Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable Market Includes Growth Rate, Industry Analysis And Forecast By 2026 – Market Strategies

Posted on by

The latest market intelligence study on Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable market relies on statistics derived from the application of both primary and secondary research to present insights pertaining to the operational model, opportunities and competitive landscape of Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable market for the forecast period, 2019 2026.

Importantly, the research taps critical data about the niche segments, market share, size, and growth rate to offer business owners, field marketing executives and stakeholders a competitive edge over others operating in the same industry. Deep dive into customer focussed aspects including spending power, shifting customer preferences and consumption volume further narrates a lot about the business processes in vogue and product utilization for the forecast period, 2019 2026.

If you are a Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable vendor than this article will help you understand the Sales Volume with Impacting Trends. Click To get FREE SAMPLE PDF (Including Full TOC, Table & Figures) @ https://www.marketexpertz.com/sample-enquiry-form/28623

The major manufacturers covered in this report:

Fasten GroupHTGDYOFCNexansBeldenSumitomo ElectricSterliteGoreCommScopeTimberconKsariaPrysmian GroupFujikura

Scope of the Report

In addition, the research on the Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable market concentrates on extracting valuable data on swelling investment pockets, significant growth opportunities and major market vendors to help understand business owners what their competitors are doing best to stay ahead in the competition. The research also segments the Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable market on the basis of the end-user, product type, application and demography for the forecast period 2018 2025. Detailed analysis of critical aspects such as the impacting factor and competitive landscape are showcased with the help of vital resources like charts, tables, and infographics.

Most important Products of Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable covered in this report are:

Type 1

Type 2

Others

On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications:

Application 1

Application 2

Application 3

Others

!!! Limited Time DISCOUNT Available !!! Get Your Copy at Discounted [emailprotected] https://www.marketexpertz.com/discount-enquiry-form/28623

For more clarity on the real potential of the Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable market for the forecast period of 2019 2026 the study provides vital intelligence on the major opportunities, threats and challenges posed by the industry. Besides, a strong emphasis is laid on the weaknesses and strengths of some of the prominent players operating in the same market. Quantitative assessment of the recent momentum brought about by events such as collaborations, acquisition and mergers, product launches and technology innovation empower product owners, marketing professionals and business analysts make a profitable decision, reduce cost and increase their customer base.

Geographically, this report studies the key regions, focuses on product sales, value, market share and growth opportunity in these regions, covering:

United States

Europe

China

Japan

Southeast Asia

India

Our reports will help you solve the following issues:

Insecurity about the future:

Our research and insights help our clients to anticipate upcoming revenue compartments and growth ranges. This help our client to invest or divest their assets.

Understanding market opinions:

It is extremely vital to have an impartial understanding of market opinions for a strategy. Our insights help to have a keen view on a market sentiment. We keep this reconnaissance by engaging with Key Opinion Leaders of a value chain of each industry we track.

Understanding the most reliable investment centers:

Our research ranks investments centers of market by considering their future demands, returns and profit margins. Our clients can focus on most prominent investment centers by procuring our market research.

Evaluating potential business partners:

Our research and insights help our clients in identifying compatible business partners.

For further information on this analysis, please visit @ https://www.marketexpertz.com/industry-overview/aerospace-fiber-optic-cable-market

The research provides answers to the following key questions:

Why Choose Market Expertz?

Request customized copy of Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable report

We are grateful to you for reading our report. If you wish to find more details of the report or want a customization, contact us. You can get a detailed information of the entire research here. If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Have Any Query? Ask Our Expert @ https://www.marketexpertz.com/customization-form/28623

About us:

Planning to invest in market intelligence products or offerings on the web? Then marketexpertz has just the thing for you reports from over 500 prominent publishers and updates on our collection daily to empower companies and individuals catch-up with the vital insights on industries operating across different geography, trends, share, size and growth rate. Theres more to what we offer to our customers. With marketexpertz you have the choice to tap into the specialized services without any additional charges.

Contact Us:John WatsonHead of Business Development40 Wall St. 28th floor New York CityNY 10005 United StatesMarket Expertz | Web: http://www.marketexpertz.comDirect Line: +1-800-819-3052E-mail: [emailprotected]

See the article here:

Aerospace Fiber Optic Cable Market Includes Growth Rate, Industry Analysis And Forecast By 2026 - Market Strategies

Gulfstream reveals G700 business jets – Aerospace Testing International

Posted on by

Aircraft manufacturer Gulfstream has revealed its new flagship business jet at the NBAA-BACE 2019 event in Las Vegas, Nevada.

A full-scale mockup of the new aircraft and a video of the aircraft taxiing under its own power at Gulfstream headquarters in Savannah, Georgia was shown during the launchat the business aviation exhibitionand conference this week.

Gulfstream President Mark Burns said,The G700 takes the very best elements from our most innovative products and unites them with cutting-edge advances to create an all-new, advanced-technology aircraft that redefines safety, comfort and range at speed.

The G700 features the tallest, widest and longest cabin in business aviation and has a range of 13,890km at Mach 0.85 or 11,853km at Mach 0.90.

The aircraft is powered by the Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines and also features winglets to ensure it achieves high performance capabilities with its larger cabin.

Gulfstream has conducted nearly 14,000 hours of lab testing in its integration- and cabin-test facilities, systems integration bench and using its iron bird. The company has successfully completed ground vibration testing, engine runs, loads calibration and all structural testing required for first flight.

The G700 flight-test fleet will incorporate five traditional test aircraft and one fully outfitted production test aircraft. Manufacturing for all test aircraft is well underway.

Gulfstream anticipates G700 customer deliveries in 2022.

The G700 features the Symmetry Flight Deck, active-control sidesticks, touch-screen technology and Gulfstreams Predictive Landing Performance System, which gives pilots advanced warning of potential runway excursions so they can adjust approaches or go around.

View post:

Gulfstream reveals G700 business jets - Aerospace Testing International

Curtiss-Wright demos total flight test instrumentation solution at ITC 2019 – Aerospace Testing International

Posted on by

Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions has demonstrated its complete airborne data acquisition system solution at the International Telemetering Conference this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The companys Aerospace Instrumentation group presented its system-level flight test instrumentation (FTI), which consists of hardware such as Axon data acquisition units, switches, data recorders, rugged cameras and multi-mode transceivers, to hundreds of delegates at this years show.

We are very proud to showcase our next generation FTI system architecture, combining our industry leading networked from ground to air capabilities with an unmatched range of proven, leading FTI technologies, all working together in one integrated system, said Lynn Bamford, senior vice president and general manager of Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions. This fully integrated system approach enables flight test customers to, for the first time, acquire a complete, future proof system solution from a single supplier.

Curtiss Wright Defense Solutions modular, commercial-off-the-shelf FTI product family is one of the most widely used in the world and supports emerging new standards with Chapter 7 and TmNS components. The high-speed Ethernet-based architecture of its FTI system enables line-of-sight communications so engineers can reconfigure test articles during a mission. For example, the data recorder, camera sources, parameters or image downlink bit rates can be remotely modified.

The company also used the International Telemetering Conference 2019 to launch its Axon ADAU data acquisition range, which integrates with its other existing data acquisition systems. Bamford said, The introduction of the new ADAU range to the Axon product line enables system designers to integrate Axon and TTC nDAU, TTC MnACQ and TTC MnHSD ranges in a seamless manner to ease and speed the setup of next generation data acquisition systems.

Thanks to their high capabilities our Axon DAUs are generating significant interest in the flight test instrumentation community.

More information on Curtiss-Wrights range of data acquisition products can be found here.

Visit link:

Curtiss-Wright demos total flight test instrumentation solution at ITC 2019 - Aerospace Testing International

American Citizen Detained While Trying to Pay a Customs Fee – The Intercept

Posted on by

It was July of last year, and the mans daughter was to be married soon. A box of celebratory gifts clothing and perfume from family in the Middle East arrived at Buffalo Niagara International Airport customs. The man had picked up similar shipments a handful of times before, enough to know the routine: The customs office calls to let him know his items have arrived, inspects the goods, and tells him to pay an import duty at an office just 13 miles away at the Peace Bridge, which connects the U.S. to Canada.

This time, however, when he arrived at the bridge office as instructed, carrying a handwritten note from the original customs office, the man, a U.S. citizen, was detained and searched by Customs and Border Protection, he said. His phones were seized and his car rifled through. His father and cousin, who had been waiting in the vehicle, were themselves detained, ordered into the office to answer questions about their national backgrounds.

The incident, as described by the man and his attorneys, illustrates just how ready officials are to conduct invasive searches at the border, where, in the name of national security, certain due process protections normally afforded Americans under the Fourth Amendment are not observed. It also calls into question whether the man, who is Muslim, was singled out because of his faith. The man, who asked not to be named because he fears retaliation and harrassment, was not flying or otherwise crossing the border that day and did not expect to be detained while merely trying to clear a package of gifts.

CBP did not respond to requests for comment.

Every citizen of the United States is constitutionally protected against unreasonable searches and seizures but there are exceptions. Although the law demands that police interested in the contents of your car trunk or location of your iPhone first obtain a warrant, the rules change for Americans traveling through, say, an airport, or a road checkpoint along the Mexican border. This is known as the border search exception to the Fourth Amendment. In these instances, courts have ruled, law enforcement can conduct a routine search of you and your belongings, like emptying of your pockets or opening your bag at airport security, without a warrant or even cause for suspicion. Any search at the border considered non-routine a strip search, for instance requires some modicum of suspicion.

But routine or non-routine, the border search exception is grounded in traversal of the border itself, the rationale being that a governments interest in who is attempting to enter the country (and what theyre carrying) is a reasonable one. Searches made at the border, pursuant to the long-standing right of the sovereign to protect itself by stopping and examining persons and property crossing into this country, are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border, the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark 1977 border search case.

But CBPs authority isnt a blank check to subject people to invasive border-type searches if they arent actually trying to cross the border, New York Civil Liberties policy counsel Zach Ahmad told The Intercept. It is incumbent on CBP to determine when someone is actually trying to enter or leave the country.

The New York man lets call him John Doe found himself on that July day stuck in this legal gray zone, where constitutional norms are suspended and Homeland Security asserts itself unflinchingly. He and one of the attorneys, Albert Fox Cahn, discussed the incident by phone in an interview with The Intercept.

Normally when paying the import duty at the airport, Doe could simply hand over the money and drive home. In the July incident, at the CBP cashiers counter, Doe was asked where hed come from. He showed his paperwork from the customs office just 12 miles away and explained that he hadnt arrived from anywhere by plane; he was an American and a local, with no intention of crossing the border that day or any other that day.

He was asked for his identification in order to pay thesmall duty fee for his daughters gifts, and only then realized that hed left his wallet at home. When he explained this, that hed made an honest mistake and wanted only to pay the routine duty owed and depart, he was told that in fact he wasnt permitted to leave. Doe asked if he could speak to a supervisor who might be familiar with his situation a customs official at the airport had emailed ahead of his arrival but was told to go inside a detention area and nothing further. He was led to an inspection room by himself. Doe was now detained.

He was asked for his identification in order to pay thesmall duty fee, and only then realized that hed left his wallet at home. When he explained this, he was told that in fact he wasnt permitted to leave.

After sitting alone in the detention room for about an hour, Doe was questioned further by a CBP officer. Where are you from? he was asked again. Here, he repeated. Doe was asked to empty the contents of his pockets and turn them inside out in front of the officers, who took his car keys and left to search the vehicle without his permission or presence. CBP was permitted to search the car, they said, because hed driven it to their office.

Does father and cousin, whod been waiting in the car during what they thought would be a quick stop, were ordered inside to join their relative in the detention room and questioned about their nationality before being let go. Doe, alarmed by what was happening, attempted to contact his brother from his phone, only to be told he wasnt permitted to use his phone at all, and that it would be now be confiscated. The CBP officer present pressed Doe on why he had two cellphones before ordering him to hand them both over; Doe said in an interview that he simply prefers having two phones and got a good deal on them. Thats not criminal, to have two phones, he said.

Its unclear what exactly CBP did with Does devices. All he and his lawyers know for certain, they told The Intercept, is that the agency had physical possession of them for roughly 45 minutes and that for part of that time, they were placed near a CBP computer, where Doe could see them.

Cellebrite, an Israeli firm that has sold forensic software to law enforcement agencies across the country including CBP has claimed the ability to pull data from a phone and onto an agents computer at speeds of up to 1 gigabyte per minute, meaning troves of emails, texts, photos, contacts, and other sensitive personal data could be exfiltrated in a relatively short amount of time.

The rules for how such device searches are supposed to be conducted in an era when the contents of your smartphone can contain more or less a full record of your existence are a muddle. Policies adopted by CBPs organizational parent entity, the Department of Homeland Security, permit border agents to conduct a so-called basic search of your phone confined to scrolling and tapping through its screen just as you would yourself without any justification. A so-called advanced device search, using software that can break through security mechanisms like password locks and encryption and make permanent copies of data for later analysis, is permitted whenever there is reasonable suspicion of activity in violation of the laws enforced or administered by CBP, or in which there is a national security concern. These terms remain largely undefined, at least in public documents, and CBP Directive No. 3340-049A, the most recently published version of Homeland Securitys rules for rummaging through phones at the border, is rife with exceptions. For example, per the July 2018 directive, Searches of electronic devices should be conducted in the presence of the individual whose information is being examined, unless, that is, there are national security, law enforcement, officer safety, or other operational considerations that make it inappropriate to permit the individual to remain present.

Sophia Cope, a senior staff attorney with Electronic Frontier Foundation, told The Intercept that searching a person already inside the U.S. stretches the Fourth Amendments border search exception beyond recognition, adding that there is nothing in CBPs policy on border searches of electronic devices that authorizes such a search like the one Doe experienced.

Searching a person already inside the U.S. stretches the Fourth Amendments border search exception beyond recognition.

After over an hour, Doe was released. At no point had he received an explanation for his detention, the search of his car, the questioning of his relatives, or the seizure of his phones, he said. During his detention, the only thing even resembling a rationale for his treatment was a comment that the handwritten note hed brought from airport customs to the CBP facility was unusual, though no attempt seemed to have been made to contact customs to see that his story checked out. Days later, a friend recommended Doe contact the Council on AmericanIslamic Relations, where Cahn, a civil liberties and privacy attorney, took up his case, along with the New York law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan. Cahn, who later left CAIR to become executive director of the Urban Justice Centers Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, told The Intercept that he and his client have yet to sue the government but hope Does story will prompt others who have been subjected to border searches without even attempting to cross the border to come forward.

Weve seen a huge surge in complaints from the Muslim community describing an ongoing campaign of discriminatory searches by CBP all across the country, said Cahn. I find it hard to believe that its a complete coincidence that of all the American citizens entering that office on that day, the man who is singled out for a search happens to be a Muslim man of Middle Eastern descent, he added. I think we see a prolonged campaign to turn the border zone into a constitutional free zone. Theres a systemic disregard for the law. Cahn told The Intercept that hes flagged the matter for several high-profile DHS officials and repeatedly reached out out to the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties at DHS, but has never received any substantive reply or explanation for Does detention. The DHS CRCL office referred a request for comment to the departments media office, which did not respond.

Theres no anger in Does voice when he talks about his detention but still traces of dismay and confusion. Why? Why only me? Why this time? Too many questions came to my mind. I [did] not cross the border, Im in the U.S. I hear a lot of things about U.S. customs sometime, especially as a Muslim. When they put me inside the room alone, I felt just like Id been selected as a criminal, like Ive done something wrong. If someone walked in and saw me in that room alone it made me feel guilty. What have I done?

Read the original:

American Citizen Detained While Trying to Pay a Customs Fee - The Intercept

The Media Yawns as Our Civil Liberties are Trampled Upon – Townhall

Posted on by

|

Posted: Oct 23, 2019 12:01 AM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.

A recently revealed court ruling received very little media attention. Most Americans are not aware that U.S. District Judge James Boasberg (an Obama nominee) issued a scathing indictment of ourfederal spy program. This ruling exposed improper searches of tens of thousands of illegal searches of raw intelligence databases, including 70,000 emails and telephone numbers, and other digital identifiers that were illegally searched. The Judge ruled that these searches were not consistent with the Fourth Amendment.

As serious as this ruling is, the media is preoccupied working on their partisan coup attempt of the Trump administration, masked as impeachment. While these liberal media hacks focus on the junk that has little impact on the American people, assaults on our liberty are a significant issue they are purposely marginalizing. Why? Keep reading.

In the months following the attacks of 9-11 the government took advantage of a nation still in shock. The government told Congress that if they only had the tools, they could prevent another attack but to do so we had to give away some essential liberties. Everybody in the media and Congress fell for it without much discussion because nobody wanted to be accused of aiding terrorists to attack again. We have to do something was the rallying cry. U.S. spy agencies knew they had an emotionally vulnerable public that could be easily persuaded to give away these essential liberties, thereby allowing the government broad surveillance authority to violate the Fourth Amendment in the name of national security. The government promised that they wouldnt abuse it even though, by its very nature, intelligence work is highly intrusive. We were also promised strict oversight. They were required to self-report when abuses were discovered. Instead, this only became public after the FBI went to an appeals court to block the judgment against them and lost. Since its inception, I opposed the Patriot Act and its ugly stepsister the USA Freedom Act. This marks, perhaps, the only time I have ever sided with the American Civil Liberties Union on a law enforcement issue.

Giving the government unbridled authority to search into our digital lives without being suspected of wrongdoing and without probable cause is not consistent with a constitutional democracy and self-rule. Its not whether the government can be trusted; instead, they should never be trusted. I believe our nations Founders also understood this. This is why we have a constitution, a pact between government and citizens limiting vast intrusions into our daily lives. I realize that government overreach has significantly expanded today, but a restrained federal bureaucracy is still the foundation of this republic.

The problem with the post 9-11 spying authority is that it allows the government to operate under a veil of secrecy. For example, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) gives the government the authority to work around the Fourth Amendment. But as we have seen with government agents requesting a search warrant or searching without one, the lack of an adversarial stage like in criminal courts, results in the loss of liberties. A core American principle is that a government working for the people must be transparent to the people. The governments claim that more transparency would hamper an investigation is nothing more than hyperbole. Nobody contests that platitude and government agents know it. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court- FISC judges, do not have the experience in spy operations to be able to ask pointed questions to test the validity of an agents claims. As a result, most applications for a search warrant in a FISA court are nearly unanimously approved. The congressional staff that does most of the oversight work lack the same experience about how these operations work, so they sit there and nod in agreement with whatever crap an experienced spy agency bureaucrat feeds them. Recall that the FBI went to a FISC to request a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign and were granted one based on a fake dossier. Even if an oversight committee asks relevant questions, the answer more times than not is that answering would jeopardize national security. That is coded language for, we dont want you to know because the answer would embarrass us. Thus the FISC has become a rubber stamp on government testimony in a search warrant request or in operations called sneak and peek where they search digital data without a warrant. Government agents then hide what they do by classifying it as top secret. This is a problem. As we are seeing, when no one is watching, abuse runs rampant.

An important question in these government surveillance abuses is who did it and what consequences will there be for this severe breach of peoples privacy. We never hear who specifically violated the Constitution or how they will be disciplined. Again its because the government operates in the dark. The agent responsible should be publicly named. This alone will make them think twice about skirting the Constitution because of public shame and humiliation. When a court finds that a local law enforcement officer violated someones Fourth Amendment rights, the evidence is thrown out, and that particular officers identity can be learned through public information disclosure. They can face criminal indictment under a 1983 claim for instance for violating a persons rights under the color of law or civil court sanctions. That serves as a deterrent and accountability. With federal agents engaged in surveillance operations that are hidden from public view, it becomes impossible to hold people accountable.

Apparently court decisions like this arent sexy enough for headline coverage in major newspapers or cable news. Congress currently is too preoccupied with the kabuki theater of impeachment. Will Adam Schiff call for hearings, demanding our civil liberties be protected from abuse? No. My suggestion is that they stop the political game-playing and work on something of value to the American people like their oversight responsibility of our spy agencies to prevent these abuses. I know. Wishful thinking.

See the original post:

The Media Yawns as Our Civil Liberties are Trampled Upon - Townhall

Trump administration ruling gives states the option to allow drug testing for unemployment benefits – KRTV Great Falls News

Posted on by

According to a ruling by the U.S. Department of Labor, several states will now be able to drug test people in certain occupations for unemployment benefits.

The new rule, which was handed down by the Trump administration on Oct. 4, gives states the option to allow people of certain occupations to pass a drug test before they can be become eligible to receive unemployment benefits. The rule is a dramatic reversal of an Obama-era policy that placed restrictions on drug testing and unemployment.

Among the states that plan to begin drug-testing certain people seeking unemployment is Wisconsin. The state's Department of Workforce Development says it currently takes seven days to receive unemployment benefits after someone first applies. However, it's unknown if the timeline could change if a drug test is involved and some officials fear any extra time could be detrimental to families in need.

"I think it's the difference between having a place to stay and an eviction," State Rep. David Bowen (D-Milwaukee) said. "I think it's the difference between having food on your table and starving."

Bowen is already nervous about his community. However, Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, says nothing is going to be implemented until he gets more answers.

"We need more details from the federal government before we go down that road," Evers said. "The last thing I ever want is to take away the ability to have a safety net for people that need it."

Those in favor of drug testing say the new policy could help an ongoing drug problem in Wisconsin. Proponents argue that the sooner those with substance abuse issues can be identified, the sooner and get the help they need.

"The point of having the drug screening is that first step to get you help so then you can find that independence to having a job," State Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menomonee Falls) said. "There's no greater social program than having a good-paying job."

The Department of Workforce Development says it is still in the early stages of evaluating the new rules, so it doesn't have a timeline for when a new policy could be implemented in Wisconsin. But, more drug testing could be costly.

"There are still 250,000 people every year collecting unemployment benefits," said Victor Forberger, a Labor & Employment Law Attorney. "That's a lot of people subject to these kind of requirements."

Forberger says if testing goes up to 10 or 20 percent, it could mean tens of thousands of dollars a year just in testing. He also says it could result in even more expense to the state in the long run.

"If we implement the drug testing and provide drug treatment programs, the numbers would be astronomical," Forberger said. "Even with minimal positive results, you're talking maybe a thousand people who would have to get drug treatment programs. That would be a huge increase in numbers. There's a whole host of issues from the Fourth Amendment and privacy concerns because factual basis for that could be challenged in court. As a result, there could be very expensive litigation."

This story was originally published by Shaun Gallagher on WTMJ in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The rest is here:

Trump administration ruling gives states the option to allow drug testing for unemployment benefits - KRTV Great Falls News

Lombardo vows to remove "worst of the worst" as Metro agrees to suspend ICE partnership – Nevada Current

Posted on by

Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo says a court ruling that prohibits Las Vegas Metro Police and other Nevada law enforcement agencies from making arrests based on immigration status may be seen as a setback, and is likely to be appealed to the Ninth Circuit. Until then, Metro will no longer honor its agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customers Enforcement to detain immigrants.

LVMPD awaits further direction from the appeals court; however, until the uncertainty in the law is clarified, it must cease honoring ICE detainers the release says. LVMPD will continue to work with ICE at the Clark County Detention Center in removing persons without legal status who have committed violent crimes.

I am optimistic that this change will not hinder LVMPDs ability to fight violent crime Lombardo said in the release. While the ruling can be seen as a setback, I am determined that through cooperation with our federal partners the goal of removing the worst of the worst can still be accomplished.

Southern Nevada groups have long complained that Metro hasfailed to be transparent and accountableabout its relationship with ICE.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, 78 law enforcement agencies across the countryparticipate in the 287(g) program. Those agencies arerequired to host steering committee meetings, like the one in Las Vegas Tuesday, where law enforcement agencies go over new information about the program.

Metro left immigrant and rights advocates even more dumbfounded earlier this month after a public meeting on the 287 (g) program ended in less than 10 minutes.

This is the right decision for the states largest law enforcement agency, Tod Story, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, said in a statement about Metros decision Wednesday. Its not just inappropriate for Nevada agencies to participate in the federal governments deportation agenda, but its unconstitutional as well. Well continue to advocate for the rights of our immigrant communities, and will engage with other police agencies around the state to end their partnerships with ICE.

The ACLU has argued the Trump administration policy of detaining immigrants was based on information gleaned from flawed databases and violates the Fourth Amendment, which requires that arrests be based on probable cause.

The rest is here:

Lombardo vows to remove "worst of the worst" as Metro agrees to suspend ICE partnership - Nevada Current

Tech Company Gave 2 New Orleans-area Sheriff’s Offices Access To Track Cell Phones Without Warrants – The Appeal

Posted on by

Two New Orleans-area sheriffs offices contracted with a company that gave them access to location data of any cell phone the agencies sought to track.

From 2015 to mid-2018, the Jefferson Parish sheriffs officewhich has jurisdiction over Louisianas second-most populous parish and also runs its jailcaptured more than 5,800 coordinates showing a cell phones location, said agency spokesperson Captain Jason Rivarde. He said the technology was used as part of criminal investigations.

Rivarde said the thousands of pings often captured location data of the same cell phone number dozens of times per day before the technology was disabled in mid-2018 by Securus Technologies, one of the nations leading providers of phone and messaging services for correctional facilities.

The contracts with Securus and the Jefferson and Orleans Parish sheriffs offices stated that the onus to collect the data legally fell on law enforcement. Despite language in the contracts that Securus makes no representation or warranty as to the legality of the technologys use, neither law enforcement agency had written policies regarding collecting, managing, or storing cell phone location data without violating peoples privacy rights.

With such powerful technology comes substantial government responsibility to build out safeguards, and it sounds like that didnt happen here, said Katie Schwartzmann, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Unions Louisiana office.

The Orleans Parish sheriffs office, whose primary function is running the citys jail and providing courthouse security, had access to the technology from April to May of 2018, before Securus disabled it. Blake Arcuri, an attorney for the sheriffs office, said the agency did not get a chance to use the technology before it was disabled and had no written policies about it. The sheriffs office said its contract with Securus was amended in March 2018 to add the location data service because the agency learned of the new feature and sought its inclusion in any subsequent agreement, but it offered no further explanation.

The Jefferson Parish sheriffs office retrieved cell phone location data through the Securus because it provided a shortcut to the data instead of going through the service providers of cell phone users, Rivarde said.

The contracts between Securus and the Orleans and Jefferson Parish sheriffs offices show that the company gave its clients access to location data for cell phones that made or received calls from their correctional facilities. The contracts also offered to provide location data for cell phones regardless of whether the phone connected with a call at their jails. The agency simply had to provide Securus with a cell phone number, and Securus would provide that phones location data. Rivarde said the Jefferson Parish sheriffs office used the service for criminal investigations, including homicides, robbery, drug or missing persons cases, and tracking fugitives.

To my knowledge, he said, the agency did not use use Securus to track locations of calls coming in and out of the jail.

Rivarde said the Jefferson Parish sheriffs office obtained court orders for the location data that the agency retrieved through Securus. But the practice of seeking court orders for the data is not mentioned in the agencys contract with Securus. And Rivarde said they had no written policies requiring court orders to use the technology.

The Appeal requested samples of five such court orders from the Jefferson Parish sheriffs office under Louisianas Public Records Act. On Oct. 22, a commander with its Central Records and Warrants Division wrote in an email to The Appeal that the public records request for samples of court orders, are not readily accessible without more information.

The Orleans Parish sheriffs office did not respond to a public records request seeking any written notification from Securus that its cell phone location technology was disabled. The Jefferson Parish sheriffs office provided a letter to The Appeal from Securus dated May 11, 2018 stating that the company could no longer provide the location-based services because some wireless carriers were no longer allowing it.

In an email statement to The Appeal, Securus said it stopped offering the location-based service in May 2018 to all of our law enforcement customers. Securus did not respond to a question about the companys rationale for discontinuing the technology. The change, however, came just weeks before the Supreme Court ruled in Carpenter v. United States that cell phone location records are protected by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, and that a warrant establishing probable cause is required to obtain them.

ACLU attorney Nathan Freed Wessler argued the case and told The Appeal that the decision powerfully recognized why we need robust privacy protections for our location data, because of all the really private and sensitive parts of our lives it can reveal.

Rivarde said that from 2015 to 2018, the Jefferson Parish sheriffs office obtained approximately 500 court orders for cell phone location data through Securus. In some instances, he said, deputies got multiple court orders for a single criminal case. Rivarde said each court order was obtained through a conversation with a magistrate commissioner and not via a written affidavit thats typically required for a warrant. The orders authorized unlimited pings on a cell phone over seven days. Warrants require a written statement establishing probable cause that a crime was committed, while court orders establish a lower standard of reasonable suspicion, Chief Justice John Roberts noted in the Carpenter ruling.

Schwartzmann said the fact that the technology was used to track individuals hundreds of times raises serious constitutional concerns.

Since Securus disabled the technology in 2018, Rivarde said, deputies have begun applying for and obtaining warrants for cell phone location data from service providers.

In April and May of 2018, an automated recording warned people who called incarcerated people at the Orleans Justice Center, that the call is subject to recording and monitoring and your location information may be collected and used by corrections and law enforcement personnel. Arcuri said the technology was never used, but the disclaimer was required when the program was available for use by the sheriffs office.

Such a recorded disclaimer may not be considered proper consent, as phones are often the only way family members can communicate with a loved one in jail, Schwartzmann said.

Law enforcement agencies with access to Securuss cell phone location data technology absolutely should have had written policies to prevent abuse, said Schwartzmann.

The office needs policies to stop an officer from using this technology to track the whereabouts of his ex-wife, a politician from tracking the whereabouts of their opponents, or officers from surveilling people they just dont like, she added.

Storage of the location data once its collected should have been addressed in written policies, Schwartzmann said.

The Jefferson Parish sheriffs office also had no written policies dictating where or how long the cell phone location data obtained through Securus should be stored or who had access to it, Rivarde said. The information was handled like any other investigative measure in criminal cases, he said. Some of the data remains logged as evidence, while others remain as part of electronic files maintained by our records division.

The public needs proof that the data is securely stored with limitations on access, said Simone Levine, executive director of the criminal legal reform organization Court Watch NOLA.

In 2018, Court Watch NOLA raised concerns about the Orleans Parish sheriffs offices practice of using Securus technology to record calls between incarcerated people and their attorneys. The organization found that the Orleans Parish district attorneys office listened to attorney-client calls and used information gathered in such conversations to prosecute people, which Levine said violated attorney-client privilege.

A spokesperson for the Orleans Parish district attorneys office declined to comment to The Appeal but referred a reporter to 2005 case law, U.S. v. Lentz, which states that a disclaimer warning prisoners that a call with their attorney is subject to monitoring forfeits privilege. In 2018, the office told The Times-Picayune the calls between incarcerated people and their attorneys were not privileged and noted the recorded warning.

The fact that jailers, and potentially investigators and prosecutors, would have had access to cell phone locations without a warrant, Levine said, has all kinds of implications that could infringe on peoples rights.

Securuss statement to The Appeal referred to the location data service as a lifesaving tool, that their law enforcement clients used to find missing children, locate individuals suffering from dementia, and apprehend violent offenders. But the companys contracts with law enforcement agencies didnt provide this rationale for tracking cell phones, and Securus didnt require clients to provide a reason to collect the location data.

See original here:

Tech Company Gave 2 New Orleans-area Sheriff's Offices Access To Track Cell Phones Without Warrants - The Appeal

ACLU Sues Over Harassment of Immigrant Advocates – The Intercept

Posted on by

Since Donald Trumpsinauguration more than two years ago, Alex Mensing,a volunteerwith the immigrant rights group Pueblo Sin Fronteras, has been pulled into secondary screening nearly 30 times at U.S. ports in the San Diego-Tijuana area, as well as the Los Angeles airport. His longest interrogation, in late 2018, spanned roughly four hours. It was hardly an isolated experience, Mensing told me. Pretty much every member of Pueblo Sin Fronteras who crossed the border was interrogated during that time,he said.

An Intercept investigation in February uncovered the backstory to those interrogations, revealing that Pueblo Sin Fronteras was targeted in a secretive joint U.S.-Mexican intelligence gathering operation, which also swept up immigration attorneys and journalists working along the border. NBC News later obtained documents showing that the operation was carried out by officials within U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the FBI, and included a secret database made up of 59 activists, journalists, attorneys, and unspecified others. At least 10 of the governments targets were volunteers with Pueblo Sin Fronteras. Mensing was one of them.

While CBP eventually admitted to the operations, which sparked multiple internal and congressional investigations, the federal law enforcement agencies involved have emerged from the episode largely unscathed. Mensing is hoping to change that. On Wednesday, he joined two other plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and Kirkland & Ellis, in filing a lawsuit against CBP, ICE, and the FBI for violations of their First and Fourth Amendment rights. Though Mensing and his co-plaintiffs did not commit any crime, violate any customs or border regulation, or engage in any other activity that could reasonably give rise to a suspicion of criminality, the ACLU alleged, they nonetheless faced repeated and prolonged detentions and interrogations at the border.

The governments powers are not limitless, the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court of Arizona, read. It cannot target people for intrusive surveillance, detention, searches, and interrogation because of their expressive political activity protected under the First Amendment. And it cannot use its border control powers to regulate the import of goods, verify travelers identities, and stop the entry of contraband to conduct suspicionless fishing expeditions for criminal activity unconnected to border enforcement that it could not conduct within the country.

The Trump administrations border enforcement agencies illegally and unconstitutionally exploited their border enforcement authorities, the complaint went on to say, by directing surveillance, detention, intrusive searches accompanied by excessive physical restraint, and intensive interrogation at the border against individuals because of their lawful humanitarian activities.

The ACLUs suit comes one year after thousands of migrants, most from Central America, made their way by caravan to the U.S. border. Some were running from the violence and instability of their home countries, others were fleeing the devastating impacts of the climate crisis on the rural communities they called home.

Families with children traveled together, seeking safety in numbers as they navigated stretches of Mexico where kidnapping, extortion, and murder of migrants are entrenched problems. Though it was not the first, the October 2018 caravan prompted a furious response from Trump, who deployed more than 5,000 troops to the border. Operation Faithful Patriot was initiated just in time for the 2018 midterm elections. Later changed to Operation Secure Line, it was the same campaign under which the surveillance of journalists, lawyers, and advocates was justified. In the months that followed, U.S. border security forces twice launched tear gas into Mexico in response to the caravan, once in November and again on New Years Eve. Both times, women and children were caught up in the gassings.

As The Intercepts and NBCs reporting revealed, the U.S. also ramped up scrutiny of advocates, lawyers, and journalists working in the Tijuana-San Diego area. Mexican law enforcement snapped photos of the passports of photojournalists working near the border wall. When asked who they were taking the images for, the Mexicans replied, For the Americans. The photojournalists were later pulled into secondary screening as they attempted to reenter the U.S. Their images and electronics were searched, and they were pumped for information about the caravan and the activists working with the migrants.

Two award-winning photographers were denied reentry into Mexico, barring them from the place where their journalistic work was focused. Immigration attorneys with the prominent border law firm Al Otro Lado were similarly denied reentry. They filed their own lawsuit, also with the ACLU, challenging the governments actions earlier this year.

By late 2018, interrogations of Pueblo Sin Fronteras volunteers had become the norm. Volunteer Jeff Valenzuela, Mensings co-plaintiff in the ACLU suit, got it particularly bad. A U.S. citizen living in Tijuana with family in California, Valenzuela told his story of border harassment for the first time in an interview with The Intercept earlier this year, explaining how he had been sent to secondary screening a half-dozen times from December through February. In one of the instances, which occurred on Christmas Day as he was attempting to visit his family, border guards searched his phone and he was held for roughly 2 1/2 hours. When Valenzuela attempted to cross the border again days later, he was taken to a concrete cell and shackled to a steel bench for approximately five hours.

For Mensing, the intensification of interrogations became too much. I just got fed up with it. I was tired of getting detained. I was tired of getting interrogated. I was concerned about further retaliation. I was concerned it would escalate, he said. And so, I did not go to the United States from January until September.

The targeting of immigration advocates has extended beyond the San Diego-Tijuana area. In June 2017, roughly 30 Border Patrol agents swept through a humanitarian camp where the faith-based group No More Deaths was providing medical care to a group of migrants who had crossed the desert in southern Arizona. The raid marked the beginning of a sustained crackdown on humanitarian aid providers in the state. In the last two years, the U.S. attorneys office in Arizona has brought nine federal cases against No More Deaths volunteers for leaving jugs of water in the Sonoran Desert, where thousands of migrants have died. In the most serious case to stem from the crackdown, Trump administration prosecutors charged Scott Warren, a geographer from the unincorporated border community of Ajo, with harboring and conspiracy for providing two undocumented migrants with food, water, and beds to sleep in over three days last year. His case ended in a hung jury over the summer. His retrial is scheduled for mid-November. Warren still faces up to 10 years in prison.

Ana Adlerstein, the third plaintiff in the ACLU suit, felt the weight of the Arizona crackdown firsthand when she accompanied an asylum-seeker to the Lukeville port of entry earlier this year. Adlerstein was taken into custody during the episode and, according to the complaint and an interview she gave to The Intercept at the time, told that the Fourth Amendment doesnt apply here. Though she was released after several hours, Adlerstein said U.S. officials accused her of violating the same smuggling statutes that Warren was charged under. Months later, Amnesty International released a report documenting how the threat of smuggling charges has appeared again and again in dozens of cases related to the Trump administrations targeting of aid providers on the border. By discriminatorily targeting human rights defenders most of them US citizens based solely on their political or other opinions, speech and activities, the Trump administration has violated international law, the US Constitution, US laws, and corresponding DHS policies that acknowledge those legally binding civil liberties protections, the July report said.

Last month, Mensing crossed the border into the U.S. for the first time in more than half a year. I got sent to secondary, he said. And I have been sent to secondary every single time I have crossed the border since. The constant pressure from the state has taken its toll, Mensing explained, not just personally, but also on efforts to advocate for some of the worlds most vulnerable populations. If it hadnt been for criminalization by both the U.S. government and the Mexican government, Mensing said, he probably would have spent the spring accompanying caravans north, as he has for the last two years. Its completely changed the way that the organization operates. It completely changes the way that Ive engaged, Mensing explained. Theres a lot of stuff that Pueblo Sin Fronteras and I could have done in the last year to support migrants, to support migrant leadership, to support migrant safety, that we werent able to do because of this process of criminalization.

For Mensing, the targeting he and other advocates have experienced is one thread in a larger story of efforts aimed at deterring migrants displaced from their homes from coming to the U.S. On Saturday, a caravan of more than 1,000 migrants from several African, Caribbean, and Central American nations set off at daybreak from Tapachula, a city in the southern Mexican state of Chiapas, headed north. They were less than a mile into the journey when Mexican security and immigration enforcement forces swarmed, stopping the caravan in its tracks. Three days later, Mensing was still dealing with the fallout, providing consultation to a Honduran national, and fellow migrant rights advocate, swept up in the crackdown.

This kind of stuff is happening every day,he told me. The constitutional violations that we are suing about are an infinitesimal tip of the iceberg of what the U.S. government is doing to crack down on migrant rights groups.

Read the original here:

ACLU Sues Over Harassment of Immigrant Advocates - The Intercept

Sobriety Checkpoint Will Be Held In Cuyahoga County – Patch.com

Posted on by

BROOK PARK, OH A sobriety checkpoint will be held somewhere in Cuyahoga County this weekend, the Ohio State Highway Patrol announced. Details on the checkpoint will be announced later in the week.

The Highway Patrol said sobriety checkpoints are designed to both intercept drunken drivers and deter impaired drivers from ever taking the road. Local law enforcement will assist in conducting the checkpoint.

Residents are asked to designate a sober driver or make other travel arrangements if they plan on drinking, the Highway Patrol said. "Don't let another life be lost for the senseless and selfish act of getting behind the wheel impaired," the Patrol said.

Police departments in Ohio are required by law to announce sobriety checkpoints and their locations prior to the operation. If law enforcement did not announce the checkpoints, residents could argue their Fourth Amendment rights had been violated.

Sobriety checkpoints are meant to serve as a deterrent to drunken driving as much as a means of catching impaired drivers. Announcing checkpoints allows police to send a strong message don't drink and drive, we'll be out there looking for you.

Read this article:

Sobriety Checkpoint Will Be Held In Cuyahoga County - Patch.com

FPC Demands Police Training in the Wake of Another Unjustifiable Kill – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Posted on by

FPC Demands Police Training in the Wake of Another Unjustifiable Kill

U.S.A. -(Ammoland.com)- Firearms Policy Coalition has issued the following statement in the wake of another killing of an armed and innocent person by police:

On October 12, in Fort Worth, Texas, Atatiana Koquice Jeffersons neighbor called the police because he saw the door of her home left ajar. A Fort Worth police officer took the call. About 2:20 a.m., without announcing his presence, he began moving around outside Ms. Jeffersons home, checking windows and making noise. Hearing alarming sounds from outside her home, Ms. Jefferson did what many responsible Americans would do: she went to investigate the sounds, prepared for the worst. Seconds later, she was shot and killed by the officer.

The tragic and unjustifiable killing of Ms. Jefferson underscores why law enforcement must be better trained to safely encounter people with guns and other constitutionally protected weapons. Especially with the ever-increasing number of individuals who keep and carry firearms for self-defense, the default assumption of law enforcement officers must be that someone armed is not a violent threat until that person proves otherwise. Assuming that every armed person poses a threat puts lives at risk and unnecessarily expands the class divide between government actors and the People they serve.

The Second Amendment codified the pre-existing right of self-defense, which includes the right to keep and bear instruments of force to repel unjust or unlawful force against them. Millions of people exercise this right every day by keeping and carrying guns for self-defense.

Effective self-defense sometimes requires responding, armed with a gun, to an alarming noise at ones home. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in its landmark D.C. v. Heller (2008) decision that the Second Amendment surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home. Thus, law enforcement officers cannot use deadly force where it would otherwise be unjustified merely because the homeowner is believed to own a firearm.

Law enforcement agencies and officers must embrace the reality that the mere presence of a firearm does not, and cannot, make its possessor a target for deadly pre-emptive force. In its recent Hicks v. Commonwealth (2019) decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted the arguments presented in our coalition brief supporting Mr. Hicks, explaining: We find no justification for the notion that a police officer may infer criminal activity merely from an individuals possession of a concealed firearm in public. . . . Unless a police officer has prior knowledge that a specific individual is not permitted to carry a concealed firearm, and absent articulable facts supporting reasonable suspicion that a firearm is being used or intended to be used in a criminal manner, there simply is no justification for the conclusion that the mere possession of a firearm, where it lawfully may be carried, is alone suggestive of criminal activity.

Mr. Hicks was seized in public. Ms. Jefferson, by contrast, was in her home. And the U.S. Supreme Court said in Heller that the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute at ones home. Ms. Jefferson was therefore exercising a core Second Amendment right by responding to an alarming noise outside her home by retrieving her firearm to protect herself and her loved ones.

Law enforcement policies and practices that ignore or discount the right to be armed (such as by perceiving all people with guns as threats to pre-emptively shoot or kill), the militarization of our police forces, the absurdly expansive and dangerous qualified immunity doctrine, the senselessly frequent hostile police encounters, and casual use of deadly force are all incredibly concerning and demand serious reform.

FPC demands that federal, state, and local law enforcement throughout the United States immediately engage in substantive training programs that acknowledge the Second and Fourth Amendment rights of armed people, and adequately address the growing number of unjustifiable and tragic killings of armed and innocent people. FPC looks forward to supporting and promoting legal and policy reforms that put human rights and liberty first.

About Firearms Policy Coalition

Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPCs mission is to defend the Peoples rightsespecially the fundamental, individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear armsadvance individual liberty, and restore freedom.

Continued here:

FPC Demands Police Training in the Wake of Another Unjustifiable Kill - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

President Trump Is Violating More Than The Emoluments Clause With His Doral Summit – Above the Law

Posted on by

Trump Doral (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Yes, Donald Trumps decision to award himself the G-7 Summit at his Doral Resort is a violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. And its probably a violation of the Domestic Emoluments Clause. In fact, its probably the most obvious violation of those clauses in American history. Its self-dealing; its corrupt; its an impeachable offense on its own. The House Judiciary Committee is going to investigate the self-dealing, because they pretty much have to.

Trump has, of course, violated the Emoluments Clause before. Hes actually facing two lawsuits about that. In fact, the Fourth Circuit just agreed to hold an en banc rehearing of one of the emoluments lawsuits.

Emoluments Clause is probably enough law for the political press to handle for one scandal. But, just among us chickens, can we also talk about how the Trump administration is potentially violating laws regarding the assignment of government contracts? Like, ALL of them?

This isnt Nam, there are rules. Hosting the G-7 is, at base, the awarding of a government contract. We have multiple, overlapping statutes regarding that process. There are procedures. There are forms. Those forms require signatures. Getting a government contract is a big part of our economy. Since our economy is based on competition, as opposed to central planning, its simply NOT A THING for the President of the United States to just pick winners of that economy, before we even get to the part where picking himself the winner is a violation of the Constitution.

Im no expert on the laws regarding government contracts, because government compliance lawyer has never been my calling. But, unlike anybody at the White House apparently, I can Google. Heres the header from the Legal Information Institute which is just Wikipedia for people who dont want to pay Westlaw:

The United States Government is the single largest procurer of goods and services in the world, and the Department of Defense (DOD) accounts for the lions share of federal acquisitions. Three major characteristics distinguish Government acquisitions from private sector contracts. First, Government contracts are subject to myriad statutes, regulations, and policies which encourage competition to the maximum extent practicable, ensure proper spending of taxpayer money, and advance socioeconomic goals. Second, Government contracts contain mandatory clauses which afford the Government special contractual rights, including the right to unilaterally change contract terms and conditions or terminate the contract. The most important clauses are the Changes clause, the Termination for Convenience clause, and the Default clause. Third, due to the Governments special status as a sovereign entity, claims and litigation follow the unique procedures of the Contract Disputes Act.

Government contracts are subject to several statutes, including the Competition in Contracting Act and the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act. In addition to statutes, there are a multitude of regulations which govern acquisitions by executive branch agencies. Foremost among these is the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which is codified in Parts 1 through 53 of Title 48, Chapter 1 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Executive branch agencies may issue their own regulatory supplements to the FAR, such as the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). The FAR is amended pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, with proposed changes issued jointly by the DOD, the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in coordination with the FAR Council.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is a dense section of law, codified in Title 48 of the U.S. Code. The prohibition against self-dealing in this space is not one of those ephemeral norms that Trump disregards all the time. The self-dealing prohibition is codified right in the statute:

48 CFR 3.601 Policy.

(a) Except as specified in 3.602, a contracting officer shall not knowingly award a contract to a Government employee or to a business concern or other organization owned or substantially owned or controlled by one or more Government employees. This policy is intended to avoid any conflict of interest that might arise between the employees interests and their Government duties, and to avoid the appearance of favoritism or preferential treatment by the Government toward its employees.

(b) For purposes of this subpart, special Government employees (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202) performing services as experts, advisors, or consultants, or as members of advisory committees, are not considered Government employees unless

(1) The contract arises directly out of the individuals activity as a special Government employee;

(2) In the individuals capacity as a special Government employee, the individual is in a position to influence the award of the contract; or

(3) Another conflict of interest is determined to exist.

Again, the law is complicated and full of exceptions and Im no compliance wonk. But the point is that this law EXISTS. So do others. The Trump administration needs to show that it complied with the law, or show that it doesnt need to comply with the law because it is eligible for some sort of exception. ALL OF THAT MUST BE WRITTEN DOWN. If those arguments dont hold water, Trump is in violation of statute. If those arguments are lies, on official government documents, those lies are crimes.

Making the Emoluments Clause argument against the president for this deal is valid, but its a little bit like pursuing a Fourth Amendment violation against the president for a car-jacking. Sure, it probably is. But, also, THERE ARE LAWS AGAINST CAR-JACKING.

President Trump and his administration, including his administrations lawyers, act like our laws are mere guidelines that dont apply to a strong president. Thats just not true. Awarding yourself a government contract is, at least, a facial violation of law. Does Trump have a defense? Mick Mulvaney suggests that he just wont show us the governments defense to these CHARGES which is also not an acceptable answer.

Trump, obviously, isnt allowed to do this. WHO IS GOING TO TELL HIM?

Elie Mystal is the Executive Editor of Above the Law and a contributor at The Nation. He can be reached @ElieNYC on Twitter, or at elie@abovethelaw.com. He will resist.

Continued here:

President Trump Is Violating More Than The Emoluments Clause With His Doral Summit - Above the Law

The World Watched as an ICE Agent Pushed an Immigration Lawyer to the Ground. Now, Shes Suing the U.S. Government. – ELLE.com

Posted on by

In the second episode of Netflixs Living Undocumented, a six-part documentary series following the lives of several undocumented immigrants in the U.S., lawyer Andrea Martinez is wheeled out of a Kansas City Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility on a stretcher. Her heels are off and her left knee is bloody. Moments earlier, cameras caught an ICE agent shoving her to the ground as she tried to enter the building with her three-year-old client, Noah. He was reuniting with his detained, pregnant mother before they were both deported to Honduras.

In the next scene, Martinez says to the camera, The fact that an ICE agent would assault me in front of cameras and 40 observers, knowing that Im an attorneyimagine, just imagine, how immigrants are treated in private ICE detention facilities.

At the time, Martinez and her colleague, attorney Megan Galicia, were accompanying Noah and his stepfather, Luis Diaz, to the ICE facility. Diaz was hesitant to go inside because he is also an undocumented immigrant, so the lawyers planned for him to hand off Noah in the parking lot. ICE agents previously said Diaz would not be detained, but when he arrived with his stepson, the agents told the lawyers Diaz would need to go inside because of the rain. As Martinez and Galicia asked Diaz if he wanted to enter the facility, an ICE agent approached and threatened to detain him if he didn't go inside. As the lawyers tried to join him, the ICE agent pushed them out of the door and locked it. Martinez fell to the ground, and says she suffered a fractured foot and a concussion.

Inside, Noah and his mother were deported, and Luis was detained anyway. When the agents finally let Martinez inside the facility, the officer tried to get her arrested for forcibly entering without permission. "It was the most strange set of events, because when you're told you have to come into a space and then the ICE agent flips and calls the police and lies, you think, 'What world am I living in?'" she told ELLE.com. "'What is happening?'"

Though a criminal investigation occurred right after, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, Timothy Garrison, decided not to press charges. But this past Thursday, Martinez, represented by the ACLU, filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri, suing the U.S. government for excessive force and unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment, as well as the two ICE agents for assault, battery, false arrest, false imprisonment, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

ELLE.com spoke with Martinez to discuss her lawsuit, her experience watching the documentary, and how she takes care of herself with such an intense job.

After law school, I spent nine months in Guatemala assisting with a human rights organization called International Justice Mission. I returned to the U.S. and spent a year as a law clerk for a federal judge at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. During that year, I married my Honduran husband and did his immigration paperwork and realized it is a very complicated field of law. People started asking me questions about immigration law, and I became increasingly interested in the complexities of the field and decided that I was going to dedicate my career to it, in large part because I always wanted to be a human rights lawyer. I believe the rights of immigrants are human rights, and this is the human rights struggle of our day.

It started when my colleague Megan Galicia received an email to a Listserv in April 2018. It was a plea to help a pregnant detained woman. Megan said she sat on it for a couple of days. One night she couldn't sleep because she kept thinking about this Bible verse that says, I was in prison, and you visited me, from Matthew 25. She felt tormented by the thought of what it would be like to be a pregnant woman detained in a place [where] you don't speak the language, you don't know anyone. Megan finally came to me and said, "No other lawyers have agreed to take the case. Do you feel like we should go visit this woman?" And I told her, "Yeah, let's go visit her."

Courtesy of Netflix

Megan and I visited Kenia. It was really disturbing to see a pregnant immigrant woman with no criminal history being detained in a county jail with people who had committed crimes. We started reaching out to local press to talk about how disturbing this new ICE policy was. This was a fairly new policy at that time, that ICE would detain pregnant women; they used to not, in our experience. The Kansas City Star wrote up a newspaper article about her being detained, and little did we know, Netflix was scouring the internet, looking for stories of immigrants that they could feature in a new documentary. I got a call from some film producers and they said, "Hey, we'd like to follow Kenia's story. Can we come film them?" We asked Kenia and Luis if that was something they would be open to. They both said yes. And wow, did [Netflix] show up.

I don't think it's happened to any immigration attorney before. It sent shockwaves throughout the lawyer world because, of course, we expect to be able to do our jobs without getting assaulted or physically injured. Thats one of the reasons why this lawsuit is so important. Lawyers simply cannot be assaulted when doing their jobs or tricked the way that we were. These ICE agents have no excuse for behaving the way they did. There were cameras, there were observers, but they were peaceful and they were in a public space. My advice is that whenever ICE is around, people need to take out their phones and start recording what's happening.

I've been going to therapy for about a year now, since the ICE assault happened, and I immediately was like, I think I need to go to more therapy. It's really hard. It was very distressing to be locked in a room with an armed ICE agent who had just assaulted me and who was refusing me medical treatment and was trying to take my phone and not letting me call the police.

Courtesy of Andrea Martinez

It's a disgrace to the United States how these immigrants are treated. The problem is that many immigrants who are abused and mistreated by ICE are eventually deported, or [are] so voiceless that they don't sue or can't sue. That's why this lawsuit is so important. This case was about me, but it represents a lot more. It represents, in my opinion, all the immigrants who have suffered abuse and mistreatment by officials at the Department of Homeland Security and have never gotten justice for the suffering that they've endured.

Im a huge proponent of self care and taking the time you need to take care of yourself first. If we're going to help other people, we have to make sure we're strong and we're healthy as advocates. For me, that means I really prioritize my faith. Also, the other immigration lawyers throughout the United States, they're such an encouragement. We don't act like competitors. We're just all sort of surviving, and there's something that's really beautiful about that. It's a community.

Visit link:

The World Watched as an ICE Agent Pushed an Immigration Lawyer to the Ground. Now, Shes Suing the U.S. Government. - ELLE.com

Are You Taking Too Many Calcium Supplements? – Health Essentials from Cleveland Clinic

Posted on by

You eat your yogurt, exercise daily and chew that calcium supplement like a champ. Osteoporosis doesnt stand a chance youre a calcium superstar!

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services.Policy

But, when it comes to calcium, its actually possible to have too much of a good thing: Calcium can build up to unhealthy levels in the bloodstream. And this hypercalcemia can cause a variety of problems ranging from not great to very serious.

Dont toss your calcium supplements just yet, though. Endocrinologist Susan Williams, MD, explains what happens when calcium levels creep too high and how to strike a healthy balance.

Calcium is key to a sturdy skeleton. Calcium is so important for the bones and teeth of growing children, but as adults, we sometimes forget how important it is throughout our lifetime, Dr. Williams says.

Besides beefing up bones, calcium is critical for the healthy function of nerves and muscles, including the heart.

Guidelines recommend a total of 1,000 milligrams per day for women until age 50 and for men until age 70.

Past those birthdays, men and women should aim for 1,200 mg per day. (For context, a cup of milk or a serving of yogurt each has about 300 mg of calcium.)

More is not better, however. Problems linked to excess calcium include:

Soaring calcium levels can be triggered by a variety of diseases,including parathyroid problems and a number of cancers. Hypercalcemia can alsobe a side effect of certain prescription meds.

But over-the-counter calcium medications can push you over the edge, too. Its surprisingly easy to overdo the calcium supplements especially if you consume a lot of dairy or otherwise get plenty from your food. Over-the-counter antacid chews and tablets pack a big calcium punch as well.

On top of all that, high doses of vitamins A and D can also cause calcium levels to rise.

Many people dont have obvious symptoms of hypercalcemia. But thesesigns hint that your calcium levels might be flying high:

Luckily, hypercalcemia caused by supplements and antacids usuallyreverses quickly when you stop taking them, Dr. Williams says. Untreated,though, long-term hypercalcemia can be serious maybe even life-threatening.

How can you make sure youre getting enough calcium withoutgoing overboard?

More here:

Are You Taking Too Many Calcium Supplements? - Health Essentials from Cleveland Clinic

I Tried Source Naturals Wellness Formula Supplement to See What the Buzz Was Aboutand Immediately Regretted It – Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted on by

Have all of your friends ever been obsessed with a TV show you've never seen? When you hang out, they laugh about the most recent episode, quote their favorite characters, and compare theories about the season finaleand you just sit there.

That's how I felt whenever my friends talked about Wellness Formula, a supplement made by a company called Source Naturals. It claims to "support the immune system when under physical stress" through a "powerful combination of herbs, antioxidants, vitamins and minerals formulated to boost your well-being." My friends (and I'm hoping I can still call them that after this article!), swear by itand to me, it sounds like bullshit.

Nonetheless, about a week ago, I woke up on a Sunday morning with a sore throat, and my friends had that look in their eyesthe Wellness Formula look. "That stuff is just a placebo," I told them. They disagreed. "It's not approved by the FDA," I said. They were unfazed. "There's no research to say it works at all." Nothing.

After a day of protesting, I gave in. I'm not proud, but I did. What's the worst that could happen? I thought.

I took six capsules after dinner. (Yes, you must take six capsules. Six capsules every three hours.) Everything was fine for the next hour or so, but around 9 o'clock, when I was ready to get into bed, my heart started racing. I was lying in bed, exhausted but unable to sleep. I was sweating. My stomach was in knots. This is it, I thought, my tragic end is going to be a Monday morning headline on the very website that employs me: "Girl, 23, Dies Alone in Bed From...Vitamins"

RELATED: 3 Things People Get Completely Wrong About Vitamin Supplements

Then, I got up, rushed to the bathroom, and vomited. Ah yes, my preferred way to spend a Sunday evening. Also, as if I hadn't already felt enough of Wellness Formula's wrath, the vomit was acidic. So much so that it burned my throat, making it painful to swallow for the next 24 hoursand giving me an even worse sore throat than the one I was trying to get rid of. After I threw up, I felt 90% better. Wellness Formula couldn't give me the other 10%. She's ruthless.

The next morning, I did what anyone would do: I bitched to my coworkers about what happened, and, because we're health editors, here we are, in the middle of this article on what's really in these supplementsand if they're dangerous at all.

See, as a health journalist, I'm skeptical of pretty much anything, especially vitamins and supplements. Why? Because I know the Food and Drug Administration only inspects a small percentage of the supplements sold in the US every year. That lack of regulation opens the door for many supplements to falsely claim specific health benefits, since their claims dont have to be backed up by research.

I wasn't able to find any clinical trials to prove Wellness Formula's specific claims, and Source Naturals didn't respond to a request for comment. There's even a disclaimer on the company's website that says, "The statements made in this website have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration," which aligns with the FDA's stance that it is "not authorized to review dietary supplement products for safety and effectiveness before they are marketed."

Still, my friends worship Wellness Formula. When one sneezes or coughs or gets a paper cut (OK fine, I'm being dramatic with that last one), another will suddenly whip around, their palm extended flat holding six capsules of Wellness Formula. They truly believe that if you take the supplement when you first feel sick, you can dodge a full-blown illness.

So, what I needed to know (and why I wanted to write this article): Can these supplements actually help you avoid getting sick? Or is my experience common, and can they actually make you feel sick?

RELATED: Do Supplements Cause Cancer? Here's What a New Study Says

At first, I thought there was no way something billed as "natural" and "healthy" could make me ill, but Beth Kitchin, PhD, assistant professor of nutrition studies at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, tells me it's entirely possible. "You got crazy high amounts of vitamin C," she says. "Which can cause stomach cramping, diarrhea, and nausea." Interesting.

About Wellness Formula's vitamin C content: Six capsules contain 1,275 mg of vitamin C. Meanwhile, the recommended daily allowance for vitamin C for adults is 75 to 90 mg per day, and the tolerable upper intake level, or the "maximum daily intake unlikely to cause adverse health effects," is 2,000 mg a day, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

While one dose puts you well above the recommended daily allowance, it keeps you just under the maximum of 2,000 mg a day. A second dose, however, puts you at 2,550 mgor 128% of the upper intake level. Three doses puts you at 191%, and, well, you get the idea.

But wait, there's more. The amount of zinc can also exceed the upper limit, Kitchin says, which may have contributed to the nausea and vomiting. (Oh right, the vomiting. How could I forget?) The recommended dietary allowance for zinc is 8 to 11 mg per day, and the tolerable upper intake level is 40 mg, according to NIH. Just one dose of Wellness Formula has 23 mg of zinc, meaning after two doses, you're at 115% of the upper intake level.

Cynthia Sass, RD, Health contributing nutrition editor, also points out that some of the ingredients "can interact with certain medications, or existing medical conditions." For example, echinacea, an herb, has been known to exacerbate autoimmune diseases, such as lupus, she says.

RELATED: These 15 Supplement Ingredients Carry Serious Health Risks, According to a New Report

In all fairness, Sass says that many of the ingredients in Wellness Formula, like vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin D, are known to support immunity (again, in amounts that don't exceed the upper intake level). But both Sass and Kitchin point out that it's simply impossible to know how the supplement will affect the immune system without clinical trails. "This is how we know, for example, that supplemental vitamin C cant cure a cold, but that zinc lozenges may reduce the duration of cold," Sass says.

Despite this lack of scientific evidence, my friends have been unswayed: "Well, I can give you anecdotal evidence that it works for me," one saidto which I say, Hello, placebo effect. Kitchin agrees: "Someone can tell you that it made them feel better, but how do they know that they wouldnt have felt better without the supplement? They dont. Thats why we do research."

Overall, neither Kitchin nor Sass say they'd recommend this supplement to their clients. Sass even went a step further about supplements and vitamins in general, saying she wouldn't blindly prescribe anyone any specific supplement without assessing "a clients personal medical history, medications, and any other supplements theyre taking" first. Huh.

That, I realized, is where I went wrong. If you take anything away from this article, it should be to always consult a professional before taking somethingeven a supplement. Not your friends who are entranced by a supplement's too-good-to-be-true benefits; a g'damn professional, like Sass. "Meet with a registered dietitian who can sit down with you and go over each supplement to determine if its appropriate, and if so, the proper dose, form, and how long you should take it," she advises.

Another tip: Kitchin says to look for a supplement with US Pharmacopeia (USP) or NSF International (NSF) logos, to be sure that it's free of contaminants and actually has in it what it says it does. Keep in mind, though, these logos do not mean that the product is effectivejust that the ingredients list isn't falsified. (FYI: Wellness Formula does not have USP or NSF logos.)

As for my friends, they're not going to stop taking Wellness Formula, and they've told me as such. They're in too deepif there's even the slightest chance they won't have to deal with the common cold this winter like the rest of us, they're down to take anything. Me? I'll stick to washing my hands and steering clear of anyone not covering their mouth during a sneeze, thankyouverymuch.

To get our top stories delivered to your inbox, sign up for the Healthy Living newsletter

Originally posted here:

I Tried Source Naturals Wellness Formula Supplement to See What the Buzz Was Aboutand Immediately Regretted It - Yahoo Lifestyle

Why Do Parents Keep Hearing About the Microbiome? – NYT Parenting

Posted on by

CreditAriel Davis

Our bodies house an extraordinarily vast collection of bacteria and other microorganisms so many, in fact, that scientists now estimate there may be just as many bacteria in our bodies as human cells.

They thrive on the skin, where they might help protect it from infection, and in areas like the intestinal tract, where they help break down food and absorb nutrients. Given the sheer volume, its no wonder scientists are discovering that these microbes play an important role in health and disease.

Research on the microbiome, that collection of microorganisms, is still in early stages, but it has become increasingly common to hear references to the microbiome in the news and advertising. Last week, Bill Gates wrote an essay for The Telegraph suggesting that correcting an out of whack microbiome by taking next-generation probiotic supplements, for example, or eating certain gut-healthy foods could eventually help prevent some of the worlds most common ills, such as malnutrition, obesity and perhaps even inflammatory conditions including asthma, allergies and some autoimmune disorders.

And Dove has been advertising an infant soap with prebiotic moisture, as well as a lotion claiming that it nourishes babys delicate microbiome. Mother Dirt, a skin-care company, also has said that its biome-friendly cleansers, shampoos, moisturizers and more help restore harmony in your skins microbiome.

If youre still a bit confused about what all of this means and who isnt? heres a short introduction to a complicated subject: the role of the microbiome.

The microbiome is a community of bacteria, fungi, viruses and other microbes that live inside your body and on its surface. Just as in a community of people, youll find both good and bad actors: Some of the microbes, like the gut bacteria that help you digest food, are beneficial, while others, like certain viruses, can be dangerous.

Everyones microbiome differs, depending on your age, gender, diet and immune system. And the types of microbes on one part of the body may be different from those on another.

Imagine the microbiome as basically like a rainforest, said Jonathan A. Eisen, Ph.D., an evolutionary biologist who directs the Microbiome Special Research Program at the University of California, Davis. On any given spot on the skin, he said, there might be hundreds to thousands of different species of microbes, which can come in hundreds of different strains. With E. coli, you cant just say you have E. coli on your skin, because some E. coli make vitamins and others kill you, said Dr. Eisen. So this is incredibly complicated.

Even something as simple as showering can affect the composition of your skins microbiome, he said, depending on the temperature of the water, the products you used and the length of time you spent in the water.

Scientists know that babies receive helpful microbes from their mothers, who pass them on to their children through the birth canal and breast milk, but the specific benefits derived from those microbes are not fully understood.

While theres still a lot that we dont know about the microbiome, scientists say its clear that it plays an important role in health and disease.

It prevents overgrowth by harmful microbes, thats one important function, said Dr. Gregory A. Storch, M.D., a professor of pediatrics at Washington University in St. Louis. Another is that its important in digestion and breaking down food.

The microbiome has also been shown to help the immune system learn the difference between good and bad bacteria, he added.

The gut microbiome plays a role in several gastrointestinal diseases, according to the American Microbiome Institute, and may even influence behavior. Accumulating evidence also suggests that the microbiome could influence asthma, obesity, heart disease, cancer therapies and even autism, but the research is far from conclusive.

In short, yes. The microbiome has become a buzzword that vaguely signifies good bacteria, so some advertisers have promoted their products as being gentle on the bodys microbes. But without studies showing that these products are truly beneficial to the helpful microbes, experts have said that consumers should be wary.

Its become incredibly hot as a scientific area, but also the realm of snake oil, Dr. Eisen said.

With that in mind, Dr. Eisen created an Overselling the Microbiome Award on his blog, which exposes questionable research as well as companies that are touting unproven claims about the microbiome to sell products. I could probably give out one of them a day if I had time, Dr. Eisen said.

When Dove started running ads for microbiome-friendly lotion and bath soap, for instance, Dr. Eisen began dissecting the claims on his blog, one by one, including the idea that Dove was nurturing the microbiome.

Anindya Dasgupta, Ph.D., a scientist at Unilever R&D, which developed a microbiome-friendly line of Baby Dove products, said its infant cleansers and lotions contained nutrients that were identical to those found naturally in skin and help to replenish skin-natural nutrients as well as a prebiotic moisturizer, which serves as an excellent nutrient source for good bacteria, helping to keep the microbiome nourished.

Unilever did not immediately respond to questions about whether the company had conducted studies that supported its claims, nor did the company explain which prebiotics or nutrients were included in its products.

The challenge in this is that some of the bacteria on our skin can be good and some can be bad, and just nourishing bacteria generally does not guarantee that you are nourishing the right ones, Dr. Eisen said.

When it comes to dietary supplements that say they support the microbiome, such as probiotics, its unclear just how helpful they are, said Dr. Martin J. Blaser, M.D., the director of the Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine at Rutgers University and author of the book Missing Microbes.

Theyre almost completely untested for the kinds of things that people are taking them for, Dr. Blaser said.

Recent studies, for example, have found that the probiotic Lactobacillus offered no benefit when treating stomach virus in children.

Even though we know that the microbiome is very important in human health, we cant assume that probiotics and other treatments that try to manipulate or even protect the microbiome will be effective, Dr. Storch said.

In addition, the Food and Drug Administration does not review, approve or strictly regulate dietary supplements or personal care products such as lotions and soaps. And it doesnt approve claims that appear on product labels.

Avoiding the overuse of antibiotics and antimicrobials is one of the best ways to help preserve the microbiome, Dr. Blaser said.

When people are exposed to antibiotics, it disturbs the beneficial microbes, which can lead to antibiotic resistance and create new illnesses.

One of the most clear examples is when antibiotics allow the bacteria Clostridium difficile to proliferate in the gut, which can damage intestinal cells and lead to inflammation in the colon.

Number one: Minimize the damage, Dr. Blaser said. We have to move from a philosophy of, This might not help you but it wont hurt, to, Is this antibiotic necessary?

Given the wide variations in how pediatricians prescribe antibiotics, Dr. Blaser advised parents to have a conversation with their childs doctor about whether antibiotics are truly necessary for certain conditions. Some ear infections and colds, for example, are caused by viruses and will resolve on their own.

Its the germaphobia that encourages killing all types of bacteria that can do more harm than good.

People shouldnt have a fetish about trying to maintain a sterile environment, Dr. Storch said. In some cases I think people are treating their own anxiety rather than any real disease threat.

While Dr. Eisen also recommended avoiding medically unnecessary antibiotics, he warned against going too far in the other direction by, say, encouraging your child to lick the subway poles to strengthen their immune system, something he refers to as microbiomania. Pathogens are real, he added, and they are transmitted by contact between people or between people and surfaces, so youre not going to protect yourself by licking everything.

Wash your hands often, dont touch things that many other people have touched, he advised. And that alone, just that, will help prevent the spread of infectious disease beyond any antimicrobial that they put in toothpaste or clothing or wherever.

Christina Caron is a parenting reporter at The New York Times.

Here is the original post:

Why Do Parents Keep Hearing About the Microbiome? - NYT Parenting

Venus Williams Reveals Health Tips, Supplements – Us Weekly

Posted on by

Venus Williams does not play games when it comes to her health. The tennis great revealed her secrets to staying fit despite an admitted love for junk food in an exclusive interview with Us Weekly.

Olympic Athletes: Where Are They Now?

I love junk food, but I just got off tour and I started eating junk food. Honestly, I started feeling so bad I had to stop, the 39-year-old star explained to Us. [I had] donuts. It was bad. I had pancakes. I ordered pancakes at 5 in the morning with jet lag. Its so bad. I was like, No, I cant live like this. I was literally like, How do I get a salad? Im so desperate for a salad.

The four-time Olympic gold medalist, who said she feels her strongest when shes eating a balanced diet, went on to detail some of her tips for keeping her mind and body working at its highest potential. I [eat] lots of greens, lots of fiber. That kind of covers it, so your bodys well nourished,she said.[I get] lots of sleep, very important. Very important for me especially since I train. My body just requires so much sleep because of that.

Celebrities Dating Athletes

She continued: I also travel with a lot of supplements, and I have a specific kit just for anti-virals. I have olive leaf extract, oregano oil. I have garlic, I have lysine and vitamin C. Everyones like, Venus, can I get them? Everyone comes to me for [my supplements] because I literally cannot get sick. I buy supplements and I have a special [kit] I put them in, its always there. Because then youre like, Oh sht, I wish I had that stuffand youre in Timbuktu.

Besides needing to staying healthy for work, the Florida native admits her sister Serena Williams daughter, Alexis, is also a motivating factor. The hard part though is if you do get sick and youre like, Oh man, I cant go see the baby, and you put yourself in quarantine. But youre just like, FaceTime me please.

Stars Theyre Just Like Us!

Venus, who is partnering with Clorox Disinfecting Wipes in an effort to keep the public safe from germs, pointed out that germs which can cause the common cold tend to lurk in some unexpected places. Obviously, its very important for me to stay healthy because my job requires that you are healthy. I just keep wipes everywhere, she continued.In [my] carry on, in my dog bag and my racket bag, and that covers all the bases. I [wipe down] things you dont think of, like when youre in your hotel room. Nobody really uses the [hotel room] phone, but every now and then you have to [make a] call. So, I always have my wipes.

View original post here:

Venus Williams Reveals Health Tips, Supplements - Us Weekly

Type 2 diabetes: Eating this superfood could help fight the condition – Express

Posted on by

Type 2 diabetes is a condition in which the body cant control the amount of glucose (sugar) in the blood, causing levels to become too high, and left untreated, serious complications such as kidney failure, nerve damage, heart disease and stroke can occur. High blood sugar levels can be prevented or managed with lifestyle changes such as regular exercise, but while the NHS recommends 30 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise five days a week, a recent report by the World Health organisation estimates a third of UK adults arent active enough. Now, new research by experts in New Zealand says consuming a specific type of blackcurrant could help sedentary adults walk for longer without getting tired. The effects took hold just an hour after taking the blackcurrant supplement.

Meanwhile the superfood also resulted in a dramatic 90 percent reduction in the build of enzymes linked to the onset of dementia and depression.

The studys lead author Dr Suzanne Hurst said: "Identifying foods or dietary supplements that specifically support the desire to exercise daily will enable an individual to adhere to an exercise programme and maintain and active and healthy lifestyle."

And she found that drinking blackcurrant juice one hour before exercise supports positive affective responses during a low impact walking exercise in healthy sedentary adults.

The blackcurrants themselves were grown in New Zealand - and because of the Southern Hemispheres intense UV light, this produces unusually high levels of protective and health-giving nutrients compared with berries grown elsewhere.

The key ingredients are anthocyanins, pigments in the fruit's skin responsible for their dark purple colouring, which belong to a group of flavonoids called polyphenols and possess high levels of antioxidants.

The participants - a group of male and female adults aged between 20 and 59 - were given either blackcurrant juice or a placebo an hour before they were asked to walk on a treadmill.

The average time walked by those whod taken blackcurrants was 11 minutes longer than those who hadnt.

While only 10 percent of those whod had the placebo walked a distance greater than 10km - compared with 30 percent of participants in the blackcurrant group.

The treadmill walkers whod had blackcurrants also reported lower exertion scores - and higher overall mood scores - than those whod had the placebo. Test subjects also underwent a blood test both before and after the experiment.

And its here they noted a huge decrease in something called monoamine oxidase-B, or MAO-B, activity - something they believe could help fight neurological diseases like dementia.

Dr Hurst, of the New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research, says: "We found that plasma collected 1 hour after blackcurrant consumption showed a dramatic acute decline - 90 percent - in platelet MAO-B activity, which was still detectable in participants plasma once they had stopped exercise.

"The pharmacological inhibition of brain MAO-B activity has been used to treat those diagnosed with neurological diseases and depression, potentially through their neuroprotective properties in reducing the metabolism of monoamines."

The findings were reported in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition and they have been welcomed by Nicki Bundock, of Surrey-based firm CurraNZ, the UKs leading supplier of New Zealand blackcurrants supplements.

Nicki explained: "Regular exercise is one of the best ways to reduce your chances of health problems like heart disease or type 2 diabetes. But if youre not an active person, starting an exercise plan and actually sticking with it can be incredibly difficult.

Studies have shown more than half of us drop out of exercise plans after just six months, reverting to inactive lifestyles. And its therefore vital we find ways to make exercise more tolerable and enjoyable.

This study suggests blackcurrant supplements can boost time spent exercising while also making it feel easier and more pleasurable. And the less stressful exercise is, the more likely it is to become a habit.

"The fact the study also suggested benefits to neurological health make it even more welcome."

Previous studies have also demonstrated the positive effect of blackcurrants on blood sugar.

A clinical trial carried out at the University of Aberdeen showed the fruit could affect how the body breaks down carbohydrates and sugars, reducing the amount of sugar that ends up in the bloodstream after a person eats a meal.

Another fruit found to have a positive impact on blood sugar is guava.

See original here:

Type 2 diabetes: Eating this superfood could help fight the condition - Express

Moon Juice founder Amanda Chantal Bacon on bringing research to the wellness industry – Glossy

Posted on by

And so what can I do I do feel like I was there and helped create a bit of this beast to really stay true to the mission and to spread that to my team?

Talking about it in earnest is one way to address the problem. Chantal Bacon also seeks to live out her values with Moon Juice, which opened its first shop in Venice, California, in 2011 and carries products that offer more than what youll find in just about any grocery store or gas station these days.

What would be the difference between a Moon Juice with some type of pasteurization on it in a cute juice shop and a juice for maybe $2.99 in a grocery store thats the same blend and organic? she asked. It would really be the difference of a label. So that didnt feel worthwhile. Herbs, though, that was something that when you scale it, it makes sense. Your costs go down. Youre able to reach more people. Supplements are actually something that you need scale for safety reasons alone.

In the latest Glossy Beauty podcast, Chantal Bacon discussed Moon Juices focus on research over marketing (people are always surprised to find out that we really dont spend any money on marketing), the companys use of Instagram and its move into beauty and skin-care products.

Here are a few highlights from the conversation, lightly edited for clarity.

Leveling up from the localhealthfood storeGoing anywhere where wellness was a term was a pretty janky health food store with bad lighting and loud sounds and strange smells. So that was really one of the intentions with Moon Juice, was to bring this next level of health, which I wasnt finding in the Vitamin Barns, with the bulk bins of the world.It was to bring some of that fine dining accuracy that Id come to know and trust and employ every day in my own kitchens and where I was working, and really missing that in the health world. Every time you got a juice it was completely different. Sometimes there were bugs in the bulk bin. It was just that angle of aesthetic and precision that was missing.

Herbs and supplements set the product apartThere are great juice companies out there that sell to Whole Foods and any grocery store, [and] any airport around the country, and theyve got organic green juice blends. So truly, what would be the difference between a Moon Juice with some type of pasteurization in it in a cute juice shop, and a juice for maybe $2.99 in a grocery store thats the same blend and organic? It would really be the difference of a label. So that didnt feel worthwhile. Herbs, though, that was something that when you scale it, it makes sense. Your costs go down. Youre able to reach more people. Supplements are actually something that you need scale for safety reasons alone. The amount of energy that we put into sourcing and testing, I couldnt do as a small company. And I knew we needed that to truly come out with the products that I wanted.

All is not well with wellnessI think that is my criticism of the wellness world, if there was one. I think theres so many wonderful things about wellness spreading, but the underbelly of it is this notion of it is for the 1% to live forever by themselves in their castles, looking young. And so what can I do I do feel like I was there and helped create a bit of this beast to really stay true to the mission and to spread that to my team? And to dig deeper into myself and look at how we can swing this thing the other way? And why do we want to be well? What is the point of living longer and feeling better and being stronger?

Research over marketingPeople are always surprised to find out that we really dont spend any money on marketing. Weve got a creative little bubble that is very lean, that goes onInstagram, which is our main marketing channel. I look at every post, Im tweaking every post. It was not so long that I was actually writing and posting each post. And we really do spend our energy and our time and our money on sourcing and testing for potency and safety. And I hope that never changes.

Go here to read the rest:

Moon Juice founder Amanda Chantal Bacon on bringing research to the wellness industry - Glossy

Vermont Futures Project recommends strengthening the innovation ecosystem – Vermont Biz

Posted on by

Vermont Business Magazine The Vermont Futures Project announces recommendations to grow and sustain Vermont businesses with further development and additional support to enhance Vermonts current innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem.

To secure our economic future, the Vermont Futures Project has identified the need to scale and grow Vermonts mid-sized businesses, defined as having 20 to 499 employees. These companies are the mainstay of Vermonts employment base which provide stable jobs, good pay and career opportunities at a scale that fits Vermonts culture, region to region.

Scott Fewell, CEO of Liquid Measurement Systems in Franklin County stated, Business innovation paves the way for economic growth, as it supports discoveries and even further entrepreneurship.

The Vermont Futures Project provided the following recommendations for private businesses, state government, non-profits and individuals:

About the Vermont Futures Project

The Vermont Futures Project promotes the long-term economic health of Vermont through leadership, research and education. The Vermont Futures Project seeks to inform the conversation about Vermonts economic future and demonstrate how a healthy economy contributes to Vermonts vibrant communities and unique quality of life.

Source: Montpelier, VT (October 24, 2019) The Vermont Futures Project

See the rest here:

Vermont Futures Project recommends strengthening the innovation ecosystem - Vermont Biz