Someone Just Used a Drone to Try to Assassinate a World Leader

A SCARY SITUATION. On Saturday, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was giving a speech when he allegedly became the victim of an assassination attempt. In this case, Maduro wasn’t targeted by a lone gunman or any person at all — his “attacker” was a pair of explosive-carrying drones.

Both drones did explode, and while Maduro escaped unscathed, the attack injured seven soldiers, according to Venezuelan authorities.

This is the first known drone assassination attempt on a president.

WHODUNNIT? Maduro later alleged during a national address that Colombia and the U.S. were responsible for the attack. According to The South China Morning Post, a senior Colombian official called the accusation “baseless,” while the U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton denied the nation’s involvement. Venezuela’s government also accused members of the opposition party of playing a role in the attack.

On Sunday, Venezuelan officials arrested six people for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt, and other than Interior Minister Reverol’s assertion that those arrested are “terrorists and hired killers,” we know little else about them.

DEMOCRATIZED DESTRUCTION. The nature of the attack means there’s really not a lot of identifying information for who the assassins might be. The type of drone used for the attacks was a DJI M600. Its $5,000 price tag isn’t too cheap, but it’s not too expensive, either, and anyone can order one online. Each drone carried 1 kilogram of C-4, a plastic explosive that anyone with internet access can figure out how to make at home.

This isn’t the first armed drone attack, either. In July, rebels in Yemen reportedly attacked Abu Dhabi’s international airport with an armed drone. No one died during that attempt, either, but that’s unlikely to discourage future attackers.

While armed drones were once solely accessible to powerful militaries, they’re on track to be available to pretty much everyone. If we don’t want the next attempted drone assassination to be successful, we’ve gotta invest in countermeasures sooner rather than later.

READ MORE: Venezuela President Maduro Survives “Drone Assassination Attempt” [BBC]

More on drone warfare: As Drones Become Tools of War, Companies Turn to Hacking Them

The post Someone Just Used a Drone to Try to Assassinate a World Leader appeared first on Futurism.

Link:
Someone Just Used a Drone to Try to Assassinate a World Leader

Some Americans Will Get to Vote via Blockchain This November

VOTING GOES MOBILE. The 2016 U.S. election was not exactly the most secure affair. Even though tech companies and lawmakers are still sorting out what happened, that’s not stopping West Virginia from thinking big and bold in 2018.

According to a CNN report published Monday, the state plans to let soldiers who are permanent residents of the state but are serving overseas vote via their smartphones using a blockchain voting app called Voatz. It will mark the first time U.S. citizens can vote via mobile app.

ROCK THE VOATZ. To use Voatz, soldiers will first need to prove they are who they claim to be. The registration process involves uploading a photo of their government-issued ID and a video of their face, taken like a selfie. The app’s facial recognition software will look at both the photo and video to ensure they depict the same person.

After this verification process, the soldiers will be all set to cast their vote. Once they do, the app anonymizes the ballots and records the votes on a blockchain, a secure digital ledger that’s nearly tamperproof.

“A HORRIFIC IDEA.” “Nearly” is the key word there — someone can change the data recorded on a blockchain. And given all the studies showing how easy it is to hack the U.S.’s electronic voting machines, many people think we should be transitioning back to using only paper ballots, not testing new ways to vote electronically.

“Mobile voting is a horrific idea,” Joseph Lorenzo Hall, the chief technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology, told CNN. “It’s internet voting on people’s horribly secured devices, over our horrible networks, to servers that are very difficult to secure without a physical paper record of the vote.”

MAKING THE LEAP. Still, West Virginia’s Secretary of State Mac Warner insists Voatz is secure. Historically, election security has been one of his top priorities — earlier this year, he secured $6.5 million in federal funding to spend on equipment, cybersecurity, and training to ensure the state’s elections are safe and secure.

West Virginia already tested Voatz in two counties during the primary elections, and several audits of the voting app revealed no issues. We’ll just have to wait to see if the same holds true in November. If it does, more governments could adopt blockchain-supported voting apps in the future.

READ MORE: West Virginia to Introduce Mobile Phone Voting for Midterm Elections [CNN]

More on blockchain voting: A New Blockchain App Is Poised to Radically Change How People Vote

The post Some Americans Will Get to Vote via Blockchain This November appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post here:
Some Americans Will Get to Vote via Blockchain This November

Researchers Inadvertently Discover Crypto Scam Involving 15,000 Twitter Bots

Researchers discover a network of Twitter bots designed to perpetuate a cryptocurrency scam while conducting a study on identifying online bots.

DON’T @ ME. It’s hard enough to figure out when humans are running a cryptocurrency scam. Now, it seems we have to worry about bots perpetuating them, too.

While conducting a study to figure out the best way to identify Twitter bots — accounts controlled by software, not humans — researchers from security software companyDuo Security came across a network of at least 15,000 bots working together to perpetuate a cryptocurrency scam.

The researchers plan to present their study on Wednesday at Black Hat, an information security conference in Las Vegas, NV.

BOT OR NOT. The researchers set out to figure out how to identify bots and networks of bots. They started by analyzing the activity of 88 million public Twitter accounts from May to July 2018. The researchers then used machine learning and other data science techniques to analyze more than 500 million tweets from those accounts.

This analysis led to the discovery of the crypto botnet scam. According to their study, more than 15,000 bots were working together to spread a fake crypto giveaway. The scheme requires users to pay some amount of an existing cryptocurrency and they’ll get a much greater amount in return (how this would make a viable business model is certainly questionable). But instead, the scam takes their crypto but gives them nothing in return.

The researchers say they reported the scam to Twitter, but the platform has yet to shut down the thousands of accounts. A Twitter spokesperson told TechCrunch the company is currently investigating the issue.

RISE OF THE TWITTER BOTS. If you spend much time at all on Twitter, you’ve likely encountered at least one bot. These bots can wield a tremendous amount of power, spreading fake news and even influencing elections.

Not only is it hard to detect bots online, we’re now reaching the point where detecting them over the phone is no easy task. Studies like the one the Duo Security team did can help address the issue by leading to better detection methods. But more stringent regulations, such as rules that require companies to identify online bots as bots the same way some propose forcing audio bots to identify themselves, could accomplish the same thing.

READ MORE: Duo Security Researchers’ Twitter ‘Bot or Not’ Study Unearths Crypto Botnet [TechCrunch]

More on Twitter bots: We’ve Seen What Bots Do to Democracy. Are We Adapting Fast Enough?

The post Researchers Inadvertently Discover Crypto Scam Involving 15,000 Twitter Bots appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original:
Researchers Inadvertently Discover Crypto Scam Involving 15,000 Twitter Bots

Figuring out How Fast the Universe Is Expanding Might Require a New Type of Physics

A number of scientifically sound studies all reached different conclusions when trying to figure out the universe's expansion rate.

WE CAN’T ALL BE RIGHT. For something identified as a “constant,” the universe’s rate of expansion sure seems awfully inconsistent.

Back in February, a team of researchers working with NASA revealed that Hubble’s Constant — the rate of the universe’s expansion accepted by most physicists for the majority of the past century — could be wrong.

That wasn’t the only study to make the claim. Now, two new studies back it up.

TWO STUDIES. ONE UNIVERSE. One of the new studies relies on measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), radiation caused by the Big Bang that still remains throughout the universe. Using data from the Planck mission, one team of researchers concluded that the rate is 67.4 km/s/Mpc (kilometers per second per Mega Parsec). That’s slower than the currently accepted Hubble’s Constant of 70 km/s/Mpc.

The other study looks at pulsating stars in nearby galaxies to determine the universe’s expansion rate. These stars have regular cycles of brightness, which makes it (relatively) easy to measure  their distance from Earth. According to that analysis, the expansion rate is 73.4 km/s/Mpc — that’s faster than the currently accept Hubble’s Constant.

TENSIONS RISE. The problem is that both of these studies appear scientifically sound. Using our current cosmological model of the universe, that should be impossible. Either there’s something wrong with one or both of these studies — maybe there’s some flaw we aren’t seeing, or perhaps the researchers are basing their conclusions on some statistical fluke.

Or maybe there’s something wrong with our physics.

If this last situation is the case, we’ll need to figure out a new physics that makes sense of all these studies. If we can do that, we could find ourselves looking at the universe through an entirely new lens.

READ MORE: The Universe’s Rate of Expansion Is in Dispute – and We May Need New Physics to Solve It [Phys.org]

More on the universe’s expansion: To Measure the Universe’s Expansion, We Might Need New Physics

The post Figuring out How Fast the Universe Is Expanding Might Require a New Type of Physics appeared first on Futurism.

Read more:
Figuring out How Fast the Universe Is Expanding Might Require a New Type of Physics

SpaceX Just Launched A Rocket With A Critical Reused Part

BLAST OFF. At 1:18 AM E.T., SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket took off from Cape Canaveral in Florida. Its primary purpose is to launch a 5.8-ton satellite called Merah Putih intended to improve telecommunications in Indonesia, India, and much of Southeast Asia.

But for SpaceX aficionados, the most exciting part of this launch is that we’ve seen part of it before. Yes, the first stage was just used in a launch back in May that sent Bangladeshi communications satellite Bangabandhu into orbit.

Now, just a few months later, it’s back again. The dream of cost-effective reusable rockets might not be so far-fetched, after all.

The Falcon 9 rocket shortly before liftoff. Screenshot from SpaceX livestream by Alexandra Ossola

REUSE, REUSE, REUSE. This launch is the first to employ a reused Block 5 — the first stage of the rocket. The Block 5, unlike previous models, is designed to need little taking-apart and refurbishment in between launches. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has called Block 5 “the most reliable rocket ever built.”

But SpaceX engineers needed to actually make sure that was true, that after its first use Block 5 would be ready to get out there again. So after the May launch, Musk said, “Ironically, we need to take it apart to confirm it does not need to be taken apart,” as Ars Technica reports. Though SpaceX hasn’t released much about what they found when they did take the Block 5 apart, the quick turnaround between launches indicates that Block 5 seems to be living up to that promise.

STICK THE LANDING. If SpaceX has its way, this won’t be the last mission for this Block 5, either. The  first stage successfully landed on the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You, which was waiting in position in the Atlantic Ocean (a camera feed loss at the moment of landing created a bit of extra drama).

If it works, we may very well see the same Block 5 again, perhaps in just a few short months. If that happens, we’d see the same Block 5 launch a whopping three times in just one year.

Update 1:46 AM ET: We’ve just completed the second burn. The Merah Putih satellite is ready to be deployed.

Update 1:50 AM ET: Merah Putih is in position. The successful mission is complete. 

READ MORE: SpaceX set to re-fly a Block 5 rocket for the first time tonight [Ars Technica]

MORE ABOUT SPACEX: SpaceX Will Be Ready to Transport Humans in April 2019, NASA Estimates

The post SpaceX Just Launched A Rocket With A Critical Reused Part appeared first on Futurism.

More:
SpaceX Just Launched A Rocket With A Critical Reused Part

Waymo’s Phoenix Project Could Tell Us If Self-Driving Cars Can Improve Public Transportation

HITCHING A RIDE TO HITCH A RIDE. The self-driving revolution is making a pit stop at the bus station before it hits your garage.

Last week, autonomous car developer Waymo (a subsidiary of Google’s parent company, Alphabet) announced plans to conduct a two-stage experiment in Phoenix, AZ, by teaming up with Valley Metro, the region’s public transit system.

The goal: figure out if Waymo’s autonomous cars can increase access to public transportation. If people have a low-cost way to hail a ride to a bus/light rail station that is maybe a bit too far to walk to, they’ll be more inclined to use public transportation (rather than just making sure they have their own car to drive to work or wherever). Autonomous ride-hailing is expected to cost less than today’s ride hailing (since companies won’t have to pay a driver). This experiment could help us figure out if people might embrace the service.

A TWO-PART PLAN. Public transit in Phoenix isn’t awful, but it’s not great, either — it’s ranked 38th nationwide.

Both stages of Waymo’s public transportation experiment focus on first- and last-mile travel — the distance between a person’s home or work and the nearest public transportation option.

In the first stage of the experiment, which will begin in August, 30 to 50 Valley Metro workers will have the opportunity to make this journey in one of Waymo’s autonomous vehicles. All they have to do is simply hail a ride via the company’s app (whether or not riders will have to pay is not clear).

In the second stage of Waymo’s public transportation experiment, the company will open up this service to Valley Metro RideChoice travelers, typically seniors and people with disabilities for whom using the standard public transportation system might be too expensive or impractical.

ALLIES, NOT FOES. While some see the rise of autonomous vehicles as a threat to public transportation, Waymo and Valley Metro believe the two can be allies.

In a blog post, Waymo has four goals as a company. One of them: connecting people with public transportation (the other three are developing autonomous trucks, autonomous vehicles for personal use, and an autonomous ride-hail service).

Waymo views this partnership with Valley Metro as a step toward achieving that goal, and Valley Metro appears to be just as gung-ho about it.

“We’re not trying to disrupt each others’ industries, we’re trying to complement,” Valley Metro’s COO Rob Antoniak told Wired. “We’re trying to leverage each others’ investments in this space, to make the best use of public infrastructure.”

And how will the organization know if their experiment worked? Simply if people use Waymo’s service.

The first phase of the experiment will likely take several months, during which Waymo will collect data to inform the second phase. If all goes well, it might not be that long before people can hitch a ride to the bus stop aboard a driverless car.

READ MORE: Can Waymo Self-Driving Cars Help Fix Phoenix’s Public Transit? [Wired]

More on Waymo: Waymo Plans to Deploy the Largest Fleet of Autonomous Vehicles by 2020

The post Waymo’s Phoenix Project Could Tell Us If Self-Driving Cars Can Improve Public Transportation appeared first on Futurism.

Here is the original post:
Waymo’s Phoenix Project Could Tell Us If Self-Driving Cars Can Improve Public Transportation

Google Maps Now (Accurately) Shows that Earth is Round

A WHOLE NEW WORLD. Google Maps now offers a refreshing new angle of Earth. That is: a more accurate one.

Google recently announced that its map would now depict a round Earth, according to The Verge. Now, when you zoom all the way out, Earth appears to be round, not flat. So far the change is only for the program’s desktop version, it will still be flat on a mobile device.

That has a few different effects, but one result is that countries and continents actually look the size they are in real life, as Google Maps noted via Twitter.

With 3D Globe Mode on Google Maps desktop, Greenland's projection is no longer the size of Africa.

Just zoom all the way out at https://t.co/mIZTya01K3 ?? pic.twitter.com/CIkkS7It8d

— Google Maps (@googlemaps) August 2, 2018

SEE YOU LATER, NAVIGATOR. The change is part of several updates meant to make Google Maps easier to use. In the past, Google used what’s known as a Mercator map. It’s good for mapping roads (at least if you ask Google), but they’re also notorious for warping the dimensions of land masses.

This update probably won’t really affect the kind of navigation you need to just get around. But if you’re using Google Maps to reference the size of nations (or, you know, validate your belief in whether or not the Earth is round), the update is kind of a big deal.

A FLAT ARGUMENT. At a time when growing numbers of Americans believe the Earth is flat, the update could be interpreted as Google siding with science. Whether that will change any flat Earthers’ minds, though, is anyone’s guess.

READ MOREGoogle Maps now depicts the Earth as a globe [The Verge]

More about the round Earth: Here’s a Primer to Help You Educate Flat-Earthers

The post Google Maps Now (Accurately) Shows that Earth is Round appeared first on Futurism.

See original here:
Google Maps Now (Accurately) Shows that Earth is Round

The U.S. Has a New Plan to Deter Would-Be Hackers

THE BOILING POINT. Since 2016, Russian hackers have been targeting U.S. utility companies’ control rooms. At times they’ve had so much control that they could decide to cut the lights for huge swathes of Americans at any moment. Now, the U.S. government has decided it’s had enough. Government officials appear determined to ramp up deterrents and punishments for hackers that mess with the electrical grid.

THE PROPOSAL. According to a report published by The Wall Street Journal on Sunday, this is a multi-agency effort — the State, Treasury, and Defense departments are pushing the initiative forward. They haven’t settled on a specific plan or tactic just yet, but they appear to be considering a number of options, none of which would hurt civilians. In other words, the U.S. wouldn’t consider turning off the power in an attacking nation. No eye-for-an-eye justice here.

So here’s what the U.S. would consider: indicting more known hackers, seizing the assets of suspects before they’re convicted, and imposing sanctions on countries that harbor the suspects. It’s also considering asking Interpol to issue Red Notices (international arrest warrants) to help the U.S. apprehend the suspects and requesting that other nations help bring these hackers to justice by arresting any that set foot within their borders.

President Donald Trump has not yet expressed support for any of these proposed plans, though White House officials told The WSJ he is “taking the matter seriously.”

MORE OF THE SAME. The U.S.’s extradition treaties would likely cover at least part of what the agencies have proposed. According to these treaties, if the U.S. accuses someone of a crime and that person flees to a nation that has an extradition treaty with the U.S., that nation must arrest the suspect and transport them to the U.S. It also works in reverse — the U.S. has to arrest and transport suspects to other nations (as long as the suspect isn’t a U.S. citizen).

Russia has no such treaty with the U.S. So as long as the accused hackers stay within the nation’s borders, the U.S. can’t reach them. The most efficient way to ward off and penalize hackers, then, might just be the proposed sanctions, though President Trump has been reluctant to issue any sanctions against Russia.

There’s another tack the U.S. might consider: updating our electrical grid so that no one can hack it in the first place. Seems like securing the funding the federal government would need to allocate to do this is a bit harder to come by.

READ MORE: U.S. Officials Push New Penalties for Hackers of Electrical Grid [The Wall Street Journal]

More on utility hacking: Yes, Russians Hacked U.S. Electric Companies, Homeland Security Confirms

The post The U.S. Has a New Plan to Deter Would-Be Hackers appeared first on Futurism.

See the article here:
The U.S. Has a New Plan to Deter Would-Be Hackers

No Existing Policies Will Be Enough To Prevent A Future “Hothouse Earth”

Even if we meet the emissions limits set by the Paris Agreement, natural feedback processes could create

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE. Right now, the Paris Agreement is probably humanity’s best shot of reducing the catastrophic effects of climate change. One hundred seventy nine nations have committed to reducing carbon emissions to ensure global temperatures don’t reach 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

But according to a new study, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), it probably won’t be enough.

Even if all the Paris Agreement signatories meet the accord’s carbon emission goals, we could still find ourselves facing a “Hothouse Earth” climate within decades.

CLIMATE CHAOS. A Hothouse Earth would be about as pleasant as it sounds (not very). The global average temperature would be 4 to 5 degrees Celsius (7.2 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit) higher than pre-industrial levels, and the sea level would be 10 to 60 meters higher than it is today. This, the researchers determined, would cause global chaos.

“A Hothouse Earth trajectory would almost certainly flood deltaic environments, increase the risk of damage from coastal storms, and eliminate coral reefs (and all of the benefits that they provide for societies) by the end of this century or earlier,” they write in the paper.

A TIPPING POINT. The problem, according to the authors, is that even if humans stop emitting carbon into the atmosphere, temperatures could still soar to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. That could trigger natural feedback processes, such as permafrost thaw, Amazon rainforest dieback, and the loss of the Arctic’s summer sea ice. These would release currently stored carbon, increasing the planet’s temperature.

“These tipping elements can potentially act like a row of dominoes. Once one is pushed over, it pushes Earth towards another. It may be very difficult or impossible to stop the whole row of dominoes from tumbling over,” co-author Johan Rockström noted in a press release. “Places on Earth will become uninhabitable if ‘Hothouse Earth’ becomes the reality.”

MORE ACTION. According to the study’s authors, our best bet for avoiding this domino effect is creating or enhancing biological carbon stores. They suggest biodiversity conservation, improved forest management, and the development of carbon-capture systems that store carbon underground.

If we put in the effort, they assert, we might be able to keep temperatures steady at that 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) milestone. If not, we could find ourselves living (or, you know, not living) on a truly unsettling version of Earth.

READ MORE: Earth at Risk of Heading Towards ‘Hothouse Earth’ State [EurekAlert]

More on the Paris Agreement: Yes, We Might Still Meet the Paris Climate Agreement’s Goals

The post No Existing Policies Will Be Enough To Prevent A Future “Hothouse Earth” appeared first on Futurism.

Continued here:
No Existing Policies Will Be Enough To Prevent A Future “Hothouse Earth”

Exoskeletons are About to Walk Ford’s Factory Floors

Assembly lines are increasingly automated, but for manufacturing at the OG of assembly lines, humans (with exoskeletons) are still behind the wheel.

HALF MAN, HALF MACHINE. Full-blown automation may be the future of manufacturing, but we’re not there yet. While some machines have taken over the more painstaking tasks on the factory floor, humans still play a vital role in the production line. But often, it isn’t easy work. Tasks typically require being on one’s feet, and some even involve making repetitive arm motions up to 4,600 times a day or one million times a year. Ouch.

At Ford though, this might all be changing. Exoskeleton use on Ford’s factory floors could soon shift into overdrive, according to Engadget.

ENTER THE EXOSKELETONS. In November 2017, EksoVest Exoskeletons, built by Ekso Bionics, were given to workers in two Ford factories. Now ,up to 75 exoskeletons will be distributed to employees at 15 factories across the world. The exoskeletons don’t have motors, or even batteries, but provide “passive assistance” in the form of arm support from five to 15 pounds. By giving more arm support the higher a person reaches, the device takes strain off of the arm muscles. If you’re not convinced it would make a difference, hold your hand above your head for a few minutes.

WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY. This is only the beginning for exoskeletons at Ford. “Today, it’s only the passive upper-arm support skeleton that helps with overhead work,” Marty Smets, Ford’s technical expert of human systems and virtual manufacturing, told Engadget.

Taking one step at a time could lead Ford to other avenues of exoskeleton use within its factories. By establishing systems for the use now, Ford is well positioned to adapt new devices as they become available. “We wanted to focus on one exoskeleton initially, then expand from there as the space grows,” Smet said.

Time will tell, but perhaps man and machine can co-exist peacefully after all.

READ MORE: Ford thinks exoskeletons are ready for prime time in its factories [Engadget]

More about exoskeletons at Ford: Ford Pilots a New Exoskeleton to Lessen Worker Fatigue

The post Exoskeletons are About to Walk Ford’s Factory Floors appeared first on Futurism.

Originally posted here:
Exoskeletons are About to Walk Ford’s Factory Floors

Geoengineering Would Hurt Earth’s Crops More Than It Would Help Them, Says Study

GETTING HANDS-ON. Think geoengineering is a great way to reverse the effects of climate change? Well, we might want to push pause on those plans. According to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, geoengineering could actually leave us worse off than if we did nothing at all.

It’s no secret that human activity is wreaking havoc on our planet. The idea behind geoengineering is that humans also have the potential to undo all that damage by taking big, bold action to alter the atmosphere.

While the specific proposals vary, one idea that’s tossed around pretty often is solar radiation management (SRM). By its logic, if we inject aerosols into the stratosphere, we would decrease the amount of sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface, therefore cooling the planet. Volcanic eruptions inspired the idea — the gases they send into the atmosphere create a similar veil over the planet.

LOOKING TO THE PAST. A team of researchers at UC Berkeley wanted to figure out what impact this approach would have on the planet’s crop yields.

To do this, they analyzed the planet’s aerosol levels, solar irradiation data, and recorded crop yields following two volcanic eruptions: the eruption of Mexico’s El Chichón in 1982 and the explosion of the Philippines’s Mount Pinatubo in 1991. The researchers concluded that the eruptions actually had a negative effect on two different types of crops — C3 crops (such as rice, soy, and wheat) and C4 crops (a category that includes maize).

Next, they decided to model how a global injection of sulfates into the stratosphere might impact crop yields. To do this, they used several Earth system models from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology. From that analysis, they concluded that the decrease in sunlight from SRM would hurt the planet’s crops more than the cooler temperatures would help them.

A BIG, BOLD, BAD IDEA. This isn’t the first study to assert that geoengineering is not a good idea. Others assert that SRM would put species in biodiverse areas at risk, while some think we simple shouldn’t do it for fear of unintended consequences.

In the paper, the Berkeley team notes that other researchers could use a similar approach to determine the impact of SRM on different types of systems, such as human health or ecosystem function. If those researchers reach the same conclusion — that SRM is more trouble than it’s worth — we might want to officially take the idea off the table.

READ MORE: Geoengineering: Volcanoes Unveil Agricultural Drawback of Stratospheric Veils [Nature]

More on geoengineering: Reversing Climate Change With Geoengineering Could Leave the Planet Worse Off

The post Geoengineering Would Hurt Earth’s Crops More Than It Would Help Them, Says Study appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post here:
Geoengineering Would Hurt Earth’s Crops More Than It Would Help Them, Says Study

New York City Council Poised to Cap The Number Of Ubers Allowed On City Streets

UBER-CONGESTED. The New York City Council is expected to vote on setting a cap on all new Uber vehicles on Wednesday. The bill, if it passes, would halt the issue of any new licenses for any new ride-hailing service drivers for a 12 month period. Several outlets have reported that the City Council is likely to vote in favor of the bill. If the vote goes as predicted, the outcome could be a boon to drivers and, as the New York Times notes, “a major blow” to the ride sharing service.

This is the first of several bills on which the City Council will vote in rapid succession. Others will decide a similar fate for other ride-hail apps like Lyft and Juno; another would establish a minimum pay rate (effectively a minimum wage) that ride-hail companies must pay its drivers operating in NYC.

DECONGESTING NYC. These bills are a response to New York City’s increasingly congested streets, for a number of people, including leaders at the city’s public transportation authority, the MTA, have largely blamed Uber and its ilk. According to Bloomberg, the use of app-based ride services has skyrocketed in the last couple of years — its drivers now represent “more than half of all for-hire cars on the road” in New York. Meanwhile, the number of iconic yellow cabs is virtually unchanged in the same period of time, thanks to a strict (and costly) medallion system.

Predictably, Uber is not happy about New York City Council’s plans. “A 12-month pause on new for-hire vehicle licenses will leave New Yorkers stranded while doing nothing to prevent congestion, fix the subways and help struggling taxi medallion owners,” an Uber spokesperson told the New York Times.

UBER-WORKED. In bringing this series of bills to the City Council, council-members hope to create a more sustainable job market for ride-hail app drivers. As the number of ride-hail drivers on the roads has risen, many have started to buckle under the economic difficulties of the situation. Most lack benefits like a 401K or health insurance. Low wages are rampant —a new report found that Uber and Lyft drivers in the U.S. only make a median profit (factoring in insurance, maintenance, repairs, and gas) of $8.55 per hour — which is, in New York City, well below the minimum wage set by the state. The situation has become so grim for some that six taxi drivers have taken their own lives in New York City alone, according to the New York Times.

Despite the tough situation for drivers, Uber has continued to grow. The company had a very healthy first quarter of this year, raking in a $2.46 billion profit, according to the Wall Street Journal. There are rumors that Uber might go public some time next year. A driver cap in the biggest city in the U.S. could put that plan in jeopardy.

A 12-month ban on new licenses isn’t a death knell for the company, not by a long shot. But the cap might buy legislators some more time to study the effect the ride hailing industry has been having on the city, and make sure it’s working for everyone.

We will update this article with the results of the vote when it happens on Wednesday.

Read more: Why a Cap on Uber in New York Would be a Major Blow for the Ride-Hail Giant [NYT]

More on Uber: It’s Not Uber’s Fault That NYC’s Public Transportation Sucks

The post New York City Council Poised to Cap The Number Of Ubers Allowed On City Streets appeared first on Futurism.

See original here:
New York City Council Poised to Cap The Number Of Ubers Allowed On City Streets

The Pentagon Tells Soldiers To Stop Sharing Their Locations With Apps

Eight months after the fitness app Strava revealed the location of military bases in Syria, the Pentagon has banned GPS tracking on wearables.

FITNESS, NO TRACKING. The Pentagon recently issued an order to all personnel working at sensitive military bases: for the love of god, stop logging your runs. In a memo acquired by The Associated Press, the Pentagon laid out new rules for how soldiers can use fitness trackers while deployed in a war zone or other high-risk areas. Namely, they need to keep the GPS off.

“These geolocation capabilities can expose personal information, locations, routines, and numbers of DOD personnel, and potentially create unintended security consequences and increased risk to the joint force and mission,” the memo said.

NOT-SO-BLURRED LINES. Back in January, Nathan Ruser, who writes for The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, noticed that the global heatmap activity on the fitness app Strava revealed the location of American military bases in Syria, where soldiers used the app on a regular basis.

Because soldiers relied on the app to track their progress as they trained and jogged the perimeter, the heatmap essentially provided a blueprint for the bases. It also gave anyone with a vague interest an idea of soldiers’ daily routines. It’s not hard to imagine that hostile forces could use that kind of information to their advantage. Oops.

The heatmap also revealed the activity of soldiers in other sensitive locations like Area 51 and the British Air Force base in the Falkland Islands.

NOT A BAN. The Pentagon did not ban fitness apps or wearable fitness trackers outright — military personnel can still use them, as long as they stop the apps from collecting location data or otherwise compromising the military’s operations. Fitbit spokeswoman told the AP that the company’s devices couldn’t track anyone who turned off location services. So it seems like there’s no reason to prevent soldiers from using them altogether.

READ MORE: Pentagon tells troops: Turn off fitness tracker GPS when you head to warzones [Ars Technica]

More about location tracking: Google Just Admitted to Tracking Your Location Even When You Have the Settings Disabled

The post The Pentagon Tells Soldiers To Stop Sharing Their Locations With Apps appeared first on Futurism.

Read more from the original source:
The Pentagon Tells Soldiers To Stop Sharing Their Locations With Apps

Turns Out Musk Might Actually Be Serious About Taking Tesla Private

According to a recent public letter, Elon Musk might actually be serious about taking Tesla private. But will a buyout ever happen?

420 BLAZE IT. In a very characteristic move, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted that he was considering taking Tesla private at a value of $420 a share.

Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 7, 2018

Was it a real thing or simply a rather expensive weed joke? It was hard to tell at first.

Turns out it was real, and pretty darn serious. In a public letter posted to Tesla’s official website, Musk elaborated on his intentions to privatize Tesla — at least in the short-term. Because Tesla was “the most shorted stock in the history of the stock market,” and quarterly earnings putting “enormous pressure” on the exponentially growing company, Musk suggests it might make more sense to trade stock privately for the time being.

BUYING TIME. Elon Musk has had a bumpy relationship with investors as of late, and has taken Twitter to lash out at short sellers repeatedly. It also closely follows an announcement that Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund has taken a 3 to 5 percent stake worth $2 billion in the company.

“In the future, once Tesla enters a phase of slower, more predictable growth, it will likely make sense to return to the public markets,” writes Musk.

As a direct result of Musk’s $420 tweet, share values started fluctuating. Trading was halted for an hour and a half Tuesday afternoon, as The New York Times reports, but when it resumed shares jumped to $367 — an increase of 16 percent since the Q2 earnings call on August 1.

BALLSY BUYOUT. But a buyout (acquiring a controlling interest in Tesla) would cost a spectacular $72 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal. And the fact that the company has been burning through cash, and even asking suppliers to refund payments might make such a buyout fairly unlikely.

Musk is leaving it to shareholders to decide if they want Tesla to privatize. So far, no actions have been taken to make this happen; a shareholder vote has not been scheduled.

Musk’s tweets, though, might present a bigger problem. Harvey Pitt, the former chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission told CNBC that discussing the exact price on Twitter was “highly unprecedented… and raises significant questions about what his intent was.”

Despite the unfolding media “shitshow,” Musk still seems to view privatization as an “enormous opportunity for us all.” We’ll find out whether or not investors agree.

Read more: Elon Musk Says in Tweet He Is Considering Taking Tesla Private [WSJ]

More on Tesla: Rising Stocks Show Tesla Investors Are Warming up to Musk’s Cool Attitude

The post Turns Out Musk Might Actually Be Serious About Taking Tesla Private appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original:
Turns Out Musk Might Actually Be Serious About Taking Tesla Private

AtheismUK.com – Challenging Religious Faith

The 2018 Atheism UK AGM will be on Saturday 4th August in London.

Continue reading Atheism UK 2018 AGM

The Danger of Religion: Faith-based thinking is inherently dangerous, such as in thinking everything happens for a reason, says Alcuin(Rad Doherty) in our forum. Rad is an Atheism UK fully paid up member and forum moderator. He is also our most prolific forum contributor (with over 800 posts). Radsaim is to undermine superstition in the UK and he is a:

Non-believer in favour of an inclusive, humanist (small h) society. One which values critical thinking and is based on secular principles such as one law for all, democracy and freedom of speech and expression.

Alcuin concludes his July 22nd 2018forum postall superstitions are inherently harmful:

Continue reading The Danger of Religion: faith-based thinking is inherently dangerous says Atheism UK member

Young seekers of truth go through a phase of wondering whether life has any discernible meaning. Why are we here? Why does the universe exist? Is there a purpose to it all? This is the ultimate question, overarching all others.

Continue reading The Search for Meaning

By James A. Haught

Im quite aware that my turn is approaching. The realization hovers in my mind like a frequent companion.

My first wife died ten years ago. Dozens, hundreds, of my longtime friends and colleagues likewise came to the end of their journeys. They number so many that I keep a Gone list in my computer to help me remember them all. Before long, it will be my turn to join the list.

Continue reading No Qualms

INFORM is based at the London School of Economics. They meeton Monday 12 February 2018 from6:30pm to 8:00pm.

Thirty years after founding INFORM, the information network on religious movements, Eileen Barker argues that the sociology of religion still has an important role.This event will celebrate Eileens work over the past 30 years.

h/t Ferran.

The Covering your Internet tracks post waswrittenby the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB) (updated December 2017) and is aimed at people that find themselves in need of greater security, privacy and anonymity (SPA) for their electronic communications.

Continue reading Covering your Internet tracks

Atheism UKwould like to raise awareness of the Secular Therapy Project, which was created, to connect non-believers who need mental health care with professionals who are either non-believers themselves or are committed to providing secular, evidence-based care. It was created to do it as confidentially as possible. Continue reading Secular Therapy Project

The September 2017 Church of England survey revealsthe extent of childhood indoctrination in Britain. So Atheism UK has compiled this post about child indoctrination help by Dr. Darrel Ray of Kids Without Gods and Dr. Marlene Winell of Journey Free: Recovery from Harmful Religion.

Continue reading Child indoctrination help for ex-Christians by Drs. Darrel Ray & Marlene Winell

A Church of England survey this week reveals the staggering extent of childhood indoctrination/ socialisation* in Britain. The survey shows that nearly two-thirds of all British Christians become Christian when they were still toddlers at 0-4 years old. (1,2)Seventeen out of twenty Christians become Christian whenchildren or teenagers, only one in twenty when adults.

* h/t Matt Sheard comment about socialisation 19/9/17.

Whilst half of Brits are Christian, four in ten dont belong to any religious group. Almost six in ten of 19-24 year olds are non-religious.

Continue reading Childhood indoctrination / socialisation of pre-school toddlers creates up to two-thirds of British Christians says survey

See the original post:

AtheismUK.com - Challenging Religious Faith

Cryptocurrency News: New Exchanges Could Boost Crypto Liquidity

Cryptocurrency News
Even though the cryptocurrency news was upbeat in recent days, the market tumbled after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rejected calls for a Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF).

That news came as a blow to investors, many of whom believe the ETF would open the cryptocurrency industry up to pension funds and other institutional investors. This would create a massive tailwind for cryptos, they say.

So it only follows that a rejection of the Bitcoin ETF should send cryptos tumbling, correct? Well, maybe you can follow that logic. To me, it seems like a dramatic overreaction.

I understand that legitimizing cryptos is important. But.

The post Cryptocurrency News: New Exchanges Could Boost Crypto Liquidity appeared first on Profit Confidential.

See the original post here:
Cryptocurrency News: New Exchanges Could Boost Crypto Liquidity

Metro Denver Aerospace Industry | Metro Denver

With the nations second-largest aerospace economy, Colorado is an aerospace leader and a premier location for companies conducting aerospace-related activities.

It is this business-friendly atmosphere that has attracted the nation's top aerospace contractors to Metro Denver, including:

The Metro Denver and Northern Colorado region also has a strong cluster of companies involved in geospatial technologies, remote sensing, imaging, and related industries. Additionally, with major DoD, NASA, and commercial activities, Colorado is the U.S. center for military space. The state's four military commandsthe primary customers for space-based research, development, acquisition, and operationsensure industry growth.

In 2017, Front Range Airport continued the application process for certification from the FAA to operate as a horizontal-launch spaceport facility. The subsequent designation for Spaceport Colorado, which may be granted in 2018, fulfills a 2011 declaration by Gov. John Hickenlooper of Colorados intent to become a spaceport state. The effort will increase Colorados competitiveness in the aerospace industry and support new opportunities in the future growth of commercial space research and transportation.

Aerospace Day at the Colorado Capitol occurs annually to recognize the industrys importance to the states economic growth. In 2015, the Colorado Legislature formed a bipartisan Aerospace and Defense Caucus to further support the continued expansion of aerospace and defense within the state.

See the original post here:

Metro Denver Aerospace Industry | Metro Denver

Best Search Engines To Use | MeMetics

Search engines are ubiquitous in our use of the internet, with most of us turning to them on multiple occasions each day. Whilst many people use browsers which are connected with one search engine or another, this wasnt always the case, although there are still people who remain staunch advocates of a certain brand, despite there being plenty of competition.

It is easy to take the technology behind a search engine for granted as we use them to find out whatever information we require. Basically speaking, a search engine crawls through an index of websites based on key terms and phrases supplied by site owners and webmasters. This all happens in a fraction of a second, with often hundreds of millions of responses ranked and returned to your screen.

It is impossible to talk about search engines without mentioning the industry leader. Google was founded after most of its competitors, but dominates the market, with an astonishing 69% of web searches taking place on its pages, knocking Bing into second place with 25%. On mobiles and tablets, Googles penetration goes further, with almost 90% of searches being carried out there.

When looking at ways in which to ensure that your business appears in the results returned by search engines, it is important to make certain that your web pages are optimised to work with the algorithms in place to rank results. This practice is called search engine optimisation (or SEO for short), and has come a long way since the days where sites just needed to include a page of key words and back links to satisfy the search engine site crawlers. In each sector there are experts out there who can help your site work within the laws of each search engines algorithm, so for example for healthcare seo, a site like bhm experts in healtcare seo would be a great first port of call.

With 25% of the market share, Microsofts entry into the search engine market, Bing is firmly established as the second choice search engine. Much of this traffic probably stems from the fact that Bing is the default option for searches carried out on Internet Explorer, helping it to claw back some ground on Google.

One of the biggest names in the internet in the 1990s, Yahoos results are now provided by Bing. This search engine remains popular thanks to the fact that many people have stuck to Yahoos e-mail service, which is actually the most popular e-mail provider, putting it firmly into third place when people are conducting a web search.

Formerly known as Ask Jeeves, the search engine dropped the butlers presence which formed the bulk of its widespread advertising campaigns in order to appeal to a more modern and savvy audience. The big selling point of this search engine is the community feel, but its results lack the depth of quality found on Google or Bing.

Read the rest here:

Best Search Engines To Use | MeMetics

Drew Peterson – Murderer – Biography

Former police sergeant Drew Peterson was convicted in the 2004 murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio. He was also named a suspect in 2007 in the disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson.

Convicted killer Drew Peterson was born on January 5, 1954. After high school, he married and went into the U.S. Army. Peterson went through several more marriages after joining the Bolingbrook Police Department in Illinois in 1977. He became a suspect in the 2007 disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, and was later convicted in the murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

Convicted murderer Drew Peterson's romantic life seemed to have a happy start. He attended Willowbrook High School in Villa Park, Illinois. A cross-country team member, Peterson dated Carol Hamilton (later Carol Brown), and took her to his senior prom. He graduated in 1972, and joined the military soon after.

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

Peterson served in the U.S. Army from 1972 to 1976, spending most of his time as a military police officer. While in the army, Peterson married his high school sweetheart Carol. The couple had two sons together. He joined the Bolingbrook Police Department in 1977. Three years later, Carol and Drew divorced, amicably by all accounts.

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

Thanks for watching!Visit Website

After his marriage to Carol ended, Peterson dated Kyle Piry. After four months, though, Piry broke it off. She later claimed that he abused his position as a police officer to harass her.

In 1982, Peterson married Vicki Connolly. The couple seemed content at first. They helped each other raise their children from previous relationships and ran a bar together for a time. "When it was good, it was wonderful, it was great. But when it was bad, it was really bad," Connolly later told the Chicago Tribune.

Connolly said that Peterson became unfaithful and controlling. She even claimed that he bugged their home so that he could keep track of her. Peterson also ran into trouble at work. He had been an undercover narcotics officer for several years when he investigated for misconduct in 1985. The Bolingbrook Fire and Police Commission decided that Peterson was guilty of disobedience and failing to report a bribe, among other infractions. He was fired, but he was reinstated the following year after appealing his case.

Peterson's marriage to Connolly fell apart in 1992 over his infidelities. He was having an affair with Kathleen Savio, and he and Connolly divorced that year. Not long after the divorce, Savio and Peterson married and eventually had two sons together, Thomas and Kristopher.

The union did not remain happy for long, however. Savio got an order of protection from Peterson in 2002, claiming that he had physically abused her. The couple divorced in 2003, without finalizing their financial arrangements. That October, Peterson married for the fourth time. He wed Stacy Cales, who was 30 years younger than him. Peterson and Cales had been having an affair during his marriage to Savio.

Peterson and Savio were set to resolve their outstanding issues regarding their divorce in April 2004. But Savio never made it to the hearing. She was found dead in her bathtub on March 1, 2004. Her hair was damp, but the bathtub was dry. At the time, Savio's death was ruled an accidental drowning. Many of her family members, however, believed that Savio had been murdered.

On October 28, 2007, Drew Peterson's fourth wife, 23-year-old Stacy Peterson, disappeared. She was supposed to go to her sister's place to help do some painting that day, but she never showed up. Drew Peterson said that he received a phone call from his wife that night, claiming that she had left him for another man. Her family reported her missing, insisting that Stacy would never have abandoned her two children. Friends also said that Stacy had been preparing to leave her husband.

Authorities and volunteers conducted an extensive search, but they found no trace of Stacy Peterson. Meanwhile, Drew Peterson quickly became a suspect in the case. He seemed unconcerned about his wife's disappearance, joking around with the media and making flippant remarks about Stacy. On the Today show, he brushed off any talk of Stacy wanting to leave him. "I'm not trying to be funny here, but Stacy Peterson would ask me for a divorce ... on a regular basis, and it was based on her menstrual cycle."

Stacy's disappearance led investigators to revisit the death of Peterson's third wife, Kathleen Savio. In November 2007, her body was exhumed and re-examined. The second report on her death, released in February 2008, declared it a homicide.

In 2009, Drew Peterson was indicted on two counts of first-degree murder in the death of Kathleen Savio. He was taken into custody that May and remained behind bars before his trial. Much of the case against Peterson relied on information that Savio gave to other people. Usually such hearsay evidence isn't allowed in court cases, but the Illinois legislature passed a special law in 2008 to make exceptions in certain cases.

Even with this new law in place, a Illinois court prohibited the use of eight of the 14 second-hand statements by prosecutors. Prosecutors appealed that decision in 2011, but an appellate court upheld the ruling.

In January 2012, a movie based on Peterson's story aired on Lifetime. The film, Untouchable, starred Rob Lowe as Drew Peterson.

On September 6, 2012, 58-year-old Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio. According to an article by The Associated Press, the 12 jurors assigned to the case came to a guilty verdict upon hearing incriminating testimony against Peterson by several witnesses. The guilty verdict was announced after two days and more than 13 hours of deliberation by jury members.Peterson had faced a maximum 60-year prison term (the state of Illinois does not have the death penalty), but in February 2013, he was sentenced to 38 years. "I did not kill Kathleen!" Peterson shouted upon hearing the sentence in court.Family members of Stacy Peterson stated that they hoped Peterson's murder conviction in Salvo's case would lead to new developments in Stacy's case, which is still under investigation. At the time of Peterson's conviction, Stacy Peterson's body had still not been found by detectives.

In February 2015, Peterson was charged with trying to arrange a hit on James Glasgow, Will County States Attorney. Stemming from activities occurring over a yearlong period from September 2013 and December 2014, Peterson was charged with one count of solicitation of murder for hire and one count of solicitation of murder. In March 2016, Illinois Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal by Peterson to throw out his conviction. The case is scheduled for sometime in 2017.

See the rest here:

Drew Peterson - Murderer - Biography

Welcome to Congressman Collin Peterson | Congressman Collin …

Latest News Rep. Peterson's Newsletter 8/3/2018

Medicare Cost Plan Transition, Disaster Assessment Meetings, 60 Years of Agricultural Research, Minnesota Small Business Association, Congressional Roundtable Discussion, Lower Sioux Head Start, Farmers Union Meetings in the 7th, Forever GI Bill Expands VA Educational Benefits, Life Saving Skills Resources.

Meeting of House and Senate Agriculture Committee Leadership, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue, Agriculture Committee Hearing Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Minnesota FFA, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Meetings in the 7th, Clay County/Moorhead Joint Law Enforcement Center, Upper Minnesota Valley Regional Development Commission Annual Meeting.

Joint Press Conference on Protecting Medicare for Minnesota Seniors, Farmers from the 7th, Minnesota Biofuels Association, National Foundation for Ectodermal Dysplasia, Moorheads Railway Underpass Groundbreaking, Hot Dog Luncheon, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, Results: The Power to End Poverty, National Guard Tour Camp Ripley, Best Small Minnesota Hospital Workplace, Soil Day, Daycare Facility Opens in Buffalo Lake, Disaster Loan Deadline Clay, Norman, Traverse and Wilkin Counties, Lauren A. Peterson.

Medicare Cost Plans, Agriculture Industry Meetings, Rock nRoll Hall of Fame, Ben Anderson, Flood Loan Deadline Approaching, Northwest Regional Development Commission, Farmers Share Supper.

Storm Damage in the 7th, Melrose Princess Jennifer Munoz, Advocacy in Marshall, and A Capitol Fourth.

See the article here:

Welcome to Congressman Collin Peterson | Congressman Collin ...