Sargassum seaweed links Amazon rainforest fires and the Caribbean Islands – Inverse

Back on the British Virgin Islands, Horton says its been an educational journey since the rafts of Sargassum wafted in back in 2011.

The island natural resources officials have learned what to do, what not to do, when to leave it so it can be incorporated in the sand; when to actually step in, clean it, and move it along.

That journey has had its ups and downs. The downs were most obvious when, in 2011, Horton saw that an abundance of Sargassum can deplete oxygen in the water when it decays.

Because marine life needs oxygen, some were not able to survive, Horton explains. We had a lot of fish, sharks, and eels that ended up dying. Thats when we got a big understanding of the negative impacts of seaweed once its in a large quantity.

Right now shes thankful that the majority of the Islands sea turtle population is in the northern area of the islands, where theres less of Sargassum, which emits the strong, rotten-egg smell when it begins to decay. Thats because when the seaweed begins to decompose, a process that starts about 48 hours after it washes ashore, it releases hydrogen sulfide, a colorless, poisonous gas.

Because its in an outdoor environment, that gas hasnt caused major health issues after immediate exposure. But that doesnt mean its not causing any harm: Research recently conducted by the Tropical Disease Unit at Toronto General Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health determined that decomposing Sargassum releases ammonia alongside the hydrogen sulfide gas, which can cause respiratory, skin, and neurocognitive symptoms.

During an eight-month period of 2018, there were 11,000 cases of acute Sargassum toxicity reported on the neighboring islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique. The illness can cause heart palpitations, shortness of breath, dizziness, vertigo, headache, and skin rashes.

Continue reading here:

Sargassum seaweed links Amazon rainforest fires and the Caribbean Islands - Inverse

Thornton family rescues 2 dogs from Caribbean who then give birth to 17 puppies – FOX 31 Denver

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

THORNTON, Colo. -- A Thornton family adopted two dogs from the Caribbean island of Saint Martin. Shortly after they returned, one of the dogs gave birth to 10 puppies; the other gave birth to 7.

Jennifer and Kevin Boltz went to the island to celebrate Jennifer's 40th birthday.

They rescued two dogs named Coconut and Maisie.

We fell in love with them and just had to do anything to get them back here with us," Jennifer said.

It took about two weeks for the Boltz family to get the dogs to the Denver area. Shortly after the dogs arrived, the family noticed their bellies were quickly growing larger. However, they at first assumed it was simply because they were malnourished and were now being properly fed.

Then, the family realized Coconut was pregnant. Six days later, they realized Maisie was pregnant as well.

Between Jennifer, Kevin, their two children, two dogs they had before Maisie and Coconut, plus all the new dogs, the Boltz family now had 25 members.

Saving 19 dogs lives is teaching our kids love and kindness. Its pretty amazing," Jennifer said.

Now, the Boltz family is working to get the dogs adopted to good homes.

The ultimate goal -- weve built a substantial list -- is to find these dogs a good home," Kevin said.

A GoFundMe account has been established to help pay for the family's expenses related to the dogs.

There is also a Facebook group where people can follow the dogs' journey.

The rest is here:

Thornton family rescues 2 dogs from Caribbean who then give birth to 17 puppies - FOX 31 Denver

Caribbean community bands together at debut event to help Dorian victims – CBC.ca

Ottawa's Caribbean community joined forces Saturdayto showcase their cultures at a brand new event that also offered the chance to raisemoney for victims of Hurricane Dorian.

One of the strongest Atlantic storms ever recorded, Dorian bulldozed parts of the Bahamas earlier this month, with sustained winds of 295 km/h and flooding that reached about sevenmeters high in some areas.

The death toll currently stands at 56, with 600 people still missing, said Bahamian Prime Minister Hubert Minnis Friday at the U.N. General Assembly.

Homes, schools and hospitals were devastated by the storm. Some people clung to tree branches or perched atop furniture for days in the floodwaters.

Flo's Seniors, a health and care program network, and Rhythm Movements Community Association, which works with youth, collected donations Saturday at Ottawa's first-ever Caribbean Culture Days.

The free event at the Ottawa Masonic Centre encouragedCanadians to get engaged in the arts and cultural life of their communities.

"We want to make sure that everybody gets assistance. We here in Canada are very lucky and what we're trying to do is just share some of that resources with the people in Bahamas," said Flo's Seniors director Joanne Robinson.

"We have many friends from Bahamas, but when disaster strikes no matter where it is as a people you try to help each other."

Michael Brooks said his group, the Rhythm Movements Community Association, is fundraising at all the events it attends and organizes.

"The same way they hurtis the same way we hurt, right? So we makesure that we all come together and make things happen," he said.

While Culture Days havebeen around for about 10 years and have taken placein hundreds of cities and towns throughout the country, this was the first year for a Caribbean-inspired version in Ottawa.

Saturday's event featured booths with information on various Caribbean countries, along with local entertainment, workshops, activities for kids and Caribbean cuisine.

Organizer Judith Headleysaid sheplans to hold the event annually, and hoped it would not onlybring together the Caribbean communitybut also showcasetheir cultures to the rest of the city.

"It's unifying everybody. It's bringing all the Caribbean islands together," said Headley, whose parents are from Jamaica.

"Each association does their own events, but we haven't really come together. We have a health seminar that we put on every year where we all come together, but other than that, there's nothing."

While Minnis appealed for world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly to tackle climate change, he also urgedtravellers to come visit the island and provide a tourist boost as the Bahamas strives to recover from the hurricane.

Dorian was "a physical apocalypse" for parts of the Bahamas, but many parts of the island chain weren't affected, Minnis noted, inviting travelers to visit them.

Tourism is the Bahamas' main industry, and revenue from visitors will "play a vital in role in reconstructing and rebuilding the affected areas," he said.

Original post:

Caribbean community bands together at debut event to help Dorian victims - CBC.ca

Video: The BEST thing to do on every Royal Caribbean ship! – Royal Caribbean Blog

Royal Caribbean's cruise ships are designed to be destinations that offer a ton for family and friends to enjoy while onboard. Each ship offers different activities, dining and entertainment, so today we have one must-do on every ship in the fleet.

It is not easy picking just one thing to do, but if you were going to go on any ship in Royal Caribbean's fleet, you will want to make sure you check off one particular onboard offering that we have listed in this video.

And if you love this video, we have lots of other great cruise videos to watchon our Royal Caribbean Blog YouTube Channel!

By the way, have you subscribed yet? Be sure to subscribe to our channel and never miss a single episode!

So check out the video and then let us know: What are your top picks for must-do activities on any Royal Caribbean ship?

Read the rest here:

Video: The BEST thing to do on every Royal Caribbean ship! - Royal Caribbean Blog

Caribbean Cruise Port Will Now Require a Passport to Get Off the Ship – Cruise Fever

One cruise port in the Caribbean will now require that passengers carry a valid passport to get off the cruise ship.

A Royal Carribbean cruise ship docked in Martinique.

Cruise Fever was alerted to this change when Carnival Cruise Line sent out a letter to guests who are booked on a cruise to Martinique. Carnival sent out the following email to passengers who are booked on the November 9 sailing on Carnival Pride warning them about this new requirement:

Dear Carnival Pride Guest,

Sponsored Links

We have an important message to share regarding travel documentation requirements for Martinique.

Officials in Martinique have informed us that all cruise visitors to the island must have a valid passport in order to go ashore. This requirement will be strictly enforced by local authorities. If you do not already have a passport, we encourage you to obtain one before your voyage.

Thank you for your understanding. We cant wait to welcome you aboard for a fun and memorable cruise.

Passports are currently not required for Caribbean cruises that start and end in the same U.S. port. However, there is now an exception for Southern Caribbean cruises to Martinique.

Read: Do I need a Passport for a Caribbean Cruise?

Martinique is a French island that is often visited on cruises to the Southern Caribbean.

Link:

Caribbean Cruise Port Will Now Require a Passport to Get Off the Ship - Cruise Fever

China says it provides aid to Caribbean with no strings attached – Jamaica Observer

Tuesday, October 01, 2019

'); } else { $(".fotorama-caption").addClass("remove_caption"); } }) .fotorama();

BEIJING, China (CMC) China has no interest in imposing its development model on other nations, like those in the Caribbean for which it provides aid, but it does believe it can offer lessons for those countries, according to a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official.

Addressing foreign journalists gathered in Beijing for celebrations to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, director general of the Information Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hua Chunying said the Asian nation will never be as keen as some countries to engage in ideological export or model replication.

President of the China Public Diplomacy Association, Wu Hailong further sought to assure that no matter how much China develops, we will not pose a threat to others.

Chunying, addressing a media forum of developing countries under the theme, 'China in My Eyes: 70 Years of Impressions and Reflections', said that the country's achievements over the past seven decades demonstrate what is possible for all developing nations.

China, despite being the world's second-largest economy, is still not classified as a developed nation. The World Bank defines a high-income country or developed country by setting the threshold for gross national income (GNI) per capita at US$12,055, but China's GNI per capita, although steadily rising, remains below that threshold, at US$9,470 in 2018.

Chunying said China had accomplished what developed countries have done for hundreds of years.

China has moved from being closed and backward to being open and making progressand from being poor and weak to leading a moderately prosperous life, she said, noting that 850 million people have been lifted out of poverty and hundreds of millions of people have entered the middle-income group.

China hasexpanded the path for developing countries to achieve modernisation, and enriched the dreams of people around the world for a better life. Over the past 70 years China hasbecome a major driver of global development and an important stabilizer of international peace, the foreign ministry spokesperson stressed, adding that this was a result of the hard work, wisdom and courage of the Chinese people.

In the process, she added, China was willing to strengthen exchanges and learning with other countries, and to assist in their development. That, she said, was coming with no strings attached.

We will never be as keen as some countries to engage in ideological export or model replication, because we believe that people of all countries have the wisdom and ability to find a development path that best suits their respective national conditions, live a better and better life, and enjoy their due dignity and rights, Chunying said.

We are all developing countries. China's development is the strength of developing countries. The more developed China is, the more capable it will be of helping developing countries achieve common development, upholding fairness and justice for them, and safeguarding their common interests.

Both Chunying and former Ambassador to Mali and Morocco Cheng Tao lamented that despite China's development, some countries refused to acknowledge its progress.

Some people in some countries seem to have a tendency as long as it is led by the communist party of China, as long as it is from China or from a socialist country, it must be wrong and must be opposed, added Chunying.

What these people may not understand is that real harmony is based on a deep understanding and respect for being different. The world is diverse and colourful. Each flower has its own unique beauty; no matter what kind of system or model as long as it is in line with the national conditions, as long as it is supported by its people, as long as it can make its own country constantly move towards light and progress, as long as it can make its people live a better life it is in line with the interests of the country, the right choice.

A country that cannot accept and tolerate the achievements and progress of other countries, but always suspects others of stealing the axe, or even doing everything possible to suppress it, will not be popular or welcomed.

A similar view was expressed by another diplomat, former ambassador to Equatorial Guinea, Uruguay, Costa Rica and Colombia, Wang Xiaoyuan. He said some nations wanted to contain the development of other nations through sanctions and trade wars, but stressed that development cannot be stopped.

Despite Xiaoyuan indicating he would not name any particular country, his comments were a clear reference to the United States, which is currently engaged in a trade war with China.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive

The rest is here:

China says it provides aid to Caribbean with no strings attached - Jamaica Observer

Schedule and Caribbean Athletes In Action Day 5 #Doha2019 – Trackalerts

Coverage of the 17th IAAF World Athletics Championships #Doha2019 is brought to you by #Puma:

The 17th IAAF World Athletics Championships Doha 2019 continues on Tuesday, 1 Oct, at the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha, Qatar.

See below Day 5 schedule and Caribbean athletes down to take at the 17th IAAF World Athletics Championships.Times are listed as EST (one hour ahead of Jamaican time).

9:30 am Mens Hammer Throw Qualification

9:35 am Mens 400 HeatsAkeem Bloomfield, Nathon Allen; Rusheen McDonald, Demish Gaye(JAM); Steven Gardiner, Alonzo Russell(BAH); Kirani James (GRN) Michael Cedano (TTO); Brandon Parris(VIN)

9:50 am Mens High Jump QualificationDonald Thomas (BAH); Luis Enrique Zayas(CUB); Luis Castro Rivera (PUR)

10:30 am Womens 400m Hurdles HeatsRonda Whyte, Rushell Clayton, Shiann Salmon (JAM); Zurian Hechavarria (CUB); Yanique Haye-Smith (TKS); Tia-Adana Belle(BAR);

11:15 am Mens Steeplechase Heats

1:05 pm Mens Pole Vault

1:50 pm Womens 400m SemifinalsShaunae-Miller Uibo(BAH); Sherika Jackson, Stephanie Ann McPherson(JAM); Roxana Gomez(CUB); Sada Williams(BAR); Aliyah Abrams(GUY)

2:20 pm Womens Javelin Throw

2:35 pm Womens 200m semifinalShashalee Forbes(JAM), Elaine Thompson(JAM); Anthoique Strachan, Tynia Gaither(BAH); Kamaria Durant(TTO); Marileidy Paulino(DOM)

3:10 pm Mens 800M FinalWesley Vasquez(PUR)

3:40 pm Mens 200M FinalKyle Greaux(TTO)

We want to hear from you! Join our lively discussion by leaving a comment below. You can also email us at info@trackalerts.com or WhatsApp your results, photos and videos to 876-893-4157

Continue reading here:

Schedule and Caribbean Athletes In Action Day 5 #Doha2019 - Trackalerts

The Shift Toward Decentralized Finance: Why Are Financial Firms Turning To Crypto? – Forbes

A wave of crypto startups has washed upon the shores of the financial industry in the last couple of years. The industry leaders, aka banks and exchanges, have seemed invincible up until now.

Nowadays, there are dozens of crypto startups racing to take over the stage. With the existing global financial system contributing to numerous inequalities, these startups have recognized the need for a better financial solution.

Seeing that blockchain technologies are a good fit for this sector, numerous companies have focused on developing blockchain-based platforms and products. The aim behind turning to crypto is to make financial services more accessible on a global scale.

Further in here Im going to tackle the issues posed by the traditional financial system. While doing so, we will look into crypto and decentralized finance as a potential solution.

To present disruption of Blockchain digital technology to businesses in the future

Traditional vs. Decentralized Finance

The current global financial system has proved to be inefficient in multiple aspects. With so many financial intermediaries present in the system, the users face countless security risks. According to CIODIVE, cyber criminals target financial services 300 times more than other sectors. PWC analysts claim that 45% of financial intermediaries such as money transfers and stock exchanges suffer from serious cyber crimes every year.

The growing number of cyber attacks leaves the public at risk of financial loss and data exploitation. The existing financial system deprives millions of people from basic financial services because of barriers such as location, wealth, and status.

A decentralized financial system based on a public blockchain would provide access to financial services to everyone, regardless of their location and status. Numerous startups and companies have recognized the potential of open source networks to change and decentralize economic activity. Networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum could solve the issues of the traditional financial system because of their permissionless nature. Blockchain could replace the current financial system because it is permissionless, decentralized and transparent.

Heres what all of this means:

One of the examples of traditional financial companies that turns its face to crypto field is Rainier AG an independent asset management firm based in Switzerland. Having been present in the traditional financial sector for over 30 years, the company has recognized the need for a shift toward new technologies.

With the primary mission to ensure security and transparency for token issuers and holders, Rainier AG has introduced a set of offers including: an international STO exchange platform, a crypto trading platform and a European electronic financial service for operating crypto and fiat currencies through a single account. And theyre planning on collaborating with top companies to provide an ecosystem that will include innovative technological products aimed at the global financial market.

With more and more companies in the financial sector adopting innovative technology, crypto and blockchain solutions are on the path to revolutionize the financial system.

The adoption of blockchain technology and the spread of crypto-based financial services would shape a new world of decentralized finance. This world would be characterized by wider global accessibility to financial services, safer transactions, and lower transaction costs.

Excerpt from:

The Shift Toward Decentralized Finance: Why Are Financial Firms Turning To Crypto? - Forbes

Elon Musk warns ‘advanced A.I.’ will soon manipulate social media – Big Think

Twitter bots in 2019 can perform some basic functions, like tweeting content, retweeting, following other users, quoting other users, liking tweets and even sending direct messages. But even though bots on Twitter and other social media seem to be getting smarter than previous iterations, these A.I. are still relatively unsophisticated in terms of how well they can manipulate social discourse.

But it's only a matter of time before more advanced A.I. changes begins manipulating the conversation on a large scale, according to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.

"If advanced A.I. (beyond basic bots) hasn't been applied to manipulate social media, it won't be long before it is," Musk tweeted on Thursday morning.

It's unclear exactly what Musk is referring to by "advanced A.I." but his tweet come just hours after The New York Times published an article outlining a study showing that at least 70 countries have experienced digital disinformation campaigns over the past two years.

"In recent years, governments have used 'cyber troops' to shape public opinion, including networks of bots to amplify a message, groups of "trolls" to harass political dissidents or journalists, and scores of fake social media accounts to misrepresent how many people engaged with an issue," Davey Alba and Adam Satariano wrote for the Times. "The tactics are no longer limited to large countries. Smaller states can now easily set up internet influence operations as well."

Musk followed up his tweet by saying that "anonymous bot swarms" presumably referring to coordinated activity by a large number of social media bots should be investigated.

"If they're evolving rapidly, something's up," he tweeted.

Musk has long predicted a gloomy future with AI. In 2017, he told staff at Neuralink Musk's company that's developing an implantable brain-computer interface that he thinks there's about "a five to 10 percent chance" of making artificial intelligence safe. In the documentary "Do You Trust Your Computer?", Musk warned of the dangers of a single organization someday developing superintelligence.

"The least scary future I can think of is one where we have at least democratized AI because if one company or small group of people manages to develop godlike digital superintelligence, they could take over the world," Musk said.

"At least when there's an evil dictator, that human is going to die. But for an AI, there would be no death. It would live forever. And then you'd have an immortal dictator from which we can never escape."

Related Articles Around the Web

Read more here:

Elon Musk warns 'advanced A.I.' will soon manipulate social media - Big Think

Letter from the front lines of the 2019 Civil War declared by Donald Trump on Twitter – USA TODAY

Christian Schneider, Opinion columnist Published 5:00 a.m. ET Oct. 1, 2019

In a series of tweets, President Trump attacked accusers in the whistleblower allegations and touted a pastor's "civil war" prediction if he is impeached. USA TODAY

Parody: Our company is gearing up for the Battle of Instagram. I must wake early to arm our pro-Trump troops with dangerously witty hashtags.

Way back in September of 2019, President Donald Trump declared a new Civil War in America over accusations he had pressured the Ukrainian president to supply him with damaging information on Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. Constitutional scholars have debated whether a president can declare war via Twitter and whether it counts if he spells it Sivil Wore.

Nonetheless, a letter from one of the troops fighting for the presidents forces has been unearthed and is now housed at the Biggest, Perfect, Most Beautiful Museum Ever (known in 2019 as the Smithsonian Institution).

Dearest Melanie:

I hope this WhatsApp message finds you safely. I am stationed here at the front lines of the Civil War, which began late in September after being declared by President Donald Trump via Twitter. As we would all soon find out, deadnaming people via tweet would be enough to get you thrown off Twitter, but presidents declaring civil wars seemed to be well within the sites terms of service.

I hope you have not lost too much sleep while I have been away. Morale is good, as General Giuliani has kept things light with his winning, ebullient personality. He has convinced us all that we are fighting the most valuable battle since the last Civil War clearly the eradication of owning human beings as slaves is morally on par with people saying mean things about President Trump.

However, like you, I am a bit perplexed as to how this particular Civil War is supposed to be won. In 1860, the adversaries were identifiable by geographic region the North battled the South by marching and firing cannonballs at the rebels. In the Great War of 2019, where Trump loyalists mingle comfortably among the despised NeverTrumpers, the battle fronts are literally everywhere. It is safe to assume that anyone not wearing an ill-fitting red baseball hat is suspect.

President Donald Trump salutes at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 20, 2019.(Photo: Zach Gibson, Getty Images)

There are only so many drag queen story hours where the insurgents can be smoked out!

Yet I can say without hesitation that our side is now enjoying a great number of glorious victories! Just yesterday, when a cuck corporal defamed our great president by suggesting Republicans would have lost their minds if President Barack O-Bummer had solicited foreign help to destroy a political opponent, I tweeted him a crippling Orange Man Bad meme. After my 12followers see it, he will certainly never be heard from again!

Chalk one up for my body count when they start handing out postwar medals!

Further, I have been reassured by Commanders Diamond and Silk that we are winning the intelligence war on the ground. Our greatest minds have been sent to hipster coffee shops to surreptitiously overhear what liberal caffeine enthusiasts might be saying about troop movements and strategies. Word is they are very adept at trying to trick people into filing sexual harassment lawsuits against the hated liberal leaders, which will surely mark their downfall!

I am sad to report, however, that provisions are running low. Leftist freedom fighters have seized all of the Chick-fil-A franchises, leaving conservative warriors all suffering from a waffle fry deficiency.

Countermeasures were taken soon thereafter when a MAGA soldier disguised himself in an Elizabeth Warren for President T-shirt, stood outside a Starbucks and yelled, I found a high school picture of Mike Pence in blackface! When the coffee shop patrons sprinted outside to see the nonexistent photo, Pepe Team 6 swooped in and commandeered the shop, seizing all of the unsold Alanis Morissette CDs prominently displayed by the register.

Yet no victory was as satisfying as the Battle of Yale, where a single Trump supporter walked on campus wearing a mildly provocative Halloween costume, leaving dozens of students dead. Who knew the free speech is violence people were right all along?

Im sorry I have actually just received an emergency message from President Trumps most brilliant strategic mind, Admiral Stephen Miller, telling me he needs my IMMEDIATE assistance. I stand ready to serve in this war to defend our truth-telling president, and will do ANYTHING to see him rightfully exonerated even by checking the $25 DONATION box as the letter asks me to do.

I must say, Melanie, that I miss your smell. I crave the touch of your skin. I can only assume it is coincidence that I have not gotten to experience either since I told you 18months ago that I voted for Donald Trump. I can promise you that those three days we dated were the most eventful of my life, and I yearn to feel your embrace once again while I sweetly whisper to you about how Hillary Clintons email server is clearly to blame for all this anti-Trump hate.

I must go now, as our company is gearing up for the Battle of Instagram. I have to get some sleep so I can be up early arming our troops with dangerously witty hashtags.

Yours always,

Private Jeff

P.S. I have some suggestions about who shouldplay me in the inevitable Ken Burns miniseries.

Christian Schneider, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors, is a reporter with The College Fix and author of the book 1916: The Blog. Follow him on Twitter: @Schneider_CM

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/10/01/donald-trump-2019-civil-war-maga-twitter-instagram-parody-column/3821962002/

More here:

Letter from the front lines of the 2019 Civil War declared by Donald Trump on Twitter - USA TODAY

Donald Trump: ‘We’re trying to find out’ the identity of whistleblower who made Ukraine complaint – USA TODAY

Whistleblowers have been at time essential and detrimental to a country's democracy, but what makes them different than a leaker? We explain. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump said Monday he is still trying to learn the identityof the whistleblower whose allegations overUkraine and JoeBidenhave triggered an impeachment inquiry a comment that some critics regarded as a presidential threat against the informer.

"We're trying to find out about a whistleblower,"Trump told reporters after an Oval Office swearing-in ceremony for new Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia.

Trump again attacked Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, accusing him of "making up" words about his phone call with the president of Ukraine but Trumpdid not again accuse Schiff of "treason" as he did earlier in the day.

After Trump spoke, Andrew Bakaj, the attorney for the unidentified whistleblower,tweeted that his client "is entitled to anonymity. Law and policy support this and the individual is not to be retaliated against. Doing so is a violation of federal law."

Critics said Trump's comments, as well as repeated attacks on the whistleblower's motives, amount to a threatof reprisal against someone seeking to expose government wrongdoing.

"We have a centuries-old bipartisan consensus that those with evidence of wrongdoing should be encouraged to step forward, not intimidated from doing so," saidJohn Kostyack, executive director of the National Whistleblower Center, a nonprofit group that promotes whistleblower protection laws.

Kostyack urged lawmakers from both parties "toaffirm that this whistleblower deserves the highest level of protection from retaliation, including the ability to maintain anonymity.

In his brief Oval Office comments, Trump claimed his accuser misrepresented his July 25 telephone conversation with the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky.

Schiff and other lawmakers said a transcript released by the White House backs the whistleblower's story Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rival Biden, who is seeking next year's Democratic nomination for president.

Thetranscript shows Trump repeatedly mentioning aid to Ukraine in close proximity to his request that Ukraine investigate Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who had business interests in the country.

Trump again called the conversation "perfect," and said he only wanted Ukraine to look into what he called "corruption." He claimed that Ukraine sought to interfere in the 2016 president election in 2016 "against us," but the intelligence community has repeatedly debunked that allegation.

Trump commented as he opened another week of impeachment turmoil by attackinghis accusers.

President Donald Trump(Photo: Scott Olson)

In a series of late-night tweets on Sunday and early-morning Monday, Trump raised the specter of "civil war," accused one key investigator of "treason," said some of his own aides may be "SPYING" on him, and accused the Democrats of trying to "destabilize" the country a year ahead of his 2020 re-election.

"They are lying & cheating like never before in our Countrys history in order to destabilize the United States of America & its upcoming 2020 Election," Trump said in one tweet.

On Monday morning, Trump repeated his claims about Schiff in a new tweet and said: "Arrest for Treason."

The angry tweets set the stage for another week of political/legal battles, as House Democrats investigate allegationsthat Trump tried to coercethe president of Ukraine into investigating Biden, and essentially inject a foreign country into the 2020 presidential campaign.

"Wehad no choice but to move forward with an impeachment inquiry," Schiff tweeted Sunday. "And our focus will be on the presidents fundamental breach of his oath office."

He added: "Coercing a foreign nation to interfere in our election is never ok, No matter what the president and his defenders say."

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/30/donald-trump-trying-find-out-who-ukraine-whistleblower/3822241002/

Read more here:

Donald Trump: 'We're trying to find out' the identity of whistleblower who made Ukraine complaint - USA TODAY

Trump targets ‘pathetic’ Federal Reserve after worst manufacturing reading in a decade – CNBC

President Donald Trump speaks at the Hispanic Heritage Month reception at the White House in Washington, September 27, 2019.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

President Donald Trump again attacked the Federal Reserve on Tuesday after the weakest U.S. manufacturing reading in 10 years.

In a tweet, the president wrote Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the central bank "have allowed the Dollar to get so strong, especially relative to ALL other currencies, that our manufacturers are being negatively affected." He contended the Fed has set interest rates "too high."

"They are their own worst enemies, they don't have a clue," he wrote. "Pathetic!"

As his trade war with China rages on, Trump has repeatedly blamed the Fed's interest rate policy for concerns about a slowing U.S. economy. He has contended the central bank has not moved quickly enough to ease monetary policy though the Fed has cut its benchmark funds rate twice this year.

The Fed did not immediately respond to a request to comment.

Trump's tweet comes after the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing reading fell to 47.8 in September, down from 49.1 in August. A reading below 50 shows a manufacturing contraction.

The poor economic data contributed to major U.S. stock indexes sliding Tuesday.

The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against a basket of global currencies, has climbed more than 3% this year and sits near its highest level since mid-2017. A stronger dollar relative to global currencies is generally expected to reduce exports and increase imports,hurting manufacturers because it makes their products more expensive overseas.

While exchange rates may have contributed to the drag on manufacturing in September, trade also did, according to ISM.

"Global trade remains the most significant issue as demonstrated by the contraction in new export orders that began in July 2019. Overall, sentiment this month remains cautious regarding near-term growth," Timothy Fiore, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, said in a release announcing the data.

Trump has repeatedly downplayed any concerns about a looming American recession. He has also contended his trade conflict with the second-largest economy in the world will not harm businesses or consumers despite indications that it has already started to hurt some companies and worry Americans.

Seeing concerns about a flagging economy as a ploy to discredit him before the 2020 election, Trump has claimed the central bank bears the blame for any slowdown rather than his own policies.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

The rest is here:

Trump targets 'pathetic' Federal Reserve after worst manufacturing reading in a decade - CNBC

Trump’s approval rating drops to low, but Americans still oppose impeachment, survey finds – CNBC

Americans by a narrow margin oppose impeachment hearings to remove President Donald Trump from office, according to the latest CNBC All-America Economic Survey.

But the CNBC poll of 800 Americans nationwide conducted last week found a significant shift where fewer Americans are opposed to impeachment. It also found a large decline in the president's overall and economic approval ratings.

The survey found 47% opposing impeachment hearings and 44% approving. The difference is within the poll's 3.5% margin of error.

The results are much closer than when an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll asked the same question in December 2017, finding 41% approving of impeachment hearings and a majority 54% disapproving.

"The American people are not jumping towards impeachment," said Micah Roberts, a partner in Public Opinion Strategies who serves as the Republican pollster for the CNBC survey. "They are cautiously moving away from opposing impeachment."

With 9% of Americans unsure about impeachment, compared with 5% in the NBC/WSJ poll, Roberts notes slightly more growth among the percentage of Americans who are unsure about impeachment as those who favor it.

Jay Campbell, partner in Hart Research, the Democratic pollster for CNBC, agreed that what's been revealed so far "is not enough" to spur public opinion toward majority support of impeachment. But Campbell said the change between the two polls is statistically significant and puts the president "in a precarious situation."

The poll shows that 88% of Republicans oppose impeachment, compared with 76% of Democrats who favor it. Independents are split about evenly, with 42% favoring impeachment and 43% opposing.

The CNBC All-America Economic Survey also found a substantial drop in Trump's overall approval rating, hitting the lowest level of his presidency. Just 37% approve of Trump's handling of his job and 53% disapprove. The president's "net approval" (approval minus disapproval) dropped to -16 points, 2 points worse than the previous low of his presidency in June and September 2017. The decline results substantially from lost support among independents.

To be sure, the change in both the approval and disapproval numbers compared with May are both within the poll's margin of error. But they amount to a change from net approval of -10 to -16, a potentially significant shift.

The president's economic approval numbers also took a hit, declining to 42% from 48% in the May CNBC survey. Fifty percent of Americans now disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, up from 43% in May and the largest economic negative rating of his presidency. It's only the second time since taking office that a CNBC survey found more Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy than approving.

The CNBC poll found that 45% of the public is concerned impeachment will have a negative effect on the stock market, and 40% are worried about the effect on the economy. Just 23% believe it will hurt their personal financial situation. Republicans are twice as concerned as Democrats about the potential economic impact of impeachment.

More:

Trump's approval rating drops to low, but Americans still oppose impeachment, survey finds - CNBC

Why Donald Trump is popular in Nigeria, Israel, and South Korea – Quartz

President Donald Trump is one of the most controversial world leaders in modern times, igniting the ire of Americas staunchest allies.

Whether its the proposed Muslim ban, the US border wall and immigration, or his praise of authoritarian leaders, Trump is deft at inciting deep divisions among the public.

In 2018, political scientist Daniel Drezner summarized this consensus in The Washington Post: The world hates President Trump.

Data from the Pew Research Center illustrates Drezners thinking. For the residents of US allies, their confidence in the US president dropped substantially from the last year of Obamas presidency to the beginning of Trumps time in office.

So, where might Trump be popular overseas, and just where might he be electable? As a political scientist who has written about the US image abroad, this question fascinates me.

Most of the world might hate Trump, but in some places, based largely on his policies, there is hope and even admiration.

In 2016 and 2017, Gallup asked respondents in more than 100 countries, Do you approve or disapprove of the job performance of the leadership of the United States? In 29 countries, Trump outdid Obama in terms of job performance.

When I look at these countries and compare them with data from Freedom House on which countries are democracies and nondemocracies, a pattern emerges. Trump is more popular than Obama among people in authoritarian nations.

Among regions around the world that seem to feel the most pro-Trump, Africa stands out.

In January 2018, The Washington Post reported that Trump derided immigrants coming from Haiti, El Salvador, and African countries. Trump said, Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here? He added, We need more people from Norway.

The African Union issued an immediate response: Given the historical reality of how many Africans arrived in the United States as slaves, this statement flies in the face of all accepted behavior and practice.

Nigerias response, however, was more tepid. A few months later, Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari was the first head of state from sub-Saharan Africa to visit the White House. When pressed on the matter of Trumps remarks at a joint press conference, Buhari remarked, Im not sure about, you know, the validity or whether that allegation against the president was true or not, adding, So, the best thing for me is to keep quiet.

What could explain this turn of events? One explanation may be that Nigerians like Trump. According to data from the Pew Research Center, Nigerian confidence in Trump to do the right thing regarding world affairs was at 59% in 2018, higher than some points during the Obama administration.

Data on Trumps total followers on Twitter may also shed some light. As of this writing, among those active Twitter accounts that follow Trump, those based in Nigeria rank in the top five. But this is notwithstanding the fact that more and more Twitter accounts are hacked and sometimes controlled by bots.

Some of Trumps foreign policies in Nigeria might explain his relative popularity. In February 2017, President Trump approved the sale of jet fighters to the Nigerian government, reversing a policy from the Obama administration. This aided the Nigerian government in its campaign against Boko Haram.

South Korea is another country where the public is warming to Trumps approachparticularly with North Korea.

Trump has made it a major priority of his administration to develop a personal relationship with North Koreas reclusive leader, Kim Jong Un. To date, Trump has had three face-to-face meetings with Kim.

Until Trump, a sitting American president had never visited with a North Korean head of state while in office. Prior to Trumps tenure, the highest-level visit between these two countries ever was former President Bill Clintons trip to Pyongyang in 2009.

Although Trump is still far from being beloved among South Koreans, they see his meetings with Kim as a good thing overall for the Korean peninsula. Confidence in Trump has risen, from 17% in 2017 to 44% in 2018 among people in South Korea.

And data from Gallups Korean headquarters illustrate that favorability toward Trump among South Koreans has more than doubled, from a paltry 9% in 2017 to a high of 32% in 2018.

Part of the reason for Trumps relative success with North Korea to date is South Koreas concurrent interest in fostering more high-profile diplomatic talks between Washington and Pyongyang.

If theres one place in the world where Trumps policies seem to be enjoying the most public support, it would be Israel.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly praised Trumps withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018.

That same month, after Trump pledged to move the capital of Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Netanyahu compared Trump to King Cyrus the Great, from 2,500 years ago, who proclaimed that the Jewish exiles in Babylon could come back and rebuild our Temple in Jerusalem.

As in the case of Nigeria and South Korea, Trumps popularity in Israel seems to be a reversal of his predecessor. Frosty personal relations plagued Obama and Netanyahu, beginning with Obamas first major foreign policy address to the Arab world in Cairo in 2009. This culminated in Netanyahus visit to Congress in 2015, when he urged Congress to oppose the Iran nuclear agreement.

In 2016, prior to the rise of Trump, Israelis ranked Obama as the worst US president for Israel in the last 30 years.

Trump, in the meantime, has surpassed Obama and is far more beloved in Israel. In July 2018, a poll found that since the election of Donald Trump, 53% of Israelis felt US standing in the world had gotten stronger, compared to just 14% who felt it had stayed the same, and 21% who felt it was weakened.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Excerpt from:

Why Donald Trump is popular in Nigeria, Israel, and South Korea - Quartz

Pelosi orders impeachment probe: ‘No one is above the law’ – The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi launched a formal impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump on Tuesday, yielding to mounting pressure from fellow Democrats and plunging a deeply divided nation into an election-year clash between Congress and the commander in chief.

The probe focuses partly on whether Trump abused his presidential powers and sought help from a foreign government to undermine Democratic foe Joe Biden and help his own reelection. Pelosi said such actions would mark a betrayal of his oath of office and declared, No one is above the law.

The impeachment inquiry, after months of investigations by House Democrats of the Trump administration, sets up the partys most direct and consequential confrontation with the president, injects deep uncertainty into the 2020 election campaign and tests anew the nations constitutional system of checks and balances.

Trump, who thrives on combat, has all but dared Democrats to take this step, confident that the specter of impeachment led by the opposition party will bolster rather than diminish his political support.

Meeting with world leaders at the United Nations, he previewed his defense in an all-caps tweet: PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT!

Pelosis brief statement, delivered without dramatic flourish but in the framework of a constitutional crisis, capped a frenetic weeklong stretch on Capitol Hill as details of a classified whistleblower complaint about Trump burst into the open and momentum shifted toward an impeachment probe.

For months, the Democratic leader has tried calming the push for impeachment, saying the House must investigate the facts and let the public decide. The new drive was led by a group of moderate Democratic lawmakers from political swing districts, many of them with national security backgrounds and serving in Congress for the first time. The freshmen, who largely represent districts previously held by Republicans where Trump is popular, risk their own reelections but say they could no longer stand idle. Amplifying their call were longtime leaders, including Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, the civil rights icon often considered the conscience of House Democrats.

Now is the time to act, said Lewis, in an address to the House. To delay or to do otherwise would betray the foundation of our democracy.

At issue are Trumps actions with Ukraine. In a summer phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, he is said to have asked for help investigating former Vice President Biden and his son Hunter. In the days before the call, Trump ordered advisers to freeze $400 million in military aid for Ukraine prompting speculation that he was holding out the money as leverage for information on the Bidens. Trump has denied that charge, but acknowledged he blocked the funds, later released.

Biden said Tuesday, before Pelosis announcement, that if Trump doesnt cooperate with lawmakers demands for documents and testimony in its investigations the president will leave Congress ... with no choice but to initiate impeachment. He said that would be a tragedy of Trumps own making.

The Trump-Ukraine phone call is part of the whistleblowers complaint, though the administration has blocked Congress from getting other details of the report, citing presidential privilege. Trump has authorized the release of a transcript of the call, which is to be made public Wednesday.

You will see it was a very friendly and totally appropriate call, Trump said.

The whistleblowers complaint was being reviewed for classified material and could go to Congress by Thursday, according to a person familiar with the issue who was not authorized to discuss it publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Trump has sought to implicate Biden and his son in the kind of corruption that has long plagued Ukraine. Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company at the same time his father was leading the Obama administrations diplomatic dealings with Kyiv. Though the timing raised concerns among anti-corruption advocates, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either the former vice president or his son.

While the possibility of impeachment has hung over Trump for many months, the likelihood of a probe had faded after special counsel Robert Muellers Trump-Russia investigation ended without a clear directive for lawmakers.

Since then, the House committees have revisited aspects of the Mueller probe while also launching new inquiries into Trumps businesses and various administration scandals that all seemed likely to drag on for months.

But details of Trumps dealings with Ukraine prompted Democrats to quickly shift course. By the time Pelosi addressed the nation Tuesday, about two-thirds of House Democrats had announced moving toward impeachment probes.

The burden will likely now shift to Democrats to make the case to a scandal-weary public. In a highly polarized Congress, an impeachment inquiry could simply showcase how clearly two sides can disagree when shown the same evidence rather than approach consensus.

Building toward this moment, the president has repeatedly been stonewalling requests for documents and witness interviews in the variety of ongoing investigations.

After Pelosis Tuesday announcement, the president and his campaign team quickly released a series of tweets attacking Democrats, including a video of presidential critics like the speaker and Rep. Ilhan Omar discussing impeachment. It concluded: While Democrats Sole Focus is fighting Trump, President Trump is fighting for you.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Pelosis well-known efforts to restrain her far-left conference have finally crumbled.

Pelosi has for months resisted calls for impeachment from her restive caucus, warning that it would backfire against the party unless there was a groundswell of public support. That groundswell hasnt occurred, but some of the more centrist lawmakers are facing new pressure back home for not having acted on impeachment.

While Pelosis announcement adds weight to the work being done on the oversight committees, the next steps are likely to resemble the past several months of hearings and legal battles except with the possibility of actual impeachment votes.

On Wednesday, the House is expected to consider a symbolic but still notable resolution insisting the Trump administration turn over to Congress the whistleblowers complaint. The Senate, in a rare bipartisan moment, approved a similar resolution Tuesday.

The lawyer for the whistleblower, who is still anonymous, released a statement saying he had asked Trumps director of national intelligence to turn over the complaint to House committees and asking guidance to permit the whistleblower to meet with lawmakers.

Pelosi suggested that this new episode examining whether a president abused his power for personal political gain would be easier to explain to Americans than some of the issues that arose during the Mueller investigation and other congressional probes.

The speaker put the matter in stark terms: The actions of the Trump presidency revealed dishonorable facts of the presidents betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of his national security and betrayal of the integrity of our elections.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace, Laurie Kellman, Andrew Taylor, Eric Tucker and Zeke Miller in Washington and Jonathan Lemire and Deb Riechmann in New York contributed to this report.

Read the original post:

Pelosi orders impeachment probe: 'No one is above the law' - The Associated Press

Donald Trump’s ‘Civil War’ Tweet Is Seditious and a ‘Grave Crime,’ Retired Army Officer Says – Newsweek

A retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and former Fox News analyst has accused President Donald Trump of sedition for tweeting about the threat of civil war if the ongoing impeachment investigation eventually unseats him.

Retired Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters was once a regular contributor to Fox News as a military analyst. He has described the network as "amoral" and "opportunistic" since severing ties with Fox News and becoming a fierce critic of both the network and of Trump.

On Sunday, Trump tweeted a quote from evangelical pastor Robert Jeffress. "If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal," the tweet read, attributed to Jeffress.

Speaking with host Anderson Cooper on CNN on Monday, Peters said the president is inciting violence and undermining the Constitution.

Cooper asked Peters what his reaction to the tweet was, to which the retired officer replied, "One word: sedition."

"Trump is inciting violence against the legitimate government of the United States and the constitutional order," he continued. "And, Anderson, that is a grave crime. You can argue about the meaning of treason, what constitutes it, what doesn'tsedition is very clear cut."

"Also I have to say there's not going to be a civil war," Peters added. "Knock that off. I've been hearing people on the extreme right saying it for years." The retired officer also noted "the irony of a draft-dodger talking up war."

Trump's civil war tweet was just one of a flurry of messages sent over the weekend, lashing out at the nascent impeachment investigation announced last week. Peters suggested the president's belligerence is evidence of his difficult position, beset by multiple investigations and facing a tough re-election campaign.

"Trump, he's afraid. He's a frightened, frightened man," Peters told Cooper. "If he loses the electionand it's not a forgone conclusion that he will but if he doeshe'll face the rest of his life in courtrooms...perhaps in prison." Peters added that Trump is "an embarrassment that cannot be measured."

Peters also had harsh words for the Republican lawmakers who are still backing the president, despite the embarrassing and incriminating revelations of recent weeks. Peters described the party as a "terrible disappointment" that has abandoned the rule of law and the constitution.

"You see Republicans on Capitol Hill just cowering, just cowering, afraid of Donald Trump, this bloated old charlatan who never served in any capacity," Peters said.

"And all these Republican patriots who served, they're running to make excuses for him, cringing," he continued, acknowledging that his "views are strong on this."

Trump's now-infamous phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky showed that he pressed Zelensky to investigate 2020 candidate Joe Biden over debunked allegations of corruption. Critics have cited the exchange as yet more evidence of Trump's transactional approach to politics and the prioritization of his own personal interests.

"With this president, it's always been said everything is transactional, relationships are transactional," Cooper said.

Peters concurred, replying: "Trump is all about Trump is all about Trump. And I really feel sorry for the people who voted for him who convinced themselves that this man is a patriot." But Peters also defended those Trump supporters who he argued had been deserted by the two main parties.

"They were abandoned by both political parties as the Republicans became the party of high finance, the Democrats became the party of high society," Peters told Cooper. "People went ignored, utterly ignored."

Read more:

Donald Trump's 'Civil War' Tweet Is Seditious and a 'Grave Crime,' Retired Army Officer Says - Newsweek

Donald Trump’s wary White House deals with the threat of impeachment – USA TODAY

Impeaching a U.S. president might not be the be-all-end-allfor their career. We explain why this is the case. Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON As the White House sought to convey a semblance of normalcy in the face of a growing crisis Thursday, President Donald Trump again attacked a new impeachment inquiry as a"disgrace" and a "terrible thing for our country."

It shouldnt be allowed there should be a way of stopping it,maybe legally through the courts,"Trump said as he returned to Washington after a week of activities with the United Nations in New York.

The whistleblower's complaint that sparked an impeachment inquiry into President Trump has been released. USA TODAY

Trump and his aides moved into communication overdrive in response to the threat of impeachment. They seekto counter the newly released complaint from an unidentified whistleblower andclaims that Trump improperly pressured Ukraine's president to investigate Democratic political rival Joe Biden.

After a high-profile House Intelligence Committee hearing on the whistleblower's allegations, Trump attacked the committee chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his colleagues.

"Here we go again," Trump said. "It's Adam Schiff and his crew making up stories and sitting there like pious, whatever you want to call them."

Schiff mocked the complaints:Im always flattered when Im attacked by someone of the presidents character."

As some White House aides tried to move the conversation back to other issues, Trump operating as his own communicationdirector hammered Democrats, the whistleblower and the media.

Some of his aides, privately,expressed anxiety about the furor.While televisions throughout the West Wing were tuned to the House Intelligence Committee hearing, they said they tryto stay focused on doing their jobs, part of which involves defending the president.

In statements and emails throughout the day, atthe White House and within Trump's reelection campaign, aides argued that the complaint doesn't go much beyond what wasn't already known.Butthe whistleblower'sreport alleged Ukraine officials were aware that Trump wanted to discuss the issue before the July 25 call at the center of the controversy and said aides tried to "lock down" notes from Trump's call to Ukraine.

President Donald Trump accuses the news media of blowing up a "nothing" call.(Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

Nothing has changed with the release of this complaint, which is nothing more than a collection of third-hand accounts of events and cobbled-together press clippings all of which show nothing improper,"White House spokeswomanStephanie Grisham said in a statement less than a half-hour after the whistleblower document was released.

Some White House aides expressed frustration that reporters were focused on Ukraine and impeachment rather than the economy and immigration.

"I know theres a big hullabaloo, White House economic adviserLarry Kudlow said as he faced a litany of questions about theimpeachment inquiry. I dont see anything.

Trump declined to take questions throughout the day. White House reporters were summoned to the South Lawn for an unscheduled event Thursday evening that turned out to be a photo-op with the president and law enforcement officials.The officers broke out into applause and chants of "U-S-A" asTrump waved to reporters, who shouted unanswered questions about the whistleblower.

Later,administration officials announced the U.S. will dramatically reduce the number of refugees allowed to resettle in the country next year permitting no more than 18,000peoplefleeing war, violence and persecution.

And Trump's campaign announced a rally in Minneapolis next month.

Refugees: Trump sets lowest cap ever on refugees

'I thought it was dead': Trump says he thought threat ended with Mueller report

Grisham and other aidesstressed that the whistlebloweracknowledged he did not witness most of the events described, relying on statements from unidentified White House officials.

Aides noted that Trump released a summary of thephone call between him and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The whistleblower complaint provides moredetails of Trump's interactions with the Ukrainianleaderand suggests that Trump and aides tried to cover up his pushfora foreign country to investigate a rival before the 2020 election by storing the notes of the call in a separate computer system reserved for highly sensitive material.

The whistleblower said some administration officials expressed concern that Trump "used the power of his office" to benefit himselfand his reelection campaign.

Some officials were "deeply disturbed" by Trump's actions and discussed how to treat details of the call because they feared "they had witnessed the president abuse his office for personal gain," the whistleblower said.

President Donald Trump says there was nothing improper in his discussions with Ukraine's president.(Photo: SAUL LOEB, AFP/Getty Images)

Team Trump pushed back on these contentions in a variety of ways, including bombarding reporters and voters with emails, commentsand social media postings.

"The president released the full transcript of his phone call yesterday. It showed nothing inappropriate, despite false media reports to the contrary," tweeted Matt Wolking, deputy director of communicationfor rapid response with Trump's reelection campaign.

In addition to his brief remarks to reporters,Trump used his standard method of communication: Twitter.

Though not directly addressing the whistleblower's claims, Trump sent out a string of tweets and retweets defending himself and denouncing the impeachment drive.

He wrote,"THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO DESTROY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND ALL THAT IT STANDS FOR. STICK TOGETHER, PLAY THEIR GAME, AND FIGHT HARD REPUBLICANS. OUR COUNTRY IS AT STAKE!"

At Joint Base Andrews after returning from New York, Trump said the phone call to Ukraine "was perfect," and "the president yesterday of Ukraine said there was no pressure put on him whatsoever, none whatsoever."

Skeptics said Trump and his communicationteam have their work cut out for them.

"They are just going after the process and the messenger," said Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor in New York. "Because if the message in the complaint is accurate and everything suggests it is, including the White House call summaryits devastating."

Trump and other administration officials sought to project the idea of business as usual, from presidential fundraisers in New York to an immigration briefing at the White House though Trump said Democrats are getting in the way.

"They're going to tie up our country," he said. "We can't talk about gun regulation. We can't talk about anything, because frankly they're so tied up."

As Washington was glued to the testimony of acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, the White House trotted out nearly a dozen federal and local law enforcement and immigration officials to discuss a favorite topic: immigration and so-called sanctuary city policies.

Flanked by county sheriffs, acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Matthew Albence blasted cities and counties that ignore federal requests to hold in jail immigrants in the country illegally.

Trump and other Republicans pointed to crimes committed by immigrants released by cities. The federal requests are the subject of litigation, and leaders of sanctuary jurisdictions noted their power to hold a person in jail for a civil immigration violation is murky.

Its time to publicly call out those who would put politics over public safety, Albence told a sparsely populated briefing room in the White House.

Albence dismissed questions about the timing of the news conference, given the other news story consuming Washington.

We started planning this several weeks ago, he said.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/26/donald-trumps-wary-white-house-deals-with-the-threat-of-impeachment/3772927002/

Read the original here:

Donald Trump's wary White House deals with the threat of impeachment - USA TODAY

How the Trump White House is Abusing the Record-Keeping System – POLITICO

Susan Walsh/AP Photo

1600 Penn

By SAMANTHA VINOGRAD

September 29, 2019

Samantha Vinograd is a CNN national security analyst. She served on the White House National Security Council for four years under President Barack Obama and in the Treasury Department under President George W. Bush. Follow her on Twitter @sam_vinograd.

Heavy public attentionas well as congressional scrutinyis focused on President Donald Trumps engagements with foreign leaders. Its now public that, after 2 years of having controversial conversations with his counterparts, Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate one of his political rivals: former Vice President Joe Biden. The now-declassified call readout and the complaint filed by a whistleblower who had concerns about the call have unlocked a Pandoras box of potential abuses of power, including extraordinary steps by the presidents team to restrict access to readouts of his conversations or not to document them at all.

According to new reporting, Trumps teamwe dont know whether it was at his direction or notmisused and abused the process for documenting and distributing readouts of several of his conversations, including his July 25 call with Zelensky and other calls with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This is on top of earlier reports that Trump concealed the contents of meetings with Putin, including in 2017 when he reportedly took an interpreters notes and instructed the interpreter not to share a readout with other administration officials. That same reporting indicated there is no detailed record of five of Trumps encounters with Putin over the past two years.

Story Continued Below

Presidents dont get to pick and choose whether they accurately document their conversations for the record. The Presidential Records Act requires that they do so. Tampering with readouts or failing to file them at all breaks that law.

The process of reading out and documenting presidential conversations isnt just a matter of upholding the Presidential Records Act, though. Its critical to ensuring that relevant officials on the U.S. national security team have the information they need to effectively perform their responsibilities. When presidents dont keep their team in the loop, national security suffers.

Heres how its supposed to work: During presidential calls and video conferences, staff from the White House Situation Room take notes in real time. Those note-takers compare their notes with those taken by other officials authorized to listen to the call often a director or senior director from the National Security Council who has responsibility for the country the president is speaking withand together they work to compile an official readout. These memorandums, which should be drafted and reviewed soon after the call while its contents are fresh in everyones minds, are intended to be as close to verbatim as possible. Thats why there is more than one note-taker assigned to the callso that note-takers can compare notes for accuracy.

The draft readout should then be sent to the national security advisers office for review. The national security adiviser historically has been either physically present or on the line for presidential calls so he or she may also have some edits to the draft readout. If former national security adviser John Bolton was not included in Trumps calls, that would be a major break with past practice. According to the whistleblower complaint, several White House staff were on the presidents call with Zelensky, but we dont yet know if Bolton was one of them.

Once the national security adviser approves the final readout for the recordoften called a MEMCON or memorandum of conversationhe or she also approves a distribution list. This step is important: It ensures U.S. officials have the information they need to perform their responsibilities, while also making sure those without a need to know what happened dont.

The distribution list should typically include certain key officials, including the director of national intelligence, CIA director and secretary of State. The list should also include other officials named on the call or who have follow ups from it. For example, Trump and Zelensky discussed military sales on their July 25 call, which means Secretary of Defense Mark Esper should have seen the readout so he could follow up with the Ukrainians regarding those sales.

Attorney General William Barr was specifically named to follow up during Trumps call with Zelensky. Trump told the Ukrainian president that Barr and Trumps personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani would call Zelensky. Yet the Department of Justice claims Barr didnt hear about the calls contents until weeks after, and that when he did get a readout he was surprised and angry that Trump grouped him with Giuliani. The reported failure to get Barr a readout is a major process foul. For one, he was named as a point of contact for Zelenskys team. But also, White House officials should have had legal concerns after Trump asked Zelensky to do him a favor by looking into Biden. The national security adviser should have flagged these legal concerns to Barr, even if Barr hadnt been assigned to call Zelensky.

According to the whistleblower complaint, while Barr did not get a readout, multiple White House officials had direct knowledge of the call and were deeply disturbed by it. Hearing about the call, White House lawyersprobably concerned with the presidents potential abuse of powerworked to lock down the official written readout of the call so that fewer people could see it.

How did White House officials work to lock down the call? They reportedly moved the readout to the codeword systema system with highly restricted access only available to people with very specific and top level access to intelligence. The codeword system is supposed to be used only for readouts, memos and communications that are classified at a codeword level. It is separate from the top secret level system in which readouts are usually drafted and distributed, informally called the high side by White House staff.

The MEMCON of the Zelensky call, which didnt deal with sensitive intelligence information, was classified as secret, according to the header at the top of the now declassified document. That level is well below codeword. And yet the readout was inappropriately sent to the codeword system. The White House is claiming its actions were motivated by a desire to limit leaks, but its also possible it wanted to hide information that could be damaging to the president.

The Trump White House has also reportedly abused the process for documenting in-person meetings with foreign leaders. In Trumps infamous 2017 Oval Office meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrovin which he shared sensitive intelligence about an ongoing intelligence operationsomeone should have been assigned to take notes and send a draft readout to the national security adviserH.R. McMaster in this casefor review and distribution.

Then, the national security adviser should have approved and distributed a MEMCON to relevant officials, and the MEMCON should have been filed for the presidential record. This time, because Trump reportedly shared codeword-level intelligence with the Russians, the MEMCON should likely have been written and distributed on the codeword-level system. Recent reporting indicates that Trump also said during that meeting he was unconcerned about Russian election interference. Comments like that make distributing a MEMCON to appropriate personnel particularly important.

But, a readout of the meetingwe dont know if it was a formal written readout or a verbal onewas reportedly limited to an "unusually" small group of people, which could indicate a failure to get the readout to those who needed it to do their jobs. The departments of Justice, Homeland Security and State and members of the intelligence community needed to know that the president had undercut their efforts to secure our elections so that they could regroup and figure out next steps, not to mention to try to convince him of how dangerous his comments were from a national security standpoint. Furthermore, if anyone failed to brief relevant officials on what transpired, that would mean that our own team didnt know something that the Russians did. The Russians could use that to manipulate or bribe the president.

While much attention is being paid to written readouts of presidential calls and meetings, they are not the only way readouts are delivered. Because these formal readouts take time to finalize, the national security adviser or an authorized member of his or her team often gives verbal readouts to key officials. This way there isnt a lag in passing on information about the presidents conversations that require immediate follow up and key officials are as up to speed as their foreign counterparts. Some State Department officials reportedly got a verbal readout of the presidents July 25 call with Zelensky. According to the whistleblower, State officials met with the Ukrainians the day after the call to navigate the Presidents demands, eventually connecting Giuliani with the Ukrainians.

By restricting access to call readouts, not writing them at all, and apparently not even giving relevant Cabinet officials verbal readouts when they were discussed on a presidential call, the presidents team made some major process fouls. But, if this looks like a comedy of errors, it is likely a well-orchestrated one. Only senior White House officialslike the national security adviser, chief of staff or the president himselfhave the authority to disturb the process in these damaging ways.

See the original post here:

How the Trump White House is Abusing the Record-Keeping System - POLITICO

Donald Trump’s windmill hatred is a worry for booming industry – New York Post

BLOCK ISLAND, R.I. The winds are blowing fair for Americas wind power industry, making it one of the fastest-growing US energy sources.

Land-based turbines are rising by the thousands across America, from the remote Texas plains to farm towns of Iowa. And the US wind boom now is expanding offshore, with big corporations planning $70 billion in investment for the countrys first utility-scale offshore wind farms.

We have been blessed to have it, says Polly McMahon, a 13th-generation resident of Block Island, where a pioneering offshore wind farm replaced the islands dirty and erratic diesel-fired power plant in 2016. I hope other people are blessed too.

But theres an issue. And its a big one. President Donald Trump hates wind turbines.

Hes called them disgusting and ugly and stupid, denouncing them in hundreds of anti-wind tweets and public comments dating back more than a decade, when he tried and failed to block a wind farm near his Scottish golf course.

And those turbine blades. They say the noise causes cancer, Trump told a Republican crowd last spring, in a claim immediately rejected by the American Cancer Society.

Now, wind industry leaders and supporters fear that the federal government, under Trump, may be pulling back from what had been years of encouragement for climate-friendly wind.

The Interior Department surprised and alarmed wind industry supporters in August, when the agency unexpectedly announced it was withholding approval for the countrys first utility-scale offshore wind project, a $2.8 billion complex of 84 giant turbines. Slated for building 15 miles (24 kilometers) off Marthas Vineyard, Massachusetts. Vineyard Wind has a brisk 2022 target for starting operations. Its Danish-Spanish partners already have contracts to supply Massachusetts electric utilities.

Investors backing more than a dozen other big wind farms are lined up to follow Vineyard Wind with offshore wind projects of their own. Shells renewable-energy offshoot is among the businesses ponying up for federal leases, at bids of more than $100 million, for offshore wind farm sites.

The Interior Department cited the surge in corporate interest for offshore wind projects in saying it wanted more study before moving forward. It directed Vineyard Wind to research the overall impact of the East Coasts planned wind boom.

Interior Department spokesman Nicholas Goodwin said offshore energy remains an important component in the Trump administrations energy strategy. But the strategy includes ensuring activities are safe and environmentally responsible, Goodwin said in a statement.

Wind power now provides a third or more of the electricity generated in some Southwest and Midwest states. And New York, New Jersey and other Eastern states already are joining Massachusetts in planning for wind-generated electricity.

Along with the US shale oil boom, the rise in wind and solar is helping cushion oil supply shocks like the recent attack on Saudi oil facilities.

But the Interior Departments pause on the Vineyard Wind project sent a chill through many of the backers of the offshore wind boom. Critics contrast it with the Republican administrations moves to open up offshore and Arctic areas to oil and gas development, despite strong environmental concerns.

That I think is sort of a new bar, for the federal government to require developers to assess the impact of not just their projects but everyones, said Stephanie McClellan, a researcher and director of the Special Initiative on Offshore Wind at the University of Delaware. That worries everybody.

Thomas Brostrom, head of US operations for Denmarks global offshore wind giant Orsted and operator of the pioneering Block Island wind farm, said that the last three, four years have seen unbelievable, explosive growth, much more than we could have really hoped for, in the US, compared to Europes already established wind power industry.

Given all the projects in development, we hope that this is a speed bump, and certainly not a roadblock, Brostrom said.

Wind power and the public perception of it have changed since Americas first proposed big offshore wind project, Cape Wind off Cape Cod, Massachusetts, died an agonizing 16-year death. Koch and Kennedy families alike, along with other coastal residents, reviled Cape Wind as a potential bird-killing eyesore in their ocean views.

But technological advances since then mean wind turbines can rise much farther offshore, mostly out of sight, and produce energy more efficiently and competitively. Climate change and the damage it will do these same coastal communities also has many looking at wind differently now.

Federal fisheries officials have been among the main bloc calling for more study, saying they need to know more about the impacts on ocean life. Some fishing groups still fear their nets will tangle in the massive turbines, although Vineyard Winds offer to pay millions of dollars to offset any harm to commercial fishing won the support of others. At least one Cape Cod town council also withheld support.

A rally for Vineyard Wind after the Interior Department announced its pause drew local Chamber of Commerce leaders and many other prominent locals. Massachusetts Republican governor, Charlie Baker, has been traveling to Washington and calling Interior Secretary David Bernhardt to try to win his support.

At Cape Cod Community College in West Barnstable, instructor Chris Powickis Offshore Wind 101 classes and workshop have drawn nuclear and marina workers, engineers, young people and others. People are hoping wind will provide the kind of good-paying professions and trades they need to afford to stay here, Powicki says.

Cape Cod has always been at the end of the energy supply line, or at least ever since we lost our dominance with the whale oil industry after the 19th century, the community college instructor said. So this is an opportunity for Cape Cod to generate its own energy.

On land, the wind boom already is well established. By next year, 9% of the countrys electricity is expected to come from wind power, according to the US Energy Information Administration. The wind industry already claims 114,000 jobs, more than twice the number of jobs remaining in US coal mining, which is losing out in competition against cleaner, cheaper energy sources despite the Trump administrations backing of coal.

The Trump animosity to wind power has gone beyond words in some states, especially in Ohio. A Trump campaign official was active this summer in winning a state ratepayer subsidy for coal and nuclear that also led to cutting state incentives for wind and solar.

But despite the steady gales of condemnation from the countrys wind-hater in chief, wind is booming most strongly in states that voted for Trump.

Then-Texas Gov. Rick Perry, now Trumps energy secretary, pushed his state to one of the current top-four wind power states, along with Oklahoma, Kansas and Iowa.

In Iowa, home to nearly 4,700 turbines that provided a third of the states electricity last year, winds popularity is such that Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley had a drone film him as he sat, grinning, atop one of the countrys biggest wind turbines.

Grassley had no patience for Trumps claim in April that wind turbines like Iowas beloved ones could cause cancer.

Idiotic, Grassley said then.

On the East Coast, many developers and supporters of offshore wind politely demur when asked about Trumps wind-hating tweets and comments.

But not on Block Island.

Were very fortunate that we got it. Very fortunate. Its helped us, McMahon, the retiree on Block Island, said of wind energy. And dont worry about the president. Hes not a nice man.

Continued here:

Donald Trump's windmill hatred is a worry for booming industry - New York Post

Forget impeachment. Donald Trump needs to resign – The Boston Globe

As the historian Rick Perlstein, author of The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, pointed out to me, in the weeks and months after the Saturday Night Massacre in October 1973, prominent members of Congress from both parties called on President Nixon to resign, including Senator Walter Mondale, a Minnesota Democrat, and Senator Edward Brooke, a Massachusetts Republican. Time magazine made the same demand in its first-ever editorial.

After the release of the smoking gun tape that showed Nixon had participated in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, Republican senators, led by Barry Goldwater, solemnly trekked to the White House to tell Nixon he must relinquish the presidency.

In 1998, when the Starr Report was released with its exhaustive tale of President Bill Clintons affair with Monica Lewinsky, 115 newspapers penned editorials calling on Clinton to resign. This week, just a couple of editorial boards have made a similar demand of Trump.

The summary of Trumps phone conversation with Zelensky suggests a malfesance thats arguably worse than Nixons. Yet, not only have Republicans failed to call for resignation, few are even willing to acknowledge that what the president did was wrong. Democrats have been equally reluctant to use the r word.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand infamously helped to push Al Franken out of the Senate by calling for him to resign. Not long after, she was among a group of Democrats who called on Trump to step down over a series of sexual assault allegations in what looked like an attempt to show consistency after the Franken imbroglio.

Earlier this year, when pictures emerged of Governor Ralph Northam of Virginia in blackface, Democrats fell over each other making similar calls. Same with the states lieutenant governor, Justin Fairfax, after allegations of sexual assault were made against him. Neither man resigned and considering that Frankens decision to leave the Senate is now viewed by many Democrats as a mistake, perhaps the new normal is simply to weather the storm.

But with Trump, the lack of resignation calls almost certainly has more to do with the fact that everyone knows hed never do it. Why bother making an ask that will just be cited by Republican as evidence of partisan intent and ignored?

Heres one reason: A call for resignation is a statement of principle that Trumps actions so clearly violate the public trust that his position in office has become untenable. Its an acknowledgment that the president has lost his moral standing and must do the right thing and surrender power. Perhaps above all, its drawing a line in the sand and saying that this behavior is egregious and theres only one right course of action for the president.

A call for resignation is as much about the moral and ethical standards of the person making the demand as the target himself or herself.

Of course, the standard of doing whats best for the country is a quaint nostrum in Trumps America.

When you have a president so completely immune from shame; and when he is enabled by a political party so infected by partisanship that winning is more important than acknowledging wrongdoing and holding leaders accountable, the idea of a selfless political act has become almost laughably antiquated.

Perhaps the most dispiriting element of the whistle-blowers complaint is that multiple individuals around the president all of whom swore an oath to uphold the Constitution appear to have understood he committed a grave abuse of power, and then went to great lengths to cover it up. The heroism of the whistle-blower is sadly matched by the cowardice of Trumps enablers.

Democrats are, of course, right to call for Trumps impeachment. Same goes for the nations editorial boards. But are they so inured to the presidents unending malfeasance, corruption, and law-breaking that they cant make the obvious call for resignation?

Trump should of course step down. He should have done it a long time ago. Its not a close call. Stating that publicly is not an example of partisan bomb-throwing, rather its the precise opposite: a principled recognition that some things are more important than politics.

Michael A. Cohens column appears regularly in the Globe. Follow him on Twitter @speechboy71.

Original post:

Forget impeachment. Donald Trump needs to resign - The Boston Globe