Nutritional Outlook’s 2019 Best of the Industry Awards, Industry Leader: Michael McGuffin – Nutritional Outlook

The American Herbal Products Association (AHPA; Silver Spring, MD) has been the chief U.S. trade association for the herbal products industry for nearly four decades. More than half of the associations existence has been led by AHPAs current president, Michael McGuffin. This year, McGuffin celebrates his 20th anniversary as AHPA president, and Nutritional Outlook is honored to recognize his longstanding work on behalf of the industry by naming him our 2019 Industry Leader.

McGuffins dedication to health, herbs, and good food is personal and far-reaching. His journey began long before he joined AHPA. Before moving to California in 1973, I had made a few gallons of sassafras tea during my youth in pre-paved Maryland suburbs. And though Id eaten wild poke salat as a kid, I gained my first appreciation of proper plant identification by mistaking the toxic Nicotiana glauca in a Venice alley as a Western cousin of poke, he tells Nutritional Outlook.

In 1974, McGuffin cofounded a retail store called Venice Fruit Trampsan accidental collective, he calls itselling fresh produce and bulk herbs on Californias Venice Boardwalk. In 1979, McGuffin and a business partner, Janet Zand, who is a now a doctor of naturopathy and oriental medicine, and a board-certified acupuncturist, took their combined fortune of $2200 to build an herbal tincture manufacturing and marketing firm called McZand Herbal. In 1985, McZand Herbal became a member of the recently formed American Herbal Products Association. (The association was founded in 1982.)

In 1990, McGuffin was elected to AHPAs board of trustees. In late 1989, I was contacted by Shel Weinberg of Trout Lake Farm to solicit my candidacy for an open board seat, McGuffin says. When I told Shel I was just too busy with my company to take on a volunteer role, he replied: Were all too busy, Michael. But its your turn. This message somehow resonated with me, and I was elected to AHPAs board of trustees in 1990 and served there until I was hired as AHPAs president in 1999.

Twenty years later, McGuffin and AHPA are a leading voice not only for the herbal products industry but for the entire dietary supplement industry, helping to shape the regulatory environment and the multibillion-dollar market for these products.

More importantly, AHPAs work has benefitted the growing number of consumers relying on natural products and herbal remedies for healthcare. This really is my lifes work, McGuffin says. I think there is a tendency for trade associations to be thought of as only advocating for industry. That isnt true, at least not for AHPA. Were doing this for consumers and my fellow American citizens who want to use herbs without undue legal obstructions. Thats why I have devoted my life to advocating for ready, informed access to herbal products in a regulatory framework that protects public health and simultaneously ensures the right to make personal healthcare choices.

A Crucial Advocate

One would be hard-pressed to find a regulatory issue related to the herbal and dietary supplement industry in which AHPAs voice isnt heard.

In the early days, even before McGuffin came on board, AHPA had begun speaking out to protect the herbal category. McGuffin says, For example, in 1983 AHPA went on record as supporting the efforts of the Fmali Herb Company in its lawsuit against FDA in response to FDAs refusal to allow import of an herbal product containing schizandra seed (Schisandra chinensis) and other herbal ingredients with a long history of human consumption in Asia. This enforcement position was based on that agencys interpretation of the 1958 food additive amendments to federal law as disallowing consideration of food use outside of the U.S. as relevant to a foods history of use. Fmali eventually won this case on appeal, which had ramifications for the entire food industry.

That was just the beginning. During McGuffins presidency, another key win was the associations push for the USDAs National Organic Program (NOP) to allow supplement products to be labeled as organic and to carry the USDA Organic seal. At the time in 2005, the NOP was only granting use of the seal to conventional food products. AHPA was also involved when FDA was establishing its 2006 law for serious adverse event reporting (AERs).

AHPAs advocacy has not only helped the herbal products industry but the larger dietary supplement industry as well. The association has been one of the leaders in conversations with regulators, including through public comments submitted to federal and state agencies. Notably, AHPA submitted more than 400 pages of comments regarding regulations proposed under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), as well as voluminous comments regarding FDAs new dietary ingredient (NDI) draft guidance (both the initial draft in 2011 and the revised draft in 2016). This year alone, AHPA submitted comments to regulators expressing its opinion on topics ranging from FDAs intention to revamp dietary supplement regulations, tariffs on herbal ingredients during the current U.S.-China trade war, crop-grouping regulations under the purview of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and even a matter as specific as the use of dairy names for plant-based products.

With McGuffin as its head, the association regularly engages with federal agencies, including FDA, the FTC, USDA, the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. AHPA actively monitors government activity at the state level as well, stepping in when issues and legislation could negatively impact herbal commerce. It has, for instance, been a leading participant in regulatory issues involving Californias Proposition 65 law. The association also extends its representation abroad via its International Committee, which works to ensure responsible international commerce of herbal products. AHPA is also an active member of the International Alliance of Dietary/Food Supplements Associations (IADSA) and regularly updates AHPAs membership on international regulatory developments. McGuffin himself has served as an industry representative for groups such as FDAs Food Advisory Committee Working Group on Good Manufacturing Practices for Dietary Supplements (1998-1999) and Californias Office of Environmental Health Hazard Analysis Food Warning Workgroup (2008-2010).

AHPA is also an active presence on Capitol Hill. In addition to its own lobbying work, AHPA is one of the associations that participates in the annual Day on the Hill event during which associations share education about the benefits of dietary and herbal supplements, alongside industry concerns, with lawmakers.

On the scientific front, AHPAs chief science officer, Holly Johnson, PhD, and AHPAs science staff participate in organizations such as the U.S. Pharmacopeia, the American Herbal Pharmacopeia, AOAC International, NSF International, and the National Institutes of Health, communicating on matters of research and natural product standards. McGuffin himself has been published in scholarly and scientific journals.

Always Looking Forward

Its hard to separate AHPAs achievements from McGuffins own; they are one and the same. McGuffin attributes the associations accomplishments to its members.

One of AHPAs strengths, reflected in the breadth and diversity of our membership, is the ability to connect many industry leaders to address the many, evolving issues and opportunities we encounter, he says. [W]e focus this combined experience and expertise, both through active engagement with regulatory working groups and with other authoritative bodies, such as the U.S. Pharmacopeia, AOAC International, and NSF International, and through submission of comments during rulemaking procedures. Under McGuffins stewardship, AHPAs Board of Trustees has grown nearly 40%.

I would like to be able to report that our positions are always embraced by regulators, but of course it would be unrealistic to have any such expectation! says McGuffin. But we have had important influence on many and diverse regulations adopted by federal agencies and occasionally by states. And we maximize opportunities for such outcomes by first engaging with our members and then communicating to regulators with as much clarity as we can. Importantly, we have also built and continue to maintain respectful relationships with government agencies, even when we disagree with them.

Click here to read our full interview with Michael McGuffin

AHPA will always serve first and foremost as a resource for its membersnearly 400 companies, including growers, processors, manufacturers, and marketers of herbs and herbal products (foods, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and non-prescription drugs).

AHPAs educational and technical tools for its members are vast, including the associations AHPA NDI Database, created in 2005, which helps the entire supplements industry by providing a searchable repository of new dietary ingredient notifications submitted to FDA. During McGuffins presidency, AHPAs board has adopted nearly 30 trade requirements or guidance policies to help promote responsible herb commerce and, in AHPAs words, represent meaningful self-regulation for the herbal products industry. During McGuffins tenure, the association also issued second editions of its Herbs of Commerce (an incorporated reference in FDAs labeling rules for herbal supplements) and Botanical Safety Handbookboth key industry primers, with McGuffin serving as managing editor. It also regularly hosts in-person events and webcasts on regulatory and technical issues, and keeps its membership informed through newsletters and e-mail alerts.

McGuffin also ensures that the association monitors the current market, keeping its eye on which herbal categories are growing and in need of guidance and exchange of information. Under McGuffins watch, the association has created additional committees reflecting some of the most active herbal markets in the past 20 years: Sports Nutrition, Cannabis, Ayurvedic Products, Chinese Herbal Products, Analytical Labs, Tea & Infusion Products, and Sustainability. Says McGuffin: It is important to remember that the herbal products industry is not monolithic. We see emerging niche interests, expertise, and needs. In order to serve the many and diverse needs of the industry, it has been vital for AHPA to tap the experts in various of these niches, and we do that by chartering committees that serve these separate and specific segments.

AHPA serves a unique function that no other trade association does. Says McGuffin, I am probably biased, but...I certainly think there would be a void of leadership for the herbal community without AHPA. There are other herb-focused organizationsthe American Herbal Pharmacopoeia, the American Botanical Council, the American Herbalist Guildand each of these also plays important roles in service to the herbal community. But AHPA plays a different role than any of these, as we have come to be relied on to serve the interests of the trade and to be the primary resource for industry advocacy. There are also several trade associations and other organizations that focus exclusively on the supplement and natural product marketsthe Council for Responsible Nutrition, the Natural Products Association, and the United Natural Products Allianceand each of these also makes significant contributions. But AHPA is again unique among these with the focused expertise of both our staff and our membership on the unique needs of the herbal products sector of the trade.

According to the American Botanical Councils (Austin, TX) journal HerbalGram and its latest Herb Market Report1, 2018 marked the U.S. herbal supplement markets strongest year of sales growth yet9.4% in 2018 to $8.8 billion. This means that U.S. herbal supplement sales are the strongest since McGuffin became AHPAs president. AHPAs guidance, both within and outside of the industry, will remain invaluable as this category increasingly goes mainstream and encounters more regulatory pressure and criticism. As AHPA continually monitors media coverage, it will continue to disseminate accurate information and correct misinformation. One pressing example of how AHPAs voice is especially valued today is in the emerging hemp cannabidiol (CBD) market. To this end, AHPA has hosted both in-depth in-person and online events to bring regulators and stakeholders closer together and to help the industry navigate the waters to ensure a responsible market. With more than 40 years of experience with herbal product regulation and what McGuffin calls a decade of engagement with this controversial herb, AHPA is an authoritative figure on Capitol Hill, urging FDA to create a lawful pathway to market for CBD products.

In looking back on his 20 years of AHPA leadership, McGuffin says, I have been a member of the natural products industry for nearly 45 years, and the bulk of my education has come from on-the-job experience. This experience in the industry and at AHPA has provided me with a valuable understanding of the distinct, but compatible, needs that individual businesses and the broader industry require to succeed.

We turned to an equally respected authority in the herbal community to offer a few words about McGuffins many contributions. Mark Blumenthal, founder and executive director of the American Botanical Council, shared these words with us:

It is highly appropriate for Nutritional Outlook to be acknowledging Michael McGuffin for his immeasurable contributions to the American herb and dietary supplement industries. Everyone in the U.S. herb industry owes a profound and genuine debt of gratitude and appreciation to him for his strategic contributions to the overall industry. This debt applies to all companies that sell botanical ingredients, whether or not they are members of AHPAwhether they consider themselves herb companies or simply dietary supplement companies that happen to sell herbal ingredients as part of their product line.

Michaels impact goes well beyond the U.S. market; it also includes benefits to foreign companies, whether they manufacture their own herbal products that theyre selling in the U.S. or whether they are botanical ingredient suppliers trying to sell to U.S. manufacturers. Either way, Michaels excellent work for over 20 years as president of AHPA has helped to create a strong and stable American herb industry where many businesses have been able to flourish due to his efforts. Under his tireless and strategic leadership, AHPA has grown to be a major trade association dealing with many different issues on numerous fronts; AHPA is very possibly the most significant trade association dedicated to botanicals in the entire world.

As one of the founders of AHPA in 1982, I know that none of us ever envisioned the size and complexity of the modern herbal industry, and by extension, the various communities of industry and non-industry stakeholders with which Michael has so deftly worked and supported. Michael has worked very strategically and has mastered many key areas of the herb industry, including the compelling areas of standardizing botanical nomenclature for herbs sold in the U.S.; providing guidance to companies on issues of safety labeling; exerting leadership on the intricacies of GMPs, Californias Proposition 65, adverse event reporting; and so much more. His deep knowledge of government regulations and energetic efforts in submitting public comments to various agencies is well-known and highly respected, including within the government agencies themselves.

Click here to read our full interview with Michael McGuffin

Originally posted here:

Nutritional Outlook's 2019 Best of the Industry Awards, Industry Leader: Michael McGuffin - Nutritional Outlook

Probiotic Food Supplements May Have different Effects On Boys And Girls: Study – News Nation

The intake of beneficial microbes like yeast in the form of probiotic food supplements can have different effects on the immune systems of male and female piglets, according to a study which suggested the findings may also apply to human infants. The researchers, including those from the University of Bristol in the UK, said piglets are valuable pre-clinical models for children in nutritional studies. The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology, revealed that 28-day old piglets produced very different levels of immune cells, antibodies, and other immune-associated molecules depending on their sex.

They said around 70 per cent of the immune system is in the gut where its development is driven during early life, largely by the resident gut bacteria, contradicting previous evidence that the difference in immunity begins during puberty.

The study also noted that dietary supplements boosting the functions of beneficial gut bacteria work differently in male and female piglets. According to the scientists, the effect of these nutritional interventions can be masked if males and females were looked at all together. Citing an example, the researchers said, the prebiotic inulin significantly increased the number of cells responsible for controlling immune responses such as the regulatory T-cells, in male guts but not in female guts. "Correct development of the immune system is essential in ensuring it responds appropriately to both harmful and harmless stimulation throughout life and this development, even during the first days of life, depends on your sex," said study co-author Marie Lewis from the University of Reading in the UK.

"Although we don't know why, we know that young girls tend to produce a more protective immune response to vaccination than boys. But what we did not expect to find is that young girls also appear to have a more regulated immune environment in their intestinal tissues than boys," Lewis added. The researchers said, currently, methods analysing the effectiveness of dietary supplements on the immune system assume that the same thing happens in boys and girls. They cautioned that this may not be the case, and that sex may be influencing data on the effectiveness of probiotics and prebiotics in infanthood.

"The work raises some really important questions about why this happens - is it because the levels of the different sex hormones make the immune systems different almost as a side effect, even at this age, or is it because the immune and reproductive systems need to be fundamentally linked during early development," said study co-author Mick Bailey from the University of Bristol.

The researchers said the findings point to the need for designing different treatments for immune disorders in girls and boys. "Given the underlying differences in immune development we identified between boys and girls, taking sex into account could provide a simple means to improve the effectiveness of pharmaceutics and other therapies which act on the immune system," Lewis said.

Read this article:

Probiotic Food Supplements May Have different Effects On Boys And Girls: Study - News Nation

Global Human Dietary Supplements Market 2019 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 – Industry News Info

The research report Human Dietary Supplements Market Global Industry Analysis 2019 2025 offers precise analytical information about the Human Dietary Supplements market. The report identifies top players in the global market and divides the market into several parameters such as major drivers market strategies and imposing growth of the key players. Worldwide Human Dietary Supplements Industry also offers a granular study of the market dynamics, segmentation, revenue, share forecasts and allows you to make superior business decisions. The report serves imperative statistics on the market stature of the prominent manufacturers and is an important source of guidance and advice for companies and individuals involved in the Human Dietary Supplements industry.

This Human Dietary Supplements market report bestows with the plentiful insights and business solutions that will support our clients to stay ahead of the competition. This market report contains categorization by companies, region, type, and application/end-use industry. The competitive analysis covered here also puts light on the various strategies used by major players of the market which range from new product launches, expansions, agreements, joint ventures, partnerships, acquisitions, and many others that leads to increase their footprints in this market. The transparent research method carried out with the right tools and methods makes this Human Dietary Supplements market research report top-notch.

Interesting? Apply for a sample report: http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-human-dietary-supplements-market-2019-by-manufacturers-496692#RequestSample

Competitive Landscape

Global Human Dietary Supplements market is highly split and the major players have used numerous tactics such as new product launches, acquisitions, innovation in products, expansions, agreements, joint ventures, partnerships, and others to increase their footprints in this market.

Key players profiled in the report include: DSM, Amway, Herbalife, Omega Protein Corporation, Bayer, Naturalife Asia, Integrated BioPharma, Nu Skin Enterprises, BASF, Surya Herbal, Bio-Botanica, Ricola, Pharmavite, Blackmores

Market Segmentation

Human Dietary Supplements Market report segmentation on Major Product Type:Vitamin, Mineral, Botanical, Fatty acids, Other supplements

Market by Application: Here, various application segments of the global Human Dietary Supplements market are taken into account for the research study.

Pharmaceutical, Food and beverage, Personal care, Others

Enquire Here For Queries Or Report Customization: http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-human-dietary-supplements-market-2019-by-manufacturers-496692#InquiryForBuying

Regional Analysis

The Human Dietary Supplements market report keenly emphasizes on industrial affairs and developments, approaching policy alterations and opportunities within the market. The regional development methods and its predictions are explained in every key point that specifies the general performance and issues in key regions such as North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East, South America, and Middle East & Africa (MEA). Various aspects such as production capability, demand, product value, material parameters and specifications, distribution chain and provision, profit and loss, are explained comprehensively in the market report.

Key Questions Answered in Global Human Dietary Supplements Market Report:-

What will the market growth rate, overview, and analysis by type of global Human Dietary Supplements Market in 2026?

What are the key factors driving, analysis by applications and countries Global Human Dietary Supplements Market?

What are dynamics, this summary includes analysis of the scope and price analysis of top players profiles of Global Human Dietary Supplements Market?

Who are the opportunities, risk and driving forces of the global Human Dietary Supplements Market?

Who are the opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Global Human Dietary Supplements Market?

What are the Global Human Dietary Supplements market opportunities, market risk and market overview of the Market?

Thanks for reading this article, you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report versions like North America, Europe or Asia. Also, If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

See the rest here:

Global Human Dietary Supplements Market 2019 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 - Industry News Info

Saving the African grey parrot: the battle to beat the pet smugglers – Financial Times

FT Seasonal Appeal

Tuesday, 19 November, 2019

The first thing to know about the African grey parrot is that it is not grey. Not entirely at least. The medium-sized bird, which lives in forests in west and central Africa, has electric-red tail feathers that make it a target for poachers, who use the plumage for ceremonial headdresses. Its body parts are used in traditional medicine.

Unfortunately for the African grey, these are the least of the species problems. A highly intelligent animal capable of mimicking human speech and which can live in captivity up to the age of 60, it has also been a sought-after pet since biblical times.

In an era when the international pet trade has reached industrial proportions, the demand from the Middle East and Asia as well as Europe and North America threatens the African greys long-term existence in the wild.

The parrot inhabits a strip of equatorial forest that runs from Ivory Coast through Nigeria, Cameroon and Gabon and into the Democratic Republic of Congo. In Ghana, where poaching has been intense, the population has fallen more than 90 per cent since the early 1990s, according to estimates. Numbers of birds in other countries are difficult to gauge, but experts at the Zoological Society of London, the FTs Seasonal Appeal partner for 2019, say they are falling sharply.

So acute has the problem become that the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) outlawed trade of the African grey altogether in 2016. Before the ban, about 1.3m parrots had been exported legally since 1980, according to estimates, excluding the hundreds of thousands that likely died during trapping and transportation.

Conservationists are divided over the efficacy of the ban. Samuel Nebaneh, a law enforcement co-ordinator in Cameroon, which has a large population of grey parrots, welcomes it. It has had a positive effect. Some parrots have been seized and traffickers have been sent to trial, he said.

Others say the ban has driven up prices, and therefore the incentive to poach, as well as prompting trappers to use longer smuggling routes where the birds are more likely to die en route. An African grey can retail for 1,000.

Pamela Watson, an author who kept two African greys when she lived in the Nigerian city of Lagos, said the Cites ban was inadequate without work at village level to give people alternative incomes.

Theyre not able to stop it because the traffickers are armed. This is a huge business. There are international gangs behind this, said Ms Watson, who now lives in London and has been unable to obtain an export licence for her parrots, which remain with friends in Lagos. After having the parrots for years and realising how intelligent they were, she said, she would not now advocate keeping them in captivity.

In 2014, Mr Nebaneh encountered a Ghanaian poacher in south-west Cameroon who had been exporting trapped birds in batches of 500.

In Cameroon, parrots are caught in forest clearings where they congregate in huge numbers. Trappers take advantage of their sociability, smearing glue on to palm fronds and branches and tethering decoy birds, which call out and attract victims to the area. The parrots become stuck and many perish through lack of food and water before trappers come to collect them. Sometimes hunters cast nets over whole flocks.

ZSL is working with authorities in Cameroon to try to halt smuggling, intervening at all levels of the supply chain. It sets up camera traps to monitor wild populations, works with local communities to discourage poaching and provide alternative livelihoods, and helps train eco-guards and border officials to recognise and stop the trade.

When birds are seized, as well as helping authorities prepare for trial through expert witnesses and record keeping, ZSL teaches eco-guards how to care for the birds and return them to the wild.

Hauls of 100 or more are not uncommon, but all too often the parrots, malnourished and traumatised, die before they can be rehabilitated.

Gary Ward, curator of birds at London Zoo, visited Cameroons Dja reserve in November to help eco-guards care for seized parrots, including providing appropriate aviaries and food supplements. The husbandry training is pretty basic, he said. Were not trying to train them how to breed the parrots, just to keep them alive.

Eleanor Harvie, ZSLs programme manager for Africa, said the eco-guards were easy to motivate, as it was more rewarding to seize live birds than, say, the tusks of an elephant or the scales of a pangolin that had already been killed. While understanding of the parrots numbers in the wild remained sketchy, she said, there might be enough to make preservation a realistic goal.

Grant Miller, who until recently worked for the UK Border Force and is now a counter-trafficking adviser to ZSL, has direct experience of the exotic pet trade. Theyre like stamp collectors, he said of those who order rare species. I want what I havent got.

Tuesday, 19 November, 2019

Mr Miller remembers rushing to Heathrow airport in June 2018 after receiving a tip-off from Interpol that a man named Jeffrey Lendrum was arriving on a flight from Johannesburg. He was the Pablo Escobar of the bird world, said Mr Miller of a man who had been arrested numerous times on bird smuggling charges.

On this occasion, Mr Lendrum was nabbed with 19 eggs and two newly hatched chicks secreted in a heavy jacket. The fish eagle and kestrel eggs, whose trade was banned, were worth between 2,000 and 8,000 each.

Grey parrots are not yet as rare or as endangered. ZSL, said Mr Miller, was hoping to keep it that way.

Follow David Pilling on Twitter: @davidpilling

Please help us support ZSLs urgent work through the FTs Seasonal Appeal. Your donation will help tackle a range of threats to wildlife across the world through science, education and conservation. Click here to donate now.

If you are a UK resident and you donate before December 31, the money you give will be matched by the UK government up to 2m. This fund-matched amount will be used by ZSL projects to help communities in Nepal and Kenya build sustainable livelihoods, escape poverty and protect their wildlife.

Read more about our Seasonal Appeal partner ZSL:ft.com/zsl-facts

More:

Saving the African grey parrot: the battle to beat the pet smugglers - Financial Times

Nutrition myths that we stopped believing in 2019, including the carnivore diet and ‘superfoods’ – INSIDER

Also myth: Fat is good.

Fat is fat, and there are different kinds. But all fats are more energy-dense, per gram, than either carbohydrates or protein.

Most nutrition experts and doctors agree it's best to favor fats that are liquid at room temperature and high in unsaturated fat, like olive oil or avocado oil, while sticking to limited amounts of foods high in saturated fats, like those in dairy, coconut oil, and meat.

"The type of fat is really important," former Harvard nutrition chair Walter Willett recently told Insider. "Emphasizing mostly unsaturated fats in a diet has positive health benefits."

Recently, high-fat, low-carb keto diets have soared in popularity as they allow dieters to essentially run on fat, but heart experts caution that they may not be healthy for everyone.

Myth: Taking supplements and breaking foods down into nutritional components is just as good as eating them whole.

The truth is there's no shortcut to good eating.

Nutrients are most potent when they come straight from food and aren't broken down into powders and capsules.

There's another great benefit to eating foods whole, like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.

"They are accompanied by many nonessential but beneficial nutrients, such as hundreds of carotenoids, flavonoids, minerals, and antioxidants that aren't in most supplements," Clifford Lo, an associate professor of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, said in a recent blog post.

People who hail from the world's Blue Zones, areas where people tend to live to about 100 years old while happy and disease-free, have known this for centuries. They eat a diet rich in beans, whole grains, and lots of fresh vegetables.

Because the supplement industry is barely regulated in the US, it's also nearly impossible to know exactly what's in the pills you're taking.

Myth: The same diet advice can be applied to everyone, at every age.

No two people, even identical twins, respond the same way to sugars and fats, which means that an ideal diet for one person might not be the answer to good health for someone else.

"Just because some diet or recommendation is out there doesn't mean that you fit it," epidemiologist Tim Spector told Business Insider when his new research on people's differing reactions to the same common foods was released earlier this year.

There's also no diet that's right for every age. Lactose intolerance, for example, becomes more common as people age and the enzymes in their guts change.

Researchers still suggest a diet rich in fiber-filled plants (including vegetables, whole grains, nuts) along with some fermented foods, is one of the best ways to foster a healthy microbiome.

"Most people in the US have non-diverse microbes and they could definitely improve their gut health," Spector said. "We think that the more microbes you've got, the better your metabolism is."

Myth: Detoxing is something your body can't do on its own.

Whether it's a juice cleanse or a charcoal latte, don't be fooled by the latest "detox" craze.

The truth is our bodies are great at detoxing all on their own.

"We each have a liver and kidneys to do that job without needing a detox diet that is, in most cases, inadequately balanced and lacking in so many important nutrients," registered dietitian Bonnie Taub Dix recently told Insider.

While charcoal is a traditional (and effective) way to rid the body of poisons, it'll also empty you out of nutrients like vitamins at the same time, and could make any drugs you're taking less effective too.

"I'd say if you're eating, like, one ice cream with activated charcoal, you're going to be fine," gynecologist Alyssa Dweck previously told Insider. "But if you're taking in a big [dose], you're going to possibly have a bigger problem."

Myth: You should snack all the time.

Research shows that inserting snacks into your daily routine isn't necessarily better for your health than eating three square meals a day.

Besides, many readily available snack foods aren't good for us. They are often ultraprocessed and high in sugar, so are linked with weight gain and more cancer cases.

"When you eat real, wholesome, healthy foods, you feel full sooner," Ocean Robbins, grandson of ice-cream magnate Irvine Robins (a Baskin-Robbins cofounder) recently told Business Insider. "Your body feels nourished. You actually have the nutrients you need and in time you can have less cravings."

Likewise, cancer researcher Miriam Merad encouraged everyone to "revisit this snacking thing" in August when her study on the cellular-level benefits of intermittent fasting was released.

"Maybe eating two times a day would be entirely sufficient and very beneficial, in fact, in terms of health," Merad said.

Other nutrition pros say built-in fasting we do overnight provides plenty of time for a gut to rest.

Myth: You don't have to eat plants. Subsisting on a carnivore diet is fine.

A "carnivore diet" has been rumored to cure conditions like type-2 diabetes and arthritis, as well as helping people lose weight. But the truth is that most of us not only need the fiber in plants, but also thrive on it.

Meat can certainly play a role in a healthy eating plan, but it shouldn't be the cornerstone, since it's fiber-free.

"There is no body of evidence that suggests that vegetables cause illness," Registered dietitian Heidi Bates said in a recent post from McGill University's Office for Science and Society. "In fact, the opposite is true. There is an excess of evidence linking vegetable consumption to reductions in the risk for heart disease, stroke, diabetes, obesity and certain types of cancer."

However you choose to have them, people around the world have known for centuries that plants are the backbone to the best diets. Meat can play a role in a healthy eating plan, but it shouldn't be the cornerstone.

Read more from the original source:

Nutrition myths that we stopped believing in 2019, including the carnivore diet and 'superfoods' - INSIDER

Flu jab: Are vitamin D supplements more effective than the flu vaccine? – Express

Flu jabs are considered the best protection against an unpredictable virus that can cause unpleasant symptoms and severe illness in at-risk groups. But nutrition also plays a critical role in staying healthy all-year-round.

Many experts agree that one of the reasons for this is that we now spend more time indoors and being in closer proximity to people makes it easier for germs to spread.

There is also evidence to suggest that being cold makes our immune system less able to fight infection, so its incredibly important that we boost our immunity during the cold winter months.

Susceptibility to infection and illness is the primary symptom of a poor immune system and a person with weakened immunity is at an increased risk of experiencing more severe infections, which are harder to treat.

Some other signs to look out for include; fatigue, digestive difficulties and joint pain.

DON'T MISS

Dr Braude said its long been known the sunshine vitamin, vitamin D helps to protect our bones, but its not becoming well-recognised as an essential vitamin for the immune system too.

She added: An analysis carried out at Queen Mary University London, found that vitamin D helps to reduce the risk of respiratory infections, including colds and flu especially amongst people who dont get enough vitamin D from exposure to sunlight, or from their diets.

Studies have also found that the vitamin is crucial for our immunity to fight off coughs, colds and flu, once we are already infected.

Vitamin D deficiency is most prevalent during the peak of cold and flu season and there is evidence to support the use of supplementation which can help to reduce both the incidence and severity of cold and flu symptoms.

Dr Braude said: A recent research review claims that vitamin D is more effective than the flu vaccine.

The evidence, which spans at least a decade, found that for those with the most significant vitamin D deficiencies (blood levels below 10 nmol/L), taking a supplement cut their risk of respiratory infection in half.

Additionally, people who took a daily or weekly vitamin D supplement, were less likely to report acute respiratory infections like influenza or the common cold than those who did not.

If you succumb to winter bugs regularly, Dr Braudes advice is to eat a colourful, varied diet filled with fresh whole-food ingredients, instead of highly processed packaged foods.

Read this article:

Flu jab: Are vitamin D supplements more effective than the flu vaccine? - Express

Unpublished report proposed abolition of provincial championships – Irish Examiner

An unpublished GAA-commissioned report aimed at outlining the organisations future towards its 150th anniversary in 2034 proposed the removal of the provincial championships.

Having been done at the behest of former GAA president Aogn Farrell, the GAA Towards 2034 committee produced the wide-ranging document in January of last year. However, it never saw the light of day.

Seen by the Irish Examiner, the report is a fascinating piece of work completed by a committee chaired by former general secretary of the Irish National Teachers Organisation John Carr and involving individuals such as current playing rules group chair David Hassan and Connacht secretary John Prenty, who recently sat on the fixtures review taskforce.

However, that fixtures review body did not take into consideration the 2034 document, which as well as calling for the replacement of the provincial championships with a tiered championship also proposed the club and county seasons be separated entirely.

As well as calling for an overhaul of the GAAs provincial and national administrative structure and the revolutionary idea of replacing the current mileage expenses with an allowance structure for inter-county players and managers only, the 2034 committee described the provincial championships as unfair and unsustainable.

The report read: While the committee recognised the allegiance that county boards have towards the provincial championships, it deems the current imbalance structure to be unfair and unsustainable on players, coaches, and officials in many counties.

Turning a blind eye to this issue is not an option if the GAA is to thrive and prosper in the future.

"The committee is of the view that the structure imbalances within the inter-county game must be addressed by the Association and suggests that provincial championships be replaced by inter-county championship competition, which will be tiered, with an overarching committee managing all national fixtures across the Gaelic games family.

The report explained the provincial championships were no longer viable considering the growing polarisation of counties in a myriad of areas. The GAA inter-county championships are based on county structures whose boundaries do not change, thus creating major disparities between counties in terms of demographics, population distribution, fundraising capacity, and geographical factors.

"For example, Connacht consists of five counties, Munster six, Ulster nine and Leinster 12.

A major demographic disparity exists between County Dublin with a population of approximately 1.3 million and less than 33,000 living in County Leitrim and 40,000 in Longford. Ten other counties have populations of less than 100,000 people (2016 Census).

In addition, the larger, more successful counties have been able to attract significant sums of money through sponsorship whereas the less populated areas are struggling to make ends meet.

It is no wonder a gulf exists between competitive andnon-competitive county teams with fewer county teams being able to realistically compete in order to win championship titles. In some provinces, the gap in standards between county teams has so widened that only two or three teams have any chance of being successful in provincial championships (The weakness of formerly strong counties is an issue that requires further consideration and is beyond the scope of this committee).

The current imbalance between counties, both nationally and within provinces, is already having a detrimental effect on inter-county championship competitions in terms of aspirations and the morale of officials, mentors, and players.

"It could be argued that the provincial, as presently constituted, is an impediment towards progress and, in effect, could be counter-productive to the development of Gaelic games in less competitive counties.

There have already been changes made to the provincial structure especially in hurling with positive effects on the game itself. Overseas structures have also been devised to enable teams from abroad to play in provincial championships.

The fixtures review taskforce ruled out removing the provincial championships on the basis that there will still enough support for the competitions. They also rejected the idea of making a clear distinction between the club and county seasons for a number of reasons including separating players entirely from their clubs for over half the year would not be desirable.

However, the 2034 body backed the split season idea on the basis of championship only.

The report read: In order to enhance the playing experiences of club players, it is imperative the Association creates separate and distinct playing seasons for inter-county and club championships in order to provide a regular and meaningful schedule of games for all players and, in turn, recognises the important ongoing work taking place in this regard at the time of writing (November 2017).

The report added: The overlap of inter-county and club fixtures makes it impossible to have proper club and inter-county seasons. One outcome is that the majority of club games are fixed in the early or late months of the year where weather conditions are more likely to be adverse, leading to match cancellations, damage to pitches through overuse and increased difficulty attracting spectators and indeed, for that matter, players.

The inescapable conclusion is that there is a pressing need to restore equilibrium between the club and inter-county games.

Follow this link:

Unpublished report proposed abolition of provincial championships - Irish Examiner

Calling For More Action On The International Day For The Abolition Of Slavery – Forbes

On December 2, the U.N. commemorates the International Day for the Abolition of Slavery marking the adoption, by the U.N. General Assembly, of the U.N. Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others. The focus of the U.N. day is to strengthen efforts to eradicate contemporary forms of slavery (modern day slavery), such as trafficking in persons, sexual exploitation, the worst forms of child labor, forced marriage and the forced recruitment of children for use in armed conflict.

Despite long-standing efforts to address the issue, the facts are mind-blowing:

An estimated 40.3 million people are in modern day slavery, including 24.9 in forced labor and 15.4 million in forced marriage;

1 in 4 victims of modern slavery are children;

Out of the 24.9 million people trapped in forced labor, 16 million people are exploited in the private sector such as domestic work, construction or agriculture;

4.8 million people in forced sexual exploitation, and 4 million people in forced labor imposed by state authorities;

Women and girls are disproportionately affected by forced labor, accounting for 99% of victims in the commercial sex industry, and 58% in other sectors.

A child break bricks at Postogola brick breaking yard in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on June 3, 2017. With ... [+] over half of the population living below the poverty line, women and children are often forced into hard manual labor such as brick breaking. (Photo credit: Mehedi Hasan/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

It is crucial to emphasize yet another important fact. Slavery, in its many forms, is a man-made problem. It reinforces the social construct of a differentiation of human value between the master and the slave and undermines the human dignity of the latter.

Money is the driver of slavery, and especially forced labor. Slavery is a lucrative business. The 24.9 million victims of forced labor are believed to contribute $150 billion worth of profit. As long as money remains the powerful incentive it is, the issue will remain unaddressed. There is a higher role business should play in countering slavery. Recognizing this role, the International Labor Organizations Global Business Network on Forced Labor brings together businesses of all sizes and sectors, and their networks, from around the globe to eradicate forced labor.

One of the recent campaigns, 50 for Freedom, a campaign led by the International Labor Organization and its partners, the International Trade Union Confederation and the International Organization of Employers, called upon at least 50 countries to ratify the International Labor Organizations Protocol on Forced Labor (the Protocol) by the end of 2019. The Protocol is a legally-binding treaty that requires states to introduce new measures to tackle forced labor in all its forms. It focuses on protection, prevention and compensation. The Protocol imposes a duty on states to ensure that all workers in all sectors are legally protected from being exploited, including by way of strengthening labor inspections, or educating about slavery-related criminal offenses and their consequences. The Protocol is set to assist the victims of slavery as it requires states to ensure the release, recovery and rehabilitation of people subjected to forced labor. The Protocol further protects them from prosecution for legal violations they were forced to commit while enslaved. The Protocol further provides victims with access to justice and compensation.

For the Protocol to come into force, it must be ratified by states. Currently, only 42 states have ratified it. More states need to join it to ensure that the messages of the Protocol are universally accepted and implemented. We must put an end to slavery and so restore human dignity of those subjected to it. The Protocol provides a comprehensive response to the issue of slavery and restoration of human dignity for its victims.

See the original post:

Calling For More Action On The International Day For The Abolition Of Slavery - Forbes

Myanmar parliament approves joining treaty on abolition of child labour – Myanmar Times

The Minimum Age Convention (138) of the International Labour Organization (ILO), which includes the abolition of child labour, was approved on Tuesday.

The convention has 18 articles and aims to effectively abolish child labour, support economic development, and provide job opportunities consistent with the fullest physical and mental development of young people, according to Labour, Immigration and Population Minister U Thein Swe.

But undeveloped countries, including Myanmar, are allowed to lower the age limit to between 12 and 14-year-old.

According to a 2015 government survey, there are about 1.12 million child workers in Myanmar between five and 17-years-old. The minimum age range for child workers under the Minimum Age Convention (138) is from 13 to 15-years-old.

MP Daw Tin Tin Win representing Constituency 5 of Bago Region in the Amyotha Hluttaw (Upper House), said the ratification of the convention is useless if the government does not have the mechanism and resources to implement it.

How can we handle if children between 5 and 13 are being forced to work, who will take charge of monitoring? she asked.

Daw Tin Tin Win said poverty and lack of knowledge are among the reasons while parents forced their children to work as young as 5-years-old.

The parents do not know the bad consequences of forcing to work at an early age, she added.

U Nay Kyaw added that the government has not been able to implement effectively the Convention on the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour (No. 182), which it signed in 2013.

Read more:

Myanmar parliament approves joining treaty on abolition of child labour - Myanmar Times

On Human Rights Day, Let’s Abolish Nuclear Weapons – Progressive.org

December 10 is Human Rights Day, when we honor the incredible work of human rights advocates around the world. It is also a time when we should demand the abolition of nuclear weapons.

When people think of human rights, nuclear weapons might not immediately come to mind. But these weapons violate our human rights by threatening our health and even survival. With about 14,000 nuclear weapons remaining in the worlds arsenals, the potential for a catastrophic nuclear war is an omnipresent threat.

On this Human Rights Day, Physicians for Social Responsibility, the national advocacy organization for which I work, is calling on decision-makers to acknowledge this threat to our human rights and respond appropriately.

How?

For starters, President Donald Trump should respond positively to Russian President Vladimir Putins request to immediately extend the New START arms control treaty. Then the United States should actively pursue an agreement among all the nuclear-armed countries to totally eliminate their arsenals.

And all of the countries on earth should join the 122 nations that in July 2017 adopted the U.N. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and bring that treaty into force.

A nuclear war would create one of the worst humanitarian crises imaginable, one for which no nation would have an adequate emergency or health response. And climate modeling has shown that a nuclear war involving less than 1 percentof the worlds arsenalstargeted on citiescould trigger global climate disruptions for ten years, degrading agricultural production and putting up to two billion people at risk of starvation.

The right to health and the right to clean air and water are human rights, not privileges reserved for the most fortunate members of society.

Physicians for Social Responsibility was founded in 1961 in order to draw attention to the grave health and humanitarian impacts of nuclear weapons. Its motto is: Prevention is the only cure.

Even if we manage to prevent a nuclear war, the arsenals are still a major health hazard. The processes of mining and refining uranium, building and testing nuclear weapons, and transporting and handling the radioactive waste byproducts have jeopardized the health and safety of communities in the United States and around the world for decades.

These activities have disproportionately impacted indiginous peoples, low-income communities and communities of color, whose families experience the harmful inheritance of multi-generational toxic nuclear legacies. Between 1946 and 1958, the residents of the Marshall Islands were forced to endure 67 atmospheric nuclear test explosions in their homeland.

These communities have called for accountability and for justice, but they havent been heard. This is a social justice issue, a health issue, and a human rights issue. The right to health and the right to clean air and water are human rights, not privileges reserved for the most fortunate members of society.

Those who stockpile and threaten to use nuclear weapons are violating our human rights. On this Human Rights Day, lets make them stop. Its time to ban nuclear weapons, for good.

This column was produced for the Progressive Media Project, which is run by The Progressive magazine, and distributed by the Tribune News Service.

December 9, 2019

11:59 AM

See more here:

On Human Rights Day, Let's Abolish Nuclear Weapons - Progressive.org

[Year in Review 2019] From Priyanka Chopra and Mary Kom to Dutee Chand and Ritu Karidhal: the top 30 women new – YourStory

As we look forward to a new year of celebrating women and their compelling stories, we also take stock of the year gone by and celebrate women who have made an impact in different fields.

Women in sports brought home accolades and medals showing us than an uneven playing field did not deter them from doing their best for their country.

Women in science made interesting discoveries while those in the armed forces showcased many firsts. Indian politics saw 78 women MPs this year, the largest ever, a sign that they are breaking the mould and not afraid of entering a murky world.

Many women made headlines this year and HerStory presents the 30 top women newsmakers of 2019:

L-R: Dutee Chand, Mary Kom, Ritu Karidhal, Muthayya Vanitha and Hima Das

Dutee Chand made headlines both on and off the field, in the process becoming the first Indian athlete to reveal a same-sex relationship. She was also named in the TIME 100 NEXT, which spotlights 100 rising stars shaping the future in various fields.

Her on-track achievements include becoming the first Indian to win a gold in the women's 100m at the World University Games. She also won the 100m gold at the Asian Championships, breaking her personal best and national record. At the 59th National Open Athletics Championship, she won a double gold at the 100m and 200m dash events. This record-breaker is now focusing on qualifying for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics.

In a career spanning almost two decades, theres been no shortage of accolades for the feisty Mary Kom. The boxing legend continues to create history and is now looking to conquer new boundaries by changing to a new weight category.

She became the first boxer in the history of the AIBA World Championships to win eight medals at the world meet. At this year's championship, she won bronze in the 51kg category. She has six gold medals from her previous attempts. The 36-year-old also won gold medals at the India Open in Guwahati and the Presidents Cup in Indonesia.

The World Olympians Association granted her the use of post-nominal letters OLY, which signifies a sports person's ongoing role in society as an Olympian, living and promoting Olympic values.

As Project Director of the Chandrayaan-2 mission, Ritu Karidhal was feted for role in helming one of Indias most ambitious lunar projects.

Ritu joined ISRO in 2007 and was also the Deputy Operations Director to Indias Mars orbiter mission, Mangalyaan. An aerospace engineer, she was born and raised in Lucknow in a middle-class family. She has a BSc. in physics from the University of Lucknow and ME degree in aerospace engineering from the Indian Institute of Science.

In 2007, she also received the ISRO Young Scientist Award from APJ Abdul Kalam, then President of India.

Muthayya Vanitha is the Project Director of Chandrayaan-2. She is the first woman to hold this position. She has led projects on satellites at ISRO. She hails from Chennai and is an electronics system engineer from the College of Engineering, Guindy.

In 2006, she received the Best Woman Scientist Award. Previously she has also managed data operations for remote sensing satellites.

This track superstar has been the most impressive performer of the year among Indian sportspersons. From her gold-winning spree in Europe to her charitable efforts, this 19-year-old has proved her mettle on and off the track. In July this year, Hima won five gold medals at various events in Poland and the Czech Republic.

She successfully returned to the 400m track at Nove Mesto, Czech Republic, after not being able to complete in the category at the Asian Athletics Championship. She also achieved her season's best timing of 52.09 seconds in the 400m to finish her European tournaments.

The Dhing Express from Assam donated half her salary for flood relief in the state. She made it to the Forbes India 30 Under 30 list. She has also been appointed as the countrys first youth ambassador to Unicef India this year.

PV Sindhu

P V Sindhu, the star of Indian badminton, celebrated another year of conquering new feats. She became the first Indian to win gold at the World Championships, another impressive record in her career. She was also named in the Forbes list of Highest Paid Female Athletes in the World. Sindhu is Indias highest paid female athlete and ranks 13th in the world for her earnings this year.

Sindhu is one of Indias strongest and bankable contenders for gold in the upcoming Tokyo Olympics after her silver in Rio. We are all expecting a smashing comeback.

Gagandeep Kang made news this year as the first Indian woman to be elected to the Fellow of Royal Society. She is currently the executive director of the Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad.

She has a bachelors in medicine, bachelor of surgery (MBBS) and a MD in microbiology. She also holds a PhD and has worked at Christian Medical College, Vellore, in Tamil Nadu.

Described as vaccine godmother by some media houses, she has worked extensively in the field of rotavirus epidemiology in India.With over 300 published scientific research papers, she is also the recipient of multiple awards such as Infosys Prize in Life Sciences in 2016 and Dr SC Parija Oration Award, Indian Academy of Tropical Parasitology, in 2015.

In January 2020, biologist Chandrima Shaha will earn the distinction of becoming the first woman president of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA) in 85 years of its existence. This is a fillip for women in science, especially those who aspire to become leaders.

Chandrima specialises in cell biology and has received multiple awards for her work and contribution to the field. She has also authored multiple research papers.

Interestingly, she is also the first female cricket commentator of All India Radio and was also vice-captain of West Bengals first womens cricket team.

Aarohi Pandit created news this year by becoming the first woman pilot to cross both the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean in a Light Sports Aircraft (LSA). With this, she also became the first woman pilot to cross the Atlantic Ocean solo.

The 23-year-old from Mumbai has been flying around the globe as part of the WE! Women Empower Expedition.

Indo-American economist Gita Gopinath is the first woman to be appointed the Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund. She is the second Indian to take up the position after former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan.

Gita is the John Zwaanstra Professor of International Studies and Economics at Harvard University. Previously, she was co-editor of American Review and has also served on the Federal Reserve Advisory council. Her research centres on international finance and macroeconomics.

L-R: Shafali Verma, Remya Haridas, Deepika Padukone, Priyanka Chopra and Kiran Mazumdar Shaw

Shafali Verma has emerged as the new wonder kid of Indian womens cricket. The 15-year-old is known for her power-hitting prowess and was picked in the Indian squad as a replacement for outgoing captain Mithali Raj.

With big boots to fill, this Rohtak-born batting sensation took on international pacers with ease. She became the youngest Indian cricketer to score a half century in an international match when she smashed 73 off 49 balls in the first T20 International against West Indies. She broke a 30-year-old record previously set by her idol Sachin Tendulkar. She also became the second youngest cricketer to ever do so.

Her inclusion in the team came on the back of her run-amassing domestic season. In her third season with Haryana, she accumulated 1,923 runs, including six hundreds and three half-centuries. Mithali Raj and England batswoman Danielle Wyatt have praised the cricketer, with the latter calling her "a superstar in the making".

Remya Haridas is the only woman MP from Kerala in the 17th Lok Sabha. She won the Lok Sabha elections from Alathur, and is the daughter of a daily wager. She is only the second Dalit woman MP from Kerala, 48 years after Bhargavi Thankappan of the CPI won an election in 1971.

Actor Deepika Padukone continues to advocate for mental health awareness through her Live Love Laugh Foundation. She also became an investor this year by investing inyogurt brand Epigamia and electric vehicle mobility startup Blu Smart.

Former Miss World, actor, and producer Priyanka Chopra made multiple investments this year. She invested in the dating and social networking app, Bumble, which was founded in 2011 by Whitney Wolfe Herd. She also invested in Holberton School, a US-based project alternative to college for software engineers.

As a Unicef Ambassador, Priyanka travelled to Jordan to meet child refugees and has been vocal about their rehabilitation. She was also featured in the worlds most admired women list released by YouGov this year.

Chairperson and Managing Director of Biocon, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw continues to inspire women in India and abroad. This year, Biocon celebrates 40 years and Kiran believes this has been possible only due to innovation and perseverance. She is a recipient of Padma Shri, Padma Vibhushan, and multiple other awards.

This year, she was also conferred with an Honorary Doctorate from Deakin University, Australia, for her pioneering entrepreneurial role in the field of biotechnology and for her sustained significant contribution to industry-academia collaboration between Australia and India.

Hailed as the Greta Thunberg of India, 11-year-old Ridhima Pandey is one of the 16 children who sued five nations believed to cause the most pollution (Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany, and Turkey). The movement led by Swedish environmentalist Greta Thunberg made the world sit up and take note of the alarming climate change issue.

In 2017, Ridhima had sued the Indian government for failing to implement environmental laws. Her fight for the future of children makes her one of the most important voices we need to pay attention to in the coming years.

At the age of 47, mother of two teenagers Bhavana Tokekar proved age is just a number by winning four gold medals at the Open Asian Powerlifting Championships organised by the World Powerlifting Congress (WPC) in Chelyabinsk, Russia.

She participated in the 'Under 67.5 Masters 2' category (45-50 age group). Bhavana started her fitness journey in 2011, to combat the side effects of a medicine she was prescribed. She first took to cycling, and eventually shifted to a gym in 2012. Married to a pilot in the Indian Air Force, Bhavana was motivated by IAF bodybuilders to try weightlifting.

She is also a long-distance runner (8-10km) and has taken part in a few marathon events. The gold medallist regularly posts videos of weight-training on Instagram.

At the age of 25, Chandrani Murmu made history by becoming the youngest-ever Lok Sabha MP. An engineering graduate from Odisha, she joined politics encouraged by her uncle, Harmohan, a social worker to fight the Lok Sabha election.

She won from Keonjhar and is working on empowerment of women and youth, improving access to education, and generating employment opportunities.

Sister of actor Alia Bhatt and daughter of filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and actor Soni Razdan, Shaheen Bhatt released her book Ive Never Been (Un)Happier where she describes in detail her struggle with depression. The book is an emotional account of living with depression in privileged circumstances.

The book has opened up conversations on mental health and reiterates the need for constant and consistent awareness.

Nivruti Rai, Intel

Nivruti Rai combines tech and leadership seamlessly and has been at the helm of Intel as Country Head Intel India and VP, Data Center Group at Intel Corporation. With Intels design and engineering centre being launched in Hyderabad recently, Nivruti has been expanding Intels footprint in India.

An ardent supporter of innovation and new technology, Nivruti also champions women's issues and is a role model and mentor for many women.

Earlier this year, she was featured on the cover of Forbes India and hailed as one of the most powerful women in business in 2019.

Forty-one-year-old Wing Commander Anjali Singh became the first woman to be appointed as a military diplomat in Indian missions abroad.Wing Commander Anjali Sharma hails from Bihar and in 2001 became a commissioned officer in the Air Force and in 17 years of service has trained on MiG29 fighter aircrafts.

The IAF officer was appointed as Deputy Air Attache at the Indian embassy in Moscow. Anjalis role is to assist in cooperation, training, and procurement in the field of defence between Russia and India.

The breakout star of Indian shooting, Elavenil Valarivan has made a strong start in her debut season at the senior level. Transitioning from the junior level, the 20-year-old won two gold medals at the ISSF World Cup, one at the Rio de Janeiro meet and one at the China meet. Her maiden senior ISSF World Cup gold in the 10m Air Rifle in Rio de Janeiro made her the third Indian shooter to win in the category.

This protge of Olympic medallist Gagan Narang is surely giving other Indian team veterans tough competition. Even though India has secured its quota for shooting for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, Elavenil hopes to get a wildcard entry to the Tokyo Olympics.

L-R: Wing Commander Anjali Singh, Elavenil Valarivan, Payal Jangid, Swara Bhasker and Minty Agarwal

Seventeen-year-old Payal Jangid became the first Indian to win the Goalkeepers Global Changemarkers Award by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The awards ceremony was held in New York.

Payal hails from Rajasthan and has been working towards abolition of child marriage in her village, Hinsla. Thanks to her efforts, her village is a child-friendly village (Bal Mitra Gram).

Actor Swara Bhasker continues to make news for taking up issues that matter, and also battling the troll army that constantly attacks her on social media.

Whether its the JNU fee hike, womens issues, or her on-screen appearances, Swara Bhasker comes across as outspoken, both online and offline.

IAF Squadron Leader Minty Agarwal is a Fight Controller with the Indian Air Force. She is the first woman to receive the Yudh Seva Medal. Awarded the medal by President of India, Ram Nath Kovind, she was part of the team that guided Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman during the Balakot airstrike in 2019 by IAF.

Paralympic silver medallist Deepa Malik was in 2019 conferred the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award, the highest sporting honour in the country. The 47-year-old paraplegic (paralysed from the chest down) became the first Indian woman para-athlete and the oldest to receive the honour.

She holds a Paralympic silver Para Asian Games medal among a total of 23 international medals and 57 national medals (51 of them are gold).

Apart from para-sports, she is also involved in adventure sports. She created four Limca World Adventure records when she swam against the current in river Yamuna. She has also taken part in the Himalayan race and the Desert Storm, two of the most treacherous routes where she biked 1,700 km in sub-zero temperatures in a span of eight days at an altitude of 18,000 feet.

The Kung Fu nuns of the Drukpa lineage train other women in self-defence. They use their spirituality to champion for gender equality, physical fitness, environmentally-friendly living, and respect for all living beings.

Many of these nuns are from the Himalayas, Ladakh, and train at the Druk Amitabha Mountain Nunnery in Nepal. Their common aim is to help others, and make a difference in the world around them. Apart from training girls in self-defence, they participate in a number of social and humanitarian activities.

This year, the Kung Fu nuns were presented with Asia Societys Gamechanger Award on October 24 for the transformative impact they are making in Asia through their diverse efforts.

In 2016, Samyuktha Vijayan underwent gender affirmative surgery in Seattle and was welcomed with open arms at her then workplace, Amazon. She quit her job to move to India to help and support the LGBTQIA+ community with her boutique startup, TouteStudio.

This year, she joined food delivery aggregator Swiggy as its first transgender employee, taking up the position of Principal Programme Manager. She is instrumental for optimising and improving the spaces of transportation and delivery at Swiggy.

Shilpa Shetty, who has previously invested in Mamaearth, a mother and child care products startup, launched her own app this year. A labour of love, the app is called the Shilpa Shetty app and provides diet plans, yoga routines, post-pregnancy weight loss options, and other similar health workouts.

Naaz Joshi was crowned Miss World Diversity for the third consecutive year. The pageant was held in August in Mauritius with 14 countries participating in the event.

Abandoned by her family as a child, she has overcome many hardships in her journey. She has undergone surgeries for gender change, embraced motherhood, and continues to model for brands. Despite her success, she still struggles to find a 9-5 well-paying job, and has to resort to sex work to support herself and her daughter.

(Edited by Rekha Balakrishnan)

(Image credits: Sasha R)

View original post here:

[Year in Review 2019] From Priyanka Chopra and Mary Kom to Dutee Chand and Ritu Karidhal: the top 30 women new - YourStory

In His New Book, DU Law Professor Makes the Case for Abolishing Immigration Prisons – University of Denver

University of Denver law professor Csar Cuauhtmoc Garca Hernndez wants to introduce you to Diego Rivera Osorio. To Gerardo Armijo and Kamyar Samimi. And to hundreds of thousands of others born on the south side of happenstance.

Theyre all real-life characters human beings with families, virtues, flaws and complicated contexts in Garca Hernndezs recently released Migrating to Prison: Americas Obsession With Locking up Immigrants(The New Press, 2019). Part dispassionate review of history and policy and part impassioned argument for demolishing immigration prisons, the book aims to reframe the national discourse about migration and incarceration.

My goal, Garca Hernndez says, is to inject into public conversations the simple question of whether we ought to lock up migrants.

Migrants like little Diego. A Honduran by birth, he had, by the time he was 3, spent 650 days in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility for children, also known as a baby jail.

Migrants like Armijo, a permanent resident who grew up near Garca Hernndezs hometown on the U.S.-Mexico border. Armijo served his country in Iraq, where he suffered injuries from an explosion. After returning to Texas, the traumatized Purple Heart recipient sought solace in illegal drugs. A subsequent arrest for possession sent him on an unceremonious trip to an ICE detention center.

And migrants like Samimi, who became a permanent resident in 1976. Nearly three decades later, he was convicted of cocaine possession and sentenced to community service. A dozen years after that, his debt to society long since paid, Samimi was arrested by ICE and incarcerated at a privately owned detention center in Aurora, Colorado. According to an internal review spurred by a congressmans inquiry, he died there of a heart attack, a victim of substandard medical care.

These stories testify to the human side of Garca Hernndezs legal specialty, the intersection between criminal law and immigration law. That territory is explored in his highly regarded first book,Crimmigration Law (American Bar Association, 2015) and at crimmigration.com, a blog he publishes to track emerging developments. The blog has become essential reading for students, faculty and practicing lawyers focused on the legal plight of immigrants.

Migrating to Prison, meanwhile, takes Garca Hernndezs work beyond a constituency of scholars to an audience of everyday citizens. In recent weeks alone, he has shared its findings and arguments at a TEDxMileHigh event and, via an op-ed, with readers of the New York Times.

A lot of people have an intuitive sense that there is something happening in our name that is problematic, he says of his fellow U.S. citizens. But they dont have the understanding of our past, and [they dont have] the language with which to grapple with the reality of immigration law enforcement right now. What Im trying to do is give people the language and give people some of the historical context.

Just what is happening in our name?

On any given day in the United States, Garca Hernndez explains, a mind-boggling number of people are awaiting due process in the nations growing number of immigration prisons, many of whose premises are demarcated by barbed wire. Some prisons are operated by private companies, others by public agencies. Regardless, most of the facilities not to mention the bureaucracies tasked with conducting hearings and processing paperwork are overwhelmed by the sheer number of detainees.

And just how bad is the incarceration rate?

We have upwards of half a million people who are locked up every single year while the government decides whether theyre going to be allowed to stay in the United States, Garca Hernndez says, comparing that to 1970, when the U.S. saw only 575 people charged with an immigration crime.

To build his case for abolishing immigration prisons, Garca Hernndez turns a critical eye to the nations history, beginning with the Naturalization Act of 1790 and ending with todays predicament. He finds precedent for abolition in the mid-20th century, when the nations chief executive, lawmakers and federal judges all but jettisoned the countrys detention policies. And as Migrating to Prison makes clear, the country did not descend into chaos.

The book also chronicles the nations retreat from those policies. In outlining that evolution, Garca Hernndez expresses frustration not just with the countrys current president, but with his predecessor as well. Under the latter, he reminds readers, the Department of Homeland Security locked up an unprecedented number of migrants, and President Trump has done his best to exceed that. But it was the Obama record that spurred Garca Hernndez to write Migrating to Prison.

I realized I wanted to tell this specific story in the late years of the Obama administration, because it was being overlooked. Everything that was happening at that moment in the nations history, the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of people losing their liberty simply because they came to the United States under the wrong circumstances, was something that was unknown to people. I couldnt get people to hear that, he recalls.

Perhaps now they are ready to hear. As he tours the country promoting Migrating to Prison, Garca Hernndez is banking on the notion that readers and citizens, armed with facts and insight into the human cost of current practices, can still be persuaded.

I do have this lingering hope that we as a nation can take a different path, Garca Hernndez says. [That hope] is informed by our past. Its informed by the fact that at one point in our past, during the Eisenhower administration, a Republican president decided this isnt the right way of doing things and decided we should shut down the facilities we had at the time. And we did. Its a reminder to me that these are not things that come to us from on high. They come to us from the democratic process, messy as it is. And the democratic process still responds to the will of the people, the political community that is the United States.

Go here to see the original:

In His New Book, DU Law Professor Makes the Case for Abolishing Immigration Prisons - University of Denver

The neglected foot soldiers of a liberalised economy – The Hindu

Editorials and articles have been written on the proposed merger of BSNL and MTNL. Permanent employees of the two telecommunication companies are planning to opt for lucrative voluntary retirement schemes and a generous package also awaits the senior employees. But what about the thousands of contract labourers, contractual and temporary workers who have served the two organisations for several years for far less wages and without any substantial social security benefits? It is not an exaggeration to say that these workers constituted the rudimentary service pool of these organisations. But now, after doing unpaid work for many months, many of the desperate employees are committing suicide.

The BSNL-MTNL case is not an aberration. There are thousands of employees in the informal sector, a majority of them engaged through contractors, working in precarious service conditions. But, who will rehabilitate these victims of an emerging market economy where most graduates are not employable due to skill deficiency and there is an acute shortage of job opportunities?

The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and the Inter State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 have been in place for long; but non-compliance is the order of the day. Similarly, manual scavengers, most of them employed as contract labourers, are still forced to do cleaning jobs under the most inhumane conditions, despite this barbaric practice having been outlawed through successive pieces of legislation. The Supreme Court, in judgment after judgment, has ruled that contract workers should be paid the same wages as permanent employees for similar jobs, but these orders seem to exist only to be taught in law classes, not for compliance by employers.

Similarly, Unorganised Workers Social Security Act, 2008, has largely been a cosmetic exercise. The second National Commission on Labour, in the year 2002, had strongly recommended abolition of the exploitative contract labour system in course of time and, in the meantime, suggested implementation of a comprehensive social security scheme. It had very rightly recommended that after two years of working for an organisation, a contract worker should be treated as a permanent worker. However, the apex court in SAIL vs. National Union of Water front Workers and others (2001) overruled some of its earlier judgments and decided that the law does not provide for automatic absorption of contract labourers upon its abolition and that the principal employer has no liability to regularise them.

It is true that our labour laws are stringent and protective, but this statement applies only to the fortunate permanent employees, who constitute roughly 10% of the total workforce. Hire and fire is the rule for the contract labourers. Laissez faire is in full bloom. Paradoxically, a rigid labour law system has also contributed to greater contractualisation of the workforce. And, engaged in substantial numbers as contract labourers are people from vulnerable caste groups. The Contract Labour Act, 1970, is applicable only to organisations and contractors who are employing 20 or more workers. Hence, the number of such workers could be much more than what the numbers suggest.

In the liberalised Indian economy of the 21st century, such labourers are treated as sacrificial goats. Pay Commissions are always very gracious to upgrade the salary structure of permanent employees on a periodical basis, but the genuine needs of contract workers are repeatedly ignored by the state. Unless our policymakers ensure strong enforcement of policies linked to such workers, suicides, as in the BSNL-MTNL case, will continue. Parliament has already enacted the Code on Wages, 2019. Indeed, we do need reform in our labour laws to enhance globalisation. But, at the same time, we also need a comprehensive umbrella of social security for these foot soldiers of growth and development.

Alok Ray is a Kolkata-based lawyer and labour law expert

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

Register to The Hindu for free and get unlimited access for 30 days.

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad mobile applications and print. Our plans enhance your reading experience.

Go here to read the rest:

The neglected foot soldiers of a liberalised economy - The Hindu

UWI examines legacy of Williams’ Capitalism and Slavery – Trinidad News

Dr Heather Cateau, senior lecturer and dean, Faculty of Humanities and Education, The UWI St Augustine, delivers greetings. -

Seventy-five years ago, a brilliant, young academic at Oxford University, Eric Williams, published Capitalism and Slavery, connecting the economic aspects between the abolition of the slave trade and West Indian slavery.

Recently, the Caricom Reparations Commission (CRC), in collaboration with The UWI Centre for Reparation Research and the Faculty of Humanities and Education at the St Augustine Campus hosted an international symposium December 13-14 to examine the impact of Dr Eric Williams and his work on the contemporary Caribbean and wider world. This Caribbean perspective joined similar commemorative activities taking place all over the world, including Africa, Britain, and the United States, said a media release.

UWI St Augustine Pro Vice-Chancellor and Principal Professor Brian Copeland noted that Williams has been an integral part of the history of the campus from inception, He served as the first and only Pro-Chancellor of the UWI and was instrumental, as were other prime ministers at the time, in setting the current framework for The UWI while being a strong advocate for the State playing a significant role in supporting the UWI.

Programme manager, culture and community development at the Caricom Secretariat, Dr Hilary Brown, speaking at the opening of the symposium. -

He expressed his appreciation for the symposium which brought together scholars, intellectuals, corporate interest groups, artists, and activists. It provides us with an opportunity to discuss his legacy with the next generation of Caribbean leaders and intellectuals. This body of work is certainly culturally important not just to Caribbean students, but is part of the knowledge base of civilisation as we know it, said Copeland.

When Capitalism and Slavery was first published, its groundbreaking work ignited scholarly debate and became the foundation for studies of imperialism and economic development, the release said.

Keynote speaker Professor Verene Shepherd, director of The UWI Centre for Reparation Research, explained that using the evidence from Capitalism and Slavery as the foundational text and adding other books on similar themes published since, along with Archival Records to which Dr Williams may have access or perhaps never thought of using, the governments of Caricom, through the CRC, have articulated the justification for the reparation demand.

Keynote speaker at Capitalism and Slavery symposium, Professor Verene Shepherd, director of The Centre for Reparations Research. -

The CRC stresses that the regions indigenous and African descendant communities who are the victims of crimes against humanity in the forms of genocide, enslavement, human trafficking, deceptive Asian indentureship and racial apartheid have a legal right to reparatory justice, and that those who committed these crimes, and who have been enriched by the proceeds of these crimes, have a reparatory case to answer, Shepherd said.

Also attending the symposium was Erica Williams-Connell, daughter of Eric Williams, who spearheaded the establishment of the Eric Williams Memorial Collection at the St Augustine Campus. Students from secondary schools also attended the event,

Here is the original post:

UWI examines legacy of Williams' Capitalism and Slavery - Trinidad News

Election won’t settle issue of EU programme participation – University World News

UNITED KINGDOM

But looming large for higher education and research is the continuing uncertainty, which the election will not resolve no matter who wins, over the future of the UKs participation in Horizon Europe, the EUs flagship research programme, and Erasmus+, its student and staff study and exchange programme, after Brexit, or over whether Brexit will happen at all.

Labour argues that under the Conservatives universities are treated as private businesses, left at the mercy of market forces, while top salaries soar and students pay more for less.

Tuition fees have trebled and maintenance grants have been scrapped, leaving the poorest graduates with an average debt of 57,000 [US$74,800], Labour's manifesto says. Therefore, the party is promising to end the failed free-market experiment in higher education, abolish tuition fees and bring back maintenance grants.

The policy would only apply to universities in England, as education is devolved to the administrations of the countries that make up the UK.

However, Natalie Perera, executive director and head of research at the Education Policy Institute (EPI), launching an analysis of the parties manifestos last week, said abolishing tuition fees would do very little to improve overall attainment or narrow the disadvantage gap. The 7 billion spent on abolishing fees could be much better spent addressing socio-economic disadvantage earlier on in a pupils life.

The political parties entered the last week of campaigning with a Conservative majority seen as the most likely outcome by voters in opinion polls, but many voters were undecided and a strong push for tactical voting by supporters of Remaining in the EU meant a hung parliament could not be ruled out as an outcome.

Conservative leader and Prime Minister Boris Johnson has promised with seemingly every soundbite to Get Brexit Done by 31 January, but in reality could only get his withdrawal agreement passed by that date and then would have to start negotiations over the future relationship with the EU.

He has also promised to finish the latter by the end of 2020 a deadline which EU leaders say is totally unrealistic or leave without a deal. Therefore, the chances of a no-deal Brexit remain quite high and the future of the UKs role in EU research programmes and Erasmus+ remains in doubt.

If, on the other hand, Labour won an unlikely majority or, more possible, was able to form a minority government, it would enter talks to secure a more favourable deal than Johnsons, based on having a customs union, close alignment with the single market and continued participation in EU agencies and funding programmes including in scientific research.

It would then put this deal to a Peoples Vote with Remaining in the EU as the other option on the ballot paper.

Labours pledges on higher education cover ensuring adequate funding for teaching and research, widening access and ending the casualisation of staff.

The EPI report points out, however, that proposals to abolish fees are hugely costly and result in the burden being shifted from graduates towards taxpayers, making the system less progressive.

It says abolition of fees favours high-earning graduates by reducing their lifetime repayments substantially, while low and middle earners would see little benefit as most do not currently fully repay their student loans.

There is also little evidence that abolishing fees would encourage more school leavers from disadvantaged backgrounds to access higher education, as the chief barrier they face is lower attainment in secondary school, it says.

Postponed decision

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have put off a decision about higher education funding until they have looked at the recommendations of the recent Augar review of student finance and funding, which would leave tuition fees at the current 9,250 (US$12,100) a year level for the time being, although the Liberal Democrats will be looking at how they can make the finance system more progressive, possibly by replacing it with a graduate tax.

According to the EPI, the current funding system creates perverse incentives for universities to provide certain courses.

With nearly all universities charging the top level of fees for most or all of their subjects, the cheapest-to-teach have expanded far more rapidly than the most expensive subjects, the EPI report says.

It argues that this is contributing to a mismatch between employers demand for skills and those acquired by workers one of the highest mismatches in the OECD, with around 40% of UK workers over- or under-qualified for their job because current higher education and further education policies are distorting provision, particularly as too little funding is going into further education.

The Conservatives have promised to look at the interest rates on student loan repayments with a view to reducing student debt and to tackle the problem of grade inflation and low-quality courses.

Fast-track entry for top talent

The Conservatives have also promised to introduce a points-based system of immigration under which they would fast track entry for the small number of best technology and science graduates from the top universities in the world and those who win top scientific prizes; and implement the proposed two-year post-study work visa for international students.

In research, they pledge to increase spending to 2.4% of GDP, the OECD average, but dont put a date on the target, a promise matched by Labour. The Liberal Democrats pledge to meet the same target by 2027.

The Tory manifesto says: Once we have got Brexit done, we will turn our attention to the great challenges of the future such as clean energy and advanced energy storage; a cure for dementia; and solving antibiotic resistance. To do this we will make an unprecedented investment in science so we can strengthen research and build the foundations for the new industries of tomorrow.

They say they will continue to collaborate internationally and with the EU on scientific research, including Horizon, although that has yet to be agreed with the EU.

There will also be a 3 billion National Skills Fund created over five years to provide matching funds for individuals and small and medium-sized enterprises for high quality education and training.

Disappointing choice on offer

The EPI said the party policies on post-18 education were few in number and particularly disappointing. While Labours most expensive policy, scrapping tuition fees, would cost 7 billion and may not improve participation, or the access of vulnerable groups, the Conservatives one concrete measure of reducing interest rates on student loans would disproportionately benefit higher earners.

None of the parties live up to the breadth and scale of Universities UKs demands in its own manifesto for higher education and research.

It calls for improved equality of access and opportunity, including more flexibility regarding learning and gaining credits over time; a civic university fund to improve cultural life in the surrounding community and work with left-behind groups and disadvantaged school pupils and the reintroduction of maintenance grants for disadvantaged students.

It also calls for increased funding for research, rising to 2.4% of GDP by 2027 and increasing the number of scientists and researchers by 260,000 by the same date; better conditions for attracting and retaining talent; support for a doubling of the share of students who study abroad to 13% including a national scholarship offer for European students; a 20 million investment into a campaign to promote the UK as study destination to EU students and implementing the two-year post-study work visa for international graduates.

It demands that the government secure associated country status for Horizon Europe and make sure that there is no decline in the total funding available for big international projects of the sort that Horizon 2020 has provided.

It calls for the creation of a UK Shared Prosperity Fund to replace European Structural and Investment Funds.

And it seeks an immigration system that facilitates and promotes academic collaboration and exchange among students, researchers and scientists and the securing of ongoing full UK participation in the next Erasmus+ programme.

If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, Universities UK says, the government should immediately reconsider the three-year limit to the European Temporary Leave to Remain scheme and guarantee EU students entering under this scheme that they will be able to stay for the duration of their course and graduate.

It also demands that under a no-deal Brexit the government create fully funded domestic replacements to the parts of Horizon 2020 not open to third countries, such as the European Research Council, and it demands an ambitious and fully funded replacement to Erasmus+.

The Universities UK manifesto says: For Global Britain to be more than a slogan, we need to reinforce this key advantage. In an ever-more connected world, we need to make sure that as we leave the EU our ties across borders are strengthened, not loosened and that academic cooperation, collaboration and exchange between the UK and our EU partners endures and grows.

Receive UWN's free weekly e-newsletters

Here is the original post:

Election won't settle issue of EU programme participation - University World News

The Supreme Court Ruled That Sentences Like Hers Are Unconstitutional. Prosecutors Are Fighting To Keep Her Incarcerated. – The Appeal

In the spring of 1990, when Barbara Hernndez was 16, her boyfriend, then 20, came up with a plan, according to court documents: She would bring a man to an abandoned house on the pretense of prostitution, and her boyfriend would rob him.

Hernndez had met her boyfriend, James Hyde, when she was in junior high school. Over the course of their relationship, she said Hyde coerced her into sex work, routinely beat her, and repeatedly raped her, according to court documents.

When she brought 28-year-old James Cotaling to the house in Pontiac, Michigan, where she and Hyde had been staying, Hyde stabbed him about two dozen times. Hyde and Hernndez were both convicted of murder and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.

In 2012, in Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court decided that mandatory life without the possibility of parole sentences for juveniles, like the one Hernndez received, were unconstitutional. In 2016, in Montgomery v. Louisiana, it ruled that the decision applied retroactively. Hernndez was one of about 2,000 people nationally who would be eligible for a new sentence.

But some prosecutors appear to be resisting the Courts decision. So far, Oakland County Prosecutor Jessica Cooper has requested that the courts reimpose life without the possibility of parole in 43 out of 48 of the countys juvenile lifer cases, according to an investigation by the Detroit Free Press. By asking for life without the possibility of parole in the majority of cases, youth advocates say Cooper has repeatedly ignored her obligations under Miller and Montgomery.

At the request of Coopers office, a circuit court judge sentenced Hernndez, now 45, to life without the possibility of parole on Aug. 8.

Not only are these policies and practices that shes pursuing inhumane and cruel, but they also dont follow what is in our view clear Supreme Court guidance, said Udi Ofer, director of the ACLUs Campaign for Smart Justice. And that is, a sentence of life without parole for a crime committed by a child should be reserved for only the rarest of the rare circumstances.

Cooper did not respond to The Appeals requests for comment, although she has previously spoken publicly about juvenile life without the possibility of parole. We are talking about victims who were stabbed, drowned, bludgeoned and decapitated, Cooper told Bridge, a local news outlet, in 2016. Many of these crimes were totally random. They walked up to a car and decided to shoot in it. On and on and on and on. We are really talking about awful cases.

The United States remains the only country that sentences children to life without the possibility of parole, say advocates. The Supreme Court has not yet found juvenile life without the possibility of parole unconstitutional, although 22 states and Washington, D.C. have banned the practice. Rather, the justices ruled that courts must attempt to distinguish between, the juvenile offender whose crime reflects unfortunate yet transient immaturity, and the rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption.

In August, prosecutor Tricia Dare invoked this language when she asked Judge Nanci Grant to sentence Hernndez to life without the possibility of parole. The crime, Dare said, was not an act involving transient immaturity, according to a transcript of the proceeding.

Hernndezs supporters contest the prosecutors view and the judges ruling, pointing to her traumatic childhood, as well as Hydes alleged abuse. According to court filings, a 1991 psychological report said Hernndez stayed with Hyde because she was afraid of him and had no place to go. In a psychiatric report detailed in the filings, Hernndez was described as essentially a slave to Hyde.

I didnt want him to kill me and now I wish that he did, said Hernndez, according to the 1991 psychiatric report. Id be dead somewhere and I would be free from him. He wouldnt hurt me no more. I didnt want that man to die (crying).

Hyde did not respond to a request for comment.

Hyde and Hernndez were tried together, but with separate juries. Detective Ralph Monday testified that Hernndez may have held down the victim, a statement he has since disavowed. According to his investigation, only Hyde attacked the victim, Monday wrote in an affidavit.

Barbara Hernndez, right, in an undated photo. Courtesy of Deborah LaBelle's office

My memory right now is that she had no role in even touching the guy, Monday told the Associated Press in 2013. Why I testified to that, who knows? he said.

Even before she met Hyde, Hernndez had been sexually and physically abused, according to court documents. Starting when she was 4 years old, her biological father molested her. The abuse stopped in 1982 when she was 8 and he was arrested for raping her mentally disabled aunt. Shortly thereafter, her mothers boyfriend moved in, and he raped Hernndez from the ages of about 9 to 12 years old, according to a mitigation report.

Hernndez and her siblings were often beaten, neglected, and without food, according to court documents. When she met Hyde, she and her family were living in a trailer without electricity, water, heat, or a toilet, according to the mitigation report. After school, Hyde took her to his home where she would shower, according to the report.

This was a travesty, her attorney Deborah LaBelle told The Appeal of Hernndezs sentence. She is like a Miller poster child. Last month, her attorneys filed an appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals.

During her incarceration, her supporters note, Hernndez earned her GED and took college courses. Since 2011, she has worked as a tutor and mentor at the Womens Huron Valley Correctional Facility, according to the Department of Corrections.

I would be more than happy to have her as a neighbor myself, Pamela Odum, who retired from the Department of Corrections, told Judge Grants court. Rehabilitation comes from within. You have to want it and Ive watched her grab it with both hands.

On the whole, Michigans prosecutors have taken a slower and more punitive approach than most other states, advocates say. In Michigan, as of July 1, 55 percent of the states juvenile lifersjust under 200were awaiting resentencing, according to the Detroit Free Press. In Pennsylvania, however, 221 juvenile lifers have already been released, according to the Department of Corrections. Sixty-seven remain to be resentenced.

Peoples lives, their fate is determined more based on where they live than their crime, said Jody Lavy, executive director of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, which advocates for the abolition of juvenile life without the possibility of parole. Michigan has steadily been an outlier.

In Michigan, even in cases where a prosecutor has sought life without the possibility of parole, judges have chosen to impose a term of years. As of July 1, 86 juvenile lifers had been released, according to the Detroit Free Press. One of those was Sheldry Topp, who left prison this year at the age of 74. Coopers office had asked the court to sentence him to life without the possibility of parole.

In 1962, Topp was convicted of a murder he committed when he was 17. As a child, his father frequently beat him with an extension cord, according to his attorneys sentencing memorandum. On one occasion, a sibling recalled, his father hit Topp with a baseball bat after he swung and missed the ball, according to the memo. Beginning at the age of 12, he was placed in three mental institutions. As a teenager, he was subjected to electric shock therapy 20 times, according to the memo.

There is variability from state to state, as well as from county to county, said Lavy. The top prosecutor in Ingham County, Michigan, Carol Siemon, told The Appeal in an email, We have not and will never seek JLWOP [juvenile life without the possibility of parole] under my administration.

The countys two juvenile lifers were resentenced to a term of years, with Siemons support; one was released and the other is up for parole in 2021, according to the prosecutors office.

I believe that each defendant should be afforded an opportunity to change and be rehabilitated, Siemon wrote to The Appeal. It may never happen, but I believe everyone should be provided that possibility and incentive.

In next years Democratic primary, Cooper, who has been in office since 2009, will face a challenger, former family court judge and prosecutor Karen McDonald. McDonald told The Appeal that she was not sure if she supported a ban on life without the possibility of parole for juveniles. When asked if her office would ever seek the sentence for youth, she said, I wouldnt say never. I agree with the Supreme Courts decision that it should be an extremely rare case.

However, McDonald said, she disagrees with Coopers approach to these cases, in particular her handling of Hernndezs case. If elected, she told The Appeal, she plans to advocate for Hernndez to be resentenced.

She should be released, McDonald said of Hernndez. Its not keeping the community safe to keep Barbara Hernndez in prison.

The Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth is a sponsor of Elizabeth Weill-Greenbergs documentary play on young people sentenced to life in prison.

Read more here:

The Supreme Court Ruled That Sentences Like Hers Are Unconstitutional. Prosecutors Are Fighting To Keep Her Incarcerated. - The Appeal

The Last Days of the BBC? – Jacobin magazine

As Britain faces a crucial general election, its second in two years, one of its most venerable institutions has been busy demolishing whats left of its reputation. The BBC has long been admired internationally for its well-resourced drama and documentary programs, and respected for the professionalism of its journalism. But its hollowing out by a series of neoliberal governments looks to have finally caught up with the once august institution. Whatever the merits of the BBCs educational and cultural output a large proportion of which anyway come from private companies its political journalism, which is at the heart of its public service remit, has failed in the most important test it faces.

For those of us familiar with the politics of the BBC, it has all been fairly predictable, even if still a little depressing, and sometimes even shocking, to watch. Lets start with the prime minister. As a number of critics have noted, the public persona of Boris was partly honed on the BBC in a series of appearances on its tired satirical show, Have I Got News for You, and the institution has since proved for the most part either unable or unwilling to puncture the performance and hold the politician to account.

Like his friend Donald Trump, Johnson has displayed remarkable arrogance and dishonesty. But while the US president is a crass bully, Johnson disguises his narcissism and ambition with a practiced self-depreciation and convivial manner that allows him to be both evasive and domineering with journalists. A revealing moment came last year shortly after his resignation as foreign secretary. Upon returning to the backbenches, the Old Etonian quickly secured the highest private income of any MP: among his various side hustles was a return to the Telegraph as a weekly columnist, for which the Conservative-supporting newspaper paid him almost 23,000 a month (which he failed to disclose to the appropriate authorities).

In one of his first articles in that post, Johnson described Muslim women who wear the burka as look[ing] like letter boxes. The calculated racism was widely condemned, including by the Muslim Council of Britain and by the then-chair of the Conservative Muslim Forum, Mohammed Amin. At the height of the short-lived controversy, the media gathered outside Johnsons home. When the future prime minister finally emerged, he approached them with no comment, but armed with plenty of boisterous charm and a tray full of mugs of tea. It was enough to disarm the group of reporters who laughed along with Boris. The BBC later posted a clip of the encounter on its YouTube channel.

Johnson, of course, emerged politically unscathed, as he has from every outrage. When he was elected Conservative leader earlier this year, Mohammed Amin resigned in protest,charging that Johnson was morally unfit to be prime minister and does not care whether what he is saying is true or false.

Part of the reason these traits have helped rather than hindered Johnsons rise is that his vices are shared by institutions at the heart of British politics. Not just the Conservative Party itself which has conducted what is likely the most dishonest campaign in British political history but also the countrys utterly unscrupulous right-wing press, which has polluted and corrupted British public life for decades, but which BBCs managers and senior journalists still treat as if they were vital components of democratic life.

Many journalists do find Johnson objectionable, and one reporter who stands out in particular is Peter Oborne, a conservative critic of political spin in the Blair era who resigned from the Telegraph over its dropping of an investigation into a major advertiser, HSBC. Early on in the election campaign, Oborne raised concerns that the British media as a whole were not holding Johnson or his ministers to account, and were too often relaying unsubstantiated claims from anonymous government sources. Not only did Oborne point in particular to the role of the BBCs most senior political reporter, Laura Kuenssberg, he also revealed that senior BBC executives had told him they thought it would be wrong to expose lies told by Johnson, since it might undermine trust in politics. The BBCs director of editorial policy and standards responded with a statement insisting that its journalists would challenge all lies, disinformation, or untruths, but stressing that the BBC would never label a prime minister a liar. This, he said, was a judgment for the public to make.

In fact, one of the first significant challenges to the prime ministers dishonesty on the BBC was to come from the public rather than its journalists. As part of a series of broadcast events, the BBC hosted a special edition of its weekly TV show Question Time, in which party leaders were in turn questioned by a selected studio audience. It was an unusually engaging program, during which all the leaders faced sustained and challenging questions, suggesting perhaps the potential of a more participatory public media. During the discussion, one member of the audience asked the prime minister: How important is it for someone in your position of power to always tell the truth? Sections of the audience burst into laughter and applauded, while Johnson twice replied that he thought it was absolutely vital.

When the clip of the exchange later appeared on BBC news bulletins, the audiences reaction had been cut out, with the footage skipping to Johnsons second reply made after the laughter had subsided. When this was brought to the attention of the BBCs editor of live political programs, Rob Burley, on social media, he dismissed the criticism, noting simply that the original program had been broadcast on the BBC. The following day, after facing sustained criticism, the BBC put out a statement acknowledging that the audience laughter had indeed been edited out, and conceding that this had been a mistake on our part.

Following that unfortunate error, the BBC had a lot to prove in its next showcase piece of political television: The Andrew Neil Interviews, a series of broadcasts in which each of the major party leaders faces a grueling half-an-hour, one-to-one interrogation with the BBCs toughest political journalist.

Andrew Neil comes from the hard right of British politics, having made his name as editor of Rupert Murdochs Sunday Times. He has fronted a number of prestigious BBC political programs over the years and, in addition to receiving over 200,000 a year from the corporation, also chairs the company that owns the Spectator, an influential conservative magazine formerly edited by Boris Johnson. Naturally, Neil is particularly hostile to the Left, but he has a reputation as a formidable interviewer for any politician to face.

The first to go head-to-head with Neil was the Scottish National Party leader Nicola Sturgeon, who faced fierce questioning over her partys policies on the EU and her record on health policy. Sturgeon is an adept politician, but it was generally agreed that it was a difficult and likely damaging half-hour. Next was Jeremy Corbyn, and ahead of the interview being aired, rumors circulated that it was, as the journalistic clich has it, a car crash. Though there was arguably some hyperbole from the right on this, it was indeed an uncomfortable half an hour for Labour. Neil was typically belligerent, focusing on the issue of antisemitism, which was once again dominating the news agenda following an intervention by Britains chief rabbi, as well as fiscal policy, which is said to be core to Neils own right-wing politics. Is there no limit to what can go on the Corbyn credit card? he asked derisively.

The wider media response focused on Corbyns supposed refusal to apologize for antisemitism (which he has done many times) and on Labours plans to abolish a 250 tax break for married couples. On the latter, the BBC joined the right-wing press in running a plainly misleading headline: Corbyn admits lower earners face tax hike under Labour, which was later amended to read: Corbyn concedes lower earners could pay more tax. The BBCs Rob Burley once again took to Twitter after the interview was aired to notealmost a clean sweep of the front pages in the morning. Still in a celebratory mood the next day, he reported that three million people had watched the program.

The Neil interview was damaging for Labour, but it was probably unavoidable, and quite proper given that all leaders would face the same level of scrutiny. Or so it seemed. A few days after it was broadcast, the BBC announced the dates of scheduled interviews with the Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson and the Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage. But there was no mention of the prime minister. In a follow-up tweet, the BBC press team stated that discussions with Johnsons team were ongoing and that the BBC hadnt yet been able to fix a date.

Labour supporters were incredulous, and it was subsequently reported that the party had been told by the BBC that interviews with all the other party leaders had been agreed (this is denied by Rob Burley). It soon became clear that the Conservatives had no intention of Johnson being interrogated by Andrew Neil, and instead offered to put the prime minister forward for The Andrew Marr Show, widely perceived to be a softer option. The BBC declined, publicly calling on Johnson to sit down with Neil, as the other leaders had, or had agreed to do. Meanwhile, BBC Politics put out a video of the prime minister eating a scone and commenting in his usual jocular manner about the technicalities of applying jam and cream.

Remarkably, the BBCs neglect of its public service obligations did not end there. Following a terrorist attack in London which the Conservatives shamelessly sought to politicize contrary to the explicit wishes of one of the victims family it agreed to have Johnson on The Andrew Marr Show after all. It cited the public interest to justify the U-turn while emphasizing that it would continue to urge Boris Johnson to take part in the prime-time Andrew Neil interview as other leaders have done. There were then regular reports that negotiations over the Neil interview were ongoing, but Neil himself subsequently confirmed that this was another lie. There were no negotiations.

Facing an unprecedented deluge of criticism, the BBCs Fran Unsworth wrote a piece for the Guardian affirming the BBCs commitment to political impartiality. She was, she said, as disappointed as our audiences that the prime minister, unlike all his fellow leaders, has not yet confirmed a date, explaining that the logistics of pinning down party leaders is complex.

The complacency of the apologia is quite something. The BBCs failure to secure an interview with the prime minister ahead of broadcasting politically damaging interviews with opposition leaders is a major political scandal, not a slightly unfortunate mishap. But what is more, the whole sorry episode is revealing of a systematic failing at the BBC. Here is a state broadcaster subjecting the opposition to relentless and damaging political interrogation, while seeming unable or unwilling to do the same when it comes to the government.

In her Guardian piece, Fran Unsworth argues that the BBCs critics are seizing on a couple of editorial mistakes as evidence of an editorial agenda that favors the Conservative Party, while ignoring hundreds of hours of impartial political journalism. She then goes a step further, dismissing all accusations of bias as conspiracy theory:

We are a large organization that employs thousands of independently minded journalists. Our editors employ their judgments on their own programs for their own audiences. These arent the ideal conditions for a conspiracy.

Nick Robinson, the BBCs former political editor who now presents BBC Radio 4s flagship political program, Today, shared Unsworths article on Twitter, remarking that the conspiracy theories are absurd if you give them more than a moments thought.

Where to start with this? As I recently wrote for the Guardian which I assume Unsworth will have read no one serious is suggesting that presenters and reporters take instructions from the government, or that there has been an edict from the BBC hierarchy instructing staff to undermine the Labour Party. But like any organization, the BBC has a working culture based around policies, conventions, and incentives that influences how the people who work there behave, and who is appointed or promoted to key roles. This is how all institutions work. We neednt detain ourselves explaining basic sociology to Unsworth and Robinson, however, since neither seems to see any issue with the claim that the BBC has generally upheld due impartiality across its programming, something which itself could be dismissed as a conspiracy theory on these same terms. How could a large organization employing thousands of independently minded journalists possibly ensure conformity to a shared set of editorial values and policies?

We all say silly things to try and win arguments, so lets put the obtuse remarks about conspiracy to one side and proceed on the assumption that the BBC, for all its complexity (everything involving human beings is complex), possesses a certain structure, culture, and set of policies which for better or worse give rise to certain regular patterns of reporting. In this, it is just like any other media organization, every one of which seems mysteriously to exhibit distinct reporting styles and political orientations despite being staffed with independently minded journalists.

The day before Unsworths Guardian article was published, the Media Reform Coalition an organization of which I am vice chair published an analysis of the BBCs election reporting undertaken by Justin Schlosberg, of Birkbeck College, University of London. It noted a number of areas where the BBC has failed in its impartiality obligations during this election campaign.

Schlosbergs report found that, in terms of access to broadcast media, the two main parties are broadly even, but as Unsworth notes, BBC impartiality does not rely on a stopwatch. The prominence given to different policy issues and stories tells a different story. Brexit and the economy, the two policy issues pushed by the Tories are the most prevalent in television news, ahead of health and the environment, which are key issues for Labour. This is despite the environment and the economy being of equal concern to voters, and health being considered much more important, according to polling.

Schlosberg also notes the strikingly different responses of television news to very similar stories about the Conservatives and Labour. One very revealing example is the response to the manifestos. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank given enormous prominence in the British media, produced a critical response to both parties manifestos, yet its response to Labours was covered fifteen times in the two days following its manifesto launch, compared to just once in the two days following the launch of the Tory manifesto. There were similar imbalances in television coverage of allegations of racism in both parties. Schlosberg writes:

During the first two weeks of the campaign, there were almost identical pairs of stories involving two Conservative candidates and two Labour candidates who were suspended or forced to resign over alleged antisemitic comments made on social media. We examined a sample of online coverage that included all national newspapers and broadcasters, as well as all scheduled TV bulletins and news programs on BBC One, BBC Two, ITV, Channel 4, and Sky. Surprisingly, there were a virtually equal number of headlines focused on the Labour candidates versus the Conservatives (fourteen and fifteen, respectively). But on television, the Labour candidates were three times more likely to be mentioned. And when the chief rabbi intervened by accusing Labour of harboring rampant antisemitism, it was a lead story across television news, far eclipsing a statement made on the same day by the Muslim Council of Britain, which was a scathing attack on Islamophobia in the Tory Party.

None of these findings are surprising. Previous work by Cardiff University academics noted that the BBC gave greater prominence to policy issues pushed by the Conservative Party than Labour in the 2015 election which was before the leftward shift of the party under Corbyn and earlier work led by Schlosberg has identified serious failings in the BBCs reporting on Labour since then.

During the so-called coup against Corbyn by the Parliamentary Labour Party following the 2016 EU referendum, the BBC gave critics of the Labour leader twice as much airtime as supporters an imbalance not evident on ITV News (the BBCs main commercial rival) and the issues mobilized by Corbyns critics were given much greater prominence. That research also noted the pejorative language BBC reporters used to describe Corbyn, his team, and his supporters. Research on the BBCs reporting of Labour antisemitism, meanwhile, not only revealed an overwhelming source of imbalance, but also found that the number of inaccurate and misleading statements in BBC TV News was as high as in the Sun newspaper, and far exceeded the number on ITV or Sky, the BBCs two main commercial rival.

All this research should be considered in the context of a broader body of scholarly work on the BBCs reporting, the findings of which are fairly consistent. Like other large media organizations, its routine news reporting is strongly shaped by governments and corporate interests, while its political output is overwhelmingly shaped by political elites, along with an associated clique of newspaper columnists, consultants, and pundits from think tanks (many with opaque funding). Its economics and business reporting has reflected a narrow range of elite opinion that has favored the Conservative Party and the interests they represent, and there is, moreover, some good evidence that in the years leading up to this election it has drifted further right.

I rather tire of having to review the academic evidence on the BBCs reporting, because it is always ignored by the BBCs senior journalists and executives, who seem blithely indifferent to criticism, no matter how reasoned and considered, unless it comes from the right. Rather than offering serious engagement with evidence, they prefer to issue banal and sentimental statements about the BBCs values and public purpose.

There are a number of reasons the BBC feels so secure in ignoring academic evidence. One is that ultimately it is much more concerned about criticisms that come from powerful people and institutions than from academics and left-wing activists. Another reason though is that it can point to surveys that suggest continued public trust in its reporting.

It would be complacent, however, to imagine that such data adequately captures peoples experiences or perspectives on an organization like the BBC. I was reminded of this when an interviewer from Ipsos MORI knocked on my door one afternoon in May. As a sociologist I was rather pleased to be on the receiving end of some research, and so happily agreed to answer some questions. I was then somewhat taken aback when it gradually became clear that this was a survey to assess public attitudes to the BBC. My responses to the set questions in the survey cited in the BBCs latest annual report made me appear highly supportive and trusting of the BBC. Suffice to say, this doesnt fully reflect my views on the organization.

I think it is likely there has been a shift that has been underway in public attitudes to the BBC, even before this election. Britains communications regulator Ofcom recently published a review of the BBCs news and current affairs programming, which included a report detailing workshops and in-depth interviews conducted by the accountancy firm PwC. Participants raised concerns over the impartiality of BBCs reporting on several areas including Brexit, Corbyn, and the Israel-Palestine conflict. Black British and British Muslim groups both expressed concerns about the lack of diversity at the BBC and its representation of ethnic minorities, while the latter group said they thought BBC journalism was risk averse because of its dependence on the government for funding. According to PwC, others also said they thought the BBC was less critical compared with other outlets for the same reason. One working-class respondent remarked: I trust them to give the facts, but Im less trusting that they are not biased toward the government.

Whats interesting is the extent to which these views in contrast to much of our public debates around the BBC tally with the scholarly research. Tom Burns, the sociologist who conducted the first major study of the BBC, described it as a quasi-governmental organization that has had to speak in ways acceptable, ultimately, to the political establishment. This is still the case today. The license fee which is the BBCs major source of funding is often said to offer a unique form of political independence, the argument being that the BBCs revenue comes not from general taxation, as with other state broadcasters, but directly from its audience, whom it seeks to represent. The license fee system does have the advantage that all the BBCs domestic audience is in economic terms equally important, in contrast to market-based funding systems where there are systemic pressures to target particular demographics. But it certainly does not afford the political independence that the BBCs uncritical supporters like to imagine.

What matters is not who pays, but who controls the money; and it is governments not audiences who have set the rate of the license fee. This has meant that the BBCs funding has always been highly politicized. Most recently, the Conservative Chancellor George Osborne who, almost in a parody of the incestuousness of Britains elite, was subsequently appointed editor of Londons only daily newspaper negotiated a secret deal with the BBCs director general, Lord Hall, severely cutting the corporations funding. This prompted a former chair, Christopher Bland, to warn that the BBC was drawing closer to becoming an arm of government. Sir Christopher was right to be concerned. But in reality, the BBC has always been close to being an arm of government, perpetually kept in a grey area somewhere between genuine independence and direct political control.

In recent decades, even the highly circumscribed independence that the BBC enjoyed in its Golden Age has been steadily eroded. The changes the BBC underwent in the wake of Thatcherism are a major focus of my book, The BBC: Myth of a Public Service, and so I wont recount them in much detail here, but the net effect was, in essence, a form of elite capture. Over the course of several decades, the BBC was radically restructured along neoliberal lines, with its news journalism brought much more under centralized editorial control and its program-making integrated into the market and its reporting restructured around the new economic orthodoxies.

The effect was a serious undermining of the organizations public service ethos, and the creation of a highly affluent and politicized strata of executives and senior editors, who today define the tone and content of the BBCs output.

The last charter renewal process, which took the broadcaster into its ninetieth year, only worsened matters. It introduced a change to the BBCs governance whereby government appointees are now involved in day-to-day management.

More significant though, and largely ignored in liberal commentary, was the return to the radical neoliberal managerialism of the 1990s. The BBCs current director general, Tony Hall, a key player in that early period of reform, promised the Conservatives a competition revolution at the BBC, opening up all BBC program-making to private sector competition, with a few exceptions, notably news.

The vision shared by the Conservative government and the BBCs managerial elite is of a BBC that acts as a quasi-official news service, a source of revenue and resources for private profit, as well as a prestigious British brand and distribution system that can give UK-based media companies a competitive edge in the international market. The result has been a broadcaster that remains publicly owned, and which on paper remains committed to a distinct set of public service values, but which, as we have seen in this election, is plainly not fit for purpose.

Given the BBCs record, many on the Left now hope for the abolition of the BBC. I find this to be completely understandable under the circumstances, though I consider it to be a disastrously shortsighted ambition. The problems with the BBC are severe and they are deep-seated, but they could be addressed in a way that preserves some of the positive elements of the public service tradition, allowing a modern public digital media to be built around the existing public infrastructure and resources.

Last year, a working group of the Media Reform Coalition I chaired developed a set of proposals for the radical reform of the BBC, arguing that it should become a modern, democratized public platform and network, fully representative of its audiences and completely independent of government and the market. A radically reformed BBC would have to be barely recognizable compared with its current incarnation, and we should be in no doubt that any such change would be strongly resisted by the BBC executive class.

My sense is that ultimately they much prefer the current situation where the BBCs public reputation can be managed or rather mismanaged through private negotiations in the corridors of power, where the threats to its independence are at least manageable and familiar, than the prospect of radical change and democratic accountability. Perhaps the greater barrier to effective reform, though, is that so many people on the Left will now regard the BBCs journalism as having been so obsequious in its treatment of an unscrupulous ruling party, and so negligent of its public service duties, that they see little much of worth to defend or to salvage.

Visit link:

The Last Days of the BBC? - Jacobin magazine

Pension Plans and Retirement: What Are the Real Advantages of RATP Workers? – Frenchly

Learn more

Subscribe toLe Point: get a digital subscriptionhere, or a print subscriptionhere.

Parisian transport has been largely paralyzed since Thursday, December 5. To protest against Emmanuel Macrons proposed pension reform, RATP unions have called for a renewable strike that will run parallel with the SNCF strike. The objective: to maintain the special pension system for RATP employees. Heres an overview of what theyre actually fighting for.

Advertisement

The special pension system concerns only the RATP employees in Paris and larger region employed by its EPIC (an acronym for public establishment of an industrial and commercial nature). The other employees are on private-law employment contracts and do not benefit from the employment guarantee. The staff working for RATPs subsidiaries that operate transport elsewhere in France or abroad do not benefit either.

The agents benefiting from the special pension system represent 90% of Epics staff, or 41,000 out of 45,000 people. Thus, within the RATP, there are two pension plans in place. In the same job role, there may be people in the general pension system with the determined age of retirement from the general pension system and the methods of calculating the pension from the general pension system, and other people under the special pension status, explains a source who knows the company well.

Together, the guarantee of employment and this special pension system make up the two original features of RATP statut (status), which can help explain the staffs uneasiness. It has a symbolic importance, its almost identity-based, the source points out. Unlike the SNCF, work hours and payment are not part of the RATPstatut. All these elements are negotiated by collective agreement, as in any other company. The announced abolition of the special regime is all the more troubling to the workers as it comes at a time when the companys monopoly on public transport is expected to end, starting in 2025 for buses, 2029 for trams and 2039 for the RER and metro, which will force the company to adapt to be competitive.

What does this special pension system include? First, early retirement for its beneficiaries. The age of eligibility depends on the staff category in thestatut to which the person belongs.

For bus, metro and RER drivers and those with very similar working conditions, the theoretical age of departure was 50 years old in 2017, an age that is gradually being raised at the rate of an additional four months per year until January 2022 when the age of retirement is 52 (its 50 years and 8 months in 2019).

The maintainers (mechanics for the buses, metros, trams, signaling systems, etc.) can retire at 55 years of age, an age that will rise to 57 in 2022, using the same process of adding four months per year. Together, these two categories cover 31,000 people.

Sedentary employees and members of the support functions (administrative and support) staff can retire at the age of 60. They will have to wait until 62 years in 2022, which will be in alignment with Frances general pension system.

But this does not mean that the employees actually retire at these ages of pension eligibility. Workers are subject to a reduction in pension if they retire too early, without having contributed enough years. In actuality, the average age of retirement is almost three years higher in each category. Employees must wait a certain number of years after the theoretical retirement age to leave without a reduction in their pension. Today, this period is three-and-a-half years and will gradually increase to five years by early 2022. Eventually, drivers, for example, will have to wait until 57 (52 plus five years) to retire without a reduction in pension payout and maintenance workers will have to wait until 62. (In 2019, RATP employees had to work just as many quarters as a private sector employee, i.e. 167 quarters, to receive a pension without reductions. However, the alignment is more theoretical because of the existence of the five year waiting period after the age of eligibility which allows people to retire without any deductions to their pension.)

However, the majority of employees do not retire with a full pension at full rate. This means that these employees believe that they have a sufficient enough pension to leave beforehand despite the reduction.

With the reform proposed in July by Haut-commissaire aux Retraites (high commissioner of pensions) Jean-Paul Delevoye, the age of retirement eligibility would be raised by four months per year, starting with those born in 1968 or later, for people who retire at a 57. Ultimately, the effective retirement age for a no-reduction retirement would be increased to the age of 64.

View this post on Instagram

5 dcembre 2019, 1er jour de grve et de manifestation contre la rforme des retraites, Macron et son monde. normment de monde Paris, un cortge dantesque qui s'est tal sur tout le boulevard magenta et qui regroupa hospitaliers, cheminots, enseignants, techniciens du gaz, reporter, tudiants, chmeurs, sans papiers. Desol tous ceux que j'oublie. #grevegenerale #greve #manifestation #protest #cheminots #hospitalier #reportage #nikonphoto #d3400 #photoreportage #paris #grevegeneral #5decembre

A post shared by Felix Raynal (@felixraynal) on Dec 6, 2019 at 2:44pm PST

The method of calculating the pension for RATP workers is also interesting. The pension of staff under the statut is based on ones salary during the last six months in the civil service, unlike a pension in the private sector which is based on the best 25 years of ones salary. The transition to calculating pension over the entire career period is therefore likely to reduce the pension of staff, especially since they benefit from higher-income careers. What worries employees today is the impact of the reform project on their pension level, underlines our source, who is familiar with the social climate in the company.

How much does this special pension system cost the population? Each year, pensions paid amount to about 1.2 billion. On the other hand, contributions from employees and employers reach 500 million, meeting the same level of contributing effort as the private sector. Theres a 700 million hole left, but of this amount, 350 million euros can be explained by the companys demographic structure. The net cost for the population of the special RATP systems exemption conditions, paid for by the State budget, therefore amounts to 350 million.

Its a burden that the company would not be able to assume on its own, because it only produces between 200 and 240 million operating profit per year, according to a close source. One of the challenges of the reform process is therefore to find out whether or not the State will continue to assume its budget-balancing subsidy for a transitional period, while the demographic compensation is assumed by the pension system.

The Court of Auditors had mentioned the figure of 3,705 for new retirees in 2017, but this figure is disputed. It corresponds to the average gross amount that a RATP employee who retired in 2017 can earn after a full career without any deduction (this number includes all categories of staff). The alternative figure is 2,856 euros proof that staff prefer to retire early and accept the reduction. As for the average pension of all RATP pensioners, including those who retired a long time ago, it amounts to 2,357 euros, all categories of staff combined. The replacement rate, or the amount a retiree can expect to receive monthly, is around 74% of their salary during their last 6 months.

To better justify the strike, the RATP unions advertised the reduction in pension that a worker could expect after a lifelong career using the proposed universal pension system. According to the calculations of several of the unions, the reform would automatically lead to a reduction in pensions, of around 500 euros per month for a mechanic, for example. But most agents already employed by the RATP when the new system comes into force will be entitled to a full carryover of their pension plan acquired under the old system at that time. Its therefore difficult to estimate the impact on their pensions, since the exact terms of this changeover, in particular, have not yet been defined. Nonetheless, its difficult to reassure workers in this time of change.

This article was first published on Le Point.

Subscribe toLe Point: get a digital subscriptionhere, or a print subscriptionhere.

Link:

Pension Plans and Retirement: What Are the Real Advantages of RATP Workers? - Frenchly

Race And Class In American Politics – KRWG

Commentary:Elections can be said to hold up a mirror to a society, Zoltan Hajnal writes in the introduction to his new book. The decisions made privately on ballots reflect who we are and provide indications of whether the nation is what it aspires to be.

Voter choice is a key metric informing Dangerously Divided, Hajnals look at the influence of race and class divisions in American politics from the voting booth to government.

Reading the book, I wondered whether voter behavior reflects who we are so much as how we think. Our view of ourselves and our country, as reflected in elections, may be distorted.

From a wide-ranging study of election data, Hajnal finds that voters are divided by race more than socioeconomic class, and that the racial divide is getting worse in a nation that is 60 percent white yet elects white people to approximately 90 percent of its elected offices.

Race is shown to be determinative as to which candidates win elections, which voters win at the polls, and who is on the losing end of policy.

While other dichotomies and tensions exist, race overwhelms them alland to degrees previously unreported. Hajnal also reports that people of color consistently lose more often, and his analysis of subsequent policies shows they are paying for it when it comes to governance.

Arguably, we are now more divided by race than at any other time in modern American history, Hajnal writes. Ironically, as the nation has become more diverse, it has become more divided by the diversity.

With white people on track to become a minority group while retaining so much power and privilege in society, the widening racial divide looms large and is restructuring American politics to a surprising extent.

Class and race are not mutually exclusive analyses, however, and they are not in competition. They overlap in significant ways and in service to prevailing relationships of power.

The implication of Hajnals research is that race whatever that really is matters more to voters than their class position, but does this render class irrelevant?

Michael Zweig, author of The Working Class Majority, defined classes as groups of people connected to one another, and made different from one another, by the ways they interact when producing goods and services.

Class analysis is essentially about power, including the shared interests among those who work and among those profiting from others work, as well as the larger structures of corporate power and concentrated wealth.

Racial division has a social function. White supremacy served as justification for settler colonialism, slavery and for the Jim Crow system of racial segregation that followed the formal abolition of human bondage.

Hajnal includes the modern history of how our two dominant parties honed their messages and strategies about race and immigration, but it is also necessary to acknowledge the class interests defended by Republicans and Democrats alike. Many laws and policies that distribute wealth upward in society are the products of bipartisan consensus.

A substantial chunk of the book argues that where Democrats hold majorities, legislatures spend more on health, education and other areas to heal gaps in the well-being of non-whites.

All well and good, but voters need to know, and analysts need to point out that those gaps exist within a political context.

It is hard to scrutinize bipartisan class politics if we are trained not to observe them. The same must be said of the inherent tensions between capitalism and democracy.

Dangerously divided: How race and class shape winning and losing in American politics, by Zoltan L. Hajnal. Cambridge University Press, 370 pages, $27.95 (softcover).

See the original post here:

Race And Class In American Politics - KRWG

Nic Cicutti: Why IHT needs to stay right where it is – Money Marketing

A few years ago, my wifes uncle died. A quiet, unassuming man, Uncle Tony lived alone in a house in our village, making do on a tiny pension that barely allowed him to turn on the heating a few hours a day in winter.

In every sense of the word, Uncle Tony was poor: his shirts were frayed at the collar and his meals consisted of baked beans on toast or cut-price, past-their-sell-by-date bargains from the discount aisle of Tesco. Except, when he died, those to whom he had left his sole asset the house he had lived in all his adult life discovered that, property prices being what they were in our area, his net estate was worth an amazing 750,000.

To be sure, his inheritors were required to pay a whopping 170,000 in inheritance tax. Plus, the number of those who shared out what was left was not insignificant. Even so, each of them received a lot more money than most could realistically hope to earn in several years of wage slavery.

Excessive taxation?

Tax or no tax, being left a shedload of money for doing nothing more onerous than taking Uncle Tony out for a pie and a pint once a month, or having him round for a Christmas dinner, would strike most of us as an excellent deal. Not for the Institute of Economic Affairs, apparently. In October this year, their director general, Mark Littlewood, wrote a piece in The Times newspaper about the pernicious effect of excessive taxation, not least that of IHT.

Littlewood cited the supposedly authoritative findings of a right-wing sorry, libertarian US thinktank heavily funded by the Koch brothers, which suggest that the UK is ranked a disappointing 25th out of 36 countries by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development for its international tax competitiveness. He then proposed the abolition of IHT, or raising its threshold even further.

How would this be paid for? Ever the egalitarian, Littlewood suggested it could be done by stripping away certain schemes that tend to benefit the more affluent. As an example, he told his readers: There is very little to justify the tax-free lump sum people can withdraw from their pension pot. Putting an end to that carve-out could, for example, go alongside reducing or eliminating IHT.

Lets look at this in more detail. According to HM Revenue and Customs own figures, the number of UK deaths resulting in an IHT charge during 2016-17 (the last available figures) was just over 28,000. Thats about 4.5 per cent of all UK deaths that year.

Around 5.4bn was raised in IHT in 2018-19 (those deaths have a long tail), with net estates valued at 1m or more accounting for a whopping 72 per cent of the total amount raised. The number of those 1m-plus estates represented 3 per cent of all estates requiring a grant of representation, which you apply for when you may be required to fill out an IHT form. A mere 8,820 estates made up 23 per cent of all gross assets before tax.

In effect, what Littlewood and the IEA are suggesting is that tax rules that raise a not insignificant slice of cash to pay for wider social needs such as roads, schools and hospitals, while still leaving the overwhelming majority of it in the hands of inheritors who have done nothing to earn it, be scrapped to benefit a few thousand people every year. And the people who would pay for it immediately would be the middle classes, for whom accessing some or all of their 25 per cent tax-free lump sum at retirement was always seen as a bonus for saving into a pension during their thrifty working lives.

They are being joined by millions of working-class savers who, as a result of auto-enrolment, have just started squirreling money into workplace defined contribution schemes and may wish to access some of that cash when they retire.

Never mind that the IEA is effectively asking the government to do away with one of the most powerful incentives for people to save for their retirement. Or that, for increasing numbers, that lump sum is probably one of the few occasions when retirees can afford some small luxury or pay off their last few debts when they stop work.

Change on the radar

None of this may matter if not for two interlinked factors. The first is the possibility that the Conservatives will win the general election. More concerning is the fact that the current chancellor, Sajid Javid, told the most recent Conservative Party conference: I shouldnt say too much now but I understand the arguments against that [IHT] tax.Sensible changes have already been made but its something thats on my mind.

In other words, this idea is definitely on the radar of someone with the capacity to make the change happen.

If this were to come about, it would benefit the few at the expense of the many. I cant imagine many financial advisers, even those who instinctively back the Tories in any election contest, supporting something as retrograde as this.

Nic Cicutti can be contacted atnic@inspiredmoney.co.uk

Follow him on Twitter @niccicutti

See original here:

Nic Cicutti: Why IHT needs to stay right where it is - Money Marketing