View: Women riding vehicles are busy wresting their freedom to be a person, forgetting their worst fears – Economic Times

How can you not know how to ride a bicycle? a man once asked me. What kind of a feminist are you? The kind of feminist who takes public transport! I said. I feel freest when I can get about on trains and cabs, by myself.

Many women like that. Maria, a 42-year-old senior analyst from Bengaluru, just moved jobs. People keep saying to her she must be so happy that her commute is down by an hour. Maria isnt. That hour of commute was my me-time between home and work. This leisure is writ large even in the sweaty sardine tin of the Mumbai local ladies compartment. Women chat, play video games, read, eat cheap idlis, buy hair clips, chop veggies, mend clothes, fight for space, are lost in thought or music or texting smiles. Some strategise for the spot near the door where you gaze at the horizon, hair and chunni flying, like Hema Malini, hawa ke saath saath, ghata ke sangh sangh.

I still feel awed that the Delhi Metro lets you come home late, something I never did through college, or tweet your people-watching observations.

That the citys buses allow working class women in a country where womens participation in the workforce has been steadily dropping the possibility of travelling free.

I took the DTC bus to college. I expected to be molested, although not as much as I was one day when six men did not let me get off at my stop and everyone laughed at my terror.

But I did not stop taking the bus or going to college. Those were the available choices.

Most women learned to drive as soon as they could to avoid the bus. They saved for two-wheelers and second-hand cars to resist family pressure to go everywhere accompanied because duniya is kharaab.

Angela, a young woman I knew, gave tuition to put herself through college. She walked everywhere and was always exhausted and late. Finally she saved up enough for a second-hand bicycle, fittingly called Devil.

She compensated for its missing bell by whistling to ask people to make way. Her smile became broader, her dreams bigger. Today she is an FM radio jockey. In my 2002 film Unlimited Girls, I interviewed Kanchan Gawre, Bombays first woman taxi driver. She chose to drive a taxi, to augment the family income, over homebound options of pickle- and papad-making. I love driving fast, she said, as I clutched the dashboard for support.

Look, if you want to go slow, you can take a bus, right? Greta lived on the ground floor of my tenement building, in a cloud of aata dust from dozens of chapatis.

Money from her husband in the Gulf had dwindled so she had begun making dabbas, delivering tiffins on foot.

Finally she saved enough for a moped and zoomed about precariously, vegetables hanging from the handlebar, offering me lifts which I timidly declined. Years later, I ran into her on a scooter, in sparkly gold jewellery.

Dont you look grand! I exclaimed. Yes, sweetheart, Im doing very well, she said. Greta Lambretta, as I think of her, had become Bombays only womens driving instructor for two-wheelers. Her photo album of students included grandmoms, modish teens, ladies in salwar kameez .

The male fantasy of a liberated woman on wheels is always a biker chick, grumbled a writer friend. But in truth, the abiding image of freedom are these women on two-wheelers and little cars. Whether it is the women of Puddukotai bicycling in saris, fetching water, dropping kids, going to work, or Saira Bano in a cherry-print shirt with her girl gang, singing, Main chali main chali, dekho pyaar ki gali, or women at smalltown traffic signals, covered head to toe against pollution and tanning.

Yet, for women, these measured personal freedoms, like the grudging, guilt-laden concessions of private family life and the unpredictable progress and minimisations of public life, are still a topography of watchfulness and inhibition.

In Dorothy Wenners documentary about the Mumbai ladies special train, a woman demonstrates things they must mind when boarding the train. Secure your pallu. Tuck your bag tight under your arm. Put your mangalsutra between your teeth so it cant be snatched in the melee.

I could add, squeeze every last drop of pee out before you leave home. Drink very little water till you have loo access. Wear a scarf to cover your breasts. Keep your elbows close to your body to prevent groping. Dont park in a deserted spot. Dont forget to fill petrol in case you get stranded at night. You get habituated to those wheels constantly turning in your mind, busy wresting the freedom to be a person, forgetting your worst fears.

Then one day some worst fear comes true. A young woman in Unnao is raped and burned to death. A vet in Hyderabad finds her scooter tyre punctured, is abducted, raped and killed. Uber admits it has had thousands of reports of sexual violence. You forget to forget your fear even as you persist with living your life.

Like many women who cannot drive, I frequently dream that I am driving a car or riding a bicycle. In these dreams, I am constantly, predictably, trying to escape from some predicament or save myself from some danger. After all, who else is going to?

View post:

View: Women riding vehicles are busy wresting their freedom to be a person, forgetting their worst fears - Economic Times

Noah explains why he’s ‘actually proud of Donald Trump’ in Best of Late Night – USA TODAY

Share This Story!

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

The comics analyze the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

OPINION

The comics analyze the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. Take a look, then vote for your favorite joke at usatoday.com/opinion. Eileen Rivers, USA TODAY Opinion

While it's certainly not good to become the fourth president in U.S. history to face articles of impeachment, there's a silver lining in all of this for President Donald Trump, at least according to late-night comic Trevor Noah. It's that he made it three years before the impeachment process jumped into full swing.

Take a look at today's Best of Late Night, above, to see Noah praise both Trump and an illegal driver. They have more in common than you'd think.

Crooner Harry Styles (filling in for late-night TV host James Corden) explains why the written articles of impeachment include scratch-and-sniff stickers and Seth Meyers becomes Rep. JimJordan sitting on a park bench in the middle of New York.

Trevor Noah(Photo: Brad Barket)

After you watch our favorite moments from last night's late-night lineup, vote for yours in the poll below.

Follow Eileen Rivers on Twitter @msdc14.

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/best-of-late-night/2019/12/11/trevor-noah-says-hes-actually-proud-donald-trump/4399130002/

Read the original post:

Noah explains why he's 'actually proud of Donald Trump' in Best of Late Night - USA TODAY

Fox News’ Chris Wallace Torches Donald Trump’s Attacks On The Press – HuffPost

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace has delivered a blistering assessment of President Donald Trumps repeated and sustained attacks on the press that report critically on him and his administration.

I believe that President Trump is engaged in the most direct sustained assault on freedom of the press in our history, the host of Fox News Sunday said at an event celebrating the First Amendmentat the Newseum media museum in Washington on Wednesday.

He has done everything he can to undercut the media, to try and delegitimize us, and I think his purpose is clear: to raise doubts when we report critically about him and his administration that we can be trusted, Wallace continued, per The Guardian.

Wallace also reportedly said this tweet from Trump in February 2017 said far more about him than it did about us.

Wallaces pointed criticism of Trump is in stark contrast to the praise his prime time colleagues on the widely watched conservative network including Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham often shower on the president.

On Monday, Wallace rejected the claim that the case for the impeachment of Trump over the Ukraine scandal is narrow.

The allegation that President Trump conditioned support for a key foreign policy ally on political benefit to him, strikes me as not narrow but far broader than the Clinton impeachment, he said.

Wallace last month explained why he believed it would be a terrible idea for Trump to testify in the House impeachment inquiry with an analogy about Prince Andrew and his friendship with the late financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

Read more here:

Fox News' Chris Wallace Torches Donald Trump's Attacks On The Press - HuffPost

Stocks rebound back to the highs of the day on report phase one deal is reached – CNBC

Stocks jumped on Thursday after Bloomberg News reported the U.S. reached a deal in principle with China on trade.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average traded 228 points higher, or 0.8%. The S&P 500 also gained 0.8% while the Nasdaq Compositetraded 0.6% higher. Thursday marked the first time since Nov. 27 that stocks hit record highs.At their session highs, the major averages were all up at least 1%.

Bloomberg's report also said U.S. negotiators had the terms of the so-called phase one deal ready for President Donald Trump.

Trump said in a tweet earlier in the dayboth sides were getting "VERY close to a BIG DEAL with China. They want it, and so do we!" The major indexes hit record highs following Trump's tweet.

CNBC confirmed reportsfrom earlier in the day that saidU.S. negotiators are offering to cancel new China tariffs and reduce existing levies on Chinese goods by up to 50% on $360 billion worth of imports. The latest trade news comes ahead of a key Sunday deadline.If an agreement is not reached by Sunday, additional U.S. levies on Chinese products will take effect.

Reports from Bloomberg News and The Wall Street Journal earlier in the week suggested that the U.S. could delay those additional tariffs. However, National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow said Tuesday the charges were "still on the table."

President Donald Trump

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

Caterpillar shares jumped 1.1% on Thursday while Micron Technology advanced 2.8%. The VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and the iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) both rose about 2% and hit all-time highs.

Bank stocks also got a lift as Treasury yields rose. The SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) climbed 2% and hit a 52-week high. J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup all traded at least 1.4% higher. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield advanced to 1.892% while the 2-year rate traded at 1.67%.

Stocks started December on the wrong foot as worries around U.S.-China trade relations increased. In the first two sessions of the month, the Dow lost more than 500 points.

The world's two largest economies have imposed tariffs on billions of dollars' worth of one another's goods since the start of 2018, battering financial markets and souring business and consumer sentiment.

Still, the major averages are up sharply for the year. The S&P 500 and Dow have jumped 25.9% and 20%, respectively, year to date. The Nasdaq is up around 30%.

Next year, however, should be tougher on Wall Street, CalSTRS CIO Christopher Ailman said.

"It will be choppy," Ailman told CNBC's Brian Sullivan in an interview that aired Thursday. "This is going to be another election year. Remember 2016? That was a really hard year where the market slugged it out to generate a positive return. We may have that kind of year because of all the rhetoric we're going to hear."

Weekly jobless claims jumped last week by 49,000 to 252,000, the Labor Department said. That is their highest level since the week that ended Sept. 30, 2017.

The data comes after the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady on Wednesday. The central bank also indicated it would likely not make any policy changes through at least 2020. The U.S. central bank's decision to keep borrowing costs unchanged was unanimous, following several dissents in recent meetings.

"This is as hardened a 'wait and see' stance as we have seen in many years, and is particularly striking since so many of the crucial macro issues are yet to be resolved," Michael Shaoul, chairman and CEO of Marketfield Asset Management, said in a note.

CNBC's Sam Meredith contributed to this report.

Original post:

Stocks rebound back to the highs of the day on report phase one deal is reached - CNBC

Judge rejects government’s motion to toss suit over missing Trump-Putin meeting notes – Politico

The order by McFadden, a Trump appointee, means that the lawsuit will be allowed to move forward and gives the government until Jan. 10 to say whether Pompeo complied with federal records law or show why he was not obligated to do so. Pompeo will then have until the middle of March to produce the State Departments record of evidence.

The Washington Post first reported in January that Trump had gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the details of his meetings with Putin, seizing the notes of his interpreter after the leaders first meeting in 2017 and ordering the translator not to disclose details of the discussion. Furthermore, The Post reported that no detailed record of Trumps communications with Putin existed, prompting a flurry of document requests from Congress and outside groups.

Trump and Putin have met in person multiple times, including a handful of occasions where few, if any, other U.S. officials were present. The disclosure of a lack of records came in the midst of special counsel Robert Muellers investigation into the 2016 Trump campaigns ties to Russia.

The administration has done everything it can to hide what Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump discussed in Hamburg, Austin Evers, executive director at American Oversight, said in a statement in response to Wednesdays ruling. Todays ruling is an important step to ensuring the government complied with its legal obligations.

Democracy Forwards senior counsel also cheered the order. President Trump clearly wishes to shield his interactions with foreign leaders even from those within his administration. But the law doesnt allow Secretary Pompeo to turn a blind eye to those efforts, Nitin Shah said in a statement, calling the ruling a win for government transparency and accountability.

The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.

In its motion to dismiss earlier this fall, the State Department rejected the watchdog groups characterization of the interpreter notes subject to the Federal Records Act and argued that Pompeo, who was not yet secretary at the time of several of the Trump-Putin meetings, was not obligated to recover and preserve the interpreter notes Trump took possession of.

Trumps efforts to keep under wraps the details of his conversations with other world leaders have taken on a new light in the wake of the ongoing impeachment inquiry.

As outlined in an August whistleblower complaint, the White House took the unusual step of placing a rough transcript of the July phone call between Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart, which is at the heart of the probe, in a secure server meant only for highly classified documents.

Read the rest here:

Judge rejects government's motion to toss suit over missing Trump-Putin meeting notes - Politico

Triggered by Donald Trump Jr. – The Atlantic

Its not news that our degraded politics has made truth elusive. Yet even seasoned Trump haters may be surprised at how elusive it has become for Don Jr. He recounts a well-worn story about the night of his birth.

When my mother first approached him with the idea of naming me Don Jr., he writes, my father is rumored to have said, We cant do that! What if hes a loser? Again, no idea whether my father ever really said this. Ive provided the italics for Don Jr., because the source of this often-repeated anecdote is a book called Raising Trump, which was written by his mom.

The alienation Don Jr. and his troops feel from the liberal culture that surrounds them forces them to a poignant furtiveness. They want us to know that while they live in the world that liberalism has made, they are not of it. Or so they believe. In reality they dart in and out, as convenience allows.

The liberal press is thoroughly corrupt, Don Jr. tells us, irredeemable, essentially useless except as a contrary indicator of actual fact. Meanwhile, he is careful to support a large number of his anecdotes and assertions with footnotesfootnotes that cite The Washington Post, Time magazine, USA Today, and other enemies of the people. (We modestly note that The Atlantic alone earns five footnotes.) So, too, Special Counsel Robert Muellers investigation, which was a Democratic sham from first day to last. Yet Don Jr. is adamant that any suggestions that he was involved in Russian collusion have been definitely disproved. Dont take his word for it, he says. Read the Mueller report.

Mueller, in Don Jr.s estimation, is a feeble old fool. He makes this pronouncement several sentences before he writes: I would actually like to think of this book as offering a reasoned antidote to all the hysterical bullshit thats flying around right now. That used to be called discourse.

Precisely when those good old days of discourse began, and when they came to an end, Don Jr. leaves unspecified, but a revealing, and by now legendary, moment in this regard came early on in his promotional tour for Triggered. He and his girlfriend, a former mid-list Fox News personality named Kimberly Guilfoyle, submitted to an interrogation with the hosts of ABCs The View. Trump held his own and managed to rassle the contest to a draw.

Conor Friedersdorf: Why the trolls booed at Don Jr.s event

We should stipulate that as an intellectual exercise, a guest turn on The View, confronting the combined exertions of Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, and Meghan McCain, is not exactly a dissertation defense at the Sorbonne. We are not talking about a graduate seminar with Stephen Hawking. What young Trump proved was that he could easily meet the hosts on their own level, bearing the same contempt for them that they held for him. When they brought up unflattering episodes from his fathers life, he brought up unflattering episodes from theirs. When they interrupted him, he interrupted their interruptions. When they got loud, he got louder.

See original here:

Triggered by Donald Trump Jr. - The Atlantic

Donald Trump Is Bad for the Jews – The New York Times

Back to the question of what makes U.S. Jews politically different. Much of the answer is historical memory. Most of us, I think, know that whenever bigotry runs free, were likely to be among its victims.

The Trump administration is, beyond any reasonable doubt, an anti-democratic, white nationalist regime. And while it is not (yet) explicitly anti-Semitic, many of its allies are: Jews will not replace us chanted the very fine people carrying torches in Charlottesville, Va. You have to be willfully ignorant of the past not to know where all this leads. Indeed, its happening already: anti-Semitic incidents have soared (and my hate mail has gotten interesting).

Jews arent the only people who have figured this out. Many Asian-American voters used to support Republicans, but the group is now overwhelmingly Democratic. Indian-Americans, in particular, are like American Jews: a high-income, high-education group that votes Democratic by large margins, presumably because many of its members also realize where white nationalism will take us.

In all of this, Republicans not just Trump, but his whole party are reaping what they sowed. Their strategy for decades has been to win votes from working-class whites, despite an anti-worker agenda, by appealing to racial resentment. Trump has just made that racial appeal cruder and louder. And one has to admit that this strategy has been quite successful.

But it takes, well, chutzpah, a truly striking level of contempt for your audience, to foment hatred-laced identity politics, then turn to members of minority groups and say, in effect, Ignore the bigotry and look at the taxes youre saving!

And some of the audience deserves that contempt. As I said, people are pretty much the same whatever their background. There are wealthy Jews who are sufficiently shortsighted, ignorant or arrogant enough to imagine that they can continue to prosper under a white nationalist government.

But most of my ethnic group, I believe, understands that Trump is bad for the Jews, whatever tax bracket we happen to be in.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

See original here:

Donald Trump Is Bad for the Jews - The New York Times

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin on impeachment: ‘Donald Trump, in a way, has already won’ – Washington Examiner

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin acknowledged that President Trump is landing some victories as the impeachment process continues in the House.

On Thursday, the House Judiciary Committee debated the two articles of impeachment filed against Trump. House Democrats believe Trump abused his power and obstructed justice in connection to his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

During a recess, Toobin offered his analysis on the situation and revealed that Trump had several wins throughout the hearing. He noted that Republicans on the committee had successfully pivoted the conversation away from impeachment and toward Trumps defense, especially when it came to discussing Hunter Biden and possible corruption with Burisma Holdings.

What struck me about this hearing was how Donald Trump, in a way, has already won, said Toobin. How much did we hear about Hunter Biden? Over and over again, about Hunter Biden. Thats what the Republicans are talking about constantly.

He added, There are questions about Hunter Bidens behavior, and so, I mean, this incredible shift of emphasis.

Toobin claimed it would be difficult for journalists to focus on impeachment while covering the topics being discussed by Republicans. He explained, I just dont know what our responsibility is as journalists because its not the point, but this is the news. And this is whats there.

During the phone call that is now the cornerstone for impeachment, Trump asked Zelensky to look into Bidens high-paying board position at Burisma. Republicans have claimed he was justified in doing so because of Bidens controversial past.

[Read more: CNN's Jeffrey Toobin: Barr is 'a Fox News bot']

Link:

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin on impeachment: 'Donald Trump, in a way, has already won' - Washington Examiner

‘Trump changed everything’: Big cities break hard left in Dem primary – POLITICO

But not all of the shift can be explained by newly elected Democrats. Michael Gianaris, the New York Senate deputy majority leader who represents western Queens, raised eyebrows in local political circles when he backed Sanders this year after endorsing Clinton in 2016.

The election of Donald Trump changed everything for a lot of us, he said. The best way to defeat a troublesome zealot like that is to make the strongest case for dramatic change, and I think Bernie Sanders does that.

In Philadelphia, Kenney, who began his political career as a moderate, has fully embraced the progressive agenda in recent years, making it unlikely that he would have endorsed a centrist. The left is so energized here that even Krasner, a progressive darling across the nation, faced backlash from Sanders supporters in the city after he sided with Warren.

Youre watching an election cycle in which presidential candidates have reason to want the endorsements of big-city progressive D.A.s because theyre having to answer questions at debates like, Do you think people who are actually incarcerated should vote?' said Krasner. Thats not even a question you would have heard eight years ago."

The lack of a dominant establishment frontrunner in the primary also means there is little political debt to pay off for some city officials and more room to support a progressive if they so wish. In 2016, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio backed Clinton, whose first Senate campaign he managed, though, to her teams chagrin, he couldnt help but speak positively about Sanders. De Blasio has yet to endorse a candidate after dropping out of the presidential race himself in September, but his heart is very much with Bernie and Warren, according to a former aide.

The shifting political climate has, to some degree, created a new class of powerbrokers. Before he announced that he was backing Warren, Krasner said six presidential contenders contacted him in person or over the phone. While she was courting the Working Families Party, Warren threw her weight behind a long-shot, left-wing Philadelphia council candidate, Kendra Brooks, who was bucking the entrenched local Democratic Party and running on the groups ticket. (Brooks won in November.) Sanders has visited the city to protest the closure of a hospital and attend a summit held by the Philadelphia AFL-CIO.

Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have been very willing to involve themselves in local issues. Thats unusual, said Larry Ceisler, a longtime Philadelphia political observer working in public relations. In past elections, it was only the mayor who presidential candidates would call and say, How about an endorsement?

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot. | Scott Olson/Getty Images

Democratic operatives and elected officials in Philly said Warrens aides in particular have made an aggressive play for endorsements. They courted me more than any other campaign, said Isaiah Thomas, one of the soon-to-be council members backing Warren. They called me. They met with me. We talked about issues. They gave me the opportunities to communicate my opinion.

While there has been a steady shift to the left in many cities, moderate Democrats are far from dead in them: In Philadelphia, U.S. Reps. Dwight Evans and Brendan Boyle both gave nods to Joe Biden, who has close ties to Philadelphia. Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who hasnt endorsed a presidential candidate yet, isnt typically swayed by the left wing of the Democratic Party as the progressives on the city council can attest. She has butted heads with them since she took office in a landslide earlier this year.

Mayor Lightfoot has proved to be the opposite of a politician who makes a move based on which way the wind blows, said Chicago-based campaign veteran and communications consultant Becky Carroll, who worked on Barack Obama and Al Gores campaigns.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, who backed Clinton in the 2016 primary and looked hard at a presidential bid himself in 2020, has not yet endorsed a candidate. In December, he flew to Iowa to participate in a forum he helped put together in which mayors interviewed some of the presidential contenders. He has personal relationships with several of them, according to his aides.

Hes a friend of Mayor Buttigiegs. He and Cory Booker were Rhodes Scholars together. Hes done a lot of things with Mayor Bloomberg, and has a great relationship with Vice President Biden, said Bill Carrick, a political consultant for Garcetti.

A Garcetti adviser said he has also met privately with Sanders had a really good meeting, in fact and Warren. The person said he will likely endorse a candidate before Super Tuesday, when California goes to the polls.

In this era, progressives are bullish on their chances of winning over more urban politicos like him and hopeful of putting an end to the practice of transactional presidential endorsements.

The reason big-city elected officials are backing progressives is because when you are in a large city, you realize the incredible need for massive government solutions, said Monica Klein, a New York City-based progressive consultant. You need a police department with 37,000 officers. You need a million tons of salt when it snows.

Shia Kapos contributed to this report.

See the original post:

'Trump changed everything': Big cities break hard left in Dem primary - POLITICO

Pennsylvania And America Need 4 More Years Of President Donald Trump In The White House: VP Mike Pence Talks Reelection And Impeachment Inquiry During…

BEAVER COUNTY (KDKA) Vice President Mike Pence shared his feelings about the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump during a visit to Beaver County.

Vice President Pence made a stop at VFW Post 128 in Rochester on Tuesday morning and was greeted by a crowd of 250 veterans.

The stop at the VFW came as the U.S. House of Representatives moves forward on articles of impeachment against Trump.

(Photo Credit: KDKA)

Whats happening in Washington, DC today is a disgrace, Pence said. Its nothing short of a partisan impeachment. But men and women of Pennsylvania, were still winning.

In 2016, the Trump-Pence ticket carried Beaver County by 18 1/2 points, and Vice President Pence wasted no time asking for continued support in 2020.

Im here for one reason and one reason only. Pennsylvania and America need four more years of President Donald Trump in the White House, Pence told the crowd.

From the VFW post, Pence started a bus tour to Hershey, where he joined President Trump at a rally on Tuesday night.

Pences first stop on the bus tour was an unannounced visit to a local restaurant.

Vice President Pence chatted with patrons and posed for pictures.

WATCH: KDKAs Jon Delano Reports On Vice President Mike Pences Visit To Beaver County.

I was very, very surprised. Hes a special man. He really is, said Virginia Mihalik of Raccoon after meeting Pence.

This visit of Vice President Pence to Kings Family Restaurant in Monaca was certainly a surprise, not only to the folks who were eating here, but even to the staff as well.

Kings server Heather Hinzman had a bit of a heads up.

Hinzman: Yesterday, I waited on two gentleman and they told me they were coming in with a party of about 20 people for tomorrow. But it was just for a group of people. They didnt tell me exactly who was coming, so we had a nice surprise today.

Delano: They didnt tell you it was the vice president and a bunch of reporters?

Hinzman: They did not. They told me it was a bunch of foreigners.

Hinzman said the gentleman apologized for lying to her, but she was not upset, saying she had a good chat with Pence.

The visit to the restaurant was a real surprise to most.

All of a sudden, I was blown away, seeing all these police officers, said Sindy Diaz of Greensburg.

Customers were taken by surprise when Pence starting working the tables.

When someone told us, I was, this cant be real . . . such an honor, noted Diaz.

WATCH: KDKAs Jon Delano Reports On Vice President Mike Pences Visit To Beaver County.

When Pence dropped by her table, Heather Cordial told him shes been in the Air Force Reserves for 21 years.

He gave me his Vice President coin, which is super awesome. He was such a nice, down to earth man, and I couldnt be happier to have met him and have his coin.

But before chatting up and taking selfies with the crowd at Kings, the vice president gave more formal remarks 10 minutes away at a VFW post in Rochester.

Noting Pennsylvanias importance for reelection, Pence recalled that every time a state win came in back in 2016, Trump hit Pence on the shoulder.

Seriously, hes going boom North Carolina great, good boom. But Im telling you when Pennsylvania came in, he almost knocked me over.

The Presidents frequent visits to this region including two in recent months to the Shell cracker plant and a Marcellus shale conference along with Pences visit, add up to this request.

Let your voice be heard.

All the good that is happening in Pennsylvania and across this country and how much more we can do with four more years with President Donald Trump in the White House, Pence said.

(Photo Credit: KDKA)

See original here:

Pennsylvania And America Need 4 More Years Of President Donald Trump In The White House: VP Mike Pence Talks Reelection And Impeachment Inquiry During...

Donald Trump Jr. Shares Bonkers Meme Of His Dad That Could Terrify The President – HuffPost

But his latest one could terrify the president.

President Donald Trumps eldest son on Monday posted a doctored picture of his dad shirtless, and with a shark on his shoulders to Instagram.

It was an attack on the impeachment inquiry into Trump over the Ukraine scandal. However, former porn star Stormy Daniels has claimed Trump (with who she reportedly had an affair) is terrified of sharks.

Haters will say its fake, read the caption on the edited snap.

Ive heard from the same reliable sources that the Democrats have used during their sham impeachment inquiry that this is in fact very real, wrote Trump Jr.

The image appears to have emanated from this 2003 WWE SummerSlam commercial starring wrestler Brock Lesnar:

Trump Jr. has previously shared a Pornhub-style meme of his father:

Trump as a Christmas ornament:

Original post:

Donald Trump Jr. Shares Bonkers Meme Of His Dad That Could Terrify The President - HuffPost

Philippines eyes fitting end to best SEA Games performance ever – Sports Interactive Network Philippines

NEW CLARK CITY - It appears Team Philippines is saving its best for last.

The gold machine continues to grind for the host, who garnered 22 more on Monday for a new record high output in the Southeast Asian Games.

The contact sports of boxing and jui-jitsi provided almost half of the gold haul in the penultimate day of competitions in this 30th edition of the biggest Games ever.

World women's champion Nesthy Petecio stood at the forefront of the Filipino pugs' seven-gold romp while petite martial artist Meggie Ochoa, another world champion, bannered a three-gold at the start of jiu-jitsu's maiden stint in the biennal meet.

As the smoke of battle cleared, the Filipinos' hiked its record total to 137 gold medals - the most the country ever had since it started competing in the regional Games in 1977.

PHOTO: Jerome Ascano

Continue reading below

The host also has also breached the 100-medal barrier in silver (102) and bronze (106) medals, making this overall championship a lot sweeter and memorable to the one first it had in 2005.

And the ending to the Filipinos most productive campaign ever could become even more unforgetable with breakthrough gold medals in women's basketball and men's volleyball, both of which will be gunning for history on Tuesday.

PHOTO: Edward Solo

Continue reading below

Giving a last-minute thrill as the Games wind down to its final hours is the tight three-way battle for second place among Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia.

The Thais have suddenly surged to second belatedly as it may, sparked by victories in athletics, boxing, and other contact sports that brought their medal total at 84 golds, 90 silvers, and 101 bronzes.

PHOTO: Marlo Cueto

Continue reading below

Just five golds behind are the Vietnamese at third with a 79-78-93 tally.

The Indons have fallen to fourth place with 69 golds, 76 silvers, and 102 bronzes, but remain very much capable of pulling surprises and challenge the Thais and Vietnamese for second place.

In a late development that warmed the hearts, Timor Leste finally bagged a silver medal courtesy of taekwondo while hiking its bronze medal tally to five.

Continue reading below

Visit link:

Philippines eyes fitting end to best SEA Games performance ever - Sports Interactive Network Philippines

Unmasking the Alt-Right: Real-World Implications of a Virtual Movement – The McGill International Review

The first article in this series discussed the psychology behind alt-right radicalization onlinewho is most vulnerable to extremist indoctrination, the risk factors correlated with such vulnerability, and the forms that the process of radicalization can take. Now, the next question to be asked concerns the actual implications and dangers of online alt-right extremist movements and their recruitment efforts. We have seen too often that radicalization in the virtual world can lead to real-world violence; we have seen terrible acts of mass violence that have been connected with members of the alt-right online, such as in Christchurch and El Paso. But are these acts of violence the only dangers posed by the activities of the alt-right online? The second part of this series will explore whether, in a hypothetical world devoid of the tragedy of alt-right violence, the virtual activities of the alt-right would still have real-world implications.

There is a tendency in alt-right activity to weave dark humour into online content, meaning that the rest of us often struggle to distinguish between honestly-held, hateful beliefs and ironically-presented hate speech. A leaked style guide from a neo-Nazi site proves that this is actually a tactic of the alt-right in some cases: The unindoctrinated should not be able to tell if we are joking or not.Anonymous imageboards like 4chan are not dedicated to any specific ideology, which makes it especially difficult to determine whether or not users actually believe the appalling things they are writing, or whether it is all part of some sort of ironic, competitive game to see who can say the most abhorrent thing, or share the most despicable, hateful meme.

The first article in this seriesdiscussed the dangers of anonymous-poster imageboards like 4chan. This danger stems from the power such sites have to provide exposure to alt-right content and to engender a link between violence, hate, and commonplace humour in peoples minds. Inherent to the structure of 4chan itself is a tendency to provide gateway content to extremist discoursewith a single click, users can be taken from one thread discussing video games or current events to another thread full of hate-ridden rants against minorities and women. 4chan users near-ubiquitous use of darkly ironic humour with regard to almost any subject means that terroristic violence, hate crimes, and bigotry are talked about in such a way thatmake people laugh and belittle their importance. This creates a link between toxic content and humour: people find themselves amusedby hateful thoughtswhether they accept them or notmaking hate speech appear more readily acceptable and less harmful.

Dr. Ghayda Hassan is the founder and director of the Canada Practitioners Network for the Prevention of Radicalization and Extremist Violence (CPN-PREV) and a UNESCO co-chair on Prevention of Violence Radicalization and Extremist Violence. She gives credence to the idea that, in certain cases, users of sites like 4chan may be participating in a collective exorcism of hate-feelings which they dont actually accept. That is, people may congregate online and express feelings of hatred which they neither accept, nor believe; indeed, they may even appear to advocate hate crimes, without actually subscribing to any part of what they are saying.

We all have hate-feelings, says Hassanhaving hate-feelings is part of being human. Neither acceptingnor acting on these very human feelings, however, isnatural, andboth can lead to discourse and actions which the majority of us would consider utterly inhumane. Normally, says Hassan, we have positive social spaces in which we can experience and express our feelings of hate without it meaning that we actually want to destroy the target of our hate. The danger comes when these constructive spaces are replaced by unmediated online platforms where real-world regulatory processes no longer exist. In the real-world, people around us react to our expressions of hate and help us to understand hate-feelings and how to deal with them in a healthy way. Online, however, anyone can say anything anonymously, and there isnt always a constructive reaction or discussion that follows in order to help somebody work through their hate-feelings in a positive way, explains Hassan.

There is the obvious concern that online alt-right content and recruitment efforts will generate more hate and inspire more radicalization, or at least expose more people to extremist ideologies than would be the case without this virtual outlet. While this may be the case, expressing hate-feelings online, even without mediation to help you interpret and dismiss them, doesnt mean that an individual will act on those feelings in real life, says Hassan.Although the risk is certainly greaterwith the lack of divide that once existed between the virtual world and the real world, activities in the virtual space can bleed into the real world, desensitizing people to violence and prejudice, and normalizing expressions of hate.

Dr. Hassan points out that, while there is certainly no guarantee of social upheaval in the foreseeable future, a look at history shows us that increased polarization of the population and increased hate around otherness can contribute to civil conflict. Thus, radicalism and expressions of hate speech that occur in the unmediated arena of the Internet have the potential to increase hatred towards others. Previous wars have all been accompanied by highly de-humanizing discourse, she continues, and we are definitely preparing the social space for a more tense relationship that, [in the] long-term, may lead to civil unrest or disruption.

Carrie Rentschler, an Associate Professor of Communications Studies at McGill University, focuses on social movements and media activism. She points to online hate-speech and the alt-rights tactics of doxxingas well as rape- and death-threats as culprits in the creation of an intense culture of fear. In such a culture, people, particularly women, are afraid to speak out against hate and condemn the alt-right for fear of retaliation against themselves or those they are close to. Whether or not rape- and death-threats are realized, the fear of that realization is often enough to shut down would-be vocal opponents of the alt-right. The very threats made by radicals online are harmful, says Rentschler; whether it is carried out or not, the threat itself says you are not safe.

Examining the practice of doxxing gives us a better understanding of just how scared targeted individuals can be. Doxxing is an attempt to stop the target from participating in a certain kind of discourse, engaging with a particular cause, or challenging a specific group or ideology online. Doxxers destroy an individuals privacy and anonymity online in an attempt tolegitimize their threats and make the target feel exposed, vulnerable, and afraid. Doxxers will reveal the real name, occupation, face, and even address about loved ones of the targeted individual. By frightening and shaming their opponents into silence, doxxers create a culture of fear wherein people are threatened away from voicing their opinions. It is a tactic used by both the alt-right and their opponents, and hasunfortunately become increasingly mainstream.

Rentschler explains that when people are afraid to challenge hateful ideologies for fear of harm being done to them or their families, our society becomes one in which the hate-mongersare empowered because there are fewer and fewer voices to counter hateful, radical ideas. Rational discourse and debate can no longer take place when too many people are frightened into silence, andhate-speech is made dangerously prominent and powerful in such a society.

Online hate speech has the potential to indoctrinate non-radicals into extremist ideologies, normalize certain kinds of violent or discriminatory discourse, desensitize people to the idea of viewing of even committing acts of violence, and create a society in which people are afraid to stand up and speak out against hatred and violence. Knowing all this, one might ask: what steps can we as a society take to combat the powerful effects of online extremism, and to protect ourselves from its influence in the real world?

Rentschler emphasizes the importance of de-platforming, moderation, and holding people to higher standards on internet platforms. There is promising evidence that banning users who share hateful and extremist content on social media platforms is an effective way to reduce the amount of hate speech that is shared. Holding people to particular standards online is essential, says Rentschler, but currently, there is very little in place to stop online hate speech and harassment. Likes, popularity votes, and upvotes are key to the proliferation of extremism online, Rentschler explains; the more popular content is, the more available and accessible it is made. This means that the more likes an alt-right post receives, the more mainstream exposure it might be given.

In terms of developing a solution to mitigate dangerous online activity, while some might think that it would be easier to discuss and challenge toxic ideas through free debate so as to prevent their normalization and acceptance into mainstream society.However, when asked, Rentschler was more skeptical: Im not sure that the fact that its out there means were discussing it and debating it, says Rentschler; unless were actively and constantly challenging such speech, its relative prominence might do far more harm than good.

And what about free speech? Isnt it important that we defend the right of even the most bigoted extremist to freely express themselves, even if what they say is abhorrent? Rentschler points out that at a certain point, the right to free speech of the alt-right infringes on that same right of those who would stand up against them, exemplified in part by the effectiveness of doxxing and similar practices. Theres an important question to be asked, she saysWho cant speak, out of fear of harassment and harm? We might champion free speech as a pillar of what makes ours a free and safe society, but when it comes to online extremism and the very clearconcerns it poses in the real world, the issue is far from black and white.

Featured imageflat screen computer monitors on table photobyKaur KristjanonUnsplash.

More here:

Unmasking the Alt-Right: Real-World Implications of a Virtual Movement - The McGill International Review

How to Fight the Alt-Right Online in 2020 – Houston Press

The reason that the Russian attack on the 2016 election worked so effectively is because of the way that the internet abhors moderation. From massive waves of false information spread virally on Facebook to the dark web corners where QAnon was born, the hands-off ideology allowed fascism and the alt-right to, in their own words, meme a president into office. Its not the only reason that Donald Trump sits in the Oval Office, but it is a massive factor that cannot be overstated. If we want 2020 and politics beyond to be different, we have to begin the process of cleaning the radiation off the wasteland of the internet.

The question is: how do we do that? With Kamala Harris out of the race, the Democrats seem to have lost the only candidate who wished to tackle online hate speech and fake news as a major issue, maybe because Harris was the candidate who drew so much of it herself that an entire sub-culture grew just to debunk it. That means that whatever happens will have to be because of pressure that the people put on the next leader, whoever she may be.

But its not an easy thing. Even as someone who never misses an episode of Ian Danskins Alt-Right Playbook I can tell you that as hard as it is to understand the alt-right, knowing how to combat them is even more difficult. I spent a little time in my own head and talking with experts, and here is what I can propose for the coming year.

First, if you are dealing with an individual that you actually know such as a family member and close friend, you might be able to deprogram them after a lot of time and effort. Deprogram might seem like a loaded word, but as Danskin points out in How to Radicalize a Normie and the Endnote video supplement, many aspects of the alt-right and QAnon especially are essentially cult-like and will require dedication to combat. Much like how many people do not want to admit a substance use problem in the house, the desire to play down alt-right radicalization of a loved one as merely a difference of opinion is strong.

Most of us are not licensed counselors, and the idea of kidnapping someone to deprogram them went out of vogue in the 1970s. As a person who wants to help, its important to forge a relationship with the affected party by connecting with them through other things like mutual interests. In-person hate group participation dropped dramatically in 2013 as white nationalists and other reactionaries realized that a decentralized, leaderless movement housed on message boards and other spaces would keep them from falling prey to the usual state controls that ended previous groups. One year later, Gamergate happened as a test of the theory with pleasing results to hateful bigots, and it's now become the standard. In-person groups still exist, and there is a lot of overlap, but its this approach that led to things like 8chan becoming a place that has been directly linked to multiple murders.

Opposition to the things your affected loved one says will only reinforce their problems. As a general guide, its best to either steer them away from those topics of conversation and onto things that belong to the two of you instead of the alt-right. If they insist on engaging, ask questions calmly and non-judgmentally without trying to debunk. The alt-right deals in memetic content and in-jokes as an isolation mechanism. Forcing people to articulate why a pizzeria is secretly a child sex ring run by Hillary Clinton often makes them realize how stupid it sounds. If youre very patient and very lucky, you might be able to eventually nudge them into counseling and get your loved one back.

Thats unfortunately the only way to fight this as individuals, but what about as a society? Thats even harder, and it will require a lot of activism.

The primary opposition right how is will. Companies like Facebook simply feel no need to tackle the issue, and with 8chan the current owner is mostly immune to financial repercussions (8chan has never made any money) and legal ones (owner Jim Watkins currently lives in the Philippines so good luck serving a subpoena). On top of that is Americas fervent dedication to an absolutist interpretation of free speech despite the fact that American fascists and hate groups have consistently reframed the argument about what they say as an attack on their right to say it. The average American is for free speech, with no desire to look at the fine print of the matter.

Because of that, I wouldnt start trying to jail Mark Zuckerberg over not fighting hate speech or fake news too much. Even if you take on people much further down the food chain such as Mark Meechan (Count Dankula) who taught his dog to give a Nazi salute when asked "Do you wanna gas the Jews?" you often end up starting a giant backlash that empowers people who use free speech arguments to protect white nationalism. As a Gamergate target myself, it is frustrating that there seems to be little to no legal repercussion for the online hate mobs, but often the case is that its just practically more harm than its worth to prosecute even when laws are broken.

Nonetheless, these companies can be influenced by the free market to change and it is probably the best path forward. Twitter, for example, has taken a much harder line against white supremacy content after years of being bashed for allowing it to thrive. Reddit as well has cleaned up its act considerably, recognizing that the constant bad press for being home to so many racists was hurting its image. They are far more careful about banning boards or quarantining sub-reddits. Its definitely a step in the right direction, small as it may seem to people who still get attacked through the sites.

8chan is currently down because even though its hard to hit Watkins for his work personally, the people who have to host the site increasingly want nothing to do with it. Storm Front as well, the traditional home of neo-Nazis online, has found it much harder to find a home for their brand of rancid mayonnaise. All of that comes from pressure on the people who control where the platforms are hosted. These are conservative companies that generally dont want any trouble, and they have every right to tell a client no thank you without raising the specter of official censorship.

Companies like PayPal, Patreon, and Venmo are also susceptible to pressure. Groups like the Proud Boys and people like Milo Yiannopoulos have systematically found themselves ousted from platforms that enable them to raise money for hateful causes. As their reach declines, so does their influence. Fighting hate by going after their servers and payment sources has been a proven tactic over the last couple of years. It should continue in earnest.

Legislation has a place as well as a way to put public pressure on companies. Its a bit early to see if grilling by members of Congress like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will have much of an effect on Facebook, but its a start. One law I would personally like to see is something mandating a certain amount of human moderators per number of users, and also mandating they be regionally distributed wisely. Non-English speakers should not be the primary moderators of American content, for instance.

Its important to understand that companies like Facebook are perfectly capable of fixing a good chunk of the problem. They simply dont want to. There is this idea that all this can be solved with a better algorithm to automatically shut down hate speech. Algorithms have their place. Facebook launched a great one after the Christchurch shooting to take down content. That said, there is no substitution for human oversight as any woman who reacted to a rape threat with men are trash and ended up with a suspended account will tell you. I landed in Facebook jail for a week over sharing this with a text description for the blind. We need people, not cost-saving bots.

Theres this misconception that we can improve technology to deal with the alt-right and hate speech. While monitoring bots can get better, they only care about what we teach them and they do not contextualize adequately. Well build a machine that can beat nearly anyone at chess but well probably never build one that can beat hardly anyone at Dungeons and Dragons. There must be an increased human presence on the ground that has adequate incentive to fight the problem. A corps of workers in this country who have the human capacity to understand the problems and the ability to fight it, will change the argument in ways that mindless machines built to replace human thought never will.

We have to care if anything is going to be done because left to their own devices companies will just do whatever is profitable no matter the risk to everyone else. Make no mistake, the rise of the alt-right and the new fascist movement in America is big, powerful, and mostly operating un-checked right now. These spaces have already bred multiple killers. And they continue to empower far-right interests by inundating our public consciousness with hate and falsehoods. Its not censorship to demand that lies be treated like lies and its not the death of free speech if Nazis arent allowed to have a 100,000-member Facebook group.

But it will only stop if we start to agree that there is a problem and demand that people who can make a difference do so. The loved ones in your life who have been led astray by toxic online communities deserve and need your compassion to be free of them. The corporations that make millions off these highly-engaged groups and the radical right politicians who benefit from fake news and hate speech do not. They must be pressured into doing something about it with every tool we have at our disposal as a democracy and a free market. If a large enough shift occurs, it will become the new, less-hateful normal.

And that is poor ground to grow the next fascist leader in.

Jef Rouner is a contributing writer who covers politics, pop culture, social justice, video games, and online behavior. He is often a professional annoyance to the ignorant and hurtful.

Read the original:

How to Fight the Alt-Right Online in 2020 - Houston Press

The Internet Is Coming to Taylor Swift’s Defense After an Alt-Right Troll Tweeted About Her Egg Count – Yahoo Lifestyle

Taylor Swift fans are fervent, sure, but nothing truly brings a community together like a man whittling a successful woman down to her reproductive parts.

On Monday night, far-right Canadian Youtuber known for his promotion of scientific racism and eugenics," according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, wrote, I cant believe Taylor Swift is about to turn 30 she still looks so young! Its strange to think that 90% of her eggs are already gone 97% by the time she turns 40 so I hope she thinks about having kids before its too late! Shed be a fun mom. :).

Understandably, the Twitter factions rioted in the comments. And, let me tell you, the burns were sick.

RELATED: Why Taylor Swift Said Demi Moore's Memoir Was One of Her Favorite Books of 2019

Honestly, if you somehow cant come to your own realization that posting about a womans egg count is a bad and very gross idea, maybe consider the fallout?

Excerpt from:

The Internet Is Coming to Taylor Swift's Defense After an Alt-Right Troll Tweeted About Her Egg Count - Yahoo Lifestyle

Michelle Malkin Appears on White Nationalist YouTube Show – Right Wing Watch

Michelle Malkin appeared on the YouTube channel of prominent white nationalist content creator Vincent James on Tuesday, where she applauded young alt-right supporters for having come to the epiphanies that for me took a long time in the making.

It appears that Malkin, after becoming a pariah among mainstream conservatives, has decided to lean into her support among the far-right.

Writers and members of the mainstream GOP began distancing themselves from Malkin after she explicitly endorsed anti-Semitic and white nationalist YouTube political personality Nicholas Fuentes in a speech at UCLA in November. Subsequently, Young Americas Foundation cut ties with Malkin. Washington Examiners Tiana Lowe chided Malkin for affiliating with racists because [Malkin] sees them as the most potent allies available to back a militantly xenophobic agenda. Jonathan S. Tobin wrote in the New York Post that Malkin thinks these haters are allies in a crusade to halt all non-European immigration (ironic, since Malkins parents were Filipino immigrants).

Malkin said she met Vincent James, who also goes by the pseudonyms of Vincent Foxx and Vincent James OConnor, at the UCLA event, adding that it was excellent to make that connection. James is a far-right YouTube political entertainer who often pushes white nationalist and conspiratorial content and was spotted perusing the perimeter of the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference with Fuentes.

During her 42-minute interview with James, Malkin said her recent embrace of the self-described groyper alt-right made sense to her because it was in line with the type of politics she had been trying to engage in for the last 25 years.

I feel like theres a good synergy and partnership here because thats the work that Ive been trying to do for 25 plus years. Its been frustrating because so many people dont care. And so, when I see a glimpse, a glimmer of a spark of energy and hope and optimism, yeah, hell yeah, Im going to run to that, Malkin said. Thats what I did.

Earlier in the interview, James had vouched for Malkin to the groyper crowd, which recently co-opted Trumps America First slogan to brand its latest efforts.

I cant stress this enough. Michelle Malkin supports America First. Michelle Malkin tells the truth. Michelle Malkin is standing up against the conservative establishment, James said.

In one portion of the duos conversation, James asked Malkin to stop him when one of the following policy proposals sounded white nationalist: an immigration moratorium for at least 10 years, prosecuting employers who hire undocumented immigrants, banning welfare for undocumented immigrants, and requiring high school students visit a third-world country so that they see how great they have it here.

Malkin did not stop him.

Malkin alleged that conservatives know and believe that demographic changes in the United States could negatively affect them, but says they dont talk about it publicly for monetary reasons. (Malkin does not seem to consider the possibility that conservatives could try appealing to immigrants instead.) Malkin also praised America First activists who hung a banner over a bridge in Virginia that featured a design scheme remarkably similar to the one used by American Identity Movement, the rebranded white nationalist group Identity Evropa.

During his interview with Malkin, James scrolled through her Twitter profile and revealed that he is the operator of The Red Elephants Fan Account on Twitter. James has been banned from Twitter before, and banned users often pose as fan accounts to gain access back onto the platform.

James has appeared on a neo-Nazi podcast and was filmed in 2017 asking members of Rise Above Movement, a violent white supremacist group, to recite the white supremacist slogan 14 Words on camera. Members of that white supremacist group have since faced federal charges for engaging in violence at the 2017 Unite the Right white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The same year, James blamed Jews for social media bans, saying that the people responsible for fact-checking articles on Facebook were very similar in DNA to [Facebook COO] Sheryl Sandberg, who is Jewish. James once kept a Holocaust denier on his payroll who later ran the failed Senate campaign of neo-Nazi Patrick Little.

As Right Wing Watch reported in 2018, James uses his platform tohostprominentwhite nationalistspeakers and sympathizers,bolstersuch white nationalist organizations as Identity Evropa,stokeracist fears about immigrants,advancerace war narratives, andspeakto aggrieved white people at-large. Last year, James dedicated one video to arguing that the Trump administration should not hire black people and especially not black women.

James denies having ever advocated for anti-immigrant, white nationalist, or anti-Semitic ideas, claiming such accusations are a tactic of communists.

Excerpt from:

Michelle Malkin Appears on White Nationalist YouTube Show - Right Wing Watch

Tucker Carlson hosted a guest with white nationalist ties to help him promote a run for Congress – Media Matters for America

Fox News Tucker Carlson recently hosted Pete DAbrosca, a congressional candidate who has ties to white nationalism and has supported the bigoted, anti-immigrant campaign of a group known as groypers, who are trolling conservative public events with anti-Semitic dog whistles and other hateful rhetoric.

Since DAbrosca announced his congressional bid and anti-immigrant platform over the summer, hes been lauded by far-right personalities and publications including Ann Coulter and the white nationalist publication VDare and appeared on the conspiracy theory outlet Infowars (which he had also appeared on before). In that most recent appearance, he agreed with the host that Democrats get elected through illegal voting and defended the leader of the groypers, a far-right media figure, Holocaust denier, and pro-segregation activist named Nick Fuentes who hosts America First on YouTube.

Carlson himself has a long history of promoting anti-immigrant white nationalism and espousing talking points that align with the beliefs of DAbrosca and Fuentes. This commentary has included repeatedly promoting the great replacement conspiracy theory, referring to a group of migrants at the southern border as an invasion that is absolutely destroying America, and arguing that Mexico is trying to change the demographics of the U.S. to sway elections. Hes called the idea that white supremacy is a serious problem in the U.S. a hoax and said immigration makes America poorer, dirtier, and more divided.

During his December 6 appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight, DAbrosca promoted his plan for a 10-year immigration moratorium, a proposal that fits with Carlsons previous denigration of immigrants:

More here:

Tucker Carlson hosted a guest with white nationalist ties to help him promote a run for Congress - Media Matters for America

Trumps Executive Order and the Rise of Anti-Semitism – The New York Times

The threads tying much of the anti-Semitic violence to white nationalist ideology are impossible to ignore. Those seams grew ever clearer in Charlottesville, at Unite the Right, where demonstrators displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans drawn from Nazi ideology, like blood and soil. When white nationalist Richard Spencer was interviewed about the role of anti-Semitism at the rally days later, he said Jews are overrepresented on the left and establishment as Ivy League-educated people who really determine policy while white people are being dispossessed.

The president himself has trafficked in anti-Semitic stereotypes, frequently endorsing crude, negative caricatures about Jews. On Saturday, speaking before the Israeli American Council, Mr. Trump said that Jews should support him because Senator Elizabeth Warrens wealth tax would put them out of business.

A lot of you are in the real estate business because I know you very well, youre brutal killers, the president said. Not nice people at all, but you have to vote for me. You have no choice.

Criticism of the presidents executive order has come from across the ideological spectrum. The Foundation For Individual Rights in Education, a group that advocates free speech on campus, often for conservatives, said the executive order would impermissibly threaten the expressive rights of students and faculty at institutions across the country.

Senator Brian Schatz, a liberal Jewish Democrat from Hawaii, summed it up: The idea that a college campus would have its views on Israel regulated by the federal Department of Education? Oy Gevalt.

Mr. Trumps executive order points agencies to the definition of anti-Semitism prepared by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. This definition includes several examples of speech that should be covered by the First Amendment, like claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. For this reason Kenneth Stern, the lead author of the definition, wrote in The Times that it shouldnt be applied to higher education. The agencys definition was prepared for data collectors writing reports in Europe, not for government officials policing campus speech.

It is true that anti-Israel speech, whether on campus or in Congress, makes some Jews feel unsafe, especially those who feel that Zionism is intrinsic to Jewish identity. Some worry that critics of Israel too often blame all Jews for the actions of the Jewish state halfway around the world. Others share critics concerns about Israeli actions but find themselves unwelcome as allies, because of hostility toward the Jewish state.

Read more:

Trumps Executive Order and the Rise of Anti-Semitism - The New York Times

How Alexander Downer set off a chain of events that may lead to Donald Trump’s impeachment – ABC News

Updated December 10, 2019 18:38:20

He's been the subject of alt-right conspiracy theories, labelled an "errand boy" for Hillary Clinton, even accused of being a leftist spy.

Australian diplomat Alexander Downer's warning to his US counterpart in London was the "tipping point" for an FBI probe into Russia's interference in the 2016 US election and, even now, may form part of impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

Now, thanks to the release of a watchdog report, we know what he said.

It started with a night out at the Kensington Wine Room, a posh bar in London, in May 2016.

As Australia's High Commissioner to the UK, Mr Downer was meeting with a member of Mr Trump's campaign team, George Papadopoulos.

According to Mr Downer's account of the night, Papadopoulos revealed information about Russia's plans to interfere in the US election before the release of tens of thousands of emails authored by Mr Trump's opponent Hillary Clinton, a claim Papadopoulos has denied.

"[Papadopoulos] said one of the reasons [Trump would win] was that the Russians might release some information which could be damaging to Hillary Clinton," Mr Downer said previously.

In a diplomatic cable to Canberra, Mr Downer downplayed the significance of Papadopoulos's apparent prediction.

But when WikiLeaks subsequently dumped the Clinton emails, Mr Downer requested a meeting about an "urgent matter" with his counterpart at the US embassy in London.

A report by US Department of Justice inspector-general Michael Horowitz has today revealed exactly what the then-high commissioner said.

Referred to in the report only as a "friendly foreign government official", Mr Downer said that Papadopoulos "suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs Clinton (and President Obama)."

Deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe characterised Mr Downer's statement as a "tipping point" in the July 2016 decision to open an investigation into Russia's attempts to interfere with the 2016 election.

"Because not only was there information that Russia was targeting US political institutions," the report states.

"Now the FBI had received an allegation from a trusted partner that there had been some sort of contact between the Russians and the Trump campaign."

The FBI's probe led to US special counsel Robert Mueller's two-year investigation into election meddling, which congressional Democrats may now use as evidence that Mr Trump obstructed justice as they start drawing up articles of impeachment.

In short, Mr Downer's suggestion that the Trump campaign "received some kind of suggestion from Russia" set off a chain of events that, along with more recent claims about Ukraine, are likely to see Mr Trump impeached by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives and tried in the Senate.

It's no wonder Trump allies have gone after the former Australian foreign minister.

Many of the theories that spread in right-wing chatrooms originated with Papadopoulos himself. He has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that Mr Downer recorded their now-infamous wine bar meeting on his smartphone.

Papadopoulos and other Trump supporters often cite a theory that the intelligence services of several countries, including Australia, had a secret plan to disrupt Mr Trump's campaign.

Mr Papadopoulos served a 14-day prison sentence last year after admitting he had lied in a 2017 interview with the FBI, hindering their investigation.

The wild theories have made it all the way into the halls of power.

Republican senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump supporter, gave credence to the tale, suggesting in October that Mr Downer was "directed" to seek a meeting with Papadopoulos.

He wrote that "US intelligence communities" accepted "information from an Australian diplomat who was also directed to contact Papadopoulos and relay information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation".

In a letter to Senator Graham, published on Twitter, US ambassador Joe Hockey rejected the assertion.

There were also claims that by reporting the matter directly to the US embassy in London, Mr Downer did not go through the correct diplomatic channels.

Mr Graham even implied Australia might be working against Mr Trump by initially refusing to release the text of Mr Downer's report.

Today's report offered a 476-page deep-dive on the origins of the Mueller probe. Mr Downer's role as the "friendly foreign government" (FFG) official is scattered throughout, but the main focus is the FBI's propriety.

There's no criticism of Mr Downer or Australia's role, and it's conceivable that, had the inspector-general discovered wrongdoing, he would have found the space to mention it in such a sweeping report.

US Attorney-General William Barr told The Australian that Mr Downer "did the right thing in supplying that information; the FFG has acted at all times just as we would hope a close ally would".

"We are grateful that we have such friends," he said. "What was subsequently done with that information by the FBI presents a separate question."

Only time will tell whether the Australia/Downer conspiracy theories will fizzle out, starved of fuel.

In the meantime, Mr Trump's allies may find alternative sources of ammunition in the report's pages.

The inspector-general ultimately "did not find any documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI's decision to conduct these operations," which contradicts Mr Trump's "witch hunt" narrative.

However, a substantial portion of the report criticises the FBI for failing to meet its own standards of accuracy and completeness in filing applications for surveillance into a member of the Trump campaign.

One low-ranking FBI lawyer may even face prosecution for altering a document related to FBI wiretaps.

Mr Trump described the report's findings as "a disgrace".

"It's far worse than I would've ever thought possible. It's an embarrassment to our country. It's dishonest."

A separate review is also underway, led by prosecutor John Durham, who was handpicked by the President's ally, Mr Barr.

In a rare statement, Mr Durham publicly said he disagreed with today's report, as did the Attorney-General.

The President says he is waiting for Mr Durham's report.

Topics:donald-trump,government-and-politics,world-politics,us-elections,united-states

First posted December 10, 2019 10:54:45

Visit link:

How Alexander Downer set off a chain of events that may lead to Donald Trump's impeachment - ABC News

The False Romance of Russia – The Atlantic

Read: Russias twin nostalgias

In his landmark 1981 book, Political Pilgrims: Travels of Western Intellectuals to the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba, Paul Hollander wrote of the hospitality showered on sympathetic Western visitors to the Communist world: the banquets in Moscow thrown for George Bernard Shaw, the feasts laid out for Mary McCarthy and Susan Sontag in North Vietnam. But his conclusion was that these performances were not the key to explaining why some Western intellectuals became enamored of communism. Far more important was their estrangement and alienation from their own cultures: Intellectuals critical of their own society proved highly susceptible to the claims put forward by the leaders and spokesmen of the societies they inspected in the course of these travels.

Hollander was writing about left-wing intellectuals in the 20th century, and many such people are still around, paying court to left-wing dictators in Venezuela or Bolivia who dislike America. There are also, in our society as in most others, quite a few people who are paid to help Americas enemies, or to spread their propaganda. There always have been.

But in the 21st century, we must also contend with a new phenomenon: right-wing intellectuals, now deeply critical of their own societies, who have begun paying court to right-wing dictators who dislike America. And their motives are curiously familiar. All around them, they see degeneracy, racial mixing, demographic change, political correctness, same-sex marriage, religious decline. The America that they actually inhabit no longer matches the white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant America that they remember, or think they remember. And so they have begun to look abroad, seeking to find the spiritually unified, ethnically pure nations that, they imagine, are morally stronger than their own. Nations, for example, such as Russia.

The pioneer of this search was Patrick Buchanan, the godfather of the modern so-called alt-right, whose feelings about foreign authoritarians shifted right about the time he started writing books with titles such as The Death of the West and Suicide of a Superpower. His columns pour scorn on modern America, a place he once described, with disgust, as a multicultural, multiethnic, multiracial, multilingual universal nation whose avatar is Barack Obama. Buchanans America is in demographic decline, has been swamped by beige and brown people, and has lost its virtue. The West, he has written, has succumbed to a sexual revolution of easy divorce, rampant promiscuity, pornography, homosexuality, feminism, abortion, same-sex marriage, euthanasia, assisted suicidethe displacement of Christian values by Hollywood values.

This litany of horrors isnt much different from what can be heard most nights on Fox News. Listen to Tucker Carlson. The American dream is dying, Carlson declared one recent evening, in a monologue that also referred to the dark age that we are living through. Carlson has also spent a lot of time on air reminiscing about how the United States was a better country than it is now in a lot of ways, back when it was more cohesive. And no wonder: Immigrants have plundered America, thanks to decadent and narcissistic politicians who refuse to defend the nation. You can read worse on the white-supremacist websites of the alt-rightdo pick up a copy of Ann Coulters Adios America: The Lefts Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellholeor hear more extreme sentiments in some evangelical churches. Franklin Graham has declared, for example, that America is in deep trouble and on the verge of total moral and spiritual collapse.

Excerpt from:

The False Romance of Russia - The Atlantic