Google to offer personal banking accounts in partnership with Citigroup – The Guardian

Google is preparing to launch a personal checking account service, a move that comes as its big tech rivals are increasingly focused on consumer finance.

The project, in partnership with Citigroup and code-named Cache, is expected to launch next year.

The existence of project, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, comes as some of the worlds biggest tech companies are challenging the primacy of the banking industry.

Over the past year, Facebook has announced it is working on a digital currency, Apple has introduced a credit card and Amazon has been in talks with banks to introduce personal accounts for consumers.

Each, in turn, is likely to stoke fears of consumers and regulators alike that technology companies are gathering too much information on their consumers.

News of the project comes a day after a whistleblower revealed the existence of Project Nightingale Googles partnership with the healthcare giant Ascendant that could give Google access to personal medical data of up to 50 million Americans.

On Tuesday, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, urged Europe to seize control of its data from Silicon Valley tech giants and establish digital sovereignty instead of relying on Amazon, Microsoft and Google.

So many companies have just outsourced all their data to US companies, Merkel said.

Im not saying thats bad in and of itself I just mean that the value-added products that come out of that, with the help of artificial intelligence, will create dependencies that Im not sure are a good thing.

While Google has enormous reach 1.4 billion people regularly use Gmail so far each of the tech giants financial offerings have run into problems.

Several partners have pulled out of Facebooks Libra cryptocurrency after regulators signaled opposition, while Apples credit card partner, Goldman Sachs, has been sued for allegedly offering discriminatory credit limits.

According to the Journal, Google is not planning to self-brand its checking or personal account service.

Our approach is going to be to partner deeply with banks and the financial system, Google executive Caesar Sengupta said. It may be the slightly longer path, but its more sustainable.

Sengupta said Google would not sell checking account users financial data in the same way that Google does not share data from its fast-growing service Google Pay with advertisers.

If we can help more people do more stuff in a digital way online, its good for the internet and good for us, Sengupta told the newspaper.

But how far Google will have to go to reassure a wary public that it can be trusted with what is arguably their most intimate information money and health is open to question.

The consulting firm McKinsey & Company found only 58% of people surveyed said they would trust the company with financial products.

A 2017 study by Bain & Company found that 45% of those surveyed in the UK said that existing banks offered all the services they need online.

David Donovan, a technology-banking specialist at Publicis Sapient, said technology companies are partnering with banks to deal with the regulatory issues.

They could prove to be a Trojan horse over time, Donovan said. But the banks are also thinking this is an easy way to get customer acquisition so it could be a win-win for both sides.

Consumers increasingly expect the same type of experience from banks as they get from Apple or Google and big tech is undoubtably going to be in financial services in some way, independently or by partnership, Donovan believes.

Theres an emerging demographic accustomed to a certain experience underpinned by emergent technology and banks are saddled with a lot of legacy technology. So theyre going to have to upgrade to be more digitally native and responsive, or theyre going to be disintermediated, or left out, by technology companies, he said.

See the original post:

Google to offer personal banking accounts in partnership with Citigroup - The Guardian

The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: NetEase, New Oriental Education & Technology and JinkoSolar – Nasdaq

For Immediate Release

Chicago, IL November 14, 2019 Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: NetEase, Inc. NTES, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. EDU and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. JKS.

Here are highlights from Wednesdays Analyst Blog:

3 Chinese ADRs to Gain from a Likely Trade Deal

A trade agreement between the United States and China is still uncertain despite encouraging comments from officials of both nations. However, the recent enthusiasm of the two nations in reaching a deal made investors somewhat optimistic lately.

There has been a decent progress on the trade deal front in the past few weeks. Particularly, comments by President Donald Trump and economic advisor Larry Kudlow earlier this week hinted at a potential trade deal.

Let us, thus, take a look at some U.S.-listed Chinese stocks that will benefit the most if the a deal materializes.

Rising Optimism on U.S.-China Trade Relationship

The U.S.-China trade war has rattled the financial markets for 19 months, as industries reliant on trade suffered because of the high tariffs that the two countries imposed on each others imports. However, there has been some relief since October 2019 after the two countries agreed on a phase one deal.

Two major developments emerged out of the October trade talks. First, Trump decided not to proceed with an escalation in tariffs on about $250 billion worth of Chinese goods from the incumbent 25% to 30% beginning Oct 15. Second, a 15% tariff imposition on about $156 billion of Chinese products (known as List 4B) from Dec 15 was also kept on hold.

While speaking at the Economic Club of New York on Nov 12, Trump blamed previous U.S. leaders who negotiated trade deals with China with scope for manipulation. However, the president repeated that a significant phase-one trade deal with the China could be reached.

Addressing the issue of cancelling punitive tariffs, Trump said, China would like to get somewhat of a rollback, not a complete rollback, because they know I won't do itFrankly, they want to make a deal a lot more than I do.

Trumps comments aptly point toward the trade wars adverse effect on China. Chinas factory activity shrank for the sixth straight month in October, as the Purchasing Managers Index for manufacturing came in at 49.3. A reading below 50 indicates contraction.

Later on the same day, Kudlow said in an interview that there is a possibility of tariffs to be adjusted, but there would be no adjustment until a final deal is reached. Kudlows comments were in response to Chinas demand for the existing tariffs to be removed as part of the phase one trade deal.

He said that the two countries had made progress on issues such as intellectual property theft, financial services, currency stability, commodities and agriculture. Kudlow added that there could be some issues as part of a second-phase agreement with China.

Also, the agreement, which was anticipated to be signed at the APEC Summit in November, has been deferred to December.

Our Choices

We have, therefore, shortlisted three U.S.-listed Chinese stocks that have outperformed the Zacks S&P 500 composite so far this year and are well positioned to do even better if a final deal between the two countries is reached. After all, business growth of these companies will accelerate if the trade barriers are removed.

These three stocks carry a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy).

NetEase, Inc. is an operator of an interactive online community in China. The company offers online gaming services, e-commerce and advertising services etc. The company carries a Zacks Rank #1. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Coherus BioSciences current-year earnings has risen 1.1% over the past 60 days. The stock has gained 25.9% year to date versus the S&P 500s 21.9% growth. You can seethe complete list of todays Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.is a provider of private educational services in China. The company offers language training and test preparation courses, online education programs and overseas studies consulting services etc. The company carries a zacks Rank #1. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Coherus BioSciences current-year earnings has risen 0.3% over the past 60 days. The stock has gained 118.4% year to date.

JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of photovoltaic products. The company carries a Zacks Rank #2. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Coherus BioSciences current-year earnings has risen 7.5% over the past 60 days. The stock has gained 62.3% year to date.

Breakout Biotech Stocks with Triple-Digit Profit Potential

The biotech sector is projected to surge beyond $775 billion by 2024 as scientists develop treatments for thousands of diseases. Theyre also finding ways to edit the human genome to literally erase our vulnerability to these diseases.

Zacks has just released Century of Biology: 7 Biotech Stocks to Buy Right Now to help investors profit from 7 stocks poised for outperformance. Our recent biotech recommendations have produced gains of +98%, +119% and +164% in as little as 1 month. The stocks in this report could perform even better.

See these 7 breakthrough stocks now>>

Media Contact

Zacks Investment Research

800-767-3771 ext. 9339

support@zacks.com

http://www.zacks.com

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumedthat any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein andis subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit http://www.zacks.com/performancefor information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.

NetEase, Inc. (NTES): Free Stock Analysis Report

New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc. (EDU): Free Stock Analysis Report

JinkoSolar Holding Company Limited (JKS): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Zacks Investment Research

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

See the article here:

The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: NetEase, New Oriental Education & Technology and JinkoSolar - Nasdaq

There Will Be No Turning Back on Facial Recognition – New York Magazine

Taylor Swift has used facial recognition at concerts to screen for stalkers. Photo: Gareth Cattermole/TAS18/Getty Images for TAS/2018 Gareth Cattermole/TAS18

On Friday, August 16, at around 7 a.m., a pair of suspicious appliances was found on a subway platform at the Fulton Street station in lower Manhattan and, an hour later, a third near a garbage can on West 16th Street. Initially, police thought they might be improvised bombs, like the shrapnel-filled pressure cookers that blew up at the 2013 Boston Marathon and in Chelsea in 2016, but upon inspection they turned out to be harmless empty rice cookers, probably meant to scare but not explode. Trains were delayed during the morning commute, but since that happens often enough without any terrorist help at all, the scariest thing about this episode may have been the way the alleged perpetrator was caught.

Minutes after the discovery, the NYPD pulled images of a man leaving the devices from subway surveillance cameras and gave them to its Facial Identification Section (FIS), which ran them through software that automatically compared his face to millions of mug shots in the police departments database. The program spit back hundreds of potential matches in which officers quickly spotted their person of interest: Larry Griffin II, a homeless 26-year-old the NYPD had arrested in March with drug paraphernalia. FIS double-checked its surveillance pictures against Griffins social-media accounts, and by 8:15 a.m., his name and photos were sent to the cell phones of every cop in New York. He was arrested in the Bronx late that night and charged with three counts of planting a false bomb. (He pleaded not guilty.)

This might seem like a feel-good story: A potentially dangerous person was identified and apprehended with previously impossible speed and no casualties thanks to by-the-book use of new technology (or newish; the NYPD has used facial-recognition software since 2011). But zoom out a little and it looks more like a silver lining on one of this years biggest feel-bad stories: The facial-recognition system that ensnared Griffin is only a small piece of a sprawling, invisible, privacy-wrecking surveillance apparatus that now surrounds all of us, built under our noses (and using our noses) by tech companies, law enforcement, commercial interests, and a secretive array of data brokers and other third parties.

In 2019, facial recognition may have finally graduated from dystopian underdog it was only the fourth- or fifth-most-frightening thing in Minority Report; its never played more than a supporting role on Black Mirror; and in the Terminator movies, it was a crucial safety feature preventing the Terminator from terminating the wrong people to full-grown modern worry.

A brief recap of the year of Face Panic:

This spring, we heard that the FBIs facial recognition database now includes more than 641 million images and the identities of an unsuspecting majority of Americans, which can be searched anytime without warrant or probable cause.

We also heard that spooked lawmakers banned police use of facial recognition in Oakland; Berkeley; Somerville, Massachusetts; and San Francisco, of all places, where Orwellian tech products are the hometown industry.

But everywhere else and in all other contexts, facial recognition is legal and almost completely unregulated and we heard that its already being used on us in city streets, airports, retail stores, restaurants, hotels, sporting events, churches, and presumably lots of other places we just dont know about.

Over the summer, we heard a rumor about a novelty photo app that might be a secret ploy by the Russian government to harvest our selfies for its own facial recognition database. That turned out to be false (or at least we think so), but it mightve made us reconsider all the photos weve given to other companies whose loophole-filled terms of use agreements translate to we own your face including Facebook, which is thought to have one of the worlds largest facial recognition databases and has not exactly proven itself to be the most responsible custodian of our private information.

We barely heard about the Commercial Facial Recognition Privacy Act of 2019, a bill introduced in March by Republican Senator Roy Blunt and Democrat Brian Schatz that would have prohibited companies from using facial recognition to track you in public, and collect or sell your face data, without your consent. It was the kind of common-sense bipartisan proposal that almost everybody can agree with; it was referred to a committee and never made it to a vote.

But we heard a lot about facial recognitionsunreliability, and that misidentifications are common, especially for people of color, and that the London Metropolitan Polices system has an appalling failure rate, and that Amazons software once mistook a bunch of seemingly upstanding congresspeople for criminal suspects. Maybe that meant, we hoped, that the technology was still only half-baked and that our worries were premature, and that one big lawsuit could make it all go away.

And then we heard about Larry Griffin II. And if his story was meant to calm any fears about facial recognition, well, mission not necessarily accomplished. If the software works well enough to identify one bomb-hoax suspect among 8.4 million New Yorkers in under an hour using only a couple of grainy surveillance photos, maybe our worries arent so premature after all. Because even though facial recognition isnt fully reliable yet, and it might never be, its already transforming law enforcement. And it probably wont need to be perfect before it transforms our everyday lives, too.

In a possibly related story, perhaps you have noticed an unusually high demand for pictures of your face over the past several years?

Computerized facial recognition has been in development since the 1960s. Progress was steady but slow, though, until the recent arrival of advanced artificial neural networks i.e., computer systems modeled on animal brains that can recognize patterns by processing examples which have allowed human programmers to feed these networks many photos of faces and then step aside while algorithms teach themselves what faces look like and then how to tell those faces apart and eventually how to decide if a face in one photo is the same face in a different photo, even if that face is wearing sunglasses or makeup or a mustache or is poorly lit or slightly blurry in one image but not the other. The more photos an algorithm has to learn from millions or billions, ideally the more accurate it becomes.

Some companies asked you to upload your vacation photos and tag yourself in them. And others asked for a selfie in exchange for an autogenerated cartoon caricature of you or to tell you which celebrity or Renaissance painting you most resemble. And then some companies got impatient with all this asking, so they acquired the other companies that had already collected your photos, or they scraped public images of you from social media and dating sites, or they set up hidden cameras in public spaces to take their own pictures.

How many algorithms have been trained on your face? Hard to say, because there arent really any laws requiring your consent, but Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, and dozens of start-ups with names like Facefirst, FaceX, and Trueface all have their own facial-recognition algorithms, and they had to have learned somewhere.

Some of those algorithms are pretty accurate, too, at least under optimal conditions. Last year, the U.S. Department of Commerces National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) tested 127 facial-recognition algorithms from 40 developers to see how often they could find matches in a large database. With high-quality images to compare, the top-performing algorithms only failed to return the correct match in 0.2 percent of searches, which is 20 times better than the results of a similar test in 2014.

Facial recognition will inevitably improve on its own, but it might be even more accurate when used in combination with other long-range biometrics. In China, gait recognition is already identifying people based on the way they walk, with 94 percent accuracy according to one company offering the service. And the Pentagon claims to have developed a heartbeat laser that is, an infrared beam that can read a persons unique cardiac signature through a shirt or jacket, allegedly with 95 percent accuracy. (The current model can reportedly detect a heartbeat from 200 meters away, but with a slightly better laser, however: I dont want to say you could do it from space, a Pentagon source told the MIT Technology Review, but longer ranges should be possible.)

For facial-recognition software to recognize you in the wild, it needs to be connected to a database with your photo and identifying information in it. (Just because an algorithm has trained with your face doesnt mean it knows who you are.) Unless youre Elena Ferrante or a member of Daft Punk, and maybe even if you are them, theres a good chance youre in a database or two.

If youve ever been tagged in a photo on Facebook or Instagram, for example, you belong to what is by Facebooks own claims the worlds largest facial-recognition database, to which users add hundreds of millions of new images every day. The companys facial-recognition algorithm, DeepFace, which is constantly retraining itself on those new images, is presumed to be more accurate than software used by most law-enforcement agencies.

For now, Facebook says it only uses DeepFace to suggest tags when users upload new pictures. But that didnt help the company in August when a federal appeals court ruled that 7 million Facebook users in Illinois can sue the company for storing their face data without permission, which they claim is a violation of the states BiometricInformationPrivacy Act, currently the only such law in the U.S., which could make Facebook liable for as much as $5,000 per affected user or $35 billion total. (In response, Facebook has stopped suggesting tags for photos by default.)

The FBIs facial-recognition database spans mug shots, the State Departments entire directory of visa and passport pictures, and photos from the Departments of Motor Vehicles in at least 22 states (and counting) that allowed the agency to scan residents drivers licenses without their consent. (In Utah, Vermont, and Washington, where undocumented immigrants can legally drive, DMVs have shared facial recognition data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.) If youve managed to keep yourself out of the FBIs database so far, that may get harder in October 2020, when Americans in 47 states will be required to show either a passport or a new federally compliant Real ID drivers license to board any domestic flight.

All of this would be bothersome enough in a world with perfect data security or one in which you could get a new face as easily as your bank replaces a stolen debit card. But we live in neither of those worlds, and faces have already been hacked. In June, U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced that hackers had breached the servers of one of its subcontractors and stolen travelers face data, some of which reportedly turned up on the dark web.

Despite plenty of more deserving scandals, though, none caused as much hysteria in 2019 as FaceApp. In July, all of your friends, plus Snooki, the Jonas Brothers, and Lebron James, shared pictures taken with the image-processing tool, which went viral by making users look like elderly people. But panic ensued when they read FaceApps merciless terms of use agreement. (You grant FaceApp a perpetual, irrevocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, fully-paid, transferable sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, publicly perform and display your User Content and any name, username or likeness provided in connection with your User Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed, without compensation to you.) And then even more panic ensued when they found out FaceApp is headquartered in St. Petersburg, Russia. Had Vladimir Putin tricked America again, this time into handing over the elusive face data of its influencers?

No, or at least probably not. FaceApp denied that the company shares data with third parties, and claimed most user images are deleted within 48 hours, which seemed to stem fears. But if FaceApp did decide to pull up stakes and pivot to facial recognition, it would not be the first company like it to do so: The photo-management app EverRoll launched in 2012 and collected 13 billion images in which users had tagged themselves and their friends. EverRolls parent company, which recently renamed itself Paravision, discontinued the app in 2016 and used those images to train its facial recognition software, which is now ranked as the No. 3 most accurate algorithm tested by NIST and is sold to law enforcement.

The worst-casescenario for facial recognition might look like something likeChinas forthcoming social credit system.When the system is fully operational next year, the government will use all surveillance methods at its disposal, including facial recognition and 200 million cameras, to track citizens behavior and assign each of them a social score, which will have a variety of consequences. Infractions such as jaywalking and buying too many video games could make it harder to rent an apartment or get a loan from a bank. That probably isnt likely in the U.S., but a more ordinary kind of surveillance is almost inevitable. Maybe its already here.

Commercial facial recognition has been around for years, but since there arent any laws requiring anyone to disclose that theyre using it on you, its impossible to say how widespread it is. Which means any camera you pass could be recognizing your face.

Among the many vendors offering commercial facial recognition software is Face-Six, a Tel Avivbased company founded by Moshe Greenshpan in 2012 after Skakash, a mobile app he was developing that would have identified actors in movies and TV shows, failed to attract investors. Greenshpan says he now serves more than 500 customers worldwide, offering a variety of custom products, including FA6 Retail (to prevent shoplifting), FA6 Class (to take attendance in schools), FA6 Med (for use in hospitals to verify patients identities and prevent treatment errors), and FA6 Drone (which identifies criminals, missing people, and civilians from a drones camera, and which is available for government and private uses.) But Greenshpans most controversial product has been Churchix, which he sells to churches that want to keep track of which parishioners are showing up to mass.

Churchix attracted negative coverage when it launched in 2015, some of which is linked to on the companys website. In the beginning, all press was good press, says Greenshpan. You really need to explain to people why facial recognition is more good than bad. Churches manage attendance manually, but when we provide an efficient tool that does it automatically, suddenly there are concerns. And if those concerns include transparency? We dont know what each and every customer does with our software, Greenshpan says, but usually churches [that use Churchix] dont tell their members.

But Greenshpan does connect me with David Weil, founder of the Warehouse, an after-school recreation center and skateboarding park in Bloomington, Indiana, which uses Face-Sixs software on two security cameras, for one extremely specific purpose: Our building is five acres under one roof, and there are over 200 registered sexual offenders in the area, says Weil. So with that much space and that many pedophiles, this software really helped us.

As visitors enter the building, the cameras scan their faces, and Face-Sixs software searches them against a database provided by the local sheriffs office. According to Weil, the Warehouse had 72,000 visits in 2018, and facial recognition managed to keep out two sex offenders: We just politely told them, Were a youth center. Youre not allowed to be here, he says. I had one false ID, but the gentleman was very understanding of the situation.

Among the other ways we know facial recognition is already being deployed:

Airlines are using it to replace boarding passes, and the Department of Homeland Security says it plans to use facial recognition on 97 percent of airline passengers by 2022.

And at least three arenas have experimented with the technology, including Madison Square Garden.

On stops of Taylor Swifts recent Reputation tour, fans faces were scanned and searched against a database of her hundreds of known stalkers.

Last year, residents of an apartment complex in Brownsville protested when they found out their landlord wanted to use facial recognition to supplement their key fobs but other buildings in the city have been known to use it for years, including the 12 that make up the Knickerbocker Village complex on the Lower East Side. Some virtual-doorman systems include it, too.

At least eight public-school districts in the U.S. have installed facial-recognition systems to detect suspended students and anyone else banned from school grounds.

Retailers use facial recognition to prevent theft, and some software even comes bundled with databases of known shoplifters, but not many stores will admit to it. Last year, the ACLU asked 20 top retail chains whether they use facial recognition, including Best Buy, Costco, Target, and Walmart, and only received two answers rom the grocery conglomerate Ahold Delhaize, whose brands include Food Lion and Stop & Shop, which doesnt use it, andfrom the hardware chain Lowes, which tested facial recognition in the past but has since stopped.

Retailers dont need to run facial-recognition software on their premises to benefit from it. Apple denies using the technology in its brick-and-mortar locations, but in one confusing incident last year, a New York teenager was arrested and charged with stealing from multiple Apple Stores when police said he was identified by facial recognition. Apple apparently employs an outside firm called Security Industry Specialists in some locations; SIS may have run facial-recognition software on surveillance footage captured inside the Apple Stores the teen was alleged to have stolen from. (Charges were dropped against him when an NYPD detective realized he looked nothing like the suspect in the footage of the robberies. In April, the teen sued Apple and SIS for $1 billion.)

Facial recognition could soon be more valuable to retailers in other ways. One likely possibility is that some will eliminate checkout lines by having customers pay with their faces. Another is using facial recognition to target the people most likely to buy things by tracking their in-person shopping habits the same way cookies track our online ones or maybe, eventually, using what they know about our virtual selves to direct us toward products in the real world. If youve ever been creeped out by an uncannily well-targeted ad served to you on Facebook or Instagram, imagine being helped by a retail employee who knows whats in your web history.

But what if youre not the person facial recognition says you are? Last year, the ACLU used Amazons facial recognition software, Rekognition, to search a database of 25,000 mug shots using photos of members of Congress and found that it misidentified 28 lawmakers as criminals, including six members of the Congressional Black Caucus, and a similar test this summer mistook 26 California state legislators, again with people of color overrepresented in the false matches.

Amazon says the ACLU intentionally misrepresented its software by setting its confidence threshold too low the company recommends that police act only on matches in which the system expresses at least 99 percent confidence but theres nothing to prevent police from doing the same thing. Its toothless, says Jacob Snow, the technology-and-civil-liberties attorney at the ACLU who ran the tests. Amazon could say to law enforcement, Were going to set the confidence threshold at 99 percent, and you cant change it. But theyre not doing that.

Dark skin isnt the only thing facial recognition fails with. In NISTs tests, it found that even top-performing algorithms had trouble identifying photos of the same person at different ages and were often unable to tell the difference between twins not just identical twins but fraternal ones of the same sex, too. And performance depends on the clarity of the photos being used. NIST was primarily comparing high-quality mug shots to other high-quality mug shots, but under real-world conditions, with blurry surveillance photos taken at bad angles by cameras that may have been set up incorrectly, results may vary.

Even a facial-recognition system with low error rates can cause problems when deployed at large scale. During six recent tests of the London polices facial-recognition system, which scanned the faces of people on public streets in search of wanted suspects, 42 matches were made but only eight were verified to be correct (30 matches were eventually confirmed to be misidentifications, and four of the 42 people disappeared into crowds before officers were able to make contact). Because they scanned thousands of faces in total, the London police said their error rate was 0.1 percent, but most headlines begged to differ: LONDON POLICE FACIAL RECOGNITION FAILS 80% OF THE TIME AND MUST STOP NOW, said one.

Police have also been caught taking creative license with the technology. A report published in May by the Georgetown Universitys Center on Privacy and Technology found that six departments in the U.S. allow officers to run composite sketches of suspects through facial-recognition software. That same report tells the story of a suspect whod been caught by surveillance cameras allegedly stealing beer from a CVS in Gramercy Park in 2017, but the video was low quality and no useful matches were returned. A detective noticed, though, that the man bore a resemblance to Woody Harrelson, so he ran a search using an image of the actor which eventually led to an arrest. The person they ended up investigating was the tenth person on the candidate list, says Georgetown Laws Clare Garvie, the author of the report, meaning the algorithm thought nine other people [in the NYPDs mug-shot database] looked more like Woody Harrelson. If you can put person A into an algorithm and find person B, why does that not prove that if youre looking for looking for person B, you might accidentally find person A? They intentionally forced a misidentification as a valid investigative technique.

NYPD spokesperson Devora Kaye notes that this case was just one of more than 5,300 requests to FIS in 2017. The NYPD, she says, only uses facial recognition as an investigative tool and doesnt arrest or detain suspects whose identities havent been corroborated by other means. A facial recognition match is a lead. No one has ever been arrested solely on the basis of a computer match, no matter how compelling.

If Larry Griffin IIs story typifies a best-case use of facial recognition for law enforcement, Kaitlin Jackson, a public defense attorney with the Bronx Defenders, tells me one that exposes its drawbacks. Jackson represented a man whod been arrested for the theft of socks from a T.J. Maxx store in February 2018, supposedly after brandishing a box cutter at a security guard. My client was picked up months after the robbery, and the only way I even found out facial recognition was used was that I just started calling the prosecutor and saying, How in the world did you decide months after that it was my client? There are no forensics, she says. It turned out the police went to T.J. Maxx security and said, We want to pull the surveillance , were going to run it through facial recognition so they were already cluing him in that any suspect will have been picked by facial recognition. And then they texted the security guard a single photo that he knows has been run through facial recognition, and they said, Is this the person? Thats the most suggestive procedure you could possibly imagine. And then they make the arrest and say its on the basis of an [eyewitness] ID, and they try to bury that this is a facial-recognition case. (The NYPD said the defendant had committed a theft at the same store before and said the security guard knew him from prior interactions. The detective on the case showed him an image hoping it would put a name to a face, the department said in a legal filing.)

Jacksons client had at least two lines of defense: He has a twin brother, who could have triggered the facial-recognition match although Jackson doesnt think the twin stole any socks either but more important, his wife was in labor at the time of the theft and he was in the delivery room. We had pictures of them at the hospital, and his name was on the birth certificate, says Jackson. But the prosecution would not dismiss the case partly, she suspects, because they have an undying faith that the software doesnt get it wrong. Their only recourse, she said, would be to argue, Maybe he left a few minutes before his baby was delivered and ran out to get socks and then came back.

Jackson says her client spent half of last year in prison. He was on probation when he was arrested. So our real problem was the way that all these systems interact. Probation lodged a hold, and they would not withdraw the hold because of this case, and the prosecution wouldnt dismiss this case. And then finally [the prosecution] offered him something that would get him out of jail. So he did what a lot of us would he took a plea of something he did not do.

But facial recognition is about more than just who you are, and what youve bought, and the crimes you have or havent committed, and whether your resemblance to a sex offender will make it hard to find places to skateboard its also about how you feel. Because another thing the technology can do, or at least supposedly do, is detect emotions.

Amazon, IBM, Microsoft, and others claim their software can guess which emotion youre feeling based on your facial expressions or in some cases microexpressions, under the logic that even if you attempt to hide your feelings, certain facial muscles are beyond your control.Amazon, for example, says Rekognition can infer whether a face is expressing happiness, sadness, anger, confusion, disgust, surprise, calmness, or fear although the documentation warns that results are not a determination of a persons internal emotional state and should not be used in such a way, and that a person pretending to have a sad face might not be sad emotionally.

Other vendors are more confident in their mood-reading abilities. The London-based start-up RealEyes markets a service to advertisers that scans peoples faces through their computers webcams to measure their attention level and emotions while they watch commercials. The Utah-based company Hirevue claims its software can analyze video job interviews to judge personality traits and eliminate disinterested candidates. (Hirevues clients include Dunkin Donuts, Staples, and Urban Outfitters.)

On its website, the facial-recognition company Kairos brags about the work it did for Legendary Pictures gauging reactions of audience members at movie test screenings: More than 450,000 emotional measurements were recorded per minute over the screening of preview films, for a total of around 100 million facial measurements processed in total. Kairos says Legendary used that data to determine which parts of movies worked best in ads, identify the demographics most likely to share trailers, and ensure Legendarys movies were appealing to mainstream audiences as well as their targeted fan demographic. Neither Kairos nor Legendary Pictures would confirm which movies were involved, but Kairos CEO Melissa Doval says the screenings probably happened in 2013 or 2014, and theres a picture from the 2013 Superman movieMan of Steelon Kairos website.

Your facial tics may not necessarily lose you any jobs or give the wrong impression about your taste in superhero movies, though because emotion-detection software might not really work. In July, a group of five top psychologists published areportinPsychological Science in the Public Interest,which cited over 1,000 other journal articles and found that facial expressions are more complex than the software gives them credit for: It is not possible to confidently infer happiness from a smile, anger from a scowl or sadness from a frown, as much of current technology tries to do when applying what are mistakenly believed to be the scientific facts.

Ultimately, the most worrisome thing about facial recognition might be how accessible it is. Because its not just available to governments and corporationsits also for sale to you, me, your landlord, random perverts, and anyone else with a camera and a computer, and for cheaper than youd probably expect: Amazons Rekognition, for example, offers a free year-long trial that lets you identify faces in 5,000 images or 1,000 minutes of video per month (and after that, its a penny per ten photos or ten cents per minute of video).

If none of the off-the-shelf software packages suit your particular needs, it turns out its pretty easy, if you know what youre doing, to roll your own facial-recognition app using freely available open-source code. I watched one YouTube tutorial in which a programmer built his own facial-recognition system that could distinguish between his face and the cast of Game of Thrones.

Its not hard to imagine more sinister applications. This spring, a developer claimed on Chinese social media that hed used facial recognition and publicly available photos from Facebook and Instagram to identify 100,000 women in amateur porn videos. He didnt share any proof and may have been lying but given all the other seemingly unbelievable things about facial recognition we now know to be true, maybe he wasnt.

I wanted to experiment myself, so I bought a Tend Insights Lynx Indoor 2, a tiny and cheap but well-reviewed home security camera that comes bundled with its own facial-recognition software. It worked well for what it did, which in my case wasnt much: I set the camera on my desk, connected it to my Wi-Fi network, downloaded the companion iPhone app, and uploaded a picture of myself so it knew what I looked like. I left my apartment, and in a few minutes when I came back, the Lynx sent a push notification to my phone to tell me I was home, along with a short video for proof. That may not sound like $60 well spent, but it was a small price for a feeling of control I might never have again: After the inaugural test of my home facial-recognition system, I unplugged it and stuffed it in a drawer.

*This article appears in the November 11, 2019, issue ofNew York Magazine. Subscribe Now!

The one story you shouldn't miss today, selected byNew York's editors.

View original post here:

There Will Be No Turning Back on Facial Recognition - New York Magazine

USM’s Graham Participating in White House Summit on Partnerships in Ocean Science and Technology – Southern Miss Now

Thu, 11/14/2019 - 17:20pm | By: James Coll

Dr. Monty Graham, Associate Vice President for Research at The University of Southern Mississippi, Coastal Operations, is a participating in todays White House Summit on Partnerships in Ocean Science and Technology in Washington D.C.Graham is joining about 100 national leaders with ocean science expertise and interests in the nations capital for the summit hosted by Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Mary Neumayr, Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality, within the Executive Office of the President. The summit is intended to bring together the private sector, academia, philanthropies, and the Federal government to discuss opportunities for building and sustaining partnerships in ocean-related research and promote technologies and investments.

The nation clearly has more needs than we have resources to meet those needs, Graham said. Partnerships are the key. What we are doing in the Gulf, in particular the Mississippi coast, is serving as a model to the nation on how to use partnerships between academia, industry, government and philanthropy to meet large and critical science and technology needs."

In addition to identifying opportunities to building cross-sector partnerships, the purpose of the summit is to engage the national community in the conversation through academic conferences and regional ocean science and technology centers. The event aligns with a 2018 Trump Administration executive order recognizing and supporting federal participation in regional ocean partnerships to advance the economic, security, and environmental interests of the United States.

Graham has also been recently selected to chair the national Consortium for Ocean Leadership (COL) Board of Trustees based in Washington, D.C. through 2021. He also serves as chair of Mississippi Governor Phil Bryants Ocean Task Force and co-chair of the Gulf Caribbean Oceanographic Consortium, and he is a board member for Ocean Exploration Trust, Inc.

Read more from the original source:

USM's Graham Participating in White House Summit on Partnerships in Ocean Science and Technology - Southern Miss Now

Virginia Beach Education Foundation using grant money for technology to improve physical education – 13newsnow.com WVEC

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. It might not be the way you remember gym class.

The Virginia Beach Education Foundation is using $38,902.94 in grant money to transform physical education at two Virginia Beach locations.

The Juvenile Detention Center and Parkway Elementary School were surprised with grant money on Thursday.

The JDC received $18,802.94, which it'll use to buy "Heart Zone Systems." If you haven't heard of them, they're like FitBits. Students will wear them during PE.

The Juvenile Detention Center will use its grant money to buy Heart Zone Systems for students to wear during PE. Pictured, from left to right, Shelley Labiosa, VBCPS employee and grant reviewer; John Mason, math teacher; Superintendent Aaron Spence; Jon Mazach, Virginia Beach Education Foundation treasurer; Jeff McGowan, health and p.e. teacher; Charles Foster, principal; Janene Gorham, director of Professional Growth and Innovation for VBCPS.

Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Parkway students are getting a really cool upgrade.

The school is using its $20,000 grant to buy a "Lu Interactive Playground."

Parkway Elementary School P.E. teacher Casey Hughes was surprised with the grant check.

Virginia Beach City Public Schools

The technologically advanced playground includes light and audio systems and a giant wall projection with 3D cameras for interactive physical activity.

The wall projection can come with apps that focus on different subjects like math, geography, even problem solving among other things all while students stay active.

The grants are two of 79 "Adopt A+ Grants." The 79 grants total $200,000.

The foundation plans to continue to surprise teachers and schools across the city with the grant money.

RELATED: Crosswalk mural aimed at keeping children safe on walks to school

RELATED: Northam announces trade plan, education grant during visit to Norfolk

RELATED: Virginia Beach schools receive 'high volume' of responses to latest school start time survey

RELATED: Chesapeake Public Schools to hold teacher job fair

RELATED: IN SESSION: Suffolk program brings dads into the classroom

See more here:

Virginia Beach Education Foundation using grant money for technology to improve physical education - 13newsnow.com WVEC

Why American Outdoor Brands, International Game Technology, and Dillard’s Jumped Today – Motley Fool

The stock market came under modest pressure on Thursday, although pullbacks were still relatively small and major benchmarks stayed close to their historic highs. Bad news on the earnings front from a major tech company weighed on investor sentiment, and some worried rising unemployment claims were a potential harbinger of economic weakness. Yet even with a slightly downbeat mood on Wall Street, some stocks managed to post strong gains. American Outdoor Brands (NASDAQ:AOBC), International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT), and Dillard's (NYSE:DDS) were among the top performers. Here's why they did so well.

Shares of American Outdoor Brands gained 6% after it announced that it would break itself up into two companies. American Outdoor said it would spin off its firearm business into a company to be known as Smith & Wesson Brands, with the remaining corporate entity keeping its original name and containing the outdoor products and accessories business. Board chair Barry Monheit said he expects the breakup to let each company "better align its strategic objectives with its capital allocation priorities." Given the challenges related to the gun business overall, it'll be interesting to see which stock performs better once the deal closes in the second half of 2020.

Image source: American Outdoor Brands.

International Game Technology saw its stock climb more than 23% after reporting its third-quarter financial results. Revenue for the slot machine and lottery specialistwas essentially flat from year-earlier levels, and adjusted earnings per share plunged 32% year over year. Yet investors seemed pleased with the numbers, in part because of how the company fought against higher taxes in the Italian market and particularly strong performance in the year-ago quarter. Moreover, IGT's outlook was reasonably solid, and those following the stock are excited about the innovative CrystalBetting terminal and how it could be an even bigger draw both for players and for the company.

Finally, shares of Dillard's rose 14%. The department store retailer surprised investors by making a modest profit in the third quarter of 2019, and even though both revenue and net income were down year over year, Dillard's managed to post flat comparable sales. That was an improvement from the previous quarter. CEO William Dillard said that "we were not satisfied with the third quarter," but shareholders seemed happy about the progress that Dillard's has made in fighting back against an extremely difficult environment for department-store retailers.

Follow this link:

Why American Outdoor Brands, International Game Technology, and Dillard's Jumped Today - Motley Fool

Common Networks bets 5G wireless technology will replace cable internet in your home – CNBC

A Common Networks field technician installing Terragraph technology on a roof in San Francisco

At first blush, inventing a start-up to challenge AT&T, Verizon and Comcast for high-speed broadband dominance seems crazy.

It takes billions of dollars to lay fiber in the ground historically, the only way to deliver ultrafast internet speeds to residential homes. The prohibitive cost has stopped some of the largest companies in the world from making a national dent in constructing high-speed broadband networks, including Verizon and Google. Meanwhile, Verizon and AT&T already plan to roll out 5G fixed broadband services in cities across the U.S., using wireless technology to compete with cable companies to provide home internet.

But Zach Brock, the CEO of Common Networks, a company he founded with three other ex-Square employees, said he believes he has helped design a technology that can upend the U.S. telecommunications market. For about $50 a month, Common Networks is offering 300Mb/sec to 1Gb/sec download speeds for households around Silicon Valley and Alameda (Oakland is coming soon). That's about $20 or $30 less per month than what Comcast charges for about the same speed without promotional pricing.

"Our focus is proving out of technology and showing we can deliver at an affordable cost," Brock said in an interview. "Our vision for the company is that everyone is connected to true broadband internet."

Common Networks, founded about three and a half years ago, leases existing fiber and uses unlicensed 5G microwave and millimeter spectrum to interact with its antenna-like devices that are installed on rooftops. Using open-source software and hardware, through a partnership with Facebook's Terragraph technology, Common Networks developed so-called graph-based technology that can deliver high-speed internet for what Brock said is about one-tenth the cost of what a telecommunications company has historically paid. To date Common Networks claims to reach more than 100,000 customers, though the company doesn't disclose its paying subscriber numbers.

The technology's prospects have been strong enough to bring in $34 million in funding from venture capital investors including General Catalyst, Eclipse Ventures and Lux Capital. On Tuesday the company made the 2019 CNBC's Upstart 100 list of the world's most promising start-ups.

Brock said his initial focus is single-family homes that don't have high-speed broadband options or have to rely on old DSL technology for Internet. Perhaps surprisingly, more than 22% of residents in San Leandro, California one of five cities Common Networks currently serves don't have a home broadband subscription of any kind. Cable companies often choose not to spend the money to connect buildings or regions of the country where they expect minimal customer retention.

"For many it may be likely that residential broadband internet is either not available or is not affordable," Magellan Advisors wrote in a review of the city's internet usage and capabilities.

More from Upstart 100:Amazon has triggered an arms race in this technologyWhy Kevin Durant and other NBA stars are betting millions on a start-up to challenge TV sportsAhead of 2020 presidential election, this start-up is using military-grade AI to stamp out fake news

Getting a foothold into homes that want broadband but can't access it may be the easiest path for the start-up, but the ultimate goal is to compete head-to-head against both cable companies and wireless providers, Brock said. Distributing broadband can be a very high-margin business, as most of the cost is fixed network infrastructure and upkeep. Cable companies, such as Comcast and Charter Communications, the two largest U.S. operators, have shifted their business models to invest billions of dollars in boosting nationwide speeds while spending less effort keeping traditional television subscribers.

Zach Brock, CEO of Common Networks.

Source: Common Networks

"Providing internet service is a very large market," said Kyle Doherty, a managing director at General Catalyst, whose venture capital firm led a $25 million Series B funding round in Common Networks last year. "High-speed broadband still isn't ubiquitous, but it will be in the future. There's a fair share of incumbents, but we're pretty compelled by the approach they're taking."

Common Networks doesn't lay any fiber nor does it need government permits to provide internet. Eschewing the enormous upfront costs of broadband infrastructure gives the company a chance to compete against much larger players if pricing is lower and customer service is dramatically better, said Doherty.

High-speed broadband still isn't ubiquitous, but it will be in the future. There's a fair share of incumbents, but we're pretty compelled by the approach they're taking.

Kyle Doherty

managing director, General Catalyst

Still, it remains to be seen how quickly Common Networks can provide its technology outside of the San Francisco Bay Area. Regulations in certain cities could delay expansion, and being first to market is an important advantage for Common Networks, Doherty said.

Verizon's 5G Home Internet is currently available in limited areas of Los Angeles, Sacramento, Houston and Indianapolis. Verizon is charging the same $50-per-month price for households with a Verizon wireless account and $70 per month for homes that don't. Verizon is also giving away the first three months of home Internet for free.

Still, the technology needs to work reliably in all neighborhoods, said telecommunications analyst Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson. Architectures based on millimeter wave spectrum suffer from wave-strength issues, he said.

"The signal doesn't travel far enough, or penetrate through obstructions well enough, to make it economically interesting," Moffett said.

But Common Networks "may have a better story to tell than the larger incumbents" because they're "all about keeping costs down," said Moffett, citing the company's use of unlicensed spectrum and limited spending on traditional network facilities.

"It's not clear how successful companies like Common Networks will be competing against the large incumbent ISPs, but there's certainly a place for them in the broadband landscape," Moffett said. "I think you'll see more and more companies like Common Networks."

Brock and his fellow former Square co-workers Grace Chen, Mark Jen and Jessica Shalek were drawn to internet distribution because cable companies have scored poorly in customer service satisfaction surveys for decades.

"There's a clear problem to solve," Brock said.

Part of the company's pitch to consumers is to be the anti-cable company in terms of customer relationships, Doherty said. Stressing the importance of the first installation, Common Networks technicians, who are all full-time employees, are trained to make a positive first impression with customers to spread word-of-mouth buzz about the company. Still, the company's primary selling point will be underpricing its competition because of the company's proprietary technology, Brock said.

Convincing customers to choose a start-up over a widely known incumbent's service will be a challenge. Brock and his team are trying to market Common Networks' service locally, going door-to-door and working with city government officials to participate in local events to spread the word.

"It's very local, and it's effective," Doherty said. "There are a lot of levers to pull, getting positive press in local newspapers and using door hangers. It's old-fashioned, but people are looking for a cheaper experience."

Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC.

WATCH: Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg: Half of the US will have 5G phones by 2024

Original post:

Common Networks bets 5G wireless technology will replace cable internet in your home - CNBC

‘Better evidence’ needed on immersive technology | News – ArtsProfessional

There is no clear evidence yet that immersive experiences can provide benefits to museums, according to a new report calling for more research into their potential.

The study from the Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre (PEC) and Cardiff University says cultural institutions have often been testbeds for immersive approaches to attracting audiences and deepening engagement, such as virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed media. But it argues that attempts to find straightforward connections between investment and outcomes have been inconclusive.

There is a seductive logic that the use of participatory and networked technologies leads to increased interaction between an experience and those [who] take part in it, it says.

The broad conflation between more interactivity or more control over a narrative and more agency should be challenged.

READ MORE:* New realities: exploring the potential of VR/AR*New fund to help develop immersive content* Museums and tourist boards at odds

The report advocates for testing the value of immersive technologies and other interventions in a way that adequately captures the nuances of immersion in museum, gallery and heritage contexts.

While immersive experiences can give greater voice to the stories of disenfranchised or underrepresented groups, the report warns that playing with the line between fact and fiction can be understood as provocative and political.

Debates about authenticity, re-creation and fakery are amplified by digital technologies and are particularly knotty in heritage contexts, it says.

The possibilities of re-creation come with increased responsibilities that designers and institutions need to take seriously, both for quality and ethical reasons.

Although it says immersive initiatives could challenge power relations in museum and heritage projects, the report notes possible tensions between these approaches and the current emphasis on economic returns within the research and policy landscape.

Co-Author Dr Jenny Kidd told ArtsProfessional that there is a need for more authoritative research and policy that underpins ethical concerns already being expressed in the sector. She says accessibility physical and economic environmental issues, privacy, data ownership, and the de-colonisation of museums all must be considered when introducing and implementing immersive technologies.

It seems a bit incongruous that in institutions where there has been so much effort in recent years to break down these barriers to access that we would reinstate them digitally.

There are further logistical challenges to the uptake and effectiveness of immersion experiences in the museum sector: cost, staff training, collaboration with partners, the usability of any immersive technologies, their sustainability beyond their initial use, and a lack of consensus on how to evaluate their impact can undermine these initiatives, the report says.

It recommends institutions consider how best to make [technology] frictionless, or even invisible. Although issues with internet connectivity and software glitches are likely to improve, such issues remain an unavoidable real-world aspect of many immersive encounters at this time.

The value of immersive experiences in museums can be complex to articulate given the levels of investment needed, it adds.

Kidd said their value will naturally be assessed if they are publicly funded, but remains optimistic about the potential of these interventions.

Theres positive work to be done in this space and I want to see us doing that work.

The rest is here:

'Better evidence' needed on immersive technology | News - ArtsProfessional

The emotional and financial cost of working with outdated technology – Ladders

It really is remarkable to think about how quickly computers made their way from revolutionary, clunky novelty, to sleek ubiquitous workplace companion. Of course, this innovation has come with a nearly equal share of benefits and setbacks some concrete, some indicative of larger issues.

What has been coined as the Technology Gap, or alternatively The Digital Divide or App gap if you like, locates the disparity between citizens that successfully interact with computers or mobile devices on a daily basis and those that do not. All the way back in 1942, political economist Joseph Schumpeter identified the broad implications of this imbalance as the most relevant feature of capitalism; Creative destruction.

With this in mind, our friends over at ZenBusiness conducted a survey to learn about the many complications that employees face when they are forced to work with outdated technology or a dearth of necessary office supplies, writting,

In 2019, the size of computers has shrunk, but their capabilities have exponentially grown. Despite advancements in this technology, though,accessibility continues to be a growing issueas the tech gap widens. As a result of this gap and other issues, many American offices are stuck with outdated technologies, low stocks of supplies, and a lack of integrated communication among teams.

More than 50% of the respondents say that their workplace technology was either moderately or completely outdated. According to the survey, computers caused workers the most difficulty, followed by printers, digital delays, cloud-based programs, cybersecurity, and general internet hiccups.

Employees reported that their workplace technology was moderately or completely outdated, a fairly low standard for workers. Specifically, computers (83.1%) and software (70.5%) were the most commonly outdated technology at work. As computers get older, they might not be able to support the newest iterations of a devices operating system, while outdated software inhibits an office from taking advantage of the latest developments in business technology, the authors explain.

As a consequence the average employee loses about 40 minutes of productivity a day, which further results in a $3,930 annual lost for employers. A routine lack of supplies additionally impacted productivity, leading to a median lost of $1,800 per week. Moreover,93% of workers say that trying to operate outdated technology severely affects their overalljob satisfaction. Thirty three percent of all of the employees surveyed say that they would even look for a new job due to their workplaces outdated technology.

Read this article:

The emotional and financial cost of working with outdated technology - Ladders

Mesothelioma Compensation Center Appeals to An Offshore Oil Rig Worker with Mesothelioma Nationwide to Call for Direct Access to Attorney Erik Karst…

NEW YORK, Nov. 13, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --TheMesothelioma Compensation Centersays, "We are appealing to an offshore oil rig worker who have recently been diagnosed with mesothelioma to call us anytime at 800-714-0303 for on the spot access to attorney Erik Karst of the law firm of Karst von Oiste. Erik Karst and his colleagues at Karst von Oiste are responsible for over a billion dollars in financial compensation results for people with mesothelioma or asbestos exposure illnesses-and they will know exactly how to help an oil rig or oil field worker with mesothelioma-especially if the person's exposure to asbestos took place in the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska or offshore oil rigs off the coast of California.

"We also want to emphasize attorney Erik Karst of the law firm of Karst von Oiste and his lawyers will go anywhere the United States for a face to face meeting with the person with mesothelioma-in the home of the person with this rare cancer. This face to face meeting will allow the lawyers to understand how the person was exposed to asbestos, and to develop a plan to get this person the best financial compensation settlement results. We have endorsed the law firm of Karst von Oiste for oil/gas exploration and development workers nationwide-because they get superior compensation results for their clients as we would be happy to discuss anytime at 800-714-0303."www.karstvonoiste.com/

TheMesothelioma Compensation Centeris an advocate for power and energy workers with mesothelioma and the appealing to people like this to avoid the following types of Internet ads:

According to the CDC, the states indicated with the highest incidence of mesothelioma include Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Louisiana, Washington, and Oregon. However, an oil field or offshore oil rig worker with mesothelioma could live in any state including California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Nebraska, North Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Idaho, or Alaska. http://MesotheliomaCompensationCenter.Com

The Mesothelioma Compensation Center specializes in assisting high-risk workers who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma. High-risk groups for exposure to asbestos include the US Navy Veterans, power plant workers, shipyard workers, oil refinery workers, public utility workers, chemical plant workers, nuclear power plant workers, oil and gas field production workers, hydro-electric workers, plumbers, electricians, welders, millwrights, pipefitters or machinists. In most instances people with mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos in the 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, or 1980's.www.karstvonoiste.com/

For more information about mesothelioma, please refer to the National Institutes of Health's web site related to this rare form of cancer:https://www.cancer.gov/types/mesothelioma

Media Contact:

Michael Thomas800-714-0303226297@email4pr.com

SOURCE Mesothelioma Compensation Center

See the rest here:

Mesothelioma Compensation Center Appeals to An Offshore Oil Rig Worker with Mesothelioma Nationwide to Call for Direct Access to Attorney Erik Karst...

Delivery of the navy’s first Arctic and offshore patrol ship delayed until 2020 – CTV News

Michael MacDonald, THE CANADIAN PRESS Published Tuesday, November 12, 2019 12:27PM AST Last Updated Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:31PM AST

HALIFAX -- The delivery date for the navy's first Arctic and offshore patrol ship has again been pushed back.

Irving Shipbuilding in Halifax was originally scheduled to deliver the ship in 2018, but in August that deadline was pushed to the end of 2019.

On Tuesday, Irving Shipbuilding released a statement saying the new ship, HMCS Harry DeWolf, is expected to be delivered during the first three months of 2020 -- nearly five years after construction first started.

The company says it had always intended to "revisit" the delivery deadline, given the fact it is building a newly designed ship with a new supply chain, a new shipyard and a new and growing workforce.

Irving spokesman Sean Lewis said the ship will be the largest naval vessel built in Canada in more than 50 years.

"We are now just weeks away from taking the future HMCS Harry DeWolf to sea for the first time, followed by formal sea trials and acceptance by our customer," Lewis said in a statement. "This will span into the first quarter of 2020."

Four of the Harry DeWolf-class of vessels, which will be capable of breaking through light ice and armed with a small cannon, are currently under construction in Halifax.

The Arctic patrol vessels are the first vessels to be built by Irving since it was selected as one of two shipyards under the federal government's multibillion-dollar national shipbuilding strategy.

Under the original plan, Irving was to build between six and eight Arctic patrol vessels at a total cost of around $3.1 billion, as well as the navy's new fleet of 15 warships for $24 billion, once those smaller ships were finished.

However, numerous delays and cost overruns saw the number of Arctic patrol vessels cut to five, even as the budget was increased to $3.5 billion. The 15 warships are now projected to cost $60 billion.

In November 2018, Ottawa announced it would pay $800 million for a sixth Arctic vessel as well as to slow production at Irving to prevent layoffs between the end of work on the last Arctic ship and the start of warship work.

Then in May, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced plans to spend an additional $15.7 billion on 18 new ships for Canadian Coast Guard, including two additional Arctic patrol vessels from Irving.

The other 16 ships are being built by Seaspan Shipbuilding in Vancouver, which was selected in 2011 as the second yard under the national shipbuilding plan.

Seaspan is also building four science vessels for the coast guard and two naval support ships.

-- With files from Lee Berthiaume

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 12, 2019.

Read the original:

Delivery of the navy's first Arctic and offshore patrol ship delayed until 2020 - CTV News

No Consensus on How to Bring Offshore Wind Power Ashore in NJ – NJ Spotlight

The two main choices are to build a backbone offshore-wind transmission system or to allow developers to build transmission lines directly to on-shore facilities.

The state yesterday began soliciting input on how to deliver power from offshore wind farms off the Jersey coast to customers, a dilemma that will get more complicated as the sector grows more critical to meeting New Jerseys energy needs.

For the short term, offshore wind developers will likely have relatively few problems hooking up with the electric grid, at least to achieve the Murphy administrations goals of developing 3,500 megawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030, according to offshore wind developers at a meeting held at the War Memorial in Trenton on Tuesday.

Long term is another issue altogether, especially if the state opts to adopt a consultants projection that the state will need to nearly triple that goal and build up to 11,000 MW of offshore wind capacity by mid-century to achieve its target of 100% clean energy by then.

If so, developers, consultants, and an executive from PJM Interconnection, the regional power grid, urged the state to begin assessing long-term projections of its own, and even of other states energy demands and profiles.

You need to start thinking about what is the ultimate build-out, said Suzanne Glass, director of infrastructure planning for the PJM, the nations largest power grid, stretching from the Eastern Seaboard to Illinois.

The meeting, held by the state Board of Public Utilities, yielded no clear consensus on whether a regional so-called backbone offshore-wind transmission system would be more cost-effective than allowing developers to build transmission lines directly to on-shore facilities.

The same debate is raging in Europe, where offshore wind farms are much more prevalent and established. rsted, which has won approval to build a 1,100 MW wind farm 15 miles off Atlantic City, has typically insisted it is better to allow the developer to also build the transmission line.

The synergies of doing offshore wind and transmission together are huge, said Utrik Stridboek, a vice president of regulatory affairs in rsted. The key is I dont think you want to create impediments to those synergies.

Yet, with the tremendous growth in offshore wind in Europe, he argued that a regional backbone system is probably inevitable there, and possibly even in the U.S., depending on the growth of the sector and the value it brings to investors.

After the meeting, rsted issued a statement, saying, There may be benefits to a planned transmission system for offshore wind but there are also significant risks.

In New Jersey, the BPU has approved an underwater transmission line from rsteds proposed wind farm to the closed Oyster Creek nuclear plant to bring ashore its power to customers. A big issue for the offshore wind developers is finding suitable places to bring power on shore to customers, with most saying such options are limited.

Just getting one cable landing to shore is very challenging, noted Kirsty Townsend of rsted.

If the state chooses to expand its goal of offshore wind capacity to 11,000 MW, there are not nearly enough interconnections onshore to accommodate that much capacity, agreed Janice Fuller, president of NJ Ocean Grid, a subsidiary of Anbaric Development Partners, LLC.

Anbaric asked the federal government to gauge interest in building such a transmission line earlier this year, in this instance, a 185-mile submarine line mostly off the Jersey coast.

Doug Copeland, development manager for Atlantic Shores, an offshore-wind farm project being pursued by EDF Renewables and Shell Energy off the Jersey coast, predicted that developers will be able to solve the technical issues relating to transmission, but offered the political issues may be more daunting.

The BPU is aiming to select the least-cost option to building an offshore-wind transmission system. Yesterdays hearing was the first of several it expects to hold with stakeholders to determine how to bring ashore the power from the wind farms.

See more here:

No Consensus on How to Bring Offshore Wind Power Ashore in NJ - NJ Spotlight

Powerful winds of change: Offshore wind power has taken off but challenges persist – Down To Earth Magazine

Technological improvements and falling costs are driving a boom in offshore wind power projects worldwide. Still, the industry faces its own peculiar share of challenges

This is the first partof athree-part series:

Technology has come a long way since windmills were used centuries ago to mill grain or pump water. Modern wind turbines are highly evolved versions and the utility-scale ones are over 100 metres tall and can power thousands of homes.

A wind farm is an area with a high density of turbines for electricity generation their history goes back over a century, when engineers saw that a cluster of turbines on land could improve the electricity generation profile. The nomenclature has changed and these farms are now called onshore wind farms the reason for this is the relatively new and fascinating story of offshore wind farms.

The basics are the same: Harnessing the energy of wind, but by building wind farms in oceans where speeds are higher and land is not a concern. The electricity produced by offshore wind turbines travels back to land through a series of cable systems that lay on the seabed.

The United Kingdom has led the charge on offshore wind installations and is currently the country with most installations by a mile. Renewable energy sources generated more electricity in the UK than fossil fuel power plants for the first, straight three-month period since record-keeping began more than 100 years ago, according to an analysis published by UK-based website Carbon Brief on October 14, 2019.

Wind farms, solar panels, biomass and hydroelectric power projects generated an estimated 29.5 terawatt hours (TWhs) of electricity in the third quarter, between July and September of 2019, marginally exceeding the 29.1 TWhs produced by plants that run on fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil.

In 2003, the 60 megawatt (MW) North Hoyle, the first offshore wind farm in the UK, became operational at a depth of less than 10 m and at a distance of 7.5 km from the shore. It was the most powerful farm at that time and could power 50,000 homes annualy.

In contrast, the 588 MW Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm, located near a former oil field in the Moray Firth, north of Scotland, and inaugurated by Prince Charles on July 29, 2019 was at a depth of 45 m and at a distance of 13 km from the coast. The 84-turbine Beatrice has the capacity to power up to 0.45 million homes.

Offshore wind energy has been identified as one of 10 industries where the UK has the potential to be a market leader and features heavily in its plans of being a net-zero emissions country by 2050. The country hopes to produce 30 gigawatt (GW) of offshore wind energy by 2030, a massive transition where 33 per cent of the UKs electricity would come from offshore wind farms up from 8 per cent in 2018.

It would be generating thousands of high-quality jobs across the UK, a strong supply chain and a fivefold increase in exports. This is our modern industrial strategy in action, Claire Perry, UKs Energy & Clean Growth minister said in a statement on March 2, 2019, when the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy officially launched its Offshore Wind Sector Deal.

This acceleration could not have been more unpredictable going by the lull in the initial years. The uptake of offshore wind energy was slow after 1991, when Denmark built Vindeby, the first offshore wind farm in the world with 11 small 450-kilowatt (kW) turbines in the shallow waters around Lolland the countrys fourth-largest island. The electricity industry considered the development to be too small at that time.

According to an article published in the New Scientist on October 20, 1990, special winches were used for construction as large cranes could not be used at sea. A system to control the turbines from land had to be set up using optical fibre cable incorporated into the seabed power cable taking energy from the turbines to the shore.

New turbines were prepared with three 16 m blades made from polyester reinforced with glass fibre, mounted on a 35 m tubular steel tower. The concrete foundations were built in a dry dock carved out of the shoreline of the island, which was then flooded to float the finished foundations to sea using a large catamaran, where they were lowered onto prepared bases, filled with gravel and surrounded by large boulders.

Offshore wind was born mainly due to the lack of space for the development of large onshore wind projects in the densely populated areas of Western Europe. The European countries led the offshore wind industry as they were the first to envision oceans as a clean energy resource and were aided by a facilitating policy environment that saw the need for clean energy much before others.

The import of offshore wind energy was realised in 2000 when the first large-scale offshore farm, Middelgrunden, 3.5 km off Copenhagen, was built with 20 Bonus 2 MW turbines and a capacity of 40 MW. Now, Denmarks biggest offshore wind farm, Thor, with a capacity of at least 800 MW, is set to be installed in the North Sea. Thor will supply power to 0.8 million households and create more than 8,000 jobs in the layout process.

The United States was a late entrant into the offshore wind energy field. It was in December 2016 that the country got its first operating offshore wind farm, the Block Island Wind Farm, off Rhode Island. The farm had a capacity of just 30 MW but it did show that the US was finally entering the offshore wind game.

The large coastline in the US offers the country significant potential estimated at over 2,000 GW. In December 2016, the US introduced the National Offshore Wind Strategy to develop the industry. The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BoEM), the federal agency responsible for offshore resources, has already granted over 15 leases for offshore wind development.

BoEM claims that the leased offshore blocks could support over 21 GW of energy. Nine mega projects signed in New York, New Jersey and states like Massachusetts and Rhode Island, with a cumulative capacity of over 4.8 GW are expected to be commissioned in the coming years. This alone could power oversix million homes along the US coast. The effort is to spur an estimated $70 billion offshore wind industry in the US over the next decade.

Ironically, there is a political backlash for this job churning sector when the US is focused on creating more jobs. President Donald Trump has not been as supportive of wind power. Trump has made hundreds of comments on Twitter and in public opposing the expansion of wind power. They say the noise causes cancer, Trump told a crowd of supporters last spring, soliciting an immediate and strong rebuttal from the American Cancer Society.

The roadblock for the industry came in August this year when the US Interior Department extended the environmental review for the $2.8 billion Vineyard Wind project off Massachusetts. The 800 MW project is the first of several massive wind farms planned off the East Coast. The review came in response to concerns from fisherfolk about the impact of offshore wind development on fisheries.

The question facing the industry is whether the review represents a genuine attempt to understand the environmental impacts associated with offshore wind or an effort to kill it, said Anthony Logan, an analyst who tracks the industry at Wood Mackenzie, a consulting firm, E&E News reported. Despite all that, analysts predict that the US will swiftly catch up.

I get that its a renewable energy project, and I get that people are excited about it, says Drew Minkiewicz, an attorney with the Fisheries Survival Fund, which has battled Equinors Empire Wind project, but would you allow a nuclear reactor or a coal plant to write its own environmental impact statement? says a Bloomberg report quoting Minkiewicz on October 1.

The dampening news from the US apart, global interest remains bullish. Even Asian countries have jumped on to the bandwagon. India, China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam are emerging as the new areas for offshore energy growth. Taiwan is considered as an ideal destination.

Global developers are making a beeline to the country which has strong winds and a shallow coastline which make it perfect for offshore wind farms. The country introduced the Offshore Demonstration Incentive Program (DIP) in 2012 and foundation installations for a demonstration project Formosa I, with two turbines of 4 MW each off the coast of Miaoli Countybegan in 2014. The country has plans to provide 5.5 GW by 2030 through projects such as Changhua 1 and 2a.

In 2018, China had already surpassed European countries in annual installations with 1.8 GW. China is aiming to install 10 GW of offshore wind energy by 2020. Similarly, Japan, South Korea and India have a target of installing 10 GW, 12 GW and 30 GW respectively by 2030. The Asian markets are predicted to add 100 GW in offshore wind by 2030, says Alok Kumar, country manager India, Advisory at DNV GLEnergy, a technology giant that is advising and assisting India with its first offshore wind farm.

Watch this space forthe second part.

This was firstpublished in Down To Earth print edition (dated 1-15 November, 2019)

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

India Environment Portal Resources :

The rest is here:

Powerful winds of change: Offshore wind power has taken off but challenges persist - Down To Earth Magazine

W&T Offshore to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conferences – EnerCom Inc.

HOUSTON, Nov. 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- W&T Offshore, Inc. (NYSE: WTI) (W&T or the Company) today announced that the Company will be participating in two upcoming investor conferences.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Tracy W. Krohn will present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2019 Global Energy Conference in Miami, Florida on Thursday, November 14, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time and will also host one-on-one meetings. The presentation will be webcast live and archived on W&Ts website, http://www.wtoffshore.com, on the Overview page in the Investor Relations section of the site. An updated investor slide deck prepared in conjunction with the Conference will be posted on the website under Presentations on November 14, prior to the presentation.

The Companys senior management will be meeting with investors at the Capital One Securities 14th Annual Energy Conference in Houston, Texas on Thursday, December 12, 2019. W&T will not be making a formal presentation. An investor deck prepared in conjunction with the Conference will be posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website on Thursday morning, December 12, under Presentations.

About W&T Offshore

W&T Offshore, Inc. is an independent oil and natural gas producer with operations offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and has grown through acquisitions, exploration and development. The Company currently has working interests in 53 producing fields in federal and state waters and has under lease approximately 826,000 gross acres, including approximately 605,000 gross acres on the Gulf of Mexico Shelf and approximately 221,000 gross acres in the deepwater. A majority of the Companys daily production is derived from wells it operates. For more information on W&T, please visit the Companys website at http://www.wtoffshore.com.

News by QuoteMediawww.quotemedia.com

Go here to read the rest:

W&T Offshore to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conferences - EnerCom Inc.

Hullihen Williams Moore column: Ratepayers beware on Dominion’s offshore wind project – Richmond.com

In September, Dominion Energy announced its $7.8 billion offshore wind proposal with more than 200 giant windmills to be located 27 miles off Virginias coast. It is to be the largest such facility in the nation. It sounds great unless you are a ratepayer who may have to pick up the tab.

This reminds me of another grand plan by Dominion 50 years ago. At that time, nuclear generation was the answer; some said it would be too cheap to meter. The company planned eight large nuclear units four at Surry and four at North Anna. It said the nuclear fuel would be repeatedly reprocessed and remains would be easy to store. Moreover, science would soon solve spent fuel problems. The company advised that changes and cost overruns would not be a problem. It also said these expensive plants would run almost constantly.

Reprocessing of the nuclear fuel did not materialize, construction costs skyrocketed and reliable operation of the units was many years coming. Four planned units were abandoned, costing ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars. The catastrophe almost drove the company to bankruptcy, but the State Corporation Commission (SCC) saved it with higher rates and little examination of the companys prudence.

The four remaining nuclear units now run efficiently, but that took decades and wasted hundreds of millions of ratepayer dollars. And, the spent fuel issue is still very real.

Lets look at the offshore wind proposal compared to the approach of 50 years ago. The chutzpah of the utility is similar, but here, Dominion doesnt even bother with the pretense of promises. Virginia law encourages wind energy but does require the SCC to review Dominions plans. Unfortunately, Virginia law severely restricts what the commission can do if it finds the project wanting. A hearing was held by the SCC on the $300 million pilot for the project and the SCC found, among many other things, the following with respect to Dominions plans:

Finally, and most importantly, from the hearing: The Project would not be deemed prudent as that term has been applied by this Commission in its long history of public utility regulation or under any common application of the term.

The SCC concluded that, even with these findings, because of the limitations set by the General Assembly, it had no choice but to approve the plans.

What has happened is worse than the nuclear debacle. There, the company took some responsibility; here it takes none. Dominion can proceed to build the pilot and, if performance is poor, customers will still pay all costs and a profit as well.

Without prudent realistic workable plans including weather considerations, it is absurd even to consider having more than 200 windmills with blades spanning over 500 feet spinning over the ocean 27 miles from shore for the relatively small amount of electricity to be generated. Would this system survive the winds and waves of a storm like Dorian or worse? These storms are getting stronger not weaker. Dorians winds were more than 200 miles per hour in the Bahamas and created a 100-foot wave off Newfoundland. Is there replacement power available when these units do not work? If so, at what cost? Is it higher than the 78 cents? If not, why build these? These realities must be considered.

The General Assembly can encourage environmentally friendly projects including offshore wind, but it must not forget that ratepayers pay the bill. The Assembly should not take over regulation and prohibit the SCC from determining whether plans and expenditures are prudent and in the public interest. The SCC must be able to examine fully this project, including all costs and the impacts of weather. The SCC must be able to determine whether spending over $7 billion of ratepayer money for 78 cents /kWh is in the public interest.

Hullihen Williams Moore is a former member and chair of the Virginia State Corporation Commission and the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board. He also practiced public utility law for 25 years and taught economic regulation at the law schools of the University of Virginia, the College of William & Mary and Washington and Lee University. Contact him at Hullie@comcast.net

Read more:

Hullihen Williams Moore column: Ratepayers beware on Dominion's offshore wind project - Richmond.com

A closer look at the West of Shetland’s offshore potential – Offshore Technology

]]>

These conditions paired with the remoteness of the area have also meant that the region is relatively unexplored, despite its potential for the oil and gas sector. According to BPs estimations currently there is at least 640mn bl of oil in recoverable resources.

GlobalData upstream oil and gas analyst Daniel Rogers says: The WoS basin in comparison to the North Sea basins has been relatively under-explored. The extreme water depths, challenging subsurface, and lack of knowledge and experience in the basin lead to higher risk than the North Sea exploration. That being said, there is currently vast acreage open to explorers and yet-to-find volumes are significant.

Drilling in the area particularly peaked after the Geological Society published a study positioning the WoS area as the largest remaining exploration site with potential forsignificantnew finds, by virtue of its relative exploration immaturity.

Although the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) considered the Central North Sea as the largest yet-to-find potential on the UK Continental Shelf, new research from Global Data found that for the last four years oil and gas production in the WoS has risen and it will overtake North Sea as future-major producing basin in UK.

The report showed that North Sea operations owned by BP and Shell, the UKs biggest oil and gas producers, saw significantly decreased production, especially in comparison to their interest in the WoS. BPs production in North Sea has fallen from about 100,100 barrels of equivalent per day (boed) in 2017 to about 40,000 boed in 2018, making the companys production in North Sea significantly lower than its WoS explorations. Shells exploration in the North Sea, has also declined from around 90,000 boed in 2018 to approximately 75, 000 boed in 2019 and it shows a tendency for Shells North Sea operations to notably drop below its WoS drilling from 2020 to 2022.

Furthermore, of the successful 30th UK Offshore Licensing Round in 2017, approximately 75% of the licensed WoS blocks involved European major participation. European majors have stakes in 80% of the planned and announced projects in the area compared to approximately 40% in the North Sea.

Overall, the report concludes that theWoS area retains the attention of major Exploration and Production operators in the region; however its infrastructure difficulties can impede the future growth potential in the basin.

Rogers concludes: There remains significant value to be captured within the North Sea particularly through near field exploration and marginal field developments, however, the West of Shetlands remains more attractive for operators willing to take higher exploration risks necessary to discover fields large enough to compete for capital within highly competitive global portfolios.

Enter your details here to receive your free whitepaper.

Close survey

Close

Visit link:

A closer look at the West of Shetland's offshore potential - Offshore Technology

GE starts work on first offshore wind factory in Asia – Recharge

GE Renewable Energy on Tuesday started construction in China of its first offshore wind assembly plant in Asia, which will produce the world's largest turbine, the 12MW Haliade-X.

The 71,000 sq metre factory in Chinas southern city of Jieyang, Guangdong province, is expected to start to manufacture the Haliade-X in the second half of 2021, according to a statement by the US group.

GE is among the first group of manufacturers to commit to investing and building factories in Jiayangs Linggang Industry Park, its offshore wind manufacturing hub, to back the citys ambition to install 13.8GW by 2030.

China is likely to become the worlds largest offshore wind market, Rachel Duan president & CEO of GE China said. By building this industry-leading factory, we hope to facilitate Guangdong province and Chinas largest-scale offshore wind vision.

Last year Chinese local governments collectively approved over 40GW of projects, of which most hope to connect to the grid by the end of 2021. Most ambitious of all, Guangdong set out a plan to build 66.9GW by 2030.

Besides the factory, GE is also launching an offshore wind operation and development center in Guangzhou, the capital city of Guangdong. The duo will become a base for the turbine maker to expand its offshore wind footprint in the Asia Pacific region, the company statement said.

Since last year, the US group has made a speedy inroad into the Chinese wind market. Just days before the construction, the manufacturer scored an onshore turbine deal with China Huaneng to provide 286 turbines of 2.5MW to a Henan-based wind farm in the largest order for a western turbine maker to date .

See the original post:

GE starts work on first offshore wind factory in Asia - Recharge

Australia to block illegal offshore gambling websites – The Guardian

The nations communications watchdog will soon block access to illegal gambling websites hosted offshore.

Australians spend up to $400m on the sites each year and often have difficulties recouping their winnings or deposits.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority will investigate suspect sites and, if unable to take enforcement action, order internet providers to block them.

The chair of Acma, Nerida OLoughlin, said the new laws were a valuable additional weapon against illegal online gambling.

There is little to no recourse for consumers engaging with these unscrupulous operators, OLoughlin said on Monday.

She said 65 illegal companies had left Australia since Acma began enforcing new rules against offshore sites in 2017.

The communications minister, Paul Fletcher, said the sites accounted for about $100m in lost tax revenue each year.

Too often these offshore operators are defrauding Australians and their websites typically provide very few, if any, harm-minimisation controls, Fletcher said.

Acmas new powers fulfil one of three legislative recommendations that came out of a 2015 review of interactive gambling.

The review, overseen by former NSW premier Barry OFarrell, made 19 recommendations to the government.

It raised a number of problems with the sites, including a lack of Australian consumer protections, as well as links with organised crime.

Continued here:

Australia to block illegal offshore gambling websites - The Guardian

W&T Offshore (WTI) Q3 Earnings Beat on Higher Production – Yahoo Finance

W&T Offshore, Inc. WTI reported third-quarter 2019 adjusted earnings (excluding one-time items) of 13 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 1 cent but declining from the year-ago figure of 30 cents.

Meanwhile, quarterly revenues decreased to $132.2 million from $153.5 million a year ago. Moreover, the top line missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $134 million.

The better-than-expected earnings were supported by higher production volumes, partially offset by a decline in average realized prices and rise in lease operating expenses.

W&T Offshore, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

W&T Offshore, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

W&T Offshore, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | W&T Offshore, Inc. Quote

Overall Production Rises

Total oil equivalent production averaged 41,149 barrels of oil equivalent per day (Boe/d), which rose 13% from 36,508 Boe/d in the year-ago quarter. Oil production was recorded at 1.7 million barrels of oil (MMBbls), flat year over year. Natural gas liquids output totaled 283 MBbls, lower than 318 MBbls a year ago. Natural gas production of 10,606 million cubic feet (MMcf) in the reported quarter was higher than 7,939 MMcf in the year-earlier period. Of the total production in the quarter, 53% comprised liquids.

The rise in production was supported by the companys Mobile Bay acquisition from Exxon Mobil Corporation XOM, which added 74 million BOE of net proved reserves to its portfolio. Moreover, W&T Offshore brought online its Gladden Deep first exploration well, which achieved an initial output rate of around 4,600 gross Boe/d.

Realized Prices Decline

The average realized price for oil during the third quarter was $59.24 a barrel, lower than the year-ago level of $69.57. The average realized price of NGL softened to $15.45 from $31.70 per barrel in the prior year. The average realized price of natural gas during the September quarter was $2.23 per thousand cubic feet, down from $2.85 in the comparable period last year. Average realized price for oil equivalent output declined to $34.56 per barrel from $45.32 a year ago.

Operating Expenses

Lease operating expenses increased to $12.46 per Boe in the third quarter from $11.14 a year ago.

Capital Spending & Balance Sheet

W&T Offshore spent $188.1 million capital through the September quarter on oil and gas resources.

As of Sep 30, 2019, the company had approximately $41.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. It also had $137.8 million remaining under its revolving bank credit facility. The company had $719 million in long-term debt.

Guidance

W&T Offshore expects production for fourth-quarter 2019 within 49,300-54,500 Boe/d. For the full year, its production view has been marginally lowered to 39,800-41,100 Boe/d.

This offshore oil and gas explorer expects lease operating expenses through 2019 between $187 million and $193 million. For the fourth quarter, the metric is expected in the range of $57-$62 million.

Full-year 2019 capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, are expected in the range of $130-$150 million.

Zacks Rank and Stocks to Consider

Currently, Jagged Peak has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). Some better-ranked players in the energy space are Lonestar Resources US Inc. LONE and Contango Oil & Gas Company MCF, each carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can seethe complete list of todays Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Lonestars 2020 earnings per share are expected to rise 77% year over year.

Contango Oil & Gas bottom line for the current year is expected to rise around 87% year over year.

5 Stocks Set to Double

Each was hand-picked by a Zacks expert as the #1 favorite stock to gain +100% or more in 2020. Each comes from a different sector and has unique qualities and catalysts that could fuel exceptional growth.

Most of the stocks in this report are flying under Wall Street radar, which provides a great opportunity to get in on the ground floor.

Today, See These 5 Potential Home Runs >>

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free reportExxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) : Free Stock Analysis ReportLonestar Resources US Inc. (LONE) : Free Stock Analysis ReportContango Oil & Gas Company (MCF) : Free Stock Analysis ReportW&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) : Free Stock Analysis ReportTo read this article on Zacks.com click here.Zacks Investment Research

Read more:

W&T Offshore (WTI) Q3 Earnings Beat on Higher Production - Yahoo Finance

Taiwan doubles next-stage offshore wind ambition to 10G – Recharge

Taiwan doubled its previous stated plans for the next stage of its offshore wind build-out with a goal to add 10GW of extra capacity from 2026 to 2035.

Taiwans President Tsai Ing-wen and its Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) on Tuesday unveiled a new target for development in the Taiwan strait. The island had only previously laid down ambitions for 5GW after 2025 without specifying a timeframe.

The President made the announcement during her speech at the inauguration ceremony for the islands first offshore wind project, Formosa 1. She urged the MOEA to quickly establish a plan for the 10GW capacity for the next 10 years.

Later, minister of economic affairs Shen Jong-Chin confirmed the figure, adding that the ministry is planning to allocate 1GW per year for the 10GW goal.

The detailed plan of allocation measures will be released in the first quarter next year, the minister said.

The bidding prices of the 10GW projects are likely to lower than the average retail power rate, MOEA said in a statement.

Already getting a head start among Asian countries for offshore wind development, Taiwan should continue moving forward and plan in advance, the statement added.

Last year Taiwan held two rounds of offshore wind allocation to award seven companies a total 5.5GW capacity for its initial stage of large-scale development between 2019-2025. However, the island had yet to make clear the post-2025 roadmap and the rules for its third-round offshore project allocation.

In September, the MOEA announced it would postpone the release of a first draft of the allocation plan from the end of August to early next year due to various disagreements among project developers and the supply chain over allocation rules and localisation requirements, Recharge previously reported.

Shen today revealed that the energy regulator is considering a two-step selection process, in which the ministry would first pick eligible developers based on their localisation commitments, followed by price-competitive auctions.

Offshore wind has become a live issue in the run-up to Taiwan's next presidential election in January, with Tsai more ambitious than her rival over wind at sea.

Read this article:

Taiwan doubles next-stage offshore wind ambition to 10G - Recharge