific community.Conference Series llc LTDorganize 2000+ Conferences once a year across USA, Canada , Europe, Middle East & Asia with support from a thousand additional scientific societies and Publishes 900+ Open access journals that contains over thousands eminent personalities, putative scientists as editorial board members.

    Why to attend??

    Encounter the target market with members from across the globe, committed to learn about Proteomics and Molecular Medicine. This is the best opportunity to outreach the largest gathering of participants from around the world. Conduct presentations, distribute and update knowledge about Proteomics and Molecular Medicine and receive name recognition at this 3-days event. World-eminent speakers, most recent researches, latest treatment techniques and theadvanced updates in protein analysis, mass spectrometry, molecular diagnostics and devices are the principal features of this conference.

    Target Audience:

    Our Organization would be privileged to welcome the:

    Highlights of latest advances on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine 2018

    Track: 1Proteomics from Discovery to Function

    Proteomicsis an emerging field that has been highly enabled by the human genome project. Proteins are the products of genes, the machinery of the cells in our bodies. When genes are disrupted, theproteinsare also affected. Whenpathogensinfect us, causing disease, proteins play a key role in signaling the presence and ridding us of these invaders. Almost every process that occurs in our cells from the metabolization of simple sugar to the division of cells is dependent on proteins for smooth operation. In general,proteomicsseeks to detect and quantify as many proteins as possible.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 2Mass Spectrometry in Proteome Research

    Mass spectrometry(MS) - based proteomics allows the sensitive and accurate quantification of almost complete proteomes of complex biological fluids and tissues. At the moment, however, the routinely usage of MS-based proteomics is prevented and complicated by the very complex work flow comprising sample preparation,chromatography, MS measurement followed by data processing and evaluation. The new technologies, products and assays developed byPrecision Proteomicscould help enabling and establishing mass spectrometry (MS) - based proteomics in academic andpharmaceutical proteomicsresearch as well as in clinical diagnostics.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Track: 3Proteomics and Molecular Medicine

    Molecular Medicinepromotes the thoughtful of biological mechanism of disease at the cellular and molecular levels for enhanced diagnoses, treatment, and prevention of disease. Proteomics plays an important role in medical research and molecular medicine, such as in drug discovery anddiagnostics, because of the link between proteins, genes anddiseases, and it is considered to be the next step in modern biology. Proteomics is dynamic compared to genomics because it changes constantly to reflect the cells environment. The main objectives in the arena of proteomics are; identifying all proteins, analyse differentialprotein expressionin different samples, characterise proteins by identifying and studying their function and cellular localisation, and recognize protein interaction networks.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 4Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics

    Molecular diagnosticsis prominent disruptive innovation in healthcare by the introduction of many tools that are having a profound impact onhealthcaredelivery. These includenext-generation sequencing, wearable sensors, liquid biopsies, direct-to-consumer testing, point-of-care assays, and early cancer detection. Join industry leaders at the molecular diagnostics event to discuss recent developments and decipher how changes in regulation, reimbursement, and implementation guidelines will impact progress in new markets created by innovations in this technology.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Track: 5Molecular Diagnostics and Devices

    Molecular diagnosticsand devices are enabling precise diagnosis and treatment ofoncology, infectious disease and immunotherapy. Experts in the arena will highlight the latest tools, clinical advances, besides commercial applications of circulating and tissue-based biomarkers that are transformingmedicine.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 6Protein Expression and Analysis

    Protein expressionrefers to the way in which proteins are synthesized, modified and regulated in living organisms. In protein research, the term can apply to either the object of study or the laboratory techniques required to manufacture proteins.Protein analysisis thebioinformaticsstudy of protein structure,protein interactionand function using database searches, sequence comparisons, structural and functional predictions.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Track: 7Proteomics and its Medicinal Research

    Personalised medicineaims to tailor treatments to achieve the best outcome for individual patients, rather than treating patients with a one size fits all approach. Personalized medicine, also termedprecision medicine, is a medical procedure that separates patients into different groupswith medical decisions, practices, interventions and/or products being tailored to the individual patient based on their predicted response or risk of disease.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 8Proteomics in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

    Biochemistryis the study of the structure and function of biological molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates and lipids. Biochemistry is also used to describe techniques suited to understanding the interactions and functions ofbiological moleculesand it is a laboratory based science that brings together biology and chemistry. By using chemical knowledge and techniques, biochemists can understand and solve biological problems. Biochemistry focuses on processes happening at a molecular level and it focuses on whats happening inside our cells. It also looks at how cells communicate with each other, for example during growth or fighting illness. Medicine is a broad category but relates to biochemistry on many levels. Doctors and nurses give drugs to patients to help cure a disease or prevent it. This is since when thatdrugis added to the human system, it alters how other chemicals in the body function, resulting in disease prevention or recovery.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Track: 9Precision Medicine and Immuno-Oncology

    The significance and role of the human genome in thediagnosisand treatment of disease, they lay out the groundwork for precision or genomic medicine. In turn,immuno-oncologyresearches are changing the way we treat cancer by unleashing the immune system, and achieving better survival for many patients and cure for some. Covering latest advances in precision medicine,genomicsand genetics for drug discovery application, cancer immuno-therapy, biomarkers and translational strategies in immune-oncology, Precision Medicine and Immuno-Oncology tracks will bring together uppermost experts from industry and academia to discuss emerging trends and solutions in order to provide the most up-to-date, scientifically sound care for patients with cancer and chronic diseases.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 10Proteomics in Computational Systems Biology

    Systems biologyis an exciting new approach to understand biological complexity. It builds on large-scale measurement technologies, such asnext-generation sequencingandmass spectrometry.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Track: 11Proteomics for Bioinformatics

    Bioinformaticsis both an umbrella term for the body of biological studies that use computer programming as part of their methodology, as well as a reference to specific analysis "pipelines" that are repeatedly used, particularly in the fields of genetics andgenomics. Common uses ofbioinformaticsinclude the identification of candidate genes and nucleotides.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Human Proteome Organization, European Proteomics Association (Eupa), Spanish Proteomics Society (Seprot), Netherlands Proteomic Platform (Npp), Japan Human Proteome Organisation (Jhupo), Italian Proteomic Association (Itpa), Portugese Proteomic Association (Rede Procura), Iranian Proteomic Society, Taiwan Proteomic Society (Tps), Austrian Proteomics Society, European Proteomics Association, British Mass Spectrometry Society, Belgian Mass Spectrometry Society, Danish Mass Spectrometry Society

    Track: 12Proteomics and its Research

    Proteins provide most of themolecularmachinery of cells. Many areenzymesor subunits of enzymes. Other proteins play structural or mechanical roles, such as those that form the struts and joints of the cytoskeleton. Eachproteinis linear polymers built ofamino acids.

    Relevant Conferences: Proteomics Conferences | Proteomics and Molecular Medicine Conferences | Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Proteomics Conferences USA

    12th International Conference on Advancements in Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery November 26-27, 2018 Dublin, Ireland; Nordic Proteomics Conference April 18-20, 2018 Bergen, Norway; XII Eupa Congress - Translating genomes into biological functions June 16-20, 2018 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 43rd FEBS 2018 Congress July 7-12, 2018 Prague, Czech Republic; Human Proteome Organization September 30 October 03 2018 Orlando, USA; Annual Swiss Proteomics Meeting 2018 April 19-20, 2018 Montreux, Switzerland; 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference August 26-31, 2018 Florence, Italy; 12th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine November 26-28, 2018 Dublin, Ireland

    Relevant Societies: Australian and New Zealand Mass Spectrometry Society, Indiana Proteomics Consortium, Proteome Society, European federation of biotechnology, Australasian Proteomics Society, Association for Molecular Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Cognition Society, Hong Kong Society For Molecular Diagnostic Sciences Limited, Biochemical Society, Society for Molecular Biology & Evolution, The French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The German Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biology Society of Japan, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

    Proteomics attribute to the study of proteomes, but is also used to characterize the techniques used to determine the complete set of proteins of an organism or system, such as protein purification and MS. Proteomics is a developing field that has been deeply enabled by the human genome project. Proteins which are the products of genes, the machinery of the cells in our bodies. When genes are disturbed, the proteins are also damaged. When pathogens infect us, causing disease, proteins play a major role in signaling the presence & ridding us of these invaders. Almost every process which that occurs in our cells from the metabolization of clean sugar to the distribution of cells is dependent on proteins for smooth operation. In general, proteomics seeks to distinguish & quantify as many proteins as possible likewise Molecular Medicine promotes the understanding of biological mechanism of disease at the cellular and molecular levels for better diagnoses, treatment, and prevention of disease. Proteomics plays an important role in medical research and molecular medicine, such as in drug discovery and diagnostics, because of the link between proteins, genes and diseases, and it is considered to be the next step in modern biology.

    There are numerous advances in this proteomics innovation, especially in the field of sub-atomic science. New proteomics and genomics advancements and creations could be utilized for ailment particular biomarker revelation and to screen tolerant reaction to the treatment. Proteomics might likewise set up new, atomic order of the malady. Applying genomic and proteomic strategies to body liquids (serum, cerebrospinal liquid, pee, and so on.) and tissue concentrates would put profitable goal diagnostic force in the hands of the clinician however approval of those techniques is an imperative issue. The quick extension of the analytic apparatuses taking into account advancements in proteomic and genomic advances can be essential for the improvement of customized solution. As a science that studies interactions between the molecular components that carry out the various biological processes in living cells, an important idea in molecular biology states that information flow in organisms follows a one-way street: Genes are transcribed into RNA, and RNA is translated into proteins.

    Why Dublin, Ireland?

    Europe is one such region which encompasses the major share of the Proteomics and molecular medicine research which is mainly on ovarian cancer biomarker research. Dublin being one of the most advanced European economies is bound to hold the chief share in Europes Proteomics and molecular medicine market. Further as EU expands the research, export and trading relations are bound to enhance.

    The globalproteomics marketis expected to reach over USD 24.8 billion by 2024 according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The introduction of technology-enabled proteomics products is one of the high-impact rendering drivers for the proteomics market growth. These products find extensive applications in drug discovery, diagnostic services, and many other research areas. The increasing market penetration of these technologies, such as ESI-LC-MS (electrospray ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry), is expected to serve as a driver of this market.

    Proteomics Market By Product, USD Million, 2013 - 2024

    Theeurope molecular diagnostics marketis expected to reach USD4.0 billion by 2024, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. Growing geriatric population and the increasing prevalence of neurological and cardiovascular disorders is expected to drive the growth of molecular diagnostics. Moreover, increasing demand for more efficient healthcare delivery to facilitate early diagnostics is further expected to boost market growth.

    Molecular medicine, diagnostic market by application, 2013-2024USD Million

    Proteomics Congress 2017

    Conference Series llc LTDtakes a great pride in announcing the 9thInternational Conference & Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine(Proteomics Congress 2017) which was held in Paris, France, during 13-15 November, 2017.

    Proteomics Congress 2017 witnessed an amalgamation of peerless speakers who enlightened the crowd with their knowledge and confabulated on various newfangled topics related to the field of proteomics and molecular medicine. The extremely illustrious conference hosted byConference Series llc LTDwas marked with the attendance of young and brilliant researchers, business delegates and talented student communities representing more than 30 countries around the world.

    The conference aimed a parallel rail with theme Novel Advancements in Proteomics and Molecular Medicine. The meeting engrossed a vicinity of cognizant discussions on novel subjects like Mass spectrometry in Proteome Research, Protein Expression and Analysis, Proteomics from Discovery to Function, Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, to mention a few. The three days event implanted a firm relation of upcoming strategies in the field of Proteomics, Molecular Medicine, Bioinformatics and Mass Spectrometry Technology with the scientific community. The conceptual and applicable knowledge shared, will also foster organizational collaborations to nurture scientific accelerations.

    The Organizing Committee would like to thank the moderatorsDr. Oliva Petra from Sanofi Genzyme, USA, Dr. Marwa Eltoweissy, University of Gttingen, Germany for their contributions which resulted in smooth functioning of the conference.

    The conference was embarked with an opening ceremony followed by a series of lectures delivered by both Honorable Guests and members of the Keynote forum. The highlights of the conference were the keynote forum by prominent scientists,Boris Zaslavsky, Cleveland Diagnostics, USA;Bin Huang, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan;Judit Ovdi, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary;Jarrod A Marto, Harvard Medical School, USA; Magnus S Magnusson, University of Iceland, Iceland; gave their fruitful contributions in the form of highly informative presentations and made the conference a top notch one.

    Conference Series llc LTDis prerogative to thank the Organizing Committee Members, Keynote speakers, Chair and Co-chairs on transcribing the plenary sessions, workshops and special sessions in a diversified and variegate manner to make this conference an enviable artifact.

    Conference Series llc LTDoffers its heartfelt appreciation to the exhibitor Proteintech, collaborators Instruct Integrating Biology, European Biotechnology Network, Bilkent Genetik Toplulugu, Malaysian Biotechnology Information Center, Swiss Biotech Association & Human Behaviour Laboratory who supported the conference in every aspect for the awe-inspiring exhibition at the venue. We also express our sincere thanks to all the media partners for the promotion of our event to glory.

    Conference Series llc LTDcongratulates the best poster award winner Dr. Pratibha Sharma, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India. We would also like to thank Dr. Jarrod A Marto, Harvard Medical School, USA and Dr. Pavlina Dolashka, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria who supported us by evaluating the posters.

    We once again thank all the participants for their wonderful contribution towards the event which helped us for successful accomplishment of this event.

    Conference Series llc LTD9thInternational Conference & Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine would not have been successful if it has not been supported by international, multi-professional steering committee and coordination of theJournal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics, Journal of Pharmacogenomics & Pharmacoproteomics & Journal of Data Mining in Genomics & Proteomics.

    After the successful completion of eleven consecutive conferences we are overwhelmed to announce our next upcoming conferences which are going to be held in Europe is the 12thInternational Conference and Expo on Proteomics and Molecular Medicine which is going to be held during November 26-28, 2018 in Dublin, Ireland.

    Conference Series llc LTDtakes a great pride in announcing the 7thInternational Conference & Expo on Proteomics(Proteomics Congress 2016) which was held in Rome, Italy, during 24-26 October, 2016.

    Proteomics Congress 2016 witnessed an amalgamation of peerless speakers who enlightened the crowd with their knowledge and confabulated on various newfangled topics related to the field of proteomics. The extremely illustrious conference hosted by Conference Series LLC was marked with the attendance of young and brilliant researchers, business delegates and talented student communities representing more than 25 countries around the world.

    The conference aimed a parallel rail with theme Proteomics: An atlas of expression. The meeting engrossed a vicinity of cognizant discussions on novel subjects like Proteomics from Discovery to Function, Mass Spectrometry in Proteome Research, Proteomics for Bioinformatics, Cancer and Clinical proteomics, to mention a few. The three days event implanted a firm relation of upcoming strategies in the field of Proteomics, Bioinformatics and Mass Spectrometry Technology with the scientific community. The conceptual and applicable knowledge shared, will also foster organizational collaborations to nurture scientific accelerations.

    The Organizing Committee would like to thank the moderatorsDr. Marwa Eltoweissy, University of Gttingen, Germany,Dr. Jill Barber, University of Manchester, UK for their contributions which resulted in smooth functioning of the conference.

    The conference was embarked with an opening ceremony followed by a series of lectures delivered by both Honorable Guests and members of the Keynote forum. The highlights of the conference were the keynote forum by prominent scientists,Boris Zaslavsky, Cleveland Diagnostics, USA;John F Cipollo, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research-USFDA, USA;Stefan Kempa, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology - MDC Berlin, Germany;Magnus S Magnusson, University of Iceland, Iceland; gave their fruitful contributions in the form of highly informative presentations and made the conference a top notch one.

    Conference Series llc LTDis prerogative to thank the Organizing Committee Members, Keynote speakers, Chair and Co-chairs on transcribing the plenary sessions, workshops and special sessions in a diversified and variegate manner to make this conference an enviable artifact.

    Go here to see the original:

    Proteomics Conferences 2018 | Molecular Medicine Congress ...

    2018 Bahamas Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Conference

    Day 1 June 20th

    All Day Exhibits (Local, Regional, and Global Companies Sponsors, Service Providers

    9:00am 10:15am Official Opening Programme

    10:30am 11:45am Speaker/Panel/Fireside Chat Opportunities

    Topic: How Can I Get Funded?

    Moderator: Rhonda Eldridge, CPA, CA, Founder & Impactioneer, Harness All Possibilities, Inc.

    Panelists

    12:00 noon 1:15pm Invitation Only: Prime Ministers Lunch

    Speaker: The Honourable K. Peter Turnquest, M.P., Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

    1:30pm 3:15pm Afternoon Panel Discussion:

    Topic: The Technology Sector in The Bahamas is Open for Business: Cryptocurrencies, ICOs, and Exchanges

    Moderator: Dr. Donovan Moxey, Chairman, 2018 BBCC Planning Committee and Co-Founder, CBI Mobile (Bah) Ltd

    Panelists

    3:30pm 4:45pm Speaker/Panel/Fireside Chat Opportunities

    Topic: Islands in the Data Stream: Blockchain as a Global Resource for Seed and Growth Capital

    Moderator: Kristie Powell

    Panelists

    5:00pm 6:30pm Speaker/Panel/Fireside Chat Opportunities

    Topic: Should I Invest?

    Moderator: Kelly Banks, Head of Digital and Innovation, Ansbacher

    Panelists

    6:30pm Private Reception

    Day 2 June 21st

    All Day Exhibit (Local, Regional, and Global Companies Sponsors, Service Providers

    9:00am 10:45am Investor Pitches

    11:00am 11:45pm noon Opening Keynote Address

    Speaker: Michael J. Casey, Chairman, CoinDesk Advisory Board

    12:00 noon 1:15pm Lunch Break at Local Establishments

    1:30pm 4:15pm Main stage

    1:30 pm Investor Pitches

    2:20 pm 3:15 pm Full STEAM Ahead: Small Island Nation Educational Outreach

    3:30 pm 4:30 pm RoundTable Discussions Outreach

    Topic: Bahamian Blockchain Enthusiasts

    Moderator: Michael J. Casey, Chairman, CoinDesk Advisory Board

    Panelists

    4:30pm 5:45pm Afternoon Panel Discussion

    Topic: A Global Perspective on Regulatory Frameworks for Cryptocurrency and ICOs

    Moderator: Joel Telpner, Partner, Sullivan & Worcester

    Panelists

    Day 3 June 22nd

    All Day Exhibit (Local, Regional, and Global Companies Sponsors, Service Providers

    9:00am 10:45am Investor Pitches

    Discussion Leader: Donovan Moxey

    11:00am 11:45am Keynote Address

    Speaker: Mr. Anthony Di Iorio, CEO, Decentral

    12:00 noon 1:15pm Lunch Break

    1:30pm 2:45pm Afternoon Panel Discussion

    Moderator: Stuart Hoegner, General Counsel, Bitfinex

    Topic: Digital Token Exchanges

    Panelists

    3:00pm 4:15pm Investor Pitches

    4:30pm 6:00pm Afternoon Presentation and Fireside Chat Topic: What Does the Future look like for Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, and FinTech Solutions?

    Interviewer: Kimberly King Burns, Managing Director, Convergenz

    Speaker(s): Manie Eagar, CEO, Digital Futures; Matthew Arnett, CEO, Po8; John Willock, Co-Founder & CEO, Quantex, Ltd.

    7:30pm Closing Reception/Celebration/Local Culture Sponsored by: BTC

    Original post:

    2018 Bahamas Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Conference

    Company Seven | Vixen GPDX German Equatorial Mount page

    Overview: What is the GPDX and when do we recommend it?

    The GPDX is one of the most massive of the three "Great Polaris" series German equatorial mounts manufactured by Vixen Co., Ltd. The other model GP mounts include the lighter weight GPE model, and another which is similar in appearance to the GPE but is its better accessorized cousin the GP. The GP series are the descendants of the Vixen "Super Polaris" mounts which came to dominate the 1980's. In the USA the Super Polaris were distributed under the Celestron trademark. The heavier duty "Super Polaris DX" was not made available in the USA until 1989 when it was evaluated by Roland Christen, founder of Astro-Physics company who imported it for sale to the USA through both Astro-Physics and Company Seven. The SP-DX was considered a suitable but relatively economical platform for their then new 12cm f8.4 ED doublet Apochromat, and their 4 and 5 Inch f8 Apo telescopes.

    The Great Polaris are an improved, modular German equatorial mount system where the customer is allowed to tailor the system to their particular needs choosing from a broad selection of accessories. The GP-DX mount closely resembles the more compact and portable GP mount however, this belies it's notably superior payload handling and tracking. The GP-DX differences include durable steel is used for the R.A. and Declination Axes shafts, the worm wheels are made of brass (to about double the tolerance of the GP) on improved bearings to provide smooth and stable operation. Accordingly, the GP-DX mount head weighs almost twice as much as the GP.

    alignment to within 3 minute accuracy possible, bubble-level, fine adjustment knobs for both altitude and azimuth, and one 8 lb / 3. kg counterweight are provided. Refinements include a Dovetail Plate hardware mechanism to facilitate the quick interchange of payloads, a better selection of tripods and electronic drive systems.

    Company Seven recommends the GPDX to accommodate payloads including:

    * there are factors acting upon a German mount affecting its suitability including: payload weight and length (torque), payload area and profile exposed to winds, desired tracking accuracy, tripod or pier resonance's, etc. What are most important to the user is how rigidly the mount holds the payload, how smoothly it tracks (amplitude and smoothness of the periodic error of a gear), and how well it overcomes the moment imparted by the load. The final operating weight put onto a mount can also depend on how the instrument is to be accessorized.

    If you wish to buy a most economical, and relatively light weight refined mount that can manage your payload for manual visual operations, or for simple driven uses then the GPDX can make sense. The GPDX can provide a lifetime of service, and it is deserved by many better quality telescopes including the Astro-Physics 105 'Traveler' or 130 mm f6 EDF, or the TeleVue NP101 and 102 or 127, etc. where the cost of the GPDX can be readily justified. And the choices of simple electronic drive systems are better for the GPDX than those available for most other mounts at or below the cost of the GPDX mounts. But when one gets to the point of buying a complete new GPDX delivered with dual axis drive controller, two motors, two clutches, etc. then the cost climbs into the realm of superior alternatives.

    For those who observe from wind prone locations, or for those who intend to become involved in longer time exposure astrophotography or CCD imaging then we suggest you consider one of the following mounts because of their more sophisticated electronics, and even better weight bearing and tracking performance:

    The GPDX mount is available as a Mount Head with Quick Release Saddle including Counterweight Shaft, 8.14 lb / 3.7 kg Counterweight, 6x 20mm Pole Alignment Finder telescope with illuminated North and Southern hemisphere reticle, bubble-level, and fine adjustment knobs for both altitude and azimuth. To arrange a complete system one orders the other components "ala carte" buying only what is needed from a selection of good choices.

    Below Right: A complete Vixen 150mm f5 reflecting telescope shown on an GPDX German Equatorial Mount with standard 3.7 andwith optional 1.9 kg counterweights, DS-1 Single Axis Drive, HAL110 Aluminum Field Tripod (39,881 bytes).Click on image to see enlarged view (164,592 bytes)

    A complete GPE mount system will usually consist of these components:

    Company Seven offers a number of third party accessories for the GP/GPDX mounts. These include Digital Setting Circle with Encoder sets, or optional fitted Carrying Bag (sample shown at right) which can provide for safer, and more convenient transport the mount with tripod attached, or one for the Tripod alone. Please understand that these are very convenient and padded lightweight bags however, these are not suitable for shipping a telescope or mount. Company Seven do offer rather costly buy sometimes necessary Airline Transport Association approved shipping cases for these products which are suitable for check in on aircraft, or shipping by common carriers.

    Please visit Company Seven's showroom to see examples of these Vixen systems firsthand. Or you may Contact Company Seven for help putting together a system for you.

    GPE Features and Specifications

    Vixen GPE Optional SD-1 Electronic Drive Specifications

    Vixen GPE Optional DD-1 Electronic Drive Specifications

    Specifications and availability subject to change

    Drive System Power Requirements, Sources

    The SD-1 Drive Controller for the GPE/GPDX mounts operates from 9 volt DC power sources, it is provided with a cluster battery holder for six alkaline "C" cell batteries, and power cord. For convenience it is probably best to keep feeding the SD-1 the provided battery pack as it needs them. For operations in below freezing conditions then we recommend you keep the battery pack for the SD-1 in a warm area, possibly in a coat pocket when working near the telescope. Otherwise you may use more costly lithium batteries which perform better at lower temperatures.

    The DD-1 Drive Controller for the GPE/GPDX mounts is provided with a cluster battery holder for eight alkaline "D" cell batteries, and power cord. The DD-1 and other common telescope powered accessories (Kendrick Dew/Frost Prevention System, CCD cameras, etc.) require a 12 volt D.C. power source. If you prefer a longer life or more cost effective power supply then Company Seven suggests the user consider one of these following options:

    Read the original here:

    Company Seven | Vixen GPDX German Equatorial Mount page

    Nanotechnology – Simple English Wikipedia, the free …

    Nanotechnology is a part of science and technology about the control of matter on the atomic and molecular scale - this means things that are about 100 nanometres across

    Nanotechnology includes making products that use parts this small, such as electronic devices, catalysts, sensors, etc. To give you an idea of how small that is, there are more nanometres in an inch than there are inches in 400 miles.[1]

    To give a international idea of how small that is, there are as many nanometres in a centimetre, as there are centimetres in 100 kilometres.

    Nanotechnology brings together scientists and engineers from many different subjects, such as applied physics, materials science, interface and colloid science, device physics, chemistry, supramolecular chemistry (which refers to the area of chemistry that focuses on the non-covalent bonding interactions of molecules), self-replicating machines and robotics, chemical engineering, mechanical engineering, biology, biological engineering, and electrical engineering.

    Generally, when people talk about nanotechnology, they mean structures of the size 100 nanometers or smaller. There are one million nanometers in a millimeter. Nanotechnology tries to make materials or machines of that size.

    People are doing many different types of work in the field of nanotechnology. Most current work looks at making nanoparticles (particles with nanometer size) that have special properties, such as the way they scatter light, absorb X-rays, transport electrical currents or heat, etc. At the more "science fiction" end of the field are attempts to make small copies of bigger machines or really new ideas for structures that make themselves. New materials are possible with nano size structures. It is even possible to work with single atoms.

    There has been a lot of discussion about the future of nanotechnology and its dangers. Nanotechnology may be able to invent new materials and instruments which would be very useful, such as in medicine, computers, and making clean electricity (nanoelectromechanical systems) is helping design the next generation of solar panels, and efficient low-energy lighting). On the other hand, nanotechnology is new and there could be unknown problems. For example if the materials are bad for people's health or for nature. They may have a bad effect on the economy or even big natural systems like the Earth itself. Some groups argue that there should be rules about the use of nanotechnology.

    Ideas of nanotechnology were first used in talk "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom", a talk given by the scientist Richard Feynman at an American Physical Society meeting at Caltech on December 29, 1959. Feynman described a way to move individual atoms to build smaller instruments and operate at that scale. Properties such as surface tension and Van der walls force would become very important.

    Feynman's simple idea seemed possible. The word "nanotechnology" was explained by Tokyo Science University Professor Norio Taniguchi in a 1974 paper. He said that nanotechnology was the work of changing materials by one atom or by one molecule. In the 1980s this idea was studied by Dr. K. Eric Drexler, who spoke and wrote about the importance of nano-scale events . "Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology" (1986) is thought to be the willythirst book on nanotechnology. Nanotechnology and Nano science started with two key developments: the start of cluster science and the invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Soon afterwards, new molecules with carbon were discovered - first fullerenes in 1986 and carbon nanotubes a few years later. In another development, people studied how to make semiconductor nano crystals. Many metal oxide nanoparticles are now used as quantum dots (nanoparticles where the behaviour of single electrons becomes important). In 2000, the United States National Nanotechnology Initiative began to develop science in this field.

    Nanotechnology has nanomaterials which can be classified into one, two and three dimensions nanoparticles. This classification is based upon different properties it holds such as scattering of light, absorbing x rays, transport electric current or heat. Nanotechnology has multidisciplinary character affecting multiple traditional technologies and different scientific disciplines. New materials which can be scaled even at atomic size can be manufactured.

    At nano scale physical properties of system or particles substantially change. Physical properties such as quantum size effects where electrons move different for very small sizes of particle. Properties such as mechanical, electrical and optical changes when macroscopic system changes to microscopic one which is of utmost importance.

    Nano materials and particles can act as catalyst to increase the reaction rate along with that produce better yield as compared to other catalyst.Some of the most interesting properties when particle gets converted to nano scale are substances which usually stop light become transparent (copper); it becomes possible to burn some materials (aluminum); solids turn into liquids at room temperature (gold); insulators become conductors (silicon). A material such as gold, which does not react with other chemicals at normal scales, can be a powerful chemical catalyst at nanoscales. These special properties which we can only see at the nano scale are one of the most interesting things about nanotechnology.

    Follow this link:

    Nanotechnology - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ...

    John McAfee Fled to Belize, But He Couldnt … – WIRED

    On November 12, 2012, Belizean police announced that they were seeking John McAfee for questioning in connection with the murder of his neighbor. Six months earlier, I began an in-depth investigation into McAfee's life. This is the chronicle of that investigation.

    Twelve weeks before the murder, John McAfee flicks open the cylinder of his Smith & Wesson revolver and empties the bullets, letting them clatter onto the table between us. A few tumble to the floor. McAfee is 66, lean and fit, with veins bulging out of his forearms. His hair is bleached blond in patches, like a cheetah, and tattoos wrap around his arms and shoulders.

    More than 25 years ago, he formed McAfee Associates, a maker of antivirus software that went on to become immensely popular and was acquired by Intel in 2010 for $7.68 billion. Now he's holed up in a bungalow on his island estate, about 15 miles off the coast of mainland Belize. The shades are drawn so I can see only a sliver of the white sand beach and turquoise water outside. The table is piled with boxes of ammunition, fake IDs bearing his photo, Frontiersman bear deterrent, and a single blue baby pacifier.

    - Better Than Human

    McAfee picks a bullet off the floor and fixes me with a wide-eyed, manic intensity. "This is a bullet, right?" he says in the congenial Southern accent that has stuck with him since his boyhood in Virginia.

    "Let's put the gun back," I tell him. I'd come here to try to understand why the government of Belize was accusing him of assembling a private army and entering the drug trade. It seemed implausible that a wildly successful tech entrepreneur would disappear into the Central American jungle and become a narco-trafficker. Now I'm not so sure.

    But he explains that the accusations are a fabrication. "Maybe what happened didn't actually happen," he says, staring hard at me. "Can I do a demonstration?"

    He loads the bullet into the gleaming silver revolver, spins the cylinder.

    "This scares you, right?" he says. Then he puts the gun to his head.

    My heart rate kicks up; it takes me a second to respond. "Yeah, I'm scared," I admit. "We don't have to do this."

    "I know we don't," he says, the muzzle pressed against his temple. And then he pulls the trigger. Nothing happens. He pulls it three more times in rapid succession. There are only five chambers.

    "Reholster the gun," I demand.

    He keeps his eyes fixed on me and pulls the trigger a fifth time. Still nothing. With the gun still to his head, he starts pulling the trigger incessantly. "I can do this all day long," he says to the sound of the hammer clicking. "I can do this a thousand times. Ten thousand times. Nothing will ever happen. Why? Because you have missed something. You are operating on an assumption about reality that is wrong."

    It's the same thing, he argues, with the government's accusations. They were a smoke screenan attempt to distort realitybut there's one thing everybody agrees on: The trouble really got rolling in the humid predawn murk of April 30, 2012.

    It was a Monday, about 4:50 am. A television flickered in the guard station of McAfee's newly built, 2.5-acre jungle outpost on the Belizean mainland. At the far end of the property, a muddy river flowed slowly past. Crocodiles lurked on the opposite bank, and howler monkeys screeched. In the guard station, a drunk night watchman gaped at Blond Ambition, a Madonna concert DVD.

    The guard heard the trucks first. Then boots hitting the ground and the gate rattling as the lock was snapped with bolt cutters. He stood up and looked outside. Dozens of men in green camouflage were streaming into the compound. Many were members of Belize's Gang Suppression Unit, an elite force trained in part by the FBI and armed with Taurus MT-9 submachine guns. Formed in 2010, their mission was to dismantle criminal organizations.

    The guard observed the scene silently for a moment and then sat back down. After all, the Madonna concert wasn't over yet. Outside, flashlight beams streaked across the property. "This is the police," a voice blared over a bullhorn. "Everyone out!"

    Deep in the compound, McAfee burst out of a thatched-roof bungalow that stood on stilts 20 feet off the ground. He was naked and held a revolver. Things had changed since his days as a high-flying software tycoon. By 2009 he had sold almost everything he ownedestates in Hawaii, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas as well as his 10-passenger planeand moved into the jungle. He announced that he was searching for natural antibiotics in the rain forest and constructed a mysterious laboratory on his property. Now his jungle stronghold was under attack. The commandos were converging on him. There were 31 of them; he was outgunned and outmanned.

    McAfee walked back inside to the 17-year-old in his bed. She was sitting up, naked, her long frizzy hair falling around her shoulders and framing the stars tattooed on her chest. She was terrified.

    As the GSU stormed up the stairs, he put on some shorts, laid down his gun, and walked out with his hands up. The commandos collided with McAfee at the top of the stairs, slammed him against the wall, and handcuffed him.

    "You're being detained on suspicion of producing methamphetamine," one of the cops said.

    McAfee twisted to look at his accuser. "That's a startling hypothesis, sir," he responded. "Because I haven't sold drugs since 1983."

    BRIAN FINKE

    Nineteen eighty-three was a pivotal year for McAfee. He was 38 and director of engineering at Omex, a company that built information storage systems in Santa Clara, California. He was also selling cocaine to his subordinates and snorting massive amounts himself. When he got too high to focus, he'd take a quaalude. If he started to fall asleep at his desk, he'd snort some more coke to wake up. McAfee had trouble making it through the day and spent his afternoons drinking scotch to even out the tumult in his head.

    He'd been a mess for a long time. He grew up in Roanoke, Virginia, where his father was a road surveyor and his mother a bank teller. His father, McAfee recalls, was a heavy drinker and "a very unhappy man" who McAfee says beat him and his mother severely. When McAfee was 15, his father shot himself. "Every day I wake up with him," McAfee says. "Every relationship I have, he's by my side; every mistrust, he is the negotiator of that mistrust. So my life is fucked."

    McAfee started drinking heavily his first year at Roanoke College and supported himself by selling magazine subscriptions door-to-door. He would knock and announce that the lucky resident had won an absolutely free subscription; all they had to do was pay a small shipping and handling fee. "So, in fact, I am explaining to them why it's not free and why they are going to pay for it. But the ruse worked," McAfee recalls. He learned that confidence was all that mattered. He smiled, fixed them with his penetrating blue-eyed gaze, and hit them with a nonstop stream of patter. "I made a fortune," he says.

    He spent his money on booze but managed to graduate and start a PhD in mathematics at Northeast Louisiana State College in 1968. He got kicked out for sleeping with one of his undergraduate students (whom he later married) and ended up coding old-school punch-card programs for Univac in Bristol, Tennessee. That didn't last long, either. He was arrested for buying marijuana, and though his lawyer got him off without a conviction, he was summarily fired.

    Still, he had learned enough to gin up an impressive, totally fake rsum and used it to get a job at Missouri Pacific Railroad in St. Louis. It was 1969 and the company was attempting to use an IBM computer to schedule trains. After six months, McAfee's system began to churn out optimized train-routing patterns. Unfortunately, he had also discovered LSD. He would drop acid in the morning, go to work, and route trains all day. One morning he decided to experiment with another psychedelic called DMT. He did a line, felt nothing, and decided to snort a whole bag of the orangish powder. "Within an hour my mind was shattered," McAfee says.

    People asked him questions, but he didn't understand what they were saying. The computer was spitting out train schedules to the moon; he couldn't make sense of it. He ended up behind a garbage can in downtown St. Louis, hearing voices and desperately hoping that nobody would look at him. He never went back to Missouri Pacific. Part of him believes he's still on that trip, that everything since has been one giant hallucination and that one day he'll snap out of it and find himself back on his couch in St. Louis, listening to Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon.

    From then on he felt like he was always one step away from a total breakdown, which finally came at Omex in 1983. He was snorting lines of coke off his desk most mornings, polishing off a bottle of scotch every day, and living in constant fear that he would run out of drugs. His wife had left him, he'd given away his dog, and in the wake of what he calls a mutual agreement, he left Omex. He ended up shuttered in his house, with no friends, doing drugs alone for days on end and wondering whether he should kill himself just as his father had. "My life was total hell," he says.

    Finally he went to a therapist, who suggested he go to Alcoholics Anonymous. He attended a meeting and started sobbing. Someone gave him a hug and told him he wasn't alone.

    "That's when life really began for me," he says.

    He says he's been sober ever since.

    When the Madonna concert ended, McAfee's drunken guard finally emerged from his station and strolled over to find out what was going on. The police quickly surrounded him. They knew who he was: Austin "Tino" Allen had been convicted 28 times for crimes ranging from robbery to assault, and he had spent most of his life in and out of prison.

    The police lined everybody up against a rock wall as the sun rose. A low, heavy heat filled the jungle. Everybody began to sweat when the police fanned out to search the property. As an officer headed toward an outlying building, one of McAfee's dogs cut him off, growled, and, according to police, went in for an attack. The cop immediately shot the dog through the rib cage.

    "What the fuck!" McAfee screamed. "That's my dog."

    The police ignored him. They left the dead dog in the dirt while they rummaged through the compound. They found shotguns, pistols, a huge cache of ammunition, and hundreds of bottles of chemicals they couldn't identify. McAfee and the others were left in the sun for hours. (GSU commander Marco Vidal claims they were under the shade of a large tree.) By the time the police announced that they were taking several of them to jail, McAfee says his face was turning pink with sunburn. He and Allen were loaded into the back of a pickup. The truck tore off, heading southeast toward Belize City at 80 miles per hour.

    McAfee tried to stay calm, but he had to admit that this was a bad situation. He had walked away from a luxurious lifemansions on multiple continents, sports cars, a private planeonly to end up in the back of a pickup cuffed to a notoriously violent man. Allen pulled McAfee close so he could be heard over the roar of the wind. McAfee tensed. "Boss, I just want to say that it's an honor to be here with you," Allen shouted. "You must be a really important person for them to send all these men to get you."

    In 1986 two brothers in Pakistan coded the first known computer virus aimed at PCs. They weren't trying to destroy anything; it was simple curiosity. They wanted to see how far their creation would travel, so they included their names, addresses, and telephone numbers in the code of the virus. They named it Brain after their computer services shop in Lahore.

    Within a year the phone at the shop was ringing: Brain had infected computers around the world. At the time, McAfee had been sober for four years and gotten a security clearance to work on a classified voice-recognition program at Lockheed in Sunnyvale, California. But then he came across an article in the San Jose Mercury News about the spread of the Pakistani Brain virus in the US.

    He found the idea terrifying. Nobody knew for sure at the time why these intrusions were occurring. It reminded him of his childhood, when his father would hit him for no reason. "I didn't know why he did it," McAfee says. "I just knew a beating could happen any time." As a boy, he wasn't able to fight back. Now, faced with a new form of attack that was hard to rationalize, he decided to do something.

    He started McAfee Associates out of his 700-square-foot home in Santa Clara. His business plan: Create an antivirus program and give it away on electronic bulletin boards. McAfee didn't expect users to pay. His real aim was to get them to think the software was so necessary that they would install it on their computers at work. They did. Within five years, half of the Fortune 100 companies were running it, and they felt compelled to pay a license fee. By 1990, McAfee was making $5 million a year with very little overhead or investment.

    His success was due in part to his ability to spread his own paranoia, the fear that there was always somebody about to attack. Soon after launching his company, he bought a 27-foot Winnebago, loaded it with computers, and announced that he had formed the first "antivirus paramedic unit." When he got a call from someone experiencing computer problems in the San Jose area, he drove to the site and searched for "virus residue." Like a good door-to-door salesman, there was a kernel of truth to his pitch, but he amplified and embellished the facts to sell his product. The RV therefore was not just an RV; it was "the first specially customized unit to wage effective, on-the-spot counterattacks in the virus war."

    It was great publicity, executed with drama and sly wit. By the end of 1988, he was on The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour telling the country that viruses were causing so much damage, some companies were "near collapse from financial loss." He underscored the danger with his 1989 book, Computer Viruses, Worms, Data Diddlers, Killer Programs, and Other Threats to Your System. "The reality is so alarming that it would be very difficult to exaggerate," he wrote. "Even if no new viruses are ever created, there are already enough circulating to cause a growing problem as they reproduce. A major disaster seems inevitable."

    In 1992 McAfee told almost every major news network and newspaper that the recently discovered Michelangelo virus was a huge threat; he believed it could destroy as many as 5 million computers around the world. Sales of his software spiked, but in the end only tens of thousands of infections were reported. Though McAfee was roundly criticized for his proclamation, the criticism worked in his favor, as he explained in an email in 2000 to a computer-security blogger: "My business increased tenfold in the two months following the stories and six months later our revenues were 50 times greater and we had captured the lion's share of the anti-virus market."

    This ability to infect others with his own paranoia made McAfee a wealthy man. In October 1992 his company debuted on Nasdaq, and his shares were suddenly worth $80 million.

    The jail cell was about 10 feet by 10 feet. The concrete floor was bare and cold, the smell of urine overpowering. A plastic milk container in the corner had been hacked open and was serving as a toilet. The detention center was located in the Queen Street police station, but everybody in Belize City called it the Pisshouse. In the shadows of his cell, McAfee could see the other inmates staring at him.

    No charges had been filed yet, though the police had confiscated what they said were two unlicensed firearms on McAfee's property; they still couldn't identify the chemicals they had found. McAfee said he had licenses for all his firearms and explained that the chemicals were part of his antibiotic research. The police weren't buying it.

    McAfee pulled 20 Belizean dollars out of his shoe and passed it through the bars to a guard. "You got a cigarette?" he asked.

    McAfee hadn't smoked for 10 years, but this seemed like a good time to start again. The guard handed him a book of matches and a pack of Benson & Hedges. McAfee lit one and took a deep drag. He was supposed to be living out a peaceful retirement in a tropical paradise. Now he was standing in jail, holding up his pants with one hand because the police had confiscated his belt. "Use this," Allen said, offering him a dirty plastic bag.

    McAfee looked confused. "You tie your pants," Allen explained.

    McAfee fed the bag through two of his belt loops, cinched it tight, and tied a knot. It worked.

    "Welcome to the Pisshouse," Allen said, smiling.

    McAfee lived in Silicon Valley for nearly 20 years. Outwardly he seemed to lead a traditional life with his second wife, Judy. He was a seasoned businessman whom startups turned to for advice. Stanford Graduate School of Business wrote two case studies highlighting his strategies. He was regularly invited to lecture at the school, and he was awarded an honorary doctorate from his alma mater, Roanoke College. In 2000 he started a yoga institute near his 10,000-square-foot mansion in the Colorado Rockies and wrote four books about spirituality. Even after his marriage fell apart in 2002, he was a respectable citizen who donated computers to schools and took out newspaper ads discouraging drug use.

    But as he neared retirement age in the late 2000s, he started to feel like he was deluding himself. His properties, cars, and planes had become a burden, and he realized that he didn't want the traditional rich man's life anymore. Maintaining so many possessions was a constant distraction; it was time, he felt, to try to live more rustically. "John has always been searching for something," says Jennifer Irwin, McAfee's girlfriend at the time. She remembers him telling her once that he was trying to reach "the expansive horizon."

    He was also hurting financially. The economic collapse in 2008 hit him hard, and he couldn't afford to maintain his lifestyle. By 2009 he'd auctioned off almost everything he owned, including more than 1,000 acres of land in Hawaii and the private airport he'd built in New Mexico. He was trying in part to deter people from suing him on the assumption that he had deep pockets. He was already facing a suit from a man who had tripped on his property in New Mexico. Another suit alleged that he was responsible for the death of someone who crashed during a lesson at a flight school McAfee had founded. He figured that if he were out of the country, he'd be less of a target. And he knew that, should he lose a case, it would be harder for the plaintiffs to collect money if he lived overseas.

    In early 2008 McAfee started searching for property in the Caribbean. His criteria were pretty basic: He was looking for an English-speaking country near the US with beautiful beaches. He quickly came across a villa on Ambergris Caye in Belize. In the early '90s he had visited the nation of 189,000 people and loved it. (Today the population is around 356,000.) He looked at the property on Google Earth, decided it was perfect, and bought it. The first time he saw it in person was in April 2008, when he moved in.

    Soon after his arrival, McAfee began to explore the country. He was particularly fascinated by stories of a majestic Mayan city in the jungle and hired a guide to go see it. Boating up a river that snaked into the northern jungle, they stopped at a makeshift dock that jutted from the dense vegetation. McAfee jumped ashore, pushed through the vines, and caught sight of a towering, crumbling temple. Trees had grown up through the ancient buildings, encasing them in roots. Giant stone faces glared out through the foliage, mouths agape. As the men walked up the steps of the temple, the guide described how the Mayans sacrificed their prisoners, sending torrents of blood down the very stairs he and McAfee were now climbing.

    McAfee was spellbound. "Belize is so raw and so clear and so in-your-face. There's an opportunity to see something about human nature that you can't really see in a politer society, because the purpose of society is to mask ourselves from each other," McAfee says. The jungle, in other words, would give him the chance to find out exactly who he was, and that opportunity was irresistible.

    So in February 2010 he bought two and a half acres of swampy land along the New River, 10 miles upriver from the Mayan ruins. Over the next year, he spent more than a million dollars filling in the swamp and constructing an array of thatched-roofed bungalows. While his girlfriend, Irwin, stayed on Ambergris Caye, McAfee outfitted the place like Kublai Khan's sumptuous house of pleasure. He imported ancient Tibetan art and shipped in a baby grand piano even though he had never taken lessons. There was no Internet. At night, when the construction stopped, there was just the sound of the river flowing quietly past. He sat at the piano and played exuberant odes of his own creation. "It was magical," he says.

    He didn't like the idea of getting old, though, so he injected testosterone into his buttocks every other week. He felt that it gave him youthful energy and kept him lean. Plus, he wasn't looking for a quiet retirement. He started a cigar manufacturing business, a coffee distribution company, and a water taxi service that connected parts of Ambergris Caye. He continued to build more bungalows on his property even though he had no pressing need for them.

    In 2010 McAfee visited a beachfront resort for lunch and met Allison Adonizio, a 31-year-old microbiologist who was on vacation. In the resort's dining room, Adonizio explained that she was doing postgrad research at Harvard on how plants combat bacteria. She was particularly interested in plant compounds that appeared to prevent bacteria from causing infections by interfering with the way the microbes communicated. Eventually, Adonizio explained, the work might also lead to an entire new class of antibiotics.

    McAfee was thrilled by the idea. He had fought off digital contagions, and now he could fight organic ones. It was perfect.

    He immediately proposed they start a business to commercialize her research. Within minutes McAfee was talking in rapid-fire bursts about how this would transform the pharmaceutical industry and the entire world. They would save millions of lives and reinvent whole industries. Adonizio was astounded. "He offered me my dream job," she says. "My own lab, assistants. It was incredible."

    Adonizio said yes on the spot, quit her research position in Boston, sold the house she had just bought, and moved to Belize. McAfee soon built a laboratory on his property and stocked it with tens of thousands of dollars' worth of equipment. Adonizio went to work trying to isolate new plant compounds that might be effective medicines, while McAfee touted the business to the international press.

    But the methodical pace of Adonizio's scientific research couldn't keep up with McAfee's enthusiasm, and his attention seemed to wander. He began spending more time in Orange Walk, a town of about 13,000 people that was 5 miles from his compound. McAfee described it in an email to friends as "the asshole of the worlddirty, hot, gray, dilapidated." He liked to walk the town's poorly paved streets and take pictures of the residents. "I gravitate to the world's outcasts," he explained in another email. "Prostitutes, thieves, the handicapped ... For some reason I have always been fascinated by these subcultures."

    Though he says he never drank alcohol, he became a regular at a saloon called Lover's Bar. The proprietor, McAfee wrote to his friends, was partial to "shatteringly bad Mexican karaoke music to which voices beyond description add a disharmony that reaches diabolic proportions." McAfee quickly noticed that the place doubled as a whorehouse, servicing, as he put it, "cane field workers, street vendors, fishermen, farmersanyone who has managed to save up $15 for a good time."

    This was the real world he was looking for, in all its horror. The bar girls were given one Belize dollar for every beer a patron bought them. To increase their earnings, some of the women would chug beers, vomit in the restroom, and return to chug more. One reported drinking 50 beers in one day. "Ninety-nine percent of people would run because they'd fear for their safety or sanity," McAfee says. "I couldn't do that. I couldn't walk away."

    McAfee started spending most mornings at Lover's. After six months, he sent out another update to his friends: "My fragile connection with the world of polite society has, without a doubt, been severed," he wrote. "My attire would rank me among the worst-dressed Tijuana panhandlers. My hygiene is no better. Yesterday, for the first time, I urinated in public, in broad daylight."

    McAfee knew he had entered a dangerous world. "I have no illusions," he noted in another dispatch. "We are tainted by everything we touch."

    Evaristo "Paz" Novelo, the obese Belizean proprietor of Lover's, liked to sit at a corner table and squint at his customers through perpetually puffy eyes. He admits to a long history of operating brothels and prides himself on his ability to figure out exactly what will please his patrons. Early on, he asked whether McAfee was looking for a woman. When McAfee said no, Novelo asked whether he wanted a boy. McAfee declined again. Then Novelo showed up at McAfee's compound with a 16-year-old girl named Amy Emshwiller.

    Emshwiller had a brassy toughness that belied her girlishness. In a matter-of-fact tone, she told McAfee that she had been abused as a child and said that her mother had forced her to sleep with dozens of men for money. "I don't fall in love," she told him. "That's not my job." She carried a gun, wore aviator sunglasses, and had on a low-cut shirt that framed her ample cleavage.

    McAfee felt a swirl of emotions: lust, compassion, pity. "I am the male version of Amy," he says. "I resonated with her story because I lived it."

    Emshwiller, however, felt nothing for him. "I know how to control men," she says. "I told him my story because I wanted him to feel sorry for me, and it worked." All Emshwiller saw was an easy mark. "A millionaire in freaking Belize, where people work all day just to make a dime?" she says. "Who wouldn't want to rob him?"

    McAfee soon realized that Emshwiller was dangerous and unstable, but that was part of her attractiveness. "She can pretend sanity better than any woman I have ever known," he says. "And she can be alluring, she can be very beautiful, she can be butchlike. She's a chameleon." Within a month they were sleeping together, and McAfee started building a new bungalow on his property for her.

    Visiting from Ambergris Caye, McAfee's girlfriend, Jennifer Irwin, was flabbergasted. She asked him to tell the girl to leave, and when McAfee refused, Irwin left the country. McAfee hardly blames her. "What I basically did was can a solid 12-year relationship for a stark-raving madwoman," he says. "But I honestly fell in love."

    One night Emshwiller decided to make her move. She slipped out of bed and pulled McAfee's Smith & Wesson out of a holster hanging from an ancient Tibetan gong in his bedroom. Her plan, if it could be called that, was to kill him and make off with as much cash as she could scrounge up. She crept to the foot of the bed, aimed, and started to pull the trigger. But at the last moment she closed her eyes, and the bullet went wide, ripping through a pillow. "I guess I didn't want to kill the bastard," she admits.

    McAfee leaped out of bed and grabbed the gun before she could fire again. She ran to the bathroom, locked herself in, and asked if he was going to shoot her. He couldn't hear out of his left ear and was trying to get his bearings. Finally he told her he was going to take away her phone and TV for a month. She was furious.

    >"I basically canned a solid 12-year relationship for a stark-raving madwoman," McAfee says. "But I fell in love."

    "But I didn't even kill you!" she shouted.

    McAfee decided it was better for Emshwiller to have her own place about a mile down the road in the village of Carmelita. So in early 2011 he built her a house in the village. Many of the homes are made of stripped tree trunks and topped with sheets of corrugated iron; 10 percent have no electricity. The village has a handful of dirt roads populated with colonies of biting ants and a grassy soccer field surrounded by palm trees and stray dogs. The town's biggest source of income: sand from a pit by the river that locals sell to construction companies.

    Emshwiller, who had grown up in the area, warned McAfee that the village was not what it appeared to be. She told him that the tiny, impoverished town of 1,600 was in fact a major shipment site for drugs moving overland into Mexico, 35 miles to the north. As Emshwiller described it, this village in McAfee's backyard was crawling with narco-traffickers.

    It was a revelation perfectly tailored to feed into McAfee's latent paranoia. "I was massively disturbed," he says. "I fell in love with the river, but then I discovered the horrors of Carmelita."

    He asked Emshwiller what he should do. "She wanted me to shoot all the men in the town," McAfee says. It occurred to him that she might be using him to exact revenge on people who had wronged her, so he asked the denizens of Lover's for more information. They told him stories of killings, torture, and gang wars in the area. For McAfee, the town began to take on mythic proportions. "Carmelita was literally the Wild West," he says. "I didn't realize that 2 miles away was the most corrupt village on the planet."

    He decided to go on the offensive. After all, he was a smart Silicon Valley entrepreneur who had launched a multibillion-dollar company. Even though he had lost a lot of money in the financial crisis, he was still wealthy. Maybe he couldn't maintain multiple estates around the world, but surely he could clean up one village.

    He started by solving some obvious problems. Carmelita had no police station, so McAfee bought a small cement house and hired workers to install floor-to-ceiling iron bars. Then he told the national cops responsible for the area to start arresting people. The police protested that they were ill-equipped for the job, so McAfee furnished them with imported M16s, boots, pepper spray, stun guns, and batons. Eventually he started paying officers to patrol during their off-hours. The police, in essence, became McAfee's private army, and he began issuing orders. "What I'd like you to do is go into Carmelita and start getting information for me," he told the officers on his payroll. "Who's dealing drugs, and where are the drugs coming from?"

    When a 22-year-old villager nicknamed Burger fired a gun outside Emshwiller's house in November 2011, McAfee decided he couldn't rely on others to get the work done; he needed to take action himself. An eyewitness told him that Burger had shot at a motorcycleit looked like a drug deal gone bad. Burger's sister said that he was firing at stray dogs that attacked him. Either way, McAfee was incensed. He drove his gray Dodge pickup to the family's wooden shack near the river and strode into the muddy yard with Emshwiller as his backup (she was carrying a matte-black air rifle with a large scope). Burger wasn't there, but his mother, sister, and brother-in-law were. "I'm giving you a last chance here," McAfee said, holding his Smith & Wesson. "Your brother will be a dead man if he doesn't turn in that gun. It doesn't matter where he goes."

    "It was like he thought he was in a movie," says Amelia Allen, the shooter's sister. But she wasn't going to argue with McAfee. Her mother pulled the gun out of a bush and handed it to him.

    Soon, McAfee was everywhere. He pulled over a suspicious car on the road only to discover that it was filled with elderly people and children. He offered a new flatscreen TV to a small-time marijuana peddler on the condition that the man stop dealing (the guy accepted, though the TV soon broke). "It was like John Wayne came to town," says Elvis Reynolds, former chair of the village council.

    When I visited the village, Reynolds and others admitted that there were fights and petty theft but insisted that Carmelita was simply an impoverished little village, not a major transit point for international narco-traffickers, as McAfee alleges. The village leaders, for their part, were dumbfounded. Many were unfamiliar with antivirus software and had never heard of John McAfee. "I thought he would come by, introduce himself, and explain what he was doing here, but he never did," says Feliciano Salam, a soft-spoken resident who has served on the village council for two years. "He just showed up and started telling us what to do."

    The fact that he was running a laboratory on his property only added to the mystery. Adonizio was continuing to research botanical compounds, but McAfee didn't want to tell the locals anything about it. In part he was worried about corporate espionage. He had seen white men in suits standing beside their cars on the heavily trafficked toll bridge near his property and was sure they were spies. "Do you realize that Glaxo, Bayer, every single drug company in the world sent people out there?" McAfee says. "I was working on a project that had some paradigm-shifting impact on the drug world. It would be insanity to talk about it."

    McAfee became convinced that he was being watched at all hours. Across the river, he saw people lurking in the forest and would surveil them with binoculars. When Emshwiller visited, she never noticed anybody but repeatedly told McAfee to be careful. She heard rumors that gang members were out to "jack" himrob and kill him. On one occasion, she recorded a village councilman discussing how to dispatch McAfee with a grenade. McAfee was wowed by her street smarts"She is brilliant beyond description," he saysand relished the fact that she had come full circle and was now defending him. "He got himself into a very entangled, dysfunctional situation," says Katrina Ancona, the wife of McAfee's partner in the water taxi business. "We kept telling him to get out."

    Adonizio was also worried about McAfee's behavior. He had initially told her that the area was perfectly safe, but now she was surrounded by armed men. When she went to talk to McAfee in his bungalow, she noticed garbage bags filled with cash and blister packs of pharmaceuticals, including Viagra. She lived just outside of Carmelita and had never had any problems. If there was any danger, she felt that it was coming from McAfee. "He turned into a very scary person," she says. She wasn't comfortable living there anymore and left the country.

    George Lovell, CEO of the Ministry of National Security, was also concerned that McAfee was buying guns and hiring guards. "When I see people doing this, my question is, what are you trying to protect?" Lovell says. Marco Vidal, head of the Gang Suppression Unit, concurred. "We got information to suggest that there may have been a meth laboratory at his location," he wrote in an email. "Given the intelligence on McAfee, there was no scope for making efforts to resolve the matter." He proposed a raid, and his superiors approved it.

    When members of the GSU swept into McAfee's compound on April 30, 2012, they found no meth. They found no illegal drugs of any kind. They did confiscate 10 weapons and 320 rounds of ammunition. Three of McAfee's security guards were operating without a security guard license, and charges were filed against them. McAfee was accused of possessing an unlicensed firearm and spent a night in the Queen Street jail, aka the Pisshouse.

    But the next morning, the charges were dropped and McAfee was released. He was convinced, however, that his war on drugs had made him some powerful enemies.

    He had reason to worry. According to Vidal, McAfee was still a "person of interest," primarily because the authorities still couldn't explain what he was up to. "The GSU makes no apologies for deeming a person in control of a laboratory, with no approval for manufacturing any substance, having gang connections and heavily armed security guards, as a person of interest," Vidal wrote.

    Vidal's suspicions may not have been far off. Two years after moving to Belize, McAfee began posting dozens of queries on Bluelight.ru, a drug discussion forum. He explained that he had started to experiment with MDPV, a psychoactive stimulant found in bath salts, a class of designer drugs that have effects similar to amphetamines and cocaine. "When I first started doing this I accidently got a few drops on my fingers while handling a used flask and didn't sleep for four days," McAfee posted. "I had visual and auditory hallucinations and the worst paranoia of my life."

    McAfee indicated, though, that the heightened sexuality justified the drug's risks and claimed to have produced 50 pounds of MDPV in 2010. "I have distributed over 3,000 doses exclusively in this country," he wrote. But neither Emshwiller, Adonizio, nor anyone else I spoke with observed him making the stuff. So how could he have produced 50 pounds without anyone noticing?

    McAfee has a simple explanation: The whole thing was an elaborate prank aimed at tricking drug users into trying a notoriously noxious drug. "It was the most tongue-in-cheek thing in the fucking world," he says, and denies ever taking the substance. "If I'm gonna do drugs, I'm gonna do something that I know is good," he says. "I'm gonna grab some mushrooms, number one, and maybe get some really fine cocaine.

    Read the rest here:

    John McAfee Fled to Belize, But He Couldnt ... - WIRED

    Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: All sides to …

    "Hot" religious topicsMenu

    A root cause for the desire to commit suicide is often depression. This can often be controlled with medication. If you are depressed, I strongly recommend that you seek medical help to see if your depression can be lifted.

    Another cause of suicidal ideation is often intolerable levels of pain associated with a terminal illness, like cancer. Many physicians are reluctant to prescribe high levels of some pain killers out of fear that the person will become addicted to them. If you are suffering from pain in spite of medication, try insisting on better levels or types of pain killers. Recruit friends and family to intercede with your physician if you can.

    If you feel overwhelmed and lack an effective support system of friends and family, consider tapping into the services of a crisis hotline. These are called by various names: distress centers, crisis centers, suicide prevention centers, etc. Their telephone numbers can often be found in the first page(s) of your telephone directory. If you cannot find a number for a center in your area, try phoning directory assistance at 4-1-1.

    In the United States, you can call 1-800-273-TALK. See: http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org/ They will direct you to a crisis center in your area.

    U.S. Crisis Center map

    Crisis centers/distress centers/ etc are often confidential services that you can phone up at any time of the day or night for support. You can usually remain anonymous.

    Wikipedia lists suicide crisis lines for many countries from Australia to the United States at: https://en.wikipedia.org/ Although these lines are often called "suicide prevention lines" or "crisis lines." most of the people calling are not suicidal, not in crisis, but are in distress. So, don't be reluctant to call them because you are not suicidal or in crisis.

    Sponsored link.

    Throughout North America, committing suicide or attempting to commit suicide is no longer a criminal offense. However, helping another person commit suicide is generally considered a criminal act. A few exceptions are:

    There were four failed ballot initiatives between 1991 and 2000:

    Between 1994 and 2016, there have been in excess of 75 legislative bills to legalize PAS in at least 21 states. Almost all failed to become law. 4

    The author of this section is approaching his 80th birthday and is in good health. To him, end of life issues have taken on a personal aspect. Being an Agnostic, he doubts the existence of an afterlife. He does not fear death. He does not fear being dead. However, he has considerable fear about the process of dying, For many people in North America is an agonizingly painful and lengthy process during which time one's enjoyment of life often drops to zero and becomes negative without any hope that it will return to positive territory. Fortunately for him, he lives in Canada which -- like all other developed countries except for the U.S. -- has universal health care. So he will receive competent medical attention. Unfortunately, pain management is often as poorly managed in Canada as it is in the U.S. He regards suicide as a civil right and would prefer that he have access to a means of suicide if life becomes unbearable. He thus strongly supports legalizing physician assisted suicide.

    He is critical of PAS laws that have been passed to date because they generally give access to assisted dying only to terminally ill people who are expected to die in the near future of natural causes. They do not do anything for people who experience chronic, overwhelming pain with no hope of relief for years.

    He has attempted to remain impartial, objective and fair while writing these essays.

    Site navigation:

    See the original post here:

    Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: All sides to ...

    Naturalistic pantheism – Wikipedia

    Naturalistic pantheism is a kind of pantheism. It has been used in various ways such as to relate God or divinity with concrete things,[1] determinism,[2] or the substance of the Universe.[3] God, from these perspectives, is seen as the aggregate of all unified natural phenomena.[4] The phrase has often been associated with the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza,[5] although academics differ on how it is used.

    The term pantheism" is derived from Greek words pan (Greek: ) meaning "all" and theos () meaning God. It was coined by Joseph Raphson in his work De spatio reali, published in 1697.[6] The term was introduced to English by Irish writer John Toland in his 1705 work Socinianism Truly Stated, by a pantheist that described pantheism as the "opinion of those who believe in no other eternal being but the universe."[7]

    The term "naturalistic" derives from the word "naturalism", which has several meanings in philosophy and aesthetics.[8] In philosophy the term frequently denotes the view that everything belongs to the world of nature and can be studied with the methods appropriate for studying that world, i.e. the sciences.[9] It generally implies an absence of belief in supernatural beings.[8]

    Joseph Needham, a modern British scholar of Chinese philosophy and science, has identified Taoism as "a naturalistic pantheism which emphasizes the unity and spontaneity of the operations of Nature."[10] This philosophy can be dated to the late 4th century BCE.[11]

    The Hellenistic Greek philosophical school of Stoicism (which started in the early 3rd century BCE)[12] rejected the dualist idea of the separate ideal/conscious and material realms, and identified the substance of God with the entire cosmos and heaven.[3] However, not all philosophers who did so can be classified as naturalistic pantheists.[13]

    Naturalistic pantheism was expressed by various thinkers,[5] including Giordano Bruno, who was burned at the stake for his views.[14] However, the 17th century Dutch philosopher Spinoza became particularly known for it.[5]

    Possibly drawing upon the ideas of Descartes,[15]Baruch Spinoza connected God and Nature through the phrase deus sive natura ("God, or Nature"),[16][17][18] making him the father of classical pantheism. He relied upon rationalism rather than the more intuitive approach of some Eastern traditions.[19]

    Spinoza's philosophy, sometimes known as Spinozism, has been understood in a number of ways, and caused disagreements such as the Pantheism controversy. However, many scholars have considered it to be a form of naturalistic pantheism. This has included viewing the pantheistic unity as natural.[20] Others focus on the deterministic aspect of naturalism.[21][22]Spinoza inspired a number of other pantheists, with varying degrees of idealism towards nature.[23][24] However, Spinoza's influence in his own time was limited.[25][26]

    Scholars have considered Spinoza the founder of a line of naturalistic pantheism, though not necessarily the only one.[27][28][29]

    In 1705 the Irish writer John Toland endorsed a form of pantheism in which the God-soul is identical with the material universe.[7][30][31]

    German naturalist Ernst Haeckel (18341919[32]) proposed a monistic pantheism in which the idea of God is identical with that of nature or substance.[33]

    The World Pantheist Movement, started in 1999, describes Naturalistic Pantheism as including reverence for the universe, realism, strong naturalism, and respect for reason and the scientific method as methods of understanding the world.[34] Paul Harrison considers its position the closest modern equivalent to Toland's.[7]

    Here is the original post:

    Naturalistic pantheism - Wikipedia

    NanoEngineering (NANO) Courses

    [ undergraduate program | graduate program | faculty ]

    All courses, faculty listings, and curricular and degree requirements described herein are subject to change or deletion without notice.

    For course descriptions not found in the UC San Diego General Catalog 201819, please contact the department for more information.

    The department website is http://nanoengineering.ucsd.edu/undergrad-programs

    All students enrolled in NanoEngineering courses or admitted to the NanoEngineering major are expected to meet prerequisite and performance standards, i.e., students may not enroll in any NanoEngineering courses or courses in another department that are required for the major prior to having satisfied prerequisite courses with a C or better. (The department does not consider D or F grades as adequate preparation for subsequent material.) Additional details are given under the program outline, course descriptions, and admission procedures for the Jacobs School of Engineering in this catalog.

    NANO 1. NanoEngineering Seminar (1)

    Overview of NanoEngineering. Presentations and discussions of basic knowledge and career opportunities in nanotechnology for professional development. Introduction to campus library resources. P/NP grades only. Prerequisites: none.

    NANO 4. ExperienceNanoEngineering(1)

    Introduction to NanoEngineering lab-based skills. Hands-on training and experimentation with nanofabrication techniques, integration, and analytical tools. This class is for NANO majors who are incoming freshmen, to be taken their first year.This class is for NanoEngineering majors who are incoming freshmen, to be taken their first year. P/NP grades only. Prerequisites: department approval required.

    NANO 15. Engineering Computation Using Matlab (4)

    Introduction to the solution of engineering problems using computational methods. Formulating problem statements, selecting algorithms, writing computer programs, and analyzing output using Matlab. Computational problems from NanoEngineering, chemical engineering, and materials science are introduced. The course requires no prior programming skills. Cross-listed with CENG 15. Prerequisites: none.

    NANO 100L. Physical Properties of Materials Lab (4)

    Experimental investigation of physical properties of materials such as: thermal expansion coefficient, thermal conductivity, glass transitions in polymers, resonant vibrational response, longitudinal and shear acoustic wave speeds, Curie temperatures, UV-VIS absorption and reflection. Prerequisites: NANO 108.

    NANO 101. Introduction to NanoEngineering (4)

    Introduction to NanoEngineering; nanoscale fabrication: nanolithography and self-assembly; characterization tools; nanomaterials and nanostructures: nanotubes, nanowires, nanoparticles, and nanocomposites; nanoscale and molecular electronics; nanotechnology in magnetic systems; nanotechnology in integrative systems; nanoscale optoelectronics; nanobiotechnology: biomimetic systems, nanomotors, nanofluidics, and nanomedicine. Priority enrollment given to NanoEngineering majors. Prerequisites: Chem 6B, Phys 2B, Math 20C, and CENG 15 or MAE 8 or NANO 15. Department approval required.

    NANO 102. Foundations in NanoEngineering: Chemical Principles (4)

    Chemical principles involved in synthesis, assembly, and performance of nanostructured materials and devices. Chemical interactions, classical and statistical thermodynamics of small systems, diffusion, carbon-based nanomaterials, supramolecular chemistry, liquid crystals, colloid and polymer chemistry, lipid vesicles, surface modification, surface functionalization, catalysis. Priority enrollment given to NanoEngineering majors. Prerequisites: Chem 6C, Math 20D, NANO 101, PHYS 2D, and NANO 106. Restricted to NanoEngineering majors or by department approval.

    NANO 103. Foundations in NanoEngineering: Biochemical Principles (4)

    Principles of biochemistry tailored to nanotechnologies. The structure and function of biomolecules and their specific roles in molecular interactions and signal pathways. Detection methods at the micro and nano scales. Priority enrollment will be given to NanoEngineering majors. Prerequisites: BILD 1, Chem 6C, NANO 101, and NANO 102. Department approval required.

    NANO 104. Foundations in NanoEngineering: Physical Principles (4)

    Introduction to quantum mechanics and nanoelectronics. Wave mechanics, the Schroedinger equation, free and confined electrons, band theory of solids. Nanosolids in 0D, 1D, and 2D. Application to nanoelectronic devices. Priority enrollment given to NanoEngineering majors Prerequisites: Math 20D, NANO 101. Department approval required.

    NANO 106. Crystallography of Materials (4)

    Fundamentals of crystallography, and practice of methods to study material structure and symmetry. Curie symmetries. Tensors as mathematical description of material properties and symmetry restrictions. Introduction to diffraction methods, including X-ray, neutron, and electron diffraction. Close-packed and other common structures of real-world materials. Derivative and superlattice structures. Prerequisites: Math 20F.

    NANO 107.Electronic Devices and Circuits for Nanoengineers (4)

    Overview of electrical devices and CMOS integrated circuits emphasizing fabrication processes, and scaling behavior. Design, and simulation of submicron CMOS circuits including amplifiers active filters digital logic, and memory circuits. Limitations of current technologies and possible impact of nanoelectronic technologies.Prerequisites: NANO 15, NANO 101, Math 20B or Math 20D, and Phys 2B.

    NANO 108. Materials Science and Engineering (4)

    Structure and control of materials: metals, ceramics, glasses, semiconductors, polymers to produce useful properties. Atomic structures. Defects in materials, phase diagrams, micro structural control. Mechanical, rheological, electrical, optical and magnetic properties discussed. Time temperature transformation diagrams. Diffusion. Scale dependent material properties. Prerequisites: upper-division standing.

    NANO 110. Molecular Modeling of Nanoscale Systems (4)

    Principles and applications of molecular modeling and simulations toward NanoEngineering. Topics covered include molecular mechanics, energy minimization, statistical mechanics, molecular dynamics simulations, and Monte Carlo simulations. Students will get hands-on training in running simulations and analyzing simulation results. Prerequisites: Math 20F, NANO 102, NANO 104, and NANO 15 or CENG 15 or MAE 8. Restricted to NanoEngineering majors or by department approval.

    NANO 111. Characterization of NanoEngineering Systems (4)

    Fundamentals and practice of methods to image, measure, and analyze materials and devices that are structured at the nanometer scale. Optical and electron microscopy; scanning probe methods; photon-, ion-, electron-probe methods, spectroscopic, magnetic, electrochemical, and thermal methods. Prerequisites: NANO 102.

    NANO 112. Synthesis and Fabrication of NanoEngineering Systems (4)

    Introduction to methods for fabricating materials and devices in NanoEngineering. Nano-particle, -vesicle, -tube, and -wire synthesis. Top-down methods including chemical vapor deposition, conventional and advanced lithography, doping, and etching. Bottom-up methods including self-assembly. Integration of heterogeneous structures into functioning devices. Prerequisites: NANO 102, NANO 104, NANO 111.

    NANO 114. Probability and Statistical Methods for Engineers (4)

    Probability theory, conditional probability, Bayes theorem, discrete random variables, continuous random variables, expectation and variance, central limit theorem, graphical and numerical presentation of data, least squares estimation and regression, confidence intervals, testing hypotheses. Cross-listed with CENG 114. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 114 and CENG 114. Prerequisites: Math 20F and NANO 15 or CENG 15 or MAE 8.

    NANO 120A. NanoEngineering System Design I (4)

    Principles of product design and the design process. Application and integration of technologies in the design and production of nanoscale components. Engineering economics. Initiation of team design projects to be completed in NANO 120B. Prerequisites: NANO 110.

    NANO 120B. NanoEngineering System Design II (4)

    Principles of product quality assurance in design and production. Professional ethics. Safety and design for the environment. Culmination of team design projects initiated in NANO 120A with a working prototype designed for a real engineering application. Prerequisites: NANO 120A.

    NANO 134. Polymeric Materials (4)

    Foundations of polymeric materials. Topics: structure of polymers; mechanisms of polymer synthesis; characterization methods using calorimetric, mechanical, rheological, and X-ray-based techniques; and electronic, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties. Special classes of polymers: engineering plastics, semiconducting polymers,photoresists, and polymers for medicine. Cross-listed with CENG 134.Students may not receive credit for bothCENG134 andNANO134. Prerequisites:Chem 6Cand Phys2C.

    NANO 141A. Engineering Mechanics I: Analysis of Equilibrium (4)

    Newtons laws. Concepts of force and moment vector. Free body diagrams. Internal and external forces. Equilibrium of concurrent, coplanar, and three-dimensional system of forces. Equilibrium analysis of structural systems, including beams, trusses, and frames. Equilibrium problems with friction. Prerequisites:Math 20C and Phys 2A.

    NANO 141B.Engineering Mechanics II: Analysis of Motion (4)

    Newtons laws of motion. Kinematic and kinetic description of particle motion. Angular momentum. Energy and work principles. Motion of the system of interconnected particles.Mass center. Degrees of freedom. Equations of planar motion of rigid bodies. Energy methods. Lagranges equations of motion. Introduction to vibration. Free and forced vibrations of a single degree of freedom system. Undamped and damped vibrations. Application to NanoEngineering problems.Prerequisites:Math 20D and NANO 141A.

    NANO 146. Nanoscale Optical Microscopy and Spectroscopy (4)

    Fundamentals in optical imaging and spectroscopy at the nanometer scale. Diffraction-limited techniques, near-field methods, multi-photon imaging and spectroscopy, Raman techniques, Plasmon-enhanced methods, scan-probe techniques, novel sub-diffraction-limit imaging techniques, and energy transfer methods. Prerequisites: NANO 103 and 104.

    NANO 148. Thermodynamics of Materials (4)

    Fundamental laws of thermodynamics for simple substances; application to flow processes and to non-reacting mixtures; statistical thermodynamics of ideal gases and crystalline solids; chemical and materials thermodynamics; multiphase and multicomponent equilibria in reacting systems; electrochemistry. Prerequisites: upper-division standing.

    NANO 150. Mechanics of Nanomaterials (4)

    Introduction to mechanics of rigid and deformable bodies. Continuum and atomistic models, interatomic forces and intermolecular interactions. Nanomechanics, material defects, elasticity, plasticity, creep, and fracture. Composite materials, nanomaterials, biological materials. Prerequisites: NANO 108.

    NANO 156. Nanomaterials (4)

    Basic principles of synthesis techniques, processing, microstructural control, and unique physical properties of materials in nanodimensions. Nanowires, quantum dots, thin films, electrical transport, optical behavior, mechanical behavior, and technical applications of nanomaterials. Cross-listed with MAE 166. Prerequisites: upper-division standing.

    NANO 158. Phase Transformations and Kinetics (4)

    Materials and microstructures changes. Understanding of diffusion to enable changes in the chemical distribution and microstructure of materials, rates of diffusion. Phase transformations, effects of temperature and driving force on transformations and microstructure. Prerequisites: NANO 108 and NANO 148.

    NANO 158L.Materials Processing Laboratory(4)

    Metal casting processes, solidification, deformation processing, thermal processing: solutionizing, aging, and tempering, joining processes such as welding and brazing. The effect of processing route on microstructure and its effect on mechanical and physical properties will be explored.NanoEngineering majors have priority enrollment. Prerequisites:NANO 158.

    NANO 161. Material Selection in Engineering (4)

    Selection of materials for engineering systems, based on constitutive analyses of functional requirements and material properties. The role and implications of processing on material selection. Optimizing material selection in a quantitative methodology. NanoEngineering majors receive priority enrollment. Prerequisites: NANO 108. Department approval required. Restricted to major code NA25.

    NANO 164. Advanced Micro- and Nano-materials for Energy Storage and Conversion (4)

    Materials for energy storage and conversion in existing and future power systems, including fuel cells and batteries, photovoltaic cells, thermoelectric cells, and hybrids. Prerequisites: NANO 101, NANO 102, NANO 148.

    NANO 168. Electrical, Dielectric, and Magnetic Properties of Engineering Materials (4)

    Introduction to physical principles of electrical, dielectric, and magnetic properties. Semiconductors, control of defects, thin film, and nanocrystal growth, electronic and optoelectronic devices. Processing-microstructure-property relations of dielectric materials, including piezoelectric, pyroelectric and ferroelectric, and magnetic materials. Prerequisites: NANO 102 and NANO 104.

    NANO 174. Mechanical Behavior of Materials (4)

    Microscopic and macroscopic aspects of the mechanical behavior of engineering materials, with emphasis on recent development in materials characterization by mechanical methods. The fundamental aspects of plasticity in engineering materials, strengthening mechanisms, and mechanical failure modes of materials systems. Prerequisites: NANO 108.

    NANO 174L. Mechanical Behavior Laboratory (4)

    Experimental investigation of mechanical behavior of engineering materials. Laboratory exercises emphasize the fundamental relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties, and the evolution of the microstructure as a consequence of rate process. Prerequisites: NANO 174.

    NANO 199. Independent Study for Undergraduates (4)

    Independent reading or research on a problem by special arrangement with a faculty member. P/NP grades only. Prerequisites: upper division and department stamp.

    NANO 200. Graduate Seminar in Chemical Engineering (1)

    Each graduate student in NANO is expected to attend three seminars per quarter, of his or her choice, dealing with current topics in chemical engineering. Topics will vary. Cross-listed with CENG 205. S/U grades only. May be taken for credit four times. Prerequisites: graduate standing.

    NANO 201. Introduction to NanoEngineering (4)

    Understanding nanotechnology, broad implications, miniaturization: scaling laws; nanoscale physics; types and properties of nanomaterials; nanomechanical oscillators, nano(bio)electronics, nanoscale heat transfer; fluids at the nanoscale; machinery cell; applications of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 201 and CENG 211. Prerequisites: graduate standing.

    NANO 202. Intermolecular and Surface Forces (4)

    Development of quantitative understanding of the different intermolecular forces between atoms and molecules and how these forces give rise to interesting phenomena at the nanoscale, such as flocculation, wetting, self-assembly in biological (natural) and synthetic systems. Cross-listed with CENG 212. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 202 and CENG 212. Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 203. Nanoscale Synthesis and Characterization (4)

    Nanoscale synthesistop-down and bottom-up; chemical vapor deposition; plasma processes; soft-lithography; self-assembly; layer-by-layer. Characterization; microscopy; scanning probe microscopes; profilometry; reflectometry and ellipsometry; X-ray diffraction; spectroscopies (EDX, SIMS, Mass spec, Raman, XPS); particle size analysis; electrical, optical. Cross-listed with CENG 213. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 203 and CENG 213. Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 204. Nanoscale Physics and Modeling (4)

    This course will introduce students to analytical and numerical methods such as statistical mechanisms, molecular simulations, and finite differences and finite element modeling through their application to NanoEngineering problems involving polymer and colloiod self-assembly, absorption, phase separation, and diffusion. Cross-listed with CENG 214. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 204 and CENG 214. Prerequisites: NANO 202 or consent ofinstructor.

    NANO 205. Nanosystems Integration (4)

    Scaling issues and hierarchical assembly of nanoscale components into higher order structures which retain desired properties at microscale and macroscale levels. Novel ways to combine top-down and bottom-up processes for integration of heterogeneous components into higher order structures. Cross-listed with CENG 215. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 205 and CENG 215. Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 208. Nanofabrication (4)

    Basic engineering principles of nanofabrication. Topics include: photo-electronbeam and nanoimprint lithography, block copolymers and self-assembled monolayers, colloidal assembly, biological nanofabrication. Cross-listed with CENG 208. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 208 and CENG 208. Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 210. Molecular Modeling and Simulations of Nanoscale Systems (4)

    Molecular and modeling and simulation techniques like molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo, and Brownian dynamics to model nanoscale systems and phenomena like molecular motors, self-assembly, protein-ligand binding, RNA, folding. Valuable hands-on experience with different simulators.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 212. Computational Modeling of Nanosystems (4)

    Various modeling techniques like finite elements, finite differences, and simulation techniques like molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo to model fluid flow, mechanical properties, self-assembly at the nanoscale, and protein, RNA and DNA folding.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 227. Structure and Analysis of Solids (4)

    Key concepts in the atomic structure and bonding of solids such as metals, ceramics, and semiconductors. Symmetry operations, point groups, lattice types, space groups, simple and complex inorganic compounds, structure/property comparisons, structure determination with X-ray diffraction. Ionic, covalent, metallic bonding compared with physical properties. Atomic and molecular orbitals, bands verses bonds, free electron theory. Cross-listed with MATS 227, MAE 251 and Chem 222.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 230. Synchrotron Characterization of Nanomaterials (4)

    Advanced topics in characterizing nanomaterials using synchrotron X-ray sources. Introduction to synchrotron sources, X-ray interaction with matter, spectroscopic determination of electronic properties of nanomagnetic, structural determination using scattering techniques and X-ray imaging techniques. Cross-listed with CENG 230. Students may not receive credit for both NANO 230 and CENG 230. Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 234. Advanced Nanoscale Fabrication (4)

    Engineering principles of nanofabrication. Topics include: photo-, electron beam, and nanoimprint lithography, block copolymers and self-assembled monolayers, colloidal assembly, biological nanofabrication. Relevance to applications in energy, electronics, and medicine will be discussed.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 238. Scanning Probe Microscopy (4)

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) detectors, imaging, image interpretation, and artifacts, introduction to lenses, electron beam-specimen interactions. Operating principles and capabilities for atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy, scanning optical microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 239. Nanomanufacturing (4)

    Fundamental nanomanufacturing science and engineering, top-down nanomanufacturing processes, bottom-up nanomanufacturing processes, integrated top-down and bottom-up nanofabrication processes, three-dimensional nanomanufacturing, nanomanufacturing systems, nanometrology, nanomanufactured devices for medicine, life sciences, energy, and defense applications.Prerequisites: department approval required.

    NANO 241. Organic Nanomaterials (4)

    This course will provide an introduction to the physics and chemistry of soft matter, followed by a literature-based critical examination of several ubiquitous classes of organic nano materials and their technological applications. Topics include self-assembled monolayers, block copolymers, liquid crystals, photoresists, organic electronic materials, micelles and vesicles, soft lithography, organic colloids, organic nano composites, and applications in biomedicine and food science. Cross-listed with Chem 241.Prerequisites: consent of instructor.

    NANO 242. Biochemisty and Molecular Biology (4)

    Excerpt from:

    NanoEngineering (NANO) Courses

    The New Fight | John McAfee

    I have retained Telsforo Guerra, former Attorney General for the country of Guatemala, to assist in my fight against the Government of Belize. Mr. Guerra is one of most prominent attorneys in Guatemala and, as a shared border neighbor, is well versed in the intricate system of corruption with the Belizean Government. Mr. Guerra is Samanthas uncle.

    I have, in the past three weeks, had no contact with the American Embassy in Belize. Since many employees of the Embassy are Belizean nationals, I did not feel safe in communicating with them. Now that I am in Guatemala, and in a safe harbor, I will reach out to the Embassy here.

    To the Prime Minister of Belize I make the following offer: I will agree to meet you in a neutral country to discuss our mutual issues. It is entirely possible that you have little or no knowledge of the level of corruption being propagated throughout every branch of your government. I will turn over to you thousands of hours of video and audio as proof, providing that we meet as gentlemen and are mutually convinced of our honesty.

    To the family of Gregory Faul: I had nothing to do with his death. I have lost five close family members in my 67 years and I know your suffering.

    To the Belizean Police: I will answer any questions that you may have over the phone. If I am indeed merely wanted for questioning, this should suffice.

    To my supporters: I have posted many short posts over the past three days during the setup and execution of my exit from Belize. The information was intended for my pursuers. I regret that it may have confused or alarmed many of you. I hope you will consider the circumstances and forgive me.

    To my freinds: I will be in touch soon. I have not slept for 24 hours. I am in non-stop meetings and strategizing our next steps. I will call and email you soon. I love you all.

    __________________________________________________

    Two of my friends are still being held in prison on trumped up charges. They are:

    Eddie Ancona:

    Cassian Chavarria:

    They were charged and have been imprisoned because three legally licensed firearms were found in the incorrect rooms on my property (stretching the law to the extreme). I would ask you to please email the following and demand their release:

    Link:

    The New Fight | John McAfee